Quarterly Report Quarter 20 – April 1 to June 30, 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quarterly Report Quarter 20 – April 1 to June 30, 2017 TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF IRRIGATION AND RURAL ROADS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECT (IRRIP2) Quarterly Report Quarter 20 – April 1 to June 30, 2017 Submission Date: July 20, 2017 Contract Agreement Number: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00, Task Order AID-621-TO-12-00002 Activity Start and End Date: August 31, 2012 to August 30, 2018 COR Name: Michelle Corzine Submitted by: Keith Williams, Chief of Party CDM International Inc. P.O. Box 6008, Morogoro, Tanzania Tel: +255 769 884 775 [Insert partner Email: [email protected] and/or project logo here] This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development/Tanzania (USAID/Tanzania). It was prepared by CDM International Inc. under the USAID Global A&E IQC (Contract No.: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00). 1 Table of Contents 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY .............................................................. 1 1.1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 1 Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Summary of Results to Date ........................................................................................ 5 1.3 Evaluation/assessment Status and/or Plans ............................................................... 6 2. ACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS ............................................... 8 2.1 Progress Narrative ......................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Implementation Status and Planned Activities ......................................................... 9 2.3 IR 2.1 – Binding Constraints to Private Sector Investment Reduced: Key Accomplishments and Results ....................................................... 9 Sub-IR 2.1.1 – Rural Farm to Market Roads in Targeted Areas Improved .................... 9 2.4 IR 2.2 – Agricultural Productivity and Profitability Increased: Key Accomplishments and Results ....................................................................... 10 Sub-IR 2.2.1 – Farmers and Other Value Chain Actors Adopted New Technology or Management Practices .............................................................................. 10 Sub-IR 2.2.3 – Human Resources and Local Organizational Capacity in the Agriculture Domain Increased ............................................................................................ 11 2.5 IR 2.1 – Binding Constraints to Private Sector Investment Reduced: Activities Next Quarter ........................................................................ 11 Sub-IR 2.1.1 – Rural Farm to Market Roads in Targeted Areas Improved .................. 11 2.6 IR 2.2 – Agricultural Productivity and Profitability Increased: Activities Next Quarter .......................................................................................... 12 Sub-IR 2.2.1 – Farmers and Other Value Chain Actors Adopted New Technology or Management Practices .............................................................................. 12 Sub-IR 2.2.3 – Human Resources and Local Organizational Capacity in the Agriculture Domain Increased ............................................................................................ 13 2.7 Challenges and Constraints ....................................................................................... 13 3. INTEGRATION OF CROSSCUTTING ISSUES AND USAID FORWARD PRIORITIES .............................................................................. 13 3.1 Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment ..................................................... 13 3.2 Youth Engagement ....................................................................................................... 14 3.3 Local Capacity Development ..................................................................................... 14 3.4 Integration and Collaboration ................................................................................... 15 3.5 Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 15 3.6 Environmental Compliance ........................................................................................ 15 4. STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION AND INVOLVEMENT ................. 16 5. MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE ISSUES ................................ 16 6. MONITORING, EVALUATION, AND LEARNING .............................. 16 i 7. SPECIAL EVENTS FOR NEXT QUARTER ............................................... 17 8. HOW IMPLEMENTING PARTNER HAS ADDRESSED COR COMMENTS FROM THE LAST QUARTERLY REPORT ..................... 17 9. FINANCIAL SUMMARY ............................................................................... 17 Annexes Annex A: Summary of Activities Completed and Planned Annex B: Implementation Schedule Annex C: Success Stories Tables Table 1.1: Indicators and Results to Date ............................................................................. 7 Table 1.2: Status of Evaluations/Assessments ....................................................................... 7 Table 2.1: Intermediate Results and IRRIP2 Component Activities ................................ 9 Table 9.1: Summary of Quarter Invoicing and Financial Status ...................................... 17 ii Acronyms and Abbreviations CRB Contractors Registration Board CRIL Cost Reimbursement Implementation Letter EA Environmental Assessment EFA Environmental Flow Assessment EMMP Environmental Mitigation Management Plan FARIL Fixed Amount Reimbursement Implementation Letter FS Feasibility Study FTF Feed the Future GoT Government of Tanzania IP Implementing Partner IR Intermediate Result IRRIP1 Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (Engineering Services) IRRIP2 Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project (Technical Assistance) iWASH Integrated Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (Program) KILORWEMP Kilombero and Lower Rufiji Wetlands Ecosystem Management Project LGA Local Government Authority LGTP Local Government Transport Programme LOP Life of Project M&E Monitoring and Evaluation NEEC National Economic Empowerment Council NIRC National Irrigation Commission OCA Organizational Capacity Assessment PO-RALG President’s Office – Regional Administration and Local Government PPRA Public Procurement Regulatory Authority PQM Project Quality Management PS3 Tanzania’s Public Sector System Strengthening RBWB Rufiji Basin Water Board RDRM Revised Desktop Reserve Model RFB Road Fund Board RRDP Feed the Future Tanzania Rural Road Development Project RUA Road Users’ Association SAGCOT Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency UWAWAKUDA Ushirika wa Wakulima Wadogo Wadogo wa Kilimo cha Umwagiliaji Mpunga Dakawa LTD (Dakawa Irrigators’ Cooperative Union) USG United States Government VAT Value-Added Tax iii WARIDI Water Resources Integration Development Initiative ZIO Zonal Irrigation Office (Morogoro) iv 1. ACTIVITY OVERVIEW/SUMMARY Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Activity Name: Roads Infrastructure Project (IRRIP2) Activity Start Date: August 31, 2012 Activity End Date: August 30, 2018 Name of Prime Implementing CDM International Inc. Partner: Contract Agreement Number: EDH-I-00-08-00023-00, Task Order AID-621-TO-12-00002 Name of Subcontractors/Sub ITECO Consult, TRG, UNESCO-IHE awardees: Major Counterpart Morogoro Zonal Irrigation Office, Local Government Authorities Organizations: Geographic Coverage: Morogoro, Manyara, Dodoma, Iringa and Mbeya Regions Reporting Period: April 1 – June 30, 2017 1.1 Executive Summary This Quarterly Report documents progress achieved on the “Technical Assistance to Support the Development of Irrigation and Rural Roads Infrastructure Project” (the Project, known as IRRIP21), implemented by CDM International Inc. (CDM Smith) during April – June 2017. Goals and Objectives USAID/Tanzania is implementing the U.S. Government’s Feed the Future (FTF) program, a cross- sector initiative to assist Tanzania in achieving its Millennium Development Goals to reduce hunger and poverty. Focused on the Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) region, FTF interventions cover a broad range of activities centered around (1) developing the rice sector to spur growth; (2) increasing food security through improved productivity, processing, transport, and storage in the maize and rice sectors; and (3) improving the nutritional status of Tanzanians, particularly women and children, through the development of the horticulture sector. Multiple FTF implementing partners (IPs) are working collaboratively on component projects to address these overarching goals. A key pillar of the FTF model is the focus on developing irrigation hubs around which the FTF IPs can orient activities to maximize impact. This includes the irrigation infrastructure required for improved productivity and expanded production of rice and maize along with associated environmental protections to maintain ecosystem goods and services, as well as the rural road infrastructure necessary for farmers to access resources and markets. Furthermore, the capacity of the institutional structures required for sustainable operation and maintenance of the investments
Recommended publications
  • Mvomero District, Morogoro Region)
    January 2015 LOCAL EDUCATION SECTOR GOVERNANCE IN TANZANIA Mapping monitoring and evaluation actors, activities and use in two selected villages of Mzumbe ward (Mvomero District, Morogoro Region) Preliminary Findings Nathalie HOLVOET and Liesbeth INBERG Institute of Development Policy and Management, University of Antwerp Elisabeth LULU and Yona MATEKERE Institute of Development Studies, Mzumbe University, Tanzania Table of Content 0. Preface 4 1. Introduction 5 2. Conceptual framework 8 3. Methodology 10 3.1. Data collection 10 3.2. Data selection and location 11 3.3. Limitations 12 4. Bio-physical conditions 13 4.1. Inputs to the education sector 13 4.2. Education activities and outputs 16 4.2.1. Morogoro Region 17 4.2.2. Mvomero District 19 4.2.3. Changarawe and Vikenge 19 5. Rules in use 26 5.1. Rules in use (formal) 26 5.1.1. Decentralisation 26 5.1.2. Open Government Partnership and Big Results Now 27 5.1.3. Education 27 5.2. Rules in use (informal) 29 6. Community attributes 30 6.1. Political context 30 6.2. Governance context 31 6.3. Socio-economic context 32 6.4. Cultural context 35 6.5. Religion 37 7. Into the action arena: Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) actors, activities and outputs 39 7.1. Schools 39 7.1.1. Primary schools 39 7.1.2. Secondary schools 40 7.2. District level actors 41 7.2.1. General 41 7.2.2. Education-specific actors 44 7.3. Village level actors 45 7.3.1. Village Council, Village education committees, Village General Assembly 45 7.3.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 Table of Contents Items Pages 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Background 1 1.2. Study rationale and objective 4 2. Description of the study area 5 2.1. Location of the study areas 5 2.2. Institutional set-up 7 3. Literature review 8 3.1. Paradigm shift 8 4. Discussion of monitoring indicators 11 4.1. Identification 12 4.2. Measurement 13 5. Methodology 13 5.1. Data type and source 14 5.2. Primary data collection 14 5.2.1. Sampling methods 14 5.2.1.1. Data collection instruments 15 5.2.1.2. Key informants 16 5.3. Data analysis 17 5.3.1. Participatory rural appraisal (pra) 17 5.3.2. Structured surveyed 17 5.3.3. GIS data 17 6. Findings 17 6.1. Situation analysis 17 6.2. Level of development of wmas 21 6.3. Social aspects 22 6.3.1. Location and size: 22 6.3.2. Population 25 6.3.3. Natural resources: 30 6.3.4. Taboos and Rituals Related to Natural Resources Conservation 31 6.3.5. Village governments: 34 Wami-Mbiki WMA i Baseline Study Report Vol. 2 6.3.6. Village government office: 36 6.3.7. Existing community based organizations: 38 6.3.8. Knowledge of the wma concept: 40 6.3.9. Wildlife related court cases: 42 6.3.10. Collaboration with other stakeholders: 44 6.3.11. Social services 46 6.3.12. Community solidarity 52 6.4. Economic aspects 54 6.4..1. Economic services 54 6.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contextual Analysis for Village Land Use Planning in Tanzania's
    A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project ILRI PROJECT REPORT ISBN: 92-9146-586-0 The International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) works to improve food and nutritional security and reduce poverty in developing countries through research for efficient, safe and sustainable use of livestock. Co-hosted by Kenya and Ethiopia, it has regional or country offices and projects in East, South and Southeast Asia as well as Central, East, Southern and West Africa. ilri.org CGIAR is a global agricultural research partnership for a food-secure future. Its research is carried out by 15 research centres in collaboration with hundreds of partner organizations. cgiar.org A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania i ii A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Tanzania’s Bagamoyo and Chalinze districts, Pwani region and Mvomero and Kilosa districts, Morogoro region Sustainable Rangeland Management Project Emmanuel Sulle and Wilbard Mkama Editor: Fiona Flintan (International Livestock Research Institute) July 2019 A contextual analysis for village land use planning in Pwani and Morogoro regions of Tanzania iii ©2019 International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) ILRI thanks all donors and organizations which globally support its work through their contributions to the CGIAR Trust Fund This publication is copyrighted by the International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI). It is licensed for use under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence.
    [Show full text]
  • Mvomero District Council Location: Mvomero Located in Morogoro
    Mvomero District Council Location: Mvomero located in Morogoro Region Short Description: The area is very fertile for sugarcane production, available water Sources for Irrigation and favorable climatic condition. It is proposed for installation of Mini Sugar Factory of 500 TCD expandable to 800TDC in six (6) years Project Benefits: The sugar industry will saves the country foreign exchange on the imported factory equipment The industry anticipate to be a significant contributor to the Government revenue through Corporate Tax on profits, PAYE deductions from earnings of employees, VAT on goods and services as well as other applicable duties and levies. Sugar industry will contributes to employments creation which is the catalyst for development of infrastructure networks such as roads, electric power, water supply projects, and education and health services in the surrounding rural communities. Project Status: Pre – Feasibility Study have completed Financing Status: No Financing Commitment Projects Cost estimates: US$ 10.30 million Description of partnership Joint Financing with local investors required: Contact person: Sugar Board of Tanzania Email: [email protected] Telephone +255222111523/5 Fax: +255222130598 Kilombero District Council Location: Kilombero located in Morogoro Region Short Description: The area is very fertile for sugarcane production, available water sources for irrigation activities, and favorable climatic condition. It is proposed for mini Sugar Factory of 1200 TCD expandable to 1,500 TDC in 6 years Project Benefits: The sugar industry will saves the country foreign exchange on the imported factory equipments The industry anticipate to be a significant contributor to the Government revenue through Corporate Tax on profits, PAYE deductions from earnings of employees, VAT on goods and services as well as other applicable duties and levies.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains
    Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 5(5): 267-279, 2017 http://www.hrpub.org DOI: 10.13189/ujar.2017.050503 Perception and Indicators of Climate Change, Its Impacts, Available Mitigation Strategies in Rice Growing Communities Adjoining Eastern Arc Mountains Kashenge Sophia1,*, Makoninde Emmanuel2 1Agriculture Research Institute – Dakawa, Tanzania 2Kilimanjaro Agriculture Training Center (KATC), Tanzania *Corresponding Authors: [email protected], [email protected] Copyright©2017 by authors, all rights reserved. Authors agree that this article remains permanently open access under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 International License Abstract Ongoing forest disturbances in the areas Tanzania. According to TFCG [19], Eastern Arc Mountains adjoining the Eastern Arc Mountains in Kilombero District originally encompass 23,700 sq. km and stretch in scattered associated with growing population and farm expansion led mountain blocks from the Taita Hills in southern Kenya to to increasing land degradation and fluctuations of the Udzungwa Mountains in southern Tanzania. The main hydrological supply downstream. This threatens not only mountains, from north to south, are: Taita Hills, North and biodiversity but also irrigated rice productivity. A structured South Pare, West and East Usambara, North and South Interview in conjunction with awareness creation was Nguru, Ukaguru, Uluguru, Rubeho, and Udzungwa. These carried out in seven villages (Chita, Mbingu, Kisegese, series of isolated mountains have been heavily covered by Namawala, Mpofu, Njage and Mofu) to determine level of forests and are recognized as one of 34 globally important understanding among rice growers on the potential of these "hot spots" for forest biodiversity according to Conservation mountains for sustainable water flow downstream and the International [7].
    [Show full text]
  • PRS Assessment on Chronic Poverty in Tanzania: Focusing on The
    Jjjgggggdrfgygfyhgfh Background Paper for the Chronic Poverty Report 2008-09 PRS Assessment on Chronic Poverty in Tanzania: Focusing on the Health and HIV/AIDS Sector What is Chronic Poverty? The distinguishing feature of chronic poverty is extended duration in absolute poverty. Tamahi Yamauchi Therefore, chronically poor people always, or usually, live below a poverty line, which is normally defined in terms of a money indicator (e.g. consumption, income, etc.), but could also be defined in terms of wider or subjective aspects of deprivation. This is different from the transitorily poor, who move in and out of poverty, or only occasionally fall below the poverty line. www.chronicpoverty.org The research for this Background Paper was made possible by funding from the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). PRS Assessment on Chronic Poverty in Tanzania Table of contents 1. Introduction............................................................................................................ 2 2. Objectives of this research................................................................................... 4 3. Background of the Tanzanian context................................................................. 6 3.1 Chronic poverty............................................................................................. 8 3.2 Who are the CPs in Tanzania (from PPA, field study)? ................................ 9 4. Research methodology....................................................................................... 17 4.1
    [Show full text]
  • Download Publication
    BRIEFING NOTE March 2015 ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN MOROGORO REGION IN TANZANIA n early 2015, Morogoro Region of Tanzania was the scene of deadly violence targeting minority Maasai and Datoga pasto- Iralist groups,1 which raised concerns in Parliament that the assaults could descend into ethnic based violence and spread across the country2. These assaults are said to be instigated by public figures with interests in acquiring land3. State authori- ties have not intervened to protect Maasai and Datoga citizens; rather police protection has been provided to others who are illegally cultivating officially registered Maasai village land. The violent episodes experienced since mid-January 2015 follow on from a decade of poor governance in Morogoro Region, with illegal eviction and dispossession of Maasai and Datoga citizens accompanied by human rights violations. None of these offences have been addressed despite high court rulings and numerous commissions of enquiry4. This brief provides a review of the violent and often deadly attacks on Maasai and Datoga citizens in Morogoro Region, committed between 15 January and the end of February 2015 as well as recommendations to duty bearers and other stakeholders. The brief is informed by civil society organisations5, official records of the Tanzanian Parliament and the media, and reference will be made where possible6. Since January 15, assaults have led to between 6 and 15 deaths (numbers still to be confirmed7) and many people have been injured and robbed. Six Maasai women were raped, 38 Maasai homesteads on village land were burned to the ground and 77 cattle were stolen. Currently 266 men, women and children are living in Mabwegere Village (Kilosa District of Morogoro Region) without food, shelter or protection.
    [Show full text]
  • Mvomero District, Tanzania1
    Lyatuu & Urassa, Land Access in Tanzania Intersect, Vol 8, No 1 (2014) Land Access and Associated Factors in Densely and Sparsely Populated Areas: Mvomero District, Tanzania1 Patricia M. Lyatuu and Justin K. Urassa Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Academy, Sokoine University of Agriculture Abstract Ensuring secure land access for rural inhabitants is a global challenge aimed to end the vicious cycle of poverty and natural resources degradation. Two important measures of secure land access include the ability to acquire tenure rights and benefits gained from the land, and yet available studies have given them little attention to date. This study drew data from 267 households in the Morogoro region of Tanzania using a questionnaire. In addition, focus group discussions and key informants were employed to explore the means and processes through which farmers in densely and sparsely populated areas—Mgeta division and Mlali division, respectively—derive a living from land. The study employed a cross-sectional design to collect qualitative and quantitative data, the latter of which was analyzed using SPSS, whereby descriptive and inferential statistics were determined. Results showed that most of the households acquire farmland through inheritance and purchase. Nonetheless, more than one third of the households in both sites were without secure land ownership. We found that access to arable land in Mgeta was constrained by soil erosion and repeated fragmentation, forcing farmers to excessively apply fertilizers, to expand farms through seasonal migration, and to trek up to 6 hours to reach their farms. In addition, lack of irrigation water discouraged many from settling in land-abundant areas, since in Mgeta water was readily available from nearby catchments.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Farmer Productivity Through Increased Access to Draught Power Opportunities
    MOVEK Development Solution SMALL FARMER PRODUCTIVITY THROUGH INCREASED ACCESS TO DRAUGHT POWER OPPORTUNITIES Consultancy Report Stakeholder mapping in Morogoro region December 2008 (Final Report) ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The Department for International Development (DfID has been a major supporter of natural resource research through its Renewable Natural Resource Research Strategy (RNRRS) which ran from 1995 to 2006. The results realized through such initiatives have enormous potential to alleviate poverty, promote economic growth, and mitigate the environmental problem. Unfortunately these efforts were not able to produce the expected results. 2. Within this reality, Research Into Use (RIU) programme has been conceived to meet this challenge. The approach used by RIU programme is slightly different from previous approaches since it has shifted its emphasis away from the generation of new knowledge to the ways in which knowledge is put into productive use 3. To complement the innovation system, the RIU programme intended to work with a network of partners (innovation platforms) working on common theme and using research knowledge in ways it hasn’t been used before to generate improved goods and services for the benefit of the poor. 4. To start the RIU programme in Tanzania identified three innovation platforms, three farm products in three regions as pilot domains. One of the platforms is access to draught power which is thought to enhance productivity of small holder farmers through increased access to and capacity to utilize draught power opportunities in Ulanga, Kilombero, Kilosa, and Mvomero districts 5. This report is based on the findings of the mapping study conducted in Ulanga, Kilombero, Kilosa and Mvomero districts which overlaped to Morogoro municipality 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfill
    Sources of Agricultural Information for Women Farmers in Hai and Kilosa Districts, Tanzania THESIS Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Elizabeth Lucas Isaya, B.S. Graduate Program in Agricultural and Extension Education The Ohio State University 2015 Master's Examination Committee: Dr. Robert Agunga, Advisor Dr. Robert J. Birkenholz Copyright by Elizabeth Lucas Isaya 2015 ABSTRACT This study investigated sources of agricultural information used by women farmers in Tanzania. Women farmers constitute the majority of farmers in Tanzania. Enabling them to increase food production will help achieve the government’s goals of achieving food security and agro-based industrialization. However, it is not clear where women farmers obtain information on modern farming methods. Knowing these sources will enable the Tanzanian government and international aid organizations channel information directed toward women farmers through those sources. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to identify women farmer’s sources of information in agriculture. Due to limited funding and time constraints, the study involved a survey of 300 women farmers in Hai and Kilosa districts of Kilimanjaro and Morogoro Regions, respectively. The survey was completed using an interview schedule. Of the 300 respondents sampled, 288 provided usable data for the study yielding a response rate of 96%. Six research objectives guided this study, namely: (a) examine the demographic characteristics of women farmers in Tanzania; (b) describe sources of information on modern farming methods for women farmers; (c) assess innovative farming methods adopted by women farmers; (d) examine women farmers’ access to and use of ICTs; (e) examine women farmers’ access to and use of agricultural extension agents; and (f) examine other challenges facing women farmers in Tanzania.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of a Livestock Feed Assessment in Mvomero District, Morogoro Region, the United Republic of Tanzania
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Enhancing dairy-based livelihoods in India andprovided by CGSpace Tanzania through feed innovation and value chain development approaches Report of a livestock feed assessment in Mvomero District, Morogoro Region, the United Republic of Tanzania By Fred Wassena (CIAT), Anthony Mbeho (TALIRI) and Abiliza E. Kimambo (SUA) In collaboration with Brigitte L. Maass (CIAT) and Ben Lukuyu (ILRI) Nairobi, Kenya: International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) May 2013 FEAST Mvomero District ♦ Morogoro Region ♦ Tanzania 2013 Summary A Feed assessment tool (FEAST) was applied in characterizing the production systems mainly related to feed innovation in Mvomero district. The villages involved were Wami Sokoine and Manyinga. The exercise was categorized into two sessions, namely, focus group discussions and individual interviews. A number of 63 and 27 participants (farmers) were involved in the focus group discussion and individual interviews, respectively. The two villages have different agro-ecological zones, marking their variation in production systems and other livestock and agricultural activities. In feeding practices, grazing and cut and carry systems dominate in Wami Sokoine and Manyinga villages, respectively, with high contribution in the diets. Key issues identified were markets and improved breeds in Manyinga, while land, water and markets were the key issues in Wami Sokoine. These could mark the potential entry points for interventions in each village. Acknowledgements We wish to acknowledge the ready collaboration and openness in sharing their views and experiences of all respondents. The participation of facilitators Dr. Ben Lukuyu (ILRI) and Dr. Brigitte Maass (CIAT) during the training is appreciated; facilitation of the partners in Morogoro by Professors Laswai and Kimambo from SUA.
    [Show full text]