Polymer Chemistry Effects on Protein Release and Immune Activation Senja Katarina Lopac Iowa State University

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Polymer Chemistry Effects on Protein Release and Immune Activation Senja Katarina Lopac Iowa State University Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2008 Polymer chemistry effects on protein release and immune activation Senja Katarina Lopac Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Polymer Chemistry Commons, and the Polymer Science Commons Recommended Citation Lopac, Senja Katarina, "Polymer chemistry effects on protein release and immune activation" (2008). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 14904. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/14904 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Polymer chemistry effects on protein release and immune activation by Senja Katarina Lopac A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Chemical Engineering Program of Study Committee: Balaji Narasimhan, Major Professor Michael Wannemuehler Aaron Clapp Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2008 Copyright © Senja Katarina Lopac, 2008. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 1450148 UMI Microform 1450148 Copyright 2008 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................ vi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1 1.2 References .................................................................................................................4 CHAPTER 2: BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW.................................5 2.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................5 2.2 Polyanhydrides..........................................................................................................5 2.2.1 History ................................................................................................................5 2.2.2 Structures............................................................................................................6 2.2.2.1 Aliphatic......................................................................................................6 2.2.2.2 Aromatic .....................................................................................................7 2.2.2.3 Novel polyanhydride...................................................................................7 2.2.2.4 Other ...........................................................................................................8 2.2.3 Synthesis.............................................................................................................9 2.2.3.1 Melt polycondensation................................................................................9 2.2.3.2 Solution polymerization............................................................................10 2.2.3.3 Dehydrative coupling................................................................................11 2.2.3.4 Ring-opening polymerization ...................................................................12 2.2.4 Characterization................................................................................................13 2.2.5 Degradation and erosion...................................................................................15 2.2.6 Polyanhydrides for drug delivery .....................................................................17 2.3 Microspheres ...........................................................................................................18 2.3.1 Fabrication........................................................................................................18 2.3.1.1 Hot-melt microencapsulation....................................................................18 iii 2.3.1.2 Solvent evaporation ..................................................................................19 2.3.1.3 Solvent removal ........................................................................................19 2.3.1.4 Spray drying..............................................................................................20 2.3.2 Characterization................................................................................................21 2.3.3 Release..............................................................................................................22 2.4 Mechanisms of Immune Response..........................................................................23 2.4.1 Innate and adaptive immunity ..........................................................................23 2.4.2 Major histocompatibility complex ...................................................................23 2.4.3 Dendritic cells...................................................................................................25 2.5 Adjuvants and Vaccines..........................................................................................27 2.5.1 Novel therapies using polymers .......................................................................28 2.6 Conclusion...............................................................................................................30 2.7 References ...............................................................................................................32 CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION .......................38 3.1 Research Objectives ................................................................................................38 3.2 Thesis Organization.................................................................................................39 CHAPTER 4: EFFECT OF POLYMER CHEMISTRY AND FABRICATION METHOD ON PROTEIN RELEASE AND STABILITY FROM POLYANHYDRIDE MICROSPHERES ..................................................................40 4.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................40 4.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................41 4.3 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................44 4.3.1 Materials...........................................................................................................44 4.3.2 Monomer/polymer synthesis ............................................................................44 iv 4.3.3 Protein...............................................................................................................45 4.3.4 Contact angle measurements ............................................................................45 4.3.5 Microsphere fabrication methods.....................................................................46 4.3.5.1 Solid-oil-oil emulsion ...............................................................................46 4.3.5.2 Cryogenic atomization..............................................................................47 4.3.6 Microsphere characterization ...........................................................................48 4.3.7 Ova release .......................................................................................................49 4.3.8 Sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).....50 4.3.9 Western blot......................................................................................................51 4.4 Results .....................................................................................................................52 4.4.1 Contact angle....................................................................................................52 4.4.2 Release of ovalbumin from polyanhydride microspheres................................53 4.4.3 SDS-PAGE.......................................................................................................56 4.4.4 Western blot......................................................................................................58 4.5 Discussion ...............................................................................................................59 4.6 Conclusion...............................................................................................................62 4.7 Acknowledgements .................................................................................................62 4.8 References ...............................................................................................................63 CHAPTER 5: EFFECT OF POLYMER CHEMISTRY ON IMMUNE ACTIVATION OF DENDRITIC CELLS.................................................................67 5.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................67 5.2 Materials
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0209462 A1 Bilotti Et Al
    US 20170209462A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2017/0209462 A1 Bilotti et al. (43) Pub. Date: Jul. 27, 2017 (54) BTK INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR Publication Classification TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA (51) Int. Cl. (71) Applicant: Pharmacyclics LLC, Sunnyvale, CA A 6LX 3/573 (2006.01) A69/20 (2006.01) (US) A6IR 9/00 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Elizabeth Bilotti, Sunnyvale, CA (US); A69/48 (2006.01) Thorsten Graef, Los Altos Hills, CA A 6LX 3/59 (2006.01) (US) A63L/454 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. CPC .......... A61 K3I/573 (2013.01); A61K 3 1/519 (21) Appl. No.: 15/252,385 (2013.01); A61 K3I/454 (2013.01); A61 K 9/0053 (2013.01); A61K 9/48 (2013.01); A61 K (22) Filed: Aug. 31, 2016 9/20 (2013.01) (57) ABSTRACT Disclosed herein are pharmaceutical combinations, dosing Related U.S. Application Data regimen, and methods of administering a combination of a (60) Provisional application No. 62/212.518, filed on Aug. BTK inhibitor (e.g., ibrutinib), an immunomodulatory agent, 31, 2015. and a steroid for the treatment of a hematologic malignancy. US 2017/0209462 A1 Jul. 27, 2017 BTK INHIBITOR COMBINATIONS FOR Subject in need thereof comprising administering pomalido TREATING MULTIPLE MYELOMA mide, ibrutinib, and dexamethasone, wherein pomalido mide, ibrutinib, and dexamethasone are administered con CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED currently, simulataneously, and/or co-administered. APPLICATION 0008. In some aspects, provided herein is a method of treating a hematologic malignancy in a subject in need 0001. This application claims the benefit of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0058872 A1 Crew Et Al
    US 2016.0058872A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2016/0058872 A1 Crew et al. (43) Pub. Date: Mar. 3, 2016 (54) IMIDE-BASED MODULATORS OF A613 L/426 (2006.01) PROTEOLYSIS AND ASSOCATED METHODS A 6LX3 L/505 (2006.01) OF USE A613 L/454 (2006.01) A613 L/55 (2006.01) (71) Applicant: Arvinas, Inc., New Haven, CT (US) C07D40 L/4 (2006.01) A6II 45/06 (2006.01) (72) Inventors: Andrew P. Crew, Guilford, CT (US); (52) U.S. Cl. Craig Crews, New Haven, CT (US), CPC ............ A61K 47/481 (2013.01); C07D401/14 Hanging Dong, Madison, CT (US); Jing (2013.01); C07D 495/14 (2013.01); C07D Wang, Milford, CT (US); Yimin Qian, 417/14 (2013.01); A61K 45/06 (2013.01); Plainsboro, NJ (US); Kam Siu Milford, A6 IK3I/505 (2013.01); A61 K3I/454 CT (US); Meizhong Jin, East Northport, (2013.01); A61 K3I/551 (2013.01); A61 K NY (US) 3 1/426 (2013.01) (21) Appl. No.: 14/792,414 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Jul. 6, 2015 The description relates to imide-based compounds, including Related U.S. Application Data bifunctional compounds comprising the same, which find utility as modulators of targeted ubiquitination, especially (63) Continuation-in-part of application No. 14/686.640, inhibitors of a variety of polypeptides and other proteins filed on Apr. 14, 2015. which are degraded and/or otherwise inhibited by bifunc (60) Provisional application No. 61/979,351, filed on Apr. tional compounds according to the present invention. In par 14, 2014, provisional application No.
    [Show full text]
  • Polyanhydride-Based Nanomedicine Platform for Combating Neurodegeneration Benjamin W
    Polyanhydride-based Nanomedicine Platform for Combating Neurodegeneration Benjamin W. Schlichtmann1, Shivani Ghaisas2, Vellareddy Anantharam2, Anumantha Kanthasamy2, Surya Mallapragada1, and Balaji Narasimhan1. 1Chemical & Biological Engineering and 2Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 Statement of Purpose: Treatment for exposure to (blue arrows). The average NP size of NF-NPs and CPTP- chemical toxins such as pesticides has resulted in an NPs was 397 ± 143 nm and 287 ± 99 nm, respectively, estimated annual cost of $200 million in recent years [1]. which is in agreement with previous work [4]. Surface Exposure to these toxins leads to neurodegeneration, zeta potential measurements demonstrated a negligible including development of chronic conditions such as effect of functionalization on surface charge, as expected. Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s diseases. Drugs that combat Non-functionalized neurodegeneration, such as antioxidants, must effectively pass through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and then target diseased neurons and their mitochondria. The efficacy of drugs administered alone to do so is significantly hindered by drug metabolism and limited CPTP bulk-functionalized localization. Polyanhydride nanoparticles (NPs) have several favorable characteristics for drug delivery to overcome these issues and improve treatment of neurodegeneration [2]. Localization can be further Pre-CPTP (control) improved using targeting ligands by directly functionalizing the polyanhydrides to ensure that the ligand persists throughout NP degradation. The lipophilic cationic ligand triphenylphosphonium (TPP) has recently shown enhanced targeting of the BBB and mitochondria Figure 1. FTIR of functionalized and non-functionalized [3]. In this work, a derivative of TPP, (3-carboxypropyl) polymer showing functionalization by the relative triphenylphosphonium (CPTP) was used to functionalize decrease (red) of non-functionalized polymer end-group polyanhydrides.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility of Monitoring Mycophenolic Acid in Solid Organ Transplant Patients
    Evidence Report/Technology Assessment Number 164 Utility of Monitoring Mycophenolic Acid in Solid Organ Transplant Patients Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-02-0020 Task Order Leader: Parminder Raina, Ph.D. Director, McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center Co-Principal Investigators: Mark Oremus, Ph.D. Johannes Zeidler, Ph.D., D.A.B.C.C. Authors: Mark Oremus, Ph.D. Johannes Zeidler, Ph.D., D.A.B.C.C. Mary H.H. Ensom, Pharm.D., F.A.S.H.P., F.C.C.P., F.C.S.H.P. Mina Matsuda-Abedini, M.D.C.M., F.R.C.P.C. Cynthia Balion, Ph.D., F.C.A.C.B. Lynda Booker, B.A. Carolyn Archer, M.Sc. Parminder Raina, Ph.D. AHRQ Publication No. 08-E006 February 2008 This report is based on research conducted by the McMaster University Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-02-0020). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the author(s), who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help clinicians, employers, policymakers, and others make informed decisions about the provision of health care services.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Acute Severe Colitis in the Era of Biologicals and Small Molecules
    Journal of Clinical Medicine Review Management of Acute Severe Colitis in the Era of Biologicals and Small Molecules Christine Verdon 1,2, Talat Bessissow 1 and Peter L. Lakatos 1,3,* 1 Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H3G 1A4, Canada; [email protected] (C.V.); [email protected] (T.B.) 2 Department of Gastroenterology, Campbelltown Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2560, Australia 3 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest H1083, Hungary * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +514-934-1934 (ext. 45567) Received: 14 November 2019; Accepted: 6 December 2019; Published: 8 December 2019 Abstract: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency which occurs in about 20%–30% of patients with ulcerative colitis during their lifetime, and does carry a mortality risk of 1%. The management of inflammatory bowel diseases has evolved with changes in objective patient monitoring, as well as the availability of new treatment options with the development of new biological and small molecules; however, data is limited regarding their use in the context of ASUC. This review aims to discuss the emerging data regarding biologicals and small molecules therapies in the context of ASUC. Keywords: acute severe ulcerative colitis; infliximab; cyclosporine; tacrolimus; corticosteroids; surgical management 1. Introduction Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a life-threatening medical emergency which carries a 1% mortality rate [1]. Patients diagnosed with ulcerative colitis (UC) have a lifetime risk of 20%–30% of developing an acute flare of their disease requiring hospitalization [2]. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of initial therapy but 30%–40% of patients who fail to respond will require second-line salvage treatment with mainly infliximab (IFX) or cyclosporine (CsA) [3,4].
    [Show full text]
  • Ciclosporin Capsules/Oral Solution ESCA: for the Treatment of Psoriasis / Atopic Dermatitis AREAS of RESPONSIBILITY for the SHARING of CARE
    Effective Shared Care Agreement (ESCA) Ciclosporin Capsules/Oral solution ESCA: For the treatment of Psoriasis / Atopic dermatitis AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE SHARING OF CARE This shared care agreement outlines suggested ways in which the responsibilities for managing the prescribing of ciclosporin in Psoriasis / Atopic dermatitis can be shared between the specialist and general practitioner (GP). You are invited to participate however, if you do not feel confident to undertake this role, then you are under no obligation to do so. In such an event, the total clinical responsibility for the patient for the diagnosed condition remains with the specialist. Sharing of care assumes communication between the specialist, GP and patient. The intention to share care will be explained to the patient by the specialist initiating treatment. It is important that patients are consulted about treatment and are in agreement with it. Patients with Psoriasis / Atopic dermatitis are usually under regular specialist follow-up, which provides an opportunity to discuss drug therapy. The doctor who prescribes the medication legally assumes clinical responsibility for the drug and the consequences of its use. RESPONSIBILITIES and ROLES Specialist responsibilities 1. Confirm the diagnosis of Psoriasis / Atopic dermatitis 2. Discuss the potential benefits, treatment side effects, and possible drug interactions with the patient 3. Ask the GP whether he or she is willing to participate in shared care before initiating therapy so that appropriate follow on prescribing arrangements can be made 4. Do baseline monitoring prior to initiation of ciclosporin, confirm the brand 5. Initiate treatment and stabilise dose of ciclosporin 6. Review the patient's condition and monitor response to treatment regularly 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Ciclosporin Drug Information
    Ciclosporin Drug information Ciclosporin is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriatic arthritis and other conditions. Ciclosporin should effectively treat • even if it doesn’t seem to your condition and prevent joint be working at first damage. It has been tested and • even when your symptoms has helped many people. However, start to improve (to help keep as with all drugs some people the disease under control). will have side-effects and your Ciclosporin may not be response to treatment needs to suitable for you if: be carefully assessed. This leaflet sets out what you need to know. • you have kidney problems • you have high blood pressure which What is ciclosporin isn’t controlled by medication • you have gout or high levels and how is it used? of urate in your blood Ciclosporin is a type of drug • you’ve had cancer. known as a disease-modifying Your doctor will check your blood anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD). pressure and arrange for you In some conditions, the immune to have a blood and urine test system becomes overactive before you start treatment. and can cause problems in the If ciclosporin isn’t suitable joints and elsewhere in the body. your doctor will discuss other Ciclosporin regulates the immune treatment options with you. system, to limit the progress of autoimmune conditions and potential damage to the joints. Ciclosporin is prescribed to reduce pain, swelling and stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis. It’s also used to treat a number of other autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, Ciclosporin can including psoriatic arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
    [Show full text]
  • Cimzia (Certolizumab Pegol)
    Cimzia (certolizumab pegol) What is Cimzia? Cimzia (also referred to by its generic name, certolizumab pegol) is a biologic medication that is used to treat severe psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis. Biologics are modern medications that are made using living cells, designed to change or mimic processes within the human body. Cimzia is taken by injection. You can read more about who Cimzia is suitable for in the ‘Who is it for?’ section on this sheet. How does Cimzia work? Cimzia blocks tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) a chemical ‘messenger’ in the immune system that signals other cells to cause inflammation. There is too much TNF alpha in the skin of people with psoriasis and the joints of people with psoriatic arthritis, which causes inflammation and can lead to tissue and joint damage. TNF alpha can also lead to increased activity of the immune system by switching on certain white blood cells in the body, called T Cells. Once T cells 1 become overactive they can trigger inflammation and other immune responses, encouraging the development of psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis. Cimzia helps lower the amount of TNF alpha to more normal levels, and switches off the inflammatory cycle of psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis. This leads to improvement in symptoms for many people who take it. Who is Cimzia for? Cimzia can be prescribed to treat severe plaque psoriasis in adults who have not responded to, or cannot take or tolerate systemic treatments such as methotrexate, ciclosporin or phototherapy. Cimzia can be prescribed to treat active and ‘progressive’ (worsening) psoriatic arthritis if other disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs have not worked.
    [Show full text]
  • Acetic Anhydride Cyclodehydration Agent, 220 Acetoamides Synthesis
    INDEX Acetic anhydride Acrylic acid cyclodehydration agent, 220 biomer polymer activity, 309 Acetoamides Acrylonitrile synthesis, 277 purification, 409 Acetone sodium naphthalene polymerized, polyanhydride solvent, 193 410 Acetone cyanohydrin N-Acryloyl-a-aminoisobutyrate azlactone raw material, 225 synthesis, 225 a-Acetoxypropionic acid N-Acryloylmethylalanine ring closure to lactone, 443 ethyl chloroformate reaction, 206 Acetyl acetone, 464 Activation energy manganese decarbonyl coordi­ styrene anoinic dispersion nating agent, 300 polymerization, 392, 296 Acetyl chloride a-Acylamino-a-aminopropionic acid coumalic acid reaction, 61 conversion to a-lactone, 445 polystyrene living particle N-Acylurea, 307 reaction, 400 Adhesives, hot melt Acetylene carbonyls synthesis concept, 480 amine condensations, 276 Adipic acid, 192 Acrolein Adipic acid, metal salts acetal formation, 62, 74 phosphorus acid chloride Acrylamide condensation, 195 hydrophilic grafts on polymers, Aldehydes 293 anionic polymerization, 322 functionalized oligomers, 205, Alkenes 211, 215-217 triazolinedione ene reaction, 2 ORTEP plots, 212 Alkenyl azalactone purification, 308 amine oligomer reaction, 208, telechelic oligomers, 203 210, 211 Acrylamides, bis type 2-Alkenyl-2-oxazoline-5-ones amine reaction, 215 amine reactions, 205, 211 Acrylamides, telechelic Alkoxides characterization, 208 catalyst for oxazolidone synthesis from azlactones, formation, 252 219, 221 Alkoxides, polymeric Acrylates, alkyl ethylene oxide polymerization, anionic polymerization, 327 330 alkali
    [Show full text]
  • METHOTREXATE for USE in RHEUMATOLOGY (ADULT and PAEDIATRIC), DERMATOLOGY, NEUROLOGY, GASTROENTEROLOGY, OPHTHALMOLOGY and RESPIRATORY MEDICINE Shared Care Protocol
    Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group METHOTREXATE FOR USE IN RHEUMATOLOGY (ADULT AND PAEDIATRIC), DERMATOLOGY, NEUROLOGY, GASTROENTEROLOGY, OPHTHALMOLOGY AND RESPIRATORY MEDICINE Shared care protocol This protocol provides prescribing and monitoring guidance for methotrexate therapy. It should be read in conjunction with the Shared care responsibilities , the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) available on www.medicines.org.uk/emc and the BNF. BACKGROUND FOR USE Methotrexate is a folic acid antagonist and is classified as an antimetabolite cytotoxic agent. It is prescribed for a wide range of conditions. It is also used as a disease modifying drug and is often referred to as a steroid-sparing agent or an immunomodulator. Indications, dose adjustments and monitoring requirements for disease modifying drugs (licensed and unlicensed indications) defined in the Oxfordshire shared care protocol are in line with national guidance published by the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR), British Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (BSPAR), the British Association of Dermatologists (BAD), NICE, European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation (ECCO), the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and British Thoracic Society (BTS) (see references). The NPSA alert on improving compliance with oral methotrexate8 recommends the use of shared care guidelines based upon the BSR/BAD guideline. Methotrexate is an established medicine with a known side effect profile. All new patients must be initiated by a specialist. Methotrexate uses in this protocol are limited to: Rheumatology Commonly used as a first line treatment for active rheumatoid arthritis (licensed). It can be used in combination with other DMARDs (such as leflunomide, sulfasalazine or hydroxychloroquine) to achieve disease remission. Also used in combination with biological agents Parenteral methotrexate is licensed for rheumatoid arthritis and can be administered subcutaneously or intramuscularly.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction of Polymer Nanoparticles for Nanoparticles Generally Have the Following Properties [13-17]: Drug Delivery Applications
    Wang H and Rempel GL, J Nanotechnol Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2015, 2: 008 DOI: 10.24966/NTMB-2044/100008 HSOA Journal of Nanotechnology: Nanomedicine & Nanobiotechnology Review Article human beings. Until now, the main techniques to fight cancer are Introduction of Polymer non-targeted chemotherapy and radiation. However, it is unavoidable to prevent systematic side effects to the human body due to Nanoparticles for Drug non-specific uptake by normal, healthy, noncancerous tissues because of the instinctive properties of the chemotherapy chemical agent Delivery Applications featured with high toxicity and a lack of tumor specificity. Hui Wang and Garry L Rempel* In order to overcome the limitations of free chemotherapeutic agents, targeting of tumors with nanoparticulate drug carriers has Department of Chemical Engineering, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario received much attention and expectance [1,2]. Nanocarriers can offer N2L 3G1, Canada many avenues over free drugs for the following aspects [3]:(1) protect the drug from premature degradation; (2) prevent drugs from prematurely interacting with the biological environment; (3) enhance absorption of the drugs into a selected tissue (for example, solid tumour); (4) control the pharmacokinetic and drug distribution profile; and (5) improve intracellular penetration. Abstract Let us first recall the important moments in the short but rapid The past half of a century has seen increasing attention focused development history of drug delivery systems (Figure 1). Lipid is on the development of polymer nanoparticle based drug delivery the first nanotechnology based drug delivery system, which was systems as being capable of improving the efficacy and obviating discovered in the 1960s and later known as liposomes [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Modification of Polyanhydride Microspheres
    COMMUNICATIONS Surface Modification of Polyanhydride Microspheres JINMING GAO†,‡,LAURA NIKLASON†,‡,XIAO-MEI ZHAO§, AND ROBERT LANGER*,† Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, and Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Received July 25, 1997. Final revised manuscript received October 31, 1997. Accepted for publication November 6, 1997. Polyanhydrides are emerging as a new class of biode- gradable polymers for drug delivery.1-3 The degradation of polyanhydride delivery systems is largely through surface erosion, potentially leading to zero-order release Scheme 1sSurface modification of pSA microspheres with ligands con- of encapsulated drugs.4,5 Recently, the Food and Drug taining amino groups via amide formation. Administration has approved the use of the polyanhydride poly[sebacic acid-co-1,3-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane] to The microspheres were collected after centrifugation (10 000 deliver drugs for treatment of brain cancer.6 This is one rpm for 10 min) at 4 °C, washed with 2 M aqueous NaCl, of the few examples where an implantable synthetic distilled water (twice), and ethanol, and dried in vacuo. The degradable polymer has been approved for human use. The surface density of argininamide was analyzed by X-ray use of polyanhydride polymers in oral delivery of insulin photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and its bulk concentra- and genes further broadens the scope of their applications tion was analyzed by 1H NMR (400 MHz) of microspheres in drug delivery.7 Despite numerous studies on polyan- dissolved in CDCl3. The size of the microspheres was hydrides, the compositions thus far developed do not have measured by a Coulter Multisizer (Coulter Electronic the capability to target specific organs or cell types.
    [Show full text]