DOCSLIB.ORG

Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Final Report Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Texas Water Development Board Prepared for the P.O. Box 1321, Capitol Station Austin, Texas 78711-3231 November 2008 Prepared by: James A. Beach, P.G. Leigh Symank Yun Huang John B. Ashworth, P.G. Tyler Davidson, P.E. Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Barry J. Hibbs, Ph.D. Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Kevin Urbancyk, Ph.D., P.G. Kenny Calhoun Steve Finch, P.G. M e x T i c e o x a s R i o G r a n d e Hudspeth Co. J e P f r f e Culberson Co. D s i a d v i o i s Texas Water Development Board Final Report Groundwater Availability Model For the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas Prepared by: James A. Beach, P.G. Leigh Symank Yun Huang John B. Ashworth, P.G. Tyler Davidson, P.E. LBG-Guyton Associates Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Bureau of Economic Geology Barry J. Hibbs, Ph.D. University of California Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Southwest Groundwater Consulting, LLC Kevin Urbancyk, Ph.D, P.G. Sul Ross State University Kenny Calhoun Daniel B. Stephens and Associates, Inc. Steve Finch John Shomaker and Associates, Inc. November 2008 GEOSCIENTIST AND ENGINEERING SEAL This report documents the work of the following Licensed Texas Geoscientists or Licensed Texas Professional Engineers: James A. Beach, P.G. Mr. Beach was the Project Manager and was responsible for overseeing the development of the conceptual model, and for development and calibration of the numerical model. Tyler Davidson, P.E. Mr. Davidson was responsible for the evaluation of hydraulic properties and water quality in the conceptual model. John Ashworth, P.G. Mr. Ashworth was responsible for helping integrate the geologic structure into the numerical model. Eddie W. Collins, P.G. Mr. Collins was responsible for development of the conceptual geologic structure in the model area. iaJij Bruce K. Darling, Ph.D., P.G. Dr. Darling was responsible for geology sections in the report. /a261 Steven Finch, P.G. Mr. Finch was responsible for estimates for the model. Groundwater Availability Model for the West Texas Bolsons (Red Light Draw, Green River Valley, and Eagle Flat) Aquifer in Texas TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Location............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Physiography ..................................................................................................... 2-9 2.3 Climate ............................................................................................................ 2-15 2.4 Vegetation and Land Use ................................................................................ 2-23 2.5 Geology ........................................................................................................... 2-26 3.0 PREVIOUS WORK ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Hydrogeologic Framework................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Groundwater Models......................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 HYDROLOGIC SETTING ............................................................................ 4-1 4.1 Hydrostratigraphy.............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1.1 Red Light Draw........................................................................................ 4-2 4.1.2 Northwest Eagle Flat................................................................................ 4-3 4.1.3 Southeast Eagle Flat................................................................................. 4-4 4.1.4 Green River Valley .................................................................................. 4-4 4.2 Structure ............................................................................................................ 4-5 4.2.1 Data Sources............................................................................................ 4-5 4.2.2 Construction of the Structural Surfaces ................................................... 4-6 4.2.3 Discussion of Structure............................................................................ 4-6 4.3 Water Levels and Regional Groundwater Flow .............................................. 4-12 4.3.1 Hydrographs........................................................................................... 4-13 4.3.2 Groundwater Flow................................................................................. 4-13 4.3.3 Potentiometric Map................................................................................ 4-17 4.3.4 Flow Systems......................................................................................... 4-20 4.3.5 Vertical Flow......................................................................................... 4-23 4.4 Recharge.......................................................................................................... 4-25 4.4.1 Recharge Areas...................................................................................... 4-25 4.4.2 Recharge Estimates from Previous Work.............................................. 4-26 4.4.3 Summary of Recharge Method .............................................................. 4-28 4.4.4 Recharge Estimates................................................................................ 4-30 4.5 Rivers, Streams, Springs and Lakes ................................................................ 4-35 4.6 Hydraulic Properties........................................................................................ 4-38 4.6.1 Hydraulic Conductivity.......................................................................... 4-38 4.6.2 Storage Properties.................................................................................. 4-39 4.7 Discharge......................................................................................................... 4-42 4.8 Water Quality.................................................................................................. 4-50 i 5.0 CONCEPTUAL MODEL OF FLOW IN WEST TEXAS BOLSON AQUIFERS..................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Conceptual model.............................................................................................. 5-1 6.0 MODEL DESIGN............................................................................................ 6-1 6.1 Code and Processor ........................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Model Layers and Grid...................................................................................... 6-2 6.3 Model Parameters............................................................................................ 6-11 6.3.1 Hydraulic Conductivity.......................................................................... 6-11 6.3.2 Storage Coefficients............................................................................... 6-12 6.4 Model Boundaries........................................................................................... 6-13 6.4.1 Lateral Boundaries................................................................................. 6-13 6.4.2 Vertical Boundaries............................................................................... 6-18 6.4.3 Streams and Springs............................................................................... 6-18 6.4.4 Recharge and Evapotranspiration .......................................................... 6-18 6.4.5 Pumping Discharge................................................................................ 6-19 7.0 MODELING APPROACH............................................................................. 7-1 7.1 Calibration ......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1.1 Approach.................................................................................................. 7-1 7.1.2 Calibration Targets and Measures ........................................................... 7-2 7.1.3 Calibration Target Uncertainty................................................................ 7-4 7.2 Sensitivity Analyses.......................................................................................... 7-5 8.0 STEADY-STATE MODEL ............................................................................ 8-1 8.1 Calibration ......................................................................................................... 8-1 8.1.1 Calibration Targets...................................................................................8-1 8.1.2 Horizontal and Vertical Hydraulic Conductivities .................................. 8-1 8.1.3 Recharge .................................................................................................. 8-8 8.1.4 Groundwater Evapotranspiration............................................................. 8-8 8.1.5 General Head Boundaries ........................................................................ 8-8 8.1.6 Calibration Results and Statistics..........................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy, Paleontology and Correlation of Lower Cretaceous Exposures in Southeastern New Mexico Barry S
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/44 Stratigraphy, paleontology and correlation of lower Cretaceous exposures in southeastern New Mexico Barry S. Kues and Spencer G. Lucas, 1993, pp. 245-260 in: Carlsbad Region (New Mexico and West Texas), Love, D. W.; Hawley, J. W.; Kues, B. S.; Austin, G. S.; Lucas, S. G.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 44th Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 357 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1993 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) from the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas
    Chapter 9 Carnivora (Mammalia, Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae) From the Earliest Hemphillian Screw Bean Local Fauna, Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas MARGARET SKEELS STEVENS1 AND JAMES BOWIE STEVENS2 ABSTRACT The Screw Bean Local Fauna is the earliest Hemphillian fauna of the southwestern United States. The fossil remains occur in all parts of the informal Banta Shut-in formation, nowhere very fossiliferous. The formation is informally subdivided on the basis of stepwise ®ning and slowing deposition into Lower (least fossiliferous), Middle, and Red clay members, succeeded by the valley-®lling, Bench member (most fossiliferous). Identi®ed Carnivora include: cf. Pseudaelurus sp. and cf. Nimravides catocopis, medium and large extinct cats; Epicyon haydeni, large borophagine dog; Vulpes sp., small fox; cf. Eucyon sp., extinct primitive canine; Buisnictis chisoensis, n. sp., extinct skunk; and Martes sp., marten. B. chisoensis may be allied with Spilogale on the basis of mastoid specialization. Some of the Screw Bean taxa are late survivors of the Clarendonian Chronofauna, which extended through most or all of the early Hemphillian. The early early Hemphillian, late Miocene age attributed to the fauna is based on the Screw Bean assemblage postdating or- eodont and predating North American edentate occurrences, on lack of de®ning Hemphillian taxa, and on stage of evolution. INTRODUCTION southwestern North America, and ®ll a pa- leobiogeographic gap. In Trans-Pecos Texas NAMING AND IMPORTANCE OF THE SCREW and adjacent Chihuahua and Coahuila, Mex- BEAN LOCAL FAUNA: The name ``Screw Bean ico, they provide an age determination for Local Fauna,'' Banta Shut-in formation, postvolcanic (,18±20 Ma; Henry et al., Trans-Pecos Texas (®g.
    [Show full text]
  • A Glimpse of Some of the Geology and Mineral Resources: Sierra Blanca
    THE EL.PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY I I GUIDEBOOK i FIFTH ANNUAL FIELD TRIP I I I I A GLIMPSE OF SOME OF THE I GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES I I SIERRA BLANCA-VAN HORN COUNTRY HUDSPETH AND CULBEWSON COUNTIES TEXAS > APRIL 3, 1971 iii TABLE OF CONTENTS F - The Texas Lineament in Eagle Flat, Texas ------------- 28 INTRODUCTION The Trans Pecos region of West Texas has attracted the attention I it deserves as a source of useful minerals both metallic and nsn- metallic. Because of the preoccupation of the people of Texas with petroleum production, many have overlooked the fact that them have been several important metal mines tn this province and that talc deposi ts are s ti1 l being worked here. Undoubtedly othep economic mineral deposits exist in the region awai ting discovery by intensive geological prospecting. The af'fi cers of the El Paso Geological Society and the field trip leadek hope that this trip will heighten inteest in the finding and developing of mineral deposi ts in Trans Pecos Texas. We welcome all our visitcs~sand know that they will wish to jodn us in thanking all those who made thds trip possible. We wish especially to acknowledge the kindness of the Pioneer Talc Company in showing us through the mill at Allamore and allowlng the group to visdt the Texsla- Talc mine. We also wish to thank Mr. Sandy Neal of Van Haon for per- mission to cross the Neal Ranch on the way to the Hazel Wne. John M. Hills, President El Paso Geological Society EL PAS0 GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OFFICERS John M.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence for Controlled Deformation During Laramide Orogeny
    Geologic structure of the northern margin of the Chihuahua trough 43 BOLETÍN DE LA SOCIEDAD GEOLÓGICA MEXICANA D GEOL DA Ó VOLUMEN 60, NÚM. 1, 2008, P. 43-69 E G I I C C O A S 1904 M 2004 . C EX . ICANA A C i e n A ñ o s Geologic structure of the northern margin of the Chihuahua trough: Evidence for controlled deformation during Laramide Orogeny Dana Carciumaru1,*, Roberto Ortega2 1 Orbis Consultores en Geología y Geofísica, Mexico, D.F, Mexico. 2 Centro de Investigación Científi ca y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE) Unidad La Paz, Mirafl ores 334, Fracc.Bella Vista, La Paz, BCS, 23050, Mexico. *[email protected] Abstract In this article we studied the northern part of the Laramide foreland of the Chihuahua Trough. The purpose of this work is twofold; fi rst we studied whether the deformation involves or not the basement along crustal faults (thin- or thick- skinned deformation), and second, we studied the nature of the principal shortening directions in the Chihuahua Trough. In this region, style of deformation changes from motion on moderate to low angle thrust and reverse faults within the interior of the basin to basement involved reverse faulting on the adjacent platform. Shortening directions estimated from the geometry of folds and faults and inversion of fault slip data indicate that both basement involved structures and faults within the basin record a similar Laramide deformation style. Map scale relationships indicate that motion on high angle basement involved thrusts post dates low angle thrusting. This is consistent with the two sets of faults forming during a single progressive deformation with in - sequence - thrusting migrating out of the basin onto the platform.
    [Show full text]
  • Finlay, Caliza……
    LÉXICO ESTRATIGRÁFICO DE MÉXICO Finlay, Caliza……....................................................................Cretácico Temprano (Albiano) Referencia(s): Richardson, G.B., 1904, Report of a reconnaissance in Trans-Pecos north of the Texas and Pacific Railway: University of Texas Bulletin, 23, 119 p. Baker, C.L., 1927, Exploratory geology of part of southwestern Trans-Pecos, Texas: University of Texas Bulletin, 2745, 70 p. Historia nomenclatural de la unidad: Richardson (1904 en Arenas-Partida, 1982) utiliza por primera vez el nombre Caliza Finlay para describir las calizas que afloran en el flanco norte de las montañas Finlay, Texas. Cabe mencionar que en esta propuesta, el autor no asigna su localidad tipo. Posteriormente, Baker (1927 en Monreal y Longoria, 1999) realiza un estudio más detallado en el que extiende la distribución geográfica de la unidad y propone la localidad estudiada por Richardson (1904) como su localidad tipo. Años después, algunos autores utilizan informalmente el nombre caliza Guante para nombrar en campo, las rocas con la misma posición estratigráfica que las de la Caliza Finlay en la Sierra Los Fresnos, norte de Sierra Pilares y Sierra El Porvenir en Chihuahua (Nichols, 1958; Ferrel, 1958; Harwell, 1959). Debido a ello, Atwill (1960 en Monreal y Longoria, 1999) realiza una investigación exhaustiva y con base en la continuidad lateral y similitud litológica de los estratos de las unidades Guante y Finlay, sugiere que se trata de la misma unidad y propone el desuso y reemplazo del término Caliza Guante por Caliza Finlay. Finalmente, Monreal y Longoria (1999) documentan que varios autores (Rodríguez-Torres y Guerrero, 1969; Rodríguez-Torres, 1969; Córdoba, 1968, 1969; Córdoba et al., 1970; De Ford y Haenggi, 1970) sugieren que la Caliza Finlay debe utilizarse como una unidad formal para el noreste de Chihuahua.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Managing the Stressed Mexico-USA Transboundary Hueco Bolson Aquifer in the El Paso Del Norte Region As a Complex System
    Understanding and managing the stressed Mexico-USA transboundary Hueco bolson aquifer in the El Paso del Norte region as a complex system Zhuping Sheng · Jeff Devere Abstract As the latest drought has swept over the Resum´ e´ Alors que la derniere` secheresse´ a atteint toute la southwestern United States, most local and regional water partie Sud-Ouest des Etats-Unis, la plus part des distribu- providers have had to rely on ground water to meet their teurs d’eau, locaux et regionaux,´ doivent s’approvisionner water demands as surface water supplies have diminished. en eau souterraine des´ lors que les niveaux des eaux de sur- In areas near major population centers this situation has face ont diminues.´ Dans les zones proches des grands cen- continued to put strain and stress on already over-drafted tres densement´ peuples,´ cette situation a continuee´ a alter´ ee´ regional aquifers. Metropolitan centers throughout the des aquiferes` dej´ a` surexploites.´ Les centres metropolitains´ southwestern United States, as exemplified by Las Vegas, du Sud-Ouest des Etats-Unis (Las Vegas dans le Nevada, Nevada; Phoenix and Tucson, Arizona; and El Paso, Texas, Phoenix et Tucson dans l’Arizona, El Paso au Texas) sont have a history of over drafting their available ground connus historiquement pour surexploites´ leurs ressources water resources. How these stressed aquifers should be en eaux souterraines. Il devient urgent de definir´ un mode managed is an urgent issue. In El Paso, Texas long-term de gestion de ses aquiferes` surexploites.´ A El Paso dans groundwater mining in the transboundary Hueco bolson le Texas, le minage de l’aquifere` transfrontalier engen- aquifer has resulted in large water level drawdowns within dre un rabattement important dans le bassin, et plus the basin, particularly in several well fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeology of the Trans-Pecos Texas
    Guidebook 25 Trans-Pecos ISxas Charles W. Kreitler andJohn M. Sharp, Jr. Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Editors Bureau of Economic Geology*W. L. Fisher, Director The University ofTexas at Austin*Austin, Texas 78713 1990 Guidebook 25 Hydrogeology of Trans-Pecos Texas Charles W. Kreitler and John M. Sharp, Jr. Field Trip Leaders and Guidebook Editors Contributors J. B. Ashworth, J. B. Chapman, R. S. Fisher, T. C. Gustavson, C. W. Kreitler, W. F. Mullican III, Ronit Nativ, R. K. Senger, and J. M. Sharp, Jr. with selected reprints by F. M. Boyd and C. W. Kreitler; L. K Goetz; W. L. Hiss; J. I. LaFave and J. M. Sharp, Jr.; P. D. Nielson and J. M. Sharp, Jr.; B. R. Scanlon, B. C. Richter, F. P. Wang, and W. F. Mullican III; and J. M. Sharp, Jr. Prepared for the 1990 Annual Meeting ofthe Geological Society ofAmerica Dallas, Texas October 29-November 1,1990 Bureau ofEconomic Geology*W. L. Fisher, Director The University ofTexas atAustin*Austin, Texas 78713 1990 Cover: One ofthe five best swimming holes inTexas. San Solomon Spring with divers, during construction ofBalmorhea State Park, 1930's. Photograph courtesy ofDarrel Rhyne, Park Superintendent, Balmorhea State Park, 1990. Contents Preface v Map ofthe field trip area, showing location ofstops vi Field Trip Road Log First-Day Road Log: El Paso, Texas-Rio Grande-Carlsbad, New Mexico l Second-Day Road Log: Carlsbad, New Mexico-Fort Davis, Texas 7 Third-Day Road Log: Fort Davis-Balmorhea State Park- Monahans State Park 14 References 19 Technical Papers Water Resources ofthe El Paso Area, Texas 21 John B.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy
    Capitan Reef Complex Structure and Stratigraphy Report by Allan Standen, P.G. Steve Finch, P.G. Randy Williams, P.G., Beronica Lee-Brand, P.G. Assisted by Paul Kirby Texas Water Development Board Contract Number 0804830794 September 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive summary....................................................................................................................1 2. Introduction................................................................................................................................2 3. Study area geology.....................................................................................................................4 3.1 Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................................4 3.1.1 Bone Spring Limestone...........................................................................................9 3.1.2 San Andres Formation ............................................................................................9 3.1.3 Delaware Mountain Group .....................................................................................9 3.1.4 Capitan Reef Complex..........................................................................................10 3.1.5 Artesia Group........................................................................................................11 3.1.6 Castile and Salado Formations..............................................................................11 3.1.7 Rustler Formation
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Apache Mountains, Trans-Pecos Texas
    GEOLOGY OF APACHE MOUNTAINS, TRANS-PECOS TEXAS John William Wood University of Texas, Ph.D. thesis, 241 p., 10 sections, 6 diagrams, 40 photos, June, 1965. ABSTRACT The Apache Mountains of southeastern Culberson County, Texas, are com- posed of Permian marine rocks deposited over truncated Paleozoic formations along part of the southwest margin of the Delaware Basin. The western sector of the range, a broadly developed half-dome, is dominated by modified horst-and-graben structure superposed on shelf, shelf-margin, and basin facies ranging in age from Leonardian to Ochoan. The eastern two-thirds of the range is an exhumed Guadalupian reef complex, the surface structure of which is the elongate, southeast-plunging Apache anticline. The oldest exposed rocks are Leonardian in age and compose the upper part of the Victorio Peak Limestone. The VictorioPeakcrops out in an isolated ridge at the western end of the range. The siltstone, dolomite, and limestone within the unit probably formed as shallow-watershelf-margin deposits. In the same ridge, the Victorio Peak is conformably overlain by shale, silt stone, and lime- stone of the Cutoff Shale. The age of at least the upper part of the Cutoff is Guadalupian. As a result of uplift, erosion, and subsequent subsidence a tongue of Cherry Canyon basin- facies oversteps trucated Cutoff beds. The Munn Formationcrops out along the western base of the range and makes up the southwestern ridges. The two members of the Munn are composed of dolomite, siltstone, and limestone deposited as shelf and shelf-margin facies. The "backbone" of the Apache Mountains is a southeast trending, massive carbonate lithosome, the Capitan Limestone, which is flanked on the northeast by a fault-line scarp and on the southwest by ridges composed of bedded back- reef dolomite and siltstone of the Seven Rivers, Yates, and Tansill formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Eagle Mountains, Hudspeth County, Texas James R
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/31 Geology of the Eagle Mountains, Hudspeth County, Texas James R. Underwood Jr., 1980, pp. 183-193 in: Trans Pecos Region (West Texas), Dickerson, P. W.; Hoffer, J. M.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 31st Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 308 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1980 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.0 Overview of Hueco Bolson
    3.0 OVERVIEW OF HUECO BOLSON The Hueco Bolson covers about 2,500 square miles, or 1.6 million acres in New Mexico, Texas, and Chihuahua (Figure 3-1). In Texas, the Hueco overlies portions of El Paso and Hudspeth Counties. The Tularosa Basin in New Mexico bounds the Hueco on the north. The boundary between the Tularosa and the Hueco is not a geologic or hydrologic boundary, and groundwater flows from the Tularosa into the Hueco. EPWU wells in the Hueco are limited to a relatively small portion of the basin as shown in Figure 3-2. Heywood and Yager (2003, pg. 2) describe the geology of the Hueco Bolson as follows: “The Hueco Bolson is a fault-bounded structural depression associated with the Rio Grande Rift. At the inception of Rio Grande rifting about 26 million years ago (Chapin and Seager, 1975), normal faults accommodated regional extension, resulting in downdropped structural grabens. Igneous rocks of Precambrian age and sedimentary rocks of Paleozoic and Mesozoic age surround and underlie the Hueco Bolson. Unconsolidated to poorly consolidated deposits of Tertiary and Quaternary age consisting primarily of gravel, sand, silt, and clay have filled the basin. These deposits compose the alluvial-aquifer system known as the Hueco Bolson.” Rio Grande alluvium overlies Hueco Bolson deposits in the valley portions of the area. The approximate extent of the alluvium is shown in Figure 3-3. The alluvium is relatively thin (about 200 feet). In cross-section (Figure 3-4), it can be seen that the Hueco is a deep basin that is bounded by faults along the Franklin and Hueco Mountains.
    [Show full text]
  • Txu-Oclc-2582435.Pdf
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PETROLEUM GEOLOGISTS VOL. 42, NO. 2 (FEBRUARY, 1958), PP. 371-386, 2 FIGS. COMANCHEAN STRATIGRAPHY OF KENT QUADRANGLE, TRANS-PECOS TEXAS 1 JOHN P. BRAND AND RONALD K. DEFORD Lubbock and Austin, Texas ABSTRACT At the northern end of the Coahuila platform, the thinned Comanchean sequence consists of the newly named Sixshooter group of carbonate formations underlain by the newly named Yearwood formation. The Sixshooter group consists, in descending order, of the Buda limestone, the newly named Boracho limestone composed of the newly named San Martine and Levinson members, and the Finlay limestone at the base. Beneath the Finlay is the Cox sandstone, and beneath the Cox, the Yearwood formation, which consists of an upper limestone member previously called Rustler (Permian) and a basal conglomeratic sandstone member that rests unconformably on Permian forma- tions. The Buda and Boracho are biostratigraphically correlative with the Washita group of central Texas; similarly, the basal part of the Levinson member and all the Finlay limestone are correlative with Fredericksburg formations. Whether any part of the Cox sandstone is contemporaneous with the Trinity group is speculative. The Yearwood is probably a Trinity, though possibly a Fredericks- burg, correlative. INTRODUCTION The Comanchean series extends as a continuous body of rock from central Texas to northern Chihuahua. One or two formations can be traced all the way, but most of the rock units of central Texas lose their lithostratigraphic identity before they reach the Mexican geosyncline in Chihuahua along the Rio Grande, which is the international boundary. The Coahuila platform just east of the geo- syncline is one of the critical areas of intervening stratigraphy, and some of the more significant outcrops are in the 30' Kent Quadrangle in Jeff Davis, Reeves, and Culberson counties, Texas, at the north end of the platform.
    [Show full text]