2017 – 2021 Scoping and Design Projects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2017 – 2021 Scoping and Design Projects Section 3 – Scoping and Design Projects 2017 – 2021 Scoping and Design Projects The purpose of this section is to identify potential future highway and bridge projects. These projects may be in the evaluation stage, which is called project scoping, or may be further along in the preliminary design process. Projects listed in this section are not commitments to construct or implement an improvement. These commitments won’t be made until the NEPA process is completed. These projects are being included in the STIP for informational purposes and subsequent phases have not yet been determined or are beyond the STIP horizon period. After needs have been identified and prioritized, the higher priority needs are included in this section. Next, a core team is formed, comprising personnel from various MoDOT departments. The core team investigates the problem or concern. The core team develops several solutions that may be either short term or long term. Some problems have no transportation or construction solution and instead may require public education or assistance through law enforcement. Once a solution is selected, additional preliminary design work occurs. Design progresses up to a point at which MoDOT is confident the solution will properly address the problem or concern and of the improvement’s cost. The potential project moves into the next stage of the planning framework, which is the prioritization and selection of projects for construction. Projects that have been prioritized and selected for construction are listed in the construction program (see Section 4.) Only the construction projects in Section 4 represent a commitment by MoDOT to build the project. Please see Section 2 for additional discussion regarding how a need becomes a project through the planning framework process of identifying and prioritizing needs, to developing solutions, to prioritizing and selecting projects for construction. The amount of time a potential project spends in the scoping and design phase varies. Some potential projects are more complex than others, and they might remain in the scoping and design phase for several years. This is especially true for projects such as Missouri and Mississippi River bridge replacements, new roadway construction, or converting a two-lane road to a four-lane road. Section 3 - 1 2017 - 2021 Scoping and Design Projects STATE FISCAL YEAR PROJECT BUDGETING (ENGINEERING) 7/2016- 7/2017- Prior Prog. 6/2017 6/2021 County: Andrew Scoping for bridge improvements over Hopkins Creek, 0.2 mile south of Rte. T near Amazonia. Project involves 3 3 1 Route: IS 29 Job No: 1I3109 twin bridges A1293 in the northbound and southbound lanes. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 1,001 - 2,000 County: Andrew Scoping for pavement improvements from Rte. T, in Savannah, to Rte. 59 in St. Joseph. 0 2 1 Route: RT DD Job No: 1S3171 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: S.T.P. 3 0 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Atchison Scoping for bridge improvements over the Nishnabotna River, 1 mile south of the Iowa State line. Involves twin 3 3 1 Route: IS 29 Job No: 1I3110 bridges A2369 in the northbound and the southbound lanes. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 1,001 - 2,000 County: Buchanan Scoping for pavement improvements from Rte. 371 (22nd Street) to I-29 in St. Joseph. 5 2 1 Route: IS 229 Job No: 1I0904 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP 3 0 0 Future Cost: 1,001 - 2,000 County: Buchanan Scoping for bridge improvements on I-229 viaduct in downtown St. Joseph. Project involves twin bridges 15 5 5 Route: IS 229 Job No: 1I3053 A2225. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 8 2 0 Future Cost: 10,001 - 15,000 Federal Oversight County: Buchanan Scoping for bridge and intersection improvements at Rte. 36 intersection in St. Joseph. Project involves bridge 12 5 5 Route: RT AC Job No: 1S3030 A2822. Anticipated Federal Category: S.T.P. Fed State Local 8 2 0 Future Cost: 2,001 - 5,000 County: Caldwell Scoping for pavement improvements from Rte. 13 to the Livingston County line, near Hamilton. Westbound 0 2 1 Route: US 36 Job No: 1P3165 lanes only. DRAFT Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 0 0 Future Cost: 2,001 - 5,000 4/22/16 Section 3 - 1 District Northwest Dollars In Thousands 2017 - 2021 Scoping and Design Projects STATE FISCAL YEAR PROJECT BUDGETING (ENGINEERING) 7/2016- 7/2017- Prior Prog. 6/2017 6/2021 County: Carroll Scoping for bridge improvements over Tater Hill Creek, 1.1 miles north of Rte. 65. Project involves bridge 20 2 1 Route: RT Z Job No: 2S2185 T0267. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 0 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Chariton Scoping for pavement improvements from Rte. 36 to Rte. 24 in Salisbury. 0 2 1 Route: MO 129 Job No: 1S3170 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: S.T.P. 3 0 0 Future Cost: 1,001 - 2,000 County: Chariton Scoping for bridge improvements over Grand River Overflow, 1.6 miles west of Rte. EE near Sumner. Project 0 3 1 Route: MO 139 Job No: 1S3157 involves bridge R0420. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 1,001 - 2,000 County: Chariton Scoping for pavement improvements from Marceline to Rte. 24 in Keytesville. 35 2 1 Route: MO 5 Job No: 1P3024 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: S.T.P. 3 0 0 Future Cost: 2,001 - 5,000 County: Daviess Scoping for bridge improvements over Clear Creek, 0.3 mile east of Rte. V near Lock Springs. Project involves 0 3 1 Route: MO 190 Job No: 1S3159 bridge S0442. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Dekalb Scoping for intersection improvements at I-35, and at Bob Griffin Road in Cameron. 0 5 5 Route: US 36 Job No: 1P3145 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP 8 2 0 Future Cost: 5,001 - 10,000 County: Dekalb Scoping for bridge improvements over Lost Creek, 0.5 mile south of Rte. W near Maysville. Involves bridge 0 2 15 Route: RT A Job No: 1S3136 A1378. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 14 3 0 DRAFTFuture Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Gentry Scoping for bridge improvements over Middle Fork Grand River, 0.6 mile east of Rte. YY near Gentry. Project 3 2 15 Route: US 169 Job No: 1P3106 involves bridge A0729. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 14 3 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 4/22/16 Section 3 - 2 District Northwest Dollars In Thousands 2017 - 2021 Scoping and Design Projects STATE FISCAL YEAR PROJECT BUDGETING (ENGINEERING) 7/2016- 7/2017- Prior Prog. 6/2017 6/2021 County: Grundy Scoping for resurface driving lanes and improvements to pedestrian ramps in Trenton from west city limits to 0 5 5 Route: MO 6 Job No: 1P3144 Rte. 65. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 8 2 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Harrison Scoping for pavement improvements from Rte. 136 to Rte. C. 5 5 1 Route: IS 35 Job No: 1I0914 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP 5 1 0 Future Cost: 5,001 - 10,000 County: Harrison Scoping for pavement improvements from Iowa State line to Rte. N at Eagleville. 0 5 1 Route: IS 35 Job No: 1I3169 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP 5 1 0 Future Cost: 2,001 - 5,000 County: Harrison Scoping for bridge improvements over White Oak Creek, 0.4 mile west of Rte. TT near McFall. Project involves 0 3 1 Route: RT P Job No: 1S3158 bridge P0576. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Holt Scoping for bridge improvements over I-29 near Oregon. Project involves bridge A1834. 6 3 1 Route: RT B Job No: 1S3061 Fed State Local Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Holt Scoping for bridge improvements over Nichols Creek, 0.3 mile east of Rte. B, near Oregon. Project involves 0 3 1 Route: RT H Job No: 1S3162 bridge P0997. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Holt Scoping for bridge improvements over Mill Creek, 1.8 miles south of Rte. 111 near Forest City. Project involves 6 3 1 Route: RT T Job No: 1S3062 bridge N0811. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 DRAFTFuture Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Holt Scoping for bridge improvements over Spring Creek, 0.5 mile south of Rte. O near Oregon. Project involves 6 3 1 Route: RT T Job No: 1S3070 bridge R0223. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 4/22/16 Section 3 - 3 District Northwest Dollars In Thousands 2017 - 2021 Scoping and Design Projects STATE FISCAL YEAR PROJECT BUDGETING (ENGINEERING) 7/2016- 7/2017- Prior Prog. 6/2017 6/2021 County: Holt Scoping for bridge improvements over Easter Creek, 0.8 mile north of Rte. U near Oregon. Project involves 6 3 1 Route: RT T Job No: 1S3071 bridge R0224. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 301 - 1,000 County: Livingston Scoping for bridge improvements over the Thompson River, 0.9 mile east of Rte. Y, near Chillicothe. Project 0 3 1 Route: MO 190 Job No: 1S3156 involves bridge A1376. Anticipated Federal Category: NHPP Fed State Local 3 1 0 Future Cost: 2,001 - 5,000 County: Livingston Scoping for bridge improvements over the Grand River, 1.3 miles south of Rte.
Recommended publications
  • North Fabius River HUC # 07110002
    North Fabius River HUC # 07110002 RAPID WATERSHED ASSESSMENT USDA NRCS 601 Business Loop 70 West Parkade Center, Suite 250 Columbia, MO 65203 Lower Missouri - Crooked River Watershed HUC #10300101 Introduction ..................................................... Page 3 A rapid watershed assessment Physical Description ........................................... Page 4 (RWA) evaluates resource A. Land Use/ Land Cover...................................Page 4 conditions and needs on an B. Grassland ..................................................Page 5 8-digit hydrologic unit (HU) C. Crop History ..............................................Page 5 basis. The assessment identifies D. Public Land ...............................................Page 5 E. Soil Capability ............................................Page 6 the primary resource concerns F. Common Resources ......................................Page 7 for the watershed being profiled G. Streams....................................................Page 9 and provides estimate as to H. Wetlands ................................................ Page 11 where conservation investments I. Relief Map................................................ Page 12 would best address the concerns J. Geology .................................................. Page 13 of landowners, conservation Resource Concerns............................................Page 14 districts, stakeholders, and A. Soils ...................................................... Page 16 others. The RWA provides B. Soil Erosion.............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fabius River Drainage District
    Des Moines River Basin Master Reservoir Regulation Manual Feasibility Report with Integrated Environmental Assessment Des Moines River, Saylorville Lake, & Lake Red Rock APPENDIX A CORRESPONDENCE AND PUBLIC COMMENTS, DISTRICT RESPONSE TO PUBLIC COMMENTS, AND PUBLIC MEETINGS INFORMATION This page was intentionally left blank. ­ CORRESPONDENCE This page was intentionally left blank. ­ CHESTER J. CULVER OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR PATTY JUDGE GOVERNOR LT. GOVERNOR July 20, 2010 Lieutenant General Robert Van Antwerp Commanding General, USAGE Headquarters, US Army Corps of Engineers 441 G. Street, NW Washington, DC 20314-1000 Dear Lt. General Van Antwerp, The floods of 2008 and 2010 in Iowa provide vivid reminders of the complex factors impacting the ability of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE) to conduct day-to-day operations of the water storage capacities of each of our state's reservoirs. Much of the analyses underlying the Water Control Activities of the USAGE are premised on decades-old technologies and assumptions about Iowa's hydrology. Based on our recent cooperative efforts with USAGE, and in light of uncontrolled releases at Saylorville Reservoir, and new reports of technical problems as to the pneumatic crest gate at that dam, we believe that a review of these complex practices would be beneficial to all parties involved. We have USAGE-controlled dams in Iowa that have reached beyond their half­ lives without a comprehensive review of their operations. What may have been defined as "normal" 30 years ago might be quite unusual today. In light of the changing Midwestern weather patterns, I believe it is imperative to the safety and well-being of Iowans that plans put in place for the facilities and operations be carefully reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • CANTON SCHOOL CELEBRATING 150 Years
    C M C M Y K Y K chool Sports In Full Swing Catch R-V and C-1 Sports S Actions See Pages 5B & 6B Serving the communities of Lewis County, Mo. since 1862 (USPS 088-820) Vol. XLIII New Series, No. 37 Th ursday, September 10, 2015 LaGrange, Mo. 63448 • 12 Pages • 2 Sections • 65 cents PRESS-NEWS JOURNAL CANTON SCHOOL ONLINE CELEBRATING 150 Years CANTON FIRE DEPARTMENT EVENT Th e Canton Fire Department will be having a ceremony to honor lives lost in the Sep- tember 11, 2001 attack of the twin towers at the parking lot by County Market/Orschlens . Public is welcome to attend. Canton R-V School is celebrating their 150 anniversary. The school has always been an important part of the community and has seen many changes over the last century and a half. The celebration started off on September 4 with a variety of activities that included big REGIONAL infl atable rides. (Photo by McKenzie Shrader) EDITION PLANNED Th e Press-News Journal is planning a regional issue for the September 17 edition. Th at Lewistown Appreciation Day is September 12 edition will be mailed to ev- Lewistown will have the annual Appre- the Wheels to Wheels Show, contact Karla from 3 to 5 p.m. Th e Power Wheels Derby ery household and business in ciation Day on Saturday, September 12. Richmond at (573) 497-2478. will be at 3 p.m. A Washer tournament be- Lewis and Knox County. Ad- Events begin at 6 a.m. with Breakfast in the Th e pedal tractor pull will be at 10 a.m gins at 4 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Fabius River
    Fabius River Watershed and Inventory Assessment, date Prepared by H. Ross Dames and David J. Neuswanger Missouri Department of Conservation, 2500 South Haliburton, Kirksville, MO 63501 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Preface ........................................................................................................................................................... 4 Location ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 Watershed Geography .............................................................................................................................. 5 Watershed Area ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Stream Orders ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Geology ......................................................................................................................................................... 7 Physiographic Region/Geology/Soils ....................................................................................................... 7 Stream Channel Gradients .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Floods in Missouri
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 370 FLOODS IN MISSOURI MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY Prepared in cooperation with the STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF MISSOURI UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 370 FLOODS IN MISSOURI MAGNITUDE AND FREQUENCY By J. K. Searcy Prepared in cooperation with the STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF MISSOURI Washington, D. C., 1955 Free on application to the Geological Survey, Washington 25, D. C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract .................................... 1 Gaging-station re cords--Continued Introduction. ................................. 1 Tarkio River basin ......................... 44 Flood-frequency design data................... 1 West Tarkio Creek near Westboro. ........ 44 The design flood ........................... 1 Tarkio River at Fairfax.................. 45 Flood-frequency curve at the design site ..... 1 Nodaway River basin ....................... 46 Maximum floods of record .................. 3 Nodaway River near Burlington Junction ... 46 The Mississippi River. ..................... 3 Missouri River main stem .................. 47 The Missouri River ........................ 5 Missouri River at St. Joseph ............. 47 Flood-frequency analysis...................... 5 Platte River basin. ......................... 48 Description of the area..................... 6 Platte River at Conception Junction........ 48 Topography ............................ 6 One Hundred and Two River near Maryville 48 The prairies ........................
    [Show full text]
  • Water-Resources Investigations of the U.S. Geological
    WATER-RESOURCES INVESTIGATIONS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY IN MISSOURI FISCAL YEAR 1983 Compiled by Wanietia M. Kratzer U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Open-File Report 83-251 Rolla, Missouri 1983 UNITED STATES DEPARTMEN^1 OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SI RVEY Dallas L. Peck, IDirector For additional information Copies of this report can write to: 2 purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey sstern Distribution Branch 1UOO Independence Road BDX 25425, Federal Center Mail Stop 200 nver, Colorado 80225 Rolla, Missouri 65401 (Telephone: (303) 234-58 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Cooperation -- 4 Hydro! ogic-data program 5 Cooperators 5 Type of data collected 7 Hydro!ogic-data stations in operation during fiscal year 1983 8 Missouri district projects - 17 Where to obtain U.S. Geological Survey publications 45 Bibliography - -- ^7 ILLUSTRATIONS Figure 1. Chart showing organization of the Missouri district 2 2. Map showing locations of Water Resources Division offices in Missouri 3 3. Map showing drainage basins in Missouri 6 WATER RESOURCES DIVISION BASIC MISSION AND PROGRAM The mission of the Water Resources Division of the U.S. Geological Survey is to provide the hydro!ogic information and understanding for the optimum utilization and management of the Nation's water resources for the overall benefit of the people of the United States, This mission is accomplished, in large part, through cooperation with other federal and non-federal agencies, by: -Systematically collecting data needed for the Continuing determination and evaluation of the quantity, quality, and use of the Nation's water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • High Risk Levees Along the Upper Mississippi River As Identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers
    High Risk Levees along the Upper Mississippi River As identified by the United States Army Corps of Engineers Levees take a hit during heavy floods. This spring, the Midwest was inundated with flooding that affected nearly 14 million people and set new record water levels in several places. While the ground was still frozen, heavy rainstorms followed heavy snow, and the resultant flooding damaged crops, homes, bridges, communities, and more. Levees are supposed to receive extensive monitoring and maintenance after floods because they serve a vital role in defending riverfront communities and lands from damage. In reviewing the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ (USACE) records, the Environmental Law & Policy Center (ELPC) identified the need for much more robust monitoring, reinforcement, and repairs. There are levees at risk of breach all along the Mississippi River in Illinois, Iowa, and Missouri, and several others have not received repairs after breaching during the 2019 floods. In Illinois, 41 of 54 levees in the St. Louis District have filed damage reports. In Missouri, 30 of 39 levees in the St. Louis District have filed damage reports. The Corps’ Rock Island District is currently working on only 22 levee rehabilitation projects. The flooding situation is likely to get worse in the future; scientists anticipate heavy rain events to increase in Midwestern states as global temperatures rise. Prudent decisionmakers should take climate resilience into account for long-term planning, prioritize which levees are repaired given limited federal and state funds, and shift towards green infrastructure. The list of levees below was drawn from the USACE National Levee Database, which reports the probability of levee failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Klingner & Associates
    NNewew HavenHaven Missouri LeveeQualifications Accreditation Klingnerngnerg eer hashhaas pep erformederfeerformerformedformeormedmed seventeen AAccredAccreditaAccreditatccreditatcccrereditadittatattionsions NNewew HHavenaven MissouriMissouri TTableable ooff CContentsontents Transmittal Letter KKlingnerlingner & AAssociatesssociates Message from Local Project Manager . 3 661616 N.N. 224th4th SStreettreet QQuincy,uincy, IILL 6623012301 1. Qualifi cations PPhone:hone: 2217.223.367017.223.3670 Water Resources Services . 4 FFax:ax: 2217.223.360317.223.3603 2. Experience with Similar Projects CContact:ontact: GGavinavin RRisleyisley Fabius River Drainage Dist 100 Yr Cert . 5 EEmail:mail: McGee & Coal Creek Drainage & Levee Dist - PAL . 6 [email protected]@klingner.com South Quincy Levee & Drainage Dist PAL . 7 Iowa River Flint Creek Drainage & Levee District - PAL . 8 Hunt-Lima Drainage & Levee Dist - Levee Improvement Project. 9 3. Project Personnel Michael D. Klingner Principal in Charge . .10 Bryan Bross, Water Resources Engineer. 11 James Powell Water Resources Engineer . 12 Gavin Risley, Water Resources Engineer. 13 Mark Bross, Hydraulic Engineer . .14 Alan Lukens, Structural Engineer. 15 Ronald W. Craven, Geotechnical Engineer. 16 Steve Mock, Land Surveyor . 17 4. Scope of Work Scope of Work . 18 - 20 5. Project Estimate Project Estimate . 21 6. Project Schedule Project Schedule . 22 Table of Contents Table 22 KKLINGNERLINGNER & AASSOCIATES,SSOCIATES, PP.. CC.. TTransmittalransmittal LLetteretter March 6, 2014 Mr. Steve Roth, City Administrator City of New Haven 101 Front Street New Haven, Missouri 63068 Re: Request for Proposal - Levee Accreditation Dear Mr. Roth: In the qualifi cations which follow, we have demonstrated how Klingner can help the City of New Haven achieve their project goals in the most cost-effective and effi cient manner. We value our working relationships with our clients, and are committed to developing a working relationship with the City of New Haven that will exceed your expectations.
    [Show full text]
  • 744 INDEX a Bagnell Access to USGS Water Data
    744 INDEX A Bagnell Access to USGS water data .............................................................. 18 Lake of the Ozarks near .......................................................... 295 Accuracy of data and computed results ............................................ 12 Osage River near ..................................................................... 297 Accuracy of the Records .................................................................. 13 Ballwin Acre-foot, definition of ..................................................................... 18 Kiefer Creek near .................................................................... 470 Adenosine triphosphate, definition of .............................................. 18 Bankfull stage, definition of ............................................................. 19 Adjusted discharge, definition of ..................................................... 18 Bardley Agee Creek near Savannah ............................................................... 717 Eleven Point River near .......................................................... 686 Agency Barnett Hollow near Camdenton ...................................................... 720 Platte River near ...................................................................... 115 Base discharge, definition of ............................................................ 19 Akers Base flow, definition of .................................................................... 19 Current River above ...............................................................
    [Show full text]