Gall Bladder Wall Thickness As a Marker of Portal Hypertension in Patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gall Bladder Wall Thickness As a Marker of Portal Hypertension in Patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver Gall Bladder Wall Thickness as a Marker of Portal Hypertension ORIGINAL ARTICLE Gall Bladder Wall Thickness as a Marker of Portal Hypertension in Patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver Jaya Pathak1, Shivangi Gharia2, Zeal Kishor Thakkar3, Kesar Prajapati4, Darshankumar M Raval5 1Associate Professor and Head of Unit, 2,4Resident, 3,5Intern, Department of Medicine, SSG Hospital and Medical College Baroda ABSTRACT BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: One of the major complications of cirrhosis is the occurrence of Portal Hypertension, which can lead to bleeding from Esophageal Varices, Hepatic Encephalopathy, Ascites, Spontanoeus Bacterial Peritonitis, Hepatorenal Syndrome, Hepatopulmonary Syndrome, etc. Early diagnosis and treatment of Portal hypertension is vital to prevent major complications in Cirrhosis of liver. Portal hypertension causes increase in the hydrostatic pressure causing oedema and congestion of Gallbladder also known as Congestive Cholecystopathy. In this study, we have attempted to find the correlation between presence of portal hypertension and increased diffuse Gallbladder Wall Thickness(GBWT). To study the relationship of Portal Hypertension to Diffuse Gallbladder Wall thickness on ultrasonography in patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver, without any intrinsic Gallbladder disease. METHODS: In the present study, 60 patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver admitted in the medical wards of SSGH, Baroda were studied. Data was collected regarding the history, physical examination, laboratory and radiological investigations, especially Gallbladder wall thickness and Upper GI Endoscopy. RESULTS: Patients were divided into 2 groups as per the Gall Bladder Wall thickness; Group A with GBWT <4mm, which consisted of 17 patients and Group B with GBWT >4mm, which consisted of 43 patients. Comparison of Serum Albumin levels between the two groups showed. CONCLUSION: In patients of Cirrhosis, increased GBWT correlated well with increased Portal Vein diameter, increased incidence of Ascites and presence of Esophageal Varices. Thus, the presence of GBWT on Ultrasonography in patients of cirrhosis without intrinsic gall bladder disease should be considered as an early sign of Portal Hypertension. Keywords: Alcohol, Gall Bladder Wall Thickness, Cirrhosis, Portal Hypertension INTRODUCTION Cirrhosis is a chronic liver disease, compensated stage is more challenging2. characterized by development of fibrosis. Compensated Cirrhosis may progress and The common causes being Alcohol, has two major consequences, Portal Chronic Hepatitis C and B infection. In the hypertension and Hepatic Failure. Portal past, it has been thought that cirrhosis was Hypertension is defined as the elevation of never reversible; however, it has become the hepatic venous pressure gradient apparent that when the underlying insult (HVPG) to > 5mmHg1.Portal that has caused the cirrhosis has been Hypertension is caused by one, increased removed, there can be reversal of fibrosis hepatic resistance to the passage of blood 1. In the early compensated stage of flow through the liver due to regenerative cirrhosis, patients are usually nodules, and second due to increased asymptomatic. Diagnosis of Cirrhosis is splanchnic blood flow secondary to relatively straightforward during the vasodilation1. Progression of fibrosis decompensated stage when the treatment parallels the increase in portal pressure may be problematic, on the contrary, and, frequently, patients with severe diagnosing Cirrhosis while it is still in fibrosis in the pre-cirrhotic stage have a HVPG>5mmHg2. Portal hypertension is *Corresponding Author: associated with the most severe Dr.Zeal Kishor Thakkar, complications of cirrhosis including Intern, Department of Medicine, Ascites and Varicealhemorrhage. Variceal SSG Hospital and Medical College bleedingis an immediate life-threatening Baroda. problem with a 20-30% mortality rate Email: [email protected] associated with each episode of bleeding. The concept of diagnosis of cirrhosis is 52 Int J Res Med. 2017; 6(4); 52-58 e ISSN:2320-2742 p ISSN: 2320-2734 Gall Bladder Wall Thickness as a Marker of Portal Hypertension changing from the documentation of reflect any changes induced by therapy8. histological fibrosis to the identification of Gall bladder wall thickness found on patients truly at risk of developing ultrasonography can be of two types: complications. HVPG is the most robust Diffuse and Focal. Focal is usually due to predictor of clinical decompensation in intrinsic Gall bladder diseases, while patients with compensated cirrhosis and diffuse is associated with many conditions portal hypertension without varices4. It has without intrinsic gall bladder disease, like been clearly demonstrated that the onset of hypoalbuminemia, Right sided heart clinically significant portal hypertension failure, Cirrhosis of Liver, Chronic Kidney (HVPG>10mmHg) marks the progression Disease. Gall Bladder wall thicknening in to a stage at risk of clinical complications. patients with Cirrhosis is mostly due to It is therefore necessary to diagnose raised hydrostatic pressure of vasculature clinical decompensation in otherwise of Gall bladder wall. Gall bladder wall compensated cirrhosis patients, so that thickening is frequently observed and early treatment can be initiated and frequently reported in association with thereby increasing the chances of reversal portal hypertension9,10. Proper diagnosis of fibrosis. In this scenario, non-invasive and management of complications of PHT methods able to mirror the hemodynamic are vital to improving quality of life and threshold play an important role3.Since a reducing mortality in cirrhotic patients. long time ago, simple blood tests were The present study was undertaken with a used in the diagnosis and prognostication view to determine the correlation of of patients with advanced liver diseases. GBWT with presence of The most largely used is a combination of Hypoalbuminemia, Ascites, Portal Vein markers of liver synthetic Diameter, Upper GI Bleed and presence of functions(albumin, bilirubin and EsophagealVarices. prothrombin time) that, together with two MATERIALS AND METHODS clinical variables ( presence and severity Study sample of ascites and encephalopathy), constitute The present study was conducted at Shri the Child Pugh Score5. HVPG is the best Sayaji General Hospital, Vadodara, a surrogate marker in chronic liver disease; tertiary health care institute, from October however the measurement of HVPG has 2015 to November 2016. This was a cross its limitations, such as its sectional study where we enrolled 60 invasiveness6.Upper GI Endoscopy is patients of Alcoholic Cirrhosis of Liver. recommended for screening of Inclusion Criteria EsophagealVarices, so as to start primary Patients diagnosed as having Alcoholic prophylaxis in patients who are at high risk Cirrhosis of Liver, with age more than 18 of Variceal Bleeding. Upper years Gastrointestinal(GI)Endoscopy , as a Exclusion Criteria screening method for diagnosis of Portal Patients with history of Gall Bladder Hypertension is also an invasive and costly diseases or Cholecystitis method. Predicting the presence of Patients with Congestive Cardiac Failure EsophagealVarices by Non Invasive Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease means might increase the compliance and Patients with Serum SGPT would permit to restrict the performance of levels>400U/L endoscopy to those patients with a high 7 Method probability of having varices. The ideal The patients were explained in detail about noninvasive test for diagnosing fibrosis the study, following which an informed and portal hypertension, should be simple consent was taken regarding permission and reproducible, readily available, less for inclusion in the study. Detailed Clinical expensive than a biopsy, and able to history was taken and then patients were predict a full spectrum of fibrosis and subjected to a thorough clinical 53 Int J Res Med. 2017; 6(4); 52-58 e ISSN:2320-2742 p ISSN: 2320-2734 Gall Bladder Wall Thickness as a Marker of Portal Hypertension examination. Blood samples were drawn B. There were 17 patients in Group A, under complete aseptic precautions after while Group B had 43 patients. obtaining informed consent. Blood Comparison amongst both groups was investigations sent included, Complete made with respect to Serum Albumin Hemogram, Liver function tests with levels, Portal Vein diameter, presence of enzymes, Total protein and serum Ascites, history suggesting Upper GI Albumin levels, Prothrombin time bleed,and presence of esophagealvariceson .Additional blood investigations were sent Upper GI endoscopy . depending on the need of the patient’s Table 1: Correlation of GBWT with clinical condition. All the patients Serum Albumin Levels underwent Ultrasonography of Abdomen, Sr. Group A Group B Albumin No. of % of No. of % of for visualisation of hepatic size, liver levels patients patients patients patients echotexture, Portal Vein diameter at porta, (gm/dl) <2.4 3 17.64 20 46.51 Flow in portal vein, Collaterals/Varices 2.5 to 2.9 5 29.41 15 34.88 and Gall Bladder Wall thickness. The >3 9 52.94 8 18.60 patients were subjected to the Ultrasound The above table shows the percentage of in the mornings ,after proper overnight patients having different albumin levels. fasting of atleast 8 hours . The Ultrasound On comparing the percentage of patients of all patients was done by a single having serum albumin levels less than 3 radiologist. All patients, irrespective of a gm/dl in Group A (47.05%)
Recommended publications
  • Congestive Cholecystopathy; a Frequent Sonographic Sign of Evolving Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotics
    Congestive Cholecystopathy; A Frequent Sonographic Sign of Evolving Esophageal Varices in Cirrhotics KHALID REHMAN YOUSAF, MIAN SAJID NISAR*, SALMAN ATIQ, AZHAR HUSSAIN*, AMNA RIZVI*, M. ISMAIL KHALID YOUSAF, ZAHID MANSOOR. Departments of Radiology and * Medicine, Omer Hospital, Lahore, Pakistan. Correspondence to Dr. Khalid Rehman Yousaf, Radiologist, New Radiology Department, SIMS/ S.H.L. Cell 923009458404 Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Background: Gallbladder wall congestion (congestive cholecystopathy) is frequent sonographic feature demonstrated in patients with chronic liver disease. Hypoalbuminemia is still considered as a most probable cause of gallbladder wall thickness in cirrhotics. Objective: To demonstrate and establish congestive cholecystopathy as a consistent sonographic sign of developing portal hypertension and its association with evolving esophageal varices in Child’s class B (compensated) and C (decompensated) cirrhotic patients. Methodology: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Department of Radiology in collaboration with Department of Medicine, Omer Hospital, Lahore, between September 2009 and January 2011. We included 103 randomly sampled cirrhotic patients (67 men, 36 women; age range 38-79 years) who were clinically categorized into Class B and Class C liver disease through modified Child Pugh Classification. Upper gastrointestinal video endoscopy was performed for assessment of esophageal varices in all patients according to Japanese Research Society. Gall bladder targeted transabdominal ultrasound was performed on gray scale as well as color Doppler. Gallbladder wall thickness (4mm as a reference upper normal limit), pattern of wall thickening (striated or non-striated) and flow in wall were evaluated. Results: Out of 103 patients, 57 (55.3%) cases were of Child’s B and 46 (44.7%) of Child’s C class.
    [Show full text]
  • Venous Complications of Pancreatitis: a Review Yashant Aswani, Priya Hira Department of Radiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra INDIA
    JOP. J Pancreas (Online) 2015 Jan 31; 16(1):20-24 REVIEW ARTICLE Venous Complications of Pancreatitis: A Review Yashant Aswani, Priya Hira Department of Radiology, Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra INDIA ABSTRACT Pancreatitis is notorious to cause vascular complications. While arterial complications include pseudoaneurysm formation with a propensity to bleed, unusual venous complications associated with pancreatitis have, however, been described. In this article, we review multitudinous venous complications in thevenous setting complications of pancreatitis can andbe quite propose myriad. a system Venous to involvementclassify pancreatitis in pancreatitis associated often venous presents complications. with thrombosis. From time to time case reports and series of INTRODUCTION THROMBOTIC COMPLICATIONS IN PANCREATITIS Venous thrombosis is the most common complication of pancreatitis mediators and digestive enzymes. Consequently, pancreatitis associated complicationsPancreatitis is cana systemic be myriad disease with vascularowing to complications release of inflammatory being a well known but infrequent phenomenon. These vascular complications affecting venous system. A surge in procoagulant inflammatory mediators, are seen in 25% patients suffering from pancreatitis and entail chronicstasis, vesselpancreatitis spasm, (CP) mass includes effects intimal from injury the surroundingdue to repeated inflamed acute pancreas causes thrombosis in acute pancreatitis [2] whereas etiology in of peripancreatic arteries. Venous complications are less commonly significant morbidity and mortality [1]. There is predominant affliction tiesinflammation, with pancreas chronic results inflammation in splenic veinwith involvement fibrosis, compressive in majority effectsof the of a pseudocyst or an enlarged inflamed pancreas [3]. Close anatomic complicationsreported and associatedare often withconfined pancreatitis to thrombosis have, however, of the been vein. described. Isolated 22% (Agrawal et al.) and 5.6% (Bernades et al.), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlation of Portal Vein Size with Esophageal Varices Severity in Patients with Cirrhosis of Liver with Portal Hypertension
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2015 1 ISSN 2250-3153 Correlation of Portal Vein Size with Esophageal Varices Severity in Patients with Cirrhosis of Liver with Portal Hypertension. Dr. K.V.L. Sudha Rani*, Dr. B. Sudarsi**, Dr. R. Siddeswari***, Dr. S. Manohar, **** * M.D., Asst. Prof. of Medicine ** M.D., Asst Prof. of Medicine *** M.D., Prof. of Medicine ****M.D., Prof. & HOD of Medicine. Abstract- This study was conducted to correlate the portal vein Complications of cirrhosis include portal hypertension, diameter measured by ultrasound to development of oesophageal spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepato renal syndrome, hepatic varices in patients with cirrhosis of liver with portal encephalopathy and hematological abnormalities. hypertension. Portal vein is formed by confluence of superior mesenteric 92 patients with cirrhosis admitted in OGH were selected for vein and splenic vein. Portal hypertension is defined as elevation the study USG was conducted in all patients to note portal vein of hepatic venous pressure gradient more than 5 mmHg. Portal size and splenic size. Upper GI endoscopy was done to detect hypertension is caused by. 1) Increased intra hepatic resistance to presence of varices with different grades. passage of blood flow through the liver due to cirrhosis and 2) In this study 65 patients had varices. Out of 65 patients 30 increased splanchnic blood flow secondary to vasodilation with had large varices (Grade III & IV) of 65 patients, 53 patients in splanchnic vascular bed. with varices have portal vein diameter > 13 mm patients, with Congestive splenomegaly is common in patients with portal small varices and those without varices portal vein diameter is < hypertension.
    [Show full text]
  • Banana May Be Forbidden After Endoscopic Variceal Ligation: a Case Report
    Case Report Banana may be forbidden after endoscopic variceal ligation: a case report Yingying Li1,2#, Xiaozhong Guo1#, Zhaohui Bai1,3, Xiaodong Shao1, Ran Wang1, Hongyu Li1, Xingshun Qi1 1Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), Shenyang 110840, China; 2Postgraduate College, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou 121001, China; 3Postgraduate College, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang 110840, China #These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence to: Dr. Xingshun Qi, MD; Prof. Hongyu Li. General Hospital of Northern Theater Command (formerly General Hospital of Shenyang Military Area), No. 83 Wenhua Road, Shenyang 110840, China. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]. Abstract: Acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) is a devastating complication of liver cirrhosis. Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) is a useful endoscopic treatment for AVH with few complications. However, the issue regarding management of early re-bleeding after EVL still needs to be concerned. Furthermore, the dietary principle after EVL is unclear. There is no consensus regarding what food should be eaten after EVL. In this paper, we reported a patient who ate a banana after an EVL and then developed early re-bleeding episodes. Keywords: Endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL); portal hypertension; banana; re-bleeding; dietary Received: 02 November 2018; Accepted: 27 January 2019; Published: 20 February 2019. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2019.01.11 View this article at: http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2019.01.11 Introduction Case presentation Acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) is a lethal consequence On May 24, 2018, a 41-year-old male was admitted to of portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis patients (1,2).
    [Show full text]
  • Esophageal Varices
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Crossref Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Critical Care Volume 2016, Article ID 2370109, 4 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/2370109 Case Report A Rare but Reversible Cause of Hematemesis: (Downhill) Esophageal Varices Lam-Phuong Nguyen,1,2,3 Narin Sriratanaviriyakul,1,2,3 and Christian Sandrock1,2,3 1 Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, University of California, Davis, Suite #3400, 4150 V Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA 2Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, USA 3VA Northern California Health Care System, Mather, USA Correspondence should be addressed to Lam-Phuong Nguyen; [email protected] Received 12 December 2015; Accepted 1 February 2016 Academic Editor: Kurt Lenz Copyright © 2016 Lam-Phuong Nguyen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. “Downhill” varices are a rare cause of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and are generally due to obstruction of the superior vena cava (SVC). Often these cases of “downhill” varices are missed diagnoses as portal hypertension but fail to improve with medical treatment to reduce portal pressure. We report a similar case where recurrent variceal bleeding was initially diagnosed as portal hypertension but later found to have SVC thrombosis presenting with recurrent hematemesis. A 39-year-old female with history of end-stage renal disease presented with recurrent hematemesis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed multiple varices.
    [Show full text]
  • Abd Quick Cases Key.Pages
    Abdominal Emergencies Quick-Cases Case 1: Esophageal Varices A 64 y/o M presents CAOx4 sitting at a kitchen table vomiting copious amounts of BRB. Pt describes acute onset of vomiting about 20 minutes prior, was “feeling fine” prior. Pt also c/o dizz and weakness since he started vomiting. He denies CP, diff brth, abd pn, headache, weakness, or syncope. You note that his skin is cool, pale, and slightly diaphoretic. PMH: Alcoholism, cirrhosis, ulcers. Meds: propranolol, prilosec. NKDA. VS: HR = 102/min and regular, BP = 96/50mmHg, RR = 14/min and reg c GTV, SpO2 = 97% RA. Shock = yes! Decompensated. Hypovolemic hemorrhagic shock. Differential Treatment: Pancreatitis Diverticulitis/LGIB • Call ALS Gastric Ulcer/UGIB • Position of comfort, supine or lat recumbent if possible Cholecystitis • Protect airway Mallory-Weiss Tear • Oxygen via NRM blow-by, don;t want to trap vomit Appendicitis • Keep warm Esophageal Varices • Rapid transport to ED Case 2: Gastric Ulcer/UGIB 38 y/o M presents CAOx4 in NAD lying in bed c/o dizz and near-syncope c exertion. Pt states symptoms have been “getting worse” since onset 5 days ago. Pt states he has been experiencing ULQ abd pn over same time period. Pn described as gnawing, constant, worse on an empty stomach, non-radiating, rated 6 on scale of 0-10. Pt ⊕ for melena over same time period, denies CP, diff brth, syncope, weakness, headache, N/V, back or flank pn. ∅PMH, ∅meds, NKDA. Skin noted to be pale, cool, dry. VS: HR = 92/min and regular, BP = 114/70mmHg, RR = 12/min and reg c GTV, SpO2 = 96% RA.
    [Show full text]
  • Gastroesophageal Reflux in Cirrhotic Patients with Esophageal Varices Without Endoscopic Treatment
    ARQGA/1291 GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX IN CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGEAL VARICES WITHOUT ENDOSCOPIC TREATMENT Rosana Bihari SCHECHTER1, Eponina Maria Oliveira LEMME1, and Henrique Sérgio Moraes COELHO2 ABSTRACT – Background - Portal hypertension in patients with liver cirrhosis causes manifestations such as esophageal varices, ascites and edema. Some studies have been conducted about the role of esophageal varices in the development of esophageal motor disorders and abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in these patients. Ascites could be a factor promoting gastroesophageal reflux and it has been questioned whether reflux would favor the rupture of varices. However there are a few studies using ambulatory esophageal pH recording in the evaluation of these patients. Aims - Evaluate gastroesophageal reflux by pH recording in cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices and possible predictors. Methods - Fifty one patients (28 men, 23 women, mean age of 54 years) with liver cirrhosis, diagnosed by clinical, laboratorial, image and histological findings were prospectively evaluated. All patients had esophageal varices confirmed by endoscopy and were submitted to a questionnaire about typical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms (heartburn and or acid regurgitation). pH recording was performed with the probe placed 5 cm above the superior lower esophageal sphincter limit, as determined by manometry. Abnormal reflux (% total time with pH <4 >4.5%) was related to the size of varices, congestive gastropathy, ascites, severity of cirrhosis and typical gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Results - The caliber of the varices was considered to be small in 30 patients (59%), medium in 17 (33%) and large in 4 (8%), 21 (41%) congestive gastropathy. Ascites was observed in 17 (33%), 32 patients (63%) were classified as Child-Pugh A, 17 (33%) Child-Pugh B and 2 (4%) Child-Pugh C.
    [Show full text]
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Portal Cavernoma
    Ju ry [ rnal e ul rg d u e S C f h o i l r u a Journal of Surgery r n g r i u e o ] J ISSN: 1584-9341 [Jurnalul de Chirurgie] Case Report Open Access Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in a Patient with Portal Cavernoma Nilanjan Panda1*, Ruchira Das2, Subhoroto Das1, Samik K Bandopadhyay1, Dhiraj Barman1 and Ramakrishna Mondol2 1Department of Surgery, R.G. Kar Medical College & Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India 2Department of Surgery, Bankura Sammilani Medical College and Hospital, Gobindonagar, Bankura, West Bengal, India Abstract Portal cavernoma (network of collateral vessels around the portal vein) is found in one-third of patients with thrombotic portal vein. Management of Cholecystitis in such a patient is problematic. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is usually contraindicated due to risk of haemorrhage. A 32 year old female presented with symptomatic calculous cholecystitis and portal cavernoma without portal hypertension. Liver functions were normal (non-cirrhotic, no jaundice). Conservative treatment failed. Imaging assessment was by Ultrasound Doppler, followed by CT and MRCP, MRI and MRA. We performed laparoscopic cholecystectomy was successfully performed. Operative time 210 minutes, blood loss 50 ml. Extreme caution and painstakingly meticulous dissection around the cavernoma was the key to success. Although open cholecystectomy may assume to be safer in such patients; enhanced magnified vision, access and maneuverability made laparoscopy a preferred option. Standby laparoscopic and open vascular instruments facility is essential. Keywords: Portal cavernoma; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Portal from the few cavernous veins coursing along the gall bladder body thrombosis into GB fossa (Figure 3). Near the Calot's triangle, gentle dissection between the peritoneal folds separated cystic artery and duct from the Introduction cavernoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension in a Patient with Colonic Carcinoma Treated with Oxaliplatin
    Case Report J Med Cases. 2021;12(3):99-101 Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension in a Patient With Colonic Carcinoma Treated With Oxaliplatin Maria Cynthia Fuentes-Lacouturea, c, Edgar Camilo Barrera-Garavitoa, Andrea Gomeza, William Mantillab Abstract chemotherapy, in which one of the main drugs is oxaliplatin, a deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) disrupter, which is applied Oxaliplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent with direct toxic action on in early (as an adjuvant treatment after surgery) or advanced deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which is known to cause an arrest in stages, and has managed to increase patients’ survival, espe- its synthesis and inducing cell death. It is a crucial medication for cially when compared with monotherapy with 5-fluorouracil colorectal carcinoma, and in combination with other medications has [2]. One of the best-known adverse effects of oxaliplatin is demonstrated to exhibit synergism, managing to increase patients’ neurotoxicity (manifested as sensory neuropathy) [2]; how- survival, especially when compared to monotherapy with 5-fluoracil. ever other less known effects have been reported, including Neurotoxicity is its most well-known adverse effect. However, other sinusoidal liver injury, which manifests with changes related less frequent secondary effects have been described in case reports, to portal hypertension. among them liver injury, which is usually secondary to liver sinusoid Medications can trigger non-cirrhotic portal hypertension injury. Despite the wide frequency of the use of this drug, the relation- (NCPH) due to direct damage to liver or because of fibrosis ship of oxaliplatin with the development of portal non-cirrhotic hy- induction. In both cases, sinusoidal and post-sinusoidal dam- pertension is largely unknown, which translates into a sub-diagnosis, age are the main histopathological findings.
    [Show full text]
  • Portal Hypertension in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
    Gut: first published as 10.1136/gut.12.10.830 on 1 October 1971. Downloaded from Gut, 1971, 12, 830-834 Portal hypertension in primary biliary cirrhosis M. C. KEW,1 R. R. VARMA, H. A. DOS SANTOS, P. J. SCHEUER, AND SHEILA SHERLOCK From the Departments of Medicine and Pathology, The Royal Free Hospital, London SUMMARY Evidence of portal hypertension was found in 50 out of 109 patients (47%) with primary biliary cirrhosis, and of these 32 bled from oesophageal varices. In four patients portal hypertension was the initial manifestation of the disease and this complication was recognized in a further 17 within two years of the first symptom of primary biliary cirrhosis. The development of portal hypertension was associated with a poor prognosis and death could frequently be attributed to variceal bleeding; the mean duration of survival from the time that portal hypertension was recog- nized was 14.9 months. Portal decompression operations may have improved the immediate prog- nosis in some patients but did not otherwise influence the progression of the disease. In 47 patients the histological findings in wedge biopsy or necropsy material were correlated with the presence or .absence of varices. An association between nodular regeneration of the liver and varices was confirmed, but, in the absence of nodules, no other histological cause for portal venous obstruction could be found. Bleeding from oesophageal varices has been thought Material and Methods http://gut.bmj.com/ to be a late and infrequent complication of primary biliary cirrhosis (Sherlock, 1959; Rubin, Schaffner, One hundred and nine patients seen at theRoyal Free and Popper, 1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Esophageal Varices
    World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines Esophageal varices JANUARY 2014 Revision authors Prof. D. LaBrecque (USA) Prof. A.G. Khan (Pakistan) Prof. S.K. Sarin (India) Drs. A.W. Le Mair (Netherlands) Original Review team Prof. D. LaBrecque (Chair, USA) Prof. P. Dite (Co-Chair, Czech Republic) Prof. Michael Fried (Switzerland) Prof. A. Gangl (Austria) Prof. A.G. Khan (Pakistan) Prof. D. Bjorkman (USA) Prof. R. Eliakim (Israel) Prof. R. Bektaeva (Kazakhstan) Prof. S.K. Sarin (India) Prof. S. Fedail (Sudan) Drs. J.H. Krabshuis (France) Drs. A.W. Le Mair (Netherlands) © World Gastroenterology Organisation, 2013 WGO Practice Guideline Esophageal Varices 2 Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ESOPHAGEAL VARICES............................................................. 2 1.1 WGO CASCADES – A RESOURCE -SENSITIVE APPROACH ............................................. 2 1.2 EPIDEMIOLOGY ............................................................................................................ 2 1.3 NATURAL HISTORY ...................................................................................................... 3 1.4 RISK FACTORS .............................................................................................................. 4 2 DIAGNOSIS AND DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS...................................................... 5 2.1 DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF ESOPHAGEAL VARICES /HEMORRHAGE ......................... 5 2.2 EXAMPLE FROM AFRICA — ESOPHAGEAL VARICES CAUSED BY SCHISTOSOMIASIS .. 6 2.3 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Idiopathic Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension
    USCAP Hans Popper Hepatopathology Companion Society Idiopathic Noncirrhotic Portal Hypertension M. Isabel Fiel, M.D. Professor of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai New York, New York Overview: Cirrhosis is the most common cause of portal hypertension but a heterogeneous group of clinical entities, collectively referred to as non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH), can also lead to elevation of the portal venous pressure in the absence of cirrhosis. Common causes of NCPH are nonalcoholic or alcoholic steatohepatitis, primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, congenital hepatic fibrosis, extra-hepatic portal vein thrombosis, and Budd-Chiari syndrome. Table 1 lists common causes of NCPH. Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is characterized by the elevation of portal venous pressure with no known cause. This entity has been ascribed various terms such as hepatoportal sclerosis, idiopathic portal hypertension, noncirrhotic portal fibrosis, incomplete septal cirrhosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) and obliterative portal venopathy (OPV). Because of the ambiguity of the nomenclature, the term INCPH was proposed to encompass these entities. Additionally, INCPH is considered a unifying term because it includes both clinical and histopathological aspects. Furthermore, the term “idiopathic” is controversial because the entity is seen in association with certain diseases. However, because the pathogenesis of INCPH remains uncertain, the term may still be applicable. The incidence of INCPH varies throughout the world. In India in the 1980s, it was estimated to be present in 23% of patients with portal hypertension although 1 currently it is reported to be lower. In the Western world, the incidence ranges from 3-5% among patients having portal hypertension.
    [Show full text]