Scalp Reconstruction: a 15-Year Experience

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scalp Reconstruction: a 15-Year Experience ORIGINAL ARTICLE Scalp Reconstruction: A 15-Year Experience Martin I. Newman, MD,† Matthew M. Hanasono, MD,† Joseph J. Disa, MD,* Peter G. Cordeiro, MD,* and Babak J. Mehrara, MD* grafts, or hardware. Although numerous case series and Abstract: Scalp reconstruction after ablative surgery can be chal- lenging. A useful reconstructive algorithm is lacking. The purpose reports have been published, study populations have been low of this study was to evaluate the authors’ experience and to identify and a useful reconstructive algorithm has not been offered. an appropriate reconstructive strategy. This was a retrospective The purpose of this study was (1) to evaluate our long-term review of all patients treated by the authors’ service for scalp defects experience with scalp reconstructions in a large series of during a 15-year period. Reconstructive methods, independent fac- cancer patients, (2) to identify an appropriate algorithm for tors, and outcomes were analyzed. A total of 73 procedures were scalp reconstruction in the cancer population, and (3) to performed in 64 patients. Techniques for reconstruction included identify comorbid factors that increased the rates of compli- primary closure, grafts, and local and distal flaps. A correlation cations in this patient population. between reconstructive technique and complications could not be demonstrated. However, an increased incidence of complications was correlated with a history of radiation, chemotherapy, cerebro- spinal fluid leaks, and an anterior location of the ablative defect (P METHODS Ͻ 0.05). Important tenets for successful management of scalp This was a retrospective review of all scalp reconstruc- defects are durable coverage, adequate debridement, preservation of tions performed at Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center blood supply, and proper wound drainage. Local scalp flaps with during a 15-year period ending November 2002. Patients who skin grafts, and free tissue transfer remain the mainstay of recon- underwent scalp reconstruction were identified by query of struction in most instances. our prospectively maintained electronic medical record data- Key Words: scalp, reconstruction, flap, skin graft, microsurgery base. Charts identified were examined with attention to the (Ann Plast Surg 2004;52: 501–506) following details: patient demographics; past medical and surgical history; nature of primary scalp or intracranial dis- ease; size, location, and nature of scalp defect; presence or absence of CSF leakage; method of reconstruction; adjunc- overage of scalp defects after ablative surgery can be tive therapies; and type and nature of complications. Cchallenging. Reconstructions may be especially difficult Complications were recorded and divided into 2 cate- in patients who have been treated with external beam radia- gories: major and minor. Major complications included death, tion or when repair is performed after wound breakdown or events requiring return to the operating room, or postopera- infection. Previous scars or fibrosis may preclude the use of tive illnesses requiring intensive medical intervention. Minor adjacent tissue for local rotational flaps. Often, cerebrospinal complications were primarily wound-related issues that were fluid (CSF) leaks are present and are further complicated by managed successfully with conservative therapy. the presence of allograft material, nonvascularized bone Complications were examined as a function of recon- structive method and comorbid factors, including diabetes, Received December 16, 2003. Accepted for publication December 17, 2003. steroids, tobacco use, prior scalp surgery, ablative defect From *The Plastic and Reconstructive Service, Memorial Sloan–Kettering more than 100 cm2, anterior location of defect, craniotomy, Cancer Center, New York, NY, and †The Division of Plastic Surgery, CSF leak, CSF drain, chemotherapy, and preoperative radia- Cornell University Medical Center, New York, NY. Presented at the 20th annual meeting of the Northeastern Society of Plastic tion therapy. Univariate analysis was performed using the Surgeons; Baltimore, MD, October 2–4, 2003. Pearson bivariate correlation coefficient with P Յ 0.05 con- Reprints: Babak J. Mehrara, MD, 1275 York Avenue, Room C-1189, New sidered significant. Logistic regression analysis was per- York, NY 10021. Tel: (212) 639–8639, Fax: (212) 717–3677, E-mail: formed to determine the independent contribution of risk [email protected] factors to postoperative complication. Multiple linear regres- Copyright © 2004 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins ISSN: 0148-7043/04/5205-0501 sion analysis was performed to evaluate the combined effects DOI: 10.1097/01.sap.0000123346.58418.e6 of variables examined on postoperative complications. Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 52, Number 5, May 2004 501 Newman et al Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 52, Number 5, May 2004 RESULTS TABLE 2. Ablative and Reconstructive Procedures Seventy-three procedures were performed in 64 pa- tients. Demographics and frequency of independent factors Variable n % identified are summarized (Table 1). Indication for ablative Indications for ablation procedure, location of resultant scalp defect, and method of Skin cancers 50 68.5 closure are presented (Table 2). Sarcomas 10 13.7 No intraoperative complications were noted. A total of Primary CNS neoplasms 8 11.0 17 postoperative complications were identified after 17 inde- Metastases 4 5.5 pendent procedures (Table 3). There were 7 major postoper- Defects ative complications, which included 1 perioperative death in Average defect size, cm2 104.8 SD Ϯ 112.3 a free flap patient who died 15 days postoperatively second- Defect size range, cm2 0–540 ary to pneumonia and renal failure. Other major complica- Location of defects tions included 1 hematoma, 1 wound dehiscence after a Frontal/frontoparietal 22 30.0 primary closure, 1 wound dehiscence after a local flap clo- Occipital/posterior 6 8.2 sure, 1 free flap distal necrosis, 1 complete free flap loss, and Parietal 11 15.1 1 “systemic” complication not otherwise specified. There Postauricular 1 1.4 were 12 minor complications and all were managed conser- Posterior 1 1.4 vatively. They included 6 partial skin graft losses or delayed Temporal/temporoparietal 18 24.7 healing, 4 wound infections or dehiscences, 1 hematoma, and Vertex 7 9.6 1 tissue expander leak that required exchange in the office Unspecified 7 9.6 suite. Methods of closure Complications examined as a function of reconstructive Primary closure 3 4.1 method identified postoperative complications in 2 of the 3 Skin graft 13 17.8 primary repairs (66.7%), 2 of the 13 skin grafts (15.4%), 7 of Local flap 29 39.7 the 29 local flaps (24.1%), and 8 of the free flaps (28.6%; Fig. Free flap 28 38.4 1). There was no statistically significant correlation between CNS, central nervous system. TABLE 1. Patient Demographics Variable n % TABLE 3. Complications Complication n % Study population No. of patients 64 Major complication 7 9.6 No. of procedures 73 Perioperative death (pneumonia) 1 1.4 Demographics Hematoma 1 1.4 Male 36 56.3 Dehiscence 2 2.7 Female 28 43.8 Distal flap necrosis 1 1.4 Average age, y 58.8 SD Ϯ 19.8 Flap loss 1 1.4 Age range, y 9–93 Systemic complication, NOS 1 1.4 Independent patient factors Minor 12 16.4 Diabetes 5 6.8 Partial STSG loss/delayed 6 8.2 Steroid use 15 22.4 Infection/dehiscence 4 5.5 Tobacco history 10 15.9 Hematoma 1 1.4 Prior Scalp surgery 43 65.2 Tissue expander leak 1 1.4 2 Scalp defect Ͼ 100 cm 26 38.2 Overall 19 26.0 Anterior location of defect 40 60.6 NOS, not otherwise specified; STSG, split-thickness skin graft. Craniotomy 24 36.4 CSF leak 5 7.6 CSF drain 6 9.1 Chemotherapy 11 15.3 reconstructive technique and major, minor, or overall com- Preoperative XRT 32 43.8 plication rate. Specific to choice of free flap, 16 rectus abdominis muscle transfers resulted in 3 total complications CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; XRT, radiation therapy. (18.8%), 1 major and 2 minor. Eleven latissimus dorsi flaps 502 © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 52, Number 5, May 2004 Scalp Reconstruction FIGURE 1. Postoperative complications as a function of reconstructive technique. Major and minor complications are plotted for each type of closure used in our study. Note the lack of statistical significance between groups. resulted in 4 total complications (36.4%), 2 major and 2 lation was noted between preoperative scalp radiation, neo- minor complications. One radial forearm flap was performed adjuvant or postoperative chemotherapy, CSF leak, and in this series and was without complication. anterior location of the ablative defect (P Յ 0.05; Table 4). Complications were also examined as a function of Preoperative scalp radiation correlated with an increase in the patient demographics (age and gender), class of malignancy, overall complication rate, (17.1% vs. 37.5%, P ϭ 0.05) as did and independent risk factors using univariate analysis (Pear- chemotherapy (19.7% vs. 54.5%, P ϭ 0.01). The presence of son correlation coefficient). A statistically significant corre- a CSF leak correlated with an increase in major complications TABLE 4. Univariate and Multivariate Statistical Analysis of Independent Variables and Postoperative Complications Univariate Analysis*, P Value Multivariate Analysis†, P Value Independent Major Minor Total Major Minor Total Variable Complications Complications Complications Complications Complications Complications Diabetes 0.38 0.91 0.51 0.97 0.85 0.54 Steroids 0.50 0.81 0.52 0.96 0.91 0.60 Tobacco 0.61 0.43 0.67 0.98 0.86 0.14 Prior scalp surgery 0.33 0.90 0.46 0.99 0.57 0.81 Defect Ͼ 100 cm2 0.54 0.79 0.53 0.96 0.30 0.55 Anterior location 0.04 0.26 0.02 0.94 0.30 0.08 Craniotomy 0.47 0.37 0.75 0.98 0.83 0.11 CSF leak 0.01 0.91 0.09 0.97 0.91 0.84 CSF drain 0.50 0.92 0.73 0.99 0.84 0.86 Chemotherapy 0.03 0.23 0.01 0.97 0.89 0.08 Radiation 0.12 0.27 0.05 1.00 0.60 0.20 *Pearson bivariate correlation.
Recommended publications
  • Surgical Planning for Resection and Reconstruction of Facial Cutaneous Malignancies 1Evren Erkul, 2Krishna G Patel, 3Terry Day
    IJHNS Surgical Planning for Resection and Reconstruction10.5005/jp-journals-10001-1281 of Facial Cutaneous Malignancies ORIGINAL ARTICLE Surgical Planning for Resection and Reconstruction of Facial Cutaneous Malignancies 1Evren Erkul, 2Krishna G Patel, 3Terry Day ABSTRACT carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) are Skin cancer can be categorized into cutaneous melanoma and the most common types of NMSC, although other less nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The latter includes such common cutaneous malignancies are well known and may histologies as Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), basal cell carcinoma include Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), angiosarcoma, and (BCC), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Of these, BCC various malignancies of the adnexal structures. Currently, and SCC are the most common skin cancers of the head the NCCN guidelines list melanoma, nonmelanoma, and and neck while malignant melanoma is the most aggressive. Merkel cell as the only separate categories for cutaneous Sunscreen protection and early evaluation of suspicious areas remain the first line of defense against all skin cancers. When malignancy with dedicated guidelines. Surgery remains prevention fails, the gold standard of skin cancer management the mainstay of treatment of skin cancers of the head and involves a multidisciplinary approach which takes into account neck region. Surgical resection and reconstruction plan- tumor location, stage and biology of disease, and availability of ning is vital to outcomes but can be difficult to standardize resources. Proper diagnosis, staging, and treatment planning due to the diverse structures in the region, variability in must all be addressed prior to initiating interventions. When nodal metastases, and various specialists diagnosing and surgery is indicated, facial reconstruction is a key aspect of the overall treatment plan and requires informed forethought as treating these malignancies.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstruction of a Secondary Scalp Defect Using the Crane Principle And
    Lu et al. BMC Surg (2021) 21:41 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01056-y CASE REPORT Open Access Reconstruction of a secondary scalp defect using the crane principle and a split-thickness skin graft Yi Lu1, Ke‑Chung Chang2, Che‑Ning Chang1 and Dun‑Hao Chang1,2,3,4* Abstract Background: Scalp reconstruction is a common challenge for surgeons, and there are many diferent treatment choices. The “crane principle” is a technique that temporarily transfers a scalp fap to the defect to deposit subcutane‑ ous tissue. The fap is then returned to its original location, leaving behind a layer of soft tissue that is used to nourish a skin graft. Decades ago, it was commonly used for forehead scalp defects, but this useful technique has been sel‑ dom reported on in recent years due to the improvement of microsurgical techniques. Previous reports mainly used the crane principle for the primary defects, and here we present a case with its coincidental application to deal with a complication of a secondary defect. Case report: We present a case of a 75‑year‑old female patient with a temporoparietal scalp squamous cell carci‑ noma (SCC). After tumor excision, the primary defect was reconstructed using a transposition fap and the donor site was covered by a split‑thickness skin graft (STSG). Postoperatively, the occipital skin graft was partially lost resulting in skull bone exposure. For this secondary defect, we applied the crane principle to the previously rotated fap as a salvage procedure and skin grafting to the original tumor location covered by a viable galea fascia in 1.5 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Original Article
    Original Article Craniofacial reconstructions: is there still room for locoregional flaps? Reconstruções craniofaciais: ainda há espaço para os retalhos locorregionais? RAFAEL ANLICOARA 1,2* MARCO AURÉLIO DE FREITAS ■ ABSTRACT CABRAL 1,2 Introduction: Advanced tumors of the head and neck still 1,2 JAIRO ZACCHÉ DE SÁ have a high prevalence in Brazil. Reconstructing a defect 1,2 GUILHERME TORREÃO DE SÁ resulting from a craniofacial resection is a challenge for 1,2 ANTONIO CARLOS CORTE REAL BRAGA the plastic surgeon. Free flaps are the first choice for these reconstructions, and locoregional flaps have been used in selected cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate a number of reconstructions with locoregional flaps in patients undergoing craniofacial oncologic resection, to demonstrate the applicability of these flaps and the end result of the reconstructions. Methods: We retrospectively studied four craniofacial reconstructions with locoregional flaps on the forehead and scalp. The patients were operated at the Clinical Hospital of the Federal University of Pernambuco. They signed a consent form allowing the scientific publication of their photographs and clinical case records. Results: All reconstructions were successful. There were no cases of local infection or meningitis, flap necrosis, liquor fistula, or dehiscence. Institution: Serviço de Cirurgia Plástica Reconstructions with locoregional flaps were safe and do Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade simple to perform for extensive defects in the craniofacial Federal de Pernambuco (HC-UFPE). Recife, region. Conclusions: Plastic surgeons can perform complex Pernambuco, Brazil. reconstructions with locoregional flaps, demonstrating that there is still room for this type of reconstruction. Article received: February 3, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Pericranial Flaps with Dermal Substitute for Scalp Reconstruction: a Case Series
    School of Medicine Faculty Publications School of Medicine 8-1-2020 Use of Pericranial Flaps with Dermal Substitute for Scalp Reconstruction: A Case Series Kongkrit Chaiyasate MD, FACS Beaumont Health Lauren N. Oliver DO Baylor College of Medicine Scott A. Kreitzberg DO Beaumont Health Mitchell Lyons MD University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Joshua Goldman MD University of Nevada, Las Vegas, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/som_fac_articles See next page for additional authors Part of the Surgery Commons Repository Citation Chaiyasate, K., Oliver, L. N., Kreitzberg, S. A., Lyons, M., Goldman, J., Lu, S. M., Bastiaans, T., Lumley, C., Sachanandani, N. S. (2020). Use of Pericranial Flaps with Dermal Substitute for Scalp Reconstruction: A Case Series. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery-Global Open, 8(8), http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003011 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Article in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Article has been accepted for inclusion in School of Medicine Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Kongkrit Chaiyasate MD, FACS; Lauren N.
    [Show full text]
  • Successful Reconstruction of Scalp and Skull Defects: Lessons Learned from a Large Series
    The Laryngoscope VC 2011 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc. Successful Reconstruction of Scalp and Skull Defects: Lessons Learned from a Large Series David C. Shonka, Jr., MD; Andrea E. Potash, MD; Mark J. Jameson, MD, PhD; Gerry F. Funk, MD Objective: To provide a framework for the management of scalp and skull defects. Design: Retrospective chart review. Setting: Two tertiary care hospitals. Patients/Intervention: Fifty-six consecutive patients who underwent reconstruction of scalp and/or skull defects with free flaps, rotational skin/fascia flaps, skin grafts, and implants. Defects closed primarily and those of the lateral temporal bone and skull base were excluded. Results: Sixty-two reconstructions were performed. Treatment of skin cancers and intracranial tumors necessitated 31 (50%) and 22 (35%) of the reconstructions, respectively. Defects included partial-thickness soft tissue (9, 15%), full-thickness soft tissue (28, 45%), full-thickness soft tissue and skull (17, 27%), and full-thickness soft tissue, skull, and dura (8, 13%). Radiation or prereconstruction wound breakdown or infection was involved in 33 (53%) and 25 (40%) of cases, respectively. The most common method of reconstruction was free tissue transfer (27, 44%) followed by local skin (15, 24%) or fascia (9, 15%) flaps. There was a 15% (9/62) complication rate; 89% (8/9) of these occurred in radiated tissues and 44% (4/9) occurred in smokers. Seven of the nine patients with complications (78%) were managed with local wound care and/or removal of an implant, whereas 2 (22%) required a second reconstructive procedure. All patients ultimately achieved a safe outcome with no infection and no bone or dural exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Scalp Reconstruction: a 10-Year Experience
    Arch Craniofac Surg Vol.21 No.4, 237-243 Archives of Craniofacial Surgery https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2020.00269 Scalp reconstruction: A 10-year experience Hyeon Uk Jang, Background: The scalp is an important functional and aesthetic structure that protects the cra- Young Woong Choi nial bone. Due to its inelastic characteristics, soft-tissue defects of the scalp make reconstruction Department of Plastic and surgery difficult. This study aims to provide an improved scalp reconstruction decision making al- Reconstructive Surgery, Inje University gorithm for surgeons. Original Article Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University Methods: This study examined patients who underwent scalp reconstruction within the last 10 School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea years. The study evaluated several factors that surgeons use to select a given reconstruction method such as etiology, defect location, size, depth, and complications. An algorithmic approach was then suggested based on an analysis of these factors. Results: Ninety-four patients were selected in total and 98 cases, including revision surgery, were performed for scalp reconstruction. Scalp reconstruction was performed by primary closure (36.73%), skin graft (27.55%), local flap (17.34%), pedicled regional flap (15.30%), and free flap (3.06%). The ratio of primary closure to more complex procedure on loose scalps (51.11%) was significantly higher than on tight scalps (24.52%) (p= 0.011). The choice of scalp reconstruction method was affected significantly by the defect size (R= 0.479, p< 0.001) and depth (p< 0.001). There were five major complications which were three cases of flap necrosis and two cases of skin necrosis.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Muscle Free Flap in the Salvage of Complicated Scalp Wounds and Infected Prosthetic Dura
    Role of Muscle Free Flap in the Salvage of Complicated Scalp Wounds and Infected Prosthetic Dura Dae Hee Han, Myong Chul Park, Dong Ha Park, Hyunsuk Song, Il Jae Lee Original Article Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea Background The prosthetic dura is an essential element in the protection of the cranial Correspondence: Il Jae Lee parenchyma and prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leakage. Although prosthetic dura are Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou widely used in neurosurgery, they occasionally provoke infection, which can be a major University Hospital, Ajou University concern after neurosurgical treatment. However, removal of the prosthetic dura carries a School of Medicine, 164 World Cup- ro, Yongtong-gu, Suwon 443-721, risk of brain parenchyma injury and cerebrospinal fluid leakage. The salvage of infected Korea prosthetic dural material has not been adequately addressed in the literature. In this study, Tel: +82-31-219-5614 we demonstrate the value of the combination of a meticulous surgical debridement of Fax: +82-31-219-5610 E-mail: [email protected] necrotic tissue and simultaneous muscle free flap for intractable postoperative epidural abscess without removal of the infected prosthetic dura. Methods Between 2010 and 2012, we reviewed the data of 11 patients with persistent infection on the prosthetic dura. The epidural infections each occurred after a neurosurgical procedure, and there was soft tissue necrosis with the disclosure of the underlying prosthetic dura and dead bone around the scalp wound. To salvage the infected prosthetic dura, meticulous debridement and a muscle free flap were performed.
    [Show full text]
  • Superficial Temporal Vessels for Head and Scalp Microsurgical
    Published online: 2020-08-23 THIEME Letter to the Editor e49 Superficial Temporal Vessels for Head and Scalp Microsurgical Reconstruction Andrea Vicente-Pardo, MD1 Alberto Pérez-García, MD1 Jorge Balaguer-Cambra, MD1 Alessandro Thione, MD1 Alberto Sánchez-García, MD1 1 Department of Plastic Surgery and Burns, University and Polytechnic Address for correspondence Alberto Pérez-García, MD, Department Hospital La Fe Valencia, Valencia, Spain of Plastic Surgery and Burns, La Fe University Hospital, Avinguda de Fernando Abril Martorell, no. 106 46026 Valencia, Spain J Reconstr Microsurg Open 2020;5:49. (e-mail: [email protected]). We have read with interest the article entitled “Utilization of occurs few millimeters above preauricular segment. Intraparotid Segments of Superficial Temporal Vessels (STV) Although there is only one comitant vein, since it has few for Head and Scalp Free Flap Micronastomosis: A Clinical, valves and many communications, it can be used in both Histological, and Cadaveric Study.”1 We congratulate Venka- directions, allowing two venous anastomosis. Although tesh et al for their relevant work. Superficial temporal vessels vasospasm could occur after artery is cut, we usually dilate (STV) are very suitable vessels for head and scalp reconstruc- vessels mechanically and irrigate local vasodilators. Our tion2 due to their proximity and relative easy dissection. result is that no anastomosis revisions were required. In Because of their tortuous anatomy and their small diameter, our series, there were no instances of postoperative compli- STV have been historically considered to be prone to vaso- cations including operative takeback, partial/total necrosis, spasm, and not appropriate vessels for microanastomosis in or facial nerve injury.
    [Show full text]
  • Author's Personal Copy Scalp Reconstruction with Superficial
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/authorsrights Author's personal copy Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (2013) 66, 660e666 Scalp reconstruction with superficial temporal artery island flap: Clinical experience on 30 consecutive cases Stefania Tenna, Beniamino Brunetti*, Achille Aveta, Igor Poccia, Paolo Persichetti Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy Received 2 October 2012; accepted 11 January 2013 KEYWORDS Summary Background: Different techniques are available to reconstruct scalp defects; how- Scalp reconstruction; ever, when the cranium is exposed or the hairline compromised, the procedure may become Forehead quite challenging. The use of superficial temporal artery fascio-cutaneous flaps has been de- reconstruction; scribed mainly to restore the hair-bearing surface of the upper lip or the eyebrow but only Temporoparietal few applications in the scalp have been reported. The authors present their experience with fascia flap; the use of superficial temporal artery island flaps to obtain durable coverage and excellent Superficial temporal contour in anterior scalp reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Eastern Green Neurosurgery Original Article egneuro,02(02):52-56,2020 Scalp Reconstruction among Neurotrauma Patients: Presentation, Management and Outcome- Single Center Study Dinesh Kumar Thapa1 1Department of Neurosurgery, B&C medical College Teaching Hospital, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal Correspondence: Dinesh Kumar Thapa Department of Neurosurgery B&C medical College Teaching Hospital, Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal Email: [email protected] Phone no: +9779843123518 Background: Scalp laceration is common findings among patients with head injury. It may present with simple laceration, laceration with loss of tissue or degloving type of injury. This study was conducted to observe the different techniques or wound management and fate of thus reconstructed scalp lacerations. Methods and materials: This is a cross-sectional analytical study which was conducted in B&C Medical College Teaching Hospital, Jhapa, Nepal. Patients presented with major scalp lacerations needing repair in Operation Theatre between June 2017 to May 2019 were included. Age, gender, mode of injuries, severity of the injury, various types of management and complicationswere studied and thus collected data were analyzedin IBM SPSS version 23. Results: There were 53 cases of scalp injuries with male(75%) predominance and mean age of 31.51 (SD 15.218) yearsin this study. Road traffic accident was the major cause of injury 28(53%), followed by physical assault 16(30%), fall injury 7(13.2%) and burn injury 2(3.7%).Primary closure was possible in 29(54.7%), advancement flap in15(28.3%), flap rotation in 7(13.2%) and split thickness skin graft was in 2(3.8%) patients. Wound infection was seen among 6(11.3%) patients, wound break down in 2(3.7%) and flap failure with dehiscence was observed in 1(1.9%) patient needing secondary healing and closure.
    [Show full text]
  • An Algorithm for One-Stage Malignant Oncologic Scalp Reconstruction
    432 Original Article Page 1 of 14 An algorithm for one-stage malignant oncologic scalp reconstruction Yuqiu Zhou1#, Zhenhua Jiang2#, Chao Li1, Yongcong Cai1, Ronghao Sun1, Chunyan Shui1, Changming An3, Zhengqi Tang4, Jianfeng Sheng5, Dingrong Liu6, Dingfen Zeng1, Jian Jiang1, Guiquan Zhu1, Shaoxin Wang1 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, China; 2Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China; 3Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 10021, China; 4Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zigong Third People’s Hospital, Zigong 643000, China; 5Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mianyang Third People’s Hospital, Mianyang 621000, China; 6Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Neijiang Second People’s Hospital, Neijiang 100191, China Contributions: (I) Conception and design: C Li, Y Cai, Y Zhou; (II) Administrative support: C Li, Y Cai; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: C Li, Y Cai; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: Y Zhou, C Shui; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: Y Zhou, J Jiang; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. #These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Chao Li; Yongcong Cai. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610041, China. Email: [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • One-Stage Tumor Resection and Free Flap Scalp Reconstruction In
    One-stage tumor resection and free flap scalp reconstruction in squamous cell carcinoma infiltrating the calvarial bone Sanas Mirhoseiny1, Anna Pokrywka2, Christian Witzel1, Arzu Orhun1, Noor Aljuied1, Johann Pratschke3, Georgios Koulaxouzidis1 1 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chirurgische Klinik, Plastische und Rekonstruktive Chirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland 2 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Berlin, Deutschland 3 Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Chirurgische Klinik, Berlin, Deutschland BACKGROUND SURGICAL PROCEDURE OUTCOME Malignant tumors of the scalp can lead to infiltration of the After initial assessment of the recipient vessels for the free In total, four patients with cutaneous malignancies infiltrating periosteum, calvarial bone, dura, and brain. Oncologic flap (superficial temporal artery and vein), tumor resection the calvarium without intracranial invasion or metastasis radicality is of important prognostic significance, thus was performed by both the plastic surgeon and received radical surgery with craniectomy and free flap resulting in complex wounds with challenging reconstructive neurosurgeon. The malignancy was removed with surgical reconstruction as a curative treatment. The patients were prospects. margins of 1-2 cm involving circular craniectomy. Depending between 77 - 82 years old and presented with multiple on the size and localization of the osseous defect, bone comorbidities including history of kidney and liver transplantation. Bone reconstruction with Palacos cement RECONSTRUCTIVE OPTIONS reconstruction was performed. The resulting defect was was necessary in three cases. In all patients, the flap healed Depending on the size, depth, and localization of the scalp reconstructed with a free latissimus dorsi muscle flap covered uneventfully with only minor complications in two patients defect, the therapeutic approach can range from secondary with split-thickness skin graft.
    [Show full text]