DOCSLIB.ORG

A Study of Pyrolysis of Charring Materials and Its Application to Fire Safety and Biomass Utilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Study of Pyrolysis of Charring Materials and Its Application to Fire Safety and Biomass Utilization A STUDY OF PYROLYSIS OF CHARRING MATERIALS AND ITS APPLICATION TO FIRE SAFETY AND BIOMASS UTILIZATION by Won Chan Park A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Mechanical Engineering) in The University of Michigan 2008 Doctoral Committee: Professor Arvind Atreya, Chair Professor James F. Driscoll Professor Margaret S. Wooldridge Associate Professor Hong G. Im © Won Chan Park 2008 To My Family ii Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Dr. Arvind Atreya for his excellent guidance. This work would not have been possible without his consideration, encouragement, inspiration and insightful suggestions. I would also like to express my appreciation to my doctoral committee, Professor James F. Driscoll, Professor Hong G. Im and Professor Margaret S. Wooldridge for their thoughtful advice. I am grateful to Dr. Howard R. Baum for his helpful suggestions. I would like to thank Professor Michael M. Chen for his advice on numerical techniques. I wish to thank my colleagues, Sung-Joon Hwang, Seung Jun Shin, Paul Teini and former lab members, Dr. Tershia Pinder, Dr. Hyoseok Lee, Dr. Melissa Chernovsky and Dr. Xin He for their collaboration on my research. I also wish to thank Brad Hartwell for his help on my experimental apparatus. I am thankful to Sean Berhan for editing my writing for grammar. I owe my loving thanks to my wife Kyung Hee Lee, my daughter Sejeong Park and my son Bradley Jin Park for their encouragement and understanding. My special gratitude is due to my parents and my brother and his family for their loving support. Financial support for this work was provided, in part, by National Institute of Standard and Technology and Industrial Assessment Center at the University of Michigan. iii Table of Contents Dedication .................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements ............................................................................................... iii List of Figures ......................................................................................................... vii List of Tables ........................................................................................................... xii List of Appendices ............................................................................................... xiii List of Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xiv Abstract ..................................................................................................................... xvii 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 General features of wood pyrolysis .................................................................... 2 1.3 Pyrolysis modeling ............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Kinetics ............................................................................................................... 6 1.5 Outline of this thesis ........................................................................................... 7 1.5.1 Charring solids undergoing opposed flow flame spread ............................ 8 1.5.2 Determination of pyrolysis temperature ..................................................... 9 1.5.3 Experimental and theoretical investigation of wood pyrolysis ................... 9 1.5.4 Three dimensional pyrolysis model for arbitrary geometry charring material .............................................................................................................. 10 2. Charring Solids Undergoing Opposed-flow Flame Spread ............... 11 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Mathematical modeling .................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Reaction mechanism ................................................................................. 14 2.2.2 Conservation of mass and energy ............................................................. 15 iv 2.2.3 Numerical analysis .................................................................................... 18 2.2.3.1 Discretization of governing equations .............................................. 19 2.2.3.2 Curved interface ................................................................................ 25 2.2.3.3 Tracking interface ............................................................................. 27 2.3 Numerical analysis ........................................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Temperature and pressure ......................................................................... 32 2.3.2 Product yields ........................................................................................... 34 2.3.3 Pyrolysis temperature ............................................................................... 37 2.3.4 Simplified models: Char layer thickness .................................................. 38 2.3.5 Simplified models: Pressure ..................................................................... 39 2.3.6 Comparison with the analytical model ..................................................... 40 2.3.7 Computational time ................................................................................... 40 2.4 Summary .......................................................................................................... 41 3. Determination of Pyrolysis Temperature for Charring Materials 42 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 43 3.2 Energy and mass balanced pyrolysis temperature concept .............................. 44 3.3 Pyrolysis models .............................................................................................. 45 3.3.1 Finite-rate kinetics model ......................................................................... 45 3.3.2 Infinite-rate kinetics (pyrolysis-front) model ........................................... 47 3.3.3 Determination of the pyrolysis temperature ............................................. 48 3.4 Results and discussion ...................................................................................... 49 3.4.1 Effect of boundary conditions ................................................................... 50 3.4.2 Effect of geometry .................................................................................... 51 3.4.3 Effects of various parameters on the pyrolysis temperature ..................... 53 3.4.4 Kinetic parameters .................................................................................... 59 3.4.5 Estimation of mass and energy balanced pyrolysis temperature .............. 61 3.4.6 Comparison with experiments on wood ................................................... 63 3.5 Summary .......................................................................................................... 64 4. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Wood Pyrolysis ..... 66 4.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 66 4.1.1 Problem description and literature review ................................................ 67 v 4.2 Experiment setup .............................................................................................. 69 4.3 Experimental result .......................................................................................... 74 4.4 Thermal mechanism of wood pyrolysis ........................................................... 79 4.4.1 Model description ..................................................................................... 79 4.4.1.1 Kinetics model .................................................................................. 79 4.4.1.2 Mass conservation ............................................................................. 83 4.4.1.3 Energy conservation .......................................................................... 87 4.4.2 Results ....................................................................................................... 90 4.4.2.1 Heat of pyrolysis and pyrolysis rate .................................................. 90 4.4.2.2 Exothermic reactions ......................................................................... 91 4.5 Modeling of endo-/exothermic wood pyrolysis ............................................... 99 4.6 Summary ........................................................................................................ 106 5. Three Dimensional Arbitrary Geometry Pyrolysis Model .............. 107 6. Conclusions and Future Work ................................................................... 111 6.1 Summary ........................................................................................................ 111 6.2 Conclusions .................................................................................................... 112 6.3 Contributions .................................................................................................. 114 6.4 Future work ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simulation of Tree Stem Injury, Air Flow and Heat Dispersion in Forests for Prediction of Fire Effects
    SIMULATION OF TREE STEM INJURY, AIR FLOW AND HEAT DISPERSION IN FORESTS FOR PREDICTION OF FIRE EFFECTS DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Efthalia K. Chatziefstratiou, Dipl. Ing., M.S. Graduate Program in Environmental Sciences The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Gil Bohrer “Advisor” Matthew B. Dickinson Ethan Kubatko Gajan Sivandran Barbara Wyslouzil Copyright by Efthalia Chatziefstratiou 2015 Abstract This work presents two computational tools, Firestem2D and the fire module of Regional Atmospheric Modelling System (RAMS)-based Forest Large Eddy Simulation (RAFLES), which will help to make predictions of fire effects on trees and the atmosphere. FireStem2D is a software tool for predicting tree stem heating and injury in forest fires. It is a physically-based, two-dimensional model of stem thermodynamics that results from heating at the bark surface. It builds on an earlier one-dimensional model (FireStem) and provides improved capabilities for predicting fire-induced mortality and injury before a fire occurs by resolving stem moisture loss, temperatures through the stem, degree of bark charring, and necrotic depth around the stem. The results of numerical parameterization and model evaluation experiments for FireStem2D that simulate laboratory stem-heating experiments of 52 tree sections from 25 trees are presented. A set of virtual sensitivity analysis experiments were also conducted to test the effects of unevenness of heating around the stem and with above ground height using data from two studies: a low-intensity surface fire and a more intense crown fire.
    [Show full text]
  • PITT Research Brief Pyrolysis
    POTENTIAL PFAS DESTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY: PYROLYSIS AND GASIFICATION In Spring 2020, the EPA established the PFAS Innovative Treatment Team (PITT). The PITT was a multi-disciplinary research team that worked full-time for 6-months on applying their scientific efforts and expertise to a single problem: disposal and/or destruction of PFAS- contaminated media and waste. While the PITT formally concluded in Fall 2020, the research efforts initiated under the PITT continue. As part of the PITT’s efforts, EPA researchers considered whether existing destruction technologies could be applied to PFAS-contaminated media and waste. This series of Research Briefs provides an overview of four technologies that were identified by the PITT as promising technologies Figure 1. Biosolids beneficial use. for destroying PFAS and the research underway by the readily available, cost effective, and produce little to no EPA’s Office of Research and Development to further hazardous residuals or byproducts. Pyrolysis and explore these technologies. Because research is still gasification have been identified as promising needed to evaluate these technologies for PFAS technologies that may be able to meet these destruction, this Research Brief should not be considered requirements with further development, testing, and an endorsement or recommendation to use this demonstrations. technology to destroy PFAS. Background Pyrolysis/Gasification: Technology Overview Pyrolysis is a process that decomposes materials at Various industries have produced and used per- and moderately elevated temperatures in an oxygen-free polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) since the mid-20th environment. Gasification is similar to pyrolysis but uses century. PFAS are found in consumer and industrial small quantities of oxygen, taking advantage of the products, including non-stick coatings, waterproofing partial combustion process to provide the heat to materials, and manufacturing additives.
    [Show full text]
  • Iqos: Evidence of Pyrolysis and Release of a Toxicant from Plastic
    iQOS: Evidence of Pyrolysis and Release of a Toxicant from Plastic Barbara Davis ([email protected]) a , Monique Williams ([email protected])a , and Prue Talbot ([email protected]) a a Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, United States Corresponding author: Prue Talbot Address: Department of Molecular, Cell and Systems Biology University of California Riverside, CA 92521 Email: [email protected] Telephone: 951-827-3768 FAX: 951-827-4286 Keywords: new tobacco products, heat-not-burn tobacco products, electronic nicotine delivery devices, ENDS, nicotine, quality control, pyrolysis, char Word Count: 3346 ABSTRACT Objective: To evaluate performance of the iQOS Heat-Not-Burn system as a function of cleaning and puffing topography, investigate the validity of manufacturer’s claims that this device does not burn tobacco, and determine if the polymer-film filter is potentially harmful. Methods: iQOS performance was evaluated using five running conditions incorporating two different cleaning protocols. Heatsticks were visually and stereomicroscopically inspected pre- and post- use to determine the extent of tobacco plug charring (from pyrolysis) and polymer-film filter melting, and to elucidate the effects of cleaning on charring. GC-MS headspace analysis was conducted on unused polymer-film filters to determine if potentially toxic chemicals are emitted from the filter during heating. Results: For all testing protocols, pressure drop decreased as puff number increased. Changes in testing protocols did not affect aerosol density. Charring due to pyrolysis (a form of organic matter thermochemical decomposition) was observed in the tobacco plug after use. When the manufacturers’ cleaning instructions were followed, both charring of the tobacco plug and melting of the polymer-film filter increased.
    [Show full text]
  • Heated Cigarettes: How States Can Avoid Getting Burned
    HEATED CIGARETTES: HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED 8/30/18 1 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED 8/30/18 2 THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW CENTER 8/30/18 3 8/30/18 4 LEGAL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE Legal Research Policy Development, Implementation, Defense Publications Trainings Direct Representation Lobby 8/30/18 5 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED • Presenters: – Kristy Marynak, MPP, Public Health Analyst, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention – Hudson Kingston, JD, LLM, Staff Attorney, Tobacco Control Legal Consortium at the Public Health Law Center 8/30/18 6 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED • Heated cigarettes on the global market • Distinguishing features 1. Heating at a temperature lower than conventional cigarettes that produce an inhalable aerosol • Heated Cigarettes: 450-700° F (generally) • Conventional cigarettes: 1250 – 1300 °F, • (max: 1500 °F) 2. Processed, commercial tobacco leaf is the nicotine source, flavor source, or both 8/30/18 7 HEATED CIGARETTES HOW STATES CAN AVOID GETTING BURNED Federal Regulation • Pre-Market Review • Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application • Vapeleaf 8/30/18 8 Heated Tobacco Products: Considerations for Public Health Policy and Practice KRISTY MARYNAK, MPP LEAD PUBLIC HEALTH ANALYST CDC OFFICE ON SMOKING AND HEALTH TOBACCO CONTROL LEGAL CONSORTIUM WEBINAR AUGUST 2018 8/30/18 9 What’s the public health importance of this topic? The landscape of tobacco products is continually changing By being proactive and anticipating new products, we can
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Products: Thermal Degradation and Fire
    Wood Products: Thermal Degradation and off. The hemicelluloses and lignin components are pyrolyzed in the ranges 200-300°C and 225-450 °C, Fire respectively (see Wood, Constituents of). Much of the acetic acid liberated from wood pyrolysis is attributed Wood is a thermally degradable and combustible to deactylation of hemicellulose. Dehydration reac­ material. Applications range from a biomass provid­ tions around 200°C are primarily responsible for ing useful energy to a building material with unique pyrolysis of hemicellulose and lignin and results in a properties. Wood products can contribute to unwant­ high char yield for wood. Although cellulose remains ed fires and be destroyed as well. Minor amounts of mostly unpyrolyzed, its thermal degradation can be thermal degradation adversely affect structural pro­ accelerated in the presence of water, acids, and oxygen. perties. Therefore, knowledge of the thermal degrad­ As the temperature increases, the degree of poly­ ation and fire performance of wood can be critical in merization of cellulose decreases further, free radicals many applications. Chemical treatments are available appear, and carbonyl, carboxyl, and hydroperoxide to improve fire performance characteristics. groups are formed. Bryden (1998) assumed tar under- goes cracking to lighter gases and repolymerization to char while streaming through the hot charred residue. Overall pyrolysis reactions are endothermic due to 1. Thermal Degradation decreasing dehydration and increasing CO formation As wood reaches elevated temperatures, the different from porous char reactions with H2O and CO2 with chemical components undergo the thermal de- increasing temperature. During this “low-temperature gradation that affects the performance of wood. The pathway” of pyrolysis, exothermic reactions of ex- extent of the changes depends on the temperature level posed char and volatiles with atmospheric oxygen are and length of time under exposure conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis Fuel Oil (PFO)
    PRODUCT BACKGROUNDER Pyrolysis Fuel Oil (PFO) Important! For detailed information on this product and emergency measures, obtain the Canadian Safety Data Sheet (SDS)/ U.S. Safety Data Sheet (SDS). In the case of an emergency, please call our 24-hour hotline at 1-800-561-6682 or 1-403-314-8767. May also be called: PFO-Joffre, Heavy Fuel Oils Product/Substance Use: • This product is a complex mixture of naphthalene, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, indene, and dicyclopentadiene, manufactured at NOVA Chemicals' Joffre, Alberta facility and shipped by railcar. • This product is used as chemical intermediate feedstock or industrial fuel. Characteristics and Safe Handling: • This product is a dark coloured, oily liquid with a pungent odour whose odour threshold is < 1 ppm. • This product is classified as a flammable liquid, health and environmental hazard in the workplace and as flammable for transportation. • Any equipment used in areas of handling or storage of the heated product must be approved for flammable liquids and properly grounded for control of static electricity. • If released from containment, product may be ignited by uncontrolled heat, sparks or flames. Containers exposed to fire conditions may explode. • Material burns readily when heated, and sparks or flames may ignite released hot liquids, vapours or mists. The vapor is heavier than air and may collect in low areas Ignition from a distant source with flashback is possible. • Any release to land or water must be isolated, controlled to avoid ignition, contained and recovered or cleaned up by properly trained and equipped personnel. Health and Safety Information: • Wear all recommended personal protective equipment if any contact with this material is likely.
    [Show full text]
  • 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research
    1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 QC 100 .U56 #82-2612- 1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce Ernest Ambler, Director, National Bureau of Standards Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 — FOREWORD The Seventh Annual Conference on Fire Research honors Professor Howard Emmons who retires from Harvard University this year. Professor Emmons has provided leadership and inspiration to many in this field as attested by the breadth and depth of the topics in the conference modeling of fire growth, flame phenomena and spread, diffusion flames and radiation, fire plumes , extinction and suppression— and the contributions of those he has taught. Howard Emmons has demonstrated the viability of scientifically based fire protection engineering practice. Of course, much remains to be done. The conference program and papers (to be published separately) provide a good indication of where we are in a numoer or crt-txcal areas of tare science.
    [Show full text]
  • Toxicity of the Pyrolysis and Combustion Products of Poly (Vinyl Chlorides): a Literature Assessment
    FIRE AND MATERIALS VOL. II, 131-142 (1987) Toxicity of the Pyrolysis and Combustion Products of Poly (Vinyl Chlorides): A Literature Assessment Clayton Huggett and Barbara C. Levin* us Department of Commerce, National Bureau of Standards, National Engineering Laboratory, Center for Fire Research, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA Poly(vinyl chlorides) (PVC) constitute a major class of synthetic plastics. Many surveys of the voluminous literature have been performed. This report reviews the literature published in English from 1969 through 1984 and endeavors to be more interpretive than comprehensive. pve compounds, in general, are among the more fire resistant common organic polymers, natural or synthetic. The major products of thermal decomposition include hydrogen chloride, benzene and unsaturated hydrocarbons. In the presence of oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide and water are included among the common combustion products. The main toxic products from PVC fires are hydrogen chloride (a sensory and pulmonary irritant) and carbon monoxide (an asphyxiant). The LCso values calculated for a series of natural and synthetic materials thermally decomposed according to the NBS toxicity test method ranged from 0.045 to 57 mgl-l in the flaming mode and from 0.045 to > 40mgl-l in the non-flaming mode. The LCso results for a PVC resin decomposed under the same conditions were 17 mg 1- 1 in the flaming mode and 20 mg 1- 1 in the non-flaming mode. These results indicate that PVC decomposition products are not extremely toxic when compared with those from other common building materials. When the combustion toxicity (based on their HCI content) of PVC materials is compared with pure HCI experiments, it appears that much of the post-exposure toxicity can be explained by the HCI tha t is genera ted.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Development Survey for Continuous Coal Charring Process
    Market development survey for continuous coal charring process by Robert A Lengemann A THESIS Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Chemical Engineering Montana State University © Copyright by Robert A Lengemann (1957) Abstract: In recent years, work has been progressing on a new continuous charring process at Montana State College. This work has been sponsored by the Montana State College Engineering Experiment Station with the hope that this process will bolster Montana's lagging coal industry. The work has now reached the point of commercialization and a market for the char needs to be developed. Several tests have been run on the char produced from this char process. Anaconda Company used the char in their Sponge Iron Plant successfully. American Chrome Company has had the char tested and accepts it with the reservation that the sulfur content must be kept below 0.5%. Colorado Fuel and Iron Corporation has used char from this char process with some success. The char used in the Anaconda test and in the American Chrome test was derived from Red Lodge coal as this coal is being used in the first commercial plant at Red Lodge, Montana. Colorado Fuel and Iron Corporation furnished their own coal since this is the coal they intend to use, should they decide to build a char plant for their use. The estimated capacity of the Red Lodge plant is 2000 lb. of char per hour per retort. The by-product yield is 20 gallons per ton of coal.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Deaths and Toxic Gases Ization and the Development of Separate Tests in Germany, France, Japan and from Barbara Chernov Levin Belgium
    18 News& Views Nature Vol. 300 4 November 1982 International Organization for Standard­ Fire deaths and toxic gases ization and the development of separate tests in Germany, France, Japan and from Barbara Chernov Levin Belgium. All these tests provide information on AMoNG the industrialized countries which of Utah7 and suggests the need for an the acute toxicity resulting from the record statistics on fires, the United States animal testing system - conventional inhalation of combustion products, but has the most fires per capita. The rate of chemical techniques would have failed to each test is performed in different labor­ fire death in the United States is almost detect such an unusual toxic product. atory decomposition conditions. The tests twice the international average and is sur­ Moreover, scientists at the National do not address the problem of the total passed only by Canada 1 • In 1979, approxi­ Bureau of Standards have found that car­ toxic hazard which a fire produces or the mately 7,800 people died and another bon monoxide concentrations measured at contribution of a material (or product in its 2 31,000 were reported injured • Direct the LC50 of twelve thermally decomposed actual end use) to that hazard under a 'real dollar loss was greater than $5 billion, but materials were 60-4,400 p.p.m., whereas fire' situation. Nonetheless, some building when indirect costs (meeting fire codes, the LC50 of pure carbon monoxide was code officials and state regulators are installing fire protection systems, support­ 5,000 p.p.m. The LC50 here measures the anxious to evaluate the combustion ing fire departments and insuring property) amount of material necessary to kill 50 per product toxicity of materials and are exam­ are included in this calculation, the annual cent of the rats exposed for 30 min.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Project Lead (TPL) Review: MR0000059-MR0000061
    U.S. Food & Drug Administration f"~-,, 11 U.S. FOOD & DRUG 10903 New Hampshire Avenue ~,./- ADM I N I STRATI ON Silver Spring, MD 20993 www.fda.gov Scientific Review of Modified Risk Tobacco Product Application (MRTPA) Under Section 911(d) of the FD&C Act -Technical Project Lead SUBMISSION INFORMATION Applicant Philip Morris Product s S.A. Product Manufacturer Philip Morris Product s S.A. Submission Date November 18, 2016 I FDA Receipt Date I December 5, 2016 Purpose ~ Risk Modificat ion (91l (g)( l )) order ~ Exposure Modification (9ll(g)(2)) order Proposed Modified Risk Modified Risk Claim #1: Claims " AVAILABLE EVIDENCE TO DATE: • The IQOS system heats t obacco but does not burn it. • This significantly reduces the production of harmful and pot entially harmful chemica ls. • Scientific studies have shown that sw itching completely from conventional cigarettes t o the IQOS syst em can reduce the risks of tobacco-related diseases." Modified Risk Claim #2: " AVAILABLE EVIDENCE TO DATE: • Swit ching complet ely to IQOS present s less risk of harm than continuing t o smoke cigarett es." Modified Risk Claim #3: " AVAILABLE EVIDENCE TO DATE: • The IQOS system heats tobacco but does not burn it. • This significant ly reduces the production of harmful and pot entially harmful chemica ls. • Scientific studies have show n that switching completely from conventional cigarettes t o the IQOS syst em significantly reduces your body's exposure t o harmful or pot entially harmful chemicals." PROPOSED MODIFIED RISK TOBACCO PRODUCT (SINGLE PRODUCTS} MR0000059: Marlboro Heatsticks1 Product Category Cigarettes Product Sub-Category Non-Combusted Package Type Box Package Quantity 20 Heat sticks Characterizing Flavor None Length 45 mm Diameter 7.42 mm 1 M ay be sold individually or as a co-packaged product .
    [Show full text]
  • Pyrolysis of Char Forming Solid Fuels: a Critical Review of the Mathematical Modelling Techniques
    Proceedings, 5th AOSFST, Newcastle, Australia, 2001 Editors: M.A. Delichatsios, B.Z. Dlugogorski and E.M. Kennedy PYROLYSIS OF CHAR FORMING SOLID FUELS: A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE MATHEMATICAL MODELLING TECHNIQUES B. Moghtaderi Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Newcastle AUSTRALIA ABSTRACT Recent advances in mathematical modelling and numerical analysis of the pyrolysis of char forming solid fuels have shed new light on the pyrolytic behaviour of these materials under fire conditions. A review of the pyrolysis models of charring solid fuels developed over the past 30 years is presented in the order of increasing complexity. The models can be broadly categorised into thermal and comprehensive type models. While thermal models predict the conversion of the virgin fuel into products based on a critical pyrolysis criterion and the energy balance, the comprehensive models describe the degradation of the fuel by a chemical kinetic scheme coupled with the conservation equations for the transport of heat and/or mass. A variety of kinetic schemes have been reported in the literature ranging from simple one-step global reactions to semi-global and multi-step reaction mechanisms. There has been much less uniformity in the description of the transport phenomena (i.e. heat and mass) in comprehensive models and different levels of approximation have been used. It is shown that the accuracy of pyrolysis models largely depends on the model parameters. If reliable data are not available, even the most advanced models give poor predictions. Keywords: Pyrolysis, charring solid fuels, mathematical modelling, fires. INTRODUCTION Pyrolysis of solid fuels plays an important role in both the ignition and growth stages of fires.
    [Show full text]