Conservative.Orgto

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Conservative.Orgto GoldwaterGoldwater 5050 yearsyears laterlater RemembrancesRemembrances byby Lee Edwards Richard ViguerieViguerie Barry Goldwater Jr. Matt SchlappSchlapp AlfredAlfred RegneryRegnery LyushunLyushun ShenShen DavidDavid KeeneKeene Michael R. LongLong A Special Report Prepared By The Washington Times Advocacy Department The father of American conservatism By Barry Goldwater Jr. line while conservatives think we should be equal at the starting line. That is the war, the classic struggle, half-century ago, Sen. going on in Congress and in America Barry Goldwater strode as we gather tonight. to the podium of the Re- I might also note that his belief that publican National Con- America and the free world will re- vention in San Francisco main free only with a strong commit- to accept his party’s ment to national defense. Clearly, with presidential nomination. the record of the current president, He declared, “Extremism in the we need a change in defense policy as defense of liberty is no vise.” Let me well. remindA you further: “Moderation in The conservative movement has the pursuit of justice is no virtue.” been on a tortuous trail. It suff ered My dad set the stage for the resur- defeat many times but came roaring rection of a passionate belief in liberty back. With the overall huge victory and redefi ned the Republican brand. in 2010 and 2014, I believe we are on It is interesting these same words the right path because we stuck to the could be used to describe another message. eff ort to ensure the civil rights of all Now we look ahead to the 2016 Americans regardless of race. Unfor- presidential election. With 70 percent tunately, those words were distorted of the state legislatures in Republican by the media and his critics. hands and 36 Republican governors In his book “Conscience of a Con- and control of the Senate and House, servative,” published in 1960, Goldwa- conservatives have an incredible re- ter noted: sponsibility to provide the leadership “The root diff erence between the so lacking at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Conservatives and the Liberals of In considering the challenges fac- today is that Conservatives take into ing the new Republican majority in account of the whole man, while Lib- Congress, it is important to review erals tend to look only at the material my father’s observation that conserva- side of man’s nature. The Conserva- tives must present positive answers to tive believes that man is in part, an national problems, not just condemn economic, an animal creature; but the answers provided by the left. He he is also a spiritual creature with ASSOCIATED PRESS PHOTOGRAPHS observed: “Our failure is the failure of spiritual needs and spiritual desires. Sen. Barry Goldwater rallied a new conservative generation during his presidential cam- Conservative demonstration. Though … Conservatism therefore looks upon paign in 1964. Although he lost that contest, his landmark philosophies of conservatism we Conservatives are deeply per- the enhancement of man’s spiritual still echo a half-century later. As Goldwater’s son, Barry Goldwater Jr., reminds us, conser- suaded that our society is ailing and nature as the primary concern of vatives must present positive answers to national problems, not just condemn them. know that Conservatism holds the political philosophy. Liberals, on the key to national salvation … we seem other hand, — in the name of concern unable to demonstrate the practical for “human beings” — regard the relevance of Conservation principles satisfaction of economic wants as the to the needs of the day.” dominant mission of society.” We have come together tonight to It is interesting that my father’s celebrate a powerful idea: liberty. We good friend Jack Kennedy echoed my came tonight to recognize a move- dad in his own speeches. While my ment: conservatism rooted in prin- dad lost the 1964 presidential race, he ciples. We came together tonight as launched a movement that has domi- brothers and sisters to remember a nated and infl uenced the body politic man who had such a powerful infl u- and government for the past 40 years. ence on the two-party system and us. I can still hear my dad explain his With fond memories of battles we philosophy “Let me remind you a fought, friends we made and a phi- conservative is one who fi ghts to ex- losophy we love, we salute our leader, pand individual liberty and resist the Sen. Barry Goldwater. accumulation of power by those who Goldwater changed America for claim they know best.” the better. He gave America a choice, THE WASHINGTON TIMES WASHINGTON THE | It was Madison versus Jeff erson as not an echo. In our hearts, we know to the balance of power. Who should he was right. Goldwater was a man control? Who should dominate? of principle, integrity and honesty. It is a struggle that has dominated His ideas, his courage and his candor the history of our country. John May- helped shape our national character, nard Keynes versus Milton Friedman, and I hope that his work will continue The New York Times versus The to be lived through the lives and dedi- Wall Street Journal, the right versus cations of the generations to come. the left, conservative versus liberal, ⦁ Barry Goldwater Jr. served in the MSNBC versus Fox, Republican ver- U.S. House of Representatives as a sus Democrat. As fi rst lady, Nancy Reagan congratulated Sen. Barry Goldwater and West Point football member representing California from TUESDAY • NOVEMBER 18 • 2014 2014 • 18 NOVEMBER • TUESDAY The diff erence between a liberal coach Earl H. “Red” Blaik aft er they received the Presidential Medal of Freedom at the 1969 to 1983, and currently serves as and a conservative is that the liberal White House on May 12, 1986. Goldwater inspired Ronald Reagan, a New Deal Demo- chairman and president of The Gold- 2 think we should be equal at the fi nish crat, to become a conservative Republican who would go on to become president. water Taplin Group. In the beginning there was Goldwater. It’s as simple as that. battle with the liberals and Demo- National Republican Senatorial stage, they welcomed him in a The ensuing campaign was crats who dominated everything. Committee, authored a book that way that told the world he was one of the most vicious and nega- The growing conservative move- students and others devoured and their man. Richard Viguerie, who tive in history, and that is say- ment had Bill Buckley, of course, became an instant hero to conser- was there and helped organize the ing something today. Goldwater but was largely composed of writ- vatives young and old. rally, remembers it as the moment was pictured as a foaming-at- ers, intellectuals and students. In 1960, a reluctant Goldwater when the political conservative the-mouth madman who would There were a few old Taft con- was nominated for vice presi- movement really began. destroy the world, who had secret servatives around as well, but dent at the Republican National Goldwater himself had always ties to German neo-Nazis, would the new conservative movement Convention and in withdrawing been reluctant about running for end Social Security and plunge linking believers in free-market gave a speech that ignited his fol- president, but was a close friend America into depression. He lost, economics with Cold Warriors lowers and led almost directly to of the incumbent Democrat, John of course, by a huge margin. And and those who are today called his nomination four years later. F. Kennedy, and the two had dis- the establishment thought the social conservatives was in its in- He stood before the assembled cussed and looked forward to conservative movement he led fancy and could count few elected delegates who had just nominated a campaign unlike any other in had been destroyed once and BY DAVID KEENE offi cials within its ranks. Richard M. Nixon and challenged modern American history. They for all. THE WASHINGTON TIMES Goldwater was something his fellow conservatives. “Let’s even talked about touring the Things would return to nor- else. He said what he thought and grow up conservatives,” he said, country together on the same mal with Democrats and “re- n a very real sense, the mod- had the courage to stand up for “If we want to take this party back plane and engaging in a series spectable” Republicans diff ering ern conservative political his beliefs. He had been elected — and I think we can someday — of Lincoln-Douglas style debates on the margins, but agreeing on movement began with Barry by upsetting the Senate’s majority let’s get to work.” that would give voters a chance major issues. The intellectual elite Goldwater. Had it not been leader and could often be found They did just that, building to choose between Kennedy’s lib- that had so hated Goldwater and Ifor the Arizona senator it might standing and voting alone on the the political infrastructure that eralism and Goldwater’s conser- his advisers (like the eccentric have taken years or even decades Senate floor regardless of the would vanquish those who had vatism. It would have been quite Milton Friedman) who they felt for conservative ideas to break odds or orders from his party’s dominated the party for most of a campaign, but it was not to be. gave the senator crazy economic into the political mainstream, leaders. He seemed to embody their lives and hand their hero Kennedy’s death put Lyndon B. advice would vanish and the Ronald Reagan would be remem- Buckley’s defi nition of the conser- the nomination. The sign that Johnson in the White House and world would go on as it had.
Recommended publications
  • CRITICAL THEORY and AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism
    CDSMS EDITED BY JEREMIAH MORELOCK CRITICAL THEORY AND AUTHORITARIAN POPULISM Critical Theory and Authoritarian Populism edited by Jeremiah Morelock Critical, Digital and Social Media Studies Series Editor: Christian Fuchs The peer-reviewed book series edited by Christian Fuchs publishes books that critically study the role of the internet and digital and social media in society. Titles analyse how power structures, digital capitalism, ideology and social struggles shape and are shaped by digital and social media. They use and develop critical theory discussing the political relevance and implications of studied topics. The series is a theoretical forum for in- ternet and social media research for books using methods and theories that challenge digital positivism; it also seeks to explore digital media ethics grounded in critical social theories and philosophy. Editorial Board Thomas Allmer, Mark Andrejevic, Miriyam Aouragh, Charles Brown, Eran Fisher, Peter Goodwin, Jonathan Hardy, Kylie Jarrett, Anastasia Kavada, Maria Michalis, Stefania Milan, Vincent Mosco, Jack Qiu, Jernej Amon Prodnik, Marisol Sandoval, Se- bastian Sevignani, Pieter Verdegem Published Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet Christian Fuchs https://doi.org/10.16997/book1 Knowledge in the Age of Digital Capitalism: An Introduction to Cognitive Materialism Mariano Zukerfeld https://doi.org/10.16997/book3 Politicizing Digital Space: Theory, the Internet, and Renewing Democracy Trevor Garrison Smith https://doi.org/10.16997/book5 Capital, State, Empire: The New American Way of Digital Warfare Scott Timcke https://doi.org/10.16997/book6 The Spectacle 2.0: Reading Debord in the Context of Digital Capitalism Edited by Marco Briziarelli and Emiliana Armano https://doi.org/10.16997/book11 The Big Data Agenda: Data Ethics and Critical Data Studies Annika Richterich https://doi.org/10.16997/book14 Social Capital Online: Alienation and Accumulation Kane X.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who They Are and How American News Media Gets It Wrong
    Jeremy Abrams The Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood: Who they are and How American News Media Gets it Wrong Jeremy Abrams 1 Table of Content I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 II. Defining Political Parties and their Role in Democracies ................................................................. 2 A. Generally ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 B. Structurally .................................................................................................................................................... 3 C. How the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood Fit the Mold ................................................. 4 III. Brief Descriptions of the Tea Party and the Muslim Brotherhood ............................................. 4 A. The Tea Party ................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. History ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The System in Which it Operates ..................................................................................................... 9 3. Official Status ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 the Right-Wing Media Enablers of Anti-Islam Propaganda
    Chapter 4 The right-wing media enablers of anti-Islam propaganda Spreading anti-Muslim hate in America depends on a well-developed right-wing media echo chamber to amplify a few marginal voices. The think tank misinforma- tion experts and grassroots and religious-right organizations profiled in this report boast a symbiotic relationship with a loosely aligned, ideologically-akin group of right-wing blogs, magazines, radio stations, newspapers, and television news shows to spread their anti-Islam messages and myths. The media outlets, in turn, give members of this network the exposure needed to amplify their message, reach larger audiences, drive fundraising numbers, and grow their membership base. Some well-established conservative media outlets are a key part of this echo cham- ber, mixing coverage of alarmist threats posed by the mere existence of Muslims in America with other news stories. Chief among the media partners are the Fox News empire,1 the influential conservative magazine National Review and its website,2 a host of right-wing radio hosts, The Washington Times newspaper and website,3 and the Christian Broadcasting Network and website.4 They tout Frank Gaffney, David Yerushalmi, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Steven Emerson, and others as experts, and invite supposedly moderate Muslim and Arabs to endorse bigoted views. In so doing, these media organizations amplify harm- ful, anti-Muslim views to wide audiences. (See box on page 86) In this chapter we profile some of the right-wing media enablers, beginning with the websites, then hate radio, then the television outlets. The websites A network of right-wing websites and blogs are frequently the primary movers of anti-Muslim messages and myths.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodicalspov.Pdf
    “Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
    [Show full text]
  • Republicans on the Run Editor's Column
    December 1984 Volume XX, No.6 Price $ 1.50 ~\- Republicans On The Run Editor's Column One of the first orders of business for RepUblicans on Capitol Hillfollowing the 1984 election was the selection of new Senate leaders. For moderates and progressives, the news was encouraging. Bob D ole was elected majon'ty leader. RIPON fORtJM John Heinz again heads the National Republican Senaton'al Commillee; John Chcifee is in charge ofth e Senate Republi­ can Conference; B ob Packwood is chairman of the Senate Editor's Column 2 Finance Commillee; a nd John Danforth is in charge of the Pronlu and Perspectivu: 3 Senate Commerce Commillee, They join other moderates A Conversation with andprogressives, such as Pete Domenici and M ark Haifield, Donald Shriver in key leadership positions. Our cover design points out that some moderates might, in A P~serlptlon (or Pro&resslves: 7 Dale Curt!, fact, seek the presidency in 1988. Ofcourse, it is too early, if not plain wrong, to start sen'ously hypothesizing about 1988. Editorial: LooklnaBeyond 1984 Yet it isn't too earlyfor GOP moderates and progressives to • begin organizing andfocusing on specific goals. This is the Toward A PrOltenive 12 Repubtlean Alenda: theme of several articles in this edilion oflhe Forum. Dale David L. S.lI acb CUrlis outlines several obstacles thaI must be overcome, but he also claims thatfivefavorable trends existfor moderates Proafuslve Republicans: IS and progressives, David Sallachpresenls theftrst in a sen'es Head Soutb and Go Wu t: William P. McKenzie ofprogressive R epublican "agendas, "focusing pn'man'ly on U.
    [Show full text]
  • The New Right
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1984 The New Right Elizabeth Julia Reiley College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Reiley, Elizabeth Julia, "The New Right" (1984). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625286. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-mnnb-at94 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NEW RIGHT 'f A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of Sociology The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Elizabeth Reiley 1984 This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Elizabeth Approved, May 1984 Edwin H . Rhyn< Satoshi Ito Dedicated to Pat Thanks, brother, for sharing your love, your life, and for making us laugh. We feel you with us still. Presente! iii. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................... v ABSTRACT.................................... vi INTRODUCTION ................................ s 1 CHAPTER I. THE NEW RIGHT . '............ 6 CHAPTER II. THE 1980 ELECTIONS . 52 CHAPTER III. THE PRO-FAMILY COALITION . 69 CHAPTER IV. THE NEW RIGHT: BEYOND 1980 95 CHAPTER V. CONCLUSION ............... 114 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................. 130 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer wishes to express her appreciation to all the members of her committee for the time they gave to the reading and criticism of the manuscript, especially Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J
    STRATEGIC PERSPECTIVES 11 Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference by Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Center for Strategic Research Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University Institute for National Strategic Studies National Defense University The Institute for National Strategic Studies (INSS) is National Defense University’s (NDU’s) dedicated research arm. INSS includes the Center for Strategic Research, Center for Complex Operations, Center for the Study of Chinese Military Affairs, Center for Technology and National Security Policy, Center for Transatlantic Security Studies, and Conflict Records Research Center. The military and civilian analysts and staff who comprise INSS and its subcomponents execute their mission by conducting research and analysis, publishing, and participating in conferences, policy support, and outreach. The mission of INSS is to conduct strategic studies for the Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the Unified Combatant Commands in support of the academic programs at NDU and to perform outreach to other U.S. Government agencies and the broader national security community. Cover: Kathleen Bailey presents evidence of forgeries to the press corps. Credit: The Washington Times Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference Deception, Disinformation, and Strategic Communications: How One Interagency Group Made a Major Difference By Fletcher Schoen and Christopher J. Lamb Institute for National Strategic Studies Strategic Perspectives, No. 11 Series Editor: Nicholas Rostow National Defense University Press Washington, D.C. June 2012 Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the contributors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Defense Department or any other agency of the Federal Government.
    [Show full text]
  • Reflections on Russell Kirk Lee Trepanier Saginaw Valley State University
    Russell Kirk: A Centennial Symposium Reflections on Russell Kirk Lee Trepanier Saginaw Valley State University A century has passed since the birth of Russell Kirk (1918-94), one of the principal founders of the post-World War II conservative revival in the United States.1 This symposium examines Kirk’s legacy with a view to his understanding of constitutional law and the American Founding. But before we examine these essays, it is worth a moment to review Kirk’s life, thought, and place in American conservatism. Russell Kirk was born and raised in Michigan and obtained his B.A. in history at Michigan State University and his M.A. at Duke Univer- sity, where he studied John Randolph of Roanoke and discovered the writings of Edmund Burke.2 His book Randolph of Roanoke: A Study in Conservative Thought (1951) would endure as one of his most important LEE TREPANIER is Professor of Political Science at Saginaw Valley State University. He is also the editor of Lexington Books’ series “Politics, Literature, and Film” and of the aca- demic website VoegelinView. 1 I would like to thank the McConnell Center at the University of Louisville for sponsoring a panel related to this symposium at the 2018 American Political Science Conference and Zachary German for his constructive comments on these papers. I also would like to thank Richard Avramenko of the Center for the Study of Liberal Democracy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Saginaw Valley State University for supporting my sabbatical, which enabled me to write this article and organize this symposium for Humanitas.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950S
    NANZAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Volume 41 (2019): 3-25 Conservatives on Madison Avenue: Political Advertising and Direct Marketing in the 1950s MORIYAMA Takahito * This article investigates how urban consumerism affected the rise of modern American conservatism by focusing on anticommunists’ political advertising in New York City during the 1950s. The advertising industry developed the new tactic of direct marketing in the post-World War II period and, over the years, several political activists adopted this new marketing technique for political campaigns. Direct mail, a product of the new marketing, was a personalized medium that built up a database of personal information and sent suitable messages to individuals, instead of standardized information to the masses. The medium was especially significant for conservatives to disseminate their ideology to prospective supporters across the country in the 1950s when the conservati ve media establishment did not exist. This research explores the development of the American right in urban areas by analyzing the role of direct mail in the conservative movement. The postwar era witnessed the rise of modern American conservatism as a political movement. Following World War II, anticommunism became widespread among Americans and the United States was confronted with communism abroad, whereas in domestic politics right-wing movements, such as McCarthyism, attacked liberalism. The New Deal had angered many Americans prior to the 1950s. Frustrated with government regulations since the 1930s, some businesspeople acclaimed the free enterprise system and individual liberties as the American ideal; several intellectuals and religious figures criticized the decline of traditional values in modern society; and white Southerners were adamant in preventing the federal government from interfering in the Jim Crow laws.
    [Show full text]
  • My Sarah Palin Romance
    Page 10a — THE CONWAY DAILY SUN, Saturday, January 23, 2016 –––––––––––––––––––––– LETTERS –––––––––––––––––––––– Ross Douthat Our Citizens United resolution got buried To the editor: ing the bill to the governor. Sixty-nine New Hamp- Then things got strange. My Sarah Palin romance shire towns, led by Conway The electronic voting system in 2013, passed resolu- suddenly failed; each repre- tions calling on the state sentative had to cast an indi- As a political journalist, you never forget the donor class. They’re in the same kind of legislature to support a vidual voice vote. the fi rst time you stop just covering a politi- blue-collar, Jacksonian, “who’s looking out constitutional amendment Reconsideration passed, cian and start identifying with her. The fi rst for you?” populism that has carried Trump to overturn the Supreme and the second vote to pass time you wed your high-minded vision of to the top of the Republican polls. And it’s a Court’s disastrous Citizens SB 136 was defeated when what politics should be to a real candidate’s populism that the GOP is discovering has a United decision, which trig- a dozen representatives perishable breath. lot more appeal to many of its voters than the gered the fl ood of money now switched their votes. My fi rst time arrived in 2008. It lasted only litmus tests of the offi cial right. engulfi ng our elections. Finally, a vote to bury the a short while. Her name was Sarah Palin. Which means that in a certain way, Trump More than two-thirds of bill for this year passed, and Let me explain.
    [Show full text]
  • What Remains, an Art Project Addressing Disinformation Campaigns (Re)Using Strategies to Delay Industry Regulation
    Universitat Oberta de Catalunya artnodes E-JOURNAL ON ART, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY http://artnodes.uoc.edu ARTICLE NODE: “AFTER THE POST-TRUTH” Recycling old strategies and devices What remains, an art project addressing disinformation campaigns (re)using strategies to delay industry regulation Marloes de Valk Piet Zwart Institute (Rotterdam, the Netherlands) Submission date: March 2019 Accepted date: May 2019 Published in: July 2019 Recommended citation De Valk, Marloes. 2019. “What remains, an art project addressing disinformation campaigns (re)using strategies to delay industry regulation”. In “After the post-truth”, coordinated by Jorge Luis Marzo Pérez. Artnodes. No. 24: 34-43. UOC [Accessed: dd/mm/yy] http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i24.3290 The texts published in this journal are – unless otherwise indicated – covered by the Creative Commons Spain Attribution 4.0 International license. The full text of the license can be consulted here: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract This paper describes a research-based art project that seeks to identify several strategies used to delay industry regulation and manipulate public opinion during the 1980s and compare them to the strategies used by online advertising platforms such as Google and Facebook which are facing regulation today. This paper will show how these strategies have been woven into the story of a game called What remains, a darkly humorous, authentic Nintendo Entertainment System (NES) game aiming to create an experience of fighting misinformation, showing the player ways to push back and regain agency by joining forces with others and actively questioning the nature of different news media.
    [Show full text]