Jupiter and Io the Planet and Its Moon Distort Each Other, with Consequences for Io’S Volcanic Activity and the Orbits of Jupiter’S Other Moons

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jupiter and Io the Planet and Its Moon Distort Each Other, with Consequences for Io’S Volcanic Activity and the Orbits of Jupiter’S Other Moons Analysis quantifies effects of tides & in Jupiter and Io The planet and its moon distort each other, with consequences for Io’s volcanic activity and the orbits of Jupiter’s other moons. Moons and planets aren’t point par- Tides in Jupiter and its inner- ticles, and their finite sizes and lack of a most large moon, Io, have rigidity affect their orbits. For example, opposite effects on Io’s orbit. the Moon’s gravity raises a tidal bulge (a) Io’s gravity creates a tidal in Earth’s oceans. Because Earth rotates bulge in Jupiter, which is pushed faster than the Moon orbits, that bulge by Jupiter’s rotation (red arrows) is always pushed slightly ahead of the ahead of the Io–Jupiter line. line between Earth and the Moon, and Gravitational interaction (black the gravitational attraction between the arrows) between Io and the Moon and the bulge pulls Earth back- bulge slows Jupiter’s rotation ward in its rotation and the Moon for- and increases Io’s orbital energy. ward in its orbit: Our days are getting (b) Jupiter also creates a tidal longer, and the Moon is gaining energy bulge in Io. Because Io has an b and thus receding. elliptical orbit, its instantaneous The same phenomenon occurs be- orbital speed varies (green tween Jupiter and its moons, particu- arrows). At its most distant point from Jupiter, Io rotates (red larly its innermost large moon, Io. On arrows) faster than it orbits, so the other hand, Jupiter also raises a the bulge lies slightly ahead of tidal bulge in Io, which causes Io to lose the Io–Jupiter line in the direc- energy. Now the Paris Observatory’s tion of Io’s rotation. At its nearest Valéry Lainey and colleagues have point to Jupiter, the opposite is teased out the previously unknown true. As a result, Jupiter exerts a magnitudes of the Jovian system’s tidal force on Io that diminishes Io’s interactions by analyzing 116 years’ orbital energy. The tidal bulges worth of observations of the moons’ and orbit eccentricity are exag- orbits.1 gerated for effect. Many moons circular. For example, Io’s and Europa’s bulge that Jupiter generates in the rocky Several dozen of the bodies orbiting point of closest approach, where Europa moon would have little effect, because Jupiter are classified as moons, but the pulls Io outward, is always at the same it would always be aligned with the Io– largest by far are the four discovered by place in their respective orbits. That re- Jupiter line. But the slight ellipticity of Galileo in 1610. In order from nearest to peated tug gives Io’s orbit a nonzero ec- Io’s orbit has two consequences, as farthest from Jupiter, they are Io, Eu- centricity. Furthermore, the Laplace res- shown in panel b. First, as the Io–Jupiter ropa, Ganymede, and Callisto. Europa, onance means that any change in Io’s distance changes, so too does the grav- the smallest of the four, is more than orbit strongly affects both Europa and itational force felt by Io, and therefore 7000 times as massive as Jupiter’s fifth Ganymede, and vice versa. the size of the bulge. Second, because Io and next largest moon, Himalia. Io, Eu- is not always moving at the same angu- ropa, and Ganymede are in a Laplace Battle of the bulges lar speed, its instantaneous orbital and resonance, meaning that their orbital Io is the only one of the Galilean moons rotational rates are not perfectly periods form small-integer ratios: Ap- to have significant tidal interaction with matched. At its farthest point from proximately every seven Earth days, Jupiter. The moon creates a tidal bulge Jupiter—the apojove—Io is spinning Jupiter is orbited by Ganymede once, in the planet (as shown in panel a of the faster than it is orbiting, so the tidal Europa twice, and Io four times. The figure), which increases Io’s orbital en- bulge lies slightly ahead of the Io– resonance has an effect on their orbits ergy at the expense of Jupiter’s rota- Jupiter line in the direction of Io’s rota- and how they influence one another. tional energy. By the virial theorem, tion. Thus Jupiter exerts a torque on Io In isolation from other satellites, when an orbiting body’s energy in- that slows the moon’s rotation and adds moons tend to settle into synchronous creases, its kinetic energy decreases to its orbital energy. At the other side of rotation (meaning that the orbital period while its potential energy increases by the orbit—the perijove—the opposite is equal to the rotational period) and cir- twice as much. So although Jupiter’s occurs: Io is orbiting faster than it is cular orbits. The Galilean moons are in tidal bulge pulls Io forward in its orbit, spinning, the bulge lags behind the Io– synchronous rotation, but because of the its net effect is to slow Io’s motion. Jupiter line, and the planet’s gravity in- Laplace resonance, their orbits are not If Io’s orbit were circular, the tidal creases the moon’s rotational energy at © 2009 American Institute of Physics, S-0031-9228-0908-320-3 August 2009 Physics Today 11 the expense of its orbital energy. And method of secular accelerations doesn’t with most estimates being between since the bulge is larger and the gravi- allow any conclusions to be drawn 2 and 2.5 W/m2. It appears, therefore, tational attraction is stronger at the per- about the tidal magnitudes: Since tides that Io is close to a thermal steady ijove, its influence wins out: Io’s tidal in Jupiter and tides in Io have similar state—that its volcanic activity is driven bulge causes Io to spiral inward toward but opposite consequences for the by the heat generated by tidal friction Jupiter. Much of the energy that goes moons’ orbits, the two effects can’t be now, rather than by heat retained from into growing, shrinking, and shifting decorrelated by looking at the orbital a past period when tides might have the bulge is dissipated through friction; accelerations alone. been even higher. the resulting heat is thought to be re- Lainey and colleagues were the first sponsible for Io’s volcanic activity, the to include the tidal effects directly in a Longer-term trends? most dramatic in the solar system. model. They numerically integrated the Lainey and colleagues reconstructed Which tidal effect is stronger, and orbits, in two-hour time steps, from what happened to Io, Europa, and whether Io’s total energy is actually in- 1891 to 2007. Then they iterated the in- Ganymede over a period of 116 years. creasing or decreasing, depends on how tegration to fit the 26 parameters of But on the time scale of orbital evolu- severely Io and Jupiter are distorted by their model: the initial position and ve- tion, 116 years is just the blink of an eye. tidal forces. Those things can’t easily be locity vectors of each of the four moons What’s next for the Jovian moons? It’s observed from Earth. To infer the tide- (they included Callisto even though it’s hard to tell, because the evolution the induced accelerations from observa- not in the Laplace resonance and researchers found is not sustainable. tions of the moons’ orbits, one must doesn’t interact strongly with the oth- Since Io’s orbital period is shortening track the Jovian moons for a long time. ers) and Jupiter’s and Io’s susceptibility while Europa’s and Ganymede’s are The earliest usable measurements of the to tides. They were able to separate the lengthening, the moons are evolving moons’ positions are photographic two tidal mechanisms because Io’s tides out of their Laplace resonance. Once the plates that date back to 1891. But the po- had a substantial effect on the eccentric- resonance is broken, Io’s orbit will lose sitions must be determined with much ity of Io’s orbit, whereas Jupiter’s tides its eccentricity, so the tidal bulge in Io greater precision than any individual had a much smaller effect. will no longer grow and shrink and will hundred-year-old measurement—or The calculation revealed that Io is no longer be susceptible to torque from even many modern measurements— speeding up and thus spiraling inward Jupiter. That means no more spiraling can provide. Averaging many measure- and losing energy, whereas Europa and inward and, most likely, no more vol- ments helps, but the positions must also Ganymede are slowing down, spiraling canism. The present results don’t offer be constrained through use of a model. outward, and gaining energy: At the any predictions, though, about how end of the 116-year period, Io is 55 km Tides over time soon the resonance will be effectively farther ahead in its orbit than it would broken, how much Io’s orbital energy Several groups in the past have at- have been without any acceleration, Eu- will ultimately decrease, or what will tempted to derive the orbital accelera- ropa is 125 km behind, and Ganymede happen once it starts increasing again. tions of Jupiter’s Galilean moons from is 365 km behind. From Io’s tidal param- “Moving out of resonance and Io’s 2 the records of their positions. But eter, Lainey’s collaborators Özgür inward spiraling are both expressions they’ve always done it by treating the Karatekin and Tim Van Hoolst, geo- of an evolution that cannot persist,” tidal effects as secular accelerations— physicists at the Royal Observatory of says David Stevenson of Caltech.
Recommended publications
  • Cladistical Analysis of the Jovian Satellites. T. R. Holt1, A. J. Brown2 and D
    47th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference (2016) 2676.pdf Cladistical Analysis of the Jovian Satellites. T. R. Holt1, A. J. Brown2 and D. Nesvorny3, 1Center for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia [email protected], 2SETI Institute, Mountain View, California, USA, 3Southwest Research Institute, Department of Space Studies, Boulder, CO. USA. Introduction: Surrounding Jupiter there are multi- Results: ple satellites, 67 known to-date. The most recent classi- fication system [1,2], based on orbital characteristics, uses the largest member of the group as the name and example. The closest group to Jupiter is the prograde Amalthea group, 4 small satellites embedded in a ring system. Moving outwards there are the famous Galilean moons, Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto, whose mass is similar to terrestrial planets. The final and largest group, is that of the outer Irregular satel- lites. Those irregulars that show a prograde orbit are closest to Jupiter and have previously been classified into three families [2], the Themisto, Carpo and Hi- malia groups. The remainder of the irregular satellites show a retrograde orbit, counter to Jupiter's rotation. Based on similarities in semi-major axis (a), inclination (i) and eccentricity (e) these satellites have been grouped into families [1,2]. In order outward from Jupiter they are: Ananke family (a 2.13x107 km ; i 148.9o; e 0.24); Carme family (a 2.34x107 km ; i 164.9o; e 0.25) and the Pasiphae family (a 2:36x107 km ; i 151.4o; e 0.41). There are some irregular satellites, recently discovered in 2003 [3], 2010 [4] and 2011[5], that have yet to be named or officially classified.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Irregular Jovian Moons with IVO
    CO Meeting Organizer EPSC2020 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2020/EPSC2020-767.html Europlanet Science Congress 2020 Virtual meeting 21 September – 9 October 2020 EPSC2020-767 EPSC Abstracts Vol.14, EPSC2020-767, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-767 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Survey of Irregular Jovian Moons with IVO Tilmann Denk 1, Alfred McEwen2, Jörn Helbert 1, and the IVO Team3 1DLR (German Aerospace Center), Berlin 2LPL, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 3JHU/APL and others The Io Volcano Observer (IVO) [1] is a NASA Discovery mission currently under Phase A study [2]. Its primary goal is a thorough investigation of Io (e.g., [3]), the innermost of Jupiter's Galilean moons and the most volcanically active body in the Solar system. The 1 von 7 27.11.2020, 13:04 CO Meeting Organizer EPSC2020 https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EPSC2020/EPSC2020-767.html strategy consists of the observation of Io mainly during ten targeted flybys [4] between August 2033 and April 2037. At this time, IVO will orbit Jupiter on highly eccentric orbits with periods between 78 and 260 days, a minimum Jupiter altitude of ~340000 km, apoapsis distances between 10 and 23 million kilometers, and an orbit inclination of ~45°. Among the remote-sensing and field-and-particle instruments, there are also a narrow-angle camera (NAC; clear aperture of ~15 cm; pixel field-of-view of 10 µrad) and an infrared mapping instrument (TMAP). The irregular moons of Jupiter [5] are a group of Solar system objects which is poorly studied.
    [Show full text]
  • 02. Solar System (2001) 9/4/01 12:28 PM Page 2
    01. Solar System Cover 9/4/01 12:18 PM Page 1 National Aeronautics and Educational Product Space Administration Educators Grades K–12 LS-2001-08-002-HQ Solar System Lithograph Set for Space Science This set contains the following lithographs: • Our Solar System • Moon • Saturn • Our Star—The Sun • Mars • Uranus • Mercury • Asteroids • Neptune • Venus • Jupiter • Pluto and Charon • Earth • Moons of Jupiter • Comets 01. Solar System Cover 9/4/01 12:18 PM Page 2 NASA’s Central Operation of Resources for Educators Regional Educator Resource Centers offer more educators access (CORE) was established for the national and international distribution of to NASA educational materials. NASA has formed partnerships with universities, NASA-produced educational materials in audiovisual format. Educators can museums, and other educational institutions to serve as regional ERCs in many obtain a catalog and an order form by one of the following methods: States. A complete list of regional ERCs is available through CORE, or electroni- cally via NASA Spacelink at http://spacelink.nasa.gov/ercn NASA CORE Lorain County Joint Vocational School NASA’s Education Home Page serves as a cyber-gateway to informa- 15181 Route 58 South tion regarding educational programs and services offered by NASA for the Oberlin, OH 44074-9799 American education community. This high-level directory of information provides Toll-free Ordering Line: 1-866-776-CORE specific details and points of contact for all of NASA’s educational efforts, Field Toll-free FAX Line: 1-866-775-1460 Center offices, and points of presence within each State. Visit this resource at the E-mail: [email protected] following address: http://education.nasa.gov Home Page: http://core.nasa.gov NASA Spacelink is one of NASA’s electronic resources specifically devel- Educator Resource Center Network (ERCN) oped for the educational community.
    [Show full text]
  • Can the Spin Rates of Irregular Satellites Provide Constraints to Their Formation Histories?
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 13, EPSC-DPS2019-671-1, 2019 EPSC-DPS Joint Meeting 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. Can The Spin Rates Of Irregular Satellites Provide Constraints To Their Formation Histories? Zeeve Rogoszinski, Douglas Hamilton Department of Astronomy, University of Maryland, MD, USA ([email protected]) Abstract volves prograde while the other retrograde. Saturn’s prograde satellites also spin on average slower than the Irregular satellites are believed to have been captured retrograde satellites. A connection between the forma- from the circumstellar disk during planetary forma- tion histories of Phoebe and Himalia [5][6] and satel- tion, and were once probably the most collisionally lite spin distributions could provide more insight to the active population in the Solar System. The resulting structure of the original satellite populations. orbital architectures at Jupiter and Saturn, especially the similarities between their largest moons Himalia and Phoebe, may provide clues to the origin of the systems. The spin-rates of several of Saturn’s irregular satellites have been recently published; we are inves- tigating whether the spin-rate distribution can signifi- cantly constrain their collisional histories. If Phoebe and Himalia share similar histories, then the satellites’ spin-rates may indicate that Jupiter and Saturn cap- tured different numbers of prograde and retrograde or- biting satellites. 1. Introduction Most of the moons orbiting giant planets are irregular satellites. They move along distant eccentric and in- clined orbits, with most orbiting retrograde, and, un- Figure 1: The eccentricities of Jupiter’s irregular satel- like their regular counterparts, are believed to have lites verses their semi-major axes.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfect Little Planet Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide Perfect Little Planet Educator’s Guide Table of Contents Vocabulary List 3 Activities for the Imagination 4 Word Search 5 Two Astronomy Games 7 A Toilet Paper Solar System Scale Model 11 The Scale of the Solar System 13 Solar System Models in Dough 15 Solar System Fact Sheet 17 2 “Perfect Little Planet” Vocabulary List Solar System Planet Asteroid Moon Comet Dwarf Planet Gas Giant "Rocky Midgets" (Terrestrial Planets) Sun Star Impact Orbit Planetary Rings Atmosphere Volcano Great Red Spot Olympus Mons Mariner Valley Acid Solar Prominence Solar Flare Ocean Earthquake Continent Plants and Animals Humans 3 Activities for the Imagination The objectives of these activities are: to learn about Earth and other planets, use language and art skills, en- courage use of libraries, and help develop creativity. The scientific accuracy of the creations may not be as im- portant as the learning, reasoning, and imagination used to construct each invention. Invent a Planet: Students may create (draw, paint, montage, build from household or classroom items, what- ever!) a planet. Does it have air? What color is its sky? Does it have ground? What is its ground made of? What is it like on this world? Invent an Alien: Students may create (draw, paint, montage, build from household items, etc.) an alien. To be fair to the alien, they should be sure to provide a way for the alien to get food (what is that food?), a way to breathe (if it needs to), ways to sense the environment, and perhaps a way to move around its planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Jovian Irregular Moons with Ivo (Io Volcano Observer)
    52nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2021 (LPI Contrib. No. 2548) 1841.pdf SURVEY OF JOVIAN IRREGULAR MOONS WITH IVO (IO VOLCANO OBSERVER). T. Denk1, A.S. McEwen2, J. Helbert1, and the IVO Team. 1DLR Berlin ([email protected]), 2LPL, University of Arizona. Introduction. This talk combines three different quantity. (Of course, with respect to mass, they topics: (1) A quick introduction into the IVO mission, a contribute very little to the Jovian moon system.) spacecraft proposed to orbit Jupiter in the 2030's decade Irregular moons are believed to be remnants from [1][2]; (2) Jupiter is host of at least 71, and likely many catastrophic collisions of progenitor objects suspected hundred [3] outer, so-called irregular moons with a size to have been trapped by Jupiter in the early history of >1 km which are poorly explored so far; (3) the Cassini the Solar system. Many details and characteristics, spacecraft performed an observation campaign of including their region of origin and their relationship to Saturn's irregular moons in the 2010 decade [4]. other small bodies, are not known [8]. Cassini has proven the feasibility and strong The Cassini observation potentials of irregular-moon observations by spacecraft campaign of Saturn's irregular orbiting the center planet of irregular moons. Such a moons was the first irregular-moon campaign is thus proposed as part of the Science inventory by a spacecraft orbiting Enhancement Option (SEO) "Jupiter system science" of the host planet [4][9]. Especially in the IVO mission. the second half of the mission, IVO (Io Volcano Observer) is approximately one or two days per a NASA Discovery mission cur- orbit were used to observe Saturn's irregular moons, rently under Phase A study.
    [Show full text]
  • The 3 Micron Spectrum of Jupiter's Irregular Satellite Himalia
    Draft version September 3, 2014 A Preprint typeset using LTEX style emulateapj v. 5/2/11 THE 3µM SPECTRUM OF JUPITER’S IRREGULAR SATELLITE HIMALIA M.E. Brown Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 A.R. Rhoden Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723 Draft version September 3, 2014 ABSTRACT We present a medium resolution spectrum of Jupiter’s irregular satellite Himalia covering the crit- ical 3 µm spectral region. The spectrum shows no evidence for aqueously altered phyllosilicates, as had been suggested from the tentative detection of a 0.7 µm absorption, but instead shows a spec- trum strikingly similar to the C/CF type asteroid 52 Europa. 52 Europa is the prototype of a class of asteroids generally situated in the outer asteroid belt between less distant asteroids which show evidence for aqueous alteration and more distant asteroids which show evidence for water ice. The spectral match between Himalia and this group of asteroids is surprising and difficult to reconcile with models of the origin of the irregular satellites. Subject headings: 1. INTRODUCTION ture, if actually present, may result from oxidized iron The origin of the irregular satellites of the giant planets in phyllosilicate minerals potentially caused by aqueous – small satellites in distant, eccentric, and inclined orbits processing on these bodies. about their parent body – remains unclear. Early work In a study of dark asteroids in the outer belt Takir & suggested that the objects were captured from previously Emery (2012) found that all asteroids that they observed heliocentric orbits by gas drag (Pollack et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Irregular Satellites of the Giant Planets 411
    Nicholson et al.: Irregular Satellites of the Giant Planets 411 Irregular Satellites of the Giant Planets Philip D. Nicholson Cornell University Matija Cuk University of British Columbia Scott S. Sheppard Carnegie Institution of Washington David Nesvorný Southwest Research Institute Torrence V. Johnson Jet Propulsion Laboratory The irregular satellites of the outer planets, whose population now numbers over 100, are likely to have been captured from heliocentric orbit during the early period of solar system history. They may thus constitute an intact sample of the planetesimals that accreted to form the cores of the jovian planets. Ranging in diameter from ~2 km to over 300 km, these bodies overlap the lower end of the presently known population of transneptunian objects (TNOs). Their size distributions, however, appear to be significantly shallower than that of TNOs of comparable size, suggesting either collisional evolution or a size-dependent capture probability. Several tight orbital groupings at Jupiter, supported by similarities in color, attest to a common origin followed by collisional disruption, akin to that of asteroid families. But with the limited data available to date, this does not appear to be the case at Uranus or Neptune, while the situa- tion at Saturn is unclear. Very limited spectral evidence suggests an origin of the jovian irregu- lars in the outer asteroid belt, but Saturn’s Phoebe and Neptune’s Nereid have surfaces domi- nated by water ice, suggesting an outer solar system origin. The short-term dynamics of many of the irregular satellites are dominated by large-amplitude coupled oscillations in eccentricity and inclination and offer several novel features, including secular resonances.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Bodies As the Most Important Objects in Planetary Sciences
    Strength In Diversity: Small Bodies as the Most Important Objects in Planetary Sciences A White Paper submitted to the National Academy of Sciences Planetary and Astrobiology Decadal Survey 2023-2032 Laura M. Woodney (California State University, San Bernardino) Andrew S. Rivkin (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory) Walter Harris (University of Arizona, Tucson) Barbara A. Cohen (NASA GSFC) Gal Sarid (SETI Institute) Maria Womack (Florida Space Institute, University of Central Florida) Olivier Barnouin (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory) Kat Volk (University of Arizona, Tucson) Rachel Klima (Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory) Yanga R. Fernandez (University of Central Florida) Jordan K. Steckloff (Planetary Science Institute, University of Texas at Austin) Paul A. Abell (NASA Johnson) Executive Summary The small bodies of the solar system are the unaccreted leftovers of planetary formation. In planetary science, they could also be mistaken for leftovers in the sense that they are “everything else” after the planets and their satellites (or sometimes just their “regular” satellites) are accounted for. This mistaken view elides the great diversity of compositions, histories, and present-day conditions and processes found in the small bodies, and the interdisciplinary nature of their study. Understanding small bodies is critical to planetary science as a field, and we urge planetary scientists and our decision makers to continue to support science-based mission selections and to recognize that while small bodies have been grouped together for convenience, the diversity of these objects in terms of composition, mass, differentiation, evolution, activity, dynamical state, physical structure, thermal environment & history, and formation vastly exceeds the observed variability in the major planets and their satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Moon Cards Mercury
    SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS MERCURY Number of known Moons: 0 Moon names: N/A SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS VENUS Number of known Moons: 0 Moon names: N/A SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS EARTH Number of known Moons: 1 Moon names: Moon SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS MARS Number of known Moons: 2 Moon names: Phobos, Deimos SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS JUPITER Number of known Moons: 67 Moon names: Io, Europa, Ganymede, Callisto, Amalthea, Himalia, Elara, Pasiphae, Sinope, Lysithea, Carme, Ananke, Leda, Metis, Adrastea, Thebe, Callirrhoe, Themisto, Kalyke, Iocaste, Erinome, Harpalyke, Isonoe, Praxidike, Megaclite, Taygete, Chaldene, Autonoe, Thyone, Hermippe, Eurydome, Sponde, Pasithee, Euanthe, Kale, Orthosie, Euporie, Aitne, Hegemone, Mneme, Aoede, Thelxinoe, Arche, Kallichore, Helike, Carpo, Eukelade, Cyllene, Kore, Herse, plus others yet to receive names SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS SATURN Number of known Moons: 62 Moon names: Titan, Rhea, Iapetus, Dione, Tethys, Enceladus, Mimas, Hyperion, Prometheus, Pandora, Phoebe, Janus, Epimetheus, Helene, Telesto, Calypso, Atlas, Pan, Ymir, Paaliaq, Siarnaq, Tarvos, Kiviuq, Ijiraq, Thrymr, Skathi, Mundilfari, Erriapus, Albiorix, Suttungr, Aegaeon, Aegir, Anthe, Bebhionn, Bergelmir, Bestla, Daphnis, Farbauti, Fenrir, Fornjot, Greip, Hati, Hyrrokin, Jarnsaxa, Kari, Loge, Methone, Narvi, Pallene, Polydeuces, Skoll, Surtur Tarqeq plus others yet to receive names SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS URANUS Number of known Moons: 27 Moon names: Cordelia, Ophelia, Bianca, Cressida, Desdemona, Juliet, Portia, Rosalind, Mab, Belinda, Perdita, Puck, Cupid, Miranda, Francisco, Ariel, Umbriel, Titania, Oberon, Caliban, Sycorax, Margaret, Prospero, Setebos, Stephano, Trinculo, Ferdinand SOLAR SYSTEM MOON CARDS NEPTUNE Number of known Moons: 14 Moon names: Triton, Nereid, Naiad, Thalassa, Despina, Galatea, Larissa, Proteus, Laomedia, Psamanthe, Sao, Neso, Halimede, plus one other yet to receive a name.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jupiter Satellites and Moon-Moon Collisions
    Draft version September 5, 2018 Typeset using LATEX RNAAS style in AASTeX62 New Jupiter Satellites and Moon-Moon Collisions Scott S. Sheppard,1 Gareth V. Williams,2 David J. Tholen,3 Chadwick A. Trujillo,4 Marina Brozovic,5 Audrey Thirouin,6 Maxime Devogele,6 Dora Fohring,3 Robert Jacobson,5 and Nicholas A. Moskovitz6 1Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution for Science, 5241 Broad Branch Rd. NW, Washington, DC 20015, USA, [email protected] 2Minor Planet Center, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 3Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawai’i, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA 4Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USA 6Lowell Observatory, 1400 W Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA Keywords: planets and satellites: individual (S/2016 J1, S/2016 J2, S/2017 J1, S/2017 J2, S/2017 J6, S/2018 J1) We report the discovery of 12 satellites of Jupiter, giving Jupiter 79 known satellites. They are between 23rd−24th mag in the r-band and 1−3 km assuming dark albedos. Most were discovered using DECam on the Blanco 4m telescope in March 2017 during a continuation of the outer solar system survey detailed in Sheppard & Trujillo (2016) and Sheppard et al. (2016). Recoveries were obtained at the Magellan, Discovery Channel, Subaru and Gemini telescopes. S. Sheppard maintains a webpage showing the characteristics of the moons. Nine of the discoveries are in the distant retrograde groupings (Fig 1). The retrogrades are clustered into or- bital groupings that might be the remnants of once-larger parent bodies that fragmented from collisions with aster- oids, comets, or other satellites (Sheppard & Jewitt (2003), Nesvorn´yet al.
    [Show full text]
  • Moons of the Solar System
    MOONS OF OUR SOLAR SYSTEM last updated October 7, 2019 Since there are over 200 known moons in our solar system, all have been given names or designations. The problem of naming is compounded when space pictures are analyzed and new moons are discovered (or on rare occasions when spacecraft images of small, distant moons are found to be imaging flaws, and a moon is removed from the list). This is a list of the planets' known moons, with their names or other designations. If a planet has more than one moon, they are listed from the moon closest to the planet to the moon farthest from the planet. Since the naming systems overlap, many moons have more than one designation; in each case, the first identification listed is the official one. MERCURY and VENUS have no known moons. EARTH has one known moon. It has no official name. MARS has two known moons: Phobos and Deimos. ASTEROIDS (Small moons have now been found around several asteroids. In addition, a growing number of asteroids are now known to be binary, meaning two asteroids of about the same size orbiting each other. Whether there is a fundamental difference in these situations is uncertain.) JUPITER has 79 known moons. Names such as “S/2003 J2" are provisional. Metis (XVI), Adrastea (XV), Amalthea (V), Thebe (XIV), Io (I), Europa (II), Ganymede (III), Callisto (IV), Themisto (XVIII), Leda (XIII), Himalia (Hestia or VI), S/2018 J1, S/2017 J4, Lysithea (Demeter or X), Elara (Hera or VII), Dia (S/2000 J11), Carpo (XLVI), S/2003 J12, Valetudo (S/2016 J2), Euporie (XXXIV), S/2003 J3, S/2011
    [Show full text]