DOCSLIB.ORG

Reconsidering Early Modern Rationalism Philosophy 481B/681B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Reconsidering Early Modern Rationalism Philosophy 481B/681B Reconsidering Early Modern Rationalism Philosophy 481b/681b Yale University Spring 2017 Tuesdays, 1:30-3:20 Julia Borcherding & Michael Della Rocca According to one of the most familiar narratives in and of the history of philosophy, standardly employed in philosophy curricula, and omnipresent in Anglophone philosophy throughout the 20th century, early modern philosophy was marked by the struggle between two highly influential, rival schools of thought: rationalism, brought on by Descartes and his followers, and empiricism, roughly starting with Locke, and roughly ending with Hume. Early modern philosophy was then finished off by Kant, who engineered the great reconciliation between and synthesis of the two by starting a new movement of his own (German Idealism). In this class, we will attempt to examine an important element of this story in greater depth, namely the movement of thought commonly subsumed under the label of “rationalism.” We will consider a number of philosophers from the period who are often considered rationalist thinkers, such as Rene ́ Descartes, Anne Conway, Baruch Spinoza, G.W.F. Leibniz, and Emilié du Chatelet.̂ In addition to considering rationalist themes in metaphysics, epistemology, and moral philosophy, we will particularly focus on different conceptions of rationalism, on what are its various methodologies, on principles that have been thought to guide rationalism, and on the arguments for and against these principles. We will also attend to challenges to rationalism both in the early modern period itself and in recent, especially feminist, thought. Requirements & Prerequisites Requirements (a) one twenty-page paper due at the end of reading period (Thursday, May 4) OR one 5-7 page paper due on Monday, March 6 (at midnight) and one 10-15 page paper due at the end of reading period. The 10-15 page paper may be a revision and an expansion of the 5-7 page paper (b) discussion with us about your paper topic and paper (c) seminar participation Prerequisites Two courses in philosophy, including Philosophy 126b or the equivalent. Office Hours Borcherding: Wednesday 1:30-2:30, Connecticut Hall 102 Della Rocca: Thursday 1:30-3:30, Connecticut Hall 401 Contact info Borcherding: [email protected]; 203-507-1905 Della Rocca: [email protected]; 203- 432-2764 Readings Readings will be made available on the course website on Canvas. Useful Editions of Primary Texts in Translation Descartes Spinoza (CSM[K] I-III) The Philosophical Writings of Descartes, 3 vols., trans. John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff, Dugald Murdoch, and Anthony Kenny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984-91. Benedictus de Spinoza, A Spinoza Reader: The Ethics and Other Works, ed. and trans. Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. (Curley) Conway Conway, Anne, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy, trans. Taylor Corse and Allison Coudert. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (Principles) Leibniz Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Philosophical Essays, eds. and trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber. Indianapolis & Cambridge: Hackett, 1989. (AG) Du Châtelet Du Chatelet,̂ Emilie, Selected Philosophical and Scientific Writings, ed. Judith P. Zinsser, trans. Isabelle Bour and Judith P. Zinsser. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009. (Writings) Schedule of Topics and Readings * =optional/supplementary readings I The Idea of Rationalism 1 Intro Session topics characteristics of rationalism varieties of rationalism 2 Spinning the Rationalist Tale topics classic features of rationalism vs empiricism origins of the rationalism-empiricism narrative contemporary accounts and critiques readings Karl Leonhard Reinhold, The Foundation of Philosophical Knowledge, 53 [38] - 63 [62] Wilhelm Gottlieb Tennemann, A Manual of the History of Philosophy, 11-12 (§27); 30-32 (§55-§62); 281-285 (§308-§314) Kuno Fischer, History of Modern Philosophy, chapter 7: “The Course of Development of Modern Philosophy”, 158- 162. Arthur Rogers, A Student’s History of Philosophy, “III. Modern Philosophy, Introduction”, 253-256. Frederick Copleston, A History of Philosophy, vol. 4, “Introduction”, §2-§4, 16-33. Knud Haakonssen, “The Idea of Early Modern Philosophy” *Alberto Vanzo, “Empiricism and Rationalism in Nineteenth-Century Histories of Philosophy” 3 First Principles topics What are classic rationalist first principles? What are first principles? The role of hypotheses readings Descartes, Principles, Preface to the French edition (CSM I, 179-190); §75 (CSM I, 221) Spinoza, Ethics, definitions and axioms of Part I; 1P1-1P15; 1p33; axioms of Part II; 2p7; 3p4-3p6 Leibniz, Primary Truths (AG 30-35); Mon. §31-§38 (AG 217-18); On the General Characteristic, part II, DM §1 (AG 35); New Essays, pref. (AG 297) Du Chatelet, Foundations of Physics, Chapter 1: Of the Principles of our Knowledge; Chapter 4: Hypotheses (Writings, 124-138, 147-155) Lin, “The Principle of Sufficient Reason in Spinoza”, The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza Detlefsen, “Du Chatelet and Descartes on the Role of Hypothesis” *Bolton, “Leibniz’s Theory of Knowledge: Mathematical and Natural Science” TeachingPortfolio|JuliaBorcherding 24 4 “Rationalist” Methodology and the Ideal of Reason topics Descartes’ rationalist methodology? The “Man of Reason” debate readings Descartes, Rules 1-4, 8, 12 (CSM I, 9-20, 28-33); Discourse, CSM I, 120-122; Meditations, Synopsis, in: Selected Writings, 73-75 (CSM I, 9-11), Second Replies (CSM I, 110-113) Astell, A Serious Proposal to the Ladies, Part II, Chapter 3, 144-155; 166-168. Gaukroger, “Descartes: Methodology” *Miles, “Descartes Method” Lloyd, The Man of Reason, Chapter 3: “Reason as attainment”, 38-50 Atherton, “Cartesian Reason” *Bordo, “The Cartesian Masculinization of Thought” II Rationalist Themes in Early Modern Philosophy Rationalist Metaphysics? 5 God topics The Priority of The Infinite Cosmological Arguments readings Descartes, Meditations, Third Meditation Hume, Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, section 2 (paragraph 14) Leibniz, Mon.,§§41, 45, 48; “That a Most Perfect Being Exists” (L 167-68); “On the Radical Origination of Things” (L 486-491); “Dodwell and Immortality” (Grua 557) Schechtman, “Descartes’s Argument for the Existence of the Idea of an Infinite Being” Adams, “The Priority of the Perfect” 6 Substance topics Theories of distinction Modes and attributes readings Descartes, Principles I 51-65; Meditations, Sixth Meditation Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature I.1.7 (pp. 24-25) Nelson, “The Rationalist Impulse” *Hoffman, “Descartes’s Theory of Distinction” *Hoffman, “Hume on the Distinction of Reason” *Baxter, “Hume, Distinctions of Reason, and Differential Resemblance” TeachingPortfolio|JuliaBorcherding 25 7 Causation topics Occasionalism Concurrence Laws readings Descartes, Meditations, Third Meditation; Fifth Replies (CSM II 254-55, 261, 275); Sixth Replies (CSM II 291- 294); The World (CSM I 92-98); Principles I 39-41, II 23-64, III 56-57; Letters (CSM III 23, 25,-26, 235, 339-40, 348, 358-59, 363, 380-82). Malebranche, The Search After Truth, 3.2.1.2, 3.2.3, 3.2.6, 6.2.3, Elucidation 15 Leibniz, “New System of Nature” (AG 138-45); “Postscript of a letter to Basnage de Beauval” (AG 147-49); “On Nature Itself” (AG 155-67); Letters to Clarke, pp. 320-24, 343-46; Monadology Della Rocca, “Causation without Intelligibility and Causation without God in Descartes” *Nadler, “Malebranche on Causation” *Rutherford, “Natures, Laws, and Miracles: The Roots of Leibniz’s Critique of Occasionalism” 8 Arguments for and Against the PSR topics The PC and the PSR Theory of Truth and the PSR Atomism, Monism, and the PSR readings Leibniz, Primary Truths; Discourse on Metaphysics, sections 8-13; Leibniz-Clarke Correspondence, 5th Letter, section 18; Confessio (A VI.iii.118); “De Existentia” (De Summa Rerum 111-13). Hume, Treatise, 1.3.3, 1.4.5 Wolff, “Rational Thoughts on God, the World, and the Soul of Human Beings” (Watkins, 11-12 [sections 28- 29,143]) Baumgarten, Metaphysics, (Watkins, 89-93) Kant, Nova Dilucidatio, Proposition 8 Look, “Grounding the Principle of Sufficient Reason: Leibnizian Rationalism and the Humean Challenge” Della Rocca, “Playing with Fire: Hume, Rationalism, and a Little Bit of Spinoza” *Adams, Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist, 65-71 Rationalist Epistemology? 9 Innate Powers & Innate Ideas topics Descartes, Locke, and Leibniz on innate ideas the role of reflection in their accounts readings Leibniz, New Essays, pref., Book 1-2; “Quid Sit Idea” Locke, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, Book 2, Chapters I, II, VI-VII TeachingPortfolio|JuliaBorcherding 26 TeachingPortfolio|JuliaBorcherding 27 Descartes, The Search for Truth (CSM II 400-420); Conversations with Burman (CSMK III, 147, 153); Comments on a Certain Broadsheet (CSM I, 303-307); selections from the Meditations and Replies McRae, “Innate Ideas” Yolton, “Locke’s Concept of Experience”, “Reflection” *Boyle, Descartes on Innate Ideas, chapter 3: “The Role of Reflection in Perceiving Innate Ideas” *Jolley, The Light of the Soul, chapters 9 & 10: “Leibniz: The Defence of Innate Ideas”, Leibniz: Innate Ideas, Reflection, and Self-Knowledge” *Borcherding, “The Marble’s Veins. Locke and Leibniz on Innate Ideas” 10 Varieties of Knowledge topics What kinds of knowledge are there on accounts standardly considered rationalist? two interesting cases: intuitive knowledge, role of imagination readings Spinoza, Ethics, Part II, 2p16-end, Part V; Treatise on the Emendation of the Intellect Leibniz, “On What is Independent of Sense
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Western Philosophy Rev
    Designed by John Cornet, Phoenix HS (Ore) Western Philosophy rev. September 2012 The very process of philosophy has been a driving force in the tranformation of the world. From the figure who dwells upon how to achieve power, to the minister who contemplates the paradox of the only truth (their faith) yet which is also stagnent, to the astronomers who are searching the stars for signs of other civilizations, to the revolutionaries who sought to construct a national government which would protect the rights of the minority, the very exercise of philosophy and philosophical thought is at a core of human nature. Philosophy addresses what are sometimes called the "big questions." These include questions of morality and ethics, ideology/faith,, politics, the truth of knowledge, the nature of reality, and the meaning of human existance (...just to name a few!) (Religion addresses some of the same questions, but while philosophy and religion overlap in some questions, they can and do differ significantly in the approach they take to answering them.) Subject Learning Outcomes Skills-Based Learning Outcomes Behavioral Expectations and Grading Policy Develop an appreciation for and enjoyment of Organize, maintain and learn how to study from a learning, particularly in how learning should subject-specific notebook Attendance, participation and cause us to question what we think we know Be able to demonstrate how to take notes (including being prepared are daily and have a willingness to entertain new utilizing two-column format) expectations perspectives on issues. Be able to engage in meaningful, substantive discussion A classroom culture of respect and Students will develop familiarity with major with others.
    [Show full text]
  • May 12, 2017 Department of Philosophy Undergraduate Course Descriptions
    UB Spring Session January 30 - May 12, 2017 Department of Philosophy Undergraduate Course Descriptions PHI 101 Introduction to Philosophy K. Cho M, W, F, 9:00 AM-9:50 AM Class # 24095 This is an introductory philosophy course with a compact and yet global design. Instead of the frequently adopted but seldom fully utilized textbooks averaging 630 pates we have chosen a text with only 130 ages but packed with content that is literally “Global”. Text: John Dewey, Confucius and Global Philosophy, by Joseph Grange, 2004, SUNY Press; Plus Occasional Handouts in class. The choice of the two names Dewey and Confucius is more symbolic. Nobody would think these two embody the Western half and The Eastern half of the world; philosophy it is rather in terms of “working connections” they reveal to each other that we perceive them as representatives of our age it its needs. Dewey was certainly a typical American philosopher, who like no one else. Advanced the cause of Pragmatism. But he was also the American philosopher who was the most open to the world. He lectured in Beijing and promoted talented Chinese scholars who came to seek his guidance. And who remembers today that Dewey was thoroughly at home in Kant’s, Kant's Critique and was a skilled Hegelian dialectician? “Breathing is an affair as much as it is an affair of the air”. Or “Walking is an affair of legs as much as it is an affair of the earth.” In these simple words, Dewy translated the speculative language of German Idealism and made philosophy an affair of living.
    [Show full text]
  • Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James Magrini College of Dupage, [email protected]
    College of DuPage [email protected]. Philosophy Scholarship Philosophy 7-1-2012 Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James Magrini College of DuPage, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub Part of the Education Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Magrini, James, "Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education" (2012). Philosophy Scholarship. Paper 30. http://dc.cod.edu/philosophypub/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy at [email protected].. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Scholarship by an authorized administrator of [email protected].. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Existentialism, Phenomenology, and Education James M. Magrini Existentialism, and specifically phenomenology, in qualitative educational research, tends to be misunderstood. There are many reasons for this, not the least of which is that scholars/researchers writing in the field often emulate and imitate the dense writing styles of philosophical forerunners in phenomenology such as Hegel, Brentano, Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Thus the writing is beyond the comprehension of many education professionals and practitioners. Existentialism and phenomenology need not be highly complex. Here I provide a summary of existentialism and phenomenology in accessible terms so that educators might see the potential this type of philosophy holds for enhancing our educational endeavors. 1. Existentialism is a modern philosophy emerging (existence-philosophy) from the 19th century, inspired by such thinkers as Kierkegaard and Nietzsche. Unlike traditional philosophy, which focuses on “objective” instances of truth, existentialism is concerned with the subjective, or personal, aspects of existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Descartes' Influence in Shaping the Modern World-View
    R ené Descartes (1596-1650) is generally regarded as the “father of modern philosophy.” He stands as one of the most important figures in Western intellectual history. His work in mathematics and his writings on science proved to be foundational for further development in these fields. Our understanding of “scientific method” can be traced back to the work of Francis Bacon and to Descartes’ Discourse on Method. His groundbreaking approach to philosophy in his Meditations on First Philosophy determine the course of subsequent philosophy. The very problems with which much of modern philosophy has been primarily concerned arise only as a consequence of Descartes’thought. Descartes’ philosophy must be understood in the context of his times. The Medieval world was in the process of disintegration. The authoritarianism that had dominated the Medieval period was called into question by the rise of the Protestant revolt and advances in the development of science. Martin Luther’s emphasis that salvation was a matter of “faith” and not “works” undermined papal authority in asserting that each individual has a channel to God. The Copernican revolution undermined the authority of the Catholic Church in directly contradicting the established church doctrine of a geocentric universe. The rise of the sciences directly challenged the Church and seemed to put science and religion in opposition. A mathematician and scientist as well as a devout Catholic, Descartes was concerned primarily with establishing certain foundations for science and philosophy, and yet also with bridging the gap between the “new science” and religion. Descartes’ Influence in Shaping the Modern World-View 1) Descartes’ disbelief in authoritarianism: Descartes’ belief that all individuals possess the “natural light of reason,” the belief that each individual has the capacity for the discovery of truth, undermined Roman Catholic authoritarianism.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Address
    Empowering Philosophy Christia Mercer COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY Presidential Address delivered at the one hundred sixteenth Eastern Division meeting of the American Philosophical Association in Philadelphia, PA, on January 10, 2020. The main goal of my presidential address in January 2020 was to show that philosophy’s past offers a means to empower its present. I hoped to encourage colleagues to make the philosophy we teach and practice more inclusive (both textually and topically) and to adopt a more public- facing engagement with our discipline. As I add these introductory remarks to my January lecture, it is June 2020 and the need to empower philosophy has never seemed more urgent. We’ve witnessed both the tragic death of George Floyd and the popular uprising of a diverse group of Americans in response to the ongoing violence against Black lives. Many white Americans—and many philosophers—have begun to realize that their inattentiveness to matters of diversity and inclusivity must now be seen as more than mere negligence. Recent demonstrations frequently contain signs that make the point succinctly: “Silence is violence.” A central claim of my January lecture was that philosophy’s status quo is no longer tenable. Even before the pandemic slashed university budgets and staff, our employers were cutting philosophy programs, enrollments were shrinking, and jobs were increasingly hard to find. Despite energetic attempts on the part of many of our colleagues to promote a more inclusive approach to our research and teaching, the depressing truth remains:
    [Show full text]
  • HURON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE Philosophy 2202G: Early Modern Philosophy 2017-2018
    HURON UNIVERSITY COLLEGE Philosophy 2202G: Early Modern Philosophy 2017-2018 Winter Term, 2018 Instructor: Dr. Steve Bland Prerequisites: none Office: A304 Tuesdays, 10:30-12:30pm, V207 Office hours: Thursdays, 12:30-2:30pm Thursdays, 11:30-12:30pm, V207 Email: [email protected] The Early Modern period (ca. 1600-1800) was one of the most fruitful and exciting eras in the history of philosophy and science. New methods of inquiry and theories of the universe and the mind marked a radical shift away from medieval philosophy and towards a novel philosophical landscape of ideas. This course will provide an introductory survey of the philosophical theories of some of the most well known and influential thinkers of the Early Modern age, including: Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. In reading and discussing some of the classic primary works of these philosophers, we will become engaged in the following topics: scepticism, the nature of reality and the mind, the existence of god, free will, and personal identity. More generally, this course will focus on the crucially important rationalism- empiricism debate, which concerned not only the source of knowledge, but the proper method of answering philosophical questions. In other words, we will canvass Early Modern philosophical theories in an effort to answer the question: how should philosophy be done? COURSE LEARNING OBJECTIVES On successful completion of this course, students will be able to: 1. Clearly formulate and explain the central philosophical theories discussed in this course. 2. Reformulate complex arguments found within primary sources. 3. Defend a plausible position on the question of the origins of philosophical knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • “Modern” Philosophy: Introduction
    “Modern” Philosophy: Introduction [from Debates in Modern Philosophy by Stewart Duncan and Antonia LoLordo (Routledge, 2013)] This course discusses the views of various European of his contemporaries (e.g. Thomas Hobbes) did see philosophers of the seventeenth century. Along with themselves as engaged in a new project in philosophy the thinkers of the eighteenth century, they are con- and the sciences, which somehow contained a new sidered “modern” philosophers. That might not seem way of explaining how the world worked. So, what terribly modern. René Descartes was writing in the was this new project? And what, if anything, did all 1630s and 1640s, and Immanuel Kant died in 1804. these modern philosophers have in common? By many standards, that was a long time ago. So, why is the work of Descartes, Kant, and their contempor- Two themes emerge when you read what Des- aries called modern philosophy? cartes and Hobbes say about their new philosophies. First, they think that earlier philosophers, particu- In one way this question has a trivial answer. larly so-called Scholastic Aristotelians—medieval “Modern” is being used here to describe a period of European philosophers who were influenced by time, and to contrast it with other periods of time. So, Aristotle—were mistaken about many issues, and modern philosophy is not the philosophy of today as that the new, modern way is better. (They say nicer contrasted with the philosophy of the 2020s or even things about Aristotle himself, and about some other the 1950s. Rather it’s the philosophy of the 1600s previous philosophers.) This view was shared by and onwards, as opposed to ancient and medieval many modern philosophers, but not all of them.
    [Show full text]
  • SPINOZA's ETHICS: FREEDOM and DETERMINISM by Alfredo Lucero
    SPINOZA’S ETHICS: FREEDOM AND DETERMINISM by Alfredo Lucero-Montaño 1. What remains alive of a philosopher's thought are the realities that concern him, the problems that he addresses, as well as the questions that he poses. The breath and depth of a philosopher's thought is what continues to excite and incite today. However, his answers are limited to his time and circumstances, and these are subject to the historical evolution of thought, yet his principal commitments are based on the problems and questions with which he is concerned. And this is what resounds of a philosopher's thought, which we can theoretically and practically adopt and adapt. Spinoza is immersed in a time of reforms, and he is a revolutionary and a reformer himself. The reforming trend in modern philosophy is expressed in an eminent way by Descartes' philosophy. Descartes, the great restorer of science and metaphysics, had left unfinished the task of a new foundation of ethics. Spinoza was thus faced with this enterprise. But he couldn't carry it out without the conviction of the importance of the ethical problems or that ethics is involved in a fundamental aspect of existence: the moral destiny of man. Spinoza's Ethics[1] is based on a theory of man or, more precisely, on an ontology of man. Ethics is, for him, ontology. He does not approach the problems of morality — the nature of good and evil, why and wherefore of human life — if it is not on the basis of a conception of man's being-in-itself, to wit, that the moral existence of man can only be explained by its own condition.
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE January, 2018 DANIEL GARBER
    CURRICULUM VITAE January, 2018 DANIEL GARBER Position: A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Philosophy Address: Department of Philosophy 1879 Hall Princeton University Princeton, NJ 08544-1006 Address (September 2017-July 2018) Institut d’études avancées 17, quai d’Anjou 75004 Paris France Telephone: 609-258-4307 (voice) 609-258-1502 (FAX) 609-258-4289 (Departmental office) Email: [email protected] Erdös number: 16 EDUCATIONAL RECORD Harvard University, 1967-1975 A.B. in Philosophy, 197l A.M. in Philosophy, 1974 Ph.D. in Philosophy, 1975 TEACHING EXPERIENCE Princeton University 2002- Professor of Philosophy and Associated Faculty, Program in the History of Science 2005-12 Chair, Department of Philosophy 2008-09 Old Dominion Professor 2009- Associated Faculty, Department of Politics 2009-16 Stuart Professor of Philosophy Garber -2- 2016- A. Watson Armour III University Professor of Philosophy University of Chicago 1995-2002 Lawrence Kimpton Distinguished Service Professor in Philosophy, the Committee on Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science, the Morris Fishbein Center for Study of History of Science and Medicine and the College 1986-2002 Professor 1982-86 Associate Professor (with tenure) 1975-82 Assistant Professor 1998-2002 Chairman, Committee on Conceptual and Historical Studies of Science (formerly Conceptual Foundations of Science) 2001 Acting Chairman, Department of Philosophy 1995-98 Associate Provost for Education and Research 1994-95 Chairman, Conceptual Foundations of Science 1987-94 Chairman, Department of Philosophy Harvard College 1972-75 Teaching Assistant and Tutor University of Minnesota, Spring 1979, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy Johns Hopkins University, 1980-1981, Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy Princeton University 1982-1983 Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, 1985-1986, Member École Normale Supérieure (Lettres) (Lyon, France), November 2000, Professeur invitée.
    [Show full text]
  • PHILOSOPHY 27 Early Modern Philosophy in This Course We Will
    PHILOSOPHY 27 Early Modern Philosophy Michael Epperson CSUS Office: Mendocino Hall # 3036 Fall 2010 Telephone: 278-4535 T & TH 10:30 – 11:45, Amador 152 Email: [email protected] Office Hours: By Appointment Description In this course we will examine the ways in which the scientific and political innovations of 16th, 17th, and 18th century Europe both influenced and were influenced by the rationalist and empiricist philosophical traditions that competed and flourished during this period. We will study the works of several philosophers working within these two traditions as they struggled to make sense of the scientific and social revolutions sweeping through their world; and we will see how their work would, in turn, help shape these revolutions, even as they continue to evolve today. One focus of the course, then, will be to examine the ways in which these philosophical traditions have maintained their relevance and influence in our own millennium as 21st century science struggles with its most difficult questions yet. Our survey will entail a careful reading and critique of the metaphysical and epistemological schemes developed by key philosophers of the early modern period, beginning with the work of Bacon, Galileo, and Descartes and concluding with Kant and his revolutionary synthesis of the rationalist and empiricist worldviews. The course website can be found at: www.csus.edu/cpns/epperson. Requirements Our work will primarily be lecture and discussion, so both careful attention to the readings and class participation will be crucial for a lively course. Please bring your text to class. There will be two examinations--one take-home mid-term paper and one in-class final--as well as several homework assignments and unannounced short answer quizzes on the readings.
    [Show full text]
  • 2202F: Early Modern Philosophy
    THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY Undergraduate Course Outline Philosophy 2202F: Early Modern Philosophy Fall 2019 Instructor: Prof. Corey W. Dyck MWF 12:30-1:30 StH 4138, Office Hours: MW 1:30-2:30 Classroom: SSC 2036 661-2111 x85749 [email protected] DESCRIPTION The early Modern period (roughly 1600-1800) was an intellectually rich and immensely influential chapter in the history of philosophy. In this course, we will survey some of its key figures and ideas, including Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume, with special attention to topics in metaphysics and epistemology. We will also consider a number of contributions by marginalized thinkers in the period. TEXT Modern Philosophy: An Anthology of Primary Sources Ariew and Watkins, eds. (3rd ed. Hackett Publishing) OBJECTIVES Students completing this course successfully will: (1) be familiar with some of the principal themes and arguments of the philosophers of the early Modern period, as well as a number of minor and marginalized figures; (2) have demonstrated an ability to comprehend and reflect upon complex philosophical arguments; (3) be able to write a longer argumentative essay exhibiting writing, researching, and critical skills. REQUIREMENTS Assignment Due Date Value Study Question Responses in-class on Fridays 15% Mid-Term TBD 20% Term Paper (Multi-stage assignment) 25% Final Exam TBD 40% Study Question Responses Most weeks, you will be provided with 4-5 study questions designed to focus your attention to key points in the reading and lectures. During the last class of the week, you will provide a brief written response to one of the questions (of my choosing).
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Philosophy
    An Introduction to Philosophy W. Russ Payne Bellevue College Copyright (cc by nc 4.0) 2015 W. Russ Payne Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document with attribution under the terms of Creative Commons: Attribution Noncommercial 4.0 International or any later version of this license. A copy of the license is found at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ 1 Contents Introduction ………………………………………………. 3 Chapter 1: What Philosophy Is ………………………….. 5 Chapter 2: How to do Philosophy ………………….……. 11 Chapter 3: Ancient Philosophy ………………….………. 23 Chapter 4: Rationalism ………….………………….……. 38 Chapter 5: Empiricism …………………………………… 50 Chapter 6: Philosophy of Science ………………….…..… 58 Chapter 7: Philosophy of Mind …………………….……. 72 Chapter 8: Love and Happiness …………………….……. 79 Chapter 9: Meta Ethics …………………………………… 94 Chapter 10: Right Action ……………………...…………. 108 Chapter 11: Social Justice …………………………...…… 120 2 Introduction The goal of this text is to present philosophy to newcomers as a living discipline with historical roots. While a few early chapters are historically organized, my goal in the historical chapters is to trace a developmental progression of thought that introduces basic philosophical methods and frames issues that remain relevant today. Later chapters are topically organized. These include philosophy of science and philosophy of mind, areas where philosophy has shown dramatic recent progress. This text concludes with four chapters on ethics, broadly construed. I cover traditional theories of right action in the third of these. Students are first invited first to think about what is good for themselves and their relationships in a chapter of love and happiness. Next a few meta-ethical issues are considered; namely, whether they are moral truths and if so what makes them so.
    [Show full text]