Cultural Landscape Report Camp Curry Historic District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Landscape Report Camp Curry Historic District National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT CAMP CURRY HISTORIC DISTRICT CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT CAMP CURRY HISTORIC DISTRICT National Park Service Yosemite National Park 2010 The authors would like to thank all of those who contributed to the development and completion of this report, including: Project Team: Daniel Schaible, Project Lead (Yosemite) Patrick Chapin, Historian (Yosemite) Brian Chilcott, Historical Landscape Architect (Yosemite) NPS Contributors Sueann Brown, Historical Architect (Yosemite) Linda Eade, Librarian (Yosemite) David Humphrey, Branch Chief, History, Architecture & Landscapes (Yosemite) George Jaramillo, Historical Architect (Yosemite) Kevin McCardle, Historical Landscape Architect (Yosemite) Niki Stephanie Nicholas, PhD., Chief, Resources Management and Science (Yosemite) Paul Rogers, Archivist (Yosemite) NPS Reviewers Lisa Acree, Botonist (Yosemite) Cathy Gilbert, Historical Landscape Architect (Pacific West Region) Randy Fong, Project Management (Yosemite) Vida Germano. Cultural Landscapes Inventory Coordinator (Pacific West Region) Laura Kirn, Archeologist (Yosemite) Kimball Koch, Cultural Landscape Program Coordinator (Pacific West Region) Jeannette Simons, Park Historic Preservation Officer (Yosemite) Greg Stock, Geologist (Yosemite) Jim Vandenberg, Project Management (Yosemite) Delaware North Companies (DNC) Don Evans, Project Manager Other Consultants, Reviewers and Advisors Leroy Radanovich, Photographer/Historian CONTENTS PART I Management Summary 11 Introduction 11 Historical Overview 13 Scope of Work and Methodology 16 Description of Study Boundaries 18 Summary of Findings 19 Geographic Information and Site Plans 23 Location Map 23 Inventory Unit Boundary Justification 23 Inventory Unit Boundary Description 24 Boundary Map 24 Boundary UTMs 25 Site Plans 27 Statement of Significance 31 Site History 37 Foundations- Pre-History to 1899 37 The David Curry Years, 1899-1918 44 Growth and Discord: Foster Curry and the Roaring Twenties, 1917-1929 53 Retrenchment and Maintenance: The Depression, Wartime and Postwar Years, 1930-1955 61 Mission 66: Early Experiments in Planning for Development, 1956-1970 71 Disaster Management, 1970-2005 75 Analysis and Evaluation of Integrity 87 Summary 87 Natural Systems and Features 91 Spatial Organization 97 Land Use 101 Vegetation 103 Views and Vistas 105 Buildings and Structures 108 Circulation 135 Archeological Sites 141 PART 2 Treatment 143 Introduction 143 History of Landscape Treatment Approaches 143 Treatment Alternatives and Implications 144 Preferred Treatment Alternative - Rehabilitation 146 Site Standards for Landscape Treatment 146 Treatment Guidelines and Recommendations 147 Recommendations for Future Work and Research 170 Bibliography 171 Appendices 175 Appendix A: Chronology 175 Appendix B: Camp Curry Historic District National Register Nomination 221 Appendix C: Talus Slope Hazard Zone Closure Correspondence 233 Appendix D: Camp Curry Decision Documentation Following SHPO Visit 235 to Yosemite on 09/17/2004 Appendix E: List of Acronyms 237 Appendix F: 11x17 Maps 238 List of Tables Table 1: Historic District UTM Coordinates 25 Table 2: List of Buildings and Structures 133 Table 3: List of Circulation Features 139 List of Figures Figure 1: Location and Context Map 23 Figure 2: Proposed Historic District Boundary Map 24 Figure 3: Site Plan of the Camp Curry Historic Lodging Area 27 Figure 4: Site Plan of the Huff Area and the Bungalows 28 Figure 5: Site Plan of the Orchard parking Area and Boys Town 29 Figure 6: The Stoneman House 41 Figure 7: Camp Curry during its inaugural year 44 Figure 8: LeConte Memorial Lodge 46 Figure 9: Yosemite Firefall 47 Figure 10: Swimming Tank and Bath House 49 Figure 11: Mother Curry Bungalow 51 Figure 12: Camp Curry Sawmill 52 Figure 13: Bungalows 53 Figure 14: Bowling Alley 54 Figure 15: Camp Curry Garage 55 Figure 16: Men’s Dormitory 55 Figure 17: 1925 Map of Camp Curry 57 Figure 18: Toboggan 60 Figure 19: Ice Skating Rink 61 Figure 20: Amphitheater 70 Figure 21: Visitor Services Building 77 Figure 22: Nob Hill Shower House buried following a rock slide 80 Figure 23: Bear Interpretive Sign 92 Figure 24: Staircase Creek Drainage Channel 94 Figure 25: Bungalows built around existing vegetation 96 Figure 26: Tent Cabin streetscape 98 Figure 27: Bungalow streetscape 99 Figure 28: Panorama view of Yosemite Falls, North Dome, Royal Arches and Washington Column 107 Figure 29: View towards Glacier Point 107 Figure 30: View through the Camp Curry Entrance Sign 108 Figure 31: Main Office 110 Figure 32: Historic Post Office 111 Figure 33: Pavilion 111 Figure 34: Camp Curry Entrance Sign 112 Figure 35: Foster Curry Bungalow 113 Figure 36: Mother Curry Bungalow 114 Figure 37: Men’s Lounge 115 Figure 38: Bungalows 116 Figure 39: Fourplex Cabins 117 Figure 40: Camp Curry Substation 118 Figure 41: Original Bungalettes 119 Figure 42: Bungalow #90 120 Figure 43: Women’s Club 120 Figure 44: Comfort Station at the Base of the Terrace 121 Figure 45: Executive Guest Comfort Station 121 Figure 46: Cabin 101 122 Figure 47: Tall Linen Hut 122 Figure 48: Tent Cabins 123 Figure 49: Bungalettes 125 Figure 50: Comfort Station at the Bungalettes 126 Figure 51: 500’s Comfort Station 126 Figure 52: 600’s Comfort Station 127 Figure 53: Amphitheater 128 Figure 54: Transit Shelter 129 Figure 55: Visitor Services Building 130 Figure 56: Nob Hill Shower House 132 Figure 57: Happy Isles Road 135 Figure 58: Packed Earth Paths between Tent Cabins 136 Figure 59: Trail to Happy Isles 137 Figure 60: Orchard Parking Area 137 Figure 61: Camp Curry Circulation Map 140 Figure 62: Original site of the LeConte Memorial Lodge 141 Figure 63: Rock fall damage at Camp Curry 149 Figure 64: Typical interpretive sign 152 Figure 65: Poor drainage at Camp Curry 153 Figure 66: Orchard Parking Area 155 Figure 67: Visual comparison of the central gathering area at Camp Curry 158 Figure 68: Obstructed view from the Main Office 159 Figure 69: Obstructed view through the Camp Curry Entrance Sign 160 Figure 70: Treatment Plan 170 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY MANAGEMENT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION This Cultural Landscape Report provides historical background and treatment recommendations for the Camp Curry Historic District; a concessioner operated commercial camping facility within Yosemite National Park. This 55-acre district is perhaps the longest continuously operating facility of its kind in the National Park System. For 110 years, it has provided visitors with food, lodging, and entertainment. Camp Curry, once very briefly known as Camp Sequoia and currently known as Curry Village, is a vast complex of guest and employee accommodations, residences, service structures, and landscape features situated in a narrow Yosemite Valley alcove at the base of the Glacier Point cliffs. During more than a century of continuous business operation, the camp has faced numerous challenges including managerial conflicts, challenging competition, uniquely complicated ownership issues, a shifting client base, and distant supply resources. But the most difficult and unpredictable constraint has always been the very thing that has made Camp Curry profitable: its physical location. The camp was established in 1899 among the talus boulders at the foot of the soaring Glacier Point rim to the south. The camp was bounded on the north side by the picturesque, half-mile wide Stoneman Meadow, itself encircled by the Merced River. Thus, from the very beginning, the operation has been literally bounded by two natural features and their associated disturbance regimes. River floods and rock falls have constantly threatened sections of Camp Curry from every side. The camp’s historical status and the narrow confines of its situation between the cliffs, meadow, and river have complicated efforts to formulate a comprehensive plan for relocating threatened or potentially threatened facilities. The complexity of resolving this quandary is evident in the long series of Curry Village management plans proposed by both the National Park Service and the concessioner dating back to 1960. Essentially no significant new facilities expansion has taken place within Curry Village since 1936. Several plans have attempted to address the rock fall hazard and ongoing challenges with congestion, particularly vehicle circulation, guest tents, and employee housing. Outside of the unplanned reduction of facilities after the rock fall of October 2008, perhaps the most significant achievement for relieving Curry Village congestion in the last forty years was the elimination CAMP CURRY, YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK 11 PART I of the Firefall in 1968. 1980 Yosemite General Management Plan (GMP) The GMP called for a substantial reduction of residential and service facility footprints in Valley areas north of Curry Road while also eliminating tents and structures in the active rock fall zone on the south side of Curry Village.1 Thirty years later little progress has been made in achieving these two objectives. In fact, after 1980 a significant new service building (the main bathhouse) was constructed within the rock fall zone and numerous “temporary” buildings have been added north of Curry Road. The GMP also recommended that the camp’s guest tent density be somehow reduced while still retaining 335 tents in a greatly diminished available area.2 Although the GMP specified that “facilities and services [should be] consistent with the historical setting of Curry Village,” it also approved demolition of the Foster Bungalow
Recommended publications
  • Yosemite Guide Yosemite
    Yosemite Guide Yosemite Where to Go and What to Do in Yosemite National Park July 29, 2015 - September 1, 2015 1, September - 2015 29, July Park National Yosemite in Do to What and Go to Where NPS Photo NPS 1904. Grove, Mariposa Monarch, Fallen the astride Soldiers” “Buffalo Cavalry 9th D, Troop Volume 40, Issue 6 Issue 40, Volume America Your Experience Yosemite, CA 95389 Yosemite, 577 PO Box Service Park National US DepartmentInterior of the Year-round Route: Valley Yosemite Valley Shuttle Valley Visitor Center Upper Summer-only Routes: Yosemite Shuttle System El Capitan Fall Yosemite Shuttle Village Express Lower Shuttle Yosemite The Ansel Fall Adams l Medical Church Bowl i Gallery ra Clinic Picnic Area l T al Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System F e E1 5 P2 t i 4 m e 9 Campground os Mirror r Y 3 Uppe 6 10 2 Lake Parking Village Day-use Parking seasonal The Ahwahnee Half Dome Picnic Area 11 P1 1 8836 ft North 2693 m Camp 4 Yosemite E2 Housekeeping Pines Restroom 8 Lodge Lower 7 Chapel Camp Lodge Day-use Parking Pines Walk-In (Open May 22, 2015) Campground LeConte 18 Memorial 12 21 19 Lodge 17 13a 20 14 Swinging Campground Bridge Recreation 13b Reservations Rentals Curry 15 Village Upper Sentinel Village Day-use Parking Pines Beach E7 il Trailhead a r r T te Parking e n il i w M in r u d 16 o e Nature Center El Capitan F s lo c at Happy Isles Picnic Area Glacier Point E3 no shuttle service closed in winter Vernal 72I4 ft Fall 2I99 m l E4 Mist Trai Cathedral ail Tr op h Beach Lo or M ey ses erce all only d R V iver E6 Nevada To & Fall The Valley Visitor Shuttle operates from 7 am to 10 pm and serves stops in numerical order.
    [Show full text]
  • Tenure Clock Extension
    11/2/2020 COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy Published on Faculty Handbook (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu (https://facultyhandbook.stanford.edu)) Home (/) > Faculty Handbook (/index) > COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy COVID-19 Tenure and Appointment Clock Extension Policy REVISED October 31, 2020 In recognition of the serious academic and personal challenges posed by the Covid-19 viral pandemic, a faculty member holding a tenure-accruing appointment is entitled to a one-year extension of the date (under the seven-year tenure clock) on which tenure would be conferred. This extension will normally have the effect of postponing for a year the initiation of the tenure review process. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension, though it extends the seven-year tenure clock deadline, does not extend the ten-year appointment clock deadline except through an exception granted by the Provost for extraordinary personal or institutional circumstances. The Covid-19 Tenure Clock Extension is available to faculty members holding a tenure-accruing appointment with the exception of those currently in a terminal year appointment or those whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process commenced prior to January 1, 2020, since the work to be evaluated was done prior to the current pandemic. Teaching relief is not associated with this extension. Effective October 1, 2020, this tenure clock extension will be automatically granted to eligible University Tenure Line junior faculty members (as defined above) whose faculty appointments at Stanford will begin prior by December 31, 2021. The extension is not available for faculty members whose tenure-conferring promotion or reappointment process has already commenced (with commencement defined as the date the department chair or school dean informs the candidate in writing that the review process has begun).
    [Show full text]
  • Nevada Fall Corridor
    NEVADA FALL CORRIDOR: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT by MARTI M. GERDES A THESIS Presented to the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science August 2004 ii "Nevada Fall Corridor: A Cultural Landscape Report," a thesis prepared by Marti M. Gerdes in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation. This thesis has been approved and accepted by: Robert Z. Melnick, Chair of the Examining Committee 2 Date Committee in Charge: Robert Z. Melnick, Chair Cathy Gilbert Lee Roth Fred Walters Accepted by: Dean of the Graduate School iii C 2004 Marti M. Gerdes iv An Abstract of the Thesis of Marti M. Gerdes for the degree of Master of Science in the Interdisciplinary Studies Program: Historic Preservation to be taken August 2004 Title: NEVADA FALL CORRIDOR: A CULTURAL LANDSCAPE REPORT Approved: Robert Z. Melnick This study describes existing conditions, evaluates significance and historic integrity, and recommends treatment strategies to preserve historic elements of the Nevada Fall Corridor cultural landscape in Yosemite National Park. It reports findings from field investigation that examined and inventoried landscape features such as stone retaining walls, treadway material, bridges and causeways, and water features on both current-use and abandoned trail segments. The site was examined numerous times over a three-month period, with a followup visit one year later. Libraries and other archives were consulted for written and photographic historic documentation, which were analyzed against current conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Landslide Hazards and Risks in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite
    Volcanoes of the Eastern Sierra Nevada Analysis of Landslide Hazards and Risks in Yosemite Valley, Yosemite National Park, California June 13, 2015 Madison Rocco Ferrara 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract………………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Geological History of Yosemite Valley………………………………………………………… 4 Causes of Landslides……………………………………………………………………………. 6 Hazards………………………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Risks………………………………………………………………………………………….… 11 Mitigation…………………………………………………………………………………….… 13 Conclusions…………………………………………………………………………………….. 15 References……………………………………………………………………...………………. 17 2 Abstract Landslides, rapid downslope movement of rock or soil, pose a risk to the nearly 4 million tourists (USGS, n.d.) that visit Yosemite Valley in Yosemite National Park, California every year. The National Park Service has made efforts to reduce the risks associated with landslide hazards by calculating a risk metric (risk level) for locations within Yosemite Valley. The National Park Service first mapped a rock fall hazard line by mapping boulders outlying the talus slope. The 90th-percentile distances, the distances at which there is a 10% probability that boulders will fall past this point, were then calculated and scaled for frequency using cosmogenic 10 Be exposure dating and STONE rock fall simulations. Using these components a rock fall hazard line was obtained and used to quantify a risk metric (risk level) at locations within Yosemite Valley. The risk metric was calculated by first identifying structures within the rock fall hazard zone and then assigning each location a numerical value based on the expected number of occupants and frequency of outlying boulder impacts in the area. The risk metric for locations within Yosemite Valley range from 0.1 (low risk) to 32.6 (high risk). This information has been used by the National Park Service to employ various mitigation techniques to reduce the risks associated with landslide hazards in Yosemite Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Valley Visitor Center
    k e k e e r e C r Upper C n Yosemite o h y c r Fall n k A a e C e l r Yosemite Point a n C 6936ft y a Lower o 2114m i North Dome e d R t 7525ft i Yosemite n I 2294m m Fall e s ek o re Y U.S. Yosemite Valley Visitor Center C ya Court a Wilderness Center n e Museum Royal Arch T Lower Yosemite Medical Clinic Cascade Fall Trail Washington Columbia YOSEMITE Column Mirror Rock VILLAGE ROYAL Eagle Lake T ARCHES 4094ft Peak H 1248m 7779ft R The Ahwahnee Half Dome 2371m Sentinel Visitor E 8836ft Bridge Parking E North 2693m B Housekeeping Pines Camp 4 R Yosemite Camp Lower O Lodge Pines Chapel Stoneman T Bridge Middle H LeConte Brother E Memorial Road open ONLY to R Lodge pedestrians, bicycles, Ribbon S Visitor Parking and vehicles with Fall Swinging Bridge Curry Village Upper wheelchair emblem Pines Lower placards Sentinel Little Yosemite Valley El Capitan Brother Beach Trailhead for Moran 7569ft Four Mile Trail (summer only) R Point Staircase Mt Broderick i 2307m Trailhead 6706ft 6100 ft b Falls Horse Tail Parking 1859m b 2044m o Fall Trailhead for Vernal n Fall, Nevada Fall, and Glacier Point El Capitan Vernal C 7214 ft Nature Center John Muir Trail r S e e 2199 m at Happy Isles Fall Liberty Cap e n r k t 5044ft 7076ft ve i 4035ft Grizzly Emerald Ri n rced e 1230m 1538m 2157m Me l Peak Pool Silver C Northside Drive ive re Sentinel Apron Dr e North one-way Cathedral k El Capitan e Falls 0 0.5 Kilometer id To Tioga Road, Tuolumne Meadows Bridge Beach hs y ed R ut a y J and Hwy 120; and Hetch Hetchy Merc iv So -w horse trail onl o 0 0.5 Mile er
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Valley Shuttle Map Use the Free Yosemite Valley Shuttle System
    Where to Go and What to Do in Yosemite National Park Vol. 8 Issue 3 Experience Yosemite To day Your America April 2 – April 29, 2008 Yosemite National Park ROAD Construction may cause INFO short delays or detours on some park roads. Call 209/372-0200 for recorded road information. yosemite park partners Visit the new Yosemite Park Partners website: www.yosemitepartners.org. Yosemite Valley Shuttle Map Use the Free Yosemite Valley Shuttle System Shuttles run daily every 15 minutes, depend- ing on the time of day. Times are posted at Upper each stop. All shuttles follow the same route, Yosemite Fall serving stops in numerical order. i Shuttle service may be affected by construction projects. Check shuttle Visitor Center Trail to stops for more information. Middle Located in Yosemite Snow Creek Cascade and Village. Park and walk Tuolumne or take the free Meadows VALLEY VISITOR SHUTTLE Lower shuttle bus. Royal 7:00 a.m. -10:00 p.m. Yosemite Arches Fall Half 1 Yosemite Village / Day Parking Dome Yosemite Village Washington Column 2 Yosemite Village P Visitor i Church 3 The Ahwahnee 5 Center Bowl 4 Mirror Lake 9 3 No bicycles 4 Yosemite Village / Degnan’s Complex 6 beyond this (seasonal) Yosemite 10 point Lodge 2 P The Ahwahnee 5 Valley Visitor Center Trail to 8 11 Columbia Point 1 P k Day 6 Lower Yosemite Fall e and Upper e P r Parking Yosemite Fall C ite 7 Camp 4/Upper Yosemite Fall Trailhead em Chapel Camp 4 os Y Housekeeping ek Walk-in 7 e 8 Yosemite Lodge Camp Cr North naya Lower Pines Te This map is not LeConte Pines 9 Valley Visitor Center Swinging Memorial Stable suitable for hiking.
    [Show full text]
  • Merced Wild and Scenic River CMP/DEIS
    ALTERNATIVE 3: DISPERSED VISITOR EXPERIENCES AND EXTENSIVE RIVERBANK RESTORATION EAST YOSEMITE VALLEY: CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS ALTERNATIVE 3 1. Former Upper and Lower River Campground Area CURRY VILLAGE AND CAMPGROUNDS • Ecological Restoration: Restore 35.6 acres of floodplain habitat within the 10-year floodplain. Restore natural floodplain topography by removing remaining asphalt and re-establishing seasonal channels, and revegetate with native plants. Remove Lower River amphitheater. Temporarily fence restoration areas to allow for recovery. 2. River Reach between Bridges Ahwahnee The Ahwahnee Backpackers • Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine Bridges: Remove the Ahwahnee and Sugar Pine bridges, and associated berm to Parking Campground Royal Arches enhance the free-flowing condition of the river. Restore area to natural conditions. Re-route the multiple-use Meadow trail north of the river. • Stoneman Bridge: Remove Stoneman Bridge to enhance free-flowing conditions of the river. Restore area to Ahwahnee Tenaya natural conditions. Reconfigure Southside Drive as a two-way road, remove the road segment through Meadow Bridge Stoneman Meadow, and re-design the intersection at Sentinel and Southside Drive. M e ya Cree r 4 na k ce Te d R 3. Curry Village Area North Pines • Ecological Restoration: Remove Southside Drive through Stoneman Meadow to enhance the hydrologic Tennis Court iv e Campground Concessioner r Stables connectivity of the meadow. Re-align road through the Boys Town area instead of the meadow, and restore No remaining area to natural conditions. Extend meadow boardwalk (up to 275 feet) to Curry Village. rth s id e 2 • Curry Orchard Parking Area: Provide 300 parking spaces. Ecologically restore part of the existing D r parking area to accommodate Stoneman Meadow restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Forest Dynamics Plot
    REFERENCE COPY - USE for xeroxing historic resource siuay VOLUME 3 OF 3 discussion of historical resources, appendixes, historical base maps, bibliography YOSEMITE NATIONAL PARK / CALIFORNIA Historic Resource Study YOSEMITE: THE PARK AND ITS RESOURCES A History of the Discovery, Management, and Physical Development of Yosemite National Park, California Volume 3 of 3 Discussion of Historical Resources, Appendixes, Historical Base Maps, Bibliography by Linda Wedel Greene September 1987 U.S. Department of the Interior / National Park Service b) Frederick Olmsted's Treatise on Parks ... 55 c) Significance of the Yosemite Grant .... 59 B. State Management of the Yosemite Grant .... 65 1. Land Surveys ......... 65 2. Immediate Problems Facing the State .... 66 3. Settlers' Claims ........ 69 4. Trails ........%.. 77 a) Early Survey Work ....... 77 b) Routes To and Around Yosemite Valley ... 78 c) Tourist Trails in the Valley ..... 79 (1) Four-Mile Trail to Glacier Point ... 80 (2) Indian Canyon Trail ..... 82 (3) Yosemite Fall and Eagle Peak Trail ... 83 (4) Rim Trail, Pohono Trail ..... 83 (5) Clouds Rest and Half (South) Dome Trails . 84 (6) Vernal Fall and Mist Trails .... 85 (7) Snow Trail ....... 87 (8) Anderson Trail ....... (9) Panorama Trail ....... (10) Ledge Trail 89 5. Improvement of Trails ....... 89 a) Hardships Attending Travel to Yosemite Valley . 89 b) Yosemite Commissioners Encourage Road Construction 91 c) Work Begins on the Big Oak Flat and Coulterville Roads ......... 92 d) Improved Roads and Railroad Service Increase Visitation ......... 94 e) The Coulterville Road Reaches the Valley Floor . 95 1) A New Transportation Era Begins ... 95 2) Later History 99 f) The Big Oak Flat Road Reaches the Valley Floor .
    [Show full text]
  • Wickman Pnw-Gtr-638
    GENERAL TECHNICAL REPORT PNW-GTR-638 een, PNW K P. F. Figure 63—Forest Service Chief Colonel Greeley (far right) with entourage at the SONC Project, 1923. (Left to right) J.F. Kimball, Hal H. Ogle, A.J. Jaenicke, S.R. Black, George Cecil, Gilbert D. Brown, W.J. Rankin, J.M. Miller, E.E. Carter, Colonel William B. Greeley. I feel that I am not saying much that is new to Arizona, then another train to the south rim, horseback or all of you. From reading your News Letters during walking down to the Colorado River at Phantom Ranch, the past summer I have been greatly impressed then up the trail to Bright Angel and the north rim. Miller with the excellent manner in which you all are undertaking your various investigations. I look for- chose the latter route. He walked down to the Phantom ward to meeting you all at the conference this fall Ranch where horses awaited to ride to Bright Angel. On and to a thorough discussion of our policy for the the return trip he reversed the mode of transport. He said it future. – F.C. Craighead. was an interesting trip, but he would not care to repeat it. For the remainder of 1923, Miller was headquartered in In the fall he spent time on the SONC project with North Fork but was there only intermittently. He continued Keen and Kimball helping to smooth operational problems. his field work on the San Joaquin Project; in May he was Miller had been a football fan since his student days at on a demonstration trip to the SONC project (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile Formation and Talus
    Nature and History on the Sierra Crest: Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Devils Postpile formation and talus. (Devils Postpile National Monument Image Collection) Nature and History on the Sierra Crest Devils Postpile and the Mammoth Lakes Sierra Christopher E. Johnson Historian, PWRO–Seattle National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 2013 Production Project Manager Paul C. Anagnostopoulos Copyeditor Heather Miller Composition Windfall Software Photographs Credit given with each caption Printer Government Printing Office Published by the United States National Park Service, Pacific West Regional Office, Seattle, Washington. Printed on acid-free paper. Printed in the United States of America. 10987654321 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural and cultural resources. This includes fostering sound use of our land and water resources; protecting our fish, wildlife, and biological diversity; preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places; and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to ensure that their development is in the best interests of all our people by encouraging stewardship and citizen participation in their care. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in island territories under U.S. administration.
    [Show full text]
  • LITERARY NONFICTION and the NATIONAL PARK MOVEMENT, 1864-PRESENT Lindsay Dunne
    Abstract Title of Dissertation: DEFINING PLACES: LITERARY NONFICTION AND THE NATIONAL PARK MOVEMENT, 1864-PRESENT Lindsay Dunne Jacoby, Doctor of Philosophy, 2014 Dissertation directed by: Professor Jeanne Fahnestock and Professor Scott Wible Department of English The canon of American “Nature writing” has long been recognized for its influence on environmental policy, but the role of specific works in shaping environmental discourse and altering material circumstances has yet to be fully understood, especially from a rhetorical perspective. In response, this dissertation explores how works of Nature writing have functioned as persuasive arguments of definition within the National Park movement. It analyzes how literary nonfiction texts promoted a public understanding of specific landscapes and redefined them as worthy of preservation. The idea of rhetorical ecology underlies this analysis: rather than relying on the commonplace idea that a single author writing a single text can influence an environmental policy, the dissertation traces how a work of literary nonfiction operates within a complex system of texts, writers, readers, institutions, objects, and history. The four main case studies demonstrate how new definitions of place have emerged through works of literary nonfiction, each acting in relationship to a larger campaign that led to the preservation of an American landscape as a National Park: Yosemite, Great Smoky Mountains, Everglades, and Voyageurs. In these landmark campaigns, a prominent work of Nature writing, by a prominent author like John Muir, Horace Kephart, Marjory Stoneman Douglas, and Sigurd Olson, built upon and contributed to a definitional discourse that enabled people to see a specific landscape differently than it had been seen before.
    [Show full text]
  • Yosemite Guide Yosemite Guide October 2, 2019 - December 3, 2019 @Yosemitenps
    Yosemite Guide Yosemite Guide October 2, 2019 - December 3, 2019 @YosemiteNPS Smoke from the 2017 Empire Fire drifts around Half Dome. Read about how fire plays an important role in Yosemite on page 10 .NPS Photo Experience Your America Yosemite National Park Yosemite Guide October 2, 2019 - December 3, 2019 Yosemite, CA 95389 Yosemite, 577 PO Box Service Park National US DepartmentInterior of the Experience Your America Yosemite National Park Yosemite Guide October 2, 2019 - December 3, 2019 Yosemite Area Regional Transportation System Year-round Route: Valley Yosemite Valley Shuttle Valley Visitor Center Summer-only Route: Hetch Upper Shuttle System El Capitan Hetchy Yosemite Shuttle Fall Yosemite Tuolumne Village Campground Meadows Lower Yosemite Parking The Ansel Fall Adams l Medical Church Bowl Yosemite i Gallery ra Clinic Picnic Area Picnic Area l T Valley al Area in inset: F e E1 t 5 Restroom Yosemite Valley i 4 m 9 The Ahwahnee Shuttle System se Yo Mirror Upper 10 3 Walk-In 6 2 Lake Campground seasonal 11 1 Yosemite North Camp 4 8 Half Dome Valley Housekeeping Pines Wawona E2 Lower 8836 ft 7 Chapel Camp Yosemite Falls Parking Lodge Pines 2693 m Yosemite 18 19 Conservation 12 17 Heritage 20 14 Swinging Center (YCHC) Recreation Campground Bridge Rentals 13 15 Reservations Yosemite Village Parking Curry Service on Happy Isles Loop Upper (Stops 15 - 19) may be Sentinel Village Pines interrupted by heavy snowfall. Beach il Trailhead E6 a Curry Village Parking r r T te Parking e n il i w M in r u d 16 o e Happy Isles Art El Capitan F s lo c and Nature Center Picnic Area Glacier Point E3 no shuttle service closed in winter Vernal 72I4 ft Fall 2I99 m l Mist Trai Cathedral ail Tr op h Beach Lo or M E4 ey ses erce all only d Ri V ver E5 Nevada Fall To & Bridalveil Fall d oa R B a r n id wo a a lv W e i The Yosemite Valley Shuttle operates from 7am to 10pm and serves stops in numerical order.
    [Show full text]