TEA Attach 13

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

TEA Attach 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ..................................................................................................i Chapter 1 Introduction..............................................................................................................1 1.1 Background..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of The Current Study ..................................................................................... 5 1.3 Approach Taken.............................................................................................................7 1.4 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Abbreviations ................................................................................................................. 8 Chapter 2 Assessing and Describing the Scenic Values of Meander Valley ...............................9 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Issues Affecting the Scenic Values of the Meander Valley....................................... 10 2.2.1 Loss of Native Vegetation............................................................................ 12 2.2.2 Plantation Forestry........................................................................................ 13 2.2.3 Cultural Landscape Management .............................................................. 14 2.2.4 Buildings, Roads and Other Development................................................ 16 2.3 Previous Approaches to Landscape Management in the Meander Valley Council Area....................................................................................................... 17 2.3.1 Visual Management System ........................................................................ 17 2.3.2 Regional Forest Agreement ......................................................................... 19 2.3.3 Tamar Regional Master Planning Authority............................................. 21 2.3.4 Scenery Protection Report – Tony Smibert................................................ 21 2.3.5 Social Values Assessment ............................................................................ 22 2.3.6 Meander Valley Council Planning Scheme 1995 ...................................... 23 2.4 Methodology of the Current Study ............................................................................. 23 2.4.1 Describing and Categorising the Landscape Character........................... 24 2.4.2 Identifying Viewing Types and Significant Viewpoints........................... 28 2.4.3 Identifying Social Value............................................................................... 28 2.4.4 Visual Assessment and Priority Mapping................................................. 34 2.4.5 The Visual Management Matrix for Rural Lands..................................... 38 Chapter 3 Managing Scenic Values in Meander Valley – Three Case Studies ............................41 3.1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................41 3.2 Case Study 1 : Westbury Plains Character Sub-Type................................................42 3.2.1 Sub-type Characteristics...............................................................................43 3.2.2 Frames of Reference for Scenic Quality......................................................46 3.2.3 Significant View Points and Seen Area Mapping.....................................50 3.2.4 Visual Management Priority........................................................................50 3.2.5 Landscape Management Policies for Westbury Plains ...............................57 3.3 Case Study 2 : Gibsons Character Sub-Type...............................................................61 3.3.1 Sub-type Characteristics...............................................................................61 3.3.2 Frames of Reference for Scenic Quality......................................................66 3.3.3 Significant Viewpoints and Seen Area Mapping......................................71 3.3.4 Visual Management Priority........................................................................71 3.3.5 Landscape Management Policies for Gibsons .............................................72 3.4 Case Study 3 : Mole Creek Character Sub-Type ........................................................85 3.4.1 Sub-type Characteristics...............................................................................85 3.4.2 Frames of Reference for Scenic Quality......................................................88 3.4.3 Significant Viewpoints and Seen Area Mapping......................................93 3.4.4 Visual Management Priority........................................................................93 3.3.5 Landscape Management Policies for Mole Creek ........................................93 Chapter 4 Mechanisms to Protect and Manage Scenic Values...................................................101 4.1 Regulative Measures......................................................................................................101 4.1.1 Existing Planning Scheme Provisions.........................................................101 4.1.2 Proposed Planning Scheme Provisions ......................................................103 4.1.3 Assessment Process.......................................................................................106 4.1.4 Other Planning Scheme Controls................................................................109 4.1.4 Other Regulative Controls ...........................................................................109 4.2 Non-Regulative Measures.............................................................................................113 4.2.1 Community Education .................................................................................113 4.2.2 Voluntary Agreements and Incentives.......................................................114 4.2.3 Negotiation between Interest Groups ........................................................115 4.2.4 Adaptation of Existing Management Tools...............................................116 4.2.5 Acquistion...................................................................................................... 116 4.3 Policy Guidelines ........................................................................................................... 117 4.3.1 Industry in the Rural Setting....................................................................... 117 4.3.2 Management of Prime View Locations...................................................... 118 4.3.3 Forestry Operations...................................................................................... 122 4.3.4 Infrastructure................................................................................................. 123 4.3.5 Specific Regional Features-........................................................................... 125 Chapter 5 Recommendations ....................................................................................................129 Appendix 1 Description of the Visual Character of the Visual Units Appendix 2 Criteria for Public Sensitivity Appendix 3 Draft Schedule for the Management of the Scenic Values in Rural Landscapes EXECUTIVE SUMMARY B ACKGROUND The Meander Valley is widely recognised for the quality and diversity of its landscapes and the cultural, natural and scenic values such landscapes hold. These values are important not only to the economy of the region but also for their role in defining the community and what it means to live there. The strong community activism and debate over approaches to the sustainable management of the resources in the Meander Valley in recent years indicates the strength of the community's attachment to these values. The Meander Valley Council is constantly seeking to improve its capacity to sustainably manage its resources and has been investigating a number of planning and management mechanisms (e.g. Natural Resource Management Strategy, Vegetation Management Strategy, Sport and Recreation Strategy). Past consultation processes have identified stakeholder concern with the loss of visual values in the Meander Valley and in particular the limited controls available to Council to protect areas of significant visual value from a range of threats. The major issues affecting the scenery of the municipality have been identified through the research and consultation processes as being: loss of native vegetation generally; the impact of increased plantation forestry; the loss or deterioration of key elements of the Meander Valley area cultural landscape; and the impacts of buildings, roads and other development. There is no formulated or agreed Statewide framework for the identification or assessment of scenic value in Tasmania, nor any models that are known to exist within Australia that have successfully tackled the management of scenic values at the local Council level in rural areas. Council recognised that an agreed framework would give some degree of certainty to all parties to the process and would help ensure that sustainability objectives are being met in a fair and orderly way. The current study has been undertaken for the Meander Valley Council
Recommended publications
  • May 2017 May 2017
    May 2017 May 2017 Winners of the Tasmanian trout fishing photo competition Congratulations to the winners of the Tasmanian Trout Fishing Photo Competition. The junior winner is Sabyn Harris with his photo, Four Springs Lake. First prize in the adult category goes to The adult runner up is David Green with his Steven Ooi for his photo, Western Lakes photo, Tyenna River. We would like thank everyone who entered the Tasmanian Trout Fishing Photo Competition. We received over 150 entries and it was a very hard job to select the winners. Congratulations really goes to all of you who entered. Thanks for sharing you inland fishing experiences with us. Page 2 of 25 May 2017 Contents Hot topics .......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Trout Weekend 2017 ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Brown trout spawning run and transfers ............................................................................................................... 4 Community Infrastructure Fund successful projects ........................................................................................... 4 Carp Workshop 2017 ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Anglers Access – Neil Morrow ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 National Trust Heritage Festival 2013 Community Milestones
    the NatioNal trust presents THE TASMANIAN HERITAGE FESTIVAL COMMUNITY MILESTONES 1 MAY - 31 MAY 2013 national trust heritage Festival 2013 COMMUNITY MILESTONES message From the miNister message From tourism tasmaNia the month-long tasmanian heritage Festival is here again. a full program provides tasmanians and visitors with an opportunity to the tasmanian heritage Festival, throughout may 2013, is sure to be another successful event for thet asmanian Branch of the National participate and to learn more about our fantastic heritage. trust, showcasing a rich tapestry of heritage experiences all around the island. The Tasmanian Heritage Festival has been running for Thanks must go to the National Trust for sustaining the momentum, rising It is important to ‘shine the spotlight’ on heritage and cultural experiences, For visitors, the many different aspects of Tasmania’s heritage provide the over 25 years. Our festival was the first heritage festival to the challenge, and providing us with another full program. Organising a not only for our local communities but also for visitors to Tasmania. stories, settings and memories they will take back, building an appreciation in Australia, with other states and territories following festival of this size is no small task. of Tasmania’s special qualities and place in history. Tasmania’s lead. The month of May is an opportunity to experience and celebrate many Thanks must also go to the wonderful volunteers and all those in the aspects of Tasmania’s heritage. Contemporary life and visitor experiences As a newcomer to the State I’ve quickly gained an appreciation of Tasmania’s The Heritage Festival is coordinated by the National heritage sector who share their piece of Tasmania’s historic heritage with of Tasmania are very much shaped by the island’s many-layered history.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Natural Values Within the 2013 Extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area
    A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Nature Conservation Report 2017/6 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Hobart A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area Jayne Balmer, Jason Bradbury, Karen Richards, Tim Rudman, Micah Visoiu, Shannon Troy and Naomi Lawrence. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, September 2017 This report was prepared under the direction of the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment (World Heritage Program). Australian Government funds were contributed to the project through the World Heritage Area program. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Tasmanian or Australian Governments. ISSN 1441-0680 Copyright 2017 Crown in right of State of Tasmania Apart from fair dealing for the purposes of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright act, no part may be reproduced by any means without permission from the Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Published by Natural Values Conservation Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment GPO Box 44 Hobart, Tasmania, 7001 Front Cover Photograph of Eucalyptus regnans tall forest in the Styx Valley: Rob Blakers Cite as: Balmer, J., Bradbury, J., Richards, K., Rudman, T., Visoiu, M., Troy, S. and Lawrence, N. 2017. A review of natural values within the 2013 extension to the Tasmanian Wilderness World Heritage Area. Nature Conservation Report 2017/6, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Statement
    THREATENED SPECIES LISTING STATEMENT ORCHID L iawenee greenhood Pterostylis pratensis D. L. Jones 1998 Status Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 ……………………………….……..………..………………..vulnerable Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ……………………..….….…...............Vulnerable Hans & Annie Wapstra Description December. In flower, the plants are 7 to 15 cm tall, Pterostylis pratensis belongs to a group of orchids with many closely sheathing stem leaves. They commonly known as greenhoods because the dorsal have 2 to 12 densely crowded white flowers with sepal and petals are united to form a predominantly dark green stripes. The hood apex curves down green, hood-like structure that dominates the abruptly and terminates with a short tip. The two flower. When triggered by touch, the labellum flips lateral sepals hang down and are fused to form a inwards towards the column, trapping any insect pouch below the labellum though the tips may inside the flower, thereby aiding pollination as the remain free. The labellum, which also hangs down, insect struggles to escape. Greenhoods are is whitish green, oblong with a shallowly notched deciduous terrestrials that have fleshy tubers, which tip and has an appendage that points out with a dark are replaced annually. At some stage in their life green, knob-like apex with a short, broad, blunt cycle all greenhoods produce a rosette of leaves. beak about 0.5 mm long. In all, the flowers are 7 to 8.5 mm long and 4.5 mm wide. The rosette of Pterostylis pratensis encircles the base of the flower stem. The 4 to 8 rosette leaves Its darker green and white flowers and larger leaves are dark green, crowded, and oval to circular can distinguish Pterostylis pratensis, which grows shaped with the broadest part in the middle, 25 to in montane and subalpine regions on the Central 35 mm long and 14 to 22 mm wide.
    [Show full text]
  • 3966 Tour Op 4Col
    The Tasmanian Advantage natural and cultural features of Tasmania a resource manual aimed at developing knowledge and interpretive skills specific to Tasmania Contents 1 INTRODUCTION The aim of the manual Notesheets & how to use them Interpretation tips & useful references Minimal impact tourism 2 TASMANIA IN BRIEF Location Size Climate Population National parks Tasmania’s Wilderness World Heritage Area (WHA) Marine reserves Regional Forest Agreement (RFA) 4 INTERPRETATION AND TIPS Background What is interpretation? What is the aim of your operation? Principles of interpretation Planning to interpret Conducting your tour Research your content Manage the potential risks Evaluate your tour Commercial operators information 5 NATURAL ADVANTAGE Antarctic connection Geodiversity Marine environment Plant communities Threatened fauna species Mammals Birds Reptiles Freshwater fishes Invertebrates Fire Threats 6 HERITAGE Tasmanian Aboriginal heritage European history Convicts Whaling Pining Mining Coastal fishing Inland fishing History of the parks service History of forestry History of hydro electric power Gordon below Franklin dam controversy 6 WHAT AND WHERE: EAST & NORTHEAST National parks Reserved areas Great short walks Tasmanian trail Snippets of history What’s in a name? 7 WHAT AND WHERE: SOUTH & CENTRAL PLATEAU 8 WHAT AND WHERE: WEST & NORTHWEST 9 REFERENCES Useful references List of notesheets 10 NOTESHEETS: FAUNA Wildlife, Living with wildlife, Caring for nature, Threatened species, Threats 11 NOTESHEETS: PARKS & PLACES Parks & places,
    [Show full text]
  • Version Detail
    Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan Main Report Sport and Recreation Tasmania Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts About this document The Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan is made up of four documents: » Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Summary » Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Main Report » Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Attachments » Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Marketing Strategy This document is the Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Main Report The Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan was prepared by Inspiring Place on behalf of Sport and Recreation Tasmania. Cite as: Sport and Recreation Tasmania (2009), Tasmanian Mountain Bike Plan: Main Report, Department of Economic Development, Tourism and the Arts, Hobart. Contact us A copy of the plan can be downloaded from the Sport and Recreation Tasmania website: www.development.tas.gov.au/sportrec/mtbplan For more information, please contact: Sport and Recreation Tasmania GPO Box 646 Hobart, Tasmania 7001 Phone: 1800 252 476 Email: [email protected] Published December 2009 ISBN 978-1-921527-05-0 © 2009 The Crown in right of Tasmania, represented by Sport and Recreation Tasmania. All rights reserved. a bc de f g hi Photographic credits Front cover a LMBC 12 Hour Race, Four Springs, Northern Tasmania. Photo: Tourism Tasmania and Brad Harris b Glenorchy Mountain Bike Park, Glenorchy. Photo: Simon French, Dirt Art c Wildside MTB Race, Ocean Beach, West Coast of Tasmania. Photo: Nic Deka d North-South Track, Wellinton Park, Hobart. Photo: Hobart City Council and Jupe-Bergshoeff e Blue Tier, North East of Tasmania. Photo: Keith Ryan f Blue Tier, North East of Tasmania. Photo: Keith Ryan g Bridestowe Lavender Farm, North East of Tasmania.
    [Show full text]
  • GREAT WESTERN TIERS and MEANDER VALLEY Destination Action Plan 2017-2020 June 2017 Acknowledgments
    GREAT WESTERN TIERS AND MEANDER VALLEY Destination Action Plan 2017-2020 June 2017 Acknowledgments The development of the Great Western Tiers and Meander Valley Destination Plan has been facilitated by Tourism Northern Tasmania with the support of the Department of State Growth. The process brought together representatives from all stakeholder groups that benefit from the visitor economy; local government, state government agencies, industry and the community, to develop a plan. This Plan seeks to identify the challenges and opportunities facing the Great Western Tiers and Meander Valley – and to establish achievable affordable priorities that if delivered would increase the competiveness of the destination. Facilitator Chris Griffin, CEO, Tourism Northern Tasmania Coordinator Gillian Miles, Industry Liaison, Tourism Northern Tasmania Destination Action Plan Leadership Group Lindi Dornauf Frank Horton Hayden Stedman Christmas Hills Raspberry Farm Kooparoona Niara Cultural Trail Parks & Wildlife Service Jonathon Harmey Androo Kelly Maria Tassone Meander Valley Council Trowunna Wildlife Park Arcoona Mark Flanigan Mick Kelly John Temple Empire Hotel MVC Councillor MVC Councillor Michal Frydrych Toni & Rob Mehigan Berice Van Der Aa Springfield Deer Farm Mole Creek Guest House Trade Training Centre Alfred Franssen Rosemary Norwood Deb White Seppenfelts Emporium Forest Walks Lodge MVC Councillor Barbara Harvey Roger Nutting Deb Willis Deloraine Deli Mountain Huts Preservation Society Deloraine Jewellers Martin Hay Vicki Pryer Kooparoona Niara Cultural Trail Visitor Information Centre Ben Harker Ross Quick Field Rabbit Mole Creek Progress Association Images used within this document are courtesy of Tourism Tasmania, Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery, Kathryn Leahy, Rob Burnett, Pete Mattila, Geoffrey Lea, N.R. Goldsmith, Knox Photographic Society, Lap Fung Lam, Chris Crerar, Masaaki Aihara, Meander Valley Council, Brian Dullaghan, Paul Flood, Joe Shemesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Tamar Development Plan
    ABN 85 082 464 622 PL SM BU GT DP EB WV U SC DB M R T NW SM SR HA P AV Q F THZ R AL QT W TU DB MB TB NN G KR KI EL K TAMAR DEVELOPMENT PLAN REV DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION APPROVALS NO. 0 Working Draft Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by NW-#30116994-v2-Tamar_Development_Plan.DOC Tamar Development Plan Copyright Notice This document is protected by copyright vested in Aurora Energy Pty Ltd. No part of the document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means including, without limitation, electronic, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of Aurora. Any breach of the above obligations may be restrained by legal proceedings seeking remedies including injunctions, damages and costs. Disclaimer This document is produced by the Network Division of Aurora Energy Pty Ltd as an internal information service and is not for general publication. This document does not necessarily contain all the information that may be necessary to enable a person to assess whether to pursue a specific investment. Aurora Energy Pty Ltd makes no representations or warranty as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness or suitability for particular purposes of the information in this document. Except insofar as liability under any statute cannot be excluded or as required by law, Aurora Energy Pty Ltd, its employees, agents and consultants will not be in any circumstances be liable to any party for any consequence of the use of this document. NW-#30116994-v2-Tamar_Development_Plan.DOC Page 2 of 42 Tamar Development Plan 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 399 a ABC Range 269-72 Aboriginal Peoples
    © Lonely Planet Publications 399 Index A animals 27-30, see also individual Hazards Beach 244 ABCABBREVIATIONS Range 269-72 animals Injidup Beach 283 AboriginalACT peoplesAustralian Capital Arenge Bluff 325 Jan Juc beach 141 Territory Adnyamathana 267 Aroona Homestead 270 Kilcarnup Beach 286 NSW New South Wales Brataualung 175 Aroona Hut 270 Le Grand Beach 302 NT Northern Territory Daruk 65 Aroona Valley 270 Lion’s Head Beach 131 Qld Queensland Dharawal 58 Arthur’s Seat 133 Little Beach 58 SA South Australia Djab wurrung 150 ATMs 367 Little Marley Beach 59 Tas Tasmania INDEX Gamilaroi 110 Augusta 281 Little Oberon Bay 180 Vic Victoria Jandwardjali 150 Australian Alps Walking Track 157, 157 Marley Beach 59 WA Western Australia Krautungulung 181 Australian Capital Territory 84 Milanesia Beach 146 Malyankapa 123 Needles Beach 131 Pandjikali 123 B Norman Beach 180 Port Davey 236 B&Bs 358 Oberon Bay 180 Wailwan 110 Babinda 356 Osmiridium Beach 241 Western Arrernte 321 backpacks 393 Peaceful Bay 291-2, 296 Acacia Flat 73 Badjala Sandblow 347 Picnic Bay 179 accidents 385-6 Bahnamboola Falls 340 Prion Beach 240, 241 accommodation 357-60 Bald Head 302 Putty Beach 55-8 Acropolis, the 228 Baldry Crossing 133 Quininup Beach 284, 44 Adaminaby 95 Balor Hut 113 Redgate Beach 287 Adelaide 251-3 Banksia Bay 351 Safety Beach 132 Admiration Point 101 Banksia Creek 351 Seal Cove 186 Aeroplane Hill 118 banksias 45 Sealers Cove 178 agriculture 46 Bare Knoll 203-4 Secret Beach 186 air travel 372-5 Barn Bluff 220, 222 Smiths Beach 283 airports 372-3 Barrington
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda October 2014
    P a g e | 1 Central Highlands Council AGENDA – ORDINARY MEETING –21st OCTOBER 2014 Agenda of an Ordinary Meeting of Central Highlands Council scheduled to be held at Bothwell Council Chambers, on Tuesday 21st October 2014, commencing at 9am and be closed to the public until 11.00am. I certify under S65(2) of the Local Government Act 1993 that the matters to be discussed under this agenda have been, where necessary, the subject of advice from a suitably qualified person and that such advice has been taken into account in providing any general advice to the Council. Lyn Eyles General Manager 1.0 OPENING 2.0 PRESENT 3.0 APOLOGIES 4.0 PECUNIARY INTEREST DECLARATIONS In accordance with Regulation 8 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) Regulations 2005, the Mayor requests Councillors to indicate whether they or a close associate have, or are likely to have a pecuniary interest (any pecuniary or pecuniary detriment) in any item of the Agenda. 5.0 COMMITTEE Regulation 15 of the Local Government (Meeting Procedures) regulations 2005 provides that Council may consider certain sensitive matters in Closed Agenda which relate to: Personnel matters, including complaints against an employee of the Council; Industrial matters relating to a person; Contracts for the supply and purchase of goods and services; The security of property of the Council Proposals for the Council to acquire land or an interest in the land or for the disposal of land; Information provided to the Council on the condition it is kept confidential; Trade secrets of private bodies; Matters relating to actual or possible litigations taken by or involving the Council or an employee of the Council; Applications by Councillors for leave of absence; The personal affairs of any person.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial History of the Upper Mersey Valley
    THE GLACIAL HISTORY OF THE UPPER MERSEY VALLEY by A a" D. G. Hannan, B.Sc., B. Ed., M. Ed. (Hons.) • Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA HOBART February, 1989 CONTENTS Summary of Figures and Tables Acknowledgements ix Declaration ix Abstract 1 Chapter 1 The upper Mersey Valley and adjacent areas: geographical 3 background Location and topography 3 Lithology and geological structure of the upper Mersey region 4 Access to the region 9 Climate 10 Vegetation 10 Fauna 13 Land use 14 Chapter 2 Literature review, aims and methodology 16 Review of previous studies of glaciation in the upper Mersey 16 region Problems arising from the literature 21 Aims of the study and methodology 23 Chapter $ Landforms produced by glacial and periglacial processes 28 Landforms of glacial erosion 28 Landforms of glacial deposition 37 Periglacial landforms and deposits 43 Chapter 4 Stratigraphic relationships between the Rowallan, Arm and Croesus glaciations 51 Regional stratigraphy 51 Weathering characteristics of the glacial, glacifluvial and solifluction deposits 58 Geographic extent and location of glacial sediments 75 Chapter 5 The Rowallan Glaciation 77 The extent of Rowallan Glaciation ice 77 Sediments associated with Rowallan Glaciation ice 94 Directions of ice movement 106 Deglaciation of Rowallan Glaciation ice 109 The age of the Rowallan Glaciation 113 Climate during the Rowallan Glaciation 116 Chapter The Arm, Croesus and older glaciations 119 The Arm Glaciation 119 The Croesus Glaciation 132 Tertiary Glaciation 135 Late Palaeozoic Glaciation 136 Chapter 7 Conclusions 139 , Possible correlations of other glaciations with the upper Mersey region 139 Concluding remarks 146 References 153 Appendix A INDEX OF FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Follows page Figure 1: Location of the study area.
    [Show full text]