DOCSLIB.ORG

James Q. Wilson Papers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Finding Aid James Q. Wilson Collection: 1949–2012 CP-760 PARDEE RAND GRADUATE SCHOOL The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. PRGS is unique in American higher education. It was founded in 1970 as one of the original eight graduate programs in public policy analysis. PRGS was the only program specializing in the Ph.D. It is also the only one based at a public policy research institute—the Santa Monica, California-based RAND Corporation—which invented many of the analytical tools of public policy analysis. ® RAND is a registered trademark. © Copyright 2013 RAND Corporation RAND OFFICES SANTA MONICA, CA • WASHINGTON, DC • PITTSBURGH, PA NEW ORLEANS, LA • JACKSON, MS • BOSTON, MA DOHA, QA • CAMBRIDGE, UK • BRUSSELS, BE www.rand.org www.prgs.edu 2 James Q. Wilson Papers Administrative Information • Title: James Q. Wilson Papers, 1949-2012 • Accession Number and/or Call Numbers: PRGS_1000 • Creator: Wilson, James Q. • Extent: 43 boxes • Repository: Pardee RAND Graduate School • 1776 Main Street • Santa Monica, CA 90401 • Acquisition Information: The collection was a gift from Roberta Wilson on 9 October 2012 • Conditions Governing Access/Restrictions: The collection contains restricted materials as noted within the finding aid; with these exceptions, the collection is open for qualified researchers. • Literary Copyright/Publication Rights: Pardee RAND Graduate School retains the literary rights to the material. In order to quote from, publish, or reproduce any of the manuscripts or visual materials, researchers must obtain formal permission from the office of the Director of Knowledge Services. In most instances, permission is given by RAND as owner of the physical property rights only, and researchers must also obtain permission from the holder of the literary rights. In some instances, RAND owns the literary rights, as well as the physical property rights. Researchers may contact RAND for further information. • Language: English • Preferred Citation: [Identification of Item and Enclosing Folder], James Q. Wilson Papers, Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, California. • Name of Cataloger/Date Completed: Brook Engebretson/15 October 2013 Biographical Note James Quinn Wilson (1931–2012) was born in Denver, Colorado, on 27 May 1931. The only child of Claude Wilson, a salesman, and Marie Quinn Wilson, a homemaker, he was raised in Long Beach, California, and attended Jordan High School. Wilson received a bachelor’s degree in political science (summa cum laude) from the University of Redlands in 1952. He served in the United States Navy from 1952 to 1955 before pursuing graduate work in political science at the University of Chicago, where he received a master’s in 1957 and doctorate in 1959, both from the department of political science. His doctoral dissertation was an analysis of the political behavior of African Americans in Chicago during the 1950s and was the basis for his first book, Negro Politics: The Search for Leadership (1960). Wilson was a faculty member of the Harvard University Department of Government from 1961 to 1987. He was appointed Henry Lee Shattuck Professor of Government in 1972 and served as chairman of the department from 1969 to 1973. He was also director of the Joint Center for Urban Studies of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and Harvard from 1963 to 1966. 9 James Q. Wilson Papers From 1987 to 1997, he was James A. Collins Professor of Management and Public Policy at the Anderson School of Management at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). From 1998 to 2009, he was Ronald Reagan Professor of Public Policy at Pepperdine University. From 2009 until his death, he was a Distinguished Scholar in the Department of Political Science and Senior Fellow at the Clough Center for the Study of Constitutional Democracy at Boston College. Wilson was a prolific author of essays and book reviews and authored or coauthored 16 books, including City Politics (1963, with Edward C. Banfield), The Amateur Democrat (1966), Varieties of Police Behavior (1968), Political Organizations (1973), Thinking about Crime (1975), The Politics of Regulation (1980), Bureaucracy (1989), The Moral Sense (1993), The Marriage Problem (2002), and Understanding America (2008, with Peter H. Schuck). Wilson’s American Government: Institutions and Policies (with John J. Dilulio, Jr.) has gone through 13 editions and is one of the most widely used textbooks on American government and politics. Wilson chaired the White House Task Force on Crime in 1966 and the 1972–73 National Advisory Commission on Drug Abuse Prevention. He was a member of the Attorney General’s Task Force on Violent Crime in 1981, the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 1985 to 1990, and the President’s Council on Bioethics from 2002 to 2005. He served on the boards of the New England Electric System, Protection One, State Farm Mutual Insurance, the RAND Corporation, and the Pardee RAND Graduate School. He chaired the Council of Academic Advisors of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI). He received numerous awards from the American Political Science Association (APSA), including the James Madison Award for distinguished scholarly contribution to political science in 1990 and the John Gaus Award for “exemplary scholarship in the joint tradition of political science and public administration” in 1994. From 1991 to 1992, he served as APSA’s president, for which he earned a Distinguished Service Certificate. In 2003, Wilson was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation’s highest civilian award. In 2007, he received the Bradley Prize from the Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation. He was awarded honorary degrees from seven universities, including Harvard. He married Roberta Evans in New Haven, Connecticut, on 13 September 1952; they had two children, Matthew Wilson (born in 1960) and Annie Wilson Gilbert (born in 1964). Wilson died at the age of 80 on 2 March 2012 in Boston, Massachusetts, from complications of leukemia. 10 James Q. Wilson Papers Cataloger’s Note An acronym list is included at the end of the finding aid. Wilson’s library of books, many annotated, and his personal computer are in the Wilson Collection and located in the archives. His personal computer, containing correspondence, drafts of publications, and photographs, is unprocessed. Christopher H. Foreman, Jr., a student of Wilson, donated five pieces of correspondence he maintained with Wilson, two published articles by Wilson, a program to the Gold Honor Medal Awards of The National Institute of Social Sciences with a related letter of correspondence attached, and a copy of his book, Signals From the Hill: Congressional Oversight and the Challenge of Social Regulation, published by Yale University Press in 1988. These items have been integrated into the collection and are noted in brackets. Scope and Content Note The James Q. Wilson Papers, 1940–2012 (43 boxes) document the career of Wilson as a political science professor at Harvard University, University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), and Pepperdine University; his speeches, research, and writing; and his advisory roles, personal, and professional relationships. Effort was made to maintain the original order in which the collection arrived at Pardee RAND Graduate School and the arrangement reflects Wilson’s organization of materials largely by subject, project, correspondent, or institution. The collection is divided into seven series: Consulting Files, Personal Files, Publications and Writings, Research Files, Speeches and Lectures, Teaching/University Affiliation Files, and Oversize. The bulk of collection materials date from the 1960s to 2012 and consists of advertisements, agreements, annual reports, awards and degrees, by-laws, charts and graphs, clippings, course materials, correspondence, meeting agendas and minutes, membership lists, memoranda, notes, organization charts, papers, presentation materials, programs, publications, reports, speeches and lectures, receipts, reprints, syllabi, and writings. As the collection is arranged by both subject and format of the materials, researchers should be aware that materials—especially correspondence, lectures, and research materials—are dispersed through the series. Correspondence is divided into incoming, outgoing, and outgoing and incoming, and arranged alphabetically by correspondent; individuals are represented in only one category within a series. The item count indicates pieces of correspondence, not including attachments. Newspaper clippings were replaced with photocopies; originals are stored separately. 11 James Q. Wilson Papers The collection consists of the following series, described in detail within this document: • Series 1: Consulting Files, 1965, 1971-1972, 1974, 1976-1977, 1979, 1982, ca. 1985, 1990-2012, n.d. • Series 1.1: Consulting Files, 1999-2005, 2008, n.d. RESTRICTED • Series 2: Personal Files, 1965-2012, n.d. • Series 2.2: Personal Files, 1980, 1992-1993, 1999, 2009-2011 RESTRICTED • Series 3: Publications and Writings, 1960-2012, n.d. • Series 4: Speeches and Lectures, 1964-1965, 1969, 1971-1974, 1976, 1979-1983, 1985, 1987-2002, 2011-2012, n.d. • Series 5: Research Files, 1949, 1951, 1956-1959, 1961-1966, 1968-1977, 1979-1983, 1985-2012, n.d. • Series 6: Teaching/University Affiliation Files, 1950, 1954, 1962, 1965, 1967, 1970- 1973, 1975-2011,
Recommended publications
  • The Iran National Intelligence Estimate: a Comprehensive Guide to What Is Wrong with the NIE James Phillips

    The Iran National Intelligence Estimate: a Comprehensive Guide to What Is Wrong with the NIE James Phillips

    No. 2098 January 11, 2008 The Iran National Intelligence Estimate: A Comprehensive Guide to What Is Wrong with the NIE James Phillips U.S. efforts to contain Iran and prevent it from attaining nuclear weapons have been set back by the release of part of the most recent National Intelligence Talking Points Estimate (NIE) on Iran’s nuclear program. “Iran: 1 • The National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) uses Nuclear Intentions and Capabilities,” the unclassi- a narrow definition of Iran’s nuclear weapons fied summary of the key judgments of the NIE, con- program that is so restrictive that even offi- tained a stunning bombshell: the conclusion that Iran cials from the normally cautious Interna- halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. tional Atomic Energy Agency have expressed What prompted this reversal of intelligence analy- disagreement with its conclusions. sis is not known. The controversial report released on • The NIE mistakenly assumes that weaponiza- December 3, 2007, contained only a summary of key tion of the warhead is the key aspect of Iran’s judgments and excluded the evidence on which the nuclear program that constitutes a potential threat. judgments were made. However, many experts on intelligence, nuclear proliferation, and the Middle • The NIE understates the importance of East have charged that the NIE is critically flawed. Iran’s “civilian” uranium enrichment efforts to the development of nuclear weapons. This paper distills many of the criticisms against • The NIE does not address related military the Iran NIE and provides a list of articles for further developments, such as Iran’s ballistic missile reading on this important issue.
  • Periodicalspov.Pdf

    Periodicalspov.Pdf

    “Consider the Source” A Resource Guide to Liberal, Conservative and Nonpartisan Periodicals 30 East Lake Street ∙ Chicago, IL 60601 HWC Library – Room 501 312.553.5760 ver heard the saying “consider the source” in response to something that was questioned? Well, the same advice applies to what you read – consider the source. When conducting research, bear in mind that periodicals (journals, magazines, newspapers) may have varying points-of-view, biases, and/or E political leanings. Here are some questions to ask when considering using a periodical source: Is there a bias in the publication or is it non-partisan? Who is the sponsor (publisher or benefactor) of the publication? What is the agenda of the sponsor – to simply share information or to influence social or political change? Some publications have specific political perspectives and outright state what they are, as in Dissent Magazine (self-described as “a magazine of the left”) or National Review’s boost of, “we give you the right view and back it up.” Still, there are other publications that do not clearly state their political leanings; but over time have been deemed as left- or right-leaning based on such factors as the points- of-view of their opinion columnists, the make-up of their editorial staff, and/or their endorsements of politicians. Many newspapers fall into this rather opaque category. A good rule of thumb to use in determining whether a publication is liberal or conservative has been provided by Media Research Center’s L. Brent Bozell III: “if the paper never met a conservative cause it didn’t like, it’s conservative, and if it never met a liberal cause it didn’t like, it’s liberal.” Outlined in the following pages is an annotated listing of publications that have been categorized as conservative, liberal, non-partisan and religious.
  • Is the United States an Outlier in Public Mass Shootings? a Comment on Adam Lankford

    Is the United States an Outlier in Public Mass Shootings? a Comment on Adam Lankford

    Discuss this article at Journaltalk: https://journaltalk.net/articles/5980/ ECON JOURNAL WATCH 16(1) March 2019: 37–68 Is the United States an Outlier in Public Mass Shootings? A Comment on Adam Lankford John R. Lott, Jr.1 and Carlisle E. Moody2 LINK TO ABSTRACT In 2016, Adam Lankford published an article in Violence and Victims titled “Public Mass Shooters and Firearms: A Cross-National Study of 171 Countries.” In the article he concludes: “Despite having less than 5% of the global population (World Factbook, 2014), it [the United States] had 31% of global public mass shooters” (Lankford 2016, 195). Lankford claims to show that over the 47 years from 1966 to 2012, both in the United States and around the world there were 292 cases of “public mass shooters” of which 90, or 31 percent, were American. Lankford attributes America’s outsized percentage of international public mass shooters to widespread gun ownership. Besides doing so in the article, he has done so in public discourse (e.g., Lankford 2017). Lankford’s findings struck a chord with President Obama: “I say this every time we’ve got one of these mass shootings: This just doesn’t happen in other countries.” —President Obama, news conference at COP21 climate conference in Paris, Dec. 1, 2015 (link) 1. Crime Prevention Research Center, Alexandria, VA 22302. 2. College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187; Crime Prevention Research Center, Alexan- dria, VA 22302. We would like to thank Lloyd Cohen, James Alan Fox, Tim Groseclose, Robert Hansen, Gary Kleck, Tom Kovandzic, Joyce Lee Malcolm, Craig Newmark, Scott Masten, Paul Rubin, and Mike Weisser for providing helpful comments.
  • Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security

    Worlds Apart: Bosnian Lessons for Global Security

    Worlds Apart Swanee Hunt Worlds Apart Bosnian Lessons for GLoBaL security Duke university Press Durham anD LonDon 2011 © 2011 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by C. H. Westmoreland Typeset in Charis by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. To my partners c harLes ansBacher: “Of course you can.” and VaLerie GiLLen: “Of course we can.” and Mirsad JaceVic: “Of course you must.” Contents Author’s Note xi Map of Yugoslavia xii Prologue xiii Acknowledgments xix Context xxi Part i: War Section 1: Officialdom 3 1. insiDe: “Esteemed Mr. Carrington” 3 2. outsiDe: A Convenient Euphemism 4 3. insiDe: Angels and Animals 8 4. outsiDe: Carter and Conscience 10 5. insiDe: “If I Left, Everyone Would Flee” 12 6. outsiDe: None of Our Business 15 7. insiDe: Silajdžić 17 8. outsiDe: Unintended Consequences 18 9. insiDe: The Bread Factory 19 10. outsiDe: Elegant Tables 21 Section 2: Victims or Agents? 24 11. insiDe: The Unspeakable 24 12. outsiDe: The Politics of Rape 26 13. insiDe: An Unlikely Soldier 28 14. outsiDe: Happy Fourth of July 30 15. insiDe: Women on the Side 33 16. outsiDe: Contact Sport 35 Section 3: Deadly Stereotypes 37 17. insiDe: An Artificial War 37 18. outsiDe: Clashes 38 19. insiDe: Crossing the Fault Line 39 20. outsiDe: “The Truth about Goražde” 41 21. insiDe: Loyal 43 22. outsiDe: Pentagon Sympathies 46 23. insiDe: Family Friends 48 24. outsiDe: Extremists 50 Section 4: Fissures and Connections 55 25.
  • The Solo Style of Jazz Clarinetist Johnny Dodds: 1923 – 1938

    The Solo Style of Jazz Clarinetist Johnny Dodds: 1923 – 1938

    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2003 The solo ts yle of jazz clarinetist Johnny Dodds: 1923 - 1938 Patricia A. Martin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Music Commons Recommended Citation Martin, Patricia A., "The os lo style of jazz clarinetist Johnny Dodds: 1923 - 1938" (2003). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1948. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1948 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE SOLO STYLE OF JAZZ CLARINETIST JOHNNY DODDS: 1923 – 1938 A Monograph Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in The School of Music By Patricia A.Martin B.M., Eastman School of Music, 1984 M.M., Michigan State University, 1990 May 2003 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This is dedicated to my father and mother for their unfailing love and support. This would not have been possible without my father, a retired dentist and jazz enthusiast, who infected me with his love of the art form and led me to discover some of the great jazz clarinetists. In addition I would like to thank Dr. William Grimes, Dr. Wallace McKenzie, Dr. Willis Delony, Associate Professor Steve Cohen and Dr.
  • The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States, 104 J

    The Current and Future State of Gun Policy in the United States, 104 J

    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 104 Article 5 Issue 4 Symposium On Guns In America Fall 2015 The urC rent And Future State Of Gun Policy In The nitU ed States William J. Vizzard Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons Recommended Citation William J. Vizzard, The Current And Future State Of Gun Policy In The United States, 104 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 879 (2015). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol104/iss4/5 This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. 0091-4169/15/10404-0879 THE JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW & CRIMINOLOGY Vol. 104, No. 4 Copyright © 2015 by Northwestern University School of Law Printed in U.S.A. THE CURRENT AND FUTURE STATE OF GUN POLICY IN THE UNITED STATES WILLIAM J. VIZZARD* In spite of years of journalistic and public attention and debate, the United States has instituted few changes in firearms policy over the past century. Opposition diluted a brief push by the Roosevelt administration in the 1930s and resulted in two minimalist federal statutes. A second effort in the wake of the assassinations of John and Robert Kennedy and Martin Luther King produced the Gun Control Act of 1968, which largely remains the primary federal law. Even this modest control effort was subsequently diluted by the Firearms Owners Protection Act of 1986.

  • The Cambridge Companion to Mario Vargas Llosa Edited by Efraín Kristal and John King Frontmatter More Information

    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86424-4 - The Cambridge Companion to Mario Vargas Llosa Edited by Efraín Kristal and John King Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to mario vargas llosa One of the major novelists in world literature over the last five decades, Mario Vargas Llosa (b. 1936) is also one of Latin America’s leading public intellectuals, a critic of art and culture, and a playwright of distinction. This Companion’s chapters chart the development of Vargas Llosa’s writings, from his rise to prominence in the early 1960s to the award of the Nobel Prize in Literature in 2010. The volume traces his literary trajectory, and the ways in which he has reinvented himself as a writer. His vast output of narrative fiction is the main focus, but the connections between his concerns as a creative writer and his rich career as a cultural and political figure are also teased out in this engaging, informative book. efraı´n kristal is Professor and Chair in Comparative Literature at UCLA. john king is Professor of Latin American Cultural History at the University of Warwick. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86424-4 - The Cambridge Companion to Mario Vargas Llosa Edited by Efraín Kristal and John King Frontmatter More information © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-86424-4 - The Cambridge Companion to Mario Vargas Llosa Edited by Efraín Kristal and John King Frontmatter More information THE
  • Southern Migration to Central and South America, 1850-1877

    Southern Migration to Central and South America, 1850-1877

    Madison Historical Review 2014 2 Austral Empires: Southern Migration to Central and South America, 1850-1877 Claire Wolnisty University of Kansas 2014 Winner of the James Madison Award for Excellence in Historical Scholarship Introduction In his 1866 book, Brazil: The Home for Southerners, Reverend Ballard Dunn likened his fellow former Confederates to a family of field mice that had been spliced apart by a plowshare. The Civil War, according to Dunn, had done nothing but transform southerners into victims. The people left in the southern region of the forcibly re-United States were the war-worn soldiers, the bereaved parents, the oppressed patriots, and the homeless and despoiled. In the face of such total devastation, Dunn asked, “[W]hy should we remain in a country, where we find that there is neither present, nor prospective, security for life, liberty, and property?”1 Dunn chose to find security for his life, liberty, and property in Brazil. Far from being the farcical scheme of a bitter man who fought for the losing side in a war, Dunn's book was a carefully researched plan for colonization. Furthermore, Dunn was among many authors who advocated for North American emigration to Latin American countries during the mid-nineteenth century. As early as 1854, Lieutenant Herndon of the United States Navy wrote Exploration of the Valley of the Amazon, a two-volume work which claimed that the Brazilian empire would welcome U.S. citizens and their slaves into its territory. In Hunting a Home in Brazil: The Agricultural Resources and Other Characteristics of the Country, Dr.
  • Washington Office Report

    Washington Office Report

    EBD #12.23 2012-2013 TO: ALA Executive Board RE: Report on Washington Office Activities ACTION REQUESTED/INFORMATION/REPORT: For information purposes. No actions requested. ACTION REQUESTED BY: No action requested. CONTACT PERSON: Emily Sheketoff, Executive Director, ALA Washington Office 202-628-8410, [email protected] DRAFT OF MOTION: None. DATE: March 29, 2013 BACKGROUND: The report provides information on recent ALA Washington Office initiatives and projects. Attachments: Executive Board Report on Washington Office Activities 1 OFFICE FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY POLICY (OITP) DCWG Releases Report on Evaluating Ebook License Terms To help public libraries navigate through the ebook environment, ALA released “The Business Model Scorecard,” a report that examines specific variables often seen in library ebook license contracts. The report, which was created by the ALA Digital Content & Libraries Working Group, can be used by librarians to weigh ebook contract variables most important to their library. The report assesses 15 ebook contract variables of importance to libraries, ranging from ebook title inclusion, to ebook pricing, to immediate patron access. http://www.districtdispatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/Ebook_scorecard.pdf OITP, Maureen Sullivan Release All-Member Communication on Ebooks In a message to members of the American Library Association, President Maureen Sullivan detailed steps taken by the organization over the past year to advocate for library access to fairly priced e-book titles. In the statement, Sullivan sums up work accomplished by the ALA Digital Content Working Group, including relationship-building with publishers, increased media outreach and information resources and tools for libraries and library advocates. The communications includes a detailed text report and an accompanying highlights video.
  • Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    Mrs. Thatcher's Return to Victorian Values

    proceedings of the British Academy, 78, 9-29 Mrs. Thatcher’s Return to Victorian Values RAPHAEL SAMUEL University of Oxford I ‘VICTORIAN’was still being used as a routine term of opprobrium when, in the run-up to the 1983 election, Mrs. Thatcher annexed ‘Victorian values’ to her Party’s platform and turned them into a talisman for lost stabilities. It is still commonly used today as a byword for the repressive just as (a strange neologism of the 1940s) ‘Dickensian’ is used as a short-hand expression to describe conditions of squalor and want. In Mrs. Thatcher’s lexicon, ‘Victorian’ seems to have been an interchangeable term for the traditional and the old-fashioned, though when the occasion demanded she was not averse to using it in a perjorative sense. Marxism, she liked to say, was a Victorian, (or mid-Victorian) ideo1ogy;l and she criticised ninetenth-century paternalism as propounded by Disraeli as anachronistic.2 Read 12 December 1990. 0 The British Academy 1992. Thanks are due to Jonathan Clark and Christopher Smout for a critical reading of the first draft of this piece; to Fran Bennett of Child Poverty Action for advice on the ‘Scroungermania’ scare of 1975-6; and to the historians taking part in the ‘History Workshop’ symposium on ‘Victorian Values’ in 1983: Gareth Stedman Jones; Michael Ignatieff; Leonore Davidoff and Catherine Hall. Margaret Thatcher, Address to the Bow Group, 6 May 1978, reprinted in Bow Group, The Right Angle, London, 1979. ‘The Healthy State’, address to a Social Services Conference at Liverpool, 3 December 1976, in Margaret Thatcher, Let Our Children Grow Tall, London, 1977, p.
  • Not Much Left

    Not Much Left

    UC_Waldman (B1J).qxd 11/19/2007 3:33 PM Page 18 Chapter One In Locke’s Step Disheartened liberals and disgruntled ex-liberals in the early twenty- Wrst century should take some comfort in the fact that liberalism in America has a longer and more glorious history than the competition. It is older than socialism and conservatism—the beginnings of which are often traced to the Anglo-Irish statesman Edmund Burke’s classic work ReXections on the Revolution in France (1790)—and has outlasted fascism and communism. One could argue that liberalism’s protean qualities as much as its inherent appeal account for its longevity and signiWcance and explain the constant fear of conservatives that at any moment liberalism will reemerge as a powerful force in American politics. After all, the ability of liberalism (and leading liberals in the United States) to respond eVectively and forcefully to changing times and national crises, espe- cially during the 1930s and the early 1960s, is among its most notable characteristics. Many historians and political scientists trace the origins of liberalism or liberal thought to the English physician and philosopher John Locke (1632–1704). Locke’s ideas on liberty, tolerance, and the rights of the individual exerted a profound inXuence on, among others, Thomas JeVerson and James Madison. Madison read Locke and various Enlight- enment thinkers while a student at Princeton University in the early 18 Copyrighted Material UC_Waldman (B1J).qxd 11/19/2007 3:33 PM Page 19 In Locke’s Step / 19 1770s. In the words of the scholar
  • Preservationism, Or the Elephant in the Room: How Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage Deceive Us Into Establishing Religion

    Preservationism, Or the Elephant in the Room: How Opponents of Same-Sex Marriage Deceive Us Into Establishing Religion

    19_WILSON.DOC 2/8/2007 2:11 PM PRESERVATIONISM, OR THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM: HOW OPPONENTS OF SAME-SEX MARRIAGE DECEIVE US INTO ESTABLISHING RELIGION JUSTIN T. WILSON* “People place their hand on the Bible and swear to uphold the Constitution. They don’t put their hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible.” –Jamin Raskin, Professor of Law, American University, in testimony before the Maryland Senate Judicial Proceedings Committee1 INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................562 I. DEFINING “MARRIAGE”........................................................................................567 A. A Brief History and Overview................................................................567 B. The Establishment Clause and Our Religious Heritage......................576 II. A PRIMER ON THE FEDERAL MARRIAGE AMENDMENT AND ITS KIN..................586 A. What Are Same-Sex Marriage Bans and What Do They Do? .............586 B. Who Supports the FMA? .........................................................................592 III. WHERE ARE WE GOING, AND WHY ARE WE IN THIS HANDBASKET?: A SHIFT IN FUNDAMENTAL(IST) RHETORIC .............................................................597 A. The Theoretical Underpinnings of Preservationism............................599 B. Preservationism: An Application ...........................................................602 IV. MODERN ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE JURISPRUDENCE: “HOPELESS DISARRAY” ............................................................................................................604