Synthesis of the Upper Thurne Research and Recommendations for Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Synthesis of the Upper Thurne Research and Recommendations for Management Report to the Broads Authority Holman IP and White SM July 2008 Department of Natural Resources Cranfield University Cranfield Bedfordshire MK43 0AL Telephone: +44 (0) 1234 750111 Ext. 2764 Fax: +44 (0) 1234 752970 Executive Summary The importance of the Upper Thurne (including Hickling Broad, Horsey Mere, Martham North and South Broads) for biodiversity is recognised under national and international conservation legislation. Appropriate water management (water resources, quality and flood defence) is fundamental to conservation in the broads. However, the incomplete understanding of the surface water system and their interactions with the wider catchment, particularly with respect to nutrient cycling, was recognised by the Appropriate Assessment Team (Broads Authority, 1999). The resulting workshop, held in Norwich in November 2001, developed a framework for a research and monitoring programme which intends to inform the ongoing activities which contribute towards the published 20 year Vision for the Upper Thurne water space. The ecology of the Upper Thurne broads has gone through a number of Phases in response to changing environmental conditions: Phase 1 – until the early 20th century – dominated by stoneworts (charophytes) and low- growing waterweeds, due to the low nutrient levels; Phase 2 – early to mid 20th century– luxuriant aquatic plant growth dominated by taller growing species better able to take advantage of enhanced nutrient levels; Phase 3 – mid 20th century to present – phytoplankton dominated system due to high nutrient and salinity levels. The Upper Thurne research has aimed to help understand how a range of hydrological, chemical and ecological factors contribute to achieving ‘clear water’ (Phase 1) conditions in Hickling Broad. The research has included catchment modelling of water and nutrient movement, groundwater modelling, hydrodynamic modelling of water and salt movement from the sea to the Upper Thurne, mesocosm (small experimental ponds) experiments of salinity effects, the use of remote sensing, lake sediment analyses, laboratory experiments of stonewort response to a range of factors including water temperature, cutting, establishment, pollutant concentrations. The report has 4 sections: 1. How the Upper Thurne water spaces have changed; 2. A description of the current status of the Upper Thurne waterways, and how these compare to the Favourable Condition criteria under the EC Habitats Directive; 3. A synthesis of the activities to identify the significant catchment water management issues, which is focussed around salinity and ochre, biocides and heavy metals within the sediment and water column, point and diffuse sources of nutrients (nitrate and phosphate) under current and future climate, sea level rise and coastal protection, monitoring and the population biology of charophytes; 4. Recommendations for management actions to address the significant issues previously identified and thereby achieve Favourable Conservation Status. The recommendations for management actions to achieve Favourable Conservation Status centre around: reducing salinity and ochre discharges from the land drainage pumps, principally the Brograve pump. An approach to identifying a solution is suggested based on principles of no significant change in current flood risk; compatibility with a range of farm systems; being consistent with existing agri-environment schemes; having a means of removing any seawater from a future coastal breach without discharging it through the Special Area of Conservation; and that there is recognition that the Brograve sub-catchment is a system that is ‘naturally’ brackish and which produces limited ochre; reducing diffuse source losses of nutrients from agriculture. Assuming that the farming community are following Codes of Good Agricultural Practice and Good Agricultural and Environment Condition requirements, a non-exhaustive list of practical measures to reduce nutrient losses from agricultural activities are suggested. i Key findings from the Upper Thurne studies The importance of land drainage to salinity management Much of the salinity in the Brograve drainage system enters via the coastal marshes, especially Hempstead marshes; Changes to the management of the land drainage systems have the potential to reduce the salinity entering the rivers and broads from the pumps e.g. raising water levels in the Hempstead Marshes by ~ 1 metre might lead to a 15% reduction in the amount of salt being discharged by drainage pumps; Such changes need to be considered in conjunction with flood risk and ‘knock-on’ effects to neighbouring drainage systems and the River Thurne. Sources and transport of nutrients from the catchment to the rivers and broads Total Phosphorous concentrations in the Upper Thurne broads regularly exceed the target limit for favourable conditions, but point sources appear to contribute little; Agricultural drains and water from the drainage pumps have the highest nitrogen (N) concentrations, but N concentrations in the broads are reduced through biological uptake or sedimentation; Increased rainfall and higher temperatures through climate change will increase nutrient (N and phosphorus (P) and sediment losses from the land; Erosion control measures, on susceptible soils and slopes, should be employed as part of good agricultural practice to reduce sediment and nutrient losses. The movement of water and salt within the rivers and broads Water and salt being discharged from the land drainage pumps form the main source of water and salt entering the River Thurne from its catchment; Constrictions within the river system, principally at Potter Heigham old bridge, where the narrow openings within the bridge impede both the downstream and upstream movement of water (depending upon tidal conditions); The role of the land drainage pumps changes with the tides – reducing salinities during extreme tides but increasing background salinity during normal tides. Environmental needs of the Stoneworts Increased water temperature leads to considerably higher growth rates and seed production of Stoneworts, suggesting that climate change may influence future growth patterns; While laboratory plant cutting experiments showed that cut stems had the ability to re-grow and branch, uprooting of Stoneworts, which is a risk of weed harvesting on the broad, leads to a high rate of plant mortality; Stoneworts are affected by a range of chemicals, particularly metals and boat antifouling paints, which have been found in sediment and water in Hickling Broad; Stoneworts in the broads are likely to be able to withstand a salinity increase of up to around 12.5 % of typical recent values for Hickling Broad, but such increases are likely to cause changes in community structure; Replicated small ‘pond’ experiments have shown that modest reductions in salinity, to around 1600–1800 mg Cl L-1 may have a substantial effect on Total Phosphorus and chlorophyll and hence on the potential for plant growth. Looking down from above (‘remote sensing’) ‘Remote sensing’ data can map the development of algal blooms in the broads, potentially providing early warnings for water users such as sailing clubs; It is shown to distinguish the presence of potentially toxic blue-green algae from other non- toxic species; The distribution and health of aquatic plants, both around the margins of the broads and, if the water is clear, those submerged beneath the waters surface can be mapped. ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................i Key findings from the Upper Thurne studies...........................................................................ii Table of Contents.................................................................................................................. iii Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 How the Upper Thurne water spaces have changed ............................................................. 2 A description of the current status of the Upper Thurne waterways; ...................................... 4 Favourable Condition criteria and current condition........................................................... 4 Synthesis of the research activities to identify the significant catchment water management issues.................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 4 Aquatic plant monitoring programme ................................................................................. 6 Salinity and ochre.............................................................................................................. 6 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 6 Ecological effects of the salinity ..................................................................................... 7 Causes of surface water salinity .................................................................................... 9 Solutions to the ochre and salinity problems.................................................................10 Hydrodynamic
Recommended publications
  • Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy

    Appendix A Norfolk Local Flood Risk Management Strategy Consultation Draft March 2015 1 Blank 2 Part One - Flooding and Flood Risk Management Contents PART ONE – FLOODING AND FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT ..................... 5 1. Introduction ..................................................................................... 5 2 What Is Flooding? ........................................................................... 8 3. What is Flood Risk? ...................................................................... 10 4. What are the sources of flooding? ................................................ 13 5. Sources of Local Flood Risk ......................................................... 14 6. Sources of Strategic Flood Risk .................................................... 17 7. Flood Risk Management ............................................................... 19 8. Flood Risk Management Authorities ............................................. 22 PART TWO – FLOOD RISK IN NORFOLK .................................................. 30 9. Flood Risk in Norfolk ..................................................................... 30 Flood Risk in Your Area ................................................................ 39 10. Broadland District .......................................................................... 39 11. Breckland District .......................................................................... 45 12. Great Yarmouth Borough .............................................................. 51 13. Borough of King’s
  • 24 South Walsham to Acle Marshes and Fens

    24 South Walsham to Acle Marshes and Fens

    South Walsham to Acle Marshes The village of Acle stands beside a vast marshland 24 area which in Roman times was a great estuary Why is this area special? and Fens called Gariensis. Trading ports were located on high This area is located to the west of the River Bure ground and Acle was one of those important ports. from Moulton St Mary in the south to Fleet Dyke in Evidence of the Romans was found in the late 1980's the north. It encompasses a large area of marshland with considerable areas of peat located away from when quantities of coins were unearthed in The the river along the valley edge and along tributary Street during construction of the A47 bypass. Some valleys. At a larger scale, this area might have properties in the village, built on the line of the been divided into two with Upton Dyke forming beach, have front gardens of sand while the back the boundary between an area with few modern impacts to the north and a more fragmented area gardens are on a thick bed of flints. affected by roads and built development to the south. The area is basically a transitional zone between the peat valley of the Upper Bure and the areas of silty clay estuarine marshland soils of the lower reaches of the Bure these being deposited when the marshland area was a great estuary. Both of the areas have nature conservation area designations based on the two soil types which provide different habitats. Upton Broad and Marshes and Damgate Marshes and Decoy Carr have both been designated SSSIs.
  • Broads Water Quality Report: River Thurne 2015

    Broads Water Quality Report: River Thurne 2015

    East Anglia Area (Essex, Norfolk and Suffolk) Broads water quality report: River Thurne 2015 Map showing the location of water quality sampling sites in the River Thurne and Broads. Broads water quality report: River Thurne 2015 Page 1 of 6 Status River: Water quality is good for dissolved oxygen, ammonia and nitrate. Broads: Nutrients (phosphorus and nitrogen – including ammonia and nitrate) are not all meeting the national and international standards High nutrient concentrations have a negative effect on the ecology of the broads. Nutrient sources include internal release from sediments, diffuse sources and tidal mixing of water from downstream. It is estimated that 97% of phosphorus in the Upper Thurne Broads and marshes comes from diffuse sources such as agriculture, minor point sources and septic tanks. Ammonia levels fail the water quality standards in Horsey Mere where concentrations are noticeably higher than the other broads in the Thurne. This is because there is an input of ammonia to the broad from the surface drains via Brograve drainage pump. The water in the Thurne river and broads is brackish. This is caused by sea water percolating through the ground close to the coast which is then drawn through drainage pumps into the broads and rivers. Actions The water catchment around the Thurne is designated as a Nitrate Vulnerable Zone. In this zone limits are set on when and how much nitrogen can be applied to agricultural land to reduce the amount of nitrate reaching the rivers and broads. https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nutrient-management-nitrate-vulnerable-zones Following studies done in 2014, the dominant source of ammonia in the Brograve drain is believed to be from agricultural activity.
  • Somerton Water Level Management Plan Review January 2019

    Somerton Water Level Management Plan Review January 2019

    OHES Project Reference: 12265 Somerton Water Level Management Plan Review January 2019 by OHES on behalf of: Caroline Laburn Broads IDB 11th January 2019 1 This page has been left blank intentionally 2 www.ohes.co.uk Somerton Water Level Management Plan Review. January 2019 Caroline Laburn Environmental Manager Water Management Alliance Kettlewell House, Austin Fields Industrial Estate, Kings Lynn, Norfolk, PE30 1PH Activity Name Position Author Kirsty Spencer Principal Consultant Approved by Andy Went Divisional Manager – Ecology and Environmental Monitoring This report was prepared by OHES Environmental Ltd (OHES) solely for use by Water Management Alliance. This report is not addressed to and may not be relied upon by any person or entity other than Water Management Alliance for any purpose without the prior written permission of the Water Management Alliance, OHES, its directors, employees and affiliated companies accept no responsibility or liability for reliance upon or use of this report (whether or not permitted) other than by Water Management Alliance for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. Head Office: Bury St Edmunds: Tewkesbury: Leicester: Exeter: 1 The Courtyard Unit A2, Risby Unit 7 Block 61B, Room 5, Unit 3 Denmark Street Business Park, Gannaway Lane The Whittle Estate, Woodbury Business Wokingham Newmarket Road Northway Industrial Cambridge Road, Park Berkshire Risby Estate Whestone, Woodbury RG40 2AZ Bury St. Edmunds Tewkesbury Leicester, Nr Exeter Suffolk GL20 8FD LE8 6LH EX5 1AY IP28
  • Norfolk Break No 4 28 September – 1 October 2020 Participants Gill Page Rob Carr Gail Wilson Dilys Wadman Leader: Chris Durdin

    Norfolk Break No 4 28 September – 1 October 2020 Participants Gill Page Rob Carr Gail Wilson Dilys Wadman Leader: Chris Durdin

    Norfolk break no 4 28 September – 1 October 2020 Participants Gill Page Rob Carr Gail Wilson Dilys Wadman Leader: Chris Durdin Two of the group stayed at the Oaklands Hotel in Thorpe St Andrew https://oaklands-hotel.co.uk Report and lists by Chris Durdin. Photos by Rob Carr, Gill Page and Chris Durdin. Cover, top: Mediterranean gull at Great Yarmouth, little egret at Breydon Water (both RC). Cover, below: Rainbows over the railway crossing at Strumpshaw Fen. Above: common darter, the group and visitor centre at NWT’s Hickling Broad and Marshes nature reserve. Below: the group in Great Yarmouth. Honeyguide Wildlife Holidays always tries to put something into nature conservation where we visit, and five new members for Norfolk Wildlife Trust from four Honeyguide Norfolk breaks certainly does that. 2 DAILY DIARY Monday 28 September – arrival Gail arrived by train to Norwich railway station. We first confirmed that Thorpe Marshes was still flooded, following last Friday’s storm, then I took her to her Airbnb. Helen and Malcolm Crowder and Julie Durdin joined the group at the Oaklands Hotel for the evening meal, a special occasion to celebrate Gill’s birthday marked by a chocolate and passionfruit birthday cake provided, free of charge, by the hotel. Tuesday 29 September – Buxton Heath and Holt Country Park It was an overcast and often wet morning at Buxton Heath, where Dilys met us having overcome the challenge of finding the rather hidden car park. Birds were thin at first: just jays, a calling green woodpecker and a skylark flight call. Eyes downward, we found mystery holes (probably a mining bee), heathers of three species and lots of fungi, with fly agarics in textbook colours and shapes (photo in lists).
  • Annual Report 2019–2020

    Annual Report 2019–2020

    Norfolk Wildlife Trust Annual report 2019–2020 Saving Norfolk’s Wildlife for the Future Norfolk Wildlife Trust seeks a My opening words are the most important message: sustainable Living Landscape thank you to our members, staff, volunteers, for wildlife and people donors, investors and grant providers. Where the future of wildlife is With your loyal and generous in the School Holidays. As part of our Greater support, and despite the Anglia partnership we promoted sustainable protected and enhanced through challenges of the current crisis, travel when discovering nature reserves. sympathetic management Norfolk Wildlife Trust will continue to advance wildlife We have also had many notable wildlife conservation in Norfolk and highlights during the year across all Norfolk Where people are connected with, to connect people to nature. habitats, from the return of the purple emperor inspired by, value and care for butterfly to our woodlands, to the creation of a Norfolk’s wildlife and wild species This report covers the year to the end of March substantial wet reedbed at Hickling Broad and 2020, a year that ended as the coronavirus Marshes in conjunction with the Environment crisis set in. Throughout the lockdown period Agency. Many highlights are the result of we know from the many photos and stories partnerships and projects which would not we received and the increased activity of our have been possible without generous support. CONTENTS online community that many people found nature to be a source of solace – often joy – in The Prime Minister had said that the Nature reserves for Page 04 difficult times.
  • Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Cambridgeshire & Essex Butterfly Conservation

    Butterfly Conservation Regional Action Plan For Anglia (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Suffolk & Norfolk) This action plan was produced in response to the Action for Butterflies project funded by WWF, EN, SNH and CCW This regional project has been supported by Action for Biodiversity Cambridgeshire and Essex Branch Suffolk branch BC Norfolk branch BC Acknowledgements The Cambridgeshire and Essex branch, Norfolk branch and Suffolk branch constitute Butterfly Conservation’s Anglia region. This regional plan has been compiled from individual branch plans which are initially drawn up from 1997-1999. As the majority of the information included in this action plan has been directly lifted from these original plans, credit for this material should go to the authors of these reports. They were John Dawson (Cambridgeshire & Essex Plan, 1997), James Mann and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Plan, 1998), and Jane Harris (Norfolk Plan, 1999). County butterfly updates have largely been provided by Iris Newbery and Dr Val Perrin (Cambridgeshire and Essex), Roland Rogers and Brian Mcllwrath (Norfolk) and Richard Stewart (Suffolk). Some of the moth information included in the plan has been provided by Dr Paul Waring, David Green and Mark Parsons (BC Moth Conservation Officers) with additional county moth data obtained from John Dawson (Cambridgeshire), Brian Goodey and Robin Field (Essex), Barry Dickerson (Huntingdon Moth and Butterfly Group), Michael Hall and Ken Saul (Norfolk Moth Survey) and Tony Prichard (Suffolk Moth Group). Some of the micro-moth information included in the plan was kindly provided by A. M. Emmet. Other individuals targeted with specific requests include Graham Bailey (BC Cambs. & Essex), Ruth Edwards, Dr Chris Gibson (EN), Dr Andrew Pullin (Birmingham University), Estella Roberts (BC, Assistant Conservation Officer, Wareham), Matthew Shardlow (RSPB) and Ken Ulrich (BC Cambs.
  • Boat Trip Operators – NWT Ranworth Broad & Hickling Broad

    Boat Trip Operators – NWT Ranworth Broad & Hickling Broad

    Boat trip Operators – NWT Ranworth Broad & Hickling Broad The Boat Trip Operators will be based at both NWT Ranworth Broad & NWT Hickling Broad and will be employed on an ‘on demand’ casual basis where required as part of a staff rota system. Norfolk Wildlife Trust has Visitor Centres situated on five of its nature reserves at Hickling Broad NNR, Holme Dunes NNR, Cley Marshes, Ranworth Broad, and Weeting Heath NNR Norfolk Wildlife Trust welcomes 250,000 people every year to these reserves. As well as ensuring visitors are well received and our Visitor Centres are in good order, we seek to increase Trust membership through active recruitment and income through sales, permits and donations. It is expected that the Boat trip operators will support the Trust in its commitment to improving the visitor experience by providing information, interpretation and a friendly welcome, whilst providing a quality service to promote the professional image of the Trust. The Boat Trip Operators will be responsible for the daily operation of a ferry service from Malthouse Staithe to the NWT “Broads Wildlife Centre” at Ranworth Broad and also for taking visitors on boat trips to experience Ranworth Broad. At Hickling Broad there are daily water trails and occasional evening boat trips. The boats used are based on a “reedlighter” type design, carry up to twelve passengers and are powered by petrol and electric motors. The post holders will also be required to undertake general maintenance on the boat as required, undertake daily checks on both the boat and life jackets and ensure the health and safety of all passengers.
  • ( 279 ) Ornithological Notes from Norfolk for 1924. In

    ( 279 ) Ornithological Notes from Norfolk for 1924. In

    ( 279 ) ORNITHOLOGICAL NOTES FROM NORFOLK FOR 1924. BY B. B. RIVIERK, F.R.C.S., F.Z.S., M.B.O.U. IN presenting my report on the Ornithology of Norfolk for the year 1924, I again acknowledge with grateful thanks the valuable assistance I have received from a number of correspondents who have sent me notes. I have also to record, with very deep sorrow, the loss of two most valued contributors to these notes in the Rev. Maurice C. H. Bird of Brunstead, who died on October 18th, 1924, in his sixty- eighth year, and in Mr. H. N. Pashley of Cley, who died on January 30th, 1925, in his eighty-first year. The past year was chiefly notable for the extraordinary number of wild fowl which visited our coasts during January and February, and for the record bags of Woodcock which continued to be made up to the end of the 1923-24 shooting season. Of these two remarkable immigrations I have already written elsewhere (Trans. Norf. <& Norwich Nat. Soc, Vol. XL, pt. v., 1923-24), so that I shall only refer to them more briefly in these notes. The winter of 1923-24, which was a long and bitterly cold one, may be said to have begun at the end of the first week of November, and lasted well into March. The first two weeks of January were marked by frosts and blizzards, a particularly severe blizzard from the S.E. occurring on the night of the 8th, whilst from February -12th until the end of the month snow fell nearly every day, the thermometer on February 29th registering 120 of frost, and another heavy snowfall occurring on March 3rd.
  • NWT Ranworth Broad - Broadland Programme

    NWT Ranworth Broad - Broadland Programme

    51747 Activities and Fieldwork 26/10/04 10:29 pm Page 1 KS 1-3 Activities and Fieldwork A Teacher’s Guide to Environmental Education 2005-2006 Norfolk Broads and North Norfolk Coast Protecting Wildlife for the Future 51747 Activities and Fieldwork 26/10/04 10:29 pm Page 2 Norfolk Wildlife Trust is working for the protection and enhancement of Norfolk’s wildlife and wild places. It aims to secure a better future for wildlife and to improve people’s understanding and appreciation of wildlife. Bayer CropScience, principal sponsor of Norfolk Wildlife Trust’s Norfolk Wildlife Trust is one of 47 Wildlife Trusts Education Programme since 1995, is delighted to continue its working to protect wildlife in town and country support into 2005. For more information on Bayer CropScience, throughout the whole of the UK. call 01603 242311. We can visit your School! Find out about the wildlife of Norfolk, and how Norfolk Wildlife Trust works to protect it, by having one of our education staff visit your school. We can also come in to deliver pre or post visit work, or we can advise you on projects to develop your school grounds for wildlife, with a free initial consultation offered. For further details call Norfolk Wildlife Trust, Tel: (01603) 625540. 51747 Activities and Fieldwork 26/10/04 10:29 pm Page 3 Welcome Welcome to the latest Norfolk Wildlife Trust Activities and Fieldwork Booklet. We hope that our improved and updated sessions, plus some exciting new activities, will get you ‘out and about’ visiting or revisiting our varied reserves.
  • Wroxham Broad to Barton Broad Wroxham to Ant Mouth the To

    Wroxham Broad to Barton Broad Wroxham to Ant Mouth the To

    Explore the Broads 2021 Saturday - Wroxham Broad to Barton Broad Wroxham to Ant Mouth The tour starts at the Norfolk Broads Yacht Club on Wroxham Broad. The first leg is relatively short and the river Bure is relatively wide, so a relaxed start to the tour. Leave the Yacht Club and aim for the opening on to the River Bure on the far right-hand side of the broad between posts marked 1 and 2. Keep on the main river unless you wish to explore Salhouse Broad which is off to the right just past some moorings on the on the left. Above is the entrance and the exit is marked by red posts. Follow the river to Horning for lunch at The Swan Inn. A space for us to take the boats out will have been kept clear to the left of the pub and to the right of Horning Sailing Club. Beware that the ‘Mississippi paddle boat’ may be moored by this grassed area as well. After lunch, launch the boat and continue along the river in the same direction. Look out for a sign to the mouth of the River Ant on the left-hand side of the river just past Horning Hall and turn left. Explore the Broads 2021 Page 1 of 4 Ant Mouth to Barton Broad Turn left off the River Bure The River Ant is narrower and winds through high reed beds. As you approach Ludham Bridge there are tight bends with boats moored on both sides. Immediately round the bends is the bridge – narrow but manageable with care.
  • The Norfolk & Norwich

    The Norfolk & Norwich

    TRANSACTIONS OF THE NORFOLK & NORWICH NATURALISTS' SOCIETY VOL. XXIII 1974 - 1976 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS Page Allard, P. R. 29 Banham, P. R. 145 Buckley, J 86,172 Funnell, B.M 251 Gosling, L. M 49 Gurney, C Ill Harding, P. T 267 Harrison, R. H 45 Hornby, R 231 Ismay, J 231, 271 Kington, J. A. 140 Lambley, P. W 170, 231, 269, 270 Norgate, T. B 167 Oliver, J 120 Peet, T. N.D 156,249 Ramsay, H. R. 28 Watts, G. D 231 Williams, R. B 257 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS (Plates adjoin pages indicated) Bat, Long-eared 60 Bearded Tit 95 Bewick's Swan ••• 103 Black-bellied Dipper ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 44 Black-headed Gull 29 Black-tailed Godwit ... ... ... ••• ••• ••• ••• 87 Common Tern ••• 94 Curlew ••• 216 Deer, Roe 61 Page Green Sandpiper ... ... ... 216 Hawfinch 79 Heron Hortus Sanitatus, figures from 117 Kingfisher 200 Knot 28 Lapwing 102 Little Egret 12 Little Ringed Plover ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 29 Osprey 102 Pied Flycatcher 44 217 Pyiausta peilucidalis 249 Red-breasted Flycatcher ... ... 44 Salt Pans 150-151 Sandwich Tern 28,201 Short-eared Owl ... ... ... ... ... 45 Snipe 200 Sparrowhawk 44 Squirrel, Grey 60 Water-rail 13 Waxwing 78,201 Weather Maps, Europe, 1784 143- 144 White-fronted Goose 45 Wryneck 217 Yare Valley 247 - 249 INDEX TO VOLUME XXIII Amphibia and Reptile Records for Norfolk ... ... 172 Barton Broad, Bird Report ... ... ... ... 5 Bird Report, Classified Notes 1972 30 1973 96 1974 202 Bird Report, Editorial 1972 2 1973 71 1974 194 Bird Ringing Recoveries 22, 92, 197 Birds and the Weather of 1784 140 Blakeney Point, Bird Report 5 Breydon Water, Bird Report ..