ANNEXURE Summary of Deos Scrutiny Report from the State Of

ANNEXURE

Summary of DEOs Scrutiny Report from the State of UTTARAKHAND General Elections to the HOUSE OF THE PEOPLE Year 2019

Category-I-Candidates where no defects pointed out by the DEO in the DEO's Scrutiny Report SI. District No.& Name of Returne Party Affiliation! Remarks NO Name Of Candidate d or Independent PC Non- returned Ajay Tamta R Bharatiya Janata Party Pradeep Tamta NR Indian National Congress 1 - K.L. Arya NR Uttarakhand Kranti DaI Almora Almora Droupadi Verma NR 'SC' Uttarakhand Kranti Dal (Democratic) Advocate Vimla NR Uttarakhand Parivartan Arya Party Total 05 05 Category -2-Candidates who failed to lodge their accounts of election expenses St. District No.& Name of Returne Party Affiliation! Remarks NO Name Of Candidate d or Independent PC Non- returned 1 03- Sunder Dhoni NR Bahujan Pamaj Party Almora Almora (Advocate) (SC) Total 01 01 Category-3- Canddates who failed to lodge their accounts within prescribed time of 30 days of declaration of results SI. District No.& Name of Returne Party Affiliation! Remarks NO Name Of Candidate d or Independent (mention (i) last PC Non- date for returned submission of accounts, (ii) date of submission of accounts and the number of days delayed, (iii) reason for late submission if obtained by the DEO) 1 03- Nil Nil Nil Almora Almora (SC) Total Nil Nil Category-4- Canddates who failed to lodge their accounts of election expenses in the manner required under law (cases other than Category 2&3) SI. District No.& Name of Returne Party Affiliation! Remarks No Name Of Candidate d or Independent (mention the PC Non- deficiencies returned found and amount of understatement any) 1 03- Nil Nil Almora Almora (SC) Total NIL NIL Category-5- Candidates who failed to lodge their accounts in time and manner (cases other than Category 2,3& 4) SI. District No.& Name of Returne Party Affiliation! Remarks No Name Of Candidate d or Independent (mention (i) last PC Non- date for returned submission of accounts, (ii) date of submission of accounts and the for late submission if obtained by the DEO, (iv) the deficiencies found and amount of understatement, if any) 03- Nil Nil Nil Almora Almora (SC) Total Nil Nil

çcc1. 4(7f(7

iIcpi')/ ___ pc1tM

ZT ICM 3f5T i -E I f1_/29— (?roroTrolo,2o19_9cI1Iui_tl)/2o19 1-iici:.9- i1,2019

General Election to LS and State Legislative Assemblies, 2019 - Filing of DEO's Scrutiny Report in EEMS Software-Regarding.

1 c , z3Y'1CM fl1Ct? cf 3fFtT 1T T0 2556/XXV-27/2019 R'iicp 21 v \'-t, 2019 t 1T5E 11 2486 1~iicp 04 'r'-1, 2019 * 31YIe11 ITf PiclitH 311.Lu111 I'S1I 76/ECl/iNST/FUNC/EEM/EEPS/2019NoI.11I F'iicp 19 'i11, 2019 r 1'1IicP f'-iicp 31 It 2019 * 3Yic11 03—.3T9T (roirro) i1c{i fcñtM e1'cl, T 1I'1i- 2019 PiclItl-f eI qk1 3PTft?1 * PiclitH cf t IRsiei c z i1T Summary Report of the DEO 11c, 1cPI1c1 IY'1c ikci 1iiii'< PiCitI'I et cli 1ci 51T ti r io et 1T4 3T1Tf 5T 1T11 -'31t 3TTZ1 ei, '.1-icli 2 c¼i, 1i I1e1 cpj

3 - 63.j d-iI\3f 4 *OT0 311R11, cp T 5 Tff çy4' pf cjfci f (cfcp) 6 1iii 31TT1, isW yfcç-f tfl

ictrf * 1RCci PicI'I * 1 Riicp 25-06-2019 NIC * I12N Lcft1

Pici Qfj cicl 'il"1I 1bii ) cp1 cp< 'i4if 3Pf1.fZff * PIC1IC1'I CW4 T *1 cRciei Ct * t1CT DEO's Scrutiny Report 1Ci, R-i')c f1T1f?1 31fT e1I1 ff m , i.j_)g[ i •icicfl.i,

(PiRti 'ficiPi) ___1ciiIcpi/ Ile1i Picit1-f &fr 51L 3e1'i SUMMARY REPORT OF DEO FOR EACH CONSTITUENCY ON LODGING OF ELECTION EXPENSES ACCOUNTS BY CANDIDATES

(a) No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency : 03-Almora(S.C) (b) Total No. of contesting candidates: 06

(c ) State and District : Uttarakhand(Almora, Pithoragarh, Bageshwar, Champawat)

(d ) Date of declaration of result of election/bye-election- 23-05-2019

(e) Last date of lodging accounts: 22-06-2019 (f) Name of the elected candidate- Shri Ajay Tamta

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11

S. Name of Due Date of Whether Whether Grand Total Whether the Total expenses incurred Total expenses incurred Remarks No. The date of lodging lodged in lodged of expenses DEO agrees by the Party (As by other/entities as of the Candidat lodging of the in the incurred! with the reported in Part-Ill of reported in Part-Ill of Expenditu e and of accounts prescribed manner authorized amount Abstract Statement I Abstract Statement re Party account by the format required by the shown by Observer Affiliation candidate (Yes or by candidate/a the No) law(Yes gent candidate or No) (as against all Lump Sum Grand Lump Sum Grand mentioned items of Amount in Total of Amount in Total of in part —Il of expenditure cash or other cash other Abstract (Should be cheque expenses /cheque expenses Statement) similar to given to in kind by given to in kind point no.22 candidate the candidate incurred of DEO's by each Political (and for the Scrutiny Political Party mention candidate Report Party names of i.e.Annexure donors) -C3) 1 S h ri 22-06- 20-06- YES YES 4577346- YES 5000000- 576500- 189776- 614147- Aj ay 2019 2019 Tamta, B.J.P.

S 2 Shri 22-06- 20-06- YES YES 4007728- YES 5000000- 137160- 886627- 140600- Pradeep 2019 2019 Ta mta I.N.C. 3 Shri. 22-06- Not NO NO Not Candidate Not Not Not Not Sundar 2019 Submitt Known has not Known Known Known Known Dhauni, ed lodged his B.S.P. final account 4 Shri K.L. 22-06- 22-06- YES YES 191465- YES NIL NIL 81000- 24000- Arya, 2019 2019 U.K.D. 5 Smt. 22-06- 22-06- YES YES 273976- YES 119976- 46000- NIL NIL Draupa 2019 2019 di Verma, UKD(D) 6 Adv. 22-06- 22-06- YES YES 38445- YES NIL NIL 28900- 101520- Bimla 2019 2019 Arya, UPPA

Signature o'fthe DEO

Comments of the Expenditure Observer, if any,

Date: 11/o6/øI7 Signature of the E s - Observer

-5- Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 1

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- Lok Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Shri Ajay Tamta, Laxmi Nivas, DugalKhola, Al mo ra 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Bhartiya Janta Party

3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Almora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting Yes

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after Yes Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(lf not, defect that could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account Yes

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the 20-06-2019 account by the candidate: (i) Original Account (ii) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time Yes

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay N/A

C . o. 13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called N/A for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof.

14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate N/A

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the N/A candidate

15. Grand total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in Rs 5767993-00 part —Il of the Abstract Statement

16. Whether in the DEO's opinion, the account of election expenses Yes of the candidate has been lodged in the manner required by the R.P. Act, 1951 and C.E. Rules, 1961 17. If No then please mention the following defects with details

(i) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising Yes of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (ii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted Yes by candidate (iii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of Yes election expenditure submitted (iv) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (v) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure Yes routed through bank account 18. (i) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for Yes rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect Yes (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect Yes was rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the Yes candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------TOTAL - -

20. Did the candidate produce his Register of Accounting Election Yes Expenditure for inspection by the Observer/RO/Authorized persons 3 times during campaign period 21. If DEO does not agree with the facts mentioned against Row. No. 19 referred to above' give the following details :-

(I) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (ii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (iii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(iv) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, (with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (v) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEO agrees that the expenses are correctly Yes reported by the candidate. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO)

Date: Q f C I? Signature / / 2- (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) DEO Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer —

r Date: Signature o he Exr . iture Observer Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 2

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- Lok Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Shri Pradeep Tamta, Viii- Lob, Post- Lob, Distt- Bageshwar 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Indian National Congress

3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Almora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting Yes

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after Yes Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(lf not, defect that could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account Yes

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the 20-06-2019 account by the candidate: (iii) Original Account (iv) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time Yes

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay N/A

13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called N/A for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof. S

14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate N/A

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the N/A candidate

15. Grand total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in Rs 4285488-00 part—Il of the Abstract Statement

(vi) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising Yes of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (vii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted Yes by candidate (viii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of Yes election expenditure submitted (ix) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (x) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure Yes routed through bank account 18. (I) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for Yes rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect Yes (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect Yes was rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the Yes candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------

TOTAL - -

!0 ..-

•(vi) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (vii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (viii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(ix) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, (with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (x) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEO agrees that the expenses are correctly Yes reported by the candidate. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO)

Date: Signature 179/0 2-0 / 7 / (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) DEO Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer--

Date: 2- Signatu e of th- xpenditure Observer Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 3

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- bk Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Shri Sundar Dhauni, Vill & Post- Mandalsera, Tahsil & Distt- Bageshwar 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Bahujan Samaj Party

3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Almora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting No

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after Did not attend the Account Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(lf not, defect that Reconciliation Meeting. could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account No

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the - account by the candidate: (v) Original Account (vi) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time No

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay Not lodged till date.

13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called Yes for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof.

7 14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate No

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the The candidate has not candidate offered any explanation.

15. Grand total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in The candidate has not part —II of the Abstract Statement lodged his final account.

16. Whether in the DEO's opinion, the account of election expenses No of the candidate has been lodged in the manner required by the R.P. Act, 1951 and C.E. Rules, 1961 17. If No then please mention the following defects with details

(xi) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising No of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (xii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted No by candidate (xiii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of No election expenditure submitted (xiv) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (xv) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure Not Known routed through bank account 18. (i) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for N/A rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect was rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the Not Known candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------

TOTAL - - -

'3 20. Did the candidate produce his Register of Accounting Election Yes Expenditure for inspection by the Observer/RO/Authorized persons 3 times during campaign period 21. If DEO does not agree with the facts mentioned against Row. No. 19 referred to above' give the following details :-

(xi) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (xii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (xiii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(xiv) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, ( with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (xv) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEC agrees that the expenses are correctly Candidate has not lodged reported by the candidate. his final account. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO)

Date: Li /2 o/ Signature / (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) DEC Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer — The candidate has failed to submit his final account. The DEO/RO has been advise to take action as per the provisions of R.P. Act 1951 and ECI guidelines/instructions.

Date: Signature of the penditure Observer

I Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 4

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- Lok Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Shri K.L. Arya dO Shivraj Banola, Mohalla- Nayalkhola, Distt- Al mora 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Uttarakhand Kranti Dal

3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Almora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting Yes

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after Yes Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(lf not, defect that could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account Yes

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the 22-06-2019 account by the candidate: (vii) Original Account (viii) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time Yes

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay N/A o 13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called N/A for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof.

14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate N/A

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the N/A candidate

15. Gra total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in Rs 215465-00 part —II of the Abstract Statement

(xvi) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising Yes of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (xvii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted Yes by candidate (xviii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of Yes election expenditure submitted (xix) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (xx) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure Yes routed through bank account 18. (i) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for Yes rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect Yes (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect Yes 'as rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the Yes candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------

h S

TOTAL - -

(xvi) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (xvii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (xviii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(xix) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, (with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (xx) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEO agrees that the expenses are correctly Yes reported by the candidate. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO)

Date: Signature / 'I (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) DEO Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer —

Date Signature the' - diture Observer o

Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 5

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- bk Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Smt. Draupadi Verma, dO Subedar Anand Singh Bora, Khadi Bazar, Dharanaula, Almora 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Uttarakhand Kranti Dal(D)

3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Almora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting Yes

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after - Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(lf not, defect that could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account Yes

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the 22-06-2019 account by the candidate: (ix) Original Account (x) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time Yes

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay N/A 13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called No for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof.

14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate N/A

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the N/A candidate

15. Grand total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in 319976- part —Il of the Abstract Statement

(xxi) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising Yes of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (xxii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted Yes by candidate (xxiii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of Yes election expenditure submitted (xxiv) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (xxv) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure - routed through bank account 18. (i) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for Yes rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect Yes (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect Yes was rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the - candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------

TOTAL - -

(xxi) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (xxii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (xxiii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(xxiv) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, (with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (xxv) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEO agrees that the expenses are correctly Yes reported by the candidate. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO)

Date: Signature I (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) DEO Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer —

Date: Sign. ure of the penditure Observer S

Serial Number of the candidate in Summary Report of the DEO- 6

Name of the State —Uttarakhand District — Almora Election- bk Sabha Samanya Nirvachan 2019

DEO's SCRUTINY REPORT ON ELECTION EXPENCES OF THE CANDIDATE UNDER RULE 89 OF C.E. RULES, 1961

S.No Description To be filled up by the DEO

1. Name & address of the candidate Advocate Bimla Arya, VIII- Baman Tiladi, Post- Barechhina, Tahsil & Distt- Almora 2. Political Party affiliation, if any Uttarakhand Parivartan Party 3. No. and name of Assembly/Parliamentary Constituency 03-Atmora(S.C)

4. Name of the elected candidate Shri Ajay Tamta

5. Date of declaration of result 23-05-2019

6. Date of Account Reconciliation Meeting 18-06-2019

7. (i) Whether the candidate or his agent had been informed Yes about the date of Account Reconciliation Meeting in writing

(ii) Whether he or his agent has attended the meeting Yes

8. Whether all the defects reconciled by the candidate after Yes Account Reconciliation Meeting (Yes or No).(If not, defect that could not be reconciled be shown in column No.19)

9. Last date prescribed for lodging Account 22-06-2019

10. Whether the candidate has lodged the Account Yes

11. If the candidate has lodged the account, date of lodging the 22-06-2019 account by the candidate: (xi) Original Account (xii) Revised account after the Account Reconciliation Meeting 12. Whether account lodged in time Yes

12A. If not lodged in time, period of delay N/A

21 13. If account not lodged or not lodged in time, whether DEO called N/A for explanation from the candidate. If not, reason thereof.

14. Explanation, if any, given by the candidate N/A

14A. Comments of the DEO on the explanation if any, of the N/A candidate

15. Grand total of all election expenses reported by the candidate in Rs 139965-00 part —Il of the Abstract Statement

(xxvi) Whether Election Expenditure Register comprising Yes of Day to Day Account Register, Cash Register, Bank Register ,Abstract Statement has been lodged (xxvii) Whether duly sworn in affidavit has been submitted Yes by candidate (xxviii) Whether requisite vouchers in respect of items of Yes election expenditure submitted (xxix) Whether separate Bank Account opened for Yes election (xxx) Whether all expenditure (expect petty expenditure Yes routed through bank account 18. (i) Whether the DEO had issued a notice to the candidate for Yes rectifying the defect (ii) Whether the candidate rectified the defect Yes (iii) Comments of the DEO on the above, i.e. whether the defect Yes was rectified or not. 19. Whether the items of election expenses reported by the Yes candidate corresponds with the expenses shown in the shadow Observation Register and Folder of Evidence. Items of Date Page No. of Mention Amount as Amount expenditure Shadow amount as per per the understated Observation Shadow account by the Register Observation submitted candidate Register/folder by the of evidence candidate

Ii, iii ------

TOTAL - -

(xxvi) Were the defects noticed by DEO brought to the No notice of the candidate during campaign period or during the Account Reconciliation Meeting (xxvii) If yes, then annex copies of all the notices issued N/A relating to discrepancies with English translation (if it is in regional language ) and mention the date of notice (xxviii) Did the candidate give any reply to the notice? No

(xxix) If yes, please Annex copies of such explanation N/A received, ( with English translation of the same, if it is in regional language) and mention date of reply (xxx) DEO,s comments/observations on the N/A candidate's explanation

22. Whether the DEO agrees that the expenses are correctly Yes reported by the candidate. (Should be similar to Column no.8 of Summary Report of DEO) N Date: L1' — 2—o / Signature (Nitin Singh Bhadauria) - DEO Almora

23. Comments, if any, by the Expenditure Observer -

Date L1 o— 2o/ Signature of th- xpenditure Observer