DOCSLIB.ORG

Republican River Basin Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Republican River Basin Study Report FINAL FULL REPORT Republican River Basin Study U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado March 2016 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Cover image: Republican River, looking downstream (eastward) from Cambridge State Aid Bridge (Nebraska Highway 47 crossing), just south of Cambridge, Nebraska. Source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Republican_River_from_NE47_DS.JPG FINAL FULL REPORT Republican River Basin Study STUDY PARTNERS Bureau of Reclamation Nebraska-Kansas Area Office, Great Plains Region State of Colorado Colorado Division of Water Resources State of Nebraska Nebraska Department of Natural Resources State of Kansas Kansas Water Office Kansas Department of Agriculture, Division of Water Resources Acronyms and Abbreviations AF acre-foot or acre-feet BAC Basin Advisory Committee (Kansas) Basin Republican River Basin BCA benefit-cost analysis BCSD bias corrected and spatially disaggregated BOD biochemical oxygen demand CDF cumulative distribution functions CFR Comprehensive Facility Review cfs cubic-feet per second CMIP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project COD chemical oxygen demand Commission Colorado Ground Water Commission Compact Republican River Compact of 1942 CWA Clean Water Act D&S Reclamation Directives and Standards EIS Environmental Impact Statement EOM end-of-month EPA Environmental Protection Agency ESA Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended ET evapotranspiration FCID Frenchman-Cambridge Irrigation District (Nebraska) FSS 2003 U.S. Supreme Court Final Settlement Stipulation FVID Frenchman Valley Irrigation District (Nebraska) GCM General Circulation Model GHG greenhouse gases GMD 4 Northwest Kansas Groundwater Management District No. 4 gpm gallons per minute HGS HydroGeoSphere (software) ID irrigation district IDC interest during construction IMP Integrated Management Plan IQR inter quartile range IWS imported water supply (RRCA accounting) KAF thousands of acre-feet KBID Kansas Bostwick Irrigation District No. 2 KBID-DOWN KBID below Lovewell Reservoir KBID-UP KBID above Lovewell Reservoir KDWPT Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism KNESCA Kansas Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act km2 square-kilometer MDS minimum desirable streamflow MOA Memorandum of Agreement NBID Bostwick Irrigation District (Nebraska) NCSD Nebraska Conservation and Survey Division NDNR Nebraska Department of Natural Resources NED National Economic Development NeRRMDA Nebraska Republican River Management Districts Association NIR net irrigation requirement NFI net farm income NNESCA Nebraska Nongame and Endangered Species Conservation Act NRD Natural Resource Districts (Nebraska) NGPC Nebraska Game and Parks Commission NWS National Weather Service OASIS Operational Analysis and Simulation of Integrated Systems (modeling software) OMR&P operations, maintenance, replacement and power PDSI Palmer Drought Severity Index POS Plan of Study PR&G Principles, Requirements, and Guidelines for Water, Land and Related Resources Implementation Studies P-SMBP Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program Reclamation Bureau of Reclamation RRCA Republican River Compact Administration RRWCD Republican River Water Conservation District (Colorado) RTU remote terminal unit STORRM STELLA Operations Republican River Model SYMAP synergraphic mapping system TDS total dissolved solids The (Basin) States Colorado, Kansas and Nebraska TMDL total maximum daily load STELLA Systems Thinking Environment and Learning Laboratory Approach (model) UNL University of Nebraska - Lincoln USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers USDA-NASS U.S. Department of Agriculture – National Agricultural Statistics Service USGS U.S. Geological Survey VE value engineering VIC variable infiltration capacity WEEG Water and Energy Efficiency Grants WWCRA West-Wide Climate Risk Assessments Table of Contents Page Summary ..................................................................................................................1 I. Findings and Conclusions Summary ...........................................................1 A. Impacts of Climate Variability and Change under No Action ............2 1. Surface and Groundwater Supplies ............................................2 2. Water Demands ..........................................................................3 3. Water Supply Imbalances ..........................................................3 B. Nebraska Alternatives .........................................................................4 C. Kansas Alternatives ............................................................................5 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................1 A. Authority .............................................................................................1 B. Location and Description of the Study Area.......................................2 C. Summary of Federal Features in the Study Area ................................7 D. Background and History .....................................................................8 1. Early Canals and Surface Water Irrigation ................................8 2. The 1930s Drought and Flood ...................................................9 3. Development and Irrigation in the 1940s.................................10 4. Effects of Development ...........................................................10 E. Existing Water Supply Challenges and Activities ............................10 1. Republican River Compact and Disputes ................................12 2. Summary of State Activities ....................................................14 3. Summary of Previous Reclamation Activities and Studies .....16 4. The Need for Federal Involvement ..........................................17 II. Purpose and Objectives ..............................................................................18 A. Study Purpose ...................................................................................18 B. Study Objectives ...............................................................................19 C. Objectives of Study Partners .............................................................19 1. Reclamation .............................................................................19 2. Colorado ...................................................................................20 3. Nebraska ..................................................................................20 4. Kansas ......................................................................................21 D. Collaboration and Stakeholder Involvement ....................................21 1. Reclamation .............................................................................22 2. Colorado ...................................................................................22 3. Nebraska ..................................................................................23 4. Kansas ......................................................................................25 E. Summary of Basin Study Technical Memoranda .............................25 F. Technical Sufficiency Review ..........................................................26 III. Current and Future Climate Conditions .....................................................29 A. Current Climate Conditions ..............................................................29 1. Summary of Previous Studies ..................................................29 2. Analysis of Current Climate Conditions ..................................32 B. Future Climate Conditions ................................................................42 i 1. Summary of Previous Studies ..................................................42 2. Analysis of Future Climate Conditions....................................45 3. Selection of Climate Scenarios for Detailed Analysis .............58 IV. Current and Future Water Supplies and Demands .....................................66 A. Water Supplies ..................................................................................66 1. Description of Basin Water Supplies .......................................66 2. Approach to Water Supply Analysis........................................67 3. Current Surface Water Availability .........................................70 4. Current Groundwater Availability ...........................................77 5. Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Supply .............81 B. Water Demands .................................................................................93 1. Description of Basin Water Demands ......................................93 2. Approach to Water Demand Analysis .....................................94 3. Current Water Demands ..........................................................95 4. Effects of Climate Variability and Change on Demands .........96 C. Water Supply Imbalances ...............................................................100 V. System Reliability and Impact Analysis ..................................................101 A. No Action – Future without Adaptation Strategies.........................101
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables
    Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks Kansas Special Size Limits, Creel Limits, and Bait Restriction Tables Dated: July 10, 2008 Blue Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Carbondale East Lake, Fall River Toe Drain 5 fish daily creel limit Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Milford Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Blue Catfish Length Limits 35 inch minimum. Blue catfish of a length less than thirty-five (35) inches are protected and must be returned to the water immediately when taken from the following waters: Cheney Reservoir, El Dorado Reservoir, Wilson Reservoir Channel Catfish Creel Limits 2 fish daily creel limit Andover - Lake George, Arma City Lake, Atchison State Fishing Lake, Blue Mound City Lake, Bonner Springs - North Park Lake, Bourbon Co. Cedar Creek, Bourbon Co. Elm Creek Lake, Bourbon State Fishing Lake, Bronson City Lake, Brown State Fishing Lake, Butler State Fishing Lake, Carbondale East Lake, Chanute City Lake, Clinton State Park - Lake Henry, Clinton State Park - Picnic Area Pond, Columbus - VFW Pond, Colwich City Lake, Douglas State Fishing Lake, Emporia - Camp Alexander Ponds, Emporia - Jones Park Ponds, Emporia - Peter Pan Park, Fall River State Park Kids Pond, Fall River Toe Drain, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake Fern, Fort Scott - Gunn Park Lake West, Fort Scott - Lake Fort Scott, Fort Scott Community College Lakes, Frontenac City Lake, Gardner City Lake, Garnett City Lake North, Garnett City Lake South, Greenbush Community Lake, Gridley City Lake, Harvey Co. Camp Hawk, Haysville - Riggs Lake, Impounded F.I.S.H. Waters, Region 1 & 3, Johnson Co. - Kill Creek Park Lake, Johnson Co. - Shawnee Mission Park , Johnson Co.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2021
    LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2021 Kansas Water Office September 2020 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Roger T1." Grange, Jr. a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The
    Ceramic relationships in the Central Plains Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Grange, Roger Tibbets, 1927- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 09/10/2021 18:53:20 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565603 CERAMIC RELATIONSHIPS' IN THE CENTRAL PLAINS ^ > 0 ^ . Roger T1." Grange, Jr. A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 2 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Roger T, Grange, Jr»________________________ entitled ______Ceramic Relationships in the Central_____ _____Plains_______________________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of _____Doctor of Philosophy________________________ April 26. 1962 Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* 5 / ? / ^ t 5 /? / C 2-— A / , - r y /n / *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination. The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination. STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in The University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
    United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS.
    [Show full text]
  • 1888 Handbook of Concordia
    HAND-BOOK )OF(- CONCORDIA AND cloUd county, Kansas CLOUD COUNTY COURT HOUSE, CONCORDIA orEazia^-G-o: C. S. BURCI-I PUBLISHING COMPANY. 1888. ms: r^i J. H. UDELL. E. E. SWEARNGIN. CLOUD COUNTY BANK, SWEARNGIN & UDELL CONCORDIA, KANSAS. REAL ESTATE, LOAN AND INSURANCE, CAPITAL, $100,000. SURPLUS, S^.ooo. Office In Iron Block, T. B. SMITH. PRESCDeNT. W. H. WRIGHT, Vice President. % STURGES, KENNETT £ PECK. Wm. M. PECK. Cashier. C 03STCOK.I3IA., KANSAS. O. B HARRISON, ASST. Cashier. '• Attorneys for the Flank. I*'.J. Atwood, President. G. V.. Latnkov, Cashier. HOWARD HILLIS, C. TC. Sweet, Vice President. W. \V. Bowman, Asst. Cashier. FIRST NATIONAL BANK, ATTORNEY AT LAW COA7CORDIA, KANSAS. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CAPITAL, SIOO.OOO. SURPLUS, $25,000. Collections made for, and Information furnished to 30x :r,:ec;to:r.s - C. V.. Swekt, Gwi. W. Mahsiiam., Tiieh. I.ai.nt,, C. A. Hktoiknav Eastern Investors. K. J. Atwooii, D. \V. Simmons, Thomas \Vhon«i. W. W. Caldwell, President. J. \V. Pktkkshn, Cashier. L. N. HOUSTON, II. II. McEcKKON, Vice President. 1*. W. Moitr.AN, Asst. Cashier. CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK, REAL ESTATE, LOAN and INSURANCE, CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. CAPITAL, $100,000. SURPLUS, $7,500. DIRECTORS. J. \V. IV.tkkson, A. Nf.i-son, J. S. Siieak ku, It. H. McEckhon, W. \V. Caldwell, -Correspondence Solicited.- T. H. IlttKKNIAN, JOSKI-II 1'KKHIKK, J. A. KldUY, I). T. DuNN INt;. W. W. CALDWELL, J. W. PETERSON, President Cili/.ens National Rank. Cashier Citizens National Rank. Real Estate Agent and Loan Broker, CALDWELL & PETERSON, Negotiators of Loans. CONCORDIA, KANSAS. Ten vcars' experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Depletion Investigations in the Republican River Basin: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas
    J. ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, Vol. 27(3) 251-263, 1999 STREAMFLOW DEPLETION INVESTIGATIONS IN THE REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN: COLORADO, NEBRASKA, AND KANSAS JOZSEF SZILAGYI University of Nebraska–Lincoln ABSTRACT Water is a critical resource in the Great Plains. This study examines the changes in long-term mean annual streamflow in the Republican River basin. In the past decades this basin, shared by three states, Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas, displayed decreased streamflow volumes as the river enters Kansas across the Nebraska-Kansas border compared to values preceding the 1950s. A recent lawsuit filed by Kansas challenges water appropriations in Nebraska. More than half of the source area for this water, however, lies outside of Nebraska. Today a higher percentage of the annual flow is generated within Nebraska (i.e., 75% of the observed mean annual stream- flow at the NE-KS border) than before the 1950s (i.e., 66% of the observed mean annual streamflow) indicating annual streamflow has decreased more dramatically outside of Nebraska than within the state in the past fifty years. INTRODUCTION The Republican River basin’s 64,796 km2 drainage area is shared by three states: Colorado, Nebraska, and Kansas (see Figure 1). Nebraska has the largest single share of the drainage area, 25,154 km2 (39% of total); Colorado can claim about 20,000 km2 (31%), while the rest, about 19,583 km2 (30%), belongs to Kansas [1], from which about 12,800 km2 (20%) lies upstream of Hardy, near the Nebraska-Kansas border. Exact figures for the contributing drainage areas (portions of the drainage areas that actually contribute water to the stream) are hard to obtain because these areas in the headwater sections of the basin have been shrinking constantly in the past fifty years.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Lake (Keith Sebelius Lake) Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication Bundled with Ph and Dissolved Oxygen
    UPPER REPUBLICAN RIVER BASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD Water Body: Norton Lake (Keith Sebelius Lake) Water Quality Impairment: Eutrophication bundled with pH and Dissolved Oxygen Subbasin: Prairie Dog Counties: Decatur, Graham, Norton, Rawlins, Sheridan, and Thomas HUC 8: 10250015 HUC 11 (HUC 14): 010 (010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070) (Figure 1) 020 (010, 020, 030, 040, 050, 060, 070) Ecoregion: Western High Plains, Flat to Rolling Cropland (25d) Central Great Plains, Rolling Plains and Breaks (27b) Drainage Area: Approximately 687 square miles Conservation Pool: Area = 2,055 acres Watershed Area: Lake Surface Area = 214:1 Maximum Depth = 12.0 meters (39.4 feet) Mean Depth = 4.9 meters (16 feet) Retention Time = 0.61 years (7.3 months) Designated Uses: Primary and Secondary Contact Recreation; Expected Aquatic Life Support, Drinking Water, Food Procurement, Industrial Water Supply, Irrigation Authority: Federal (U.S. Bureau of Reclamation), State (Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks) 2002 303(d) Listing: Upper Republican River Basin Lakes Impaired Use: All uses are impaired to a degree by eutrophication Water Quality Standard: Nutrients - Narrative: The introduction of plant nutrients into streams, lakes, or wetlands from artificial sources shall be controlled to prevent the accelerated succession or replacement of aquatic biota or the production of undesirable quantities or kinds of aquatic life. (KAR 28-16-28e(c)(2)(B)). The introduction of plant nutrients into surface waters designated for primary or secondary contact recreational use shall be controlled to 1 prevent the development of objectionable concentrations of algae or algal by-products or nuisance growths of submersed, floating, or emergent aquatic vegetation.
    [Show full text]
  • Republican River Valley and Adjacent Areas, Nebraska
    A, Economic Geology, 97 B, Descriptive Geology 119 M, General Hydrograpmc investigations, 26 (0, Underground Waters, 72 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES I>. WALOOTT, DIKECTOR GEOLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF THE REPUBLICAN RIVER VALLEY AND ADJACENT AREAS, NEBRASKA G. E. CONDRA -FERTY OF -LOGICAL Sl'». WASHINGTON (GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1907 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction __'___________________________________ 7 Geography _____________________________________ 8 Topography______________________.._ 8 Drainage _____________________________.____ 8 Climate "_________________________ _ _________ ._..__ 9 Temperature_______l_____________________ 9 Rainfall _____________________________________ 9 Winds_____________________________________ 10 Descriptive geology ________________________________ 10 General relations _____ _________ ___ ________ 10 Structure____________________________ 11 Description of the rocks____ ______________________ 11 Carboniferous system_______________________ 11 Cretaceous system.__________________________ 12 Dakota formation_________________________ 12 Character and thickness______________ 12 Distribution_________________ 13 Benton group________________________ 13 Members represented________________ 13 Graneros shale_ ________________________ 14 Character and thickness_________________ 14 Exposures,_________ _______ _-_________ 14 Greenhorn limestone_____________________ 14 Character and thickness___________________ 14 Fossils_________________________ 16 Carlile shale______.___________________
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas River Basin Model
    Kansas River Basin Model Edward Parker, P.E. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District KANSAS CITY DISTRICT NEBRASKA IOWA RATHBUN M I HARLAN COUNTY S S I LONG S S I SMITHVILLE BRANCH P TUTTLE P CREEK I URI PERRY SSO K MI ANS AS R I MILFORD R. V CLINTON E WILSON BLUE SPRINGS R POMONA LONGVIEW HARRY S. TRUMAN R COLO. KANOPOLIS MELVERN HILLSDALE IV ER Lake of the Ozarks STOCKTON KANSAS POMME DE TERRE MISSOURI US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Kansas River Basin Operation Challenges • Protect nesting Least Terns and Piping Plovers that have taken residence along the Kansas River. • Supply navigation water support for the Missouri River. • Reviewing requests from the State of Kansas and the USBR to alter the standard operation to improve support for recreation, irrigation, fish & wildlife. US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model Requirements • Model Period 1/1/1920 through 12/31/2000 • Six-Hour routing period • Forecast local inflow using recession • Use historic pan evaporation – Monthly vary pan coefficient • Parallel and tandem operation • Consider all authorized puposes • Use current method of flood control US Army Corps of Engineers Kansas City District Model PMP Revisions • Model period from 1/1/1929 through 12/30/2001 • Mean daily flows for modeling rather than 6-hour data derived from mean daily flow values. • Delete the requirement to forecast future hydrologic conditions. • Average monthly lake evaporation rather than daily • Utilize a standard pan evaporation coefficient of 0.7 rather than a monthly varying value. • Separate the study basin between the Smoky River Basin and the Republican/Kansas River Basin.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Lovewell Spring Newsletter
    LOVEWELL STATE PARK SPRING NEWSLETTER March 2021 Welcome to this edition of the Lovewell State Park Spring Newsletter! We sincerely hope you enjoy it and will provide us feedback on the format and content. 2020 — A Record Year!! STATE PARK FEES FOR 2021 Annual Vehicle $25.00 With the outbreak of a global pandemic in Kansas SR/Disabled Annual $13.75 March of 2020, the Daily Vehicle $ 5.00 future of Kansas Kansas SR/Disabled Daily $ 3.25 State Parks was at first uncertain. But by Unconventional Vehicle Permit $52.50 mid-April, as visitors Annual Camp Permit $202.50 ($252.50 after March 31) began to see the state 14 Day Camp Permit $112.50 parks as a way to social distance and still get out of the house and make wonderful outdoor memories, the flood gates opened Daily Camp $ 10.00 and parks like Lovewell State Park were busier than ever before! Prime Site (all 50amp sites) $ 2.00 All primitive and utility campgrounds were full from late April Electricity $ 9.00 through the end of July, and nearly full for most of August. Many of the visitors were completely new to camping, fishing Elect/Water $11.00 and boating. This resulted in a record year for visitation and Elect/Water/Sewer $12.00 revenue for all of our Kansas State Parks. Catch phrases like the Seasonal Campsite Elect $371.50 per month “new normal” have become a reality. This is evidenced by the launch of our 2021 camping inventory this past December, Seasonal Campsite Elect/Water $431.50 per month which was DOUBLE that of the launch date in 2020! Therefore, Seasonal Campsite Elect/Water/Sewer $491.50 per month it is seemingly imperative to reserve your 2021 camping cabin or * Transaction Fee of $2.75 will be added to each campsite transaction TOTAL.
    [Show full text]
  • II. the Battle of Summit Springs
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: The Republican River Expedition, June-July 1869: II. The Battle of Summit Springs Full Citation: James T King, “The Republican River Expedition, June-July, 1869: II. The Battle of Summit Springs,” Nebraska History 41 (1960): 281-298 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH1960SummitSprings.pdf Date: 11/10/2011 Article Summary: The Republican River Expedition against the Cheyenne had to contend with elusive enemies, false alarms and weary troops. Despite all these obstacles the expedition ultimately changed the Republican Valley from an Indian-held wilderness to a region ready for settlement. Cataloging Information: Names: Frank North, EA Carr, Tall Bull, Maria Weichell, Susanna Alderdice Place Names: Julesburg, Nebraska; Fort Sedgewick, Colorado Territory Keywords: Frank North, Pawnee Scouts, EA Carr, Cheyenne, Dog Soldiers, Tall Bull, Maria Weichell, Susanna Alderdice Photographs / Images: map of Republican River Expedition sites, Pawnee Scouts, Luther H North at site of battle (1933) " " ~ ~ ~ " " " ~ ----- .
    [Show full text]
  • HOUSE BILL No. 2680
    HOUSE BILL No. 2680 AN ACT concerning wildlife and parks; relating to violations of wildlife and parks laws; concerning cash bonds; changing the name of Toronto state park to Cross Timbers state park at Toronto Lake; amending K.S.A. 32-837 and 32-1050 and repealing the existing sections. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Kansas: Section 1. K.S.A. 32-1050 is hereby amended to read as follows: 32- 1050. (a) Whenever any person is issued a citation by a conservation officer or deputy conservation officer of the wildlife and parks conser- vation service or by any law enforcement officer for any of the violations described in subsection (b), the officer may require such person to give bond in the amount specified in subsection (b) for the offense for which the person was charged, which bond shall be subject to forfeiture if the person does not appear at the court at the time specified in the written citation. The bond shall be a cash bond and shall be payable using cash or legal tender identified as travelers checks, certified checks, cashiers checks, personal checks and postal money orders. The cash bond shall be taken in the following manner: The officer shall furnish the person charged with a stamped envelope addressed to the judge or clerk of the court named in the written citation and the person shall place in such envelope the amount of the bond, and in the presence of the officer shall deposit the same in the United States mail. After having complied with these requirements, the person charged need not sign the citation, but the officer shall note the amount of the bond mailed on the citation and shall give a copy of such citation to the person.
    [Show full text]