DOCSLIB.ORG

Production Process in the Nba: a Formula for a Successful Team

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Production Process in the Nba: a Formula for a Successful Team PRODUCTION PROCESS IN THE NBA: A FORMULA FOR A SUCCESSFUL TEAM A THESIS Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Economics and Business The Colorado College In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Bachelor of Arts By Jigmei Dorji May 2016 PRODUCTION PROCESS IN THE NBA: A FORMULA FOR A SUCCESSFUL TEAM Jigmei Dorji May 2016 Economics Abstract Achieving success in the National Basketball Association is not only a priceless and historic feat, but teams that have success in the playoffs and regular season also benefit from financial bonuses. This paper estimates a production function for professional basketball teams, and uses the results to determine significant areas of focus that are positively and negatively associated with regular season win percentage. A Cobb- Douglas production function and multi-variable Ordinary Least Squares regression models are applied to data collected from the 2010-11 through 2014-15 seasons in the National Basketball Association. The results are also applied to successful teams in the playoffs in order to determine how regular season results translate to the playoffs. The resulting estimates indicate that successful NBA teams over the last five seasons have focused on shooting efficiently, keeping opponent shooting percentages low, rebounding, forcing turnovers at a high rate, and building their teams through the draft. KEYWORDS: Correlation, Econometrics, Multicollinearity, Multiple Variable Model, Ordinary Least Squares, Regression, Cobb Douglas, Production Function, Production Measurement, Sports JEL CODES: C1, C3, D24, L83 ON MY HONOR, I HAVE NEITHER GIVEN NOR RECEIVED UNAUTHORIZED AID ON THIS THESIS Jigmei Dorji Signature TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION……………………………………...…………………………………1 Financial Incentive………………………………………………………………...2 Area of Focus………………...……………………………………………………2 LITERATURE REVIEW………………………………………………………………....3 Cobb-Douglas Production Functions……………………………………………...6 Basketball Analytics………………………………………………………………7 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK………………………………………………………...9 Graph 1: Output and Marginal Product of Input X………………………………10 DATA AND METHODOLOGY………………………………………………………...12 Recent Trends in Basketball Statistics…………………………………………...18 Methodology……………………………………………………………………..19 REGRESSION RESULTS AND ANALYSIS…………………………………………..20 Table 1: Net Rating Regression Results…………………………………………20 Graph 2: Net Rating vs. Winning Percentage……………………………………21 Table 2: Play Style Regression Results………………………………………….22 Table 2.1: Offensive Rating Regression Results………………………………...24 Table 2.1a: Field Goal Percentage vs. Assists…………………………………...28 Table 2.2: Defensive Rating Regression Results………………………………...29 Table 3: Fixed Team Effects Regression Results………………………………..30 Table 3.1: Summarization of Win Percentage by Conference…………………...31 Table 4: Play Style and Fixed Team Effects Regression Results………………..33 Table 4.1: Play Style and Fixed Team Effects Beta Coefficients………………..35 Table 4.2: Summarization of Inputs and Output…………………………………37 Table 4.3: Play Style and Fixed Team Effects VIFs……………………………..39 CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………..40 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………..45 Introduction Every year from October to June for 82 games (with more successful teams playing close to 100 including the playoffs), 30 teams fight for supremacy in the National Basketball Association (NBA). But, only one team can call themselves the champions of the league at the end of the season. Over the last five seasons, four different franchises have claimed the Larry O’Brien trophy – the Dallas Mavericks, the Miami Heat (twice), the San Antonio Spurs, and most recently, the Golden State Warriors. The current decade has been a relatively balanced few years when compared to historical trends. The NBA has only had ten different teams win a title since 1975, indicating that the league has been enjoying a spell of competitive balance in the last five seasons. Led by eventual Most Valuable Player (MVP) Stephen Curry, the 2014-15 Warriors were able to jump out to an early lead in the standings despite playing in an incredibly competitive Western Conference. Golden State finished the season with a league-leading record of 67 wins and 15 losses and defeated the Cleveland Cavaliers in the NBA Finals for their first championship since 1975. Although the supremacy that Golden State exhibited during the 2015 season is now indisputable, did the Warriors exhibit distinct types of advantages that allowed them to dominate over the rest of the NBA? What types of effects did the style of play have on the winning percentage of the team? How did the personnel affect the record of the team? Did the fixed effects that the franchise has implemented off the court have an impact on the record on the floor? 1 Financial Incentive Winning a championship is the unmistakable goal of any NBA franchise and the players involved. Not only is claiming the Larry O’Brien trophy and hanging up the title banner priceless and intangibly significant, but teams that have success in the playoffs benefit from monetary bonuses as well. After winning the 2014 title, the San Antonio Spurs were awarded over $2 million in bonuses from the NBA, not including the trophy and championship rings, while the runner-up Miami Heat were also awarded $1.5 million. The valuations of franchises also increase significantly after winning the championship. According to Forbes, recent NBA champions have gained an average of 30% in team value after raising the trophy. Teams also raise ticket prices significantly during their Finals run. In 2015, the average Finals ticket prices in Golden State ran over $1,200 while the average ticket prices in Cleveland were over $1,300. Compared to the regular season, when the Warriors charged an average ticket price of $327 and the Cavs charged an average price of $258, merely playing in the Finals has provided a tangible financial benefit. In addition, teams that make the playoffs are awarded nearly $200,000 as a bonus, while teams that reach the conference finals are awarded over $380,000. The team that finishes the regular season with the best record in the NBA and in each conference is also awarded well over $300,000 as a bonus. Area of Focus The length of this study focuses on the past five seasons in the NBA. In particular, I plan to observe the characteristics of teams since the 2010-2011 season and determine the inputs that have been significant in affecting regular season success in the past five 2 years of NBA basketball. Due to the makeup of the last four title-winning teams, I expect that accurate three-point shooting and assisted field goals, as well as defending three- pointers are indicators of successful team basketball in the NBA. These team characteristics are related to the style of play that teams consciously employ, but are also a result of the type of players that each team has available. As far as fixed team effects, I expect that teams that build through the draft and free agency will have positive relationships with winning percentage. I plan to use an extensive list of independent variables in the model, including variables measuring the output of the team, statistics measuring the style of play the team utilizes (such as percentage of total shots from three-point range), and additional variables measuring fixed team effects (such as average attendance and the conference of the team). After running several regressions and determining significant variables through the model, the models should be able to describe successful teams from the past five years through style of play as well as the areas of focus that the team exhibits through their statistics. After determining the significant inputs in the model, the results should also be able to predict characteristics of successful teams in the future. Literature Review The article “Who is ‘Most Valuable’? Measuring the Player’s Production of Wins in the National Basketball Association” by David Berri of Managerial and Decision Economics (Berri, 1999) focused on linking individual performance to team wins in the NBA. Berri found that although having the MVP certainly helps to produce wins, having multiple efficient and productive teammates – particularly in the Playoffs – was the key 3 factor in the 1997-1998 season. The model that Berri used to determine each player’s production of wins was: Production of wins = (PM + TF + TDF – PA + TA) * total mins (2.1) Berri first calculated each of the inputs individually, and then combined the factors into the equation above. His inputs were per-minute player production (PM), per-minute team tempo factor (TF), per-minute team defensive factor (TDF), average per-minute production at position (PA), and average player’s per-minute production (TA). The results that the model produced indicated that one dominant player per team is not enough to have success against Playoff competition. Fiona Carmichael, Dennis Thomas, and Robert Ward’s article “Team Performance: The Case of English Premiership Football” (Carmichael, Thomas, & Ward, 2000) utilized a linear production function where the individual match results were determined by various input variables. However, a slight variation in inputs that the authors used compared to the other cases used as background knowledge in this study was the difference in the types of independent variables. Team performance is still the variable utilized as output in this scenario, but statistics such as difference in shots on target, difference in percentage of all successful passes, difference
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Custom to Code. a Sociological Interpretation of the Making of Association Football
    From Custom to Code From Custom to Code A Sociological Interpretation of the Making of Association Football Dominik Döllinger Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Humanistiska teatern, Engelska parken, Uppsala, Tuesday, 7 September 2021 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Associate Professor Patrick McGovern (London School of Economics). Abstract Döllinger, D. 2021. From Custom to Code. A Sociological Interpretation of the Making of Association Football. 167 pp. Uppsala: Department of Sociology, Uppsala University. ISBN 978-91-506-2879-1. The present study is a sociological interpretation of the emergence of modern football between 1733 and 1864. It focuses on the decades leading up to the foundation of the Football Association in 1863 and observes how folk football gradually develops into a new form which expresses itself in written codes, clubs and associations. In order to uncover this transformation, I have collected and analyzed local and national newspaper reports about football playing which had been published between 1733 and 1864. I find that folk football customs, despite their great local variety, deserve a more thorough sociological interpretation, as they were highly emotional acts of collective self-affirmation and protest. At the same time, the data shows that folk and early association football were indeed distinct insofar as the latter explicitly opposed the evocation of passions, antagonistic tensions and collective effervescence which had been at the heart of the folk version. Keywords: historical sociology, football, custom, culture, community Dominik Döllinger, Department of Sociology, Box 624, Uppsala University, SE-75126 Uppsala, Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer
    applied sciences Article Offensive and Defensive Plus–Minus Player Ratings for Soccer Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, 6410 Molde, Norway; [email protected] Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 16 October 2020; Published: 20 October 2020 Abstract: Rating systems play an important part in professional sports, for example, as a source of entertainment for fans, by influencing decisions regarding tournament seedings, by acting as qualification criteria, or as decision support for bookmakers and gamblers. Creating good ratings at a team level is challenging, but even more so is the task of creating ratings for individual players of a team. This paper considers a plus–minus rating for individual players in soccer, where a mathematical model is used to distribute credit for the performance of a team as a whole onto the individual players appearing for the team. The main aim of the work is to examine whether the individual ratings obtained can be split into offensive and defensive contributions, thereby addressing the lack of defensive metrics for soccer players. As a result, insights are gained into how elements such as the effect of player age, the effect of player dismissals, and the home field advantage can be broken down into offensive and defensive consequences. Keywords: association football; linear regression; regularization; ranking 1. Introduction Soccer has become a large global business, and significant amounts of capital are at stake when the competitions at the highest level are played. While soccer is a team sport, the attention of media and fans is often directed towards individual players. An understanding of the game therefore also involves an ability to dissect the contributions of individual players to the team as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference-Based Analysis of the Impact of Observed Game Parameters on the Final Score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019
    Original Article Difference-based analysis of the impact of observed game parameters on the final score at the FIBA Eurobasket Women 2019 SLOBODAN SIMOVIĆ1 , JASMIN KOMIĆ2, BOJAN GUZINA1, ZORAN PAJIĆ3, TAMARA KARALIĆ1, GORAN PAŠIĆ1 1Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 2Faculty of Economy, University of Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina 3Faculty of Physical Education and Sport, University of Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT Evaluation in women's basketball is keeping up with developments in evaluation in men’s basketball, and although the number of studies in women's basketball has seen a positive trend in the past decade, it is still at a low level. This paper observed 38 games and sixteen variables of standard efficiency during the FIBA EuroBasket Women 2019. Two regression models were obtained, a set of relative percentage and relative rating variables, which are used in the NBA league, where the dependent variable was the number of points scored. The obtained results show that in the first model, the difference between winning and losing teams was made by three variables: true shooting percentage, turnover percentage of inefficiency and efficiency percentage of defensive rebounds, which explain 97.3%, while for the second model, the distinguishing variables was offensive efficiency, explaining for 96.1% of the observed phenomenon. There is a continuity of the obtained results with the previous championship, played in 2017. Of all the technical elements of basketball, it is still the shots made, assists and defensive rebounds that have the most significant impact on the final score in European women’s basketball.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Computer Science in Sport a Comprehensive
    International Journal of Computer Science in Sport Volume 18, Issue 1, 2019 Journal homepage: http://iacss.org/index.php?id=30 DOI: 10.2478/ijcss-2019-0001 A comprehensive review of plus-minus ratings for evaluating individual players in team sports Lars Magnus Hvattum Faculty of Logistics, Molde University College, Molde, Norway Abstract The increasing availability of data from sports events has led to many new directions of research, and sports analytics can play a role in making better decisions both within a club and at the level of an individual player. The ability to objectively evaluate individual players in team sports is one aspect that may enable better decision making, but such evaluations are not straightforward to obtain. One class of ratings for individual players in team sports, known as plus-minus ratings, attempt to distribute credit for the performance of a team onto the players of that team. Such ratings have a long history, going back at least to the 1950s, but in recent years research on advanced versions of plus-minus ratings has increased noticeably. This paper presents a comprehensive review of contributions to plus- minus ratings in later years, pointing out some key developments and showing the richness of the mathematical models developed. One conclusion is that the literature on plus-minus ratings is quite fragmented, but that awareness of past contributions to the field should allow researchers to focus on some of the many open research questions related to the evaluation of individual players in team sports. KEYWORDS: RATING SYSTEM, RANKING, REGRESSION, REGULARIZATION IJCSS – Volume 18/2019/Issue 1 www.iacss.org Introduction Rating systems, both official and unofficial ones, exist for many different sports.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding
    Trunzo Scholz 1 Dan Trunzo and Libby Scholz MCS 100 June 4, 2016 Our Shining Moment: Hierarchical Clustering to Determine NCAA Tournament Seeding This project tries to correctly predict the NCAA Tournament Selection Committee’s bracket arrangement. We look both to correctly predict the 36 at large teams included in the tournament, and to seed teams in a similar way to the selection committee. The NCAA Tournament Selection Committee currently operates in secrecy, and the selection process is not transparent, either for teams or fans. If we successfully replicate the committee’s selections, our variable choices shed light on the “black box” of selection. As basketball fans ourselves, we hope to better understand which teams are in, which are out, and why Existing Selection Process 32 teams automatically qualify for the March NCAA tournament by winning their conference championship tournament. The other 36 “at large” teams are selected by the ten person committee through multiple voting rounds, where a team needs progressively fewer votes from the committee to make the tournament. Once the teams are selected, a similar process follows for seeding, where the selection committee ranks the best eight teams remaining, then the best six, and then the best four as more teams are placed in the bracket. Once all 68 teams are ranked, they are then placed in a bracket. At this point, the actual rank order may be violated to avoid “teams from the ​ ​ same conference… meet[ing] prior to the regional final if they played each other three or more times during the regular season and conference tournament,” or prior to the semifinals if they played at least twice.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening a New Door: Constructing the Value of Winning Index For
    International Journal of Business in Sports, Tourism & Hospitality Management https://www.gaics.org/Journal/JBSM @2021 Global Academic Industrial Society Opening a New Door: Constructing the Value of Winning Index for the National Basketball Associa- tion Armand Araque1, Bryce Davis1, James Du2, Brett Crown2, Yessica Corona1, Tyler Doll1 1College of Business, Florida State University, USA 2The Department of Sport Management, Florida State University, USA Abstract Competitive culture represents one of the most prominent contributors to the success of sport or- ganizations that value meritocracy and winning at all costs. In the case of the National Basketball As- sociation (NBA), stakeholders, including the league, teams, players, and fans, all play essential roles in creating team franchise values. The purpose of this study is to explore the extent to which winning con- tributes to the economic value of NBA franchises while controlling for market heterogeneity, star player influence, and unobservable factors such as year fixed effects. By leveraging publicly available panel data consisting of the NBA seasons from 2011-2012 to 2018-2019, the paper develops a value of win- ning (VOW) index based on NBA team performance. Based on the results of econometric panel analy- sis, winning has a significant, positive effect on a team’s franchise value. The findings indicated that every percentage increase in an NBA team’s winning percentage on average leads to approximately $196 million of an increase in team franchise values. Further, we find that the added value of winning varies on a team’s market size where counterintuitively the relation is more pronounced in smaller markets.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Ownerships in European Football: the Example of the Suning Holdings Group
    1 Department of Business and Management Chair of Corporate Strategies Chinese ownerships in European football: the example of the Suning Holdings Group SUPERVISOR CANDIDATE Prof. Paolo Boccardelli Davide Fabrizio Matr. 668151 CORRELATOR Prof. Enzo Peruffo ACADEMIC YEAR 2018/2019 2 3 Index Introduction ....................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1: Chinese Ownerships in Football ................................................... 10 1.1 The economic and legal background: revenues diversification and Financial Fair Play ......................................................................................... 11 1.1.1 A mountain to climb: profits drivers in football............................. 11 1.1.2 UEFA and Financial Fair Play: the end of football patronage? ...... 16 1.2 A new Silk Road: brief history of the phenomenon .............................. 21 1.2.1 The internal expansion: State Council’s guidelines and the development of Chinese football ..................................................................................... 21 1.2.2 The external expansion: some very good (and a few, very bad) examples .................................................................................................... 29 1.2.2.1 A.C. Pavia and A.C. Milan.............................................................. 40 1.3 Strategies change: Chinese capital control policies and their aftermaths on football .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association
    Measuring Production and Predicting Outcomes in the National Basketball Association Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael Steven Milano, M.S. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Packianathan Chelladurai, Advisor Brian Turner Sarah Fields Stephen Cosslett Copyright by Michael Steven Milano 2011 Abstract Building on the research of Loeffelholz, Bednar and Bauer (2009), the current study analyzed the relationship between previously compiled team performance measures and the outcome of an “un-played” game. While past studies have relied solely on statistics traditionally found in a box score, this study included scheduling fatigue and team depth. Multiple models were constructed in which the performance statistics of the competing teams were operationalized in different ways. Absolute models consisted of performance measures as unmodified traditional box score statistics. Relative models defined performance measures as a series of ratios, which compared a team‟s statistics to its opponents‟ statistics. Possession models included possessions as an indicator of pace, and offensive rating and defensive rating as composite measures of efficiency. Play models were composed of offensive plays and defensive plays as measures of pace, and offensive points-per-play and defensive points-per-play as indicators of efficiency. Under each of the above general models, additional models were created to include streak variables, which averaged performance measures only over the previous five games, as well as logarithmic variables. Game outcomes were operationalized and analyzed in two distinct manners - score differential and game winner.
    [Show full text]
  • Kahlil Gibran a Tear and a Smile (1950)
    “perplexity is the beginning of knowledge…” Kahlil Gibran A Tear and A Smile (1950) STYLIN’! SAMBA JOY VERSUS STRUCTURAL PRECISION THE SOCCER CASE STUDIES OF BRAZIL AND GERMANY Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Susan P. Milby, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2006 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Melvin Adelman, Adviser Professor William J. Morgan Professor Sarah Fields _______________________________ Adviser College of Education Graduate Program Copyright by Susan P. Milby 2006 ABSTRACT Soccer playing style has not been addressed in detail in the academic literature, as playing style has often been dismissed as the aesthetic element of the game. Brief mention of playing style is considered when discussing national identity and gender. Through a literature research methodology and detailed study of game situations, this dissertation addresses a definitive definition of playing style and details the cultural elements that influence it. A case study analysis of German and Brazilian soccer exemplifies how cultural elements shape, influence, and intersect with playing style. Eight signature elements of playing style are determined: tactics, technique, body image, concept of soccer, values, tradition, ecological and a miscellaneous category. Each of these elements is then extrapolated for Germany and Brazil, setting up a comparative binary. Literature analysis further reinforces this contrasting comparison. Both history of the country and the sport history of the country are necessary determinants when considering style, as style must be historically situated when being discussed in order to avoid stereotypification. Historic time lines of significant German and Brazilian style changes are determined and interpretated.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Shot Locations and Shot Types Used in NCAA Men's Division I Basketball"
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons All NMU Master's Theses Student Works 8-2019 SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL Olivia D. Perrin Northern Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/theses Part of the Programming Languages and Compilers Commons, Sports Sciences Commons, and the Statistical Models Commons Recommended Citation Perrin, Olivia D., "SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL" (2019). All NMU Master's Theses. 594. https://commons.nmu.edu/theses/594 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All NMU Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL By Olivia D. Perrin THESIS Submitted to Northern Michigan University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Office of Graduate Education and Research August 2019 SIGNATURE APPROVAL FORM SUCCESSFUL SHOT LOCATIONS AND SHOT TYPES USED IN NCAA MEN’S DIVISION I BASKETBALL This thesis by Olivia D. Perrin is recommended for approval by the student’s Thesis Committee and Associate Dean and Director of the School of Health & Human Performance and by the Dean of Graduate Education and Research. __________________________________________________________ Committee Chair: Randall L. Jensen Date __________________________________________________________ First Reader: Mitchell L. Stephenson Date __________________________________________________________ Second Reader: Randy R.
    [Show full text]
  • 2K Sports Crowns Kevin Durant, Blake Griffin and Derrick Rose As Cover Athletes for NBA® 2K13
    2K Sports Crowns Kevin Durant, Blake Griffin and Derrick Rose as Cover Athletes for NBA® 2K13 June 26, 2012 7:30 AM ET Trio of young superstars represents the "New Dynasty" of NBA legends NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jun. 26, 2012-- 2K Sports today announced that the Oklahoma City Thunder's Kevin Durant, Los Angeles Clippers' Blake Griffin and the Chicago Bulls' Derrick Rose have been crowned the cover athletes for NBA® 2K13, the next installment of the top-selling and top-rated NBA video game simulation franchise*. "Being crowned as one of the NBA 2K13 cover athletes is a huge honor and something I always dreamt about," said Durant, who won his third straight scoring title and led the Thunder franchise to their first NBA Finals appearance since 1996. "It's definitely humbling to grace the cover after the likes of Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson and Larry Bird." "There's so much young talent around the NBA, so it's very exciting to be chosen for NBA 2K's 'New Dynasty' alongside Kevin and Derrick," added Griffin, who helped lead the Clippers to their first postseason since 2006. "The NBA 2K series has always been my first choice when I want to get a game in." "It's a dream come true to be one of the cover athletes for NBA 2K13," commented Rose, the 2010-11 NBA Most Valuable Player, who led the Bulls to a league-best 50-16 record this season. "I've worked closely with 2K Sports since NBA 2K10, and I'm honored to follow in the footsteps of Michael Jordan as the latest Chicago Bull to be featured on the cover." In their young but impressive careers, Rose, Durant and Griffin have each taken the NBA by storm.
    [Show full text]
  • Trojans Try for a 'Three-Peat'
    TRAVERSE CITY RECORD-EAGLE Kickoff 2005 27 Conference shuffle glance The conference shake-up that start- ed last season continues in 2005. Here are the conferences that’ll have a new look: AP Photo Southern Cal coach Pete ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE Boston College’s arrival makes 12 Carroll and quarterback teams in the ACC with two divisions: Matt Leinart embrace after Atlantic their 55-19 win over Boston College Oklahoma in the Orange Clemson Florida State Bowl at Pro Player Stadium Maryland in Miami, Jan. 4, 2005. North Carolina State Wake Forest Change is in store for Coastal college football in 2005, Duke Georgia Tech from an abundance of new Miami head coaches to instant North Carolina Virginia replay in eight conferences. Virginia Tech But there's one striking BIG EAST constant: Southern Boston College and Temple are out. California starts at the Cincinnati, Louisville and South Florida are in via Conference USA. head of the class. They join Connecticut, Pittsburgh, Rutgers, Syracuse and West Virginia. 2005 COLLEGE FOOTBALL PREVIEW MID-AMERICAN CONFERENCE Marshall and Central Florida exited, leaving the MAC with 12 teams. East Trojans try for a ‘three-peat’ Akron Bowling Green Buffalo Kent State ball now,” said Miami coach draft. tailback Adrian Peterson, the Miami (Ohio) Leinart tries for a Larry Coker, who was part of a But who needs a job when Heisman runner-up as a fresh- Ohio Hurricanes program that won you’re having this much fun? man in 2004, is a nice way to West Ball State Heisman repeat 34 straight from 2000-2003, but Now Leinart has a chance to start.
    [Show full text]