DOCSLIB.ORG

Voter Registration Statistics for the 2020 Primary Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voter Registration Statistics for the 2020 Primary Election MONTGOMERY COUNTY VOTER REGISTRATION STATISTIC BOOK 2020 PRIMARY ELECTION COUNTYWIDE 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Wednesday, May 27, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY ADARIAN 10 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 12 AMERICAN EAGLE 2 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 5 American Solidarity Party 4 ANARCHIST 1 ANTI OBAMA 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 ASIAN 1 ATHEIST 1 BI-PARTISAN 4 BIRTHDAY 3 BLANK 609 both 1 BULL MOOSE 2 CAPITALIST 1 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 2 CENTRIST 2 CHRISTIAN 5 COMMUNIST 7 CONSERVATIVE 36 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 2 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 19 CONSTITUTIONAL 66 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 CONSUMER 3 DECLINE TO STATE 4 DEMOCRATIC 286292 Democratic Republican 1 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 6 Ethan's Party 1 FEDERALIST 1 FREE 1 FREEDOM 2 GARY JOHNSON 1 GO STEELERS 1 GOOD NEIGHBOR 2 GREEN 624 GREEN PARTY 14 1 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY GREEN PARTY OF THE US 3 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HALLOWEEN 3 HILLARY 1 HUMANE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 I DON'T KNOW 2 IDK 1 I'M IN THE MIDDLE 1 IND. 4 INDEPENDANT 140 INDEPENDENCE 10 INDEPENDENT 6869 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 2 PA INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE 1 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 10 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 9 INDEPENDENT-COMPLETION 1 INDEPENT 5 INDIVIDUAL 1 JACOBIN 1 JEDI 2 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 47 LIBERTARIAN 2789 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 4 Libertarian Socialist 1 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MARIJUANA 1 MODERATE 19 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 MUSLIM 1 My Party 1 N/A 35 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 2 NEUTRAL 8 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO 1 NO AFFILIATION 51274 NO PARTY 560 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NON DENOMINATIONAL 1 Non Party 3 NONE 2742 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 18564 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 27 OBAMA 1 2 County ID County Political Party Count of Voters by Party CO46 MONTGOMERY COUNTY OPEN 5 OTHER 2198 OTHER POLITICAL VIEWS 1 PATRIOT 19 PENNSYLVANIA 1 PIRATE 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 1 PIZZA PARTY 1 PROGRESSIVE 4 REAGANITE 1 REFORM 15 REPUBLICAN 201102 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 12 TEA PARTY 2 THE SURPRISE PARTY 1 TOGA 1 TRANSHUMANIST PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 36 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 48 UNDECLARED 4 UNDETERMINED 1 UNITED AMERICA 1 UNKNOWN 28 WHIG 1 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 YOUNG OUTSIDER 1 Count of Voters in CO46: 574403 Total Voters on Report: 574403 3 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Wednesday, May 27, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC01 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 1 AMERICAN 2 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 ANARCHIST 1 ATHEIST 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BLANK 65 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 2 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 13 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 25101 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 3 FREE 1 GREEN 69 GREEN PARTY 2 INDEPENDANT 11 INDEPENDENT 700 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 2 LIBERAL 8 LIBERTARIAN 294 MODERATE 4 N/A 2 NEUTRAL 2 NO 1 NO AFFILIATION 5468 NO PARTY 74 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NONE 348 NON-PARTISAN 2058 NOT SURE 6 OPEN 2 OTHER 254 PATRIOT 3 PIRATE 1 PROGRESSIVE 2 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 21003 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 1 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC01 1ST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT UNAFFILIATED 4 UNDECIDED 4 UNDECLARED 1 UNKNOWN 3 Count of Voters in USC01: 55529 USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 9 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 10 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 5 American Solidarity Party 4 ANTI OBAMA 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 ASIAN 1 BI-PARTISAN 3 BIRTHDAY 3 BLANK 500 both 1 BULL MOOSE 2 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 2 CENTRIST 2 CHRISTIAN 4 COMMUNIST 6 CONSERVATIVE 33 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 CONSTITUTION 16 CONSTITUTIONAL 52 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 CONSUMER 3 DECLINE TO STATE 3 DEMOCRATIC 244252 Democratic Republican 1 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 3 FEDERALIST 1 FREEDOM 2 GARY JOHNSON 1 GO STEELERS 1 GOOD NEIGHBOR 2 GREEN 529 GREEN PARTY 9 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 2 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HALLOWEEN 3 HILLARY 1 HUMANE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 I DON'T KNOW 2 2 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT IDK 1 I'M IN THE MIDDLE 1 IND. 4 INDEPENDANT 122 INDEPENDENCE 10 INDEPENDENT 5891 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 2 PA INDEPENDENT CONSERVATIVE 1 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 9 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 7 INDEPENDENT-COMPLETION 1 INDEPENT 5 INDIVIDUAL 1 JACOBIN 1 JEDI 2 LIBERAL 37 LIBERTARIAN 2417 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 4 Libertarian Socialist 1 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MARIJUANA 1 MODERATE 15 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 MUSLIM 1 My Party 1 N/A 33 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 2 NEUTRAL 6 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO AFFILIATION 43372 NO PARTY 468 NON DENOMINATIONAL 1 Non Party 3 NONE 2189 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 15887 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 21 OBAMA 1 OPEN 3 OTHER 1889 OTHER POLITICAL VIEWS 1 PATRIOT 14 PENNSYLVANIA 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 1 PROGRESSIVE 2 REAGANITE 1 REFORM 14 REPUBLICAN 174676 3 U.S. Congress ID U.S. Congress Political Party Count of Voters by Party USC04 4TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 12 TEA PARTY 2 THE SURPRISE PARTY 1 TRANSHUMANIST PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 30 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 43 UNDECLARED 3 UNDETERMINED 1 UNITED AMERICA 1 UNKNOWN 24 WHIG 1 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 YOUNG OUTSIDER 1 Count of Voters in USC04: 492727 USC05 5TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT BLANK 44 CAPITALIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DEMOCRATIC 16939 Ethan's Party 1 GREEN 26 GREEN PARTY 3 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 INDEPENDANT 7 INDEPENDENT 278 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 2 LIBERTARIAN 78 NO AFFILIATION 2434 NO PARTY 18 NONE 205 NON-PARTISAN 619 OTHER 55 PATRIOT 2 PIZZA PARTY 1 REPUBLICAN 5423 TOGA 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 1 UNKNOWN 1 Count of Voters in USC05: 26147 Total Voters on Report: 574403 4 SENATORIAL DISTRICTS 00000-DST-009-C Montgomery County Wednesday, May 27, 2020 Voter Count by Selected District and Party Federal Voter (Y) IS 0 AND Valid Voter (Y) IS 1 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS04 4TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 2 AMERICAN 2 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 3 American Solidarity Party 3 ASIAN 1 BLANK 95 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 2 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 6 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 56169 GOOD NEIGHBOR 1 GREEN 98 GREEN PARTY 2 HALLOWEEN 2 INDEPENDANT 21 INDEPENDENCE 1 INDEPENDENT 876 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 1 PA INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 1 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 2 JEDI 2 LIBERAL 6 LIBERTARIAN 351 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 2 MODERATE 2 N/A 2 NO AFFILIATION 6542 NO PARTY 61 Non Party 2 NONE 390 NON-INCRIMINATING 1 NON-PARTISAN 2188 NOT DEMO-REPO 1 NOT SURE 5 OPEN 1 OTHER 280 PATRIOT 3 REPUBLICAN 21729 SILLY PARTY 1 SOCIALIST 3 TEA PARTY 1 UNAFFILIATED 6 1 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS04 4TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT UNDECIDED 4 UNDECLARED 1 UNKNOWN 8 WHIG 1 WIG-REPUBLICAN 1 Count of Voters in STS04: 88886 STS07 7TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 1 BLANK 34 CARE 1 CENTRALIST 1 CONSTITUTIONAL 1 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 21653 GARY JOHNSON 1 GREEN 38 GREEN PARTY 3 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 GUNS AND DOPE 1 HUMANITARIAN 1 INDEPENDANT 7 INDEPENDENT 488 INDEPENDENT AMERICAN PARTY OF 1 PA INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 1 LIBERAL 2 LIBERTARIAN 173 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 MODERATE 2 N/A 3 NEW PROGRESSIVE 1 NO AFFILIATION 3620 NO PARTY 43 NONE 135 NON-PARTISAN 1249 NOT SURE 2 OTHER 124 PROGRESSIVE 1 REFORM 1 REPUBLICAN 13749 SOCIALIST 1 UNAFFILIATED 2 UNDECIDED 2 UNKNOWN 2 Count of Voters in STS07: 41347 STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 4 AMERICA 1 AMERICAN 3 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 2 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 1 ANARCHIST 1 ATHEIST 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BIRTHDAY 1 BLANK 110 CENTRALIST 1 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST 1 CONSERVATIVE 6 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 1 Conservative Republican 1 CONSTITUTION 2 CONSTITUTIONAL 17 CONSUMER 1 DECLINE TO STATE 1 DEMOCRATIC 55725 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 3 FREE 1 FREEDOM 1 GREEN 130 GREEN PARTY 3 IDK 1 INDEPENDANT 24 INDEPENDENCE 3 INDEPENDENT 1495 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 3 INDEPENDENT REPUBLICAN 4 LIBERAL 15 LIBERTARIAN 641 Libertarian Socialist 1 MANAYUNK INDEPENDENT 1 MODERATE 7 N/A 5 NEUTRAL 2 NO 1 NO AFFILIATION 11412 NO PARTY 163 NO YOU PROBLEMS 1 NONE 605 NON-PARTISAN 4247 NOT SURE 8 OPEN 2 OTHER 481 PATRIOT 5 PIRATE 1 PIRATE PARTY OF THE UNITED STATES 1 REFORM 4 REPUBLICAN 50332 RIGHT TO LIFE 1 3 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS12 12TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT SOCIALIST 3 UNAFFILIATED 8 UNDECIDED 10 UNDECLARED 2 UNKNOWN 6 Count of Voters in STS12: 125514 STS17 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 1 AMERICAN 1 American Solidarity Party 1 ANTIESTABLISHMENT 1 BI-PARTISAN 1 BLANK 188 CAPITALIST 1 CENTRIST 1 CHRISTIAN 1 COMMUNIST 2 CONSERVATIVE 7 CONSTITUTION 6 CONSTITUTIONAL 11 CONSUMER 1 DEMOCRATIC 73810 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 2 Ethan's Party 1 FEDERALIST 1 GREEN 133 GREEN PARTY 5 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 HILLARY 1 I DON'T KNOW 1 IND. 2 INDEPENDANT 36 INDEPENDENCE 3 INDEPENDENT 1467 INDEPENDENT DEMOCRAT 3 JACOBIN 1 LABOR 1 LIBERAL 13 LIBERTARIAN 505 LIBERTARIAN REPUBLICAN 1 MODERATE 3 MODERN WHIG PARTY 1 N/A 16 NATIONAL SOCIALIST 1 NEUTRAL 2 NO AFFILIATION 11953 NO PARTY 97 Non Party 1 NONE 801 NON-PARTISAN 3637 4 State Senate ID State Senate Political Party Count of Voters by Party STS17 17TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT NOT SURE 3 OTHER 462 PATRIOT 3 PIZZA PARTY 1 PROGRESSIVE 1 REFORM 3 REPUBLICAN 36021 SOCIALIST 1 TOGA 1 UNAFFILIATED 10 UNCERTAIN 1 UNDECIDED 11 UNITED AMERICA 1 UNKNOWN 6 Count of Voters in STS17: 129247 STS24 24TH SENATORIAL DISTRICT ADARIAN 1 AMERICAN 5 AMERICAN EAGLE 1 AMERICAN INDEPENDENT 1 BI-PARTISAN 2 BIRTHDAY 1 BLANK 111 BULL MOOSE 1 CHRISTIAN 2 COMMUNIST 3 CONSERVATIVE 12 CONSERVATIVE DEMOCRAT 1 CONSERVATIVE INDEPENDENT 1 CONSTITUTION 4 CONSTITUTIONAL 16 CONSTITUTIONAL CONSERVATIVE 1 CONSTITUTIONALIST 1 DEMOCRATIC 45413 DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST 1 FREEDOM 1 GOOD NEIGHBOR 1 GREEN 136 GREEN PARTY 1 GREEN PARTY OF THE US 1 HALLOWEEN 1 HUMANE 1 I DON'T KNOW 1 I'M IN THE MIDDLE 1 IND.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report for Austria– Questionnaire Related the Administration Control
    ADMINISTRATIVE JUSTICE IN EUROPE – Report for Austria– Questionnaire related the administration control list and typology in the 25 Member States of the European Union Preliminary. 1. Administration jurisdictional control was one typical concern of the liberal streams in the 19th century. In Austria, “the Reichsgericht”, a precursor of the Constitutional Court, was created by the December 1867 constitution which also planned creation of a Supreme Administrative Court (hereafter “the Verwaltungsgerichtshof”). However, this project was only fulfilled in 1876. Following this, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof played a decisive role in developing the legal protection system in Austria, establishing fundamental principles for administrative procedural law. Between 1934 and 1938, the Constitutional Court and the Verwaltungsgerichtshof merged to become “the Bundesgerichtshof”. Several judges were retired for political reasons. The introductions of Chambers with extended composition and of actions for administrative failure to act were significant reforms. After 1938, “the Bundesgerichtshof” lost its authority as Constitutional Court as well as several of its administrative jurisdiction authorities. Several judges were retired for political reasons. In 1940 “the Bundesgerichtshof” became “the Verwaltungsgerichtshof in Vienna” which was an administrative authority of the Reich. In 1941, the Verwaltungsgerichtshof became the “Vienna Außensenat” of the “Reichsverwaltungsgericht” by forming an organisational association with other German administrative courts. A few weeks after the Austrian declaration of independence in 1945, Chancellor Renner commissioned Mr. Coreth to revive the Verwaltungsgerichtshof which took up its duties again on 7th December 1945. The legal text on the Verwaltungsgerichtshof was amended and reissued several times but, in substance, it is still in force today. In 1945, the Constitutional Court was re-established with the same capacities as 1933 and it began carrying out its duties again in 1946.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources for Genealogical Research at the Austrian War Archives in Vienna (Kriegsarchiv Wien)
    SOURCES FOR GENEALOGICAL RESEARCH AT THE AUSTRIAN WAR ARCHIVES IN VIENNA (KRIEGSARCHIV WIEN) by Christoph Tepperberg Director of the Kriegsarchiv 1 Table of contents 1. The Vienna War Archives and its relevance for genealogical research 1.1. A short history of the War Archives 1.2. Conditions for doing genealogical research at the Kriegsarchiv 2. Sources for genealogical research at the Kriegsarchiv 2. 1. Documents of the military administration and commands 2. 2. Personnel records, and records pertaining to personnel 2.2.1. Sources for research on military personnel of all ranks 2.2.2. Sources for research on commissioned officers and military officials 3. Using the Archives 3.1. Regulations for using personnel records 3.2. Visiting the Archives 3.3. Written inquiries 3.4. Professional researchers 4. Relevant publications 5. Sources for genealogical research in other archives and institutions 5.1. Sources for genealogical research in other departments of the Austrian State Archives 5.2. Sources for genealogical research in other Austrian archives 5.3. Sources for genealogical research in archives outside of Austria 5.3.1. The provinces of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy and its “successor states” 5.3.2. Sources for genealogical research in the “successor states” 5.4. Additional points of contact and practical hints for genealogical research 2 1. The Vienna War Archives and its relevance for genealogical research 1.1. A short history of the War Archives Today’s Austrian Republic is a small country, but from 1526 to 1918 Austria was a great power, we can say: the United States of Middle and Southeastern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 17-1200 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- INDEPENDENT PARTY, ET AL., Petitioners, v. ALEX PADILLA, CALIFORNIA SECRETARY OF STATE, Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Petition For Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Ninth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF CITIZENS IN CHARGE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- PAUL A. ROSSI Counsel of Record 316 Hill Street Mountville, PA 17554 (717) 961-8978 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the party names INDEPENDENT PARTY and AMERICAN INDEPENDENT PARTY are so sim- ilar to each other that voters will be misled if both of them appeared on the same California ballot. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page QUESTION PRESENTED................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................... ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................. ii STATEMENT OF INTEREST ............................. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................................... 2 ARGUMENT ........................................................ 3 CONCLUSION ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi Party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M
    Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofré-Vilà, Christopher M. Meissner, Martin McKee, and David Stuckler NBER Working Paper No. 24106 December 2017, Revised in September 2020 JEL No. E6,N1,N14,N44 ABSTRACT We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success. Voting data from a thousand districts and a hundred cities for four elections between 1930 and 1933 shows that areas more affected by austerity (spending cuts and tax increases) had relatively higher vote shares for the Nazi party. We also find that the localities with relatively high austerity experienced relatively high suffering (measured by mortality rates) and these areas’ electorates were more likely to vote for the Nazi party. Our findings are robust to a range of specifications including an instrumental variable strategy and a border-pair policy discontinuity design. Gregori Galofré-Vilà Martin McKee Department of Sociology Department of Health Services Research University of Oxford and Policy Manor Road Building London School of Hygiene Oxford OX1 3UQ & Tropical Medicine United Kingdom 15-17 Tavistock Place [email protected] London WC1H 9SH United Kingdom Christopher M. Meissner [email protected] Department of Economics University of California, Davis David Stuckler One Shields Avenue Università Bocconi Davis, CA 95616 Carlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on and NBER Social Dynamics and Public Policy (Dondena) [email protected] Milan, Italy [email protected] Austerity and the Rise of the Nazi party Gregori Galofr´e-Vil`a Christopher M. Meissner Martin McKee David Stuckler Abstract: We study the link between fiscal austerity and Nazi electoral success.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria FULL Constitution
    AUSTRIA THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF 1920 as amended in 1929 as to Law No. 153/2004, December 30, 2004 Table of Contents CHAPTER I General Provisions European Union CHAPTER II Legislation of the Federation CHAPTER III Federal Execution CHAPTER IV Legislation and Execution by the Länder CHAPTER V Control of Accounts and Financial Management CHAPTER VI Constitutional and Administrative Guarantees CHAPTER VII The Office of the People’s Attorney ( Volksanwaltschaft ) CHAPTER VIII Final Provisions CHAPTER I General Provisions European Union A. General Provisions Article 1 Austria is a democratic republic. Its law emanates from the people. Article 2 (1) Austria is a Federal State. (2) The Federal State is constituted from independent Länder : Burgenland, Carinthia, Lower Austria, Upper Austria, Salzburg, Styria, Tirol, Vorarlberg and Vienna. Article 3 (1) The Federal territory comprises the territories ( Gebiete ) of the Federal Länder . (2) A change of the Federal territory, which is at the same time a change of a Land territory (Landesgebiet ), just as the change of a Land boundary inside the Federal territory, can—apart from peace treaties—take place only from harmonizing constitutional laws of the Federation (Bund ) and the Land , whose territory experiences change. Article 4 (1) The Federal territory forms a unitary currency, economic and customs area. (2) Internal customs borders ( Zwischenzollinien ) or other traffic restrictions may not be established within the Federation. Article 5 (1) The Federal Capital and the seat of the supreme bodies of the Federation is Vienna. (2) For the duration of extraordinary circumstances the Federal President, on the petition of the Federal Government, may move the seat of the supreme bodies of the Federation to another location in the Federal territory.
    [Show full text]
  • Active Political Parties in Village Elections
    YEAR ACTIVE POLITICAL PARTIES IN VILLAGE ELECTIONS 1894 1895 1896 1897 Workingman’s Party People’s Party 1898 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1899 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1900 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1901 Workingman’s Party Citizen’s Party 1902 Citizen’s Party Reform Party Independent Party 1903 Citizen’s Party Independent Party 1904 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1905 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1906 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1907 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1908 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1909 Citizen’s Party Union Party 1910 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1911 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1912 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1913 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1914 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1915 Citizen’s Party People’s Party 1916 Citizen’s Party Independent Party American Party 1917 Citizen’s Party American Party 1918 Citizen’s Party American Party 1919 Citizen’s Party American Party 1920 Citizen’s Party American Party 1921 Citizen’s Party American Party 1922 Citizen’s Party American Party 1923 Citizen’s Party American Party 1924 Citizen’s Party American Party Independent Party 1925 Citizen’s Party American party 1926 Citizen’s party American Party 1927 Citizen’s Party No Opposition 1928 Citizen’s Party American Party 1929 Citizen’s Party American Party 1930 Citizen’s Party American Party 1931 Citizen’s Party American Party 1932 Citizen’s Party American Party 1933 Citizen’s Party American Party 1934 Citizen’s Party American Party 1935 Citizen’s Party American Party 1936 Citizen’s Party Old Citizen’s
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Edition of the Comprehensive Plan
    FAIRFAX COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, 2017 Edition AREA II Vienna Planning District, Amended through 2-23-2021 Overview Page 1 VIENNA PLANNING DISTRICT OVERVIEW OVERVIEW The Vienna Planning District encompasses approximately 12,000 acres, or about five percent of the county. The planning district is located in the central northeast section of the county, and is generally bordered to the east by Leesburg Pike (Route 7), the Capital Beltway/Interstate 495 (I-495), Interstate 66 (I-66), and Prosperity Avenue, and to the west by Hunter Mill Road, Blake Lane, and the Difficult Run Stream Valley (see Figure 1). The planning district contains the Town of Vienna, the Vienna Transit Station Area (TSA) and portions of the Merrifield Suburban Center and the Tysons Urban Center. Plan recommendations for the Merrifield Suburban Center are included in the Area I volume of the Comprehensive Plan, Merrifield Suburban Center. Plan recommendations for the Tysons Urban Center are included in the Area II volume of the Comprehensive Plan, Tysons Urban Center. The Town of Vienna has jurisdiction over its own planning functions. Consult the Town of Vienna Comprehensive Plan for recommendations within this area. The planning district is predominantly comprised of single-family neighborhoods. The exceptions to this are areas within the Vienna TSA, Merrifield Suburban Center, and the Tysons Urban Center. The planning district is traversed by several major roads and highways, including I-495, I-66, the Dulles Airport Access Road and Dulles Toll Road (DAAR, Route 267), Lee Highway (Route 29), Arlington Boulevard (Route 50), Leesburg Pike, and Chain Bridge Road (Route 123).
    [Show full text]
  • Republican Women and the Gendered Politics of Partisanship
    Melanie Susan Gustafson. Women and the Republican Party, 1854-1924. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2001. ix + 288 pp. $34.95, cloth, ISBN 978-0-252-02688-1. Reviewed by Linda Van Ingen Published on H-Women (June, 2002) Republican Women and the Gendered Politics tions of party politics. In other words, disfran‐ of Partisanship, 1854-1924 chised women were both partisan and nonparti‐ Melanie Gustafson successfully confronts the san players who sought access to the male-domi‐ historical complexity of American women's parti‐ nated institutions of political parties without los‐ sanship in Women and the Republican Party, ing their influence as women uncorrupted by 1854-1924. Her work deepens and enriches the such politics. The resulting portrait of women's field of women's political history in the late nine‐ political history, then, is more complex than pre‐ teenth and early twentieth centuries by bringing viously realized. This book demonstrates how together two seemingly disparate trends in wom‐ much of women's political history is about the en's politics. On the one hand, historians have gendered politics of partisanship. long focused on women's nonpartisan identities in Gustafson develops her analyses with a focus their altruistic reform and suffrage movements. on the Republican Party at the national level. Politics in these studies has been defined broadly From its founding in 1854, through the Progres‐ to include the wide range of women's public activ‐ sive Party challenge in the early twentieth centu‐ ities and the formation of a women's political cul‐ ry, to the height of its success in the 1920s, the Re‐ ture.[1] On the other hand, historians have more publican Party provides a chronological history recently studied women's partisan loyalties and that holds Gustafson's study of women's varied their roles in institutional politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Austria | Freedom House
    Austria | Freedom House https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/austria A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Executive elections in Austria are generally free and fair. The president is elected for a six-year term and has predominantly ceremonial duties. The president does, however, appoint the chancellor, who also needs the support of the legislature to govern. Austria’s current president is the former head of the Green Party, Alexander Van der Bellen, who was elected after a close and controversial poll that featured a repeat of the run-off between Van der Bellen and FPÖ candidate Norbert Hofer. The run-off was repeated after the Constitutional Court established that there had been problems with the handling of postal ballots. Following the 2017 elections to the National Council (Nationalrat), the lower house of parliament, ÖVP head Sebastian Kurz became chancellor with support of the right- wing, populist FPÖ. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Legislative elections in Austria are generally considered credible. The National Council has 183 members chosen through proportional representation at the district, state, and federal levels. Members serve five-year terms. The 62 members of the upper house, the Federal Council (Bundesrat), are chosen by state legislatures for five- or six-year terms. Snap elections to the National Council took place in 2017, one year early, following the collapse of the coalition between the SPÖ and the ÖVP. Animosities between the two former coalition partners were reflected in an antagonistic, heavily-fought election campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Distribution in the Weimar Reichstag in 1919-1933
    Power Distribution in the Weimar Reichstag in 1919-1933 Fuad Aleskerov1, Manfred J. Holler2 and Rita Kamalova3 Abstract: ................................................................................................................................................2 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................2 2. The Weimar Germany 1919-1933: A brief history of socio-economic performance .......................3 3. Political system..................................................................................................................................4 3.2 Electoral system for the Reichstag ..................................................................................................6 3.3 Political parties ................................................................................................................................6 3.3.1 The Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD).....................................................................7 3.3.2 The Communist Party of Germany (Kommunistische Partei Deutschlands – KPD)...............8 3.3.3 The German Democratic Party (Deutsche Demokratische Partei – DDP)...............................9 3.3.4 The Centre Party (Deutsche Zentrumspartei – Zentrum) .......................................................10 3.3.5 The German People's Party (Deutsche Volkspartei – DVP) ..................................................10 3.3.6 German-National People's Party (Deutsche
    [Show full text]
  • SOOTHING SYRUP Lrusio:I, Will Be Found in the Solicitation Year the Whigs Were in a Minority
    jrioJe JYY. 740. Tarborough, ( Edgecombe County, JV 6TJ balurday, June 13 1840 To. ATI Xo 24. - -, i LuiLMfwaMmf'nTraifOTiiii1ntT Tjc Trti&orough Z9rcss, rung in the ears ofthe people of North Car- Three Solicitors were elected, and two of gum to strike out a censure which he had I BY fiBORiSK HOWAKI), 7?l 2& ? .Tj olina for more than five years. them whigs! gone out of his way and out of the Consti- - J Now suppose I Re- I do Is published weekly at Two llithtrs and Ff'; then, shew that the not overlook the fact that Gen. j Union, to affix to Jackson, when all the i CVW.v per year, if p.i'ul in a Ivaac r, 7"nv publican party of North Carolina have not Patterson resigne I his office of world knows,'h it Mr. Mangum was elected From the Treasurer thillttrs at the expiration of the subscription year. Raleigh Standard. seiz.-- upon the public offices thit they in 1S.33, and that Mr. Couits a R?pn!)Ii h the Senate as a JACKSON MAN, J 7 V- iVr period les? thm a year, liHve , anj not proscribed the whig tint in fact cit-- w a in ins piace. it is also What epithet should honest politicians ap- i 2-- th r.'z.s per month. Subscribers are at liberty to IS 10. office-holder- Raleigh, My, the Whigs ire the Then tell true, that Mr. Courts got a large ply to the "Rayncr Resolutions," discontinue at anytime, 0:1 giving notice thereof number which TO CA- me what epithet will of votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Trans*Forming Understanding of Sexual Orientation and Gender
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2016 Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample Karen Elaine Bittner Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Bittner, Karen Elaine, "Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample" (2016). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 15879. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/15879 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Trans*forming understanding of sexual orientation and gender variant minorities: Testing the minority stress model with a diverse sample by Karen Elaine Bittner A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Psychology Program of Study Committee: Frederick O. Lorenz, Co-Major Professor Susan E. Cross, Co-Major Professor Janet N. Melby Carolyn E. Cutrona Max Guyll Patrick I. Armstrong Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2016 Copyright © Karen
    [Show full text]