ICPSR Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research
Dutch Parliamentary Election Study, 1998
Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk, and Marlies Kamp
ICPSR 2836
DUTCH PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION STUDY, 1998
(ICPSR 2836)
Principal Investigators
Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk, and Marlies Kamp University of Twente
First ICPSR Version December 1999
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106
BIBLIOGRAPHIC CITATION
Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is:
Aarts, Kees, Henk van der Kolk, and Marlies Kamp. DUTCH PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION STUDY, 1998 [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: NIWI-Steinmetz Archive/Dutch Electoral Research Foundation (SKON) [producers], 1999. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: NIWI-Steinmetz Archive/Koeln, Germany: Zentralarchiv fuer Empirische Sozialforschung/ Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributors], 1999.
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION ON USE OF ICPSR RESOURCES
To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Please indicate in a cover letter which data were used.
DATA DISCLAIMER
The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
DATA COLLECTION DESCRIPTION
Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk, and Marlies Kamp DUTCH PARLIAMENTARY ELECTION STUDY, 1998 (ICPSR 2836)
SUMMARY: This survey focuses on the Netherlands Second Chamber parliamentary election of May 6, 1998. Part 1, Main Study, contains data from the first wave of interviews conducted before the election (March 30-May 5, 1998) and after the election (May 11-July 4, 1998), and a self-completion questionnaire given to respondents at the end of the second wave. Topics addressed during Wave 1 included: the respondent's interest in politics; the most important problems facing the nation; government policy satisfaction; attitudes toward voting; perception of public opinion poll results; political issues such as euthanasia, income differences, asylum seekers, European unification, ethnic minorities, and European Union (EU) membership; sympathy shown by political parties and politicians; political knowledge of leaders and coalitions; social and political goals; and the presence of a cultural community. Topics covered during Wave 2 included respondent's interest level in the campaign; electoral behavior; coalition preference; views on the importance of issues including nuclear plants, traffic, financial deficit, crime, health care, and the environment; satisfaction with democracy in the Netherlands; attention paid to regional differences; faith in prospective premiers; external and internal political efficacy; political cynicism, social isolation; acceptance of political decisions; civic competence and political participation; and social class images. Items in the self- completion questionnaire focused on trust in political institutions, including the police, parliament, and judges; media consumption; whether the respondent had been approached by a political party; whether he/she had tried to convince others to vote; and the demographic characteristics of those with whom the respondent discussed matters of importance. Background information on Part 1 respondents includes age, sex, political party, political orientation, electoral participation history, marital status, employment status, household income, religion, education, household composition, and demographic characteristics of parents and household members. Part 2, Nonresponse Study, Stimulus-Effect Study, and Corresponding Parts of Main Study, contains data from interviews conducted with respondents unwilling to participate in the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study (Nonresponse Study) and data from face-to-face or telephone interviews conducted with a random sample of respondents (Stimulus-Effect Study). Topics addressed in these studies concerned neighborhood characteristics, including degree of urbanization, income level, social class, and education; interest in politics; and voting intention. Background information on Part 2 respondents includes age, sex, electoral participation history, and household composition.
NOTE: (1) The data are provided as SPSS portable files. (2) The codebook identifies 957 variables for Part 1 and 47 variables for Part 2, but with the inclusion of the Steinmetz Archive study number (V0001), these totals increase by 1. (3) This collection has not been processed by ICPSR staff. ICPSR is distributing the data and documentation for this collection in essentially the same form in which they were received. When appropriate, hardcopy documentation has been converted to machine-readable form and variables have been recoded to ensure respondents' anonymity. (4) The codebook is provided as a Portable Document Format (PDF) file. The PDF file format was developed by Adobe Systems Incorporated and can be accessed using PDF reader software, such as the Adobe Acrobat Reader. Information on how to obtain a copy of the Acrobat Reader is provided through the ICPSR Website on the Internet.
EXTENT OF COLLECTION: 2 data files + machine-readable documentation (PDF)
EXTENT OF PROCESSING: CONCHK.PR
Part 1: Main Study Part 2: Nonresponse Study, Cases: 2,101 Stimulus-Effect Study, Variables: 958 and Corresponding Parts of Main Study Cases: 5,658 Variables: 48 Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998
Documentation
Kees Aarts Henk van der Kolk Marlies Kamp
NIWI/Steinmetz Archive Dutch Electoral Research Foundation (SKON) Enschede, May 1999
ISBN: 9036513200
1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ASSISTANCE
All manuscripts utilizing the data documented in this codebook should identify the original collectors of the data. All users are urged to include some adaptation of the following statement in their publication (the brackets indicate items which can be inserted or deleted as appropriate):
The data [and tabulations] utilized in this [publication] were originally collected for the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 by Kees Aarts and Henk van der Kolk on behalf of the Dutch Electoral Research Foundation (SKON). This study has been made possible by grants from Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdomrelations (BZK), Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP), the University of Amsterdam and the Department of Public Administration and Public Policy of the University of Twente. The original collectors of the data do not bear any responsibility for the analyses or interpretations published here. The data are distributed by Steinmetz Archive, Amsterdam, the Netherlands and by the ICPSR, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America and the Zentral Archiv in Cologne, Germany.
In order to provide the funding agencies with essential information about the use of the data that have been collected with their assistance, each user of the data is expected to send two copies of each completed manuscript to the distributor of the data:
Niwi/Steinmetz Archive Postbus 95110 1090 HC Amsterdam The Netherlands email: [email protected] http:\\www.niwi.knaw.nl phone: +31204628600 fax: +31206658013
Aarts, Kees
Dutch Parliamentary election study 1998; an enterprise of the Dutch political science community/ Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk, Marlies Kamp - Amsterdam, NIWI/Steinmetz Archive; Enschede: Ducth Electoral Research Foundation (SKON), Steinmetz Archive codebook P1415 and P1416, With ref.
ISBN: 9036513200
Subject headings: parliamentary elections; The Netherlands; codebook
2 © Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland 1999
3 CONTENTS
1. GENERAL INFORMATION ...... 10 1.1 INTRODUCTION ...... 10 1.2 FUNDING...... 10 1.3 ORGANIZATION ...... 10 1.4 GLOBAL STUDY DESIGN AND FIELDWORK ...... 11 1.5 THE QUESTIONNAIRES ...... 12 1.6 ADDED VARIABLES ...... 13 1.7 DATA PROCESSING AND CLEANING ...... 13 1.8 PRIVACY PROTECTION MEASURES ...... 14 1.9 DATA FILES ...... 14 2. SAMPLING INFORMATION, RESPONSE AND DESIGN...... 16 2.1 SAMPLING: PERSONS INSTEAD OF ADDRESSES ...... 16 2.1.1 The selection of municipalities ...... 16 2.1.2 The selection of individuals ...... 19 2.2 ROLLING CROSS-SECTION DESIGN ...... 20 2.3 RESPONSE AND NON-RESPONSE: THE MAIN STUDY ...... 22 2.3.1 Measures to reduce non-response...... 23 2.3.2 Response rates of the first wave and the second wave ...... 23 2.3.3 Self-completion questionnaire ...... 24 2.3.4 Quality of the sample of the main study ...... 25 2.3.5 Willingness to participate in the planned panelstudy...... 26 2.4 NON-RESPONSE PROJECT ...... 27 2.5 STIMULUS-EFFECT PROJECT ...... 28 3. DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES...... 31 3.1 VARIABLE DESCRIPTION LIST ...... 31 3.1.1 First wave...... 31 3.1.2 Second wave...... 44 3.1.3 Self completion questionnaire ...... 52 3.1.4 Special file...... 58 3.2 GUIDE TO THE DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES ...... 60 3.3 DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES OF THE MAIN STUDY: FIRST WAVE...... 62 3.3.1 Interview identification ...... 62 3.3.2 Contextual Variables ...... 63 3.3.3 Weights ...... 73 3.3.4 Political interest and communication ...... 74 3.3.5 Most important national problem ...... 81 3.3.6 Party adherence...... 82 3.3.7 Party membership ...... 91 3.3.8 Government policy satisfaction ...... 97 3.3.9 Vote intention Second Chamber 1994...... 99 3.3.10 General attitude towards (not) voting ...... 107 3.3.11 Perception of poll results ...... 122
4 3.3.12 Political (position) issues - euthanasia ...... 129 3.3.13 Political (position) issues – income differences ...... 136 3.3.14 Political (position) issues – asulum seekers ...... 140 3.3.15 Political (position) issues – European unification ...... 147 3.3.16 Political (position) issues – ethnic minorities ...... 154 3.3.17 Political knowledge – membership of the EU ...... 161 3.3.18 Left-right self-rating ...... 165 3.3.19 Previous voting behavior ...... 166 3.3.20 Sympathy scores for political parties...... 169 3.3.21 Sympathy scores for politicians...... 180 3.3.22 Political knowledge – photo questions...... 189 3.3.23 Political knowledge – largest party ...... 199 3.3.24 Political knowledge – composition of coalition...... 201 3.3.25 Coalition preference before elections...... 208 3.3.26 Social and political goals ...... 216 3.3.27 Political and cultural community ...... 233 3.3.28 Composition of household – presence of persons ...... 237 3.3.29 Composition of household – sex ...... 240 3.3.30 Composition of household – age...... 252 3.3.31 Composition of household – household income...... 259 3.3.32 Background characteristics of respondent – social and economic variables...... 262 3.3.33 Background characteristics of respondent – religion...... 275 3.3.34 Background characteristics of respondent – formative period....281 3.3.35 Social class ...... 287 3.3.36 Background characteristics of partner – social and economic variables...... 288 3.3.37 Background characteristics of partner – religion ...... 303 3.3.38 Background characteristics of head of household – social and economic variables ...... 311 3.3.39 Background characteristics of father – social and economic variables 328 3.3.40 Background characteristics of mother – social and economic variables 339 3.3.41 Interview information ...... 350 3.3.42 Text variables first wave...... 356 3.3.43 Order variables first wave...... 364 3.4 DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES OF THE MAIN STUDY: SECOND WAVE...... 365 3.4.1 Interest and activities in campaign ...... 365 3.4.2 Voting behavior Second Chamber 1998...... 368 3.4.3 Coalition preference after elections...... 393 3.4.4 (Post)materialist values ...... 395 3.4.5 Importance of issues ...... 397 3.4.6 Political parties importance of issues – unemployment ...... 412 3.4.7 Political parties importance of issues – cleaner environment .....419 3.4.8 Political parties importance of issues – fighting crime ...... 426
5 3.4.9 Political parties importance of issues – refugees ...... 433 3.4.10 Political parties importance of issues – health care...... 440 3.4.11 Social participation ...... 447 3.4.12 Political (position) issues – social benefits ...... 453 3.4.13 Political (position) issues – nuclear plants...... 460 3.4.14 Satisfaction with (Dutch) democracy ...... 467 3.4.15 Regional differences...... 476 3.4.16 Foreigners ...... 477 3.4.17 Faith in prospective premiers ...... 479 3.4.18 Left-right ...... 483 3.4.19 External political efficacy ...... 495 3.4.20 Internal political efficacy ...... 498 3.4.21 Political cynicism ...... 500 3.4.22 Social isolation ...... 502 3.4.23 Bases of accepting political decisions ...... 509 3.4.24 Vote probability...... 518 3.4.25 Civic competence and civic political participation...... 529 3.4.26 Confessional attitude...... 534 3.4.27 Social class ...... 540 3.4.28 Right-wing orientations...... 541 3.4.29 Interview characteristics ...... 549 3.4.30 Text variables second wave ...... 556 3.4.31 Order variables second wave...... 558 3.5 DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES OF THE MAIN STUDY: SELF-COMPLETION QUESTIONNAIRE ...... 560 3.5.1 Number of relevant others mentioned ...... 560 3.5.2 Relevant others – age, sex and marital status ...... 561 3.5.3 Relevant others – relationship to respondent ...... 565 3.5.4 Relevant others – religious denomination ...... 574 3.5.5 Relevant others – employment status ...... 576 3.5.6 Relevant others – frequency of contact ...... 577 3.5.7 Relevant others – political variables...... 579 3.5.8 Frequency contact with others ...... 592 3.5.9 Trust in political institutions ...... 600 3.5.10 Media consumption ...... 604 3.5.11 Media consumption – radio ...... 613 3.5.12 Media consumption – newspapers...... 618 3.5.13 Media consumption – magazines...... 621 3.5.14 Political television commercials...... 625 3.5.15 Internet ...... 632 3.5.16 Approached by a political party ...... 633 3.5.17 Political interest ...... 647 3.5.18 Reading (inter)national news...... 649 3.5.19 Convincing others to vote for party...... 653 3.5.20 Completion information ...... 654 3.5.21 Text variables self-completion questionnaire ...... 655
6 3.6 DOCUMENTATION OF VARIABLES OF NON-RESPONSE AND STIMULUS EFFECT PROJECT ...... 656 3.6.1 Interview identification ...... 656 3.6.2 Contextual variables...... 657 3.6.3 Political variables (first wave equivalents) ...... 668 3.6.4 Background characteristics ...... 672 3.6.5 Interview information ...... 675 3.6.6 Political variables (second wave equivalent) ...... 676 3.6.7 Reasons for not intending to vote...... 679 3.6.8 Non-response information ...... 683 3.6.9 Text variables CATI interview...... 689 4. ADDED VARIABLES AND CODING SCHEMES...... 690 4.1 ADDED INDEXES...... 690 4.1.1 The construction of scale scores...... 690 4.1.2 A list of scales added to the data file...... 690 4.2 CODED VARIABLES/CODING SCHEMES...... 695 4.2.1 Most important national problems ...... 695 4.2.2 Reasons for not voting ...... 702 4.2.3 Motivation for party choice ...... 704 4.2.4 Occupation ...... 708 4.2.5 Education ...... 710 4.3 WEIGHTS ...... 711 4.3.1 Statistics Netherlands weight (V0025)...... 711 4.3.2 Simple post-stratification weight (V0026) ...... 711 4.3.3 Rolling cross-section post-stratification weight (V0027) ...... 712 4.4 OTHER ADDED VARIABLES ...... 712 4.4.1 Party adherence...... 712 4.4.2 Household characteristics ...... 713 4.4.3 Data from Geo-marktprofiel (zip-code related variables)...... 714 4.5 RANDOMIZATION ...... 715 5. QUESTIONNAIRES AND INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS ...... 716 5.1 FIRST AND SECOND WAVE...... 716 5.1.1 Questionnaire wave 1 (Dutch)...... 717 5.1.2 Showcards wave 1 (Dutch) ...... 793 5.1.3 Questionnaire wave 2 (Dutch)...... 798 5.1.4 Showcards wave 2 (Dutch) ...... 845 5.2 INTERVIEWER INSTRUCTIONS ...... 849 5.3 SELF-COMPLETION QUESTIONNAIRE ...... 867 5.3.1 Self-completion questionnaire (Dutch) ...... 867 5.4 NON-RESPONSE QUESTIONNAIRE ...... 882 5.4.1 Non-response questionnaire (Dutch)...... 882 5.5 STIMULUS EFFECT PROJECT...... 885 5.5.1 Stimulus-effect questionnaire (Dutch) ...... 885
7 6. PREVIOUS ELECTION STUDIES AND COMPARABILITY OF QUESTIONS...... 889 6.1 OVERVIEW OF DPES STUDIES 1971-1998 ...... 889 6.2 COMPARABILITY OF QUESTIONS WITH PREVIOUS ELECTION STUDIES ...... 891 6.3 COMPARABILITY WITH CSES QUESTIONS ...... 923 7. OUTCOME OF THE 1998 PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS ...... 931
8 Tables
Table 1: The Global Design of the DPES 1998...... 12 Table 2: The structure of the data files...... 15 Table 3: Actual number of municipalities and the number of selected municipalities...... 17 Table 4: Participation of municipalities ...... 18 Table 5: Original sample and gross sample ...... 20 Table 6: The number of realized interviews each week ...... 20 Table 7: Rolling cross section within strata (first wave)...... 22 Table 8: Response rates first wave ...... 24 Table 9: Response rates second wave (V0515 and V1313) ...... 24 Table 10: Response rates of the self-completion questionnaire...... 25 Table 11: Response within strata (first wave)...... 26 Table 12: Response and non-response in the non-response project...... 27 Table 13: Main study and stimulus effect study compared...... 29 Table 14: Response within strata (stimulus effect study) ...... 29 Table 15: Response rates of the Stimulus effect study ...... 30
9 1. General Information
1.1 Introduction
This codebook provides information about the organization and design of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 (DPES 1998) and about the contents of the associated data files. The DPES 1998 is the ninth in a series of national election studies.1 Previous studies have been conducted around the parliamentary elections of 1971, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1989 and 1994.2 In 1998 Parliament had served its full term and elections were held on May 6 1998. The codebook consists of seven parts. In this first part general aspects of the DPES 1998 are described. In the second part information about the sample, the response and the design of the study is presented. Part 3 contains information about the variables in the data file. In part 4 information about the added variables is listed as well as the coding schemes used for the ‘open-ended’ questions. In part 5 the (Dutch) questionnaires and showcards that were used in the interviews are documented. This part also contains the text of the self- completion questionnaire, the non-response questionnaire, the questionnaire of the Stimulus-effect project and a list of instructions given to the interviewers. An overall comparison of questions with previous Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies and with CSES questions (see below) is presented in part 6. Finally information about the outcome of the 1998 parliamentary elections is presented in part 7. Additional information can be found on the internet: http://www.bsk.utwente.nl/skon.
1.2 Funding
The Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 has been made possible by grants from the Dutch Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), the Ministry of the Interior and Kingdomrelations (BZK), the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports (VWS), the Social and Cultural Planning Office (SCP), the University of Amsterdam and the Department of Public Administration and Public Policy of Twente. Computing and printing facilities were contributed by the University of Twente.
1.3 Organization
1 In addition to the election study documented in this codebook, SKON also conducted together with Statistics Netherlands (CBS) a new, third wave of interviews for the 1994-1998 panel study. This panel has already been interviewed twice in the first and the second wave of 1994 by CBS. The fieldwork of this panel study was conducted by CBS. The documentation of the panel study is presented in a separate codebook and can be obtained from Steinmetz Archive Amsterdam together with the panel data file. 2 A direct predecessor of the DPES was conducted after the 1967 parliamentary election. Unfortunately, a large part of the original data of the 1967 study is lost.
10 The Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 was conducted by a team at the University of Twente under the auspices of the Dutch Electoral Research Foundation SKON (Stichting KiezersOnderzoek Nederland). The team consisted of Kees Aarts, Henk van der Kolk (study directors), Marlies Kamp (assistant study director) and Jacques Thomassen (Chair of SKON), all associated with the University of Twente (UT). This team designed the study and the questionnaires under the auspices of the board of SKON. SKON is the formal successor of the interuniversity workgroups that were responsible for the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies in the 1971-1986 period. In 1998 the board of SKON consisted of: Jacques Thomassen (University of Twente, Chair), Cees van der Eijk (University of Amsterdam), Irwin Ph.D. (University of Leiden), Kees Aarts (University of Twente), Paul Dekker (SCP) and Hans Anker. The fieldwork of the DPES was conducted by the Institute of Applied Social Research (ITS) at the University of Nijmegen (supervisors: Harm Hartman, Jan Bilo and Henk Verhoeven). The face to face interviews were held by interviewers of the ITS using notebook computers (Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing: CAPI).
1.4 Global Study Design and Fieldwork
The DPES 1998 consists of 5 major parts: the first wave of interviews, the second wave of interviews, a self-completion questionnaire (these three parts are together called ‘the main study’), a non-response project, and a Stimulus-effect project. In addition to these five parts, a third wave of interviews with respondents who participated in the second wave will be conducted after the next parliamentary elections (planned for 2002). The documentation of this panelstudy will eventually be presented in a separate codebook. Parallel to the DPES 1998 a third wave of interviews was held with respondents participating in the second wave of the DPES 1994. This study was conducted by the Central Bureau of Statistics. The documentation of this panelstudy will also be presented in a separate codebook. The first wave of interviews was conducted before the election of May 6 1998. This wave started on March 30 and ended on May 5, one day before the parliamentary elections. 2,101 respondents were interviewed during this first wave of interviews. In the first wave a rolling cross-section design was used in order to enhance the possibilities for studying the campaign. It is discussed more extensively in section 2.2. The second wave of interviews started on May 11 and ended on July 4. In this second wave 1,814 respondents were re-interviewed. The remaining 287 respondents participating in the first wave refused to be re- interviewed or could not be contacted again. Hundred and forty-one of these, however, could be contacted by telephone in order to ascertain their actual voting behavior. At the end of the second wave a self-completion questionnaire was handed over to the respondents. They were asked to fill in the questionnaire and return it to the fieldwork organization. The drop off questionnaire was returned by
11 1,199 persons. During the first wave of interviews the CATI-center of the fieldwork organization tried to contact all 2,106 non-respondents in the so called non-response project. Non-respondents were urged once more to grant an interview (with the option of a different interviewer). As many as possible of those refusing to be interviewed face to face were asked why they would not cooperate and were asked questions on political interest, efficacy and voting behavior. These questions were identical to the questions asked to respondents of the first wave. These questions are referred to as CATI-questions. A total of 926 initial non-respondents were interviewed this way. Besides the main study and the non-response project a stimulus-effect project was conducted. This project aims at facilitating the study of interview participation effects. A random sample of persons not included in the main sample was contacted by telephone and asked about their willingness to grant a face to face interview and their voting behavior. They were also asked some questions about political interest and political efficacy in order to allow comparisons between the main study, non-response project and the stimulus-effect project. The global design of the DPES 1998 is summarized in table 1.
Table 1: The Global Design of the DPES 1998
Before elections After elections
Self- Main study Wave 1 Wave 2 completion questionnaire Gross sample Non- response CATI questions CATI questions project
Stimulus Stimulus- effect sample effect project CATI questions
1.5 The questionnaires
The questionnaires used in the first and second wave can be divided into three parts. The first part is the so-called fixed part. This part contains topics that are in principle included in all DPESs. This part includes variables which have been part of the questionnaire for several years (see part 6), (e.g. party choice, party adherence, issues orientations and candidate evaluations). The second part is the variable part. This part contains questions proposed by the study directors and scholars in the field. Mostly these questions are part of specific research
12 projects. In 1998 17 scholars proposed questions for the variable part. Several proposals were selected for inclusion. The third part consists of a variety of social and demographic characteristics. In several sets of questions, the items have been asked in a randomized order. By randomizing the order of items for every respondent, the impact of the order of items on answers can be controlled. The documentation of randomization procedures is explained in part 3 of this codebook. The questionnaire used in the second wave contains questions which are part of the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). These questions have been asked in a large number of other countries which enables an international comparison of some attitudes and behavior. An extensive comparison of CSES questions and the Dutch questions used in the questionnaire is presented in part 6 of this codebook.
1.6 Added variables
The dataset of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 has been enriched with various extra variables. These variables do not replace any of the original information, but they have been added to the data file for convenience: (1) coded verbatim answers. The original text of the answers (in Dutch) is contained in the data file. (2) indexes. Information about scales and coding schemes are documented in part 4 of this codebook. (3) zipcode related variables. Although the zipcode itself is not presented in the public data file for reasons of privacy protection, some information about neighborhoods has been added to the data file. (4) interviewer related variables. Both identification code, sex and age of the interviewer have been added to the data file.
1.7 Data processing and cleaning
Data processing and data cleaning have been performed by the ITS and the study directors. The coding of the most important national problems, motivation for not voting, motivation for party choice, Dutch politicians, education, degree of urbanization and occupation was performed by ITS as well, on the basis of coding schemes provided by the study directors. The information on response and non-response was also provided by ITS. Consistency checks have been performed and incorrect data entries have been corrected when it was possible to establish unequivocally that the interviewer or the coder had made a mistake in recording or coding the answers. If it was obvious that the interviewer had made such a mistake and the correct code could not be established without doubt, the incorrect codes were replaced by missing data codes. Consistency checks were performed by Roald Geerligs and Marieke van Genugten.
13 1.8 Privacy protection measures
Several variables in the main study have been recoded to a missing value in the public datafile in order to protect the privacy of individual respondents. These variables are available for scientific purposes, but only after a motivated request, which should be directed to SKON. SKON retains the right to refuse such requests.
The variables recoded to a missing value are: V0011 0/Municipality V0012 0/Zip code V0568 I/39b Respondents current occupation (text) V0570 I/39k Respondents former occupation (text) V0572 I/43b Partners current occupation (text) V0574 I/43k Partners former occupation (text) V0576 I/46b Head of households current occupation (text) V0578 I/46k Head of households former occupation (text) V0580 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (text) V0582 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (text)
The measures just described prevent easy identification of (some of) the individual respondents. However, they do not guarantee that individual respondents in the public datafile of the main study and/or the special study cannot be identified. It is understood that everyone who uses the data of the DPES98 main study and/or special study, will refrain from efforts to identify individual respondents, from using any information they might obtain about individual respondents for other than strictly scientific purposes, and from disclosing any identifying information about individual respondents. In case of doubt, the user of the data is referred to SKON. The data of DPES 98 have been collected in compliance with VOI-gedragscode persoonsregistraties - gedragscode voor houders van persoonsregistraties ten behoeve van sociaal- wetenschappelijk opdrachtonderzoek en statistiek, Vereniging van Onderzoeks Instituten, Amsterdam 1991.
1.9 Data files
The Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 is available as a set of two, related public documentation files. These documentation file can be obtained from Steinmetz Archive in Amsterdam (the Netherlands), ICPSR, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America and the Zentral Archiv in Cologne, Germany. The structure of the data files is summarized in table 2:
14 Table 2: The structure of the data files
→ variables age, Intende Pol. Actual 1st wave 2nd wave Type of sex, d voting interest, voting face-to- face-to- interview neighb. behavior political behavior face face record charact. attitudes questions questions (V0003): Main study N = 1199 N = 615 N = 141 N = 146 missing missing Nonresponse N = 926 Study N = 1180 missing
Stimulus N = 712 Effect study N = 739 missing
The first file contains the data collected in the first wave, the second wave as well as the self-completion questionnaire from all respondents participating in the first wave. This data-file is referred to as the ‘main study’. The type of interview record (V0003) indicates who participated in which interviews. This file is numbered P1415 in the Steinmetz Archive Amsterdam. The second file contains information from the non-response project, the stimulus effect study as well as the relevant parts from the main file. The file is referred to as the special file. This file is numbered P1416 in the Steinmetz Archive Amsterdam. Both files are available as SPSS file, with 2101 cases and 957 variables (main study; including some variables not included in the public datafile) and 5658 cases with 47 variables (additional study; including some variables not included in the public datafile). The files are fully labeled and contain missing value definitions. Additional information can be obtained from Steinmetz Archive in Amsterdam, or at http://www.bsk.utwente.nl/skon.
15 2. Sampling Information, Response and Design
2.1 Sampling: persons instead of addresses
The Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 was based on a sample of persons, rather than addresses. The DPES has from 1981 onward employed the mail delivery addresses in the Netherlands as a sampling frame (van der Eijk, Niemöller & Eggen 1981). A number of considerations resulted in a change of the sampling frame for the 1998 election study. (1) The strong interest in the nature of non-response in the Dutch election studies led us to reconsider what had become standard practice. Using the mail-delivery register and selecting the person to be interviewed in the field, made it practically impossible to collect any personal data whatsoever about the non-respondents. The electoral or population registers are much more attractive from this point of view, since these registers include some personal characteristics which can be used in analyses of the response and non-response, such as age and gender. (2) The registers also provide the precise names and addresses of the persons, which means that the introductory letter can directly address the person to be interviewed – selection in the field is no longer needed. This was regarded as a benefit for the interviewers, who would be enabled to address the right person directly by telephone when he or she was not found home. The personal introductory letter was also expected to raise the response just because it would be personal, instead of anonymous. (3) The population and electoral registers are the (theoretically) right sampling frames for a study into electoral behavior. The main disadvantages of using the population or electoral registers are that drawing the sample would become more expensive, that the cooperation of the municipalities had to be secured, and that it might take much time.
2.1.1 The selection of municipalities Sampling consisted of a two stage procedure. In the first stage municipalities were selected. The desired net sample size had been set at 2,000. Because the Dutch population was at that time 15,559,889 this meant that 1 out of 7,780 persons had to be interviewed.3 To keep travel time and costs within acceptable limits, the minimum number of addresses to be sampled for each municipality (i.e. the net cluster size) was set to 1% of the net sample size (i.e. 20 interviews). The relatively large cluster size helped to keep the sampling procedure manageable within the short time available. The associated loss in precision of estimation compared with a cluster size of 10, will generally not exceed 1% point (Hartman 1998). All this meant that municipalities with at least 20 * 7780 ( = 155,599) inhabitants were self-selective. Only 8 municipalities were self-selective (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Den Haag, Utrecht, Eindhoven, Groningen, Tilburg,
3 The number of persons eligible to vote, which was the theoretical population, was not available. This number, however, is highly correlated with the number of inhabitants.
16 Breda). The number of persons to be interviewed in these municipalities was determined by the number of inhabitants (# inhabitants / 7780 = # persons to be interviewed). The total number of persons to be interviewed in the self-selective municipalities was 346. Therefore a total of (2,000 - 346 =) 1,654 persons had to be interviewed in non-self-selective municipalities. Since the cluster size was set at 20, (1654/20 ≈) 83 additional municipalities had to be selected. This was done in a stratification procedure. The strata were determined by region and degree of urbanization. Four regions were defined: North (Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe ), East (Overijssel, Flevoland, Gelderland), West (Utrecht, Noord-Holland, Zuid- Holland, Zeeland) and South (Noord-Brabant, Limburg). Urbanization consists of five categories: very strongly urbanized, strongly urbanized, urbanized, weakly urbanized, not urbanized.4 For all municipalities the number of inhabitants was determined. All municipalities were then ordered using the strata and the number of inhabitants. The cumulative number of inhabitants was determined for this list in order to control for the size of municipalities. A step procedure was then used to determine which municipality was to be included in the sample. This resulted in the additional selection of 83 municipalities. The results of the first step in the sampling procedure are summarized in Table 3:
Table 3: Actual number of municipalities and the number of selected municipalities
# municipalities (1 January 1996) Region # municipalities selected Urbanization North East West South Total 1 Highest 1 011 012 1 8 9 2 1 7 33 8 49 1 5 12 6 24 3 8 17 43 20 88 2 5 8 6 21 4 17 53 71 44 185 2 7 6 6 21 5 Lowest 63 60 60 55 238 4 4 4 4 16 Total 90 137 218 127 572 10 21 38 22 91
Because some municipalities might decide not to cooperate, an additional smaller sample of 35 municipalities was selected in exactly the same way as the larger sample, providing possibilities for replacement within a cell (sample II). It should be noted that in some cells of the table, replacement is not possible (for example the highly urbanized municipalities in the northern region) or only possible to a very limited extent. It was decided that if municipalities would not
4 This variable is based upon the average number persons living on a square kilometer.
17 cooperate, and replacement was not possible, the mail-delivery register would be used for that municipality. In January 1998, all (91 from sample I + 35 from sample II = ) 126 municipalities were asked to cooperate. Of the 91 selected municipalities all 8 self selective municipalities decided to cooperate. Of the remaining 83 municipalities, two municipalities decided first to ask their citizens whether they objected to providing their addresses to the ITS. If a citizen did not object his address was provided to the ITS. Twenty four municipalities refused to cooperate or could otherwise not be included in the sample. Five other municipalities did not refuse, but did not deliver the addresses in time. Of these 29 municipalities, 20 could be replaced from the smaller sample of 35 municipalities by municipalities in the same stratum. A major problem was the selection of level-4-urbanization municipalities in the South, which could not be solved in time. Instead, 2 additional level-5- urbanization municipalities in the same region from sample II were included to replace two of the level-4-urbanization municipalities. In 5 municipalities it was decided to use mail-delivery points. For two refusing municipalities no alternatives were found, it was decided to slightly increase the number of desired interviews in municipalities in the same, or in adjacent cells.
Table 4: Participation of municipalities
18 # municipalities selected Region # municipalities from original sample I # municipalities replaced from sample II # municipalities mail delivery points Urbanization North East West South Total 1 Highest 1 0809 1 7 8 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 1 5 12 6 24 0 4 9 5 18 0 1 2 1 4 1 0 1 0 2 3 2 5 8 6 21 2 4 6 3 15 0 2 2 0 4 0 0 0 3 3 4 2 7 6 6 21 1 4 3 1 9 1 2 3 2 8 0 0 0 3 0 5 Lowest 4 4 4 4 16 4 2 2 4 12 0 2 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 Total 10 21 38 22 91 8 14 27 14 62 1 7 9 5 22 1 0 1 5 5
2.1.2 The selection of individuals In order to select individuals, cooperating municipalities were asked to draw a sample from the population register. First they would have to select persons belonging to the target population (eligible voters) and then to order them by age or zip code. Considering the municipal sample size of (at least) 20 and an estimated response rate of 50%, a step number was used for drawing a sample. In municipalities for which no replacement could be found a sample was drawn from the mail-delivery registers. At the door the household member who was eligible to vote on May 6 and who would be the first to have her or his birthday was selected for an interview. The original sample consists of 4564 units, including 4331 individuals and 233 addresses. Some of the addresses were not inhabited or did not include enfranchised voters. The difference between the original sample and the gross sample (the sample used as a basis for the non-response percentage) consists mainly of persons not approached by an interviewer (see table 5). Because the size of non-response is unknown in advance, the field work organization, had to
19 estimate the number of non-respondents. Based on this estimate sample units were issued to the interviewers. The interviewers were monitored continuously as the rolling cross section design required so (refer to section 2.2.). In order to keep costs within limits, to keep as close as possible to both the stratification scheme and the rolling cross section design, interviewers exceeding the target set for their stratification cell, were told not to use the rest of the issued addresses. Therefore, these addresses were not approached at all, although they were included in the original sample.
Table 5: Original sample and gross sample
Original number of sample units 4564 - not eligible to vote 62 - died 14 - jail/hospital/institution 13 - address uninhabited/ does not exist 37 - not approached 231 Total not included in the sample 357 Gross sample 4207
This means that the gross sample consists of 4207 eligible voters.
2.2 Rolling Cross-Section Design
In preparing the 1998 study, it was decided to enhance the possibilities for studying the campaign. Instead of opting for the 1981 design with a two-wave pre-election panel (which was discarded because of the costs, the lack of time available for preparation, and the relatively low amount of extra information to be obtained), a variant of a rolling cross-sectional design was selected. The group of interviewers for DPES 1998 was well distributed over the various cells of the stratification table. At the beginning of the fieldwork, every interviewer received his or her list with individuals to be approached. The interviewers were instructed to aim at a uniform distribution of their interviews over a period of five weeks. For every week in which they realized at least 5 interviews, they would receive a financial bonus. Of course, since the number of individuals on their list was limited, in the end the bonus would be larger when the interviewers would also set a maximum to the number of successful interviews per week. New lists with names and addresses of individuals were only given if all persons on the original list had been approached and the number of successful interviews was still below the required number in that cell of the stratification table.
Table 6: The number of realized interviews each week
20 Number of realized Week Week Week Week Week interviews 14 15 16 17 18 0196446 141211 246548 35611712 41518182420 53535422919 698101210 792810 8145 91113 10 2 2 1 11 1 2 1 12 1 1 Total 95 95 95 95 95 Total # interviews 356 446 413 450 436
Explanation: of the 95 interviewers participating in the survey, 19 have not interviewed a single person in the first week of the survey. Table 7 relates the two stratification variables to the rolling cross section design. The table indicates that every week is a good representation of the strata.
21 Table 7: Rolling cross section within strata (first wave) week 14 Region week 15 week 16 week 17 week 18 Urbanization North East West South Total 1 (Highest) 5 65 70 4 63 67 6 54 60 5 48 53 8 59 67 2517 33 25 80 5 24 51 30 110 5 22 55 31 113 5 28 63 32 128 6 24 50 34 114 31526 30 24 95 14 30 40 31 115 8 30 33 24 95 4 34 40 24 102 4 17 47 29 97 4819 29 8 64 13 30 31 8 82 8 30 28 14 78 10 24 30 13 77 11 16 26 20 73 5 (Lowest) 10 10 5 22 47 21 9 13 29 72 9 27 15 26 67 22 19 17 32 90 16 24 14 31 85 Total 43 72 162 79 356 57 93 198 98 446 36 87 185 95 413 46 105 198 101 450 45 81 196 114 436
2.3 Response and non-response: the main study
In the 1980s, the response rate of the DPES has fallen dramatically from 69.3% (1981) to 46.1% (1989). The 1994 study showed stabilization (47.5%). The main
22 reason for selecting the population registers as our sample frame, rather than the mail delivery register, was the problem of non-response in the DPES. The personalized approach of respondents associated with this sample frame was expected to reduce non-response. Also, information about age and sex of both respondents and non-respondents (in addition to address information) would help to analyze non-response. Finally, a sample of persons would facilitate a closer study of non-response, which is one of the major components of DPES 1998.
2.3.1 Measures to reduce non-response To increase the response rate several measures were taken. A number of measures were respondent related. First a sample of persons was taken from the municipal registers of eligible voters, instead of using the mail-delivery point which was used in previous studies. As a result, the respondents could be contacted personally by means of a letter of introduction. This letter announced that an interviewer would come along to interview the respondent and contained some information about the character of the survey. Together with this introduction letter a lottery ticket (1/5 of a ticket for state lotteries which costs 5 Dfl) was sent to the respondents in order to convince them to participate in the survey. Initial non-response was contacted by telephone whenever possible, and urged once more to grant the interview, if necessary to another interviewer (see below). At the end of the second interview a second lottery ticket was handed over to the respondent to reward their participation and to encourage them to fill in the self-completion questionnaire and to send it back. A second set of measures were interviewer related. The fieldwork organization has its own corps of interviewers and they were intensively instructed in March 1998, both orally and in writing at different locations in the Netherlands. At each of those meetings one of the study directors was present to inform the interviewers about goals, backgrounds and the design of the study, the structure of the questionnaires and specific aspects of the study. The interviewers received a bonus if they managed to interview 5 persons a week. For a strict monitoring process, the interviewers were required to send the data to ITS every day (by modem). This provided ITS with insight in the interviewers schedules and in the response. Interviewers in the “difficult” urbanized West were promised extra bonuses for a minimum response rate. All interviewers also received a lottery ticket.
2.3.2 Response rates of the first wave and the second wave The following tables contain information about the response and the non- response for the first and second wave of the study. This information is contained in variable V1310 of the special file. Additional information can be found in V1312 of the special file.
23 Table 8: Response rates first wave % Gross sample 4207 100,0 Response first wave 2101 49,9 Non-response: - never cooperates 285 - no interest 952 - inconvenience/visitors 112 - privacy 75 - lack of efficacy 62 - Useless 47 - illness/language barrier/handicapped 173 - no contact 395 - other 5 Total non-response 2106 50,1
Panel attrition between the first and second wave shows the following characteristics:
Table 9: Response rates second wave (V0515 and V1313) % Sample (participants 1st wave) 2101 100 These figures response second wave 1814 86,3 are based Non-response second wave: upon V0515 - refusal 112 (reasons for - illness 15 not intending to - language 2 - occupied 5 participate in - no contact/holiday etc 101 second wave) - unknown 52 and V1313 Total 287 13,7 (contacted by telephone (CATI) after non-response second wave). After a complete cleaning and checking of the dataset, two respondents were found who did not participate in the second wave, but who nevertheless seem to have answered CATI questions and also returned the self-completion questionnaire. After consultation of the original data, it was made sure this strange occurence was not due to cleaning of the dataset. The data from these two respondents got lost somewhere between the actual interview and the construction of the preliminary dataset by the ITS. The two respondents were coded 13 in variable V0003.
2.3.3 Self-completion questionnaire
24 After the interviews held in the second wave a self-completion questionnaire was handed over to the respondents. The self-completion questionnaire contained questions on the social network of the respondents and the frequency of watching tv, listening to the radio and the frequency of reading newspapers. A self-completion questionnaire was used because questions on social network are difficult to answer in a face to face interview. The self-completion questionnaire was handed over to the respondents of which 1754 promised to fill in the questionnaire and return it to the ITS in the postage paid envelope. Eventually 1199 respondents returned the questionnaire.
Table 10: Response rates of the self-completion questionnaire % Sample (participants 2nd wave) 1814 100,0 response 1199 66,1 Non-response 615 33,9
In addition two respondents coded as panel attrition in the second wave filled in the self-completion questionnaire (see section 2.3.2.). Therefore most variables between V0950 and V1206 (self-completion part of the main study) contain 1201 relevant answers.
2.3.4 Quality of the sample of the main study
We can compare the sample with some known population characteristics in order to assess the quality of the samples. The first table contains the number of inhabitants, the number of sample units in the gross sample, the sample units to be interviewed and the number (and percentage) of completed interviews (first wave) in each of the strata.
25 Table 11: Response within strata (first wave)
# inhabitants (dec. 1997) Region # units in gross sample # units to be interviewed # interviews (1st wave) Urbanization North East West South Total 1 (Highest) 168,754 0 2,572,645 0 2,741,399 51 658 709 22 330 352 28 289 317 2 88,722 710,011 1,873,212 1,006,817 3,678,762 55 215 505 266 1041 12 91 241 129 473 26 115 252 152 545 3 298,634 851,263 1,219,189 847,918 3,217,004 87 277 368 276 1008 38 109 157 109 413 45 137 190 132 504 4 398,953 1,023,902 945,011 953,255 3,321,121 94 226 286 123 729 51 132 121 123 427 51 116 144 63 374 5 (Lowest) 678,058 638,035 653,268 632,242 2,601,603 194 141 123 262 720 87 82 84 81 334 87 70 64 140 361 Total 1,633,121 3,223,211 7,263,325 3,4440,232 15,559,889 481 859 1940 927 4207 210 414 934 442 2000 237 438 938 487 2101 he general level of response was higher than the 2000 aimed at. The column totals, indicating the spread over regions are roughly comparable to the overall response. The rows, however, deviate considerably from the desired numbers. Moreover, some numbers in the individual cells indicate that there is a substantial difference between the number of desired and the number of actual interviews. The number of successful interviews in the most urbanized cities in the West, for example, is below target.
2.3.5 Willingness to participate in the planned panelstudy All respondents participating in the second wave were asked to participate in a third wave to be held after the next elections for the second chamber. Of the 1814, 1731 persons expressed their willingness to participate in this panel.
26 2.4 Non-response project
One of the components of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998 is a comprehensive study to reveal the nature of non-response and to gain insight in the characteristics of non-respondents. During the first wave of interviews sample units were asked to participate in the DPES 1998. If a person did not want to cooperate, could not be contacted, or was unable to participate, he or she was contacted by the CATI-center of ITS. The non-respondent was then asked (again) why he or she was not willing to participate in the survey. Another effort was made to convince the non-respondent to participate in the survey. In a few cases this effort was succesful. If the respondent was not willing to participate in a personal interview a few short questions were asked by telephone. These questions correspond with questions in the first or second wave of interviews and refer for example to political interest, education and intended voting behavior. Unfortunately some respondents had no telephone or had a secret telephone number. Therefore not all non-respondents could be contacted for the non- response project. Not all of those reached by telephone were willing to participate in a short interview by telephone. In the end 926 non-respondents were willing to cooperate in the non-response project.
Table 12: Response and non-response in the non-response project % Initial number of non-respondents 2106 100% Non-response 926 44% - refusal (no reason mentioned) 498 - no time 2 - never cooperates 3 - no interest 18 - privacy 3 - lack of efficacy 2 - inconvenience 6 - illness/language barrier/handicapped 49 - no contact/ secret telephone number 529 - other5 70 Total 1180 56%
The causes of non-response reported in Table 12 are based on reports by interviewers. In this study a comparison can be made between the causes of non-response as indicated by the interviewers in the field and the causes of non- response as indicated by the CATI team. The relevant information is contained in the special file.
5 A few of the ‘other’ respondents indicated their willingness to be interviewed in a face-to-face interview. Therefore, their interview was terminated. However, due to lack of time, the respondents were never again approached by an interviewer.
27 2.5 Stimulus-effect project
The fifth component of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies of 1998 was a stimulus-effect project. This project was conducted in order to study the effect of face-to-face interviews upon political interest and (reported) turnout. There is a persistent gap between actual turnout in Dutch parliamentary elections and the reported turnout in the DPES. One of the possible causes of this gap, apart from selective survey response and an inclination towards socially desirable answers, might be the fact that respondents have been interviewed before the elections about political topics, which might have led to greater levels of measured interest or turnout. This was studied using a quasi-experimental design. The stimulus sample in this experiment is the DPES sample. Of course the stimulus dispensed is not identical for all units in the stimulus sample. The strongest stimulus is probably the face-to-face interview. A weaker stimulus is the telephone interview with non-respondents. These two stimuli are not assigned randomly to the sample units, but are at least partly a consequence of individual characteristics. The control sample was approached only after the elections, so that the stimulus of being approached and interviewed is not dispensed upon the sample units before the elections. The control, or non-stimulus sample was drawn at random from the sampling units not drawn into the wave 1 gross sample (the stimulus sample). In order to have an identical response group in both samples, units in the non-stimulus sample were approached in almost the same way we approached units in the wave 1 gross sample. They received a letter announcing that an interviewer would visit them in order to make an appointment for a long face-to-face interview. In order to keep the costs within limits the respondent was then approached by the CATI-team. The CATI-interviewers first asked whether an appointment could be made. After this, people who agreed to be interviewed were told they were included in the sample, but might not be approached again. This was done in order to avoid annoyance among those respondents agreeing to be interviewed in a face-to-face interview. Irrespective of whether the respondent agreed to a face-to-face interview, a small number of questions, almost identical to the questions in the non-response project, was then asked.6 As a result, like the original sample, the control group can be divided into three parts: those willing to grant a face-to-face interview who answered the CATI- questions, those not willing to grant a face-to-face interview who answered the CATI-questions, and a non-response group. Voting behavior is of course the central variable in this experiment. Therefore, it is necessary to know the actual voting behavior of all units in both the stimulus sample and the control sample. However, we do not know the voting behavior of respondents refusing to participate in the first wave and respondents refusing to participate in the second wave. It was decided to approach the latter group by
6 Since the control group was interviewed after the elections, the vote intention questions were replaced by voting behavior questions.
28 telephone. This enables a comparison between the stimulus group and the control group. This comparison is summarized in table 13.
Table 13: Main study and stimulus effect study compared. v0003 Main study and non-response group v1314 Stimulus study: v0003 >= 21 11. 1st wave, 2nd wave and Mail 12. 1st wave, 2nd wave 1 Willing to participate in a 13. 1st wave, voting behavior known face to face interview 14. 1st wave, voting behavior unknown
15. non-response project 2 Refusing to participate in face to face interview
16. no data/no contact other no data/no contact
The variables of the stimulus-effect project are connected to comparable variables in the main study and the non-response project by using identical variable names and variable numbers. The variables are presented in part 3 of this codebook.
Table 14: Response within strata (stimulus effect study)
# units in gross sample Region # interviews (1st wave) Urbanization North East West South Total 1 (Highest) 17 225 242 8 95 103 22078 150 95 343 10 39 69 43 161 328102 129 94 353 12 48 59 55 174 43783 97 46 263 21 41 49 25 136 5 (Lowest) 64 56 42 88 250 39 36 22 41 138 Total 166 319 323 643 1451 90 164 294 164 712
29 Table 15: Response rates of the Stimulus effect study
% Original number of sample units 1508 Outside population 57 Gross sample 1451 100,0% Initial response 712 49,1% Non-response: - refusal 268 - no interest 32 - inconvenience/visitors 49 - privacy 8 - lack of efficacy 1 - illness/language barrier/handicapped 24 - no contact 351 (85 sent back postcard) - other 6 Total 739 51,9%
In addition to the 712 persons interviewed by the CATI team, all respondents who could not be contacted by telephone (initial non-respondents) were sent a postcard with a small number of questions. 85 persons (5,9 percent of the gross sample) returned the card. V0003 contains a code for those sending back a postcard.
30 3. Documentation of variables
3.1 Variable description list
3.1.1 First wave Interview identification V0001 0/ Study number V0002 0/ Respondent identification number V0003 0/ Type of interview record
Contextual variables V0010 0/ Region V0011 0/ Municipality V0012 0/ Zip code V0013 0/ Degree of urbanization V0014 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - welfare V0015 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class A V0016 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B1 V0017 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B2 V0018 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class C V0019 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class D V0020 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education low V0021 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education middle V0022 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education high
Weights V0025 0/ Weight 1: sex, age, marital status, region, urbanization, electoral behavior (CBS) V0026 0/ Weight 2: region, urbanization (stratification variables) V0027 0/ Weight 3: region, urbanization, time of interview first wave (rolling cross section)
Political interest and communication V0030 I/2 Reads about national news? V0031 I/3 Talks about national news? V0032 I/4 Reads about foreign news? V0033 I/5 Interested in politics? V0034 I/index Political interest score q2-5 V0035 I/6 Daily newspaper - first answer V0036 I/6 Daily newspaper - second answer V0037 I/6 Daily newspaper - third answer V0038 I/6 Daily newspaper - fourth answer V0039 I/6 Daily newspaper - fifth answer V0040 I/7 Frequency watching NOS TV newscast V0041 I/8 Frequency watching RTL4 TV newscast
31 V0042 I/9 Frequency watching NOVA - Den Haag Vandaag TV broadcast
Most important national problem V0045 I/10 Most important national problem - first answer V0046 I/10 Most important national problem - second answer V0047 I/10 Most important national problem - third answer V0048 I/10 Most important national problem - fourth answer V0049 I/10 Most important national problem - fifth answer
Party adherence V0050 I/11a Respondent is (not) adherent to a party V0051 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - first party V0052 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - second party V0053 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - third party V0054 I/11b2 Party respondent is most attracted to V0055 I/11c Respondent is (not) convinced adherent V0056 I/11d Respondent is not an adherent and (not) attracted to a party V0057 I/11e Party respondent is attracted to V0058 I/index Strength of party adherence q11 V0059 I/index Direction of party adherence q11
Party membership V0060 I/12a Respondent is (not) member of a party V0061 I/12b Party respondent is member of V0062 I/12c Respondent has (never) been member of a party V0063 I/12d Party respondent was member of - first party V0064 I/12d Party respondent was member of - second party V0065 I/12e Respondent (never) considered to become member of a party V0066 I/12f Party respondent considered to become member of – first party V0067 I/12f Party respondent considered to become member of – second party V0068 /12f Party respondent considered to become member of – third party
Government policy satisfaction V0070 I/13a Effect government policy on economic situation V0071 I/13b Effect government policy on employment V0072 I/13c Effect government policy on respondents finances V0073 I/14 General satisfaction with government V0074 I/index Policy satisfaction score q13ab-q14
Vote intention Second Chamber 1994 V0075 I/15a Intends to vote in 1998 parliamentary elections? V0076 I/2a Vote intention 1998 parliamentary elections V0077 I/2b Does hesitating respondent consider to vote for party? V0078 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for – first party V0079 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for – second party
32 V0080 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for – third party V0081 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for – fourth party V0082 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for – fifth party V0083 I/2d Vote intention if non-voter is obliged to vote
General attitude towards (not)voting V0085 I/16a Voting is a duty to society V0086 I/16b Voting costs me a great deal of time and effort V0087 I/16c Voting supports the democratic system V0088 I/16d Voting does not help to exert political influence V0089 I/16e Voting is a way of declaring ones political conviction V0090 I/16f Voting does not avail me anything V0091 I/16g Voting is a way of supporting a political party V0092 I/16h If one does not vote, one loses the right to criticize V0093 I/16i It makes no sense to vote when all goes well V0094 I/17a Willingness to exert oneself in order to vote V0095 I/17b Importance of a high turnout V0096 I/17c Turnout and individual electoral behavior - first priority V0097 I/17d Turnout and individual electoral behavior - second priority V0098 I/17e Turnout and individual electoral behavior - third priority V0099 I/17f Turnout and individual electoral behavior - fourth priority
Perception of poll results V0100 I/18a Frequency of encountering poll results V0101 I/18b Perceived accuracy of poll results V0102 I/18c Present poll result CDA compared to 1994 election results V0103 I/18d Present poll result PvdA compared to 1994 election results V0104 I/18e Present poll result VVD compared to 1994 election results V0105 I/18f Present poll result D66 compared to 1994 election results V0106 I/18g Which party will be the largest in 1998 elections?
Political (position) issues - euthanasia V0110 I/19a Euthanasia - position of CDA V0111 I/19b Euthanasia - position of PvdA V0112 I/19c Euthanasia - position of VVD V0113 I/19d Euthanasia - position of D66 V0114 I/19e Euthanasia - position of GroenLinks V0115 I/19f Euthanasia - position of GPV V0116 I/19g Euthanasia - position of respondent
Political (position) issues - income differences V0117 I/20a Income differences - position of CDA V0118 I/20b Income differences - position of PvdA V0119 I/20c Income differences - position of VVD V0120 I/20d Income differences - position of D66 V0121 I/20e Income differences - position of GroenLinks
33 V0122 I/20f Income differences - position of GPV V0123 I/20g Income differences - position of respondent
Political (position) issues - asylum seekers V0124 I/21a Asylum seekers - position of CDA V0125 I/21b Asylum seekers - position of PvdA V0126 I/21c Asylum seekers - position of VVD V0127 I/21d Asylum seekers - position of D66 V0128 I/21e Asylum seekers - position of GroenLinks V0129 I/21f Asylum seekers - position of GPV V0130 I/21g Asylum seekers - position of respondent
Political (position) issues - European unification V0131 I/22a European unification - position of CDA V0132 I/22b European unification - position of PvdA V0133 I/22c European unification - position of VVD V0134 I/22d European unification - position of D66 V0135 I/22e European unification - position of GroenLinks V0136 I/22f European unification - position of GPV V0137 I/22g European unification - position of respondent
Political (position) issues - ethnic minorities V0138 I/23a Ethnic minorities - position of CDA V0139 I/23b Ethnic minorities - position of PvdA V0140 I/23c Ethnic minorities - position of VVD V0141 I/23d Ethnic minorities - position of D66 V0142 I/23e Ethnic minorities - position of GroenLinks V0143 I/23f Ethnic minorities - position of GPV V0144 I/23g Ethnic minorities - position of respondent
Political knowledge - membership of the EU V0150 I/24 Is Germany member of the European Union? V0151 I/24 Is United States member of the European Union? V0152 I/24 Is France member of the European Union? V0153 I/24 Is Italy member of the European Union? V0154 I/24 Is Spain member of the European Union? V0155 I/24 Is Poland member of the European Union? V0156 I/24 Is Lithuania member of the European Union? V0157 I/24 Is Sweden member of the European Union? V0158 I/24 Is Norway member of the European Union? V0159 I/24 Is Turkey member of the European Union?
Left-right self-rating V0160 I/25 Left-right self-rating (11 point scale)
Previous voting behavior
34 V0165 I/26a Did (not) vote in 1994 parliamentary elections V0166 I/26b Party voted for in 1994 parliamentary elections V0167 I/27a Did (not) vote in most recent municipal elections V0168 I/27b Party voted for in most recent municipal elections V0169 I/27c Reason for not voting in most recent municipal elections
Sympathy scores for political parties V0170 I/28a Sympathy score PvdA V0171 I/28b Sympathy score VVD V0172 I/28c Sympathy score D66 V0173 I/28d Sympathy score GroenLinks V0174 I/28e Sympathy score CDA V0175 I/28f Sympathy score SGP V0176 I/28g Sympathy score GPV V0177 I/28h Sympathy score RPF V0178 I/28i Sympathy score Centrumdemocraten V0179 I/28j Sympathy score SP V0180 I/28k Sympathy score AOV
Sympathy scores for politicians V0181 I/29a Sympathy score Wim Kok (PvdA) V0182 I/29b Sympathy score Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (CDA) V0183 I/29c Sympathy score Frits Bolkestein (VVD) V0184 I/29d Sympathy score Els Borst (D66) V0185 I/29e Sympathy score Paul Rosenmöller (GroenLinks) V0186 I/29f Sympathy score Gert Schutte (GPV) V0187 I/29g Sympathy score Jan Marijnissen (SP) V0188 I/29h Sympathy score Hans Janmaat (Centrumdemocraten) V0189 I/29i Sympathy score Thom de Graaf (D66)
Political knowledge - photo questions V0190 I/30.1.1 Photo A - Jacques Wallage V0191 I/30.1.2 Party of Wallage (PvdA) V0192 I/30.1.3 Political function Wallage V0193 I/30.2.1 Photo B - Thom de Graaf V0194 I/30.2.2 Party of de Graaf (D66) V0195 I/30.2.3 Political function of de Graaf V0196 I/30.3.1 Photo C - Annemarie Jorritsma V0197 I/30.3.2 Party of Jorritsma (VVD) V0198 I/30.3.3 Political function of Jorritsma V0199 I/30.4.1 Photo D - Piet Bukman V0200 I/30.4.2 Party of Bukman (CDA) V0201 I/30.4.3 Political function of Bukman V0202 I/index Political knowledge score 1 (0-12) q30 V0203 I/index Political knowledge score 2 (0-4) q30
35 Political knowledge - largest party V0205 I/31a Which party is the larger: PvdA or VVD? V0206 I/31b Which party is the larger: D66 or GroenLinks? V0207 I/31c Which party is the larger: CDA or PvdA? V0208 I/31d Which party is the larger: VVD or D66?
Political knowledge - composition of coalition V0210 I/31e Is PvdA member of present coalition? V0211 I/31e Is CDA member of present coalition? V0212 I/31e Is VVD member of present coalition? V0213 I/31e Is D66 member of present coalition? V0214 I/31e Is GroenLinks member of present coalition? V0215 I/31e Is SGP member of present coalition? V0216 I/31e Is GPV member of present coalition? V0217 I/31e Is RPF member of present coalition? V0218 I/31e Is CD member of present coalition? V0219 I/31e Is Unie 55+ member of present coalition? V0220 I/31e Is AOV member of present coalition? V0221 I/31e Is SP member of present coalition? V0222 I/31e Is Senioren 2000 member of present coalition? V0223 I/31e Other party which is member of present coalition V0224 I/index Correct perception composition present coalition q31
Coalition preference before elections V0230 I/31f Is PvdA preferred in new government coalition? V0231 I/31f Is CDA preferred in new government coalition? V0232 I/31f Is VVD preferred in new government coalition? V0233 I/31f Is D66 preferred in new government coalition? V0234 I/31f Is GroenLinks preferred in new government coalition? V0235 I/31f Is SGP preferred in new government coalition? V0236 I/31f Is GPV preferred in new government coalition? V0237 I/31f Is RPF preferred in new government coalition? V0238 I/31f Is CD preferred in new government coalition? V0239 I/31f Is Unie 55+ preferred in new government coalition? V0240 I/31f Is AOV preferred in new government coalition? V0241 I/31f Is SP preferred in new government coalition? V0242 I/31f Is Senioren 2000 preferred in new government coalition V0243 I/31f Other party preferred in new government coalition V0244 I/31g Does it matter which parties are member of the coalition?
Social and political goals V0250 I/32a Goals 1 - securing a high-paying job V0251 I/32b Goals 2 - working hard and saving for the future V0252 I/32c Goals 3 - maintaining high economic growth V0253 I/32d Goals 4 - personal freedom V0254 I/32e Goals 5 - being open-minded to new ideas
36 V0255 I/32f Goals 6 - freedom of speech V0256 I/32g Goals 7 - seeking personal fulfillment V0257 I/32h Goals 8 - giving people more say in government decisions V0258 I/32i Goals 9 - increasing benefits for the disadvantaged V0259 I/32j Goals 10 - improving environment and quality of life V0260 I/32k Goals 11 - active citizen participation in local politics V0261 I/32l Goals 12 - replacing parties by strong leaders V0262 I/32m Goals 13 - preserving traditional morals and values V0263 I/32n Goals 14 - respect for authorities V0264 I/32o Goals 15 - providing for strong defense forces even in present situation V0265 I/32p Goals 16 - limiting room for dissenters V0266 I/32q Goals 17 - stimulating loyalty and patriotism
Political and cultural community V0270 I/33a All having Dutch ancestors are entitled to Dutch nationaliy V0271 I/33b All working & living in the Netherlands are entitled to Dutch nationality V0272 I/33c Solidarity among inhabitants of country arises through the centuries V0273 I/33d Cultural differences within a country do not obstruct mutual solidarity
Composition of household - presence of persons V0280 I/37 Number of household members V0281 I/37 Composition of household V0282 I/37 Is partner present in household? V0283 I/37 Number of (foster-, step-)children in household V0284 I/37 Number of (foster-, step-)parents (in law) in household V0285 I/37 Number of (great)grandparents in household V0286 I/37 Number of (step-)brothers and sisters (in law) in household V0287 I/37 Number of residents, boarders and others in household
Composition of household - sex V0288 I/37 Sex of respondent V0289 I/37 Sex of partner V0290 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)parent (in law) #1 V0291 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)parent (in law) #2 V0292 I/37 Sex of (great)grandparent #1 V0293 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #1 V0294 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #2 V0295 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #3 V0296 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #4 V0297 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #5 V0298 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #6 V0299 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #7
37 V0300 I/37 Sex of (foster-, step-)child #8 V0301 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 V0302 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 V0303 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #3 V0304 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #4 V0305 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #5 V0306 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #6 V0307 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #7 V0308 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #1 V0309 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #2 V0310 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #3 V0311 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #4 V0312 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #5 V0313 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #6 V0314 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #7 V0315 I/37 Sex of resident, boarder, other #8
Composition of household - age V0316 I/37 Age of respondent V0317 I/37 Age of partner V0318 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)parent (in law) #1 V0319 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)parent (in law) #2 V0320 I/37 Age of (great)grandparent #1 V0321 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #1 V0322 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #2 V0323 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #3 V0324 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #4 V0325 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #5 V0326 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #6 V0327 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #7 V0328 I/37 Age of (foster-, step-)child #8 V0329 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 V0330 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 V0331 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #3 V0332 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #4 V0333 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #5 V0334 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #6 V0335 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #7 V0336 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #1 V0337 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #2 V0338 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #3 V0339 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #4 V0340 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #5 V0341 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #6 V0342 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #7 V0343 I/37 Age of resident, boarder, other #8
38 Composition of household - household income V0344 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 1 V0345 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 2 V0346 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 3 V0347 I/37 Main breadwinner in household V0348 I/51 Net annual income of respondents household
Background characteristics of respondent - social and economic variables V0350 I/1b Date of birth of respondent (yyyymmdd) V0351 I/1c Marital status of respondent V0352 I/38a Highest education (completed) of respondent V0353 I/38bc Education respondent started afterwards V0354 I/39a Current occupational status of respondent V0355 I/39aw Sector in which respondent is currently employed V0356 I/39ah Reason respondent does not work V0357 I/39anw Reason respondent never worked V0358 I/39b Respondents current occupation (sbc92) V0359 I/39b Respondents current occupation (u&s92) V0360 I/39b Respondents current occupation (isei92) V0361 I/39b Respondents current occupation (egp92) V0362 I/39b Respondents current occupation (isco88) V0363 I/39ef Number of employees supervised by respondent V0364 I/39gh Number of persons employed by self-employed respondent V0365 I/39i Number of hours respondent works per week V0366 I/39j Reason why respondent is not full-time working V0367 I/39k Respondents former occupation (sbc92) V0368 I/39k Respondents former occupation (u&s92) V0369 I/39k Respondents former occupation (isei92) V0370 I/39k Respondents former occupation (egp92) V0371 I/39k Respondents former occupation (isco88) V0372 I/39mn Number of employees respondent supervised in former occupation V0373 I/39o Number of hours respondent worked per week V0374 I/39p Former job respondent ended in which year? V0375 I/39q Respondent willing to work regularly?
Background characteristics of respondent - religion V0376 I/40a Type of belief in God V0377 I/40b Religious denomination of respondent V0378 I/40c Dutch Reformed denomination of respondent V0379 I/40d Calvinist denomination of respondent V0380 I/40ba Other Christian denomination of respondent V0381 I/40ba Other religious denomination of respondent V0382 I/40e Respondents attendance of religious services V0385 I/40f Denomination in which respondent was raised - first answer
39 V0386 I/40f Denomination in which respondent was raised - second answer
Background characteristics of respondent - formative period V0387 I/34a Discussed politics at home when adolescent V0388 I/34b Respondent had (no) father during adolescence V0389 I/34c Respondent had (no) mother during adolescence V0390 I/35b Party preference of father during adolescence - first V0391 I/35b Party preference of father during adolescence - second V0392 I/36b Party preference of mother during adolescence - first V0393 I/36b Party preference of mother during adolescence - second
Social class V0394 I/41 Social class - self image
Background characteristics of partner - social and economic variables V0400 I/42a Highest education (completed) of partner V0401 I/42bc Education partner started afterwards V0402 I/43a Current occupational status of partner V0403 I/43aw Sector in which partner is currently employed V0404 I/43ah Reason partner does not work V0405 I/43anw Reason partner never worked V0406 I/43b Partners current occupation (sbc92) V0407 I/43b Partners current occupation (u&s92) V0408 I/43b Partners current occupation (isei92) V0409 I/43b Partners current occupation (egp92) V0410 I/43b Partners current occupation (isco88) V0411 I/43ef Number of employees supervised by partner V0412 I/43gh Number of persons employed by self-employed partner V0413 I/43i Number of hours partner works per week V0414 I/43j Reason why partner is not full-time working V0415 I/43k Partners former occupation (sbc92) V0416 I/43k Partners former occupation (u&s92) V0417 I/43k Partners former occupation (isei92) V0418 I/43k Partners former occupation (egp92) V0419 I/43k Partners former occupation (isco88) V0420 I/43mn Number of employees partner supervised in former occupation V0421 I/43o Number of hours partner worked per week V0422 I/43p Former job partner ended in which year? V0423 I/43q Partner willing to work regularly?
Background characteristics of partner - religion V0424 I/44a Religious denomination of partner V0425 I/44b1 Dutch Reformed denomination of partner V0426 I/44b2 Calvinist denomination of partner V0427 I/44b3 Other Christian denomination of partner
40 V0428 I/44b4 Other religious denomination of partner V0429 I/44d Partners attendance of religious services V0430 I/44e Denomination in which partner was raised - first answer V0431 I/44e Denomination in which partner was raised - second answer
Background characteristics of head of household - social and economic variables V0435 I/45a Highest education (completed) of head of household V0436 I/45bc Education head of household started afterwards V0437 I/46a Current occupational status of head of household V0438 I/46aw Sector in which head of household is currently employed V0439 I/46ah Reason head of household does not work V0440 I/46b Head of households current occupation (sbc92) V0441 I/46b Head of households current occupation (u&s92) V0442 I/46b Head of households current occupation (isei92) V0443 I/46b Head of households current occupation (egp92) V0444 I/46b Head of households current occupation (isco88) V0445 I/46egf Number of employees supervised by head of household V0446 I/46gh Number of persons employed by self-employed head of household V0447 I/46i Number of hours head of household works per week V0448 I/46j Reason why head of household is not full-time working V0449 I/46k Head of households former occupation (sbc92) V0450 I/46k Head of households former occupation (u&s92) V0451 I/46k Head of households former occupation (isei92) V0452 I/46k Head of households former occupation (egp92) V0453 I/46k Head of households former occupation (isco88) V0454 I/46mn Number of employees supervised by head of household in former job V0455 I/46o Number of hours head of household worked per week V0456 I/46p Former job head of household ended in which year? V0457 I/46q Head of household willing to have work regularly?
Background characteristics of father - social and economic variables V0460 I/47 Highest education (completed) of father V0461 I/48a Occupational status of father during adolescence V0462 I/48aw Sector in which father was employed V0463 I/48ah Reason father did not work V0464 I/48an Reason father had never worked V0465 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (sbc92) V0466 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (u&s92) V0467 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (isei92) V0468 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (egp92) V0469 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (isco88) V0470 I/48ef Number of employees supervised by father V0471 I/48gh Number of persons employed by self-employed father
41 V0472 I/48i Number of hours father spent on work during adolescence V0473 I/48j Reason why father was not full-time working
Background characteristics of mother - social and economic variables V0480 I/v49 Highest education (completed) of mother V0481 I/50a Occupational status of mother during adolescence V0482 I/50aw Sector in which mother was employed V0483 I/50ah Reason mother did not work V0484 I/50an Reason mother had never worked V0485 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (sbc92) V0486 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (u&s92) V0487 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (isei92) V0488 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (egp92) V0489 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (isco88) V0490 I/50ef Number of persons supervised by mother V0491 I/50gh Number of persons employed by self-employed mother V0492 I/50i Number of hours mother spent on work during adolescence V0493 I/50j Reason why mother was not full-time working
Interview information V0500 0/ Interviewer Wave 1 identification number V0501 0/ Interviewer wave 1 characteristic - age V0502 0/ Interviewer wave 1 characteristic - sex V0503 0/ Week of interview Wave 1 V0504 0/ Date of interview Wave 1 (yyyymmdd) V0505 0/ Duration of interview Wave 1 (mmm) V0506 I/53a Any person present at first interview? V0507 I/53c Present at first interview - children under 6 years V0508 I/53d Present at first interview - children 6 years and older V0509 I/53e Present at first interview - spouse or partner V0510 I/53f Present at first interview - other relatives V0511 I/53g Present at first interview - other adults V0512 I/54a Disturbing influences first interview - first coding V0513 I/54b Disturbing influences first interview - second coding V0514 I/52a Willingness to participate in next wave V0515 I/52b Not willing to participate - reason
Text variables first wave V0550 I/10 Most important national problem - first answer (text) V0551 I/10 Most important national problem - second answer (text) V0552 I/10 Most important national problem - third answer (text) V0553 I/10 Most important national problem - fourth answer (text) V0554 I/10 Most important national problem - fifth answer (text) V0555 I/27c Reason for not voting in most recent municipal elections (text) V0556 I/30.1.1 Photo A - other name (text) V0557 I/30.1.2 Party – other (text)
42 V0558 I/30.1.3 Political function - other (text) V0559 I/30.2.1 photo C - other name (text) V0560 I/30.2.2 Party - other (text) V0561 I/30.2.3 Political function - other (text) V0562 I/30.3.1 Photo C - other name (text) V0563 I/30.3.2 Party - other (text) V0564 I/30.3.3 Political function - other (text) V0565 I/30.4.1 Photo D - other name (text) V0566 I/30.4.2 Party - other (text) V0567 I/30.4.3 Political function - other (text) V0568 I/39b Respondents current occupation (text) V0569 I/39cd Branch of industry of respondents current occupation (text) V0570 I/39k Respondents former occupation (text) V0571 I/39l Branch of industry of respondents former occupation (text) V0572 I/43b Partners current occupation (text) V0573 I/43cd Branch of industry of partners current occupation (text) V0574 I/43k Partners former occupation (text) V0575 I/43l Branch of industry of partners former occupation (text) V0576 I/46b Head of households current occupation (text) V0577 I/46cd Branch of industry of head of households current occupation (text) V0578 I/46k Head of households former occupation (text) V0579 I/46l Branch of industry head of households former occupation (text) V0580 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (text) V0582 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (text) V0584 I/52b Not willing to participate - reason (text) V0585 I/54b Disturbing influences first interview (text)
Order variables first wave V0590 I/16 Order of statements about (not) voting V0591 I/18 Order of questions about poll results V0592 I/28 Order of questions about party sympathy V0593 I/29 Order of questions about sympathy of politicians V0594 I/32 Order of statements about the goals society should aim at
43 3.1.2 Second wave Interest and activities in campaign V0600 II/2 Read campaign news in newspaper? V0601 II/3a Has seen electoral debates? V0602 II/3b Has seen electoral debate on eve of elections? V0603 II/3a Influenced by electoral debate on eve of elections? V0604 II/4 Campaign activity - displayed window posters V0605 II/4 Campaign activity - tried to convince others V0606 II/4 Campaign activity - contributed money to party V0607 II/4 Campaign activity - attended election rallies
Voting behavior Second Chamber 1998 V0610 II/5 Did (not) vote in 1998 parliamentary elections V0611 II/6 Party voted for in 1998 parliamentary elections V0612 II/7 Party choice - first reason V0613 II/7 Party choice - second reason V0614 II/7 Party choice - third reason V0615 II/7 Party choice - fourth reason V0616 II/8 Party choice - when decided V0617 II/9a Did (not) cast preferential vote V0618 II/9b Reason for preferential vote - first reason V0619 II/9b Reason for preferential vote - second reason V0620 II/9c Did respondent authorize someone to vote by proxy? V0621 II/9d Person authorized to vote by proxy V0622 II/9e Has been authorized by someone to vote by proxy V0623 II/9f Person who authorized respondent to vote by proxy V0624 II/9g What time did you vote? V0625 II/10a Previous voting behavior of respondent V0626 II/11 Party previously voted for - first answer V0627 II/11 Party previously voted for - second answer V0628 II/11 Party previously voted for - third answer V0629 II/11 Party previously voted for - fourth answer V0630 II/11 Party previously voted for - fifth answer V0631 II/12a Considered not to vote V0632 II/12b Did hesitate about party choice V0633 II/13 First party considered as alternative choice V0634 II/13 Second party considered as alternative choice V0635 II/13 Third party considered as alternative choice V0636 II/13 Fourth party considered as alternative choice V0637 II/13 Fifth party considered as alternative choice V0638 II/14 Did not vote - first reason V0639 II/14 Did not vote - second reason V0640 II/14 Did not vote - third reason V0641 II/15 Did not vote - when decided V0642 II/16 Preferred party of non-voters
44 Coalition preference after elections V0650 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - D66 V0651 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - PvdA V0652 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - CDA V0653 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - VVD V0654 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - GroenLinks
(Post)materialist values V0655 II/18a (Post-)materialist priorities - first choice V0656 II/18b (Post-)materialist priorities - second choice V0657 II/18c (Post-)materialist priorities - third choice V0658 II/18d (Post-)materialist priorities - fourth choice
Importance of issues V0660 II/19a Importance - income differences V0661 II/19b Importance - integration ethnic minorities V0662 II/19c Importance - nuclear plants V0663 II/19d Importance - heavy traffic on highways V0664 II/19e Importance - environmental pollution V0665 II/19f Importance - unemployment V0666 II/19g Importance - euthanasia V0667 II/19h Importance - European Union V0668 II/19i Importance - financial deficit of the state V0669 II/19j Importance - level social benefits V0670 II/19k Importance - securing good provision for old age V0671 II/19l Importance - misusing social benefits V0672 II/19m Importance - seeking for asylum V0673 II/19n Importance - crime V0674 II/19o Importance - health care
Political parties importance of issues - unemployment V0680 II/20a Importance unemployment - CDA V0681 II/20b Importance unemployment - PvdA V0682 II/20c Importance unemployment - VVD V0683 II/20d Importance unemployment - D66 V0684 II/20e Importance unemployment - GroenLinks V0685 II/20f Importance unemployment - GPV V0686 II/20g Importance unemployment - party voted for (II/6)
Political parties importance of issues - cleaner environment V0687 II/21a Importance cleaner environment - CDA V0688 II/21b Importance cleaner environment - PvdA V0689 II/21c Importance cleaner environment - VVD V0690 II/21d Importance cleaner environment - D66 V0691 II/21e Importance cleaner environment - GroenLinks V0692 II/21f Importance cleaner environment - GPV
45 V0693 II/21g Importance environment - party voted for (II/6)
Political parties importance of issues - fighting crime V0694 II/22a Importance fighting crime - CDA V0695 II/22b Importance fighting crime - PvdA V0696 II/22c Importance fighting crime - VVD V0697 II/22d Importance fighting crime - D66 V0698 II/22e Importance fighting crime - GroenLinks V0699 II/22f Importance fighting crime - GPV V0700 II/22g Importance fighting crime - party voted for (II/6)
Political parties importance of issues - refugees V0701 II/23a Importance refugees - CDA V0702 II/23b Importance refugees - PvdA V0703 II/23c Importance refugees - VVD V0704 II/23d Importance refugees - D66 V0705 II/23e Importance refugees - GroenLinks V0706 II/23f Importance refugees - GPV V0707 II/23g Importance refugees - party voted for (II/6)
Political parties importance of issues - health care V0708 II/24a Importance health care - CDA V0709 II/24b Importance health care - PvdA V0710 II/24c Importance health care - VVD V0711 II/24d Importance health care - D66 V0712 II/24e Importance health care - GroenLinks V0713 II/24f Importance health care - GPV V0714 II/24g Importance health care - party voted for (II/6)
Social participation V0720 II/25 How active: environmental organization V0721 II/25 How active: traffic organization V0722 II/25 How active: housing organization V0723 II/25 How active: third world or human rights V0724 II/25 How active: union V0725 II/25 How active: professional organization V0726 II/25 How active: neighborhood organization V0727 II/25 How active: womens organization V0728 II/25 How active: sports organization V0729 II/25b Other members of household member of union?
Political (position) issues - social benefits V0730 II/28a Social benefits - position of CDA V0731 II/28b Social benefits - position of PvdA V0732 II/28c Social benefits - position of VVD V0733 II/28d Social benefits - position of D66
46 V0734 II/28e Social benefits - position of GroenLinks V0735 II/28f Social benefits - position of GPV V0736 II/28g Social benefits - position of respondent
Political (position) issues - nuclear plants V0737 II/27a Nuclear plants - position of CDA V0738 II/27b Nuclear plants - position of PvdA V0739 II/27c Nuclear plants - position of VVD V0740 II/27d Nuclear plants - position of D66 V0741 II/27e Nuclear plants - position of GroenLinks V0742 II/27f Nuclear plants - position of GPV V0743 II/27g Nuclear plants - position of respondent
Satisfaction with (Dutch) democracy V0745 II/29a Satisfaction with democracy in the Netherlands V0746 II/29b Fairness of elections in the Netherlands V0747 II/29c Reason unfairness elections in the Netherlands V0748 II/29d Parties (not) interested in opinions of people V0749 II/29e Parties necessary for functioning of democracy V0750 II/29f Evaluation of Dutch economy V0751 II/29ghi Dutch economy compared to 12 months ago V0752 II/29j Members of Dutch parliament are aware of opinions of ordinary people V0753 II/29k Did you have contact with member of parliament? V0754 II/29l How much does it matter which party one votes for? V0755 II/29m How much does it matter who is in charge? V0756 II/29n Are people open about their political opinion?
Regional differences V0757 II/30a Not enough attention paid to regional differences in composition parliament V0758 II/30b Every region/city should have representative
Foreigners V0759 II/31a Enfranchise foreigners in municipal elections V0760 II/31b Enfranchise foreigners in parliamentary elections
Faith in prospective premiers V0765 II/32 Faith in Jaap de Hoop Scheffer as prime minister V0766 II/32 Faith in Wim Kok as prime minister V0767 II/32 Faith in Frits Bolkestein as prime minister V0768 II/32 Faith in Els Borst as prime minister
Left-right V0770 II/33 Left-right self-rating (10 point scale) V0775 II/34a Left-right rating of PvdA (10 point scale)
47 V0776 II/34b Left-right rating of VVD (10 point scale) V0777 II/34c Left-right rating of D66 (10 point scale) V0778 II/34d Left-right rating of GroenLinks(10 point scale) V0779 II/34e Left-right rating of CDA (10 point scale) V0780 II/34f Left-right rating of SGP (10 point scale) V0781 II/34g Left-right rating of GPV (10 point scale) V0782 II/34h Left-right rating of RPF (10 point scale) V0783 II/34i Left-right rating of Centrumdemocraten (10 point scale) V0784 II/34j Left-right rating of SP (10 point scale) V0785 II/34k Left-right rating of AOV/Unie 55+ (10 point scale)
External political efficacy V0790 II/35a MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me V0791 II/35b Parties only interested in my vote, not in my opinion V0792 II/35c People like me have no influence on politics V0793 II/35d So many people vote, my vote does not matter V0794 II/35e MPs quickly lose contact with citizens V0795 II/index External political efficacy score q35
Internal political efficacy V0796 II/36a Consider myself qualified for politics V0797 II/36b Well informed about political problems V0798 II/36c Politics sometimes too complicated V0799 II/index Internal political efficacy score q36
Political cynicism V0800 II/37a Politicians promise more than they can deliver V0801 II/37b Ministers primarily self-interested V0802 II/37c Friends more important than abilities to become MP V0803 II/index Political cynicism score q37
Social isolation V0804 II/38 Can one trust other people? V0805 II/39a When you have problems, you are on your own V0806 II/39b Nobody has special interest in you V0807 II/39c There is always someone you can ask for help V0808 II/39d Even closest family not interested V0809 II/39e I often feel abandoned V0810 II/39f I do not know whom to ask for help, besides my family
Bases of accepting political decisions V0815 II/41a Acceptance political decisions - legality V0816 II/41b Acceptance political decisions - tradition V0817 II/41c No acceptance political decisions - self-interest V0818 II/41d No acceptance political decisions - principles V0819 II/41e No acceptance political decisions - feelings
48 V0820 II/41f Action when political decisions are illegal V0821 II/41g Action when political decisions are against self-interest V0822 II/41h Action when political decisions are against principles V0823 II/41i Action when political decisions are against feelings
Vote probability V0830 II/43a Probability of future vote for PvdA V0831 II/43b Probability of future vote for VVD V0832 II/43c Probability of future vote for D66 V0833 II/43d Probability of future vote for GroenLinks V0834 II/43e Probability of future vote for CDA V0835 II/43f Probability of future vote for SGP V0836 II/43g Probability of future vote for GPV V0837 II/43h Probability of future vote for RPF V0838 II/43i Probability of future vote for Centrumdemocraten V0839 II/43j Probability of future vote for SP V0840 II/43k Probability of future vote for AOV/Unie 55+
Civic competence and civic political participation V0842 II/44a Chance acting against unjust national bill V0845 II/44b Did (not) contact cabinet minister V0846 II/44b Did (not) contact member of parliament V0847 II/44b Did (not) sign a petition V0848 II/44b Did (not) try to activate interest group V0849 II/44b Did (not) try to activate radio or TV V0850 II/44b Did (not) try to activate political party V0851 II/44b Did (not) contact mayor or alderman V0852 II/44b Did (not) contact municipal councilor V0853 II/44b Did (not) join civic action group V0854 II/44b Did (not) join demonstration V0855 II/44b Did (not) try to activate newspaper V0856 II/44b Did (not) lodge a complaint V0857 II/44b Did (not) contact department official V0858 II/index Civic participation score q44b
Confessional attitude V0860 II/45ab Should there also be confessional parties? V0861 II/45c Should there also be confessional unions? V0862 II/45de Should there also be confessional schools? V0863 II/45fg Should there also be confessional radio and tv? V0864 II/46 Religion is a good guide in politics V0865 II/index Confessional attitude score q45-q46
Social class V0870 II/47 Social class - self image
49 Right-wing orientations V0875 II/48a An important job is to teach children patriotism V0876 II/48b Our social provisions are not meant for foreigners V0877 II/48c Every Dutchman should observe our national symbols V0878 II/48d Foreigners are a threat to our culture V0879 II/48e Youngsters should learn self-control and determination V0880 II/48f Foreigners abuse social provisions more than Dutchmen V0881 II/48g Children should learn obedience and respect for authourities V0882 II/48h Differences between ethnic groups are natural
Interview characteristics V0883 II/v49 Reason to participate in this survey V0885 II/ Interviewer Wave 2 identification number V0886 0/ Interviewer wave 2 characteristic - age V0887 0/ Interviewer wave 2 characteristic - sex V0888 II/ Date of second interview (yyyymmdd) V0889 II/ Duration of second interview (mmm) V0890 II/51a Any person present at second interview? V0891 II/51c Present at second interview - children under 6 years V0892 II/51d Present at second interview - children 6 years and older V0893 II/51e Present at second interview - spouse or partner V0894 II/51f Present at second interview - other relatives V0895 II/51g Present at second interview - other adults V0896 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview - first coding V0897 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview - second coding V0898 II/v50a1 Accepted lottery ticket V0899 II/v50a1 Promised to fill in self-completion questionnaire V0900 II/50b Willingness to participate in next wave V0901 II/50c Reason for not willing to participate in next wave
Text variables second wave V0905 II/7 Party choice - reason (text) V0906 II/9b Other reason for preferential vote (text) V0907 II/14a Did not vote - first reason (text) V0908 II/14b Did not vote - second reason (text) V0909 II/14c Did not vote - third reason (text) V0910 II/14d Did not vote - fourth reason (text) V0911 II/14e Did not vote - fifth reason (text) V0912 II/29c Reason elections in the Netherlands are unfair (text) V0913 II/50c Reason for not willing to participate in next wave (text) V0914 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview (text)
Order variables second wave V0915 II/19 Order of questions about the importance of issues V0916 II/20-24 Order of questions about the importance parties attach to issues
50 V0917 II/30 Order of questions about territorial representation V0918 II/32 Order of questions about prospective prime ministers V0919 II/35 Order of questions about external efficacy V0920 II/36 Order of questions about internal efficacy V0921 II/37 Order of questions about cynicism V0922 II/39 Order of questions about political trust V0923 II/41 Order of questions about legitimacy V0924 II/43 Order of questions about probability future vote V0925 II/48 Order of questions about right wing-extremism and xenophobia
51 3.1.3 Self completion questionnaire Number of relevant others mentioned V0950 S/1 Number of relevant persons mentioned
Relevant others - age, sex and marital status V0951 S/2 Age first relevant person V0952 S/2 Age second relevant person V0953 S/2 Age third relevant person V0954 S/3 Sex first relevant person V0955 S/3 Sex second relevant person V0956 S/3 Sex third relevant person V0957 S/4 Marital status first relevant person V0958 S/4 Marital status second relevant person V0959 S/4 Marital status third relevant person
Relevant others - relationship to respondent V0960 S/5 First relevant person is - member of family V0961 S/5 First relevant person is - colleague V0962 S/5 First relevant person is - member of same club V0963 S/5 First relevant person is - member of same church V0964 S/5 First relevant person is - neighbor V0965 S/5 First relevant person is - friend V0966 S/5 First relevant person is - other V0967 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of family V0968 S/5 Second relevant person is - colleague V0969 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of same club V0970 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of same church V0971 S/5 Second relevant person is - neighbor V0972 S/5 Second relevant person is - friend V0973 S/5 Second relevant person is - other V0974 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of family V0975 S/5 Third relevant person is - colleague V0976 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of same club V0977 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of same church V0978 S/5 Third relevant person is - neighbor V0979 S/5 Third relevant person is - friend V0980 S/5 Third relevant person is - other
Relevant others - religious denomination V0981 S/6 Religious denomination of first relevant person V0982 S/6 Religious denomination of second relevant person V0983 S/6 Religious denomination of third relevant person
Relevant others - employment status V0984 S/7 Employment status of first relevant person V0985 S/7 Employment status of second relevant person
52 V0986 S/7 Employment status of third relevant person
Relevant others - frequency of contact V0987 S/9 How often do you speak with first relevant person V0988 S/9 How often do you speak with second relevant person V0989 S/9 How often do you speak with third relevant person
Relevant others - political variables V0990 S/10 Political interest of first relevant person V0991 S/10 Political interest of second relevant person V0992 S/10 Political interest of third relevant person V0993 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with first relevant person V0994 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with second relevant person V0995 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with third relevant person V0996 S/12 Political agreement with first relevant person V0997 S/12 Political agreement with second relevant person V0998 S/12 Political agreement with third relevant person V0999 S/13 Left-right rating of first relevant person (11 point scale) V1000 S/13 Left-right rating of second relevant person (11 point scale) V1001 S/13 Left-right rating of third relevant person (11 point scale) V1002 S/14 Left right self-rating (11 point scale) V1003 S/15 Party first relevant person voted for V1004 S/15 Party second relevant person voted for V1005 S/15 Party third relevant person voted for
Frequency contact with others V1010 S/16 Frequency contact with - family V1011 S/16 Frequency contact with - friends V1012 S/16 Frequency contact with - neighbors V1013 S/16 Frequency contact with - colleagues V1014 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - family V1015 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - friends V1016 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - neighbors V1017 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - colleagues
Trust in political institutions V1020 S/18 Trust in churches V1021 S/18 Trust in army V1022 S/18 Trust in judges V1023 S/18 Trust in press V1024 S/18 Trust in police V1025 S/18 Trust in parliament V1026 S/18 Trust in administration V1027 S/18 Trust in big companies V1028 S/18 Trust in European Union V1029 S/18 Trust in NATO
53 Media consumption - television V1030 S/19 Frequency watching - Netwerk V1031 S/19 Frequency watching - NOS 8 uur journaal (Ned.1) V1032 S/19 Frequency watching - NOS 6 uur journaal (Ned.2) V1033 S/19 Frequency watching - 2 Vandaag (Ned.2) V1034 S/19 Frequency watching - Jeugdjournaal (Ned.3) V1035 S/19 Frequency watching - Barend & Witteman (Ned.3) V1036 S/19 Frequency watching - Lingo (Ned.3) V1037 S/19 Frequency watching - Achter het Nieuws (ceased to exist 20/09/92) V1038 S/19 Frequency watching - NOS 10 uur journaal (Ned.3) V1039 S/19 Frequency watching - NOVA-Den Haag Vandaag (Ned.3) V1040 S/19 Frequency watching - RTL4-journaal (RTL4) V1041 S/19 Frequency watching - 5 Uur Show (RTL4) V1042 S/19 Frequency watching - The Bold and the Beautiful (RTL4) V1043 S/19 Frequency watching - Goede Tijden Slechte Tijden (RTL4) V1044 S/19 Frequency watching - RTL5-journaal (RTL5) V1045 S/19 Frequency watching - Vijf in het Land (RTL5) V1046 S/19 Frequency watching - Hart van Nederland (SBS6) V1047 S/19 Frequency watching - Actienieuws (SBS6) V1048 S/19 Frequency watching - Goudkust (SBS6) V1049 S/19 Frequency watching - Onderweg naar Morgen (Veronica)
Media consumption - radio V1055 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 1 V1056 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 2 V1057 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 3 V1058 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 4 V1059 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 5 V1060 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 10 Gold V1061 S/20 Frequency listening to - Veronica V1062 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 538 V1063 S/20 Frequency listening to - Sky Radio V1064 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio Klassiek V1065 S/20 Frequency listening to - Regional network V1066 S/20 Frequency listening to - other V1067 S/20 Other radiostation respondent listens to
Media consumption - newspapers V1070 S/21 Frequency reading - Telegraaf V1071 S/21 Frequency reading - Algemeen Dagblad V1072 S/21 Frequency reading - NRC Handelsblad V1073 S/21 Frequency reading - Volkskrant V1074 S/21 Frequency reading - Trouw V1075 S/21 Frequency reading - Parool
54 V1076 S/21 Frequency reading - Regional newspaper
Media consumption - magazines V1080 S/22 Frequency reading - De Groene Amsterdammer V1081 S/22 Frequency reading - Elsevier V1082 S/22 Frequency reading - Vrij Nederland V1083 S/22 Frequency reading - Story V1084 S/22 Frequency reading - Weekend V1085 S/22 Frequency reading - Prive‚ V1086 S/22 Frequency reading - Panorama V1087 S/22 Frequency reading - Viva V1088 S/22 Frequency reading - Margriet V1089 S/22 Frequency reading - Libelle V1090 S/22 Frequency reading - Other
Political television commercials V1095 S/23 Seen television commercial of PvdA V1096 S/23 Seen television commercial of CDA V1097 S/23 Seen television commercial of VVD V1098 S/23 Seen television commercial of D66 V1099 S/23 Seen television commercial of GroenLinks V1100 S/23 Seen television commercial of SP V1101 S/23 Seen television commercial of other party V1105 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of PVDA V1106 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of CDA V1107 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of VVD V1108 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of D66 V1109 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of GroenLinks V1110 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of SP V1111 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of other party
Internet V1115 S/25 Used internet to find information about electoral campaign
Approached by a political party V1120 S/26 Approached by mail by PvdA V1121 S/26 Approached on the street by PvdA V1122 S/26 Approached in another way by PvdA V1123 S/26 Approached by mail by CDA V1124 S/26 Approached on the street by CDA V1125 S/26 Approached in another way by CDA V1126 S/26 Approached by mail by VVD V1127 S/26 Approached on the street by VVD V1128 S/26 Approached in another way by VVD V1129 S/26 Approached by mail by D66 V1130 S/26 Approached on the street by D66
55 V1131 S/26 Approached in another way by D66 V1132 S/26 Approached by mail by GroenLinks V1133 S/26 Approached on the street by GroenLinks V1134 S/26 Approached in another way by GroenLinks V1135 S/26 Approached by mail by SGP V1136 S/26 Approached on the street by SGP V1137 S/26 Approached in another way by SGP V1138 S/26 Approached by mail by GPV V1139 S/26 Approached on the street by GPV V1140 S/26 Approached in another way by GPV V1141 S/26 Approached by mail by RPF V1142 S/26 Approached on the street by RPF V1143 S/26 Approached in another way by RPF V1144 S/26 Approached by mail by Centrumdemocraten V1145 S/26 Approached on the street by Centrumdemocraten V1146 S/26 Approached in another way by Centrumdemocraten V1147 S/26 Approached by mail by UNIE 55+ V1148 S/26 Approached on the street by UNIE 55+ V1149 S/26 Approached in another way by UNIE 55+ V1150 S/26 Approached by mail by AOV V1151 S/26 Approached on the street by AOV V1152 S/26 Approached in another way by AOV V1153 S/26 Approached by mail by SP V1154 S/26 Approached on the street by SP V1155 S/26 Approached in another way by SP V1156 S/26 Approached by mail by Senioren 2000 V1157 S/26 Approached on the street by Senioren 2000 V1158 S/26 Approached in another way by Senioren 2000 V1159 S/26 Approached by mail by other party V1160 S/26 Approached on the street by other party V1161 S/26 Approached in another way by other party
Political interest V1164 S/v27 Interested in politics? V1165 S/28 Political interest - municipality V1166 S/28 Political interest - neighborhood V1167 S/28 Political interest - province V1168 S/28 Political interest - Europe V1169 S/28 Political interest - rest of the world
Reading (inter)national news V1170 S/29 Reads national news in national newspaper V1171 S/29 Reads national news in regional/local newspaper V1172 S/29 Reads national news in weekly magazine V1173 S/29 Reads national news in monthly magazine V1174 S/29 Reads foreign news in national newspaper
56 V1175 S/29 Reads foreign news in regional/local newspaper V1176 S/29 Reads foreign news in weekly magazine V1177 S/29 Reads foreign news in monthly magazine
Convincing others to vote for party V1180 S/30 Did you recommend acquaintance to vote for party? V1181 S/31 Did acquaintance recommend you to vote for party? V1182 S/32 Friends generally have same party preference
Completion information V1185 S/33 What day did you fill in this questionnaire? (yyyymmdd) V1186 S/34 What time did you fill in this questionnaire? (hhmm) V1187 S/35 Duration of filling in questionnaire (mmm) V1188 S/ Date of receipt of the questionnaire (yyyymmdd)
Text variables self-completion questionnaire V1200 S/8 Profession of first relevant person (text) V1201 S/8 Profession of second relevant person (text) V1202 S/8 Profession of third relevant person (text) V1203 S/20 Frequency listening to other - namely (text) V1204 S/22 Frequency reading other - namely (text) V1205 S/23 Seen television commercial of other party - namely (text) V1206 S/26 Approached by other party, namely (text)
57 3.1.4 Special file
Interview identification V0001 0/ Study number V0002 0/ Respondent identification number V0003 0/ Type of interview record
Contextual variables V0010 0/ Region V0011 0/ Municipality V0012 0/ Zip code V0013 0/ Degree of urbanization V0014 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - welfare V0015 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class A V0016 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B1 V0017 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B2 V0018 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class C V0019 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class D V0020 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education low V0021 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education middle V0022 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education high
Political variables first wave equivalent V0033 INH/ Interested in politics? V0075 IN/ Intends to vote in 1998 parliamentary elections? V0076 IN/11 Vote intention 1998 parliamentary elections V0167 INH/ Did (not) vote in most recent municipal elections
Background characteristics V0280 INH/4b Number of household members including respondent V0281 INH/4c Type of household composition V0288 0/ Sex of respondent V0316 Age of respondent at time of interview V0350 0/ Date of birth of respondent (yyyymmdd) V0352 INH/ Highest education (completed) of respondent
Interview information V0504 0/ Date of computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) (yyyymmdd) V0516 0/ Time start of CATI interview (hh:mm:ss) V0517 0/ Time end of CATI interview (hh:mm:ss)
Political variables second wave equivalent V0610 IIH/ Did (not) vote in 1998 parliamentary elections V0611 IIH/ Party voted for in 1998 parliamentary elections V0798 INH/ Politics sometimes too complicated V0790 INH/ MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me
58 Reasons for not intending to vote V1300 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - first V1301 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - second V1302 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - third V1303 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fourth
Non-response information V1310 I/ Reason for not willing to participate in first wave (first wave) V1311 N/0 Reason for not willing to participate in non-response study V1312 N/1 Reason for not willing to participate in first wave (non-response study) V1313 II/ Reason for not willing to participate in second wave despite promise V1314 H/ Willingness to participate in a National Survey on Politics V1315 H/ Reason for not willing to participate in Hawthorne study
Text variables CATI interview V1316 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - first (text) V1317 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - second (text) V1318 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - third (text) V1319 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fourth (text) V1320 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fifth (text)
59 3.2 Guide to the documentation of variables
All variables are documented in the same format. Several types of information are distinguished. In the example each type is represented by means of a small printed number. Because none of the variables contained all types of information we added empty cells and information not referring to this specfic variable.
V06021 II/3b Has seen electoral debate on eve of elections?2 Did you watch the debate of the party leaders on the eve of the election, entirely or for the greater part?3
999 (inappropriate) routing (V601, code 3).4
1. yes, all of it5 326 15.5 33.9 2. yes, parts of it 337 16.0 35.1 3. no, not at all 298 14.2 31.0 990. MS6 00MD 991. NS7 00MD 992. HS8 00MD 995. no second answer9 00MD 996. PA10 287 13.7 MD 997. DK11 2.1 MD 998. NA12 00MD 999. INAP13 851 40.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
1 Variable name. The variable name in this example is V0602. A unique variable name has been assigned to each of the variables in the data file. 2 Variable label. In this case, V0602 has the label ‘II/3b Has seen electoral debate on eve of elections?'. The first number (II) indicates in which wave the question is asked, in this case the question is asked in the second wave. If the question was asked in the first wave a I was used. A question contained in the self-completion questionnaire is indicated by an S. If the question was asked in the non-response project an N is printed. For the stimulus response project the letter H (Hawthorne) is used. In the special file sometimes combinations of numbers and letters were used (i.e.: IHN/ indicating that the question was asked in the first wave, the stimulus-effect study and the non-response study). The number after the slash is used to identify the question by means of which the data for the documented variable were obtained. In this case, the question number is 3b. This number refers to the Dutch questionnaires printed in this codebook. In some cases (indices and questions asked in more than one questionnaire) this second number was omitted. The text in the label gives a first indication of the contents of the question. 3 Translation of original Dutch question text. The original Dutch question text is
60 documented in part 5 of this codebook. 4 Additional information. Information about the variable or reference to the place where such information can be found. In this case, the reader is informed about the specific routing used. 5 Value labels. Value used to store information in the data file. 6 MS (Main study). This value label is only used in the special file. It refers to a missing code because the question was not asked in the main study. 7 NS (Non-response study). This value label is only used in the special file. It refers to a missing code because the question was not asked in the non- response study. 8 HS (Hawthorne study). This value label is only used in the special file. It refers to a missing code because the question was not asked in the stimulus effect study. 9 No second answer. Some open ended questions were coded into separate variables. A respondent receiving one coding was assigned a 995 code on the remaining variables referring to this question. 10 PA (Panel attrition). The respondents of the first wave of interviews who were not willing to participate in the second wave of interviews received the code 996 for questions asked in the second wave. Respondents not returning the self completion questionnaire received code 996 for questions asked in this part of the main study. 11 DK (Don’t know). All respondents who answered don’t know received the code 997. In some cases the code don’t know was printed on the screen of the computer. In this case don’t know received a separate code. 12 NA (No answer). If a respondent refused to give an answer or if no answer was recorded by the interviewer code 998 was assigned. 13 INAP (Inapplicable routing). Code 999 indicates inapplicable variable as a result of questionnaire routing. The meaning of it is explained on top of the table.
61 3.3 Documentation of variables of the main study: first wave
3.3.1 Interview identification
V0001 0/ Study number The Steinmetz study number of the special file is P1415
V0002 0/ Respondent identification number Respondent identification number ranges from 10003 to 61503.
V0003 0/ Type of interview record Refer to 2.3.2 and 2.3.3 for additional info about this variable
11. sample 1/w1-w2-S: self-completion (I) 1199 57.1 57.1 12. sample 1/w1-w2: second wave (I) 615 29.3 29.3 13. sample 1/w1-C: interviewed CATI (I) 143 6.8 6.8 14. sample 1/w1-N: first wave (I) 144 6.9 6.9
2101 100.0 100.0
62 3.3.2 Contextual Variables
V0010 0/ Region North (Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe ) East (Overijssel, Flevoland, Gelderland) West (Utrecht, Noord-Holland, Zuid-Holland, Zeeland) South (Noord-Brabant, Limburg).
1. North 237 11.3 11.3 2. East 438 20.8 20.8 3. South 487 23.2 23.2 4. West 939 44.7 44.7
2101 100.0 100.0
V0011 0/ Municipality This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0012 0/ Zip code This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0013 0/ Degree of urbanization This variable gives an indication of the degree of urbanization of the municipality the respondent lives in. This variable was designed by Statistics Netherlands.
Code Label Description 1 very strongly urban more than 2,500 addresses per square kilometer 2 strongly urban 1,500 - 2,499 addresses per square kilometer 3 mildly urban 1,000 - 1,499 addresses per square kilometer 4 hardly urban 500 - 999 addresses per square kilometer 5 not urban 1 - 499 addresses per square kilometer
1. very strongly urban 317 15.1 15.1 2. strongly urban 545 25.9 25.9 3. mildly urban 504 24.0 24.0 4. hardly urban 374 17.8 17.8 5. not urban 361 17.2 17.2
2101 100.0 100.0
63 64 V0014 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - welfare Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable.
Income Housing prices W1 At least 2x modal High W2 1x-2x modal above average W3 1x modal average W4 below modal low W5 low (unemployed) low W6 both high and low both low and high
Level of welfare in this zip-code area.
1. W1 – high 137 6.5 6.6 2. W2 – above average 602 28.7 28.9 3. W3 – average 860 40.9 41.2 4. W4 – low 299 14.2 14.3 5. W5 – minimum 82 3.9 3.9 6. W6 – heterogeneous 105 5.0 5.0
2101 100.0 100.0
65 V0015 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class A Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable.
Income Education (lowest level) Housing Social ownership Class above modal University/higher vocational - above modal higher level secondary yes unknown university -A above modal Higher level secondary/middle vocational no modal University - unknown higher vocational -B1 above modal Unknown/ lower vocational/no education - modal higher level secondary/higher vocational - below modal higher vocational/university - unknown higher level secondary/middle vocational - B2 unknown unknown yes modal Lower vocational - below modal higher level secondary - unknown unknown/lower vocational/middle secondary no C below modal Lower vocational - unknown primary school -D
The percentage of households in social class A in this zip-code area as compared to the national mean.
1 extremely low 0.00-0.49 less than half the mean percentage 2 very low 0.50-0.66 3 Low 0.67-0.79 4 less than average 0.80-0.89 5 Average 0.90-1.09 (about) the mean percentage 6 more than average 1.10-1.24 7 High 1.25-1.49 8 very high 1.50-1.99 9 extremely high 2.00- > more than 2 times the mean percentage
1. extremely low 463 22.0 22.8 2. very low 198 9.4 9.8 3. low 160 7.6 7.9 4. less than average 119 5.7 5.9 5. average 231 11.0 11.4 6. more than average 149 7.1 7.3 7. high 205 9.8 10.1 8. very high 320 15.2 15.8 9. extremely high 184 8.8 9.1 998. NA 72 3.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
66 67 V0016 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B1 Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class B1 as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 255 12.1 12.2 2. very low 177 8.4 8.4 3. low 186 8.9 8.9 4. less than average 143 6.8 6.8 5. average 329 15.7 15.7 6. more than average 284 13.5 13.5 7. high 502 23.9 24.0 8. very high 218 10.4 10.4 9. extremely high 2 .1 .1 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0017 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B2 Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class B2 as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
2. very low 17 .8 .8 3. low 23 1.1 1.1 4. less than average 733 34.9 35.0 5. average 915 43.6 43.7 6. more than average 172 8.2 8.2 7. high 128 6.1 6.1 8. very high 71 3.4 3.4 9. extremely high 37 1.8 1.8 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
68 V0018 0/Neighborhood characteristic - social class C Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class C as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 96 4.6 4.6 2. very low 158 7.5 7.5 3. low 253 12.0 12.1 4. less than average 236 11.2 11.3 5. average 527 25.1 25.2 6. more than average 406 19.3 19.4 7. high 417 19.8 19.9 8. very high 2 .1 .1 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0019 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class D Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class D as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 604 28.7 29.7 2. very low 235 11.2 11.6 3. low 165 7.9 8.1 4. less than average 119 5.7 5.9 5. average 163 7.8 8.0 6. more than average 97 4.6 4.8 7. high 195 9.3 9.6 8. very high 266 12.7 13.1 9. extremely high 188 8.9 9.3 998. NA 69 3.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
69 V0020 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education low Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
Level of education Low Lower vocational or no education at all Middle Higher than lower level vocational - Middle level vocational High Higher than middle level vocational
The percentage of persons with a low level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 292 13.9 14.0 2. very low 224 10.7 10.7 3. low 222 10.6 10.6 4. less than average 190 9.0 9.1 5. average 373 17.8 17.9 6. more than average 269 12.8 12.9 7. high 299 14.2 14.3 8. very high 216 10.3 10.3 9. extremely high 2 .1 .1 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0021 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education middle Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0020 for information about the construction of levels of education. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
The percentage of persons with a middle level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 23 1.1 1.1 2. very low 33 1.6 1.6 3. low 119 5.7 5.7 4. less than average 266 12.7 12.7 5. average 1042 49.6 49.7 6. more than average 502 23.9 24.0 7. high 105 5.0 5.0 8. very high 6 .3 .3 998. NA 5 .2 MD
70 2101 100.0 100.0
71 V0022 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education high Refer to 4.4.3 below for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0020 for information about the construction of levels of education. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
The percentage of persons with a high level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 237 11.3 11.3 2. very low 303 14.4 14.5 3. low 279 13.3 13.3 4. less than average 165 7.9 7.9 5. average 319 15.2 15.2 6. more than average 202 9.6 9.6 7. high 272 12.9 13.0 8. very high 227 10.8 10.8 9. extremely high 92 4.4 4.4 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
72 3.3.3 Weights
V0025 0/ Weight 1: sex, age, marital status, region, urbanization, electoral behavior (CBS) Refer to 4.3.1 for an explanation of this weight.
V0026 0/ Weight 2: region, urbanization (stratification variables) Refer to 4.3.2 for an explanation of this weight
V0027 0/ Weight 3: region, urbanization, time of interview first wave (rolling cross section) Refer to 4.3.3 for an explanation of this weight.
73 3.3.4 Political interest and communication
V0030 I/2 Reads about national news? First I want to ask you a few questions about the news in Dutch newspapers. When there is domestic news in the newspapers, for example news about governmental problems, how often do you read such news?
Showcard 1 presented, listing response alternatives
1. (nearly) always 525 25.0 25.0 2. often 333 15.8 15.8 3. now and then 713 33.9 33.9 4. seldom or never 361 17.2 17.2 5. does not read paper 169 8.0 8.0
2101 100.0 100.0
V0031 I/3 Talks about national news? When there is a discussion in a group about such problems in our country, do you generally join the conversation, do you listen with interest, do you not listen or are you not interested?
1. joins conversation 1019 48.5 48.5 2. listens with interest 842 40.1 40.1 3. does not listen/not interested 238 11.3 11.3 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0032 I/4 Reads about foreign news? When there is foreign news in the newspaper, for example about tensions or discussions between different countries, how often do you read such news? Showcard 1 used, listing response alternatives.
1. (nearly) always 374 17.8 17.8 2. often 437 20.8 20.8 3. now and then 754 35.9 35.9 4. seldom or never 355 16.9 16.9 5. does not read paper 180 8.6 8.6 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
74 V0033 I/5 Interested in politics? Are you very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested?
1. very interested 199 9.5 9.5 2. fairly interested 1355 64.5 64.6 3. not interested 543 25.8 25.9 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0034 I/ index Political interest score q2-5 Constructed from V0030 TO V0033. Refer to 4.1.1 below for the construction of the index. The H-value of this index is .64
0. low 204 9.7 9.7 1. 964 45.9 45.9 2. 485 23.1 23.1 3. 330 15.7 15.7 4. high 118 5.6 5.6
2101 100.0 100.0
75 V0035 I/6 Daily newspaper - first answer Which newspaper or newspapers do you read (almost) daily? 1. Telegraaf 325 15.5 18.4 2. Volkskrant 172 8.2 9.7 3. Trouw 43 2.0 2.4 4. NRC Handelsblad 82 3.9 4.6 5. Parool 37 1.8 2.1 6. Algemeen Dagblad 177 8.4 10.0 7. Regional paper 901 42.9 51.0 8. Nederlands/Reformatorisch Dagblad 23 1.1 1.3 9. Financieel Dagblad 4 .2 .2 10. Foreign newspaper 2 .1 .1 993. no daily newspaper 309 14.7 MD 994. uncodable 4 .2 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0036 I/6 Daily newspaper - second answer Refer to V0035 for complete question text
1. Telegraaf 41 2.0 10.3 2. Volkskrant 31 1.5 7.8 3. Trouw 5 .2 1.3 4. NRC Handelsblad 34 1.6 8.5 5. Parool 11 .5 2.8 6. Algemeen Dagblad 35 1.7 8.8 7. Regional paper 220 10.5 55.3 8. Nederlands/Reformatorisch Dagblad 9 .4 2.3 9. Financieel Dagblad 9 .4 2.3 10. Foreign newspaper 3 .1 .8 993. no daily newspaper 309 14.7 MD 995. no other newspaper 1372 65.3 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
76 V0037 I/6 Daily newspaper - third answer Refer to V0035 for complete question text
1. Telegraaf 5 .2 8.1 2. Volkskrant 4 .2 6.5 3. Trouw 9 .4 14.5 4. NRC Handelsblad 5 .2 8.1 5. Parool 5 .2 8.1 6. Algemeen Dagblad 4 .2 6.5 7. Regional paper 26 1.2 41.9 8. Nederlands/Reformatorisch Dagblad 1 .0 1.6 9. Financieel Dagblad 3 .1 4.8 993. no daily newspaper 309 14.7 MD 995. no other newspaper 1708 81.3 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0038 I/6 Daily newspaper - fourth answer Refer to V0035 for complete question text
4. NRC Handelsblad 2 .1 22.2 5. Parool 1 .0 11.1 6. Algemeen Dagblad 2 .1 22.2 7. Regional paper 2 .1 22.2 9. Financieel Dagblad 1 .0 11.1 10. Foreign newspaper 1 .0 11.1 993. no daily newspaper 309 14.7 MD 995. no other newspaper 1761 83.8 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0039 I/6 Daily newspaper - fifth answer Refer to V0035 for complete question text
4. NRC Handelsblad 1 .0 20.0 5. Parool 1 .0 20.0 6. Algemeen Dagblad 2 .1 40.0 7. Regional paper 1 .0 20.0 993. no daily newspaper 309 14.7 MD 995. no other newspaper 1765 84.0 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD
77 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
78 V0040 I/7 Frequency watching NOS TV newscast Could you indicate on this card how often you generally watch the NOS television newscast? Showcard 2 presented, listing response alternatives
1. (almost) daily 1261 60.0 60.7 2. 3-4 times per week 336 16.0 16.2 3. 1-2 times per week 266 12.7 12.8 4. less than once a week 215 10.2 10.3 993. does not own tv set 23 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0041 I/8 Frequency watching RTL4 TV newscast Could you indicate on this card how often you generally watch the RTL-4 television newscast? Showcard 2 used, listing response alternatives
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0040, code 993)
1. (almost) daily 656 31.2 31.6 2. 3-4 times per week 363 17.3 17.5 3. 1-2 times per week 421 20.0 20.3 4. less than once a week 634 30.2 30.6 997. DK 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 23 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0042 I/9 Frequency watching NOVA - Den Haag Vandaag TV broadcast Could you indicate on this card how many times per week you generally watch the current affairs program NOVA- Den Haag Vandaag? Showcard 2 used, listing response alternatives
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0040, code 993)
1. (almost) daily 261 12.4 12.6 2. 3-4 times per week 260 12.4 12.5 3. 1-2 times per week 500 23.8 24.1 4. less than once a week 1057 50.3 50.9 999. INAP 23 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
79 80 3.3.5 Most important national problem
V0045 I/10 Most important national problem - first answer And now I would like to ask you, what do you think are the most important problems in our country? Refer to 4.2.1 for a description of the codes and the frequencies
V0046 I/10 Most important national problem - second answer Refer to V0045 for complete question text and to 4.2.1 for a description of the codes and frequencies
V0047 I/10 Most important national problem - third answer Refer to V0045 for complete question text and to 4.2.1 for a description of the codes and frequencies
V0048 I/10 Most important national problem - fourth answer Refer to V0045 for complete question text and to 4.2.1 for a description of the codes and frequencies
V0049 I/10 Most important national problem - fifth answer Refer to V0045 for complete question text and to 4.2.1 for a description of the codes and frequencies
81 3.3.6 Party adherence
V0050 I/11a Respondent is (not) adherent to a party Many people think of themselves as adherent to a particular political party, but there are also people who do not think of themselves as an adherent to a political party. Do you think of yourself as an adherent or not as an adherent to a political party?
1. adherent 585 27.8 27.9 2. not adherent 1514 72.1 72.1 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
82 V0051 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - first party To which party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, codes 2-998)
1. PVDA 172 8.2 29.5 2. CDA 163 7.8 28.0 3. VVD 119 5.7 20.4 4. D66 27 1.3 4.6 5. GroenLinks 23 1.1 3.9 6. SGP 16 .8 2.7 7. GPV 14 .7 2.4 8. RPF 20 1.0 3.4 9. Centrumdemocraten 4 .2 .7 10. Unie 55+ 2 .1 .3 11. AOV 1 .0 .2 12. SP 19 .9 3.3 30. local party 3 .1 .5 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1516 72.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0052 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - second party Refer to V0051 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, codes 2-998)
1. PVDA 3 .1 15.8 2. CDA 1 .0 5.3 3. VVD 1 .0 5.3 4. D66 2 .1 10.5 5. GroenLinks 5 .2 26.3 8. RPF 3 .1 15.8 11. AOV 1 .0 5.3 12. SP 3 .1 15.8 995. no other party mentioned 564 26.8 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1516 72.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
83 V0053 I/11b1 Party respondent is adherent to - third party Refer to V0051 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, codes 2-998)
4. D66 2 .1 33.3 7. GPV 1 .0 16.7 12. SP 2 .1 33.3 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 16.7 995. no other party mentioned 577 27.5 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1516 72.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
84 V0054 I/11b2 Party respondent is most attracted to Which of these parties you feel most attracted to?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, codes 2-998 or V0052, codes 995-997)
1. PVDA 7 .3 38.9 2. CDA 2 .1 11.1 3. VVD 1 .0 5.6 4. D66 2 .1 11.1 5. GroenLinks 1 .0 5.6 8. RPF 1 .0 5.6 11. AOV 1 .0 5.6 12. SP 3 .1 16.7 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 2082 99.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
85 V0055 I/11c Respondent is (not) convinced adherent Would you call yourself a very convinced adherent to this party, a convinced adherent or do you consider yourself not to be an adherent?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, codes 2, 997; V0051, codes 997, 998)
1. very convinced adherent 74 3.5 12.6 2. convinced adherent 346 16.5 59.1 3. not convinced adherent 165 7.9 28.2 999. INAP 1516 72.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
86 V0056 I/11d Respondent is not an adherent and (not) attracted to a party Is there a party to which you feel more attracted than to other parties?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, code 1)
1. attracted 930 44.3 61.4 2. not attracted 585 27.8 38.6 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 585 27.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
87 V0057 I/11e Party respondent is attracted to Which party is that?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0050, code1; V0056, codes 2, 997)
1. PVDA 257 12.2 28.2 2. CDA 134 6.4 14.7 3. VVD 214 10.2 23.5 4. D66 90 4.3 9.9 5. GroenLinks 101 4.8 11.1 6. SGP 7 .3 .8 7. GPV 8 .4 .9 8. RPF 20 1.0 2.2 9. Centrumdemocraten 2 .1 .2 10. Unie 55+ 3 .1 .3 11. AOV 9 .4 1.0 12. SP 53 2.5 5.8 19. CPN 1 .0 .1 21. PSP 1.0.1 23. Senioren 2000 3 .1 .3 30. local party 7 .3 .8 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 .1 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .1 994. uncodable 14 .7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 1171 55.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
88 V0058 I/index Strength of party adherence q11 Strength of party adherence Constructed from V0050 TO V0057. Refer to 4.4.1 below for the construction of the index
0. neither adherent. nor attracted 585 27.8 28.1 1. DK whether attracted 1 .0 .0 2. attracted. not adherent 910 43.3 43.8 4. adherent. not convinced 165 7.9 7.9 6. adherent. convinced 344 16.4 16.5 7. adherent. very convinced 74 3.5 3.6 991. NA1 (adherent. DK party) 2 .1 MD 992. NA2 (attracted. DK party) 18 .9 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0059 I/index Direction of party adherence q11 Direction of party adherence Constructed from V0050 TO V0057. Refer to 4.4.1 below for the construction of this variable.
1. PVDA 428 20.4 28.6 2. CDA 296 14.1 19.8 3. VVD 333 15.8 22.3 4. D66 118 5.6 7.9 5. GroenLinks 123 5.9 8.2 6. SGP 23 1.1 1.5 7. GPV 22 1.0 1.5 8. RPF 41 2.0 2.7 9. Centrumdemocraten 6 .3 .4 10. Unie 55+ 4 .2 .3 11. AOV 11.5.7 12. SP 73 3.5 4.9 19. CPN 1 .0 .1 21. PSP 1.0.1 23. Senioren 2000 3 .1 .2 30. local party 10 .5 .7 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 .1 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .1 994. uncodable 14 .7 MD 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 586 27.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
89 90 3.3.7 Party membership
V0060 I/12a Respondent is (not) member of a party Are you a member of a party or not?
1. member 91 4.3 4.3 2. not a member 2010 95.7 95.7
2101 100.0 100.0
V0061 I/12b Party respondent is member of Of which party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 2)
1. PVDA 12 .6 13.2 2. CDA 34 1.6 37.4 3. VVD 9 .4 9.9 4. D66 2 .1 2.2 5. GroenLinks 6 .3 6.6 6. SGP 4 .2 4.4 7. GPV 7 .3 7.7 8. RPF 5 .2 5.5 11. AOV 1 .0 1.1 12. SP 4 .2 4.4 30. local party 7 .3 7.7 999. INAP 2010 95.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
91 V0062 I/12c Respondent has (never) been member of a party Have you ever been a member of a political party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1)
1. yes 153 7.3 7.6 2. no 1857 88.4 92.4 999. INAP 91 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
92 V0063 I/12d Party respondent was member of - first party Of which party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 2)
1. PVDA 40 1.9 26.7 2. CDA 30 1.4 20.0 3. VVD 24 1.1 16.0 4. D66 7 .3 4.7 5. GroenLinks 2 .1 1.3 6. SGP 1 .0 .7 7. GPV 2 .1 1.3 11. AOV 1 .0 .7 12. SP 1.0.7 15. KVP\RKSP 11 .5 7.3 16. CHU 2 .1 1.3 17. ARP 7 .3 4.7 18. SDAP 2 .1 1.3 19. CPN 6 .3 4.0 20. PPR 2 .1 1.3 21. PSP 11 .5 7.3 22. BoerenPartij 1 .0 .7 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1948 92.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0064 I/12d Party respondent was member of - second party Refer to V0063 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 2)
3. VVD 1 .0 33.3 19. CPN 1 .0 33.3 21. PSP 1 .0 33.3 995. no other party mentioned 148 7.0 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1948 92.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
93 V0065 I/12e Respondent (never) considered to become member of a party Have you ever considered to become a member of a political party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 1)
1. yes 168 8.0 9.0 2. no 1689 80.4 91.0 999. INAP 244 11.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
94 V0066 I/12f Party respondent considered to become member of - first party Of which party?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 1; V0064, code 2)
1. PVDA 47 2.2 28.5 2. CDA 35 1.7 21.2 3. VVD 28 1.3 17.0 4. D66 19 .9 11.5 5. GroenLinks 10 .5 6.1 7. GPV 1 .0 .6 8. RPF 7 .3 4.2 12. SP 8 .4 4.8 13. Centrumpartij 1 .0 .6 18. SDAP 1 .0 .6 19. CPN 3 .1 1.8 20. PPR 1.0.6 21. PSP 3 .1 1.8 30. local party 1 .0 .6 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1933 92.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0067 I/12f Party respondent considered to become member of - second party Refer to V0066 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 1; V0064, code 2)
2. CDA 3 .1 30.0 3. VVD 2 .1 20.0 4. D66 2 .1 20.0 5. GroenLinks 2 .1 20.0 12. SP 1 .0 10.0 995. no other party mentioned 156 7.4 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1934 92.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
95 V0068 I/12f Party respondent considered to become member of - third party Refer to V0066 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0060, code 1; V0062, code 1; V0064, code 2)
1. PVDA 1 .0 50.0 2. CDA 1 .0 50.0 995. no other party mentioned 164 7.8 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1934 92.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
96 3.3.8 Government policy satisfaction
V0070 I/13a Effect government policy on economic situation I would now like to ask a few questions about what you think of the policies the government has conducted during the past four years. First, the economic situation in the Netherlands: do you think that the economic situation has been influenced favorably, unfavorably or neither by the government policies? Showcard 3 presented, listing response alternatives
1. favorably 1209 57.5 60.0 2. unfavorably 162 7.7 8.0 3. not (un)favorably 645 30.7 32.0 997. DK 85 4.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0071 I/13b Effect government policy on employment And employment: do you think that employment in the Netherlands has been influenced favorably, unfavorably, or neither by the government policies? Showcard 3 used, listing response alternatives
1. favorably 1303 62.0 63.7 2. unfavorably 241 11.5 11.8 3. not (un)favorably 500 23.8 24.5 997. DK 57 2.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0072 I/13c Effect government policy on respondents finances And your personal financial situation: do you think that your personal financial situation has been influenced favorably, unfavorably, or neither by the government policies? Showcard 3 used, listing response alternatives
1. favorably 552 26.3 26.8 2. unfavorably 479 22.8 23.2 3. not (un)favorably 1031 49.1 50.0 997. DK 39 1.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
97 V0073 I/14 General satisfaction with government With the help of this card, could you indicate how satisfied you are in general with what the government has done during the past four years? Showcard 4 presented, listing response alternatives
1. very satisfied 22 1.0 1.1 2. satisfied 912 43.4 44.1 3. not (un)satisfied 864 41.1 41.8 4. unsatisfied 240 11.4 11.6 5. very unsatisfied 29 1.4 1.4 997. DK 34 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0074 I/index Policy satisfaction score q13ab-q14 Constructed from V0070, V0071, V0073. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of the index. The H-value of this index is .37
0. low 407 19.4 19.4 1. 506 24.1 24.1 2. 624 29.7 29.7 3. high 564 26.8 26.8
2101 100.0 100.0
98 3.3.9 Vote intention Second Chamber 1994
V0075 I/15a Intends to vote in 1998 parliamentary elections? As you may know, elections for the Second Chamber will be held in May of this year. Do you intend to vote or not, or don’t you know yet?
1. yes. intends to vote 1806 86.0 92.6 2. not intend to vote 145 6.9 7.4 997. DK 150 7.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0076 I/2a Vote intention 1998 parliamentary elections Which party do you intend to vote for on May 6?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 2, 997)
1. PVDA 393 18.7 27.8 2. CDA 292 13.9 20.6 3. VVD 323 15.4 22.8 4. D66 105 5.0 7.4 5. GroenLinks 121 5.8 8.5 6. SGP 18 .9 1.3 7. GPV 21 1.0 1.5 8. RPF 40 1.9 2.8 9. Centrumdemocraten 3 .1 .2 10. Unie 55+ 3 .1 .2 11. AOV 11.5.8 12. SP 75 3.6 5.3 19. CPN 1 .0 .1 21. PSP 1.0.1 23. Senioren 2000 4 .2 .3 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 .1 63. De Groenen 3 .1 .2 66. VIP 1 .0 .1 993. invalid 2 .1 MD 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 995. abstention 18 .9 MD 997. DK 362 17.2 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 295 14.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
99 V0077 I/2b Does hesitating respondent consider to vote for party? Are there any parties you consider to vote for?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 1,2; V0076, code 1-995, 998)
1. yes 373 17.8 74.0 2. no 131 6.2 26.0 997. DK 8 .4 MD 999. INAP 1589 75.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
100 V0078 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for - first party Which parties do you consider to vote for?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1,2; V0076, codes 1-995, 998; V0077, codes 2, 997)
1. PVDA 128 6.1 34.9 2. CDA 57 2.7 15.5 3. VVD 58 2.8 15.8 4. D66 43 2.0 11.7 5. GroenLinks 47 2.2 12.8 6. SGP 1 .0 .3 7. GPV 3 .1 .8 9. Centrumdemocraten 3 .1 .8 11. AOV 2 .1 .5 12. SP 23 1.1 6.3 61. Nederland Mobiel 2 .1 .5 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1728 82.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
101 V0079 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for - second party Refer to V0078 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1,2; V0076, codes 1-995, 998; V0077, codes 2, 997)
1. PVDA 38 1.8 14.7 2. CDA 44 2.1 17.0 3. VVD 53 2.5 20.5 4. D66 40 1.9 15.4 5. GroenLinks 43 2.0 16.6 6. SGP 5 .2 1.9 7. GPV 1 .0 .4 8. RPF 3 .1 1.2 10. Unie 55+ 1 .0 .4 11. AOV 3 .1 1.2 12. SP 27 1.3 10.4 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 .4 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 995. no other choice mentioned 108 5.1 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1728 82.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
102 V0080 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for - third party Refer to V0078 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1,2; V0076, codes 1-995, 998; V0077, codes 2, 997)
1. PVDA 10 .5 16.9 2. CDA 4 .2 6.8 3. VVD 9 .4 15.3 4. D66 6 .3 10.2 5. GroenLinks 12 .6 20.3 7. GPV 4 .2 6.8 8. RPF 2 .1 3.4 12. SP 10 .5 16.9 13. Centrumpartij 1 .0 1.7 66. VIP 1 .0 1.7 995. no other choice mentioned 310 14.8 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1728 82.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
103 V0081 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for - fourth party Refer to V0078 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1,2; V0076, codes 1-995, 998; V0077, codes 2, 997)
4. D66 1 .0 7.1 5. GroenLinks 5 .2 35.7 8. RPF 4 .2 28.6 12. SP 2 .1 14.3 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 7.1 68. NCPN 1 .0 7.1 995. no other choice mentioned 355 16.9 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1728 82.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
104 V0082 I/2c Party hesitating respondent considers to vote for - fifth party Refer to V0078 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1,2; V0076, codes 1-995, 998; V0077, codes 2, 997)
4. D66 1 .0 33.3 5. GroenLinks 1 .0 33.3 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 33.3 995. no other choice mentioned 366 17.4 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1728 82.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
105 V0083 I/2d Vote intention if non-voter is obliged to vote Suppose that you were obligated by law to vote. For which party would you vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, codes 1, 3, 997)
1. PVDA 27 1.3 42.9 2. CDA 12 .6 19.0 3. VVD 8 .4 12.7 4. D66 1 .0 1.6 5. GroenLinks 8 .4 12.7 6. SGP 1 .0 1.6 10. Unie 55+ 1 .0 1.6 12. SP 2 .1 3.2 19. CPN 1 .0 1.6 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 1.6 66. VIP 1 .0 1.6 993. invalid 7 .3 MD 994. uncodable 4 .2 MD 995. abstention 38 1.8 MD 997. DK 31 1.5 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1956 93.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
106 3.3.10 General attitude towards (not) voting
V0085 I/16a Voting is a duty to society Now I would like to present you a few statements about casting a vote or not in the parliamentary elections. So, the issue is not which party you vote for. Would you indicate by means of this card which answer reflects your opinion the best? Showcard 5 presented, listing response alternatives
Voting is a duty to society
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 355 16.9 17.1 2. agree 1134 54.0 54.5 3. disagree 525 25.0 25.2 4. fully disagree 68 3.2 3.3 997. DK 17 .8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
107 V0086 I/16b Voting costs me a great deal of time and effort Voting costs me a great deal of time and effort
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 21 1.0 1.0 2. agree 85 4.0 4.1 3. disagree 1066 50.7 50.9 4. fully disagree 924 44.0 44.1 997. DK 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
108 V0087 I/16c Voting supports the democratic system Voting supports the democratic system
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 572 27.2 27.8 2. agree 1357 64.6 66.0 3. disagree 110 5.2 5.4 4. fully disagree 16 .8 .8 997. DK 46 2.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
109 V0088 I/16d Voting does not help to exert political influence Voting does not help to exert political influence
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 56 2.7 2.7 2. agree 366 17.4 17.8 3. disagree 1356 64.5 66.0 4. fully disagree 278 13.2 13.5 997. DK 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
110 V0089 I/16e Voting is a way of declaring ones political conviction Voting is a way of declaring one’s political conviction
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 362 17.2 17.4 2. agree 1473 70.1 70.8 3. disagree 227 10.8 10.9 4. fully disagree 18 .9 .9 997. DK 21 1.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
111 V0090 I/16f Voting does not avail me anything Voting does not avail me anything
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 136 6.5 6.6 2. agree 729 34.7 35.2 3. disagree 1053 50.1 50.8 4. fully disagree 153 7.3 7.4 997. DK 30 1.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
112 V0091 I/16g Voting is a way of supporting a political party Voting is a way of supporting a political party
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 418 19.9 20.0 2. agree 1548 73.7 74.0 3. disagree 116 5.5 5.5 4. fully disagree 9 .4 .4 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
113 V0092 I/16h If one does not vote, one loses the right to criticize If one does not vote, one loses the right to criticize
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 433 20.6 20.8 2. agree 1045 49.7 50.1 3. disagree 529 25.2 25.4 4. fully disagree 79 3.8 3.8 997. DK 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
114 V0093 I/16i It makes no sense to vote when all goes well It makes no sense to vote when all goes well
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0590 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. fully agree 38 1.8 1.8 2. agree 153 7.3 7.3 3. disagree 1297 61.7 62.2 4. fully disagree 597 28.4 28.6 997. DK 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
115 V0094 I/17a Willingness to exert oneself in order to vote Would you indicate by means of this card how willing you are to exert yourself in order to vote? ‘1’ means that you are willing to exert yourself greatly, ‘7’ means that you are not willing to exert yourself at all. Please indicate the number which applies to you. Showcard 6 presented, listing response alternatives
1. willing to take much trouble 663 31.6 31.7 2. 2 501 23.8 23.9 3. 3 357 17.0 17.0 4. 4 274 13.0 13.1 5. 5 132 6.3 6.3 6. 6 57 2.7 2.7 7. not willing to take any trouble 110 5.2 5.3 997. DK 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
116 V0095 I/17b Importance of a high turnout And how important is a high turnout for you? On this card ‘1’ means that you consider the turnout very important, and ‘7’ means that you consider the turnout very unimportant. Please indicate the number which applies to you. Showcard 7 presented, listing response alternatives
1. very important 1075 51.2 51.5 2. 2 474 22.6 22.7 3. 3 249 11.9 11.9 4. 4 137 6.5 6.6 5. 5 55 2.6 2.6 6. 6 33 1.6 1.6 7. very unimportant 64 3.0 3.1 997. DK 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
117 V0096 I/17c Turnout and individual electoral behavior - first priority On these cards four situations are presented. They are about turnout in elections. You yourself may or may not vote, and the same applies to the other Dutch. Of course, your vote by itself does not make much difference for the total turnout. Would you please consider these four situations, and rank them in the order of your preference?
Showcards 8a, 8b, 8c and 8d presented, each listing one situation: 8a: You VOTE and so do most other people. The turnout will be very high, but you have to exert yourself in order to vote. 8b: You do NOT vote but most other people do vote. The turnout will be very high and you do not have to exert yourself in order to vote. 8c: You do NOT vote and so do most other people. The turnout will be very low and you do not have to exert yourself in order to vote. 8d: You VOTE but most other people do not vote. The turnout will be very low and you have to exert yourself in order to vote.
Which situation is your first preference? Interviewer is instructed to press respondent to rank-order the situations when necessary
1. vote - high turnout 1610 76.6 79.3 2. not vote - high turnout 120 5.7 5.9 3. not vote - low turnout 50 2.4 2.5 4. vote - low turnout 251 11.9 12.4 995. no preference 60 2.9 MD 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
118 V0097 I/17d Turnout and individual electoral behavior - second priority And which situation is your second preference?
1. vote - high turnout 248 11.8 12.3 2. not vote - high turnout 322 15.3 16.0 3. not vote - low turnout 106 5.0 5.3 4. vote - low turnout 1333 63.4 66.4 995. no further preference 90 4.3 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
119 V0098 I/17e Turnout and individual electoral behavior - third priority And which situation is your third preference?
1. vote - high turnout 74 3.5 3.9 2. not vote - high turnout 1157 55.1 60.4 3. not vote - low turnout 391 18.6 20.4 4. vote - low turnout 294 14.0 15.3 995. no further preference 171 8.1 MD 997. DK 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
120 V0099 I/17f Turnout and individual electoral behavior - fourth priority And which situation is your fourth preference?
1. vote - high turnout 80 3.8 4.2 2. not vote - high turnout 335 15.9 17.5 3. not vote - low turnout 1381 65.7 72.1 4. vote - low turnout 120 5.7 6.3 995. no further preference 185 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
121 3.3.11 Perception of poll results
V0100 I/18a Frequency of encountering poll results Prior to the elections, polls are conducted in order to find out which party people plan to vote for. How many times in the past weeks have you encountered these poll results in newspapers, radio or television? Did you almost never encounter these poll results, from time to time, several times or very often?
1. (almost) never 497 23.7 23.8 2. from time to time 670 31.9 32.1 3. several times 685 32.6 32.9 4. very often 232 11.0 11.1 997. DK 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
122 V0101 I/18b Perceived accuracy of poll results In your opinion, how accurate is the image these polls provide of the strength of the various parties? Is this image very accurate, accurate, inaccurate or very inaccurate?
1. very well 48 2.3 2.6 2. well 1366 65.0 73.5 3. bad 423 20.1 22.8 4. very bad 22 1.0 1.2 997. DK 241 11.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
123 V0102 I/18c Present poll result CDA compared to 1994 election results Now I would like to ask you how some of the parties are doing according to the poll results in comparison with the elections of 1994. Showcard 9 presented, listing response alternatives How do you think the CDA is doing in the poll results in comparison with the election result in 1994?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0591 for the order in which questions were asked.
113 5.4 6.0 1. much better 2. a little better 755 35.9 40.3 3. almost the same 594 28.3 31.7 4. a little worse 355 16.9 19.0 5. much worse 55 2.6 2.9 997. DK 229 10.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
124 V0103 I/18d Present poll result PvdA compared to 1994 election results How do you think the PvdA is doing in the poll results in comparison with the election result in 1994?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0591 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much better 333 15.8 17.5 2. a little better 869 41.4 45.7 3. almost the same 536 25.5 28.2 4. a little worse 152 7.2 8.0 5. much worse 11 .5 .6 997. DK 200 9.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
125 V0104 I/18e Present poll result VVD compared to 1994 election results How do you think VVD is doing in the poll results in comparison with the election result in 1994?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0591 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much better 248 11.8 13.4 2. a little better 845 40.2 45.6 3. almost the same 450 21.4 24.3 4. a little worse 288 13.7 15.5 5. much worse 22 1.0 1.2 997. DK 247 11.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
126 V0105 I/18f Present poll result D66 compared to 1994 election results How do you think D66 is doing in the poll results in comparison with the election result in 1994?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0591 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much better 8 .4 .4 2. a little better 91 4.3 4.9 3. almost the same 102 4.9 5.5 4. a little worse 438 20.8 23.6 5. much worse 1215 57.8 65.5 997. DK 247 11.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
127 V0106 I/18g Which party will be the largest in 1998 elections? Which party do you think will become the largest in the coming parliamentary elections?
1. PVDA 1514 72.1 77.5 2. CDA 196 9.3 10.0 3. VVD 221 10.5 11.3 4. D66 10 .5 .5 5. GroenLinks 7 .3 .4 9. Centrumdemocraten 4 .2 .2 12. SP 1.0.1 994. uncodable 16 .8 MD 997. DK 132 6.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
128 3.3.12 Political (position) issues - euthanasia
V0110 I/19a Euthanasia - position of CDA Now some questions about political affairs that are frequently in the news. When a doctor ends the life of a person at the latter’s request, this is called euthanasia. Some people think that euthanasia should be forbidden by law. Others feel that a doctor should always be allowed to end a life, if the patient makes that request. Of course, there are people whose opinions lie somewhere in between.
Showcard 10 presented, showing a horizontal line with seven numbered positions, and one postion ‘don’t know’. Position ‘1’ is labeled ‘It should be forbidden that a doctor ends the life of a patient at the latter’s request’, and position ‘7’is labeled ‘A doctor should always be allowed to end the life of a patient when the latter requests so’.
Suppose that the people ( and parties) who think that euthanasia should be forbidden are at the beginning of this line (at number 1) and the people (and parties) who feel that a doctor should always be allowed to end a life upon a patient’s request are at the end of the line ( at number 7).
I will ask you first to place some political parties on the line. If you have no idea at all which position a party has, then please feel free to say so.
Where would you place the CDA on this line?
1. forbid euthanasia 397 18.9 22.1 2. 2 550 26.2 30.6 3. 3 440 20.9 24.5 4. 4 246 11.7 13.7 5. 5 107 5.1 5.9 6. 6 36 1.7 2.0 7. allow euthanasia 23 1.1 1.3 997. DK 302 14.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
129 V0111 I/19b Euthanasia - position of PvdA And where the PvdA?
1. forbid euthanasia 38 1.8 2.2 2. 2 63 3.0 3.6 3. 3 121 5.8 6.9 4. 4 311 14.8 17.7 5. 5 564 26.8 32.1 6. 6 508 24.2 28.9 7. allow euthanasia 154 7.3 8.8 997. DK 342 16.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
130 V0112 I/19c Euthanasia - position of VVD And where VVD?
1. forbid euthanasia 38 1.8 2.3 2. 2 64 3.0 3.9 3. 3 120 5.7 7.4 4. 4 267 12.7 16.4 5. 5 433 20.6 26.6 6. 6 520 24.8 31.9 7. allow euthanasia 188 8.9 11.5 997. DK 471 22.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
131 V0113 I/19d Euthanasia - position of D66 And where D66?
1. forbid euthanasia 32 1.5 2.0 2. 2 67 3.2 4.2 3. 3 105 5.0 6.6 4. 4 238 11.3 14.9 5. 5 341 16.2 21.3 6. 6 480 22.8 30.0 7. allow euthanasia 339 16.1 21.2 997. DK 499 23.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
132 V0114 I/19e Euthanasia - position of GroenLinks And where GroenLinks?
1. forbid euthanasia 70 3.3 5.2 2. 2 86 4.1 6.4 3. 3 78 3.7 5.8 4. 4 157 7.5 11.7 5. 5 242 11.5 18.1 6. 6 425 20.2 31.8 7. allow euthanasia 280 13.3 20.9 997. DK 757 36.0 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
133 V0115 I/19f Euthanasia - position of GPV And where GPV?
1. forbid euthanasia 1245 59.3 81.3 2. 2 157 7.5 10.3 3. 3 29 1.4 1.9 4. 4 22 1.0 1.4 5. 5 12 .6 .8 6. 6 16 .8 1.0 7. allow euthanasia 50 2.4 3.3 997. DK 567 27.0 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
134 V0116 I/19g Euthanasia - position of respondent And where would you place yourself?
1. forbid euthanasia 164 7.8 7.9 2. 2 104 5.0 5.0 3. 3 98 4.7 4.7 4. 4 219 10.4 10.6 5. 5 352 16.8 17.0 6. 6 548 26.1 26.5 7. allow euthanasia 586 27.9 28.3 997. DK 30 1.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
135 3.3.13 Political (position) issues – income differences
V0117 I/20a Income differences - position of CDA Some people and parties think that the differences in incomes in our country should be increased (at number 1). Others think that these differences should be decreased (at number 7). Of course, there are also people whose opinion is somewhere in between.
Showcard 11 presented, showing a horizontal line with seven numbered positions, and one postion ‘don’t know’. Position ‘1’ is labeled ‘The differences in incomes in our country should be increased’, and position ‘7’is labeled ‘The differences in incomes in our country should be decreased’.
Where would you place CDA on this line?
1. larger differences 33 1.6 1.9 2. 2 68 3.2 3.9 3. 3 281 13.4 16.3 4. 4 661 31.5 38.3 5. 5 449 21.4 26.0 6. 6 181 8.6 10.5 7. smaller differences 51 2.4 3.0 997. DK 377 17.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0118 I/20b Income differences - position of PvdA And where PvdA?
1. larger differences 37 1.8 2.0 2. 2 58 2.8 3.2 3. 3 79 3.8 4.3 4. 4 160 7.6 8.7 5. 5 380 18.1 20.7 6. 6 713 33.9 38.8 7. smaller differences 409 19.5 22.3 997. DK 265 12.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
136 V0119 I/20c Income differences - position of VVD And where VVD?
1. larger differences 329 15.7 18.4 2. 2 618 29.4 34.6 3. 3 410 19.5 23.0 4. 4 210 10.0 11.8 5. 5 94 4.5 5.3 6. 6 85 4.0 4.8 7. smaller differences 40 1.9 2.2 997. DK 315 15.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0120 I/20d Income differences - position of D66 And where D66?
1. larger differences 10 .5 .6 2. 2 54 2.6 3.3 3. 3 203 9.7 12.5 4. 4 557 26.5 34.2 5. 5 479 22.8 29.4 6. 6 263 12.5 16.2 7. smaller differences 61 2.9 3.7 997. DK 473 22.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
137 V0121 I/20e Income differences - position of GroenLinks And where GroenLinks?
1. larger differences 23 1.1 1.5 2. 2 52 2.5 3.3 3. 3 56 2.7 3.6 4. 4 122 5.8 7.8 5. 5 232 11.0 14.8 6. 6 563 26.8 35.9 7. smaller differences 520 24.8 33.2 997. DK 530 25.2 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0122 I/20f Income differences - position of GPV And where GPV?
1. larger differences 33 1.6 2.8 2. 2 95 4.5 8.2 3. 3 208 9.9 17.9 4. 4 366 17.4 31.4 5. 5 234 11.1 20.1 6. 6 159 7.6 13.7 7. smaller differences 69 3.3 5.9 997. DK 931 44.3 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
138 V0123 I/20g Income differences - position of respondent And where would you place yourself?
1. larger differences 56 2.7 2.7 2. 2 102 4.9 4.9 3. 3 174 8.3 8.4 4. 4 488 23.2 23.6 5. 5 399 19.0 19.3 6. 6 425 20.2 20.5 7. smaller differences 426 20.3 20.6 997. DK 31 1.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
139 3.3.14 Political (position) issues – asulum seekers
V0124 I/21a Asylum seekers - position of CDA Allowing asylum seekers to enter the Netherlands has frequently been in the news during the last few years. Some people think that the Netherlands should allow more asylum seekers than the government currently does. Other people think that the Netherlands should send asylum seekers who are already staying here back to their country of origin. Of course, there are also people whose opinion lies somewhere in between.
Showcard 12 presented, showing a horizontal line with seven numbered positions, and one position ‘don’t know’. Position ‘1’is labeled ‘The Netherlands should allow more asylum seekers to enter’, and position ‘7’ is labeled ‘The Netherlands should send back as many asylum seekers as possible’.
At the beginning of this line are the people (and parties) who think that the Netherlands should allow more asylum seekers to enter (at number 1); at the end of the line are the people (and parties) who think that the Netherlands should send back as many asylum seekers as possible. Where would you place CDA on this line?
1. admit more asylum seekers 37 1.8 2.1 2. 2 162 7.7 9.3 3. 3 482 22.9 27.6 4. 4 636 30.3 36.4 5. 5 320 15.2 18.3 6. 6 87 4.1 5.0 7. send back asylum seekers 24 1.1 1.4 997. DK 353 16.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
140 V0125 I/21b Asylum seekers - position of PvdA And where the PvdA?
1. admit more asylum seekers 142 6.8 7.9 2. 2 397 18.9 22.2 3. 3 565 26.9 31.6 4. 4 399 19.0 22.3 5. 5 199 9.5 11.1 6. 6 65 3.1 3.6 7. send back asylum seekers 22 1.0 1.2 997. DK 312 14.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
141 V0126 I/21c Asylum seekers - position of VVD And where the VVD?
1. admit more asylum seekers 24 1.1 1.3 2. 2 59 2.8 3.3 3. 3 92 4.4 5.2 4. 4 173 8.2 9.7 5. 5 403 19.2 22.6 6. 6 697 33.2 39.1 7. send back asylum seekers 334 15.9 18.7 997. DK 319 15.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
142 V0127 I/21d Asylum seekers - position of D66 And where D66?
1. admit more asylum seekers 38 1.8 2.4 2. 2 176 8.4 10.9 3. 3 394 18.8 24.4 4. 4 611 29.1 37.9 5. 5 284 13.5 17.6 6. 6 84 4.0 5.2 7. send back asylum seekers 25 1.2 1.6 997. DK 489 23.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
143 V0128 I/21e Asylum seekers - position of GroenLinks And where GroenLinks?
1. admit more asylum seekers 228 10.9 14.9 2. 2 493 23.5 32.3 3. 3 344 16.4 22.5 4. 4 226 10.8 14.8 5. 5 98 4.7 6.4 6. 6 91 4.3 6.0 7. send back asylum seekers 46 2.2 3.0 997. DK 571 27.2 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
144 V0129 I/21f Asylum seekers - position of GPV And where GPV?
1. admit more asylum seekers 55 2.6 4.6 2. 2 164 7.8 13.7 3. 3 224 10.7 18.8 4. 4 314 14.9 26.3 5. 5 223 10.6 18.7 6. 6 134 6.4 11.2 7. send back asylum seekers 79 3.8 6.6 997. DK 903 43.0 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
145 V0130 I/21g Asylum seekers - position of respondent And where would you place yourself on this line?
1. admit more asylum seekers 77 3.7 3.7 2. 2 199 9.5 9.7 3. 3 260 12.4 12.6 4. 4 642 30.6 31.1 5. 5 373 17.8 18.1 6. 6 271 12.9 13.1 7. send back asylum seekers 239 11.4 11.6 997. DK 39 1.9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
146 3.3.15 Political (position) issues – European unification
V0131 I/22a European unification - position of CDA The European unification is well under way. The countries of the European Union have decided to work more and more closely together. But not everybody holds the same view about it. Some people and parties think that the European unification should go further. Others think that the European unification has already gone too far.
Showcard 13 presented, showing a horizontal line with seven numbered positions and a position ‘don’t know’. Position ‘1’ is labeled ‘The European unification should go further’ and position ‘7’ is labeled ‘The European unification has already gone too far’.
Suppose the people and parties who think that the European unification should go further are at the beginning of this line (at number 1); and the people and parties who think the European unification has already gone too far are at the end of the line (at number 7).
Where would you place CDA on this line?
1. unification should go further 69 3.3 4.7 2. 2 267 12.7 18.0 3. 3 540 25.7 36.5 4. 4 374 17.8 25.3 5. 5 181 8.6 12.2 6. 6 42 2.0 2.8 7. unification has gone too far 8 .4 .5 997. DK 619 29.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
147 V0132 I/22b European unification - position of PvdA And where the PvdA?
1. unification should go further 176 8.4 11.2 2. 2 473 22.5 30.0 3. 3 476 22.7 30.2 4. 4 255 12.1 16.2 5. 5 126 6.0 8.0 6. 6 58 2.8 3.7 7. unification has gone too far 14 .7 .9 997. DK 523 24.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
148 V0133 I/22c European unification - position of VVD And where VVD?
1. unification should go further 119 5.7 7.7 2. 2 349 16.6 22.7 3. 3 331 15.8 21.5 4. 4 291 13.9 18.9 5. 5 284 13.5 18.5 6. 6 135 6.4 8.8 7. unification has gone too far 30 1.4 1.9 997. DK 560 26.7 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
149 V0134 I/22d European unification - position of D66 And where D66?
1. unification should go further 74 3.5 5.1 2. 2 313 14.9 21.6 3. 3 446 21.2 30.8 4. 4 382 18.2 26.4 5. 5 165 7.9 11.4 6. 6 49 2.3 3.4 7. unification has gone too far 19 .9 1.3 997. DK 653 31.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
150 V0135 I/22e European unification - position of GroenLinks And where GroenLinks?
1. unification should go further 55 2.6 4.4 2. 2 182 8.7 14.6 3. 3 256 12.2 20.6 4. 4 327 15.6 26.3 5. 5 240 11.4 19.3 6. 6 147 7.0 11.8 7. unification has gone too far 36 1.7 2.9 997. DK 854 40.6 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
151 V0136 I/22f European unification - position of GPV And where GPV?
1. unification should go further 18 .9 1.8 2. 2 57 2.7 5.8 3. 3 120 5.7 12.1 4. 4 269 12.8 27.2 5. 5 251 11.9 25.4 6. 6 204 9.7 20.6 7. unification has gone too far 69 3.3 7.0 997. DK 1103 52.5 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
152 V0137 I/22g European unification - position of respondent And where would you place yourself on his line?
1. unification should go further 154 7.3 7.8 2. 2 290 13.8 14.8 3. 3 352 16.8 17.9 4. 4 532 25.3 27.1 5. 5 281 13.4 14.3 6. 6 196 9.3 10.0 7. unification has gone too far 158 7.5 8.0 997. DK 136 6.5 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
153 3.3.16 Political (position) issues – ethnic minorities
V0138 I/23a Ethnic minorities - position of CDA There is disagreement in the Netherlands about foreigners and ethnic minorities. Some people and parties think that these people should be able to live in the Netherlands while preserving all customs of their own culture. Others think that these people, if they stay in the Netherlands, should fully adjust themselves to Dutch culture. Of course, there are also people whose opinion is somewhere in between.
Showcard 13.1 presented, showing a horizontal line with seven numbered positions and a position ‘don’t know’. Position ‘1’ is labeled ‘Foreigners should be able to live in the Netherlands while preserving all customs of their own culture’. Position ‘7’ is labeled ‘Foreigners in the Netherlands should fully adjust themselves to the Dutch culture’.
At the beginning of this line are the people (and parties) who think that foreigners and ethnic minorities should be able to live in the Netherlands while preserving all customs of their own culture (at number 1); at the end of the line are the people (and parties) who think that these people should fully adjust themselves to Dutch culture (at number 7).
Where would you place CDA at this line?
1. preserve cultural customs 25 1.2 1.4 2. 2 152 7.2 8.8 3. 3 392 18.7 22.7 4. 4 496 23.6 28.8 5. 5 464 22.1 26.9 6. 6 148 7.0 8.6 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 48 2.3 2.8 997. DK 376 17.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
154 V0139 I/23b Ethnic minorities - position of PvdA And where the PvdA?
1. preserve cultural customs 109 5.2 6.2 2. 2 340 16.2 19.4 3. 3 578 27.5 32.9 4. 4 365 17.4 20.8 5. 5 236 11.2 13.4 6. 6 102 4.9 5.8 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 25 1.2 1.4 997. DK 346 16.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
155 V0140 I/23c Ethnic minorities - position of VVD And where the VVD?
1. preserve cultural customs 20 1.0 1.2 2. 2 37 1.8 2.1 3. 3 103 4.9 5.9 4. 4 232 11.0 13.4 5. 5 393 18.7 22.6 6. 6 703 33.5 40.5 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 248 11.8 14.3 997. DK 365 17.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
156 V0141 I/23d Ethnic minorities - position of D66 And where D66?
1. preserve cultural customs 34 1.6 2.1 2. 2 171 8.1 10.5 3. 3 410 19.5 25.2 4. 4 542 25.8 33.3 5. 5 343 16.3 21.1 6. 6 101 4.8 6.2 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 25 1.2 1.5 997. DK 475 22.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
157 V0142 I/23e Ethnic minorities - position of GroenLinks And where GroenLinks?
1. preserve cultural customs 211 10.0 13.7 2. 2 494 23.5 32.1 3. 3 355 16.9 23.1 4. 4 216 10.3 14.1 5. 5 148 7.0 9.6 6. 6 79 3.8 5.1 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 34 1.6 2.2 997. DK 562 26.7 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
158 V0143 I/23f Ethnic minorities - position of GPV And where GPV?
1. preserve cultural customs 35 1.7 2.9 2. 2 95 4.5 7.8 3. 3 124 5.9 10.2 4. 4 200 9.5 16.4 5. 5 282 13.4 23.1 6. 6 325 15.5 26.6 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 159 7.6 13.0 997. DK 876 41.7 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
159 V0144 I/23g Ethnic minorities - position of respondent And where would you place yourself on this line?
1. preserve cultural customs 68 3.2 3.3 2. 2 163 7.8 7.9 3. 3 239 11.4 11.5 4. 4 450 21.4 21.7 5. 5 450 21.4 21.7 6. 6 371 17.7 17.9 7. completely adjust to Dutch culture 334 15.9 16.1 997. DK 26 1.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
160 3.3.17 Political knowledge – membership of the EU
V0150 I/24 Is Germany member of the European Union? Showcard 13.2 presented, listing (from 1 to 10) Germany, United States, France, Italy, Spain, Poland, Lithuania, Sweden, Norway, and Turkey.
I now show you a list of countries. Can you tell me which of these countries you think is a member of the European Union? Please mention the number of the country which is a member of the European Union.
Germany
0. no 24 1.1 1.2 1. yes 1987 94.6 98.8 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0151 I/24 Is United States member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording United States of America
0. no 1928 91.8 95.9 1. yes 83 4.0 4.1 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0152 I/24 Is France member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording France
0. no 69 3.3 3.4 1. yes 1942 92.4 96.6 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
161 V0153 I/24 Is Italy member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Italy
0. no 233 11.1 11.6 1. yes 1778 84.6 88.4 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0154 I/24 Is Spain member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Spain
0. no 231 11.0 11.5 1. yes 1780 84.7 88.5 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0155 I/24 Is Poland member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Poland
0. no 1711 81.4 85.1 1. yes 300 14.3 14.9 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
162 V0156 I/24 Is Lithuania member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Lithuania
0. no 1932 92.0 96.1 1. yes 79 3.8 3.9 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0157 I/24 Is Sweden member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Sweden
0. no 964 45.9 47.9 1. yes 1047 49.8 52.1 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0158 I/24 Is Norway member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Norway
0. no 999 47.5 49.7 1. yes 1012 48.2 50.3 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
163 V0159 I/24 Is Turkey member of the European Union? Refer to V0150 for complete question wording Turkey
0. no 1650 78.5 82.0 1. yes 361 17.2 18.0 997. DK 90 4.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
164 3.3.18 Left-right self-rating
V0160 I/25 Left-right self-rating (11 point scale) Showcard 14 presented, showing a horizontal line with 11 positions numbered 0 through 10, and a position ‘don’t know’. Position ‘0’ is labeled ‘left’ and position ‘10’ is labeled ‘right’.
Political opinions are often described in terms of left or right. When you think of your own political opinions, where would you place yourself on this line? Please mention the number that applies to you.
0. left 21 1.0 1.1 1. 1 57 2.7 2.9 2. 2 121 5.8 6.2 3. 3 272 12.9 14.0 4. 4 241 11.5 12.4 5. 5 449 21.4 23.2 6. 6 231 11.0 11.9 7. 7 301 14.3 15.5 8. 8 175 8.3 9.0 9. 9 35 1.7 1.8 10. right 36 1.7 1.9 997. DK 162 7.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
165 3.3.19 Previous voting behavior
V0165 I/26a Did (not) vote in 1994 parliamentary elections The previous elections for the Second Chamber were held in 1994. Did you vote in these elections, or not?
1. voted 1689 80.4 80.8 2. did not vote 265 12.6 12.7 3. not entitled to vote 137 6.5 6.6 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0166 I/26b Party voted for in 1994 parliamentary elections For which party did you vote then?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0165, codes 2,3, 997)
1. PVDA 465 22.1 28.4 2. CDA 365 17.4 22.3 3. VVD 328 15.6 20.0 4. D66 269 12.8 16.4 5. GroenLinks 76 3.6 4.6 6. SGP 17 .8 1.0 7. GPV 19 .9 1.2 8. RPF 30 1.4 1.8 9. Centrumdemocraten 12 .6 .7 10. Unie 55+ 7 .3 .4 11. AOV 12.6.7 12. SP 32 1.5 2.0 21. PSP 1.0.1 23. Senioren 2000 4 .2 .2 64. Natuurwetpartij 2 .1 .1 68. NCPN 1 .0 .1 993. invalid 5 .2 MD 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 997. DK 37 1.8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD 999. INAP 412 19.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
166 V0167 I/27a Did (not) vote in most recent municipal elections Did you vote in the latest municipal elections?
1. voted 1515 72.1 72.2 2. did not vote 564 26.8 26.9 3. not entitled to vote 19 .9 .9 997. DK 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0168 I/27b Party voted for in most recent municipal elections For which party did you vote then?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0167, codes 2,3, 997)
1. PVDA 305 14.5 20.7 2. CDA 305 14.5 20.7 3. VVD 251 11.9 17.0 4. D66 102 4.9 6.9 5. GroenLinks 105 5.0 7.1 6. SGP 17 .8 1.2 7. GPV 28 1.3 1.9 8. RPF 31 1.5 2.1 9. Centrumdemocraten 3 .1 .2 10. Unie 55+ 2 .1 .1 11. AOV 10.5.7 12. SP 65 3.1 4.4 19. CPN 1 .0 .1 23. Senioren 2000 6 .3 .4 30. local party 243 11.6 16.5 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .1 994. uncodable 8 .4 MD 995. abstention 7 .3 MD 997. DK 18 .9 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 586 27.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
167 V0169 I/27c Reason for not voting in most recent municipal elections Why did you not vote? Refer to 4.2.2 below for a description of the exact meaning of the codes
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0167, codes 1,3, 997)
10. physical/personal circumstances (general) 8 .4 1.5 11. handicap or illness 30 1.4 5.4 12. family matters 4 .2 .7 13. weather 3 .1 .5 14. no electricity at voting office 2 .1 .4 20. absence (general) 40 1.9 7.3 21. no time 58 2.8 10.5 22. too late 12 .6 2.2 23. had to work 14 .7 2.5 24. vacation 21 1.0 3.8 25. could not find voting office 2 .1 .4 30. no interest (general) 79 3.8 14.3 31. does not care 8 .4 1.5 32. forgot to vote 40 1.9 7.3 41. religious conviction 4 .2 .7 42. does not vote on principle 4 .2 .7 50. could not make a choice 44 2.1 8.0 60. protest (general) 6 .3 1.1 61. disagrees with parties/government 10 .5 1.8 71. parties have nothing to offer 10 .5 1.8 72. parties do not keep promises 7 .3 1.3 73. distrust parties/politicians 5 .2 .9 74. voting is of no use 17 .8 3.1 75. voting does not yield anything 22 1.0 4.0 76. politics is a mess 3 .1 .5 77. all parties are the same 3 .1 .5 78. no political involvement 6 .3 1.1 80. feelings of incompetence (general) 3 .1 .5 81. too little knowledge of politics 39 1.9 7.1 82. no ties with community 5 .2 .9 91. did not receive notification 3 .1 .5 92. lost notification 8 .4 1.5 94. no elections/municipal redivision 26 1.2 4.7 101. forgot to give proxy 3 .1 .5 111. everything is fine 2 .1 .4 997. DK 13 .6 MD 999. INAP 1537 73.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
168 3.3.20 Sympathy scores for political parties
V0170 I/28a Sympathy score PvdA There are many political parties in our country. I would like to know from you how sympathetic you find these parties. You can give each party a score between 0 and 100. The more sympathetic you find a party, the higher the score you give. A score of 50 means that you find a party neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic. If you don’t know a party, please feel free to say so.
Showcard 15 presented, listing a horizontal line with ten labels at equal distance, 0 . . . 100. Position ‘0’ is additionally labeled as ‘very unsympathetic’, position ‘50’ as ‘neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic’, and position ‘100’ as ‘very sympathetic’.
First we take the PvdA. Which score would you give the PvdA?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 12 .6 .6 4. 1 .0 .0 5. 1 .0 .0 7. 1 .0 .0 10. 26 1.2 1.3 20. 32 1.5 1.6 30. 57 2.7 2.8 40. 120 5.7 5.9 45. 1.0.0 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 350 16.7 17.2 51. 1.0.0 55. 1.0.0 60. 374 17.8 18.3 65. 5.2.2 70. 441 21.0 21.6 75. 17 .8 .8 80. 356 16.9 17.5 85. 3.1.1 90. 161 7.7 7.9 95. 1.0.0 100. very sympathetic 79 3.8 3.9 997. DK 58 2.8 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
169 V0171 I/28b Sympathy score VVD And the VVD?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 31 1.5 1.5 1. 1 .0 .0 5. 3 .1 .1 10. 84 4.0 4.2 15. 1.0.0 20. 110 5.2 5.4 25. 3.1.1 30. 189 9.0 9.3 35. 2.1.1 40. 304 14.5 15.0 45. 2.1.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 372 17.7 18.4 54. 1.0.0 55. 3.1.1 60. 316 15.0 15.6 62. 1.0.0 65. 5.2.2 70. 299 14.2 14.8 75. 10 .5 .5 80. 186 8.9 9.2 85. 2.1.1 90. 69 3.3 3.4 100. very sympathetic 28 1.3 1.4 997. DK 77 3.7 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
170 V0172 I/28c Sympathy score D66 And D66? This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 20 1.0 1.0 4. 1 .0 .1 5. 1 .0 .1 6. 1 .0 .1 10. 62 3.0 3.1 15. 1.0.1 20. 98 4.7 4.9 25. 1.0.1 30. 140 6.7 7.0 32. 1.0.1 35. 1.0.1 40. 235 11.2 11.8 45. 1.0.1 49. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 457 21.8 22.9 54. 1.0.1 55. 3.1.2 59. 1.0.1 60. 397 18.9 19.9 65. 6.3.3 66. 2.1.1 70. 308 14.7 15.4 75. 9.4.5 80. 167 7.9 8.4 85. 5.2.3 86. 1.0.1 90. 53 2.5 2.7 100. very sympathetic 21 1.0 1.1 997. DK 104 5.0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
171 V0173 I/28d Sympathy score GroenLinks And GroenLinks?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 36 1.7 1.8 5. 2 .1 .1 8. 1 .0 .1 10. 67 3.2 3.4 15. 3.1.2 20. 103 4.9 5.3 25. 2.1.1 30. 171 8.1 8.8 40. 201 9.6 10.3 45. 1.0.1 48. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 315 15.0 16.2 55. 1.0.1 59. 1.0.1 60. 290 13.8 14.9 61. 1.0.1 65. 5.2.3 70. 346 16.5 17.8 75. 4.2.2 79. 1.0.1 80. 263 12.5 13.5 85. 3.1.2 90. 93 4.4 4.8 95. 1.0.1 98. 2.1.1 100. very sympathetic 33 1.6 1.7 997. DK 152 7.2 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
172 V0174 I/28e Sympathy score CDA And the CDA?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 22 1.0 1.1 5. 2 .1 .1 10. 43 2.0 2.1 20. 81 3.9 4.0 25. 1.0.0 30. 131 6.2 6.5 40. 255 12.1 12.6 45. 4.2.2 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 480 22.8 23.7 51. 1.0.0 55. 3.1.1 60. 380 18.1 18.7 63. 1.0.0 65. 6.3.3 70. 305 14.5 15.0 75. 4.2.2 80. 192 9.1 9.5 85. 2.1.1 90. 75 3.6 3.7 95. 1.0.0 99. 1.0.0 100. very sympathetic 37 1.8 1.8 997. DK 72 3.4 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
173 V0175 I/28f Sympathy score SGP And the SGP?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 115 5.5 7.7 4. 1 .0 .1 5. 6 .3 .4 8. 1 .0 .1 10. 208 9.9 13.9 20. 227 10.8 15.1 25. 8.4.5 30. 238 11.3 15.9 35. 3.1.2 39. 1.0.1 40. 191 9.1 12.7 45. 2.1.1 46. 1.0.1 49. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 287 13.7 19.1 55. 2.1.1 60. 79 3.8 5.3 65. 1.0.1 70. 54 2.6 3.6 80. 45 2.1 3.0 90. 14 .7 .9 100. very sympathetic 14 .7 .9 997. DK 600 28.6 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
174 V0176 I/28g Sympathy score GPV And the GPV?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 104 5.0 6.6 3. 2 .1 .1 5. 5 .2 .3 8. 1 .0 .1 10. 207 9.9 13.1 15. 2.1.1 20. 230 10.9 14.6 25. 2.1.1 30. 224 10.7 14.2 35. 6.3.4 40. 199 9.5 12.6 45. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 314 14.9 19.9 55. 1.0.1 60. 106 5.0 6.7 64. 1.0.1 65. 1.0.1 70. 79 3.8 5.0 75. 1.0.1 80. 61 2.9 3.9 90. 12 .6 .8 98. 1.0.1 100. very sympathetic 17 .8 1.1 997. DK 522 24.8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
175 V0177 I/28h Sympathy score RPF And the RPF?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 103 4.9 7.4 1. 1 .0 .1 3. 2 .1 .1 4. 1 .0 .1 5. 5 .2 .4 10. 169 8.0 12.2 20. 222 10.6 16.0 25. 2.1.1 30. 216 10.3 15.6 35. 2.1.1 40. 162 7.7 11.7 45. 4.2.3 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 263 12.5 18.9 55. 1.0.1 60. 77 3.7 5.5 65. 2.1.1 70. 62 3.0 4.5 80. 55 2.6 4.0 90. 27 1.3 1.9 100. very sympathetic 12 .6 .9 997. DK 711 33.8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
176 V0178 I/28i Sympathy score Centrumdemocraten And the Centrumdemocraten?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 1454 69.2 74.6 1. 13 .6 .7 2. 1 .0 .1 3. 1 .0 .1 5. 4 .2 .2 10. 191 9.1 9.8 15. 3.1.2 20. 93 4.4 4.8 25. 1.0.1 30. 50 2.4 2.6 35. 1.0.1 40. 40 1.9 2.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 56 2.7 2.9 60. 19 .9 1.0 70. 12 .6 .6 80. 3.1.2 90. 1.0.1 100. very sympathetic 5 .2 .3 997. DK 152 7.2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
177 V0179 I/28j Sympathy score SP And the SP?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 110 5.2 6.5 1. 1 .0 .1 5. 2 .1 .1 10. 149 7.1 8.8 13. 1.0.1 20. 169 8.0 10.0 25. 5.2.3 30. 185 8.8 11.0 35. 3.1.2 40. 199 9.5 11.8 45. 2.1.1 48. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 317 15.1 18.8 55. 1.0.1 60. 174 8.3 10.3 65. 1.0.1 70. 154 7.3 9.1 75. 6.3.4 80. 134 6.4 8.0 85. 1.0.1 90. 44 2.1 2.6 95. 1.0.1 100. very sympathetic 24 1.1 1.4 997. DK 414 19.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
178 V0180 I/28k Sympathy score AOV And the AOV?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0592 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 83 4.0 5.4 3. 1 .0 .1 5. 2 .1 .1 10. 138 6.6 8.9 20. 135 6.4 8.7 22. 1.0.1 25. 3.1.2 30. 154 7.3 10.0 35. 1.0.1 40. 151 7.2 9.8 45. 2.1.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 434 20.7 28.1 55. 3.1.2 60. 184 8.8 11.9 65. 2.1.1 70. 139 6.6 9.0 75. 2.1.1 80. 81 3.9 5.2 90. 15 .7 1.0 100. very sympathetic 15 .7 1.0 997. DK 553 26.3 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
179 3.3.21 Sympathy scores for politicians
V0181 I/29a Sympathy score Wim Kok (PvdA) I would also like to know how sympathetic you find the following politicians. If you don’t know a politician, please feel free to say so. Showcard 15 used.
First Wim Kok. Which score would you give him? Wim Kok was Prime minister, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the Labor party PvdA.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 12 .6 .6 5. 1 .0 .0 8. 1 .0 .0 10. 21 1.0 1.0 20. 16 .8 .8 25. 2.1.1 30. 34 1.6 1.7 40. 67 3.2 3.3 45. 1.0.0 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 193 9.2 9.4 52. 1.0.0 55. 2.1.1 60. 232 11.0 11.3 65. 5.2.2 70. 463 22.0 22.5 75. 18 .9 .9 80. 518 24.7 25.2 85. 8.4.4 86. 1.0.0 90. 320 15.2 15.5 95. 2.1.1 96. 1.0.0 100. very sympathetic 139 6.6 6.8 997. DK 41 2.0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
180 V0182 I/29b Sympathy score Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (CDA) And Jaap de Hoop Scheffer? Jaap de Hoop Scheffer was Floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the Christian Democratic party CDA.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 25 1.2 1.5 1. 1 .0 .1 4. 1 .0 .1 5. 3 .1 .2 7. 1 .0 .1 10. 61 2.9 3.7 15. 2.1.1 20. 87 4.1 5.2 25. 4.2.2 30. 144 6.9 8.6 35. 1.0.1 40. 200 9.5 12.0 45. 3.1.2 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 394 18.8 23.7 55. 4.2.2 60. 304 14.5 18.3 65. 9.4.5 70. 225 10.7 13.5 75. 7.3.4 80. 127 6.0 7.6 90. 39 1.9 2.3 100. very sympathetic 23 1.1 1.4 997. DK 434 20.7 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
181 V0183 I/29c Sympathy score Frits Bolkestein (VVD) And Frits Bolkestein? Frits Bolkestein was floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the conservative liberal party, VVD
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 78 3.7 3.9 1. 2 .1 .1 5. 1 .0 .0 6. 1 .0 .0 10. 122 5.8 6.1 20. 131 6.2 6.5 21. 1.0.0 25. 2.1.1 29. 1.0.0 30. 182 8.7 9.1 35. 4.2.2 40. 279 13.3 13.9 45. 4.2.2 49. 1.0.0 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 326 15.5 16.2 54. 1.0.0 55. 4.2.2 60. 292 13.9 14.5 65. 6.3.3 70. 267 12.7 13.3 75. 5.2.2 80. 204 9.7 10.2 85. 4.2.2 90. 61 2.9 3.0 95. 1.0.0 100. very sympathetic 28 1.3 1.4 997. DK 91 4.3 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
182 V0184 I/29d Sympathy score Els Borst (D66) And Els Borst? Els Borst was first candidate on the election list, party leader of the progressive liberal party D66 and Minister of Health, Welfare and Sports.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 44 2.1 2.3 1. 3 .1 .2 4. 1 .0 .1 6. 1 .0 .1 10. 50 2.4 2.6 15. 2.1.1 20. 87 4.1 4.5 25. 7.3.4 30. 162 7.7 8.4 35. 1.0.1 40. 208 9.9 10.8 45. 2.1.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 368 17.5 19.2 55. 7.3.4 60. 380 18.1 19.8 61. 1.0.1 65. 5.2.3 70. 334 15.9 17.4 75. 7.3.4 80. 176 8.4 9.2 85. 2.1.1 90. 58 2.8 3.0 100. very sympathetic 15 .7 .8 997. DK 178 8.5 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
183 V0185 I/29e Sympathy score Paul Rosenmöller (GroenLinks) And Paul Rosenmoller? Paul Rosenmöller was floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the environmental party GroenLinks.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 18 .9 1.1 5. 2 .1 .1 10. 34 1.6 2.0 15. 1.0.1 20. 46 2.2 2.7 22. 1.0.1 25. 1.0.1 30. 64 3.0 3.8 35. 1.0.1 40. 154 7.3 9.1 45. 2.1.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 231 11.0 13.7 55. 2.1.1 60. 257 12.2 15.2 61. 1.0.1 65. 5.2.3 68. 1.0.1 70. 361 17.2 21.4 75. 4.2.2 80. 322 15.3 19.1 85. 3.1.2 90. 131 6.2 7.8 95. 2.1.1 100. very sympathetic 46 2.2 2.7 997. DK 408 19.4 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
184 V0186 I/29f Sympathy score Gert Schutte (GPV) And Gert Schutte? Gert Schutte was floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the orthodox protestant party GPV.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 41 2.0 4.1 3. 1 .0 .1 5. 1 .0 .1 10. 59 2.8 5.8 15. 1.0.1 20. 87 4.1 8.6 30. 102 4.9 10.1 35. 1.0.1 40. 133 6.3 13.1 45. 4.2.4 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 216 10.3 21.3 60. 129 6.1 12.7 65. 3.1.3 70. 116 5.5 11.5 71. 1.0.1 75. 2.1.2 80. 75 3.6 7.4 90. 26 1.2 2.6 100. very sympathetic 14 .7 1.4 997. DK 1082 51.5 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
185 V0187 I/29g Sympathy score Jan Marijnissen (SP) And Jan Marijnissen? Jan Marijnissen was floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the socialistic party SP
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 24 1.1 2.0 1. 2 .1 .2 5. 1 .0 .1 6. 1 .0 .1 10. 37 1.8 3.1 20. 55 2.6 4.6 25. 4.2.3 30. 92 4.4 7.7 40. 130 6.2 10.9 45. 1.0.1 48. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 232 11.0 19.5 55. 1.0.1 60. 190 9.0 16.0 69. 1.0.1 70. 190 9.0 16.0 75. 7.3.6 80. 126 6.0 10.6 90. 64 3.0 5.4 95. 4.2.3 100. very sympathetic 26 1.2 2.2 997. DK 907 43.2 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
186 V0188 I/29h Sympathy score Hans Janmaat (Centrumdemocraten) And Hans Janmaat? Hans Janmaat was floor leader in the Second Chamber, first candidate on the election list and party leader of the extreme right party CentrumDemocraten
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 1492 71.0 76.6 1. 21 1.0 1.1 2. 4 .2 .2 3. 2 .1 .1 5. 5 .2 .3 8. 1 .0 .1 9. 1 .0 .1 10. 200 9.5 10.3 15. 1.0.1 20. 89 4.2 4.6 30. 50 2.4 2.6 40. 19 .9 1.0 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 31 1.5 1.6 60. 9.4.5 70. 11 .5 .6 80. 5.2.3 90. 2.1.1 99. 1.0.1 100. very sympathetic 4 .2 .2 997. DK 151 7.2 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
187 V0189 I/29i Sympathy score Thom de Graaf (D66) And Thom de Graaf? Thom de Graaf was floor leader in the Second Chamber and second on the election list of D66
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0593 for the order in which questions were asked.
0. very unsympathetic 12 .6 1.2 10. 17 .8 1.6 20. 43 2.0 4.2 30. 53 2.5 5.1 40. 116 5.5 11.2 45. 1.0.1 50. neither sympathetic nor unsympathetic 244 11.6 23.6 54. 1.0.1 60. 211 10.0 20.4 65. 3.1.3 66. 1.0.1 70. 193 9.2 18.7 75. 4.2.4 80. 95 4.5 9.2 85. 2.1.2 90. 26 1.2 2.5 95. 1.0.1 100. very sympathetic 9 .4 .9 997. DK 1059 50.4 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
188 3.3.22 Political knowledge – photo questions
V0190 I/30.1. 1.Photo A - Jacques Wallage Here are photographs of a number of politicians. Could you tell me for each person the name, the party and the function within this party? Showcard 16a presented, showing a photograph of Jacques Wallage, PvdA, member of parliament and leader of PvdA fraction in Second Chamber.
What is the name of this politician?
1. Wallage 851 40.5 89.4 2. de Graaf 3 .1 .3 3. Jorritsma 1 .0 .1 4. Bukman 2 .1 .2 5. van Aartsen 2 .1 .2 6. Bolkestein 8 .4 .8 10. Dijkstal 1 .0 .1 12. Janmaat 3 .1 .3 13. Kok 2 .1 .2 14. Marijnissen 1 .0 .1 15. Rosenmöller 4 .2 .4 19. van Thijn 32 1.5 3.4 20. Wijers 26 1.2 2.7 21. Peper 4 .2 .4 88. Other name 12 .6 1.3 997. DK 1133 53.9 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
V0191 I/30.1. 2.Party of Wallage (PvdA) What is the party of this politician?
1. PVDA 1119 53.3 81.3 2. CDA 131 6.2 9.5 3. VVD 66 3.1 4.8 4. D66 52 2.5 3.8 5. GroenLinks 2 .1 .1 7. GPV 1 .0 .1 9. Centrumdemocraten 2 .1 .1 11. AOV 1 .0 .1 12. SP 2.1.1 997. DK 716 34.1 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
189 2101 100.0 100.0
190 V0192 I/30.1. 3.Political function Wallage What is the function of this politician?
1. leader of party group 602 28.7 59.8 2. member of Second Chamber 34 1.6 3.4 4. wrong answer 371 17.7 36.8 997. DK 1079 51.4 MD 998. NA 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
191 V0193 I/30.2. 1.Photo B - Thom de Graaf Showcard 16b presented, showing a photograph of Thom de Graaf, D66, member of parliament and leader of the D66 fraction in the Second Chamber. What is the name of this politician?
1. de Graaf 704 33.5 87.1 2. Wallage 4 .2 .5 3. Jorritsma 2 .1 .2 4. Bukman 2 .1 .2 12. Janmaat 1 .0 .1 13. Kok 1 .0 .1 14. Marijnissen 3 .1 .4 15. Rosenmöller 79 3.8 9.8 88. other name 12 .6 1.5 997. DK 1276 60.7 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
192 V0194 I/30.2. 2.Party of de Graaf (D66) What is the party of this politician?
1. PVDA 37 1.8 3.3 2. CDA 26 1.2 2.4 3. VVD 46 2.2 4.2 4. D66 847 40.3 76.7 5. GroenLinks 138 6.6 12.5 6. SGP 3 .1 .3 7. GPV 1 .0 .1 8. RPF 1 .0 .1 9. Centrumdemocraten 1 .0 .1 10. Unie 55+ 1 .0 .1 12. SP 4.2.4 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 997. DK 989 47.1 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0195 I/30.2. 3.Political function of de Graaf What is the function of this politician?
1. leader of party group 501 23.8 60.4 2. member of Second Chamber 99 4.7 11.9 4. wrong answer 230 10.9 27.7 997. DK 1259 59.9 MD 998. NA 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
193 V0196 I/30.3. 1.Photo C - Annemarie Jorritsma Showcard 16c presented, showing a photograph of Annemarie Jorritsma, VVD, Minister of Transport and Communications What is the name of this politician?
1. Jorritsma 1359 64.7 94.5 4. Bukman 1 .0 .1 6. Bolkestein 1 .0 .1 7. Borst 32 1.5 2.2 10. Dijkstal 1 .0 .1 14. Marijnissen 1 .0 .1 17. Sorgdrager 13 .6 .9 18. Terpstra 22 1.0 1.5 88. other name 8 .4 .6 997. DK 658 31.3 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0197 I/30.3. 2.Party of Jorritsma (VVD) What is the party of this politician?
1. PVDA 135 6.4 8.5 2. CDA 117 5.6 7.4 3. VVD 1244 59.2 78.2 4. D66 90 4.3 5.7 5. GroenLinks 4 .2 .3 7. GPV 1 .0 .1 997. DK 508 24.2 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
194 V0198 I/30.3. 3.Political function of Jorritsma What is the function of this politician?
1. minister of Transport and Communications 1568 74.6 91.2 2. minister 20 1.0 1.2 3. of Transport and Communications 3 .1 .2 4. wrong answer 129 6.1 7.5 997. DK 379 18.0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
195 V0199 I/30.4. 1.Photo D - Piet Bukman Showcard 16d presented, showing a photograph of Piet Bukman, CDA, member of parliament and chairman of the Second Chamber. What is the name of this politician?
1. Bukman 548 26.1 77.2 3. de Graaf 4 .2 .6 4. Jorritsma 1 .0 .1 5. van Aartsen 18 .9 2.5 6. Bolkestein 52 2.5 7.3 7. Borst 2 .1 .3 11. Dolman 7 .3 1.0 12. Janmaat 5 .2 .7 13. Kok 1 .0 .1 14. Marijnissen 3 .1 .4 16. Schutte 50 2.4 7.0 88. other name 19 .9 2.7 997. DK 1375 65.4 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0200 I/30.4. 2.Party of Bukman (CDA) What is the party of this politician?
1. PVDA 92 4.4 8.8 2. CDA 737 35.1 70.2 3. VVD 103 4.9 9.8 4. D66 19 .9 1.8 5. GroenLinks 2 .1 .2 6. SGP 18 .9 1.7 7. GPV 69 3.3 6.6 8. RPF 4 .2 .4 9. Centrumdemocraten 3 .1 .3 11. AOV 3 .1 .3 997. DK 1042 49.6 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
196 V0201 I/30.4. 3.Political function of Bukman What is the function of this politician?
1. chairman of Second Chamber 689 32.8 70.7 2. member of Second Chamber 61 2.9 6.3 4. wrong answer 224 10.7 23.0 997. DK 1117 53.2 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0202 I/index Political knowledge score 1 (0-12) q30 Constructed from V0190 TO V0201. Refer to 4.1.1 below for the construction of this variable. The H-value of this index is .62
0. low 259 12.3 12.3 1. 205 9.8 9.8 2. 220 10.5 10.5 3. 231 11.0 11.0 4. 147 7.0 7.0 5. 143 6.8 6.8 6. 114 5.4 5.4 7. 115 5.5 5.5 8. 116 5.5 5.5 9. 121 5.8 5.8 10. 99 4.7 4.7 11. 146 6.9 6.9 12. high 185 8.8 8.8
2101 100.0 100.0
197 V0203 I/index Political knowledge score 2 (0-4) q30 Constructed from V0190 TO V0201. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this variable. The H-value of this index is .63
0. low 981 46.7 46.7 1. 515 24.5 24.5 2. 204 9.7 9.7 3. 216 10.3 10.3 4. high 185 8.8 8.8
2101 100.0 100.0
198 3.3.23 Political knowledge – largest party
V0205 I/31a Which party is the larger: PvdA or VVD? In the Second Chamber larger and smaller parties have seats. Could you indicate for the following two parties which one currently has more seats? PvdA or VVD?
1. PvdA 1780 84.7 88.1 2. VVD 224 10.7 11.1 3. same number of seats 17 .8 .8 997. DK 79 3.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0206 I/31b Which party is the larger: D66 or GroenLinks? D66 or GroenLinks?
1. D66 1811 86.2 90.0 2. GroenLinks 177 8.4 8.8 3. same number of seats 24 1.1 1.2 997. DK 88 4.2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
199 V0207 I/31c Which party is the larger: CDA or PvdA? CDA or PvdA?
1. CDA 342 16.3 16.8 2. PvdA 1666 79.3 82.1 3. same number of seats 22 1.0 1.1 997. DK 70 3.3 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0208 I/31d Which party is the larger: VVD or D66? VVD or D66?
1. VVD 1791 85.2 88.8 2. D66 208 9.9 10.3 3. same number of seats 17 .8 .8 997. DK 84 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
200 3.3.24 Political knowledge – composition of coalition
V0210 I/31e Is PvdA member of present coalition? According to you, which party or parties are currently part of the cabinet? Answers recoded to variables per party. PvdA
0. no 71 3.4 3.5 1. yes 1944 92.5 96.5 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0211 I/31e Is CDA member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. CDA
0. no 1481 70.5 73.5 1. yes 534 25.4 26.5 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
201 V0212 I/31e Is VVD member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. VVD
0. no 226 10.8 11.2 1. yes 1789 85.1 88.8 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0213 I/31e Is D66 member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. D66
0. no 298 14.2 14.8 1. yes 1717 81.7 85.2 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
202 V0214 I/31e Is GroenLinks member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. GroenLinks
0. no 1892 90.1 93.9 1. yes 123 5.9 6.1 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0215 I/31e Is SGP member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. SGP
0. no 2009 95.6 99.7 1. yes 6 .3 .3 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
203 V0216 I/31e Is GPV member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. GPV
0. no 2007 95.5 99.6 1. yes 8 .4 .4 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0217 I/31e Is RPF member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. RPF
0. no 2012 95.8 99.9 1. yes 3 .1 .1 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
204 V0218 I/31e Is CD member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. CD
0. no 2006 95.5 99.6 1. yes 9 .4 .4 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0219 I/31e Is Unie 55+ member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. Unie 55+
0. no 2013 95.8 99.9 1. yes 2 .1 .1 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
205 V0220 I/31e Is AOV member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. AOV
0. no 2010 95.7 99.8 1. yes 5 .2 .2 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0221 I/31e Is SP member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. SP
0. no 2001 95.2 99.3 1. yes 14 .7 .7 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
206 V0222 I/31e Is Senioren 2000 member of present coalition? Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. Senioren 2000
0. no 2006 95.5 99.6 1. yes 9 .4 .4 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0223 I/31e Other party which is member of present coalition Refer to V0210 for complete question wording. Name of other party currently part of cabinet
15. KVP 1 .0 50.0 19. CPN 1 .0 50.0 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 995. no other party mentioned 2011 95.7 MD 997. DK 85 4.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0224 I/index Correct perception composition present coalition q31e Constructed from V0210 TO V0223. This variable is simply constructed by assigning the value ‘correct’ to all respondents correctly perceiving the coalition as a coalition of PvdA, VVD and D66 (and no other parties).
0. not correct 768 36.6 36.6 1. correct 1333 63.4 63.4
2101 100.0 100.0
207 3.3.25 Coalition preference before elections
V0230 I/31f Is PvdA preferred in new government coalition? After the elections for the Second Chamber, a new cabinet must be formed. In the Netherlands, a cabinet is mostly formed by different parties. According to you which parties should be part of the next cabinet? If respondent only mentions one party, interviewer continues: Are there perhaps parties which according to you should be part of this cabinet as well?
Answers recoded to variables per party. PvdA
0. no 231 11.0 11.8 1. yes 1719 81.8 88.2 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0231 I/31f Is CDA preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. CDA
0. no 1025 48.8 52.6 1. yes 925 44.0 47.4 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
208 V0232 I/31f Is VVD preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. VVD
0. no 694 33.0 35.6 1. yes 1256 59.8 64.4 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0233 I/31f Is D66 preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. D66
0. no 994 47.3 51.0 1. yes 956 45.5 49.0 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
209 V0234 I/31f Is GroenLinks preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. GroenLinks
0. no 1455 69.3 74.6 1. yes 495 23.6 25.4 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0235 I/31f Is SGP preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. SGP
0. no 1916 91.2 98.3 1. yes 34 1.6 1.7 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
210 V0236 I/31f Is GPV preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. GPV
0. no 1900 90.4 97.4 1. yes 50 2.4 2.6 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0237 I/31f Is RPF preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. RPF
0. no 1908 90.8 97.8 1. yes 42 2.0 2.2 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
211 V0238 I/31f Is CD preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. CD
0. no 1940 92.3 99.5 1. yes 10 .5 .5 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0239 I/31f Is Unie 55+ preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. Unie 55+
0. no 1945 92.6 99.7 1. yes 5 .2 .3 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
212 V0240 I/31f Is AOV preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. AOV
0. no 1922 91.5 98.6 1. yes 28 1.3 1.4 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0241 I/31f Is SP preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. SP
0. no 1840 87.6 94.4 1. yes 110 5.2 5.6 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
213 V0242 I/31f Is Senioren 2000 preferred in new government coalition? Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. Senioren 2000
0. no 1937 92.2 99.3 1. yes 13 .6 .7 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0243 I/31f Other party preferred in new government coalition Refer to V0230 for complete question wording. Name of other party preferred in cabinet
15. KVP\RKSP 1 .0 10.0 19. CPN 1 .0 10.0 63. De Groenen 1 .0 10.0 65. KPP 1 .0 10.0 71. all parties 1 .0 10.0 72. all parties except CD/CP 2 .1 20.0 73. no parties. but capable men 2 .1 20.0 74. new party 1 .0 10.0 994. uncodable 7 .3 MD 995. no other party mentioned 1933 92.0 MD 997. DK 149 7.1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
214 V0244 I/31g Does it matter which parties are member of the coalition? Does it make much difference to you, a little, or no difference at all which parties become part of the government?
1. much 1250 59.5 59.9 2. little 619 29.5 29.6 3. not at all 219 10.4 10.5 997. DK 12 .6 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
215 3.3.26 Social and political goals
V0250 I/32a Goals 1.- securing a high-paying job I now mention to you a number of personal and social goals. Would you please indicate for each of these how much attention we should pay to it in our society? Showcard 17 presented, listing the response alternatives
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
Securing a high-paying job?
1. much more attention 226 10.8 10.8 2. more attention 1104 52.5 53.0 3. no more no less attention 627 29.8 30.1 4. less attention 119 5.7 5.7 5. much less attention 7 .3 .3 997. DK 18 .9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
216 V0251 I/32b Goals 2.- working hard and saving for the future Working hard and saving for the future
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 114 5.4 5.5 2. more attention 817 38.9 39.1 3. no more no less attention 870 41.4 41.7 4. less attention 268 12.8 12.8 5. much less attention 19 .9 .9 997. DK 12 .6 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
217 V0252 I/32c Goals 3.- maintaining high economic growth Maintaining high economic growth
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 137 6.5 6.6 2. more attention 930 44.3 44.5 3. no more no less attention 841 40.0 40.3 4. less attention 167 7.9 8.0 5. much less attention 14 .7 .7 997. DK 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
218 V0253 I/32d Goals 4.- personal freedom Personal freedom
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 208 9.9 10.0 2. more attention 881 41.9 42.2 3. no more no less attention 919 43.7 44.0 4. less attention 76 3.6 3.6 5. much less attention 6 .3 .3 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
219 V0254 I/32e Goals 5.- being open-minded to new ideas Being open-minded to new ideas
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 305 14.5 14.6 2. more attention 1440 68.5 69.1 3. no more no less attention 313 14.9 15.0 4. less attention 25 1.2 1.2 5. much less attention 1 .0 .0 997. DK 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
220 V0255 I/32f Goals 6.- freedom of speech Freedom of speech
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 209 9.9 10.0 2. more attention 817 38.9 39.1 3. no more no less attention 1004 47.8 48.1 4. less attention 52 2.5 2.5 5. much less attention 7 .3 .3 997. DK 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
221 V0256 I/32g Goals 7.- seeking personal fulfillment Seeking personal fulfillment
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 187 8.9 9.0 2. more attention 1280 60.9 61.7 3. no more no less attention 543 25.8 26.2 4. less attention 59 2.8 2.8 5. much less attention 6 .3 .3 997. DK 26 1.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
222 V0257 I/32h Goals 8.- giving people more say in government decisions Giving people more say in government decisions
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 296 14.1 14.2 2. more attention 1133 53.9 54.4 3. no more no less attention 539 25.7 25.9 4. less attention 106 5.0 5.1 5. much less attention 7 .3 .3 997. DK 19 .9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
223 V0258 I/32i Goals 9.- increasing benefits for the disadvantaged Increasing benefits for the disadvantaged
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 344 16.4 16.5 2. more attention 1153 54.9 55.4 3. no more no less attention 456 21.7 21.9 4. less attention 114 5.4 5.5 5. much less attention 16 .8 .8 997. DK 17 .8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
224 V0259 I/32j Goals 10.- improving environment and quality of life Improving environment and quality of life
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 563 26.8 26.9 2. more attention 1115 53.1 53.2 3. no more no less attention 348 16.6 16.6 4. less attention 62 3.0 3.0 5. much less attention 7 .3 .3 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
225 V0260 I/32k Goals 11.- active citizen participation in local politics Active citizen participation in local politics
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 171 8.1 8.2 2. more attention 1205 57.4 58.0 3. no more no less attention 618 29.4 29.8 4. less attention 75 3.6 3.6 5. much less attention 8 .4 .4 997. DK 24 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
226 V0261 I/32l Goals 12.- replacing parties by strong leaders Replacing parties by strong leaders
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 43 2.0 2.1 2. more attention 260 12.4 12.7 3. no more no less attention 411 19.6 20.1 4. less attention 729 34.7 35.6 5. much less attention 606 28.8 29.6 997. DK 52 2.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
227 V0262 I/32m Goals 13.- preserving traditional morals and values Preserving traditional morals and values
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 332 15.8 15.9 2. more attention 985 46.9 47.2 3. no more no less attention 597 28.4 28.6 4. less attention 148 7.0 7.1 5. much less attention 24 1.1 1.2 997. DK 14 .7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
228 V0263 I/32n Goals 14.- respect for authorities Respect for authorities
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 213 10.1 10.3 2. more attention 922 43.9 44.4 3. no more no less attention 721 34.3 34.7 4. less attention 190 9.0 9.2 5. much less attention 30 1.4 1.4 997. DK 22 1.0 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
229 V0264 I/32o Goals 15.- providing for strong defense forces even in present situation Providing for strong defense forces
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 46 2.2 2.2 2. more attention 417 19.8 20.0 3. no more no less attention 767 36.5 36.8 4. less attention 688 32.7 33.0 5. much less attention 164 7.8 7.9 997. DK 19 .9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
230 V0265 I/32p Goals 16.- limiting room for dissenters Limiting room for dissenters
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 25 1.2 1.2 2. more attention 293 13.9 14.2 3. no more no less attention 710 33.8 34.4 4. less attention 721 34.3 34.9 5. much less attention 316 15.0 15.3 997. DK 32 1.5 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
231 V0266 I/32q Goals 17.- stimulating loyalty and patriotism Stimulating loyalty and patriotism
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0594 for the order in which questions were asked.
1. much more attention 116 5.5 5.6 2. more attention 640 30.5 30.8 3. no more no less attention 898 42.7 43.2 4. less attention 340 16.2 16.3 5. much less attention 87 4.1 4.2 997. DK 17 .8 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
232 3.3.27 Political and cultural community
V0270 I/33a All having Dutch ancestors are entitled to Dutch nationality There are several rules that can determine whether someone can become a Dutch citizen. Please indicate by means of a number from 1 to 10 to what extent you agree with the each statement. ‘1’ means that you fully disagree with the statement; ‘10’ means that you fully agree with the statement.
Showcard 18 presented, showing a horizontal line with 10 numbered positions. Position ‘1’ is labeled ‘fully disagrees’; position ‘10’ is labeled ‘fully agrees’.
All people with Dutch ancestors should have the right to become a Dutch citizen.
1. fully disagree 140 6.7 6.7 2. 2 87 4.1 4.2 3. 3 137 6.5 6.6 4. 4 94 4.5 4.5 5. 5 226 10.8 10.8 6. 6 116 5.5 5.6 7. 7 164 7.8 7.9 8. 8 283 13.5 13.6 9. 9 162 7.7 7.8 10. fully agree 675 32.1 32.4 997. DK 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
233 V0271 I/33b All working & living in the Netherlands are entitled to Dutch nationality All people who live and work in the Netherlands should have the right to become a Dutch citizen.
1. fully disagree 191 9.1 9.1 2. 2 147 7.0 7.0 3. 3 214 10.2 10.2 4. 4 147 7.0 7.0 5. 5 263 12.5 12.6 6. 6 164 7.8 7.9 7. 7 215 10.2 10.3 8. 8 303 14.4 14.5 9. 9 128 6.1 6.1 10. fully agree 316 15.0 15.1 997. DK 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
234 V0272 I/33c Solidarity among inhabitants of country arises through the centuries There are many factors that give people the feeling that they belong together. Next come two statements. Please indicate by means of a number between 1 and 10 again to what extent you agree with the following statements. ‘1’ means that you fully disagree with the statement and ‘10’ that you fully agree with the statement. Showcard 18 used. Solidarity between the inhabitants from a country originates through the centuries.
1. fully disagree 59 2.8 2.9 2. 2 61 2.9 3.0 3. 3 134 6.4 6.5 4. 4 110 5.2 5.4 5. 5 300 14.3 14.6 6. 6 275 13.1 13.4 7. 7 366 17.4 17.8 8. 8 409 19.5 19.9 9. 9 115 5.5 5.6 10. fully agree 226 10.8 11.0 997. DK 45 2.1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
235 V0273 I/33d Cultural differences within a country do not obstruct mutual solidarity Cultural differences within a country do not obstruct mutual solidarity
1. fully disagree 139 6.6 6.7 2. 2 181 8.6 8.8 3. 3 278 13.2 13.5 4. 4 193 9.2 9.3 5. 5 267 12.7 12.9 6. 6 193 9.2 9.3 7. 7 285 13.6 13.8 8. 8 296 14.1 14.3 9. 9 103 4.9 5.0 10. fully agree 130 6.2 6.3 997. DK 36 1.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
236 3.3.28 Composition of household – presence of persons
V0280 I/37 Number of household members Now I would like to ask you some questions about yourself, your household and the members of your family. Including yourself, how many persons belong to your household? Refer to 4.4.2 for more information about the construction of variables related to household characteristics.
1. 1 357 17.0 17.0 2. 2 748 35.6 35.6 3. 3 338 16.1 16.1 4. 4 430 20.5 20.5 5. 5 161 7.7 7.7 6. 6 47 2.2 2.2 7. 7 9 .4 .4 8. 8 7 .3 .3 9. 9 1 .0 .0 10. 10 3 .1 .1
2101 100.0 100.0
237 V0281 I/37Composition of household Can you tell me the composition of the household you belong to? Please include all persons living in this household, any resident persons too. - What is the name of the first/second/etceteras person in the household? - What is the relationship of [this person] to yourself? - What is the sex of [this person]? - What is the age of [this person]?
1. single person household 357 17.0 17.0 2. single person. others 215 10.2 10.2 3. couple, no children 672 32.0 32.0 4. couple, 1 child 263 12.5 12.5 5. couple, 2 children 336 16.0 16.0 6. couple, 3 children 118 5.6 5.6 7. couple, 4 children 34 1.6 1.6 8. couple, 5 or more children 12 .6 .6 9. single parent, 1 child 39 1.9 1.9 10. single parent, 2 children 15 .7 .7 11. single parent, 3 children 6 .3 .3 12. single parent, 4 children 2 .1 .1 14. couple, 1 child, other(s) 8 .4 .4 15. couple, 2 children, other(s) 5 .2 .2 16. couple, 3 children, other(s) 1 .0 .0 19. single parent,1 child, other(s) 3 .1 .1 20. single parent, 2 children, other(s) 2 .1 .1 22. single parent, 4 children, other(s) 2 .1 .1 24. couple, no children, other(s) 11 .5 .5
2101 100.0 100.0
V0282 I/37 Is partner present in household? Refer to V0281 for complete question text
0. no 641 30.5 30.5 1. yes 1460 69.5 69.5
2101 100.0 100.0
238 V0283 I/37 Number of (foster-. step-)children in household Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0284 I/37 Number of (foster-. step-)parents (in law) in household Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0285 I/37 Number of (great)grandparents in household Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0286 I/37 Number of (step-)brothers and sisters (in law) in household Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0287 I/37 Number of residents/boarders/others in household Refer to V0281 for complete question text
239 3.3.29 Composition of household – sex
V0288 I/37 Sex of respondent Refer to V0281 for complete question text
1. male 1022 48.6 48.6 2. female 1079 51.4 51.4
2101 100.0 100.0
V0289 I/37 Sex of partner Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. male 734 34.9 50.3 2. female 726 34.6 49.7 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0290 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 142 6.8 72.4 2. female 54 2.6 27.6 999. INAP 1905 90.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0291 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 30 1.4 18.8 2. female 130 6.2 81.3 999. INAP 1941 92.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
240 V0292 I/37 Sex of (great)grandparent #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 1 .0 20.0 2. female 4 .2 80.0 999. INAP 2096 99.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0293 I/37Sex of (foster-. step-)child #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 444 21.1 52.5 2. female 402 19.1 47.5 999. INAP 1255 59.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0294 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 276 13.1 51.8 2. female 257 12.2 48.2 999. INAP 1568 74.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0295 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 95 4.5 54.3 2. female 80 3.8 45.7 999. INAP 1926 91.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
241 242 V0296 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 25 1.2 50.0 2. female 25 1.2 50.0 999. INAP 2051 97.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0297 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 9 .4 75.0 2. female 3 .1 25.0 999. INAP 2089 99.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0298 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 3 .1 60.0 2. female 2 .1 40.0 999. INAP 2096 99.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0299 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
243 244 V0300 I/37 Sex of (foster-. step-)child #8 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0301 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 89 4.2 58.6 2. female 63 3.0 41.4 999. INAP 1949 92.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0302 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 26 1.2 47.3 2. female 29 1.4 52.7 999. INAP 2046 97.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0303 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 9 .4 64.3 2. female 5 .2 35.7 999. INAP 2087 99.3
2101 100.0
245 246 V0304 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 6 .3 85.7 2. female 1 .0 14.3 999. INAP 2094 99.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0305 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 3 .1 75.0 2. female 1 .0 25.0 999. INAP 2097 99.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0306 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 1 .0 50.0 2. female 1 .0 50.0 999. INAP 2099 99.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0307 I/37 Sex of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 2 .1 100.0 999. INAP 2099 99.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
247 248 V0308 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 18 .9 52.9 2. female 16 .8 47.1 999. INAP 2067 98.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0309 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 3 .1 33.3 2. female 6 .3 66.7 999. INAP 2092 99.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0310 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
1. male 2 .1 66.7 2. female 1 .0 33.3 999. INAP 2098 99.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0311 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
249 250 V0312 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0313 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0314 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0315 I/37 Sex of resident/boarder/other #8 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
2. female 1 .0 100.0 999. INAP 2100 100.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
251 3.3.30 Composition of household – age
V0316 I/37 Age of respondent Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0317 I/37 Age of partner Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
V0318 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0319 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0320 I/37 Age of (great)grandparent #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0321 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0322 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0323 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
252 253 V0324 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0325 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0326 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0327 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0328 I/37 Age of (foster-. step-)child #8 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0329 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0330 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0331 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
254 255 V0332 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0333 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0334 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0335 I/37 Age of (step-)brother/sister (in law) #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0336 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #1 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0337 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #2 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0338 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #3 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0339 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #4 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
256 257 V0340 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #5 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0341 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #6 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0342 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #7 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
V0343 I/37 Age of resident/boarder/other #8 Refer to V0281 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories)
258 3.3.31 Composition of household – household income
V0344 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 1 Does one of these persons provide the largest contribution to the total income of the household? Which person/persons is/are that?
1. respondent 1153 54.9 55.1 2. partner 736 35.0 35.2 3. (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #1 153 7.3 7.3 4. (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #2 31 1.5 1.5 5. (great)grandparent #1 2 .1 .1 6. (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 5 .2 .2 8. (foster-. step-)child #1 1 .0 .0 9. (foster-. step-)child #2 1 .0 .0 16. resident. boarder. other #1 9 .4 .4 17. resident. boarder. other #2 1 .0 .0 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0345 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 2 Refer to V0344 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories; no other largest contributor to household income)
1. respondent 100 4.8 45.0 2. partner 93 4.4 41.9 4. (foster-. step-)parent (in law) #2 8 .4 3.6 6. (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 6 .3 2.7 7. (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 1 .0 .5 8. (foster-. step-)child #1 6 .3 2.7 16. resident. boarder. other #1 7 .3 3.2 17. resident. boarder. other #2 1 .0 .5 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1874 89.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
259 V0346 I/37f Largest contributor to household income - 3 Refer to V0344 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0281, relevant categories; no other largest contributor to household income)
1. respondent 8 .4 42.1 2. partner 1 .0 5.3 6. (step-)brother/sister (in law) #1 2 .1 10.5 7. (step-)brother/sister (in law) #2 2 .1 10.5 8. (foster-. step-)child #1 3 .1 15.8 9. (foster-. step-)child #2 1 .0 5.3 16. resident. boarder. other #1 1 .0 5.3 17. resident. boarder. other #2 1 .0 5.3 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 2077 98.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0347 I/37 Main breadwinner in household Refer to V0344 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 997, 998)
1. respondent 1047 49.8 50.0 2. partner 644 30.7 30.8 3. respondent and partner equally 181 8.6 8.7 4. parent #1 138 6.6 6.6 5. parent #2 30 1.4 1.4 6. other situations 52 2.5 2.5 999. INAP 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
260 V0348 I/51 Net annual income of respondents household Showcard 24 presented, listing response alternatives (letter and income group). This card shows some income levels. This is about the total net income of all family members together, after deduction of taxes and the like. Any extra income and the income of children should be included: child allowances, welfare payments, social security, and pensions also count as income.
Could you indicate which of the categories contains the annual net income of your household? When respondent objects or hesitates, the interviewer emphasizes the importance of the question for scientific research, and guarantees that the information will remain absolutely secret.
1. less than 17000 83 4.0 4.4 2. 17000 - 21000 86 4.1 4.6 3. 21000 - 24000 76 3.6 4.1 4. 24000 - 28000 82 3.9 4.4 5. 28000 - 31000 107 5.1 5.7 6. 31000 - 35000 125 5.9 6.7 7. 35000 - 38000 144 6.9 7.7 8. 38000 - 45000 225 10.7 12.0 9. 45000 - 52000 210 10.0 11.2 10. 52000 - 59000 184 8.8 9.8 11. 59000 - 73000 254 12.1 13.5 12. 73000 or more 300 14.3 16.0 997. DK 155 7.4 MD 998. NA 70 3.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
261 3.3.32 Background characteristics of respondent – social and economic variables
V0350 I/1b Date of birth of respondent (yyyymmdd) From 19070504 to19800505 (2 missing cases)
V0351 I/1c Marital status of respondent Are you single, married, divorced, or are you a widow(er)?
1. never married 604 28.7 28.8 2. married 1268 60.4 60.4 3. divorced 104 5.0 5.0 4. widow(er) 124 5.9 5.9 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
262 V0352 I/38a Highest education (completed) of respondent The next questions are about your own education. Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives (refer to 4.2.5 below).
Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which you received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
1. LA - elementary 288 13.7 13.7 2. LB - extended elementary 42 2.0 2.0 3. LV - (lower) vocational 365 17.4 17.4 4. U - secondary 370 17.6 17.6 5. UV - middle level vocational 122 5.8 5.8 6. M - higher level secondary 228 10.9 10.9 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 225 10.7 10.7 8. HBO - higher level vocational 245 11.7 11.7 9. S - university level vocational 42 2.0 2.0 10. H - university 171 8.1 8.2 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0353 I/38bc Education respondent started afterwards Did you start education at a higher level afterwards? Showcard 19 used. (refer to 4.2.5 below).
Could you indicate by means of this card which education that is? You can mention the number of the education.
0. no (further) education 1435 68.3 69.0 1. LA - elementary 2 .1 .1 2. LB - extended elementary 10 .5 .5 3. LV - (lower) vocational 48 2.3 2.3 4. U - secondary 51 2.4 2.5 5. UV - middle level vocational 71 3.4 3.4 6. M - higher level secondary 43 2.0 2.1 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 134 6.4 6.4 8. HBO - higher level vocational 147 7.0 7.1 9. S - university level vocational 33 1.6 1.6 10. H - university 107 5.1 5.1 997. DK 19 .9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
263 2101 100.0 100.0
264 V0354 I/39a Current occupational status of respondent The next questions are about your profession. Showcard 20 presented, listing response alternatives.
Could you indicate by means of this card what your daily activities are or which situation applies to you?
1. paid job 1266 60.3 60.3 2. used to work 710 33.8 33.8 3. has never worked 125 5.9 5.9
2101 100.0 100.0
V0355 I/39aw Sector in which respondent is currently employed Are you working in the public service, on the payroll, self-employed, or how?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3)
1. public service 248 11.8 19.6 2. on the payroll 846 40.3 67.0 3. self-employed 159 7.6 12.6 4. ambiguous 9 .4 .7 5. cooperating in familybusiness 1 .0 .1 998. NA 3 .1 MD 999. INAP 835 39.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
265 V0356 I/39ah Reason respondent does not work Is that because of permanent disability or incapacitation to work, unemployment, being job-seeking, retirement, living off investments, domestic work, care for children, or is there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
1. disability to work 114 5.4 16.2 2. job-seeking 47 2.2 6.7 3. retired 285 13.6 40.5 4. domestic work 222 10.6 31.5 5. study 19 .9 2.7 6. other 17 .8 2.4 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 1391 66.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0357 I/39anw Reason respondent never worked Is that because of study, unemployment, being job-seeking, domestic work, care for children, disability, or is there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 2)
1. study 74 3.5 59.7 2. unemployment job-seeking 3 .1 2.4 3. domestic word care for children 45 2.1 36.3 4. disability 2 .1 1.6 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1976 94.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
266 V0358 I/39b Respondents current occupation (sbc92) What is your profession or function?
99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3) Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
V0359 I/39b Respondents current occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0358 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3)
V0360 I/39b Respondents current occupation (isei92) Refer to V0358 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3)
V0361 I/39b Respondents current occupation (egp92) Refer to V0358 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3)
1. I - higher controller 214 10.2 17.0 2. II - lower controller 400 19.0 31.8 3. IIIa - skilled nonmanual 147 7.0 11.7 4. IIIb - semi-skilled nonmanual 107 5.1 8.5 5. IVa - self-employed with employee(s) 19 .9 1.5 6. IVb - self-employed without employees 32 1.5 2.5 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 22 1.0 1.7 8. V - manual supervisor 55 2.6 4.4 9. VI - skilled manual 82 3.9 6.5 10. VIIa - semi-skilled manual 170 8.1 13.5 11. VIIb - farm labor 11 .5 .9 998. NA 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 835 39.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0362 I/39b Respondents current occupation (isco88) Refer to V0358 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for
267 additional information about the coding of this variable.
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3)
268 V0363 I/39ef Number of employees supervised by respondent Do you supervise people in your profession or function? How many persons do you supervise?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3; V0355, code 3)
0. none 740 35.2 66.9 1. 1-4 178 8.5 16.1 2. 5-9 83 4.0 7.5 3. 10-19 55 2.6 5.0 4. 20-49 33 1.6 3.0 5. 50-99 11 .5 1.0 6. 100 or more 6 .3 .5 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 994. 47.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
269 V0364 I/39gh Number of persons employed by self-employed respondent Do you employ people? How many people do you employ?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2, 3; V0355, code 1, 2, 4, 5, 998)
0. none 99 4.7 62.3 1. 1-4 36 1.7 22.6 2. 5-9 8 .4 5.0 3. 10-19 9 .4 5.7 4. 20-49 4 .2 2.5 5. 50-99 1 .0 .6 6. 100 or more 2 .1 1.3 999. INAP 1942 92.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0365 I/39i Number of hours respondent works per week How many hours do you work on average per week, not counting unpaid hours?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2,3)
2. 1- 12 hours 117 5.6 9.3 3. 12-20 hours 132 6.3 10.5 4. 20-30 hours 115 5.5 9.2 5. 30 hours or more 892 42.5 71.0 997. DK 4 .2 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD 999. INAP 835 39.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
270 V0366 I/39j Reason why respondent is not full-time working You work less than 30 hours per week on average. Could you indicate by means of this card which situation applies to you? Showcard 21 presented, listing response alternatives.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 2,3; V0365, codes 5, 997, 998)
1. partial disability 15 .7 4.6 2. unemployed. job-seeking 12 .6 3.7 3. domestic work. care for family 223 10.6 68.8 4. study 50 2.4 15.4 5. volunteer 7 .3 2.2 6. no other activities 15 .7 4.6 7. (early) retirement 2 .1 .6 998. NA 40 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1737 82.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
271 V0367 I/39k Respondents former occupation (sbc92) You used to have a paid job. In which function have you worked? Showcard 21 used. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
V0368 I/39k Respondents former occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0367 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
V0369 I/39k Respondents former occupation (isei92) Refer to V0367 for complete question text
99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
V0370 I/39k Respondents former occupation (egp92) Refer to V0367 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
1. I - higher controller 36 1.7 78.3 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 10 .5 21.7 998. NA 664 31.6 MD 999. INAP 1391 66.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0371 I/39k Respondents former occupation (isco88) Refer to V0367 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
272 V0372 I/39mn Number of employees respondent supervised in former occupation Did you supervise people in your profession or function? How many persons did you supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
0. none 444 21.1 63.0 1. 1-4 96 4.6 13.6 2. 5-9 65 3.1 9.2 3. 10-19 43 2.0 6.1 4. 20-49 33 1.6 4.7 5. 50-99 6 .3 .9 6. 100 or more 18 .9 2.6 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1391 66.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0373 I/39o Number of hours respondent worked per week How many hours did you work on average per week?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
2. 1- 12 hours 19 .9 2.7 3. 12-20 hours 47 2.2 6.7 4. 20-30 hours 46 2.2 6.5 5. 30 hours or more 591 28.1 84.1 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1391 66.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
273 V0374 I/39p Former job respondent ended in which year? In which year did you have paid work most recently?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, codes 1, 3)
V0375 I/39q Respondent willing to work regularly? Would you like to have paid work regularly?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0354, code 1; V0356, codes 1,3; V0357, code 4)
1. yes 164 7.8 35.3 2. no 300 14.3 64.7 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1633 77.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
274 3.3.33 Background characteristics of respondent – religion
V0376 I/40a Type of belief in God Now I would like to ask you a few questions about your religion or philosophy of life. Showcard 22 presented, listing response alternatives: - 1. I do not believe in God - 2. I do not know if there is a God, and I do not believe that there is a way of finding that out. - 3. I do not believe in a God who occupies himself with each of us personally, but I do believe in one or another higher power. - 4. Some times I believe in God, some times not. - 5. I believe in God, even if I have my doubts - 6. I believe without doubt that God really exists. Which of the following statements on this card most closely corresponds with your opinion about God?
1. do not believe in God 286 13.6 13.7 2. do not know if there is a God 230 10.9 11.0 3. do believe a higher power 396 18.8 18.9 4. On certain occasions I believe in God 186 8.9 8.9 5. I believe in God although I have doubts 417 19.8 19.9 6. I believe in God without any doubts 580 27.6 27.7 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
275 V0377 I/40b Religious denomination of respondent Do you consider yourself a member of a particular church or religious community, and if so, which one?
1. Roman Catholic 583 27.7 27.8 2. Dutch Reformed 230 10.9 11.0 3. Calvinist 143 6.8 6.8 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 38 1.8 1.8 5. other Christian 62 3.0 3.0 6. Islamic 20 1.0 1.0 7. other religion 30 1.4 1.4 8. no religion 992 47.2 47.3 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
276 V0378 I/40c Dutch Reformed denomination of respondent Do you consider yourself a member of a specific group within the Dutch Reformed Church, and if so, which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0377, codes 1, 3-998)
0. no direction 107 5.1 47.6 1. Vrijzinnige Richting 40 1.9 17.8 2. Midden Orthodox 29 1.4 12.9 3. Gereformeerde Bond 27 1.3 12.0 4. Confessioneel 21 1.0 9.3 8. other 1 .0 .4 997. DK 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1871 89.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0379 I/40d Calvinist denomination of respondent Of which of the Reformed (Calvinist) churches, communities of denominations do you consider yourself to be a member?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0377, codes 1, 2, 4-998)
1. Synodaal 87 4.1 61.3 2. Vrijgemaakt (art.31) 18 .9 12.7 3. Buiten Verband 6 .3 4.2 4. Christelijk Gereformeerd 12 .6 8.5 5. Gereformeerde Gemeenten 18 .9 12.7 6. Oud Gereformeerd 1 .0 .7 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1958 93.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
277 V0380 I/40ba Other Christian denomination of respondent Which?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0377, codes 1-4, 6-998)
1. Apolistische beweging 9 .4 16.7 2. Baptisten 6 .3 11.1 3. Doopsgezind 5 .2 9.3 4. Luthers 2 .1 3.7 5. Remonstrantse broederschap 3 .1 5.6 6. (Vrije) evangelische gemeente 18 .9 33.3 7. Zevendedagsadventisten 1 .0 1.9 10. Syrisch orthodox 1 .0 1.9 11. Jehova Getuigen 5 .2 9.3 12. Leger des Heils 1 .0 1.9 88. Other 3 .1 5.6 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 2044 97.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0381 I/40ba Other religious denomination of respondent Which?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0377, codes 1-6, 8-998)
1. Joods 4 .2 16.0 2. Hindoestaans 11 .5 44.0 5. Humanisme 3 .1 12.0 7. Boedhisme 4 .2 16.0 8. other 3 .1 12.0 997. DK 4 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 2071 98.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
278 V0382 I/40e Respondents attendance of religious services How often do you attend religious services?
1. at least once a week 289 13.8 13.8 2. 2 or 3 times a month 110 5.2 5.2 3. once a month 132 6.3 6.3 4. several times a year 453 21.6 21.6 5. (almost) never 1116 53.1 53.1 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
279 V0385 I/40f Denomination in which respondent was raised - first answer Were you brought up in a particular religion or denomination, and if so, which one?
1. Roman Catholic 895 42.6 42.7 2. Dutch Reformed 390 18.6 18.6 3. Calvinist 227 10.8 10.8 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 10 .5 .5 5. other Christian 68 3.2 3.2 6. Islamic 19 .9 .9 7. other religion 16 .8 .8 8. no religion 471 22.4 22.5 994. uncodable 4 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0386 I/40f Denomination in which respondent was raised - second answer Refer to V0385 for complete question text
2. Dutch Reformed 5 .2 41.7 3. Calvinist 2 .1 16.7 5. other Christian 2 .1 16.7 7. other religion 2 .1 16.7 8. no religion 1 .0 8.3 995. no second answer 2084 99.2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
280 3.3.34 Background characteristics of respondent – formative period
V0387 I/34a Discussed politics at home when adolescent Now I would like to ask you a few questions about the period when you were 10 to 16 years old. At that time, were political topics discussed often, fairly often, not often, or not at all in your home?
1. often 242 11.5 11.6 2. fairly often 385 18.3 18.5 3. not often 936 44.6 44.9 4. not at all 523 24.9 25.1 997. DK 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
281 V0388 I/34b Respondent had (no) father during adolescence Did you have a father in that period? Foster father and stepfather are included as father.
1. yes 1992 94.8 94.8 2. no 109 5.2 5.2
2101 100.0 100.0
V0389 I/34c Respondent had (no) mother during adolescence Did you have a mother in that period? Foster mother and stepmother are included as mother.
1. yes 2067 98.4 98.4 2. no 33 1.6 1.6 997. DK 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
282 V0390 I/35b Party preference of father during adolescence - first answer Do you still know which party your father preferred then? And which party was that?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0388, code 2)
1. PVDA 524 24.9 32.8 2. CDA 317 15.1 19.8 3. VVD 169 8.0 10.6 4. D66 33 1.6 2.1 5. GroenLinks 11 .5 .7 6. SGP 29 1.4 1.8 7. GPV 21 1.0 1.3 8. RPF 11 .5 .7 10. Unie 55+ 1 .0 .1 12. SP 1.0.1 15. KVP\RKSP 269 12.8 16.8 16. CHU 79 3.8 4.9 17. ARP 85 4.0 5.3 18. SDAP 22 1.0 1.4 19. CPN 15.7.9 20. PPR 3.1.2 21. PSP 2.1.1 22. BoerenPartij 5 .2 .3 62. NMP 1 .0 .1 992. not enfranchised 7 .3 MD 994. uncodable 5 .2 MD 997. DK 350 16.7 MD 998. NA 32 1.5 MD 999. INAP 109 5.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
283 V0391 I/35b Party preference of father during adolescence - second answer Refer to V0390 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0388, code 2)
1. PVDA 3 .1 23.1 2. CDA 1 .0 7.7 3. VVD 5 .2 38.5 4. D66 1 .0 7.7 7. GPV 1 .0 7.7 15. KVP\RKSP 1 .0 7.7 19. CPN 1 .0 7.7 992. not enfranchised 7 .3 MD 995. no second party mentioned 1590 75.7 MD 997. DK 350 16.7 MD 998. NA 32 1.5 MD 999. INAP 109 5.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
284 V0392 I/36b Party preference of mother during adolescence - first answer And do you still know which party your mother preferred then? And which party was that?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0389, code 2)
1. PVDA 461 21.9 29.5 2. CDA 323 15.4 20.7 3. VVD 144 6.9 9.2 4. D66 45 2.1 2.9 5. GroenLinks 15 .7 1.0 6. SGP 33 1.6 2.1 7. GPV 22 1.0 1.4 8. RPF 17 .8 1.1 11. AOV 1 .0 .1 12. SP 2.1.1 15. KVP\RKSP 292 13.9 18.7 16. CHU 92 4.4 5.9 17. ARP 87 4.1 5.6 18. SDAP 11 .5 .7 19. CPN 9 .4 .6 20. PPR 4.2.3 21. PSP 3.1.2 22. BoerenPartij 1 .0 .1 992. not enfranchised 8 .4 MD 994. uncodable 6 .3 MD 997. DK 452 21.5 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 34 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
285 V0393 I/36b Party preference of mother during adolescence - second answer Refer to V0394 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0389, code 2)
1. PVDA 2 .1 18.2 2. CDA 1 .0 9.1 3. VVD 3 .1 27.3 4. D66 2 .1 18.2 7. GPV 2 .1 18.2 15. KVP\RKSP 1 .0 9.1 992. not enfranchised 8 .4 MD 995. no second party mentioned 1557 74.1 MD 997. DK 452 21.5 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 34 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
286 3.3.35 Social class
V0394 I/41 Social class - self image One sometimes speaks of the existence of various social classes and groups. If you were to assign yourself to a particular social class, which one would that be?
Showcard 23 presented, listing response alternatives.
1. upper class 28 1.3 1.4 2. upper middle class 331 15.8 16.1 3. middle class 1173 55.8 57.0 4. upper working class 148 7.0 7.2 5. working class 379 18.0 18.4 997. DK 33 1.6 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
287 3.3.36 Background characteristics of partner – social and economic variables
V0400 I/42a Highest education (completed) of partner The next questions are about your partner’s education. Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives. (refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which your partner received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. LA - elementary 161 7.7 11.1 2. LB - extended elementary 22 1.0 1.5 3. LV - (lower) vocational 319 15.2 22.0 4. U - secondary 246 11.7 17.0 5. UV - middle level vocational 93 4.4 6.4 6. M - higher level secondary 119 5.7 8.2 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 166 7.9 11.5 8. HBO - higher level vocational 183 8.7 12.6 9. S - university level vocational 24 1.1 1.7 10. H - university 115 5.5 7.9 997. DK 11 .5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
288 V0401 I/42bc Education partner started afterwards Did your partner start education at a higher level afterwards? Showcard 19 used. (refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card which education that is? You can mention the number of the education.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
0. no (further) education 1119 53.3 77.7 1. LA - elementary 1 .0 .1 2. LB - extended elementary 1 .0 .1 3. LV - (lower) vocational 28 1.3 1.9 4. U - secondary 31 1.5 2.2 5. UV - middle level vocational 40 1.9 2.8 6. M - higher level secondary 21 1.0 1.5 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 70 3.3 4.9 8. HBO - higher level vocational 72 3.4 5.0 9. S - university level vocational 20 1.0 1.4 10. H - university 37 1.8 2.6 997. DK 19 .9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
289 V0402 I/43a Current occupational status of partner The next questions are about your partner’s profession. Showcard 20 presented, listing response alternatives. Could you indicate by means of this card what your partner’s daily activities are or which situation applies to your partner? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. paid job 935 44.5 64.1 2. used to work 468 22.3 32.1 3. has never worked 55 2.6 3.8 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
290 V0403 I/43aw Sector in which partner is currently employed Is your partner working in the public service, on the payroll, self- employed, or how?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
1. public service 178 8.5 19.1 2. on the payroll 627 29.8 67.1 3. self-employed 123 5.9 13.2 4. ambiguous 3 .1 .3 5. cooperating in familybusiness 3 .1 .3 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1166 55.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
291 V0404 I/43ah Reason partner does not work Is that because of permanent disability or incapacitation to work, unemployment, being job-seeking, retirement, living off investments, domestic work, care for children, or is there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; v0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
1. disability to work 81 3.9 17.3 2. job-seeking 20 1.0 4.3 3. retired 154 7.3 33.0 4. domestic work 192 9.1 41.1 5. study 4 .2 .9 6. other 16 .8 3.4 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1633 77.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
292 V0405 I/43anw Reason partner never worked Is that because of study, unemployment, being job-seeking, domestic work, care for children, disability, or is there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, code 1, 2, 997)
1. study 3 .1 5.5 2. unemployment job-seeking 3 .1 5.5 3. domestic word care for children 46 2.2 83.6 4. disability 2 .1 3.6 5. other reason 1 .0 1.8 999. INAP 2046 97.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
293 V0406 I/43b Partners current occupation (sbc92) What is your partner’s profession or function? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
V0407 I/43b Partners current occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0406 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
V0408 I/43b Partners current occupation (isei92) Refer to V0406 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
294 V0409 I/43b Partners current occupation (egp92) Refer to V0406 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
1. I - higher controller 166 7.9 21.6 2. II - lower controller 197 9.4 25.6 3. IIIa - skilled nonmanual 110 5.2 14.3 4. IIIb - semi-skilled nonmanual 76 3.6 9.9 5. IVa - self-employed with employee(s) 17 .8 2.2 6. IVb - self-employed without employees 22 1.0 2.9 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 21 1.0 2.7 8. V - manual supervisor 31 1.5 4.0 9. VI - skilled manual 47 2.2 6.1 10. VIIa - semi-skilled manual 69 3.3 9.0 11. VIIb - farm labor 13 .6 1.7 998. NA 166 7.9 MD 999. INAP 1166 55.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0410 I/43b Partners current occupation (isco88) Refer to V0406 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
295 V0411 I/43ef Number of employees supervised by partner Does your partner supervise people in his/her profession or function? How many persons does your partner supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997; V0403, codes 3, 998)
0. none 548 26.1 68.3 1. 1-4 107 5.1 13.3 2. 5-9 52 2.5 6.5 3. 10-19 51 2.4 6.4 4. 20-49 28 1.3 3.5 5. 50-99 8 .4 1.0 6. 100 or more 8 .4 1.0 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1290 61.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
296 V0412 I/43gh Number of persons employed by self-employed partner Does your partner employ people? How many people does your partner employ?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997; V0403, code 1, 2, 4, 5, 998)
0. none 65 3.1 52.8 1. 1-4 35 1.7 28.5 2. 5-9 8 .4 6.5 3. 10-19 5 .2 4.1 4. 20-49 7 .3 5.7 5. 50-99 1 .0 .8 6. 100 or more 2 .1 1.6 999. INAP 1978 94.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
297 V0413 I/43i Number of hours partner works per week How many hours does your partner work on average per week, not counting unpaid hours?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997)
1. 0 hours 2 .1 .2 2. 1- 12 hours 46 2.2 4.9 3. 12- 20 hours 113 5.4 12.1 4. 20- 30 hours 87 4.1 9.3 5. 30 hours or more 683 32.5 73.4 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1166 55.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
298 V0414 I/43j Reason why partner is not full-time working Showcard 21 presented, listing response alternatives. Your partner works less than 30 hours per week on average. Could you indicate by means of this card which situation applies to your partner?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 2, 3, 997; V0413, code 5, 997, 998)
1. partial disability 10 .5 4.7 2. unemployed. job-seeking 5 .2 2.3 3. domestic work. care for family 176 8.4 82.6 4. study 5 .2 2.3 5. volunteer 4 .2 1.9 6. no other activities 9 .4 4.2 7. (early) retirement 4 .2 1.9 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 34 1.6 MD 999. INAP 1853 88.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
299 V0415 I/43k Partners former occupation (sbc92) Your partner used to have a paid job. In which function has your partner worked? Showcard 21 used. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
V0416 I/43k Partners former occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0415 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
99999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
V0417 I/43k Partners former occupation (isei92) Refer to V0415 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
V0418 I/43k Partners former occupation (egp92) Refer to V0415 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
1. I - higher controller 28 1.3 100.0 998. NA 440 20.9 MD 999. INAP 1633 77.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0419 I/43k Partners former occupation (isco88) Refer to V0415 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
300 V0420 I/43mn Number of employees partner supervised in former occupation Did your partner supervise people in his/her profession or function? How many persons did your partner supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
0. none 318 15.1 69.4 1. 1-4 59 2.8 12.9 2. 5-9 19 .9 4.1 3. 10-19 22 1.0 4.8 4. 20-49 19 .9 4.1 5. 50-99 8 .4 1.7 6. 100 or more 13 .6 2.8 997. DK 8 .4 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1633 77.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
301 V0421 I/43o Number of hours partner worked per week How many hours did your partner work on average per week?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
2. 1- 12 hours 18 .9 3.9 3. 12-20 hours 41 2.0 8.9 4. 20-30 hours 29 1.4 6.3 5. 30 hours or more 371 17.7 80.8 997. DK 7 .3 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1633 77.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0422 I/43p Former job partner ended in which year? In which year did your partner have paid work most recently?
9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 3, 997)
V0423 I/43q Partner willing to work regularly? Would your partner like to have paid work regularly?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0402, codes 1, 997)
1. yes 78 3.7 27.5 2. no 206 9.8 72.5 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1815 86.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
302 3.3.37 Background characteristics of partner – religion
V0424 I/44a Religious denomination of partner Does your partner consider him/herself a member of a particular church or religious community, and if so, which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. Roman Catholic 468 22.3 32.3 2. Dutch Reformed 177 8.4 12.2 3. Calvinist 109 5.2 7.5 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 16 .8 1.1 5. other Christian 37 1.8 2.5 6. Islamic 20 1.0 1.4 7. other religion 16 .8 1.1 8. no religion 608 28.9 41.9 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
303 V0425 I/44b 1. Dutch Reformed denomination of partner Does your partner consider him/herself a member of a specific group within the Dutch Reformed Church, and if so, which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0424, codes 1, 3-998)
0. no direction 89 4.2 51.4 1. Vrijzinnige Richting 30 1.4 17.3 2. Midden Orthodox 17 .8 9.8 3. Gereformeerde Bond 19 .9 11.0 4. Confessioneel 17 .8 9.8 8. other 1 .0 .6 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1924 91.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
304 V0426 I/44b 2. Calvinist denomination of partner Which denomination?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0424, codes 1, 2, 4-998)
1. Synodaal 69 3.3 65.7 2. Vrijgemaakt (art.31) 12 .6 11.4 3. Buiten Verband 4 .2 3.8 4. Christelijk Gereformeerd 6 .3 5.7 5. Gereformeerde Gemeenten 14 .7 13.3 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1992. 94.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
305 V0427 I/44b 3. Other Christian denomination of partner Which?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0424, codes 1-4, 6-998)
1. Apolistische beweging 7 .3 20.0 2. Baptisten 2 .1 5.7 3. Doopsgezind 2 .1 5.7 4. Luthers 3 .1 8.6 5. Remonstrantse broederschap 1 .0 2.9 6. (vrije) evangelische gemeente 14 .7 40.0 7. Zevendedagsadventisten 1 .0 2.9 10. Syrisch orthodox 1 .0 2.9 11. Jehova Getuigen 2 .1 5.7 12. Leger des Heils 1 .0 2.9 88. Other 1 .0 2.9 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 2064 98.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
306 V0428 I/44b 4. Other religious denomination of partner Which denomination?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0; V0424, codes 1-6, 8-998
1. Joods 1 .0 6.7 2. Hindoestaans 7 .3 46.7 7. Boedhisme 3 .1 20.0 8. other 4 .2 26.7 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 2085 99.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
307 V0429 I/44d Partners attendance of religious services How often does your partner attend religious services?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. at least once a week 189 9.0 13.0 2. 2 or 3 times a month 86 4.1 5.9 3. once a month 101 4.8 6.9 4. several times a year 291 13.9 20.0 5. (almost) never 791 37.6 54.3 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
308 V0430 I/44e Denomination in which partner was raised - first answer Was your partner brought up in a particular religion or denomination, and if so, which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. Roman Catholic 616 29.3 42.5 2. Dutch Reformed 252 12.0 17.4 3. Calvinist 166 7.9 11.4 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 7 .3 .5 5. other Christian 36 1.7 2.5 6. Islamic 20 1.0 1.4 7. other religion 11 .5 .8 8. no religion 343 16.3 23.6 994. uncodable 3 .1 MD 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
309 V0431 I/44e Denomination in which partner was raised - second answer Refer to V0430 for a complete wording of the question.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0282, code 0)
1. Roman Catholic 1 .0 14.3 2. Dutch Reformed 2 .1 28.6 3. Calvinist 3 .1 42.9 5. other Christian 1 .0 14.3 995. no second answer 1447 68.9 MD 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 641 30.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
310 3.3.38 Background characteristics of head of household – social and economic variables
V0435 I/45a Highest education (completed) of head of household The next questions are about the main breadwinner’s education. Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives. (refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which the main breadwinner received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2)
1. LA - elementary 19 .9 10.4 2. LB - extended elementary 1 .0 .5 3. LV - (lower) vocational 43 2.0 23.6 4. U - secondary 25 1.2 13.7 5. UV - middle level vocational 13 .6 7.1 6. M - higher level secondary 11 .5 6.0 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 24 1.1 13.2 8. HBO - higher level vocational 28 1.3 15.4 9. S - university level vocational 2 .1 1.1 10. H - university 16 .8 8.8 997. DK 12 .6 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1905 90.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
311 V0436 I/45bc Education head of household started afterwards Did the main breadwinner start education at a higher level afterwards? Could you indicate by means of this card which education that is? You can mention the number of the education. Showcard 19 used. (refer to 4.2.5 below).
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2)
0. no (further) education 152 7.2 84.0 3. LV - (lower) vocational 3 .1 1.7 4. U - secondary 1 .0 .6 5. UV - middle level vocational 2 .1 1.1 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 9 .4 5.0 8. HBO - higher level vocational 7 .3 3.9 10. H - university 7 .3 3.9 997. DK 13 .6 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1905 90.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
312 V0437 I/46a Current occupational status of head of household The next questions are about the main breadwinner’s profession. Showcard 20 presented, listing response alternatives. Could you indicate by means of this card what the main breadwinner’s daily activities are or which situation applies to the main breadwinner? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2)
1. paid job 156 7.4 80.8 2. used to work 37 1.8 19.2 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1905 90.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
313 V0438 I/46aw Sector in which head of household is currently employed Is the main breadwinner working in the public service, on the payroll, self-employed, or how?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
1. public service 29 1.4 18.6 2. on the payroll 101 4.8 64.7 3. self-employed 25 1.2 16.0 4. ambiguous 1 .0 .6 999. INAP 1945 92.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
314 V0439 I/46ah Reason head of household does not work Is that because of permanent disability or incapacitation to work, unemployment, being job-seeking, retirement, living off investments, domestic work, care for children, or is there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 3-998)
1. disability to work 22 1.0 59.5 2. job-seeking 6 .3 16.2 3. retired 5 .2 13.5 4. domestic work 4 .2 10.8 999. INAP 2064 98.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
315 V0440 I/46b Head of households current occupation (sbc92) What is the main breadwinner’s profession or function? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
V0441 I/46b Head of households current occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0440 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
V0442 I/46b Head of households current occupation (isei92) Refer to V0440 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
316 V0443 I/46b Head of households current occupation (egp92) Refer to V0440 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
1. I - higher controller 25 1.2 17.1 2. II - lower controller 39 1.9 26.7 3. IIIa - skilled nonmanual 15 .7 10.3 4. IIIb - semi-skilled nonmanual 5 .2 3.4 5. IVa - self-employed with employee(s) 3 .1 2.1 6. IVb - self-employed without employees 5 .2 3.4 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 9 .4 6.2 8. V - manual supervisor 18 .9 12.3 9. VI - skilled manual 9 .4 6.2 10. VIIa - semi-skilled manual 18 .9 12.3 998. NA 10 .5 MD 999. INAP 1945 92.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0444 I/46b Head of households current occupation (isco88) Refer to V0440 for complete question text Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 9999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
317 V0445 I/46ef Number of employees supervised by head of household Does the main breadwinner supervise people in his/her profession or function? How many persons does the main breadwinner supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
0. none 69 3.3 57.5 1. 1-4 18 .9 15.0 2. 5-9 13 .6 10.8 3. 10-19 13 .6 10.8 4. 20-49 5 .2 4.2 5. 50-99 2 .1 1.7 997. DK 10 .5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1970 93.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
318 V0446 I/46gh Number of persons employed by self-employed head of household Does the main breadwinner employ people? How many people does the main breadwinner employ?
0. none 14 .7 56.0 1. 1-4 5 .2 20.0 2. 5-9 2 .1 8.0 3. 10-19 4 .2 16.0 999. INAP 2076 98.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
319 V0447 I/46i Number of hours head of household works per week How many hours does the main breadwinner work on average per week, not counting unpaid hours?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998)
2. 1- 12 hours 2 .1 1.3 3. 12- 20 hours 1 .0 .7 4. 20- 30 hours 8 .4 5.2 5. 30 hours or more 142 6.8 92.8 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1945 92.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
320 V0448 I/46j Reason why head of household is not full-time working Showcard 21 presented, listing response alternatives. The main breadwinner works less than 30 hours per week on average. Could you indicate by means of this card which situation applies to the main breadwinner?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 2, 997, 998; V0447, codes 5, 997, 998)
1. partial disability 3 .1 37.5 3. domestic work. care for family 4 .2 50.0 7. (early) retirement 1 .0 12.5 998. NA 3 .1 MD 999. INAP 2090 99.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
321 V0449 I/46k Head of households former occupation (sbc92) The main breadwinner used to have a paid job. In which function has the main breadwinner worked? Showcard 21 used.
Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
V0450 I/46k Head of households former occupation (u&s92) Refer to V0449 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
V0451 I/46k Head of households former occupation (isei92) Refer to V0449 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
322 V0452 I/46k Head of households former occupation (egp92) Refer to V0449 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
1. I - higher controller 3 .1 100.0 998. NA 34 1.6 MD 999. INAP 2064 98.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0453 I/46k Head of households former occupation (isco88) Refer to V0449 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
323 V0454 I/46mn Number of employees supervised by head of household in former job Did the main breadwinner supervise people in his/her profession or function? How many persons did the main breadwinner supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
0. none 23 1.1 67.6 1. 1-4 3 .1 8.8 2. 5-9 1 .0 2.9 3. 10-19 4 .2 11.8 4. 20-49 2 .1 5.9 5. 50-99 1 .0 2.9 997. DK 3 .1 MD 999. INAP 2064 98.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
324 V0455 I/46o Number of hours head of household worked per week How many hours did the main breadwinner work on average per week?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
4. 20-30 hours 3 .1 9.1 5. 30 hours or more 30 1.4 90.9 997. DK 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 2064 98.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
325 V0456 I/46p Former job head of household ended in which year? In which year did the main breadwinner have paid work most recently?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998)
326 V0457 I/46q Head of household willing to have work regularly? Would the main breadwinner like to have paid work regularly?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0344, codes 1, 2; V0345, codes 1, 2; V0346, codes 1,2; V0437, codes 1, 997, 998; V0439, codes 1,3)
1. yes 7 .3 77.8 2. no 2 .1 22.2 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 2091 99.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
327 3.3.39 Background characteristics of father – social and economic variables
V0460 I/47Highest education (completed) of father The next question is about your father’s education when you were 10-16 years old. Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives. (refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which your father received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
999 (inappropriate) routing. This routing is too complicated to be summarized like the other routings. If the father was deceased (V0388, code 2); or the father is the only largest contributor to the household income (father is the only Head of Household) (V0344, V0345, V0346 in relation to V0290 and V0291), than this question was not asked.
1. LA – elementary 741 35.3 43.5 2. LB - extended elementary 34 1.6 2.0 3. LV - (lower) vocational 302 14.4 17.7 4. U – secondary 184 8.8 10.8 5. UV - middle level vocational 56 2.7 3.3 6. M - higher level secondary 73 3.5 4.3 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 81 3.9 4.8 8. HBO - higher level vocational 123 5.9 7.2 9. S - university level vocational 31 1.5 1.8 10. H – university 80 3.8 4.7 997. DK 132 6.3 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD 999. INAP 258 12.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
328 V0461 I/48a Occupational status of father during adolescence The next questions are about your father’s profession when you were 10-16 years old. Showcard 20 presented, listing response alternatives. Could you indicate by means of this card what your father’s daily activities were then or which situation applied to your father?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0460, code 999).
1. paid job 1591 75.7 88.3 2. used to work 204 9.7 11.3 3. has never worked 6 .3 .3 997. DK 5 0.2 MD 998. NA 37 1.8 MD 999. INAP 258 12.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
329 V0462 I/48aw Sector in which father was employed Was your father working in the public service, on the payroll, self- employed, or how?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, code 2 – 999)
1. public service 287 13.7 18.0 2. on the payroll 865 41.2 54.4 3. self-employed 434 20.7 27.3 4. ambiguous 5 .2 .3 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 470 22.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
330 V0463 I/48ah Reason father did not work Was that because of permanent disability or incapacitation to work, unemployment, being job-seeking, retirement, living off investments, domestic work, care for children, or was there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 1, 3-999)
1. disability to work 51 2.4 25.1 2. job-seeking 11 .5 5.4 3. retired 94 4.5 46.3 4. domestic work 2 .1 1.0 5. study 2 .1 1.0 88. died 43 2.0 21.2 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1858 88.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
331 V0464 I/48anw Reason father had never worked Was that because of study, unemployment, being job-seeking, domestic work, care for children, disability, or was there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 1, 2, 996-999)
1. study 1 .0 9.1 3. domestic word care for children 1 .0 9.1 4. disability 2 .1 18.2 5. other reason 7 .3 63.6 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 2050 97.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
332 V0465 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (sbc92) What was your father’s profession or function? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 2- 999)
V0466 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (u&s92) Refer to V0465 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 2- 999)
V0467 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (isei92) Refer to V0465 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 2- 999)
333 V0468 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (egp92) Refer to V0465 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 2- 999)
1. I - higher controller 260 12.4 17.2 2. II - lower controller 148 7.0 9.8 3. IIIa - skilled nonmanual 80 3.8 5.3 4. IIIb - semi-skilled nonmanual 42 2.0 2.8 5. IVa - self-employed with employee(s) 116 5.5 7.7 6. IVb - self-employed without employees 71 3.4 4.7 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 152 7.2 10.1 8. V - manual supervisor 100 4.8 6.6 9. VI - skilled manual 71 3.4 4.7 10. VIIa - semi-skilled manual 411 19.6 27.2 11. VIIb - farm labor 58 2.8 3.8 998. NA 82 3.9 MD 999. INAP 510 24.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0469 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (isco88) Refer to V0465 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 2- 999)
334 V0470 I/48ef Number of employees supervised by father Did your father supervise people in his profession or function?
How many persons did your father supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, code 2-999, V0462, 3, 997- 998)
0. none 697 33.2 64.2 1. 1-4 110 5.2 10.1 2. 5-9 86 4.1 7.9 3. 10-19 88 4.2 8.1 4. 20-49 69 3.3 6.4 5. 50-99 18 .9 1.7 6. 100 or more 18 .9 1.7 997. DK 71 3.4 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 905 43.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
335 V0471 I/48gh Number of persons employed by self-employed father Did your father employ people?
How many people did your father employ?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, code 2-999, V0462, 1-2, 4-998)
0. none 185 8.8 43.9 1. 1-4 142 6.8 33.7 2. 5-9 39 1.9 9.3 3. 10-19 26 1.2 6.2 4. 20-49 20 1.0 4.8 5. 50-99 6 .3 1.4 6. 100 or more 3 .1 .7 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 46 2.2 MD 999. INAP 1629 77.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
336 V0472 I/48i Number of hours father spent on work during adolescence How many hours did your father work on average per week, not counting unpaid hours?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0462, codes 2-999)
3. 12-20 hours 3 .1 .2 4. 20-30 hours 5 .2 .3 5. 30 hours or more 1506 71.7 99.5 997. DK 70 3.3 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 478 22.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
337 V0473 I/48j Reason why father was not full-time working Showcard 21 presented, listing response alternatives. Your father worked less than 30 hours per week on average. Could you indicate by means of this card which situation applied to your father?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0461, codes 997-999; V0472, codes 5- 999)
1. partial disability 2 .1 50.0 2. unemployed, job-seeking 1 .0 25.0 6. no other activities 1 .0 25.0 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 2058 98.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
338 3.3.40 Background characteristics of mother – social and economic variables
V0480 I/v49 Highest education (completed) of mother The next question is about your mother’s education when you were 10-16 years old.
Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives. (Refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which your mother received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
999 (inappropriate) routing. This routing is too complicated to be summarized like the other routings. If the mother was deceased (V0389, code 2); or the mother is the only largest contributor to the household income (mother is the only Head of Household)(V0344, V0345, V0346 in relation to V0290 and V0291), than this question was not asked.
1. LA – elementary 902 42.9 46.6 2. LB - extended elementary 35 1.7 1.8 3. LV - (lower) vocational 423 20.1 21.8 4. U – secondary 317 15.1 16.4 5. UV - middle level vocational 39 1.9 2.0 6. M - higher level secondary 66 3.1 3.4 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 41 2.0 2.1 8. HBO - higher level vocational 85 4.0 4.4 9. S - university level vocational 8 .4 .4 10. H – university 21 1.0 1.1 997. DK 109 5.2 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 51 2.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
339 V0481 I/50a Occupational status of mother during adolescence The next questions are about your mother’s profession when you were 10-16 years old. Showcard 20 presented, listing response alternatives. Could you indicate by means of this card what your mother’s daily activities were then or which situation applied to your mother?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0480, code 999)
1. paid job 523 24.9 26.4 2. used to work 679 32.3 34.3 3. has never worked 777 37.0 39.3 997. DK 29 1.4 MD 998. NA 42 2.0 MD 999. INAP 51 2.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
340 V0482 I/50aw Sector in which mother was employed Was your mother working in the public service, on the payroll, self- employed, or how?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0480, code 999; V0481 codes 2-998)
1. public service 87 4.1 16.7 2. on the payroll 302 14.4 58.0 3. self-employed 114 5.4 21.9 4. ambiguous 3 .1 .6 5. cooperating in familybusiness 15 .7 2.9 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1539 73.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
341 V0483 I/50ah Reason mother did not work Was that because of permanent disability or incapacitation to work, unemployment, being job-seeking, retirement, living off investments, domestic work, care for children, or was there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0480, code 999; V0481, code 1, 3-998 )
1. disability to work 14 .7 2.1 2. job-seeking 1 .0 .1 3. retired 34 1.6 5.0 4. domestic work 606 28.8 89.6 5. study 1 .0 .1 6. other 5 .2 .7 88. died 15 .7 2.2 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1383 65.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
342 V0484 I/50an Reason mother had never worked Was that because of study, unemployment, being job-seeking, domestic work, care for children, disability, or was there another reason?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0480, code 999; V0481, code 1, 2, 997- 998 )
2. unemployment job-seeking 3 .1 .4 3. domestic word care for children 763 36.3 98.7 4. disability 7 .3 .9 997. DK 4 .2 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1285 61.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
343 V0485 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (sbc92) What was your mother’s profession or function? Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999)
V0486 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (u&s92) Refer to V0485 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999)
V0487 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (isei92) Refer to V0485 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999)
344 V0488 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (egp92) Refer to V0485 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999)
1. I - higher controller 28 1.3 5.5 2. II - lower controller 69 3.3 13.6 3. IIIa - skilled nonmanual 72 3.4 14.2 4. IIIb - semi-skilled nonmanual 76 3.6 15.0 5. IVa - self-employed with employee(s) 34 1.6 6.7 6. IVb - self-employed without employees 50 2.4 9.9 7. IVc - self-employed farmer 15 .7 3.0 8. V - manual supervisor 3 .1 .6 9. VI - skilled manual 11 .5 2.2 10. VIIa - semi-skilled manual 137 6.5 27.1 11. VIIb - farm labor 11 .5 2.2 997. DK 777 37.0 MD 998. NA 49 2.3 MD 999. INAP 769 36.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0489 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (isco88) Refer to V0485 for complete question text. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable 999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999)
345 V0490 I/50ef Number of persons supervised by mother Did your mother supervise people in her profession or function?
How many persons did your mother supervise?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999; V0482, code 3)
0. none 361 17.2 91.2 1. 1-4 14 .7 3.5 2. 5-9 12 .6 3.0 3. 10-19 5 .2 1.3 4. 20-49 4 .2 1.0 997. DK 7 .3 MD 998. NA 43 2.0 MD 999. INAP 1655 78.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
346 V0491 I/50gh Number of persons employed by self-employed mother Did your mother employ people?
How many people did your mother employ?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2- 999; V0482, code 1-2, 997-999)
0. none 71 3.4 62.3 1. 1-4 34 1.6 29.8 2. 5-9 5 .2 4.4 3. 10-19 2 .1 1.8 4. 20-49 2 .1 1.8 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1948 92.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
347 V0492 I/50i Number of hours mother spent on work during adolescence How many hours did your mother work on average per week, not counting unpaid hours?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0481, codes 2-999)
2. 1- 12 hours 57 2.7 12.2 3. 12-20 hours 146 6.9 31.3 4. 20-30 hours 85 4.0 18.2 5. 30 hours or more 179 8.5 38.3 997. DK 52 2.5 MD 998. NA 39 1.9 MD 999. INAP 1543 73.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
348 V0493 I/50j Reason why mother was not full-time working Showcard 21 presented, listing response alternatives. Your mother worked less than 30 hours per week on average. Could you indicate by means of this card which situation applied to your mother?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0492, codes 5-999)
1. partial disability 2 .1 .8 3. domestic work. Care for family 244 11.6 98.8 6. no other activities 1 .0 .4 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 43 2.0 MD 999. INAP 1810 86.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
349 3.3.41 Interview information
V0500 0/ Interviewer wave 1 identification number Interviewer identification number ranges from 13001 to 99001 .
V0501 0/ Interviewer wave 1 characteristic - age Information contained in this variable was collected by the fieldwork organization.
V0502 0/ Interviewer wave 1 characteristic - sex Information contained in this variable was collected by the fieldwork organization.
1. male 580 27.6 27.7 2. female 1513 72.0 72.3 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0503 0/ Week of interview Wave 1
14 356 16.9 16.9 15 446 21.2 21.2 16 413 19.7 19.7 17 450 21.4 21.4 18 436 20.8 20.8
2101 100.0 100.0
V0504 0/ Date of interview Wave 1 (yyyymmdd)
V0505 0/ Duration of interview Wave 1 (mmm)
350 V0506 I/53a Any person present at first interview? This question has been answered by the interviewer. Were there any other people in the room during the interview besides the respondent?
1. yes 701 33.4 33.4 2. no 1400 66.6 66.6
2101 100.0 100.0
351 V0507 I/53c Present at first interview - children under 6 years This question has been answered by the interviewer. Please indicate of this/these person(s) whether they followed the conversation completely or in part, that is: listened actively, whether they intervened in the interview, that is: offered an own opinion, corrected the respondent; whether they suggested answers; etceteras
Children under 6 years old?
0. not present 1996 95.0 95.0 1. did not listen 75 3.6 3.6 2. did listen 18 .9 .9 3. did participate 12 .6 .6
2101 100.0 100.0
V0508 I/53d Present at first interview - children 6 years and older Refer to V0507 for the question text. Children older than 6 years?
0. not present 2008 95.6 95.6 1. did not listen 46 2.2 2.2 2. did listen 44 2.1 2.1 3. did participate 3 .1 .1
2101 100.0 100.0
352 V0509 I/53e Present at first interview - spouse or partner Refer to V0507 for the question text. Husband, wife, or partner?
0. not present 1633 77.7 77.7 1. did not listen 175 8.3 8.3 2. did listen 247 11.8 11.8 3. did participate 46 2.2 2.2
2101 100.0 100.0
V0510 I/53f Present at first interview - other relatives Refer to V0507 for the question text. Other relatives?
0. not present 2015 95.9 95.9 1. did not listen 45 2.1 2.1 2. did listen 36 1.7 1.7 3. did participate 5 .2 .2
2101 100.0 100.0
V0511 I/53g Present at first interview - other adults Refer to V0507 for the question text. Other adults?
0. not present 2033 96.8 96.8 1. did not listen 29 1.4 1.4 2. did listen 34 1.6 1.6 3. did participate 5 .2 .2
2101 100.0 100.0
353 V0512 I/54a Disturbing influences first interview - first coding This question has been answered by the interviewer. Were there any disturbing influences during the interview, such as a television set or radio that were on, other people arriving for a visit, etceteras?
0. no disturbing influences 1966 93.6 93.8 1. visitors 10 .5 .5 2. tv, radio, loud music, loud noise 33 1.6 1.6 3. children 36 1.7 1.7 4. telephone 9 .4 .4 5. pets 12 .6 .6 6. partner 6 .3 .3 7. interview not at home 6 .3 .3 8. attitude/condition respondent 7 .3 .3 9. other member of household 4 .2 .2 10. talking of other people present (not specified) 7 .3 .3 994. uncodable 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0513 I/54b Disturbing influences first interview - second coding Refer to V0512 for the question text.
1. visitors 3 .1 11.5 2. tv, radio, loud music, loud noise 2 .1 7.7 3. children 8 .4 30.8 4. telephone 2 .1 7.7 5. pets 1 .0 3.8 6. partner 3 .1 11.5 8. attitude/condition respondent 3 .1 11.5 10. talking of other people present (not specified) 4 .2 15.4 995. no second coding 2075 98.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
354 V0514 I/52a Willingness to participate in next wave Thank you very much for your cooperation. After the elections, ITS would like to talk with you again about some topics which will receive a lot of attention by then. If you don’t object, someone will come along after May 6.
1. does not mind 2009 95.6 95.9 2. does mind 86 4.1 4.1 997. DK 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0515 I/52b Not willing to participate - reason Could you indicate why you object?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0514, codes 1, 997)
1. is not interested in the subject/politics 16 .8 18.6 2. does not feel like it 2 .1 2.3 3. has poor knowledge of the subject/politics 9 .4 10.5 4. it takes too much time 26 1.2 30.2 5. does not see the point of participating 4 .2 4.7 6. is fed up with it 7 .3 8.1 7. is not available (holiday. emigration etc.) 6 .3 7.0 8. has been bothered once too often by interviews 2 .1 2.3 11. was disappointed with the previous interview 1 .0 1.2 14. too old/ill 2 .1 2.3 88. other 10 .5 11.6 93. uncodable 1 .0 1.2 999. INAP 2015 95.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
355 3.3.42 Text variables first wave
V0550 I/10 Most important national problem - first answer (text) Refer to V0045 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 10. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0045.
V0551 I/10 Most important national problem - second answer (text) Refer to V0045 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 10. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0046.
V0552 I/10Most important national problem - third answer (text) Refer to V0045 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 10. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0047.
V0553 I/10 Most important national problem - fourth answer (text) Refer to V0045 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 10. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0048.
V0554 I/10 Most important national problem - fifth answer (text) Refer to V0045 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 10. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0049.
V0555 I/27c Reason for not voting in most recent municipal elections (text) Refer to V0169 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 27c. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0169.
V0556 I/30.1. 1. Photo A - other name (text) Refer to V0190 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.1.1.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0190.
V0557 I/30.1. 2. Party – other (text) Refer to V0191 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.1.2.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0191.
V0558 I/30.1. 3. Political function - other (text) Refer to V0192 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.1.3.. The coded version
356 of this answer can be found in variable V0192.
357 V0559 I/30.2. 1. Photo B - other name (text) Refer to V0193 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.2.1.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0193.
V0560 I/30.2. 2. Party - other (text) Refer to V0194 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.2.2.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0194.
V0561 I/30.2. 3. Political function - other (text) Refer to V0195 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.2.3.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0195.
V0562 I/30.3. 1. Photo C - other name (text) Refer to V0196 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.3.1.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0196.
V0563 I/30.3. 2. Party - other (text) Refer to V0197 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.3.2.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0197.
V0564 I/30.3. 3. Political function - other (text) Refer to V0198 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.3.3.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0198.
V0565 I/30.4. 1. Photo D - other name (text) Refer to V0199 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.4.1.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0199.
V0566 I/30.4. 2. Party - other (text) Refer to V0200 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.4.2.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0200.
V0567 I/30.4. 3. Political function - other (text) Refer to V0201 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 30.4.3.. The coded version of this answer can be found in variable V0201.
358 V0568 I/39b Respondents current occupation (text) Refer to V0358 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 39b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0358, V0359, V0360 V0361 and V0362. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0569 I/39cd Branch of industry of respondents current occupation (text) What kind of company are you working for? What kind of company do you own? This string variable contains the original answer to question 39cd. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0570 I/39k Respondents former occupation (text) Refer to V0367 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 39k. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0367, V0368, V0369 V0370 and V0371. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0571 I/39l Branch of industry of respondents former occupation (text) What kind of company did you work for? This string variable contains the original answer to question 39l. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0572 I/43b Partners current occupation (text) Refer to V0406 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 43b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0406, V0407, V0408 V0409 and V0410. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0573 I/43cd Branch of industry of partners current occupation (text) What kind of company is your partner working for? What kind of company does your partner own? This string variable contains the original answer to question 43cd. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0574 I/43k Partners former occupation (text) Refer to V0415 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 43k. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0415, V0416, V0417 V0418 and V0419. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the
359 coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
360 V0575 I/43l Branch of industry of partners former occupation (text) What kind of company did your partner work for? This string variable contains the original answer to question 43l. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0576 I/46b Head of households current occupation (text) Refer to V0440 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 46b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0440, V0441, V0442 V0443 and V0444. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0577 I/46cd Branch of industry of head of households current occupation (text) What kind of company is the main breadwinner working for? What kind of company does the main breadwinner own? This string variable contains the original answer to question 46cd. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0578 I/46k Head of households former occupation (text) Refer to V0449 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 39b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0449, V0450, V0451 V0452 and V0453. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0579 I/46l Branch of industry head of households former occupation (text) What kind of company did the main breadwinner work for? This string variable contains the original answer to question 46l. This datafile does not contain a coded version of this variable.
V0580 I/48b Fathers occupation during adolescence (text) Refer to V0465 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 48b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0465, V0466, V0467 V0468 and V0469. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0582 I/50b Mothers occupation during adolescence (text) Refer to V0485 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 50b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0485, V0486, V0487 V0488 and V0489. Refer to 4.2.4 below for additional information about the
361 coding of this variable. This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
362 V0584 I/52b Not willing to participate - reason (text) Refer to V0515 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 52b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0515.
V0585 I/54b Disturbing influences first interview (text) Refer to V0512 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 54b. The coded version of this answer can be found in V0512 and V0513.
363 3.3.43 Order variables first wave
V0590 I/16 Order of statements about (not) voting This order variable refers to V0085 to V0093. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0591 I/18 Order of questions about poll results This order variable refers to V0102 to V0105. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0592 I/28 Order of questions about party sympathy This order variable refers to V0170 to V0180 . Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0593 I/29 Order of questions about sympathy of politicians This order variable refers to V0181 to V0189 . Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0594 I/32 Order of statements about the goals society should aim at This order variable refers to V0250 to V0266 . Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
364 3.4 Documentation of variables of the main study: second wave
3.4.1 Interest and activities in campaign
V0600 II/2 Read campaign news in newspaper? I would like to begin with a question about the campaign preceding the election of the Second Chamber on May 6. If there was news about the election campaign in the newspaper, how often did you read such news? Showcard 1 presented, listing response alternatives
1. (nearly) always 203 9.7 11.2 2. often 319 15.2 17.6 3. now and then 754 35.9 41.6 4. seldom or never 403 19.2 22.2 5. does not read papers 135 6.4 7.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
365 V0601 II/3a Has seen electoral debates? In the week prior to the election, debates were held on television, in which the leaders of the large political parties participated. Did you watch one of these debates, entirely or for the greater part?
1. yes, all of it 280 13.3 15.4 2. yes, parts of it 683 32.5 37.7 3. no, not at all 851 40.5 46.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0602 II/3b Has seen electoral debate on eve of elections? Did you watch the debate of the party leaders on the eve of the election, entirely or for the greater part?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V601, code 3).
1. yes, all of it 326 15.5 33.9 2. yes, parts of it 337 16.0 35.1 3. no, not at all 298 14.2 31.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 851 40.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0603 II/3a Influenced by electoral debate on eve of elections? Did the debate of the party leaders affect your vote choice?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V601, code 3)
1. yes 136 6.5 14.3 2. no 812 38.6 85.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 851 40.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
366 V0604 II/4 Campaign activity - displayed window posters During the election campaign all kinds of activities are undertaken. We have here a list of such activities. Would you tell which of the following activities you have undertaken during the recent campaign? Showcard 2 presented, listing response alternatives Displayed window posters
0. not mentioned 1759 83.7 97.0 1. mentioned 55 2.6 3.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0605 II/4 Campaign activity - tried to convince others Refer to V0604 for complete question text Tried to convince others
0. not mentioned 1528 72.7 84.2 1. mentioned 286 13.6 15.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0606 II/4 Campaign activity - contributed money to party Refer to V0604 for complete question text Contributed money to party
0. not mentioned 1784 84.9 98.3 1. mentioned 30 1.4 1.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0607 II/4 Campaign activity - attended election rallies Refer to V0604 for complete question text Attended election rallies
0. not mentioned 1795 85.4 99.0 1. mentioned 19 .9 1.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
367 3.4.2 Voting behavior Second Chamber 1998
V0610 II/5 Did (not) vote in 1998 parliamentary elections Did you vote in the parliamentary election on May 6?
1. yes 1647 78.4 90.8 2. no 167 7.9 9.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0611 II/6 Party voted for in 1998 parliamentary elections Which party did you vote for?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. PVDA 480 22.8 29.4 2. CDA 288 13.7 17.7 3. VVD 358 17.0 22.0 4. D66 191 9.1 11.7 5. GroenLinks 141 6.7 8.7 6. SGP 14 .7 .9 7. GPV 21 1.0 1.3 8. RPF 39 1.9 2.4 9. Centrumdemocraten 4 .2 .2 10. Unie 55+ 2 .1 .1 11. AOV 4 .2 .2 12. SP 72 3.4 4.4 23. Senioren 2000 4 .2 .2 61. Nederland Mobiel 4 .2 .2 63. De Groenen 6 .3 .4 64. Natuurwetpartij 1 .0 .1 66. VIP 1 .0 .1 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 995. abstention 4 .2 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 6 .3 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
368 V0612 II/7 Party choice - first reason Why did you vote [party mentioned by respondent]?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, codes 997-998)
Refer to 4.2.3 for a description of the codes and the frequencies
V0613 II/7 Party choice - second reason Refer to V0612 for complete question text and to 4.2.3 for a description of the codes and the frequencies
V0614 II/7 Party choice - third reason Refer to V0612 for complete question text and to 4.2.3 for a description of the codes and the frequencies
V0615 II/7 Party choice - fourth reason Refer to V0612 for complete question text and to 4.2.3 for a description of the codes and the frequencies
V0616 II/8 Party choice - when decided When did you decide to vote for [party mentioned by respondent]? Was this on the day of the election, during the last days before the election, during the last weeks before the election, a few months before the election, or did you know even longer beforehand for which party you would vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. election day 137 6.5 8.3 2. last days 276 13.1 16.8 3. last weeks 245 11.7 14.9 4. last months 216 10.3 13.1 5. much earlier 772 36.7 46.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
369 V0617 II/9a Did (not) cast preferential vote Did you vote for the first candidate on the party list?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
1. no preferential vote 1243 59.2 76.5 2. preferential vote 382 18.2 23.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
370 V0618 II/9b Reason for preferential vote - first reason Why did you vote for another candidate?
999 (inappropriate) routing (999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, codes 994, 995, 997, 998; V0617, codes 997, 998)
1. first woman 97 4.6 27.5 2. acquaintance 77 3.7 21.8 3. knew candidate (tv radio newspaper) 3 .1 .8 5. negative about 1st candidate (general) 23 1.1 6.5 6. negative about 1st candidate (effectiveness) 4 .2 1.1 7. negative about 1st candidate (sympathy) 12 .6 3.4 10. policy (environment/animals) 4 .2 1.1 11. policy (foreigners) 2 .1 .6 12. policy (agriculture) 4 .2 1.1 13. policy (3rd world) 1 .0 .3 14. regional candidate 36 1.7 10.2 15. same sector/ background 4 .2 1.1 16. 2nd/3rd woman 9 .4 2.5 17. candidate trait (general) 20 1.0 5.7 18. candidate trait (retrospective) 14 .7 4.0 19. candidate trait (sympathy) 17 .8 4.8 20. candidate trait (integrity) 2 .1 .6 21. candidate trait (age) 3 .1 .8 23. candidate trait (trust) 3 .1 .8 24. last candidate on list 6 .3 1.7 25. second person 2 .1 .6 26. no reason 10 .5 2.8 994. uncodable 26 1.2 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1432 68.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
371 V0619 II/9b Reason for preferential vote - second reason Refer to V0618 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, codes 994, 995, 997, 998; V0617, codes 997, 998)
10. policy (environment/animals) 1 .0 7.7 14. regional candidate 1 .0 7.7 16. 2nd/3rd woman 4 .2 30.8 18. candidate trait (retrospective) 2 .1 15.4 19. candidate trait (sympathy) 1 .0 7.7 21. candidate trait (age) 3 .1 23.1 22. candidate trait (expertise) 1 .0 7.7 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 995. no second coding 367 17.5 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 1432 68.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
372 V0620 II/9c Did respondent authorize someone to vote by proxy? Did you authorize someone to vote for you by proxy?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. yes 169 8.0 10.3 2. no 1478 70.3 89.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0621 II/9d Person authorized to vote by proxy Whom?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0620, code 2)
1. partner 98 4.7 60.9 2. (step/grand) parent 23 1.1 14.3 3. (step/grand) child 9 .4 5.6 4. other member of household 5 .2 3.1 5. neighbor 19 .9 11.8 6. brother/sister 2 .1 1.2 7. friend 5 .2 3.1 994. uncodable 2 .1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1645 78.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
373 V0622 II/9e Has been authorized by someone to vote by proxy Were you authorized by anyone to vote by proxy?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0620, code 1)
1. yes 204 9.7 13.8 2. no 1274 60.6 86.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 336 16.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0623 II/9f Person who authorized respondent to vote by proxy By who?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0620, code 1, V0622, code 2)
1. partner 129 6.1 64.8 2. (step/grand) parent 13 .6 6.5 3. (step/grand) child 28 1.3 14.1 4. other member of household 7 .3 3.5 5. neighbor 18 .9 9.0 7. friend 1 .0 .5 10. other member of family 2 .1 1.0 11. ex family/household member 1 .0 .5 994. uncodable 3 .1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1610 76.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
374 V0624 II/9g What time did you vote? At what time did you vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0620, code 1)
1. between 8 and 9 a.m. 169 8.0 11.4 2. between 9 and 12 a.m. 325 15.5 22.0 3. between 12 and 2 p.m. 137 6.5 9.3 4. between 2 and 6 p.m. 404 19.2 27.4 5. between 6 and 7 p.m. 226 10.8 15.3 6. between 7 and 8 p.m. 216 10.3 14.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 336 16.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
375 V0625 II/10a Previous voting behavior of respondent You voted for [party mentioned by respondent]. Have you always voted for [party mentioned by respondent] or have you at times voted for [another party/ a party]?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. always this party 550 26.2 33.5 2. sometimes other party 998 47.5 60.7 3. not entitled to vote 68 3.2 4.1 4. did not vote before 27 1.3 1.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
376 V0626 II/11Party previously voted for - first answer Which other party or parties have you voted for?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0625, codes 1,3,4, 997)
1. PVDA 209 9.9 21.1 2. CDA 217 10.3 21.9 3. VVD 135 6.4 13.6 4. D66 204 9.7 20.6 5. GroenLinks 44 2.1 4.4 6. SGP 8 .4 .8 7. GPV 11 .5 1.1 8. RPF 5 .2 .5 9. Centrumdemocraten 6 .3 .6 10. Unie 55+ 3 .1 .3 11. AOV 10 .5 1.0 12. SP 22 1.0 2.2 13. Centrumpartij 4 .2 .4 14. EVP 2.1.2 15. KVP\RKSP 29 1.4 2.9 16. CHU 3.1.3 17. ARP 16 .8 1.6 19. CPN 15 .7 1.5 20. PPR 13 .6 1.3 21. PSP 20 1.0 2.0 22. BoerenPartij 8 .4 .8 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 .1 24. DS70 2 .1 .2 30. local party 2 .1 .2 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .1 68. NCPN 1 .0 .1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 816 38.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
377 V0627 II/11Party previously voted for - second answer Refer to V0626 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0625, codes 1,3,4, 997)
1. PVDA 49 2.3 17.7 2. CDA 42 2.0 15.2 3. VVD 25 1.2 9.0 4. D66 52 2.5 18.8 5. GroenLinks 25 1.2 9.0 6. SGP 1 .0 .4 7. GPV 4 .2 1.4 8. RPF 3 .1 1.1 9. Centrumdemocraten 2 .1 .7 10. Unie 55+ 2 .1 .7 11. AOV 1 .0 .4 12. SP 9 .4 3.2 13. Centrumpartij 2 .1 .7 14. EVP 1.0.4 15. KVP\RKSP 9 .4 3.2 16. CHU 4 .2 1.4 17. ARP 2 .1 .7 19. CPN 10 .5 3.6 20. PPR 14 .7 5.1 21. PSP 15 .7 5.4 22. BoerenPartij 2 .1 .7 24. DS70 1 .0 .4 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .4 64. Natuurwetpartij 1 .0 .4 995. abstention 714 34.0 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 816 38.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
378 V0628 II/11Party previously voted for - third answer Refer to V0626 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0625, codes 1,3,4, 997)
1. PVDA 6 .3 13.6 2. CDA 3 .1 6.8 3. VVD 7 .3 15.9 4. D66 4 .2 9.1 5. GroenLinks 5 .2 11.4 7. GPV 1 .0 2.3 12. SP 1 .0 2.3 13. Centrumpartij 1 .0 2.3 14. EVP 3 .1 6.8 15. KVP\RKSP 3 .1 6.8 17. ARP 1 .0 2.3 19. CPN 1 .0 2.3 21. PSP 6 .3 13.6 22. BoerenPartij 1 .0 2.3 63. De Groenen 1 .0 2.3 995. abstention 947 45.1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 816 38.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
379 V0629 II/11Party previously voted for - fourth answer Refer to V0626 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0625, codes 1,3,4, 997)
1. PVDA 1 .0 12.5 2. CDA 1 .0 12.5 4. D66 2 .1 25.0 5. GroenLinks 3 .1 37.5 16. CHU 1 .0 12.5 995. abstention 983 46.8 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 816 38.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
380 V0630 II/11Party previously voted for - fifth answer Refer to V0626 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0625, codes 1,3,4, 997)
21. PSP 2 .1 100.0 995. abstention 989 47.1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 816 38.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
381 V0631 II/12a Considered not to vote Have you seriously considered not to vote in the parliamentary election of May 6?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. yes 90 4.3 5.5 2. no 1557 74.1 94.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0632 II/12b Did hesitate about party choice And have you seriously considered to vote for [a different party than [party mentioned by respondent]/a party] in the parliamentary election of May 6?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. yes 512 24.4 31.1 2. no 1133 53.9 68.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 167 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
382 V0633 II/13 First party considered as alternative choice Which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; v0632, code 2, 997)
1. PVDA 112 5.3 22.5 2. CDA 57 2.7 11.5 3. VVD 73 3.5 14.7 4. D66 77 3.7 15.5 5. GroenLinks 117 5.6 23.5 6. SGP 3 .1 .6 7. GPV 5 .2 1.0 8. RPF 7 .3 1.4 10. Unie 55+ 2 .1 .4 11. AOV 1 .0 .2 12. SP 37 1.8 7.4 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 .2 61. Nederland Mobiel 2 .1 .4 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .2 65. KPP 1.0.2 66. VIP 1 .0 .2 993. invalid 1 .0 MD 994. uncodable 5 .2 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1302 62.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
383 V0634 II/13 Second party considered as alternative choice Refer to V0633 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; v0632, code 2, 997
1. PVDA 9 .4 12.7 2. CDA 7 .3 9.9 3. VVD 10 .5 14.1 4. D66 13 .6 18.3 5. GroenLinks 16 .8 22.5 7. GPV 4 .2 5.6 12. SP 11 .5 15.5 23. Senioren 2000 1 .0 1.4 995. no second party mentioned 432 20.6 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1302 62.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
384 V0635 II/13 Third party considered as alternative choice Refer to V0633 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; v0632, code 2, 997)
3. VVD 1 .0 16.7 4. D66 2 .1 33.3 5. GroenLinks 1 .0 16.7 7. GPV 1 .0 16.7 8. RPF 1 .0 16.7 995. no second party mentioned 497 23.7 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1302 62.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
385 V0636 II/13 Fourth party considered as alternative choice Refer to V0633 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; v0632, code 2, 997)
4. D66 1 .0 100.0 995. no second party mentioned 502 23.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1302 62.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
386 V0637 II/13 Fifth party considered as alternative choice Refer to V0633 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; v0632, code 2, 997)
5. GroenLinks 1 .0 100.0 995. no second party mentioned 502 23.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 1302 62.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
387 V0638 II/14 Did not vote - first reason Why didn’t you vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 1)
10. physical/personal circumstances 2 .1 1.2 11. handicapped/ill 16 .8 9.7 12. family matters 2 .1 1.2 20. absence (not in town. abroad) 6 .3 3.6 21. no time 13 .6 7.9 22. too late 6 .3 3.6 23. had to work 7 .3 4.2 24. vacation 10 .5 6.1 30. no interest 18 .9 10.9 31. does not care 4 .2 2.4 32. forgot to vote 6 .3 3.6 41. religious beliefs 3 .1 1.8 42. principle 7 .3 4.2 50. could not make a choice 17 .8 10.3 60. protest 2 .1 1.2 61. disagrees with parties 3 .1 1.8 62. rejects party system 1 .0 .6 72. politicians do not keep promises 1 .0 .6 73. does not trust politicians 1 .0 .6 74. it is no use to vote 18 .9 10.9 76. politics is a mess 2 .1 1.2 81. no political knowledge 10 .5 6.1 91. did not receive summons 1 .0 .6 92. lost summons 7 .3 4.2 101. forgot to give proxy 1 .0 .6 102. proxy did not vote 1 .0 .6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 999. INAP 1647 78.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
388 V0639 II/14 Did not vote - second reason Refer to V0638 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 1)
12. family matters 1 .0 2.4 13. weather 1 .0 2.4 20. absence (not in town. abroad) 1 .0 2.4 21. no time 3 .1 7.1 22. too late 2 .1 4.8 24. vacation 1 .0 2.4 30. no interest 2 .1 4.8 31. does not care 2 .1 4.8 32. forgot to vote 2 .1 4.8 50. could not make a choice 6 .3 14.3 60. protest 1 .0 2.4 61. disagrees with parties 2 .1 4.8 62. rejects party system 3 .1 7.1 72. politicians do not keep promises 1 .0 2.4 73. does not trust politicians 3 .1 7.1 74. it is no use to vote 3 .1 7.1 75. it does not yield to vote 3 .1 7.1 81. no political knowledge 4 .2 9.5 101. forgot to give proxy 1 .0 2.4 995. no other reason mentioned 125 5.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 1647 78.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
389 V0640 II/14 Did not vote - third reason Refer to V0638 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 1)
21. no time 1 .0 16.7 61. disagrees with parties 1 .0 16.7 73. does not trust politicians 1 .0 16.7 74. it is no use to vote 3 .1 50.0 995. no other reason mentioned 161 7.7 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 1647 78.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
390 V0641 II/15 Did not vote - when decided When did it become clear that you would not vote? Was that on the day of the election, during the last days before the election, the last weeks before the election, a few months beforehand or did you know even longer beforehand that you would not vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 1)
1. election day 46 2.2 28.0 2. last days 35 1.7 21.3 3. last weeks 21 1.0 12.8 4. last months 5 .2 3.0 5. much earlier 57 2.7 34.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 999. INAP 1647 78.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
391 V0642 II/16 Preferred party of non-voters Supposed that you would in fact have voted, which party would you have voted for?
1. PVDA 56 2.7 43.8 2. CDA 17 .8 13.3 3. VVD 30 1.4 23.4 4. D66 7 .3 5.5 5. GroenLinks 9 .4 7.0 6. SGP 1 .0 .8 7. GPV 1 .0 .8 8. RPF 1 .0 .8 12. SP 5 .2 3.9 66. VIP 1 .0 .8 993. invalid 1 .0 MD 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 32 1.5 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1647 78.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
392 3.4.3 Coalition preference after elections
V0650 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - D66 After the election, a new cabinet is formed. This card shows five parties. Could you tell which combination of two or more parties you yourself would prefer most to form the government? Showcard 3 presented, showing the five largest parties
0. not mentioned 753 35.8 42.9 1. mentioned 1001 47.6 57.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0651 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - PvdA Refer to V0650 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 189 9.0 10.8 1. mentioned 1565 74.5 89.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0652 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - CDA Refer to V0650 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1119 53.3 63.8 1. mentioned 635 30.2 36.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
393 V0653 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - VVD Refer to V0650 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 626 29.8 35.7 1. mentioned 1128 53.7 64.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0654 II/17 Party to be included in coalition - GroenLinks Refer to V0650 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1265 60.2 72.1 1. mentioned 489 23.3 27.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
394 3.4.4 (Post)materialist values
V0655 II/18a (Post-)materialist priorities - first choice This card lists several goals one could strive for. Suppose you would have to make a choice out of these, which goal would you find most desirable? Showcard 4 presented, listing the four political goals
1. maintaining order 804 38.3 44.7 2. more say in politics 259 12.3 14.4 3. fight rising prices 167 7.9 9.3 4. freedom of speech 569 27.1 31.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0656 II/18b (Post-)materialist priorities - second choice And which do you find desirable in the second place?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0655, code 997)
1. maintaining order 518 24.7 29.2 2. more say in politics 358 17.0 20.2 3. fight rising prices 334 15.9 18.8 4. freedom of speech 566 26.9 31.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 23 1.1 MD 999. INAP 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
395 V0657 II/18c (Post-)materialist priorities - third choice And after that?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0655, code 997; V0656, code 997)
1. maintaining order 306 14.6 17.9 2. more say in politics 543 25.8 31.8 3. fight rising prices 501 23.8 29.3 4. freedom of speech 359 17.1 21.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 67 3.2 MD 999. INAP 38 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0658 II/18d (Post-)materialist priorities - fourth choice And after that?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0655, code 997; V0656, code 997; V0657, code 997)
1. maintaining order 141 6.7 8.3 2. more say in politics 575 27.4 33.6 3. fight rising prices 728 34.7 42.6 4. freedom of speech 265 12.6 15.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 999. INAP 105 5.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
396 3.4.5 Importance of issues
V0660 II/19a Importance - income differences The Second Chamber deals with a variety of issues. Not everyone finds these issues equally important. I now mention to you a number of issues. Could you indicate for each of these issues how important or unimportant it is for you? Whether you agree with what the Second Chamber does, is not what matters here.
Showcard 5 presented, listing a horizontal line with 10 categories numbered 1 to 10, and one category ‘Do not know’. Category 1 is labeled ‘very unimportant’ and category 10 is labeled ‘very important’ On this card, ‘1’ means that you consider this topic to be very unimportant and ‘10’ means that you consider this topic to be very important.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Income differences
1. very unimportant 17 .8 .9 2. 2 18 .9 1.0 3. 3 30 1.4 1.7 4. 4 67 3.2 3.7 5. 5 175 8.3 9.7 6. 6 276 13.1 15.2 7. 7 474 22.6 26.2 8. 8 467 22.2 25.8 9. 9 153 7.3 8.5 10. very important 133 6.3 7.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
397 V0661 II/19b Importance - integration ethnic minorities This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Integration of ethnic minorities
1. very unimportant 30 1.4 1.7 2. 2 20 1.0 1.1 3. 3 45 2.1 2.5 4. 4 71 3.4 4.0 5. 5 193 9.2 10.8 6. 6 266 12.7 14.9 7. 7 428 20.4 23.9 8. 8 457 21.8 25.5 9. 9 159 7.6 8.9 10. very important 121 5.8 6.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 24 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
398 V0662 II/19c Importance - nuclear plants This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Nuclear plants
1. very unimportant 84 4.0 4.7 2. 2 72 3.4 4.0 3. 3 107 5.1 6.0 4. 4 127 6.0 7.1 5. 5 207 9.9 11.6 6. 6 288 13.7 16.1 7. 7 287 13.7 16.1 8. 8 324 15.4 18.2 9. 9 150 7.1 8.4 10. very important 139 6.6 7.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 29 1.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
399 V0663 II/19d Importance - heavy traffic on highways This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Heavy traffic on the highways
1. very unimportant 17 .8 .9 2. 2 30 1.4 1.7 3. 3 52 2.5 2.9 4. 4 78 3.7 4.3 5. 5 194 9.2 10.8 6. 6 306 14.6 17.0 7. 7 398 18.9 22.1 8. 8 438 20.8 24.3 9. 9 143 6.8 7.9 10. very important 146 6.9 8.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
400 V0664 II/19e Importance - environmental pollution This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Environmental pollution
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .2 2. 2 6 .3 .3 3. 3 17 .8 .9 4. 4 23 1.1 1.3 5. 5 69 3.3 3.8 6. 6 164 7.8 9.1 7. 7 333 15.8 18.4 8. 8 577 27.5 31.9 9. 9 343 16.3 19.0 10. very important 271 12.9 15.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 5 .2 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
401 V0665 II/19f Importance - unemployment This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Unemployment
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .2 2. 2 3 .1 .2 3. 3 3 .1 .2 4. 4 9 .4 .5 5. 5 46 2.2 2.5 6. 6 125 5.9 6.9 7. 7 353 16.8 19.5 8. 8 670 31.9 37.1 9. 9 331 15.8 18.3 10. very important 264 12.6 14.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
402 V0666 II/19g Importance - euthanasia This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Euthanasia
1. very unimportant 29 1.4 1.6 2. 2 19 .9 1.1 3. 3 46 2.2 2.6 4. 4 53 2.5 2.9 5. 5 120 5.7 6.7 6. 6 260 12.4 14.5 7. 7 362 17.2 20.1 8. 8 445 21.2 24.7 9. 9 239 11.4 13.3 10. very important 225 10.7 12.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
403 V0667 II/19h Importance - European Union This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
European Union
1. very unimportant 51 2.4 2.9 2. 2 49 2.3 2.8 3. 3 61 2.9 3.5 4. 4 116 5.5 6.6 5. 5 242 11.5 13.7 6. 6 355 16.9 20.1 7. 7 385 18.3 21.8 8. 8 343 16.3 19.4 9. 9 108 5.1 6.1 10. very important 54 2.6 3.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 50 2.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
404 V0668 II/19i Importance - financial deficit of the state This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Financial deficit of the state
1. very unimportant 22 1.0 1.2 2. 2 15 .7 .8 3. 3 43 2.0 2.4 4. 4 58 2.8 3.3 5. 5 181 8.6 10.2 6. 6 320 15.2 17.9 7. 7 466 22.2 26.1 8. 8 400 19.0 22.4 9. 9 189 9.0 10.6 10. very important 89 4.2 5.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 31 1.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
405 V0669 II/19j Importance - level social benefits This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Level of social benefits
3. 3 5 .2 .3 4. 4 21 1.0 1.2 5. 5 66 3.1 3.7 6. 6 206 9.8 11.4 7. 7 515 24.5 28.6 8. 8 580 27.6 32.2 9. 9 254 12.1 14.1 10. very important 154 7.3 8.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
406 V0670 II/19k Importance - securing good provision for old age This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Securing a good provision for the old age
1. very unimportant 1 .0 .1 2. 2 3 .1 .2 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 5 .2 .3 5. 5 33 1.6 1.8 6. 6 96 4.6 5.3 7. 7 258 12.3 14.3 8. 8 572 27.2 31.6 9. 9 418 19.9 23.1 10. very important 422 20.1 23.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
407 V0671 II/19l Importance - misusing social benefits This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Misusing social benefits
1. very unimportant 10 .5 .6 2. 2 14 .7 .8 3. 3 19 .9 1.1 4. 4 27 1.3 1.5 5. 5 71 3.4 3.9 6. 6 131 6.2 7.3 7. 7 299 14.2 16.6 8. 8 465 22.1 25.8 9. 9 349 16.6 19.4 10. very important 418 19.9 23.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
408 V0672 II/19m Importance - seeking for asylum This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Refugees and asylum seekers
1. very unimportant 27 1.3 1.5 2. 2 31 1.5 1.7 3. 3 42 2.0 2.3 4. 4 64 3.0 3.5 5. 5 150 7.1 8.3 6. 6 263 12.5 14.6 7. 7 425 20.2 23.6 8. 8 486 23.1 27.0 9. 9 197 9.4 10.9 10. very important 118 5.6 6.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
409 V0673 II/19n Importance - crime This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Crime
1. very unimportant 1 .0 .1 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 9 .4 .5 5. 5 24 1.1 1.3 6. 6 55 2.6 3.0 7. 7 194 9.2 10.7 8. 8 517 24.6 28.6 9. 9 484 23.0 26.7 10. very important 522 24.8 28.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
410 V0674 II/19o Importance - health care This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0915 for the order in which the questions were asked.
Health service
3. 3 3 .1 .2 4. 4 2 .1 .1 5. 5 9 .4 .5 6. 6 33 1.6 1.8 7. 7 148 7.0 8.2 8. 8 542 25.8 29.9 9. 9 526 25.0 29.0 10. very important 550 26.2 30.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
411 3.4.6 Political parties importance of issues – unemployment
V0680 II/20a Importance unemployment - CDA Showcard 5 used Not all parties find every issue equally important. One party devotes special attention to crime prevention, while another party pays more attention to a cleaner environment. I would like to ask you how important or unimportant according to you several issues are for the various parties. When an issue is very unimportant for a party, you can indicate this with a ‘1’. When an issue is very important for a party, you can indicate that with a ‘10’.
The first issue is unemployment. How important or unimportant does CDA find this issue?
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 2. 2 4 .2 .3 3. 3 9 .4 .6 4. 4 19 .9 1.2 5. 5 70 3.3 4.5 6. 6 183 8.7 11.8 7. 7 610 29.0 39.2 8. 8 480 22.8 30.8 9. 9 133 6.3 8.5 10. very important 46 2.2 3.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 258 12.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
412 V0681 II/20b Importance unemployment - PvdA And PVDA?
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 3 .1 .2 5. 5 17 .8 1.0 6. 6 48 2.3 2.9 7. 7 241 11.5 14.6 8. 8 666 31.7 40.4 9. 9 488 23.2 29.6 10. very important 182 8.7 11.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 165 7.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
413 V0682 II/20c Importance unemployment - VVD And VVD?
1. very unimportant 3 .1 .2 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 11 .5 .7 4. 4 28 1.3 1.7 5. 5 74 3.5 4.6 6. 6 273 13.0 17.0 7. 7 505 24.0 31.4 8. 8 499 23.8 31.1 9. 9 166 7.9 10.3 10. very important 45 2.1 2.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 208 9.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
414 V0683 II/20d Importance unemployment - D66 And D66?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .3 3. 3 1 .0 .1 4. 4 8 .4 .5 5. 5 49 2.3 3.2 6. 6 192 9.1 12.6 7. 7 533 25.4 34.9 8. 8 551 26.2 36.1 9. 9 147 7.0 9.6 10. very important 40 1.9 2.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 288 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
415 V0684 II/20e Importance unemployment - GroenLinks GroenLinks?
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .3 2. 2 4 .2 .3 3. 3 7 .3 .5 4. 4 19 .9 1.3 5. 5 61 2.9 4.1 6. 6 179 8.5 12.1 7. 7 393 18.7 26.6 8. 8 448 21.3 30.3 9. 9 282 13.4 19.1 10. very important 80 3.8 5.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 337 16.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
416 V0685 II/20f Importance unemployment - GPV GPV?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .6 2. 2 3 .1 .3 3. 3 6 .3 .7 4. 4 17 .8 1.9 5. 5 74 3.5 8.5 6. 6 193 9.2 22.1 7. 7 316 15.0 36.1 8. 8 206 9.8 23.5 9. 9 43 2.0 4.9 10. very important 12 .6 1.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 939 44.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
417 V0686 II/20g Importance unemployment - party voted for (II/6) And how important does [party respondent voted for if this is another party than those already mentioned] find this issue according to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
1. very unimportant 1 .0 .1 3. 3 3 .1 .2 4. 4 5 .2 .3 5. 5 26 1.2 1.7 6. 6 91 4.3 6.0 7. 7 372 17.7 24.6 8. 8 581 27.7 38.5 9. 9 321 15.3 21.3 10. very important 110 5.2 7.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 120 5.7 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
418 3.4.7 Political parties importance of issues – cleaner environment
V0687 II/21a Importance cleaner environment - CDA And a cleaner environment? How important or unimportant does CDA find this issue?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .3 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 7 .3 .5 4. 4 14 .7 .9 5. 5 100 4.8 6.5 6. 6 340 16.2 22.0 7. 7 629 29.9 40.7 8. 8 344 16.4 22.3 9. 9 74 3.5 4.8 10. very important 30 1.4 1.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 270 12.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
419 V0688 II/21b Importance cleaner environment - PvdA And PVDA?
1. very unimportant 3 .1 .2 4. 4 9 .4 .6 5. 5 40 1.9 2.5 6. 6 216 10.3 13.5 7. 7 587 27.9 36.8 8. 8 564 26.8 35.3 9. 9 138 6.6 8.6 10. very important 40 1.9 2.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 217 10.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
420 V0689 II/21c Importance cleaner environment - VVD And VVD?
1. very unimportant 8 .4 .5 2. 2 6 .3 .4 3. 3 19 .9 1.2 4. 4 63 3.0 4.0 5. 5 160 7.6 10.2 6. 6 441 21.0 28.3 7. 7 540 25.7 34.6 8. 8 250 11.9 16.0 9. 9 57 2.7 3.7 10. very important 17 .8 1.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 253 12.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
421 V0690 II/21d Importance cleaner environment - D66 And D66?
1. very unimportant 3 .1 .2 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 13 .6 .9 5. 5 51 2.4 3.3 6. 6 182 8.7 11.9 7. 7 547 26.0 35.8 8. 8 547 26.0 35.8 9. 9 148 7.0 9.7 10. very important 35 1.7 2.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 285 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
422 V0691 II/21e Importance cleaner environment - GroenLinks GroenLinks?
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 4 .2 .2 4. 4 8 .4 .5 5. 5 15 .7 .9 6. 6 36 1.7 2.2 7. 7 111 5.3 6.9 8. 8 363 17.3 22.7 9. 9 601 28.6 37.5 10. very important 461 21.9 28.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 212 10.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
423 V0692 II/21f Importance cleaner environment - GPV GPV?
1. very unimportant 3 .1 .3 2. 2 9 .4 1.0 3. 3 6 .3 .7 4. 4 21 1.0 2.4 5. 5 82 3.9 9.3 6. 6 204 9.7 23.2 7. 7 343 16.3 39.0 8. 8 163 7.8 18.5 9. 9 34 1.6 3.9 10. very important 14 .7 1.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 934 44.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
424 V0693 II/21g Importance environment - party voted for (II/6) And how important does [party respondent voted for if this is another party than those already mentioned] find this issue according to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 6 .3 .4 5. 5 47 2.2 3.2 6. 6 173 8.2 11.6 7. 7 497 23.7 33.3 8. 8 494 23.5 33.1 9. 9 194 9.2 13.0 10. very important 77 3.7 5.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 138 6.6 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
425 3.4.8 Political parties importance of issues – fighting crime
V0694 II/22a Importance fighting crime - CDA And crime prevention? How important or unimportant does CDA find this issue?
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 2. 2 4 .2 .3 4. 4 7 .3 .5 5. 5 24 1.1 1.5 6. 6 109 5.2 7.0 7. 7 399 19.0 25.7 8. 8 613 29.2 39.4 9. 9 282 13.4 18.1 10. very important 114 5.4 7.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 260 12.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
426 V0695 II/22b Importance fighting crime - PvdA And PVDA?
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .3 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 4 .2 .3 5. 5 33 1.6 2.1 6. 6 153 7.3 9.6 7. 7 494 23.5 31.1 8. 8 625 29.7 39.3 9. 9 198 9.4 12.5 10. very important 76 3.6 4.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 224 10.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
427 V0696 II/22c Importance fighting crime - VVD And VVD?
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .3 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 1 .0 .1 4. 4 11 .5 .7 5. 5 34 1.6 2.2 6. 6 105 5.0 6.7 7. 7 339 16.1 21.5 8. 8 589 28.0 37.3 9. 9 358 17.0 22.7 10. very important 135 6.4 8.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 236 11.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
428 V0697 II/22d Importance fighting crime - D66 And D66?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .3 2. 2 1 .0 .1 4. 4 10 .5 .7 5. 5 48 2.3 3.2 6. 6 182 8.7 12.1 7. 7 548 26.1 36.3 8. 8 530 25.2 35.1 9. 9 131 6.2 8.7 10. very important 53 2.5 3.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 306 14.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
429 V0698 II/22e Importance fighting crime - GroenLinks GroenLinks?
1. very unimportant 7 .3 .5 2. 2 5 .2 .3 3. 3 11 .5 .8 4. 4 26 1.2 1.8 5. 5 81 3.9 5.6 6. 6 236 11.2 16.3 7. 7 475 22.6 32.8 8. 8 403 19.2 27.8 9. 9 155 7.4 10.7 10. very important 49 2.3 3.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 366 17.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
430 V0699 II/22f Importance fighting crime - GPV GPV?
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .4 2. 2 2 .1 .2 3. 3 4 .2 .4 4. 4 12 .6 1.3 5. 5 33 1.6 3.6 6. 6 103 4.9 11.2 7. 7 239 11.4 25.9 8. 8 311 14.8 33.7 9. 9 149 7.1 16.1 10. very important 66 3.1 7.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 891 42.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
431 V0700 II/22g Importance fighting crime - party voted for (II/6) And how important does [party respondent voted for if this is another party than those already mentioned] find this issue according to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 2 .1 .1 5. 5 19 .9 1.3 6. 6 74 3.5 5.0 7. 7 380 18.1 25.7 8. 8 597 28.4 40.4 9. 9 279 13.3 18.9 10. very important 122 5.8 8.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 153 7.3 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
432 3.4.9 Political parties importance of issues – refugees
V0701 II/23a Importance refugees - CDA And the problem of refugees? How important or unimportant does CDA find this issue?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .3 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 7 .3 .5 4. 4 23 1.1 1.5 5. 5 103 4.9 6.8 6. 6 265 12.6 17.4 7. 7 579 27.6 38.1 8. 8 416 19.8 27.4 9. 9 94 4.5 6.2 10. very important 28 1.3 1.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 292 13.9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
433 V0702 II/23b Importance refugees - PvdA And PVDA?
2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 3 .1 .2 4. 4 13 .6 .8 5. 5 52 2.5 3.3 6. 6 159 7.6 10.0 7. 7 495 23.6 31.1 8. 8 600 28.6 37.7 9. 9 215 10.2 13.5 10. very important 52 2.5 3.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 223 10.6 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
434 V0703 II/23c Importance refugees - VVD And VVD?
1. very unimportant 7 .3 .4 2. 2 9 .4 .6 3. 3 31 1.5 2.0 4. 4 83 4.0 5.2 5. 5 160 7.6 10.1 6. 6 293 13.9 18.5 7. 7 290 13.8 18.3 8. 8 373 17.8 23.5 9. 9 250 11.9 15.8 10. very important 90 4.3 5.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 227 10.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
435 V0704 II/23d Importance refugees - D66 And D66?
1. very unimportant 6 .3 .4 3. 3 7 .3 .5 4. 4 17 .8 1.1 5. 5 73 3.5 4.9 6. 6 270 12.9 18.1 7. 7 574 27.3 38.6 8. 8 429 20.4 28.8 9. 9 90 4.3 6.0 10. very important 22 1.0 1.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 325 15.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
436 V0705 II/23e Importance refugees - GroenLinks GroenLinks?
1. very unimportant 11 .5 .8 2. 2 6 .3 .4 3. 3 14 .7 1.0 4. 4 20 1.0 1.4 5. 5 83 4.0 5.7 6. 6 172 8.2 11.9 7. 7 362 17.2 25.1 8. 8 445 21.2 30.8 9. 9 240 11.4 16.6 10. very important 92 4.4 6.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 368 17.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
437 V0706 II/23f Importance refugees - GPV GPV?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .6 2. 2 6 .3 .7 3. 3 18 .9 2.0 4. 4 33 1.6 3.7 5. 5 94 4.5 10.6 6. 6 212 10.1 23.9 7. 7 279 13.3 31.5 8. 8 189 9.0 21.3 9. 9 35 1.7 3.9 10. very important 16 .8 1.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 925 44.0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
438 V0707 II/23g Importance refugees - party voted for (II/6) And how important does [party respondent voted for if this is another party than those already mentioned] find this issue according to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .3 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 5 .2 .3 4. 4 18 .9 1.2 5. 5 44 2.1 3.0 6. 6 154 7.3 10.4 7. 7 409 19.5 27.7 8. 8 554 26.4 37.5 9. 9 226 10.8 15.3 10. very important 63 3.0 4.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 150 7.1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
439 3.4.10 Political parties importance of issues – health care
V0708 II/24a Importance health care - CDA And health service? How important or unimportant does CDA find this issue?
1. very unimportant 2 .1 .1 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 1 .0 .1 4. 4 12 .6 .8 5. 5 46 2.2 2.9 6. 6 124 5.9 7.9 7. 7 479 22.8 30.3 8. 8 608 28.9 38.5 9. 9 236 11.2 14.9 10. very important 69 3.3 4.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 235 11.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
440 V0709 II/24b Importance health care - PvdA And PVDA?
1. very unimportant 1 .0 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 3 .1 .2 5. 5 36 1.7 2.2 6. 6 112 5.3 6.9 7. 7 429 20.4 26.4 8. 8 682 32.5 42.0 9. 9 276 13.1 17.0 10. very important 81 3.9 5.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 192 9.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
441 V0710 II/24c Importance health care - VVD And VVD?
1. very unimportant 4 .2 .3 2. 2 1 .0 .1 3. 3 9 .4 .6 4. 4 27 1.3 1.7 5. 5 88 4.2 5.6 6. 6 297 14.1 18.9 7. 7 554 26.4 35.3 8. 8 436 20.8 27.8 9. 9 118 5.6 7.5 10. very important 37 1.8 2.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 243 11.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
442 V0711 II/24d Importance health care - D66 And D66?
1. very unimportant 5 .2 .3 3. 3 4 .2 .3 4. 4 10 .5 .6 5. 5 41 2.0 2.6 6. 6 121 5.8 7.7 7. 7 350 16.7 22.4 8. 8 553 26.3 35.4 9. 9 351 16.7 22.5 10. very important 128 6.1 8.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 251 11.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
443 V0712 II/24e Importance health care - GroenLinks GroenLinks?
1. very unimportant 6 .3 .4 2. 2 2 .1 .1 3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 15 .7 1.0 5. 5 54 2.6 3.7 6. 6 143 6.8 9.8 7. 7 398 18.9 27.2 8. 8 554 26.4 37.9 9. 9 231 11.0 15.8 10. very important 56 2.7 3.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 353 16.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
444 V0713 II/24f Importance health care - GPV GPV?
1. very unimportant 3 .1 .3 2. 2 2 .1 .2 3. 3 5 .2 .6 4. 4 14 .7 1.6 5. 5 54 2.6 6.0 6. 6 151 7.2 16.8 7. 7 295 14.0 32.8 8. 8 287 13.7 31.9 9. 9 67 3.2 7.5 10. very important 21 1.0 2.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 915 43.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
445 V0714 II/24g Importance health care - party voted for (II/6) And how important does [party respondent voted for if this is another party than those already mentioned] find this issue according to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2; V0611, code 994, 995, 997, 998)
3. 3 2 .1 .1 4. 4 7 .3 .5 5. 5 21 1.0 1.4 6. 6 72 3.4 4.8 7. 7 360 17.1 23.8 8. 8 647 30.8 42.8 9. 9 299 14.2 19.8 10. very important 102 4.9 6.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 120 5.7 MD 999. INAP 184 8.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
446 3.4.11 Social participation
V0720 II/25 How active: environmental organization On this card several kinds of clubs and organizations are presented. Do these include organizations of which you are a member? You can name the number of the club or organization of which you are a member. Showcard 6 presented, listing nine types of clubs and organizations
INT: ask for each club and the like, of which respondent is a member: Are you very active, fairly active, or not so active?
Environment and nature conservation, such as Greenpeace, Natuurmonumenten
1. very active 6 .3 .3 2. reasonably active 45 2.1 2.5 3. not active 551 26.2 30.4 4. not member 1208 57.5 66.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
447 V0721 II/25 How active: traffic organization Traffic and transportation, such as ANWB, ENFB or the organization of travelers ROVER
1. very active 2 .1 .1 2. reasonably active 33 1.6 1.8 3. not active 966 46.0 53.4 4. not member 808 38.5 44.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0722 II/25 How active: housing organization Organizations of tenants or home-owners, such as Vereniging Eigen Huis
1. very active 11 .5 .6 2. reasonably active 26 1.2 1.4 3. not active 317 15.1 17.5 4. not member 1456 69.3 80.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
448 V0723 II/25 How active: third world or human rights Third world, human rights and peace, such as Terre des Hommes or Amnesty International
1. very active 9 .4 .5 2. reasonably active 58 2.8 3.2 3. not active 232 11.0 12.8 4. not member 1511 71.9 83.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0724 II/25 How active: union Trade unions, such as FNV or CNV
1. very active 12 .6 .7 2. reasonably active 48 2.3 2.7 3. not active 380 18.1 21.0 4. not member 1370 65.2 75.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
449 V0725 II/25 How active: professional organization Professional organization
1. very active 10 .5 .6 2. reasonably active 37 1.8 2.0 3. not active 131 6.2 7.2 4. not member 1632 77.7 90.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0726 II/25 How active: neighborhood organization Neighborhood or district organization
1. very active 41 2.0 2.3 2. reasonably active 104 5.0 5.7 3. not active 156 7.4 8.6 4. not member 1509 71.8 83.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
450 V0727 II/25 How active: womens organization Women’s organizations or - unions
1. very active 31 1.5 1.7 2. reasonably active 39 1.9 2.2 3. not active 56 2.7 3.1 4. not member 1684 80.2 93.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0728 II/25 How active: sports organization Sporting clubs
1. very active 226 10.8 12.5 2. reasonably active 304 14.5 16.8 3. not active 161 7.7 8.9 4. not member 1119 53.3 61.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
451 V0729 II/25b Other members of household member of union? Are other members of your household member of a trade union?
1. yes 384 18.3 21.6 2. no 1394 66.3 78.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 25 1.2 MD 998. NA 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
452 3.4.12 Political (position) issues – social benefits
V0730 II/28a Social benefits - position of CDA Some people and parties consider the social benefits to be too high. Others consider the social benefits to be too low. Of course, there are also people whose opinion lies somewhere in between. At the beginning of this line are people and parties who consider the social benefits to be too low (at number 1). At the end of the line are people and parties who consider the social benefits to be too high (at number 7).
Showcard 8 presented, listing a horizontal line with seven categories numbered 1 to 7 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘the social benefits are much too low’ and category 7 is labeled ‘the social benefits are much too high’.
Where would you place the CDA at this line?
1. much too low 14 .7 .9 2. 2 48 2.3 3.2 3. 3 266 12.7 17.9 4. 4 608 28.9 40.9 5. 5 426 20.3 28.6 6. 6 104 5.0 7.0 7. much too high 22 1.0 1.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 326 15.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
453 V0731 II/28b Social benefits - position of PvdA And the PvdA?
1. much too low 82 3.9 5.2 2. 2 312 14.9 19.6 3. 3 544 25.9 34.2 4. 4 272 12.9 17.1 5. 5 204 9.7 12.8 6. 6 139 6.6 8.7 7. much too high 37 1.8 2.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 224 10.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
454 V0732 II/28c Social benefits - position of VVD And VVD?
1. much too low 6 .3 .4 2. 2 30 1.4 1.9 3. 3 107 5.1 6.9 4. 4 319 15.2 20.6 5. 5 488 23.2 31.4 6. 6 468 22.3 30.2 7. much too high 134 6.4 8.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 262 12.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
455 V0733 II/28d Social benefits - position of D66 And D66?
1. much too low 7 .3 .5 2. 2 80 3.8 5.5 3. 3 339 16.1 23.2 4. 4 604 28.7 41.4 5. 5 327 15.6 22.4 6. 6 85 4.0 5.8 7. much too high 18 .9 1.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 354 16.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
456 V0734 II/28e Social benefits - position of GroenLinks And GroenLinks?
1. much too low 141 6.7 10.0 2. 2 394 18.8 28.0 3. 3 343 16.3 24.4 4. 4 244 11.6 17.4 5. 5 138 6.6 9.8 6. 6 92 4.4 6.5 7. much too high 54 2.6 3.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 408 19.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
457 V0735 II/28f Social benefits - position of GPV And GPV?
1. much too low 9 .4 1.1 2. 2 28 1.3 3.4 3. 3 124 5.9 15.2 4. 4 343 16.3 42.0 5. 5 211 10.0 25.8 6. 6 89 4.2 10.9 7. much too high 13 .6 1.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 997 47.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
458 V0736 II/28g Social benefits - position of respondent And where would you place yourself?
1. much too low 114 5.4 6.6 2. 2 200 9.5 11.5 3. 3 360 17.1 20.8 4. 4 569 27.1 32.8 5. 5 296 14.1 17.1 6. 6 139 6.6 8.0 7. much too high 56 2.7 3.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 80 3.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
459 3.4.13 Political (position) issues – nuclear plants
V0737 II/27a Nuclear plants - position of CDA Now I would like to ask you some questions about political affairs that are regularly in the news. As you may know, some people fear that within the foreseeable future a shortage of energy will occur in the world. One means of supply this shortage is to build nuclear power plants. Some people therefore believe that the Netherlands should quickly increase the number of nuclear power plants. Others, on the other hand, consider the dangers too great and think that no nuclear power plants should be built at all.
At the beginning of this line are people and parties who think that additional nuclear plants should be built in the Netherlands (at number 1); at the end of this line are people and parties who think that no nuclear plants should be built at all (at number 7).
Showcard 7 presented, listing a horizontal line with seven categories numbered 1 to 7 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘additional nuclear plants should be built in the Netherlands’ and category 7 is labeled ‘no new nuclear plants should be built at all in the Netherlands’.
Where would you place the CDA on this line?
1. more nuclear plants 10 .5 .9 2. 2 38 1.8 3.3 3. 3 207 9.9 18.1 4. 4 362 17.2 31.6 5. 5 300 14.3 26.2 6. 6 166 7.9 14.5 7. no nuclear plants 62 3.0 5.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 669 31.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
460 V0738 II/27b Nuclear plants- position of PvdA And the PVDA?
1. more nuclear plants 9 .4 .7 2. 2 33 1.6 2.7 3. 3 107 5.1 8.6 4. 4 223 10.6 18.0 5. 5 358 17.0 28.9 6. 6 352 16.8 28.4 7. no nuclear plants 157 7.5 12.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 575 27.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
461 V0739 II/27c Nuclear plants - position of VVD And the VVD?
1. more nuclear plants 50 2.4 4.1 2. 2 224 10.7 18.4 3. 3 364 17.3 29.8 4. 4 232 11.0 19.0 5. 5 177 8.4 14.5 6. 6 125 5.9 10.2 7. no nuclear plants 48 2.3 3.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 594 28.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
462 V0740 II/27d Nuclear plants - position of D66 And D66?
1. more nuclear plants 6 .3 .5 2. 2 31 1.5 2.6 3. 3 117 5.6 9.8 4. 4 308 14.7 25.7 5. 5 326 15.5 27.2 6. 6 282 13.4 23.5 7. no nuclear plants 128 6.1 10.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 616 29.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
463 V0741 II/27e Nuclear plants - position of GroenLinks And GroenLinks?
1. more nuclear plants 36 1.7 2.7 2. 2 30 1.4 2.3 3. 3 38 1.8 2.9 4. 4 44 2.1 3.3 5. 5 67 3.2 5.1 6. 6 271 12.9 20.5 7. no nuclear plants 836 39.8 63.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 492 23.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
464 V0742 II/27f Nuclear plants - position of GPV And GPV?
1. more nuclear plants 7 .3 1.0 2. 2 27 1.3 3.8 3. 3 102 4.9 14.3 4. 4 226 10.8 31.7 5. 5 176 8.4 24.7 6. 6 114 5.4 16.0 7. no nuclear plants 61 2.9 8.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1099 52.3 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
465 V0743 II/27g Social benefits – position of respondent And where would you place yourself?
1. much too low 43 2.0 2.5 2. 2 71 3.4 4.2 3. 3 137 6.5 8.1 4. 4 274 13.0 16.2 5. 5 223 10.6 13.2 6. 6 329 15.7 19.4 7. much too high 616 29.3 36.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 121 5.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
466 3.4.14 Satisfaction with (Dutch) democracy
V0745 II/29a Satisfaction with democracy in the Netherlands On the whole, are you very satisfied, fairly satisfied, not very satisfied, or not at all satisfied with the way democracy works in the Netherlands?
1. very satisfied 234 11.1 13.0 2. satisfied 1353 64.4 75.3 3. not very satisfied 174 8.3 9.7 4. not at all satisfied 35 1.7 1.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 18 .9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
467 V0746 II/29b Fairness of elections in the Netherlands In some countries, people believe their elections are conducted fairly. In other countries, people believe that their elections are conducted unfairly. Thinking of the last elections in the Netherlands, where would you place it on this scale of ‘1’ to ‘5’, where ‘1’ means that the last election was conducted fairly and ‘5’ means that the last election was conducted unfairly?
Showcard 9 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘elections were conducted fairly’ and category 5 is labeled ‘elections were conducted unfairly’.
1. elections were fair 1270 60.4 70.9 2. 2 373 17.8 20.8 3. 3 114 5.4 6.4 4. 4 23 1.1 1.3 5. elections unfair 11 .5 .6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 23 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0747 II/29c Reason unfairness elections in the Netherlands What exactly, do you believe, was unfair?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0746, codes 1-3, 997)
1. campaign 4 .2 13.3 2. not everyone votes 2 .1 6.7 3. no trust in voting machines 3 .1 10.0 4. counting of the votes 11 .5 36.7 5. government composition. Losers in coalition 3 .1 10.0 6. no trust (general) 5 .2 16.7 7. political parties unfair 2 .1 6.7 994. uncodable 3 .1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 1780 84.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
468 V0748 II/29d Parties (not) interested in opinions of people Some people say that political parties in the Netherlands care what ordinary people think. Others say that political parties in the Netherlands don’t care what ordinary people think. On this card, ‘1’ means that the parties care about what ordinary people think, and ‘5’ means that the parties do not care what ordinary people think. Which number applies to you?
Showcard 10 presented listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘political parties care about what ordinary people think’ and category 5 is labeled ‘political parties do not care about what ordinary people think’.
1. interested 156 7.4 8.7 2. 2 610 29.0 33.9 3. 3 630 30.0 35.0 4. 4 309 14.7 17.2 5. not interested 95 4.5 5.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
469 V0749 II/29e Parties necessary for functioning of democracy Some people say that political parties are necessary to make our political system work. Others think that political parties are not needed in our country. On this card ‘1’ means that political parties are necessary to make our political system work, and ‘5’ means that political parties are not needed in the Netherlands). Which number applies to you?
Showcard 11 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘political parties are needed in our political system’ and category 5 is labeled ‘political parties are not needed in our political system’.
1. necessary 1080 51.4 60.5 2. 2 525 25.0 29.4 3. 3 123 5.9 6.9 4. 4 41 2.0 2.3 5. not necessary 17 .8 1.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 28 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0750 II/29f Evaluation of Dutch economy What do you think of the general economic situation these days in the Netherlands? Do you think that it is very good, good, neither good nor bad, bad of very bad?
1. very good 271 12.9 15.0 2. good 1250 59.5 69.3 3. not good / not bad 261 12.4 14.5 4. bad 21 1.0 1.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
470 V0751 II/29ghi Dutch economy compared to 12 months ago If you compare the present economic situation with that of twelve months ago, has this economic situation gotten better, stayed the same, or gotten worse?
Would you say much better of somewhat better? Would you say much worse or somewhat worse?
1. much improved 134 6.4 7.6 2. improved 724 34.5 41.3 3. remained the same 825 39.3 47.0 4. worse 60 2.9 3.4 5. much worse 11 .5 .6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 60 2.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
471 V0752 II/29j Members of Dutch parliament are aware of opinions of ordinary people Some people think that members of the Second Chamber are well aware of what ordinary people think. Others say that members of the Second Chamber do not know what ordinary people think. On this card ‘1’ means that the members of the Second Chamber are well aware of what ordinary people think, and ‘5’ means that the members of the Second Chamber do not know what ordinary people think. Which number applies to you?
Showcard 12 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘Members of the Second Chamber are well aware of what ordinary people think’ and category 5 is labeled ‘Members of the Second Chamber do not know what ordinary people think’.
1. MPs well informed 70 3.3 3.9 2. 2 427 20.3 24.0 3. 3 676 32.2 37.9 4. 4 461 21.9 25.9 5. MPs not well informed 148 7.0 8.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 30 1.4 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
472 V0753 II/29k Did you have contact with member of parliament? Have you, during the past year, had any contact with a member of the Second Chamber?
1. yes 98 4.7 5.4 2. no 1715 81.6 94.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0754 II/29l How much does it matter which party one votes for? Some people think that whatever one votes, does not make any difference to what happens. Others say that what one votes for, does make a difference to what happens. On this card, ‘1’ means that whatever one votes does not make a difference, and ‘5’ means that what one votes for does make a difference. Which number applies to you?
Showcard 13 presented listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘Whatever one votes, does not make a difference for what happens’ and category 5 is labeled ‘What one votes for, does make a difference for what happens’.
1. does not matter 95 4.5 5.3 2. 2 178 8.5 9.9 3. 3 280 13.3 15.5 4. 4 679 32.3 37.6 5. matters 575 27.4 31.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
473 V0755 II/29m How much does it matter who is in charge? Some people think it does not make a difference who is in power. Others think that it does make a difference who is in power. On this card ‘1’ means that it does not make a difference who is in power, and ‘5’ means that it does make a difference who is in power. Which number applies to you?
Showcard 14 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘it does not make a difference who is in power’ and category 5 is labeled ‘it does make a difference who is in power’.
1. does not matter 60 2.9 3.3 2. 2 94 4.5 5.2 3. 3 145 6.9 8.0 4. 4 623 29.7 34.5 5. matters 882 42.0 48.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
474 V0756 II/29n Are people open about their political opinion? When people are asked for their opinion on political matters, do you expect that most people in the Netherlands usually say what they really think or do you expect that they hide this? On this card ‘1’ means that most people in the Netherlands usually say what they think about political matters, and ‘5’ means that most people usually hide what they think about political matters. Which number applies to you?
Showcard 15 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 5 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘most people say what they think about political matters’ and category 5 is labeled ‘most people hide what they think about political matters’.
1. say what they think 276 13.1 15.5 2. 2 573 27.3 32.1 3. 3 451 21.5 25.3 4. 4 361 17.2 20.2 5. withhold opinion 125 5.9 7.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 28 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
475 3.4.15 Regional differences
V0757 II/30a Not enough attention paid to regional differences in composition parliament I now read to you some statements about politicians and parties. Could you say for each statement whether you fully agree, agree, disagree or fully disagree?
In the composition of the Second Chamber, too little attention is paid to regional differences in the Netherlands. Showcard 16 presented, listing the response categories.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0917 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 103 4.9 6.0 2. agree 781 37.2 45.8 3. agree nor disagree 473 22.5 27.7 4. disagree 331 15.8 19.4 5. fully disagree 19 .9 1.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 107 5.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0758 II/30b Every region/city should have representative Every region and large city should be represented by at least one member in the Second Chamber Showcard 16 used.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0917 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 141 6.7 7.9 2. agree 931 44.3 52.3 3. agree nor disagree 270 12.9 15.2 4. disagree 403 19.2 22.6 5. fully disagree 36 1.7 2.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 33 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
476 3.4.16 Foreigners
V0759 II/31a Enfranchise foreigners in municipal elections Some people think that foreigners who have lived in the Netherlands for considerable time, should be enfranchised. Others are of the opinion that only people with Dutch nationality should be enfranchised. Could you say of the following statement whether you agree completely, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, or disagree completely?
Foreigners should be enfranchised for municipal elections. Showcard 16 used. INT.: If respondent says: ‘but they already are’, say: ‘that is right, but do you think they should be enfranchised?’
1. fully agree 172 8.2 9.5 2. agree 890 42.4 49.3 3. agree nor disagree 204 9.7 11.3 4. disagree 434 20.7 24.0 5. fully disagree 105 5.0 5.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
477 V0760 II/31b Enfranchise foreigners in parliamentary elections Foreigners should be enfranchised for the elections of thee Second Chamber. Showcard 16 used.
1. fully agree 120 5.7 6.7 2. agree 733 34.9 40.7 3. agree nor disagree 257 12.2 14.3 4. disagree 551 26.2 30.6 5. fully disagree 140 6.7 7.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
478 3.4.17 Faith in prospective premiers
V0765 II/32 Faith in Jaap de Hoop Scheffer as prime minister I will now mention to you the name of a possible candidate for the position of prime minister, one at a time. Could you indicate how much faith you would have in this person as prime minister? You can mention the number that applies to the candidate. If you do not know the candidate, please do not hesitate to say so.
Jaap de Hoop Scheffer? Showcard 17 presented, listing a horizontal line with five categories numbered 1 to 7 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘no faith at all’ and category 5 is labeled ‘very much faith’.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0918 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. no faith at all 171 8.1 10.6 2. 2 234 11.1 14.4 3. 3 357 17.0 22.0 4. 4 367 17.5 22.7 5. 5 334 15.9 20.6 6. 6 126 6.0 7.8 7. a lot of faith 31 1.5 1.9 993. person unknown 164 7.8 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 30 1.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
479 V0766 II/32 Faith in Wim Kok as prime minister Wim Kok?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0918 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. no faith at all 5 .2 .3 2. 2 21 1.0 1.2 3. 3 30 1.4 1.7 4. 4 87 4.1 4.8 5. 5 233 11.1 12.9 6. 6 706 33.6 39.2 7. a lot of faith 718 34.2 39.9 993. person unknown 4 .2 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
480 V0767 II/32 Faith in Frits Bolkestein as prime minister Frits Bolkestein?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0918 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. no faith at all 179 8.5 10.1 2. 2 196 9.3 11.1 3. 3 285 13.6 16.1 4. 4 326 15.5 18.4 5. 5 359 17.1 20.3 6. 6 316 15.0 17.9 7. a lot of faith 106 5.0 6.0 993. person unknown 30 1.4 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
481 V0768 II/32 Faith in Els Borst as prime minister Els Borst?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0918 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. no faith at all 126 6.0 7.2 2. 2 202 9.6 11.6 3. 3 327 15.6 18.8 4. 4 413 19.7 23.7 5. 5 408 19.4 23.5 6. 6 202 9.6 11.6 7. a lot of faith 61 2.9 3.5 993. person unknown 50 2.4 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 24 1.1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
482 3.4.18 Left-right
V0770 II/33 Left-right self-rating (10 point scale) It is often said of political beliefs that they are left or right. When you think of your own political beliefs, where would you place yourself on this line? Please tell the number that applies to you.
Showcard 18 presented, listing a horizontal line with ten categories numbered 1 to 10 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘left’ and category 10 is labeled ‘right’.
1. left 43 2.0 2.5 2. 2 79 3.8 4.7 3. 3 224 10.7 13.3 4. 4 245 11.7 14.5 5. 5 270 12.9 16.0 6. 6 291 13.9 17.2 7. 7 284 13.5 16.8 8. 8 191 9.1 11.3 9. 9 36 1.7 2.1 10. right 27 1.3 1.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 123 5.9 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
483 V0775 II/34a Left-right rating of PvdA (10 point scale) It is also said of political parties that they are left or right. Would you please indicate the degree to which you think that a party is left or right?
The PVDA? Showcard 18 used.
1. left 89 4.2 5.5 2. 2 154 7.3 9.4 3. 3 313 14.9 19.2 4. 4 431 20.5 26.4 5. 5 299 14.2 18.3 6. 6 168 8.0 10.3 7. 7 97 4.6 5.9 8. 8 55 2.6 3.4 9. 9 12 .6 .7 10. right 15.7.9 993. party unknown 4 .2 MD 994. could not position party 123 5.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 53 2.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
484 V0776 II/34b Left-right rating of VVD (10 point scale) And the VVD?
1. left 7 .3 .4 2. 2 22 1.0 1.4 3. 3 40 1.9 2.5 4. 4 65 3.1 4.0 5. 5 135 6.4 8.3 6. 6 187 8.9 11.6 7. 7 308 14.7 19.0 8. 8 530 25.2 32.8 9. 9 241 11.5 14.9 10. right 82 3.9 5.1 993. party unknown 4 .2 MD 994. could not position party 136 6.5 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 56 2.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
485 V0777 II/34c Left-right rating of D66 (10 point scale) And D66?
1. left 15 .7 1.0 2. 2 66 3.1 4.2 3. 3 148 7.0 9.4 4. 4 288 13.7 18.3 5. 5 422 20.1 26.8 6. 6 408 19.4 25.9 7. 7 169 8.0 10.7 8. 8 44 2.1 2.8 9. 9 12 .6 .8 10. right 4 .2 .3 993. party unknown 4 .2 MD 994. could not position party 171 8.1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 62 3.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
486 V0778 II/34d Left-right rating of GroenLinks(10 point scale) And GroenLinks
1. left 283 13.5 17.6 2. 2 525 25.0 32.7 3. 3 395 18.8 24.6 4. 4 187 8.9 11.6 5. 5 101 4.8 6.3 6. 6 54 2.6 3.4 7. 7 38 1.8 2.4 8. 8 17 .8 1.1 9. 9 4 .2 .2 10. right 3 .1 .2 993. party unknown 4 .2 MD 994. could not position party 145 6.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 57 2.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
487 V0779 II/34e Left-right rating of CDA (10 point scale) And the CDA?
1. left 7 .3 .4 2. 2 22 1.0 1.4 3. 3 50 2.4 3.1 4. 4 116 5.5 7.2 5. 5 286 13.6 17.7 6. 6 422 20.1 26.1 7. 7 387 18.4 24.0 8. 8 231 11.0 14.3 9. 9 65 3.1 4.0 10. right 29 1.4 1.8 993. party unknown 3 .1 MD 994. could not position party 143 6.8 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 52 2.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
488 V0780 II/34f Left-right rating of SGP (10 point scale) And the SGP?
1. left 11 .5 1.0 2. 2 27 1.3 2.4 3. 3 35 1.7 3.2 4. 4 54 2.6 4.9 5. 5 73 3.5 6.6 6. 6 106 5.0 9.6 7. 7 182 8.7 16.4 8. 8 265 12.6 23.9 9. 9 252 12.0 22.7 10. right 103 4.9 9.3 993. party unknown 187 8.9 MD 994. could not position party 411 19.6 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 107 5.1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
489 V0781 II/34g Left-right rating of GPV (10 point scale) And the GPV?
1. left 7 .3 .6 2. 2 7 .3 .6 3. 3 33 1.6 3.0 4. 4 38 1.8 3.4 5. 5 97 4.6 8.8 6. 6 121 5.8 11.0 7. 7 198 9.4 18.0 8. 8 269 12.8 24.4 9. 9 241 11.5 21.9 10. right 91 4.3 8.3 993. party unknown 162 7.7 MD 994. could not position party 437 20.8 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 112 5.3 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
490 V0782 II/34h Left-right rating of RPF (10 point scale) And the RPF?
1. left 12 .6 1.2 2. 2 10 .5 1.0 3. 3 30 1.4 3.0 4. 4 37 1.8 3.7 5. 5 74 3.5 7.3 6. 6 100 4.8 9.9 7. 7 195 9.3 19.3 8. 8 282 13.4 27.9 9. 9 200 9.5 19.8 10. right 71 3.4 7.0 993. party unknown 211 10.0 MD 994. could not position party 469 22.3 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 122 5.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
491 V0783 II/34i Left-right rating of Centrumdemocraten (10 point scale) And the Centrumdemocraten?
1. left 159 7.6 11.3 2. 2 26 1.2 1.9 3. 3 28 1.3 2.0 4. 4 21 1.0 1.5 5. 5 27 1.3 1.9 6. 6 21 1.0 1.5 7. 7 25 1.2 1.8 8. 8 40 1.9 2.9 9. 9 120 5.7 8.6 10. right 934 44.5 66.7 993. party unknown 47 2.2 MD 994. could not position party 276 13.1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 83 4.0 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
492 V0784 II/34j Left-right rating of SP (10 point scale) And the SP?
1. left 430 20.5 30.4 2. 2 423 20.1 29.9 3. 3 196 9.3 13.8 4. 4 114 5.4 8.1 5. 5 93 4.4 6.6 6. 6 47 2.2 3.3 7. 7 45 2.1 3.2 8. 8 43 2.0 3.0 9. 9 15 .7 1.1 10. right 10.5.7 993. party unknown 70 3.3 MD 994. could not position party 250 11.9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 76 3.6 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
493 V0785 II/34k Left-right rating of AOV/Unie 55+ (10 point scale) And AOV/Unie 55+?
1. left 6 .3 .6 2. 2 26 1.2 2.4 3. 3 55 2.6 5.1 4. 4 98 4.7 9.1 5. 5 254 12.1 23.5 6. 6 314 14.9 29.0 7. 7 188 8.9 17.4 8. 8 107 5.1 9.9 9. 9 23 1.1 2.1 10. right 11 .5 1.0 993. party unknown 104 5.0 MD 994. could not position party 511 24.3 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 115 5.5 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
494 3.4.19 External political efficacy
V0790 II/35a MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me I shall now read you a number of statements. Would you tell me for each statement if, according to you, it is true or false?
Members of parliament do not care about the opinions of people like me Showcard 19 presented, listing the response categories ‘true’ and ‘false’.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0919 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. true 654 31.1 36.8 2. not true 1123 53.5 63.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0791 II/35b Parties only interested in my vote. not in my opinion Political parties are only interested in my vote and not in my opinions.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0919 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. true 832 39.6 46.7 2. not true 951 45.3 53.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 30 1.4 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
495 V0792 II/35c People like me have no influence on politics People like me have absolutely no influence on governmental policy
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0919 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. true 736 35.0 40.9 2. not true 1062 50.5 59.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0793 II/35d So many people vote, my vote does not matter So many people vote in elections that my vote does not matter.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0919 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. true 166 7.9 9.2 2. not true 1641 78.1 90.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0794 II/35e MPs quickly lose contact with citizens Usually our representatives in the Second Chamber quickly lose contact with the people in the country.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0919 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. true 1223 58.2 70.3 2. not true 517 24.6 29.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 73 3.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
496 V0795 II/index External political efficacy score q35 Constructed from V0790 to V0794. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this index. The H-value of this index is 0.54.
0. low 97 4.6 5.3 1. 1 333 15.8 18.4 2. 2 276 13.1 15.2 3. 3 347 16.5 19.1 4. 4 437 20.8 24.1 5. high 324 15.4 17.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
497 3.4.20 Internal political efficacy
V0796 II/36a Consider myself qualified for politics Would you tell me whether you fully agree, agree, disagree or fully disagree with the following statements.
I am well qualified to play an active role in politics Showcard 20 presented, listing the response categories.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0920 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 38 1.8 2.1 2. agree 400 19.0 22.1 3. disagree 892 42.5 49.4 4. fully disagree 477 22.7 26.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 6 .3 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0797 II/36b Well informed about political problems I have a good understanding of the important political problems in our country.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0920 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 65 3.1 3.6 2. agree 1088 51.8 60.4 3. disagree 551 26.2 30.6 4. fully disagree 98 4.7 5.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
498 V0798 II/36c Politics sometimes too complicated Sometimes politics seems so complicated that people like me cannot really understand what is going on.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0920 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 241 11.5 13.3 2. agree 876 41.7 48.3 3. disagree 633 30.1 34.9 4. fully disagree 62 3.0 3.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0799 II/index Internal political efficacy score q36 Constructed from V0796 to V0798. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this index. The H-value of this index is 0.47.
0. low 473 22.5 26.1 1. 1 661 31.5 36.4 2. 2 415 19.8 22.9 3. high 265 12.6 14.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
499 3.4.21 Political cynicism
V0800 II/37a Politicians promise more than they can deliver Although they know better, politicians promise more than they can deliver. Showcard 20 used.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0921 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 307 14.6 17.1 2. agree 1269 60.4 70.9 3. disagree 211 10.0 11.8 4. fully disagree 4 .2 .2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 23 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0801 II/37b Ministers primarily self-interested Ministers and state secretaries are primarily concerned about their personal interests.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0921 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 65 3.1 3.7 2. agree 441 21.0 25.1 3. disagree 1174 55.9 66.7 4. fully disagree 80 3.8 4.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 53 2.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
500 V0802 II/37c Friends more important than abilities to become MP One is more likely to become a member of parliament because of one’s political friends than because of one’s abilities.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0921 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 78 3.7 4.5 2. agree 589 28.0 34.3 3. disagree 999 47.5 58.3 4. fully disagree 49 2.3 2.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 98 4.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0803 II/index Political cynicism score q37 Constructed from V0800 to V0802. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this index. The H-value of this index is 0.51.
0. low 196 9.3 10.8 1. 1 805 38.3 44.4 2. 2 495 23.6 27.3 3. high 318 15.1 17.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
501 3.4.22 Social isolation
V0804 II/38 Can one trust other people? In general, do you think that most people can be trusted or do you think one can not be careful enough in contacts with other people?
1. people can be trusted 1060 50.5 58.9 2. one should be careful 739 35.2 41.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 14 .7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
502 V0805 II/39a When you have problems, you are on your own I now read to you some statements. Could you indicate by means of this card to what extent you agree or disagree with these statements. Please mention the number which applies to you.
When you really are in trouble, in the end you are on your own.
Showcard 22 presented, listing a horizontal line with ten categories numbered 1 to 10 and a ‘Do not know’ category. Category 1 is labeled ‘fully disagree’ and category 10 is labeled ‘fully agree’.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 541 25.7 29.9 2. 2 339 16.1 18.7 3. 3 225 10.7 12.4 4. 4 136 6.5 7.5 5. 5 78 3.7 4.3 6. 6 81 3.9 4.5 7. 7 112 5.3 6.2 8. 8 127 6.0 7.0 9. 9 69 3.3 3.8 10. fully agree 102 4.9 5.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
503 V0806 II/39b Nobody has special interest in you There is nobody who has a special interest in you.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 749 35.6 41.5 2. 2 421 20.0 23.3 3. 3 255 12.1 14.1 4. 4 97 4.6 5.4 5. 5 89 4.2 4.9 6. 6 66 3.1 3.7 7. 7 44 2.1 2.4 8. 8 37 1.8 2.0 9. 9 23 1.1 1.3 10. fully agree 25 1.2 1.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 6 .3 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
504 V0807 II/39c There is always someone you can ask for help There is always someone I can call upon when I need help.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 30 1.4 1.7 2. 2 30 1.4 1.7 3. 3 32 1.5 1.8 4. 4 34 1.6 1.9 5. 5 53 2.5 2.9 6. 6 46 2.2 2.5 7. 7 108 5.1 6.0 8. 8 321 15.3 17.7 9. 9 368 17.5 20.3 10. fully agree 790 37.6 43.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
505 V0808 II/39d Even closest family not interested Even from your closest family you cannot expect much interest.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 713 33.9 39.4 2. 2 403 19.2 22.3 3. 3 209 9.9 11.6 4. 4 90 4.3 5.0 5. 5 79 3.8 4.4 6. 6 83 4.0 4.6 7. 7 80 3.8 4.4 8. 8 63 3.0 3.5 9. 9 24 1.1 1.3 10. fully agree 65 3.1 3.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
506 V0809 II/39e I often feel abandoned I often feel abandoned.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 635 30.2 35.1 2. 2 469 22.3 25.9 3. 3 267 12.7 14.7 4. 4 99 4.7 5.5 5. 5 94 4.5 5.2 6. 6 89 4.2 4.9 7. 7 56 2.7 3.1 8. 8 59 2.8 3.3 9. 9 16 .8 .9 10. fully agree 27 1.3 1.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
507 V0810 II/39f I do not know whom to ask for help. besides my family When I need help from outside the family, I would not even know whom to turn to.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0922 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully disagree 716 34.1 41.7 2. 2 393 18.7 22.9 3. 3 234 11.1 13.6 4. 4 78 3.7 4.5 5. 5 50 2.4 2.9 6. 6 46 2.2 2.7 7. 7 55 2.6 3.2 8. 8 68 3.2 4.0 9. 9 27 1.3 1.6 10. fully agree 50 2.4 2.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD 999. INAP 93 4.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
508 3.4.23 Bases of accepting political decisions
V0815 II/41a Acceptance political decisions - legality Do you fully agree, agree, neither agree, nor disagree, disagree or fully disagree with the following statements?
If a government decision is made according to the rules, I accept it Showcard 24 presented, listing the response categories.
1. fully agree 163 7.8 9.0 2. agree 1211 57.6 67.2 3. agree nor disagree 278 13.2 15.4 4. disagree 144 6.9 8.0 5. fully disagree 7 .3 .4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
509 V0816 II/41b Acceptance political decisions - tradition I accept government decisions because this ought to be so as of old.
1. fully agree 39 1.9 2.2 2. agree 465 22.1 25.8 3. agree nor disagree 331 15.8 18.3 4. disagree 845 40.2 46.8 5. fully disagree 124 5.9 6.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
510 V0817 II/41c No acceptance political decisions - self-interest If a government decision is not in my interest, I do not accept it.
1. fully agree 19 .9 1.1 2. agree 196 9.3 10.9 3. agree nor disagree 358 17.0 19.9 4. disagree 1124 53.5 62.5 5. fully disagree 102 4.9 5.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 14 .7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
511 V0818 II/41d No acceptance political decisions - principles If a government decision is contrary to my principles, I do not accept it.
1. fully agree 96 4.6 5.3 2. agree 755 35.9 42.1 3. agree nor disagree 409 19.5 22.8 4. disagree 509 24.2 28.4 5. fully disagree 26 1.2 1.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 17 .8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
512 V0819 II/41e No acceptance political decisions - feelings If a government decision is not in accordance with my feelings, I do not accept it
1. fully agree 54 2.6 3.0 2. agree 537 25.6 29.9 3. agree nor disagree 463 22.0 25.8 4. disagree 699 33.3 38.9 5. fully disagree 43 2.0 2.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
513 V0820 II/41f Action when political decisions are illegal In which of the following situations would you take action against government decisions?
I will take action when a government decision is not made according to the rules.
1. yes 1069 50.9 59.7 2. no 723 34.4 40.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 21 1.0 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
514 V0821 II/41g Action when political decisions are against self-interest I will take action when a government decision is not in my interest.
1. yes 247 11.8 13.8 2. no 1537 73.2 86.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 30 1.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
515 V0822 II/41h Action when political decisions are against principles I will take action when a government decision is contrary to my principles.
1. yes 870 41.4 48.9 2. no 910 43.3 51.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 33 1.6 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
516 V0823 II/41i Action when political decisions are against feelings I will take action if a government decision is not in accordance with my feelings
1. yes 465 22.1 26.3 2. no 1303 62.0 73.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 46 2.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
517 3.4.24 Vote probability
V0830 II/43a Probability of future vote for PvdA Some people are quite certain that they will always vote for the same party. Others reconsider each time to which party they will give their vote. I will mention a number of parties. Would you indicate for each party how probable it is that you will ever vote for that party? Tell me the number that applies to the party. If you do not know a party or if you do not know the answer, do not hesitate to say so and we will continue with the next party.
The PvdA?
Showcard 26 presented, listing a horizontal line with ten categories numbered 1 to 10, and one separate category, named ‘Do not know’. Category 1 is labeled ‘I will certainly never vote for this party’, category 10 is labeled ‘I will vote for this party some time certainly’.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 126 6.0 7.0 2. 2 60 2.9 3.3 3. 3 73 3.5 4.1 4. 4 88 4.2 4.9 5. 5 135 6.4 7.5 6. 6 173 8.2 9.6 7. 7 265 12.6 14.7 8. 8 270 12.9 15.0 9. 9 218 10.4 12.1 10. sometime certainly 394 18.8 21.9 993. party unknown 3 .1 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
518 V0831 II/43b Probability of future vote for VVD And the VVD?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 345 16.4 19.3 2. 2 126 6.0 7.0 3. 3 132 6.3 7.4 4. 4 131 6.2 7.3 5. 5 154 7.3 8.6 6. 6 151 7.2 8.4 7. 7 172 8.2 9.6 8. 8 208 9.9 11.6 9. 9 143 6.8 8.0 10. sometime certainly 227 10.8 12.7 993. party unknown 10 .5 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
519 V0832 II/43c Probability of future vote for D66 And D66?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 243 11.6 13.7 2. 2 90 4.3 5.1 3. 3 124 5.9 7.0 4. 4 130 6.2 7.3 5. 5 186 8.9 10.5 6. 6 260 12.4 14.6 7. 7 256 12.2 14.4 8. 8 262 12.5 14.8 9. 9 102 4.9 5.7 10. sometime certainly 123 5.9 6.9 993. party unknown 18 .9 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 20 1.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
520 V0833 II/43d Probability of future vote for GroenLinks And GroenLinks?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 311 14.8 17.5 2. 2 143 6.8 8.1 3. 3 138 6.6 7.8 4. 4 138 6.6 7.8 5. 5 181 8.6 10.2 6. 6 188 8.9 10.6 7. 7 222 10.6 12.5 8. 8 209 9.9 11.8 9. 9 126 6.0 7.1 10. sometime certainly 120 5.7 6.8 993. party unknown 21 1.0 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
521 V0834 II/43e Probability of future vote for CDA And the CDA?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 298 14.2 16.7 2. 2 119 5.7 6.7 3. 3 148 7.0 8.3 4. 4 153 7.3 8.6 5. 5 188 8.9 10.5 6. 6 199 9.5 11.1 7. 7 197 9.4 11.0 8. 8 181 8.6 10.1 9. 9 103 4.9 5.8 10. sometime certainly 203 9.7 11.3 993. party unknown 9 .4 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
522 V0835 II/43f Probability of future vote for SGP And the SGP?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 812 38.6 53.6 2. 2 250 11.9 16.5 3. 3 140 6.7 9.2 4. 4 101 4.8 6.7 5. 5 73 3.5 4.8 6. 6 51 2.4 3.4 7. 7 37 1.8 2.4 8. 8 24 1.1 1.6 9. 9 13 .6 .9 10. sometime certainly 14 .7 .9 993. party unknown 260 12.4 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 39 1.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
523 V0836 II/43g Probability of future vote for GPV And the GPV?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 781 37.2 51.6 2. 2 243 11.6 16.1 3. 3 131 6.2 8.7 4. 4 94 4.5 6.2 5. 5 76 3.6 5.0 6. 6 64 3.0 4.2 7. 7 45 2.1 3.0 8. 8 30 1.4 2.0 9. 9 32 1.5 2.1 10. sometime certainly 18 .9 1.2 993. party unknown 262 12.5 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 38 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
524 V0837 II/43h Probability of future vote for RPF And the RPF?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 790 37.6 53.3 2. 2 212 10.1 14.3 3. 3 154 7.3 10.4 4. 4 95 4.5 6.4 5. 5 58 2.8 3.9 6. 6 61 2.9 4.1 7. 7 28 1.3 1.9 8. 8 33 1.6 2.2 9. 9 18 .9 1.2 10. sometime certainly 33 1.6 2.2 993. party unknown 295 14.0 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 36 1.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
525 V0838 II/43i Probability of future vote for Centrumdemocraten And the Centrumdemocraten?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 1560 74.3 89.1 2. 2 73 3.5 4.2 3. 3 34 1.6 1.9 4. 4 21 1.0 1.2 5. 5 21 1.0 1.2 6. 6 14 .7 .8 7. 7 10 .5 .6 8. 8 9 .4 .5 9. 9 1 .0 .1 10. sometime certainly 8 .4 .5 993. party unknown 51 2.4 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
526 V0839 II/43j Probability of future vote for SP And SP?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 578 27.5 34.5 2. 2 242 11.5 14.4 3. 3 153 7.3 9.1 4. 4 111 5.3 6.6 5. 5 135 6.4 8.1 6. 6 126 6.0 7.5 7. 7 130 6.2 7.8 8. 8 89 4.2 5.3 9. 9 51 2.4 3.0 10. sometime certainly 61 2.9 3.6 993. party unknown 111 5.3 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 27 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
527 V0840 II/43k Probability of future vote for AOV/Unie 55+ And AOV/Unie 55+?
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0924 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. certainly never 622 29.6 37.9 2. 2 200 9.5 12.2 3. 3 131 6.2 8.0 4. 4 130 6.2 7.9 5. 5 149 7.1 9.1 6. 6 150 7.1 9.1 7. 7 132 6.3 8.0 8. 8 83 4.0 5.1 9. 9 23 1.1 1.4 10. sometime certainly 21 1.0 1.3 993. party unknown 133 6.3 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 40 1.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
528 3.4.25 Civic competence and civic political participation
V0842 II/44a Chance acting against unjust national bill Suppose that the Second Chamber considers a bill that you feel is extremely unjust or wrong. How great is the chance that you would attempt to do something about it? Is this chance very big, big, small or very small?
1. very big 78 3.7 4.3 2. big 437 20.8 24.2 3. small 803 38.2 44.5 4. very small 485 23.1 26.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0845 II/44b Did (not) contact cabinet minister This card lists what you could do if the Second Chamber considers a bill that you felt to be unjust or wrong. Would you please have a look at these options and then tell me which of those you have ever used? You can mention the numbers of the options you have ever used. Showcard 27 presented, listing 13 possible forms of action.
0. not mentioned 1742 82.9 96.0 1. mentioned 72 3.4 4.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0846 II/44b Did (not) contact member of parliament Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1712 81.5 94.4 1. mentioned 102 4.9 5.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
529 V0847 II/44b Did (not) sign a petition Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 625 29.7 34.5 1. mentioned 1189 56.6 65.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0848 II/44b Did (not) try to activate interest group Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1604 76.3 88.4 1. mentioned 210 10.0 11.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0849 II/44b Did (not) try to activate radio or TV Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1713 81.5 94.4 1. mentioned 101 4.8 5.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
530 V0850 II/44b Did (not) try to activate political party Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1687 80.3 93.0 1. mentioned 127 6.0 7.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0851 II/44b Did (not) contact mayor or alderman Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1561 74.3 86.1 1. mentioned 253 12.0 13.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0852 II/44b Did (not) contact municipal councilor Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1553 73.9 85.6 1. mentioned 261 12.4 14.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
531 V0853 II/44b Did (not) join civic action group Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1530 72.8 84.3 1. mentioned 284 13.5 15.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0854 II/44b Did (not) join demonstration Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1359 64.7 74.9 1. mentioned 455 21.7 25.1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0855 II/44b Did (not) try to activate newspaper Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1657 78.9 91.3 1. mentioned 157 7.5 8.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
532 V0856 II/44b Did (not) lodge a complaint Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1477 70.3 81.4 1. mentioned 337 16.0 18.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0857 II/44b Did (not) contact department official Refer to V0845 for complete question text
0. not mentioned 1711 81.4 94.3 1. mentioned 103 4.9 5.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0858 II/index Civic participation score q44b Constructed from V0845 to V0857. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this index. The H-value of this index is 0.36.
0. low 381 18.1 21.0 1. 1 609 29.0 33.6 2. 2 310 14.8 17.1 3. 3 221 10.5 12.2 4. 4 98 4.7 5.4 5. 5 64 3.0 3.5 6. 6 47 2.2 2.6 7. 7 26 1.2 1.4 8. 8 14 .7 .8 9. 9 13 .6 .7 10. 10 7 .3 .4 11. 11 9 .4 .5 12. 12 10 .5 .6 13. high 5 .2 .3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
533 3.4.26 Confessional attitude
V0860 II/45ab Should there also be confessional parties? Now I would like to ask you some questions about politics and religion. Do you think that political parties should be completely separated from religion, or do you think that there should also be confessional parties, that is, parties based on religion?
When you think about these confessional political parties, do you find that there should be separate Roman Catholic and Protestant parties, or should these parties according to you be included in a general Christian association?
Note: the questions in this set have been slightly altered as compared to previous versions of the DPES. In prior versions people were asked whether they preferred having confessional parties (schools; unions; radio and tv) to having secular parties (schools; unions; radio and tv). The word ‘also’ was included because the original question had become obsolete and because it was felt that the original question was interpreted by respondents as ‘also’ having confessional parties (schools; unions; radio and tv) instead of ‘only’ confessional parties (schools; unions; radio and tv)
1. secular 721 34.3 40.5 2. also religious 63 3.0 3.5 3. also confessional 289 13.8 16.2 4. also interconfessional 707 33.7 39.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 33 1.6 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
534 V0861 II/45c Should there also be confessional unions? And unions? Do you think that unions should be completely separated from religion, or do you think that there should also be confessional unions?
Refer to note included in the documentation of V0860 above.
1. secular 1089 51.8 62.1 2. also religious 666 31.7 37.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 58 2.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
535 V0862 II/45de Should there also be confessional schools? Do you think that schools should be completely separated from religion, or do you think that there should also be confessional schools, that is, schools based on religion?
Refer to note included in the documentation of V0860 above.
When you think about these confessional schools, do you find that there should be separate Roman Catholic and Protestant schools, or should they according to you be included in a general Christian association?
1. secular 549 26.1 30.8 2. also religious 37 1.8 2.1 3. also confessional 509 24.2 28.6 4. also interconfessional 686 32.7 38.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 33 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
536 V0863 II/45fg Should there also be confessional radio and tv? Do you think that broadcasting organizations should be completely separated from religion, or do you think that there should also be confessional broadcasting organizations, that is broadcasting organizations based on religion?
Refer to note included in the documentation of V0860 above.
1. secular 606 28.8 34.4 2. also religious 60 2.9 3.4 3. also confessional 452 21.5 25.7 4. also interconfessional 644 30.7 36.5 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 52 2.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
537 V0864 II/46 Religion is a good guide in politics Do you fully agree, agree, disagree or fully disagree with the following statement?
Religion is a good guide in politics
1. fully agree 112 5.3 6.4 2. agree 577 27.5 32.8 3. disagree 829 39.5 47.2 4. fully disagree 239 11.4 13.6 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 56 2.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
538 V0865 II/index Confessional attitude score q45-q46 Constructed from V0860 to V0864. Refer to 4.1.1 for the construction of this index. The H-value of this index is 0.50. Also refer to the note included in the documentation of V0860 above.
0. low 257 12.2 14.2 1. 276 13.1 15.2 2. 311 14.8 17.1 3. 279 13.3 15.4 4. 388 18.5 21.4 5. high 303 14.4 16.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
539 3.4.27 Social class
V0870 II/47 Social class - self image One sometimes speaks of the existence of various social classes and groups. If you were to assign yourself to a particular social class, which one would that be? Showcard 28 presented, listing the response categories.
1. upper class 31 1.5 1.7 2. upper middle class 308 14.7 17.2 3. middle class 985 46.9 55.0 4. upper working class 122 5.8 6.8 5. working class 346 16.5 19.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 14 .7 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
540 3.4.28 Right-wing orientations
V0875 II/48a An important job is to teach children patriotism On this card several views are shown which have recently been put forward. Opinions about these views differ strongly. We would like to know your opinion. Could you indicate whether you fully agree, agree, neither agree, nor disagree, disagree, or fully disagree with each statement. If you don’t know about a statement, or if you do not want to tell your opinion, please do not hesitate to say so.
An important job for schools is to teach the pupils patriotism Showcard 29 presented, listing the response categories
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 107 5.1 5.9 2. agree 666 31.7 36.8 3. agree nor disagree 388 18.5 21.4 4. disagree 541 25.7 29.9 5. fully disagree 108 5.1 6.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
541 V0876 II/48b Our social provisions are not meant for foreigners Our social provisions are not meant for foreign workers.
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 28 1.3 1.6 2. agree 224 10.7 12.4 3. agree nor disagree 289 13.8 16.0 4. disagree 1031 49.1 57.2 5. fully disagree 232 11.0 12.9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
542 V0877 II/48c Every Dutchman should observe our national symbols Every Dutchman should show due respect for our national symbols, like the flag and the national anthem
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 196 9.3 10.8 2. agree 978 46.5 54.0 3. agree nor disagree 330 15.7 18.2 4. disagree 247 11.8 13.6 5. fully disagree 61 2.9 3.4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
543 V0878 II/48d Foreigners are a threat to our culture Foreigners are a threat to our culture
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 87 4.1 4.8 2. agree 410 19.5 22.6 3. agree nor disagree 344 16.4 19.0 4. disagree 712 33.9 39.3 5. fully disagree 258 12.3 14.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
544 V0879 II/48e Youngsters should learn self-control and determination Youngsters should in the first place learn self-control and determination
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 312 14.9 17.2 2. agree 1030 49.0 56.9 3. agree nor disagree 237 11.3 13.1 4. disagree 215 10.2 11.9 5. fully disagree 16 .8 .9 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 4 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
545 V0880 II/48f Foreigners abuse social provisions more than Dutchmen Foreigners make more abuse of the social provisions than Dutch people
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 135 6.4 7.8 2. agree 441 21.0 25.3 3. agree nor disagree 469 22.3 27.0 4. disagree 587 27.9 33.7 5. fully disagree 108 5.1 6.2 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 73 3.5 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
546 V0881 II/48g Children should learn obedience and respect for authorities The most important thing children should learn is obedience and espect for authorities
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 268 12.8 14.8 2. agree 848 40.4 46.8 3. agree nor disagree 296 14.1 16.3 4. disagree 351 16.7 19.4 5. fully disagree 48 2.3 2.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
547 V0882 II/48h Differences between ethnic groups are natural Differences between ethnic groups are innate
This variable is part of a randomized set of questions. Refer to V0925 for the order in which the questions were asked.
1. fully agree 56 2.7 3.1 2. agree 610 29.0 34.3 3. agree nor disagree 298 14.2 16.7 4. disagree 680 32.4 38.2 5. fully disagree 137 6.5 7.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 33 1.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
548 3.4.29 Interview characteristics
V0883 II/49 Reason to participate in this survey We have reached the end of the questionnaire. We are grateful that you have participated in this research. This research is held around every election. Luckily, each time many people like you are willing to participate in this kind of surveys, but there are always as well people not willing to participate. We would like to know from you what has been the reason for you to participate in this research.
1. not thought about it 158 7.5 8.7 2. research is interesting/fun 511 24.3 28.2 3. being interviewed is nice 23 1.1 1.3 4. interviewer seemed nice person 49 2.3 2.7 5. did not want to disappoint interviewer 61 2.9 3.4 6. curious about the questions 209 9.9 11.5 7. duty 115 5.5 6.3 8. politics is interesting 165 7.9 9.1 9. other 523 24.9 28.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0885 II/ Interviewer Wave 2 identification number Interviewer identification number ranges from 13004 to 99001.
V0886 0/ Interviewer wave 2 characteristic - age This variable was based upon information collected by the fieldwork organization.
V0887 0/ Interviewer wave 2 characteristic - sex This variable was based upon information collected by the fieldwork organization.
1. Male 445 21.2 24.5 2. Female 1369 65.2 75.5 996. PA 287 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0888 II/ Date of second interview (yyyymmdd)
549 V0889 II/ Duration of second interview (mmm)
550 V0890 II/51a Any person present at second interview? INT: Write down without asking Were there any other people in the room besides the respondent during the interview?
1. yes 441 21.0 24.3 2. no 1373 65.3 75.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0891 II/51c Present at second interview - children under 6 years INT: Would you indicate of these persons whether they followed the conversation completely or in part; that is, listened actively, whether they intruded into the interview; that is, offered an own opinion, corrected the respondent, offered suggestions, and the like?
Children under 6 year?
0. not present 1736 82.6 95.7 1. did not listen 68 3.2 3.7 2. did listen 5 .2 .3 3. did participate 5 .2 .3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0892 II/51d Present at second interview - children 6 years and older Children over 6 years?
0. not present 1757 83.6 96.9 1. did not listen 37 1.8 2.0 2. did listen 19 .9 1.0 3. did participate 1 .0 .1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
551 V0893 II/51e Present at second interview - spouse or partner Husband, wife, or partner?
0. not present 1555 74.0 85.7 1. did not listen 121 5.8 6.7 2. did listen 120 5.7 6.6 3. did participate 18 .9 1.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0894 II/51f Present at second interview - other relatives Other relatives?
0. not present 1750 83.3 96.5 1. did not listen 42 2.0 2.3 2. did listen 20 1.0 1.1 3. did participate 2 .1 .1 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0895 II/51g Present at second interview - other adults Other adults?
0. not present 1769 84.2 97.5 1. did not listen 37 1.8 2.0 2. did listen 8 .4 .4 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
552 V0896 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview - first coding INT: Where there any disturbing influences during the interview, such as a television set or radio that was on, other people arriving for a visit, etc.?
The disturbing factors were
0. no disturbing influences 1733 82.5 95.7 1. visitors 6 .3 .3 2. tv, radio, loud music, loud noise 31 1.5 1.7 3. children 26 1.2 1.4 4. telephone 2 .1 .1 5. pets 3 .1 .2 6. partner 1 .0 .1 7. interview not at home 8 .4 .4 994. uncodable 4 .2 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0897 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview - second coding The disturbing factors were
0. no disturbing influences 1733 82.5 99.5 1. visitors 1 .0 .1 2. tv, radio, loud music, loud noise 2 .1 .1 3. children 3 .1 .2 4. telephone 1 .0 .1 5. pets 1 .0 .1 995. no second coding 73 3.5 MD 996. PA 287 13.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0898 II/50a1 Accepted lottery ticket We really appreciate your opinion very much, which is why I may offer you this lottery ticket.
1. yes 1794 85.4 99.0 2. no 19 .9 1.0 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
553 V0899 II/50a1 Promised to fill in self-completion questionnaire Here I have a written questionnaire with a few questions. Would you fill in this questionnaire and send it back in this postage-paid envelope?
1. yes 1754 83.5 96.7 2. no 59 2.8 3.3 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0900 II/50b Willingness to participate in next wave Around the next election for the Second Chamber, ITS would like to interview everybody who participated in this survey for the last time. The questions will be more or less the same as this time. Do you mind if by then we contact you one more time?
1. not willing 78 3.7 4.3 2. willing 1731 82.4 95.7 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 997. DK 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
554 V0901 II/50c Reason for not willing to participate in next wave Could you perhaps indicate why you object?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0900, code 2)
1. is not interested in the subject/politics 16 .8 20.5 2. does not feel like it 1 .0 1.3 3. has poor knowledge of the subject/politics 2 .1 2.6 4. it takes too much time 5 .2 6.4 5. does not see the point of participating 1 .0 1.3 6. is fed up with it 17 .8 21.8 7. is not available (holiday. emigration etc.) 4 .2 5.1 8. has been bothered once too often by interviews 1 .0 1.3 10. never participates in interviews 2 .1 2.6 11. was disappointed with the previous interview 2 .1 2.6 12. too difficult 1 .0 1.3 13. let others do the job/let others have a chance 8 .4 10.3 too 14. too old/ill 8 .4 10.3 15. does not want to commit himself/herself 2 .1 2.6 88. other 5 .2 6.4 93. uncodable 3 .1 3.8 996. PA 287 13.7 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 1731 82.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
555 3.4.30 Text variables second wave
V0905 II/7Party choice - reason (text) Refer to V0612 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 7 (wave 2). Respondents answering to have voted, but not able or willing to mention a party, were asked ‘why did you vote’. This answer was not coded. The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0612, V0613, V0614 and V0615.
V0906 II/9b Other reason for preferential vote (text) Refer to V0618 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 9b (wave 2). The coded version of the answers can be found in V0618.
V0907 II/14a Did not vote - first reason (text) Refer to V0638 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original first answer to question 14 (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0638.
V0908 II/14b Did not vote - second reason (text) Refer to V0638 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original second answer to question 14 (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0639.
V0909 II/14c Did not vote - third reason (text) Refer to V0638 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original third answer to question 14 (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0640.
V0910 II/14d Did not vote - fourth reason (text) Refer to V0638 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original fourth answer to question 14 (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0641.
V0911 II/14e Did not vote - fifth reason (text) Refer to V0638 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original fifth answer to question 14 (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0642.
V0912 II/29c Reason elections in the Netherlands are unfair (text)
556 Refer to V0747 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original first answer to question 29c (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0747.
V0913 II/50c Reason for not willing to participate in next wave (text) Refer to V0901 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original first answer to question 50c (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0901.
V0914 II/52b Disturbing influences second interview (text) Refer to V0896 for a complete question text. This string variable contains the original answer to question 52b (wave 2). The coded version of the valid answers can be found in V0896 and V0897.
557 3.4.31 Order variables second wave
V0915 II/19 Order of questions about the importance of issues This order variable refers to V0660 to V0674. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0916 II/20-24 Order of questions about the importance parties attach to issues This order variable refers to V0680 to V0714 (issues are randomized, not parties). Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0917 II/30 Order of questions about territorial representation This order variable refers to V0757 and V0758. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0918 II/32 Order of questions about prospective prime ministers This order variable refers to V0765 to V0768. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0919 II/35 Order of questions about external efficacy This order variable refers to V0790 to V0794. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0920 II/36 Order of questions about internal efficacy This order variable refers to V0796 to V0798. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0921 II/37 Order of questions about cynicism This order variable refers to V0800 to V0802. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0922 II/39Order of questions about political trust This order variable refers to V0805 to V0810. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0923 II/41 Order of questions about legitimacy This order variable refers to V0815 to V0823. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
558 V0924 II/43 Order of questions about probability future vote This order variable refers to V0830 to V0840. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
V0925 II/48 Order of questions about right wing-extremism and xenophobia This order variable refers to V0875 to V0882. Refer to 4.5 below for an explanation of the meaning of order variables.
559 3.5 Documentation of variables of the main study: self-completion questionnaire
You have just participated in a research that ITS is conducting by order of a number of Dutch universities. We sincerely thank you for the time and effort that you have spent in having two interviews with our interviewer. As part of this research, this questionnaire was left with you. This questionnaire contains some questions about how people get information and opinions on political matters. In an oral survey these questions cannot be dealt with adequately. Would you please fill in the questionnaire and return it to ITS in the envelope provided?
Thank you very much in advance.
The following questions are about people you regularly have contact with.
3.5.1 Number of relevant others mentioned
V0950 S/1 Number of relevant persons mentioned With which three persons in your surroundings do you discuss things that you consider important? It is not your partner who is meant here, but friends or the rest of the family.
0. no persons mentioned 45 2.1 3.7 1. 1 108 5.1 9.0 2. 2 133 6.3 11.1 3. 3 915 43.6 76.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
560 3.5.2 Relevant others – age, sex and marital status
V0951 S/2 Age first relevant person What is the age of this person? (If you do not know the exact age, estimate it)
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
V0952 S/2 Age second relevant person Refer to V0951 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
V0953 S/2 Age third relevant person Refer to V0951 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
561 V0954 S/3 Sex first relevant person Is this person a man or a woman?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. male 576 27.4 50.1 2. female 573 27.3 49.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0955 S/3 Sex second relevant person Refer to V0954 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. male 502 23.9 48.1 2. female 542 25.8 51.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 4 .2 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0956 S/3 Sex third relevant person Refer to V0954 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. male 432 20.6 47.5 2. female 477 22.7 52.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
562 V0957 S/4 Marital status first relevant person What is the marital status of this person?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. not married 291 13.9 25.4 2. married 730 34.7 63.6 3. divorced 52 2.5 4.5 4. widow(er) 74 3.5 6.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0958 S/4 Marital status second relevant person Refer to V0957 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. not married 244 11.6 23.5 2. married 697 33.2 67.1 3. divorced 56 2.7 5.4 4. widow(er) 42 2.0 4.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0959 S/4 Marital status third relevant person Refer to V0957 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. not married 257 12.2 28.2 2. married 541 25.7 59.5 3. divorced 62 3.0 6.8 4. widow(er) 50 2.4 5.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
563 564 3.5.3 Relevant others – relationship to respondent
V0960 S/5 First relevant person is - member of family What is the relationship of this person to you?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 513 24.4 45.1 1. yes 625 29.7 54.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0961 S/5 First relevant person is - colleague Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 1049 49.9 92.2 1. yes 89 4.2 7.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0962 S/5 First relevant person is - member of same club Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 1098 52.3 96.5 1. yes 40 1.9 3.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
565 V0963 S/5 First relevant person is - member of same church Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 1104 52.5 97.0 1. yes 34 1.6 3.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0964 S/5 First relevant person is - neighbor Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 1082 51.5 95.1 1. yes 56 2.7 4.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0965 S/5 First relevant person is - friend Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 758 36.1 66.6 1. yes 380 18.1 33.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
566 V0966 S/5 First relevant person is - other Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. no 1133 53.9 99.6 1. yes 5 .2 .4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
567 V0967 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of family Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 528 25.1 51.4 1. yes 500 23.8 48.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0968 S/5 Second relevant person is - colleague Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 929 44.2 90.4 1. yes 99 4.7 9.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0969 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of same club Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 1002 47.7 97.5 1. yes 26 1.2 2.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
568 V0970 S/5 Second relevant person is - member of same church Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 1004 47.8 97.7 1. yes 24 1.1 2.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0971 S/5 Second relevant person is - neighbor Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 963 45.8 93.7 1. yes 65 3.1 6.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0972 S/5 Second relevant person is - friend Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 669 31.8 65.1 1. yes 359 17.1 34.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
569 V0973 S/5 Second relevant person is - other Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. no 1018 48.5 99.0 1. yes 10 .5 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 20 1.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
570 V0974 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of family Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 550 26.2 61.2 1. yes 348 16.6 38.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0975 S/5 Third relevant person is - colleague Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 766 36.5 85.3 1. yes 132 6.3 14.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0976 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of same club Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 870 41.4 96.9 1. yes 28 1.3 3.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
571 V0977 S/5 Third relevant person is - member of same church Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 859 40.9 95.7 1. yes 39 1.9 4.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0978 S/5 Third relevant person is - neighbor Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 842 40.1 93.8 1. yes 56 2.7 6.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0979 S/5 Third relevant person is - friend Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 538 25.6 59.9 1. yes 360 17.1 40.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
572 V0980 S/5 Third relevant person is - other Refer to V0960 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. no 889 42.3 99.0 1. yes 9 .4 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
573 3.5.4 Relevant others – religious denomination
V0981 S/6 Religious denomination of first relevant person Does this person consider himself/herself to belong to a particular church or religious community, and if so, to which one?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. Roman Catholic 329 15.7 28.9 2. Dutch reformed 156 7.4 13.7 3. Calvinist 88 4.2 7.7 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 5 .2 .4 5. Other Christian 21 1.0 1.8 6. Islamic 7 .3 .6 7. other 75 3.6 6.6 8. no religion 456 21.7 40.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0982 S/6 Religious denomination of second relevant person Refer to V0981 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. Roman Catholic 289 13.8 28.1 2. Dutch reformed 122 5.8 11.9 3. Calvinist 79 3.8 7.7 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 4 .2 .4 5. Other Christian 14 .7 1.4 6. Islamic 7 .3 .7 7. other 79 3.8 7.7 8. no religion 434 20.7 42.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 19 .9 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
574 V0983 S/6 Religious denomination of third relevant person Refer to V0981 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. Roman Catholic 234 11.1 26.1 2. Dutch reformed 101 4.8 11.3 3. Calvinist 77 3.7 8.6 4. General Protestant Christian (SOW) 3 .1 .3 5. Other Christian 23 1.1 2.6 6. Islamic 6 .3 .7 7. other 93 4.4 10.4 8. no religion 359 17.1 40.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 19 .9 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
575 3.5.5 Relevant others – employment status
V0984 S/7 Employment status of first relevant person Which situation applies to this person?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. (self-)employed 686 32.7 60.9 2. not employed anymore 379 18.0 33.6 3. never been employed 62 3.0 5.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 29 1.4 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0985 S/7 Employment status of second relevant person Refer to V0984 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. (self-)employed 649 30.9 63.3 2. not employed anymore 320 15.2 31.2 3. never been employed 56 2.7 5.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 23 1.1 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0986 S/7 Employment status of third relevant person Refer to V0984 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. (self-)employed 590 28.1 65.8 2. not employed anymore 232 11.0 25.9 3. never been employed 74 3.5 8.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 19 .9 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
576 3.5.6 Relevant others – frequency of contact
V0987 S/9 How often do you speak with first relevant person How often do you speak to this person, in person or on the telephone?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. (almost) every day 417 19.8 36.4 2. at least once a week 543 25.8 47.4 3. at least once a month 153 7.3 13.4 4. less than once a month 32 1.5 2.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 11 .5 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0988 S/9 How often do you speak with second relevant person Refer to V0987 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. (almost) every day 279 13.3 27.0 2. at least once a week 518 24.7 50.0 3. at least once a month 196 9.3 18.9 4. less than once a month 42 2.0 4.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0989 S/9 How often do you speak with third relevant person Refer to V0987 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. (almost) every day 239 11.4 26.4 2. at least once a week 389 18.5 43.0 3. at least once a month 223 10.6 24.6 4. less than once a month 54 2.6 6.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
577 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
578 3.5.7 Relevant others – political variables
V0990 S/10 Political interest of first relevant person Is this person very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. very interested 197 9.4 17.3 2. fairly interested 656 31.2 57.5 3. not interested 288 13.7 25.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 15 .7 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0991 S/10 Political interest of second relevant person Refer to V0990 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. very interested 165 7.9 16.0 2. fairly interested 602 28.7 58.3 3. not interested 265 12.6 25.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0992 S/10 Political interest of third relevant person Refer to V0990 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. very interested 129 6.1 14.3 2. fairly interested 525 25.0 58.2 3. not interested 248 11.8 27.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
579 580 V0993 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with first relevant person How often do you discuss politics with this person?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. always 52 2.5 4.5 2. sometimes 591 28.1 51.7 3. seldom 321 15.3 28.1 4. never 179 8.5 15.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0994 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with second relevant person Refer to V0993 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. always 31 1.5 3.0 2. sometimes 495 23.6 47.7 3. seldom 326 15.5 31.4 4. never 186 8.9 17.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0995 S/11 Frequency talking about politics with third relevant person Refer to V0993 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. always 25 1.2 2.8 2. sometimes 380 18.1 41.9 3. seldom 327 15.6 36.1 4. never 175 8.3 19.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
581 2101 100.0 100.0
582 V0996 S/12 Political agreement with first relevant person When you discuss politics with this person, how often do you agree with each other? When you never discuss politics with a person (question 11), you do not have to fill in anything for this person.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0; V0993, code 4)
1. often 477 22.7 50.6 2. sometimes 409 19.5 43.4 3. seldom 47 2.2 5.0 4. never 9 .4 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 35 1.7 MD 999. INAP 224 10.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0997 S/12 Political agreement with second relevant person Refer to V0996 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1; V0994, code 4)
1. often 360 17.1 43.3 2. sometimes 399 19.0 48.0 3. seldom 66 3.1 7.9 4. never 7 .3 .8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 30 1.4 MD 999. INAP 339 16.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V0998 S/12 Political agreement with third relevant person Refer to V0996 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2; V0995, code 4)
1. often 283 13.5 39.8 2. sometimes 369 17.6 51.9 3. seldom 48 2.3 6.8 4. never 11 .5 1.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 29 1.4 MD
583 999. INAP 461 21.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
584 V0999 S/13 Left-right rating of first relevant person (11 point scale) It is often said of political beliefs that they are left or right. When you think of the political beliefs of these three persons, where would you place them on a scale running from 0 to 10? 0 means left and 10 means right. Please write down the number that applies.
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
0. left 59 2.8 5.6 1. 1 25 1.2 2.4 2. 2 65 3.1 6.2 3. 3 110 5.2 10.5 4. 4 133 6.3 12.7 5. 5 210 10.0 20.1 6. 6 101 4.8 9.6 7. 7 141 6.7 13.5 8. 8 132 6.3 12.6 9. 9 27 1.3 2.6 10. right 44 2.1 4.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 109 5.2 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
585 V1000 S/13 Left-right rating of second relevant person (11 point scale) Refer to V0999 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
0. left 41 2.0 4.3 1. 1 11 .5 1.1 2. 2 65 3.1 6.8 3. 3 89 4.2 9.3 4. 4 109 5.2 11.4 5. 5 211 10.0 22.0 6. 6 127 6.0 13.3 7. 7 119 5.7 12.4 8. 8 124 5.9 12.9 9. 9 34 1.6 3.5 10. right 28 1.3 2.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 90 4.3 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
586 V1001 S/13 Left-right rating of third relevant person (11 point scale) Refer to V0999 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
0. left 28 1.3 3.3 1. 1 19 .9 2.3 2. 2 57 2.7 6.8 3. 3 79 3.8 9.4 4. 4 103 4.9 12.2 5. 5 174 8.3 20.6 6. 6 102 4.9 12.1 7. 7 130 6.2 15.4 8. 8 103 4.9 12.2 9. 9 24 1.1 2.8 10. right 24 1.1 2.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 72 3.4 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
587 V1002 S/14 Left right self-rating (11 point scale) And where would you place yourself?
0. left 36 1.7 3.3 1. 1 45 2.1 4.2 2. 2 94 4.5 8.7 3. 3 139 6.6 12.8 4. 4 119 5.7 11.0 5. 5 193 9.2 17.8 6. 6 108 5.1 10.0 7. 7 149 7.1 13.7 8. 8 126 6.0 11.6 9. 9 39 1.9 3.6 10. right 36 1.7 3.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 117 5.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
588 V1003 S/15 Party first relevant person voted for Which party did this person vote for in the election of the Second Chamber of May 6?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0)
1. PVDA 239 11.4 32.8 2. CDA 162 7.7 22.2 3. VVD 150 7.1 20.6 4. D66 68 3.2 9.3 5. GroenLinks 54 2.6 7.4 6. SGP 13 .6 1.8 7. GPV 8 .4 1.1 8. RPF 15 .7 2.1 9. Centrumdemocraten 1 .0 .1 10. Unie 55+ 3 .1 .4 11. AOV 15 .7 2.1 63. De Groenen 1 .0 .1 993. not allowed to vote 11 .5 MD 995. abstention 52 2.5 MD 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 364 17.3 MD 999. INAP 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
589 V1004 S/15 Party second relevant person voted for Refer to V1003 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1)
1. PVDA 179 8.5 30.4 2. CDA 108 5.1 18.3 3. VVD 138 6.6 23.4 4. D66 70 3.3 11.9 5. GroenLinks 49 2.3 8.3 6. SGP 8 .4 1.4 7. GPV 9 .4 1.5 8. RPF 16 .8 2.7 11. AOV 10 .5 1.7 30. local party 1 .0 .2 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 .2 993. not allowed to vote 9 .4 MD 994. uncodable 1 .0 MD 995. abstention 49 2.3 MD 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 400 19.0 MD 999. INAP 153 7.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
590 V1005 S/15 Party third relevant person voted for Refer to V1003 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0950, code 0,1,2)
1. PVDA 128 6.1 26.7 2. CDA 106 5.0 22.1 3. VVD 117 5.6 24.4 4. D66 41 2.0 8.6 5. GroenLinks 49 2.3 10.2 6. SGP 6 .3 1.3 7. GPV 10 .5 2.1 8. RPF 6 .3 1.3 10. Unie 55+ 5 .2 1.0 11. AOV 10 .5 2.1 12. SP 1.0.2 993. not allowed to vote 11 .5 MD 995. abstention 40 1.9 MD 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 385 18.3 MD 999. INAP 286 13.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
591 3.5.8 Frequency contact with others
V1010 S/16 Frequency contact with - family How often do you have contact with: (Please do not include members of your household) Contact: talking on the telephone as well as paying a visit or speaking to someone in person
NOTE This note pertains to an error in the self-completion questionnaire. The third category of question 16 was erroneously labeled as “once a week” instead of “once a month”. This error was discovered in the first week of the second wave of interviews. The interviewers were immediately instructed to correct the mistake before handing over the self-completion questionnaire to the respondents. Some self-completion questionnaires containing the mistake had already been handed over to respondents interviewed in the first week. The returned questionnaires containing the uncorrected label have been interpreted as if the respondents were aware of the mistake and understood that the label should have read “once a month”.
1. at least once a week 743 35.4 65.3 2. once every two weeks 277 13.2 24.3 3. once a month 91 4.3 8.0 4. never 27 1.3 2.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 63 3.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
592 V1011 S/16 Frequency contact with - friends Refer to V1010 for complete question text
1. at least once a week 646 30.7 57.7 2. once every two weeks 346 16.5 30.9 3. once a month 90 4.3 8.0 4. never 37 1.8 3.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 82 3.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
593 V1012 S/16 Frequency contact with - neighbors Refer to V1010 for complete question text
1. at least once a week 598 28.5 55.2 2. once every two weeks 244 11.6 22.5 3. once a month 100 4.8 9.2 4. never 141 6.7 13.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 118 5.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
594 V1013 S/16 Frequency contact with - colleagues Refer to V1010 for complete question text
1. at least once a week 620 29.5 65.6 2. once every two weeks 53 2.5 5.6 3. once a month 43 2.0 4.6 4. never 229 10.9 24.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 256 12.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
595 V1014 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - family Do you discuss personal problems with:
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1010, code 4)
1. yes 907 43.2 83.1 2. no 184 8.8 16.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 83 4.0 MD 999. INAP 27 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
596 V1015 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - friends Refer to V1014 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1011, code 4)
1. yes 871 41.5 82.2 2. no 188 8.9 17.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 105 5.0 MD 999. INAP 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
597 V1016 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - neighbors Refer to V1014 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1012, code 4)
1. yes 172 8.2 19.0 2. no 733 34.9 81.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 155 7.4 MD 999. INAP 141 6.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
598 V1017 S/17 Discusses personal matters with - colleagues Refer to V1014 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1013, code 4)
1. yes 266 12.7 37.7 2. no 439 20.9 62.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 267 12.7 MD 999. INAP 229 10.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
599 3.5.9 Trust in political institutions
V1020 S/18 Trust in churches Would you indicate to me for each of the following Dutch institutions whether you trust them very much, fairly much, not so much, or not at all?
1. very much 93 4.4 7.9 2. fairly much 345 16.4 29.4 3. not so much 540 25.7 46.0 4. not at all 196 9.3 16.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 27 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1021 S/18 Trust in army Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 38 1.8 3.3 2. fairly much 431 20.5 37.3 3. not so much 541 25.7 46.8 4. not at all 146 6.9 12.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1022 S/18 Trust in judges Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 132 6.3 11.4 2. fairly much 687 32.7 59.5 3. not so much 278 13.2 24.1 4. not at all 57 2.7 4.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 47 2.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
600 V1023 S/18 Trust in press Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 20 1.0 1.7 2. fairly much 335 15.9 28.9 3. not so much 650 30.9 56.0 4. not at all 155 7.4 13.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 41 2.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1024 S/18 Trust in police Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 74 3.5 6.4 2. fairly much 721 34.3 61.9 3. not so much 312 14.9 26.8 4. not at all 58 2.8 5.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 36 1.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1025 S/18 Trust in parliament Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 56 2.7 4.8 2. fairly much 667 31.7 57.5 3. not so much 374 17.8 32.3 4. not at all 62 3.0 5.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 42 2.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
601 V1026 S/18 Trust in administration Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 11 .5 1.0 2. fairly much 396 18.8 34.2 3. not so much 648 30.8 56.0 4. not at all 102 4.9 8.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 44 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1027 S/18 Trust in big companies Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 30 1.4 2.6 2. fairly much 430 20.5 37.1 3. not so much 585 27.8 50.4 4. not at all 115 5.5 9.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 41 2.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1028 S/18 Trust in European Union Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 31 1.5 2.7 2. fairly much 427 20.3 36.9 3. not so much 551 26.2 47.7 4. not at all 147 7.0 12.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 45 2.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
602 V1029 S/18 Trust in NATO Refer to V1020 for complete question text
1. very much 60 2.9 5.2 2. fairly much 526 25.0 45.6 3. not so much 455 21.7 39.4 4. not at all 113 5.4 9.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 47 2.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
603 3.5.10 Media consumption
V1030 S/19 Frequency watching - Netwerk Now some questions about yourself. We start with television and radio programs.
On the average, how often per week do you watch the following programs? (per program, only one answer is possible)
1. never 383 18.2 32.3 2. less than once a week 318 15.1 26.8 3. once or twice a week 277 13.2 23.4 4. 3 or 4 times a week 109 5.2 9.2 5. (almost) always 98 4.7 8.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1031 S/19 Frequency watching - NOS 8 uur journaal (Ned.1) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 166 7.9 13.9 2. less than once a week 162 7.7 13.6 3. once or twice a week 218 10.4 18.3 4. 3 or 4 times a week 217 10.3 18.2 5. (almost) always 429 20.4 36.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1032 S/19 Frequency watching - NOS 6 uur journaal (Ned.2) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 428 20.4 36.0 2. less than once a week 232 11.0 19.5 3. once or twice a week 183 8.7 15.4 4. 3 or 4 times a week 126 6.0 10.6 5. (almost) always 221 10.5 18.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 11 .5 MD
604 2101 100.0 100.0
605 V1033 S/19 Frequency watching - 2 Vandaag (Ned.2) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 429 20.4 36.4 2. less than once a week 315 15.0 26.7 3. once or twice a week 243 11.6 20.6 4. 3 or 4 times a week 80 3.8 6.8 5. (almost) always 113 5.4 9.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 21 1.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1034 S/19 Frequency watching - Jeugdjournaal (Ned.3) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 666 31.7 56.1 2. less than once a week 281 13.4 23.7 3. once or twice a week 134 6.4 11.3 4. 3 or 4 times a week 46 2.2 3.9 5. (almost) always 61 2.9 5.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1035 S/19 Frequency watching - Barend & Witteman (Ned.3) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 572 27.2 48.2 2. less than once a week 335 15.9 28.2 3. once or twice a week 187 8.9 15.8 4. 3 or 4 times a week 49 2.3 4.1 5. (almost) always 44 2.1 3.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
606 V1036 S/19 Frequency watching - Lingo (Ned.3) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 649 30.9 54.4 2. less than once a week 267 12.7 22.4 3. once or twice a week 165 7.9 13.8 4. 3 or 4 times a week 45 2.1 3.8 5. (almost) always 67 3.2 5.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1037 S/19 Frequency watching - Achter het Nieuws (ceased to exist 22/09/92) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
Note: The newsshow ‘ Achter het News’ , once a well-known TV- programm, ceased to exist on september 22, 1992. The name was included in question 19 of the self-completion questionnaire for methodological purposes.
1. never 536 25.5 45.5 2. less than once a week 344 16.4 29.2 3. once or twice a week 187 8.9 15.9 4. 3 or 4 times a week 60 2.9 5.1 5. (almost) always 50 2.4 4.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 24 1.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1038 S/19 Frequency watching – NOS 10 uur journaal (Ned.3) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 338 16.1 28.3 2. less than once a week 244 11.6 20.4 3. once or twice a week 266 12.7 22.2 4. 3 or 4 times a week 175 8.3 14.6 5. (almost) always 173 8.2 14.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
607 608 V1039 S/19 Frequency watching - NOVA-Den Haag Vandaag (Ned.3) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 359 17.1 30.1 2. less than once a week 312 14.9 26.1 3. once or twice a week 278 13.2 23.3 4. 3 or 4 times a week 132 6.3 11.1 5. (almost) always 113 5.4 9.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1040 S/19 Frequency watching - RTL4-journaal (RTL4) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 294 14.0 24.6 2. less than once a week 243 11.6 20.3 3. once or twice a week 226 10.8 18.9 4. 3 or 4 times a week 183 8.7 15.3 5. (almost) always 249 11.9 20.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1041 S/19 Frequency watching - 5 Uur Show (RTL4) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 884 42.1 73.9 2. less than once a week 164 7.8 13.7 3. once or twice a week 78 3.7 6.5 4. 3 or 4 times a week 29 1.4 2.4 5. (almost) always 41 2.0 3.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 5 .2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
609 V1042 S/19 Frequency watching - The Bold and the Beautiful (RTL4) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 937 44.6 78.1 2. less than once a week 73 3.5 6.1 3. once or twice a week 48 2.3 4.0 4. 3 or 4 times a week 36 1.7 3.0 5. (almost) always 105 5.0 8.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 2 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1043 S/19 Frequency watching - Goede Tijden Slechte Tijden (RTL4) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 783 37.3 65.4 2. less than once a week 106 5.0 8.8 3. once or twice a week 87 4.1 7.3 4. 3 or 4 times a week 56 2.7 4.7 5. (almost) always 166 7.9 13.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 3 .1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1044 S/19 Frequency watching - RTL5-journaal (RTL5) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 638 30.4 53.5 2. less than once a week 305 14.5 25.6 3. once or twice a week 158 7.5 13.3 4. 3 or 4 times a week 47 2.2 3.9 5. (almost) always 44 2.1 3.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
610 V1045 S/19 Frequency watching - Vijf in het Land (RTL5) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 723 34.4 60.7 2. less than once a week 238 11.3 20.0 3. once or twice a week 143 6.8 12.0 4. 3 or 4 times a week 54 2.6 4.5 5. (almost) always 34 1.6 2.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1046 S/19 Frequency watching - Hart van Nederland (SBS6) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 565 26.9 47.4 2. less than once a week 234 11.1 19.6 3. once or twice a week 192 9.1 16.1 4. 3 or 4 times a week 101 4.8 8.5 5. (almost) always 100 4.8 8.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1047 S/19 Frequency watching - Actienieuws (SBS6) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 737 35.1 62.2 2. less than once a week 196 9.3 16.5 3. once or twice a week 137 6.5 11.6 4. 3 or 4 times a week 56 2.7 4.7 5. (almost) always 59 2.8 5.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
611 V1048 S/19 Frequency watching - Goudkust (SBS6) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 1059 50.4 88.7 2. less than once a week 40 1.9 3.4 3. once or twice a week 32 1.5 2.7 4. 3 or 4 times a week 13 .6 1.1 5. (almost) always 50 2.4 4.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1049 S/19 Frequency watching - Onderweg naar Morgen (Veronica) Refer to V1030 for complete question text
1. never 1049 49.9 87.8 2. less than once a week 53 2.5 4.4 3. once or twice a week 25 1.2 2.1 4. 3 or 4 times a week 22 1.0 1.8 5. (almost) always 46 2.2 3.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 6 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
612 3.5.11 Media consumption – radio
V1055 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 1 On the average, how many hours per week do you listen to the following radio stations? (per station, only one answer is possible)
1. never 787 37.5 66.4 2. less than one hour a week 187 8.9 15.8 3. 1-8 hours a week 146 6.9 12.3 4. 8-16 hours a week 41 2.0 3.5 5. more than16 hours a week 25 1.2 2.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1056 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 2 Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 814 38.7 68.6 2. less than one hour a week 182 8.7 15.3 3. 1-8 hours a week 110 5.2 9.3 4. 8-16 hours a week 42 2.0 3.5 5. more than16 hours a week 39 1.9 3.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1057 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 3 Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 660 31.4 55.5 2. less than one hour a week 249 11.9 20.9 3. 1-8 hours a week 172 8.2 14.5 4. 8-16 hours a week 49 2.3 4.1 5. more than16 hours a week 59 2.8 5.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
613 V1058 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 4 Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 972 46.3 82.2 2. less than one hour a week 126 6.0 10.7 3. 1-8 hours a week 56 2.7 4.7 4. 8-16 hours a week 23 1.1 1.9 5. more than 16 hours a week 6 .3 .5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 18 .9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1059 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 5 Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 1021 48.6 86.2 2. less than one hour a week 107 5.1 9.0 3. 1-8 hours a week 41 2.0 3.5 4. 8-16 hours a week 11 .5 .9 5. more than16 hours a week 4 .2 .3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1060 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 10 Gold Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 782 37.2 65.7 2. less than one hour a week 192 9.1 16.1 3. 1-8 hours a week 134 6.4 11.3 4. 8-16 hours a week 34 1.6 2.9 5. more than16 hours a week 49 2.3 4.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
614 V1061 S/20 Frequency listening to - Veronica Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 844 40.2 70.9 2. less than one hour a week 169 8.0 14.2 3. 1-8 hours a week 115 5.5 9.7 4. 8-16 hours a week 39 1.9 3.3 5. more than16 hours a week 24 1.1 2.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1062 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio 538 Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 888 42.3 74.7 2. less than one hour a week 124 5.9 10.4 3. 1-8 hours a week 105 5.0 8.8 4. 8-16 hours a week 43 2.0 3.6 5. more than16 hours a week 28 1.3 2.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1063 S/20 Frequency listening to - Sky Radio Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 623 29.7 52.3 2. less than one hour a week 198 9.4 16.6 3. 1-8 hours a week 215 10.2 18.1 4. 8-16 hours a week 73 3.5 6.1 5. more than16 hours a week 82 3.9 6.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
615 V1064 S/20 Frequency listening to - Radio Klassiek Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 935 44.5 78.6 2. less than one hour a week 121 5.8 10.2 3. 1-8 hours a week 102 4.9 8.6 4. 8-16 hours a week 19 .9 1.6 5. more than 16 hours a week 12 .6 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 12 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1065 S/20 Frequency listening to - Regional network Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 668 31.8 56.3 2. less than one hour a week 170 8.1 14.3 3. 1-8 hours a week 200 9.5 16.8 4. 8-16 hours a week 66 3.1 5.6 5. more than16 hours a week 83 4.0 7.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1066 S/20 Frequency listening to - other Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. never 970 46.2 84.6 2. less than one hour a week 40 1.9 3.5 3. 1-8 hours a week 61 2.9 5.3 4. 8-16 hours a week 27 1.3 2.4 5. more than16 hours a week 48 2.3 4.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 55 2.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
616 V1067 S/20 Other radiostation respondent listens to Refer to V1055 for complete question text
1. Noordzee 42 2.0 29.4 2. jfk 15 .7 10.5 3. talkradio 5 .2 3.5 5. classic 11 .5 7.7 6. foreign 26 1.2 18.2 7. regional 18 .9 12.6 8. ndr 5 .2 3.5 9. other 21 1.0 14.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 997. DK 6 .3 MD 998. NA 1052 50.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
617 3.5.12 Media consumption – newspapers
V1070 S/21 Frequency reading - Telegraaf On the average, how many hours per day do you spend reading the following newspapers? (per newspaper, only one answer is possible)
1. never 845 40.2 71.3 2. less than15 minutes a day 134 6.4 11.3 3. 15 - 30 minutes a day 105 5.0 8.9 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 75 3.6 6.3 5. more than 60 minutes a day 26 1.2 2.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1071 S/21 Frequency reading - Algemeen Dagblad Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 955 45.5 80.6 2. less than 15 minutes a day 109 5.2 9.2 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 63 3.0 5.3 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 46 2.2 3.9 5. more than 60 minutes a day 12 .6 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 16 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1072 S/21 Frequency reading - NRC Handelsblad Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 1055 50.2 88.8 2. less than15 minutes a day 53 2.5 4.5 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 30 1.4 2.5 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 39 1.9 3.3 5. more than 60 minutes a day 11 .5 .9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 13 .6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
618 V1073 S/21Frequency reading - Volkskrant Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 955 45.5 80.7 2. less than15 minutes a day 93 4.4 7.9 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 53 2.5 4.5 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 66 3.1 5.6 5. more than 60 minutes a day 17 .8 1.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 17 .8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1074 S/21Frequency reading - Trouw Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 1118 53.2 93.8 2. less than15 minutes a day 29 1.4 2.4 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 14 .7 1.2 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 19 .9 1.6 5. more than 60 minutes a day 12 .6 1.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1075 S/21 Frequency reading - Parool Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 1142 54.4 95.7 2. less than15 minutes a day 23 1.1 1.9 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 12 .6 1.0 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 9 .4 .8 5. more than 60 minutes a day 7 .3 .6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
619 V1076 S/21 Frequency reading - Regional newspaper Refer to V1070 for complete question text
1. never 297 14.1 25.0 2. less than15 minutes a day 220 10.5 18.5 3. 15 – 30 minutes a day 281 13.4 23.7 4. 30 – 60 minutes a day 266 12.7 22.4 5. more than 60 minutes a day 122 5.8 10.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
620 3.5.13 Media consumption – magazines
V1080 S/22 Frequency reading - De Groene Amsterdammer On the average, how many hours per week do you spend reading the following magazines? (per magazine, only one answer is possible)
1. never 1172 55.8 98.2 2. less than 60 minutes a week 19 .9 1.6 3. 2 hours a week 1 .0 .1 4. 2-3 hours a week 1 .0 .1 5. more than 3 hours a week 1 .0 .1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1081 S/22 Frequency reading - Elsevier Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 1041 49.5 87.3 2. less than 60 minutes a week 111 5.3 9.3 3. 2 hours a week 22 1.0 1.8 4. 2-3 hours a week 12 .6 1.0 5. more than 3 hours a week 6 .3 .5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 9 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1082 S/22 Frequency reading - Vrij Nederland Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 1075 51.2 90.1 2. less than 60 minutes a week 82 3.9 6.9 3. 2 hours a week 19 .9 1.6 4. 2-3 hours a week 8 .4 .7 5. more than 3 hours a week 9 .4 .8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
621 V1083 S/22 Frequency reading - Story Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 993 47.3 83.7 2. less than 60 minutes a week 173 8.2 14.6 3. 2 hours a week 14 .7 1.2 4. 2-3 hours a week 5 .2 .4 5. more than 3 hours a week 2 .1 .2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1084 S/22 Frequency reading - Weekend Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 1037 49.4 87.4 2. less than 60 minutes a week 138 6.6 11.6 3. 2 hours a week 10 .5 .8 4. 2-3 hours a week 1 .0 .1 5. more than 3 hours a week 1 .0 .1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 14 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1085 S/22 Frequency reading – Privé Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 991. 47.2 83.6 2. less than 60 minutes a week 171 8.1 14.4 3. 2 hours a week 16 .8 1.3 4. 2-3 hours a week 4 .2 .3 5. more than 3 hours a week 4 .2 .3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 15 .7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
622 V1086 S/22 Frequency reading - Panorama Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 974 46.4 81.8 2. less than 60 minutes a week 186 8.9 15.6 3. 2 hours a week 26 1.2 2.2 4. 2-3 hours a week 2 .1 .2 5. more than 3 hours a week 2 .1 .2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 11 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1087 S/22Frequency reading - Viva Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 1097 52.2 92.0 2. less than 60 minutes a week 86 4.1 7.2 3. 2 hours a week 10 .5 .8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1088 S/22 Frequency reading - Margriet Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 909 43.3 76.2 2. less than 60 minutes a week 211 10.0 17.7 3. 2 hours a week 47 2.2 3.9 4. 2-3 hours a week 19 .9 1.6 5. more than 3 hours a week 7 .3 .6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
623 V1089 S/22 Frequency reading - Libelle Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 854 40.6 71.7 2. less than 60 minutes a week 243 11.6 20.4 3. 2 hours a week 64 3.0 5.4 4. 2-3 hours a week 22 1.0 1.8 5. more than 3 hours a week 8 .4 .7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1090 S/22 Frequency reading - Other Refer to V1080 for complete question text
1. never 703 33.5 60.6 2. less than 60 minutes a week 224 10.7 19.3 3. 2 hours a week 129 6.1 11.1 4. 2-3 hours a week 55 2.6 4.7 5. more than 3 hours a week 49 2.3 4.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 41 2.0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
624 3.5.14 Political television commercials
V1095 S/23 Seen television commercial of PvdA During the election period, have you seen a promotional film or a broadcast of a political party on television? (per party, only one answer is possible)
1. yes 628 29.9 55.9 2. no 496 23.6 44.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 77 3.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1096 S/23 Seen television commercial of CDA Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 527 25.1 47.5 2. no 582 27.7 52.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 92 4.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1097 S/23 Seen television commercial of VVD Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 520 24.8 47.1 2. no 584 27.8 52.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 97 4.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
625 V1098 S/23 Seen television commercial of D66 Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 480 22.8 43.7 2. no 618 29.4 56.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 103 4.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1099 S/23 Seen television commercial of GroenLinks Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 438 20.8 39.9 2. no 661 31.5 60.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 102 4.9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1100 S/23 Seen television commercial of SP Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 319 15.2 29.5 2. no 762 36.3 70.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 120 5.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
626 V1101 S/23 Seen television commercial of other party Refer to V1095 for complete question text
1. yes 102 4.9 9.9 2. no 927 44.1 90.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 172 8.2 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
627 V1105 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of PVDA How did you like this promotional film? (per party, only one answer is possible) When you have not seen a promotional film of a party (question 23), you do not have to fill in anything for that party
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1095, code 2)
1. good 242 11.5 46.7 2. mediocre 257 12.2 49.6 3. bad 19 .9 3.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 187 8.9 MD 999. INAP 496 23.6 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1106 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of CDA Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1096, code 2)
1. good 85 4.0 19.6 2. mediocre 256 12.2 59.1 3. bad 92 4.4 21.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 186 8.9 MD 999. INAP 582 27.7 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1107 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of VVD Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1097, code 2)
1. good 126 6.0 29.9 2. mediocre 240 11.4 56.9 3. bad 56 2.7 13.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 195 9.3 MD 999. INAP 584 27.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
628 629 V1108 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of D66 Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1098, code 2)
1. good 98 4.7 25.5 2. mediocre 227 10.8 59.0 3. bad 60 2.9 15.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 198 9.4 MD 999. INAP 618 29.4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1109 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of GroenLinks Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1099, code 2)
1. good 146 6.9 41.6 2. mediocre 158 7.5 45.0 3. bad 47 2.2 13.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 189 9.0 MD 999. INAP 661 31.5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1110 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of SP Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1100, code 2)
1. good 83 4.0 33.2 2. mediocre 124 5.9 49.6 3. bad 43 2.0 17.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 189 9.0 MD 999. INAP 762 36.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
630 V1111 S/24 Evaluation television commercial of other party Refer to V1105 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1101, code 2)
1. good 14 .7 22.6 2. mediocre 23 1.1 37.1 3. bad 25 1.2 40.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 212 10.1 MD 999. INAP 927 44.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
631 3.5.15 Internet
V1115 S/25 Used internet to find information about electoral campaign During the election period, did you ever use the Internet to get information on politics?
1. yes 72 3.4 6.1 2. no 1110 52.8 93.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 19 .9 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
632 3.5.16 Approached by a political party
V1120 S/26 Approached by mail by PvdA During the election period, have you been contacted by a politician of a political party through mail or through a talk on the street?
0. no 1015 48.3 84.6 1. yes 185 8.8 15.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1121 S/26 Approached on the street by PvdA Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1173 55.8 97.8 1. yes 27 1.3 2.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1122 S/26 Approached in another way by PvdA Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1173 55.8 97.8 1. yes 27 1.3 2.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
633 V1123 S/26 Approached by mail by CDA Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1029 49.0 85.8 1. yes 171 8.1 14.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1124 S/26 Approached on the street by CDA Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1164 55.4 97.0 1. yes 36 1.7 3.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1125 S/26 Approached in another way by CDA Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1182 56.3 98.5 1. yes 18 .9 1.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
634 V1126 S/26 Approached by mail by VVD Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1066 50.7 88.8 1. yes 134 6.4 11.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1127 S/26 Approached on the street by VVD Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1175 55.9 97.9 1. yes 25 1.2 2.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1128 S/26 Approached in another way by VVD Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1178 56.1 98.2 1. yes 22 1.0 1.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
635 V1129 S/26 Approached by mail by D66 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1081 51.5 90.1 1. yes 119 5.7 9.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1130 S/26 Approached on the street by D66 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1176 56.0 98.0 1. yes 24 1.1 2.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1131 S/26 Approached in another way by D66 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1177 56.0 98.1 1. yes 23 1.1 1.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
636 V1132 S/26 Approached by mail by GroenLinks Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1090 51.9 90.8 1. yes 110 5.2 9.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1133 S/26 Approached on the street by GroenLinks Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1179 56.1 98.3 1. yes 21 1.0 1.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1134 S/26 Approached in another way by GroenLinks Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1180 56.2 98.3 1. yes 20 1.0 1.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
637 V1135 S/26 Approached by mail by SGP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1152 54.8 96.0 1. yes 48 2.3 4.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1136 S/26 Approached on the street by SGP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1196 56.9 99.7 1. yes 4 .2 .3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1137 S/26 Approached in another way by SGP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1192 56.7 99.3 1. yes 8 .4 .7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
638 V1138 S/26 Approached by mail by GPV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1162 55.3 96.8 1. yes 38 1.8 3.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1139 S/26 Approached on the street by GPV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1195 56.9 99.6 1. yes 5 .2 .4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1140 S/26 Approached in another way by GPV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1197 57.0 99.8 1. yes 3 .1 .3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
639 V1141 S/26 Approached by mail by RPF Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1161 55.3 96.8 1. yes 39 1.9 3.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1142 S/26 Approached on the street by RPF Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1194 56.8 99.5 1. yes 6 .3 .5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1143 S/26 Approached in another way by RPF Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1193 56.8 99.4 1. yes 7 .3 .6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
640 V1144 S/26 Approached by mail by Centrumdemocraten Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1184 56.4 98.7 1. yes 16 .8 1.3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1145 S/26 Approached on the street by Centrumdemocraten Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1199 57.1 99.9 1. yes 1 .0 .1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1146 S/26 Approached in another way by Centrumdemocraten Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1198 57.0 99.8 1. yes 2 .1 .2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
641 V1147 S/26 Approached by mail by UNIE 55+ Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1177 56.0 98.1 1. yes 23 1.1 1.9 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1148 S/26 Approached on the street by UNIE 55+ Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1195 56.9 99.6 1. yes 5 .2 .4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1149 S/26 Approached in another way by UNIE 55+ Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1196 56.9 99.7 1. yes 4 .2 .3 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
642 V1150 S/26 Approached by mail by AOV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1178 56.1 98.2 1. yes 22 1.0 1.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1151 S/26 Approached on the street by AOV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1198 57.0 99.8 1. yes 2 .1 .2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1152 S/26 Approached in another way by AOV Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1195 56.9 99.6 1. yes 5 .2 .4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
643 V1153 S/26 Approached by mail by SP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1087 51.7 90.6 1. yes 113 5.4 9.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1154 S/26 Approached on the street by SP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1183 56.3 98.6 1. yes 17 .8 1.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1155 S/26 Approached in another way by SP Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1178 56.1 98.2 1. yes 22 1.0 1.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
644 V1156 S/26 Approached by mail by Senioren 2000 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1182 56.3 98.5 1. yes 18 .9 1.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1157 S/26 Approached on the street by Senioren 2000 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1198 57.0 99.8 1. yes 2 .1 .2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1158 S/26 Approached in another way by Senioren 2000 Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1199 57.1 99.9 1. yes 1 .0 .1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
645 V1159 S/26 Approached by mail by other party Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1192 56.7 99.3 1. yes 8 .4 .7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1160 S/ 26 Approached on the street by other party Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1199 57.1 99.9 1. yes 1 .0 .1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1161 S/26 Approached in another way by other party Refer to V1120 for complete question text
0. no 1191 56.7 99.3 1. yes 9 .4 .8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 1 .0 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
646 3.5.17 Political interest
V1164 S/27 Interested in politics? Are you very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested?
1. very interested 111 5.3 9.3 2. fairly interested 817 38.9 68.5 3. not interested 265 12.6 22.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 8 .4 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1165 S/28 Political interest - municipality Are you very, fairly, not much, or not at all interested in political matters in …? (per event only one answer is possible) Your Municipality
1. very much 97 4.6 8.3 2. fairly much 517 24.6 44.1 3. little 500 23.8 42.6 4. not at all 59 2.8 5.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 28 1.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1166 S/28 Political interest - neighborhood Refer to V1165 for complete question text Your Neighbourhood
1. very much 110 5.2 9.7 2. fairly much 445 21.2 39.2 3. little 488 23.2 43.0 4. not at all 92 4.4 8.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 66 3.1 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
647 V1167 S/28 Political interest - province Refer to V1165 for complete question text Your Province
1. very much 27 1.3 2.4 2. fairly much 341 16.2 30.1 3. little 638 30.4 56.4 4. not at all 126 6.0 11.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 69 3.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1168 S/28 Political interest - Europe Refer to V1165 for complete question text Europe 1. very much 62 3.0 5.5 2. fairly much 360 17.1 31.8 3. little 549 26.1 48.5 4. not at all 161 7.7 14.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 69 3.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1169 S/28 Political interest - rest of the world Refer to V1165 for complete question text The rest of the world.
1. very much 70 3.3 6.2 2. fairly much 417 19.8 36.8 3. little 492 23.4 43.5 4. not at all 153 7.3 13.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 69 3.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
648 3.5.18 Reading (inter)national news
V1170 S/29 Reads national news in national newspaper In which papers do you read national news: national newspaper
0. no 553 26.3 47.5 1. yes 611 29.1 52.5 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1171 S/29 Reads national news in regional/local newspaper regional, local newspaper Refer to V1170 for complete question text
0. no 342 16.3 29.4 1. yes 822 39.1 70.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1172 S/29 Reads national news in weekly magazine weekly magazine Refer to V1170 for complete question text
0. no 903 43.0 77.6 1. yes 261 12.4 22.4 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
649 V1173 S/29 Reads national news in monthly magazine monthly magazine Refer to V1170 for complete question text
0. no 1073 51.1 92.2 1. yes 91 4.3 7.8 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 37 1.8 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
650 V1174 S/29 Reads foreign news in national newspaper In which papers do you read foreign news: national newspaper
0. no 490 23.3 45.0 1. yes 600 28.6 55.0 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 111 5.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1175 S/29 Reads foreign news in regional/local newspaper regional/local newspaper Refer to V1174 for complete question text
0. no 489 23.3 44.9 1. yes 601 28.6 55.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 111 5.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1176 S/29 Reads foreign news in weekly magazine weekly magazine Refer to V1174 for complete question text
0. no 897 42.7 82.3 1. yes 193 9.2 17.7 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 111 5.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
651 V1177 S/29 Reads foreign news in monthly magazine monthly magazine Refer to V1174 for complete question text
0. no 1018 48.5 93.4 1. yes 72 3.4 6.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 111 5.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
652 3.5.19 Convincing others to vote for party
V1180 S/30 Did you recommend acquaintance to vote for party? During the election campaign, did you advise acquaintances to vote for a specific party?
1. yes 220 10.5 18.4 2. no 974 46.4 81.6 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 7 .3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1181 S/31 Did acquaintance recommend you to vote for party? And did any of your acquaintances advise you to vote for a specific party?
1. yes 189 9.0 15.9 2. no 1002 47.7 84.1 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 10 .5 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
V1182 S/32 Friends generally have same party preference Do your friends and acquaintances generally have the same party preference as you, or do they have a different party preference?
1. yes 320 15.2 47.8 2. no 350 16.7 52.2 996. PA 900 42.8 MD 998. NA 531 25.3 MD
2101 100.0 100.0
653 3.5.20 Completion information
V1185 S/33 What day did you fill in this questionnaire? (yyyymmdd) What is the date on which you filled in this questionnaire?
V1186 S/34 What time did you fill in this questionnaire? (hhmm) What is the time at which you filled in this questionnaire?
V1187 S/35 Duration of filling in questionnaire (mmm) How long did it take you to complete this questionnaire?
V1188 S/ Date of receipt of the questionnaire (yyyymmdd) This is based on a record kept by the fieldwork organization
654 3.5.21 Text variables self-completion questionnaire
V1200 S/8 Profession of first relevant person (text) What is the profession or function of this person? If one of the persons has never had a paid job (question 7), you do not have to fill in anything for this person.
V1201 S/8 Profession of second relevant person (text) Refer to V1200 for complete question text
V1202 S/8 Profession of third relevant person (text) Refer to V1200 for complete question text
V1203 S/20 Frequency listening to other - namely (text) On the average, how many hours per week do you listen to the following radio stations? (per station, only one answer is possible)
V1204 S/22 Frequency reading other - namely (text) On the average, how many hours per week do you spend reading the following magazines? (per magazine, only one answer is possible)
V1205 S/23 Seen television commercial of other party - namely (text) During the election period, have you seen a promotional film or a broadcast of a political party on television? (per party, only 1 answer is possible)
V1206 S/26 Approached by other party. namely (text) During the election period, have you been contacted by a politician of a political party through mail or through a talk on the street?
655 3.6 Documentation of variables of non-response and stimulus effect project
3.6.1 Interview identification
V0001 0/ Study number The Steinmetz study number of the special file is P1416
V0002 0/ Respondent identification number Respondent identification number ranges from 10003 to 72279.
V0003 0/ Type of interview record
11. sample 1/w1-w2-S: self-completion 1199 21.2 21.2 12. sample 1/w1-w2: second wave 615 10.9 10.9 13. sample 1/w1-C: interviewed CATI 143 2.5 2.5 14. sample 1/w1-N: first wave 144 2.5 2.5 15. sample 1/NR-C: non-response study 926 16.4 16.4 16. sample 1/NR-NR: non-response first sample 1180 20.9 20.9 21. sample 2/C: interviewed CATI 712 12.6 12.6 22. sample 2/NR-C: non-response before CATI 388 6.9 6.9 23. sample 2/card: returned postcard 85 1.5 1.5 24. sample 2/NR-NR: non-response second sample 266 4.7 4.7
5658 100.0 100.0
656 3.6.2 Contextual variables
V0010 0/ Region North (Groningen, Friesland, Drenthe ) East (Overijssel, Flevoland, Gelderland) West (Utrecht, Noord-Holland, Zuid-Holland, Zeeland) South (Noord-Brabant, Limburg).
1. North 647 11.4 11.4 2. East 1178 20.8 20.8 3. South 1250 22.1 22.1 4. West 2583 45.7 45.7
5658 100.0 100.0
V0011 0/ Municipality This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0012 0/ Zip code This variable has been removed from the public datafile for reasons of privacy.
V0013 0/ Degree of urbanization This variable gives an indication of the degree of urbanization of the municipality the respondent lives in. This variable was designed by Statistics Netherlands.
Code Label Description 1 very strongly urban more than 2,500 addresses per square kilometer 2 strongly urban 1,500 - 2,499 addresses per square kilometer 3 mildly urban 1,000 - 1,499 addresses per square kilometer 4 hardly urban 500 - 999 addresses per square kilometer 5 not urban 1 - 499 addresses per square kilometer
1. very strongly urban 951 16.8 16.8 2. strongly urban 1384 24.5 24.5 3. mildly urban 1361 24.1 24.1 4. hardly urban 992. 17.5 17.5 5. not urban 970 17.1 17.1
5658 100.0 100.0
657 V0014 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - welfare Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable.
Income Housing prices W1 At least 2x modal high W2 1x-2x modal above average W3 1x modal average W4 below modal low W5 low (unemployed) low W6 both high and low both low and high
Level of welfare in this zip-code area.
1. W1 – high 321 5.7 5.7 2. W2 - above average 1510 26.7 26.9 3. W3 – average 2394 42.3 42.7 4. W4 – low 861 15.2 15.4 5. W5 – minimum 239 4.2 4.3 6. W6 – heterogeneous 279 4.9 5.0 998. NA 54 1.0 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
658 V0015 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class A Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable.
Income Education (lowest level) Housing Social ownership Class above modal university/higher vocational - above modal higher level secondary yes unknown university -A above modal higher level secondary/middle vocational no modal university - unknown higher vocational -B1 above modal unknown/ lower vocational/no education - modal higher level secondary/higher vocational - below modal higher vocational/university - unknown higher level secondary/middle vocational - B2 unknown unknown yes modal lower vocational - below modal higher level secondary - unknown unknown/lower vocational/middle secondary no C below modal lower vocational - unknown primary school -D
The percentage of households in social class A as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1 extremely low 0.00-0.49 less than half the mean percentage 2 very low 0.50-0.66 3 low 0.67-0.79 4 less than average 0.80-0.89 5 average 0.90-1.09 (about) the mean percentage 6 more than average 1.10-1.24 7 high 1.25-1.49 8 very high 1.50-1.99 9 extremely high 2.00- > more than 2 times the mean percentage
1. extremely low 1318 23.3 24.3 2. very low 547 9.7 10.1 3. low 451 8.0 8.3 4. less than average 340 6.0 6.3 5. average 583 10.3 10.7 6. more than average 403 7.1 7.4 7. high 573 10.1 10.6 8. very high 771 13.6 14.2 9. extremely high 440 7.8 8.1 998. NA 232 4.1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
659 660 V0016 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B1 Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class B1 as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 727 12.8 12.9 2. very low 558 9.9 9.9 3. low 466 8.2 8.3 4. less than average 412 7.3 7.3 5. average 884 15.6 15.7 6. more than average 797 14.1 14.2 7. high 1255 22.2 22.3 8. very high 520 9.2 9.2 9. extremely high 5 .1 .1 998. NA 34 .6 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
661 V0017 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class B2 Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class B2 as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
2. very low 57 1.0 1.0 3. low 95 1.7 1.7 4. less than average 1926 34.0 34.2 5. average 2525 44.6 44.9 6. more than average 439 7.8 7.8 7. high 323 5.7 5.7 8. very high 180 3.2 3.2 9. extremely high 84 1.5 1.5 998. NA 29 .5 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
662 V0018 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class C Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class C as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 203 3.6 3.6 2. very low 411 7.3 7.3 3. low 607 10.7 10.8 4. less than average 627 11.1 11.1 5. average 1413 25.0 25.1 6. more than average 1177 20.8 20.9 7. high 1183 20.9 21.0 8. very high 7 .1 .1 998. NA 30 .5 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
663 V0019 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - social class D Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0015 for information about the construction of the social classes and the construction of the categories.
The percentage of households in social class D as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area
1. extremely low 1501 26.5 27.4 2. very low 610 10.8 11.1 3. low 427 7.5 7.8 4. less than average 299 5.3 5.5 5. average 456 8.1 8.3 6. more than average 295 5.2 5.4 7. high 501 8.9 9.1 8. very high 789 13.9 14.4 9. extremely high 607 10.7 11.1 998. NA 173 3.1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
664 V0020 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education low Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
Level of education Low Lower vocational or no education at all Middle Higher than lower level vocational - Middle level vocational High Higher than middle level vocational
The percentage of persons with a low level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 654 11.6 11.7 2. very low 598 10.6 10.7 3. low 586 10.4 10.5 4. less than average 493 8.7 8.8 5. average 990 17.5 17.7 6. more than average 763 13.5 13.6 7. high 900 15.9 16.1 8. very high 613 10.8 10.9 9. extremely high 7 .1 .1 998. NA 54 1.0 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
V0021 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education middle Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0020 for information about the construction of levels of education. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
The percentage of persons with a middle level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 46 .8 .8 2. very low 77 1.4 1.4 3. low 281 5.0 5.0 4. less than average 760 13.4 13.5 5. average 2821 49.9 50.1 6. more than average 1361 24.1 24.2 7. high 275 4.9 4.9 8. very high 8 .1 .1 998. NA 29 .5 MD
665 5658 100.0 100.0
666 V0022 0/ Neighborhood characteristic - education high Refer to 4.4.3 for more information about the construction of this Geo-Marktprofiel variable. Refer to variable V0020 for information about the construction of levels of education. Refer to V0015 for information about the construction of the categories.
The percentage of persons with a high level of education as compared to the national mean in this zip-code area.
1. extremely low 660 11.7 11.7 2. very low 890 15.7 15.8 3. low 812 14.4 14.4 4. less than average 451 8.0 8.0 5. average 885 15.6 15.7 6. more than average 519 9.2 9.2 7. high 676 11.9 12.0 8. very high 540 9.5 9.6 9. extremely high 196 3.5 3.5 998. NA 29 .5 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
667 3.6.3 Political variables (first wave equivalents)
V0033 INH/ Interested in politics? Non-response and Stimulus effect study: Are you very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested at all? Main study: Are you very interested in political topics, fairly interested or not interested?
1. very interested 359 6.3 9.4 2. fairly interested 2197 38.8 57.8 3. not interested 1247 22.0 32.8 997. DK 5 .1 MD 998. NA 1850 32.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
668 V0075 IN/ Intends to vote in 1998 parliamentary elections? Non-response: As you may know, elections for the Second Chamber will be held in May this year. Do you intend to vote or not, or do you not know yet ? (Not asked in stimulus-effect study) Main study: As you may know, elections for the Second Chamber will be held in May of this year. Do you intend to vote or not, or don’t you know yet?
1. yes 2494 44.1 90.6 2. no 259 4.6 9.4 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 997. DK 224 4.0 MD 998. NA 1210 21.4 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
669 V0076 IN/11 Vote intention 1998 parliamentary elections Non-response study: Which party do you intend to vote for on May 6? Main study: Which party do you intend to vote for on May 6?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 2)
1. PVDA 517 9.1 28.7 2. CDA 371 6.6 20.6 3. VVD 417 7.4 23.1 4. D66 126 2.2 7.0 5. GroenLinks 140 2.5 7.8 6. SGP 34 .6 1.9 7. GPV 25 .4 1.4 8. RPF 49 .9 2.7 9. Centrumdemocraten 5 .1 .3 10. Unie 55+ 4 .1 .2 11. AOV 14.2.8 12. SP 90 1.6 5.0 19. CPN 1 .0 .1 21. PSP 1.0.1 23. Senioren 2000 5 .1 .3 61. Nederland Mobiel 1 .0 .1 63. De Groenen 3 .1 .2 66. VIP 1 .0 .1 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 993. invalid 3 .1 MD 994. uncodable 26 .5 MD 995. abstention 19 .3 MD 997. DK 709 12.5 MD 998. NA 1367 24.2 MD 999. INAP 259 4.6 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
670 V0167 INH/ Did (not) vote in most recent municipal elections Non-response and Stimulus effect study: Did you vote in the most recent municipal elections? Main study: Did you vote in the latest municipal elections?
1. yes 2609 46.1 70.8 2. no 1058 18.7 28.7 3. not enfranchised 17 .3 .5 997. DK 9 .2 MD 998. NA 1965 34.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
671 3.6.4 Background characteristics
V0280 INH/4b Number of household members including respondent Stimulus effect study: Including yourself, how many persons belong to your household? Main study: Now I would like to ask you some questions about yourself, your household and the members of your family. Including yourself, how many persons belong to your household?
1. one person 456 8.1 16.3 2. two or more persons 2342 41.4 83.7 991. NS 2106 37.2 MD 997. DK 10 .2 MD 998. NA 744 13.1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
V0281 INH/4c Type of household composition Stimulus effect study: Can you tell me the composition of the household you belong to? Main study: Can you tell me the composition of the household you belong to? Please include all persons living in this household, any resident persons too. - What is the name of the first/second/etceteras person in the household? - What is the relationship of [this person] to yourself? - What is the sex of [this person]? - What is the age of [this person]?
1. single person 456 8.1 16.3 2. couple, no children 905 16.0 32.4 3. couple, child(ren) 1071 18.9 38.3 4. couple, child(ren), other(s) 34 .6 1.2 5. couple, other(s) 3 .1 .1 6. 1 parent, child(ren) 83 1.5 3.0 7. 1 parent, child(ren), other(s) 7 .1 .3 8. other 235 4.2 8.4 991. NS 2106 37.2 MD 997. DK 4 .1 MD 998. NA 754 13.3 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
672 V0288 0/ Sex of respondent Non-response and Stimulus effect study: INT: Write down the sex of respondent Main study: Refer to V0281 for complete question text
1. male 2579 45.6 47.2 2. female 2881 50.9 52.8 998. NA 198 3.5 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
V0316 Age of respondent at time of interview Non-response and Stimulus effect study: Will you allow me to ask you your age? Main study: Refer to V0281 for complete question text
V0350 0/ Date of birth of respondent (yyyymmdd) Ranges from 19070504 TO 19800505 (2 missing cases). These data are derived from the sample frame.
673 V0352 INH/ Highest education (completed) of respondent Non-response and Stimulus effect study: Could you indicate your highest educational degree? Main study: The next questions are about your own education. Showcard 19 presented, listing response alternatives (refer to 4.2.5 below). Could you indicate by means of this card the highest education for which you received a diploma? You can mention the number of the education.
1. LA - elementary 503 8.9 14.1 2. LB - extended elementary 58 1.0 1.6 3. LV - (lower) vocational 655 11.6 18.4 4. U - secondary 628 11.1 17.7 5. UV - middle level vocational 365 6.5 10.3 6. M - higher level secondary 337 6.0 9.5 7. MV - higher middle level vocational 267 4.7 7.5 8. HBO - higher level vocational 445 7.9 12.5 9. S - university level vocational 45 .8 1.3 10. H - university 254 4.5 7.1 997. DK 46 .8 MD 998. NA 2055 36.3 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
674 3.6.5 Interview information
V0504 0/ Date of computer assisted telephone interview (CATI) (yyyymmdd) Standard computer data.
V0516 0/ Time start of CATI interview (hh:mm:ss) Standard computer data.
V0517 0/ Time end of CATI interview (hh:mm:ss) Standard computer data.
675 3.6.6 Political variables (second wave equivalent)
V0610 IIH/ Did (not) vote in 1998 parliamentary elections Stimulus effect study: As you may know, elections for the Second Chamber have been held on May 6. Did or did you not vote? Main study: Did you vote in the parliamentary election on May 6?
1. yes 2382 42.1 86.0 2. no 387 6.8 14.0 991. NS 2086 36.9 MD 998. NA 803 14.2 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
V0611 IIH/ Party voted for in 1998 parliamentary elections Stimulus effect study: Which party did you vote for? Main study: Which party did you vote for?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0610, code 2)
1. PVDA 633 11.2 28.6 2. CDA 431 7.6 19.5 3. VVD 487 8.6 22.0 4. D66 250 4.4 11.3 5. GroenLinks 193 3.4 8.7 6. SGP 23 .4 1.0 7. GPV 29 .5 1.3 8. RPF 48 .8 2.2 9. Centrumdemocraten 6 .1 .3 10. Unie 55+ 3 .1 .1 11. AOV 6 .1 .3 12. SP 83 1.5 3.7 15. KVP\RKSP 1 .0 .0 23. Senioren 2000 5 .1 .2 61. Nederland Mobiel 5 .1 .2 63. De Groenen 8 .1 .4 64. Natuurwetpartij 2 .0 .1 65. KPP 1.0.0 66. VIP 1 .0 .0 991. NS 2086 36.9 MD 994. uncodable 5 .1 MD 995. abstention 11 .2 MD 997. DK 21 .4 MD 998. NA 933 16.5 MD 999. INAP 387 6.8 MD
676 5658 100.0 100.0
677 V0790 INH/ MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me Non-response and Stimulus effect study: I would like to know your opinion on two statements. Members of parliament do not care about the opinions of people like me. Do you fully agree, agree, disagree or fully disagree with this statement.
Main study: I shall now read you a number of statements. Would you tell me for each statement if, according to you, it is true or false? Members of parliament do not care about the opinions of people like me Showcard 19 presented, listing the response categories ‘true’ and ‘false’.
1. agree 1508 26.7 46.0 2. disagree 1770 31.3 54.0 997. DK 231 4.1 MD 998. NA 2149 38.0 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
V0798 INH/ Politics sometimes too complicated Non-response and Stimulus effect study: Sometimes politics seems so complicated that a person like me cannot really understand what is going on. Do you fully agree, agree, disagree or fully disagree with this statement. Main study: Sometimes politics seems so complicated that people like me cannot really understand what is going on.
1. fully agree 525 9.3 15.4 2. agree 1549 27.4 45.3 3. disagree 1136 20.1 33.2 4. fully disagree 208 3.7 6.1 997. DK 90 1.6 MD 998. NA 2150 38.0 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
678 3.6.7 Reasons for not intending to vote
V1300 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - first Why do you not intend to vote?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 1,only asked in non- response study)
10. physical/personal circumstances 4 .1 3.5 11. ill/handicapped/too old 1 .0 .9 20. absence 3 .1 2.7 21. no time 2 .0 1.8 24. holiday 1 .0 .9 30. not interested 41 .7 36.3 31. no significance to me 1 .0 .9 42. does not vote on principle 1 .0 .9 50. could not make a choice 2 .0 1.8 72. parties/politicians do not keep their promises 5 .1 4.4 73. do not trust parties/politicians 6 .1 5.3 74. voting is no use 7 .1 6.2 75. voting does not yield any profit 12 .2 10.6 76. politics are messy 1 .0 .9 80. feelings of incompetence 5 .1 4.4 81. too little knowledge 10 .2 8.8 110. trust 1 .0 .9 120. other 10 .2 8.8 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 997. DK 74 1.3 MD 998. NA 1181 20.9 MD 999. INAP 718 12.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
679 V1301 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - second Refer to V1300 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 1,only asked in non- response study)
11. ill/handicapped/too old 1 .0 2.4 30. not interested 10 .2 23.8 50. could not make a choice 1 .0 2.4 72. parties/politicians do not keep their promises 4 .1 9.5 73. do not trust parties/politicians 3 .1 7.1 74. voting is no use 2 .0 4.8 75. voting does not yield any profit 7 .1 16.7 76. politics are messy 1 .0 2.4 81. too little knowledge 4 .1 9.5 120. other 8 .1 21.4 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 995. no other answer 72 1.3 MD 997. DK 74 1.3 MD 998. NA 1181 20.9 MD 999. INAP 718 12.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
680 V1302 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - third Refer to V1300 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 1,only asked in non- response study)
72. parties/politicians do not keep their promises 2 .0 18.2 74. voting is no use 1 .0 9.1 75. voting does not yield any profit 1 .0 9.1 76. politics are messy 1 .0 9.1 120. other 6 .1 54.5 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 995. no other answer 102 1.8 MD 997. DK 74 1.3 MD 998. NA 1181 20.9 MD 999. INAP 718 12.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
681 V1303 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fourth Refer to V1300 for complete question text
999 (inappropriate) routing (V0075, code 1,only asked in non- response study)
74. voting is no use 2 .0 66.7 77. parties are all the same 1 .0 33.3 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 20 .4 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 995. no other answer 110 1.9 MD 997. DK 74 1.3 MD 998. NA 1181 20.9 MD 999. INAP 718 12.7 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
682 3.6.8 Non-response information
V1310 I/ Reason for not willing to participate in first wave (first wave) As reported by the interviewer.
21. never participates 285 5.0 13.5 22. not interested in this topic 952 16.8 45.2 23. because of privacy 75 1.3 3.6 24. feelings of incapacity 62 1.1 2.9 25. inconvenience 91 1.6 4.3 26. uselessness 47 .8 2.2 31. ill/handicapped 152 2.7 7.2 32. language 21 .4 1.0 33. occupied/visitors 21 .4 1.0 34. not able to make appointment 178 3.1 8.5 51. holiday 48 .8 2.3 61. not present, despite appointment 24 .4 1.1 62. not able to contact 148 2.6 7.0 99. other 2 .0 .1 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
683 V1311 N/0 Reason for not willing to participate in non-response study As reported by the CATI interviewer.
5. refusal during interview (no reason coded) 498 8.8 42.2 11. no time 2 .0 .2 12. not interested 14 .2 1.2 21. never participates 3 .1 .3 22. not interested in this topic 4 .1 .3 23. privacy 3 .1 .3 24. feelings of incapacity 2 .0 .2 25. inconvenience 6 .1 .5 31. ill/handicapped 45 .8 3.8 32. language 4 .1 .3 34. not able to make appointment 20 .4 1.7 51. holiday 21 .4 1.8 61. not present despite appointment 1 .0 .1 62. no contact/not present 2 .0 .2 71. answering machine 3 .1 .3 73. no telephone/secret number 279 4.9 23.6 80. unable to contact 203 3.6 17.2 99. other 70 1.2 5.9 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 999. INAP 926 16.4 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
684 V1312 N/1 Reason for not willing to participate in first wave (non- response study) Non-response study: We would like to know why you were are not participating in the Dutch National Election Study. Can you please tell me more about your choice not to participate?
1. never participates: matter of principle 190 3.4 14.8 2. does not participate now: not interested in topic 230 4.1 17.9 3. privacy: no strangers into the house 23 .4 1.8 4. privacy: fear lack of confidentiality 7 .1 .5 5. privacy: does not hand over personal data 36 .6 2.8 6. incapacity: I do not know anything about it 48 .8 3.7 7. incapacity: better ask someone else 8 .1 .6 8. incapacity: I am too old 117 2.1 9.1 9. inconvenience: too often bothered with surveys 138 2.4 10.7 10. inconvenience: takes too much time or effort 229 4.0 17.8 11. inconvenience: too many personal trouble 27 .5 2.1 12. inconvenience: bad timing 87 1.5 6.8 13. uselessness: they will not use it 24 .4 1.9 14. uselessness: I never hear from them again 4 .1 .3 15. uselessness: it is of no importance to me 27 .5 2.1 16. other 93 1.6 7.2 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 997. DK 1 .0 MD 998. NA 809 14.3 MD 999. INAP 8 .1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
685 V1313 II/ Reason for not willing to participate in second wave despite promise We would like to know why you were are not participating in the second wave of the Dutch National Election Study. Can you please tell me more about your choice not to participate?
11. no time 7 .1 4.3 12. not interested 5 .1 3.1 21. never participates 1 .0 .6 22. not interested in this topic 19 .3 11.8 23. privacy 4 .1 2.5 24. feelings of incapacity 4 .1 2.5 25. inconvenience 5 .1 3.1 31. ill/handicapped 13 .2 8.1 32. language 2 .0 1.2 33. occupied/visitors 5 .1 3.1 34. not able to make appointment 42 .7 26.1 51. holiday 15 .3 9.3 61. not present despite appointment 25 .4 15.5 62. no contact/not present 12 .2 7.5 74. moved/ does not live here 1 .0 .6 99. other 1 .0 .6 991. NS 2106 37.2 MD 992. HS 1451 25.6 MD 998. NA 126 2.2 MD 999. INAP 1814 32.1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
686 V1314 H/ Willingness to participate in a National Survey on Politics Some time ago, you did recieve a letter concerning the Dutch national election study. Are you willing to participate in this study?
1. yes 401 7.1 37.7 2. no 664 11.7 62.3 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 2106 37.2 MD 998. NA 386 6.8 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
687 V1315 H/ Reason for not willing to participate in Hawthorne study What reasons do you have not to participate?
999 (inappropriate) routing (V1314, code 1)
5. refusal during interview 268 4.7 45.7 11. no time 18 .3 3.1 12. not interested 29 .5 4.9 22. not interested in this topic 3 .1 .5 23. privacy 8 .1 1.4 24. feelings of incapacity 1 .0 .2 31. ill/handicapped 20 .4 3.4 32. language 4 .1 .7 34. not able to make appointment 15 .3 2.6 51. holiday 16 .3 2.7 62. no contact/not present 2 .0 .3 71. answering machine 3 .1 .5 73. no telephone/secret number 172 3.0 32.9 99. other 6 .1 1.0 990. MS 2101 37.1 MD 991. NS 2106 37.2 MD 998. NA 485 8.6 MD 999. INAP 401 7.1 MD
5658 100.0 100.0
688 3.6.9 Text variables CATI interview
V1316 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - first (text) Refer to V1300 for a complete question text. This string variable contzins the answers to question 10 of the non-response study. The coded answer to this question can be found in V1300 of the special file.
V1317 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - second (text) Refer to V1300 for a complete question text. This string variable contzins the answers to question 10 of the non-response study. The coded answer to this question can be found in V1301 of the special file.
V1318 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - third (text) Refer to V1300 for a complete question text. This string variable contzins the answers to question 10 of the non-response study. The coded answer to this question can be found in V1302 of the special file.
V1319 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fourth (text) Refer to V1300 for a complete question text. This string variable contzins the answers to question 10 of the non-response study. The coded answer to this question can be found in V1303 of the special file.
V1320 N/10 Reason for not intending to vote - fifth (text) Refer to V1300 for a complete question text. This string variable contzins the answers to question 10 of the non-response study. The coded answer to this question can be found in V1304 of the special file.
689 4. Added Variables and coding schemes
4.1 Added indexes
4.1.1 The construction of scale scores The data file contains several series of variables which can be considered as indicators of a single latent construct. In line with previous Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies, for some of these series of variables scale scores have been constructed and added to the data file. The scale scores are based on tests of the unidimensionality of the variables involved according to the Mokken model (Mokken 1971). These tests are reported here. In order to facilitate the comparability with earlier studies, all analyses were performed on dichotomized variables, although dichotomization is no longer required as a result of methodological advances in the Mokken model (MSP 1988). Since usually more than one dichotomization of a variable is possible, and since other scaling models may be applicable, it should be kept in mind that the analyses reported here are exemplary rather than exhaustive. Furthermore, the data file contains more series of variables which might be regarded as indicators of unidimensional constructs than are included in this Appendix. The reports summarize, for each scale score, the values of the indicators which were selected as “positive” response (i.e., contributing to the latent construct), the proportion of respondents choosing this positive response (or the “difficulty” of the item), the scalability coefficient of the item with the other items in the analysis (the “Hi” coefficient of item homogeneity), and the scalability coefficient for all items (the “H” coefficient of homogeneity for a set of items). The frequency distribution of the resulting scale score is reported in the documentation of variables.
Conventionally, the Hi and H coefficients are interpreted as follows:
Hi H < .30 nonscalable item no scale .30 – .40 weak item weak scale .40 – .50 medium item medium scale > .50 strong item strong scale
4.1.2 A list of scales added to the data file
Wave 1 Variable Scale Constituting variables w question H
V0030 Reads about national news? 1 2 V0031 Talks about national problems? 1 3
690 V0032 Reads about foreign news? 1 4 V0033 Interested in politics? 1 5 V0034 Political interest .64 V0070 Effect government policy on economic situation 1 13a V0071 Effect government on employment 1 13b V0073 Satisfaction with government 1 14 V0074 Policy satisfaction .37 V0190 Name Wallage 1 30a V0191 Party Wallage 1 30b V0192 Function Wallage 1 30c V0193 Name De Graaf 1 30d V0194 Party De Graaf 1 30e V0195 Function De Graaf 1 30f V0196 Name Jorritsma 1 30g V0197 Party Jorritsma 1 30h V0198 Function Jorritsma 1 30i V0199 Name Bukman 1 30j V0200 Party Bukman 1 30k V0201 Function Bukman 1 30l V0202 Political knowledge I .62 Wallage (name, party and function correct) 1 30a-c De Graaf (name, party and function correct) 1 30d-f Jorritsma (name, party and function correct) 1 30g-i Bukman (name, party and function correct) 1 30j-l V0203 Political knowledge II .63
Wave 2 V0790 MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me 2 35a V0791 Parties only interested in my vote, not in my opinion 2 35b V0792 People like me have no influence on politics 2 35c V0793 So many people vote, my vote does not matter 2 35d V0794 MPs quickly lose contact with citizens 2 35e V0795 External political efficacy .54 V0796 Consider myself qualified for politics 2 36a V0797 Well informed about political problems 2 36b V0798 Politics sometimes too complicated 2 36c V0799 Internal political efficacy .47 V0800 Politicians promise more than they can deliver 2 37a V0801 Ministers primarily self-interested 2 37b V0902 Friends more important than abilities to become MP 2 37c V0803 Political cynicism .51 V0845 Did (not) contact cabinet minister 2 44b V0846 Did (not) contact member of parliament 2 44b V0847 Did (not) sign a petition 2 44b V0848 Did (not) try to activate interest group 2 44b V0849 Did (not) try to activate radio or tv 2 44b V0850 Did (not) try to activate political party 2 44b V0851 Did (not) contact mayor or alderman 2 44b V0852 Did (not) contact municipal councilor 2 44b V0853 Did (not) join civic action group 2 44b V0854 Did (not) join demonstration 2 44b
691 V0855 Did (not) try to activate newspaper 2 44b V0856 Did (not) lodge a complaint 2 44b V0857 Did (not) contact department official 2 44b V0858 Civic participation .36 V0860 Should there be confessional parties 2 45a 45b V0861 Should there be confessional unions 2 45c V0862 Should there be confessional schools 2 45d-e V0863 Should there be confessional radio or tv 2 45f -g V0864 Religion is a good guide in politics 2 46 V0865 Confessional attitude .50
Political Interest (V0034) The Political Interest score (range: 0 – 4) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions I/2 - I/5.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0030 I/2 Reads about national news? 1 .25 .63 V0031 I/3 Talks about national news? 1,2 .89 .74 V0032 I/4 Reads about foreign news? 1,2 .39 .64 V0033 I/5 Interested in politics? 1 .09 .62 H = .64
Policy Satisfaction (V0074) The Policy Satisfaction score (range: 0 – 3) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions I/13a, I/13b and I/14.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0070 I/13a Effect government policy on economic situation 1 .58 .39 V0071 I/13b Effect government policy on employment 1 .62 .38 V0073 I/14 General satisfaction with government 1,2 .44 .35 H = .37
Note: a fourth, related item (V0072, “I/13c Effect government policy on respondents finances”) was excluded from the scale because of its low item scalability (with “positive” response 1, difficulty = .26 and Hi = .29).
Political Knowledge - 1 (V0202) The questions about name, party and function of four politicians whose photograph was shown, are summarized in two distinct scale scores, V0202 and V0203. The Political Knowledge score 1 (range: 0 – 12) was established by counting the “positive” responses to all twelve questions I/30.1.1 – I/30.4.3.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0190 I/30.1.1 Photo A - Jacques Wallage 1 .40 .60 V0191 I/30.1.2 Party of Wallage (PvdA) 1 .53 .68 V0192 I/30.1.3 Political function Wallage 1,2 .30 .63 V0193 I/30.2.1 Photo B - Thom de Graaf 1 .34 .64 V0194 I/30.2.2 Party of de Graaf (D66) 4 .40 .66
692 V0195 I/30.2.3 Political function de Graaf 1,2 .28 .62 V0196 I/30.3.1 Photo C - Annemarie Jorritsma 1 .65 .51 V0197 I/30.3.2 Party of Jorritsma (VVD) 3 .59 .66 V0198 I/30.3.3 Political function Jorritsma 1 .75 .69 V0199 I/30.4.1 Photo D - Piet Bukman 1 .26 .64 V0200 I/30.4.2 Party of Bukman (CDA) 2 .35 .58 V0201 I/30.4.3 Political function Bukman 1,2 .35 .60 H = .62
Political Knowledge - 2 (V0203) The second scale, Political Knowledge score 2 (range: 0 – 4) was established by counting the number of times the respondent correctly answered all three questions regarding a politician in the series of questions I/30.1.1 – I/30.4.3.
Item Label difficulty Hi A Name, party and function Wallage correct .24 .64 B Name, party and function de Graaf correct .21 .62 C Name, party and function Jorritsma correct .46 .69 D Name, party and function Bukman correct .19 .59 H = .63
External Political Efficacy (V0795) The External Political Efficacy score (range: 0 – 5) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions II/35a-e.
Item Label “positive” difficu Hi responses lty V0790 II/35a MPs do (not) care about opinions of people like me 2 .62 .57 V0791 II/35b Parties only interested in my vote, not in my opinion 2 .52 .54 V0792 II/35c People like me have no influence on politics 2 .59 .49 V0793 II/35d So many people vote, my vote does not matter 2 .90 .58 V0794 II/35e MPs quickly lose contact with citizens 2 .29 .57 H = .54
Note: the External Political Efficacy score (V0795) is different from the political efficacy scores included in earlier Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies, since a fifth item (V0794) was added to the scale.
Internal Political Efficacy (V0799) The Internal Political Efficacy score (range: 0 – 3) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions II/36a-c.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0796 II/36a Consider myself qualified for politics 1,2 .24 .52 V0797 II/36b Well informed about political problems 1,2 .64 .48 V0798 II/36c Politics sometimes too complicated 3,4 .38 .43 H = .47
Note: the Internal Political Efficacy score (V0799) is different from the Internal Political Efficacy score included in Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1994, since fewer items were included in the questionnaire.
693 Political Cynicism (V0803) The Political Cynicism score (range: 0 – 3) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions II/37a-c.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0800 II/37a Politicians promise more than they can deliver 1,2 .87 .68 V0801 II/37b Ministers primarily self-interested 1,2 .28 .49 V0802 II/37c Friends more important than abilities to become MP 1,2 .37 .47 H = .51
Civic Participation (V0858) The Civic Participation score (range: 0 – 14) was established by counting the “positive” responses to question II/44b.
Item Label “positive” difficulty Hi responses V0845 II/44b Did (not) contact cabinet minister 1 .04 .31 V0846 II/44b Did (not) contact member of parliament 1 .06 .37 V0847 II/44b Did (not) sign a petition 1 .66 .51 V0848 II/44b Did (not) try to activate interest group 1 .12 .38 V0849 II/44b Did (not) try to activate radio or TV 1 .06 .28 V0850 II/44b Did (not) try to activate political party 1 .07 .44 V0851 II/44b Did (not) contact mayor or alderman 1 .14 .35 V0852 II/44b Did (not) contact municipal councilor 1 .14 .35 V0853 II/44b Did (not) join civic action group 1 .16 .36 V0854 II/44b Did (not) join demonstration 1 .25 .32 V0855 II/44b Did (not) try to activate newspaper 1 .09 .38 V0856 II/44b Did (not) lodge a complaint 1 .19 .37 V0857 II/44b Did (not) contact department official 1 .06 .30 H = .36
Note: the Civic Participation score is comparable to similar scale scores in earlier Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies. The set of 13 items might also be divided into subsets which indicate distinct dimensions of civic participation (compare Anker & Oppenhuis 1994, 332-333).
Confessional Attitude (V0865) The Confessional Attitude score (range: 0 – 5) was established by counting the “positive” responses to questions II/45a-g and 46.
Item Label “positive” responses difficulty Hi V0860 II/45ab Should there be confessional parties? 2,3,4 .58 .55 V0861 II/45c Should there be confessional unions? 2,3,4 .37 .55 V0862 II/45de Should there be confessional schools? 2,3,4 .68 .51 V0863 II/45fg Should there be confessional radio and TV? 2,3,4 .64 .50 V0864 II/46 Religion is a good guide in politics 1,2 .38 .40 H = .50
Note: It is emphasized that the question wording of questions 45a-g is not the same as
694 the wording of similar questions in earlier Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies, so that neither these questions nor the scale score can be compared over time. Furthermore, it is possible that the response to question 46 (“Religion is a good guide in politics”) was affected by the change in wording of the previous questions.
4.2 Coded variables/coding schemes
The open questions have been coded for the convenience of the user. The original answers have been included in the data file as string variables, or (in the case of the verbatim answers to questions about occupation) may be used after consultation with SKON.
V0045 - V0049 Most important national problems Coding scheme 1986 V0169 Reason for not voting in most Coding scheme 1994 recent municipal elections Profession (4x) Several V0612 – V0615 Motivation for party choice Coding scheme 1994
4.2.1 Most important national problems In the 1998 questionnaire respondents were asked what they thought were the most important problems in our country. The interviewers wrote down the verbatim answers. These answers are presented in the data file as string variables. Users should be aware that these answers are all in Dutch, and that English translations are not available. A maximum of five answers was allowed. The data file also contains 5 coded answers. In order to keep longitudinal comparability in tact, the answers were coded using the scheme that was used between 1981 and 1989. The coding scheme used by Statistics Netherlands (CBS) in 1989 and 1994 was a simplified version of this coding scheme. The codes presented here can be recoded easily into this simplified version. The very detailed coding scheme used in 1989 and 1994 was not used again. The coding of the most important answers has been performed by ITS.
01 Agricultural policy, agricultural problems, including: destruction of fruit and vegetables; agricultural problems; agricultural policy; etc.
02-07 Taxes 02 Taxes too high, including: VAT; road tax; excise; legacy-duties; mortgage relief too low. 03 Taxes too low, including: see 02. 04 Evasion of social security levies by employers ("koppelbazen"). 05 Evasion of social security levies by employees ("zwart werken", "beunhazerij"). 06 Evasion of social security levies otherwise / tax evasion in general. 07 Other references to taxes.
08-10 Foreign relations 08 Common Market, Europe, including: (too much) influence of the Common Market; leveling within the EEC; Common Market policy.
695 09 Developmental aid, relations with the Third World. 10 Other references to foreign relations.
11 Culture and recreation, including: recreation; sports; not enough facilities for recreation; too few playgrounds for children; other cultural problems.
12-13 Defense, war and peace 12 Nuclear armaments in general, nuclear assignments for the Dutch armed forces, cruise missiles. 13 Defense in general, including: - defense policy; too much money spent on defense; too little money spent on defense; subversion in the armed forces; NATO; armaments; peace; war.
14 Democratization, including: civic participation in public administration ("medezeggenschap"); worker's participation in industry; inequality of power; differences between classes; need for further democratization.
15-18 Economical and financial problems, 86 15 Governmental spending too high; governmental budget deficits; need for cuts in government expenditures. 16 Governmental spending for unjustified or unimportant purposes; too much attention for economical prosperity instead of well-being; wrong investments; governmental waste; complaining about budget cuts in specific areas. 17 Economic growth; lack of economic growth; economic stagnation. 18 Other economical or financial problems, including: business-climate; influence of multinationals; capital growth sharing by workers ("vermogensaanwasdeling"); regional economic problems; problems of shopkeepers.
86 Reduction of working hours per week ("arbeidstijd (duur)verkorting), part time jobs, etc.
19-24 Energy problems 19 Nuclear power, nuclear powerstations (general), including: nuclear waste 20 Growth of, introduction of nuclear power, nuclear powerstations. 21 Protest, resistance against nuclear power, or of nuclear powerstations (anti- nuclear movement). 22 Energy in general, concern about energy, availability of energy. 23 Shortage of energy, exhaustion of raw materials. 24 Other references to energy, including: energy prices; dependency on oil- sheiks etc.
25 Ethical problems, 82, 87 including: (racial) discrimination and other injustice (except when 82 or 87 is more appropriate); change of mentality; prevailing attitudes are a problem;
696 (dissatisfaction, lack of interest, people are too exacting, change of mentality is needed); too little tolerance, too little freedom.
82 Fascism, Racism, Anti-semitism.
87 Discrimination (without further references or qualifications).
26-28 Law and order 85, 89 26 Crime, including: aggression, violence, vandalism, bank robberies, juvenile delinquency. 27 Demonstrations, riots, protest. 28 Other law and order problems, including: (better) protection of law and order; subversion of authority; too lenient behaviour of the police; too light punishments; rightlessness.
85 Riot-police behaviour ("optreden Mobiele Eenheid").
89 Strikes, walk-outs, labour disputes.
29-33 Income and prices, 86 29 Prices, inflation, price policy, price increases, everything becomes more expensive, the cost of living. 30 Price and wage policy. 31 Differences in income; mention of either too low, or too high wages for specifically mentioned groups. 32 Incomes, wages, salaries. 33 Other references to income and prices.
86 Reduction of working hours per week ("arbeidstijd (duur)verkorting), part time jobs, etc.
34 Squatting ("kraken", "krakers", "kraakbeweging")
35-37 Social work 35 Care for the elderly, problems of the elderly. 36 Care for other specifically mentioned groups, for instance handicapped people. 37 Other references to social work, including: welfare work; problems of social work.
38-40 Environmental pollution 38 The issue of refuse, dumping of dangerous or toxic waste (for the problem of nuclear waste: see 19). 39 Environmental pollution, including: water; air. 40 Other references to environmental pollution.
697 41-46 Minorities 41 Favoritism towards ethnical minorities (immigrant workers, South-Molluccans, gypsies, etc.). 42 Discrimination against ethnical minorities. 43 Ethnical minorities in general. 44 Favoritism towards Dutch minorities. 45 Discrimination against Dutch minorities. 46 Dutch minorities in general.
47 Education and science, including: education; education at school; scientific research; improvement of education; better opportunities for study; too little day-release courses, retraining; limited entry-quota by universities, etc; school fees; career-planning.
48-52 Political problems 48 Low quality of political parties, politicians, political system, including: too much talk, indecision; politics is unintelligible; the government itself is a problem; the government should go, the cabinet should go; finding (getting) a good government, recruiting cabinet-ministers; government policy; the government lacks firmness; no proper governance; obsolete law, obsolete political system; political parties don't keep promises; formation of a (coalition) government. 49 Lack of cooperation, including: too many political parties, splinter groups; not enough cooperation among political parties; polarization between parties. 50 Red tape, bureaucracy, including: red tape, bureaucracy, over-organization, corruption. 51 Any mention of a specific political party / politician / political organization. 52 Other political problems, including: political dissatisfaction, lack of political interest, uninterested voters, low turn-out; influence of abject ideologies; we're drifting too far to the left/right.
53 Religious problems, including: ecclesiastical problems; godlessness, atheism, apostasy, Sunday observance.
54-55 Town and country planning 54 Overpopulation, population policy. 55 Other references to town and country planning, including: town and country planning; environmental conditions, lack of space, not much living room; loss of nature by building houses, roads, etc; conservation of nature; regional development.
56-59 Welfare services, welfare legislation, welfare benefits 56 Welfare benefits are too high / too expensive. 57 Welfare benefits are too low. 58 Administration of welfare services, existing welfare regulations, including: incorrect administration of welfare services (possibility of “oneigenlijk
698 gebruik"); discrimination of specifically mentioned groups referring to welfare legislation. 59 Welfare services in general, including: good social security; need for lowering of retirement age; social problems, etc.
60 Government subsidies, including: subsidy policy; too many / too few subsidies, etc.
61-62 Traffic 61 Public transportation. 62 Other references to traffic, including: traffic, traffic problems; too many cars; traffic safety, too many accidents; not enough roads, bad roads, road system insufficient; parking problems.
63 Welfare state ("verzorgingsstaat")
64-70 Public health 64 Public health, financial problems, including: too high costs of hospitalisation, nursing; too little money available for hospitalisation, nursing. 65 Narcotics, addicts, government policy regarding drug-addiction. 66 Abortion in general. 67 Increasing the possibilities for obtaining abortion. 68 Restriction of the possibilities for obtaining abortion. 69 Euthanasia. 70 Public health in general, including: birth control; hospitals understaffed; nursing; public health; heart surgery; consumption of alcohol, etc.
71-73 Women's emancipation 71 Pro-emancipation. 72 Against emancipation. 73 Remarks on women's emancipation or discrimination of women in general (without sufficient information to be classified as pro or con emancipation)
74-76 Employment, 88 74 Unemployment, unemployment in specifically mentioned regions, closing down of firms and businesses. 75 Shortage of certain kinds of workers, foreign workers are recruited despite unemployment. 76 Other references to employment.
88 Youth-unemployment, poor prospects of the young to find employment etc.
77-80 Housing shortage
699 77 Housing shortage: quantitative, including: housing shortage, housing, public housing, house building; shortage of housing for one-person households, bachelors, one-parent families. 78 Housing shortage: qualitative, including: shortage of good housing, housing not fit to live in; slum clearance, urban redevelopment; too many high-rise buildings. 79 Housing shortage: financial, including: rent too high; housing too expensive; unjust distribution of housing. 80 Other references to housing.
82 Description inserted between categories 25 and 26
85 Description inserted between categories 28 and 29
86 Description inserted between categories 18 and 19 and categories 33 and 34
87 Description inserted between categories 25 and 26
88 Description inserted between categories 76 and 77
89 Description inserted between categories 28 and 29
90-99 Closing categories 90 There are no problems. 91 Uncodable response. 97 Ddon't know. 98 Not ascertained. 99 Inappropriate (i.e. no second, third, fourth or fifth answer).
V0045 V0046 V0047 V0048 V0049 1 agricultural policy 22 22 16 2 2 2 taxes too high 12 15 7 5 5 evasion social security levies employees 1 6 evasion social security levies otherwise 1 1 7 other references to taxes 1 7 3 3 3 8 common market, Europe 12 13 15 2 3 9 developmental aid 1 7 2 2 1 10 foreign relations, other 2 3 11 culture and recreation 4 6 5 13 defense in general 4 2 1 14 democratization 4 2 1 1 15 gvt spending too high 20 6 2 3 1 16 gvt spending for unjustified purposes 10 19 11 7 2 17 (lack of) economic growth 7 8 10 2 18 other economical / financial problems 24 19 18 11 6 19 nuclear power(general) 1 1
700 22 energy in general 2 5 1 24 other references to energy 3 25 ethical problems 78 74 43 24 11 26 crime 308 201 128 46 25 27 demonstrations, riots, protest 1 28 other law and order problems 20 51 50 14 9 29 prices, the cost of living 4 8 4 3 1 30 price and wage policy 1 31 differences in income 83 42 29 12 5 32 incomes, wages, salaries 4 3 4 3 33 other references to income and prices 2 3 3 35 care for the elderly 38 51 41 14 6 36 care for other groups 8 5 8 2 3 37 other references to social work 1 2 1 1 38 refuse, dumping toxic waste 1 5 2 1 2 39 environmental pollution 10 21 8 1 4 40 other references env. pollution 94 79 48 31 17 41 favoritism towards ethnical minorities 23 10 3 3 42 discrimination ethnical minorities 19 10 6 2 43 ethnical minorities in general 111 51 28 16 4 45 discrimination Dutch minorities 2 46 Dutch minorities in general 1 47 education and science 40 69 45 24 8 48 low quality parties, politicians, system 17 25 19 9 8 49 lack of cooperation 2 4 1 50 red tape, bureaucracy 6 8 7 8 3 51 a specific party politician 2 2 1 52 other political problems 11 7 12 12 53 religious problems 3 2 3 5 54 overpopulation, population policy 28 14 7 5 2 55 references to town & country planning 20 26 17 7 2 56 welfare benefits are too high 1 3 1 1 57 welfare benefits are too low 11 8 3 3 58 administration of welfare services 33 41 31 15 6 59 welfare services in general 55 48 25 10 1 60 government subsidies 1 61 public transportation 7 15 16 11 3 62 other references to traffic 75 92 55 26 10 63 welfare state 4 1 1 64 public health, financial problems 80 62 30 10 2 65 government policy drug-addiction 29 33 26 9 4 66 abortion in general 4 3 2 1 68 restriction obtaining abortion 2 69 euthanasia 2 11 2 1 70 public health in general 229 115 67 19 10 71 pro-emancipation 1
701 73 discrimination of women 1 2 2 1 74 unemployment general 85 54 24 10 3 75 shortage of certain kinds of workers 2 2 76 other references to employment 29 27 14 10 77 housing shortage: quantitative 5 4 2 1 78 housing shortage: qualitative 4 1 79 housing shortage: financial 4 5 8 2 2 80 other references to housing 3 3 2 82 fascism, racism, anti-Semitism 9 14 5 5 86 reduction of working hours 1 2 1 87 discrimination 11 15 2 3 88 youth-unemployment 13 3 4 1 2 89 strikes, walk-outs, labor disputes 1 90 no problems 25 92 refugees / seekers of political asylum 226 147 43 30 9
994 uncodable 14 19 15 8 1 997 DK 92 92 92 92 92 995 no further answer - 374 1006 1543 1817
4.2.2 Reasons for not voting In the first wave the motivation for not voting for the municipal elections on March 4 was established (V0169). In the second wave the reason for not voting for the parliamentary elections on May 6 was established (V0638 to V0640). Again the interviewers had to type the verbatim answers. In the data file contains both the verbatim answers (in Dutch) and the coded answers. The coding scheme is identical to the one used in the DPES of 1994.
Motivation for not casting a vote
010 Physical and personal circumstances 011 respondent is handicapped or ill 012 family matters (relatives ill, funeral, etc.) 013 weather 020 Absence (not in town, abroad) 021 no time 022 too late 023 had to work 024 vacation
030 No interest 031 doesn’t care 032 forgot to vote 033 voting is not compulsory 040 Beliefs 041 religious beliefs
702 042 does not vote on principle 050 Could not make a choice 060 Protest 061 disagree with the parties (or government) 062 rejects the party system 070 Cynicism 071 no party has anything good to offer 072 parties (politicians) do not keep their promises 073 does not trust the parties (politicians) 074 it is no use to vote 075 it does not yield anything to vote 076 politics is a mess 080 Feelings of incompetence 081 does not know much about politics 090 No summons 091 did not receive summons 092 lost summons 100 Problems with proxy 101 forgot to give proxy to someone 102 proxy did not vote 110 Negative toward Europe 111 Europe too far away 112 Against Europe 113 Own country first 114 Europe doesn’t make sense 910 Uncodable 997 Don’t know 999 INAP
INAP codes were assigned if the respondent had cast a vote (or intended to cast a vote), in the case of panel attrition, and after the respondent did not know what answer to give (code 997).
V0169 V0638 V0639 V0640 10 physical/personal circumstances 8 2 11 handicapped/ill 30 16 12 family matters 4 2 1 13 weather 3 1 14 no electricity at voting office 2 20 absence (not in town, abroad) 40 6 1 21 no time 58 13 3 1 22 too late 12 6 2 23 had to work 14 7 24 vacation 21 10 1 25 could not find find voting office 2 30 no interest 79 18 2 31 does not care 8 4 2
703 32 forgot to vote 40 6 2 41 religious beliefs 4 3 42 principle 4 7 50 could not make a choice 44 17 6 60 protest 6 2 1 61 disagrees with parties 10 3 2 1 62 rejects party system 1 3 71 parties have nothing to offer 10 72 politicians do not keep promises 7 1 1 73 does not trust politicians 5 1 3 1 74 it is no use to vote 17 18 3 3 75 voting does not yield anything 22 3 76 politics is a mess 3 2 77 all parties are the same 3 78 no political involvement 6 80 feelings of incompetence (general) 3 81 no political knowledge 39 10 4 82 no ties with community 5 91 did not receive summons 3 1 92 lost summons 8 7 94 no elections / munici pal redivision 26 101 forgot to give proxy 3 1 1 102 proxy did not vote 1 111 everything is fine 2
996 PA 287 287 287 997 DK 13 2 995 no second answer 125 161 999 INAP 1537 1647 1647 1647
4.2.3 Motivation for party choice In the second wave of interviews respondents were asked why they voted for a certain party during parliamentary elections. The respondents could give a maximum of four reasons for party choice. Again the interviewers had to type the verbatim answers of the respondents. In the data file both the verbatim answers and the coded answers are listed.
1994: Appendix 11
Code Motivation for party choice
100 Representation of interests 101 interests of workers, employees, working people 102 interests of shop owners, small business 103 interests of (free) enterprise, entrepreneurs, business (in general)
704 104 recipients of (unemployment) benefits 105 interests of economically disadvantaged groups, the financial weak, minimum incomes 106 interests of elderly 107 interests of youth 108 interests of women 109 groups (not specified) other than “people like me” 110 respondent’s own personal interests 111 representation of other interests 112 general interest, the national interest
150 Power relations 151 satisfaction with coalition 152 dissatisfaction with coalition 153 performance and policies of coalition without specification of (dis)satisfaction 154 performance and policies of opposition without specification of (dis)satisfaction 155 this party belongs in a govenment, this party should be included in a coalition
200 Beliefs 201 religious beliefs 202 unspecified personal philosophy 203 left ideological beliefs 204 center ideological beliefs 205 right ideological beliefs 206 liberal
250 Candidates 251 party leader PvdA: Kok (positive impact on party choice) 252 party leader PvdA: Kok (negative impact on party choice) 253 party leader CDA: Brinkman (positive impact on party choice) 254 party leader CDA: Brinkman (negative impact on party choice) 255 party leader VVD: Bolkestein (positive impact on party choice) 256 party leader VVD: Bolkestein (negative impact on party choice) 257 party leader D66: Van Mierlo (positive impact on party choice) 258 party leader D66: Van Mierlo (negative impact on party choice) 259 other PvdA candidates (positive impact on party choice) 260 other PvdA candidates (negative impact on party choice) 261 other CDA candidates (positive impact on party choice) 262 other CDA candidates (negative impact on party choice) 263 other VVD candidates (positive impact on party choice) 264 other VVD candidates (negative impact on party choice) 265 other specifically mentioned candidates (positive impact on party choice) 266 other specifically mentioned candidates (negative impact on party choice)
705 267 candidates: unspecified (positive impact on party choice) 267 candidates: unspecified (negative impact on party choice)
300 Party 301 party identification, adherence, membership 302 general positive qualification concerning the party 303 best party 304 party is least of all evils 305 it is a large party 306 it is a small party 307 new party 308 party manifesto, policy of party, ideas of party
350 Policy areas, specific platform planks 351 abortion 352 euthanasia 353 foreigners, aliens 354 crime, law and order, police 355 defense 356 nuclear armaments policy 357 economic problems 358 government budget deficits 359 fighting (unemployment), stimulating employment 360 part-time jobs, reduction of working hours 361 social benefits, policy 362 income policy 363 social benefits; fraud 364 decreasing income gap 365 increasing income gap 366 deregulation, smaller role of govenment in society 367 (nuclear) energy 368 “nuclear mess” 369 environmental pollution, care, problems 370 shortage of housing, cost of housing 371 tax reforms 372 health care 373 education 374 reform political system, reform administrative system 375 protection of property, house ownership 700 Other reasons: tradition, imitation, impact of media 701 tradition 702 imitation 703 impact of media 704 other, idiosyncratic reason 910 Uncodable 995 No second, third, fourth, or fifth answer
706 997 Don’t know (DK) 998 Not ascertained (NA) 999 Inappropriate (INAP)
V0612 V0613 V0614 V0615 101 workers, employees, working people 24 1 102 shop owners, small business 8 103 (free) enterprise, entrepreneurs, business 11 2 1 105 economically disadvantaged groups 17 9 2 106 interests of elderly 8 1 1 107 interests of youth 7 1 109 groups (unspecified) other than "people like me" 5 2 110 respondent"s own personal interests 44 6 111 representation of other interests 14 2 112 general interest, the national interest 2 1 151 satisfaction with coalition 84 17 152 dissatisfaction with coalition 15 3 153 policies of coalition without specification 3 1 154 policies of opposition without specification 3 1 155 this party belongs in a government 16 3 156 special support of party, strategic choice 65 17 201 religious beliefs 95 16 202 unspecified personal philosophy 3 203 left ideological beliefs 25 4 204 center ideological beliefs 14 4 205 right ideological beliefs 1 206 liberal 16 4 251 party leader PvdA: Kok (positive impact) 63 24 2 252 party leader PvdA: Kok (negative impact) 1 253 party leader CDA: De Hoop Scheffer (positive) 2 255 party leader VVD: Bolkestein (positive) 15 6 1 256 party leader VVD: Bolkestein (negative) 4 1 257 party leader D66: Borst (positive) 11 5 3 258 party leader D66: Borst (negative) 1 265 other D66 candidates (positive) 1 267 other specifically mentioned candidates (positive) 12 3 1 1 268 other specifically mentioned candidates (negative) 1 269 candidates: unspecified (positive) 20 4 270 candidates: unspecified (negative) 1 301 party identification, adherence, membership 188 12 1 302 general positive qualification concerning party 55 8 1 303 best party 29 1 304 party is least of all evils 28 4 305 it is a large party 4 14 1 306 it is a small party 6 1 307 new party 1 308 party manifesto, policy of party, ideas of party 276 51 2
707 309 the debate 12 3 310 dissatisfaction with other parties 4 1 351 abortion 5 3 352 euthanasia 2 5 4 353 foreigners, aliens 36 26 2 354 crime, law and order, police 6 5 2 355 defense 2 1 357 economic problems 4 2 358 government budget deficits 3 359 fighting (unemployment), stimulating employment 4 3 1 361 social benefits, policy 33 26 3 362 income policy 4 3 1 364 decreasing income gap 3 4 367 (nuclear) energy 1 1 369 environmental pollution, care, problems 37 18 4 371 tax reforms 1 6 1 372 health care 16 11 2 373 education 1 1 375 protection of property, house ownership 6 4 1 376 drugs 1 377 nuclear family 1 1 701 tradition 147 18 702 imitation 11 2 703 impact of media 2 2 704 other, idiosyncratic reason 47 1
994 uncodable 30 996 PA 287 287 287 287 997 DK 9 998 NA 13 13 13 13 995 No further answer 1247 1583 1621 999 INAP 178 178 178 178
4.2.4 Occupation In the data file several variables contain information on occupation. This variable coded into the very detailed SBC92. This scheme was also used in 1994. Later the codes in SBC92 were used to construct several other variables. The first variable derived from the SBC is the International Standard Classification of Occupations Code (ISCO88) designed by the International Labor Office (ILO) (CBS 1995). This coding scheme was used because the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study joined the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES). Three additional classifications, namely U&S92, ISEI92 and EGP92, were derived from SBC92 (and (in EGP92) some additional variables). The following scheme summarizes the variables measuring occupational status according to the various coding schemes:
708 head of respondent partner household father mother SBC92 V0358 V0406 V0440 V0465 V0485 U&S92 V0359 V0407 V0441 V0466 V0486 ISEI92 V0360 V0408 V0442 V0467 V0487 EGP92 V0361 V0409 V0443 V0468 V0488 ISCO88 V0362 V0410 V0444 V0469 V0489
U&S-scale for occupational prestige (U&S-92), International Socio-Economic Index of occupational status (ISEI-92)
Information about SBC 1992 can be found in (CBS 1992b). A comparison of several classification standards and a long list of references can be found in (Bakker et al 1997).
The ISCO Codes (in the datafile a more refined coding is used):
Label Code Description 1 Legislators, senior officials and mangers 11 Legislators and senior officials 12 Corporate managers 13 General managers 2 Professionals 21 Physical, mathematical and engineering science professionals 22 Life science and health professionals 23 Teaching professionals 24 Other professionals 3 Technicians and associated professionals 31 Physical and engineering science associate professionals 32 Life science and health associate professionals 33 Teaching associate professionals 34 Other associate professionals 4 Clerks 41 Office clerks 42 Customer services clerks 5 Services workers and shop and market 51 Personal and protective service sales workers workers 52 Models, sales persons and demonstrators 6 Skilled agricultural and fishery workers 61 Market-oriented skilled agricultural and fishery workers 62 Subsistence agricultural and fishery workers 7 Craft and related trade workers 71 Extraction and building trade workers 72 Metal, machinery and related trade workers 73 Precision, handicraft, printing and related trade workers 74 Other craft and related trades
709 workers 8 Plant and machine operators and 81 Stationary-plant and related assemblers operators 82 Machine operators and assemblers 83 Drivers and mobile-plant operators 9 Elementary occupations 91 Sales and services elementary occupations 92 Agricultural, fishery and related laborers 93 Laborers in mining, construction, manufacturing and transport 10 Armed forces 01 Armed forces
4.2.5 Education The datafile contains several variables pertaining to education. These variables provide information about educational attachment of the respondent, his or her partner, the head of household, and the father and mother of the respondent. In this section a description of the meaning of the codes of all types is presented. The coding scheme was used in the DPES until 1986. In order to facilitate a comparison with the coding scheme of 1994, a column with the codes used in that year is given.
Code Code 1994 1998 1 1 Elementary education 2 2 Extended elementary education (VGLO, LAVO) 2 3 Elementary and lower vocational education (LTS, Huishoudschool, LEAO) 2 4 Elementary and middle level secondary education (ULO, MULO, 3-jarige HBS, MAVO) 3 5 Elementary and lower middle level vocatiional education (MEAO, UTS) 3 6 Elementary and higher secondary education (5-jarige HBS, Gymnasium, MMS), Lyceum, Atheneum, HAVO) 3 7 Elementary, secondary and higher middle level vocational education (MBA, MTS) 4 8 Elementary and secondary education plus higher level vocational education (HTS, HEAO, Sociale or Pedagogische Academie, Kunstonderwijs, Zeevaartschool, Kweekschool, SPD, GA-) 4 9 Elementary, secondary and university level vocational education (MO-akten, Accountancy, Beroeps Officiersopleiding, GA-II, GF, etc. 5 10 Elementary, secondary and tertiary (university) education (Universiteit or Hogeschool)
710 4.3 Weights
V0025 – V0027 are three weighting variables. The first weighting variable, V0025, was constructed by Statistics Netherlands, using an elaborate weighting model including electoral behavior. By using electoral behavior, it excludes all respondents not participating in the second wave. The second and third weighing factor, V0026 and V0027, are post-stratification weights for the pre-election sample as a whole and for the pre-election rolling cross-section design, respectively.
4.3.1 Statistics Netherlands weight (V0025) The weighting variable was provided by Statistics Netherlands, and constructed by means of the Bascula program. This weight is explored and defended in (Schmeets & Molin 1990) and (CBS 1992a). The weight (‘model 4’) is based upon actual voting behavior (including non-voting) , agegroup (18-24; 25-34; 35- 44; 45-54; 55-64; 65-74; 75 and older), sex, marital status (married; divorced; widow(er); not-married), degree of urbanization (see V0013) and region (see V0010). In the original weighing factor M4 household size was taken into account (Schmeets & Molin 1992: 13 and 23), however, because a sample of persons instead of households was used, this correction was not performed in the construction of this weight. Since the CBS weight is partly based on electoral behavior, it can only be computed for those respondents about whom information on their electoral behavior is available, i.e. the respondents in the post-election wave of interviews. The minimum value of weight 1 is of course 0, the maximum value is 3,75. The variance is 0.473. The mean is 0.86, due to the fact that first wave respondents not participating in the second wave are not included (weight = 0).
4.3.2 Simple post-stratification weight (V0026) The simple post-stratification weight V0026 only adjusts for flaws in the net pre- election sample when compared to the desired number of sample units according to the stratification table, Table 11. Table 11 contains 18 non-empty cells, so that V0026 has only 18 distinct values. For computing these weights, Statistics Netherlands provided a table with the population figures of persons aged 18 and over for all Dutch municipalities, on January 1, 1998. On the basis of this table, the number of enfranchised persons in each cell of the stratification table could be computed.7 The realized number of pre-election interviews (refer to Table 11) should ideally have an identical distribution over the cells of the table. However, the actual numbers of successful pre-election interviews in the cells of the table
7 Not all persons aged 18 and over in a municipality are enfranchised: e.g., foreigners and persons in mental institutions are not. The potential bias that might have resulted from an non-uniform distribution of adults without the right to vote over the stratification table, was ignored.
711 deviate, and V0026 can be used to correct for this deviation (and this deviation only). Each respondent was assigned a value on V0026 depending on the cell of Table 11 this respondent belongs to, and according to the formula:
V0026 = (# population aged 18 and over in the cell) (total # respondents) * (total # population aged 18 and over) (# respondents in cell)
V0026, thus computed, has a minimum value of .47, a maximum value of 2.12, and its variance is .008. Its mean value, of course, is 1.
4.3.3 Rolling cross-section post-stratification weight (V0027) The rolling cross-section post-stratification weight V0027 was computed in the same way as the simple post-stratification weight V0026, with one important difference: the second part of the multiplication in its formula (total # respondents/# respondents in cell) was now computed separately for each week of the fieldwork. Since the fieldwork for the pre-election interviews was conducted in five weeks, V0027 has 5*18 = 90 different values. The minimum and maximum per week, as well as the variance, are here summarized.
Week 14 Week 15 Week 16 Week 17 Week 18 Minimum .39 .52 .48 .52 .43 Maximum 2.83 3.54 2.24 2.20 1.80 Variance .196 .188 .096 .129 .093 n = 356 446 413 450 436
4.4 Other added variables
4.4.1 Party adherence Strength of Party Adherence (V0058) The values of V0058 (Strength of Party Adherence) have been assigned as follows:
0 ‘neither adherent, nor attracted’: if V0056 = 2. 1 ‘DK whether attracted’: if V0056 = 997. 2 ‘attracted, not adherent’ if V0056 = 1 and V0057 < 990. 3 ‘attracted, DK whether adherent’ if V0051 = 997 and V0056 = 1 and V0057 < 990. 4 ‘adherent, not convinced’ if V0050 = 1 and V0055 = 3 and V0051 < 990. 5 ‘adherent, DK whether convinced’ if V0050 = 1 and V0055 = 997 and V0051 < 990. 6 ‘adherent, convinced’ if V0050 = 1 and V0055 = 2 and V0051 < 990. 7 ‘adherent, very convinced’ if V0050 = 1 and V0055 = 1 and V0051 < 990.
712 8 ‘NA1 (adherent, DK party)’ if V0050 = 1 and V0051 ≥ 990. 9 ‘NA2 (attracted, DK party)’ if V0056 = 1 and V0057 ≥ 990. 997 ‘DK’ if V0050 = 997 or 998.
Direction of Party Adherence (V0059) For the complete list of value labels of V0059 (Direction of Party Adherence), refer to the frequency table. The basic procedure was as follows:
= V0051 IF V0051 < 990. = V0054 IF V0054 < 990. = V0057 IF V0057 < 990. 997 ‘DK’ IF V0051 = 997 OR V0054 = 997 OR V0057 = 997. 998 ‘NA’ IF V0051 = 998 OR V0057 = 998. 999 ‘neither adherent nor attracted, or dk whether attracted (INAP)’ if V0058 = 0 or 1.
4.4.2 Household characteristics
The data file contains a large number of variables describing the composition of the household the respondent belongs to (V0280 - V0347). This information was obtained during the first wave of interviews. The variables have been constructed from the following interview questions:
I/37a Now I would like to ask you some questions regarding yourself, your household and the members of your family. Including yourself, how many persons are part of the household that you belong to? INTERVIEWER: Do not count children who live in lodgings elsewhere as household members. Answer is coded into V0280.
Can you tell me how the household that you belong to, is composed? This is about all persons who live in this household, so including eventual residents. Can you tell me for each of the persons mentioned what relationship they have with you, for example your child, father or mother? INTERVIEWER: Enter into scheme. INTERVIEWER: Ask for the age in years and the gender of persons.
I/37n What is the name of the 1st person in the household? INTERVIEWER: NOTICE, fill in name/number of person from old to young.
I/37b What is the relationship of [. . . . ] with yourself? 1 (grand-)grandparent 2 (foster-, step-)parent (-in law)
713 3 partner, husband, wife 4 (foster-, step-)child 5 resident, boarder, other
I/37c What is the gender of [ . . . . .]
I/37d What is the age of [ . . . . .]
I/37e Does one of these persons contribute most towards the total household income? 1 yes (entered into scheme) 2 no, more than one person contribute equally
(if I/37e is answered ‘2’) I/37f Which persons? (entered into scheme).
The scheme resulting from these questions I/37 contains for each household member, including the respondent, information on gender, age, relationship with respondent, and whether the person is (one of) the largest contributor(s) to the total household income. The number of household members varies from 1 to 10. In order to make this information about the composition of the household more accessible, a number of operations were performed on the raw data. Using nested vector routines, the data were reorganized into four groups:
(1) The number of persons with a specific relationship to the respondent in the household (refer to I/37b), e.g., the number of (great-)grandparents (V0281 - V0287); (2) The gender of each of the persons with a specific relationship to the respondent, e.g., sex of (great-)grandparent #1 (V0288 - V0315); (3) The age of each of the persons with a specific relationship to the respondent, e.g., age of (great-)grandparent #1 (V0316 - V0343); (4) Identification of the main breadwinner(s) in the household, e.g., largest contributor to household income #3 is (great-)grandparent #1 (V0344 - V0346).
Finally, a typology of the main breadwinner in the household has been added (V0347), e.g. ‘respondent and partner equally’.
4.4.3 Data from Geo-marktprofiel (zip-code related variables)
With respect to households, the zip-code area is the smallest geographically identifiable unit in the Netherlands beyond household. In the Netherlands zip- codes (4 digits and two letters) are assigned to about 420.000 geographical units. Each zip-code area includes on average 16 households. Because zip-
714 codes were available for both respondents and non-respondents, we tried to enrich the data-set with variables available from other sources in order to enlarge the possibilities of comparing both respondents and non-respondents. The variables included in the data-set (V0014 TO V0022) were constructed by Geo- marktprofiel b.v.. These variables are constructed from a telephone interview (by Interview). Each year between 80.000 and 100.000 persons are contacted. After a specification of the boundaries of the zip-code area, the interviewees are asked questions about this area. The welfare indicator (V0014) is based upon a question about the average level of income. The Social Class indicators (V0015- V0019) are constructed from income, education and homeownership. Education indicators are constructed from a question about the level of income in the zip- code area.
4.5 Randomization Some sets of questions were asked in a randomized order. In order to study the effect of randomization, we included the original order of in so called ‘order variables’. The meaning of the these string variables is straightforward. For example the order of questions with respect to the present poll results (question 18c-f) was presented in a randomized order. This order is given in variable V0590. ‘01040203’ in this string variable means that the order of question in the interview was 18c;18f;18d;18e.
715 5. Questionnaires and interviewer instructions
5.1 First and second wave
In this chapter the Dutch questionnaires and showcards are presented. The English translation is presented with the variables in the third part of this codebook.
The data were collected by means of computer-assisted interviewing (CAPI). Therefore the presentation here differs slightly from that in the fieldwork. Every question, including the answering categories, was presented to the interviewer on a separate screen. The interviewer only read the text on the screen (the answering categories were not read to the respondents) and recorded an answering category which corresponds to the answer of the respondent. In a few cases the interviewer had to type the full answer. Copies of the original interviewing program can be obtained via Steinmetz Archive.
The answering categories ‘don’t know’ and ‘refuses to answer’ were in some cases presented on the screen next to the other answering categories. If the respondent did answer ‘don’t know’ the interviewer had to record the answering category which applied to don’t know. In cases where the don’t know category was not presented on the screen and the respondent answered don’t know, the interview could strike a special key [ for the answer don’t know. If the respondent answered ‘refuses to answer’ the interviewer could strike another key ] or could pick the answeringcode on the screen if the categories were presented there. In the questionnaire presented below all categories are listed, also those categories that were not presented on the screen.
Interviewer instructions were presented on the screen. These instructions were preceded by the letters ENQ. A handout given to the interviewers during the interview instruction contained all the interviewer instructions and a description and explanation of many possible difficulties. The handout is contained in this codebook. A few instructions referred to OP, which means person being interviewed (onderzoekspersoon). In several questions the respondent had to rate for example politicians or parties. The interviewer had to write down this rating and an automatic check in the CAPI-questionnaire checked if the rating was within the range permitted.
During the interview showcards were used. If the respondent had to use a showcard, a message was presented on the screen which card was needed. If necessary the routing of the questionnaire is indicated by (Naar .. ). See for an example question 2 in the first wave of the Dutch questionnaire. In the electronic version of the interview the routing is automatically. If the interview proceeds with the next question in line this indication is absent. In several cases the questions were randomized. This was indicated by the sentence: ‘Stellingen randomiseren’. In the electronic version the randomization was automatically performed.
If certain information was already obtained by previous questions, this information was imputed in the text of other questions. If this is the case, it is indicated by means of these two brackets [ and ]. See for an example question 7 in the second wave of the Dutch questionnaire. The questions presented below are all in Dutch. English translations can be obtained from the variable documentation part in the previous chapter.
716 5.1.1 Questionnaire wave 1 (Dutch)
Identificatienummer EnquêteurEnquêtrice:
Datum waarop afspraak is gemaakt met OP:
Begintijd interview: Datum interview:
Goedemorgenmiddagavond. Zoals u in de brief heeft kunnen lezen houdt het ITS in opdracht van een aantal Nederlandse universiteiten een onderzoek over enkele onderwerpen die de laatste tijd nogal eens in de belangstelling hebben gestaan. Mag ik u hierover enkele vragen stellen?
ITS: Koppelen met personenbestand; controleer op geslacht en geboortedatum. Dag en maand MOETEN juist zijn. Jaartal mag eventueel afwijken (binnen een bepaalde marge). ENQ: Stel het geslacht van de respondent vast 1 man 2 vrouw
1a Welke nationaliteit heeft u? 1 Nederlandse 2 anders, nl...... ENQ: Indien OP NIET de Nederlandse nationaliteit heeft; einde interview!!!!!!
1b Wat is uw geboortedatum? ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing ENQ: Indien geslacht en geboortedatum juist zijn, doorgaan met de vragenlijst. ENQ: Indien geslacht en of geboortedatum niet juist zijn; vind de juiste persoon. ENQ: Indien de juiste persoon onvindbaar is, einde interview.
1c Bent u ongehuwd, gehuwd, gehuwd geweest of weduweweduwnaar? 1 ongehuwd 2 gehuwd 3 gehuwd geweest 4 weduweweduwnaar 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate routing)
2 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 1 Allereerst wil ik u een paar vragen stellen over het nieuws in de krant. Als er in de krant binnenlands nieuws staat, bijvoorbeeld nieuws over regeringsproblemen, hoe vaak leest u dat dan?
717 1 (bijna) altijd 2 vaak 3 zo nu en dan 4 zelden of nooit 5 leest geen krant (Naar 3 en sla 4 en 6 over!) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
3 Als er in gezelschap over zulke problemen in ons land gesproken wordt, doet u dan meestal mee met het gesprek, luistert u met belangstelling, luistert u niet of heeft u geen belangstelling?
1 doet meestal mee 2 luistert met belangstelling 3 luistert niet of geen belangstelling 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag overslaan indien OP bij vraag 2 leest geen krant (5) heeft geantwoord 4 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 1 Als er in de krant buitenlands nieuws staat, bijvoorbeeld nieuws over spanningen of besprekingen tussen verschillende landen, hoe vaak leest u dat dan?
1 (bijna) altijd 2 vaak 3 zo nu en dan 4 zelden of nooit 5 leest geen krant (Naar 5 en sla 6 over) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
5 Bent u zeer geïnteresseerd in politieke onderwerpen, tamelijk geïnteresseerd of niet geïnteresseerd?
1 zeer geïnteresseerd 2 tamelijk geïnteresseerd 3 niet geïnteresseerd 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen te stellen indien OP krant leest. 6 Welke krant of welke kranten leest u dagelijks of vrijwel dagelijks? ENQ: Onbeperkt aantal antwoorden mogelijk.
718 ITS: Codering in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde krant. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde krant, etc. 1 De Telegraaf 2 De Volkskrant 3 Trouw 4 NRC Handelsblad 5 Het Parool 6 Algemeen Dagblad 7 regionale krant, nl... 8 andere krant, nl.... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 2 7 Kunt u met behulp van dit kaartje aangeven hoe vaak in de week u het NOS- journaal volgt? ENQ: Indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren (minder dan 1 keer per week)
1 (vrijwel) dagelijks 2 3 a 4 keer per week 3 1 a 2 keer per week 4 minder dan 1 keer per week 5 heeft geen televisie (Naar 10) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP tv heeft ENQ: Overhandig kaart 2 8 Kunt u met behulp van dit kaartje aangeven hoe vaak in de week u het RTL4- journaal volgt? ENQ: Indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren (minder dan 1 keer per week)
1 (vrijwel) dagelijks 2 3 a 4 keer per week 3 1 a 2 keer per week 4 minder dan 1 keer per week 5 heeft geen televisie (Naar 10) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP tv heeft ENQ: Overhandig kaart 2 9 Kunt u met behulp van dit kaartje aangeven hoe vaak in de week u het actualiteitenprogramma NOVA-Den Haag Vandaag volgt?
719 ENQ: Indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren (minder dan 1 keer per week)
1 (vrijwel) dagelijks 2 3 a 4 keer per week 3 1 a 2 keer per week 4 minder dan 1 keer per week 5 heeft geen televisie 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
10 Vervolgens zou ik u willen vragen wat u de belangrijkste problemen in ons land vindt? ENQ: Goed doorvragen, probeer te achterhalen wat OP bedoelt (specificeer de antwoorden, b.v. inkomensverschillen groter of kleiner maken). ENQ: Indien OP slechts een probleem noemt vragen; Zijn er nog andere problemen? ENQ: Maximaal 7 antwoorden. ENQ: Door OP genoemde problemen duidelijk van elkaar onderscheiden d.m.v. een puntkomma (;). 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing ITS: Codering in maximaal 7 variabelen. Eerste variabele is het eerst genoemde probleem. Tweede variabele is het tweede genoemde probleem etc. ITS: Variabele opnemen die aangeeft welke antwoorden voor de prompt zijn genoemd
11a Veel mensen voelen zich aanhanger van een bepaalde politieke partij, maar er zijn ook mensen die zich geen aanhanger van een politieke partij voelen. Voelt u zich aanhanger of voelt u zich geen aanhanger van een politieke partij?
1 aanhanger (Naar 11b) 2 geen aanhanger (Naar 11d) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 11d) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 11d) 999 (inappropriate) routing
11b Van welke partij? (Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk) ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks
720 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP meerdere partijen noemt 11b2 Tot welke van deze partijen voelt u zich het meest aangetrokken? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP aanhanger is en op vraag 11b meerdere antwoorden geeft. 11c Zoudt u zichzelf een zeer overtuigde aanhanger willen noemen een overtuigde aanhanger of vindt u zichzelf geen overtuigde aanhanger?
721 1 zeer overtuigde aanhanger (Naar 12a) 2 overtuigde aanhanger (Naar 12a) 3 geen overtuigde aanhanger (Naar 12a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 12a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag stellen indien OP geen aanhanger is of als OP bij vraag 11b slechts een antwoord geeft!! 11d Is er een partij waartoe u zich meer voelt aangetrokken dan tot andere partijen?
1 ja (Naar 11e) 2 nee (Naar 12a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 12a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
11e Welke partij is dat? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
12a Bent u wel of geen LID van een politieke partij?
1 wel lid (Naar 12b) 2 geen lid (Naar 12c) 996 panel attrition
722 997 weet niet (Naar 12c) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12c) 999 (inappropriate) routing
12b Van welke partij? (Naar 13a) Maximaal 3 antwoorden. ITS: Codering in 3 variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen te stellen als OP op 12a geen lid of weet niet heeft geantwoord) 12c Bent u ooit lid geweest van een politieke partij?
1 ja (Naar 12d) 2 nee (Naar 12e) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 12e) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12e) 999 (inappropriate) routing
12d Van welke partij of partijen? (Naar 13a) Maximaal 3 antwoorden ITS: Codering in 3 variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66
723 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 13 Centrumpartij 14 EVP 15 KVPRKSP 16 CHU 17 ARP 18 SDAP 19 CPN 20 PPR 21 PSP 22 Boerenpartij 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP geen lid is 12e Heeft u ooit overwogen om lid te worden van een politieke partij? (Niet stellen als OP ooit partijlid was) 1 ja (Naar 12f) 2 nee (Naar 13a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
12f Van welke partij of partijen? (Naar 13a) Onbeperkt aantal antwoorden mogelijk ITS: Codering in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks
724 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 13 Centrumpartij 14 EVP 15 KVPRKSP 16 CHU 17 ARP 18 SDAP 19 CPN 20 PPR 21 PSP 22 Boerenpartij 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 3 13a Ik wil nu een paar vragen stellen over wat u vindt van het beleid dat de afgelopen 4 jaar door de regering gevoerd is. Allereerst de ECONOMISCHE TOESTAND VAN NEDERLAND: denkt u dat de economische toestand door het gevoerde regeringsbeleid gunstig, ongunstig, of niet gunstig maar ook niet ongunstig is beïnvloed?
1 gunstig 2 ongunstig 3 niet gunstig, maar ook niet ongunstig 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik weer kaart 3 13b En de WERKGELEGENHEID: denkt u dat de werkgelegenheid in Nederland door het gevoerde regeringsbeleid gunstig, ongunstig, of niet gunstig maar ook niet ongunstig beïnvloed is?
1 gunstig
725 2 ongunstig 3 niet gunstig, maar ook niet ongunstig 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik nogmaals kaart 3 13c En uw PERSOONLIJKE FINANCIELE SITUATIE, denkt u dat uw persoonlijke financiële situatie door het gevoerde regeringsbeleid gunstig, ongunstig, of niet gunstig maar ook niet ongunstig is beïnvloed?
1 gunstig 2 ongunstig 3 niet gunstig, maar ook niet ongunstig 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
14 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 4 Kunt u met behulp van de kaart aangeven hoe tevreden of ontevreden u IN HET ALGEMEEN bent met wat de regering in de afgelopen 4 jaar heeft gedaan?
1 zeer tevreden 2 tevreden 3 niet tevreden, maar ook niet ontevreden 4 ontevreden 5 zeer ontevreden 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
15a Zoals u misschien weet zijn er in mei van dit jaar verkiezingen voor de TWEEDE KAMER. Gaat u dan wel of niet stemmen, of weet u dat nog niet?
1 gaat wel stemmen (Naar 2a) 2 gaat niet stemmen (Naar 2d) 3 weet het nog niet (Naar 2b) 996 panel attrition 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 16a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
Box 2: 2a Op welke partij gaat u stemmen op 6 mei? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD
726 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 2b) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 16a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP nog niet weet of hijzij gaat stemmen of als OP niet weet op welke partij hijzij gaat stemmen 2b Zijn er misschien partijen waarop u overweegt te gaan stemmen bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei?
1 ja (Naar 2c) 2 nee (Naar 16a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 16a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 16a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
2c Welke partijen zijn dat? (Naar 16a) (Onbeperkt aantal antwoorden mogelijk) ITS: Codering in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV
727 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP niet gaat stemmen 2d Stel dat het verplicht zou zijn om te gaan stemmen. Wat zou u dan stemmen? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 16a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 16a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
Dan wil ik u nu een aantal uitspraken voorleggen die betrekking hebben op het wel of niet gaan stemmen bij de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer. Het gaat er dus niet om op welke partij u gaat stemmen. Wilt u met behulp van deze kaart aangeven in hoeverre u het eens bent met de volgende uitspraken.
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 5 16a Stemmen is een plicht tegenover de samenleving 1 helemaal mee eens
728 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16b Stemmen kost mij veel tijd en inspanning 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16c Stemmen ondersteunt de democratie 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16d Om politieke invloed uit te oefenen helpt stemmen niet 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16e Stemmen is een manier om je politieke overtuiging kenbaar te maken 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
729 999 (inappropriate) routing
16f Stemmen levert mij persoonlijk niets op 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16g Stemmen is een manier om steun te geven aan een politieke partij 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16h Als je niet stemt verlies je het recht om kritiek uit te oefenen 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16i Als alles goed gaat heeft het geen zin om te stemmen 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 6
730 Wilt u met behulp van deze kaart aangeven hoeveel moeite u wilt doen om te gaan stemmen. Een 1 betekent dat u veel moeite wilt doen, een 7 betekent dat u geen enkele moeite wilt doen. Noemt u maar het cijfer dat op u van toepassing is. 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 7 17b En hoe belangrijk vindt u een hoge opkomst? Op deze kaart betekent een 1 dat u de opkomst belangrijk vindt en een 7 betekent dat u de opkomst onbelangrijk vindt. Noemt u maar het cijfer dat op u van toepassing is. 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig de vier losse kaartjes 8a, 8b, 8c en 8d. Op deze kaarten staan vier situaties beschreven. Ze gaan over de opkomst bij verkiezingen. U kunt zelf wel of niet gaan stemmen, en dat geldt ook voor de andere Nederlanders. Voor de totale opkomst maakt alleen uw stem natuurlijk niet veel uit. Wilt u deze vier situaties eens bekijken en deze vervolgens in de volgorde plaatsen van uw voorkeur? ENQ: Dring zonodig aan op een keuze
17c Welke van deze vier situaties heeft uw eerste voorkeur? 1 situatie A 2 situatie B 3 situatie C 4 situatie D 5 kan ECHT geen voorkeur aangeven (Naar 18a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
17d En welke situatie heeft uw tweede voorkeur? 1 situatie A 2 situatie B 3 situatie C 4 situatie D 5 kan ECHT geen voorkeur aangeven (Naar 18a)
731 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
17e En welke situatie heeft uw derde voorkeur? 1 situatie A 2 situatie B 3 situatie C 4 situatie D 5 kan ECHT geen voorkeur aangeven (Naar 18a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Wijs de laatste kaart aan en noteer A, B, C, of D 17f Dus de situatie op deze kaart heeft uw laagste voorkeur? 1 situatie A 2 situatie B 3 situatie C 4 situatie D 5 kan ECHT geen voorkeur geven 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
18a Voorafgaand aan verkiezingen worden opiniepeilingen gehouden om erachter te komen wat mensen van plan zijn te gaan stemmen. Hoe vaak bent u in de laatste weken uitslagen van dergelijke peilingen tegengekomen in de krant of op radio en televisie? Is dat vrijwel nooit het geval geweest, weleens, meerdere malen of zeer vaak? 1 (vrijwel) nooit 2 weleens 3 meerdere malen 4 zeer vaak 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
18b Hoe goed is naar uw mening het beeld dat opiniepeilingen geven van de aanhang van de diverse partijen? Is dat zeer goed, goed, slecht of zeer slecht? 1 zeer goed 2 goed 3 slecht 4 zeer slecht 996 panel attrition
732 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van de partijen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 9 18c Ik zou u nu willen vragen hoe enkele partijen er in de opiniepeilingen in vergelijking met de verkiezingen van 1994 voorstaan. Hoe staat het CDA er volgens u voor in de peilingen in vergelijking met de uitslag in 1994? 1 veel beter 2 iets beter 3 ongeveer hetzelfde 4 iets slechter 5 veel slechter 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik nog steeds kaart 9 18d Hoe staat de PVDA er volgens u voor in de peilingen in vergelijking met de uitslag van 1994? 1 veel beter 2 iets beter 3 ongeveer hetzelfde 4 iets slechter 5 veel slechter 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik weer kaart 9 18e En de VVD? 1 veel beter 2 iets beter 3 ongeveer hetzelfde 4 iets slechter 5 veel slechter 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik nog steeds kaart 9 18f En D66? 1 veel beter 2 iets beter 3 ongeveer hetzelfde 4 iets slechter 5 veel slechter
733 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
18g Welke partij wordt volgens u het grootst bij de komende Tweede Kamerverkiezingen? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders,nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van de issues randomiseren Volgorde van partijen NIET randomiseren!! ITS: Indien OP tot drie keer toe zegt een bepaalde partij niet te kennen, dan deze partij niet meer opnoemen m.b.t. volgend issue. 19a Nu een paar vragen over politieke zaken die regelmatig in het nieuws zijn. Als een arts het leven van een patiënt op diens verzoek beëindigt noemen we dat EUTHANASIE. Sommige mensen en partijen vinden dat euthanasie verboden moet zijn. Anderen vinden dat een arts altijd euthanasie mag toepassen als een patiënt daarom vraagt. Natuurlijk zijn er ook mensen met een mening die daar tussenin ligt.
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 10
Stel: de mensen (en partijen) die vinden dat euthanasie verboden moet zijn staan aan het begin van de lijn (bij cijfer 1) en de mensen (en partijen) die vinden dat de arts altijd euthanasie mag toepassen als de patiënt daarom vraagt staan aan het einde van de lijn (bij cijfer 7) Ik ga u eerst vragen om politieke partijen te plaatsen op deze lijn. Als u helemaal niet weet welk standpunt een partij heeft, zeg het dan gerust.
734 Waar zou u het CDA op de lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19e En waar de SP? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
735 999 (inappropriate) routing
19g En waar zou u uzelf plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 11 20a Dan wil ik het nu met u over een ander probleem hebben. Sommige mensen en partijen vinden dat de verschillen in inkomens in ons land groter moeten worden (bij cijfer 1). Anderen vinden dat deze verschillen kleiner moeten worden (bij cijfer 7). Natuurlijk zijn er ook mensen met een mening die hier ergens tussenin ligt.
Waar zou u het CDA op de lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
736 20e En waar de SP? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20g En waar zou u uzelf plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De Issues 21 en 22 mogen niet direct na elkaar worden voorgelegd!! ENQ: Overhandig kaart 12 21a De toelating van asielzoekers is de afgelopen jaren vaak in het nieuws geweest. Sommige mensen vinden dat Nederland meer asielzoekers zou moeten toelaten dan nu het geval is. Andere mensen vinden dat Nederland de asielzoekers die hier al zijn, zoveel mogelijk zou moeten terugsturen naar hun land van herkomst. Natuurlijk zijn er ook weer mensen met een mening die daar tussen in ligt. Aan het begin van de lijn staan nu personen (en partijen) die vinden dat Nederland meer asielzoekers moet toelaten (dus bij cijfer 1); aan het einde van de lijn staan de personen (en partijen) die vinden dat Nederland zoveel mogelijk asielzoekers moet terugsturen (dus bij cijfer 7).
Waar zou u het CDA op de lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen
737 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21e En waar de SP? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21g En waar zou u uzelf plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 13
738 22a In Nederland wordt verschillend gedacht over allochtonen en etnische minderheden. Sommige mensen en partijen vinden dat deze mensen in Nederland moeten kunnen leven met behoud van alle gewoonten van de eigen cultuur. Anderen vinden dat zij zich, als zij in Nederland blijven, volledig moeten aanpassen aan de Nederlandse cultuur. Natuurlijk zijn er ook mensen die een mening hebben die daar tussen in ligt. Aan het begin van de lijn staan nu personen (en partijen) die vinden dat allochtonen en etnische minderheden in Nederland moeten kunnen leven met behoud van alle gewoonten van de eigen cultuur (dus bij cijfer 1); aan het einde van de lijn staan de personen (en partijen) die vinden dat deze mensen zich volledig moeten aanpassen aan de Nederlandse cultuur (dus bij cijfer 7) Waar zou u het CDA op de lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22e En waar de SP? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition
739 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22g En waar zou u uzelf plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 13.1 23a De Europese eenwording is in volle gang. De landen van de Europese Unie hebben besloten om steeds nauwer met elkaar te gaan samenwerken. Maar niet iedereen denkt hierover hetzelfde. Sommige mensen en partijen vinden dat de Europese eenwording nog verder zou moeten gaan. Anderen vinden dat de Europese eenwording al te ver is gegaan. Stel dat de mensen en partijen die vinden dat de Europese Eenwording nog verder zou moeten gaan aan het begin van de lijn staan (bij cijfer 1) en dat de mensen en partijen die vinden dat de eenwording al te ver is gegaan aan het einde van de lijn staan (bij cijfer 7).
Waar zou u het CDA op deze lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet
740 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23e En waar de SP? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23g En waar zou u uzelf plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 13.2 24a Ik toon u hierbij een lijstje landen. Kunt u mij zeggen welk van deze landen volgens u lid is van de Europese Unie? Noemt u maar het nummer van het land dat lid is van de Europese Unie. ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde land. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde land, etc. 1 Duitsland 2 Verenigde Staten 3 Frankrijk 4 Italië 5 Spanje 6 Polen 7 Litouwen
741 8 Zweden 9 Noorwegen 10 Turkije 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
X1a-X1g en X2a-X2g plaatsen openlaten i.v.m. issues die (ineens) in de belangstelling staat. (Formaat is hetzelfde als de vorige vraag!) Tevens worden dan 2 kaarten toegevoegd.
25 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 14 Van politieke opvattingen wordt vaak gezegd dat zij LINKS OF RECHTS zijn. Wanneer u denkt aan uw eigen politieke opvattingen, waar zou u zichzelf dan plaatsen? Noemt u maar het cijfer dat op u van toepassing is. 0...10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
26a De vorige verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer zijn in 1994 gehouden. Heeft u toen gestemd of niet? 1 wel gestemd (Naar 26b) 2 niet gestemd (Naar 27a.1 of 27a.2) 3 mocht nog niet stemmen (Naar 27a.1 of 27a.2) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 27a.1 of 27a.2) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 27a.1 of 27a.2) 999 (inappropriate) routing
26b Op welke partij heeft u TOEN gestemd? (Naar 27a.1 of 27a.2)
1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco
742 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ITS: Koppelen met regiocodewoonplaats Alleen te stellen indien gemeenteraadsverkiezingen gehouden zijn op 4 maart. 27a Heeft u gestemd bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen van 4 maart?
1 wel gestemd (Naar 27b) 2 niet gestemd (Naar 27c) 3 mocht (nog) niet stemmen (Naar 28a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 28a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 28a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen te stellen indien geen gemeenteraadsverkiezingen zijn gehouden op 4 maart (i.v.m. Herindeling). 27a Heeft u gestemd bij de laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen? 1 wel gestemd (Naar 27b) 2 niet gestemd (Naar 27c) 3 mocht (nog) niet stemmen (Naar 28a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 28a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 28a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
27b Op welke partij heeft u toen gestemd? (Naar 28a) (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst, nl...
743 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27c Waarom heeft u niet gestemd? ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde reden. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde reden, etc. ENQ: Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk ENQ: Letterlijk noteren...... ITS: Automatisch coderen.
Volgorde van de partijen randomiseren 28a ENQ: Overhandig kaart 15 Er zijn veel politieke partijen in ons land. Ik zou graag van u weten hoe sympathiek u deze partijen vindt. U kunt iedere partij hiervoor punten geven tussen de 0 en de 100. Hoe sympathieker u een partij vindt, hoe meer punten u die partij geeft. 50 betekent dat u die partij niet sympathiek, maar ook niet onsympathiek vindt. Als u een partij niet kent, zegt u het dan gerust.
Als eerste nemen we de PvdA. Hoeveel punten zou u de PvdA geven?
ENQ: Als OP deze partij niet kent dan code 101 gebruiken. 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28b En de VVD? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28c En D66? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
744 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28d En GroenLinks? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28e En het CDA? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28f En de SGP? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28g En het GPV? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28h En de RPF? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28i En de Centrumdemocraten? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
745 999 (inappropriate) routing
28j En de SP? 0..100 101 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van de personen randomiseren. 29a ENQ: Gebruik weer kaart 15 Ik zou ook graag van u weten hoe sympathiek u de volgende politici vindt. Als u een politicus niet kent, zegt u het dan gerust. ENQ: Als respondent deze politicus niet kent dan code 101 gebruiken. Allereerst nemen we Wim Kok. Hoeveel punten zou u hem geven? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29b En Jaap de Hoop Scheffer? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29c En Frits Bolkestein? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29d En Els Borst? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29e En Paul Rosenmöller?
746 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29f En Gert Schutte? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29g En Jan Marijnissen? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29h En Hans Janmaat? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 29i En ... ? (misschien nieuwe, opkomende kandidaat) 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van de foto’s randomiseren Hier zijn foto’s van een aantal politici. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 16a Wilt u van elke persoon de naam, de partij, en de functie binnen de partij zeggen? 30a Naam 1 Jacques Wallage 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition
747 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30b Partij 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30c Functie 1 Fractievoorzitterkamerlid 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 16b 30d Naam 1 Thom de Graaf 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30e Partij 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66
748 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30f Functie 1 fractievoorzitterkamerlid 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 16c 30g Naam 1 Annemarie Jorritsma 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30h Partij 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1
749 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30i Functie 1 Minister van Verkeer en Waterstaat 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 16d 30j Naam 1 Piet Bukman 2 anders, nl..(ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30k Partij 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30l Functie
750 1 Voorzitter Tweede Kamerkamerlid 2 anders, nl.. (ENQ: Letterlijk noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31a In de Tweede Kamer zitten grote en kleine partijen. Kunt u van de volgende twee partijen steeds zeggen welke op dit moment meer zetels heeft? PVDA of VVD? 1 PVDA 2 VVD 3 evenveel zetels 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31b GroenLinks of D66? 1 GroenLinks 2 D66 3 evenveel zetels 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31c CDA of PVDA? 1 CDA 2 PVDA 3 evenveel zetels 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31d VVD of D66? 1 VVD 2 D66 3 evenveel zetels 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31e Welke partij of partijen maken volgens u momenteel deel uit van de regering? ITS: Coderen in maximaal 8 variabelen, allemaal met waarden gelijk aan de partijen.
751 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31f Na de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer moet er een nieuwe regering worden gevormd. De regering wordt in Nederland meestal gevormd door verschillende partijen. Welke partijen moeten volgens u deel uitmaken van de nieuwe regering? ENQ: Vraag eventueel: Zijn er wellicht partijen die volgens u ook moeten deelnemen aan deze regering? ITS: Variabele opnemen die aangeeft welke antwoorden voor de prompt zijn genoemd ITS: Codering in maximaal 8 variabelen. Elke variabele heeft een verzameling waarden die gelijk is aan de verzameling partijen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. De tweede variabele de tweede genoemde partij, etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 dummy 1
752 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 40 alle partijen 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31g Maakt het voor u veel, weinig of niets uit welke partijen in de regering komen? 1 veel 2 weinig 3 niets 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig 17 Op deze kaart staan een aantal persoonlijke en sociale doelen. Wilt u bij ieder ervan aangeven of u vindt dat wij daar in Nederland veel meer of veel minder aandacht aan zouden moeten besteden?
32a Zeker stellen van een goed betaalde baan 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32b Hard werken en sparen voor de toekomst 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
753 32c Zorgen voor een hoge economische groei 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32d Persoonlijke vrijheid 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32e Open staan voor nieuwe ideeën 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32f Vrijheid van meningsuiting 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32g Streven naar persoonlijke ontplooiing 1 veel meer aandacht
754 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32h Mensen meer inspraak geven bij besluiten van de overheid 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32i Verhoging van de uitkeringen aan de minima 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32j Verbetering van het milieu en de kwaliteit van het bestaan 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32k Actieve deelname van burgers aan de gemeentepolitiek 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht
755 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32l Vervangen van partijen door enkele sterke leiders 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32m In stand houden van traditionele normen en waarden 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32n Respect hebben voor autoriteiten 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32o Ook in de huidige situatie zorgen voor een sterk leger 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht
756 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32p Beperkingen opleggen aan andersdenkenden 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32q Stimuleren van trouw en vaderlandsliefde 1 veel meer aandacht 2 meer aandacht 3 niet meer en niet minder aandacht 4 minder aandacht 5 veel minder aandacht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Er zijn allerlei regels die kunnen bepalen of iemand Nederlander mag worden. Hieronder volgen twee uitspraken die betrekking hebben op het Nederlanderschap. Wilt u door middel van een cijfer van 1 tot en met 10 aangeven in hoeverre u het met iedere uitspraak eens bent. Een 1 betekent dat u het helemaal niet eens bent met de uitspraak, een 10 betekent dat u het helemaal eens bent met de uitspraak.
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 18 33a Ik vind dat alle mensen die Nederlandse VOOROUDERS hebben recht hebben op het Nederlanderschap 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
33b Ik vind dat alle mensen die in Nederland WONEN EN WERKEN recht hebben op het Nederlanderschap
757 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Er zijn diverse factoren die mensen het gevoel geven dat ze bij elkaar horen. Hierna volgen twee uitspraken. Wilt u door middel van een cijfer van 1 tot en met 10 weer aangeven in hoeverre u het met iedere uitspraak eens bent. Een 1 betekent dat u het helemaal niet eens bent met de uitspraak, een 10 betekent dat u het helemaal eens bent met de uitspraak.
ENQ: Gebruik weer kaart 18 33c Saamhorigheid tussen de inwoners van een land ontstaat door de eeuwen heen. 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
33d Culturele verschillen binnen een land staan onderlinge saamhorigheid niet in de weg. 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34a Dan wil ik u nu enkele vragen stellen over de periode waarin u 10 tot 16 jaar was. Werd er toen bij u thuis veel, tamelijk veel, weinig of niet over politieke onderwerpen gesproken? 1 veel 2 tamelijk veel 3 weinig 4 niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34b Had u in deze periode een vader? ENQ: Ook pleeg- of stiefvader als vader aanduiden. 1 ja 2 nee (Vragen 35a, 35b, 47 en 48a-j overslaan) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
758 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34c Had u in deze periode een moeder? ENQ: Ook pleeg- of stiefmoeder als moeder aanduiden. 1 ja 2 nee (Vragen 36a, 36b, 49 en 50a-j overslaan) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen stellen indien OP vader had. 35a Weet u nog aan welke partij uw VADER TOEN de voorkeur gaf? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 36a) 3 OP had destijds geen (pleeg)vader (Naar 36a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 36a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 36a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
35b En welke partij was dat? ENQ: wanneer respondent meer partijen noemt, deze noteren (Maximaal 2 antwoorden) ITS: Codering in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 13 Centrumpartij 14 EVP 15 KVPRKSP 16 CHU 17 ARP 18 SDAP 19 CPN 20 PPR 21 PSP
759 22 Boerenpartij 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen stellen indien OP moeder had. 36a En weet u nog aan welke partij uw MOEDER TOEN de voorkeur gaf? 1 ja (Naar 36b) 2 nee (Naar 37a) 3 OP had destijds geen (pleeg)moeder (Naar 37a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 37a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 37a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
36b En welke partij was dat? ENQ: wanneer respondent meer partijen noemt, deze noteren (Maximaal 2 antwoorden) ITS: Codering in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 13 Centrumpartij 14 EVP 15 KVPRKSP 16 CHU 17 ARP 18 SDAP 19 CPN 20 PPR 21 PSP 22 Boerenpartij 30 lokale lijst 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition
760 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Dan zou ik u nu wat vragen willen stellen met betrekking tot uzelf, uw huishouden en uw familieleden. 37a Uzelf meegerekend, uit hoeveel personen bestaat dan het huishouden waartoe u behoort? ENQ: Kinderen die elders op kamers wonen niet tot het huishouden rekenen. 1 1 persoon (OP) (Naar 38a) 2 meer dan 1 persoon (Naar 37b) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
37b Kunt u mij zeggen hoe het huishouden waartoe u behoort is samengesteld? Het gaat dus om alle personen die in deze huishouding wonen dus ook eventueel inwonende personen. ENQ: Invullen in schema ENQ: vraag naar de leeftijd in jaren en het geslacht van personen
37c Kunt u mij van elk van de genoemde personen aangeven wat zij van u zijn, bijvoorbeeld uw kind, vader of moeder? ENQ: Invullen in schema ENQ: Behandel elke genoemde persoon en geef voor elk aan wat de relatie van die persoon tot de respondent is met als mogelijkheden: 1 (over-)grootouder 2 (pleeg-, stief-, schoon-) ouder 3 partner, echtgenoot, echtgenote 4 (schoon-, stief-) broer of zus 5 (pleeg-, stief-) kind 6 inwonende persoon, kostganger, overige 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
37d ENQ: Stel vast of u iedereen in het huishouden gehad heeft. 1 ja (Naar 37e) 2 nee, stel van anderen het geslacht, de geboortedatum en de relatie tot OP vast (ENQ: Invullen in schema) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
761 37e Levert een van deze personen de grootste bijdrage aan het totale inkomen van de huishouding? 1 ja (ENQ: Invullen in schema) 2 nee, meerdere personen leveren gelijke bijdrage (ENQ: Invullen in schema) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing ENQ: Invullen in schema ENQ: Meerdere personen aanduiden is alleen mogelijk indien er door meerdere personen een gelijk inkomen wordt ingebracht.
Persoon Geslacht Leeftijd (in Relatie tot OP Persoon levert (1 man, 2 jaren) (code 1 tm 6) grootste vrouw) bijdrage (evt. samen met anderen) (1 ja 2 nee) 1 2 3 4 5 6 ......
De volgende vragen gaan over uw eigen opleiding. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 38a Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen wat de hoogste school-opleiding is waarvan u een diploma heeft behaald? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
38b Bent u hierna nog aan een opleiding begonnen op een hoger niveau? ENQ: Korte cursussen of opleidingen (korter dan 1 jaar) niet meerekenen. 1 ja (Naar 38c) 2 nee (Naar 39a) 996 panel attrition
762 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Gebruik weer kaart 19 38c Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen welke opleiding dat is? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over uw beroep. 39a Kunt u aangeven wat u momenteel doet of welke situatie op u van toepassing is? ENQ: Indien meer dan 1 werkkring, vragen over de werkkring met de meeste uren per week ENQ: Banen via het uitzendbureau is ‘elders in loondienst’ (b) ENQ: Vrijwilligers, niet betaald werk is ‘heeft betaald werk verricht’ (2) of ‘heeft nooit betaald werk verricht’ (3)
1 verricht betaald werk (Naar 39a1) 2 heeft betaald werk verricht, maar doet dat nu niet (meer) door (Naar 39a2) 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht (Naar 39a3)
39a1 U verricht betaald werk. Bent u werkzaam in overheidsdienst, in loondienst, zelfstandig werkzaam of op andere wijze? 1 in overheidsdienst (Naar 39b en 39c) 2 elders in loondienst (Naar 39b en 39c) 3 zelfstandig werkzaam (Naar 39b en 39d) 4 anders, nl..... (Naar 39b en 39c)
39a2 U heeft betaald werk verricht maar doet dat nu niet (meer). Is dit vanwege blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, pensionering of rentenierend, huishoudelijke werk, opvoeding van kinderen of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid (Naar 39k) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 39k) 3 gepensioneerd, rentenierend (Naar 39k) 4 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 39k) 5 anders, nl...... (Naar 39k)
39a3 U heeft nooit betaald werk verricht. Is dit vanwege studie, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, huishoudelijk werk, de opvoeding van kinderen, arbeidsongeschiktheid of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 studeert nog (Naar 39q)
763 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 39q) 3 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 39q) 4 arbeidsongeschikt (Naar 40a) 5 anders, nl..... (Naar 39q) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 40a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 40a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
39b Wat is uw beroep of functie? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39c Bij wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling bent u werkzaam? (Naar 39e) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39d Wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling heeft u? (Indien zelfstandig werkzaam; code c bij 39a) (Naar 39g) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39e Geeft u in uw beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 39i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39f Aan hoeveel personen geeft u leiding? (Naar 39i) ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9
764 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen voor persoon die zelfstandig werkzaam is (code c bij 39a) 39g Heeft u personeel in dienst? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 39i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39h Hoeveel personeel heeft u in dienst? 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39i Hoeveel uur werkt u gemiddeld per week, onbetaalde uren niet meegeteld? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) ITS: Indien OP minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 39j, anders naar vraag 40a 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP minder dan 30 uur werkt Overhandig kaart 21 39j U werkt minder dan 30 uur per week. Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven welke situatie verder op u van toepassing is. (Naar 40a) 1 gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikt 2 werkloos, werkzoekend
765 3 huishoudelijk werkzorg voor kinderen 4 studeert nog 5 vrijwilliger 6 geen andere werkzaamheden 7 overig, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39k U heeft vroeger betaald werk verricht. In welke functie bent u werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie. ENQ: Indien OP zijn werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die OP voorheen had. ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39l Bij welk soort bedrijf of instelling bent u werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39m Heeft u in uw beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers gegeven? 1 ja (Naar 39n) 2 nee (Naar 39o) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39n Aan hoeveel personen heeft u leiding gegeven? ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding werd gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer
766 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39o Hoeveel uur heeft u gemiddeld per week gewerkt? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) ITS: Indien OP minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 39p, anders naar vraag 40a 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39p In welk jaar heeft u voor het laatst betaald werk gehad? (Naar 40a) ENQ: Indien OP bij 39a 2f, 2h of 2i heeft geantwoord naar 39q. (Voer getal in tussen 1 en 98) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag alleen stellen indien OP bij 39a 2f, 2h,2i of 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht heeft geantwoord. 39q Zou u regelmatig werk willen hebben? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Dan wil ik u nu enkele vragen stellen over uw godsdienst of levensbeschouwing. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 22 40a Welke van de uitspraken op deze kaart komt het meest overeen met uw mening over God? ENQ: Slechts een antwoord mogelijk 1 Ik geloof niet in God 2 Ik weet niet of er een God is, en ik geloof niet dat er een manier is om dat te weten te komen 3 Ik geloof niet in een God, die zich met ieder van ons persoonlijk bezighoudt, maar ik geloof wel in een of andere hogere macht 4 Op sommige momenten geloof ik in God, op andere momenten niet 5 Ik geloof in God, al heb ik mijn twijfels 6 Ik geloof zonder twijfel dat God werkelijk bestaat
767 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
40b Rekent u zichzelf tot een bepaalde kerkelijke gezindte of levensbeschouwelijke groepering en ZO JA: tot welke? ENQ: Indien OP noemt Samen op weg, dit noteren bij 5 anders, nl.. ENQ: Indien OP noemt Protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd 1 Rooms-katholiek (Naar 40e) 2 Nederlands Hervormd (Naar 40c) 3 Gereformeerd (Naar 40d) 4 Islamitisch (Naar 40e) 5 anders , nl.. (Naar 40e) 6 geen (Naar 40e) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 40e) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 40e) 999 (inappropriate) routing
40c Rekent u zichzelf tot een bepaalde richting in de Nederlands Hervormde Kerk, en ZO JA: tot welke? 1 Vrijzinnige richting (Naar 40e) 2 Midden Orthodox (Naar 40e) 3 Gereformeerde Bond (Naar 40e) 4 Confessionele richting (Naar 40e) 5 anders, nl. ... (Naar 40e) 6 geen richting (Naar 40e) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 40e) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 40e) 999 (inappropriate) routing
40d Tot welke van de Gereformeerde kerken, gemeenten of gezindten rekent u zichzelf? 1 Gereformeerde Kerken in Nederland (synodaal) 2 Gereformeerde Kerken, vrijgemaakt (artikel 31) 3 Nederlands Gereformeerde Kerken (buiten verband) 4 Christelijk Gereformeerde Kerk 5 Gereformeerde gemeenten 6 Oud gereformeerde gemeenten 7 anders, nl. ... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
40e Hoe vaak gaat u naar godsdienstige bijeenkomsten of kerkdiensten? 1 elke week of vaker 2 2 tot 3 keer per maand
768 3 1 keer per maand 4 enkele keren per jaar 5 (praktisch) nooit 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
40f Bent u opgegroeid in een bepaalde kerkelijke gezindte of levensbeschouwelijke groepering en ZO JA: welke? ENQ: Maximaal 2 codes mogelijk ENQ: Indien OP noemt Samen op weg, dit noteren bij 5 anders, nl.. ENQ: Indien OP noemt Protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd ITS: Coderen in 2 variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde gezindte of groepering. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde gezindte of groepering. 1 Rooms-katholiek 2 Nederlands Hervormd 3 Gereformeerd 4 Islamitisch 5 andere gezindte of groepering, nl. ... 6 geen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 23 Er wordt wel eens gesproken over het bestaan van verschillende sociale klassen en groepen. Als u zichzelf tot een bepaalde sociale klasse zou moeten rekenen, welke zou dat dan zijn? 1 hogere klasse 2 hogere middenklasse 3 gewone middenklasse 4 hogere arbeidersklasse 5 gewone arbeidersklasse 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien respondent partner heeft, bekend uit de huishoudbox; anders ga naar vraag 45a De volgende vragen gaan over de opleiding van uw partner. ENQ: Overhandig 19 42a Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen wat de hoogste school-opleiding is waarvan uw partner een diploma heeft behaald? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition
769 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
42b Is uw partner hierna nog aan een opleiding begonnen op een hoger niveau? ENQ: Korte cursussen of opleidingen (korter dan 1 jaar) niet meerekenen. 1 ja (Naar 42c) 2 nee (Naar 43a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 42c Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen welke opleiding dat is? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over het beroep van uw partner . 43a Kunt u aangeven wat uw partner momenteel doet of welke situatie op uw partner van toepassing is? ENQ: Indien meer dan 1 werkkring, vragen over de werkkring met de meeste uren per week ENQ: Banen via het uitzendbureau is ‘elders in loondienst’ (b) ENQ: Vrijwilligers, niet betaald werk is ‘heeft betaald werk verricht’ (2) of ‘heeft nooit betaald werk verricht’ (3) 1 verricht betaald werk (Naar 43a1) 2 heeft betaald werk verricht, maar doet dat nu niet (meer) door (Naar 43a2) 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht (Naar 43a3)
43a1 Uw partner verricht betaald werk. Is uw partner werkzaam in overheidsdienst, in loondienst, zelfstandig werkzaam of op andere wijze? 1 in overheidsdienst (Naar 43b en 43c) 2 elders in loondienst (Naar 43b en 43c) 3 zelfstandig werkzaam (Naar 43b en 43d) 4 anders, nl..... (Naar 43b en 43c)
43a2 Uw partner heeft betaald werk verricht maar doet dat nu niet (meer). Is dit vanwege blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, pensionering of rentenierend, huishoudelijke werk, opvoeding van kinderen of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid (Naar 43k) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 43k)
770 3 gepensioneerd, rentenierend (Naar 43k) 4 huishoudelijk werkopvoeden van kinderen (Naar 43k) 5 anders, nl...... (Naar 43k)
43a3 Uw partner heeft nooit betaald werk verricht. Is dit vanwege studie, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, huishoudelijk werk, de opvoeding van kinderen, arbeidsongeschiktheid of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 studeert nog (Naar 43q) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 43q) 3 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 43q) 4 arbeidsongeschikt (Naar 44a) 5 anders, nl..... (Naar 43q) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 44a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 44a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
43b Wat is het beroep of de functie van uw partner? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43c Bij wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling is uw partner werkzaam? (Naar 43e) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43d Wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling heeft uw partner? (Indien zelfstandig werkzaam; code c bij 43a) (Naar 43g) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43e Geeft uw partner in zijnhaar beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers?
771 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 43i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43f Aan hoeveel personen geeft uw partner leiding? (Naar 43i) ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen voor persoon die zelfstandig werkzaam is (code c bij 43a) 43g Heeft uw partner personeel in dienst? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 43i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43h Hoeveel personeel heeft uw partner in dienst? 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43i Hoeveel uur werkt uw partner gemiddeld per week, onbetaalde uren niet meegeteld? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen...... (aantal noteren)
772 ITS: Indien partner minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 43j, anders naar vraag 44a 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien partner minder dan 30 uur werkt ENQ: Overhandig kaart 21 43j Uw partner werkt minder dan 30 uur per week. Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven welke situatie verder op uw partner van toepassing is. (Naar 44a) 1 gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikt 2 werkloos, werkzoekend 3 huishoudelijk werkzorg voor kinderen 4 studeert nog 5 vrijwilliger 6 geen andere werkzaamheden 7 overig, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43k Uw partner heeft vroeger betaald werk verricht. In welke functie is uw partner werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie. ENQ: Indien partner zijnhaar werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die partner voorheen had. ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43l Bij welk soort bedrijf of instelling is uw partner werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
773 43m Heeft uw partner in zijnhaar beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers gegeven? 1 ja (Naar 43n) 2 nee (Naar 43o) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43n Aan hoeveel personen heeft uw partner leiding gegeven? ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding werd gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43o Hoeveel uur heeft uw partner gemiddeld per week gewerkt? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43p In welk jaar heeft uw partner voor het laatst betaald werk gehad? (Naar 44a) (Voer getal in tussen 1 en 98) ENQ: Indien OP bij 43a 2f, 2h of 2i heeft geantwoord naar 43q 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag alleen stellen indien OP bij 43a 2f, 2h, 2i of 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht heeft geantwoord. 43q Zou uw partner regelmatig werk willen hebben? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
774 999 (inappropriate) routing
44a Behoort uw partner tot een bepaalde kerkelijke gezindte of levensbeschouwelijke groepering en ZO JA: tot welke? ENQ: Indien OP noemt Samen op weg, dit noteren bij 5 anders, nl.. ENQ: Indien OP noemt Protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd 1 Rooms-katholiek (Naar 44d) 2 Nederlands Hervormd (Naar 44b) 3 Gereformeerd (Naar 44c) 4 Islamitisch (Naar 44d) 5 anders, nl.. (Naar 44d) 6 geen (Naar 44d) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 44d) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 44d) 999 (inappropriate) routing
44b Behoort uw partner tot een bepaalde richting in de Nederlands Hervormde Kerk, en ZO JA: tot welke?
1 Vrijzinnige richting (Naar 44d) 2 Midden Orthodox (Naar 44d) 3 Gereformeerde Bond (Naar 44d) 4 Confessionele richting (Naar 44d) 5 anders, nl. ... (Naar 44d) 6 geen richting (Naar 44d) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 44d) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 44d) 999 (inappropriate) routing
44c Tot welke van de Gereformeerde kerken, gemeenten of gezindten behoort uw partner? 1 Gereformeerde kerken in Nederland (synodaal) 2 Gereformeerde kerken, vrijgemaakt (artikel 31) 3 Nederlands Gereformeerde kerken (buiten verband) 4 Christelijk Gereformeerde kerk 5 Gereformeerde gemeenten 6 Oud gereformeerde gemeenten 7 anders, nl. ... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
44d Hoe vaak gaat uw partner naar godsdienstige bijeenkomsten of kerkdiensten? 1 elke week of vaker 2 2 tot 3 keer per maand
775 3 1 keer per maand 4 enkele keren per jaar 5 (praktisch) nooit 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
44e Is uw partner opgegroeid in een bepaalde kerkelijke gezindte of levensbeschouwelijke groepering en ZO JA: welke? ENQ: Maximaal 2 codes mogelijk ENQ: Indien OP noemt Samen op weg, dit noteren bij 5 anders, nl.. ENQ: Indien OP noemt Protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd ITS: Coderen in 2 variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde gezindte of groepering. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde gezindte of groepering. 1 Rooms-katholiek 2 Nederlands Hervormd 3 Gereformeerd 4 Islamitisch 5 anders, nl. ... 6 geen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien respondent en partner geen hoofdkostwinner zijn(bekend uit huishoudbox), anders ga naar vraag 47. De volgende vragen gaan over de opleiding van de hoofdkostwinner. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 45a Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen wat de hoogste school-opleiding is waarvan de hoofdkostwinner een diploma heeft behaald? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
45b Is de hoofdkostwinner hierna nog aan een opleiding begonnen op een hoger niveau? ENQ: Korte cursussen of opleidingen (korter dan 1 jaar) niet meerekenen. 1 ja (Naar 45c) 2 nee (Naar 46a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
776 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 45c Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen welke opleiding dat is? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over het beroep van de hoofdkostwinner. 46a Kunt u aangeven wat de hoofdkostwinner momenteel doet of welke situatie op de hoofdkostwinner van toepassing is? ENQ: Indien meer dan 1 werkkring, vragen over de werkkring met de meeste uren per week ENQ: Banen via het uitzendbureau is ‘elders in loondienst’ (b) ENQ: Vrijwilligers, niet betaald werk is ‘heeft betaald werk verricht’ (2) of ‘heeft nooit betaald werk verricht’ (3) 1 verricht betaald werk (Naar 46a1) 2 heeft betaald werk verricht, maar doet dat nu niet (meer) door (Naar 46a2) 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht (Naar 46a3)
46a1 De hoofdkostwinner verricht betaald werk. Is de hoofdkostwinner werkzaam in overheidsdienst, in loondienst, zelfstandig werkzaam of op andere wijze? 1 in overheidsdienst (Naar 46b en 46c) 2 elders in loondienst (Naar 46b en 46c) 3 zelfstandig werkzaam (Naar 46b en 46d) 4 anders, nl..... (Naar 46b en 46c)
46a2 De hoofdkostwinner heeft betaald werk verricht maar doet dat nu niet (meer). Is dit vanwege blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, pensionering of rentenierend, huishoudelijke werk, opvoeding van kinderen of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid (Naar 46k) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 46k) 3 gepensioneerd, rentenierend (Naar 46k) 4 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 46k) 5 anders, nl...... (Naar 46k)
46a3 De hoofdkostwinner heeft nooit betaald werk verricht. Is dit vanwege studie, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, huishoudelijk werk, de opvoeding van kinderen, arbeidsongeschiktheid of heeft dit een andere reden? 1 studeert nog (Naar 46q) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 46q) 3 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 46q) 4 arbeidsongeschikt (Naar 47)
777 5 anders, nl..... (Naar 46q) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 47) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 47) 999 (inappropriate) routing
46b Wat is het beroep of de functie van de hoofdkostwinner? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen
996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46c Bij wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling is de hoofdkostwinner werkzaam? (Naar 46e) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46d Wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling heeft de hoofdkostwinner? (Indien zelfstandig werkzaam; code c bij 46a) (Naar 46g) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46e Geeft de hoofdkostwinner in zijnhaar beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 46i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46f Aan hoeveel personen geeft de hoofdkostwinner leiding? (Naar 46i)
778 ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen voor persoon die zelfstandig werkzaam is (code c bij 46a) 46g Heeft de hoofdkostwinner personeel in dienst? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 46i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46h Hoeveel personeel heeft de hoofdkostwinner in dienst? 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46i Hoeveel uur werkt de hoofdkostwinner gemiddeld per week, onbetaalde uren niet meegeteld? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) ITS: Indien hoofdkostwinner minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 46j, anders naar vraag 47 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien hoofdkostwinner minder dan 30 uur werkt ENQ: Overhandig kaart 21
779 46j De hoofdkostwinner werkt minder dan 30 uur per week. Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven welke situatie verder op de hoofdkostwinner van toepassing is. (Naar 47) 1 gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikt 2 werkloos, werkzoekend 3 huishoudelijk werkzorg voor kinderen 4 studeert nog 5 vrijwilliger 6 geen andere werkzaamheden 7 overig, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46k De hoofdkostwinner heeft vroeger betaald werk verricht. In welke functie is de hoofdkostwinner werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie. ENQ: Indien hoofdkostwinner zijnhaar werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die hoofdkostwinner voorheen had. ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46l Bij welk soort bedrijf of instelling is de hoofdkostwinner werkzaam geweest? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46m Heeft de hoofdkostwinner in zijnhaar beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers gegeven? 1 ja (Naar 46n) 2 nee (Naar 46o) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
780 46n Aan hoeveel personen heeft de hoofdkostwinner leiding gegeven? ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding werd gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46o Hoeveel uur heeft de hoofdkostwinner gemiddeld per week gewerkt? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46p In welk jaar heeft de hoofdkostwinner voor het laatst betaald werk gehad? (Naar 47) ENQ: Indien OP bij 46a 2f, 2h of 2i heeft geantwoord naar 46q (Voer getal in tussen 1 en 98) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP bij 46a 2f, 2h, 2i of 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht heeft geantwoord 46q Zou de hoofdkostwinner regelmatig werk willen hebben? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vraag gaat over de opleiding van uw (pleeg-, stief-)vader toen U tussen de 10 en 16 jaar oud was. ENQ: Vragen overslaan indien bij 34b is geantwoord dat OP geen vader had in deze periode of als vader hoofdkostwinner was. Indien de vader van OP inmiddels overleden is, vragen wel stellen.
781 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 47 Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen wat de hoogste school-opleiding is waarvan uw vader een diploma heeft behaald? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over het beroep van uw (pleeg-, stief-)vader toen U tussen de 10 en 16 jaar oud was. ENQ: Vragen overslaan indien bij 34b is geantwoord dat OP geen vader had in deze periode of als vader hoofdkostwinner is. Indien de vader van OP inmiddels is overleden, vragen wel stellen.
48 Kunt u aangeven wat uw vader toen deed of welke situatie op de vader van toepassing was? ENQ: Indien meer dan 1 werkkring, vragen over de werkkring met de meeste uren per week ENQ: Banen via het uitzendbureau is ‘elders in loondienst’ (b) ENQ: Vrijwilligers, niet betaald werk is ‘heeft betaald werk verricht’ (2) of ‘heeft nooit betaald werk verricht’ (3) 1 verricht betaald werk (Naar 48a1) 2 heeft betaald werk verricht, maar doet dat nu niet (meer) door (Naar 48a2) 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht (Naar 48a3)
48a1 Uw vader verrichte betaald werk. Was uw vader werkzaam in overheidsdienst, in loondienst, zelfstandig werkzaam of op andere wijze? 1 in overheidsdienst (Naar 48b en 48c) 2 elders in loondienst (Naar 48b en 48c) 3 zelfstandig werkzaam (Naar 48b en 48d) 4 anders, nl..... (Naar 48b en 48c)
48a2 Uw vader had betaald werk verricht maar deed dat nu niet (meer). Was dat vanwege blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, pensionering of rentenierend, huishoudelijke werk, opvoeding van kinderen of had dit een andere reden? 1 blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid (Naar 49) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 49) 3 gepensioneerd, rentenierend (Naar 49) 4 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 49) 5 anders, nl...... (Naar 49)
48a3 Uw vader heeft nooit betaald werk verricht. Was dit vanwege studie, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, huishoudelijk werk, de opvoeding van kinderen, arbeidsongeschiktheid of had dit een andere reden? 1 studeerde nog (Naar 49)
782 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 49) 3 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 49) 4 arbeidsongeschikt (Naar 49) 5 anders, nl..... (Naar 49) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 49) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 49) 999 (inappropriate) routing
48b Wat was het beroep of de functie van uw vader? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48c Bij wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling was uw vader werkzaam? (Naar 48e) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48d Wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling had uw vader? (Indien zelfstandig werkzaam; code c bij 48a) (Naar 48g) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48e Gaf uw vader in zijn beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 48i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48f Aan hoeveel personen gaf uw vader leiding? (Naar 48i)
783 ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen voor persoon die zelfstandig werkzaam is (code c bij 48a) 48g Had uw vader personeel in dienst? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 48i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48h Hoeveel personeel had uw vader in dienst? 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48i Hoeveel uur werkte uw vader gemiddeld per week, onbetaalde uren niet meegeteld? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) ITS: Indien vader minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 48j, anders naar vraag 49 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien vader minder dan 30 uur werkt ENQ: Overhandig kaart 21
784 48j Uw vader werkte minder dan 30 uur per week. Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven welke situatie verder op uw vader van toepassing was. (Naar 49) 1 gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikt 2 werkloos, werkzoekend 3 huishoudelijk werkzorg voor kinderen 4 studeert nog 5 vrijwilliger 6 geen andere werkzaamheden 7 overig, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over de opleiding van uw (pleeg-, stief-)moeder toen U tussen de 10 en 16 jaar oud was. ENQ: Vragen overslaan indien bij 34c is geantwoord dat OP geen moeder had of als moeder hoofdkostwinner is. Indien de moeder van OP inmiddels overleden is, vragen wel stellen.
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 49 Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart zeggen wat de hoogste school-opleiding is waarvan uw moeder een diploma heeft behaald? Noemt u maar het nummer van de opleiding. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
De volgende vragen gaan over het beroep van uw (pleeg-, stief-)moeder toen U tussen de 10 en 16 jaar oud was. ENQ: Vragen overslaan indien bij 34c is geantwoord dat OP geen moeder had in deze periode of als moeder hoofdkostwinner is. Indien de moeder van OP inmiddels is overleden, vragen wel stellen.
50 Kunt u aangeven wat uw moeder toen deed of welke situatie op de moeder van toepassing was? ENQ: Indien meer dan 1 werkkring, vragen over de werkkring met de meeste uren per week ENQ: Banen via het uitzendbureau is ‘elders in loondienst’ (b) ENQ: Vrijwilligers, niet betaald werk is ‘heeft betaald werk verricht’ (2) of ‘heeft nooit betaald werk verricht’ (3) 1 verricht betaald werk (Naar 50a1)
785 2 heeft betaald werk verricht, maar doet dat nu niet (meer) door (Naar 50a2) 3 heeft nooit betaald werk verricht (Naar 50a3)
50a1 Uw moeder verrichte betaald werk. Was uw moeder werkzaam in overheidsdienst, in loondienst, zelfstandig werkzaam of op andere wijze? 1 in overheidsdienst (Naar 50b en 50c) 2 elders in loondienst (Naar 50b en 50c) 3 zelfstandig werkzaam (Naar 50b en 50d) 4 anders, nl..... (Naar 50b en 50c)
50a2 Uw moeder had betaald werk verricht maar deed dat nu niet (meer). Was dat vanwege blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, pensionering of rentenierend, huishoudelijke werk, opvoeding van kinderen of had dit een andere reden? 1 blijvende invaliditeit of arbeidsongeschiktheid (Naar 50) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 50) 3 gepensioneerd, rentenierend (Naar 50) 4 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 50) 5 anders, nl...... (Naar 50)
50a3 Uw moeder heeft nooit betaald werk verricht. Was dit vanwege studie, werkloosheid of werkzoekend, huishoudelijk werk, de opvoeding van kinderen, arbeidsongeschiktheid of had dit een andere reden? 1 studeerde nog (Naar 51) 2 werkloos, werkzoekend (Naar 51) 3 huishoudelijk werk (Naar 51) 4 arbeidsongeschikt (Naar 51) 5 anders, nl..... (Naar 51) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 51) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 51) 999 (inappropriate) routing
50b Wat was het beroep of de functie van uw moeder? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50c Bij wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling was uw moeder werkzaam? (Naar 50e) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen
786 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50d Wat voor soort bedrijf of instelling had uw moeder? (Indien zelfstandig werkzaam; code c bij 50a) (Naar 50g) ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ...... ITS: Automatisch coderen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50e Gaf uw moeder in haar beroep of functie leiding aan medewerkers? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 50i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50f Aan hoeveel personen gaf uw moeder leiding? (Naar 50i) ENQ: Personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen. 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Alleen voor persoon die zelfstandig werkzaam is (code c bij 50a) 50g Had uw moeder personeel in dienst? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 50i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50h Hoeveel personeel had uw moeder in dienst?
787 1 1-4 2 5-9 3 10-19 4 20-49 5 50-99 6 100 of meer 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50i Hoeveel uur werkte uw moeder gemiddeld per week, onbetaalde uren niet meegeteld? ENQ: De uren van alle banen optellen ...... (aantal noteren) ITS: Indien moeder minder dan 30 uur per week werkt, naar vraag 50j, anders naar vraag 51 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien moeder minder dan 30 uur werkt ENQ: Overhandig kaart 21 50j Uw moeder werkte minder dan 30 uur per week. Kunt u aan de hand van deze kaart aangeven welke situatie verder op uw moeder van toepassing was. (Naar 51) 1 gedeeltelijk arbeidsongeschikt 2 werkloos, werkzoekend 3 huishoudelijk werkzorg voor kinderen 4 studeert nog 5 vrijwilliger 6 geen andere werkzaamheden 7 overig, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
51 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 24 Op deze kaart staan enige inkomensgroepen. Het gaat hier om het totale netto inkomen van alle gezinsleden bij elkaar per jaar, na aftrek van belastingen en dergelijke. Eventuele bijverdiensten en de inkomsten van meeverdienende kinderen moet u dus meetellen: kinderbijslag, sociale uitkeringen, AOW en pensioen gelden ook als inkomen. Kunt u aangeven in welke categorie het jaarlijkse netto inkomen van uw huishouden valt?
788 ENQ: Indien respondent bezwaar maakt of aarzelt: Deze vraag is voor het onderzoek erg belangrijk. Ik kan u verzekeren dat dit natuurlijk STRIKT GEHEIM blijft. Maar voor wetenschappelijke verwerking van de gegevens van alle ondervraagden bij elkaar, is het voor dit onderzoek een uitermate belangrijk gegeven.
1 A 2 B 3 C 4 D 5 E 6 F 7 G 8 H 9 I 10 J 11 K 12 L 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
52a Hartelijk dank voor uw medewerking. Na de verkiezingen wil het ITS graag met u verder praten over enkele onderwerpen die dan in de belangstelling staan. Als u er geen bezwaar tegen heeft zal na 6 mei weer iemand bij u langs komen. ENQ: Noteer(NIET oplezen): 1 heeft geen bezwaar (Naar 52c) 2 heeft bezwaar (Naar 52b) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
52b ENQ: Noteer waarom OP bezwaar heeft ENQ: Indien OP niet aangeeft waarom hij bezwaar heeft, vragen: Kunt u misschien aangeven waarom u hier bezwaar tegen heeft? ......
52c Bent u tegen die tijd bereikbaar op uw huidig adres of op een ander adres? 1 heeft bezwaar (Naar 53a) 2 huidig adres (Naar 52e) 3 ander adres (Naar 52d) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 52e) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 52e) 999 (inappropriate) routing
789 52d Hoe luidt het andere adres? ....
52e ENQ: Probeer een afspraak met OP te maken voor een vervolgbezoek in de periode van 7 mei tot X juni. 1 afspraak gemaakt 2 geen afspraak gemaakt (Naar 52g)
52f ENQ: Noteer hier deze afspraak ten behoeve van onze administratie. Afspraak: ...
52g Bent u in de weken na 6 mei misschien afwezig, bijvoorbeeld in verband met vakantie?
1 nee, niet afwezig (Naar 53a) 2 ja 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
52h Afwezig van ... tot ... ENQ: voer datum in.
ENQ: Invullen zonder te vragen 53a ENQ: Stel vast of er tijdens het gesprek ook andere personen in de kamer waren.
1 ja (Naar 53b) 2 nee e (Naar 54a) 997 weet niet (Naar 54a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 54a)
53b ENQ: Stel vast wie dat waren. (voer maximaal 5 codes in)
1 Kind(eren) jonger dan 6 jaar (Naar 53c) 2 Oudere kinderen (Naar 53d) 3 Man, vrouw, partner (Naar 53e) 4 Overige familieleden (Naar 53f) 5 Overige volwassenen (Naar 53g) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 54a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
53c Wilt u van deze persoon of personen aangeven of zij het gesprek geheel of gedeeltelijk volgden d.w.z. actief meeluisterden, zich in het gesprek mengden d.w.z. een eigen mening gaven, of zij de ondervraagde persoon corrigeerden, of zij antwoorden suggereerden etcetera? Alleen gesteld indien kinderen jonger dan 6 jaar aanwezig. Kinderen jonger dan 6 jaar:
790 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien oudere kinderen aanwezig. 53d Oudere kinderen:
1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien man, vrouw, partner aanwezig. 53e Man, vrouw, partner: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien overige familieleden aanwezig. 53f Overige familieleden: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien overige volwassenen aanwezig. 53g Overige volwassenen: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
54a ENQ: Waren er storende invloeden bij het gesprek, zoals bijvoorbeeld: TV of radio stond aan, mensen kwamen op bezoek, etcetera?
1 wel storende invloeden (Naar 54b) 2 geen storende invloeden (EINDE INTERVIEW) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
791 999 (inappropriate) routing
54b De storende invloeden waren nl. ... (EINDE INTERVIEW)
Datum einde interview:
Eindtijd interview:
792 5.1.2 Showcards wave 1 (Dutch) Boekje met de volgende toonkaarten (1e golf)
Kaart 1 (bijna) altijd vaak zo nu en dan zelden of nooit leest geen krant
Kaart 2 (vrijwel) dagelijks 3 a 4 keer per week 1 a 2 keer per week minder dan 1 keer per week heeft geen televisie
Kaart 3 gunstig ongunstig niet gunstig, maar ook niet ongunstig
Kaart 4 zeer tevreden tevreden niet tevreden, maar ook niet ontevreden ontevreden zeer ontevreden
Kaart 5 helemaal mee eens mee eens mee oneens helemaal mee oneens
Kaart 6 Lijn 1-7 1 ik wil veel moeite doen om te gaan stemmen 7 ik wil geen enkele moeite doen om te gaan stemmen 8 weet niet
Kaart 7 Lijn 1-7 1 een hoge opkomst is belangrijk 7 een hoge opkomst is onbelangrijk 8 weet niet
Kaart 8a tot en met kaart 8d zijn vier losse kaartjes!
793 Kaart 8a U gaat WEL stemmen en de meeste andere kiezers doen dat ook. De opkomst is dan heel hoog, maar u moet wel de moeite doen om uw stem uit te brengen.
Kaart 8b U gaat NIET stemmen maar de meeste andere kiezers gaan wel stemmen. De opkomst is dan heel hoog, en u hoeft geen moeite te doen om uw stem uit te brengen.
Kaart 8c U gaat NIET stemmen en de meeste andere kiezers doen dat ook niet. De opkomst is dan heel laag, en u hoeft geen moeite te doen om uw stem uit te brengen.
Kaart 8d U gaat WEL stemmen maar de meeste andere kiezers doen dat niet. De opkomst is dan heel laag, en u moet wel de moeite doen om uw stem uit te brengen.
Kaart 9 veel beter iets beter ongeveer hetzelfde iets slechter veel slechter
Kaart 10 Lijn 1-7 1 het moet verboden zijn dat een arts het leven van een patiënt op diens verzoek kan beëindigen 7 een arts mag altijd als een patiënt daartoe de wens te kennen geeft diens leven beëindigen 8 weet niet
Kaart 11 Lijn 1-7 1 de verschillen in inkomens in ons land moeten groter worden 7 de verschillen in inkomens in ons land moeten kleiner worden 8 weet niet
Kaart 12 Lijn 1-7 1 Nederland moet meer asielzoekers toelaten 7 Nederland moet zoveel mogelijk asielzoekers terugsturen 8 weet niet
Kaart 13 Lijn 1-7 1 allochtonen moeten in Nederland kunnen leven met behoud van alle gewoonten van de eigen cultuur
794 7 allochtonen moeten zich in Nederland volledig aanpassen aan de Nederlandse cultuur 8 weet niet
Kaart 13.1 1 De Europese eenwording zou nog verder moeten gaan 7 De Europese eenwording is al veel te ver gegaan 8 weet niet
Kaart 13.2 1 Duitsland 2 Verenigde Staten 3 Frankrijk 4 Italië 5 Spanje 6 Polen 7 Litouwen 8 Zweden 9 Noorwegen 10 Turkije
Kaart 14 0-10 0 Links 10 Rechts 11 weet niet
Kaart 15 Lijn 0-100 0 zeer onsympathiek 50 niet sympathiek maar ook niet onsympathiek 100 zeer sympathiek
Kaart 16a Foto 1 Jacques Wallage, Fractievoorzitterkamerlid, PVDA
Kaart 16b Foto 2 Thom de Graaf, Fractievoorzitterkamerlid, D66
Kaart 16c Foto 3 Annemarie Jorritsma, Minister van Verkeer en Waterstaat, VVD
Kaart 16d Foto 4 Piet Bukman, Voorzitter Tweede Kamerkamerlid, CDA
Kaart 17 veel meer aandacht meer aandacht niet meer en niet minder aandacht minder aandacht veel minder aandacht
795 Kaart 18 Lijn 1-10 1 helemaal niet mee eens 10 helemaal mee eens
Kaart 19 1 Lager onderwijs 2 VGLO, LAVO 3 LTS, Huishoudschool, LEAO 4 (M)ULO, 3-jarige HBS, MAVO 5 MEAO, UTS 6 5-jartige HBS, Gymnasium, MMS, Lyceum, Atheneum, HAVO 7 MBA, MTS 8 HTS, HEAO, Sociale of Pedagogische Academie, Kunstonderwijs, Zeevaartschool, Kweekschool, SPD, GA-1 9 MO-akten, Accountancy, Beroeps Officiersopleiding, GA-2, GF, etc. 10 Universiteit, Hogeschool
Kaart 22 1 Ik geloof niet in God 2 Ik weet niet of er een God is, en ik geloof niet dat er een manier is om dat te weten te komen 3 Ik geloof niet in een God, die zich met ieder van ons persoonlijk bezighoudt, maar ik geloof wel in een of andere hogere macht 4 Op sommige momenten geloof ik in God, op andere momenten niet 5 Ik geloof in God, al heb ik mijn twijfels 6 Ik geloof zonder twijfel dat God werkelijk bestaat
Kaart 23 hogere klasse hogere middenklasse gewone middenklasse hogere arbeidersklasse gewone arbeidersklasse
Kaart 24 Ook maandlonen en weeklonen toevoegen Bedragen aanpassen. ITS hierover vragen
A = minder dan f 17.000,- per jaar B = f 17.000,- tot 21.000,- per jaar C = f 21.000,- tot f 24.000,- per jaar D = f 24.000,- tot f 28.000,- per jaar E = f 28.000,- tot f 31.000,- per jaar F = f 31.000,- tot f 35.000,- per jaar G = f 35.000,- tot f 38.000,- per jaar H = f 38.000,- tot f 45.000,- per jaar I = f 45.000,- tot f 52.000,- per jaar J = f 52.000,- tot f 59.000,- per jaar K = f 59.000,- tot f 73.000,- per jaar L = meer dan f 73.000,- per jaar
796 797 5.1.3 Questionnaire wave 2 (Dutch)
Identificatienummer EnquêteurEnquêtrice:
Datum waarop afspraak is gemaakt met OP:
Datum interview:
Begintijd interview:
Goedemorgenmiddagavond. Zoals u in de brief heeft kunnen lezen houdt het ITS in opdracht van een aantal Nederlandse universiteiten een onderzoek naar enkele onderwerpen die de laatste tijd nogal eens in de belangstelling hebben gestaan.
1a Bent u voor de verkiezingen door mijeen enquêteurenquêtrice van het ITS geïnterviewd? 1 ja 2 nee (Misschien vergist de persoon zich of herinnert de persoon het zich niet meer) (Vind de persoon die voor de verkiezingen is geïnterviewd. Indien onmogelijk: Einde interview) 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
ITS: Koppeling met eerste interview, zodat controle mogelijk is. 1b ENQ: Stel vast wat het geslacht is van de persoon die voor u zit (dus niet vragen) 1 man 2 vrouw Koppeling met eerste interview, zodat controle mogelijk is.
1c Wat is uw geboortedatum? ...(volledige datum) ENQ: Indien geboortedatum en geslacht onjuist zijn: vind de persoon die voor de verkiezingen is geïnterviewd. ENQ: Indien onmogelijk: einde interview!
ENQ: OP is ...jaar oud
2 Ik wil beginnen met een vraag over de campagne die aan de Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei is voorafgegaan. Als er in de krant nieuws over de verkiezingscampagne stond, hoe vaak las u dat dan? ENQ: Overhandig kaart 1 1 (bijna) altijd 2 vaak 3 zo nu en dan 4 zelden of nooit 5 leest geen krant 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
798 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Vraag alleen stellen indien debatten gehouden zijn 3a In de week voorafgaand aan de verkiezingen werden op de televisie debatten gehouden waaraan de lijsttrekkers van de grote politieke partijen meededen. Heeft u een van deze debatten geheel of grotendeels of gezien? 1 ja, geheel 2 ja, grotendeels 3 nee (Naar 4) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
3b Heeft u het lijsttrekkersdebat op de avond voor de verkiezingen geheel of grotendeels gezien? 1 ja, geheel 2 ja, grotendeels 3 nee (Naar 4) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropiate) routing
3c Heeft dit debat invloed gehad op wat u op 6 mei heeft gestemd? ENQ: Dit geldt ook voor diegenen die niet gestemd hebben op 6 mei 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropiate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 2 4 Tijdens de verkiezingscampagne worden allerlei activiteiten ondernomen. Wij hebben hier een lijst van zulke activiteiten. Wilt u zeggen welke van de volgende dingen u heeft gedaan in de afgelopen campagne?
ENQ: voer maximaal 4 codes in ITS: Codering in vier variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde activiteit. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde activiteit, etc. ITS: Codes 1 tot en met 4 mogen niet in combinatie met code 5, 996, 997, 998, 999! 1 ophangen raambiljet of verkiezingsbord 2 anderen overhalen om partij te stemmen 3 geven van geld 4 bezoeken bijeenkomsten 5 geen van deze 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
799 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
5 Heeft u gestemd bij de Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei? ENQ: Als OP d.m.v. een volmacht heeft gestemd, ja (1) noteren. 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 14) 996 panel attrition (Naar 17) 997 weet niet (Naar 17) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 17) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 17)
6 Op welke partij heeft u gestemd? (Slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 23 Senioren 2000 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 9c) 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
7 Waarom heeft u [antwoord vraag 6][deze partij] gestemd? ENQ: Doorvragen bij onduidelijk antwoord of 'beste partij'. Toets het antwoord letterlijk en volledig in. ENQ: Vraag eventueel: ‘Kunt u daarover nog iets meer zeggen?”
8 Wanneer heeft u besloten om [antwoord vraag 6][deze partij] te stemmen? Was dat op de DAG van de verkiezingen zelf, de laatste DAGEN voor de verkiezingen, de laatste WEKEN voor de verkiezingen, een paar MAANDEN tevoren of wist u al LANGER van tevoren hoe u zou gaan stemmen? 1 op de dag zelf 2 laatste dagen
800 3 laatste weken 4 een paar maanden tevoren 5 langer van tevoren 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag alleen stellen indien OP bij vraag 6 een partij heeft genoemd, dus niet als OP ongeldig of blanco heeft gestemd. 9a Heeft u gestemd op de eerste kandidaat van de lijst? 1 ja (Naar 9c) 2 nee (Naar 9b) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Deze vraag alleen stellen indien OP bij vraag 6 een partij heeft genoemd, dus niet als OP ongeldig of blanco heeft gestemd. 9b Waarom heeft u op een andere kandidaat gestemd? 1 eerste vrouw 2 bekende 3 anders, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP gestemd heeft code 1 bij vraag 5. 9c Heeft u aan iemand een volmacht gegeven om voor u te gaan stemmen? 1 ja (Naar 9d) 2 nee (Naar 9e) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
9d Aan wie? (Naar 10a) 1 echtgenootpartner 2 (groot-stief-pleeg-) ouder(s) 3 (stief-pleeg-) kind(eren) 4 ander lid van het huishouden 5 buurmanbuurvrouw 6 anders, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
801 9e Heeft u een volmacht van iemand anders gekregen? 1 ja (Naar 9f) 2 nee (Naar 9g) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
9f Van wie? 1 echtgenootpartner 2 (groot-stief-pleeg-) ouder(s) 3 (stief-pleeg-) kind(eren) 4 ander lid van het huishouden 5 buurmanbuurvrouw 6 anders, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP gestemd heeft, code 1 bij vraag 5. Niet stellen indien OP volmacht heeft gegeven aan ander, code 1 bij 9c. 9g Hoe laat heeft u gestemd? 1 tussen 8.00 en 9.00 uur 2 tussen 9.00 en 12.00 uur 3 tussen 12.00 en 14.00 uur 4 tussen 14.00 en 18.00 uur 5 tussen 18.00 en 19.00 uur 6 tussen 19.00 en 20.00 uur 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ITS: Indien OP GroenLinks noemt bij vraag 6, vraag 10b.1 stellen ITS: Indien OP CDA noemt bij vraag 6, vraag 10b.2 stellen ITS: In alle andere gevallen vraag 10a stellen, dus ook als OP blanco of ongeldig heeft gestemd
10a U heeft [antwoord vraag 6] gestemd. Heeft u altijd op [antwoord vraag 6] gestemd of heeft u weleens op [een andere partij][een partij] gestemd? 1 altijd [antwoord vraag 6] (Naar 12a) 2 weleens een andere partij (Naar 11) 3 was niet eerder kiesgerechtigd (Naar 12a) 4 was kiesgerechtigd maar heeft nooit gestemd (Naar 12a) 996 panel attrition (Naar 12a) 997 weet niet (Naar 12a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12a)
802 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 12a)
10b1 Heeft u altijd GroenLinks gestemd of heeft u weleens op een andere partij gestemd? Partijen waaruit GroenLinks is ontstaan zoals de PPR, de PSP, de CPN en de EVP kunt u beschouwen als andere partijen. 1 altijd deze partij (Naar 12a) 2 weleens een andere partij (Naar 11) 3 was niet eerder kiesgerechtigd (Naar 12a) 4 was kiesgerechtigd maar heeft nooit gestemd (Naar 12a) 996 panel attrition (Naar 12a) 997 weet niet (Naar 12a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12a) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 12a)
10b2 Heeft u altijd CDA gestemd of heeft u weleens op een andere partij gestemd? Partijen waaruit CDA is ontstaan zoals de KVP, ARP en de CHU kunt u beschouwen als andere partijen. 1 altijd deze partij (Naar 12a) 2 weleens een andere partij (Naar 11) 3 was niet eerder kiesgerechtigd (Naar 12a) 4 was kiesgerechtigd maar heeft nooit gestemd (Naar 12a) 996 panel attrition (Naar 12a) 997 weet niet (Naar 12a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 12a) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 12a)
11 Welke partij was dat of welke partijen waren dat? ENQ: Meer antwoorden mogelijk ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV 12 SP 13 Centrumpartij 14 EVP 15 KVPRKSP 16 CHU 17 ARP
803 18 SDAP 19 CPN 20 PPR 21 PSP 22 Boerenpartij 23 Senioren 2000 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 30 lokale lijst, nl.. 60 anders, nl... 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
12a Heeft u bij de Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei serieus overwogen om niet te gaan stemmen? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
12b Heeft u bij de Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei serieus overwogen om op [een andere partij dan antwoord vraag 6][een partij][een andere partij dan de partij waarop u gestemd heeft] te gaan stemmen? 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 17) 996 panel attrition (Naar 17) 997 weet niet (Naar 17) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 17) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 17)
13 Op welke? (Naar 17) ENQ: Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde partij. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde partij, etc. 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+
804 11 AOV 12 SP 23 Senioren 2000 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 94 ongeldig 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ITS: Vraag 14 tm 16 niet stellen indien OP op vraag 5 ja (1) heeft geantwoord. Ga dan naar 17 14 Waarom heeft u niet gestemd? ENQ: Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde reden. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde reden
15 Wanneer werd duidelijk dat u niet zou gaan stemmen? Was dat op de DAG van de verkiezingen zelf, de laatste DAGEN voor de verkiezingen, de laatste WEKEN voor de verkiezingen, een paar MAANDEN van tevoren of wist u al LANGER dat u niet zou gaan stemmen? 1 op de dag zelf 2 laatste dagen 3 laatste weken 4 een paar maanden tevoren 5 langer van tevoren 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
16 Stel dat u toch had gestemd, op welke partij had u dan gestemd? (Slechts een antwoord mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D66 5 GroenLinks 6 SGP 7 GPV 8 RPF 9 Centrumdemocraten 10 UNIE 55+ 11 AOV
805 12 SP 23 Senioren 2000 24 dummy 2 25 dummy 3 26 dummy 4 60 anders, nl... 95 blanco 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 3 17 Na de verkiezingen wordt er/Er is zojuist een nieuwe regering gevormd. Op deze kaart staan 5 partijen. Kunt u zeggen welke combinatie van 2 of meer van deze partijen U zelf het liefst in de regering wilt? ENQ: Lees de zin op die van toepassing is. ENQ: 1 combinatie geven van tenminste 2 partijen ENQ: Voer maximaal 5 codes in 1 D66 2 PVDA 3 CDA 4 VVD 5 GroenLinks 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 4 18a Op deze kaart staan verschillende dingen die je kunt nastreven. Als u daaruit zou moeten kiezen, welk doel lijkt u dan het meest wenselijk? ITS: De codes sluiten elkaar uit. Indien OP op 18a 1 antwoordt, kan op 18b alleen nog 2, 3 of 4 geantwoord worden, etc. 1 De orde in het land handhaven 2 De politieke inspraak van de burgers vergroten 3 Prijsstijgingen tegengaan 4 De vrijheid van meningsuiting beschermen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
18b En wat vindt u op de tweede plaats wenselijk? 1 De orde in het land handhaven 2 De politieke inspraak van de burgers vergroten 3 Prijsstijgingen tegengaan 4 De vrijheid van meningsuiting beschermen 996 panel attrition
806 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
18c En daarna? 1 De orde in het land handhaven 2 De politieke inspraak van de burgers vergroten 3 Prijsstijgingen tegengaan 4 De vrijheid van meningsuiting beschermen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van issues randomiseren 19b en 19m mogen NIET na elkaar 19j en 19l mogen NIET na elkaar ENQ: Overhandig kaart 5 19a De Tweede Kamer houdt zich met veel onderwerpen bezig. Niet iedereen vindt al deze onderwerpen even belangrijk. Ik noem u nu een aantal onderwerpen. Kunt u van deze onderwerpen aangeven hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk u ze vindt? Het gaat er dus niet om of u het eens bent met wat de Tweede Kamer doet. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat U het onderwerp zeer onbelangrijk vindt en 10 dat U het onderwerp zeer belangrijk vindt.
INKOMENSVERSCHILLEN 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19b INTEGRATIE VAN ETNISCHE MINDERHEDEN 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19c KERNCENTRALES 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19d DRUKTE OP DE AUTOWEGEN 1..10
807 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19e MILIEUVERVUILING 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19f WERKLOOSHEID 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19g EUTHANASIE 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19h EUROPESE UNIE 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19i FINANCIERINGSTEKORT VAN HET RIJK 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19j HOOGTE VAN DE SOCIALE VOORZIENINGEN 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19k WAARBORGEN VAN EEN GOEDE OUDEDAGSVOORZIENING (zoals de AOW)
808 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19l MISBRUIK MAKEN VAN SOCIALE VOORZIENINGEN 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19m VLUCHTELINGEN EN ASIELZOEKERS 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19n CRIMINALITEIT 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
19o GEZONDHEIDSZORG 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde issues randomiseren Volgorde partijen NIET randomiseren ITS: Indien OP tot twee keer toe zegt een bepaalde partij niet te kennen, dan deze partij niet meer noemen m.b.t. het volgende issue ENQ: Overhandig weer kaart 5 20a Niet iedere partij vindt elk onderwerp even belangrijk. De ene partij besteedt vooral aandacht aan de bestrijding van criminaliteit, terwijl bij een andere partij een schoner milieu meer aandacht krijgt. Ik wil U vragen hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk verschillende onderwerpen volgens u zijn voor de verschillende partijen. Als een onderwerp voor een partij zeer onbelangrijk is, dan geeft U dat aan met een 1. Als dit onderwerp voor een partij zeer belangrijk is, dan geeft U dat aan met een 10.
Het eerste probleem is WERKLOOSHEID. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het CDA het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID?
809 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20b. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de PvdA het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20c. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de VVD het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20d. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt D66 het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20e. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt GroenLinks het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
810 20f. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de GPV het probleem: WERKLOOSHEID? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
20g. En hoe belangrijk vindt volgens u [eigen partijkeuze indien een andere dan de al genoemde partijen] dit onderwerp? (afleiden van antwoord op vraag 6) 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21a. En een SCHONER MILIEU. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het CDA het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21b. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de PVDA het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU?
1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21c. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de VVD het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition
811 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21d. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt D66 het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21e. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt GroenLinks het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21f. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het GPV het probleem: een SCHONER MILIEU? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
21g. En hoe belangrijk vindt volgens u [eigen partijkeuze indien een andere dan de al genoemde partijen] dit onderwerp? (afleiden van antwoord op vraag 6) 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22a En het BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het CDA het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT?
812 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22b Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de PVDA het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22c. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de VVD het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22d. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt D66 het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22e Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt GroenLinks het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
813 22f Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het GPV het probleem: BESTRIJDEN VAN DE CRIMINALITEIT? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
22g En hoe belangrijk vindt volgens u [eigen partijkeuze indien een andere dan de al genoemde partijen] dit onderwerp? (afleiden van antwoord op vraag 6) 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23a En het VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het CDA het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23b Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de PVDA het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23c. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de VVD het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition
814 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23d. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt D66 het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23e Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt GroenLinks het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23f Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het GPV het probleem: VLUCHTELINGENPROBLEEM? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
23g En hoe belangrijk vindt volgens u [eigen partijkeuze indien een andere dan de al genoemde partijen] dit onderwerp? (afleiden van antwoord op vraag 6) 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24a En de GEZONDHEIDSZORG. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het CDA het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10
815 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24b Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de PVDA het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24c. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt de VVD het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24d. Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt D66 het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24e Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt GroenLinks het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
816 24f Hoe belangrijk of onbelangrijk vindt het GPV het probleem: GEZONDHEIDSZORG? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
24g En hoe belangrijk vindt volgens u [eigen partijkeuze indien een andere dan de al genoemde partijen] dit onderwerp? (afleiden van antwoord op vraag 6) 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Xa tot en met Xg Positie openlaten voor issue dat mogelijk in de belangstelling staat
25a ENQ: Overhandig kaart 6 Op deze kaart staan verschillende soorten verenigingen en organisaties. Zijn hier organisaties bij waar u lid van bent? Noemt u maar het nummer van de vereniging of de organisatie waar u lid van bent. ITS: Coderen in 9 variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde organisatie. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde organisatie, etc. ITS: Elke variabele heeft de volgende antwoordcategorieën 1 geen lid 2 zeer actief 3 tamelijk actief 4 niet actief ENQ: Bij elke vereniging en dergelijke waar OP lid van is, vragen: 'Bent u daarin zeer actief, tamelijk actief of niet zo actief?' 1 Milieu- en natuurbehoud, zoals Greenpeace, Natuurmonumenten 2 Verkeer en vervoer, zoals de ANWB, de ENFB of de reizigersorganisatie ROVER 3 Vereniging van huurders of van eigen woningbezit, zoals de vereniging 'Eigen Huis' 4 Derde wereld, mensenrechten en vrede, zoals Terre des Hommes of Amnesty International 5 Vakbond, zoals de FNV of het CNV 6 Beroeps- of standsorganisatie 7 Buurt- of wijkvereniging 8 Vrouwenverenigingen of -bonden
817 9 Sportverenigingen 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
25b Zijn andere leden van uw huishouden lid van een vakbond? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Issues NIET randomiseren. Partijen niet randomiseren!!!! 26a- 26g Positie openlaten voor Issue dat mogelijk in de belangstelling staat. In dat geval wordt er ook een kaart toegevoegd. Formaat is zelfde als 27a- 27g.
ITS: Indien issue wordt toegevoegd, moet de introductiezin opgelezen worden bij 26a. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 7 27a Nu een paar vragen over politieke zaken die regelmatig in het nieuws zijn. Zoals u misschien weet bestaat bij sommige mensen en partijen de vrees dat er binnen afzienbare tijd een tekort aan energie in de wereld zal ontstaan. Een manier om in dit tekort te kunnen voorzien is het bouwen van KERNCENTRALES. Sommigen vinden dat om die reden Nederland snel moet werken aan de uitbreiding van het aantal kerncentrales, anderen daarentegen vinden de gevaren te groot en vinden dat er in het geheel geen kerncentrales moeten worden gebouwd.
Aan het begin van de lijn staan personen en partijen die vinden dat in Nederland kerncentrales erbij moeten worden gebouwd (bij 1). Aan het einde van de lijn staan personen en partijen die vinden dat er in het geheel geen kerncentrales moeten worden gebouwd (bij 7). Ik ga u eerst vragen om politieke partijen te plaatsen op deze lijn. Als u helemaal niet weet welk standpunt een partij heeft, zegt u het dan gerust. Waar zou u het CDA op deze lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen
818 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27e En waar GroenLinks? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
27g En waar zou u zichzelf op deze lijn plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
819 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 8 28a Sommige mensen en partijen vinden de sociale uitkeringen te hoog. Anderen vinden de sociale uitkeringen juist te laag. Natuurlijk zijn er ook mensen met een mening hier ergens tussenin. Aan het begin van de lijn staan personen en partijen die vinden dat sociale uitkeringen veel te laag zijn (bij 1). Aan het einde van de lijn staan personen en partijen die vinden dat sociale uitkeringen veel te hoog zijn (bij 7). Waar zou u het CDA op deze lijn plaatsen? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28b En waar de PVDA? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28c En waar de VVD? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28d En waar D66? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28e En waar GroenLinks?
820 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28f En waar de GPV? 1..7 8 kan partij niet plaatsen 9 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
28g En waar zou u zichzelf op deze lijn plaatsen? 1..7 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Nu wil ik u enkele vragen stellen over de democratie in Nederland. 29a Bent u over het algemeen genomen zeer tevreden, tamelijk tevreden, niet erg tevreden of helemaal niet tevreden met de wijze waarop de democratie in Neder- land functioneert? 1 zeer tevreden 2 tamelijk tevreden 3 niet erg tevreden 4 helemaal niet tevreden 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 9 29b In sommige landen vinden mensen dat hun verkiezingen eerlijk verlopen. In andere landen vinden mensen dat hun verkiezingen oneerlijk verlopen. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat de verkiezingen eerlijk verlopen zijn en 5 dat de verkiezingen oneerlijk verlopen zijn. Wanneer u aan de afgelopen Tweede Kamerverkiezingen denkt, waar zou u zichzelf dan plaatsen? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
821 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen stellen indien OP 4 of 5 antwoordt (oneerlijke verkiezingen) bij vraag 29b 29c Wat vond u precies oneerlijk? ENQ: Letterlijk noteren ENQ: Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk ITS: Coderen in meerdere variabelen. Eerste variabele is eerst genoemde reden. Tweede variabele is tweede genoemde reden, etc......
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 10 29d Sommige mensen vinden dat politieke partijen in ons land belangstelling hebben voor de meningen van gewone mensen. Anderen vinden dat politieke partijen geen belangstelling hebben voor de meningen van gewone mensen. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat de partijen belangstelling hebben voor de meningen van gewone mensen en 5 dat de partijen geen belangstelling hebben voor de meningen van gewone mensen. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 11 29e Sommige mensen vinden dat politieke partijen nodig zijn om ons politieke stelsel te laten werken. Anderen vinden dat politieke partijen in ons land niet nodig zijn. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat politieke partijen nodig zijn, en 5 dat politieke partijen niet nodig zijn in ons politieke stelsel. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Nu iets over de economische toestand van Nederland. 29f Wat vindt u van de algemene economische toestand in Nederland op dit moment? Vindt u deze zeer goed, goed, niet goed en niet slecht, slecht, of zeer slecht? 1 zeer goed 2 goed 3 niet goed en niet slecht 4 slecht 5 zeer slecht 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
822 29g Als u de economische toestand van nu vergelijkt met die van twaalf maanden geleden, is die economische toestand dan beter geworden, gelijk gebleven, of slechter geworden? 1 beter geworden (Naar 29h) 2 gelijk gebleven (Naar 29j) 3 slechter geworden (Naar 29i) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 29j) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 29j) 999 (inappropriate) routing
29h Veel beter of enigszins beter? 1 veel beter (Naar 29j) 2 enigszins beter (Naar 29j) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29i Veel slechter of enigszins slechter? 1 veel slechter 2 enigszins slechter 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 12 29j Sommige mensen vinden dat leden van de Tweede Kamer goed op de hoogte zijn van wat gewone mensen denken. Anderen vinden dat leden van de Tweede Kamer niet weten wat gewone mensen denken. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat Tweede kamerleden goed op de hoogte zijn van wat gewone mensen denken, en 5 dat Tweede Kamerleden niet weten wat gewone mensen denken. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
29k Heeft u in het afgelopen jaar contact gehad met een lid van de Tweede Kamer? 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
823 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 13 29l Sommige mensen vinden dat wat men stemt geen verschil maakt voor wat er gebeurt. Anderen vinden dat wat men stemt wel verschil maakt voor wat er gebeurt. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat wat men stemt geen verschil maakt en 5 dat wat men stemt wel verschil maakt. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 14 29m Sommige mensen vinden dat het geen verschil maakt wie aan de macht is. Anderen vinden dat het wel verschil maakt wie aan de macht is. Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat het geen verschil maakt wie aan de macht is en 5 dat het wel verschil maakt wie aan de macht is. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig kaart 15 29n Wanneer mensen om hun mening over politieke zaken wordt gevraagd, denkt u dan dat de meeste mensen in Nederland doorgaans ook zeggen wat zij echt vinden of denkt u dat zij dat meestal voor zich houden? Op deze kaart betekent 1 dat de meeste mensen in Nederland zeggen wat zij vinden over politieke zaken en 5 dat de meeste mensen voor zich houden wat zij vinden over politieke zaken. Welk cijfer is op u van toepassing? 1..5 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 16 30a Ik lees u nu enkele stellingen voor over politici en partijen. Wilt u van elke stelling zeggen of u het er helemaal mee eens, mee eens, niet mee eens maar ook niet mee oneens, mee oneens, of helemaal mee oneens bent? Als u het niet weet, zegt u het dan gerust.
Bij de samenstelling van de Tweede Kamer wordt te weinig rekening gehouden met regionale verschillen in Nederland. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens
824 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
30b Elke regio en grote stad moet worden vertegenwoordigd door tenminste één lid in de Tweede Kamer. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren Sommige mensen vinden dat buitenlanders die hier al geruime tijd wonen kiesrecht moeten hebben. Anderen zijn van mening dat alleen mensen met de Nederlandse nationaliteit kiesrecht moeten hebben. Wilt u van de volgende stelling zeggen of u het er helemaal mee eens, mee eens, niet mee eens maar ook niet mee oneens, mee oneens, of helemaal mee oneens bent? Als u het niet weet, zegt u het dan gerust. ENQ: Overhandig weer kaart 16 31a Buitenlanders die al geruime tijd in Nederland wonen moeten het recht hebben om te stemmen bij de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen. ENQ: Indien OP zegt: ‘Maar dit hebben ze al’. Zeg dan: Dat klopt, maar vindt U dat zij het recht moeten hebben om te stemmen. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
31b Buitenlanders die al geruime tijd in Nederland wonen moeten het recht hebben om te stemmen bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens
825 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van de politici randomiseren 32a ENQ: Overhandig kaart 17 Ik noem nu telkens de naam van een mogelijke kandidaat voor de post van minister-president. Wilt u aangeven hoeveel vertrouwen u in deze persoon zou hebben als minister- president? Noemt u maar het cijfer dat van toepassing is. Als u een kandidaat niet kent zegt u het dan gerust (code 8).
ENQ: Als OP een kandidaat niet kent code 8 gebruiken Jaap De Hoop Scheffer? 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32b Wim Kok? 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32c Frits Bolkestein? 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
32d Els Borst? 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 32e En ...... (nieuwe kandidaat) 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition
826 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 32f En...... (nieuwe kandidaat) 1..7 8 kent kandidaat niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
33 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 18 Van politieke opvattingen wordt vaak gezegd dat zij LINKS OF RECHTS zijn. Wanneer u denkt aan uw eigen politieke opvattingen, waar zou u dan zichzelf op deze lijn plaatsen? Noemt u maar het cijfer dat op u van toepassing is. 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Volgorde van partijen NIET randomiseren!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 34a Ook van politieke partijen wordt gezegd dat zij LINKS of RECHTS zijn. ENQ: Overhandig kaart 18 Wilt u aangeven in welke mate u vindt dat een partij links of rechts is? Allereerst de PvdA? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34b En de VVD? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34c En D66? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
827 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34d En GroenLinks? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34e En het CDA? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34f En de SGP? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34g En het GPV? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34h En de RPF? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34i En de Centrumdemocraten? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet
828 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34j En de SP? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
34k En de AOVUnie 55+? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 34l En .....(nieuwe partij)? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 34m En ...... (nieuwe partij)? 1..10 11 kan partij niet plaatsen 12 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 19 35a Ik lees u nu enkele stellingen voor. Wilt u voor elke uitspraak zeggen of dit volgens u zo is of niet zo is? Kamerleden bekommeren zich niet om de mening van mensen zoals ik. 1 dat is zo 2 dat is niet zo 996 panel attrition
829 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
35b De politieke partijen zijn alleen maar geïnteresseerd in mijn stem en niet in mijn mening. 1 dat is zo 2 dat is niet zo 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
35c Mensen zoals ik hebben geen enkele invloed op de regeringspolitiek. 1 dat is zo 2 dat is niet zo 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
35d Er stemmen zoveel mensen bij de verkiezingen dat mijn stem er niet toe doet. 1 dat is zo 2 dat is niet zo 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
35e Meestal verliezen onze vertegenwoordigers in de Tweede Kamer al snel het contact met de mensen in het land. 1 dat is zo 2 dat is niet zo 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig Kaart 20 Wilt u voor de volgende stellingen zeggen of u het daar helemaal mee eens, mee eens, mee oneens of helemaal mee oneens bent? 36a Ik ben goed in staat om een actieve rol te spelen in de politiek. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
830 999 (inappropriate) routing
36b Ik heb een goed beeld van de belangrijkste politieke problemen in ons land 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
36c Soms lijkt de politiek zo ingewikkeld dat mensen zoals ik niet echt kunnen begrijpen wat er speelt. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
STELLINGEN RANDOMISEREN ENQ: Overhandig kaart 20 37a Tegen beter weten in beloven politici meer dan ze kunnen waarmaken. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
37b Ministers en staatssecretarissen zijn vooral op hun eigenbelang uit. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
37c Kamerlid word je eerder door je politieke vrienden dan door je bekwaamheden. 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens
831 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
38 Vindt u over het algemeen dat de meeste mensen wel te vertrouwen zijn of vindt u dat men niet voorzichtig genoeg kan zijn in de omgang met mensen? 1 wel te vertrouwen 2 men kan niet voorzichtig genoeg zijn 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren 39a en 39c mogen NIET na elkaar ENQ: Overhandig kaart 22 39a Ik noem u nu een aantal stellingen. Kunt u met behulp van deze kaart aangeven of u het helemaal niet eens of helemaal eens bent met deze stellingen. Noemt u maar het nummer dat op u van toepassing is. Als je echt in de problemen zit, sta je uiteindelijk alleen 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39b Er is niemand die speciaal belangstelling voor je heeft 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39c Er is altijd wel iemand waar ik kan aankloppen als ik hulp nodig heb 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39d Zelfs van je naaste familieleden kan je weinig belangstelling verwachten 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
39e Vaak voel ik me in de steek gelaten 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
832 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ITS: Deze vraag koppelen met huishoudbox uit 1e golf. ITS: Vraag niet stellen voor OP die geen huishouden heeft (Dan naar 40a) 39f Als ik buiten het gezin hulp nodig zou hebben, zou ik niet eens weten bij wie ik zou moeten zijn 1..10 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
40a tot en met 40j positie openlaten
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 24 41a Bent u het met de volgende stellingen helemaal mee eens, mee eens, niet mee eens maar ook niet mee oneens, mee oneens of helemaal mee oneens? Als een overheidsbeslissing volgens de regels tot stand is gekomen, dan accepteer ik haar 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41b Overheidsbeslissingen accepteer ik omdat dit als vanouds zo hoort 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41c Als een overheidsbeslissing niet in mijn belang is, dan accepteer ik haar niet 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
833 41d Als een overheidsbeslissing in strijd is met mijn principes, dan accepteer ik haar niet 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41e Als een overheidsbeslissing niet in overeenstemming is met mijn gevoel, dan accepteer ik haar niet 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41f In welke van de volgende situaties zou U actie ondernemen tegen overheidsbeslissingen? Ik zal actie ondernemen als een overheidsbeslissing niet volgens de regels tot stand is gekomen 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41g Ik zal actie ondernemen als een overheidsbeslissing niet in mijn belang is 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41h Ik zal actie ondernemen als een overheidsbeslissing in strijd is met mijn principes 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet
834 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
41i Ik zal actie ondernemen als een overheidsbeslissing niet in overeenstemming is met mijn gevoel 1 ja 2 nee 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
42a tm 42d positie openlaten voor nieuwe vraag. Vraag heeft formaat van 41a tm 41e
Volgorde van de partijen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 26 43a Voor sommigen is het heel zeker dat zij altijd op dezelfde partij zullen stemmen. Anderen bekijken elke keer opnieuw aan welke partij zij hun stem geven. Ik noem u een aantal partijen. Wilt u voor elke partij aangeven hoe waarschijnlijk het is dat u er ooit op zult stemmen? Noemt u maar het cijfer dat van toepassing is.
Als u een partij niet kent of het niet weet, zeg het gerust, we gaan dan verder met de volgende partij. De PvdA? ENQ: Als OP deze partij niet kent dan code 11 gebruiken. 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43b En de VVD? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43c En D66? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
835 43d En GroenLinks? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43e En het CDA? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43f En de SGP? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43g En het GPV? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43h En de RPF? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43i En de Centrumdemocraten? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43j En de SP? 1..10 11 kent partij niet
836 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
43k En AOVUNIE 55+? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Positie openlaten 43l En...... (nieuwe partij)? 1..10 11 kent partij niet 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
44a Stel: de Tweede Kamer behandelt een wetsvoorstel dat u zeer onrechtvaardig of verkeerd vindt. Hoe groot is de kans dat u zou proberen daar iets tegen te doen? Is die kans zeer groot, groot, klein of zeer klein? 1 zeer groot 2 groot 3 klein 4 zeer klein 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
44b ENQ: Overhandig kaart 27 Op deze kaart staat wat u zou kunnen doen als de Tweede Kamer een wetsvoorstel behandelt dat volgens u onrechtvaardig of verkeerd is. Wilt u deze mogelijkheden bekijken, en mij dan zeggen van welke daarvan u wel eens gebruik hebt gemaakt? U kunt de nummers noemen van de mogelijkheden waarvan u wel eens gebruik hebt gemaakt. ENQ: Maximaal 13 codes ITS: Code 1 tm 13 mogen niet in combinatie met code 14, 996, 997, 998, 999. ITS: Coderen in 13 dichotome variabelen. Eerste variabele is contact opgenomen met minister met als antwoordcategorie: 1 ja 2 nee Tweede variabele is tweede activiteit, etc. 1 contact opgenomen met minister 2 contact opgenomen met lid van de Tweede Kamer 3 meegedaan aan handtekeningenactie 4 een organisatie ingeschakeld
837 5 radiotelevisie ingeschakeld 6 geprobeerd politieke partij in te schakelen 7 contact opgenomen met burgemeester of wethouder 8 contact opgenomen met gemeenteraadslid 9 meegedaan aan actiegroep 10 meegedaan aan demonstratie 11 de krant ingeschakeld 12 een bezwaarschrift ingediend 13 contact opgenomen met ambtenaar van ministerie 14 geen van deze mogelijkheden 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Nu wil ik u enkele vragen stellen over politiek en godsdienst. 45a Vindt u dat politieke partijen geheel los moeten staan van godsdienst, of bent u van mening dat er ook confessionele partijen moeten zijn, d.w.z. politieke partijen die gebaseerd zijn op godsdienst. 1 politieke partijen moeten geheel los staan van godsdienst (Naar 45c) 2 er moeten ook confessionele politieke partijen zijn (Naar 45b) 996 panel attrition (Naar 45c) 997 weet niet (Naar 45c) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 45c) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 45c)
45b Als u denkt aan deze confessionele politieke partijen...... vindt u dan dat er afzonderlijke rooms-katholieke en protestants-christelijke politieke partijen moeten zijn of moeten zij volgens u in een algemeen christelijk verband worden opgenomen? 1 afzonderlijk rooms-katholiek en protestants-christelijk 2 algemeen christelijk 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
45c En vakbonden? Vindt u dat vakbonden geheel los moeten staan van godsdienst, of bent u van mening dat er ook confessionele vakbonden moeten zijn? 1 vakbonden moeten geheel los staan van godsdienst 2 er moeten ook confessionele vakbonden zijn 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
45d Vindt u dat scholen geheel los moeten staan van godsdienst, of bent u van mening dat er ook confessionele scholen moeten zijn, d.w.z. scholen die gebaseerd zijn op godsdienst. 1 scholen moeten geheel los staan van godsdienst (Naar 45f)
838 2 er moeten ook confessionele scholen zijn (Naar 45e) 996 panel attrition (Naar 45f) 997 weet niet (Naar 45f) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 45f) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 45f)
45e Als u denkt aan deze confessionele scholen...... vindt u dan dat er afzonderlijke rooms-katholieke en protestants-christelijke scholen moeten zijn of moeten zij volgens u in een algemeen christelijk verband worden opgenomen? 1 afzonderlijk rooms-katholiek en protestants-christelijk 2 algemeen christelijk 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
45f Vindt u dat omroepen geheel los moeten staan van godsdienst, of bent u van mening dat er ook confessionele omroepen moeten zijn, d.w.z. omroepen die gebaseerd zijn op godsdienst. 1 omroepen moeten geheel los staan van godsdienst (Naar 46) 2 er moeten ook confessionele omroepen zijn (Naar 45g) 996 panel attrition (Naar 46) 997 weet niet (Naar 46) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 46) 999 (inappropriate) routing (Naar 46)
45g Als u denkt aan deze confessionele omroepen...... vindt u dan dat er afzonderlijke rooms-katholieke en protestants-christelijke omroepen moeten zijn of moeten zij volgens u in een algemeen christelijk verband worden opgenomen? 1 afzonderlijk rooms-katholiek en protestants-christelijk 2 algemeen christelijk 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
46 Bent u het met de volgende uitspraak helemaal mee eens, mee eens, mee oneens of helemaal mee oneens? ...HET GELOOF IS VOOR DE POLITIEK EEN GOEDE WEGWIJZER.... 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
47 ENQ: Overhandig kaart 28 Er wordt wel gesproken over het bestaan van verschillende sociale klassen en groepen. Als u zichzelf tot een bepaalde sociale klasse zou moeten rekenen, welke zou dat dan zijn?
839 1 hogere klasse 2 hogere middenklasse 3 gewone middenklasse 4 hogere arbeidersklasse 5 gewone arbeidersklasse 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
Stellingen randomiseren ENQ: Overhandig kaart 29 48a Op deze kaart staan verschillende opvattingen die de laatste tijd nogal eens worden verkondigd. De meningen hierover lopen sterk uiteen. Wij zouden graag UW mening weten. Wilt u voor elke uitspraak zeggen of u het er helemaal mee eens, mee eens, niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens, mee oneens of helemaal mee oneens bent. Als u het van een bepaalde uitspraak niet weet of niet wilt zeggen, zegt u het dan gerust.
1 Een belangrijke taak voor het onderwijs is het bijbrengen van vaderlandsliefde aan de leerlingen 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48b Onze sociale voorzieningen zijn niet bedoeld voor gastarbeiders 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48c Iedere Nederlander dient de nodige eerbied in acht te nemen tegenover onze nationale symbolen zoals de vlag en het volkslied 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
840 999 (inappropriate) routing
48d Buitenlanders vormen een bedreiging voor onze cultuur 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48e Wat jongeren op de eerste plaats moeten leren is zelfbeheersing en vastberadenheid 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48f Buitenlanders maken meer misbruik van de sociale voorzieningen dan Nederlanders 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48g Het belangrijkste dat kinderen moeten leren is gehoorzaamheid en eerbied voor gezag 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
48h Verschillen tussen etnische groepen zijn aangeboren 1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens
841 3 niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens 4 mee oneens 5 helemaal mee oneens 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
49 We zijn aan het einde gekomen van de vragenlijst. We zijn u dankbaar dat u heeft meegewerkt aan dit onderzoek. Dit onderzoek wordt rond elke verkiezingen gehouden. Elke keer zijn er gelukkig veel mensen zoals u die willen meewerken aan dit soort onderzoeken, er zijn ook altijd mensen die niet mee willen werken. We willen graag van u weten wat voor u de reden is geweest om aan dit onderzoek mee te werken. ENQ: Antwoordmogelijkheden NIET oplezen
1 gewoonniet over nagedacht 2 aan een onderzoek meewerken vind ik leukinteressant 3 interviewer over de vloer is gezelligleuk om te praten 4 interviewer leek me een aardig persoon 5 wilde interviewer niet teleurstellen na zoveel moeite 6 benieuwd naar de vragen 7 hoor je te doenburgerplicht 8 politiek vind ik interessant 9 anders, nl.. 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
ENQ: Overhandig Schriftelijke vragenlijst en 15 staatslot. 50a Wij stellen uw mening zeer op prijs, daarom mag ik u dit staatslot overhandigen. Ik heb hier nog een schriftelijke vragenlijst met enkele vragen. Wilt u deze invullen en terugsturen in deze portvrije envelop? 1 respondent accepteert staatslot en belooft schriftelijke vragenlijst in te vullen en te retourneren 2 respondent weigert staatslot maar belooft schriftelijke vragenlijst in te vullen en te retourneren 3 respondent accepteert staatslot maar weigert schriftelijke vragenlijst 4 respondent weigert staatslot en schriftelijke vragenlijst 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
50b Bij de volgende Tweede Kamerverkiezingen wil het ITS in opdracht van een aantal Nederlandse universiteiten graag voor de laatste keer een gesprek voeren met iedereen die aan dit onderzoek heeft meegedaan. De vragen zullen ongeveer hetzelfde zijn als die van deze keer. Vindt u het bezwaarlijk als we tegen die tijd nog één keer contact met u opnemen? 1 ja, heeft bezwaar (Naar 50c) 2 nee, heeft geen bezwaar (Naar 50d)
842 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 51a) 998 wil niet zeggen (Naar 51a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
50c ENQ: Noteer waarom OP bezwaar heeft. ENQ: Indien OP niet aangeeft waarom hij bezwaar heeft, vragen: Kunt u misschien aangeven waarom u hier bezwaar tegen heeft? ...... (Naar 51a)
50d ENQ: Noteer de volgende gegevens van OP Naam OP: Voorletters OP: Telefoonnummer OP:
ENQ: Invullen zonder te vragen. 51a ENQ: Stel vast of er tijdens het gesprek ook andere personen in de kamer waren. 1 ja 2 nee (Naar 52a) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet (Naar 52a) 999 (inappropriate) routing
51b ENQ: Stel vast wie dat waren. (voer maximaal 5 codes in) 1 Kind(eren) jonger dan 6 jaar (Naar 51c) 2 Oudere kinderen (Naar 51d) 3 Man, vrouw, partner (Naar 51e) 4 Overige familieleden (Naar 51f) 5 Overige volwassenen (Naar 51g) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
51c Wilt u van deze persoon of personen aangeven of zij het gesprek geheel of gedeeltelijk volgden d.w.z. actief meeluisterden, zich in het gesprek mengden d.w.z. een eigen mening gaven, of zij de ondervraagde persoon corrigeerden, of zij antwoorden suggereerden etcetera?
Alleen gesteld indien kinderen jonger dan 6 jaar aanwezig. Kinderen jonger dan 6 jaar: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien oudere kinderen aanwezig. 51d Oudere kinderen: 1 volgden gesprek niet
843 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien man, vrouw, partner aanwezig. 51e Man, vrouw, partner: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien overige familieleden aanwezig. 51f Overige familieleden: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
Alleen gesteld indien overige volwassenen aanwezig. 51g Overige volwassenen: 1 volgden gesprek niet 2 volgden gesprek wel 3 mengden zich in gesprek 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
52a ENQ: Waren er storende invloeden bij het gesprek, zoals bijvoorbeeld: TV of radio stond aan, mensen kwamen op bezoek, etcetera? 1 wel storende invloeden (Naar 50b) 2 geen storende invloeden (EINDE INTERVIEW) 996 panel attrition 997 weet niet 999 (inappropriate) routing
52b De storende invloeden waren nl. ... (EINDE INTERVIEW)
Datum einde interview:
Tijdstip einde interview:
844 5.1.4 Showcards wave 2 (Dutch)
Kaart 1 (bijna) altijd vaak zo nu en dan zelden of nooit leest geen krant
Kaart 2 een raambiljet of een verkiezingsbord thuis opgehangen gesprekken met anderen gevoerd om hen over te halen op een bepaalde partij te stemmen aan een politieke partij geld gegeven speciaal voor haar verkiezingsactiviteiten een verkiezingsvergadering, -bijeenkomst of -forum bezocht
Kaart 3 GroenLinks VVD
D66 PVDA
CDA
Kaart 4 de orde in het land handhaven de politieke inspraak van de burgers vergroten prijsstijgingen tegengaan de vrijheid van meningsuiting beschermen
Kaart 5 Lijn 1..10 1 zeer onbelangrijk 10 zeer belangrijk weet niet
Kaart 6 1 Milieu- en natuurbehoud, zoals Greenpeace, Natuurmonumenten 2 Verkeer en vervoer, zoals de ANWB, de ENFB of de reizigersorganisatie ROVER 3 Vereniging van huurders of van eigen woningbezit, zoals de vereniging Eigen huis 4 Derde wereld, mensenrechten en vrede, zoals Terre des Hommes of Amnesty International 5 Vakbond, zoals de FNV of het CNV 6 Beroeps- of standsorganisatie 7 Buurt- of wijkvereniging 8 Vrouwenvereniging of -bonden 9 sportverenigingen
845 Kaart 7 Lijn 1..7 1 in Nederland moet snel worden gewerkt aan uitbreiding van het aantal kerncentrales 7 in Nederland moeten in het geheel geen kerncentrales worden gebouwd weet niet
Kaart 8 Lijn 1..7 1 De uitkeringen zijn veel te laag 7 De uitkeringen zijn veel te hoog weet niet
Kaart 9 Lijn 1..5 1 de verkiezingen zijn eerlijk verlopen 5 de verkiezingen zijn oneerlijk verlopen
Kaart 10 Lijn 1..5 1 de partijen hebben belangstelling voor wat gewone mensen willen 5 de partijen hebben geen belangstelling voor wat gewone mensen willen
Kaart 11 Lijn 1..5 1 politieke partijen zijn nodig in ons politieke stelsel 5 politieke partijen zijn niet nodig in ons politieke stelsel
Kaart 12 Lijn 1..5 1 Tweede Kamerleden zijn goed op de hoogte van wat gewone mensen denken 5 Tweede Kamerleden weten niet wat gewone mensen denken
Kaart 13 Lijn 1..5 1 wat men ook stemt, het maakt geen verschil voor wat er gebeurt 5 wat men ook stemt, het maakt wel verschil voor wat er gebeurt
Kaart 14 Lijn 1..5 1 het maakt geen verschil wie aan de macht is 5 het maakt wel verschil wie aan de macht is
Kaart 15 Lijn 1..5 1 de meeste mensen zeggen wat zij vinden over politieke zaken 5 de meeste mensen houden voor zich wat zij vinden over politieke zaken
Kaart 16 helemaal mee eens
846 mee eens niet mee eens, niet mee oneens mee oneens helemaal mee oneens
Kaart 17 Lijn 1..7 1 helemaal geen vertrouwen 7 zeer veel vertrouwen weet niet
Kaart 18 Lijn 1..10 1 Links 10 Rechts weet niet
Kaart 19 dat is zo dat is niet zo
Kaart 20 helemaal mee eens mee eens mee oneens helemaal mee oneens
Kaart 21 openlaten
Kaart 22 1..10 1 helemaal niet mee eens 10 helemaal mee eens
Kaart 23 openlaten
Kaart 24 helemaal mee eens mee eens niet mee eens, maar ook niet mee oneens mee oneens helemaal mee oneens
Kaart 25 openlaten
Kaart 26 Lijn 1..10 1 ik zal zeker nooit op deze partij stemmen 10 ik zal zeker weleens op deze partij stemmen
847 Kaart 27 1 contact opgenomen met minister 2 contact opgenomen met lid van de Tweede Kamer 3 meegedaan aan handtekeningenactie 4 een organisatie ingeschakeld 5 radiotelevisie ingeschakeld 6 geprobeerd politieke partij in te schakelen 7 contact opgenomen met burgemeester of wethouder 8 contact opgenomen met gemeenteraadslid 9 meegedaan aan actiegroep 10 meegedaan aan demonstratie 11 de krant ingeschakeld 12 een bezwaarschrift ingediend 13 contact opgenomen met ambtenaar van ministerie
Kaart 28 hogere klasse hogere middenklasse gewone middenklasse hogere arbeidersklasse gewone arbeidersklasse
Kaart 29 helemaal mee eens mee eens niet mee eens, niet mee oneens mee oneens helemaal mee oneens
848 5.2 Interviewer instructions
1 Achtergronden Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek (NKO)
Doelstelling Het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek (hierna NKO te noemen) is een onderzoek dat sinds 1967 wordt gehouden rond de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen in Nederland onder leiding van een interuniversitair samenwerkingsverband. Sinds 1989 opereert dit samenwerkingsverband onder de naam Stichting Kiezersonderzoek Nederland (SKON). Het NKO heeft twee doeleinden. Allereerst heeft het NKO als doel het gedrag en de opvattingen van kiezers bij verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer te analyseren en te verklaren. Tevens biedt het NKO vanwege haar lange traditie inzicht in politieke veranderingen in Nederland. De vraagstelling is door de jaren heen voor een groot gedeelte gelijk gebleven zodat verschuivingen in gedrag en opvattingen op eenvoudige wijze gesignaleerd kunnen worden. De gegevens worden verzameld ten behoeve van wetenschappelijk onderzoek en zijn voor iedereen beschikbaar. In 1967 werd het eerste NKO gehouden. Dit onderzoek vond plaats na de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 1967. Vanaf 1971 wordt er zowel voor als na de verkiezingen voor de Tweede Kamer een enquête gehouden. De overige NKO’s werden gehouden in 1971, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1982, 1986, 1989 en in 1994. Dit jaar zal het NKO 1998 aan de reeks kiezersonderzoeken worden toegevoegd. Het NKO 1998 wordt, onder auspiciën van SKON, uitgevoerd door een projectdirectie, bestaande uit: Dr. C.W.A.M. Aarts, Dr. H. van der Kolk en Drs. M.A.A. Kamp, allen verbonden aan de Universiteit Twente te Enschede. Het ITS te Nijmegen is verantwoordelijk voor het veldwerk. Het NKO 1998 wordt financieel mogelijk gemaakt door o.a. het ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, het ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport, het Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau en de Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk onderzoek.
Opzet van het onderzoek Het NKO 1998 bestaat uit een hoofdonderzoek, een vervolgonderzoek, een schriftelijke vragenlijst en een non-respons onderzoek.
Het hoofdonderzoek Voor het hoofdonderzoek worden kiesgerechtigde Nederlanders benaderd door middel van een steekproef uit het gemeenteregister. Hiervoor zijn 93 gemeenten benaderd, verspreid over het land. Het onderzoek bestaat uit twee gedeelten. Het eerste vraaggesprek vindt plaats voor de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen, de zogenaamde eerste golf. Het tweede vraaggesprek vindt plaats na de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen, de zogenaamde tweede golf. De nettosteekproef omvat in 1998 2000 adressen. Aangezien er gebruik gemaakt wordt van een personensteekproef is het mogelijk om de respondenten persoonlijk aan te schrijven en te benaderen.
Het vervolgonderzoek Naast het hoofdonderzoek omvat het NKO ook een vervolgonderzoek. Het vervolgonderzoek houdt een derde benadering in van de respondenten die in 1994 hebben deelgenomen aan de eerste en de tweede golf. Zij hebben destijds toegezegd
849 mee te zullen werken aan een vervolgonderzoek bij de volgende verkiezingen. Dit onderzoek blijft hier echter buiten beschouwing.
De schriftelijke vragenlijst Na het interview van de tweede golf wordt bij de respondenten een schriftelijke vragenlijst achtergelaten. Deze vragenlijst kan door de respondenten op een later tijdstip worden ingevuld zonder aanwezigheid van de interviewer. Deze vragenlijst zal o.a. vragen bevatten naar het gebruik van media en het sociale netwerk van de respondent.
Het non-respons onderzoek Indien een interviewer contact heeft gehad met een respondent, maar deze weigert zich te laten interviewen of als de respondent na verschillende bezoeken van de interviewer niet thuis wordt aangetroffen, wordt vanuit het ITS getracht deze persoon telefonisch te bereiken. Tijdens dit telefoongesprek wordt naar de reden gevraagd waarom men niet deel wil nemen aan het interview. Soms zal deze reden aanleiding zijn om een afspraak te maken of om een andere enquêteur te sturen. Indien de respondent nog steeds weigert om deel te nemen aan het interview wordt getracht nog enkele vragen te stellen met betrekking tot de politieke interesse, het stemgedrag en enkele achtergrondkenmerken.
Steekproeftrekking Voor het NKO 1998 is een steekproef van kiesgerechtigde Nederlanders getrokken op basis van de gemeentelijke bevolkingsadministratie (GBA). De naam-, adres- en woonplaatsgegevens die zo verkregen worden, worden gebruikt om de respondenten persoonlijk aan te schrijven. Het persoonlijk aanschrijven gebeurt door middel van de brief die de enquêteur aan de respondent stuurt. Door middel van deze brief wordt de respondent geïnformeerd over het onderzoek en wordt het bezoek van de enquêteur aangekondigd. Nadat de brief aan de respondenten is verstuurd, gaat de enquêteur langs bij de respondent. Indien de respondent niet thuis is, wordt op een later tijdstip een nieuwe poging ondernomen. Als na X pogingen de respondent nog niet thuis is, kunt u deze respondent melden als NON-RESPONS.
Incentives Om de bereidheid om mee te werken te vergroten wordt aan elke persoon in de steekproef tegelijk met de introductiebrief een 15 staatslot gestuurd. Indien de respondent echter principiële bezwaren heeft dient u zich te verontschuldigen en te streven naar een interview zonder incentive. Na het tweede interview wordt er zoals reeds eerder vermeld een schriftelijke vragenlijst achtergelaten. Hierbij ontvangt de respondent wederom een 15 staatslot. Indien de respondent echter principiële bezwaren had bij het eerste vraaggesprek dan geeft u dit staatslot niet!
2. Organisatie en looptijd veldwerk
Zoals reeds vermeld in de brief die u ontving ter introductie van het NKO-onderzoek, bestaat het veldwerk voor u uit twee gedeelten:
850 Eerste Golf
Hieronder wordt de eerste meting verstaan waarin het >Rolling Thunder Design= wordt toegepast. Het >Rolling Thunder Design= houdt in dat de steekproef in porties wordt verdeeld van elk 1 week. Aangezien de eerste golf bestaat uit 5 weken, zijn er dus 5 porties te verdelen. Het is noodzaak dat iedere portie een afspiegeling is van de totale steekproef. Daarom zullen iedere week ongeveer hetzelfde aantal interviews afgenomen moeten worden en bovendien moeten bepaalde kenmerken zoals leeftijd, geslacht, regio op dezelfde wijze gespreid zijn als in de totale steekproef. Het >Rolling Thunder Design= wordt toegepast om vast te stellen of er in de weken voorafgaande aan de verkiezingen veranderingen plaatsvinden bij de bevolking naar aanleiding van actuele gebeurtenissen.
Wat verlangen wij van u? De bovenstaande methode van onderzoek (en ook van het veldwerk) is voor ons nieuw en vergt van u een bepaalde discipline in de organisatie van uw interviews. Aangezien vrijwel de meesten van u beschikbaar zijn voor alle 5 weken, dient u iedere week eenzelfde aantal interviews te realiseren. Dit aantal is vastgesteld op minimaal 4 interviews per week en betekent 20 interviews voor de gehele veldwerkperiode in de eerste golf. Uitgegaande van de beschikking over 100 interview(-st)ers worden er dan per week 400 interviews afgenomen en dat zou het totaal aantal voor de eerste golf brengen op 2000. Een eenvoudig sommetje en na het lezen van dit stukje zult u denken: “ dit wisten wij al!” en dat klopt. Echter, u weet ook dat uw (en ook ons) werk altijd een klus is waarbij veel >maren en alsen= voorkomen. Zodra we iets moeten doen dat met mensen te maken heeft, is 1+1 niet altijd meer 2! Want zoals het er nu voorstaat zullen 90 interview(-st)ers aan dit onderzoek meewerken en dat betekent dat er méér interviews per week door u gedaan moeten worden, namelijk 5. De voorgestelde bonus voor het realiseren van 4 interviews per week blijft gehandhaafd, maar voor het 5e gesprek krijgt u nog eens fl. 10,- extra. Om een misverstand uit de wereld te helpen: er zijn interview(-st)ers die denken dat er per dag 1 interview afgenomen moet worden. Dit is onjuist. Het gaat hierbij om 5 per week, dus u kunt (en mag) er meerdere per dag afnemen.
Wat krijgt u van ons? Naast de (reeds aangekondigde) bonus en 15 staatslot, krijgt u van ons natuurlijk adressen, enveloppen en introductiebrieven met 15 staatslot. Het is de bedoeling dat u tweemaal zoveel adressen ontvangt dan het aantal interviews dat u moet afnemen.
Werkwijze Aangezien u het dubbele aantal adressen ontvangt (wij gaan er vanuit dat het responspercentage 50% of hoger is), zal dit waarschijnlijk betekenen dat u uw respondenten meerdere malen zult moeten benaderen voor het maken van een afspraak. De introductiebrieven en staatsloten krijgt u van mij opgestuurd in de week van 23 maart. U verstuurt de brieven naar uw respondenten direct na ontvangst en u probeert dan een afspraak te maken voor een van de volgende 5 weken. Er wordt dus veel gevraagd van uw overredingskracht en van uw planning. Wij hebben geprobeerd door middel van dat 15 staatslot bij te dragen om de respondent het belang van deelname aan het onderzoek te laten inzien.
851 Let wel: U dient alle respondenten te benaderen ook als u uw afsprakenquotum van 5 per week reeds heeft behaald. Het is namelijk van groot belang dat we de nonrespons goed in kaart kunnen brengen. Omdat u ook het telefoonnummer van de respondent ter beschikking krijgt, mag u de respondent telefonisch benaderen voor het maken van een afspraak. Omdat er telefonisch afspraken gemaakt kunnen worden, is het ditmaal niet zo dat een benadering van 5 keer als non-respons wordt beschouwd! Tijdens de gehele veldwerkperiode is het de bedoeling dat u uw data (respons, nonrespons en afspraken) van dit project frequent ( 1 maal per dag) overstuurt zodat wij direct weten hoe in een week de stand van zaken is en een overzicht hebben van het verloop van uw acties. Ook al heeft u die dag geen interview afgenomen, wij willen wel weten welke en hoeveel afspraken u gemaakt heeft voor alle 5 weken. Eventueel kunnen we dan nog tijdig adressen en brieven nasturen (dit geldt vooral voor de grotere steden, waar de nonrespons traditioneel groter is dan elders). Een en ander is ook van belang voor het eventueel nabestellen van staatsloten.
Looptijd van de eerste golf De eerste dag dat er interviews afgenomen kunnen worden is maandag 30 maart. Dit is dus de eerste week. De tweede week start op 6 april, de 3e week op 13 april, de 4e week op 20 april. De laatste en 5e week start op 27 april en duurt tot 5 mei. Deze laatste datum is de dag voor de verkiezingen van 6 mei.
Tweede Golf
Direct na de verkiezingen start de tweede golf. Deze interviews vinden plaats met dezelfde respondenten die u in de eerste golf geinterviewd hebt. U kunt al na het eerste gesprek vragen of de respondent aan een tweede gesprek wilt meewerken en alvast voor na 6 mei een afspraak maken voor dit gesprek. Deze interviews dienen plaats te vinden voor 1 juli. De looptijd voor deze tweede golf bedraagt dus 8 weken. Voor dit gedeelte van het veldwerk zullen geen instructies plaatsvinden. De vragenlijst krijgt u op floppydisk toegestuurd waarna u deze kunt installeren op uw notebook. Bovendien ontvangt u ook een schriftelijke versie van de vragenlijst. Dit zal gebeuren in de week van 11 mei.
Algemene opmerkingen
De steekproef Ten tijde van het schrijven van deze instructie waren nog niet alle adresbestanden van de gemeenten ontvangen. Het kan dus mogelijk zijn dat u adrssen ontvangt die niet via de bevolkingsregisters is verkregen en u dus niet kunt beschikken over de gegevens van de respondent aangaande het geslacht en de geboortedatum. Wel krijgt u naam-, adres- , woonplaatsgegevens en telefoonummers tot uw beschikking.
Vergoedingen instructies Voor het bijwonen van de instructie (2 uur) wordt fl 20,- vergoed. De reistijdvergoeding van en naar de instructie bedraagt fl. 10,- per uur. Openbaar vervoer wordt vergoed.
852 Vergoedingen interviews De vergoeding van een interview is fl. 20,-. (het gesprek duurt 1 uur) Voor de respons bedraagt de vergoeding fl. 7,50 Kilometervergoeding bedraagt fl 0,75 per gereden kilometer. Voor een non-respons kunt u fl. 2,50 declareren.
3 Interviewregels
Het NKO 1998 is niet ingewikkeld van structuur, toch zijn er enkele aspecten waar rekening mee gehouden dient te worden.
U dient zich strikt te houden aan de volgende regels:
1 De vragen moeten letterlijk gesteld worden, ongeacht de lengte
2 Lees de vragen neutraal voor, zodat uit de intonatie geen mening te beluisteren valt
3 Goed doorvragen, met name bij open vragen
4 Antwoorden niet interpreteren, vraag goed door indien het antwoord onduidelijk is.
5 Niet sturen van antwoorden
6 Ga niet in discussie met de respondent
7 Laat geen eigen mening, ideeën of gevoelens blijken, zowel in woord als in gebaar
8 Respecteer de normen en waarden van de respondent, de respondent moet zich vrij voelen in het beantwoorden van de vragen. Dit is essentieel voor het onderzoek, aangezien het gaat om politiek wat voor veel mensen een onderwerp is waar niet makkelijk over gepraat wordt
9 Bij de meeste vragen is een spontaan antwoord van de respondent vereist, waar niet lang over nagedacht moet worden. Toch zullen vele respondenten een langere bedenktijd nodig hebben. Indien de respondent om nadere uitleg vraagt of een discussie begint, kunt u hier het beste NIET op ingaan. U kunt bijvoorbeeld zeggen; “Het gaat om het antwoord dat u het eerste te binnen schiet”.
10 Bij vragen waarbij een toonkaart gehanteerd wordt, dient u het nummer van de toonkaart voor het stellen van de vraag te noemen, zodat de respondent de juiste toonkaart voor zich kan nemen.
11 De antwoorden op open vragen letterlijk en volledig noteren
12 Indien de respondent meerdere antwoorden kan geven bij open vragen, de antwoorden scheiden d.m.v. een puntkomma ;
853 4 Toonkaarten en de vragenlijst
Opstarten Efficiënt, gemakkelijk en meest praktisch is, na te gaan of de persoon die geïnterviewd moet worden aanwezig is en mee wil doen voordat men de gegevens gaat invoeren. Indien de respondent wel aanwezig is maar op dit moment niet mee wil werken maar op een later tijdstip wel, dan is het raadzaam een afspraak te maken.
Toonkaarten Bij het NKO wordt een groot aantal toonkaarten en een setje met losse toonkaarten gebruikt met hierop de antwoorden waaruit de respondent kan kiezen. Het is de bedoeling dat de respondent de betreffende kaart voor zich heeft tijdens het stellen van de vraag. De respondent kan dan meelezen en heeft op deze wijze enige houvast bij het beantwoorden van de vragen.
In het onderzoek worden enkele vragenblokken gerandomiseerd. Dit betekent dat de vragen in verschillende volgorden gesteld worden. Het is daarom van belang om bij het stellen van de vraag duidelijk aan te geven welke toonkaart gehanteerd moet worden, zodat de respondent de juiste toonkaart voor zich heeft.
De vragenlijst
Geslacht vaststellen C stel ZELF het geslacht van de respondent vast, dit hoeft u dus NIET te vragen. Typ het nummer in wat van toepassing is. vraag 1a C indien de respondent een andere nationaliteit heeft dan de Nederlandse, noteer bij 2 de nationaliteit C indien de respondent niet de Nederlandse nationaliteit heeft, eindigt hier het interview, zij mogen namelijk GEEN stem uitbrengen bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 6 mei 1998 C indien de respondent niet de Nederlandse nationaliteit heeft verschijnt de melding: Maak dit onderzoek Non-Respons. Druk op
Doorgaan Uitstel interview Non-respons
Selecteer nu Non-respons. vraag 1b C geboortedatum: noteer de dag, de maand en het geboortejaar van de respondent, bv 16 08 45 vraag 1c
854 C gehuwd geweest: respondent is gescheiden C indien respondent getrouwd is maar niet (meer) met de echtgenoot samenleeft, maar met een andere partner dit noteren bij gehuwd vraag 2 C kaart 1 gebruiken C binnenlands nieuws: berichten in de krant over gebeurtenissen in Nederland C regering: de Koningin plus de ministers vraag 3 C zulke problemen in ons land: bv regeringsproblemen, problemen die in Nederland gesignaleerd worden vraag 4 C kaart 1 gebruiken C buitenlands nieuws: berichten in de krant over gebeurtenissen in het buitenland vraag 6 C indien respondent regionale krant noemt, deze bij 7 noteren C indien respondent andere krant noemt, deze bij 8 noteren vraag 7 C kaart 2 gebruiken C NOS-journaal: het journaal op Nederland 1, 2 en 3 C het tijdstip waarom men dit journaal bekijkt is niet van belang C indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren vraag 8 C kaart 2 gebruiken C RTL-journaal: het journaal op RTL4 en RTL5 C indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren C het tijdstip waarop men dit journaal bekijkt is niet van belang vraag 9 C kaart 2 gebruiken C NOVA-Den Haag Vandaag: het actualiteitenprogramma van Nederland 3, na het 10 uur journaal C indien OP zender niet kan ontvangen, code 4 noteren vraag 10 C de enquêteur mag geen suggesties geven! C de respondent kan maximaal 7 problemen noemen C noteer de problemen letterlijk en volledig C mogelijke nationale problemen kunnen bv zijn: toenemende criminaliteit, toenemende milieuvervuiling. Indien respondent bv criminaliteit noemt, vragen of
855 de respondent dit kan toelichten, probeer te achterhalen of de respondent de toenemende milieucriminaliteit een probleem vindt of de toenemende criminaliteit onder jongeren; laat de respondent zelf het probleem specificeren C indien de respondent maar 1 probleem noemt, vraag dan: Zijn er nog ander problemen? vraag 11a C aanhanger: persoon die de ideeën van een bepaalde partijgroep onderschrijft enof steun geeft aan een partijgroep vraag 11c C overtuigde aanhanger: persoon die ideeën van een bepaalde partijgroep onderschrijft enof steun geeft aan een partijgroep vraag 11d C aangetrokken tot: zich aangesproken voelen door de ideeën van een bepaalde partijgroep vraag 12a C lid: persoon die contributie betaalt aan een partijvereniging vraag 12e C overwogen om lid te worden: er over nagedacht om lid te worden en mogelijk actie ondernomen om lid te worden, uiteindelijk is de respondent echter geen lid geworden van een politieke partij vraag 13a C kaart 3 C beleid: maatregelen, wetten, richtlijnen, regels en dergelijke die de overheid maakt om bepaalde doelen te bereiken C economische toestand: de situatie van Nederland m.b.t. de economie; bv de waarde van de gulden t.o.v. de Duitse mark, de export- en importcijfers van Nederland vraag 13b vraag 13c C kaart 3 vraag 14 C kaart 4 vraag 15a C indien respondent antwoordt dat weet ik (nog) niet, code 3 noteren vraag 2b in Box 2 C partij waarop u overweegt te stemmen: partijen waarop OP misschien gaat stemmen
856 vraag 16a tm vraag 16i C kaart 5 vraag 16c C kaart 5 C democratie: vorm van politieke besluitvorming; burgers brengen een stem uit en kiezen op deze wijze vertegenwoordigers die hun belangen behartigen en besluiten nemen vraag 17a C kaart 6 C moeite doen om te gaan stemmen: een inspanning leveren om te gaan stemmen C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 17b C kaart 7 C opkomst: aantal mensen dat is gaan stemmen bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 17c tm vraag 17e C losse kaartjes 8a, 8b, 8c, 8d C het gaat om een ordening van voorkeuren C dring zonodig aan op een keuze C indien respondent geen keus kan maken code 5 noteren vraag 18a C opiniepeilingen: onderzoek dat een indicatie geeft hoe groot de aanhang van een bepaalde partij is op een bepaald moment, bijvoorbeeld hoeveel zetels een partij zal behalen of hoeveel mensen er gaan stemmen bij verkiezingen vraag 18b C aanhang: persoon die de ideeën van een partijgroep onderschrijft enof steun geeft aan een partijgroep vraag 18c tm vraag 18f C kaart 9 vraag 18g C grootst: de partij die de meeste stemmen zal krijgen bij de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen vraag 19a - 19g C kaart 10
857 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, code 8 noteren C indien de respondent de partij niet kent, code 9 noteren C euthanasie: op verzoek van de patiënt beëindigt een arts het leven van de patiënt vraag 20a - 20g C kaart 11 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, code 8 noteren C indien de respondent de partij niet kent, code 9 noteren vraag 21a - 21g C kaart 12 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, code 8 noteren C indien de respondent de partij niet kent, code 9 noteren C asielzoekers: mensen die verzoeken om in een land te mogen wonen omdat zij in hun eigen land niet veilig kunnen leven, bijvoorbeeld vanwege hun godsdienst of politieke overtuiging, of omdat zij op zoek zijn naar betere leefomstandigheden en ontwikkelingsmogelijkheden vraag 22a - 22g C kaart 13 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, code 8 noteren C indien de respondent de partij niet kent, code 9 noteren C allochtonen: mensen die niet de nationaliteit bezitten van het land waarin zij wonen C etnische minderheden: mensen met een nationaliteit die in de minderheid is in het land waarin ze leven vraag 23a - 23g C kaart 13.1 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, code 8 noteren C indien de respondent de partij niet kent, code 9 noteren C Europese eenwording: één Europa zonder landsgrenzen en met één gemeenschappelijke munt vraag 24a C kaart 13.2 C noteer de cijfers die de respondent noemt C Europese unie: samenwerkingsverband van Europese landen, dit moet uiteindelijk leiden tot één Europa zonder landsgrenzen en met één gemeenschappelijke munt
858 vraag 25 C kaart 14 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt C politieke opvattingen: ideeën met betrekking tot de politiek C indien respondent 11 weet niet zegt, type [ (het weet niet teken) vraag 27a C de laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen kunnen gehouden zijn op 4 maart j.l, maar het is ook mogelijk (i.v.m. gemeentelijke herindeling) dat dit langer geleden is vraag 28a tm vraag 28l C kaart 15 C sympathiek vinden : waardering hebben C indien de respondent een partij niet kent, code 101 noteren, kent partij niet C indien de respondent de partij niet kan plaatsen, weet niet noteren C hier zit een lege vraag in, type [ (het weet niet teken) vraag 29a tm vraag 29j C kaart 15 C sympathiek vinden : waardering hebben C indien de respondent de politicus niet kent, code 101 noteren C indien de respondent de politicus niet kan plaatsen, [ weet niet noteren vraag 30a tm vraag 30l C kaart 16a, 16b, 16c, 16d C overhandig de foto=s maar noem de namen van de personen niet!!! C de namen van de politici en de functie verschijnen op het scherm C indien de respondent een naam enof functie noemt die niet overeen komt met die op het scherm, noteer dan het antwoord van de respondent letterlijk en volledig vraag 31a tm vraag 31d C zetels: aantal plaatsen die een partij heeft in de Tweede Kamer op basis van het aantal stemmen dat de partij behaald heeft bij de laatste Tweede Kamerverkiezingen vraag 31f C indien respondent maar een partij noemt, vraag dan : “Zijn er wellicht partijen die volgens u ook moeten deelnemen aan deze regering?” vraag 32a tm vraag 32q C kaart 17 C persoonlijke en sociale doelen: zaken die van individueel enof collectief belang zijn om na te streven
859 C de stellingen kunnen zowel voor de respondent alleen, als voor iedereen van belang zijn vraag 32d C kaart 17 C persoonlijke vrijheid: een individu maakt zelf uit wat hijzij doet enof belangrijk vindt vraag 32g C kaart 17 C persoonlijke ontplooiing: de mogelijkheden voor een individu om zich te ontwikkelen vraag 32i C kaart 17 C minima: mensen die rond moeten komen met een inkomen op of onder het niveau van het sociale minimum vraag 32j C kaart 17 C verbetering van het milieu: maatregel om het milieu minder te belasten, te verbeteren C kwaliteit van het bestaan: mensen een doel geven in hun leven vraag 32n C kaart 17 C autoriteiten: gezaghebbende instanties vraag 32p C kaart 17 C andersdenkenden: mensen met een afwijkende mening vraag 33a tm vraag 33d C kaart 18 vraag 33c C kaart 18 C saamhorigheid: het gevoel dat mensen bij elkaar horen vraag 35avraag 36a C partijvoorkeur: partij waarvan vader of moeder aanhanger was vraag 35bvraag 36b C meer antwoorden mogelijk vraag 37a
860 C kinderen die elders op kamers wonen NIET tot het huishouden rekenen vraag 37n C er wordt gevraagd naar de namen van de andere personen in het huishouden; noteer hier bijvoorbeeld pa, ma, kind 1, kind 2, persoon 1, persoon 2 etc vraag 37b tm vraag 37e C de antwoorden die de respondent geeft invullen C leeftijd in jaren C de gegevens van de respondent ook invullen, dit in verband met vraag 37e! C meerdere personen kunnen een gelijk inkomen ontvangen vraag 38a C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 38b C cursussen korten dan een jaar niet meerekenen vraag 38c C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 39a C kaart 20 C indien respondent meer dan 1 werkkring heeft, vragen naar de werkkring met de meeste uren C indien respondent 2 banen heeft van 20 uur, vragen naar de werkkring met het hoogste salaris C banen via het uitzendbureau is >elders in loondienst= C vrijwilligersniet betaald werk is >heeft betaald werk verricht= of >heeft nooit betaald werk verricht= vraag 39b vraag 39c vraag 39d C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig vraag 39f vraag 39h C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment vraag 39i C uren van alle banen meetellen C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment vraag 39j C kaart 21
861 C het gaat om de voornaamste bezigheden vraag 39k vraag 39l C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig C als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie C indien de respondent zijn werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die de respondent voorheen had vraag 39n C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 39o C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 40a C kaart 22 vraag 40b vraag 40f C indien respondent antwoordt protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd C indien respondent antwoordt Samen op weg, code 5 noteren C indien respondent antwoordt godsdienst, godsdienst noteren bij code 5 vraag 40c vraag 40d C elke andere stroming letterlijk en volledig noteren vraag 41 C kaart 23 vraag 42a C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 42b C cursussen korten dan een jaar niet meerekenen vraag 42c C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 43a.1 C kaart 20 C indien respondent meer dan 1 werkkring heeft, vragen naar de werkkring met de meeste uren
862 C indien respondent 2 banen heeft van 20 uur, vragen naar de werkkring met het hoogste salaris C banen via het uitzendbureau is >elders in loondienst= C vrijwilligersniet betaald werk is >heeft betaald werk verricht= of >heeft nooit betaald werk verricht= vraag 43b vraag 43c vraag 43d C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig vraag 43f vraag 43h C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 43i C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 43j C kaart 21 C het gaat om de voornaamste bezigheden vraag 43k vraag 43l C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig C als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie C indien de respondent zijn werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die de respondent voorheen had vraag 43n C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding werd gegeven meetellen vraag 43o C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 44a vraag 44e C indien respondent antwoordt protestant, vragen Nederlands Hervormd of Gereformeerd C indien respondent antwoordt Samen op weg, code 5 noteren C indien respondent antwoordt andere godsdienst, deze noteren bij code 5 vraag 44b vraag 44c C elke andere stroming letterlijk en volledig noteren vraag 45a C kaart 19
863 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 45b C cursussen korten dan een jaar niet meerekenen vraag 45c C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 46a.1 C kaart 20 C indien respondent meer dan 1 werkkring heeft, vragen naar de werkkring met de meeste uren C indien respondent 2 banen heeft van 20 uur, vragen naar de werkkring met het hoogste salaris C banen via het uitzendbureau is >elders in loondienst= C vrijwilligersniet betaald werk is >heeft betaald werk verricht= of >heeft nooit betaald werk verricht= vraag 46b vraag 46c vraag 46d C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig vraag 46f vraag 46h C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 46i C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 46j C kaart 21 C het gaat om de voornaamste bezigheden vraag 46k vraag 46l C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig C als niet voldoende duidelijk is goed doorvragen naar beroepfunctie C indien de respondent zijn werkzaamheden langzaam heeft afgebouwd, vragen naar de functie die de respondent voorheen had vraag 46n C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 46o C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment
864 C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 47 C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 48a.1 C kaart 20 C indien respondent meer dan 1 werkkring heeft, vragen naar de werkkring met de meeste uren C indien respondent 2 banen heeft van 20 uur, vragen naar de werkkring met het hoogste salaris C banen via het uitzendbureau is >elders in loondienst= C vrijwilligersniet betaald werk is >heeft betaald werk verricht= of >heeft nooit betaald werk verricht= vraag 48b vraag 48c vraag 48d C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig vraag 48f vraag 48h C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 48i C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 48j C kaart 21 C het gaat om de voornaamste bezigheden vraag 49 C kaart 19 C noteer het cijfer dat de respondent noemt vraag 50a.1 C kaart 20 C indien respondent meer dan 1 werkkring heeft, vragen naar de werkkring met de meeste uren C indien respondent 2 banen heeft van 20 uur, vragen naar de werkkring met het hoogste salaris C banen via het uitzendbureau is >elders in loondienst= C vrijwilligersniet betaald werk is >heeft betaald werk verricht= of >heeft nooit betaald werk verricht= vraag 50b vraag 50c vraag 50d
865 C noteer het antwoord dat de respondent geeft letterlijk en volledig vraag 50f vraag 50h C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C personeel aan wie via anderen leiding wordt gegeven meetellen vraag 50i C indien respondent zegt varieert, dan vragen naar de situatie op dit moment C de uren van alle banen optellen vraag 50j C kaart 21 C het gaat om de voornaamste bezigheden vraag 51 C kaart 24 C let erop dat het om het totale NETTO inkomen gaat C indien respondent bezwaar maakt of aarzelt, zeg dan: “ Deze vraag is voor het onderzoek erg belangrijk. Ik kan u verzekeren dat dit natuurlijk STRIKT GEHEIM blijft.” C dit is de laatste vraag van de vragenlijst. vraag 52a C bedank de respondent vraag 52b C noteer hier het bezwaarde bezwaren vraag 52d C noteer het nieuwe adres van de OP vraag 52f C noteer hier de afspraak die gemaakt is met de OP vraag 52g C noteer hier wanneer de OP afwezig is vraag 53a tm vraag 54b C deze vragen moet U zelf invullen
866 5.3 Self-Completion questionnaire
The self-completion questionnaire contained questions about the social network of the respondent, the television programs he watches and the radioprograms he listens to. Because of a routing schema not every respondent had to answer all questions. If a respondent could skip a question this was indicated by the sentence: ‘hoeft u voor die persoonpersonen niet in te vullen’. Sometimes only one answer could be coded. If this was the case this was indicated by the sentence: ‘slechts 1 antwoord mogelijk’. If more answers could be coded this was indicated by the sentence ‘meerdere antwoorden mogelijk’. For most questions the respondent could circle a number which represented the answer. Sometimes the category ‘different’ was used. In those cases the respondent could write down what the different situation was like. These different situations are presented as verbatim answers in the data file.
5.3.1 Self-completion questionnaire (Dutch)
8KHHIW]RMXLVWGHHOJHQRPHQDDQHHQRQGHU]RHNGDWKHW,76KRXGWLQRSGUDFKWYDQHHQDDQWDO 1HGHUODQGVHXQLYHUVLWHLWHQ:LMGDQNHQXKDUWHOLMNYRRUGHWLMGHQPRHLWHGLHXJHGDDQKHHIWRP JHVSUHNNHQWHYRHUHQPHWRQ]HLQWHUYLHZ VW HU$OVRQGHUGHHOYDQGLWRQGHU]RHNLVGH]HYUDJHQOLMVW ELMXDFKWHUJHODWHQ'H]HYUDJHQOLMVWEHYDWHQNHOHYUDJHQRYHUKRHPHQVHQDDQLQIRUPDWLHHQ PHQLQJHQRYHUSROLWLHNH]DNHQNRPHQ7LMGHQVHHQPRQGHOLQJLQWHUYLHZNXQQHQGH]HYUDJHQ PLQGHUJRHGDDQGHRUGHZRUGHQJHVWHOG :LOWXGHYUDJHQOLMVWLQYXOOHQHQLQGHELMJHYRHJGHHQYHORSWHUXJVWXUHQDDQKHW,76"
$OYDVWEHGDQNWYRRUXZPHGHZHUNLQJ
'HYROJHQGHYUDJHQJDDQRYHUSHUVRQHQPHWZLHXUHJHOPDWLJFRQWDFWKHHIW
0HWZHONHGULHSHUVRQHQLQXZRPJHYLQJEHVSUHHNWXGLQJHQGLHXEHODQJULMNYLQGW" +HWJDDWKLHUQLHWRPXZSDUWQHUPDDURPYULHQGHQRIGHUHVWYDQGHIDPLOLH
1RWHHUKLHUGHYRRUQDDPRILQLWLDOHQYDQGH]HSHUVRQHQ
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ
:DWLVGHOHHIWLMGYDQGH]HSHUVRRQ" $OVXGHOHHIWLMGQLHWSUHFLHVZHHWJHHIGDQHHQVFKDWWLQJ
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ
867 868 ,VGH]HSHUVRRQHHQPDQRIHHQYURXZ"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ PDQ YURXZ
:DWLVGHEXUJHUOLMNHVWDDWYDQGH]HSHUVRRQ"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 2QJHKXZG *HKXZG *HKXZGJHZHHVW :HGXZHZHGXZQDDU
:DWLVGHUHODWLHYDQGH]HSHUVRRQWRWX]HOI" 0HHUDQWZRRUGHQPRJHOLMN
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ IDPLOLHOLG LHPDQGYDQKHWZHUN OLGYDQGH]HOIGHYHUHQLJLQJ OLGYDQGH]HOIGHNHUN EXXUPDQEXXUYURXZ YULHQGYULHQGLQ DQGHUVQO
869 5HNHQWGH]HSHUVRRQ]LFK]HOIWRWHHQEHSDDOGHNHUNHOLMNHJH]LQGWHRIOHYHQVEHVFKRXZHOLMNH JURHSHULQJHQ]RMDWRWZHONH"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 5RRPV.DWKROLHN 1HGHUODQGV+HUYRUPG *HUHIRUPHHUG ,VODPLWLVFK $QGHUVQO *HHQ ZHHWQLHW
:HONHVLWXDWLHLVRSGH]HSHUVRRQYDQWRHSDVVLQJ"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ YHUULFKWEHWDDOGZHUN KHHIWEHWDDOGZHUNYHUULFKWPDDUGRHWGDWQXQLHW PHHU KHHIWQRRLWEHWDDOGZHUNYHUULFKW
:DWLV?ZDVKHWEHURHSRIGHIXQFWLHYDQGH]HSHUVRRQ" ,QGLHQHHQYDQGHSHUVRQHQQRRLWEHWDDOGZHUNKHHIWYHUULFKW YUDDJ KRHIWXYRRUGLHSHUVRRQ QLHWVLQWHYXOOHQ
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ
+RHYDDNVSUHHNWXGH]HSHUVRRQSHUVRRQOLMNRIYLDGHWHOHIRRQ"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ HONHGDJRIELMQDHONHGDJ PLQVWHQVNHHUSHUZHHN PLQVWHQVNHHUSHUPDDQG
870 PLQGHUGDQNHHUSHUPDDQG
,VGH]HSHUVRRQ]HHUJHwQWHUHVVHHUGLQSROLWLHNHRQGHUZHUSHQWDPHOLMNJHwQWHUHVVHHUGRI QLHWJHwQWHUHVVHHUG"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ ]HHUJHwQWHUHVVHHUG WDPHOLMNJHwQWHUHVVHHUG QLHWJHwQWHUHVVHHUG
+RHYDDNVSUHHNWXPHWGH]HSHUVRRQRYHUSROLWLHN"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ DOWLMGDOVLNGH]HSHUVRRQ]LH VRPV ]HOGHQ QRRLW
$OVXRYHUSROLWLHNVSUHHNWPHWGH]HSHUVRRQ+RHYDDNEHQWXKHWGDQPHWHONDDUHHQV" ,QGLHQXPHWHHQSHUVRRQQRRLWRYHUSROLWLHNVSUHHNW YUDDJ GDQKRHIWXYRRUGH]HSHUVRRQ QLHWVLQWHYXOOHQ
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ YDDN VRPV ]HOGHQ QRRLW
9DQSROLWLHNHRSYDWWLQJHQZRUGWYDDNJH]HJGGDW]LM/,1.6RI5(&+76]LMQ:DQQHHUX GHQNWDDQGHSROLWLHNHRSYDWWLQJHQYDQGH]HGULHSHUVRQHQZDDU]RXXKHQGDQSODDWVHQRSHHQ VFKDDOYDQWRW" EHWHNHQW/,1.6HQEHWHNHQW5(&+761RWHHUWXPDDUKHWQXPPHUGDWYDQWRHSDVVLQJLV
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ
871 (QZDDU]RXX]LFK]HOISODDWVHQ"
2SZHONHSROLWLHNHSDUWLMKHHIWGH]HSHUVRRQJHVWHPGELMGH7ZHHGH.DPHUYHUNLH]LQJHQYDQ PHL"
3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 3HUVRRQ 39'$ &'$ 99' ' *URHQ/LQNV 6*3 *39 53) &HQWUXPGHPRFUDWHQ 81,($29 63 DQGHUVQO QLHWNLHVJHUHFKWLJG KHHIWQLHWJHVWHPG ZHHWQLHW
+RHYDDNKHHIWXFRQWDFWPHW $8%*H]LQVOHGHQQLHWPHHUHNHQHQ &RQWDFW ]RZHOSUDWHQGRRUGHWHOHIRRQDOVRSYLVLWHJDDQRILHPDQGVSUHNHQ
HHQRIPHHU RQJHYHHU HHQPDDOSHU QRRLW NHUHQSHU HHQPDDOSHU ZHHN ZHHN WZHHZHNHQ
872 IDPLOLHOHGHQ YULHQGHQYULHQGLQQHQ EXUHQ FROOHJD’VRSKHWZHUN
873 %HVSUHHNWXSHUVRRQOLMNHSUREOHPHQPHW ,QGLHQXQRRLWFRQWDFWKHHIW YUDDJ GDQKRHIWXYRRUGH]HSHUVRQHQQLHWVLQWHYXOOHQ
MD QHH IDPLOLHOHGHQ YULHQGHQYULHQGLQQHQ EXUHQ FROOHJD’VRSKHWZHUN
:LOWXPLMYRRUHONYDQGHYROJHQGH1HGHUODQGVHLQVWHOOLQJHQ]HJJHQRIXGDDUKHHOYHHO WDPHOLMNYHHOQLHW]RYHHORIKHOHPDDOJHHQYHUWURXZHQLQKHHIW"
KHHOYHHO WDPHOLMNYHHO QLHW]RYHHO KHOHPDDO JHHQ NHUNHQ OHJHU UHFKWHUV SHUV SROLWLH 7ZHHGH.DPHU DPEWHQDUHQ JURWHEHGULMYHQ 'H(XURSHVH8QLH 'H1$92
'DQQXHQNHOHYUDJHQRYHUX]HOIZHEHJLQQHQPHWWHOHYLVLHHQUDGLRSURJUDPPD’V
+RHYDDNLQGHZHHNNLMNWXJHPLGGHOGQDDUGHYROJHQGHSURJUDPPD’V" SHUSURJUDPPDLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
NLMNW PLQGHU j j YULMZHO ZHHW QRRLW GDQ NHHUSHU NHHUSHU GDJHOLMNV QLHW NHHUSHU ZHHN ZHHN ZHHN 1HWZHUN 1HG 126XXUMRXUQDDO 1HG
874 126XXUMRXUQDDO 1HG 9DQGDDJ 1HG -HXJGMRXUQDDO 1HG %DUHQG :LWWHPDQ 1HG /LQJR 1HG $FKWHUKHWQLHXZV 1HG 126XXUMRXUQDDO 1HG 129$'HQ+DDJ9DQGDDJ 1HG 57/MRXUQDDO 57/ 8XU6KRZ 57/ 7KHEROGDQGWKHEHDXWLIXO 57/ *RHGH7LMGHQ6OHFKWH7LMGHQ 57/ 57/MRXUQDDO 57/ 9LMILQKHW/DQG 57/ +DUWYDQ1HGHUODQG 6%6 $FWLHQLHXZV 6%6 *RXGNXVW 6%6 2QGHUZHJQDDU0RUJHQ 9HURQLFD
+RHYHHOXXUSHUZHHNOXLVWHUWXJHPLGGHOGQDDUGHYROJHQGHUDGLR]HQGHUV" SHU]HQGHULVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
OXLVWHUW PLQGHU XXU XXU PHHU ZHHW QRRLW GDQ SHU SHU GDQ QLHW XXUSHU ZHHN ZHHN XXUSHU ZHHN ZHHN 5DGLR 5DGLR
875 5DGLR 5DGLR 5DGLR 5DGLR*ROG 9HURQLFD 5DGLR 6N\5DGLR 5DGLR.ODVVLHN 5HJLRQDOH]HQGHU $QGHUH]HQGHUQO
+RHYHHOXXUSHUGDJEHVWHHGWXJHPLGGHOGDDQKHWOH]HQYDQGHYROJHQGHNUDQWHQ" SHUNUDQWLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
OHHVWQRRLW PLQGHU HHQNZDU HHQKDOI PHHUGDQ ZHHW GDQHHQ WLHUWRW XXUWRW HHQXXU QLHW NZDUWLHU HHQKDOI HHQXXU SHUGDJ SHUGDJ XXUSHU SHUGDJ GDJ 'H7HOHJUDDI $OJHPHHQ'DJEODG 15&+DQGHOVEODG 'H9RONVNUDQW 7URXZ +HW3DURRO 5HJLRQDOHNUDQW
+RHYHHOXXUSHUZHHNEHVWHHGWXJHPLGGHOGDDQKHWOH]HQYDQGHYROJHQGHWLMGVFKULIWHQ" SHUWLMGVFKULIWLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
OHHVW PLQGHU XXU XXU PHHU ZHHW QRRLW GDQ SHU SHU GDQ QLHW XXUSHU ZHHN ZHHN XXUSHU ZHHN ZHHN
876 'H*URHQH$PVWHUGDPPHU (OVHYLHU 9ULM1HGHUODQG 6WRU\ :HHNHQG 3ULYp 3DQRUDPD 9LYD 0DUJULHW /LEHOOH $QGHUEODGQO
+HHIWXWLMGHQVGHYHUNLH]LQJVSHULRGHHHQSURPRWLHILOPRIHHQXLW]HQGLQJYDQHHQSROLWLHNH SDUWLMJH]LHQRSWHOHYLVLH" SHUSDUWLMLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
MD QHH ZHHW QLHW 39'$ &'$ 99' ' *URHQ/LQNV 63 $QGHUHSDUWLMQO
:DWYRQGXYDQGH]HSURPRWLHILOP" SHUSURPRWLHILOPLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN ,QGLHQXYDQHHQSDUWLMJHHQSURPRWLHILOPKHHIWJH]LHQ YUDDJ GDQKRHIWXYRRUGLHSDUWLMQLHWVLQ WHYXOOHQ
JRHG PDWLJ VOHFKW JHHQ
877 PHQLQJ 39'$ &'$ 99' ' *URHQ/LQNV 63 $QGHUHSDUWLMQO
+HHIWXWLMGHQVGHYHUNLH]LQJVSHULRGHZHOHHQVKHW,QWHUQHWJHEUXLNWRPLQIRUPDWLHRYHU SROLWLHNWHYHUNULMJHQ"
MD QHH
%HQWXWLMGHQVGHYHUNLH]LQJVSHULRGHGRRUHHQSROLWLFXVYDQHHQSROLWLHNHSDUWLMEHQDGHUG GRRUPLGGHOYDQSRVWRIHHQJHVSUHNRSVWUDDW" 0HHUGHUHDQWZRRUGHQPRJHOLMN
MDYLDSRVW MDYLD MDDQGHUV QHH JHVSUHNRS 'RRUHHQOLGYDQ VWUDDW 39'$ &'$ 99' ' *URHQ/LQNV 6*3 *39 53) &HQWUXPGHPRFUDWHQ 81,(
878 $29 63 6HQLRUHQ DQGHUVQO ZHHWQLHW
%HQWX]HHUJHwQWHUHVVHHUGLQSROLWLHNHRQGHUZHUSHQWDPHOLMNJHwQWHUHVVHHUGRIQLHW JHwQWHUHVVHHUG"
]HHUJHwQWHUHVVHHUG WDPHOLMNJHwQWHUHVVHHUG QLHWJHwQWHUHVVHHUG
+HHIWXKHHOYHHOWDPHOLMNYHHOZHLQLJRIKHOHPDDOJHHQLQWHUHVVHLQSROLWLHNH JHEHXUWHQLVVHQ SHUJHEHXUWHQLVLVVOHFKWVDQWZRRUGPRJHOLMN
KHHOYHHO WDPHOLMN ZHLQLJ KHOHPDDO ZHHWQLHW YHHO JHHQ LQXZZRRQSODDWV LQGHEXXUWRIZLMNZDDUXZRRQW LQXZSURYLQFLH LQGH(XURSHVHSROLWLHN LQSROLWLHNXLWGHUHVWYDQGHZHUHOG
,QZHONHEODGHQOHHVWX PHHUGHUHDQWZRRUGHQPRJHOLMN
ODQGHOLMNH UHJLRQDOH ZHHNEODG PDDQG ZHHWQLHW NUDQW NUDQW EODG ELQQHQODQGVQLHXZV EXLWHQODQGVQLHXZV
879 +HHIWXWLMGHQVGHFDPSDJQHNHQQLVVHQDDQJHUDGHQRSHHQEHSDDOGHSDUWLMWHVWHPPHQ"
MD QHH
(QKHHIWLHPDQGYDQXZNHQQLVVHQXDDQJHUDGHQRSHHQEHSDDOGHSDUWLMWHVWHPPHQ"
-D 1HH
880 +HEEHQXZYULHQGHQRINHQQLVVHQLQKHWDOJHPHHQGH]HOIGHSDUWLMYRRUNHXUDOVXRIKHEEHQ ]LMHHQDQGHUHSDUWLMYRRUNHXU"
GH]HOIGHSDUWLMYRRUNHXU DQGHUHSDUWLMYRRUNHXU ZHHWQLHW
:DWLVGHGDWXPZDDURSXGH]HYUDJHQOLMVWKHHIWLQJHYXOG"
'DJ 0DDQG
:DWLVKHWWLMGVWLSZDDURSXGH]HYUDJHQOLMVWKHHIWLQJHYXOG"
8XU 0LQXWHQ
+RHODQJKHHIWXJHGDDQRYHUKHWLQYXOOHQYDQGH]HYUDJHQOLMVW"
0LQXWHQ
:DWLVXZJHERRUWHGDWXP"
'DJ 0DDQG -DDU
:DWLVXZJHVODFKW"
PDQ YURXZ
'LWLVKHWHLQGHYDQGHYUDJHQOLMVW
+DUWHOLMNGDQNYRRUXZPHGHZHUNLQJ
881 5.4 Non-response questionnaire
The documentation of the non-response questionnaire is comparable with the documentation of the first and second wave. These questions have standardized answering categories and are identical to questions used in the main study of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998. Background characteristics like age and sex and education are asked to be compared with the background characteristics of the respondents in the first and second wave and to make sure the right person was interviewed. Also the reason for not participating in the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study was established. The interest in politics was measured to find out whether people who do not participate in the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study are less interested in politics than people who do participate. Political efficacy is measured in the non-response project, because a lack of political efficacy can also be a reason for not participating in the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study. Questions about voting behavior and political preference were asked at the end of the interview because they were expected to meet with resistance.
5.4.1 Non-response questionnaire (Dutch)
1 Wij willen graag iets meer weten waarom u niet aan het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek meedoet. Kunt u mij daarover iets meer vertellen? Enq.: Het gegeven antwoord in één van de volgende categorieën indelen.
1 doet nooit mee principieel tegen enquêtes 2 doet nu niet mee geen interesse in het onderwerp 3 privacyredenen - laat geen vreemden binnen angstgevoelens - vrees dat gegevens niet vertrouwelijk behandeld worden - geeft geen persoonlijke gegevens 4 onbekwaamheidsgevoelens - ik weet er niets van af - ze kunnen net zo goed een ander vragen - ik ben er te oud voor 5 overlast - te vaak lastiggevallen met enquêtes - kost te veel tijd moeite - persoonlijk al genoeg zorgen 6 nutteloosheid - ze doen er toch niets mee - ik hoor er toch niets meer van - ik heb er geen belang bij 7 anders, nl...... 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
882 999 (inappropriate) routing
2 Enq. Noteer geslacht 1 man 2 vrouw 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
3 Mag ik vragen wat uw leeftijd is? ...... 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
4 Kunt u mij zeggen wat uw hoogst voltooide school-opleiding is?
1 Lager onderwijs 2 VGLO, LAVO 3 LBO, LTS, ITO, Huishoudschool, LEAO, LHNO, Lagere LandbouwTuinbouwNautische School, 3 jaar Handelsavondschool 4 (M)ULO, 3-jarige HBS, MAVO, IVO, 3 jaar VWO, 3 jaar VHMO, Middenschool, 3 jaar Atheneum, 3 jaar Gymnasium 5 MEAO, UTS, MBO, MHNO, InAs, Verpleegster, KMS, Politieschool, Middelbare LandbouwTuinbouwNautische School, Middelbare Detailhandelschool 6 5-jarige HBS, Gymnasium, MMS, Lyceum, Atheneum, HAVO 7 MBA, MTS 8 HBO, HTS (voor ‘57 MTS), HEAO, Sociale of pedagogische academie, kunstonderwijs, zeevaartschool, kweekschool, SPD, GA-1, Hogere LandbouwTuinbouwZeevaartschool, Hogere detailhandelschool, NLO 9 MO-akten, Accountancy, Beroeps Officiersopleiding, GA-2, GF etc., KMA, Politie Academie, Kandidaatsopleiding 10 Universiteit, Hogeschool 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
5 Bent u zeer geïnteresseerd in politieke onderwerpen, tamelijk geinteresseerd of niet geïnteresseerd?
1 zeer geïnteresseerd 2 tamelijk geïnteresseerd 3 niet geïnteresseerd 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
883 999 (inappropriate) routing
Ik wil graag uw mening over de volgende twee stellingen.
6 Soms lijkt de politiek zo ingewikkeld dat mensen zoals ik niet echt kunnen begrijpen wat er speelt. Bent u het met deze stelling...
1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
7 Kamerleden bekommeren zich niet om de mening van mensen zoals ik. Bent u het met deze stelling...
1 helemaal mee eens 2 mee eens 3 mee oneens 4 helemaal mee oneens 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
8 Heeft u gestemd bij de laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen?
1 ja, wel gestemd 2 nee, niet gestemd 3 nee, mocht (nog) niet stemmen 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen 999 (inappropriate) routing
9 Zoals u misschien weet zijn er mei van dit jaar verkiezingen voor de TWEEDE KAMER. Gaat u dan wel of niet stemmen, of weet u dat nog niet?
1 gaat wel stemmen (10 en 12 niet stellen) 2 gaat niet stemmen (11 en 12 niet stellen) 3 weet het nog niet (10 en 11 niet stellen) 997 weet niet (19 en 11 niet stellen) 998 wil niet zeggen (10 en 11 niet stellen) 999 (inappropriate) routing
10 Waarom gaat u niet stemmen?
884 ENQ: Meerdere antwoorden mogelijk ENQ: Letterlijk noteren.
11 Op welke partij gaat u stemmen op 6 mei?
12 Als u op 6 mei gaat stemmen, op welke partij gaat u dan stemmen?
5.5 Stimulus effect project
The documentation of the stimulus-effect questionnaire is comparable with the documentation of the main study and the non-response study. The questions have standardized answering categories and are almost identical to questions used in the non-response study of the Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1998. Background characteristics like age and sex and education are asked to be compared with the background characteristics of the respondents in the first and second wave and to make sure the right person was interviewed.
5.5.1 Stimulus-effect questionnaire (Dutch)
A. Goedemiddag\avond u spreekt met ... van ITS Nijmegen. Ik zou graag willen spreken met ... Bent u dat, of zou deze persoon even aan de lijn kunnen komen?
Kort geleden hebben we u een brief gestuurd met het verzoek om mee te werken aan het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek. Zou u in principe bereid zijn hieraan mee te willen werken?
B. Interviewer. Probeer respondent over te halen mee te werken door op het nut van het onderzoek te wijzen. INT: Vraag niet om waarom, maar noem redenen en vraag, bent u bereid? argumenten: wetenschappelijk, alle bevolkingsgroepen vertegenwoordigd c1 alsnog bereid (naar D) c2 blijft bij wiegering (naar C)
C. We respecteren uw mening. Toch wil ik u nog wat vragen. U zou ons erg helpen als u nu een paar korte vragen zou willen beantwoorden. Dit duurt hooguit 2 minuten. Kan dat? INT: LICHT EVENTUEEL TOE: Het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek wordt elke vier jaar naar aanleiding van de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen georganiseerd. Er zijn altijd veel mensen die hier aan mee werken, maar ook steeds meer mensen die er niet aan mee willen werken. Omdat we weinig van deze mensen weten wordt de waarde van het onderzoek in gevaar gebracht. Daarom willen we u enkele vragen stellen Ja (naar v1) Nee (naar einde)
885 D. Wij zijn blij met uw bereidheid om mee te willen werken. Het is zo dat we nog niet precies bepaald hebben wie er wel en niet aan het onderzoek mee gaan doen. U komt bij ons in een kaartenbak en we zullen later wellicht contact met u opnemen om een afspraak te maken. Nu zouden we graag een paar korte vragen willen stellen. Dit duurt hooguit 2 minuten. Kan dat? INT: LICHT EVENTUEEL TOE: Het Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek wordt elke vier jaar naar aanleiding van de Tweede Kamerverkiezingen georganiseerd. Er zijn altijd veel mensen die hier aan mee werken, maar ook steeds meer mensen die er niet aan mee willen werken. Van al deze mensen willen we weten wat voor soort mensen het zijn, om de waarde van het onderzoek niet in gevaar te brengen Ja (naar v1) Nee (naar einde) v1. Bent u zeer geïnteresseerd in politieke onderwerpen, tamelijk geïnteresseerd of niet geïnteresseerd? : c1 zeer geïnteresseerd, c2 tamelijk geïnteresseerd, c3 niet geïnteresseerd v2. Zoals u misschien weet waren er 6 mei verkiezingen voor de TWEEDE KAMER. Heeft u wel of niet gestemd: c1 ja, wel gestemd, c2 nee, niet gestemd, c3 nee, mocht niet stemmen v3a. INT: Noteer geslacht :mv; v3b. Mag ik vragen wat uw leeftijd is?:18..99; v3c. Heeft u de Nederlandse Nationaliteit?:Ja Nee; v4a. Kunt u mij zeggen wat uw hoogst voltooide school-opleiding is?: c1 Lager onderwijs, c2 VGLO, LAVO, c3 LBO, LTS, ITO, Huishoudschool, LEAO, LHNO, Lagere Landbouw\ Tuinbouw\ Nautische School, 3 jaar Handelsavondschool, c4 (M)ULO, 3-jarige HBS, MAVO, IVO, 3 jaar VWO, 3 jaar VHMO, Middenschool, 3 jaar Atheneum, 3 jaar Gymnasium, c5 MEAO, UTS, MBO, MHNO, InAs, Verpleegster, KMS, Politieschool, Middelbare Landbouw\Tuinbouw\Nautische School, Middelbare Detailhandelschool, c6 5-jarige HBS, Gymnasium, MMS, Lyceum, Atheneum, HAVO, VWO, c7 MBA, MTS,
886 c8 HBO, HTS (voor '57 MTS), HEAO, Sociale of pedagogische academie, kunstonderwijs, zeevaartschool, kweekschool, SPD, GA-1, Hogere Landbouw\Tuinbouw\Zeevaartschool, Hogere detailhandelschool, NLO, c9 MO-akten, Accountancy, Beroeps Officiersopleiding, GA-2, GF etc., KMA, Politie Academie, Kandidaatsopleiding, c10 Universiteit, Hogeschool); v4b. Uzelf meegerekend, uit hoeveel personen bestaat het huishouden waartoe u behoort? Enq: Kinderen die elders op kamers wonen niet tot het huishouden rekenen. : c1 1 persoon, c2 meer dan een persoon); v4c. Uit welke personen bestaat het huishouden waartoe u behoort? INT: EVENTUEEL HELPEN : c1 echtpaarvaste partners, c2 echtpaarvaste partners en kind(eren), c3 echtpaarvaste partners en kind(eren) en ander(en), c4 echtpaarvaste partners en ander(en), c5 1-ouder en kind(eren), c6 1-ouder en kind(eren) en ander(en), c7 anders, nl...); v4cand v4cand Anders, namelijk:....
Ik wil graag uw mening over de volgende twee stellingen. v5a. Soms lijkt de politiek zo ingewikkeld dat mensen zoals ik niet echt kunnen begrijpen wat er speelt. Bent u het met deze stelling ... : c1 helemaal eens, c2 eens, c3 oneens, c4 helemaal oneens v5b. Kamerleden bekommeren zich niet om de mening van mensen zoals ik. Bent u het met deze stelling ... : c1 helemaal eens, c2 eens, c3 oneens, c4 helemaal oneens
(alleen te stellen als op vraag 2 'gaat wel stemmen' is geantwoord). v6. Op welke partij heeft u gestemd op 6 mei? : .... v6and 5band Welke andere partij?: ....
887 v6a. Heeft u gestemd bij de laatste gemeenteraadsverkiezingen? : c1 ja, wel gestemd, c2 nee, niet gestemd, c3 nee, mocht (nog) niet stemmen
Ik wil u hartelijk bedanken voor uw medewerking!
(Indien buiten de populatie) Dan heb ik verder geen vragen meer voor u. We willen alleen spreken met kiesgerechtigde Nederlanders. Ik wil u hartelijk bedanken voor uw bereidheid tot medewerking!
888 6. Previous election studies and comparability of questions
6.1 Overview of DPES Studies 1971-1998
DPES 1971 DPES 1972 DPES 1977 DPES 1981 DPES 1982 DPES 1986 DPES 1989 DPES 1994 DPES 1998 Special surveys 1971 Wave 1 (2,495) April 28 ‘71
Wave 2 (1,980) 1972 November 29 ‘72 Wave 3 (1,324) Wave 1 (1,526) New voters (325) New voters (210) 1973 Panel 4 (887) Wave 2 (1,036)
1974
1975
1976
1977 Wave 1 (1,856) May 25 1977 Panel 5 (509) Wave 2 (1,434) 1978
1979 Panel 6 (437)
1980
1981 Wave 1 (2,305) Wave 2 (1,812) May 26 1981 Wave 3 (1,620) 1982 Sept. 8 1982 Panel 4 (1,206) Wave 1 (1,541) 1983
1984
1985
1986 Wave 1 (1,630) May 21 1986 Stratified Sample Panel 5 (757) Wave 2 (1,360) (782) 1987
1988
889 DPES 1971 DPES 1972 DPES 1977 DPES 1981 DPES 1982 DPES 1986 DPES 1989 DPES 1994 DPES 1998 Special surveys 1989 Wave 1 (1,754) Sept 6. 1989 Panel (650) Wave 2 (1,506) 1990
1991
1992
1993
1994 Wave 1 (1,812) May 3 1994 Panel (875) Wave 2 (1,527) 1995
1996
1997
1998 May 6 1998 Wave 1 (2100) Non-response (926) Wave 2 (1814) Panel (...) Drop off (1201) Stimulus-effect (1451)
890 6.2 Comparability of questions with previous election studies
In this section an overview of questions asked in previous Dutch Parliamentary Election Studies (1971-1998) is presented. All previous questions have been inspected, compared and listed in this overview. If two questions dealt with the same topic the question is comparable and listed in the same row. Therefore the questions in one row can differ with regard to formulations and presentations. Questions concerning background characteristics like sex and age were not included in this overview.
In the first column English labels are presented. The second and third column contain the numbers of the questions in the Dutch questionnaire in the first and the second wave of the 1998 study, etcetera’s.
1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA reads national news 2 - 2 - 2 2 - 2 1 - 11111113- 22-21-14 10 20 talks national news 3 - 3 - 3 3 - 3 2 - 22222224- 21-28-13 9 10 106 people ask you for opinion ------20-29-12 8 11 107 read foreign news 4 - 4 - 4 4 - 4 3 - 33333335- 24-22-- interested in politics5- 5- 5a5- 54- 44444446- 5- 27-11 interest in politics changed - - - - 5b 5c ------in last 4 years 5d most/least interested in ------23 24-- local, national or foreign news daily newspaper 6 - 6 - - 65 - - 5 ------2-4-5-- 6 7 watching nos-news 7 - 7 - 6 6 - 6 6 ------watching rtl4-news 8 - 8 - 7 - - 7 ------watching tvprograms 9 - - - 8 ------1-2-3-10 listening radioprograms ------3-4-- paper or nos-news most ------7------25 26-- reliable local issues ------11-12-- 12 13
891 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 13 14 15 14a 16a 14b 16b 14c 14d most important problems 10-9- 117- 88- - 55555- 10-15-17-9 OP 17 18 local problems ------6-8-- international problems ------23-19-- party/person to solve ------16-18-- important problems 7 9 OP is adherent party 11a - 10a - 12a 9a - - 9a - - 6a 6a 7a 7a 7a 5a 36 - 68 - 60 - 47 adherent which party 11b - 10b - 12b 9b - - 9b - - 6b 6b 7b 7b 7b 5b 37 - 69 - 61 - 48 convinced adherent 11c - 10c - 12c 9c - - 9c - - 6c 6c 7c 7c 7c 5c 38 - 70 - -49 64 other parties OP is adherent ------7a 7b8a 8b 8a 8b - 6a 6b ------to 7c 7d 8c 8d 8c 8d 6c 6d
party doesn’t exist anymore, ------65 66-- OP is attracted to.. OP is attracted to party 11d - 10d - 12d 9d - - 9d - - 7a 8a 9a 9a 8a 7a 39 - 71 - 62 - 50 attracted to which party 11e - 10e - 12e 9e - - 9e - - 7b 8b 9b 9b 8b 7b 40 - 72 - 63 - 51 10a 10a 8a 8b 10b 10b other parties OP is attracted ------9a 9b------to most attracted to party 11b2 ------party member 12a-11a--10a--10a--8a10a11a---41-73-99-6 which party 12b-11b--10b--10b--8b10b11b---42-74-100-7 ever been party member 12c - ---10c--10c--8c10c11c---43-75-101-- party ever been member of 12d ------102-- considered to be member 12e ------party considered to be 12f------member other members family party --11c------member members family party --11d------member of which party
892 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA effect policy economic 13a-12a-16a12a-22a11a-8-----14a------situation last 4 years future economic situation ------162---- 163 effect policy employment 13b-12b-16b12b-22b11b-9-----14b------last 4 years effect policy OP finances 13c-12c-16c12c-22c11c-10-----14c------last 4 years satisfaction government last 14 - 13 - 17 11 - 23 12 - 11 - - - 33 - 15 - 59 83 44 - 4 25 4 years satisfaction opposition ------48c--26 48d 27 effect policy environment ------22d------last 4 years effect policy social security ------22e------last 4 years evaluation ministers, ------4851a78 -39-- second chamber 51b 91 67 51c 51d 51e 51f 51g 51h evaluation government’s ------13a- 84a ---- policy 13b 84 b 13c 84c 13d 84d 13e 84e 13f 13g 13h 13i 13j 13k 13l evaluation foreign policy ------80--109- promotion/distribution ------2045a --13- affluence 21a 45b 14 21b 45c 15 22 45d 16 23a 45e 17 23b 45f 18
893 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 45g 45h 45i 45j 45k 45l 45m
governement should/ ------2-531 did 3 7 8 increase affluence 4 9 10 5 others who increase ------6a-11- affluence 6b 12
personal situation ------7a 7b-6- 7c 7d satisfaction education ------16 17- 19 20 - possibilities 18 21 evaluation government’s ------40-- spending taxes increase government ------85 86---- expenses party/politician should follow ------15-60-45-- own program/issues as a 88 41 coalition partner 89 42 90 43 44 OP intends to vote 15a - 14a - - 8a - - 15a - - - - 16a 15a - - 23 - - 48g - - -
vote if today elections are ------85-- held
894 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA OP votes for which party Box 2 - Box - - 8b - - 15b - - - - 16b 15b - - 24a - - 48h 86 - - 2a why this party ------87-- 97 98 OP hesitates to Box 2 - Box ------88-- vote/between parties 2a/2c 89 why OP doesn’t vote ------90-- voting depends on what ------91-- party OP votes for if he --Box------24b---92-- decides to vote 2b 93 OP voted in previous 26a-15a-34a18a---16-40a43a6a6a6a-2151-94-4a elections 5a
OP ever voted in previous ------2428--24--4--96-5b elections OP voted for which party26b-15b-34b18b---17-40b43b 6b 6b 6b -22552a-95-4b 25 29 25 why OP doesn’t vote ------52b---- party OP votes for if voting Box 2 - Box --8c--15c----16c15c------is obliged 2b party OP votes for if OP had ------1716------two votes voting issues 16a ------16b 16c 16d 16e 16f 16g 16h 16i willing to vote 17a ------17b 17c 17d 17e interest in elections ------83--
895 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA abortion party + self - - ---13a- - 13a - - 37a 39a - 26a - 28 26a 58a ----- 13b 26b 58b 13c 26c 58c 13d 26d 58d 13e 57a 57b 57c 57d euthanasia party + self 19a - 16a - 18a - 17a 24a -18a13------19b 16b 18b 17b 24b 19c 16c 18c 17c 24c 19d 16d 18d 17d 24d 19e 16e 18e 17e 24e 19f 24f 19g crime party + self - - 17a - 21a ------17b 21b 17c 21c 17d 21d 17e 21e income differences party + 20a - 18a - 19a 16a - 25a 13c 18b - 38 40 - 27 - 31 28a ------self 20b 18b 19b 16b 25b 28b 20c 18c 19c 16c 25c 28c 20d 18d 19d 16d 25d 28d 20e 18e 19e 16e 25e 20f 20g nuclear plants party + self - 27a 19a - - 14a - - 13b 18c 12 37b 39b - 26b - 29 27a ------27b 19b 14b 27b 27c 19c 14c 27c 27d 19d 14d 27d 27e 19e 14e 27f 27g persons seeking asylum 21a ------21b 21c 21d 21e 21f
896 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 21g ethnic minorities party + self 23a - 20a - 20a ------75--- 23b 20b 20b 75a 23c 20c 20c 75b 23d 20d 20d 75c 23e 20e 20e 75d 23f 75e 23g 75f inflation party + self + ------1032a 41a 17 coalition 11 32b 41b 15 32c 41c 16 32d 41d 33 42 social benefits party + self - 28a ------28b 28c 28d 28e 28f 28g pollution party + self + ------2534a 43a 22 coalition 27 34b 43b 20 23 34c 43c 21 24 34d 43d 26a 35 44 26b education OP + coalition ------18 change society party + self ------95-69-40 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 employers should have say ------29a-----23 in business 29b 24 29c 29d defense party + self------31a------
897 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 31b 31c 31d OP reads about abortion, ------25a------nuclear weapons, income, 25 b aid, defense etc. 25c 25d 25e 25f close nuclear plants - - ---15--13b18d1237c39c-26c-30------equality of opportunities, ------55a44a - 31a -30 incomes 55b 44b 31b 30 55c 44c 31c 30 55d 44d 31d 30
freedom rights ------54a43a - 30a -29 54b 43b 30b 29 54c 43c 30c 29 30d OP votes for municipal 27a-21a-35a---14a------145- elections party OP voted for last 27b-21b-35b------municipal elections why vote for municipal --22a------elections OP voted for which party at --22b-35b---14b------146- municipal elections why OP didn’t vote at 27c-22c------municipal elections idealism - - 23a ------23b 23c good/bad characteristics ------16a------parties 16b 16c 16d 16e 16f 16g 16h
898 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA politicians out of own district ------17------male or female members of ------18------parliament sympathy parties 28a - 24a - 40a ---19----12a11a 9a -7a-67---- 28b 24b 40b 12b 11b 9b 7b 28c 24c 40c 13a 12a 10a 8a 28d 24d 40d 13b 12b 10b 8b 28e 24e 40e 14a 13a 11a 9a 28f 24f 40f 14b 13b 11b 9b 28g 24g 40g 15a 14a 12a 28h 24h 40h 15b 14b 12b 28i 24i 40i 28j 40j 28k 40k 28l 40l sympathy politicians 29a - 25a ---40a-20------48------29b 25b 40b 29c 25c 40c 29d 25d 40d 29e 25e 40e 29f 25f 40f 29g 25g 40g 29h 25h 40h 29i 25i 40i 29j 25j 40j 25k 40k 25l faith in people who rule the ------40 41---38 country faith in organizations ------42a---- 42b 42c 42d 42e 42f 42g 42h 42i
899 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 42j 42k 42l 42m 42n 42o 42p coalition preference 31f 17 26 - 37a 19 - - 21a - - 26 31 - 17 27 25 14 - 63 48a 53 66 68 45 62 48b 57 58 59 59 OP expects coalition ------5667- coalition formed in ------6443--- accordance with election 42a outcome 42b 44 45 matters to OP who are in 31g - 27 - 37b 20 - - 22 - - 27 32 - 18 28 26 19 - 66 - 55 - 46 coalition party states that it intends to ------16-61-52-44 form a coalition before elections are held queen/other asks formation ------17 18------of cabinet OP reads polls 18a ------23------accuracy of polls 18b ------24------party lost compared to last 18c ------25a------elections 18d 25b 18e 25c 18f 25d 25e citizenship 33a ------33b 33c 33d political socialization 34a -28- 45a 28 - - p26a ------68 6996 97 79a 103 - 41 34b 29a 45b 29a p26b 70 98 79b 43 34c 29b 45c 29b p26c 71 35a 30a 45d 30a p26d 72 35b 30b 45e 30b p26e 36a 36b
900 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA family values - - 31a - 41a ------31b 41b 31c 41c 31d 41d 31e 41e 31f 41f 31g 41g 31h 41h 31i 41i 31j 41j 31k 41k 31l 41l 31m 41m 31n 41n position issues - - 33a - 42a ------73 74- 33b 42b 33c 42c 34a 43a 34b 43b 34c 43c 34d 43d 34e 43e 35 44 meaning of life - - 36a ------110-- 36b 111 36c 112 36d 36e 36f 36g 36h 36i political issues pollution - - ---21----24 25------34a-- 22a 26a 34b 22b 26b 34c 22c 34d 35 dilemma OP or other people ------43a------pay for environment 43b 43c
901 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 43d motives/actions of OP ------44a------considering environment 44b 45a 45b 46a 46b evaluation cooperation ----2523a- 31a ------between parties 23b 31b 23c 31c 23d 31d 31e 31f 31g evalutation cooperation -----24a------within parties 24b 24c 24d evaluation politicians - - ---25a------25b 25c 25d 26a 26b - 26c 26d 26e 26f 26g OP reads campaign news - 2 - 2 9 - 1 9 - 1 ------OP did watch election -3a- 3 10 - 2 10 - 2 - - 30a ------debate on tv 3b 30b debate changed OP’s -3c------30c------opinion towards party/ do or 30d don’t vote 30e 30f 30g 30h 30i 30j
902 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA campaign activity - 4 - 4 13 - 31 - - 35 - 44 - - - 36 - 45 13 14 76a - 104 -8a 44 76b 105 8b 76c 8c 76d 8d 76e 8e 76f 8f reason OP participated in ------15 16----- campaign activity OP voted for last elections - 5 - 5 14a - 3 11 - 3 5 11 15 - - 13 16 - 1 47 - - 133 1 why OP voted ---6------48a---- OP voted for which party - 6 - 7 14b - 4 12 - 4 5a 12 16 - - 14 17 - 6 49 - - 134 2 why this party - 7 - 8 14c - 5a 5b 13 - 5 6 6a 13 17 - - 15 18 - 7 50 - - 135 - why OP vote blanc/unvalid ------235- when decided to vote - 8 - 9 14d - 9 14 - 6 - 14 18 - - 16 19 - 8 - - - 136 - OP always voted for this - 10a - 10a - - 10 15a -7-1519--17--953--139- party 10b1 10b 15b 138 10b2
OP would vote for other ------12a----3a party if CDA did not exist 12b (which party) OP votes in future------54---- which other party - 11 - 11 - - 11 16 - 8 - 16 20 - - 18 - - 10 - - - - - OP considered not to vote - 12a - 12a - - 12a 17a - 9 - 17 21 - - 19 20 ------OP considered to vote for -12b-12b--12b17b-9a-1721--1920------different party for which party -13-13--1318-10-1822--2021------evaluation performance ------1923------campaign leader importance performance ------2024------campaign leader why didn’t OP vote - 14 - 14 15a - 14 19 - 11 - 21 25 - - 21 22 - 3 48b - - 140 - when decided not to vote - 15 - 15 15b - 15 20 - 12 - 22 26 - - 22 23 - ----141- voted for which party if OP -16-16--1621-1372327--2324------did vote OP considers not to vote in ------142- future
903 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA voted for first on list-9a----6------reasons voted for first on list------7a 7b------name of candidate OP ------8------voted for why vote for other candidate - 9b ------OP voted for provincial ------143- elections for which party ------144- statement to govern------45--- party best idea solving - 20a -1738a------28------unemployment 20b 20c 20d 20e 20f 20g party best idea solving - 22a -1838b------28------crime 22b 22c 22d 22e 22f 22g party best idea solving - 21a -1938c------28------pollution 21b 21c 21d 21e 21f 21g party best idea solving ---2038d------28------welfare fraud party best idea solving ---2138e------budget deficit party best idea solving ---2238f------pensioners income party best idea solving ------28 ------housing problems party best idea refugees - 23a ------23b
904 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 23c 23d 23e 23f 23g party best idea heath 24a 24b 24c 24d 24e 24f 24g party/organizations/govern ------13 14- 28 29 - ment dealing with housing 15 30 31 problems 32 33 34 party/organizations/govern ------19a- 22 23 - ment dealing with education 19b 24 25 20 21 26 27 22a 22b party/organizations/govern ------8 9 10- 35 36 - ment dealing with inflation 11 12 37 38 39 40 party/organizations/govern ------30a- - 28 29 - 45 46 - ment dealing with aid 30b 30 47 48 30c 49 50 30d 51 52 53 54 developmental countries ------46----- decide on their own how to spend money evaluation foreign policy ------110- parties 111 evaluation Dutch foreign ------80--112- policy 113 114 115 116 117
905 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 118 a 118b 118c 118d 118e 119 120 121 evaluation foreign policy ------122- other countries 123 124 125 126a 126b 126c 126d 126e 126f 127 128 129 130 131a 131b perception OP Nato and ------18a- - 19 27 39a 41a - 30a - 32 - 44 45 - - - - - nuclear weapons 18b 18c 18d 18e perception parties Nato and ------19a--202839b41b-30b-33------nuclear weapons 19b 19c 19d sign petition nuclear ------21------weapons station new nuclear ------39c41c------weapons preference OP/party to use ------60a- 31a - 56a 28 extra income 60b 31b 56b 28 60c 31c 56c 28
906 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA civil rights ------56a- 54a - 86a - 56b 54b 86b 56c 54c 86c 56d 54d 86d 54e 86e 53a 85a 53b 85b 53c 85c 53d 85d 53e 85e 87a 87b 87c 87d 88a 88b 88c 88d reduce deficit or ------2030-2419------unemployment reduce or differ ------25a------unemployment benefit 25b unemployed self-others ------2620-----38------60 61 cause ------25a--11 12------unemployment/inflation 25b opposition between groups ------24-51a-57- 51b 51c 51d 51e 51f 51g 51h 51i 51j 51k 51l 69 expectations coalition on Op ------21a28a-22a16a------48e---
907 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA finances 21b 28b 22b 16b expectations general ------22a29a-23a17------48f--- prosperity expectations coalition ------22b29b - 23b 18a ------general prosperity 22c 29c 23c 18b 29d 29e 29f expectation electoral ------21 2223 24------outcome society should have more ------58- control on industry more control on banks ------34--- government influence on ------35 36--- technics /birthcontrol valence issues - - - 23a 39a ------29------23b 39b 23c 39c 23d 39d 23e 39e date on behalf of European ---24------elections OP intents to vote for ---25a------European elections 25c did OP vote at European ---25b-17a------elections why did OP vote - - - 26 ------which party did OP vote for - - - 27 - 17b ------why didn’t OP vote - - - 28 ------did OP advise others how to ------26--17--84-- vote did others advise OP how to ------18----- vote vote OP’s friends the same ------19-81--- as OP European unification party + 22a - - 29a 22a ------self 22b 29b 22b 22c 29c 22c 22d 29d 22d 22e 29e 22e
908 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 22f 29f 22g 29g 29h OP’s attitude towards world ------66 67--- 71 72 one government for western ------43-73 74-83 8454 Europe 53 OP ‘s influence on EG ------108a 78 79 - 108b 80 81 82 Dutch attitude towards EG ------4281 82---- OP would move to other ------75 76- region/ abroad 77 faith in prospective premiers - 32a - 30a 26a - 24a - - 28 - 36 38 - 20 29 27a ------32b 30b 26b 24b 27b 32c 30c 26c 24c 27c 32d 30d 26d 27d 32e 26e 32f 26f political knowledge (photos) 30a - - 31a 36a -23--27-3537-19--46 47------30b 31b 36b 30c 31c 36c 30d 31d 36d 30e 36e 30f 36f 30g 36g 30h 36h 30i 36i 30j 36j 30k 36k 30l 36l coalition is already formed ------64- political knowledge 18g ------57-7941 36 65 - (questions) 24a 32a 87 68 37 31a 32b 25 51 31b 32c 55 56 49 31c 109a 31d 109b 31e 109c 109d
909 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 109e position countries ------69a--- 69b 69c - 69d 69e there are to much parties------46-- opinion OP amount of ------48-- parties in Second Chamber opinion OP certain amount ------20-57-50-- of seats to make it to the 58 Second Chamber good/bad characteristics ---32a------prime-minister candidates 32b 32c 32d 32e 32f 32g 32h left-right self 25 33 32 33 23a 27 25 - - 29 15a 10 14 19 22 31 12 49 61 - - - - - attitude changed last 4 ----23b------years 23c 23d 23e left-right parties - 34a - 34a 24a - 26a 27a -3015b10a14a--3213------34b 34b 24b 26b 27b 34c 34c 24c 26c 27c 34d 34d 24d 26d 27d 34e 34e 24e 26e 27e 34f 34f 24f 26f 27f 34g 34g 24g 26g 27g 34h 34h 24h 26h 27h 34i 34i 24i 26i 27i 34j 24j 26j 34k 24k 26k 34l 24l 26l 34m meaning left-right - - - 35a ------20a---50a------35b 20b 50b
910 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA efficacy - 35a - 36a 29a - 27a 41a - 31a -9-182130933-77a- 38a -37 35b 36b 29b 27b 41b 31b 77b 38b 37 35c 36c 29c 27c 41c 31c 77c 38c 37 35d 36d 29d 27d 41d 31d 77d 38d 37 cynicism - 37a - 37a 31a - 28a 42a - 32a --12--42--50a----- 37b 37b 31b 28b 42b 32b 50b 37c 37c 31c 28c 42c 32c 50e distrust ------11--41--50c77e ---- 50d 77f 77g protest + reaction------13--40------confidence in people ------53-52a-5939 52b 60 52c 61 confidence in organizations ------5242---- Op’s opinion on society ------30f------77a----- matters 30i 77b 30b 77c 30k 77d 30g 77e 30f 77f 30l 77g 30c 77h 30d 77i 30e 77j 30j 77k 30a 77l 29 chance of war ------47a----- 47b 47c 49 issues considering the world------48----- help for threatened ------76 77--- countries 78 OP’s orientations towards - 36c - 38a 30c ------politics 35e 38b 29e 36a 38c 30a 36b 38d 38e
911 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 38f 30b 38g 38h 32a 39a 32b 39b 32c 39c 32d 39d 32e 39e 32f 39f 40a 40b 40c importance institutions - - - 41a ------41b 41c 41d electoral issues ------34a- 94a - - 72a 36 34b 94b 72b 36 34c 94c 72c 36 34d 94d 72d 36 34e 94e 72e 36 34f 93 72f 69 70 71
government without second ------92-68-35 chamber accept decisions ------3538 39-64a--- government 64b 64c 64d 63 meaning democracy - - - 42 ------37--- 38 OP’s influence at ------39 40--- company/organization where he works priority to problems - 19a - 43a ------19----
912 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA according to OP 19b 43b 19c 43c 19d 19e 19f 19g 19h 19i 19j 19k 19l 19m 19n 19o chance OP acting against ---44a------28----- local bill action local bill ------89 90- chance OP acting against - 44a - 44b 33a - 29 47 - 33 - 41 - - - 33 - - 30 - 57 - 94 - national bill OP acts against European ------58-95- bill political participation - 44b - 45 33b - 30a 48 - 34a -43---35--3227 28 61a -98- 30b 34b 27 29 30 61b 89 90 30c 34c 29 31 32 61c 91 92 30d 34d 33 34 61d 93 99 30e 34e 35 38 61e 100 30f 34f 39 61f 30g 34g 61g 30h 34h 61h 30i 34i 61j 30j 34j 61k 30k 34k 61l 30l 34l 61m 30m 34m 55 56 expected effect political ------42---34--31 343760a-9732 participation 60b 33 60c 60d 60e
913 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 60f 60g 60h 60i 60j 60k expected effect political ------59a-96- participation, local 59b 59c 59d 59e 59f 59g 59h 59i 59j 59k 59l OP acted on own initiative ------33----- or because someone asked purpose of goals ------3436a---- 36b goal achieved ------3537---- meaning/ meaningfull ------36----- OP’s opinion on political ------37a- 62a - 101a - pressure tactics 37b 62b 101b 37c 62c 101c 40 62d 101d 62e 101e 62f 101f 62g 103 65 102a 102b 104 105 106a 106b OP is member union - 25a - 46a - - 32a - - 36a - 30 --34---7426a - 152 -- 30 34 74 26b 153 OP is member of which---46b--32b--36b------
914 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA union union related to fnv, cnv ------32c--36c------other family members -25b-46c--33--37------152-- member union member professional -25a----34--38----34---7426b-152-- organization is OP member of woman-, -25a------30--34---7426b---- neighborhoodorganization 26a or other organizations is OP member of a -25a------73----- sportsorganization is OP member of tv------75 76----- organization or tv-magazine should the Netherlands ------82---52 continue membership of NATO sympathy social movements------39a22------39b 39c 39d 39e OP participate in social -25a------40a23------movements (environment/ 40b anti nuclear power etc) 40c 40d 40e willing to participate in ------62----- organizations Op’s own evaluation ------63----- political dilemma's - - - 47a ------47b 47c 47d 47e position OP towards ideas ------3133------to solve unemployment OP’s ideas to solve ------3234------unemployment position OP towards income ------3335------differences
915 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA position OP towards ------3436--39------woman’s emancipation position OP towards ---48a------foreigners, people from 48b another nationality/race position OP towards ---49------46---- positive action towards foreigners chance ever vote for a party - 43a - 50a - - 35a 38a -4121-42---34-----137- 43b 50b 35b 38b 43c 50c 35c 38c 43d 50d 35d 38d 43e 50e 35e 38e 43f 50f 35f 38f 43g 50g 35g 38g 43h 50h 35h 38h 43i 50i 35i 38i 43j 35j 43k 35k 43l 35l trait evaluations politicians ------32a- 42a ------32b 42b 32c 42c 32d 42d 32e 42e 32f 42f 32g 42g 33a 42h 33b 33c 33d 33e 33f 33g 34a 34b 34c 34d 34e 34f
916 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 34g 35a 35b 35c 35d 35e 35f 35g 36a 36b 36c 36d 36e 36f 36g 37a 37b 37c 37d 37e 37f 37g influence of groups/people ------25a- 32a - 107 - on decisions 25b 32b 132 25c 32c 25d 32d 25e 32e 25f 32f 25g 32g 25h 32h 25i 32i 25j 32j 25k 32k 25l 32l 25m 32m 25n 32n 41 32o 32p 32q 47
917 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA daughter marry’s foreigner ------46---- appropriate influence of ------26a- 33a - 108 - groups 26b 33b 26c 33c 26d 33d 26e 33e 26f 33f 26g 33g 26h 33h 26i 33i 26j 33j 26k 33k 26l 33l 26m 33m 26n 33n 33o 33p 33q confessional attitude party - 45a - 51a - - 36a - - 43 - 28a - - 31a - 10a 51 52 - - 49a - 62 58 45b confessional attitude unions - 45c - 51b - - 36b - - 43 - 28b - - 31b - 10b 53 - - 49b - 62 58 confessional attitude - 45d - 51c - - 36c - - 43 - 28c - - 31c - 10c 54 - - 49c - 62 58 schools 45e confessional attitude - 45f -51d--36d--43-28d--31d-10d55------radio/tv 45g religion as guide - 46 - 52 - - 37 - - 44 - 29 - - 32 - 11 56b - - 50b - 63b - goal Christian party is ------56a--50a-63a- unclear religious attitudes ------45a-----43b------43c religion OP 40a - - 58a -----45------36------55 40b 58b 40c 40d 40e 40f confessional attitude ------46a------nursing home confessional attitude school ------46b------for child
918 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA refuse homosexual teachers ------47------value priorities 1-4 - 18a - 53a 27a - 38a 39a ------37------18b 53b 27b 38b 39b 18c 53c 27c 38c 39c trust in people - 38 ------social isolation - 39a ------39b 39c 39d 39e 39f acceptance decisions of - 41a ------government 41b 41c 41d 41e act on behalf of decisions of - 41f ------government 41g 41h 41i most/least important priority/ ---54a28a - 39a 40a ------38------goal 54b 28b 39b 40b society and personal goals 32a - - 55a ------32b 55b 32c 55c 32d 55d 32e 55e 32f 55f 32g 55g 32h 55h 32i 55i 32j 55j 32k 55k 32l 55l 32m 55m 32n 55n 32o 55o 32p 55p 32q 55q turnout, time work---56a------
919 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA time OP voted -9g-56b------reason OP didn’t vote - - - 56c ------amount of hours OP worked ---56d------on electionday did you give authority for -9c------voting gave authority to-9d------did you got authority from -9e------anyone got authority from-9f------long term party preference - - - 57a ------57b 57c reason cooperate in -49------interview CSES-module - 29a ------29b 29c 29d 29e 29f 29g 29h 29i 29j 29k 29l 29m 29n - 30a ------Questions about regions 30b
Foreigners right to vote for - 31a ------municipal and 2 chamber 31b elections extremism - 48a ------48b 48c 48d 48e
920 1998 1998 1994 1994 1994 1989 1989 1989 1986 1986 1986 1982 1982 1981 1981 1981 1981 1977 1977 1972 1972 1971 1971 19 WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE FRESH WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WAVE WA 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 5 1 2 1 2 1 2 5 PANEL PANEL PANEL PANEL PA 48f 48g 48h egoism-altruism ------41a------41b
921
6.3 Comparability with CSES questions
The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES) is a collaborative program of cross-national research among election studies conducted in over fifty consolidated and emerging democracies. The goals of this program of research are threefold: illuminate how electoral institutions constrain the beliefs and behaviors of citizens to condition the nature and quality of democratic choice as expressed through popular elections; understand the nature of political and social cleavages and alignments; and shed light on how citizens, living under diverse political arrangements, evaluate democratic institutions and processes. By coordinating the collection of electoral data across polities, the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems strives to advance the understanding of enduring and fundamental debates about electoral behavior.
CSES Var English Dutch Remarks Q1 V0745 On the whole, are you very Bent u over het algemeen satisfied, fairly satisfied, not genomen zeer tevreden, tamelijk very satisfied, or not at all tevreden, niet erg tevreden of satisfied with the way helemaal niet tevreden met de democracy works in the wijze waarop de democratie in Netherlands? Nederland functioneert? 1 very satisfied 1 zeer tevreden 2 fairly satisfied 2 tamelijk tevreden 3 not very satisfied 3 niet erg tevreden 4 not at all satisfied 4 helemaal niet tevreden 8 don’t know 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Q2 V0746 In some countries, people In sommige landen vinden de believe their elections are mensen dat hun verkiezingen conducted fairly. In other eerlijk verlopen. In andere landen countries, people believe vinden mensen dat hun that their elections are verkiezingen oneerlijk verlopen. conducted unfairly. Thinking Op deze kaart betekent een 1 dat of the last elections in the de verkiezingen eerlijk verlopen Netherlands, where would zijn en een 5 dat de verkiezingen you place it on the scale of oneerlijk verlopen zijn. Wanneer u one to five, where ONE aan de afgelopen Tweede means that the last election Kamerverkiezingen denkt, waar was conducted fairly and zou u uzelf dan plaatsen? FIVE means that the last 1...5 election was conducted 997 weet niet unfairly? 998 wil niet zeggen Scale 1..5 8 don’t know V0747 Added, open follow-up Alleen indien OP 4 of 5 noemt bij question for those de vorige vraag respondents choosing category 4 or 5:...... Wat vond u precies oneerlijk? What exactly, do you believe, was unfair? Q3 V0050 Do you usually think of Veel mensen voelen zich These
923 yourself as close to any aanhanger van een bepaalde questions particular political party? politieke partij, maar er zijn ook have 1 yes Naar 11b mensen die zich geen aanhanger been 2 no Naar 11d voelen van een politieke partij. included 8 don’t know Naar 11d Voelt u zich aanhanger of voelt u in the zich geen aanhanger van een pre- politieke partij? election 1 is aanhanger --> Naar 11b interview 2 is geen aanhanger --> Naar 11d and have been formulate d according to the DPES tradition. Q3a V0051- Which party is that? Van welke partij? V0053 First party mentioned (one (Meerdere partijen mogelijk) mentioned to 11c) 1 PVDA Second party mentioned 2 CDA (more parties mentioned to 3 VVD 11b2) 4 D66 Third party mentioned (...etcetera ...) 60 anders, nl... 97 weigert 98 weet niet 99 wil niet zeggen
Indien meer dan 1 partij genoemd: 11b2 Tot welke van deze partijen voelt u zich het meest aangetrokken? (1 partij mogelijk) 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D’66 (... etcetera...) 60 anders, nl... 97 weigert 98 weet niet 99 wil niet zeggen Q3b V0054 Which party do you feel closest to? ...... (To ...) Q3c Q3e V0055 Do you feel very close to this Zoudt u zichzelf een zeer party, somewhat close, or overtuigde aanhanger willen not very close? noemen, een overtuigde 1 very close aanhanger of vindt u zichzelf geen 2 somewhat close overtuigde aanhanger? 3 not very close 1 zeer overtuigde aanhanger Naar 8 don’t know 12a 2 overtuigde aanhanger Naar 12a 3 geen overtuigde aanhanger
924 Naar 12a 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen Q3c V0056 Do you feel yourself a little Is er een partij waartoe u zich closer to one of the political meer voelt aangetrokken dan tot parties than the others? andere partijen? 1 yes 1 ja Naar 11e 2 no 2 nee Naar 12a 8 don’t know 997 weet niet Naar 12a 998 wil niet zeggen
V0057 Which party is that? Welke partij is dat? ...... 1 PVDA 2 CDA 3 VVD 4 D’66 (... etcetera...) 60 anders, nl... 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Q4 V0748 Some people say that Sommige mensen vinden dat de political parties in the politieke partijen in ons land Netherlands care what belangstelling hebben voor de ordinary people think. Others meningen van gewone mensen. say that political parties in Anderen zeggen dat de partijen the Netherlands don’t care geen belangstelling hebben voor what ordinary people think. de meningen van gewone Using the scale on this card mensen. Op deze kaart betekent (where ONE means that 1 dat de partijen belangstelling political parties care about hebben voor de meningen van what ordinary people think, gewone mensen, en 5 dat de and FIVE means that they partijen geen belangstelling don’t care what ordinary hebben voor de meningen van people think), where would gewone mensen. Welke cijfer is you place yourself? op u van toepassing? Scale 1..5 8 don’t know 1 De partijen hebben belangstelling voor wat gewone mensen willen (...) 5 De partijen hebben geen belangstelling voor wat gewone mensen willen 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Q5 V0749 Some people say that Sommige mensen vinden dat political parties are politieke partijen nodig zijn om ons necessary to make our politieke stelsel te laten werken. political system work in the Anderen denken dat politieke Netherlands. Others think partijen in ons land niet nodig zijn. that political parties are not [KAART] Op deze kaart betekent needed in the Netherlands. `1' dat politieke partijen nodig zijn
925 Using the scale on this card, en `5' dat politieke partijen in ons (where ONE means that stelsel niet nodig zijn. Welk cijfer is political parties are op u van toepassing? necessary to make our political system work, and 1 Politieke partijen zijn nodig in FIVE means that political ons politieke stelsel parties are not needed in the (...) Netherlands), where would 5 Politieke partijen zijn niet nodig you place yourself? in ons politieke stelsel Scale 1..5 997 weet niet 8 don’t know 998 wil niet zeggen
Q6 - Do you happen to remember Q6 - Q6c the name of any candidates have not who ran/stood in your Lower been house primary electoral included district, e.g. constituency, in the district, riding/ in the last DPES parliamentary/ congressional election? 1 yes 5 no (Naar Q7) 8 don’t know
Q6a Candidate 1 Q6b Candidate 2 Q6c Candidate 3
Q7 V0170- I’d like to know what you Overhandig kaart Included V0180 think about each of our Er zijn veel politieke partijen in in pre- political parties. After I read ons land. Ik zou graag van u election the name of a political party, weten hoe sympathiek u deze interview. please rate it on a scale from partijen vindt. Scale U kunt iedere partij hiervoor 0 to 10, where 0 means you punten geven tussen de 0 en de format strongly dislike that party 100. Hoe sympathieker u een according and 10 means you strongly partij vindt, to DPES like that party. If I come to a hoe meer punten u die partij tradition, party you haven’t heard of or geeft. 50 betekent dat u die partij i.e. 0 - you feel you do not know niet sympathiek, maar ook niet 100 enough about it, just say so. onsympathiek vindt. Als u een The first party is party A, etc. partij niet kent, zegt u het dan gerust.
Als eerste nemen we de PvdA. Hoeveel punten zou u de PvdA geven?
ENQ: Als OP deze partij niet kent dan code 101 gebruiken. 0..100 101 kent partij niet 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Etc. overige partijen
926 Q8 V0181- And now using the same Gebruik weer kaart Scale V0189 scale, I’d like to ask you how Ik zou ook graag van u weten hoe format much you like or dislike sympathiek u de volgende politici according some political leaders. vindt. Als u een politicus niet to DPES kent, zegt u het dan gerust. Again, if I come to a leader ENQ: Als respondent deze tradition, you haven’t heard of or you politicus niet kent dan code 101 i.e. 0 - feel you don not know gebruiken. 100 enough about, just say so. Allereerst nemen we Wim Kok. The first political leader is A, Hoeveel punten zou u hem etc.. geven? 0..100 101 kent kandidaat niet 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Q9 V0750 What do you think of the Wat vindt u van de algemene state of the economy these economische toestand in days in the Netherlands. Nederland op dit moment? Vindt u Would you say that the deze zeer goed, goed, niet goed state of the economy is very en niet slecht, slecht, of zeer good, good, neither good slecht? nor bad, bad of very bad? 1 zeer goed 1 very good 2 goed 2 good 3 niet goed en niet slecht 3 neither good not bad 4 slecht 4 bad 5 zeer slecht 5 very bad 997 weet niet 8 don’t know 998 wil niet zeggen Q10 V0751 Would you say that over the Als u de economische toestand past twelve months, the van nu vergelijkt met die van state of the economy in the twaalf maanden geleden, is die Netherlands has gotten economische toestand dan beter better, stayed about the geworden, gelijk gebleven, of same, or gotten worse? slechter geworden? 1 gotten better (to Q10a) 1 beter geworden (ga naar ...) 3 stayed the same 3 gelijk gebleven 5 gotten worse (to Q10b) 5 slechter geworden (ga naar ...) 8 don’t know 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen Q10a V0751 Would you say much better veel beter of enigszins beter? of somewhat better? 1 veel beter 1 much better 2 enigszins beter 2 somewhat better 997 weet niet 8 don’t know 998 wil niet zeggen
Q10b V0751 Would you say much worse veel slechter of enigszins or somewhat worse? slechter? 5 much worse 5 veel slechter 4 somewhat worse 4 enigszins slechter 8 don’t know 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen Q11 V0752 Some people say that Sommige mensen vinden dat members of Parliament leden van de Tweede Kamer goed know what ordinary people op de hoogte zijn van wat gewone think. Others say that mensen denken. Anderen zijn van
927 members of Parliament don’t mening dat leden van de Tweede know much about what Kamer niet weten wat gewone ordinary people think. Using mensen denken. [KAART 3] Op the scale on this card, deze kaart betekent het cijfer ‘1’ (where ONE means that the dat Tweede Kamerleden goed op members of Parliament don’t de hoogte zijn van wat gewone know what ordinary people mensen denken, en cijfer `5' dat think, and FIVE means that Tweede Kamerleden niet weten the members of Parliament wat gewone mensen denken. don’t know much about what Welk cijfer is op u van ordinary people think), toepassing? where would you place yourself? 1 Tweede Kamerleden zijn goed Scale 1..5 op de hoogte van wat gewone 8 don’t know mensen denken (...) 5 Tweede Kamerleden weten niet wat gewone mensen denken 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Q12 V0753 During the last twelve Heeft u in het afgelopen jaar months, have you had any contact gehad met een lid van de contact with a member of Tweede Kamer? Parliament in any way? 1 ja 1 yes 2 nee 5 no, no contact at all 997 weet niet 8 don’t know 998 wil niet zeggen
Q13 V0755 Some people say it makes a Sommige mensen vinden dat het difference who is in power. verschil maakt wie aan de macht Others say that is doesn’t is. Anderen vinden dat het geen make a difference who is in verschil maakt wie aan de macht power. Using the scale on is. Op deze kaart betekent een 1 this card (where one means dat het geen verschil maakt wie that it makes a difference aan de macht is en een 5 dat het who is in power and five wel verschil maakt wie aan de means that it doesn’t make a macht is. Welk cijfer is op u van difference who is in power) toepassing? where would you place 1 Het maakt geen verschil wie aan yourself? de macht is Scale 1..5 (... ) 8 don’t know 5 Het maakt wel verschil wie aan de macht is 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen Q14 V0754 Some people say that no Sommige mensen vinden dat, matter who people vote for, wat men ook stemt, het geen it won’t make any difference verschil maakt voor wat er to what happens. Others say gebeurt. Anderen vinden dat wat that who people vote for can men stemt wel verschil maakt make a difference to what voor wat er gebeurt. Welk cijfer happens. Using the scale on op deze KAART is op u van this card (where one means toepassing? Op deze kaart
928 that voting won’t make a betekent 1 dat wat men stemt difference to what happens geen verschil maakt en 5 dat wat and five means that voting men stemt wel verschil maakt. can make a difference), Welk cijfer is op u van where would you place toepassing? yourself? 1 Wat men ook stemt, het maakt Scale 1..5 geen verschil 8 don’t know (...) 5 Wat men ook stemt, het maakt wel verschil 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen Q15 V0756 When people are asked to Wanneer mensen om een mening express an opinion, do you over politieke zaken wordt believe most people in the gevraagd, denkt u dan dat de Netherlands usually say meeste mensen in Nederland what they think about politics doorgaans ook zeggen wat zij or do you believe most echt vinden of denkt u dat zij dat people usually hide what meestal voor zich houden? Op they really think about deze kaart betekent 1 dat de politics? Using the scale on meeste mensen in Nederland this card, (where one means zeggen wat zij vinden over that most people in the politieke zaken en 5 dat de Netherlands usually say meeste mensen voor zich houden what they think about wat zij vinden over politieke politics, and five means that zaken. Welk cijfer is op u van most people usually hide toepassing? what they really think), where would you place 1 De meeste mensen zeggen wat yourself? zij vinden over politieke zaken Scale 1..5 (...) 8 don’t know 5 De meeste mensen houden voor zich wat zij vinden over politieke zaken 8 weet niet
Q16 V0770 In politics people sometimes Overhandig Kaart Scale talk of left and right. Where Van politieke opvattingen wordt format would you place yourself on vaak gezegd dat zij links of rechts according a scale from 0 to 10 where 0 zijn. Wanneer u denkt aan uw to DPES means left and 10 means eigen politieke opvattingen, waar tradition, right. zou u dan zichzelf op deze lijn i.e. 1 - 10 plaatsen? Noemt u maar het cijfer (pre- dat op u van toepassing is. election Schaal 1..10 interview 997 weet niet contains 998 wil niet zeggen left-right self- placemen t on 0 - 10 scale) V0775- Using the same scale, Overhandig Kaart Scale V0785 where would you place party Ook van politieke partijen wordt format A gezegd dat zij links of rechts zijn. according
929 Wilt u aangeven in welke mate u to DPES vindt dat een partij links of rechts tradition, is? i.e. 1 - 10 PvdA 1..10 etc. 11 kent partij niet 997 weet niet 998 wil niet zeggen
Other variables CSES module
CS Question Wave Question Variables ES 1 Age 1 /2 1b V0316 2 Sex 1 /2 1 V0288 3 Education 1 38a t/m 38c V0352-V0353 4 Marital status 1 1c V0351 5 Member of a union 2 25a V0724 6 Other union members in 2 25b V0729 household 7 Employment status 1 39b V0358 8 Main occupation 1 39b V0358 9 Public or private employment 1 39aw V0355 10 Industrial sector of employment 1 39c V0569 11 Income household 1 51 V0358 12 Number of people in household 1 37a V0280 13 Number of people in household 1 37a 37d V0280-V0343 under 18 14 Attendance of religious services 1 40e V0382 15 Religiosity (degree) 1 40b V0377 16 Religious denomination 1 40b 40c 40d V0377-V0379 17 Language usually spoken at -- - home 18 Region of residence 1/2 sample info V0010 19 Respondents race - - - 20 Rural or urban residence 1/2 sample info V0013 21 Political information 1 24, 30a-30l, 31a- V0150-V0159 31e V0190-V0201 V0205-V0223 22 # days between election and 1/2 date interview V0504 interview V0888 23 Electoral district - - -
930 7. Outcome of the 1998 parliamentary elections
The 1998 election was characterized by a major role for the media. For the first time almost all political parties used the Internet to dispense information about politicians, the party, activities and their party manifesto. During special broadcasting time political parties were able to present themselves to the public. They were also able to buy broadcasting time from public and commercial television-stations to show spots on tv or to broadcast spots on radio stations. Several large polling firms signed contracts with the media and presented figures on tv about the predicted election outcome. Politicians appeared in several television shows and entertainment programs or toured through the country to meet voters. The traditional leaflets and window posters were also used during the election campaign.
The 1998 election outcome did not differ much from the predicted election outcomes which dominated the news. PvdA, VVD and GroenLinks were the big winners and CDA, D66, AOV/Unie55+ and CD the losers. PvdA won 8 seats (from 37 to 45 seats). PvdA did manage to remain the largest party in parliament. VVD, the third largest party during the period 1994-1998, won 7 seats (from 31 to 38 seats) and became the second party in parliament. GroenLinks gained 6 seats (from 5 to 11). CDA lost 5 seats (from 34 to 18). This was a great surprise because in the opinion polls CDA was predicted to stay the second party in parliament as it did during the period 1994-1998. D66 lost 10 seats, as foreseen in the opinions polls. D66 also was the big loser during the municipal elections on March 4, 1998. SP won 3 seats (from 2 to 5). SGP gained 1 seat (from 2 to 3). RPF and GPV remained constant at 2 seats. The party for the elderly AOV/Unie 55+ lost all of their 7 seats and had to leave the parliament just like the ethnocentric CentrumDemocraten. They lost 3 seats. All other parties that run for parliament did not receive any seats. A total 8,607,787 voters cast a vote during the 1998 Parliamentary election. This is 73% of the electorate. In 1994 78% of the electorate cast their vote: a record low since the abolition of compulsory voting.
In the 1998 Parliamentary elections 22 parties run for parliament. The valid votes were presented as follows:
Party Absolute Percentage Number of seats Number of seats number of of popular in Parliament in Parliament votes vote after May 6 1998 during 1994-1998
PvdA 2,494,555 29,0 45 37 VVD 2,124,971 24,7 38 31 CDA 1,581,053 18,4 29 34 D66 773,497 9,0 14 24 GroenLinks 625,968 7,3 11 5 SP 303,703 3,5 5 2 RPF 174,593 2,0 3 3 SGP 153,583 1,8 3 2 GPV 108,724 1,3 2 2 CD 52,226 0,6 0 3 AOV/Unie 55+ 45,994 0,5 0 7 Nederland Mobiel 45,219 0,5 0 - Senioren 2000 36,157 0,4 0 - NMP 23,512 0,3 0 - De Groenen 16,585 0,2 0 0
931 Natuurwetpartij 15,746 0,2 0 0 KPP 8,233 0,1 0 - VIP 7,225 0,1 0 0 NSOV 6,455 0,1 0 - NCPN 5,620 0,1 0 0 IdeALISTEN/JIJ 2,500 0,0 0 - Het Kiezers Collectief 1,668 0,0 0 - Overige 0,0 - 0
Total 100 150 150
Explanation of acronyms:
PvdA Partij van de Arbeid Labor Party VVD Volkspartij voor Vrijheid en People’s Party for Freedom and Democratie Democracy CDA Christen Democratisch Appel Christian Democratic Appeal D66 Democraten 1966 Democrats 1966 GroenLinks GroenLinks GreenLeft SP Socialistische Partij Socialist Party RPF Reformatorische Politieke Reformed Political Federation Federatie SGP Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij Political Reformed Party GPV Gereformeerd Politiek Verbond Reformed Political Association CD CentrumDemocraten Center Democrats AOV/Unie 55+ Algemeen Ouderen Verbond/ Unie General Seniors Union/ Union 55 55+ plus Nederland Mobiel Nederland Mobiel Dutch mobile Senioren 2000 Senioren 2000 Seniors Union 2000 NMP Nederlandse Middenstands Partij Dutch Tradespeople party De Groenen De Groenen The Greens Natuurwetpartij Natuurwet Partij Natural Law Party KPP Katholieke Politieke Partij Catholic Political Party VIP Vrije Indische Partij Free Indonesian Party NSOV Nieuw Solidair Ouderen Verbond New Solidair Elderly Union NCPN Nieuwe Communistische Partij New Communist Party Nederland Netherlands IdeALISTEN/JIJ IdeaLISTEN/JIJ Idealists/You Het Kiezers Het Kierzers Collectief The Voters Collective Collectief
932 REFERENCES
Anker, H., & Oppenhuis, E.V., Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1994. Amsterdam: SWIDOC
Bakker, B., Sieben, I. Nieuwbeerta, P. Ganzeboom, H. (1997) Maten voor prestige, sociaal-economische status en sociale klasse voor de standaard beroepen classificatie 1992, in: Sociale Wetenschappen Vol. 40 (Issue 1), 1997, 1-22 (22)
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1992b). Standaard Beroepenclassificatie 1992. SDU, 's-Gravenhage.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1992a) Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek 1971- 1989; de invloed van de herweging. Sociaal-culturele berichten 1992-19, CBS, Voorburg/Heerlen, 1993.
Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (1995) Divisie Sociaal-economische statistieken; Sector integratie en presentatie J.A. Oud tel 070-3375704 Concept schakelschema SBC'92 - ISCO-88 24-3-1995.
Eijk, C. van der B. Niemoller, A.Th.J. Eggen (1981), Dutch Parliamentary Election Study 1981. Amsterdam: Department of Political Science, University of Amsterdam
Hartman, Harm (1998) "Survey en designeffecten" Unpublished note, ITS, Nijmegen
Mokken, R.J. (1971) A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis, with Applications to Political Research. The Hague: Mouton
MSP (1988) MSP: A Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polychotomous Items, Version 1.50. User's Manual. Groningen: IEC ProGamma
Schmeets, J.J.G. & Molin, E.J.E. (1990) Nationaal Kiezersonderzoek 1989; constructie en evaluatie van weegmodellen in kiezersonderzoek, CBS, Heerlen.
933