Eunethta Joint Action 3 WP4 ALECTINIB AS MONOTHERAPY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Eunethta Joint Action 3 WP4 ALECTINIB AS MONOTHERAPY EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 WP4 Rapid assessment of pharmaceutical technologies using the HTA Core Model® for Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment ALECTINIB AS MONOTHERAPY FOR THE FIRST-LINE TREATMENT OF ADULT PATIENTS WITH ALK-POSITIVE ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER Project ID: PTJA03 Version 1.3, 22th January 2018 Dec2015 ©EUnetHTA, 2015. Reproduction is authorised provided EUnetHTA is explicitly acknowledged1 PTJA03 - Alectinib as monotherapy for the first line treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC DOCUMENT HISTORY AND CONTRIBUTORS Version Date Description V1.0 24/11/2017 First draft. V1.1 18/12/2017 Input from coauthors and dedicated reviewers has been processed. V1.2 04/01/2018 Input from medical editor has been processed. V1.3 22/01/2019 Input from manufacturer has been processed. Disclaimer The assessment represents a consolidated view of the EUnetHTA assessment team members and is in no case the official opinion of the participating institutions or individuals. EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 is supported by a grant from the European Commission. The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the authors, and neither the European Commission nor EUnetHTA are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Assessment team Author(s) Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV), Sweden Coauthor(s) Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions (HVB), Austria Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare (AAZ), Croatia Dedicated National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), United Kingdom Reviewer(s) Regione Veneto, Italy Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment (AETSA), Spain National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (NIPN), Hungary Ministry of Health (MoH), Malta (observer) Consultation of the draft rapid assessment Manufacturer(s) [v1.2] Roche (factual accuracy check) Medical editor [v1.1]] Compuscript Ltd Conflict of interest All authors and dedicated reviewers involved in the production of this assessment have declared they have no conflicts of interest in relation to the technology assessed according to the EUnetHTA declaration of interest and confidentiality undertaking form. How to cite this assessment Please cite this assessment as follows: Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (TLV), Main Association of Austrian Social Security Institutions (HVB), Agency for Quality and Accreditation in Health Care and Social Welfare (AAZ). Rapid assessment on pharmaceutical technologies using the HTA Core Model for Rapid Relative Effectiveness Assessment. Alectinib as monotherapy for the first-line treatment of adult patients with ALK-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer. EUnetHTA Project ID: PTJA03. 2017. Version 1.3, 22th January 2018 EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 WP4 2 PTJA03 - Alectinib as monotherapy for the first line treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY OF RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF ALECENSA (ALECTINIB) ............................. 8 1 SCOPE ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2 METHODS AND EVIDENCE INCLUDED ............................................................................... 18 2.1 ASSESSMENT TEAM ............................................................................................................ 18 2.2 SOURCE OF ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS .................................................................................. 18 2.3 SEARCH ............................................................................................................................. 18 2.4 STUDY SELECTION .............................................................................................................. 19 2.5 DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSES ...................................................................................... 20 2.6 QUALITY RATING ................................................................................................................ 21 2.7 PATIENT INVOLVEMENT ....................................................................................................... 22 2.8 DESCRIPTION OF THE EVIDENCE USED ................................................................................. 23 2.9 DEVIATIONS FROM PROJECT PLAN ....................................................................................... 23 3 DESCRIPTION AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF TECHNOLOGY (TEC) ........... 24 3.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ....................................................................................................... 24 3.2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 24 4 HEALTH PROBLEM AND CURRENT USE OF THE TECHNOLOGY (CUR) ....................... 29 4.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ....................................................................................................... 29 4.2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 29 5 CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS .................................................................................................. 33 5.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ....................................................................................................... 33 5.2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 33 6 SAFETY ................................................................................................................................... 50 6.1 RESEARCH QUESTIONS ....................................................................................................... 50 6.2 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................... 50 7 PATIENT INVOLVEMENT ....................................................................................................... 58 8 DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................................... 60 9 CONCLUSION ......................................................................................................................... 63 APPENDIX 1. EXTRAPOLATION OF PFS AND OS/SURVIVAL ANALYSIS ............................. 64 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 64 MODEL DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................. 65 SELECTION OF PARAMETRIC FUNCTION ....................................................................................... 68 RESULTS FOR PREFERRED EXTRAPOLATION MODELS .................................................................. 71 APPENDIX 2: METHODS AND DESCRIPTION OF THE EVIDENCE USED .............................. 78 DOCUMENTATION OF THE SEARCH STRATEGIES ........................................................................... 78 DESCRIPTION OF THE EVIDENCE USED ....................................................................................... 93 APPENDIX 3: REGULATORY AND REIMBURSEMENT STATUS ........................................... 124 APPENDIX 4: CHECKLIST FOR POTENTIAL ETHICAL, ORGANISATIONAL, PATIENT AND SOCIAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS ................................................................ 132 APPENDIX 5. HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE ............................................................. 133 APPENDIX 6. INDIRECT COMPARISONS – STATISTICAL ASPECTS ................................... 135 GENERAL REMARKS .................................................................................................................. 135 10 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 144 Version 1.3, 22th January 2018 EUnetHTA Joint Action 3 WP4 3 PTJA03 - Alectinib as monotherapy for the first line treatment of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Tables Table 0.1. Summary of findings for alectinib, primary analysis 9 February 2017 .......................... 13 Table 1.1. Scope according to population, intervention, comparison, outcomes and study design analysis........................................................................................................................................... 16 Table 2.1. Main characteristics of studies included ....................................................................... 23 Table 3.1. Features of the intervention and comparators .............................................................. 25 Table 3.2. Administration and dosing of the intervention and comparators ................................... 25 Table 4.1 Estimated incidence of (ALK-positive) NSCLC in Europe in 2012 ................................. 32 Table 5.1. Research questions and element IDs ........................................................................... 33 Table 5.2. Baseline characteristics of patients across relevant studies ......................................... 36 Table 5.3. Overall survival .............................................................................................................. 37 Table 5.4. Progression-free survival by investigator and independent review committee assessments for alectinib versus crizotinib in the ALEX trial (intent-to-treat
Recommended publications
  • Alectinib Provides a New Option for ALK-Positive NSCLC Patients After Progression on Crizotinib See Commentary on Page 239
    Community Translations Edited by Jame Abraham, MD, FACP Alectinib provides a new option for ALK-positive NSCLC patients after progression on crizotinib See Commentary on page 239 n December 2015, alectinib became the third ALK inhibitor approved by the United States Food and What’s new, what’s important IDrug Administration for the treatment of non-small- The US Food and Drug Administration approved alectinib to cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that displays rearrangements of treat patients with metastatic ALK-positive non-small-cell lung the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. Alectinib is cancer whose disease had progressed or who could not toler- a second-generation small molecule inhibitor of the ALK ate treatment with crizotinib. In clinical trials, alectinib showed a protein that joins ceritinib in providing a useful treatment partial response of 38%-44% and an average progression-free option for patients who have progressed on crizotinib, as survival of 11.2 months. In all, 61% of patients experienced a a result of its ability to target crizotinib-resistant mutant complete or partial reduction in their brain metastatic lesions, forms of the ALK protein. Alectinib also displays enhanced with a progression-free survival of of 9.1 months. The recom- penetrance of the blood-brain barrier, which improves ef- mended dose is 600 mg orally twice daily. cacy against central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The most common side effects are fatigue, constipation, swell- Te FDA awarded alectinib accelerated approval on the ing (edema), and muscle pain (myalgia). Treatment with alec- basis of 2 phase 2, single-arm clinical trials in patients tinib may cause sunburn when patients are exposed to sunlight, with ALK-positive NSCLC who had progressed on and pregnant women should be notifed of the possible risk to crizotinib therapy, a group of patients who have few avail- the fetus, and to use contraception throughout treatment and for able treatment options.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaceutics of Oral Anticancer Agents and Stimulants
    Pharmaceutics of oral anticancer agents and stimulants Maikel Herbrink The research in this thesis was performed at the Departments of Pharmacy & Pharma- cology and Medical Oncology & Clinical Pharmacology of the Netherlands Cancer Insti- tute – Antoni van Leeuwenhoek hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Printing of this thesis was financially supported by: Netherlands Cancer Institute Chipsoft BV Pfizer BV ISBN: 978-90-393-6997-5 Design, lay-out and print Gildeprint, Enschede © Maikel Herbrink, 2018 Pharmaceutics of oral anticancer agents and stimulants Farmaceutisch onderzoek naar oraal toegediende antikankermiddelen en stimulantia (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. H.R.B.M. Kummeling, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 27 juni 2018 des middags te 4.15 uur door Maikel Herbrink geboren op 2 februari 1990 te Groningen Promotoren: Prof. dr. J.H. Beijnen Prof. dr. J.H.M. Schellens Copromotor: Dr. B. Nuijen Contents Preface 9 Chapter 1: Introduction 15 1.1 Variability in bioavailability of small molecular tyrosine 17 kinase inhibitors Cancer Treat Rev. 2015 May;41(5):412-422 1.2 Inherent formulation issues of kinase inhibitors 51 J Control Release. 2016 Oct;239:118-127 1.3 High-tech drugs in creaky formulations 81 Pharm Res. 2017 Sep;34(9):1751-1753 Chapter 2: Pharmaceutical analysis of oral anticancer drug substances 89 2.1. Thermal study of pazopanib hydrochloride 91 J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017 Dec;130(3):1491-1499 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 07052020 MR ASCO20 Curtain Raiser
    Media Release New data at the ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program reflects Roche’s commitment to accelerating progress in cancer care First clinical data from tiragolumab, Roche’s novel anti-TIGIT cancer immunotherapy, in combination with Tecentriq® (atezolizumab) in patients with PD-L1-positive metastatic non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Updated overall survival data for Alecensa® (alectinib), in people living with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive metastatic NSCLC Key highlights to be shared on Roche’s ASCO virtual newsroom, 29 May 2020, 08:00 CEST Basel, 7 May 2020 - Roche (SIX: RO, ROG; OTCQX: RHHBY) today announced that new data from clinical trials of 19 approved and investigational medicines across 21 cancer types, will be presented at the ASCO20 Virtual Scientific Program organised by the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), which will be held 29-31 May, 2020. A total of 120 abstracts that include a Roche medicine will be presented at this year's meeting. "At ASCO, we will present new data from many investigational and approved medicines across our broad oncology portfolio," said Levi Garraway, M.D., Ph.D., Roche's Chief Medical Officer and Head of Global Product Development. “These efforts exemplify our long-standing commitment to improving outcomes for people with cancer, even during these unprecedented times. By integrating our medicines and diagnostics together with advanced insights and novel platforms, Roche is uniquely positioned to deliver the healthcare solutions of the future." Together with its partners, Roche is pioneering a comprehensive approach to cancer care, combining new diagnostics and treatments with innovative, integrated data and access solutions for approved medicines that will both personalise and transform the outcomes of people affected by this deadly disease.
    [Show full text]
  • The Predictive Values of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 26 August 2021 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646577 The Predictive Values of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring Uncommon EGFR Mutations—The Mutation Patterns, Use of Different Generations of EGFR-TKIs, and Concurrent Edited by: Genetic Alterations Francois X. Claret, University of Texas MD Anderson † † Cancer Center, United States Jiarong Tan , Chengping Hu , Pengbo Deng*, Rongjun Wan, Liming Cao, Min Li, Reviewed by: Huaping Yang, Qihua Gu, Jian An and Juan Jiang Lin Liu, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China Nankai University, China Hui Guo, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) 19del and L858R mutation are Jiaotong University, China “ ” Tony Y. Hu, known as common mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and predict Tulane University, United States sensitivities to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), whereas 20ins and T790M *Correspondence: mutations confer drug-resistance to EGFR-TKIs. The role of the remaining uncommon Pengbo Deng EGFR mutations remains elusive. [email protected] †These authors have contributed Methods: We retrospectively screened a group of NSCLC patients with uncommon equally to this work EGFR mutations other than 20ins and T790M. The mutation patterns, use of different generations of EGFR-TKIs, and concurrent genetic alterations were analyzed. Meanwhile, Specialty section: This article was submitted to a cohort of patients with single 19del or L858R were included for comparison. Cancer Molecular Targets Results: A total of 180/1,300 (13.8%) patients were identified. There were 102 patients and Therapeutics, a section of the journal with advanced or recurrent NSCLC that received first-line therapy of gefitinib/erlotinib/ Frontiers in Oncology icotinib and afatinib and were eligible for analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib and Alectinib for ALK
    cancers Systematic Review Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib and Alectinib for ALK-Rearrangement Positive Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Asian and Non-Asian Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Koichi Ando 1,2,* , Ryo Manabe 1, Yasunari Kishino 1, Sojiro Kusumoto 1, Toshimitsu Yamaoka 3 , Akihiko Tanaka 1, Tohru Ohmori 1,4 and Hironori Sagara 1 1 Division of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan; [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (Y.K.); [email protected] (S.K.); [email protected] (A.T.); [email protected] (T.O.); [email protected] (H.S.) 2 Division of Internal Medicine, Showa University Dental Hospital Medical Clinic, Senzoku Campus, Showa University, 2-1-1 Kita-senzoku, Ohta-ku, Tokyo 145-8515, Japan 3 Advanced Cancer Translational Research Institute, Showa University, 1-5-8 Hatanodai, Shinagawa-ku, Tokyo 142-8555, Japan; [email protected] 4 Department of Medicine, Division of Respiratory Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Health and Hospitals Corporation, Ebara Hospital, 4-5-10 Higashiyukigaya, Ohta-ku, Tokyo 145-0065, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +81-3-3784-8532 Citation: Ando, K.; Manabe, R.; Kishino, Y.; Kusumoto, S.; Yamaoka, Simple Summary: The treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement-positive T.; Tanaka, A.; Ohmori, T.; Sagara, H. (ALK-p) advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Preclinical Activity of the Liposomal Cisplatin Lipoplatin in Ovarian Cancer
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on September 17, 2014; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0713 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Preclinical activity of the liposomal cisplatin Lipoplatin in ovarian cancer 1Naike Casagrande, 1Marta Celegato, 1Cinzia Borghese, 1Maurizio Mongiat, 1,2 Alfonso Colombatti, 1*Donatella Aldinucci 1Experimental Oncology 2, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, Aviano, PN, Italy; 2Department of Medical and Biological Science Technology and MATI (Microgravity Ageing Training Immobility) Excellence Center, University of Udine, Italy. *Corresponding Author: Donatella Aldinucci, Experimental Oncology 2, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, via F. Gallini 2, Aviano I-33081, Italy. Phone: Italy-0434- 659234; Fax: Italy-0434-659428; e-mail: [email protected] Running title: Preclinical activity of Lipoplatin in ovarian cancer Key words: ovarian cancer; liposomal Cisplatin; spheroids; migration; cancer stem cells. Acknowledgments: This research was supported by Ministero della Salute, Ricerca Finalizzata FSN, I.R.C.C.S., Rome, Italy The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. Word count: 4703 Figures: 5 Table: 1 Statement of translational relevance At present, standard treatment for ovarian cancer involves tumor debulking with platinum- based chemotherapy. The response to this regimen is at least 70% of patients; however, 60- 80% of the first responders relapse within 18 months with a platinum-resistant disease. Lipoplatin is one of the most promising liposomal platinum drug formulations under clinical investigation. Our preclinical data demonstrated that Lipoplatin was active in a panel of ovarian cancer cell lines, including Cisplatin-resistant cells. We have shown that Lipoplatin induced apoptosis and ROS production, reduced spheroid growth and migration, reduced cancer stem cell number, and inhibited more than 90% tumor xenograft growth with low toxicity, while cisplatin resulted either un-effective or effective but too toxic.
    [Show full text]
  • Alecensa, INN-Alectinib
    Package leaflet: Information for the patient Alecensa 150 mg hard capsules alectinib This medicine is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. You can help by reporting any side effects you may get. See the end of section 4 for how to report side effects. Read all of this leaflet carefully before you start taking this medicine - because it contains important information for you. ● Keep this leaflet. You may need to read it again. ● If you have any further questions, ask your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. ● This medicine has been prescribed for you only. Do not pass it on to others. It may harm them, even if their signs of illness are the same as yours. ● If you get any side effects, talk to your doctor, pharmacist or nurse. This includes any possible side effects not listed in this leaflet. See section 4. What is in this leaflet 1. What Alecensa is and what it is used for 2. What you need to know before you take Alecensa 3. How to take Alecensa 4. Possible side effects 5. How to store Alecensa 6. Contents of the pack and other information 1. What Alecensa is and what it is used for What Alecensa is Alecensa is a cancer medicine that contains the active substance alectinib. What Alecensa is used for Alecensa is used to treat adults with a type of lung cancer called ‘non-small cell lung cancer’ (‘NSCLC’). It is used if your lung cancer: ● is ‘ALK-positive’ - this means your cancer cells have a fault in a gene that makes an enzyme called ALK (‘anaplastic lymphoma kinase’), see ‘How Alecensa works’, below ● and is advanced.
    [Show full text]
  • Systemic Lipoplatin Infusion Results in Preferential Tumor Uptake in Human Studies
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH 25: 3031-3040, (2005) _______________________________________________________________________________________________ Systemic Lipoplatin Infusion Results in Preferential Tumor Uptake in Human Studies T ENI BOULI K AS1, GEO RGE P. STAT HOPO U LOS 2, N IKOL A OS VO LAKA K IS1 and MARIA VOUG I OUKA 1 , 1Regulon, Inc. 715 Nor th Shoreline Blvd., Mountain View, C alifornia 94043, U.S.A. and Regulon AE, Grigoriou Afxentiou7, Athehs 174 55; 1Errik os Dunant Hos pital, Mes ogeion 107, Athens 15128, Gr eece ; Abstract. LipoplatinTM, a liposomal formulation of cisplatin, Key words: Lipoplatin, cisplatin, tumor targeting, gastric cancer, colon was developed with almost negligible nephrotoxicity, ototoxic ity , cancer, hepatocellular cancer. and ne urotoxicity as demonstrated in prec linical and Phase I human studies. A polyethy le ne-gly col c oating of the liposome w ith a m odel where Lipoplatin damage s more tumor c ompare d to nanoparticles is s upposed to r e sult in tumor accum ulation of the normal c ells. In c onclusion, Lipoplatin has the ability to drug by extravas ation through the altere d tumor vasculatur e. We prefe r entially conce ntr ate in malignant tis sue both of primar y and e xplored the hypothe s is that intrav e nous infusion of Lipoplatin m etastatic origin following intravenous infusion to patients. In r esults in tumor targeting in four independent patient c ases (one this respect, Lipoplatin emerges as a very promising drug in the w ith hepatocellular adenoc ar cinom a, two w ith gastr ic cancer, arsenal of chemotherapeutics. and one with colon c ancer ) w ho under went Lipoplatin infusion followed by a pr esche dule d s urger y ~ 20h later.
    [Show full text]
  • Alecensa® (Alectinib) Capsules(Genentech, Approved
    tools Approved Drugs • Janssen Biotech, Inc. (janssenbiotech.com) cal will begin selling the once-a-day pill in announced that the FDA has granted the U.S. on Feb. 1, 2016. • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration accelerated approval to Darzalex™ (FDA) granted accelerated approval to (daratumumab injection) as a single • Millennium Pharmaceuticals (millennium. Alecensa® (alectinib) capsules (Genentech, agent for the treatment of patients with com) announced that the FDA has approved gene.com) for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at Ninlaro® (ixazomib) in combination with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- least three prior lines of therapy, including lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the positive metastatic non-small cell lung a proteasome inhibitor (PI) and an immuno- treatment of patients with multiple cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on or are modulatory agent, or who are double- myeloma who have received at least one intolerant to crizotinib. Alecensa is an oral refractory to a PI and an immunomodula- prior therapy. Ixazomib is the first approved medication that blocks the activity of the ALK tory agent. oral proteasome inhibitor. protein, which may prevent NSCLC cells from growing and spreading. • The FDA approved Bristol-Myers Squibb’s • The FDA approved Bristol-Myers Squibb’s (bms.com) Empliciti™ (elotuzumab) in (bms.com) Opdivo® (nivolumab) Injection • Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. combination with lenalidomide and for the treatment of advanced renal cell (tevausa.com) and Eagle Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dexamethasone for the treatment of carcinoma in patients who have received (eagleus.com) announced that the FDA has patients with multiple myeloma who have prior anti-angiogenic therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • First-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Driver Alterations
    First-Line Treatment Options for Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Driver Alterations Patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer Nonsquamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma Activating EGFR mutation other Sensitizing (L858R/exon 19 MET exon 14 skipping than exon 20 insertion mutations, EGFR exon 20 mutation ALK rearrangement ROS1 rearrangement BRAF V600E mutation RET rearrangement NTRK rearrangement mutations KRAS alterations HER2 alterations NRG1 alterations deletion) EGFR mutation T790M, L858R or Ex19Del PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options PS 0-2 Treatment Options Emerging target; no Emerging target; no Emerging target; no Platinum doublet † † † Osimertinib monotherapy S Afatinib monotherapy M M Alectinib S Entrectinib M Dabrafenib/trametinib M Capmatinib M Selpercatinib M Entrectinib M conclusions available conclusions available conclusions available chemotherapy ± bevacizumab Gefitinib with doublet Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on M M M Brigatinib S Crizotinib M M Tepotinib M Pralsetinib* W Larotrectinib M chemotherapy non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline If alectinib or brigatinib are not available If entrectinib or crizotinib are not available Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Standard treatment based on Dacomitinib monotherapy M Osimertinib W M M M Ceritinib S Ceritinib W non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline non-driver mutation guideline Monotherapy with afatinib M Crizotinib S Lortlatinib W Standard treatment based on Erlotinib/ramucirumab M M non-driver mutation guideline Erlotinib/bevacizumab M Monotherapy with erlotinib M Strength of Recommendation Monotherapy with gefitinib M S Strong M Moderate W Weak Monotherapy with icotinib M Notes.
    [Show full text]
  • Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Promising Tools for Targeted Cancer Therapies
    Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 13768-13801; doi:10.3390/ijms150813768 OPEN ACCESS International Journal of Molecular Sciences ISSN 1422-0067 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijms Review Small-Molecule Inhibitors of the Receptor Tyrosine Kinases: Promising Tools for Targeted Cancer Therapies Mohammad Hojjat-Farsangi Department of Oncology-Pathology, Immune and Gene Therapy Lab, Cancer Center Karolinska (CCK), Karolinska University Hospital Solna and Karolinska Institute, Stockholm 17176, Sweden; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +46-517-74308; Fax: +46-517-75897 Received: 3 July 2014; in revised form: 31 July 2014 / Accepted: 5 August 2014 / Published: 8 August 2014 Abstract: Chemotherapeutic and cytotoxic drugs are widely used in the treatment of cancer. In spite of the improvements in the life quality of patients, their effectiveness is compromised by several disadvantages. This represents a demand for developing new effective strategies with focusing on tumor cells and minimum side effects. Targeted cancer therapies and personalized medicine have been defined as a new type of emerging treatments. Small molecule inhibitors (SMIs) are among the most effective drugs for targeted cancer therapy. The growing number of approved SMIs of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) i.e., tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the clinical oncology imply the increasing attention and application of these therapeutic tools. Most of the current approved RTK–TKIs in preclinical and clinical settings are multi-targeted inhibitors with several side effects. Only a few specific/selective RTK–TKIs have been developed for the treatment of cancer patients. Specific/selective RTK–TKIs have shown less deleterious effects compared to multi-targeted inhibitors.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights Into Mechanisms of Cisplatin Resistance: from Tumor Cell to Microenvironment
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review New Insights into Mechanisms of Cisplatin Resistance: From Tumor Cell to Microenvironment Shang-Hung Chen 1,2 and Jang-Yang Chang 1,2,* 1 National Institute of Cancer Research, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan 70456, Taiwan 2 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +886-6-2757575 (ext. 50002) Received: 28 July 2019; Accepted: 21 August 2019; Published: 24 August 2019 Abstract: Although cisplatin has been a pivotal chemotherapy drug in treating patients with various types of cancer for decades, drug resistance has been a major clinical impediment. In general, cisplatin exerts cytotoxic effects in tumor cells mainly through the generation of DNA-platinum adducts and subsequent DNA damage response. Accordingly, considerable effort has been devoted to clarify the resistance mechanisms inside tumor cells, such as decreased drug accumulation, enhanced detoxification activity, promotion of DNA repair capacity, and inactivated cell death signaling. However, recent advances in high-throughput techniques, cell culture platforms, animal models, and analytic methods have also demonstrated that the tumor microenvironment plays a key role in the development of cisplatin resistance. Recent clinical successes in combination treatments with cisplatin and novel agents targeting components in the tumor microenvironment, such as angiogenesis and immune cells, have also supported the therapeutic value of these components in cisplatin resistance. In this review, we summarize resistance mechanisms with respect to a single tumor cell and crucial components in the tumor microenvironment, particularly focusing on favorable results from clinical studies.
    [Show full text]