Approval of Resolution 2020/21-24, Approving Seattle Public Schools' Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan for Submiss

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Approval of Resolution 2020/21-24, Approving Seattle Public Schools' Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan for Submiss SCHOOL BOARD ACTION REPORT DATE: May 19. 2021 FROM: Dr. Brent C. Jones, Interim Superintendent LEAD STAFF: JoLynn Berge, Chief Financial Officer; James Bush; Chief of Equity, Partnerships, and Engagement; Carri Campbell, Chief of Public Affairs; Rob Gannon; Deputy Superintendent; Greg Narver, Chief Legal Counsel; Dr. Concie Pedroza, Chief of Student Support Services; Fred Podesta, Chief Operations Officer; Dr. Keisha Scarlett, Chief Academic Officer, Noel Treat, Chief Human Resources Officer; Dr. Mia Williams, Chief of the Office of African American Male Achievement; Dr. Caleb Perkins, Executive Director of College & Career Readiness; Julia Warth, Director of Board Relations and Strategic Initiatives, [email protected], 206.252.0124 For Introduction: May 19, 2021 For Action: May 26, 2021 1. TITLE Approval of Resolution 2020/21-24, approving Seattle Public Schools’ Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan for submission to OSPI on June 1, 2021. 2. PURPOSE This Board Action would approve Resolution 2020/21-24 and the Seattle Public Schools’ Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan for submission to OSPI on June 1, 2021, as required in House Bill 1368, Chapter 3, Laws of 2021. 3. RECOMMENDED MOTION I move that the School Board approve Resolution 2020/21-24 and the attached Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan for submission to OSPI on June 1, 2021, as required by House Bill 1368, Chapter 3, Laws of 2021 and approve receipt of Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) funding. 4. BACKGROUND INFORMATION a. Background The Washington State Legislature passed House Bill 1368 during the 2021 legislative session. The bill requires school districts to submit an Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan to the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction (OSPI) by June 1, 2021 in order for districts to receive their Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ESSER III) funding as authorized by the America Rescue Plan Act of 2021. OSPI created a template for the plan, including components required in HB 1368 to address student academic and well-being needs “resulting from school building closures and extended time in remote learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic.” The 1 OSPI template includes identification of diagnostic assessment tools by grade level, identification of student learning and well-being needs, strategies to support students most impacted by building closures, community engagement, and the use of an equity tool. The plan must be approved by the Board at a public meeting and there must be an opportunity for public comment, which can occur at a regular meeting of the Board. The opportunity for public comment is being provided through testimony during the May 19, 2021 Regular Board meeting as well as through a Let’s Talk form available online until May 25, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. at the following link: https://www.k12insight.com/Lets- Talk/Dialogue.aspx?k=PR2B78N4B9LT@WF7G2YLT@DY6Z1KXLT. Feedback received through Let’s Talk will be shared with the Board. The plan must also be posted on the district website in an ADA accessible format with translation available prior to submitting to OSPI. The American Rescue Plan Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief (ARP ESSER) Fund under the American Rescue Plan (ARP) Act of 2021, Public Law 117-2 also requires districts to create plans in order to receive ESSER III funds. The plan elements include those required by OSPI, as well as how the district will adhere to CDC health and safety guidance and ensure continuity of academic and other services for students. The ARP ESSER plan focuses on planned expenditures for the ESSER III funds, while the Safe Return to In-Person and Continuity of Services Plan focuses more on the services and strategies. The Safe Return to In-Person and Continuity of Services Plan must be submitted 30 days after receipt of ESSER III funds by the district. The plans must be posted online publicly in an ADA accessible format and with translation available. The plans may be combined by OSPI. Seattle Public Schools submitted earlier plans for the 2020-21 school year to OSPI regarding instructional model and health and safety, as required. To accompany those plans, the Board also passed resolutions to provide guidance on additional educational innovations, such as outdoor and community education. These resolutions, along with the Board’s current work on student outcomes focused governance in relation to the district strategic plan, Seattle Excellence, have informed the current plan. Instructional Model Based on state requirements from the Governor and State Superintendent as well as the district’s desire to serve students, SPS is planning to have five full days of in-person instruction at all 104 schools in the fall. Staff will spend the next few months working to ensure that this in-person experience is safe, welcoming, and engaging. The district is committed to working with our community to open schools and to welcome back students to in-person learning. At the same time, some students and families will make the request to continue their learning in a fully remote setting. For these students and families, staff are developing virtual options. All options will be guided by the district’s strategic plan, Seattle Excellence, and the student outcome priorities identified by the Board. In addition, the district will draw on everything learned from the many engagement efforts with students and families this year, including the work of the Remote Learning and Outdoor and Community-Based 2 Education Task Forces. And ultimately, the district strives to support all students in their ongoing learning trajectories with all available tools, resources, and opportunities. OSPI Academic and Student Well-Being Recovery Plan The template provided by OSPI for districts to submit the Academic and Student Well- Being Recovery Plan includes six themes: student well-being; student and family voice; professional learning; recovery and acceleration; diagnostic assessment tools; and community partnerships. The plan also requires the use of an equity tool and updates to be made in Fall 2021 and Spring 2022 in a model of continuous improvement. Elements of Seattle Public School’s Strategic Plan and Board goals show a high level of alignment with the required six themes. Many of the themes will be addressed by ongoing, already established initiatives in instructional improvement, current assessments used, future re- examination of our assessment program, social-emotional learning, and community and family engagement. Other examples of workstreams are initiatives that were being planned for the beginning of next school year. All of the data, evidence, and engagement we gathered over the past year informed the plan and emphasis for the start of 21-22 of student well-being and wellness, as well as efforts to make curriculum more responsive to African American males. Staff will continue to engage families and students, monitor data and explore ways in which SPS can better support students and families in a model of Listen, Act, Deliver as part of our continuous improvement strategy. Student Well-Being. Seattle Public Schools is developing a comprehensive plan for well-being of all students, “A Culture of Care.” Components of this plan may include: Tier 1 supports such as monthly community circles; restorative practices; social emotional and trauma informed lessons and supports incorporated into daily instruction; processes to identify students in crisis and access appropriate acute or longer-term supports; strengthening of partnerships with community-based organizations and culturally relevant agencies; and evaluation of supports using the SPS racial equity analysis tool. Student and Family Voice. The Office of Public Affairs (OPA) and the Division of Equity, Partnerships & Engagement (EPE) commenced a start of school outreach and engagement plan that has committed to ongoing engagement with over 20 community based organizations that primarily serve students of color furthest from educational justice. Moving forward, OPA and EPE will convene an internal SPS workgroup to support the ongoing two-way engagement with students, families and communities related to Summer and Fall Start of School. (For additional outreach, see Community Engagement below and Attachment 3). Professional Learning. Professional learning is central to implementation of components of the Recovery Plan and will include training on “Culture of Care” practices (see above and Attachment 3); Science of Reading course for all certificated K-3 teachers; support for culturally responsive instruction; and continue to support professional learning on 3 recent curricular adoptions for Science K-12, Math 6-8, ELA K-5, and Spanish 6-12. These professional development sessions will provide detailed guidance on curriculum, assessment, and instruction to promote culturally relevant, antiracist practices and to maintain high, standards-based expectations for all students. Recovery and Acceleration. Recovery and acceleration efforts will include both universal and targeted supports, including: continuous school improvement plans (CSIP) for every school with specific processes targeting sustained; improvements to implementation of MTSS at the building level; MTSS framework that ensures strong Tier 1 and Tier 2 instruction in foundational literacy skills; Comprehensive Recovery Plans for summer and fall of 2021 for PreK-21 Students with IEPs; continued efforts to expand access to core instruction for multilingual students through co-teaching, co-planning, student schedules, student course advising and scaffolding; and providing additional, targeted resources at 13 priority schools where more than 50% of the district’s K-3 African American boys are enrolled. The professional learning across content areas described above will also help us provide differentiated instruction for all learners, including English Learners, students with IEPs, and advanced learners, so that our classrooms can be more effective and inclusive. In particular, this will help us support a more inclusive approach to our content area classes in the middle school level, especially in Science and Social Studies.
Recommended publications
  • District Improvement Plan November 30, 2011 Vision: Every Student Achieving, Everyone Accountable
    Seattle Public Schools District Improvement Plan November 30, 2011 Vision: Every Student Achieving, Everyone Accountable Mission: Enabling all students to achieve to their potential through quality instructional programs and a shared commitment to continuous improvement. PURPOSES of the DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN (DIP) To establish, monitor and direct efforts of all schools to increase the achievement of all students, including students who are not yet meeting standards, as well as those who are already meeting standards but can achieve at even higher levels. To comply with Federal, state and SPS requirements and policies. OVERVIEW of SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS (SPS) Washington State’s largest public school system; the 44th largest in the United States. As of fall 2011, SPS has 95 schools and programs, serving about 48,496 students. Over 100 languages and dialects are spoken by our students and their families. Seattle Schools is a district in Step 2 of Improvement as defined by No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Data on teacher quality, as defined by NCLB, for Seattle Schools is available at : http://reportcard.ospi.k12.wa.us/summary.aspx?year=2010-11 Student ethnicities: o 1% American Indian/Alaskan Native; o 20% Asian; o 19% Black; o 12% Hispanic; o 43% White; And, o 5% Multiracial. Special programs for which our students qualify: o Free or reduced-price meals, 43%. o Special education, 13%. o English Language Learners, 12%. o Accelerated Progress Program/Spectrum 10%. o Migrant, less than 1%. SPS follows two Theories of Action – statements of our primary beliefs: o The quality of instruction in the classroom defines the rate and quality of student achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Mission Our Approach
    Our Mission The Race and Social Justice Community Roundtable is focused on eliminating racial inequity in our communities. To accomplish this, we recognize the necessity of institutions and community based organizations working in collaboration. Challenging the status quo and moving to equity will require a collective effort and vision. The Roundtable consists of 26 members from community organizations, government, social service agencies and philanthropy. The Roundtable's race-specific approach to community building and policy development will: • Implement innovative approaches that support and highlight existing racial equity work; • Strengthen our our relationships to the community and support a process of mutual accountability for ending racial inequity; and • Deepen our insight into the root causes of poverty and racial inequity in Seattle/King County. We work to eliminate race-based inequity in our community and promote race and social justice across Seattle/King County institutions. Our Approach • Developing a statewide legislative agenda for racial Roundtable members Julie Nelson and Yvonne equity. Redding-White discussing the Racial Equity • Adopting and promoting a Racial Equity Toolkit to Toolkit with community members. assess budget, policies and practices. • Promoting collaborative strategies across institutions to end racial inequity in education, health, criminal justice, economics and the environment. Roundtable Members o Arab American Community Coalition, o Seattle City Council, Councilmember Damon Shadid Bruce Harrell o Casey Family Programs, Lyman Legters, o Seattle Education Association, Olga Senior Director Addae, President o Child Care Resources, Deeann Burtch o Seattle Housing Authority, Tom Tierney, Puffert, CEO Director o City of Seattle, Julie Nelson, Office of o Seattle Indian Health Board, Ralph Civil Rights Director Forquera, Director o El Centro de la Raza, Estela Ortega, o Seattle Public Schools, Susan Enfield, Director Chief Academic Officer o Horn of Africa, Tsegaye Gebru, Exec.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Parents Involved in Racially Integrated Schools Cara Sandberg
    Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal Volume 2012 | Number 2 Article 8 Fall 3-2-2012 Getting Parents Involved in Racially Integrated Schools Cara Sandberg Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Education Law Commons Recommended Citation Cara Sandberg, Getting Parents Involved in Racially Integrated Schools, 2012 BYU Educ. & L.J. 449 (2012). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/vol2012/iss2/8 . This Casenote is brought to you for free and open access by BYU Law Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal by an authorized editor of BYU Law Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GETTING PARENTS ]NVOL VED IN RACIALLY INTEGRATED SCHOOLS INTRODUCTION "The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race. "1 In 2007, the United States Supreme Court decided Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, a case that considered the constitutionality of school assignment policies that voluntarily considered the race of students. The Court held that voluntary race-conscious school assignments in school districts like Seattle, which were never subjected to a court-ordered desegregation mandate, violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.2 Part I of this comment proposes that the Supreme Court's plurality decision in Parents Involved-the most recent in a series of school integration and civil rights decisions-promotes the theory of colorblindness, and rejects voluntary adoption of race-conscious remedies Lo promote racial integration in public schools.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    NEWS RELEASE FROM THE OFFICE OF THE MAYOR & SEATTLE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Katherine Bush, Mayor’s Office, 206.684.8180 Kim Schmanke, Seattle Public Schools, 206.465.5404 Jason Kelly, Office of Planning & Community Development, 206.615.0494 City Government, School District to plan together on future schools, Memorial Stadium, and Fort Lawton SEATTLE (Nov. 20, 2017) – The City of Seattle and Seattle Public Schools today announced a historic new partnership to plan for a new Memorial Stadium and the potential of a new school at Seattle Center, provide land for a new downtown elementary school, and allow the school district to join the Fort Lawton Redevelopment Agreement process. The agreement signed today at Memorial Stadium outlines a process for the district and the City to plan together for a growing student population, explore opportunities for the district to acquire land for educational uses at Ft. Lawton and other areas of the city, and achieve an exciting shared vision for Seattle Center. The school district and city will form joint technical teams to review school capacity issues, plan strategically for future school locations, and redesign Memorial Stadium. The City of Seattle has added almost 100,000 residents since 2010. Nearly 8,000 additional students have enrolled in Seattle Public Schools over the last decade. The City and the district will better coordinate their planning efforts to meet future school needs for students and families. “Making sure every one of our children has a strong, healthy, and fair start is the measure of a great city. Public education is one of the most important factors in sustaining a great city.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Q2 Library Levy Report
    Q2|2020 The Seattle Public Library LEVY REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Centering equity, expanding virtual services and confronting new financial realities The Library levy measure approved by Seattle voters in August 2019 provided a clear framework for how the public investment would be used to restore, maintain and improve Library services. This report, which covers activities and spending for the second quarter of 2020, continues the series of updates for the Library Board of Trustees and the public established with the 2012 levy to document implementation of levy priorities and accomplishments. Last August, Seattle voters overwhelmingly approved a seven-year, $219.1 million property tax increase to maintain and enhance Library services from 2020 through 2026. Enhancements include: additional Library hours; elimination of overdue fines; improved collections; more investment in technology; safer, cleaner buildings; and additional programming and services for children and high-needs communities. Many of these enhancements came out of priorities identified through a 2018 community survey that assessed public satisfaction with existing Library programs and services and gauged interest in potential new service offerings. More than 26,000 Seattle residents responded to this survey. At the beginning of 2020, we fulfilled two key voter promises: Eliminating overdue fines and adding an hour of Library service at each location on Sunday. By March, however, the Library was forced to make an unprecedented pivot in response to the global pandemic. Working closely with the city to make decisions, we closed all Library facilities on March 13. At the end of the second quarter, the Library’s physical locations remained closed (except for restroom services provided at five locations).
    [Show full text]
  • The Seattle Public Library 2010 Annual Report
    Partnerships Summer Reading Program Digital collection Read Text a Librarian Strategic Plan Center for the Book Washington Online catalog Patrons Budget challenges SPL Mobile App Children Library Materials Budget Global Reading Challenge Reduced hours RRServices eporteport toto thethe CommunityCommunity Teens Literacy Capital improvements 20102010 Programs & classes Programs Green initiatives Social networking Hildreth Seattle Reads Books Blueprint for the Library’s future Strategic Plan SPL Mobile Text A Librarian Budget cuts New mission statement Anonymous donor Dear friends, A large focus of 2010 was developing a new Strategic Plan – the blueprint for the Library’s future! Residents were invited to participate through open houses, citywide forums, focus groups and a survey that was completed by nearly 33,000 people! Our new mission statement, “The Seattle Public Library brings people, information and ideas together to enrich lives and build community,” is the inspiration for why we open our doors every day. Budget cuts were a major concern with continued reduced city revenue and competing demands for limited funds. A $1.7 million cut to the Library budget resulted in severe reductions to branch hours and the collection, a week-long shutdown of the entire Library system and the elimination of staff positions. We also increased fnes and fees. An anonymous donor – who read about our budget situation – pledged $500,000 if it could be matched by community contributions. The additional $500,000 was raised by year’s end, thanks to the generosity of the people of Seattle! Despite continued challenges, the Library remains committed to providing exceptional service. We added a Text A Librarian service and developed a mobile app called “SPL Mobile” to better serve patrons on the go.
    [Show full text]
  • Friday Memo to the Board for October 11
    Friday Memo to the Board Superintendent’s Highlights For the week of October 7-11, 2019 Seattle Super Readers Update: I visited Bailey Gatzert on Thursday. Principal Belle and his team set high expectations for students and are providing students the structures and supports they need to ensure that each student reaches these expectations. In multiple classrooms, students were building their academic vocabulary in science class. This work builds Super Readers’ reading comprehension. Safe & Welcoming Environments: Principal Belle and staff are working closely with a central office team to build out their Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS). They are boldly confronting their data and are committed to ensuring that each student feels safe and welcome at Bailey Gatzert. Principal Belle lives his values. He meets with a small group of boys every other week to build positive relationships with them. He and the students look forward to these meetings! Culturally Responsive Workforce: Did you know that our school leader corps is the most diverse employee group as compared to all staff, teachers, central office managers, and teacher leaders? I would like to thank Chief Jessee, Dr. Starosky and their team for their relentless commitment to hiring a diverse workforce. Community and Partnerships: • Thank you, Director Geary and all the staff that attended the Black and Orange Gala to support the Alliance for Education. • I am circling back with Central Office staff teams to talk about the strategic plan and how their work supports the plan. I met with the Equity, Partnership & Engagement, Business & Finance, Research & Evaluation, Communications & Customer Services, and the Legal Divisions this week.
    [Show full text]
  • School Exclusion and Why Seattle Is Not So Progressive Nikkita Oliver A
    School Exclusion and Why Seattle is Not So Progressive Nikkita Oliver A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Education University of Washington 2016 Committee: Joy Williamson-Lott Kimberly Ambrose Program Authorized to Offer Degree: College of Education © Copyright 2016 Nikkita Oliver 2 University of Washington Abstract School Exclusion and Why Seattle is Not So Progressive Nikkita Oliver Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Dr. Joy Williamson-Lott Professor, History of American Education Associate Dean, Graduate Studies As of 2013 Seattle Public Schools District has been under investigation by the Department of Education for the disproportionate and disparate impact of school exclusion policies upon students of color—specifically black students. The City of Seattle, locally, nationally, and even internationally, is currently hailed as being one of the most progressive and liberal cities. However, scratch just beneath the surface and one will find a history of racism that still deeply harms black and brown residents and greatly benefits white residents. This history and the resulting policies create a climate and context where it is difficult to challenge the many ways in which white supremacist policies further marginalize already disenfranchised populations. For this reason, Seattle is really a faux progressive city that will continue to struggle to end the issue of racial disproportionality and disparate impact in Seattle Public Schools’ school discipline practice and, specifically, use of school exclusion practices unless the City, Seattle Public Schools, and the residents make some major paradigm shifts. This paper will investigate these issues by investigating Seattle’s history and the issue of school exclusion from multiple vantage points utilizing a Critical Race Theory lens.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPA Determination
    ANALYSIS AND DECISION OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION AND INSPECTIONS SEPA Threshold Determination for 2021 Affordable Housing on Religious Properties Land Use Code Amendments Project Proponent: City of Seattle BACKGROUND The proposed code changes would fulfill requirements in Substitute House Bill 1377, passed by the Washington State Legislature in 2019, amending 35.63 RCW, 35A.63 RCW, 36.70A RCW, and 44.28 RCW. The State’s legislation was meant to support affordable housing development for low-income households on properties owned or controlled by a religious organization, by requiring increased permissible densities and at least a 50-year commitment to the affordable housing. Religious organizations own property currently in use as religious facilities as well as property with other uses, such as accessory parking, residential, office, or school uses. The proposed Land Use Code changes would affect properties located throughout Seattle in many different zones. The analysis in Appendix A (the staff report for the proposal) shows that properties currently owned by religious organizations are located in many zones and across all Seattle neighborhoods. Many sites and much of the land area these organizations currently own are located in single-family zones. See Appendix A for detail by zone on the location, number, and land area of religious organization-owned sites. PROPOSAL The proposal is a non-project action that would implement a suite of land use code changes in zones throughout Seattle to support development of affordable housing on property owned or controlled by a religious organization. Increases in maximum height and floor area limits and changes to other development standards would allow additional development of long-term, income-restricted affordable housing on property that meets certain eligible criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle Public Schools HS Graduation Commencements News Release(2)
    News Release For immediate release: June 9, 2009 Contact: David Tucker, Media Relations (206) 252-0203 High School Graduation Commencements Celebrate the Academic Achievements of Seattle Public Schools’ Students Seattle - Seattle Public Schools celebrates the academic achievements of its high school graduates with commencements occurring throughout the city, Tuesday, June 9 through Thursday, June 18. Superintendent Maria L. Goodloe-Johnson, Ph.D., will be speaking at four high school commencements this year: Ingraham High School, Rainier Beach High School, Roosevelt High School and South Lake High School. Seattle Public Schools is committed to providing an excellent education for every student and dedicated to seeing every student graduate from high school prepared for college, careers and life. The District’s five year strategic plan, Excellence for All, is focused on raising student achievement by ensuring excellence in every classroom, strengthening leadership throughout the district and building an infrastructure that works well. “We are proud to celebrate the great accomplishments these new graduates have achieved, and look forward to the leaders that they will become in the future,” said Superintendent Goodloe-Johnson. “Helping more students graduate with the skills needed to succeed in higher education and in their careers is the primary goal for Seattle Public Schools. We will continue to set high expectations for all students and to recognize and support the critical role that teachers, staff and families play in helping students succeed.” With a goal of increasing graduation rates and academic achievement, Seattle Public Schools added more than 30% additional Advanced Placement (AP) courses this year; administered the PSAT district-wide to ninth, tenth and eleventh grade students; and is creating a consistent, comprehensive approach to math, science, and reading and writing through curriculum alignment.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining Social Capital and Whiteness in a University Community Engagement Network
    University of Washington Tacoma UW Tacoma Digital Commons Ed.D. Dissertations in Practice Education Spring 6-10-2021 Examining Social Capital and Whiteness in a University Community Engagement Network Bonnie Nelson [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/edd_capstones Part of the Educational Leadership Commons, and the Higher Education Commons Recommended Citation Nelson, Bonnie, "Examining Social Capital and Whiteness in a University Community Engagement Network" (2021). Ed.D. Dissertations in Practice. 61. https://digitalcommons.tacoma.uw.edu/edd_capstones/61 This Open Access (no embargo, no restriction) is brought to you for free and open access by the Education at UW Tacoma Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Ed.D. Dissertations in Practice by an authorized administrator of UW Tacoma Digital Commons. EXAMINING SOCIAL CAPITAL AND WHITENESS 1 Examining Social Capital and Whiteness in a University Community Engagement Network Bonnie Nelson A dissertation in practice submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of the Doctorate of Education In Educational Leadership University of Washington Tacoma 2021 Supervisory Committee: M. Billye Sankofa Waters, Ph.D., Chair Charlie Collins, Ph.D., member Kevin Ward, Ph.D., member Program Authorized to Offer Degree: UWT Education Program EXAMINING SOCIAL CAPITAL AND WHITENESS 2 Examining Social Capital and Whiteness in a University Community Engagement Network Bonnie Nelson Dissertation Chair: Dr. M. Billye Sankofa Waters Abstract University place-based community engagement initiatives often draw upon diverse stakeholders and organizations. However, these initiatives often uphold systems and structures rooted in Whiteness and oppression. Drawing from Critical Race Theory and social capital theory, this study examined Whiteness, network structure, value, and trust within the Seattle University Youth Initiative (SUYI) Network.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Official Local Voters' Pamphlet
    August 7, 2012 Primary and Special Election King County Official Local Voters’ Pamphlet For more information call 206-296-VOTE (8683) or visit www.kingcounty.gov/elections 2 A letter from the Director Dear King County Voter: The August primary and November general election represent the grand fi nale of our four year election cycle in this Presidential election year. In keeping with the drama and intensity of Presidential year elections, this election cycle, national headlines have focused on stories about what some consider to be safeguards and others deem barriers to voter registration and voting. Registered voter purges, requirements to provide government issued photo identifi cation, redistricting with the appearance of isolating minority communities, and screening requirements for voter registration are examples of programs creating controversy. Naturally, advocacy groups have lined up on both sides of these actions. Department of Justice law suits and Supreme Court rulings have reined in some states to address any semblance of voter discrimination. A prominent issue related to these actions is citizenship, and the fear that non-citizens are taking part in our political process. Citizen concerns about voting rights and voter fraud have increased. Recently, King County’s Election Department has received inquiries about the efforts we take to research the validity of citizenship for voter registration in our county, offering the opportunity to clarify myths about voter fraud. I’ve seen immigrant citizens avoid their legal right to vote due to fears brought with them from their former place of citizenship. Reports and proof of non-citizens illegally invading the ballot box are extremely rare.
    [Show full text]