DOCSLIB.ORG

Terms and Definitions of the ISO 19100 Standards A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

985 Terms and Definitions of the ISO 19100 Standards Glossary This listing of terms and definitions has been compiled from the ISO 19100 standards published up until April 2011 or that have reached the enquiry or approval stage (Draft International Standard (DIS) or Final Draft International Standard (FDIS)). Every definition is followed by a source remark indicating the standard in which the term was originally defined. If the definition has been adopted from standards other than the geomatics standards, the ISO 19100 standard is mentioned as well. A few of the terms still have inconsistent definitions, such as “attribute”. In these cases, two or more definitions are given. The harmonization of all terms is ongoing in the ISO/TC 211 groups. A a posteriori classification NOTE Abstract test suites are described in a conformance classification scheme based upon definition of classes clause after clustering the field samples collected [ISO 19105] [UNFAO LCCS 2:2005, ISO 19144-1] acceptance testing (user) a priori classification process of determining whether an implementation classification scheme structured so that the classes are satisfies acceptance criteria, enabling the user to abstract conceptualizations of the types actually determine whether to accept the implementation occurring NOTE 1 This includes the planning and execution of NOTE The approach is based upon definition of several kinds of tests (e.g., functional, volume, classes before any data collection actually takes place performance tests) that demonstrate that the [UNFAO LCCS 2:2005, ISO 19144-1] implementation satisfies the user requirements abbreviation NOTE 2 This is not a part of conformance testing. designation formed by omitting words or letters from access control a longer form and designating the same concept combination of authentication and authorization [ISO 1087-1, ISO 19104] [ISO 19153] abstract test case accreditation generalized test for a particular requirement the outcome of the accreditation procedure NOTE An abstract test case is a formal basis for [ISO 19158] deriving executable test cases. One or more test accreditation framework purposes are encapsulated in the abstract test case. An the framework in which customers works with abstract test case is independent of both the suppliers to assure data quality implementation and the values. It should be complete [ISO 19158] in the sense that it is sufficient to enable a test verdict accreditation procedure to be assigned unambiguously to each potentially procedure by which a customer assures that its observable test outcome (i. e., sequence of test events) suppliers are capable of consistently delivering the [ISO 19105] product to the required quality abstract test method NOTE The accreditation procedure is a second-party method for testing implementation independent of any (customer) conformity assessment activity particular test procedure [ISO 19158] [ISO 19105] accuracy abstract test module closeness of agreement between an observed value set of related abstract test cases and the true value or a reference value accepted as true NOTE Abstract test modules may be nested in NOTE 1 A test result can be observations or a hierarchical way measurements [ISO 19105] NOTE 2 For positioning services, the test result is abstract test suite (ATS) a measured value or set of values abstract test module specifying all the requirements to NOTE 3 For observations and measurements, true be satisfied for conformance. values are not obtainable. In their place reference 986 Terms and Definitions of the ISO 19100 Standards Glossary values which are accepted as true values are used affine coordinate system [ISO 3534-1, ISO 19157, ISO 19116] coordinate system in Euclidean space with straight active object axes that are not necessarily mutually perpendicular object which is capable of independent actions, and [ISO 19111] therefore capable of initiating interactions between agency itself and other objects without immediate prior legal relationship of a person (called the agent) who external stimulation acts on behalf of another person, company or NOTE Compare with passive object. An active object government (called the principal) can represent a user, or an active service that depends [ISO 19153] on internal (and therefore not visible) triggers to start agent actions. Active and passive states may exist for the one who acts on behalf of another same object, and such a service may transition [ISO 19153] between these two states depending on invocation of aggregation <UML> an activation or deactivation operation protocol special form of association that specifies a whole–part [ISO 19132] relationship between the aggregate (whole) and active sensing system a constituent part sensing system that emits energy that the sensor uses NOTE See: composition to perform the sensing [UML 2, ISO/TS 19103] [ISO/TS 19130] along-track active sensor direction in which the sensor platform moves sensor that generates the energy that it uses to [ISO/TS 19130] perform the sensing altitude [ISO/TS 19130-2] height where the chosen reference surface is mean sea active SONAR level type of active sensor that transmits sound waves into [ISO 6709] water and receives the returned waves echoed from analyte objects in the water chemical species whose concentration is subject to [ISO/TS 19130-2] observation actor <UML> NOTE Specialization of observable property type coherent set of roles that users of use cases play when [ISO 19156] interacting with these use cases annotate NOTE An actor may be considered to play a separate adding notations or commentaries to a resource (or role with regard to each use case with which it parts of it), creating a new resource communicates [ISO 19153] [retired version of ISO/TS 19103] annotation adjustable model parameters any marking on illustrative material for the purpose of model parameters that can be refined using available clarification additional information, such as ground control points, NOTE Numbers, letters, symbols, and signs are to improve or enhance modeling corrections examples of annotation [ISO/TS 19130] [ISO 19117] administrative source aperture reference point (ARP) source with the administrative description (where three-dimensional (3-D)locationofthecenterofthe applicable) of the parties involved, the rights, synthetic aperture restrictions, and responsibilities created, and the basic NOTE It is usually expressed in Earth-centered administrative units affected Earth-fixed (ECEF) coordinates in meters EXAMPLE 1 The evidence of a party’s right to [ISO/TS 19130] a basic administrative unit application EXAMPLE 2 A document describing a transaction manipulation and processing of data in support of user (a deed), or a judgement of the register holder requirements [ISO 19152] [ISO 19101] admitted term application schema term rated according to the scale of the term conceptual schema for data required by one or more acceptability rating as a synonym for a preferred term applications [ISO 1087-1, ISO 19104] [ISO 19101] Terms and Definitions of the ISO 19100 Standards 987 NOTE An application schema describes the content, <Road gml:id = r1 />; here gml:id is an attribute) Glossary the structure, and the constraints applicable to NOTE 2 In this international standard (ISO 19143) an information in a specific application domain. attribute is an XML attribute unless otherwise area recording specified Instantaneously recording an image in a single frame [ISO 19136, ISO 19143] [ISO/TS 19130-2] attribute event association <UML> value of an attribute of a feature which may apply to semantic relationship that can occur between typed only part of the feature instances NOTE 1 An attribute event includes the linearly NOTE A binary association is an association among referenced location of where the attribute value exactly two classifiers (including the possibility of an applies along the attributed feature association from a classifier to itself) NOTE 2 An attribute event may be qualified by the [UML 2, ISO/TS 19103] instant in which, or period during which, the attribute associative concept system value applied concept system based on associative, i. e., thematic or [ISO 19148] pragmatic, relations attributed feature NOTE An associative relation exists between the feature along which an attribute event applies concepts education and teaching,andbaking and oven [ISO 19148] [ISO 12620, ISO 19146] authentication attitude verification that a potential partner in a conversation is orientation of a body, described by the angles between capable of representing a person or organization the axes of that body’s coordinate system and the axes [W3C, ISO 19153] of an external coordinate system authorization NOTE In positioning services, this is usually the determination of whether a subject is allowed to have orientation of the user’s platform, such as an aircraft, the specified types of access to a particular resource boat, or automobile NOTE Usually, authorization is in the context of [ISO 19116] authentication. Once a subject is authenticated, it may attribute be authorized to perform different types of access a named element within a classifier that describes [ISO 19153] a range of values that instances of the classifier may azimuth resolution <SAR> hold resolution in the cross-range direction NOTE An attribute is semantically equivalent to NOTE This is usually measured in terms of the a composition association; however, the intent and impulse response of the synthetic-aperture RADAR usage are normally different (SAR) sensor and processing system. It is a
Recommended publications

  • AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 ISO 6709:2008 ISO 6709:2008 Cor.1 (2009) AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011

    AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 ISO 6709:2008 ISO 6709:2008 Cor.1 (2009) AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011AS/NZS ISO Australian/New Zealand Standard™ Standard representation of geographic point location by coordinates AS/NZS ISO 6709:2011 This Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard was prepared by Joint Technical Committee IT-004, Geographical Information/Geomatics. It was approved on behalf of the Council of Standards Australia on 15 November 2011 and on behalf of the Council of Standards New Zealand on 14 November 2011. This Standard was published on 23 December 2011. The following are represented on Committee IT-004: ANZLIC—The Spatial Information Council Australasian Fire and Emergency Service Authorities Council Australian Antarctic Division Australian Hydrographic Office Australian Map Circle CSIRO Exploration and Mining Department of Lands, NSW Department of Primary Industries and Water, Tas. Geoscience Australia Land Information New Zealand Mercury Project Solutions Office of Spatial Data Management The University of Melbourne Keeping Standards up-to-date Standards are living documents which reflect progress in science, technology and systems. To maintain their currency, all Standards are periodically reviewed, and new editions are published. Between editions, amendments may be issued. Standards may also be withdrawn. It is important that readers assure themselves they are using a current Standard, which should include any amendments which may have been published since the Standard was purchased. Detailed information about joint Australian/New Zealand Standards can be found by visiting the Standards Web Shop at www.saiglobal.com.au or Standards New Zealand web site at www.standards.co.nz and looking up the relevant Standard in the on-line catalogue.
  • Iso/Iwa 26:2017

    Iso/Iwa 26:2017

    INTERNATIONAL IWA WORKSHOP 26 AGREEMENT First edition 2017-08 Using ISO 26000:2010 in management systems Utilisation de la norme ISO 26000:2010 dans les systèmes de management Reference number IWA 26:2017(E) © ISO 2017 IWA 26:2017(E) COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT © ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form orthe by requester. any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401 ISOCH-1214 copyright Vernier, office Geneva, Switzerland Tel. +41 22 749 01 11 Fax +41 22 749 09 47 www.iso.org [email protected] ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved IWA 26:2017(E) Contents Page Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v 1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual Language Resources and Interoperability, Pages 1–8, Sydney, July 2006

    Proceedings of the Workshop on Multilingual Language Resources and Interoperability, Pages 1–8, Sydney, July 2006

    COLING •ACL 2006 MLRI’06 Multilingual Language Resources and Interoperability Proceedings of the Workshop Chairs: Andreas Witt, Gilles Sérasset, Susan Armstrong, Jim Breen, Ulrich Heid and Felix Sasaki 23 July 2006 Sydney, Australia Production and Manufacturing by BPA Digital 11 Evans St Burwood VIC 3125 AUSTRALIA c 2006 The Association for Computational Linguistics Order copies of this and other ACL proceedings from: Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL) 209 N. Eighth Street Stroudsburg, PA 18360 USA Tel: +1-570-476-8006 Fax: +1-570-476-0860 [email protected] ISBN 1-932432-82-5 ii Table of Contents Preface .....................................................................................v Organizers . vii Workshop Program . ix Lexical Markup Framework (LMF) for NLP Multilingual Resources Gil Francopoulo, Nuria Bel, Monte George, Nicoletta Calzolari, Monica Monachini, Mandy Pet and Claudia Soria . 1 The Role of Lexical Resources in CJK Natural Language Processing Jack Halpern . 9 Towards Agent-based Cross-Lingual Interoperability of Distributed Lexical Resources Claudia Soria, Maurizio Tesconi, Andrea Marchetti, Francesca Bertagna, Monica Monachini, Chu-Ren Huang and Nicoletta Calzolari. .17 The LexALP Information System: Term Bank and Corpus for Multilingual Legal Terminology Consolidated Verena Lyding, Elena Chiocchetti, Gilles Sérasset and Francis Brunet-Manquat . 25 The Development of a Multilingual Collocation Dictionary Sylviane Cardey, Rosita Chan and Peter Greenfield. .32 Multilingual Collocation Extraction: Issues and Solutions Violeta Seretan and Eric Wehrli . 40 Structural Properties of Lexical Systems: Monolingual and Multilingual Perspectives Alain Polguère . 50 A Fast and Accurate Method for Detecting English-Japanese Parallel Texts Ken’ichi Fukushima, Kenjiro Taura and Takashi Chikayama . 60 Evaluation of the Bible as a Resource for Cross-Language Information Retrieval Peter A.
  • ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) Liaison to IFLA

    ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) Liaison to IFLA

    ISO/TC46 (Information and Documentation) liaison to IFLA Annual Report 2015 TC46 on Information and documentation has been leading efforts related to information management since 1947. Standards1 developed under ISO/TC46 facilitate access to knowledge and information and standardize automated tools, computer systems, and services relating to its major stakeholders of: libraries, publishing, documentation and information centres, archives, records management, museums, indexing and abstracting services, and information technology suppliers to these communities. TC46 has a unique role among ISO information-related committees in that it focuses on the whole lifecycle of information from its creation and identification, through delivery, management, measurement, and archiving, to final disposition. *** The following report summarizes activities of TC46, SC4, SC8 SC92 and their resolutions of the annual meetings3, in light of the key-concepts of interest to the IFLA community4. 1. SC4 Technical interoperability 1.1 Activities Standardization of protocols, schemas, etc. and related models and metadata for processes used by information organizations and content providers, including libraries, archives, museums, publishers, and other content producers. 1.2 Active Working Group WG 11 – RFID in libraries WG 12 – WARC WG 13 – Cultural heritage information interchange WG 14 – Interlibrary Loan Transactions 1.3 Joint working groups 1 For the complete list of published standards, cfr. Appendix A. 2 ISO TC46 Subcommittees: TC46/SC4 Technical interoperability; TC46/SC8 Quality - Statistics and performance evaluation; TC46/SC9 Identification and description; TC46/SC 10 Requirements for document storage and conditions for preservation - Cfr Appendix B. 3 The 42nd ISO TC46 plenary, subcommittee and working groups meetings, Beijing, June 1-5 2015.
  • Part 2: Data Category Selection (DCS) for Electronic Terminological Resources (ETR)

    Part 2: Data Category Selection (DCS) for Electronic Terminological Resources (ETR)

    © ISO 2003 – All rights reserved Reference number of working document: ISO/TC 37/SC 3 N 486 Date: 2003-10-31 (12620.Part 2.doc ) ISO/CD 12620-2 Committee identification: ISO/TC 37/SC 3 Secretariat: DIN Terminology and other language resources — Data categories — Part 2: Data category selection (DCS) for electronic terminological resources (ETR) Warning This document is not an ISO International Standard. It is distributed for review and comment. It is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an International Standard. Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. Document type: International standard Document subtype: if applicable Document stage: 00.20 Document language: en M:\dms\dtec\xdom741\iso\12620\Part 2\N486 CD12620pt2 2003.DOC EN2 2000-07-10 © ISO ISO Draft Revision 12620, Part 2:2003(E) Copyright notice This ISO document is a draft revision and is copyright-protected by ISO. While the reproduction of a draft revision in any form for use by participants in the ISO standards development process is permitted without prior permission from ISO, neither this document nor any extract from it may be reproduced, stored or transmitted in any form for any other purpose without prior written permission from ISO. Requests for permission to reproduce this document for the purpose of selling it should be addressed as shown below or to ISO’s member body in the country of the requester: [Indicate : the full address telephone number fax number telex number and electronic mail address as appropriate, of the Copyright Manager of the ISO member body responsible for the secretariat of the TC or SC within the framework of which the draft has been prepared] Reproduction for sales purposes may be subject to royalty payments or a licensing agreement.
  • Certification Consulting 2

    Certification Consulting 2

    www.excelledia.com Excelledia Quality Consulting EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Excelledia Quality Consulting is a leading business process improvement and management consulting firm, helping organizations to be significantly more effective, efficient and financially profitable. We provide best practice business optimization solutions that address processes, technology & organizational improvements. Excelledia facilitates enhanced competitiveness through multi-faceted interventions leading to Business Improvement through consulting, people, process and operational assessments, benchmarking and resource provisioning through Quality Outsourcing. We are specialized in the following areas: Excelledia’s Market Segments: 3 Training Services: Excelledia Consultancy Project programmes focus on Business Optimizations principles. Our Consultancy Project programs are organized in public or in-house sessions and mainly focus on knowledge and skills to equip your team to get rid of non-value added work, avoid unnecessary costs, streamline processes, increase customer satisfaction, and establish a culture of business excellence. Excelledia provides a range of specialized, targeted Consultancy Project courses that focus on growing peoples’ competencies, which will equip the trainees / delegates with the necessary tools to successfully assess a company’s systems and processes and improve the effectiveness and efficiency. Some of these trainings are in the areas of: 1. Lean Six Sigma – Green Belt & Black Belt 2. ISO Management Systems – Lead Auditor & Internal Auditor Programmes 3. Business Strategy & Leadership 4. Sales Skills & Soft Skills (ILM & CIPS Accredited) 5. Project Management 6. HSE Programmes Consulting Services: Excelledia works with organizations across various industries, for enterprise-wide deployment of process improvement and quality initiatives using various models like ISO Management System, Lean Six Sigma, Project Management from PMI, Risk Management etc.
  • Geohack - Boroo Gold Mine

    Geohack - Boroo Gold Mine

    GeoHack - Boroo Gold Mine DMS 48° 44′ 45″ N, 106° 10′ 10″ E Decim al 48.745833, 106.169444 Geo URI geo:48.745833,106.169444 UTM 48U 585970 5399862 More formats... Type landmark Region MN Article Boroo Gold Mine (edit | report inaccu racies) Contents: Global services · Local services · Photos · Wikipedia articles · Other Popular: Bing Maps Google Maps Google Earth OpenStreetMap Global/Trans-national services Wikimedia maps Service Map Satellite More JavaScript disabled or out of map range. ACME Mapper Map Satellite Topo, Terrain, Mapnik Apple Maps (Apple devices Map Satellite only) Bing Maps Map Aerial Bird's Eye Blue Marble Satellite Night Lights Navigator Copernix Map Satellite Fourmilab Satellite GeaBios Satellite GeoNames Satellite Text (XML) Google Earthnote Open w/ meta data Terrain, Street View, Earth Map Satellite Google Maps Timelapse GPS Visualizer Map Satellite Topo, Drawing Utility HERE Map Satellite Terrain MapQuest Map Satellite NASA World Open Wind more maps, Nominatim OpenStreetMap Map (reverse geocoding), OpenStreetBrowser Sentinel-2 Open maps.vlasenko.net Old Soviet Map Waze Map Editor, App: Open, Navigate Wikimapia Map Satellite + old places WikiMiniAtlas Map Yandex.Maps Map Satellite Zoom Earth Satellite Photos Service Aspect WikiMap (+Wikipedia), osm-gadget-leaflet Commons map (+Wikipedia) Flickr Map, Listing Loc.alize.us Map VirtualGlobetrotting Listing See all regions Wikipedia articles Aspect Link Prepared by Wikidata items — Article on specific latitude/longitude Latitude 48° N and Longitude 106° E — Articles on
  • Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies (2020)

    Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies (2020)

    Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies Revised May 2020 Patricia Harpring Managing Editor Getty Vocabulary Program Patricia Harpring Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies revised 13 May 2020 1 Table of Contents • Contributing to ULAN ….76 • Preface ….3 • ...Required Fields ….82 • What Are the Getty Vocabularies …5 • ...Sources ….99 • Basics for Contributions ….18 • Contributing to TGN ….103 • ...Who Contributes? ….19 • ...Required Fields ….109... • ...Processing Contributions ….21 • Sources ….122 • ...Criteria for Contributions ….23 • Contributing to CONA ….128 • ...XML: Mapping Your Data ….30 • ...Required Fields ….134 • …Spreadsheet: use OpenRefine...33 • ...Sources ….156 • …Online contribution form …35 • Contributing to the IA ….163 • Contributing to the AAT ….36 • ...Required Fields ….168 • ...Required Fields ….42 • ...Sources ….181 • ...Sources ...68 • Exercise ……. 188 Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies Patricia Harpring Contributing to the Getty Vocabularies revised 13 May 2020 2 Preface • This presentation is a brief overview of general issues surrounding contributions to the Getty Vocabularies • It includes examples of various issues surrounding contributions; it is not comprehensive Getty Vocabularies • The complex and extensive rules and examples surrounding the fields are not included in this presentation • For extensive guidance concerning rules and issues, in a field‐by‐field discussion, see the online • For general information about contributions and Getty Vocabulary Editorial Guidelines, which contain links to contribution
  • Deliverable 3.5.1 Initial Report on Spatial Data Quality As- Sessment

    Deliverable 3.5.1 Initial Report on Spatial Data Quality As- Sessment

    Collaborative Project GeoKnow - Making the Web an Exploratory for Geospatial Knowledge Project Number: 318159 Start Date of Project: 2012/12/01 Duration: 36 months Deliverable 3.5.1 Initial Report On Spatial Data Quality As- sessment Dissemination Level Public Due Date of Deliverable Month 20, 30/07/2014 Actual Submission Date Month 20, 04/07/2014 Work Package WP3, Spatial knowledge aggregation, fusing and quality assessment Task T3.5 Type Report Approval Status Final Version 1.0 Number of Pages 26 Filename D3.5.1_Initial_Report_On_Spatial_Data_Quality _Assessment.pdf Abstract: This deliverable provides a survey of the metrics used for measuring Spatial Data Quality and the initial results of the CROCUS, a semi-automatic tool developed to measure Data Quality in the context of GeoKnow. The information in this document reflects only the author’s views and the European Community is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The information in this document is provided ”as is” without guarantee or warranty of any kind, express or implied, including but not limited to the fitness of the information for a particular purpose. The user thereof uses the information at his/ her sole risk and liability. Project funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme (2007 - 2013) D3.5.1 - v. 1.0 .................................................................................................... History Version Date Reason Revised by 0.0 07/07/2014 First draft created Muhammad Saleem 0.1 15/07/2014
  • Barbatula Leoparda (Actinopterygii, Nemacheilidae), a New Endemic Species of Stone Loach of French Catalonia

    Barbatula Leoparda (Actinopterygii, Nemacheilidae), a New Endemic Species of Stone Loach of French Catalonia

    Scientific paper Barbatula leoparda (Actinopterygii, Nemacheilidae), a new endemic species of stone loach of French Catalonia by Camille GAULIARD (1), Agnès DETTAI (2), Henri PERSAT (1, 3), Philippe KEITH (1) & Gaël P.J. DENYS* (1, 4) Abstract. – This study described a new stone loach species in France, Barbatula leoparda, which is endemic to French Catalonia (Têt and Tech river drainages). Seven specimens were compared to 49 specimens of B. bar- batula (Linnaeus, 1758) and 71 specimens of B. quignardi (Băcescu-Meşter, 1967). This new species is char- acterized by the presence of blotches on the belly and the jugular area in individuals longer than 47 mm SL and by a greater interorbital distance (35.5 to 41.8% of the head length). We brought moreover the sequence of two mitochondrial markers (COI and 12S, respectively 652 and 950 bp) of the holotype, which are well distinct from all other species, for molecular identifications. This discovery is important for conservation. Résumé. – Barbatula leoparda (Actinopterigii, Nemacheilidae), une nouvelle espèce endémique de loche fran- che en Catalogne française. © SFI Submitted: 4 Jun. 2018 Cette étude décrit une nouvelle espèce de loche franche en France, Barbatula leoparda, qui est endémique Accepted: 23 Jan. 2019 Editor: G. Duhamel à la Catalogne française (bassins de la Têt et du Tech). Sept spécimens ont été comparés à 49 spécimens de B. barbatula (Linnaeus, 1758) et 71 spécimens de B. quignardi (Băcescu-Meşter, 1967). Cette nouvelle espèce est caractérisée par la présence de taches sur le ventre et dans la partie jugulaire pour les individus d’une taille supérieure à 47 mm LS et par une plus grande distance inter-orbitaire (35,5 to 41,8% de la longueur de la tête).
  • 0.85A Short Introduction to Volunteered Geographic Information [0.1Cm]Presentation of the Openstreetmap Project

    0.85A Short Introduction to Volunteered Geographic Information [0.1Cm]Presentation of the Openstreetmap Project

    M GIS A Short Introduction to Volunteered Geographic Information Presentation of the OpenStreetMap Project Sylvain Bouveret { LIG-STeamer / Universit´eGrenoble-Alpes Quatri`eme Ecole´ Th´ematique du GDR Magis. S`ete, September 29 { October 3, 2014 Sources I Part of the presentation dedicated to OSM inspired from: I An old joint presentation with N. Petersen and Ph. Genoud I Nicolas Moyroud: Several talks from 3rd MAGIS summer school 2012 Released under licence CC-BY-SA and downloadable here: http://libreavous.teledetection.fr. I Guillaume All`egre: Cartographie libre du monde: OpenStreetMap Released under licence CC-BY-SA. I Reference book about VGI [Sui et al., 2013] I Other references cited throughout the presentation Sui, D. Z., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M., editors (2013). Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Springer. ´ M GIS 2 / 107 GdR MAGIS { Ecole de G´eomatique 29 septembre au 3 octobre 2014 { S`ete Outline 1. Introduction to Volunteered Geographic Information 2. Presentation of the OpenStreetMap Project 3. Using OpenStreetMap Data 4. Using Volunteered Geographic Information ´ M GIS 3 / 107 GdR MAGIS { Ecole de G´eomatique 29 septembre au 3 octobre 2014 { S`ete Outline 1. Introduction to to Volunteered Volunteered Geographic Geographic Information Information 2. Presentation of the OpenStreetMap Project 3. Using OpenStreetMap Data 4. Using Volunteered Geographic Information ´ M GIS 3 / 107 GdR MAGIS { Ecole de G´eomatique 29 septembre au 3 octobre 2014 { S`ete Outline 1. Introduction to Volunteered Geographic Information 2. Presentation of of the the OpenStreetMap OpenStreetMap Project Project 3. Using OpenStreetMap Data 4. Using Volunteered Geographic Information ´ M GIS 3 / 107 GdR MAGIS { Ecole de G´eomatique 29 septembre au 3 octobre 2014 { S`ete Outline 1.
  • GSS Initiative Data Quality ACCEPTED.Pdf

    GSS Initiative Data Quality ACCEPTED.Pdf

    REPORT OVERVIEW In the Fall of 2010, the Bureau of the Census, Geography Division contracted with independent subject matter experts David Cowen, Ph.D., Michael Dobson, Ph.D., and Stephen Guptill, Ph.D. to research five topics relevant to planning for its proposed Geographic Support System (GSS) Initiative; an integrated program of improved address coverage, continual spatial feature updates, and enhanced quality assessment and measurement. One report frequently references others in an effort to avoid duplication. Taken together, the reports provide a more complete body of knowledge. The five reports are: 1. Reporting on the Use of Handheld Computers and the Display/Capture of Geospatial Data 2. Measuring Data Quality 3. Reporting the State and Anticipated Future Directions of Addresses and Addressing 4. Identifying the Current State and Anticipated Future Direction of Potentially Useful Developing Technologies 5. Researching Address and Spatial Data Digital Exchange and Data Integration The reports cite information provided by Geography Division staff at “The GSS Initiative Offsite, January 19-21, 2010.” The GSS Initiative Offsite was attended by senior Geography Division staff (Division Chief, Assistant Division Chiefs, & Branch Chiefs) to prepare for the GSS Initiative through sharing information on current procedures, discussing Initiative goals, and identifying Initiative priority areas. Materials from the Offsite remain unpublished and are not available for dissemination. The views expressed in these reports are the personal views of the authors and do not reflect the views of the Department of Commerce or the Bureau of the Census. Department of Commerce Bureau of the Census Geography Division Measuring Data Quality December 29, 2010 Task 5: Measuring Data Quality A Report to the Geography Division, U.S.