DOCSLIB.ORG

Superconformal Quantum Mechanics from M2-Branes Arxiv:1503.03906

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CALT-TH-2015-011 OU-HET 852 Superconformal Quantum Mechanics from M2-branes Tadashi Okazaki1 Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91125, USA and Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science Osaka University 1-1 Machikaneyama-cho Toyonaka, Osaka 560-0043, Japan arXiv:1503.03906v1 [hep-th] 12 Mar 2015 [email protected] Abstract We discuss the superconformal quantum mechanics arising from the M2-branes. We begin with a comprehensive review on the superconformal quantum mechanics and emphasize that conformal symmetry and supersymmetry in quantum mechanics con- tain a number of exotic and enlightening properties which do not occur in higher dimensional field theories. We see that superfield and superspace formalism is avail- able for N ≤ 8 superconformal mechanical models. We then discuss the M2-branes with a focus on the world-volume descriptions of the multiple M2-branes which are su- perconformal three-dimensional Chern-Simons matter theories. Finally we argue that the two topics are connected in M-theoretical construction by considering the multiple M2-branes wrapped around a compact Riemann surface and study the emerging IR quantum mechanics. We establish that the resulting quantum mechanics realizes a set of novel N ≥ 8 superconformal quantum mechanical models which have not been reached so far. Also we discuss possible applications of the superconformal quantum mechanics to mathematical physics. Contents 1 Introduction and Overview 6 1.1 Historical background . 6 1.2 What I did . 13 I Superconformal Mechanics 15 2 Conformal Mechanics 16 2.1 SL(2; R) conformal symmetry . 16 2.2 Spectrum . 20 2.3 Time evolution . 30 2.4 Operator . 35 2.5 Gauged conformal mechanics . 40 2.6 Black hole . 46 2.7 Non-linear realization . 51 2.8 Multi-particle conformal mechanics . 56 2.9 Calogero model . 58 3 Superconformal Mechanics 61 3.1 Superalgebra and supergroup . 61 3.1.1 Lie superalgebra . 62 3.1.2 Lie supergroup . 63 3.1.3 Superconformal algebra . 65 3.2 One-dimensional supersymmetry . 69 3.2.1 Supermultiplet . 69 3.2.2 Automorphic duality . 72 3.3 N = 1 Superconformal mechanics . 74 3.3.1 One particle free action . 74 3.3.2 Multi-particle model . 76 3.3.3 Gauged superconformal mechanics . 78 1 3.4 N = 2 Superconformal mechanics . 81 3.4.1 One particle model . 81 3.4.2 Multi-particle model . 90 3.4.3 Freedman-Mende model . 93 3.4.4 Gauged superconformal mechanics . 94 3.5 N = 4 Superconformal mechanics . 97 3.5.1 (4; 4; 0) supermultiplet . 102 3.5.2 (3; 4; 1) supermultiplet . 104 3.5.3 (2; 4; 2) supermultiplet . 106 3.5.4 (1; 4; 3) supermultiplet . 107 3.5.5 (0; 4; 4) supermultiplet . 109 3.5.6 Multi-particle model . 110 3.5.7 Gauged superconformal mechanics . 117 3.6 N = 8 Superconformal mechanics . 120 N 3.6.1 On-shell SU(1; 1j 2 ) action . 121 3.6.2 Superspace and supermultiplet . 121 3.6.3 Multi-particle model . 135 II M2-branes 136 4 BLG-model 137 4.1 Construction . 137 4.1.1 Lie 3-algebra . 139 4.1.2 Lagrangian . 141 4.1.3 Gauge transformation . 142 4.1.4 Supersymmetry transformation . 143 4.1.5 M2-brane algebra . 144 4.2 A4 BLG-theory . 147 4.2.1 Quiver gauge structure . 148 4.2.2 Superconformal symmetry . 150 4.2.3 Parity invariance . 150 4.2.4 Moduli space . 150 5 ABJM-model 155 5.1 Construction . 155 5.1.1 Lagrangian . 156 5.1.2 Supersymmetry transformation . 157 5.2 Moduli space . 157 2 5.3 Duality between BLG and ABJ(M) . 158 III SCQM from M2-branes 160 6 N = 16 Superconformal Mechanics 161 6.1 N = 16 gauged quantum mechanics . 161 6.2 Reduction . 165 6.3 OSp(16j2) superconformal mechanics . 170 7 N = 12 Superconformal Mechanics 174 7.1 N = 12 gauged quantum mechanics . 174 7.2 Reduction . 177 7.3 SU(1; 1j6) superconformal mechanics . 180 8 Curved Branes and Topological Twisting 184 8.1 Topological twisting . 184 8.1.1 d = 4, N = 2 SYM theories . 184 8.1.2 d = 4, N = 2 SCFT on C × Σ . 187 8.1.3 d = 4, N = 4 SYM theories . 195 8.1.4 d = 4, N = 4 SYM theories on C × Σ . 204 8.1.5 d = 3, N = 4 SYM theories . 205 8.1.6 d = 3, N = 8 SYM theories . 207 8.1.7 d = 3, N = 8 SYM theories on R × Σ . 209 8.1.8 d = 2, N = 8 SYM theories . 210 8.1.9 d = 3, N = 4 Chern-Simons matter theories . 213 8.1.10 d = 3, N = 5 Chern-Simons matter theories . 218 8.1.11 d = 3, N = 6 Chern-Simons matter theories . 219 8.1.12 d = 3, N = 8 Chern-Simons matter theories . 219 8.1.13 d = 2, N = (2; 2) non-linear sigma-model . 223 8.2 Curved branes and twisted theories . 227 8.2.1 D3-branes and twisted d = 4, N = 4 SYM theories . 229 8.2.2 D2-branes and twisted d = 3, N = 8 SYM theories . 231 8.2.3 D2-branes and twisted d = 3, N = 8 SYM theories on R × Σ . 231 8.2.4 Relationship between d = 4 and d = 3 twists . 233 8.2.5 D1-branes and twisted d = 2, N = 8 SYM theories . 234 8.2.6 M2-branes and twisted BLG theory . 236 3 9 Curved M2-branes and Topological Twisting 237 9.1 M2-branes wrapping a holomorphic curve . 237 9.2 Supersymmetry in Calabi-Yau space . 238 9.3 Calibration and supersymmetric cycle . 240 9.4 Topological twisting . 244 10 SCQM from M2-branes in a K3 surface 247 10.1 K3 twisting . 247 10.2 Twisted theory . 251 10.3 Derivation of quantum mechanics . 254 11 Conclusion and Discussion 260 11.1 Conclusion . 260 11.2 Future directions . 262 11.2.1 AdS2=CFT1 correspondence . 262 11.2.2 Indices and the reduced Gromov-Witten invariants . 263 11.2.3 1d-2d relation . 264 4 Acknowledgments I would like to acknowledge kind support and help with deep appreciation and grat- itude to many people. I owe a debt of appreciation to Hirosi Ooguri for continuous guidance during my days at Caltech over the past two and a half years. It goes without saying that my study and experiences at Caltech would not be possible if were not for his arrangement. Moreover this thesis would not have been completed without his suggestion and assistance. I cannot thank him enough for all that he has done for me. I was really happy to study at Caltech guided by whom I respect. I would like to express my gratitude to Yutaka Hosotani for always helping me to study at Caltech and consulting me when I am in trouble. His advice was always a useful resource for me. I am profoundly grateful to Satoshi Yamaguchi for continuing encouragement and innumerable discussions. Over the past five years, particularly in the first two and a half years I could learn many things through collaboration works and countless times of long hours of discussions with him. I am glad that I was able to start my study of string theory with him at Osaka University. It was my indelible memory to talk about physics and life with brilliant members and alumni at Caltech including, Hee-Joong Chung, Abhijit Gadde, Siqi He, Koji Ishiwata, Hyungrok Kim, Kazunobu Maruyoshi, Elena Murchikova, Yu Nakayama, Chan Youn Park, Ke Ye, Du Pei, Pavel Putrov and Wenbin Yan. I extend my attitude to my colleagues at Osaka University including Tetsuya Enomoto, Tomohiro Horita, Takuya Shimotani, Akinori Tanaka, Akio Tomiya. The study meeting continuing for a long stretch of time with them is a good memory now. I wish to thank Greg Marlowe, the house owner for sharing with me a nice place to live at Pasadena and for always encouraging me. I was often relaxed myself by talking with him. I would like to thank Carol Silberstein, the secretary at Caltech and Kumiko Nakayama, Keiko Takeda, the secretaries at Osaka University for arranging a lot of procedures so that I could do my research at Caltech. They are always kind and I was helped many times. Finally I am grateful to my parents for giving constant support to me. 5 Chapter 1 Introduction and Overview 1.1 Historical background The pursue of Theory of Everything that describes our nature and achieves unification of all fundamental interactions, i.e. electroweak, strong and gravitational interactions has been a mission agitating theoretical physicists. Historically much of significant developments in theoretical physics were achieved by overcoming the inconsistency between existing concepts. The special relativity was established from the crisis be- tween classical mechanics and electrodynamics, the general relativity was proposed by reconciling the special relativity and Newtonian gravity and quantum field theory was acquired by combining quantum mechanics and the special relativity. However, we are now confronting another contradiction between quantum field theory and the general relativity. Although a quantum field theory as the standard model success- fully describes and predicts almost all phenomena controlled by electroweak and strong forces, the general relativity describing the gravity that is the remaining fundamen- tal interaction seriously disagrees with the quantum field theory. This indicates that quantum field theory cannot lead to the correct quantization of gravity. Therefore it is expected that the standard model is regarded as the low-energy effective theory of a more fundamental theory. String theory has been proposed as the promising candidate for such a fundamental theory since it can naturally describe all fundamental interactions.
Recommended publications
  • Quantum Simplicial Geometry in the Group Field Theory Formalism

    Quantum Simplicial Geometry in the Group Field Theory Formalism

    Quantum simplicial geometry in the group field theory formalism: reconsidering the Barrett-Crane model Aristide Baratin∗1 and Daniele Oriti†2 1Centre de Physique Th´eorique, CNRS UMR 7644, Ecole Polytechnique F-9112 Palaiseau Cedex, France 2Max-Planck-Institut f¨ur Gravitationsphysik Albert Einstein Institute Am M¨uhlenberg 2, 14476, Golm, Germany, EU A dual formulation of group field theories, obtained by a Fourier transform mapping functions on a group to functions on its Lie algebra, has been proposed recently. In the case of the Ooguri model for SO(4) BF theory, the variables of the dual field variables are thus so(4) bivectors, which have a direct interpretation as the discrete B variables. Here we study a modification of the model by means of a constraint operator implementing the simplicity of the bivectors, in such a way that projected fields describe metric tetrahedra. This involves a extension of the usual GFT framework, where boundary operators are labelled by projected spin network states. By construction, the Feynman amplitudes are simplicial path integrals for constrained BF theory. We show that the spin foam formulation of these amplitudes corresponds to a variant of the Barrett-Crane model for quantum gravity. We then re-examin the arguments against the Barrett-Crane model(s), in light of our construction. Introduction Group field theories (GFT) represent a second quantized framework for both spin networks and simplicial geometry [6, 7, 9], field theories on group manifolds (or Lie algebras) producing Feynman amplitudes which can be equivalently expressed as simplicial gravity path integrals [5] or spin foam models [10], in turn covariant formulations of spin networks dynamics [1]3.
  • Arxiv:1812.11658V1 [Hep-Th] 31 Dec 2018 Genitors of Black Holes And, Via the Brane-World, As Entire Universes in Their Own Right

    Arxiv:1812.11658V1 [Hep-Th] 31 Dec 2018 Genitors of Black Holes And, Via the Brane-World, As Entire Universes in Their Own Right

    IMPERIAL-TP-2018-MJD-03 Thirty years of Erice on the brane1 M. J. Duff Institute for Quantum Science and Engineering and Hagler Institute for Advanced Study, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 77840, USA & Theoretical Physics, Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom & Mathematical Institute, Andrew Wiles Building, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, United Kingdom Abstract After initially meeting with fierce resistance, branes, p-dimensional extended objects which go beyond particles (p=0) and strings (p=1), now occupy centre stage in theo- retical physics as microscopic components of M-theory, as the seeds of the AdS/CFT correspondence, as a branch of particle phenomenology, as the higher-dimensional pro- arXiv:1812.11658v1 [hep-th] 31 Dec 2018 genitors of black holes and, via the brane-world, as entire universes in their own right. Notwithstanding this early opposition, Nino Zichichi invited me to to talk about su- permembranes and eleven dimensions at the 1987 School on Subnuclear Physics and has continued to keep Erice on the brane ever since. Here I provide a distillation of my Erice brane lectures and some personal recollections. 1Based on lectures at the International Schools of Subnuclear Physics 1987-2017 and the International Symposium 60 Years of Subnuclear Physics at Bologna, University of Bologna, November 2018. Contents 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Geneva and Erice: a tale of two cities . 5 1.2 Co-authors . 9 1.3 Nomenclature . 9 2 1987 Not the Standard Superstring Review 10 2.1 Vacuum degeneracy and the multiverse . 10 2.2 Supermembranes .
  • Simulating Quantum Field Theory with a Quantum Computer

    Simulating Quantum Field Theory with a Quantum Computer

    Simulating quantum field theory with a quantum computer John Preskill Lattice 2018 28 July 2018 This talk has two parts (1) Near-term prospects for quantum computing. (2) Opportunities in quantum simulation of quantum field theory. Exascale digital computers will advance our knowledge of QCD, but some challenges will remain, especially concerning real-time evolution and properties of nuclear matter and quark-gluon plasma at nonzero temperature and chemical potential. Digital computers may never be able to address these (and other) problems; quantum computers will solve them eventually, though I’m not sure when. The physics payoff may still be far away, but today’s research can hasten the arrival of a new era in which quantum simulation fuels progress in fundamental physics. Frontiers of Physics short distance long distance complexity Higgs boson Large scale structure “More is different” Neutrino masses Cosmic microwave Many-body entanglement background Supersymmetry Phases of quantum Dark matter matter Quantum gravity Dark energy Quantum computing String theory Gravitational waves Quantum spacetime particle collision molecular chemistry entangled electrons A quantum computer can simulate efficiently any physical process that occurs in Nature. (Maybe. We don’t actually know for sure.) superconductor black hole early universe Two fundamental ideas (1) Quantum complexity Why we think quantum computing is powerful. (2) Quantum error correction Why we think quantum computing is scalable. A complete description of a typical quantum state of just 300 qubits requires more bits than the number of atoms in the visible universe. Why we think quantum computing is powerful We know examples of problems that can be solved efficiently by a quantum computer, where we believe the problems are hard for classical computers.
  • Arxiv:Hep-Th/9905112V1 17 May 1999 C E a -Al Kallosh@Physics.Stanford.Edu

    Arxiv:Hep-Th/9905112V1 17 May 1999 C E a -Al [email protected]

    SU-ITP-99/22 KUL-TF-99/16 PSU-TH-208 hep-th/9905112 May 17, 1999 Supertwistors as Quarks of SU(2, 2|4) Piet Claus†a, Murat Gunaydin∗b, Renata Kallosh∗∗c, J. Rahmfeld∗∗d and Yonatan Zunger∗∗e † Instituut voor theoretische fysica, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium ∗ Physics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA, 1682, USA ∗∗ Physics Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4060, USA Abstract 5 The GS superstring on AdS5 × S has a nonlinearly realized, spontaneously arXiv:hep-th/9905112v1 17 May 1999 broken SU(2, 2|4) symmetry. Here we introduce a two-dimensional model in which the unbroken SU(2, 2|4) symmetry is linearly realized. The basic vari- ables are supertwistors, which transform in the fundamental representation of this supergroup. The quantization of this supertwistor model leads to the complete oscillator construction of the unitary irreducible representations of the centrally extended SU(2, 2|4). They include the states of d = 4 SYM theory, massless and KK states of AdS5 supergravity, and the descendants on AdS5 of the standard mas- sive string states, which form intermediate and long massive supermultiplets. We present examples of long massive supermultiplets and discuss possible states of solitonic and (p,q) strings. a e-mail: [email protected]. b e-mail: [email protected]. c e-mail: [email protected]. d e-mail: [email protected]. e e-mail: [email protected]. 1 Introduction Supertwistors have not yet been fully incorporated into the study of the AdS/CFT correspondence [1].
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity

    Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity

    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
  • Introduction to Supersymmetry(1)

    Introduction to Supersymmetry(1)

    Introduction to Supersymmetry(1) J.N. Tavares Dep. Matem¶aticaPura, Faculdade de Ci^encias,U. Porto, 4000 Porto TQFT Club 1Esta ¶euma vers~aoprovis¶oria,incompleta, para uso exclusivo nas sess~oesde trabalho do TQFT club CONTENTS 1 Contents 1 Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics 2 1.1 The Supersymmetric Oscillator . 2 1.2 Witten Index . 4 1.3 A fundamental example: The Laplacian on forms . 7 1.4 Witten's proof of Morse Inequalities . 8 2 Supergeometry and Supersymmetry 13 2.1 Field Theory. A quick review . 13 2.2 SuperEuclidean Space . 17 2.3 Reality Conditions . 18 2.4 Supersmooth functions . 18 2.5 Supermanifolds . 21 2.6 Lie Superalgebras . 21 2.7 Super Lie groups . 26 2.8 Rigid Superspace . 27 2.9 Covariant Derivatives . 30 3 APPENDIX. Cli®ord Algebras and Spin Groups 31 3.1 Cli®ord Algebras . 31 Motivation. Cli®ord maps . 31 Cli®ord Algebras . 33 Involutions in V .................................. 35 Representations . 36 3.2 Pin and Spin groups . 43 3.3 Spin Representations . 47 3.4 U(2), spinors and almost complex structures . 49 3.5 Spinc(4)...................................... 50 Chiral Operator. Self Duality . 51 2 1 Supersymmetry in Quantum Mechanics 1.1 The Supersymmetric Oscillator i As we will see later the \hermitian supercharges" Q®, in the N extended SuperPoincar¶eLie Algebra obey the anticommutation relations: i j m ij fQ®;Q¯g = 2(γ C)®¯± Pm (1.1) m where ®; ¯ are \spinor" indices, i; j 2 f1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ;Ng \internal" indices and (γ C)®¯ a bilinear form in the spinor indices ®; ¯. When specialized to 0-space dimensions ((1+0)-spacetime), then since P0 = H, relations (1.1) take the form (with a little change in notations): fQi;Qjg = 2±ij H (1.2) with N \Hermitian charges" Qi; i = 1; ¢ ¢ ¢ ;N.
  • Quantum Field Theory*

    Quantum Field Theory*

    Quantum Field Theory y Frank Wilczek Institute for Advanced Study, School of Natural Science, Olden Lane, Princeton, NJ 08540 I discuss the general principles underlying quantum eld theory, and attempt to identify its most profound consequences. The deep est of these consequences result from the in nite number of degrees of freedom invoked to implement lo cality.Imention a few of its most striking successes, b oth achieved and prosp ective. Possible limitation s of quantum eld theory are viewed in the light of its history. I. SURVEY Quantum eld theory is the framework in which the regnant theories of the electroweak and strong interactions, which together form the Standard Mo del, are formulated. Quantum electro dynamics (QED), b esides providing a com- plete foundation for atomic physics and chemistry, has supp orted calculations of physical quantities with unparalleled precision. The exp erimentally measured value of the magnetic dip ole moment of the muon, 11 (g 2) = 233 184 600 (1680) 10 ; (1) exp: for example, should b e compared with the theoretical prediction 11 (g 2) = 233 183 478 (308) 10 : (2) theor: In quantum chromo dynamics (QCD) we cannot, for the forseeable future, aspire to to comparable accuracy.Yet QCD provides di erent, and at least equally impressive, evidence for the validity of the basic principles of quantum eld theory. Indeed, b ecause in QCD the interactions are stronger, QCD manifests a wider variety of phenomena characteristic of quantum eld theory. These include esp ecially running of the e ective coupling with distance or energy scale and the phenomenon of con nement.
  • Inönü–Wigner Contraction and D = 2 + 1 Supergravity

    Inönü–Wigner Contraction and D = 2 + 1 Supergravity

    Eur. Phys. J. C (2017) 77:48 DOI 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-4615-1 Regular Article - Theoretical Physics Inönü–Wigner contraction and D = 2 + 1 supergravity P. K. Concha1,2,a, O. Fierro3,b, E. K. Rodríguez1,2,c 1 Departamento de Ciencias, Facultad de Artes Liberales, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez, Av. Padre Hurtado 750, Viña del Mar, Chile 2 Instituto de Ciencias Físicas y Matemáticas, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia, Chile 3 Departamento de Matemática y Física Aplicadas, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Alonso de Rivera 2850, Concepción, Chile Received: 25 November 2016 / Accepted: 5 January 2017 / Published online: 25 January 2017 © The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract We present a generalization of the standard cannot always be obtained by rescaling the gauge fields and Inönü–Wigner contraction by rescaling not only the gener- considering some limit as in the (anti)commutation relations. ators of a Lie superalgebra but also the arbitrary constants In particular it is well known that, in the presence of the exotic appearing in the components of the invariant tensor. The Lagrangian, the Poincaré limit cannot be applied to a (p, q) procedure presented here allows one to obtain explicitly the AdS CS supergravity [7]. This difficulty can be overcome Chern–Simons supergravity action of a contracted superal- extending the osp (2, p) ⊗ osp (2, q) superalgebra by intro- gebra. In particular we show that the Poincaré limit can be ducing the automorphism generators so (p) and so (q) [9]. performed to a D = 2 + 1 (p, q) AdS Chern–Simons super- In such a case, the IW contraction can be applied and repro- gravity in presence of the exotic form.
  • Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory

    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory

    Introductory Lectures on Quantum Field Theory a b L. Álvarez-Gaumé ∗ and M.A. Vázquez-Mozo † a CERN, Geneva, Switzerland b Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain Abstract In these lectures we present a few topics in quantum field theory in detail. Some of them are conceptual and some more practical. They have been se- lected because they appear frequently in current applications to particle physics and string theory. 1 Introduction These notes are based on lectures delivered by L.A.-G. at the 3rd CERN–Latin-American School of High- Energy Physics, Malargüe, Argentina, 27 February–12 March 2005, at the 5th CERN–Latin-American School of High-Energy Physics, Medellín, Colombia, 15–28 March 2009, and at the 6th CERN–Latin- American School of High-Energy Physics, Natal, Brazil, 23 March–5 April 2011. The audience on all three occasions was composed to a large extent of students in experimental high-energy physics with an important minority of theorists. In nearly ten hours it is quite difficult to give a reasonable introduction to a subject as vast as quantum field theory. For this reason the lectures were intended to provide a review of those parts of the subject to be used later by other lecturers. Although a cursory acquaintance with the subject of quantum field theory is helpful, the only requirement to follow the lectures is a working knowledge of quantum mechanics and special relativity. The guiding principle in choosing the topics presented (apart from serving as introductions to later courses) was to present some basic aspects of the theory that present conceptual subtleties.
  • Dimensional Topological Quantum Field Theory from a Tight-Binding Model of Interacting Spinless Fermions

    Dimensional Topological Quantum Field Theory from a Tight-Binding Model of Interacting Spinless Fermions

    This is a repository copy of (3+1)-dimensional topological quantum field theory from a tight-binding model of interacting spinless fermions. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/99993/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Cirio, M, Palumbo, G and Pachos, JK (2014) (3+1)-dimensional topological quantum field theory from a tight-binding model of interacting spinless fermions. Physical Review B, 90 (8). 085114. ISSN 2469-9950 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.085114 Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ (3+1)-dimensional topological quantum field theory from a tight-binding model of interacting spinless fermions Mauro Cirio,1 Giandomenico Palumbo,2 and Jiannis K. Pachos2 1Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, Australia 2School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom (Dated: July 15, 2014) Currently, there is much interest in discovering analytically tractable (3 + 1)-dimensional models that describe interacting fermions with emerging topological properties.
  • Construction and Examples of Higher Gauge Theories∗

    Construction and Examples of Higher Gauge Theories∗

    Construction and examples of higher gauge theories∗ Tijana Radenkovi´cy Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Pregrevica 118, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia Marko Vojinovi´cz Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Pregrevica 118, 11080 Belgrade, Serbia Abstract We provide several examples of higher gauge theories, constructed as gener- alizations of a BF model to 2BF and 3BF models with constraints. Using the framework of higher category theory, we introduce appropriate 2-groups and 3- groups, and construct the actions for the corresponding constrained 2BF and 3BF theories. In this way, we can construct actions which describe the correct dynamics of Yang-Mills, Klein-Gordon, Dirac, Weyl, and Majorana fields coupled to Einstein-Cartan gravity. Each action is naturally split into a topological sector and a sector with simplicity constraints. The properties of the higher gauge group structure opens up a possibility of a nontrivial unification of all fields. 1. Introduction The quantization of the gravitational field is one of the fundamental open problems in modern physics. There are various approaches to this prob- lem, some of which have developed into vast research frameworks. One of such frameworks is the Loop Quantum Gravity approach, which aims to establish a nonperturbative quantization of gravity, both canonically and covariantly [1, 2, 3]. The covariant approach is slightly more general, and ∗ This work was supported by the project ON171031 of the Ministry of Education, Sci- ence and Technological Development (MPNTR) of the Republic of Serbia, and partially by the bilateral scientific cooperation between Austria and Serbia through the project \Causality in Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Gravity - 2018-2019", no.
  • Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation Stephan

    Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation Stephan

    To appear in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Effective Field Theories, Reductionism and Scientific Explanation Stephan Hartmann∗ Abstract Effective field theories have been a very popular tool in quantum physics for almost two decades. And there are good reasons for this. I will argue that effec- tive field theories share many of the advantages of both fundamental theories and phenomenological models, while avoiding their respective shortcomings. They are, for example, flexible enough to cover a wide range of phenomena, and concrete enough to provide a detailed story of the specific mechanisms at work at a given energy scale. So will all of physics eventually converge on effective field theories? This paper argues that good scientific research can be characterised by a fruitful interaction between fundamental theories, phenomenological models and effective field theories. All of them have their appropriate functions in the research process, and all of them are indispens- able. They complement each other and hang together in a coherent way which I shall characterise in some detail. To illustrate all this I will present a case study from nuclear and particle physics. The resulting view about scientific theorising is inherently pluralistic, and has implications for the debates about reductionism and scientific explanation. Keywords: Effective Field Theory; Quantum Field Theory; Renormalisation; Reductionism; Explanation; Pluralism. ∗Center for Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 817 Cathedral of Learning, Pitts- burgh, PA 15260, USA (e-mail: [email protected]) (correspondence address); and Sektion Physik, Universit¨at M¨unchen, Theresienstr. 37, 80333 M¨unchen, Germany. 1 1 Introduction There is little doubt that effective field theories are nowadays a very popular tool in quantum physics.