DOCSLIB.ORG

Perak State Recommendation Report on Good Regulatory Practice (Grp)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PERAK STATE RECOMMENDATION REPORT ON GOOD REGULATORY PRACTICE (GRP) Table of Contents Contents Page Table of Contents ii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background, mandate and methodology for 1 the study 1.2 Objective and Scope 2 1.3 What is GRP – NPDIR 2 CHAPTER 2 ABOUT THE STATE GOVERNMENT 6 2.1 State characteristics 6 2.1.1 Brief History of Perak State 8 2.1.2 No. of State Governments and Local 10 Authorities 2.1.3 Population by Local Authorities 13 2.1.4 Land area of Local Authorities 14 2.1.5 Population density 14 2.1.6 Median average resident income 14 2.2 Income of local authority from rates, 15 licenses etc. 2.3 Dominant economic activities and 16 industries 2.4 Regulatory Responsibilities (state list and 17 concurrent list) CHAPTER 3 ANALYSIS OF STATE GOVERNMENT RULE 18 MAKING PROCESS 3.1 Existing regulation and governance 18 rulemaking (include institutions) Rule making process of Perak Local Authorities ii 3.1.1 Mechanism of Rule Making Process (Current 23 Procedures) 3.1.2 Evaluation of the Existing Mechanism of Rule 29 Making Process (gap analysis but benchmarking against what) 3.2 Rulemaking Regulation and Governance 32 of Perak Land and Mines (PTG) 3.3 Gap analysis matrix – to compare between 36 existing state rule-making process with NPDIR CHAPTER 4 RECOMMENDATIONS & CONCLUSIONS 38 4.1 Recommendations to Improve the Rule 38 Making Process (recommendations) 4.1.1 Recommendation PBN & PBT 38 4.2 Conclusion 42 iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background, mandate and methodology for the study The Government’s regulatory reform initiative took a significant step forward in 2013 with the introduction of the policy and guidelines for implementing good regulatory practice. The circular on the National Policy on the Development and Implementation of Regulations (NPDIR) was issued by the Chief Secretary to the Government of Malaysia on 15 July 2013 which requires all federal ministries and agencies to undertake good regulatory practice (GRP) and regulatory impact analysis (RIA) in developing new and amended regulations. This policy seeks to ensure that regulations are developed according to international best practice in regulatory management. In the Eleventh Malaysia Plan (2016-2020), Malaysia Productivity Corporation (MPC) has been mandated to expand the adoption of the National policy on Development and Implementation of Regulations (NDPIR) to states and local governments. This initiative is to accelerate a comprehensive and inclusive regulatory reform in Malaysia to ensure new and existing regulations, as well as their administration and enforcement, are aligned with GRP. For the purpose of this report, the methodology consists of three main phases: Phase 1: • Desk research – collecting data and information. • Data collected from several related website such as Department of Statistic, State Economic Planning Unit, 1 State Agencies, local Authorities and few other related websites. • Data and information also collected via phone call and email. Phase 2: • Analysis of data, review and confirmation of data and information. Phase 3: • Recommendations for improvement and report writing 1.2 Objective and Scope Generally, the objective and scope of this report is to develop a recommendation report to implement GRP for the state of Perak and Local Authorities. The specific objective and scope are: a. To analyze practices existing regulation and governance rule- making (include institutions) b. To find the gap analysis between existing state rule-making process with NPDIR c. To provide recommendation on how to improve the rule making process to ensure that it is align with NPDIR. 1.3 What is GRP – NPDIR The National Policy on the Development and Implementation of Regulations (NPDIR) has been developed to support the modernisation of the regulatory regime. There is increasing recognition that over-regulation, poorly designed regulations or in some cases under-regulation leads to regulatory failures which undermines the intentions of good policies. Global competition, social, economic and technological changes requires the government to consider the inter-related impacts of regulatory regimes, to ensure that regulatory structures and processes continue to be relevant, robust, transparent, accountable and forward-looking. 2 The goal of good regulatory policy is to achieve coherence, effectiveness, efficiency and accountability in the rule-making and implementation process. This modernization is also an essential part of realizing several of the policy objectives of the NEM that include: • Removal of barriers and reduce cost of doing business; • Improvement in decision making for policy implementation; and • Improvement in economic efficiency through enabling fair competition. The Special Task Force to Facilitate Business (PEMUDAH) was established by the government to ensure that Malaysia remains an attractive and competitive investment location. PEMUDAH has been addressing service delivery issues that relate directly to investment and starting a business. It has recognized that changes in rules and legislation are also required. NPDIR policy complements PEMUDAH’s efforts and will ensure that any new regulation does not result in disincentives to business, investment and trade. NPDIR guides the development of good regulations, which is essential in achieving the NEM policy objectives. It sets out core principles that regulatory authorities should adhere to in regulating and outlines a number of steps that will be taken to put the principles into practice. It will also seek to reduce, if not eliminate, cumbersome and inappropriate bureaucratic procedures that affect the cost of investing and the potential returns on investment. The objective of the policy is to ensure that Malaysia’s regulatory regime effectively supports the country’s aspirations to be a high-income and progressive nation whose economy is competitive, subscribes to sustainable development and inclusive growth. The policy is implemented to promote a regulatory process that is effective, efficient and accountable as well as to achieve greater coherence among the policy objectives of government. This policy applies to all federal government ministries, departments, statutory bodies and regulatory commissions. It is also applicable for voluntary 3 adoption by state government and local authorities. Regulators proposing new regulations or regulatory changes must undertake the regulatory impact analysis (RIA) involving the following components: • Problem Identification Regulators must establish clear objectives, evidence that a problem has arisen and government intervention is required. Regulators must ensure that risks are of sufficient significance to justify intervention. • Objectives Objectives of the proposal or the problem must be identified, described, analysed and documented clearly and concisely. • Instrument Options The objectives must be analysed to ensure the most effective and efficient option is chosen. It must be demonstrated that new regulations will help solve the problem. • Assessment of Impact An assessment of the impact (costs, benefits and where relevant, levels of risk) of a range of feasible options for consumers, business, government and the community must be carried out to assess potential effects. • Consultation Regulators proposing new regulations or changes must carry out timely and thorough consultations with affected parties. • Conclusion and RIS should include a statement identifying the Recommendation preferred option based on the impact analysis. • Implementation The implementation strategy and a review of the preferred option must be described comprehensively in RIS. 4 • Publication of RIS RIS is to be published on the regulator’s and MPC website as soon as practicable from the date of official announcement of the decision. In order to standardize the way that polices, laws and regulations are developed and improve overall regulatory quality, regulatory impact statements and public consultations were introduced. Under National Policy on the Development and Implementation of Regulations (NPDIR), all Federal Government regulators must undertake Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA) and present the Regulatory Impact Statement (RIS) in the creation of all new regulations or review of regulations that relate to, or impact business, investments and trade, upon assessment by MPC. The process is also applicable for voluntary adoption by state governments and local authorities. RIA will be applied in all ministries and agencies. The tool is to enable governments to make sound analysis, evidence-based decision making and ensure transparency in all new and amended regulations. 5 CHAPTER 2 ABOUT THE STATE GOVERNMENT 2.1 State characteristics Perak is a peaceful and beautiful state, and full of opportunities. Bordered by a number of other states, Perak offers various privileges in aspects of economy, tourism, infrastructure and others. Perak or also known as Perak Darul Ridzuan is the second largest state in Peninsular Malaysia (after Pahang), with an area of 21,000 square km. It is one of the states that form the Federation of Malaya. Hulu Perak District with size, position and features itself is a special territory that the volume of population growth will be the smallest population between regions. Northern Region (Mature and Long Dissolved District as well Kerian region) as a growth region that driven by the ‘Greater Kamunting’ Growth Area is projected to be the focus of 23 percent of total population of Perak by 2040. Kinta Valley Metropolitan
Recommended publications
  • Perak Heads of State Department and Local Authority Directory 2020

    Perak Heads of State Department and Local Authority Directory 2020

    PERAK HEADS OF STATE DEPARTMENT AND LOCAL AUTHORITY DIRECTORY 2020 DISTRIBUTION LIST NO. DESIGNATION / ADDRESS NAME OF TELEPHONE / FAX HEAD OF DEPARTMENT 1. STATE FINANCIAL OFFICER, YB Dato’ Zulazlan Bin Abu 05-209 5000 (O) Perak State Finance Office, Hassan *5002 Level G, Bangunan Perak Darul Ridzuan, 05-2424488 (Fax) Jalan Panglima Bukit Gantang Wahab, [email protected] 30000 IPOH 2. PERAK MUFTI, Y.A.Bhg. Tan Sri Dato’ Seri Haji 05-2545332 (O) State Mufti’s Office, Harussani Bin Haji Zakaria 05-2419694 (Fax) Level 5, Kompleks Islam Darul Ridzuan, Jalan Panglima Bukit Gantang Wahab, [email protected] 30000 IPOH. 3. DIRECTOR, Y.A.A. Dato Haji Asa’ari Bin 05-5018400 (O) Perak Syariah Judiciary Department, Haji Mohd Yazid 05-5018540 (Fax) Level 5, Kompleks Mahkamah Syariah Perak, Jalan Pari, Off Jalan Tun Abdul Razak, [email protected] 30020 IPOH. 4. CHAIRMAN, Y.D.H Dato’ Pahlawan Hasnan 05-2540615 (O) Perak Public Service Commission, Bin Hassan 05-2422239 (Fax) E-5-2 & E-6-2, Menara SSI, SOHO 2, Jalan Sultan Idris Shah, [email protected] 30000 IPOH. 5. DIRECTOR, YBhg. Dato’ Mohamad Fariz 05-2419312 (D) Director of Land and Mines Office, Bin Mohamad Hanip 05-209 5000/5170 (O) Bangunan Sri Perak Darul Ridzuan, 05-2434451 (Fax) Jalan Panglima Bukit Gantang Wahab, [email protected] 30000 IPOH. 6. DIRECTOR, (Vacant) 05-2454008 (D) Perak Public Works Department, 05-2454041 (O) Jalan Panglima Bukit Gantang Wahab, 05-2537397 (Fax) 30000 IPOH. 7. DIRECTOR, TPr. Jasmiah Binti Ismail 05-209 5000 (O) PlanMalaysia@Perak, *5700 Town and Country Planning Department, [email protected] 05-2553022 (Fax) Level 7, Bangunan Kerajaan Negeri, Jalan Panglima Bukit Gantang Wahab, 30000 IPOH.
  • No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Taiping 15 16 17 NEGERI PERAK

    No 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Taiping 15 16 17 NEGERI PERAK

    NEGERI PERAK SENARAI TAPAK BEROPERASI : 17 TAPAK Tahap Tapak No Kawasan PBT Nama Tapak Alamat Tapak (Operasi) 1 Batu Gajah TP Batu Gajah Batu 3, Jln Tanjung Tualang, Batu Gajah Bukan Sanitari Jalan Air Ganda Gerik, Perak, 2 Gerik TP Jln Air Ganda Gerik Bukan Sanitari D/A MDG 33300 Gerik, Perak Batu. 8, Jalan Bercham, Tanjung 3 Ipoh TP Bercham Bukan Sanitari Rambutan, Ipoh, Perak Batu 21/2, Jln. Kuala Dipang, Sg. Siput 4 Kampar TP Sg Siput Selatan Bukan Sanitari (S), Kampar, Perak Lot 2720, Permatang Pasir, Alor Pongsu, 5 Kerian TP Bagan Serai Bukan Sanitari Beriah, Bagan Serai KM 8, Jalan Kuala Kangsar, Salak Utara, 6 Kuala Kangsar TP Jln Kuala Kangsar Bukan Sanitari Sungai Siput 7 Lenggong TP Ayer Kala Lot 7345 & 7350, Ayer Kala, Lenggong Bukan Sanitari Batu 1 1/2, Jalan Beruas - Sitiawan, 8 Manjung TP Sg Wangi Bukan Sanitari 32000 Sitiawan 9 Manjung TP Teluk Cempedak Teluk Cempedak, Pulau Pangkor Bukan Sanitari 10 Manjung TP Beruas Kg. Che Puteh, Jalan Beruas - Taiping Bukan Sanitari Bukit Buluh, Jalan Kelian Intan, 33100 11 Pengkalan Hulu TP Jln Gerik Bukan Sanitari Pengkalan Hulu 12 Perak Tengah TP Parit Jln Chopin Kanan, Parit Bukan Sanitari 13 Selama TP Jln Tmn Merdeka Kg. Lampin, Jln. Taman Merdeka, Selama Bukan Sanitari Lot 1706, Mukim Jebong, Daerah Larut 14 Taiping TP Jebong Bukan Sanitari Matang dan Selama Kampung Penderas, Slim River, Tanjung 15 Tanjung Malim TP Penderas Bukan Sanitari Malim 16 Tapah TP Bidor, Pekan Pasir Kampung Baru, Pekan Pasir, Bidor Bukan Sanitari 17 Teluk Intan TP Changkat Jong Batu 8, Jln.
  • Issue 3/2015

    Issue 3/2015

    Issue 3/2015 Students in the Power and Control Labaratory 02 Collaborations at Work 07 10 12 14 16 18 20 02 Collaborations at Work 03 TAR was visited by the High UCommisioner of Uganda at Petaling Council Chairman visits Schools Jaya Campus on 12 May 2015. Visit by High TAR Council-cum-Malaysia The delegation was led by the High UMental Literacy Movement Commisioner of Uganda, His Excellency (MMLM) Chairman Tun Dr Stephen Mubiru accompanied by the First Commisioner of Uganda Ling Liong Sik led a delegation Secretary Mbabazi Samantha Sherurah. On to visit nine secondary schools hand to welcome the guests were UTAR leaders. He further expressed desire for on 27 and 28 April; and 11, 14, President Ir Prof Academician Dato’ Dr “I consider this an important day in our continued collaboration, including the 15 and 28 May 2015. Passionate Chuah Hean Teik, Vice President for R&D lives, as we have place a key into the door possibility of setting up an exchange visits about affordable education and and Commercialisation Prof Ir Dr Lee Sze that opens up to great possibilities in the for staff and students from UTAR and mental literacy for all, the visits Wei, Institute of Postgraduate Studies and future,” said Mubiru with a smile. universities in Uganda. were a continuation of the Teach Research Director Prof Dr Faidz bin Abd “We have a lot to learn from Malaysia To date, UTAR houses one international For Malaysia (TFM) school visits Rahman, Division of Programme Promotion when it comes to technology application,” he student from Uganda who is undertaking the of 2014.
  • The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    The Perak Development Experience: the Way Forward

    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences December 2013, Vol. 3, No. 12 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Perak Development Experience: The Way Forward Azham Md. Ali Department of Accounting and Finance, Faculty of Management and Economics Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v3-i12/437 Speech for the Menteri Besar of Perak the Right Honourable Dato’ Seri DiRaja Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir to be delivered on the occasion of Pangkor International Development Dialogue (PIDD) 2012 I9-21 November 2012 at Impiana Hotel, Ipoh Perak Darul Ridzuan Brothers and Sisters, Allow me to briefly mention to you some of the more important stuff that we have implemented in the last couple of years before we move on to others areas including the one on “The Way Forward” which I think that you are most interested to hear about. Under the so called Perak Amanjaya Development Plan, some of the things that we have tried to do are the same things that I believe many others here are concerned about: first, balanced development and economic distribution between the urban and rural areas by focusing on developing small towns; second, poverty eradication regardless of race or religion so that no one remains on the fringes of society or is left behind economically; and, third, youth empowerment. Under the first one, the state identifies viable small- and medium-size companies which can operate from small towns. These companies are to be working closely with the state government to boost the economy of the respective areas.
  • Chapter 1 Introduction

    Chapter 1 Introduction

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background Study Tin mining is one of the oldest industries in Malaysia. As what had been researched by James R.Lee (2000), the tin mining started since 1820s in Malaysia after the arrival of Chinese immigrants. The Chinese immigrants settled in Perak and started tin mines. Their leader was the famous Chung Ah Qwee. Their arrival contributed to the needed labour and hence the growth of the tin mining industry. Tin was the major pillars of the Malaysian economy. Tin occurs chiefly as alluvial deposits in the foothills of the Peninsular on the western site. The most important area is the Kinta Valley, which includes the towns of Ipoh, Gopeng, Kampar and Batu Gajah in the state of Perak. But that was long ago before price of tin had fallen greatly and high cost of mining had shutdown the industry. What is left now is the abandoned mine site scattered all over Perak. Some mines are far from populated area and some are in the population itself such as Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP). The campus is located on land that was once an active tin mining site. The residual of past activities can be seen where number of mining ponds can be found scattered in the vicinity of UTP. The main concern from geologist and nature agencies are the identification of Potentially Toxic Elements (PTEs) and the level of concentration for each element found in the area. Until now, there are only a few numbers of studies in Malaysia that has been done on data collection of PTEs and elevated content of PTEs in former mine.
  • 190531 SAM Annual Report 2018 F

    190531 SAM Annual Report 2018 F

    SAHABAT ALAM MALAYSIA (SAM) ANNUAL REPORT 2018 No. 1 Jalan Joki, 11400 Penang Tel: +604 827 6 930 Fax: +604 827 6 932 ACKNOWLEDGMENT SAM would like to thank all staff, members, volunteers, friends, donors, funders and the media for all your support. SAM would like to thank Amelia Collins of FoEI and all SAM staff for graciously allowing us to use their photographs for this report. !2 SAM ANNUAL REPORT 2018 IN A NUTSHELL 2018 was a significant year for Malaysia, with the national elections that changed the political landscape of the country. The non stop myriad of activities under various projects from the beginning of the year kept all SAM staff busy. Some of the major issues SAM handled in 2018 included: Lynas - to remove radioactive waste from Malaysia Plastic waste trade and dumping Reclamation projects - proposed and ongoing (Penang, Perak, Kedah) Road projects in Penang - PIL1, three major roads Development on hill slopes in Penang, Perak, Kedah, etc SAM’s main activities in 2018 were carried out Our activities included conducting awareness Trawler encroachments into coastal fishing under the following work heads: zone raising programmes among rural and local Land rights of indigenous communities in communities, meeting and having dialogues Protection and conservation of forest and Sarawak & Peninsular Malaysia with local, state and federal authorities, coastal ecosystems; Expansion of plantations and development workshop on constructing fishing gears, Defending indigenous communities of monoculture plantations in permanent preparing
  • Royal Belum State Park

    Royal Belum State Park

    Guide Book Royal Belum State Park For more information, please contact: Perak State Parks Corporation Tingkat 1, Kompleks Pejabat Kerajaan Negeri, Daerah Hulu Perak, JKR 341, Jalan Sultan Abd Aziz, 33300 Gerik, Perak Darul Ridzuan. T: 05-7914543 W: www.royalbelum.my Contents Author: Nik Mohd. Maseri bin Nik Mohamad Royal Belum - Location 03 Local Community 25 Editors: Roa’a Hagir | Shariff Wan Mohamad | Lau Ching Fong | Neda Ravichandran | Siti Zuraidah Abidin | Introduction 05 Interesting Sites and Activities Christopher Wong | Carell Cheong How To Get There 07 within Royal Belum 29 Design & layout: rekarekalab.com Local History 09 Sites and Activities 31 ISBN: Conservation History 11 Fees And Charges 32 Printed by: Percetakan Imprint (M) Sdn. Bhd. Organisation of Royal Belum State Park 13 Tourism Services and Accommodation in 33 Printed on: FSC paper Physical Environment 14 Belum-Temengor 35 Habitats 15 Useful contacts 36 Photo credits: WWF-Malaysia Biodiversity Temengor Lake Tour Operators Association 37 Tan Chun Feng | Shariff Wan Mohamad | Mark Rayan Darmaraj | Christopher Wong | Azlan Mohamed | – Flora 17 Conclusion 38 Lau Ching Fong | Umi A’zuhrah Abdul Rahman | Stephen Hog | Elangkumaran Sagtia Siwan | – Fauna 19 - 22 Further Reading Mohamad Allim Jamalludin | NCIA – Avifauna 23 Additional photos courtesy of: Perak State Parks Corporation 02 Royal Belum – Location Titiwangsa Range and selected National and State Parks in Peninsular Malaysia. KEDAH Hala Bala THAILAND Wildlife Sanctuary PERLIS Bang Lang STATE PARK National Park
  • Higher-Resolution Biostratigraphy for the Kinta Limestone and an Implication for Continuous Sedimentation in the Paleo-Tethys, Western Belt of Peninsular Malaysia

    Higher-Resolution Biostratigraphy for the Kinta Limestone and an Implication for Continuous Sedimentation in the Paleo-Tethys, Western Belt of Peninsular Malaysia

    Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences Turkish J Earth Sci (2017) 26: 377-394 http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/earth/ © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/yer-1612-29 Higher-resolution biostratigraphy for the Kinta Limestone and an implication for continuous sedimentation in the Paleo-Tethys, Western Belt of Peninsular Malaysia 1,2, 2 3 4 2 5 Haylay TSEGAB *, Chow Weng SUM , Gatovsky A. YURIY , Aaron W. HUNTER , Jasmi AB TALIB , Solomon KASSA 1 South-East Asia Carbonate Research Laboratory (SEACaRL), Department of Geosciences, Faculty of Geosciences and Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia 2 Department of Geosciences, Faculty of Geosciences and Petroleum Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Bandar Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia 3 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russian Federation 4 Department of Applied Geology, Western Australian School of Mines, Curtin University, Perth, Australia 5 Department of Applied Geology, School of Applied Natural Sciences, Adama Sciences and Technology University, Adama, Ethiopia Received: 29.12.2016 Accepted/Published Online: 21.09.2017 Final Version: 13.11.2017 Abstract: The paleogeography of the juxtaposed Southeast Asian terranes, derived from the northeastern margins of Gondwana during the Carboniferous to Triassic, resulted in complex basin evolution with massive carbonate deposition on the margins of the Paleo- Tethys. Due to the inherited structural and tectonothermal complexities, discovery of diagnostic microfossils from these carbonates has been problematic. This is particularly the case for the Kinta Limestone, a massive Paleozoic carbonate succession that covers most of the Kinta Valley in the central part of the Western Belt of Peninsular Malaysia.
  • Data Standardization Analysis to Form Geo-Demographics Classification Profiles Using K-Means Algorithms

    Data Standardization Analysis to Form Geo-Demographics Classification Profiles Using K-Means Algorithms

    GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space 12 issue 6 (34 - 42) 34 Themed issue on current social, economic, cultural and spatial dynamics of Malaysia’s transformation © 2016, ISSN 2180-2491 Improving the tool for analyzing Malaysia’s demographic change: Data standardization analysis to form geo-demographics classification profiles using k-means algorithms Kamarul Ismail1, Nasir Nayan1, Siti Naielah Ibrahim1 1Jabatan Geografi dan Alam Sekitar, Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, 35900 Tanjong Malim, Perak Correspondence: Kamarul Ismail (email: [email protected]) Abstract Clustering is one of the important methods in data exploratory in this era because it is widely applied in data mining.Clustering of data is necessary to produce geo-demographic classification where k-means algorithm is used as cluster algorithm. K-means is one of the methods commonly used in cluster algorithm because it is more significant. However, before any data are executed on cluster analysis it is necessary to conduct some analysis to ensure the variable used in the cluster analysis is appropriate and does not have a recurring information. One analysis that needs to be done is the standardization data analysis. This study observed which standardization method was more effective in the analysis process of Malaysia’s population and housing census data for the Perak state. The rationale was that standardized data would simplify the execution of k-means algorithm. The standardized methods chosen to test the data accuracy were the z-score and range standardization method. From the analysis conducted it was found that the range standardization method was more suitable to be used for the data examined.
  • Property Market Review 2018 / 2019 Contents

    Property Market Review 2018 / 2019 Contents

    PROPERTY MARKET REVIEW 2018 / 2019 CONTENTS Foreword Property Northern 02 04 Market 07 Region Snapshot Central Southern East Coast 31 Region 57 Region 75 Region East Malaysia The Year Glossary 99 Region 115 Ahead 117 This publication is prepared by Rahim & Co Research for information only. It highlights only selected projects as examples in order to provide a general overview of property market trends. Whilst reasonable care has been exercised in preparing this document, it is subject to change without notice. Interested parties should not rely on the statements or representations made in this document but must satisfy themselves through their own investigation or otherwise as to the accuracy. This publication may not be reproduced in any form or in any manner, in part or as a whole, without writen permission from the publisher, Rahim & Co Research. The publisher accepts no responsibility or liability as to its accuracy or to any party for reliance on the contents of this publication. 2 FOREWORD by Tan Sri Dato’ (Dr) Abdul Rahim Abdul Rahman 2018 has been an eventful year for all Malaysians, as Speed Rail) project. This move was lauded by the World witnessed by Pakatan Harapan’s historical win in the 14th Bank, who is expecting Malaysia’s economy to expand at General Election. The word “Hope”, or in the parlance of 4.7% in 2019 and 4.6% in 2020 – a slower growth rate in the younger generation – “#Hope”, could well just be the the short term as a trade-off for greater stability ahead, theme to aptly define and summarize the current year and as the nation addresses its public sector debt and source possibly the year ahead.
  • Upper Kinta Basin Environmental Assessment Report

    Upper Kinta Basin Environmental Assessment Report

    UPPER KINTA BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT PREPARED BY: IN COORPERATION WITH: Upper Kinta Baseline Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS ii Page Table of Contents iii List of Tables v List of Figures vii List of Annexes x Global Environment Centre Nov 2018 Upper Kinta Baseline Environmental Assessment Report TABLE OF CONTENTS iii Page CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1.1 BACKGROUND 1-1 1.2 OBJECTIVES 1-2 1.2.1 Target beneficiaries 1-3 1.3 BASELINE STUDY 1-4 1.3.1 Format of this report 1-5 CHAPTER 2: UPPER KINTA BASIN 2.1 PROJECT AREA 2-1 2.2 METHODOLOGY 2-2 2.3 SECONDARY DATA ANALYSIS 2-3 2.3.1 Climate 2-3 2.3.2 Geology and Soil Type 2-3 2.3.3 Water Supply 2-4 2.3.4 Demography 2-6 2.3.5 Land Use Assessment 2-9 2.4 LAND USE WITHIN UKB 2-10 2.4.1 Forest 2-11 2.4.2 Agriculture 2-12 2.4.3 Residential and Transportation Facility 2-12 2.4.4 Industries 2-13 2.4.5 Waterbody 2-15 2.4.6 Others 2-16 2.5 LAND USE AND WATER BODIES 2-17 CHAPTER 3: POLLUTION SOURCE RAPID INVENTORY 3.1 INTRODUCTION 3-1 3.2 METHODOLOGY 3-2 3.2.1 Pollution Source Inventory 3-2 3.2.2 Water Quality Study 3-2 3.2.2.1 Secondary Data Collection 3-2 3.2.2.2 Sampling by GEC Team 3-4 3.2.3 Biological Water Quality Study 3-7 3.3 RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS 3-8 3.3.1 Pollution Source Inventory 3-8 3.3.2 Water Quality Status 3-31 3.3.2.1 Water Quality Monitoring by Agencies 3-31 3.3.2.2 Overall UKB Water Quality Status 3-32 3.3.2.3 Impact of Development Activities 3-38 3.3.2.4 Water Quality Status before Dam 3-39 3.3.3 Biological Water Quality Status 3-40 3.3.3.1 Distribution
  • UTP CSR A5 Booklet (Final) (1).Pdf

    UTP CSR A5 Booklet (Final) (1).Pdf

    Making a Difference through UNIVERSITY SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY www.utp.edu.my/usr UTPOfficial About UTP Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS (UTP) was established on 10 January 1997 and is a leading private university in Malaysia. The University conducts extensive research The campus is built on a 400 hectare (1,000 activities in collaboration with PETRONAS acres) site strategically located at Bandar and other institutions and industries, locally Seri Iskandar, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia. and abroad, on six research focus and niche The University is a wholly-owned subsidiary areas. The focus areas are self-sustainable of PETRONAS, the national oil and gas building, transport infrastructure, health company of Malaysia. analytics, hydrocarbon recovery, contaminant management and autonomous system. UTP offers a wide range of industry-relevant engineering, science and technology UTP has produced more than 15,000 programmes at undergraduate and graduates and currently has an enrollment postgraduate levels. It aims to produce of over 1,200 foundation students, 6,000 well-rounded graduates with excellent undergraduates and 1,200 postgraduates leadership qualities and communication from more than 60 countries around abilities. the world. A caring global university with strong social values for the well being of society In 2013, UTP embarked on a new approach for its corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives. Having been established nearly two decades prior, and with numerous accolades for academic excellence, the University wanted local communities in the vicinity of its campus in Bandar Seri Iskandar to grow and prosper. The new CSR plan would shift the focus from being purely philanthropic and charity-based to those that emphasise more on capacity building for empowerment.