Archives of Suicide Research, 20:1–21, 2016 Copyright # International Academy for Suicide Research ISSN: 1381-1118 print=1543-6136 online DOI: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1004494
Religion and Suicide Risk: A Systematic Review
Ryan E. Lawrence, Maria A. Oquendo, and Barbara Stanley
Although religion is reported to be protective against suicide, the empirical evidence is incon- sistent. Research is complicated by the fact that there are many dimensions to religion (affiliation, participation, doctrine) and suicide (ideation, attempt, completion). We system- atically reviewed the literature on religion and suicide over the last 10 years (89 articles) with a goal of identifying what specific dimensions of religion are associated with specific aspects of suicide. We found that religious affiliation does not necessarily protect against suicidal ideation, but does protect against suicide attempts. Whether religious affiliation protects against suicide attempts may depend on the culture-specific implications of affiliat- ing with a particular religion, since minority religious groups can feel socially isolated. After adjusting for social support measures, religious service attendance is not especially protective against suicidal ideation, but does protect against suicide attempts, and possibly protects against suicide. Future qualitative studies might further clarify these associations.
Keywords religion, spirituality, suicide, suicidal ideation, suicide attempt
INTRODUCTION We conducted a systematic review of the literature with the goal of identifying Although religion is reported to be protec- what specific dimensions of religiosity are tive against suicide, (Koenig, 2009; Perlman, associated with specific aspects of suicide. Neufeld et al., 2011; Suicide Prevention We hypothesized that religious affiliation Resource Center, 2003), the empirical evi- and frequent attendance at religious services dence is inconsistent, with some studies would protect against suicide attempts, but reporting it to be protective (Dervic et al., not suicidal ideation, reflective of clinical 2004), others finding it a risk factor (Zhao experience wherein persons say, ‘‘I think et al., 2012), and still others reporting it about suicide, but would never do it unrelated to suicide risk (Le, Nguyen, Tran, because of my religion.’’ A second goal & Fisher, 2012). The relationship between was to identify whether religion is ever religion and suicide is complicated because associated with increased suicide risk, for both religion and suicide are complex con- instance if a person feels rejected by God structs. Religion has many dimensions or by the community. (affiliation, participation, doctrine) as does suicide (ideation, attempt, completion). METHOD
In October 2013 we searched Pubmed (all Supplemental data for this article can be accessed on fields) using the terms ‘‘suicide AND religi- the www.tandfonline.com/usui. on’’ (n ¼ 387 articles), ‘‘deliberate self-harm
1 Religion and Suicide Risk
AND religion’’ (n ¼ 1 article with original they have been operationalized in a variety data and two review articles), ‘‘suicide of ways, ranging from single-item measures AND spirituality’’ (n ¼ 15 additional (e.g., religious affiliation: yes=no (Dervic articles), and ‘‘deliberate self-harm AND et al., 2004)) to more complex scales (e.g., spirituality’’ (n ¼ 0 articles). Results were 20-item Spiritual Wellbeing Scale (Ellison, limited to English language articles pub- 1983)). For the purposes of this review, lished within the last 10 years. we included any characteristic that was We focused on articles that measured described in the article as religious or spiri- suicidal ideation (seriously thinking about tual. One article was excluded because the attempting suicide), suicide attempt (non-fatal religious variable was ‘‘being possessed by self-harm accompanied by any intent to die), spirits,’’ and three articles were excluded and suicide (intentional self-harm resulting in because they utilized religious characteris- death). No article was excluded owing to tics of large populations, rather than differences in terminology. individuals. Religion and spirituality are concepts The final review included 89 articles. A that elude strict definition. Nevertheless, total of 316 articles were excluded for
TABLE 1. The table Lists Articles Excluded from the Current Literature Review on Religion and Suicide. Pubmed was Searched (October 2013). Search Terms were: Suicide AND Religion, Deliberate Self-Harm AND Religion, Suicide AND Spirituality, Deliberate Self-harm AND Spirituality. The Search was Limited to Articles Published Within the Last 10 years, and Written in English. A Total of 405 Articles were Retrieved, 89 Articles were Reviewed, 316 Articles were Excluded for Reasons Described here
No original Different Analytic Other data (136) topic (100) limitations (77) exclusions (3)
Review article Assisted suicide= No religion variable (18) Article not in (68) Euthanasia (70) English (1) Essay (52) Suicide terrorism (15) Religion variable was ‘‘spirit possession’’ (1) Incorrect citation (1) Commentary Beliefs about suicide in Did not measure suicidal ideation, attempt or Outside 10-year (14) general (9) suicide (18) frame (1) Annotated Beliefs about people Case report or series (16) bibliography who self-harm (1) (1) Not a formal Rational suicide (2) Did not compare suicide risk across religion (12) study (1) or spirituality (5) variables Coping after a suicide Did not report results from comparing suicide (2) risk by religion (1) Talking with patients No statistical test for significance (1) about suicide (1) Did not use individual-level religion data (4) Religion=spirituality variables were not sufficiently described for evaluation (1)