Tourism Explosion": the Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 2011 A Study of Historic Towns after "Tourism Explosion": The Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey Aysem Kilinc-Unlu University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Kilinc-Unlu, Aysem, "A Study of Historic Towns after "Tourism Explosion": The Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey" (2011). Theses (Historic Preservation). 169. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/169 Suggested Citation: Kilinc-Unlu, Aysem. (2011). A Study of Historic Towns after "Tourism Explosion": The Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/169 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Study of Historic Towns after "Tourism Explosion": The Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey Abstract In his book The Conservation of European Cities, Donald Appleyard stated that, "The old city exemplifies the human scale, individuality, care and craftsmanship, richness and diversity that are lacking in the modern plastic, machine-made city with its repetitive components and large scale projects." However, many historic cities are in danger of becoming plastic because of tourism development despite the distinctive qualities they once had. Recent layers are not valued, faux elements are used to keep historic identity of built fabric, or diversity gets lost by replicating a selected type of architectural form. This thesis looks both into intended and market driven changes before and after "tourism explosion" in three towns in western Turkey, and tries to understand what happened to these "old" qualities in the course of change so that reasons behind homogenized historic settlements can be revealed and proper planning and management can protect against the homogenization process. Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Suggested Citation: Kilinc-Unlu, Aysem. (2011). A Study of Historic Towns after "Tourism Explosion": The Case of Çeşme, Foça and Şirince in Western Turkey. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/169 A STUDY OF HISTORIC TOWNS AFTER “TOURISM EXPLOSION”: THE CASE OF ÇEùME, FOÇA AND ùøRøNCE IN WESTERN TURKEY Aysem Kilinc-Unlu A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Ful¿ llment of the Requirements of the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN HISTORIC PRESERVATION 2011 ______________________ Advisor Randall F. Mason Associate Professor in Historic Preservation ______________________ Program Chair Randall F. Mason Associate Professor ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my advisor, Randall Mason, for his support and guidance during my thesis research, and throughout my time at Penn. I am also grateful to the students and professors of the Middle East Technical University, Graduate Program in Restoration for sharing their hard work on ùirince and Çeúme. Mostly, I would like to thank my whole family for their never-ending love, cheer, support, patience, generosity and encouragement, even from thousands of miles away. And Ça÷lar, thank you for standing behind me and encouraging me all the time. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................iii LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................iv 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................1 Thesis ....................................................................................6 2. LITERATURE REVIEW .............................................................10 Literature Review on Tourism and Heritage ..........................10 Literature Review on Tourism Development in Turkey ........24 3. ÇEùME ........................................................................................36 History and Development ......................................................37 Current Status, January 2011 .................................................47 Analysis..................................................................................54 4. FOÇA .......................................................................................58 History and Development ......................................................59 Current Status, January 2011 .................................................70 Analysis..................................................................................77 5. ùøRøNCE ..................................................................................80 History and Development ......................................................80 Current Status, October 2007 and January 2011 ....................94 Analysis..................................................................................98 6. CONCLUSION ........................................................................101 BIBLIOGRAPHY ..............................................................................108 APPENDIX: DEFINITIONS OF LEGAL DESIGNATIONS ...........113 INDEX ...............................................................................................116 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Advertisement campaigns; above, Greece (for 2008); below, India (initiated in 2002). Source: http://nation-branding.info/brandinggreece/greek-tourism-ads-2008, www.incredibleindiacampaign.com. ................................................................................3 Figure 2. Matrix outlining basic characteristics of the three case studies. ...................7 Figure 3. Marmaris Castle almost invisible behind a stone-clad concrete building and identically decorated restaurants in the foreground. Source: http://www.net-bilgi.com/ tag/marmaris-nerededir. ...................................................................................................18 Figure 4. Above, TopkapÕ Palace in østanbul; center, a model of the Palace in Miniaturk Park; below, WOW TopkapÕ Hotel in Antalya. Source: http://www.À ickr.com/photos/ joannehedger/4608509921, http://www.À ickr.com/photos/mehmetcaglayan/1301748729, http://www.topkapipalaceantalya.com. ............................................................................19 Figure 5. Commercial center of KuúadasÕ; above, shutters are down and no one is walking on the streets during the low season; below, a view during the high season while shops and restaurants are open, attracting tourists with signage in English and stalls full of generic gifts and fake-brand clothing. Source: Author, 2011; http://www.À ickr.com/ photos/54813587@N07/5125909632/in/set-72157625050337261. ................................22 Figure 6. Hatched area showing the 3-km wide coastline from Çanakkale to Mersin which was declared as the tourism development area for mass tourism by the Second Five-Year Development Plan in 1968. Source: Edited from the base map from http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BlankMapTurkeyProvinces.png. ..........................................26 Figure 7. Clusters of indistinguishable vacation homes in YalÕkavak, Bodrum spreading over the hills; a view which is not very different in other coastal towns along Aegean and Mediterranean seas. Source: www.yalikavak.bel.tr, accessed March 10, 2011. .................................................................................................................................28 Figure 8. Geographic distribution of the Culture and Tourism Preservation and Development Regions declared by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Source: Base map from Google Earth, data from the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. ......................34 Figure 9. Location of Çeúme and Karaburun Peninsula in relation to ø zmir. Source: Edited from Google Maps, 2011. .....................................................................................38 Figure 10. Aerial view of Çeúme district center showing main roads connecting to øzmir, and some of the landmarks. The commercial area surveyed for this thesis is illustrated by a dashed line. Source: Edited from Google Maps, 2011. ...........................38 iv Figure 11. Partial aerial view of the district showing vacation homes; the highway connection of Çeúme to ø zmir can be seen on the right. Source: Çeúme Belediyesi, http://www.cesmebelediyesi.com/index.php?page=p_galeri_havafoto. ..........................43 Figure 12. Natural, archaeological and urban sites in and around Çeúme district center which are under different levels of protection by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism. Source: Aerial view from Google Maps, 2011; data from METU Çeúme Studio Report, 2011. .................................................................................................................................43 Figure 13. Çeúme Sheraton Hotel on IlÕca beach is one of the largest and most popular facilities in the district. Source: http://www.sheratoncesme.com/?page=fotograÀ ar. ......45 Figure 14. Building integrity in the study area as of January 2011. Source: Aerial view from Google Maps, 2011; plan from Çeúme Municipality; data collected through ¿ eld survey