Cf. Diagram #1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Diagram #1 TRINITARIAN ONENESS Dialectic Distinction Tension and balance Oneness Multiplicity, plurality, complexity Singularity, simplicity, unity Single integer Father, Son, and Holy Spirit One God - Deut. 6:4; Mk. 12:29; I Cor. 8:6; Eph. 4:6; Mathematical oneness co-equal, co-essential, co-eternal I Tim. 2:5 Polytheism - many gods Jesus declared: Monotheism Tritheism - three gods “I and the Father are one” (Jn. 10:30). Trinitarian Monotheism Monad Monotheism “I AM way, truth, life” (Jn. 14:6; cf. Jn. 4:26; 6:35,48; (singular, unextended unit of one) 8:12,48; 11:25) Triunity - Trinity - three-in-one Judaism, Islam, Jehovah’s Witnesses Jewish leaders rejected as blasphemy against monad God. Subordinationism Early Christians forced to consider how such a oneness Monistic Monotheism Son and Spirit subordinated to Father could be explained. (singular, comprehensive extension as second-class deities Ontological Trinity in all things) “Only one Person in the universe” Theophilus of Antioch (175) What is the one? “God is all in all” “God only” Arianism (Arius-250-336) Referred to Father, Son, Holy Spirit as trias - triad or Substance, nature, essence, being? threesomeness. Not co-equal, co-essential persons. Son made by the Father. Tertullian of Carthage (160-230) Athanasius (296-373) explained that the three Spirit proceeded from the Father. First to use Latin trinitas - triunity or trinity Persons were essentially and consubstantially the “same Monarchianism Thus Son and Spirit are being” - homoousion. Impersonal primacy of God the ontologically inferior to the Father, Council of Nicea (325) accepted homoousion as orthodox What are the three? Father as demi-gods. statement of God’s oneness. Distinctions, realities, natures, particulars, persons? anomoousion - “not same being” Council of Nicea (325) identified as “three personae” Essential Oneness heteroousion - “different being” Modalism - Sabellianism Semi-Arians - Son and Spirit are One God without distinction, homoiousion - “like or similar Operational Trinity revealed in 3 modes, manifestatins, being” forms or roles. Administrative and Functional Gregory of Nazianzus (330-389) Distinction Used Greek perichoresis to explain the interpenetration Unitarianism Social Trinity and coinherence of the persons of Trinity. Paternity, filiation, procession Mutual indwelling - “I am in the Father, and the Father is Divine committee The Father sent the Son. the Son emptied Himself, in Me” (Jn. 14:10,11) the Spirit is joined with the spirit of man. Relational Oneness ©2002 by James A. Fowler.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Leibniz and Monads
Leibniz and Monads The Human Situaon Team Omega, Spring 2010 Dr. Cynthia Freeland Overview • Leibniz’s Life • The Rise of Modernism • Monadology 1‐30 • All about Monads Leibniz 1646‐1716 The Duchess of Orleans said of him: “It's so rare for intellectuals to be smartly dressed, and not to smell, and to understand jokes.” A contemporary descripon of Leibniz “Leibniz was a man of medium height with a stoop, broad‐shouldered but bandy‐legged, as capable of thinking for several days sing in the same chair as of travelling the roads of Europe summer and winter. He was an indefagable worker, a universal leer writer (he had more than 600 correspondents), a patriot and cosmopolitan, a great scienst, and one of the most powerful spirits of Western civilisaon.” Goried Wilhelm von Leibniz “A walking encyclopedia” – King George I Monadology, 1714 Leibniz the Polymath • Studies in university: Law, philosophy, Lan, Greek • Independent: algebra, mathemacs, physics, dynamics, opcs, tried to create a submarine • Secretary of Nuremberg Alchemical Society • Laws of moon, gravity, mechanics, dynamics, topology, geology, linguiscs • Polics, internaonal aﬀairs, economics, coinage, watches, lamps • Traveled to Paris, London, Vienna, Italy, etc. • Invented Inﬁnitesimal calculus, created a notaon for it d(xn) = nxn‐1dx Leibniz’s Calculang Machine Leibniz and the Prince • 1676‐1716, Librarian to the Duke of Hanover • Privy councilor to successive members of the House of Brunswick of Hanover, and friend/correspondent/teacher of successive prominent women in the family
[Show full text]
It Should Never Be Forgotten for a Single Moment That
a s t u d y o n t he holy guardian angel a study on the holy guardian angel Content CHAPTER 1: A SHORT INTRODUCTION 2 CHAPTER 2: AMONG THE CHALDEAN 7 1. Introduction 7 2. Chaldean Demonology 8 3. Personal spirit relations among the Chaldeans 12 4. Summary 16 5. Selected Literature 17 CHAPTER 3: AMONG THE ZOROASTRIAN 18 1. Preamble 18 2. Introduction 19 3. Mazdian Demonology 22 4. The Constitution of Man 28 5. The Fravashis 32 6. The Ritual Practice 36 7. Selected Literature 40 CHAPTER 4: AMONG THE ANCIENT GREEK 42 1. Introduction 42 2. Plato’s Elements of the Soul - Logos, Eros and Thumos 43 3. The Nous - the Ancient Higher Self 47 4. The early Greek idea of the Daimon 53 5. The Socratic Daimonion 56 6. Deiﬁcation of Man 59 7. The Evil Daimon 63 8. Selected Literature 70 © Copyright © 2013 by Frater Acher | www.theomagica.com All rights reserved. This eBook can be shared and distributed freely in its complete PDF format. However, no portion or quotes taken out of context may be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the expressed written permission of the publisher except for the use of brief quotations in a book review. ii CHAPTER 1 a study on the holy guardian angel a short introduction I. OUTER PERSPECTIVE Few topics in Western Occultism gained as much attention and dedication by practitioners in recent decades as the Holy Guardian Angel. Since the teachings of the sage Abramelin - written down by Abraham of Worms - were published in 1725, for many attaining knowledge and conversation with one's personal guardian angel rose to become the epiphany of the magical Arte.
[Show full text]
Iamblichus and Julian''s ''Third Demiurge'': a Proposition
Iamblichus and Julian”s ”Third Demiurge”: A Proposition Adrien Lecerf To cite this version: Adrien Lecerf. Iamblichus and Julian”s ”Third Demiurge”: A Proposition . Eugene Afonasin; John M. Dillon; John F. Finamore. Iamblichus and the Foundations of Late Platonism, 13, BRILL, p. 177-201, 2012, Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts. Studies in Platonism, Neoplatonism, and the Platonic Tradition, 10.1163/9789004230118_012. hal-02931399 HAL Id: hal-02931399 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02931399 Submitted on 6 Sep 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Iamblichus and Julian‟s “Third Demiurge”: A Proposition Adrien Lecerf Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France [email protected] ABSTRACT. In the Emperor Julian's Oration To the Mother of the Gods, a philosophical interpretation of the myth of Cybele and Attis, reference is made to an enigmatic "third Demiurge". Contrary to a common opinion identifying him to the visible Helios (the Sun), or to tempting identifications to Amelius' and Theodorus of Asine's three Demiurges, I suggest that a better idea would be to compare Julian's text to Proclus' system of Demiurges (as exposed and explained in a Jan Opsomer article, "La démiurgie des jeunes dieux selon Proclus", Les Etudes Classiques, 71, 2003, pp.
[Show full text]
The Principles of Philosophy Known As Monadology
The Principles of Philosophy known as Monadology G. W. Leibniz 1714 Copyright © Jonathan Bennett 2017. All rights reserved [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difﬁculty than it is worth. First launched: 2004 ******** 1. My topic here will be the monad, which is just a simple substance to •come into existence naturally, for that would substance. By calling it ‘simple’ I mean that it has no parts, involve its being put together, assembled, composed, and a though it can be a part of something composite. simple substance couldn’t be formed in that way because it 2. There must be simple substances, because there are has no parts. composites. A composite thing is just a collection of simple 6. So we can say that the only way for monads to begin ones that happen to have come together. or end—to come into existence or go out of existence—is 3. Something that has no parts can’t be extended, can’t have •instantaneously, being created or annihilated all at once. a shape, and can’t be split up. So monads are the true atoms Composite things, in contrast with that, can begin or end of Nature—the elements out of which everything is made.
[Show full text]
Proclus and Artemis: on the Relevance of Neoplatonism to the Modern Study of Ancient Religion
Kernos Revue internationale et pluridisciplinaire de religion grecque antique 13 | 2000 Varia Proclus and Artemis: On the Relevance of Neoplatonism to the Modern Study of Ancient Religion Spyridon Rangos Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/1293 DOI: 10.4000/kernos.1293 ISSN: 2034-7871 Publisher Centre international d'étude de la religion grecque antique Printed version Date of publication: 1 January 2000 ISSN: 0776-3824 Electronic reference Spyridon Rangos, « Proclus and Artemis: On the Relevance of Neoplatonism to the Modern Study of Ancient Religion », Kernos [Online], 13 | 2000, Online since 21 April 2011, connection on 01 May 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/kernos/1293 ; DOI : 10.4000/kernos.1293 Kernos Kernos, 13 (2000), p. 47-84. Proclus and Artemis: On the Relevance of Neoplatonism to the Modern Study of Andent Religion* Imagine the situation in which contemporary philosophers would find themselves if Wittgenstein introduced, in his Philosophical Investigations, the religious figure of Jesus as Logos and Son of God in order to illuminate the puzzlement ofthe private-language paradox, or if in the second division of Being and Time Heidegger mentioned the archangel Michael to support the argument of 'being toward death'. Similar is the perplexity that a modern reader is bound to encounter when, after a highly sophisticated analysis of demanding metaphysical questions about the relationship of the one and the many, finitude and infinity, mind and body, Proclus, l in ail seriousness and without the slightest touch of irony, assigns to some traditional gods of Greek polytheism a definitive place in the structure of being.
[Show full text]
The Unique Cosmology of Genesis 1 Gerhard F
The Unique Cosmology of Genesis 1 Gerhard F. Hasel Michael G. Hasel he opening chapters of the Bible (Gen. and “knows” humanity in its totality. But T 1–11) contain the history of begin- in the biblical Creation, these realities are nings, focusing on natural and historical expressed in their totalities as originating beginnings and the ensuing history of the from the Creator. The totalities of God’s world and humankind.1 Nowhere else in created world and what is in it depicts how Scripture is found such a comprehensive the origin and continuing existence of the and detailed narration of the origin of the world and life is expressed in time and earth and humanity. space. While this is important in itself, it re- Today, there are many who believe that ceives greater significance when one it is unnecessary to engage in a dialogue be- recognizes that the Genesis account for tween the biblical presentation of Creation the origin of the universe (cosmology) in and the scientific quest for understanding the Creation account is without rival. No- the world and humanity. But such dialogue where in the ancient Near East or Egypt and interaction are not only desirable, has anything similar been recorded. The they are essential. The sciences can deal unique words about Creator, creation, and only with partial spheres of knowledge but creature—of God, world, and humanity in not with totalities. Genesis 1; 2—set the entire tone for the This totality is already revealed in the wonderful and unique saving message of first verse of the Bible: “In the beginning the Bible.
[Show full text]
The Relevance of Hindu God Concepts and Arguments Proving the Existence of God Perspective Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz
Vol. 4 No. 2 October 2020 THE RELEVANCE OF HINDU GOD CONCEPTS AND ARGUMENTS PROVING THE EXISTENCE OF GOD PERSPECTIVE GOTTFRIED WILHELM LEIBNIZ By: Krisna S. Yogiswari Sekolah Tinggi Agama Hindu Negeri Mpu Kuturan Singaraja Email: [email protected] Received: June 23, 2020 Accepted: October 12, 2020 Published: October 31, 2020 Abstract Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz is a German philosopher who provides a comprehensive argument about the existence of God. Although Leibniz has made a mistake in thinking about God, the evidence of God’s presence offered by him gives us an example and a strength to deepen our faith: Leibniz’s courage is to increase his confidence and his power to maintain God's existence. The arguments presented by Leibniz are very relevant to the concept of God in Hinduism. It also seems that with evidence of harmony that had already been built before, Leibniz fell into the trap of atheism implicitly because it denied the existence of a personal God and only relied on internal law. Regarding the harmony that had already been built before, Leibniz explained that civil laws were working in monade. Monade are predetermined natures, which result in having one characteristic that governs everything. But the best is that not only for the whole in general but also for individuals, especially individuals who have a love for God. Keyword: Leibniz, Existence, God, Hinduism 175 Vol. 4 No.2 October 2020 I. INTRODUCTION qualitative philosophical research approach, The issue and debate about the with the existence of God as a material existence of God is a line of continuity that object and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s flows and leads to the entire history of the perspective as a formal object.
[Show full text]
Plotinian Henadology
CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PhilPapers Edward P. Butler PLOTINIAN HENADOLOGY In his Life of Plotinus, Plotinus’ student Porphyry states that there were, in Plotinus’ time, “many Christians and others, and sectarians [αἱρετικοι] who had abandoned the old philosophy,” from whom came a profusion of “treatises” as well as “revelations” (ἀποκαλύψεις), that Porphyry says “deceived themselves and many others, alleging that Plato had not penetrated to the depths of intelligible substance,” and that Plotinus “often attacked their position in his lectures,” as well as in the entire treatise that Porphyry says “we have given the title ‘Against the Gnostics’” (Vita Plotini 16.1‑11). The project of refuting these sectarians was so important to Plotinus that not only was it a recurring focus of his own work, but Porphyry speaks of his fellow student Amelius and himself pursuing it in multiple works of theirs as well. In Plotinus’ day, so ‑called Gnostics and Christians were scarcely distinguishable, and it was surely difficult to imagine any one of this profusion of emerging sects achieving hegemonic status, much less that one of them, through seizing for itself the power of the imperial state, would be able to sweep away before it cults that had existed for thousands of years. Hence Plotinus writes against the new sectarians, not as a threat against the Pagan world, but as a threat to the correct interpretation of Platonism, because some of these sects had adopted elements of it and might, if not critiqued, succeed in positioning themselves as Plato’s legitimate interpreters.
[Show full text]
To Find the Maker and Father. Proclus' Exegesis of Plato Tim. 28C3-5
Études platoniciennes 2 | 2006 Le Timée de Platon To find the maker and father. Proclus' exegesis of Plato Tim. 28c3-5 Jan Opsomer Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/1074 DOI: 10.4000/etudesplatoniciennes.1074 ISSN: 2275-1785 Publisher Société d’Études Platoniciennes Printed version Date of publication: 16 June 2006 Number of pages: 261-283 ISBN: 978-2-251-44310-2 Electronic reference Jan Opsomer, « To ﬁnd the maker and father. Proclus' exegesis of Plato Tim. 28c3-5 », Études platoniciennes [Online], 2 | 2006, Online since 11 August 2016, connection on 19 April 2019. URL : http://journals.openedition.org/etudesplatoniciennes/1074 ; DOI : 10.4000/ etudesplatoniciennes.1074 Études Platoniciennes est mis à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modiﬁcation 4.0 International. TO FIND THE MAKER AND FATHER. PROCLUS’ EXEGESIS OF PLATO TIM. 28C3-5* JAN OPSOMER The maker and father of this universe it is a hard task to find, and having found him, it would be impossible to declare him to everyone. to;n me;n ou\n poihth;n kai; patevra tou'de tou' panto;" euJrei'n te e[rgon kai; euJrovnta eij" a{panta" ajduvnaton levgein (Tim. 28C3-5) The ab ove quotation from Plato’s Ti m a e u s is for Pro clus the occasion to insert into his C o m m e n t a ry on the Ti m a e u s (1.299.13-319.21) an e l ab o rate discussion of the ontological status of the demiurge and of his predecessors’ views concerning this matter.
[Show full text]
Zurvanite Iconographic Canon. Astronomy and Mythology
Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2014, 2(2), 66 – 102; http://aaatec.org/art/a_ge3 www.aaatec.org ISSN 2310-2144 Zurvanite Iconographic Canon. Astronomy and Mythology. Vitalij E. Larichev 1†, Sergey A. Parshikov 2, Elena G. Gienko 3 1 Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation. 2 NO "Environmental center of rational management of natural resources" (NO EC RMNR), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation. 3 Siberian State Academy of Geodesy, Plakhotnogo st.10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article reveals the results of the study of iconographic canon of Zurvanite mythologem belonging to the worldwide myths, comprising the myth of the divine twins. The following reasons make the theme relevant: 1. There is no iconographic canon Zurvanite mythologem which is universally accepted by modern Iranian studies; 2.Saratsk petroglyphic composition of XVIII-XVII centuries BC (Minusinsk Basin of Siberia) in Khakassia that we have defined as the earliest of all supposed images of Zurvanite myth; 3. The significance of Zurvanite myths in the process of monotheistic theology’s forming. In our work we have come to the conclusion that the creators of Saratsk petroglyphic composition were the bearers of the Andronovo cultural-historical community who came to the territory of Khakassia in XVIII-XVII centuries BC. In the processes of semantic disclosure of mythologem of the symbols of Saratsk petroglyphic composition due to the fact that Andronovs belonged to the circle of Aryan tribes confederation we relied on the text of the Avesta, Pahlavi texts and medieval authors mentioned in Zurvanite mythologem. Studies have shown that the spatial distribution of Saratsk petroglyphic composition corresponds to the astronomically significant areas of the Saratsky Sunduk sanctuary which is a "classical" Iranian-Aryan vara (protective slab separatings the sacred world from the real world - profane) located on the top of the Saratsky Sunduk mountain.
[Show full text]
Creatio Ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 1995 Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas James Noel Hubler University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, Ancient Philosophy Commons, Christianity Commons, History of Christianity Commons, History of Religion Commons, Other Classics Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Religious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religion Commons Recommended Citation Hubler, James Noel, "Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas" (1995). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 980. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/980 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/980 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Creatio ex Nihilo: Matter, Creation, and the Body in Classical and Christian Philosophy Through Aquinas Abstract Creatio ex nihilo marked a major redefinition of the material cosmos by the Christian apologists of the late second century, Tatian and Theophilus of Antioch. Other scholars have properly assigned the origin of creatio ex nihilo to these thinkers, notably Gerhard May and David Winston, but the reasons for the teaching' s appearance remained unexplained. By examining the Classical philosophical views of matter, the challenge that Greek views of matter raised for the Christian message become evident. For Stoic, Platonist, and Peripatetic alike matter imposed the natural necessity of corruption upon the body. The moral limitations imposed by matter made a bodily resurrection seem offensive. Christian hopes for a resurrection seemed misguided both intellectually and morally.
[Show full text]
Zurvanite Iconographic Canon. Astronomy and Mythology
Archaeoastronomy and Ancient Technologies 2014, 2(2), 66 – 102; http://aaatec.org/documents/article/ge3.pdf www.aaatec.org ISSN 2310-2144 Zurvanite iconographic canon. Astronomy and mythology. Vitalij E. Larichev 1†, Sergey A. Parshikov 2, Elena G. Gienko 3 1 Institute of Archaeology and Ethnography of SB RAS, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation. 2 NO "Environmental center of rational management of natural resources" (NO EC RMNR), Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation. 3 Siberian State Academy of Geodesy, Plakhotnogo st.10, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation; E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This article reveals the results of the study of iconographic canon of Zurvanite mythologem belonging to the worldwide myths, comprising the myth of the divine twins. The following reasons make the theme relevant: 1. There is no iconographic canon Zurvanite mythologem which is universally accepted by modern Iranian studies; 2.Saratsk petroglyphic composition of XVIII-XVII centuries BC (Minusinsk Basin of Siberia) in Khakassia that we have defined as the earliest of all supposed images of Zurvanite myth; 3. The significance of Zurvanite myths in the process of monotheistic theology’s forming. In our work we have come to the conclusion that the creators of Saratsk petroglyphic composition were the bearers of the Andronovo cultural-historical community who came to the territory of Khakassia in XVIII-XVII centuries BC. In the processes of semantic disclosure of mythologem of the symbols of Saratsk petroglyphic composition due to the fact that Andronovs belonged to the circle of Aryan tribes confederation we relied on the text of the Avesta, Pahlavi texts and medieval authors mentioned in Zurvanite mythologem.
[Show full text]