Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Final Report

Ipswich Borough Council

March 2010

1 Contents Page Number

1. Introduction 3

2. Ipswich Borough Council Housing Requirements 4

3. SHLAA Methodology and stakeholder involvement 4

4. The SHLAA process 5

5. Discounting sites 6

6. Assessing when and whether sites are likely to be 6 developed

7. Review of the Assessment 10

8. Contacts 10

Annex A Map: Ipswich Study Area Annex B SHLAA Stakeholder list Annex C Methodology consultation comments and council responses Annex D SHLAA Stakeholder Workshop attendees and key points Annex E Site Assessment Form Annex F Landownership Form Annex G Summary of general and site-specific representations Annex H List of Sites Annex J Site Sheets

Table 1 Estimating the housing potential of sites

2 1. Introduction

1.1 The Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) is a key component of the evidence base underpinning the Local Development Framework (LDF), by identifying a list of sites which may be suitable and available for housing development. The purpose of the study is to identify sites with potential for housing development but the study does not make any decisions about site allocations. These decisions will be made in the Council’s site allocation development plan documents, which are principally the Site Allocations and Policies document and the IP-One Area Action Plan. Any site identified with potential for housing development will also need to be assessed through the planning process and also be the subject of sustainability appraisal before any development can occur.

1.2 In order to achieve this Planning Policy Statement 3 (PPS3) requires local authorities to identify specific deliverable sites within their LDF which will deliver housing for the first 5 years from adoption of the relevant development plan document (DPD) and then to identify locations and sites that will enable the delivery of housing for at least 15 years from the date of adoption of the development plan document. The SHLAA is required by PPS3 to provide at the local level evidence of the opportunities to meet the need and demand for housing in the Borough. A wider Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA) for Ipswich Borough Council, Coastal District Council, Babergh District Council and Mid-Suffolk District Council has already been undertaken and that document highlighted amongst other things, the close relationship in housing market terms between the Ipswich and Suffolk Coastal areas and as such a joint approach to a SHLAA is considered appropriate. With regard to the other two authorities i.e. Babergh and Mid-Suffolk these two councils have recently completed a joint SHLAA with their other neighbouring authorities namely Forest Heath and St Edmundsbury. Compatibility between this SHLAA and the other joint SHLAA is important to provide a detailed picture for the SHMA area.

1.3 Detailed guidance on producing a SHLAA was published in July 2007 by the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) ‘Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessments Practice Guidance’ (the Guidance). The Guidance strongly recommends the use of the standard methodology set out within it, noting that in doing so a should not need to justify the methodology used in preparing its assessment including at independent examination. A methodology was drafted in line with the approach suggested in the Guidance, but included where appropriate local interpretations and definitions appropriate to the Ipswich and Suffolk Coastal local area (the study area). The map in Annex A shows the Ipswich study area consisting of the IP-One Area Action Plan area and the rest of the Borough.

1.4 A four-week consultation with stakeholders in respect of the draft methodology occurred from 23rd October – 24th November 2008. A full list of stakeholders consulted is shown in Annex B. Comments were noted and the response of the two councils is shown in Annex C.

1.5 DCLG advocate a partnership approach when undertaking a SHLAA to ensure a joined up and robust approach. To ensure this is achieved the SHLAA has been carried out by the both Ipswich Borough Council and Suffolk Coastal District Council. This report however only focuses on the

3 administrative area of Ipswich Borough Council. Suffolk Coastal District Council will produce a draft report for their administrative area.

1.6 The purpose of the SHLAA as noted in the methodology is to identify sites with potential for housing, assess their housing potential, and assess when they are likely to be developed. It is important to remember the SHLAA is an evidence base document and does not make site allocations. This will be done principally through the IP-One Area Action Plan, and the Site Allocations and Policies Development Plan Documents (consultation in 2010 and subject to sustainability appraisal).

1.7 The SHLAA identifies potential housing sites at a particular point in time, in this instance April 2009. However, the SHLAA will be regularly monitored and reviewed as sites become available and others are taken out of the supply, with an updated report produced as part of the annual monitoring process. In addition Ipswich Borough Council is required to demonstrate an ongoing five- year supply of sites available for housing in accordance with Government guidance and some of the sites identified within the SHLAA, where they have already been identified in the Local Development Framework and have political support can contribute to this.

2. Ipswich Borough Council Housing Requirements

2.1 The Regional Spatial Strategy for the East of England, known as the ‘East of England Plan’ requires Ipswich Borough Council to deliver 15,400 homes between April 2001 and March 2021, 770 per annum. In addition the Borough Council is required to find 3,320 homes from April 2021 to March 2025, 830 per annum as identified in the East of England Plan. As at 31 March 2009, 6,177 dwellings had been completed since April 2001, with a further 823 under , 2,757 with planning permission, and 707 with a resolution to grant planning permission (subject to the prior completion of a Section 106 agreement). This leaves 4,936 homes to be found on new site allocations to 2021 with the additional 3,320 homes to 2025.

3. SHLAA Methodology and stakeholder involvement

3.1 The SHLAA methodology was produced in partnership with Suffolk Coastal District Council and was consulted on with stakeholders in October and November 2008. The methodology was produced in accordance with Government practice guidance.

3.2 The guidance advocated a partnership approach to producing the SHLAA and engagement with key stakeholders defined as in the methodology as:

 Government Office for the East of England  Registered Social Landlords  Suffolk County Council   Other neighbouring authorities  Major planning agents/builders operating within the SHLAA area  Homes and Communities Agency

4 3.3 In addition, Ipswich Borough Council invited a number of key stakeholders to a stakeholder engagement workshop in Ipswich in May 2009. These stakeholders were asked about their views on the current market climate and their opinions on the suggested delivery of a number of sites. A list of attendees and a summary of the key points raised at this workshop is shown in Annex D.

3.4 A separate meeting organised by Suffolk Coastal District Council took place in Woodbridge in September 2009 to discuss a selection of their sites and likely delivery.

3.5 Ipswich Borough Council produced a draft report in September 2009, which was put out for public consultation alongside the Council’s Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies development plan document between 2nd October and 27th November 2009. A number of representations were received and a full table of representations is available on request. For the purposes of the final report the Council has summarised the general representations on the draft report and the site-specific representations in Annex G together with the Council’s response.

3.6 This report sets out the position known to the Council in January 2010 and some of the likely delivery timescales have been changed from 2009-2014 to 2010-2015 to reflect the current position. As mentioned in Paragraph 1.7 of this report, the SHLAA will be updated as part of the annual monitoring process.

3.7 During the consultation process it was highlighted that some of the site boundaries were incorrect and these have been amended accordingly and result in some slight changes in the indicative capacity of individual sites.

3.8 There was a question emerging from the consultation process around the inclusion of student accommodation. In the absence of clear guidance on whether or not to include student accommodation in the housing supply, the Council has highlighted where a site has a permission for student accommodation and the number of student accommodation dwellings to be delivered. This is calculated using the definition from DCLG regarding Communal establishments, which states that purpose-built (separate) homes such as self-contained flats clustered into units with 4 to 6 bedrooms should be counted as a dwelling. The approved layout plans from the planning applications for student housing are used to establish how many ‘separate homes’ there are in the development. Every cluster of 4 to 6 bedrooms with a shared kitchen and bathroom behind an entrance door is counted as one dwelling.

4. The SHLAA process

4.1 The sites identified in the SHLAA were from a variety of sources including reviewing existing housing allocations, unimplemented and outstanding planning permissions, sites suggested by developers, landowners and other interested parties, sites identified in the previous Urban Capacity Study and greenfield sites. A base date of 1 April 2008 was used for site selection. The methodology set the site threshold for consideration of at least 0.1 ha or a capacity of 10 dwellings or more in IP-One and at least 0.2 ha or a capacity of 10 dwellings or more in the rest of the Borough.

5 4.2 The sites were mapped onto a GIS layer and planning officers undertook a site visit of each site using the site assessment form shown in Annex E.

4.3 The information collected from the site visits was entered into spreadsheet and stored electronically. This will be updated regularly as information becomes available to ensure an accurate record of housing land supply and the SHLAA is required to be updated annually through the Annual Monitoring Report.

4.4 A total of 186 sites were identified and considered through the SHLAA process and those suggested for inclusion in years 1-5 (2010-2015) and years 6-10 (2015-2020) were explored further at the stakeholder workshop. Of these 186 sites, 6 have been sub-divided due to availability at different timescales, therefore totalling 192 sites. In the absence of individual sites for years 11-15 (2020-2025), a broad location to the north of Ipswich is considered, however as the individual sites that make up this broad location have been identified by developers, landowners and other interested parties, we have put all of these initially in years 6-10. As mentioned earlier in the report, the SHLAA does not allocate sites, however it is realised that some of this broad location could be included in the supply of years 6-10 if required.

5. Discounting sites

5.1 In assessing the housing potential of sites, it was necessary to ascertain first of all whether they were suitable for housing development and if so whether they were available or likely to be available during the first ten years. Where we were uncertain about the intentions of a landowner or tenant, we wrote to these enclosing a landownership form, which asked about their intentions for years 1-5, 6-10, 11-15 and 16-20, shown in Annex F.

5.2 It was identified that some sites although available and theoretically could accommodate housing on the site, there were major constraints such as flooding or pollution, which would prevent housing development occurring and would be too difficult to overcome during the plan period. These have been noted in the site sheets contained in Annex J of this report.

5.3 In total 56 sites have been identified as suitable for housing development but not deliverable, and 22 sites have been identified as not suitable for housing development. There were 6 sites, which have been built since 1 April 2008 and a further 3 sites currently under construction. 31 sites currently have planning permission or planning permission recently expired not including student accommodation. We anticipate most of these sites to be delivered between 2009 and 2015, although in some instances the total dwellings granted planning permission, it is suggested, will need to be reduced in light of current market conditions.

6. Assessing when and whether sites are likely to be developed

6.1 In assessing when and whether sites are likely to be developed it is necessary to ascertain whether they are deliverable, that is within years 1-5 or developable within years 6-10 and in the case of this SHLAA a broad location for years 11-15. Definitions of deliverable and developable are shown below:

6  Deliverable – if a site is available now, offers a suitable location for housing development now and there is a reasonable prospect that housing will be delivered on the site within five years from the adoption of the plan; and

 Developable – if the site is in a suitable location for housing development and there is a reasonable prospect that the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time.

A site is considered suitable, available and achievable as follows:

 Suitable – a site offers a suitable location for housing development and would contribute to the creation of sustainable, mixed communities.

 Available – a site is considered available for development, when on the best information available, there is confidence that there are no legal or ownership problems.

 Achievable – a site is considered achievable for development where there is a reasonable prospect that housing will be developed on the site at a particular point in time.

The site sheets contained within Annex J show whether we consider a site to be suitable, available and achievable.

6.2 Where it is unknown when a site could be developed then it will be regarded as not currently developable. Where sites do not meet all three of this criteria they have been discounted as per section 5.

6.3 Sites that do meet the criteria have been assessed for likely housing potential and timing of deliverability. Table 1 shows the density assumptions for each site.

7 Table 1: Estimating the housing potential of sites

IP-One Rest of IP-One Within 800 metres Rest of Borough (Waterfront) of a district centre High density – 165 High density – 110 Medium density – Low density – 35 dwellings per dwellings per 45 dwellings per dwellings per hectare hectare hectare hectare

6.4 In addition to estimating the housing potential of sites, in order to ensure a realistic element of deliverability, it was assumed that those sites with other uses identified in the preferred options of the Council’s development plan documents were taken into consideration.

6.5 The sites were categorised between those in IP-One and those in the rest of the Borough in accordance with the two Development Plan Documents currently being progressed through the Local Development Framework. It was found that 2,095 dwellings were developable in IP-One and 7,355 in the rest of the Borough. The latter figure includes 5,960 on the broad location to the north of the town. In terms of timing, it is suggested that 623 dwellings in IP- One area are deliverable in Period 1 and 1,472 in Period 2. In the rest of the Borough, it is suggested that 902 dwellings are deliverable in Period 1 and 6,453 dwellings in Period 2, although this includes the broad location to the north of the town. If we discount this broad location, the figure is 493 dwellings and therefore it is recognised that to ensure a continuous 15-year land supply, some of the 5,960 should be included in Period 2. However, it is the role of the Local Development Framework to identify which sites should be allocated for years 6-10 and which for 11-15. A full list of sites for each area can be seen in Annex H together with their likely delivery timescale.

6.6 The current economic climate has meant that a number of brownfield sites available for development are less likely to be achievable in the first five years. The SHLAA is intended to take a long-term view and therefore these are assumed to be achievable in years 6-10. The SHLAA is to be reviewed annually and changes can be made in light of the market conditions at the time.

6.7 The site sheets shown in Annex J show a number of constraints, which are explained in more detail below and have been considered in accordance with the site assessment checklist shown in the methodology.

Access and Highways

Where the site has a restricted access and/or a detrimental impact on either the local or trunk highway network or both, yes has been entered into the constraint box. Where there is a possible access constraint or impact on the highway network then possible has been entered into the constraint box.

AQMA within or close to

A site within or close to an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA) has yes in the constraint box. Where a site has a potential impact on air quality, for example if traffic feeds into an AQMA or the site has the potential to generate a large amount of traffic, then possible has been entered into the constraint box.

8 Area of Archaeological Importance

Where a site is within the area of archaeological importance defined within the adopted Ipswich Local Plan (1997), then yes has been entered into the constraint box. Where it has been suggested by other parties that the area is a site is of archaeological importance, possible has been entered into the constraint box.

Conservation Area

Where a site is within a conservation area defined within the adopted Ipswich Local Plan (1997), then yes has been entered into the constraint box. Where a site is adjacent to a conservation area and could therefore impact upon it, this has been noted in the constraint box.

Contaminated

It is not possible to say if a site definitely has contamination or not where this is not known, however it is possible to say a site has possible contamination due to a previous use or where the storage of hazardous substances may have taken place. Furthermore, for any housing planning application, a contamination assessment needs to occur.

Existing Use

A number of the sites suggested as suitable for housing development have existing uses upon them. Where these are in areas clearly defined for employment for example, it is often the case that although the area could be redeveloped, it is not likely to happen and therefore the site is not deliverable. Where there are a few uses on the site and there is a prospect the site could be redeveloped upon relocation of the existing businesses then possible has been entered into the constraint box. As this is a long-term study it is not possible to know exactly if a business will relocate or if a site will become vacant, but we publish this document to the best of our knowledge and if it later transpires that a site is actually not going to be available for redevelopment it can be deleted from this study in the future as this document will be updated annually as mentioned earlier.

Flood Zones 2 & 3

A site within Flood Zones 2 or 3 as defined by the Environment Agency in January 2009 has a yes in the constraint box. It is recognised that a number of sites have significant flood risk constraints and these will be assisted by the construction of the proposed flood barrier. Surface water flooding is also recognised as an issue and will be addressed in a level 2 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, identifying areas at risk of surface water flooding.

Listed Buildings or adjacent to

Sites which have Listed Buildings on site have a yes in the constraint box and those either adjacent or opposite a Listed Building or buildings have either adjacent or opposite in the constraint box.

9 Recreation and open space

Sites that have are defined as recreation or open space areas have a yes in the constraint box.

TPO on site or nearby

Sites that have a Tree Preservation Order(s) on the site or nearby have yes in the constraint box.

Wildlife site or adjacent to

A wildlife site in the context of this document has been defined as a Local Wildlife Site or County Wildlife site. Where a site is not designated as a wildlife site, but there are clearly wildlife features, for example the site is countryside, then countryside has been entered into the constraint box.

Other constraints

These can include noise for example and are mentioned in the summary box of each site sheet.

6.8 A number of sites also have significant constraints whether it be a site at risk of flooding and dependent upon construction of the proposed flood barrier, or a greenfield site where a significant amount of new infrastructure is needed. These types of constraints can be overcome although it is suggested that sites with significant constraints of this type are more likely to be deliverable within years 6-10.

7. Review of the Assessment

7.1 Ipswich Borough Council is publishing the SHLAA as evidence base for the Local Development Framework and in particular at this stage the Proposed Submission Core Strategy and Policies. This document does not allocate sites for housing development. The purpose of the SHLAA is to assess the deliverability and developability of sites and information contained within this document will be used to inform an indicative housing trajectory for the Borough, setting out how much housing can be provided and when.

7.2 As stated earlier the SHLAA will be reviewed annually to ensure an accurate supply of sites for housing development if required. It may be that some sites are removed from the SHLAA pool as no longer being available or deliverable, while new sites may also come to our attention.

8. Contacts

Ipswich Borough Council Robert Hobbs Senior Planner [email protected] 01473 432931 Suffolk Coastal District Council Hilary Hanslip Principal Planning Officer [email protected] 01394 444761

10 Annex A Map: Ipswich Study Area

11 Annex B

SHLAA Stakeholder list

Registered Social Landlords and Housing Providers Anchor Housing Association Anchor Trust Anglia Housing Group Broadland Housing Association Coastal Housing Action Group Concern Housing Co-op Homes Services English Churches Housing Group Flagship Housing Group Granta Housing Association Habinteg Housing Association Hanover Housing Association Hastoe Housing Association Hereward Housing Housing 21 Housing Corporation Iceni Homes Ipswich YMCA Jephson Housing Association London & Quadrant Housing Association Orbit Housing Group Orwell Housing Association Presentation Housing Association Ltd Raglan Housing Association Ltd Richmond Fellowship Housing Riverside Housing Group Sanctuary Housing Association Servite Houses Shaftesbury Housing Association SOLO Housing St Matthew Housing Stonham Housing Association Suffolk Heritage Housing Association Suffolk Housing Society Swan Housing Association Warden Housing Association Wherry Housing Association

Planning agents/developers/builders Associated British Ports Adam Holmes Associates Alfred McAlpine Developments Alsop Verrill Andrew Martin Associates Apollo Capital Projects Ashley Homes Ashwell Developments Ltd ASP Atisreal Barrett Eastern Counties

12 Barton Willmore Homes Beeson Properties Ltd Homes Bellway Urban Renewal Berwicks BG Properties Bidwells Bill Wilson Planning Ltd Birketts Solictors Boyer Planning Ltd Braceforce Properties Brimble, Lea & Partners Broadlands Broadway Malyan Planning Brown & Co Bryant Homes Hertford Ltd Carter Jonas CB Hillier Parker CB Richard Ellis Charter Partnership Chelsteen Homes Chris Thomas Ltd Churchmanor Estates Company Plc Clarke & Simpson Ltd Cushman and Wakefield David Clarke & Associates David Hicken Associates Ltd David Lock Associates David Walker Chartered Surveyors David Wilson Estates Davies Arnold Cooper Development Planning & Design Services Development Planning Partnership D J Trower Ltd Don Proctor Planning Donaldsons Drivers Jonas DTZ Consulting and Research DTZ Debenham Thorpe EWS Chartered Surveyors Fairview New Homes Ltd Farningham McCreadie Partnership Featherstone Builders Ltd Firstplan FPD Savills FRCA Fuller Peiser G L Hearn Planning plc Gerald Eve Gladstone Homes Ltd GMA Planning

13 Mr Gordon Terry Gough Planning Services Grantham Parsons and Nolan Ltd Greystoke & Everleigh Ltd Grove Builders Guardian Royal Exchange Properties GVA Grimley Harris Lamb Planning Consultancy Healey & Baker Higgins Homes Ltd Hopkins Homes Indigo Planning Ingleton Properties Ltd Mr J Martin-Shaw J S Bloor January’s JB Planning Associates John Field Consultancy John Newton Associates Jones Lang LaSalle Kesgrave Covenant Ltd KLH Architects Lawson Planning Partnership Lennon Planning Ltd Levvel Martin Robeson Planning Practice McCarthy & Stone Developments Ltd Merchant Projects Mersea Homes Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners Neil Ward Associates Peacock & Smith Peecock Short Property Solutions Pegasus Planning Group Persimmon Homes (Essex) Peter J Hamilton & Associates Phillips Planning Services Ltd Planning Potential Premier Planning Pullman Development Ltd R G Carter Ipswich Ltd Rapleys LLP Redrow Homes (Eastern) Ltd Robert Turley Associates Robottom Developments Ltd Roger Tym & Partners RPS Chapman Warren RPS Planning RPS plc S Sacker (Claydon) Ltd Savills (L&P) Ltd Smart Planning Ltd Developments Terence O’Rourke Planning Tetlow King Planning

14 The Fairfield Partnership The Landscape Partnership The National Trust The Planning Bureau Ltd Tomlinson Construction Town Planning Consultancy W S W S Development Wates Landmark West and Partners Wharfside Regeneration (Ipswich Ltd) White Young Green Planning Wilcon Homes Anglia Ltd Wilson Connelly Home Counties Wimborne Estates Ltd Wimpey Homes Wincer Kievenaar Partnership

Planning authorities Babergh District Council Mid Suffolk District Council Waveney District Council

Other stakeholders Anglian Telecom plc Anglian Water Services Ltd British Energy Group plc British Gas BT Group plc Coal Authority COLT Telecom Group plc Defence Estates E.On UK plc East of England Development Agency (EEDA) East of England Regional Assembly (EERA) East of England Strategic Health Authority Easynet Ltd EDF Energy English Heritage Environment Agency Equant UK Ltd Essex and Suffolk Water Company Fibrenet Group plc Fibrespan Ltd Friends, Families & Travellers Community Base Fujitsu Services Gamma Telecom Global Crossing (UK) Telecommunications Ltd GO-East Highways Agency Home Builders Federation Hutchinson 3G UK Ltd Internet-Central Ltd Ipswich NHS Trust Ipswich Primary Care Trust

15 Level 3 Communications Local Health Partnerships NHS Trust MCI WorldCom Ltd MLL Telecom Ltd Mobile Operators Association National Grid National Housing Federation National Power plc National Trust Natural England NEOS Networks Newnet plc NHS Norfolk, Suffolk & Cambridgeshire Strategic Health Authority NTL UK Nuclear Electric plc O2 Airwave Opal Telecom Orange Pipex Powergen Retail Ltd Reach Europe Redstone Shelter Sport England SSE Telecom Suffolk Biodiversity Partnership Suffolk Coastal Primary Care Trust Suffolk County Council Suffolk East Primary Care Trust Suffolk Health Authority Suffolk Mental Health Partnership NHS Trust Suffolk Primary Care Trust Suffolk Police THUS plc T-Mobile (UK) Ltd Torch Communications Ltd Transco UK Broadband Ltd Vectone Services Ltd Vodafone Ltd

16 Annex C

Methodology consultation comments and council responses

Consultee Section of Comments Ipswich and Suffolk Coastal response Document Anglian Water General Recommend that any sites chosen through the SHLAA Noted. criteria should then be tested for appropriateness using the Haven Gateway Water Cycle Study to check for environmental constraints and advise on infrastructure needs and suitable timing for the development. Barton Willmore Stage 7, Table 6 states that greenfield sites and sites with major Noted. Have deleted this row from Table 6 and Table 6. policy constraints should be marked as - -. Given the shift the scoring criteria in accordance with Planning in emphasis from PPG3 to PPS3 with the dropping of the Advisory Service guidance. sequential test in PPS3 do not consider that housing sites should be penalised because they do not conform to current local plan policy, for example if they are outside the development boundary and therefore greenfield. The LDF can where appropriate allocate such sites for development, and so the SHLAA should look forward to identify appropriate housing sites, and should not be constrained by existing policy. A suitable greenfield site should be scored +. Barton Willmore Stage 7, A suitable greenfield site could be more appropriate to Noted. Have deleted reference to previously Table 6. develop than a brownfield site, and in the scoring system developed land (PDL) or greenfield site from for Suitability for housing and Previously developed land or Table 6, as this would be a subsequent policy brownfield, sustainable greenfield sites should score decision, and have deleted the scoring criteria higher. Propose that the scoring system should be in accordance with Planning Advisory Service amended to better recognise the benefits of developing guidance. sustainable greenfield sites.

17 Barton Willmore Para 2.26 Para 2.26 (now para 2.25) of the councils SHLAA Noted. Guidance from the Planning Advisory (now para methodology states that should a shortfall of sites be Service states: "possible broad locations 2.25) identified then broad locations for growth should be should be assessed in the same way as identified or a windfall allowance should be investigated. identifiable sites so as to provide a rounded Paragraph 43 of the Communities and Local Government assessment of potential sources of supply, with Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment Practice consistent information on deliverability / Guidance, states that when the Assessment is reviewed "it developability." may be concluded that insufficient sites have been identified and that further sites need to be sought." This implies that broad locations for growth and windfall allowances should not be the only way of addressing a housing shortfall if specific sites are available to provide a housing supply for the full 15 years of a plan.

Boyer Planning General Support the general methodology, as it would seem Noted. consistent with the Practice Guidance. Boyer Planning Stage 1 The local planning authorities need to be certain that the Noted, this will be achieved through methodology and assessment of sites identified within the stakeholder engagement. SHLAA provide a degree of certainty as to its findings. Boyer Planning Stage 2 & 3 The purpose of the SHLAA is to identify sites capable of Disagree. We will include brownfield sites such being delivered for housing and the development of sites, as vacant garage blocks where we know there such as vacant garage blocks and other incidental areas is potential for them to be redeveloped in the of vacant urban land, tend to come forward as future for housing. opportunities rather part of any forward planning process. Boyer Planning Stage 2 & 3 Insofar as reviewing existing information is concerned, it Noted, some sites identified for other uses will be important to have regard to sites that might be have been included in the study. identified for other possible uses. Boyer Planning Stage 4 The Practice Guidance is quite clear that the SHLAA is to Noted. The site size threshold will be adhered exclude windfall sites until very much later in the process. to. The site threshold as identified in paragraph 2.19 (now para 2.18) should be adhered to.

18 Boyer Planning Stage 5 We assume that all the characteristics listed within para Correct. 2.16 (now para 2.15) will be set out clearly in the SHLAA consultation document to allow such details to be verified. Boyer Planning Stage 6 The same situation applies in respect of this stage that Agree. developers and landowners will have the opportunity to respond to the housing potential of individual sites. Such potential will depend on a range of factors including market demand and viability of proposals. Boyer Planning Stage 7 Verifying the conclusions and information contained within Stakeholder consultation is planned on the Stages 5, 6 and 7 of the SHLAA will need the crucial input draft report. of developers and landowners and for such inputs to be given considerable weight. Boyer Planning Stage 7, The SHLAA document is intended to identify potential Noted and have deleted this row from Table 6. Table 6 housing land and the Practice Guidance does not seek to differentiate between greenfield sites and previously developed land. Accordingly, that a site may be constrained either because it is greenfield or previously developed land is not relevant and should be deleted as a key issue from Table 6. Whether or not a site is greenfield or previously developed land is not a measure of constraint in itself other than where previously developed land is the subject of contamination or other physical constraints. Boyer Planning Stage 7, Correctly flood risk is identified as a key issue in identifying Noted, document corrected. Table 6 future housing sites. However there is an error in the Flood Risk Key Issue in that Flood Zone 3b comprises functional flood plain whereas Flood Zone 3a in certain circumstances can be considered appropriate for housing development. Sites in Flood Zone 3b are therefore more constrained.

19 Boyer Planning Stage 8 Noted at para 2.25 (now para 2.24) that identifying new Noted, stakeholders have the opportunity to be sites or re-visting assumptions made within the SHLAA will involved through consultation on the draft be undertaken by the two local planning authorities. It is report. crucial for those who have an interest in providing housing development within the area should be included as part of the process to ensure that full information has been made available to the local planning authorities. Boyer Planning Stage 9 It is acknowledged that the local planning authorities Noted. The two councils have consulted on the should take a lead in identifying broad locations for methodology and will consult again on the draft housing development within their respective areas. report. However the identification of such locations should have full regard to the availability of land for housing which can be developed in such areas and in that regard consultation with landowners and developers should form part of the process. Boyer Planning Stage 10 Should the SHLAA require the need to rely on a windfall Noted. contribution then that needs to have regard to market considerations. Past take-up rates of windfall sites may not necessarily continue into the future. It will be a matter for consultation and assessment at that time. The Coal General No specific comments to make. No response necessary. Authority

20 David Lock General Fundamental concern that the timing of preparation of the Draft findings will be in place prior to Associates SHLAA undermines the robustness and soundness of the consultation on the emerging LDF. emerging Ipswich LDF, on the basis that the SHLAA will not be finalised until consultation on the next stage of the DPD production process has commenced, and that previous stages of relevant DPDs will not have been adequately informed by the SHLAA. David Lock General Concerned that the proposed methodology allows policy to Agree the SHLAA is a technical exercise only Associates influence the identification and assessment of sites, rather although the objective of maximising brownfield than being a technical exercise only. This is contrary to development continues. Have deleted guidance on the preparation of SHLAAs. reference to previously developed land (PDL) or greenfield site from Table 6, as this would be a subsequent policy decision. David Lock General Concerned that the proposed methodology fails to provide Agree larger sites have the potential to deliver Associates a robust basis for assessment in that it fails to recognise new services, however this is an additional cost the potential for new services to be delivered in support of to the delivery of the site and first of all it is new development locations. important to assess proximity to existing local services. Have added a row to Table 6 focusing on the potential for creating and/or improving access to services. David Lock General Concerned that inadequate consultation may mean that The two councils invited comments from a Associates inadequacies in the identification and assessment of sites range of stakeholders and further consultation may not be apparent until conclusion of the SHLAA. will take place once site assessments have been carried out. David Lock Stage 2 Wish to be reassured that there is continuity between the Noted. Where known, sites on the urban fringe Associates Ipswich urban capacity study and the SHLAA and that no of Ipswich have been included in the SHLAA. potential sites on the urban fringe could fall between these The list of sites was also consulted on two definitions. alongside the methodology. David Lock Stage 2 Advice published by the Planning Advisory Service Agree. Greenfield sites are included in the Associates explicitly explains that potential opposition to greenfield SHLAA. sites does not represent a reason for not identifying such sites as a potential source of land.

21 David Lock Stage 2 In referring to emerging LDF documents as a Agree, the SHLAA is a technical exercise, Associates consideration in the identification of sites, it is suggested however guidance also clearly states that that the necessary policy neutrality set out in guidance is where sites have been considered in a local not being upheld. It would clearly be prejudicial to the authority's preferred options, then they should findings of the assessment if emerging LDF policy were to be included in the SHLAA. influence the identification or assessment of the suitability of sites. David Lock Stage 2 Concerns about policy impartiality relevant in relation to Amend. To more properly accord with national Associates para 2.6 of the proposed assessment methodology. It is guidance on this issue, the words "and of a not clear how exactly the criteria or provisions of the last scale appropriate" will be deleted. sentence of that paragraph will be determined or applied, although it is clear that the implication is that some degree of judgement will be applied to potential sites before they can be included as a potential source. With reference to para 21 of the Practice Guidance, would recommend that any suggestion of pre-determination of the suitability of sites must be avoided, and recommend the last sentence of this paragraph is removed. David Lock Stage 6 The Practice Guidance includes advice at para 30 to help Noted, para 2.18 (now para 2.17) will be Associates local authorities determine whether it is appropriate to use clarified making reference to the fact that when existing policies as a guide to inform site design variables assessing densities a mix of factors will be (such as on density), which in turn informs capacity. Para used including national guidance, emerging 2.18 (now para 2.17) of the proposed methodology makes policy and sample site information provided no reference to the appraisal of the suitability of existing through the viability assessment work carried policy. Recommend the proposed methodology be out in parallel with the Strategic Housing amended to recognise that existing emerging policy may Market Assessment. not provide sufficient guidance for assessing the development capacity of sites, and that consideration must therefore be given to alternative means of assessing site capacities.

22 David Lock Stage 7 Recommend that the title of the 'policy restrictions' Reference to emerging policy deleted. Associates subsection in Table 6 refer only to existing policy, and not to 'emerging' policy. David Lock Stage 7 Practice Guidance refers to specific policy considerations Noted. Methodology sets out such an Associates such as designations for protected areas, existing approach. allocations or community policy, not to constraint policies. Suggest that the robustness of the SHLAA and any dependent plan policy is predicated on a fair and policy neutral approach to assessing sites, and that those policies to be used are set out clearly. David Lock Stage 7 Suggest that a priority afforded to previously developed Noted. Have deleted reference to previously Associates land is a matter of policy, to be applied when allocating developed land (PDL) or greenfield site from sites and that suitability is a matter of technical scoring assessment. assessment for which PDL is not a relevant consideration. David Lock Stage 7 Recommend that the SHLAA methodology recognises Noted. Agree larger sites have the potential to Associates both proximity to existing services, and the potential for deliver new services, however this is an delivering new services, as part of its evaluation of sites. additional cost to the delivery of the site and first of all it is important to assess proximity to existing local services. David Lock Stage 7 Need for community engagement to ensure the Noted. Consultation will be carried out on the Associates robustness of assessments. draft report. David Lock Stages 8, 9 Would remind the authorities that the circumstances by Noted. Sites have been identified on a Associates & 10 which individual sites cannot be identified must be on a technical basis. technical basis, rather than a policy basis. East of England Ipswich Borough Council and Suffolk Coastal District Noted. Regional Council are commended for working together to develop Assembly this SHLAA methodology for the Ipswich Policy Area. The Assembly fully supports this approach.

23 Environment General The methodology outlined in the SHLAA document Noted. Agency appears to conform to the government guidance and therefore no specific comments are to be made, except for three items: the site assessment form; the consultation process; and sustainable settlements. Environment Stage 7, The site assessment form seems to take a broad-brush Potential for cumulative impact effect as part of Agency Table 6 approach, arguably a simplistic approach. For instance, in the assessment / and use made of relation to ecology it merely asks for species rich sustainability appraisals already carried out. attributes. What about impacts on adjacent land or located Footnote added to the site assessment where development could significantly affect a SSSI / checklist table: "Sites will be looked at on national nature reserve? Does the site include or individual basis and their cumulative impact." significantly affect any other site of local importance such Amended ecology row in Table 6. as local wildlife site, ancient woodland and protected verge or affect protected habitat or species (if known)? Consider the need to set out a more detailed approach in order to capture full information. Environment Stage 7, Taking flood risk, it would be preferable if the landowner / The councils already have this information Agency Table 6 developer was asked to indicate which flood zone the site along with the Strategic Flood Risk lies in, i.e. Flood Zone 1, 2 or 3. The information is Assessment. available on the Environment Agency Flood Maps on the Environment Agency website. Environment Stage 7, Regarding contaminated and hazardous land, ask the Both councils hold or have access to this Agency Table 6 landowner / developer to advise whether the site falls information. within a groundwater source protection zone. Environment Stage 7, Would the site impact on an air quality management area Both councils hold or have access to this Agency Table 6 (AQMA)? information, but have added a row in Table 6. Environment Stage 7, Does the site impact on the historic, cultural and built Both councils hold or have access to this Agency Table 6 environment? information, but have added a row in Table 6.

24 Environment Consultation May be worthwhile having a panel of key stakeholders, The two councils invited comments from a Agency process including the statutory environmental bodies, who would range of stakeholders on the methodology and consider and give advice and opinions on the draft SHLAA site list, and further consultation will take place prior to its consideration and approval by the Councils. once site assessments have been carried out. The panel membership could comprise LPA policy planners/engineers, volume house builders, small scale builders, land agents, planning consultants, registered social landlords involved in new build projects. Environment Sustainable Purdis Heath is included as a major centre. It seems a bit Purdis Farm is part of a wider eastwards Agency settlements too fragmented to justify meeting the description of a major extension of Ipswich and is urban in character. centre. Highways Stage 7, Table 6: Access & Highway: A significant amount of traffic The Access and Highways criteria will be Agency Table 6 emanating from Ipswich (and a lesser amount from divided into two, with one focusing on the ) uses the A14 as a distributor route. Recent impact on the local road network and the other work by Suffolk County Council indicate that through traffic focusing on the impact on the trunk network. crossing the Orwell Bridge is only about 20% of total traffic. With concerns on the future capacity of the A14, there is a need to manage down demand. Consequently it is suggested that Access & Highway is split into local and trunk road segments with the trunk element based on an assessment of likelihood to use the A14 or possibly proximity to A14 junctions. Highways Stage 7, Table 6: Access to Services: There is an option which Noted. An additional row will be added Agency Table 6 picks up public transport, however there is no clear assessing cycling and walking opportunities. assessment of the opportunity for sustainable transport, i.e. opportunities not to use the car, opportunities for cycling, walking etc. This assessment is essential if future demand levels for transport are going to be effectively managed.

25 Merchant Stage 2 Urban extensions are a separate category of source, Noted. Where known, sites on the urban fringe Projects ensure continuity between the urban capacity study and of Ipswich as well as other towns have been the SHLAA and that no potential sites on the urban fringe included in the SHLAA and a list of sites was (which may or may not constitute urban extensions) are consulted on. excluded from consideration. Merchant Stage 2 It would clearly be prejudicial to the findings of the Amend. Final sentence to be amended to read: Projects assessment if emerging LDF policy was to influence the "Any opportunities for urban extensions will be identification or assessment of the suitability of sites and identified by means of sites submitted for the last row of Table 4 on page 9 is unfairly influenced by consideration for allocation through the relevant existing policies. Suggest the final sentence of this row is DPD". deleted. Merchant Stage 2 Suggest that any suggestion of the pre-determination of Amend. To more properly accord with national Projects the suitability of sites must be avoided, and strongly guidance on this issue, the words "and of a recommend that the last sentence of para 2.6 is removed. scale appropriate" will be deleted from para 2.6. Merchant Stage 6 Suggest that the proposed methodology be amended to Noted, para 2.18 (now para 2.17) will be Projects recognise that existing and emerging policy may not clarified making reference to the fact that when provide sufficient guidance for assessing the development assessing densities a mix of factors will be capacity of sites, and that consideration must therefore be used including national guidance, emerging given to alternative means of assessing sites and site policy and sample site information provided capacities, and in addition the issue of viability is through the viability assessment work carried adequately addressed particularly in the current economic out in parallel with the Strategic Housing cycle. Market Assessment. Merchant Stage 7 The Practice Guidance makes it clear that policies Noted. Reference to emerging policy deleted. Projects designed to constrain development must be regarded with considerable caution and emerging LDF policies that predate the SHLAA and are restrictive in nature should clearly be disregarded. Table 6 should consequentially be amended to give clarity on this issue. Merchant Stage 7 Previously developed land PDL should not be criteria for Noted. Have deleted reference to previously Projects selection, it is used to prioritise allocation not selection of developed land (PDL) or greenfield site from suitable sites. Table 6.

26 Merchant Stage 7 Expect those sites subject to flood risk to be considered Disagree, as with flood adaptation and Projects unsuitable for development when assessed through mitigation measures in place, sites subject to SHLAA. an element of flood risk can be considered suitable for development. Merchant Stage 7 Wrong to use the presence of local services as a Noted. Agree larger sites have the potential to Projects determinant in selecting suitable sites. Suggest that the deliver new services, however this is an SHLAA methodology recognises both proximity to existing additional cost to the delivery of the site and services, and the potential for delivering new services, as first of all it is important to assess proximity to part of its evaluation of sites. existing local services. Have added a row to Table 6 focusing on the potential for creating and/or improving access to services. Merchant Stage 7 Suggest the viability assessment methodologies used for Agree. Projects the SHLAA and SHMA should be compatible to allow comparison and consistency. Merchant Stage 7 Given the technical nature of many of the judgements Agree. Developers and landowners have the Projects required in respect of the criteria in Table 6, would suggest option to complete the site assessment form that developers be given an opportunity to advise the available on each authority's website. Further authorities in respect of specific sites, and suggest that the consultation will take place once site conclusions of the assessment be published for fact- assessments have been carried out. The checking before the SHLAA relies on the conclusions of councils also have data submitted with the appraisals. representations on the LDF from objectors. Merchant Stages 8, 9 It is important that the preceding stages of the assessment There is no bias as greenfield and brownfield Projects and the full have not included a bias which precludes certain types of sites are considered on an equal footing. The 15 year site (for example, greenfield sites capable of delivering a SHLAA is a piece of technical work to inform supply new network of facilities and services) being taken forward subsequent policy decisions. to Stage 8. The circumstances by which individual sites cannot be identified must be considered on a technical, rather than a policy, basis. Windfall sites are clearly that and play no part in assessing the 15-year supply. Nathaniel General As the methodology accords with the SHLAA Practice Noted. Lichfield and Guidance published in July 2007, are satisfied with the Partners approach.

27 Natural England Stage 7, In Table 6, under 'Developable limitations', Potential for cumulative impact effect as part of Table 6 'Designated/protected area' is listed as one of the key the assessment / and use made of issues. In addition to including whether or not a site falls sustainability appraisals already carried out. within a designated/protected area, it should also be Footnote added to the site assessment considered whether the development of a site would cause checklist table: "Sites will be looked at on an an indirect impact on designated/protected areas, through, individual basis and their cumulative impact." for example, water resource/quality issues, increased recreational pressure. Sport England General Wish to confirm its opposition to the potential allocation of Noted. There is an existing use in operation any existing or former sports facilities for new housing row in Table 6. development unless it could be demonstrated to their satisfaction that there was no longer a need to retain sites for sports use or satisfactory replacement provision was made. Sport England would only accept a site being surplus to requirements if it could be satisfactorily demonstrated that there is a surplus of facilities through an up-to-date sports facility assessment or playing pitch assessment prepared in accordance with the guidance set out in PPG17. This applies to both existing and former sites because former sports sites offer the potential to be brought back into use to meet current of future unmet needs. Sport England General In terms of the SHLAA Methodology, Sport England would Noted. This will be a policy decision rather than encourage the existing or potential role of a site in meeting one affecting the developability of the land. sports facility needs to be a material consideration when deciding which sites to progress to allocations.

28 Annex D

Ipswich SHLAA Stakeholder Workshop Attendance List – May 2009

Sue Bull Anglian Water

David Barker Barton Willmore

Isabel Lockwood Bidwells

Jonathan Stoddart CBRE

Andrew Hunter Environment Agency

Doug Malins Flagship Housing

Eric Cooper Highways Agency

Christopher Smith Hopkins Homes

Mike Goodson Iceni Homes

Martin Blake Merchant Projects

Stuart Cock Mersea Homes

Andy Redman Savills

Sarah Barker Ipswich Borough Council

Denis Cooper Ipswich Borough Council

Robert Hobbs Ipswich Borough Council

Mike Tee Ipswich Borough Council

Jason Wakefield Ipswich Borough Council

Russell Williams Ipswich Borough Council

Hilary Hanslip Suffolk Coastal District Council

29 Key points raised at the Stakeholder Workshop

- Density of housing development – local development framework preferred options densities perceived as too high.

- Market for flats – perceived oversupply at present.

- Parking associated with housing development – in particular associated with flats.

- Existing use values of employment uses and retail – especially in the current economic climate.

- A comprehensive approach must be taken for any Northern Fringe development – to deliver the necessary infrastructure.

- Need to meet the jobs targets – when considering housing development on existing employment sites.

30 Annex E

Ipswich & Suffolk Coastal SHLAA Site Assessment Form

Ipswich Borough Council and Suffolk Coastal District Council are undertaking a joint Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment as part of the evidence base for the local development framework of each respective authority.

Site Assessment Settlement

Site name

Site reference

Site size (hectares)

Greenfield/Brownfield/Mixed

Current planning status (under construction/detailed pp/outline pp/application submitted/none) / local plan allocation Form of development approved (if any) / recent planning history

Current use(s)

Surrounding land use(s)

Character of surrounding area

Physical constraints identified on site visit

Initial assessment of what the site is suitable for

31 Stage 7a – Suitability for housing Policy restrictions Designated/protected area

Agricultural land classification

Existing use in operation

Developable limitations Contaminated and Hazardous land

Flood risk

Infrastructure – water/drainage/sewerage

Access and Highways (local roads)

Access and Highways (trunk roads)

Potential impacts Impact on Landscape and Protected Trees

Impact on the Historic Built Environment

Ecology (species rich)

Environmental conditions Proximity to noise and other pollutants

Proximity to an Air Quality Management Area (AQMA)

Access to services Local employment opportunities

Public transport – bus or rail service

32 Potential for creating and/or improving access to services

Cycling and walking opportunities

Access to convenience shop(s)

Access to health centre/doctors’ surgery

Access to primary school

Access to a meeting place (e.g. church, hotel with conference facilities, library)

Access to public open space

Stage 7b – Availability for housing Availability for housing – difference between availability and site ownership?

Site ownership

Stage 7c – Achievability for housing Achievability/viability – difference between achievability and market factors

Market factors

Cost factors

Delivery factors

Conclusion

33 Annex F

Landownership Form

The information on this form is to be used for the purpose of informing the evidence base for the preparing of the Ipswich Local Development Framework and the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment.

Would you be willing for the content of this form to be published on the Council’s website?

Yes  No 

Personal telephone numbers and e-mail details will not be published.

1. Site Reference:

2. Site Address:

3. Please can you confirm on the attached site sheet, which part of the site if not all you own and confirm your details below. If you are aware of other landowners on the site, please can you also give the details in the boxes and on an attached sheet of paper if necessary.

1. Name: Company: Address:

Post Code: Tel No: Email address:

2. Name: Company: Address:

Post Code: Tel No: Email address:

34 3. Name: Company: Address:

Post Code: Tel No: Email address:

4. Are there any tenants on the site? Yes  No 

If you answered yes to question 4, please indicate how many tenants there are and when their lease expires?

Tenant 1. ______

Tenant 2. ______

Tenant 3. ______

5. What are your future intentions for the site? Do you intend to sell the land/relocate in the next few years? If yes, please indicate the likely timescale, within next 5 years, 6-10 years, 11-15 or 16-20 years)

6. Do you already have a contractual agreement with a developer to redevelop the site?

Yes  No 

Where possible please indicate the developer’s name.

______

35 7. Would you be willing to meet with Planning Officers to discuss the possibilities for redevelopment of the site?

Yes  No 

8. Please advise if we have your correct contact details?

Yes  No 

Form completed by (Name) ______

Company name ______

Please give address if different from the address on the front Address:

Post Code: Tel No: Email:

On the (Date) ______

Thank you for your assistance.

Please return the completed Form by … to: Planning Policy, Ipswich Borough Council, Grafton House, 15-17 Russell Road, Ipswich, IP1 2DE

36 Summary of general representations Annex G

Consultee Support Comments Council response /Object Barton Willmore on behalf of Object Crest considers the level of brownfield land that could come We believe redevelopment on Crest Nicholson forward will be less that [sic] is currently predicted in the these sites will occur during the SHLAA as many of the site [sic] identified for development plan period as outlined in the between 2015 and 2020 are not developable. Having SHLAA. Many of the sites reviewed the SHLAA we have particular concerns over a identified for delivery in this time number of sites in the IP-One Area and in the Rest of the period are in flood zone 3 and we Borough that will be delivered between years 6 and 10. The believe that these will be SHLAA in our analysis is too optimistic about the developable after the flood barrier development that can come forward in the IP-One area of is completed. Ipswich, particularly between 2015 and 2020. We do not consider that many of the sites which are in flood zone 3 are not [sic] a suitable location for housing and this could be the case even after the flood barrier is in place. Also many brownfield sites are still in alternative uses and have been for many years. We can see little justification in many cases for the SHLAA to conclude that many of these sites can come forward between 2015 and 2020 particularly when many could have come forward as windfalls in the recent housing boom. Dave Robinson Object The final version of the core strategy, which has just been The SHLAA updates the Ipswich published, has introduced a significant change regarding Urban Capacity Study (2008) building on the Northern Fringe without detailed which informed the Site justification. No supporting documentation has been Allocations document. The produced to say why the situation has changed in just over a SHLAA assesses the year. The core strategy briefly refers to a Strategic Housing deliverability/developability of

37 Land Availability Assessment (SLHAA) [sic]. This sites and identifies additional sites supporting document is only now out for consultation and including those on greenfield appears to have repeated the process that produced the initial land. A number of sites identified Site Allocations document. However, the SLHAA [sic] have in the Site Allocations document significantly watered down many of the proposed sites in and the IP-One Area Action Plan terms of density and availability. Why has the situation are no longer deliverable and changed? therefore should not be considered as part of the potential housing land supply. David Lock Associates on behalf Object Overall we would like to reiterate our concern that the timing The Ipswich Urban Capacity of Mersea Homes and validity of the SHLAA risks to undermine the robustness Study (2008) informed the and soundness of the emerging LDF. We are concerned that Preferred Options of the LDF and relevant DPDs will not have been adequately informed by the SHLAA updates this study the SHLAA. The SHLAA draft report, subject to this further assessing the consultation, has obviously failed to comply with the deliverability/developability of guidance at least in one instance. The land west of sites, and identifying additional Westerfield Road (IP181) is currently being promoted for sites including those on greenfield development and a planning application for a residential-led land. The site needs to be scheme was submitted with the clear intention to deliver the considered as part of a broad scheme within the first five years. Despite this evidence, location and therefore however, the site is only scheduled for development in the infrastructure associated within medium term. We strongly object to this timescale as our the development would mean client has provided sufficient evidence to prove that the site delivery with the second five year can be delivered early on. Furthermore, we question that phase of the plan period. The sites are being scheduled for early delivery that are neither summary of the key points raised available nor achievable for various reasons. By doing so the at the stakeholder workshop is an Authority has failed its own methodology. Having taken part accurate reflection of the main in the Stakeholder Workshop we would like to highlight that issues raised at the meeting. A the key points listed in Appendix D are only a small planning permission can lapse but selection. Further important points that were raised and had this does not mean the landowner

38 consensus at the meeting have been ignored. We would like does not have any intention to to object to the inclusion of sites being deliverable in the 1st develop the site within five years. period where planning permission has expired. Without a The fact that planning permission detailed analysis of the reasons why permission has lapsed was sought indicated a there is a high risk to include sites that are not actually willingness to consider the site for achievable or available for various reasons, thereby residential development. jeopardising the soundness of the SHLAA and subsequently the housing delivery strategy. East of England Regional Support Consultation document does not raise conformity issues Noted. Assembly against policies in the East of England Plan. The strong focus on the principles of sustainable development during the site assessment and evaluation is supported. Environment Agency Object For any site that falls within Flood Zone 2 and 3, a Flood Noted. Each site in Flood Zone 2 Risk Assessment (FRA) will be required accompanying any and 3 will be subject to a Flood planning application. In addition a FRA will also be required Risk Assessment at the time of for any site that is over one hectare in size. Any dwelling any planning application. houses in Flood Zone 3b will be objected in principle. Houses in Flood Zone 3a may be acceptable. This is subject to the provision that the submitted FRA has demonstrated the development will be safe. Any development that falls within 9 metres from the bank of a main river or designated flood defence will require a Flood Defence Consent. GVA Grimley on behalf of Support The SHLAA Guidance (CLG, 2007) provides the framework Noted. The SHLAA has met this Gainsborough Retail Park Limited against which to assess the Draft SHLAA. It defines the criteria. – In Administration purpose of a SHLAA which is to identify sites with potential for housing, to assess the yield of these and assess whether they are likely to be developed. It encourages local planning authorities to consider as many sites with housing potential both in and around settlements as possible. A SHLAA is also

39 required to assess the deliverability and developability of all sites. Part of such an assessment is to identify sites with the potential for housing development based upon suitability (in terms of being in a suitable location that will contribute to the creation of sustainable, mixed communities), availability and achievability. Ipswich Labour Group Object We generally support the site allocations as amended over Noted. Site-specific comments are the past 18 months, subject to further amendments. noted in the table below. JB Planning Associates on behalf Object The SHLAA serves to demonstrate that there is currently The SHLAA has been informed of Barratt Strategic neither a 10 year nor 15 year supply of deliverable sites. We by discussions with agents, do not accept the SHLAA figures of around 2,000 units for developers and landowners and IP-One and 1,400 for the rest of the Borough. Although a we believe the sites identified number of undeliverable/unsuitable sites have been removed with housing potential in the from the SHLAA since our previous representations, the SHLAA are deliverable and SHLAA continues to include a number of inappropriate and developable within the plan undeliverable sites in both the IP-One area and the remainder period. of the Borough. Our estimate of achievable capacity (based on our analysis of sites at the Preferred Options stage) within both areas is circa 2,500 units, which if found to be correct, reveals an even larger shortfall in the 10 year land supply. We believe that the Council’s SHLAA is unrealistic. We do not believe the sites included within the Council’s SHLAA are likely to deliver the volume of housing which is required, or at the rate which the Council have anticipated. Mr Barry Reeve Object The final version of the core strategy, which has just been The SHLAA updates the Ipswich published, has introduced a significant change regarding Urban Capacity Study (2008) building on the Northern Fringe without detailed which informed the Site justification. No supporting documentation has been Allocations document. The produced to say why the situation has changed in just over a SHLAA assesses the

40 year. The core strategy briefly refers to a Strategic Housing deliverability/developability of Land Availability Assessment (SLHAA) [sic]. This sites and identifies additional sites supporting document is only now out for consultation and including those on greenfield appears to have repeated the process that produced the initial land. A number of sites identified Site Allocations document. However, the SLHAA [sic] have in the Site Allocations document significantly watered down many of the proposed sites in and the IP-One Area Action Plan terms of density and availability. Why has the situation are no longer deliverable and changed? therefore should not be considered as part of the potential housing land supply.

Mrs Barbara Robinson Object The final version of the core strategy, which has just been The SHLAA updates the Ipswich published, has introduced a significant change regarding Urban Capacity Study (2008) building on the Northern Fringe without detailed which informed the Site justification. No supporting documentation has been Allocations document. The produced to say why the situation has changed in just over a SHLAA assesses the year. The core strategy briefly refers to a Strategic Housing deliverability/developability of Land Availability Assessment (SLHAA) [sic]. This sites and identifies additional sites supporting document is only now out for consultation and including those on greenfield appears to have repeated the process that produced the initial land. A number of sites identified Site Allocations document. However, the SLHAA [sic] have in the Site Allocations document significantly watered down many of the proposed sites in and the IP-One Area Action Plan terms of density and availability. Why has the situation are no longer deliverable and changed? therefore should not be considered as part of the potential housing land supply. Suffolk Primary Care Trust Support Support the approach taken. Noted. The Coal Authority Support No specific comments to make at this stage. Noted.

41 Westerfield Parish Council Object The final version of the core strategy, which has just been The SHLAA updates the Ipswich published, has introduced a significant change regarding Urban Capacity Study (2008) building on the Northern Fringe without detailed which informed the Site justification. No supporting documentation has been Allocations document. The produced to say why the situation has changed in just over a SHLAA assesses the year. The core strategy briefly refers to a Strategic Housing deliverability/developability of Land Availability Assessment (SLHAA) [sic]. This sites and identifies additional sites supporting document is only now out for consultation and including those on greenfield appears to have repeated the process that produced the initial land. A number of sites identified Site Allocations document. However, the SLHAA [sic] have in the Site Allocations document significantly watered down many of the proposed sites in and the IP-One Area Action Plan terms of density and availability. Why has the situation are no longer deliverable and changed? therefore should not be considered as part of the potential housing land supply.

42 Summary of site-specific representations

Consultee Support Site Comments Council response /Object Ref. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP001 Site should be identified as student accommodation in the Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson SHLAA and not for market housing. student accommodation. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP002 The site should be identified for a doctors/employment in the Site is suitable for of Crest Nicholson SHLAA. housing development if planning permission is not implemented. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP003 The SHLAA should not identify the site for housing due to We believe of Crest Nicholson uncertainty over whether it is developable and the site should be redevelopment on this site used for employment. will occur during the plan period as outlined in the SHLAA. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP003 The site should be predominantly houses, and therefore lower The high-density is density than currently proposed. indicative and suitable in this regeneration area. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP004 The SHLAA should not identify the site for housing due to We believe of Crest Nicholson uncertainty over whether it is developable and the site should be redevelopment on this site used for employment. will occur during the plan period as outlined in the SHLAA. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP004 The site should be medium/high density housing and urge the The high-density is protection of the facade of the Bus Depot, an important referent indicative and suitable in in the industrial and social history of the town. this regeneration area. We would want to see retention of the tram shed and façade in any

43 redevelopment. Rapleys on behalf of Support IP005 Our client notes the preparation and publication of the SHLAA, This study is part of an Associated British Foods and that this is being used as part of the evidence base for the evidence base and production of the LDF. We trust that those sites identified in the inclusion of sites in this SHLAA will be included in the submission draft of the Site study does not guarantee Allocations DPD. they will be identified for development. However they will be considered in producing the submission draft of the IP-One Area Action Plan and Site Allocations DPDs. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP005 Site is adjacent to a conservation area. The site could be an Noted. Amended site of Crest Nicholson accessible and high profile employment site for a range of uses. sheet to read adjacent to To be allocated for housing in the five year housing supply more conservation area. The certainty will be required over deliverability. We understand the site is available now and developer is looking at a residential scheme with community the landowner is uses and playing fields (in conjunction with IP032). We promoting the site for a therefore consider that it is likely some 100 homes will be housing allocation. delivered on the site 005 in the LDF period between 2010 and 2015. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP006 SHLAA states that redevelopment for 28 homes is the preferred Open space will be of Crest Nicholson option. We understand that the Co-op is likely to relocate. The considered at the time of site must accommodate 10% open space. Note the SHLAA any planning application. conclusion of 28 units. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP007 SHLAA states that redevelopment for 18 homes is the preferred Viability of the site would of Crest Nicholson option. Developing the site for 18 dwellings is considered need to be assessed at the unviable, as 18 dwellings will not generate sufficient funds to time of any planning ensure development of the site. The SHLAA should not identify application and there may

44 the site for 18 homes. be a need to increase the housing numbers on the site. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP008 We support the SHLAA conclusion of open space. No change. of Crest Nicholson Ipswich Labour Group Support IP008 The site should be retained for open space. This has been No change. accepted by the administration and we call for its retention. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP009 The SHLAA states that there is capacity for 14 dwellings. The No change. of Crest Nicholson site will, in all likelihood, come forward for residential use between 2015 and 2020 given the site history. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP010a With the owner of the eastern part of the sites having the No change. of Crest Nicholson & intention of seeking residential development on part of their land IP010b we estimate that 150 dwellings could come forward here. With the school taking up about 1 hectare of the Co-op site about 0.75 hectares will be left giving about 35 dwellings. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP010a We feel the suggested lower density of 103 is much more The housing numbers & appropriate for this site. suggested are 185 IP010b dwellings across the two sites. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP011a IP011a has planning consent for 124 units of student housing. Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson The SHLAA should not identify the site for housing. student accommodation. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP011b The SHLAA does not justify why there is a reasonable prospect We believe of Crest Nicholson that the site is available for housing or whether the delivery of redevelopment on this site housing this is achievable at the point envisaged. We do not see will occur during the plan how the Council can reasonably justify that the site is likely to period as outlined in the come forward between 2015 and 2020. The SHLAA should not SHLAA. identify the site for housing due to questions over whether the site is developable.

45 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP012 The SHLAA should identify the site for student accommodation Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson and not market housing, as there is no certainty that the site will student accommodation. be available for market housing or that any student planning permission will allow the delivery of market housing to be achievable on the site. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP013 Difficulty in accommodating Core Strategy Policy Area 22, Open space will be of Crest Nicholson open space requirements of 10% open space not including considered at the time of gardens. Student housing or low density housing would be most any planning application. appropriate as high density housing would adversely affect the The SHLAA is residential amenity and the amenity of Alexandra Park. We note suggesting medium- the SHLAA conclusion that 5 dwellings will come forward. density housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP014 The residential property values in the area make development on It is anticipated that of Crest Nicholson the site between 2010 and 2015 unlikely. The SHLAA should housing delivery would state that 23 homes will come forward between 2015 and 2020 occur towards the end of as the owners have stated that the site will be available and they the first five years. wish to relocate. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP015 The site should be retained as a car park due to the importance The SHLAA is proposing of Crest Nicholson of its location serving the nearby council offices and railway 20% housing station. We consider that to develop the site for 20% of housing development as part of a will not provide an acceptable residential environment given the larger redevelopment surrounding land uses and that the development should not alongside site IP083 that include housing. The SHLAA should not allocate the site for could include new car housing and it should remain in car parking or employment uses. parking, employment and riverside walk. The site is opposite new residential development and which is easily accessible by a footbridge.

46 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP016 We are pleased to see that the SHLAA now states that because Noted. of Crest Nicholson of the constraints of the site that 34 dwellings are appropriate. William and Mileva Object IP016 We would like to express our concern at the proposal to build 34 There are tree Donachie homes on the site of the Funeral Directors, Suffolk Road. This preservation orders on the space seems far too small for such a number of dwellings – site. The slope is especially if they are primarily going to be more than one identified as a constraint bedroom. We were under the impression that the trees on this along with access. Any site were protected and are concerned that they may well be cut planning application down or severely cut back. The amount of slope and the would need to consider changing levels of the land are significant and we wonder how traffic generation. stable the land is. In addition, we are particularly concerned about vehicular access to and from the site for 34 homes, which could easily mean 64 cars. Suffolk Road is already very congested, as people living there clearly have to park their own vehicles on the road. This means there is room for only one car to pass up or down the street. The same is true for Hervey Street. On many occasions we have had to reverse quite long distances to allow a vehicle to pass, as due to the hill and the bend, it is not possible to see if the single lane available is clear to the top of the road. The proposed housing will severely compromise quality of life for people living on Suffolk Road and Hervey Street to an unacceptable degree. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP017 The site could come forward for development, given the The SHLAA does not of Crest Nicholson surrounding land use and that for a builder’s yard it is relatively include any housing in its poorly located, however the Council identifies that the multiple appraisal on this site but ownerships on the site will delay delivery and have not does make a suggestion of identified when the site will come forward. We there consider housing should the site be that no housing should be forecast from the site due to the deliverable as the site is uncertainty of delivery. suitable for housing.

47 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP018 The site should be retained in its current use and should not be We believe of Crest Nicholson allocated for housing due to uncertainty over the delivery of the redevelopment on this site site that first requires the existing business to relocate. The will occur during the plan importance of such established business uses in providing a period as outlined in the sustainable settlement and the difficulty of accurately SHLAA. forecasting the redevelopment of the site should be recognised. We do not consider that the SHLAA adequately justifies that there is a reasonable prospect of the site coming forward for housing between 2015 and 2020 when it has been in commercial uses for over 35 years and when there are multiple occupiers on the site. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: Employment.

Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP019 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site will deliver no No change. of Crest Nicholson housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP020a The SHLAA should recognise that the site could only deliver 6 No change. of Crest Nicholson dwellings (IP020a). Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP020b There needs to be clarity over the need to retain the water We believe of Crest Nicholson infrastructure on the northern part of the site before the land is redevelopment on this site deemed available for housing development. The SHLAA should will occur during the plan recognise that the site could only deliver 6 dwellings (IP020a). period as outlined in the SHLAA. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP021 The site has an implemented planning permission for 5 No change. of Crest Nicholson dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP022 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site has an No change. of Crest Nicholson implemented planning permission for 6 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP023 Retain as a fire station. The site should not be allocated in the No change. of Crest Nicholson LDF for redevelopment due to the uncertainty over delivery of alternative uses on the site. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be allocated for housing.

48 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP024 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be No change. of Crest Nicholson allocated for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP025 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site has an No change. of Crest Nicholson implemented planning permission for 7 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP026 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be No change. of Crest Nicholson allocated for housing and is currently in use and gypsy and traveller accommodation. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP027 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is suitable for No change. of Crest Nicholson housing however the poor access is a significant constraint. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP028a The SHLAA should identify the site for 14 dwellings. No change. of Crest Nicholson Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP028b Should the existing use relocate the most appropriate occupier 20% of the site is of Crest Nicholson would be for retention as employment or redevelopment for suggested for residential leisure. Residential use would be at risk of flooding and an development and the site allocation should not be made until the necessary work has been opposite is recent undertaken to show that the site can be delivered. The SHLAA residential development. should not identify the site for housing as there is not a reasonable prospect that the delivery of housing is achievable or that the site is available. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP029 The Council’s SHLAA does not justify why there is a The site is in the of Crest Nicholson reasonable prospect that the development of 50% of the site for ownership of the Borough housing will happen between 2015 and 2020. The site is most Council and following suitable for retention as employment due to the adverse impact adoption of the LDF, we that the A14 would have on the living conditions of occupiers of believe the site may come the residential properties. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: forward for housing. Employment use. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP030 Development of greenfield land in the Borough should take No change. of Crest Nicholson place in a comprehensive manner and should not include relatively small sites such as this on their own. We support the

49 SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be allocated for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP031 Possible 70 homes could come forward on the vacant Co-op part The SHLAA of Crest Nicholson of the site. The delivery of the site for residential use is uncertain acknowledges that due to the willingness of landowners and flood risk. The redevelopment of the SHLAA should not identify the site for housing and there is not remainder of the site a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for housing. would be dependent upon the relocation of existing businesses and the 81 homes suggested is an indicative capacity. The likely delivery timescale is 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP031 Given the character of housing in this location [2- to 4-storey The site occupies a terraces, generally] the density should be medium. We should be prominent waterside looking for houses and not high-density apartments, which position and high-density would be completely out of place in this location. can mean 4-storey. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP032 Site is adjacent to a conservation area. The site could be an No change. of Crest Nicholson accessible and high profile employment site for a range of uses. To be allocated for housing in the five year housing supply more certainty will be required over deliverability. We understand the developer is looking at a residential scheme with community uses and playing fields (in conjunction with IP005). We therefore consider that it is likely some 62 homes will be delivered on the site 032 in the LDF period between 2010 and 2015. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP032 We continue to oppose the use of this site for housing. This The landowner is prominent site at the western entrance to the town should be promoting residential

50 retained wholly as open space. development. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP033 Residential development is likely as the site is available and There is a need for a large of Crest Nicholson deliverable with a developer promoting the land, and is likely to area of open space in this be developed at greater housing numbers than proposed by the area of the town. Council given the precedent of recent neighbouring development. Recommend SHLAA conclusion 125 dwellings. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP033 The new proposal raises the proportion of land for housing from The landowner is 20% as originally proposed to 50%. This is in an area classified proposing a much higher in the 1997 Local Plan as 'deficient in open space'. The proportion than 50%. proportion should therefore remain 20% housing maximum. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP034 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be No change. of Crest Nicholson developed for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP035 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site should not be No change. of Crest Nicholson allocated for housing due to the mixed use planning consent on the site. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP036a The site has been purchased by the University College [sic] Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson Suffolk and is proposed by them to be developed for a range of student accommodation. uses including education, student accommodation and housing. There is an objection from the Environment Agency against high-density housing.

Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP036b The site has been purchased by the University College [sic] The site is available for of Crest Nicholson Suffolk and is proposed by them to be developed for a range of development and we uses including education, student accommodation and housing. believe that market There is an objection from the Environment Agency against housing may be high-density housing. developed in years 6-10. Associated British Ports, Object IP037 We find the indicative capacity disappointing and, in our Viability of the site would owner and operator of the opinion, insufficient to allow the economic delivery of the site need to be assessed at the Port of Ipswich within the plan period for the alternative use. The site area is time of any planning

51 stated as 6.02 hectares, and its indicative capacity as 331 homes. application. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP037 The need to provide a second access to the site to enable The landowner believes of Crest Nicholson delivery for housing is a major practical and financial constraint residential development is to development on the site. The viability of residential suitable on the site, and at development is questionable; the site holds significant value to a greater number than the owners, the development constraints, and the requirement for suggested in the SHLAA. 40% affordable housing will make it unlikely that development will come forward. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: employment application. Environment Agency Object IP037 We have concerns regarding the suitability of housing at this Flood risk would have to location. At present the island site is lower than surrounding be addressed at the time land on the opposite bank. Therefore in a flood event this would of any planning be one of the first places to experience flooding. This will application for continue to be the situation after the Ipswich Tidal Barrier development. scheme has been implemented. The scheme has been designed so part of the Island site will pass flood water into the wet dock, used as a storage area in a flood event. Any development on the Island site will have to carefully and concisely look at the effect of off-site flooding in a town-wide basis. Safe access/egress away from the development may be a major issue. We are not saying that housing is unachievable at this location, but demonstrating that the site will be safe may be a major obstacle to overcome.

Ipswich Labour Group Object IP037 We are very strongly opposed to the allocation of the Island site High-density housing will for yet more apartment blocks: the views of the newly be necessary to ensure the regenerated Waterfront will be immeasurably damaged by high- viability of any residential rise buildings in this important location. We maintain our view development. that the majority of this site should be allocated for leisure/open

52 space, with a maximum of 20% for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP038 Due to the recent planning approval we consider that the site is No change. of Crest Nicholson likely to come forward for 351 dwellings as set out in the SHLAA as the main occupiers are expected to leave shortly. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP039 Given the allocation for mixed use development in 2001 the Given the changing of Crest Nicholson viability of the development must be questionable. The flood nature of the area risk will be a further significant development constraint and the surrounding the site, we employment is valuable to meet the RSS employment targets. believe that a residential We do not consider that there is sufficient value in residential led mixed use scheme can development on the site to develop it between 2010 and 2015. be delivered towards the Recommend SHLAA conclusion employment use. end of the first five years from adoption of the plan. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP040 Development on the site is considered likely to be delivered in No change. of Crest Nicholson the next five years. Support SHLAA conclusion of 11 units. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP041 We do not consider that the Police Station can be allocated due We believe of Crest Nicholson to the uncertainty over the relocation. The SHLAA identifies redevelopment on this site potential for a mixed housing/employment scheme (with 29 new will occur during the plan homes). The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a period as outlined in the reasonable prospect that the site will be available for housing. SHLAA. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP042 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP043 The SHLAA does not make it clear why the development of 105 The landowner is seeking of Crest Nicholson or fewer units on the site will be viable and why the site is redevelopment on this site available and suitable to deliver housing and that this is and therefore we believe achievable. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a housing can be delivered reasonable prospect that the site will be available for housing. within five years from adoption of the plan. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP044 The viability of a residential scheme should be investigated by The SHLAA is of Crest Nicholson the Council as it may not be viable for housing to form part of suggesting 20% of the

53 the redevelopment. Since the site is in flood zone 3, we consider site for housing as part of that it should be retained as an existing car park or developed for a mixed use development. employment. Recommend SHLAA conclusion that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site is available for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP045 Due to the value of employment uses on the site residential We believe of Crest Nicholson development may not be viable within the plan period. In view redevelopment on this site of the employment targets set out in RSS14, the sustainable will occur during the plan location of this employment site and the fact that it is operating period as outlined in the very successfully as evidenced by the occupancy rate, the site SHLAA. should be retained in its existing use. Evidence of recent lettings for 10 years would mean that if allocated for redevelopment in the LDF delivery of the redevelopment could not be forecast with enough certainty to be sure that the site would be delivered. Due to the age of the buildings, redevelopment is unlikely to be viable and residential in this location will be constrained given the flood risk. Recommend SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP046 Support SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for No change. of Crest Nicholson residential development. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP047 The location within the flood plain makes the site difficult to The SHLAA is of Crest Nicholson develop for housing as a safe access will be required. If the suggesting 20% of the flooding issues can be overcome the site is in an appropriate site for housing as part of location for commercial and retail uses. Recommend SHLAA a mixed use development. conclusion employment use. A planning application is pending for a retail-led scheme with residential.

54 Ipswich Society Object IP047 Though we accept that this site is suitable for housing The SHLAA assesses development, we think that it would be more appropriately housing potential and a utilised for class A office development either in multiple use or planning application is for one large company. This would fit with the constraints and pending for a retail-led would be deliverable. scheme with residential. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP048 The Council’s SHLAA does not justify why there is a We believe of Crest Nicholson reasonable prospect that the development of 20% of site for redevelopment on this site housing will happen between 2015 and 2020. The will occur during the plan redevelopment of this land has been talked about for 30 years, period as outlined in the what reasonable likelihood is there is little to provide confidence SHLAA. that the site will come forward in the next 10 years. Due to the uncertainty of housing delivery on the site due to multiple landownership’s the site is not allocated for housing in the LDF. Recommend SHLAA conclusion that housing will not be delivered on the site between 2015 and 2020. Christ Church Object IP048 The boundary of the Mint Quarter should be adjusted to exclude Site boundary has been the graveyard, school room block and church house, all of which amended, and indicative form part of the curtilage of the church and are fully used in the capacity has been reduced operation of this busy church. to 64 homes. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP048 Given the history of this site, we cannot see that housing will be Noted. ‘deliverable’ on this site before 2015. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP049 Residential location in this location is contrary to current flood A planning application of Crest Nicholson policy. Flooding issues may be able to be overcome on this site has been received for a with the provision of safe access and the tidal barrier, however mixed-use development delivery is not certain. Recommend SHLAA conclusion that the including 200 residential site not be allocated for housing due to uncertainty over the dwellings. The Applicant delivery. believes if planning permission is granted that development could be

55 built within five years. Indicative capacity changed to reflect current market aspirations. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP050 There are clear constraints to the development of housing on this The SHLAA is of Crest Nicholson site, namely flooding, and we consider that these issues should suggesting housing as be overcome before the site is identified for development. part of a mixed use Recommend SHLAA conclusion employment and boat park. development in years 6- 10 from adoption of the plan and after the flood defence barrier is scheduled for implementation. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP051 Most appropriate development option is a mixed use We believe of Crest Nicholson development, principally of leisure and sports related uses to redevelopment on this site build on the attraction of the football ground. This could contain will occur during the plan an element of housing if the serious flood risk issues can be period as outlined in the overcome. Given the significant flood risk there is considerable SHLAA. uncertainty over the deliverability of housing on this site. A small housing development on 20% of the site is likely to be of poor quality as it will not relate well to existing housing and will be surrounded by employment and leisure uses. Preferred SHLAA conclusion mixed leisure and employment development. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP052 The site has planning permission for 397 student homes. The Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson SHLAA states that this is equivalent to 132 dwellings but does student accommodation. not set out why this is the case. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: student housing.

56 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP053 Support SHLAA conclusion that the site is unavailable and not No change. of Crest Nicholson viable for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP054 The site is in multiple ownerships and contains several important No change. of Crest Nicholson employment sites however some including the Daily Times print works could be available, so part of the site could come forward for development. A number of landowners have made representations in the preferred options on this land promoting land for residential development. There is a likelihood that some development will come forward on this site outside flood zone 3, particularly to the north of the site. Support the SHLAA conclusion that 94 homes can come forward between 2010 and 2015. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP055 The site comprises a swimming pool complex and the town’s We believe of Crest Nicholson main multi storey car park. Both are important town centre redevelopment on this site facilities in sustainable locations close to the bus station. will occur during the plan Redeveloping the site would require their replacement elsewhere period as outlined in the and no site has been identified for the relocation, making the SHLAA. proposal to develop the site questionable in terms of viability and delivery. We would question the prospects of the swimming pool being redeveloped as it is currently being refurbished. The offices are predominantly let and in good condition. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP056 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is unavailable for The Council states that of Crest Nicholson development for housing. the site is not suitable for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP057 We note the SHLAA conclusion that as the site has planning No change. of Crest Nicholson permission for office development it is not available for housing. Anglian Water Object IP058 Would expect this site to be listed under ‘Sites not Suitable for This view needs to be Housing Development’ as it is within the 400 metre cordon balanced against the need sanitaire of a Sewage Treatment Works. for housing and an

57 individual planning application should be determined on its own merits. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP058 The site has a number of serious constraints to development, the A County Wildlife site in of Crest Nicholson nearby sewerage works will constrain housing development and the form of bee orchids the County Wildlife site designation could constrain any type of exists and the site sheet development. The fact that the site has not been developed for has been amended to housing and has no recent planning history raises questions over reflect this. SHLAA its delivery, and the Council must be certain about the suggests 50% low-density landownership position and the constraints to delivery that this housing on the site. imposes before allocating the site. Given that the site has been vacant for a considerable period promoting the site for a mix of uses will give the best chance of development taking place. Support SHLAA conclusion that 102 homes will be delivered between 2015 and 2020. GVA Grimley on behalf of Object IP058 We welcome that the Draft SHLAA has identified that a mix of The suggested option of Gainsborough Retail Park uses, including employment and housing, would be suitable for 50% low-density housing Limited – In Administration this site. The site is well located for housing. It is also both is an indicative one. If the ‘deliverable’ and ‘developable’ in accordance with the site comes forward for objectives and criteria of PPS3. We therefore think this site is development prior to suitable for both short and medium term allocation, rather than 2015 it would be just the period suggested by the Draft SHLAA of “6-10 years welcomed by the Council, from adoption of the plan”. The site allocation should be for a however the Council flexible, mixed use designation, to include employment uses and cannot be certain at this housing in proportions dependent upon viability, deliverable in time this will be the case. the short to medium term. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP059 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the planning application No change. of Crest Nicholson will deliver housing and the efforts of owners to gain planning

58 consent for housing over a period of time. We note the SHLAA conclusion that 130 homes will be provided between 2009 and 2014. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP060 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is in use and [sic] a No change. of Crest Nicholson business centre and is not available for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP061 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is required for a No change. of Crest Nicholson school. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP062 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for No change. of Crest Nicholson housing. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP062 No part of this site should be allocated for housing but retained No change. as allotments for the long-term benefit of local residents. It should be transferred to the 'Not deliverable' category. This has been accepted by the administration and we call for its retention. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP063 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for No change. of Crest Nicholson housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP064 The SHLAA seeks redevelopment for 52 dwellings. However, We believe of Crest Nicholson the site is an existing industrial estate and has employment uses redevelopment on this site to the west and open space to the east. The industrial estate is will occur during the plan largely occupied, is in multiple ownerships and occupation and period as outlined in the is viable. As such, redevelopment is unnecessary and unviable, SHLAA. and any development for housing would be inappropriate in the flood plain. The relocation of many of the existing uses to allow residential development is unlikely to be viable. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: retain for employment use. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP065 The site has been cleared of the former club building and the The Council is the of Crest Nicholson sports ground has fallen out of use. Nevertheless, Sport England landowner and supports has objected to the redevelopment of the site, without adequate the suggestion of housing replacement facilities elsewhere. Until a clear indication that the on the site. site is surplus to requirements delivery is uncertain and it is

59 unlikely that a redevelopment application will proceed without the relocation of the sports facilities elsewhere. Recommend SHLAA conclusion community uses/ open space. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP065 We would like to see a mix of housing and community use on No change. this site, and therefore propose a lower number of dwellings here. This has been accepted by the administration and we call for its retention. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP066 The proposed housing numbers are unviable to develop the site. We believe of Crest Nicholson The only access is currently from White Elm Street, through the redevelopment on this site industrial estate Bishops Hill being above the level of the main will occur during the plan part of the site. This site forms an integral part of the period as outlined in the employment area and redevelopment for residential use would SHLAA. create conflict with adjoining employment uses. Recommend SHLAA conclusion, retain employment use.

Anglian Water Object IP067 Would expect this site to be listed under 'Sites not Suitable for This view needs to be Housing Development' as it is within the 400 metre cordon balanced against the need sanitaire of a Sewage Treatment Works. for housing and an individual planning application should be determined on its own merits. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP067 A small housing development near to Pipers Vale would be No change. of Crest Nicholson appropriate. The landowner British Energy is promoting this. Note SHLAA conclusion of 37 dwellings between 2015 and 2020. Gerald Eve LLP on behalf Object IP067 The previous allocation was for 50% of the site to be allocated Anglian Water object to of British Energy PLC for housing and 50% for employment use, with an indicative housing development

60 capacity of 92 homes to be built at low density. The current within 400 metres of the allocation now identifies 20% of the site for housing and an sewage works and indicative capacity for 37 homes to be built at low density. therefore to mitigate the There has been no material change in circumstances following impact of the sewage the previous document of November 2007 and it is unclear why works, we believe a lower the suggested option has changed to now only allocate 20% of proportion of the site is the site for housing. The revised allocation states that the suitable. The SHLAA deliverability of housing on the site is not achievable. Given the does not allocate the site site is in single ownership these delivery concerns are not for housing and is an justified and it is clear that a significant level of both housing evidence base study. and employment could be delivered. The summary states that housing would need to be located to the north of the site furthest away from the sewage works which was an identified constraint. This concern can be overcome by an agreement to carry out opfalmetric testing on the site to assess the impact of the odour from the sewage works and confirm that other areas of the site are appropriate for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP068 Although the site benefits from extant planning permission for The site was granted of Crest Nicholson residential uses, the deliverability is questionable since the outline planning scheme has not been developed in the past four years and the permission and is located current planning permission will lapse in 2009. The present in area of change in the commercial use has reached a level that exceeds the residential town. The site is current value of the site. The site is at risk from flooding and will vacant. require a new safe access requiring strategic bund to deliver residential uses on the site raising questions over viability and deliverability. Part of site may be required for wet dock crossing. As such, we do not consider that this site should be allocated for housing and the existing used should be retained. The site is in a poor residential location and the most likely scenario is the continuation of the existing use or student

61 accommodation. Recommended SHLAA conclusion there is not a reasonable prospect that the site is available for housing or could be developed at the point envisaged. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP069 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is not available for No change. of Crest Nicholson housing. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP069 We oppose the allocation of the site for yet more apartments. It No change. is uniquely placed as a community facility, being the only town centre community space of its size in the town centre. It is our strong view that is should either be re-designated as 'Not deliverable' [and its continued community use confirmed] or not designated for high-density housing until an equivalent community facility has been allocated in the town centre as its replacement. This has been accepted by the administration and we call for its retention. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP070 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not appropriate No change. of Crest Nicholson for residential uses. Anglian Water Object IP072 Would expect this site to be listed under 'Sites not Suitable for This view needs to be Housing Development' as it is within the 400 metre cordon balanced against the need sanitaire of a Sewage Treatment Works. for housing and an individual planning application should be determined on its own merits. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP072 A small housing development has recently been built to the west We believe of Crest Nicholson of the site, at Pipers Vale Close and fronting Sandyhill Lane. redevelopment on this site However, development of uses other than employment uses at will occur during the plan this site would mean a loss of employment land. Recommend period as outlined in the SHLAA conclusion retain for employment use. SHLAA.

62 GVA Grimley on behalf of Object IP072 The site allocation should be for a flexible, mixed use The SHLAA looks at the Gainsborough Retail Park designation, to include employment uses and housing in housing potential and the Limited – In Administration proportions dependent upon viability. The SHLAA should site allocation would need expressly seek to optimise development density on all sites, to to be considered through make the 'best use of land', subject to design quality, mitigation production of the Site of environmental impacts and infrastructure capacity. Allocations DPD. Low- density housing is appropriate in this area of the town. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP073 If the site were to be redeveloped, it would be most suited to a The Council believes of Crest Nicholson low density residential uses. A medium density scheme in this medium-density housing location would be inappropriate as it could lead to overlooking is appropriate on this site and loss of privacy for the existing residential properties. at 45 dwellings per Recommend SHLAA conclusion low density housing for 48 hectare. dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP074 Note the SHLAA conclusion that the site has planning No change. of Crest Nicholson permission for 18 dwellings that could commence within 5 years. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP075 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not deliverable No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP076 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable Site is suitable for of Crest Nicholson for residential uses due to a poor environment including noise residential but not constraints. available. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP076 We question whether this site is suitable for 50% medium Site is suitable for density housing: there are serious access, traffic, and air quality residential but not issues on this site. We feel public open space is more available. appropriate, and support an imaginative plan for an Environment Centre, with premises for an education facility, a boating/canoe centre, and low-density affordable housing. This assessment has

63 been largely accepted by the administration, but we feel it is a site capable of use as 'Recreation/Open Space', as described above. Depending on access arrangements and careful design, we feel it is also possible for a small part of the site to be available for affordable housing. Associated British Ports, Object IP077 We were very disappointed to note that site IP077 - Drunken The site has now been owner and operator of the Docker area was considered a site not suitable for Housing divided into two and Port of Ipswich Development. We would further question this given its location would need to be at the head of the Wet Dock, by the lock gates and adjacent to reassessed in a future the proposed redevelopment of the existing Anglo Norden site. edition of the SHLAA. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP077 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is not suitable for Part of the site may be of Crest Nicholson residential use as it is more suitable for other uses and due to suitable for residential but constraints on the site. this would have to be assessed in a future edition of the SHLAA. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP078 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is more suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for non residential uses. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP079 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is more suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for non residential uses. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP080 Housing for 26 dwellings if 10% open space can be provided on Open space will be of Crest Nicholson site. considered at the time of any planning application. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP081 The Councils comments are confusing as to whether the site is The Council has spoken of Crest Nicholson available for housing or whether this is achievable. We do not with the landowner who see how the Council can reasonably justify that the site is likely supports the suggestion of to come forward between 2015 and 2020. The SHLAA should high-density housing in not identify the site for housing due to uncertainty over whether the future on this site. it is developable

64 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP082 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is more suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for non residential uses. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP083 The site is in flood zone 3 so development will be very difficult The SHLAA is proposing of Crest Nicholson for housing due to the need for safe access and development for 20% housing other uses may well be uneconomic due to the increased costs to development as part of a mitigate the flood riskThe Councils SHLAA does not justify larger redevelopment why there is a reasonable prospect that the development of the alongside site IP015 that site along with the site to the south for mixed use development is could include new car achievable at the point envisaged. We do not see how the parking and employment. Council can reasonably justify that the site is likely to come The site is opposite new forward between 2015 and 2020. The SHLAA should not residential development allocate the site for housing and it should remain for and which is easily employment uses. accessible by a footbridge. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP084 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site has planning No change. of Crest Nicholson permission for 79 dwellings that will be delivered in 5 years. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP085 We note the SHLAA conclusion of 14 dwellings on this site. No change. of Crest Nicholson Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP086 We support the SHLAA conclusion that this site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP087 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is not available for No change. of Crest Nicholson housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP088 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site has planning No change. of Crest Nicholson permission for 16 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP089 The site is in multiple ownerships and is used for parking. No change. of Crest Nicholson Despite being allocated for housing in 2001, no applications have come forward for a comprehensive residential proposal, suggesting that there may be ownership constraints preventing such development. The Co-op site could however deliver 34

65 dwellings. The remaining land is valuable car parking for nearby businesses so is unlikely to come forward. We support the SHLAA conclusion for 34 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP090 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site has planning Move to years 6-10 of Crest Nicholson permission for 142 dwellings. following correspondence with planning agent for the site. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP091 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site has development No change. of Crest Nicholson underway for 36 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP092 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is more suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for non residential uses. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP093 We note the SHLAA conclusion that this site is more suitable No change. Site is of Crest Nicholson for non residential uses and has planning permission for a care suitable for housing but home. not deliverable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP094 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the landowner prefers a No change. of Crest Nicholson non residential use. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP095 Since this site is currently occupied by an existing dwelling, we No change. Site is of Crest Nicholson consider that it is unsuitable for allocation since it is not suitable for housing but available now, and the presence of mature trees on the site not deliverable. would make any development difficult to achieve. We support the SHLAA recommendation that the site is not suitable for housing. Mr Ray Atkinson Support IP095 Further to previous correspondence indicating considerable No change. dissatisfaction with the consultation process in relation to a particular site allocation (viz.UC106 - Morpeth House 97-99 Lacey Street), I would like to congratulate the Council on the thoroughness of subsequent deliberations and documentation. I am especially pleased to note the explicit acceptance of the need to protect assets such as green corridors (even if not publicly

66 accessible - Policies Area 21 - p.259), the extra concerns for the protection of trees and hedgerows (DC10 - mentioned in App.5 - p.222), and that a number of sites including gardens are now confirmed as "not deliverable" and will not be carried forward into the final submission document (including site UC106-App.9 Chap.7 Table 1 p.283 refers). Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP096 The site is within flood zone three, and therefore would need to No change. The site has of Crest Nicholson be subject to a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and the temporary planning sequential approach should be applied. Therefore, we consider consent for a car park and that the best use for this site is most likely to be retention for the site is suitable for employment uses, with the adjoining site 002. Recommend housing. SHLAA conclusion: employment. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP097 This is the principle telephone exchange for the town as such We believe of Crest Nicholson complex infrastructure is routed to it. Millions of pounds of redevelopment on this site infrastructure will be on site both above and below ground. will occur during the plan Therefore it is highly unlikely to be available for development. period as outlined in the Since this site is in use and has high value infrastructure SHLAA. associated with it, we consider that it would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available nor realistically achievable or viable. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: No change from present use. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP098 The site is within flood zone three, and therefore would need to Landowner is seeking a of Crest Nicholson be subject to a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and the residential allocation. sequential approach should be applied. Therefore, we consider that the best use for this site is most likely to be retention for employment uses. Recommend SHLAA conclusion employment use. Firstplan on behalf of Object IP098 In calculating the indicative capacity of 63 homes on the site The 71 homes would only National Grid Property based on a density of 110dph the SHLAA has not included the be applicable if the

67 Holdings Ltd new full site area which equates to 0.64 ha. Rather it has been existing five dwellings incorrectly based on the smaller previous site area of 0.57 ha. were demolished. The calculation should be corrected to reflect the increased site Therefore for the area - which would equate to 71 homes. It is noted that in the purposes of the SHLAA "Constraints" section of the Site Sheet in addition to the we will acknowledge the indication that the site is within or close to an Air Quality option of 63 homes with Management Area is contaminated and is within a Flood Zone, the five dwellings present indicates that there are other constraints. However, these until more firm plans are constraints are not specified. As per the submissions made submitted. previously on behalf of NGPH, the identified constraints of the site can be appropriately dealt with and it is helpful that the "Summary" section of the document indicates that there are reasonable prospects these can be overcome. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP098 We question whether this is now deliverable, given a recent The agent for the refusal on safety grounds of an application for housing on an landowner believes the adjacent site. site is deliverable within five years. GVA Grimley on behalf of Object IP099 The Draft SHLAA notes that this site is not suitable for housing No change. Site is too Gainsborough Retail Park due to the proximity of the sewage works. If the adverse affects close to the sewage works Limited – In Administration to residential amenity caused by the sewage works could be for residential mitigated against, then the land would be suitable for housing on development. the same basis as set out in the response to the adjacent site (IP058) which is also part of the former Volvo site. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP100 Since the site is in existing residential use and is in multiple No change. of Crest Nicholson ownership, we consider that it would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. Support SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for housing.

68 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP101 This site has severe access constraints and is mostly in use as We believe of Crest Nicholson shared amenity space for the surrounding residential properties. redevelopment on this site Since this site is in existing residential amenity use and may be will occur during the plan in multiple ownership, we consider that it would be period as outlined in the inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither SHLAA. available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. Recommend SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP102 Since the site is in existing residential use and is in a No change. of Crest Nicholson considerable number of ownerships, we consider that it would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. Support SHLAA conclusion that the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP103 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not No change. of Crest Nicholson developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP104 This site is let at a good rent to a good covenant. There is not the We believe of Crest Nicholson slightest prospect that the indicative capacity of 15 homes would redevelopment on this site produce a value anywhere near existing so the allocation is not will occur during the plan viable. Recommend SHLAA conclusion, the site is not period as outlined in the developable. SHLAA. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP105 The site is a poor quality depot however it is in flood zone 3 so We believe of Crest Nicholson delivery of medium density housing is difficult and may not be redevelopment on this site viable. It would be necessary to demonstrate that the allocation will occur during the plan of the site would comply with a Sequential Flood Risk period as outlined in the Assessment, including the Sequential Approach to site selection. SHLAA. Recommend SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP106 The site has previously been subject to an application for No change. of Crest Nicholson redevelopment for housing, which was refused by the Council on access and flooding grounds. The surrounding land has had planning permission granted for residential development,

69 therefore, the earlier access and flooding issues would need to be overcome if development were to follow precedent in this location and proceed. We support the SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP107 Since this site is in multiple ownership, we consider that it No change. of Crest Nicholson would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term.

Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP108 The site is currently in commercial/employment use with no We believe of Crest Nicholson indication that the occupier intends to relocate or that the site redevelopment on this site will become available. The site is effectively at two levels so will occur during the plan redevelopment to accommodate 7 dwellings would be difficult. period as outlined in the Recommend SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. SHLAA. Patricia Chittick Object IP108 Vermont Crescent is an unmade up road and already not in good This would be considered condition. I would say that if any further houses are built which at the time of any would need to use the Crescent as a result of their position this planning application. would make the road unsafe. The Crescent is a private road and the up keep the responsibility of the residents. Should further houses be built which might need to use the road for access, as I said above the road might become unsafe and also unpassable even by the emergency services. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP109 Since this site already has planning permission, we consider that No change. of Crest Nicholson the capacity for this site should be based on the existing proposals. We note the SHLAA conclusion of 13 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP110 Residential development is a possibility, however, the site No change. of Crest Nicholson appears to be in at least two different ownerships, and comprises the house and garden of one property, and the garden of an

70 adjacent property. Therefore, any development brought forward on this site would require the loss of a large family property. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP111 Since this site is in use as a bowling club, we consider that it No change. of Crest Nicholson would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably deliverable in the long term. We support the SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP112 This site is occupied by the Plumb Centre and a carpet shop We believe of Crest Nicholson which have occupied the site for the last 4 years. The two sites redevelopment on this site are therefore very valuable in commercial uses and it is unlikely will occur during the plan that residential value will make development viable, making the period as outlined in the availability and deliverability of the site questionable. SHLAA. Recommend SHLAA conclusion, the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP113 The SHLAA suggests a mix of uses including 3 homes. Note the No change. of Crest Nicholson SHLAA conclusion of 3 dwellings. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP114 Since this site is in multiple ownership, we consider that it No change. of Crest Nicholson would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP115 There are serious issues over the delivery of the site due to No change. of Crest Nicholson multiple uses and access the site should not therefore be allocated. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP116 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site can deliver 350 No change. of Crest Nicholson homes between 2010 and 2015. Environment Agency Object IP116 The constraints listing for site IP116 states 'No' against 'Wildlife Noted and changed. site or adjacent to', which is incorrect. The constraints table for

71 this site overlooks earlier comments from Suffolk Wildlife Trust which stated that the adjacent St Clement's Golf Course is a Local Wildlife Site in Ipswich Wildlife Audit 2000, identified as suitable for a variety of birds and invertebrates. The site contributes to local biodiversity. Contains a mixture of oak woodland and grassland, and proximity to the railway line means it is part of a wildlife corridor. The scale and density of the proposed development at this site could have harmful impacts through disturbance to the habitats and species present at this wildlife site. This aspect has been overlooked. Ipswich Labour Group Object IP116 We support the reduction in housing numbers on this site. We No change. are pleased that the numbers are reduced to 350 but our preferred option is for 300. Kevin and Ann Matthews Object IP116 The site has been split into two for the purposes of the It is intended that the golf development framework plan. Whilst this may suit the planning course site is kept as open process, it nevertheless undermines a key aspect of the site space. The St Clement’s appraisal. As a combined site, the area of St Clements exceeds Hospital Grounds site that of Christchurch Park and also of Holywells Park. It is offers the opportunity to disappointing that the site is ear-marked for early development. deliver family housing in In our view, important sites should only be considered when less the town. important options are exhausted. There are demands in the overall planning process that rightly consider provision of sites that promote good health and sport. Development of St Clements is at odds with these aspirations. The site is currently in use for sports and could easily be adapted to further health and sport provision e.g. woodland walks, provision of a children's play area. Although the site is classified as a brown site, the site is predominantly a mix of green field and woodland. There are a considerable number of buildings of dubious

72 condition that could be easy removed to facilitate the creation of an important Park area.

Lawson Planning Object IP116 The Trust welcomes the recognition of the St Clement's Hospital The site boundary has Partnership on behalf of Site as having the potential to accommodate 350 homes. been amended. Suffolk Mental Health However, the Trust objects to the misrepresentation of the site Partnership NHS Trust with regard to the site boundary. The plan for the St Clement's site within the current SHLAA does not accurately reflect the development potential of the site. Areas that need to be retained for health care are shown as part of the land for redevelopment and vice versa. R.B. Bartlett Object IP116 Although the Indication Capacity of Homes proposed for this The density suggested is site is rated at 350, the lower of two options prepared by the low and in line with consultants Lawson Planning Partnership Ltd., I consider this family housing currently figure to be too high in respect of density of housing in relation delivered in the town. to the surrounding area; access for and consequent increased flow of traffic on the minor road at peak hours; availability of public transport and school places. I therefore call for this figure to be reduced. I also strongly oppose any public access to the site from Chilton Road or the footpath to the rear of Temple Road. The Kesgrave Covenant Ltd Object IP116 The owners of St Clement's Golf Course are this company and a At the time of any charity, (The Charity). The Charity is very concerned that it planning application appears that the northern part of St Clement's site will be neighbouring landowners considered without reference to the southern golf course part. It will be consulted. is suggested that the future of the whole of the St Clement's site should be considered as the single entity it has always been, providing much needed housing in an outstanding location in relation to the town centre and Ipswich Hospital.

73 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP117 Since this site is in multiple ownership, we consider that it No change. of Crest Nicholson would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP118 We note the SHLAA conclusion that 3 dwellings will come No change. of Crest Nicholson forward and the development has been implemented. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP119 We understand the Council own the site. The site is occupied by Noted. Site sheet of Crest Nicholson 4 apparently businesses, Cooper BMW, Builder Centre, amended to read ‘Not Cattermoles Garage and Car Glass and Trim. The site is within suitable for housing 60 metres of high voltage overhead transmission lines with the development’. problems that this creates in respect of Department of Health Advice. The site is within flood zone three, and therefore would need to be subject to a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and the sequential approach should be properly applied. Therefore, we consider that the residential planning uses may not be the most appropriate use for the site. Particularly as residential development has been ruled out to the north due to noise. Recommend SHLAA conclusion: employment. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP120 The site is occupied by Jaguar and Cooper on 25 year leases Cooper is relocating from of Crest Nicholson with at least ten years to run. These existing uses hold the site. Likely delivery significant value raising questions over the viability of the timescale for housing is in development. This site is located in flood zone three, and is the SHLAA as years 6- actually surrounded by the river both to the east and the west. As 10. such, the site would need to be subject to a Strategic Flood Risk Assessment and the sequential approach should be applied. The viability of redevelopment for housing is questionable, since several of the established businesses have recently invested in new modern buildings at the site. Retention of commercial uses

74 is therefore more appropriate. Recommended SHLAA conclusion employment use. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP121 The levels across the site and the Anglian Water equipment will We believe of Crest Nicholson make development difficult. The existing/proposed kiosks over redevelopment on this site the boreholes may make development of this site difficult as the will occur during the plan site may be unavailable for development due to its use by period as outlined in the Anglian Water and the need to relocate equipment. SHLAA. Recommended SHLAA conclusion the site is not developable. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP122 The site comprises the rear gardens of two residential properties, No change. of Crest Nicholson which front Ramsey Close and Wigmore Close. Delivery is uncertain and for this reason no allocation should be made. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP123 A housing scheme in this location may not be viable if the No change. of Crest Nicholson existing use is to be retained on part of the site. The housing element will be isolated in an area dominated by commercial uses and roads making it a poor location in respect of residential amenity. We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP124 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP125 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP126 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Ipswich Labour Group Support IP126 We are pleased that the proposal to allocate this site for housing No change. has been reversed. We support its current use as a community resource, and call for its retention.

75 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP127a We support the SHLAA conclusion that 3 dwellings will come No change. of Crest Nicholson forward.

Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP127b Ownership constraints are likely to make redevelopment of 127b No change. of Crest Nicholson difficult. The deliverability of this site and the viability is seriously questioned and we consider that the most appropriate option would be not to allocate the site. Since this site is in multiple ownership, we consider that it would be inappropriate for allocation as housing, as the site is neither available now, nor reasonably achievable in the long term. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP128 Site 128 has planning permission for 48 dwellings. Note the No change. of Crest Nicholson SHLAA conclusion that 48 dwellings will come forward. Bretons Object IP128 The site indicated is less than that given planning permission The site boundary has although the indicative capacity is fine. been amended. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP129 Site 129 is fully occupational and there are complications with We believe of Crest Nicholson releasing BT land for development due to the cost of relocating redevelopment on this site expensive telecommunications infrastructure and relocating the will occur during the plan different telecoms operators that now have the ability to use BT period as outlined in the buildings. We understand that leases on the building have SHLAA. something in the order of 16 years to run. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP130 We note the SHLAA conclusion that 12 dwellings will come No change. of Crest Nicholson forward. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP131 We note the SHLAA conclusion that 34 dwellings will come No change. of Crest Nicholson forward. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP132 We note the SHLAA conclusion for 62 dwellings. Changed to 64 dwellings of Crest Nicholson in line with the planning permission. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP133 We note the SHLAA conclusion for 47 dwellings. No change. of Crest Nicholson

76 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP134 Due to the uncertainty of delivery we do not consider that the No change. of Crest Nicholson site should be allocated. We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP135 We note the SHLAA conclusion of 24 dwellings. No change. of Crest Nicholson Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP136 The most recent application does not propose any residential at We believe residential of Crest Nicholson this site, therefore it seems the developers are no longer could be delivered on this promoting residential development on this site. As such, it is site as part of a mixed use likely that this site will be unavailable for residential scheme. development in the near future. Recommend SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP137 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for residential development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP138 The site is occupied by empty offices and any residential No change. of Crest Nicholson development would lack adequate amenity space, therefore we consider that the most appropriate use would be for the site to remain in employment use. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for residential development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP139 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. We believe of Crest Nicholson for residential development. the site is not suitable for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP140 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for No change. We believe of Crest Nicholson residential development. the site is not suitable for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP141 The site has good access to the A14 and to public transport. No change. of Crest Nicholson There are a number of existing employment and retail uses nearby. This site could therefore be an accessible and high profile employment site suitable for a range of uses. We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available for residential

77 development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP142 We note the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available as No change. of Crest Nicholson it is required for a school and support the conclusion that the site is not deliverable for development. Anglian Water Object IP143 Noted that site IP143 is also within 400m of the STW. Expect This view needs to be site to be listed under 'Sites not Suitable for Housing balanced against the need Development' as within the 400 metre cordon sanitaire of a for housing and an Sewage Treatment Works. individual planning application should be determined on its own merits. This site is not available for residential development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP143 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. GVA Grimley on behalf of Support IP143 We note that the Draft SHLAA concludes that housing would No change. Gainsborough Retail Park not be deliverable on this site because "the landowner has Limited - In Administration pursued non-residential uses". We can confirm that the site has extant planning permission for retail use and it is intended that the site should be developed and occupied accordingly, either pursuant to the existing consent or pursuant to a new, improved retail consent tailored to market demand. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP144 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP145 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not No change. of Crest Nicholson deliverable for development and the site is allocated for open space. Kevin and Ann Matthews Object IP145 The site has been split into two for the purposes of the It is intended that the golf development framework plan. Whilst this may suit the planning course site is kept as open

78 process, it nevertheless undermines a key aspect of the site space. The St Clement’s appraisal. As a combined site, the area of St Clements exceeds Hospital Grounds site that of Christchurch Park and also of Holywells Park. It is offers the opportunity to disappointing that the site is ear-marked for early development. deliver family housing in In our view, important sites should only be considered when less the town. important options are exhausted. There are demands in the overall planning process that rightly consider provision of sites that promote good health and sport. Development of St Clements is at odds with these aspirations. The site is currently in use for sports and could easily be adapted to further health and sport provision e.g. woodland walks, provision of a children's play area. Although the site is classified as a brown site, the site is predominantly a mix of green field and woodland. There are a considerable number of buildings of dubious condition that could be easy removed to facilitate the creation of an important Park area. The Kesgrave Covenant Ltd Object IP145 Agree that the site is suitable and available for housing (limited Should the golf club no amount). The site is both a suitable and attractive location for longer be required, the housing development, and the owners, this company and a Council will seek to re- charity, (The Charity), are able to confirm that there are no legal evaluate the site. The or ownership constraints. Disagree that the site is not achievable. SHLAA says the site is There is every prospect that limited housing can be developed suitable for a small on an appropriate part(s) of the site during the second five year element of specialist period of the 15 year Plan period. This should take place in housing although this is conjunction with the planned housing development on the dependent upon the northern part of the whole St Clement's site. Now that the relocation of the golf development of the northern part of the whole St Clement's club. Hospital site (which includes the golf course) is being considered, continuing provision of these facilities, without which the golf course could not operate, are in question.

79 Furthermore, the building of housing adjacent to the golf course may remove one of the nine holes and is likely to result in real problems between the housing and the golf uses. Thus there is a major possibility that the golf course will become operationally unviable. conclusion, there are no insurmountable constraints preventing the delivery and development of the site. In addition the proposal to provide the combined development of the proposed public open space with a modest amount of housing would comply with the overall aims of PPG17; which seeks to maintain an adequate supply of public open space and states that wherever possible the aim should be to achieve qualitative improvements to open spaces, sports and recreation facilities. The proposed housing will act as an enabling development to secure the provision and laying out of the public open space. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP146 The site has good access to the A14 and to public transport. No change. of Crest Nicholson There are a number of existing employment and retail uses nearby. This site could therefore be an accessible and high profile employment site suitable for a range of uses. We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not deliverable for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP147 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development due to the importance of the existing use. Network Rail Support IP147 The current programme for the 'Bacon Chord' is for consultation No change. and detailed design work to take place through 2010 with the intention of submitting either a draft Transport and Works Order or application for Development Consent to the Infrastructure Planning Commission, as appropriate, in October/November 2010. Subject to the necessary consents being granted it is hoped

80 to start work on site in the late spring of 2012 with a completion by spring 2014. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP148 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP149 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP150 Note SHLAA conclusion that 166 dwellings will be delivered Changed to 155 dwellings of Crest Nicholson between 2009 and 2012. in line with the planning permission. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP151 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for residential development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP152 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP153 We agree with the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not No change. of Crest Nicholson suitable for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP154 This site is in use as a Fitness First and Staples, with car parking, We believe of Crest Nicholson these uses hold significant value. The site is therefore redevelopment on this site unavailable for redevelopment without the relocation of these will occur during the plan units in the near future. It is by no means obvious how housing period as outlined in the could then take up 50%. The car parking ratios on the site will SHLAA. be held under lease and will be required to maintain the viability of existing uses. The site is therefore not deliverable with certainty in the plan period. The risk of flooding seriously prejudices residential development on this site. There is significant uncertainty with the delivery of this redevelopment. Recommended SHLAA conclusion not available for housing development Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP155 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development.

81 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP156 The site should not be identified for 51 houses in the SHLAA as Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson the planning consent for student accommodation restricts the student accommodation. permission to this use. There is therefore no certainty that the site is available for market housing in the first five years of the plan. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for market housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP157 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not No change. of Crest Nicholson deliverable for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP158 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson and deliverable for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP159 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not suitable No change. of Crest Nicholson for housing development. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP161 Note SHLAA conclusion of 13 dwellings to be delivered No change. of Crest Nicholson between 2009 and 2014. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP162 Note Planning permission implemented and site completed. No change. of Crest Nicholson Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP163 Note SHLAA conclusion of 34 dwellings between 2009 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2014 with the implementation of the existing consent. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP164 The site has planning permission for 76 dwellings. The SHLAA Noted and site sheet of Crest Nicholson states that the current figure is likely to be reduced as the amended to ‘Not development is not viable and suggests 43 dwellings will come deliverable’ as we believe forward between 2009 and 2014. The SHLAA does not make alternative uses are clear why the development of 33 fewer units on the site will be preferred. viable and why the site is available and suitable to deliver housing and that this is achievable. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for housing.

82 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP165 The site has an expired planning permission for 218 dwellings. We expect 100 dwellings of Crest Nicholson The SHLAA states that the current figure is likely to be reduced may come forward from as the development is not viable and suggests 135 dwellings will discussions with the come forward between 2009 and 2014. The SHLAA does not landowner and the site make clear why the development of 83 fewer units on the site sheet has been amended will be viable and why the site is available and suitable to to reflect this. deliver housing and that this is achievable. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for housing until the viability is resolved. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP166 Note SHLAA conclusion that Planning permission is No change. of Crest Nicholson implemented for 24 dwellings and site is completed. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP167 Note SHLAA conclusion of 39 dwellings between 2009 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2014. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP168 Note SHLAA conclusion that 48 dwellings will be delivered Changed to 51 dwellings of Crest Nicholson between 2008 and 2010 as the development is being and 2010 completion date implemented. changed to 2013. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP169 Note SHLAA conclusion of 10 dwellings between 2009 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2014. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP170 Note Planning permission implemented and site completed. No change. of Crest Nicholson Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP172 The site should not be identified for 17 houses in the SHLAA as Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson the planning consent for student accommodation restricts the student accommodation. permission to this use. There is therefore no certainty that the site is available for market housing in the first five years of the plan. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for market housing.

83 Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP173 Note SHLAA conclusion of 13 dwellings between 2009 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2010. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP174 The SHLAA states that this site has potential for 14 dwellings. The site had planning of Crest Nicholson Although the site benefits from extant planning permission for permission for residential residential uses, the deliverability is questionable since the and prior to expiry was scheme has not been developed since planning permission was expected towards end of granted and the current planning permission has lapsed. The site first five years. A new is not in a good location for housing being close to the town permission could be centre. As such, we do not consider that this site should be forthcoming when market allocated for housing and the existing used should be retained. improves. The site is in a poor residential location and the most likely scenario is the continuation of the existing use or student accommodation. Recommended SHLAA conclusion there is not a reasonable prospect that the site is available for housing or could be developed at the point envisaged. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP175 Note SHLAA conclusion that 12 dwellings will be delivered No change. of Crest Nicholson between 2009 and 2014 with the implementation of the existing consent. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP176 Note SHLAA conclusion that 14 dwellings will be delivered No change. of Crest Nicholson between 2009 and 2014 with the implementation of the existing consent. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP177 The SHLAA provides no justification why the site will deliver 6 The site had planning of Crest Nicholson dwellings between 2009 and 2014 given that the existing permission for residential consent has not been implemented in a period of high house and prior to expiry was prices. To suggest in the SHLAA that housing development will expected towards end of take place the Council must be clear that there are not first five years. A new constraints that have prevented the implementation of the old permission could be planning permission. Recommended SHLAA conclusion there is forthcoming when market not a reasonable prospect that the site is available for housing or improves.

84 could be developed at the point envisaged. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP178 The site should not be identified for 31 market houses in the Noted and amended to of Crest Nicholson SHLAA as the planning consent for student accommodation student accommodation. restricts the permission to this use. There is therefore no certainty that the site is available for market housing in the first five years of the plan. The SHLAA conclusion should be that there is not a reasonable prospect that the site will be available for market housing. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP179 Site 179 is located west of Henley Road and north of the The site was identified as of Crest Nicholson existing urban edge either side of Thurleston Lane. The site is on an option for housing the south side of an attractive valley and has strong visual development at the issues connections with the rural landscape to the north. The site is and options stage of the remote from the town centre, and there is little scope for creating LDF. There are interested links into the existing urban area adjacent to the site, other than parties actively promoting via Henley Road. For these reasons the site is not considered part of the site. The suitable for development. Recommended SHLAA conclusion SHLAA identifies sites the site is not suitable for housing development. with potential for housing of which this is one. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP180 In respect of the constraints listed in the SHLAA these can be Possible contamination is of Crest Nicholson overcome when development takes place on the site. It is identified as the existing possible to create an access to the site from Henley Road that use is agricultural. It is would be linked to a park and ride and a high quality bus service noted that the agent for into the town. There is no contamination on the site that would the landowner states there prevent development of the site for housing. The existing use of is no contamination that the land is not a constraint to development. Any recreation or would prevent housing open space value of the site would be enhanced through the development. We believe development. We consider that development of the site is the development of the therefore achievable. site would not be achievable within five

85 years due to the infrastructure requirements needed in this broad location. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP181 Note SHLAA conclusion of 1122 dwellings between 2015 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2020. Ipswich Society Object IP181 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP182 Note SHLAA conclusion of 1242 dwellings between 2015 and Noted. of Crest Nicholson 2020. Ipswich Society Object IP182 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP183 Site 183 is located to the west of the Tuddenham Road and is The site was identified as of Crest Nicholson bounded to the north by the Ipswich-Lowestoft railway. And to an option for housing the west by the Felixstowe branch line. The Millennium development at the issues cemetery lies to the south. The site is remote from the existing and options stage of the urban area and the presence of the cemetery and the Felixstowe LDF. The SHLAA branch line between the site and the existing urban edge would identifies sites with prevent satisfactory integration between any development and potential for housing of the existing town. For these reasons the site is not considered which this is one. suitable for development. Ipswich Society Object IP183 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place.

86 Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP184 Site 184 is located approximately 300 metres east of Tuddenham The site could potentially of Crest Nicholson Road and lies on the north side of Humber Doucy Lane. It is accommodate housing remote from the town centre and is poorly connected to the which is the purpose of facilities in the town. It is much smaller than the other sites and the SHLAA and is is therefore unlikely to be able to accommodate the scale of available. development that will be required to ensure that appropriate facilities are provided. Ipswich Society Object IP184 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place. The Kesgrave Covenant Ltd Object IP184 Agree and Support - that the site is suitable and available for 50% of the site has been housing. Query - that only 50% of the site is to be developed for identified for housing as housing, particularly as the preferred density (which is the site is peripheral to supported) is low. Disagree - that the site is not achievable. the built-up area and Perhaps not immediately, but the suggested delivery timescale of infrastructure constraints April 2015 - March 2020 is supported and deliverable, as this exist. Possible will give sufficient time for any perceived infrastructure contamination is constraints to be resolved. The site has been in agricultural use identified as the existing for centuries and contamination is not likely. use is agricultural. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP185 Note SHLAA conclusion of 339 dwellings between 2015 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2020. Ipswich Society Object IP185 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP186 Note SHLAA conclusion of 41 dwellings between 2015 and No change. of Crest Nicholson 2020.

87 Ipswich Society Object IP186 We would reiterate your comments in the summary section of Noted. these six sites (IP181-IP186 inclusive) but would wish to make clear our absolute opposition to any development without master planning being in place. Barton Willmore on behalf Support IP187 We support the SHLAA conclusion that the site is not available No change. of Crest Nicholson for development. Barton Willmore on behalf Object IP188 The viability of the development must be questionable. The The site is promoted by of Crest Nicholson flood risk will be a further significant development constraint the agent for the and the employment is valuable to meet the RSS employment landowner as suitable for targets. We do not consider that there is sufficient value in a housing allocation. residential development on the site to develop it between 2010 and 2015. Recommended SHLAA conclusion employment use.

88 List of Sites Annex H

Sites with planning permission, recently expired or recently implemented planning permissions for housing development

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP020a Water Tower 0.41 6 IP021 Randwell Close 0.24 5 IP022 Foxhall Road 0.17 6 IP025 Former Garages, Recreation Way 0.19 7 IP028a Land West of Greyfriars Road 0.06 14 IP038 Land between Vernon Street & Stoke Quay 1.43 351 IP040 Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive 0.73 11 IP043 Commercial Buildings & Jewish Burial Ground, Star 0.66 106 Ln IP059 Elton Park Industrial Estate 6.61 130 IP068 Truck and Car Co 0.22 14 IP074 Church and land at Upper Orwell Street 0.31 18 IP084 County Hall, St Helen’s Street 0.84 79 IP085 345 Woodbridge Road 0.38 14 IP088 79 Cauldwell Hall Road 0.30 16 IP090 Europa Way 1.43 142 IP091 Drive 0.63 36 IP109 R/O Jupiter Road & Reading Road 0.42 13 IP118 Rear of 76-108 Victoria Street 0.21 3 IP127a 15-39a Bucklesham Road 0.14 3 IP128 Former Driving Test Centre, Woodbridge Road 0.62 48 IP130 South of South Street 0.22 12 IP131 488-496 Woodbridge Road 0.37 34 IP132 Bridge Street, Northern Quays (west) 0.18 64 IP133 South of Felaw Street 0.41 47 IP135 112-116 Bramford Road 0.17 24 IP150 Land south of Ravenswood 34.78 155 IP161 2 Park Road 0.35 13 IP162 52 Belstead Road 0.23 9 IP163 Rear of 411-417 Bramford Road 0.75 34 IP165 Eastway Business Park, Europa Way 2.08 100 IP166 Former Reservoir, Spring Road 0.25 24 IP167 11 St Georges Street 0.17 39 IP168 Stoke Park Drive 2.45 51 IP169 23-25 Burrell Road 0.08 10 IP172 15-19 St Margaret’s Green 0.08 17 IP173 36-48 St Helen’s Street 0.06 13 IP174 12 Tacket Street 0.04 14 IP175 47-51 Waveney Road 0.15 12 IP176 7-9 Woodbridge Road 0.05 14 IP177 Lock-up Garages rear of 16-30 Richmond Road 0.13 6 Total 1714

89 IP-One Area Period 1 (Years 1-5)

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP014 Orwell Church 0.21 23 IP039 Land between Vernon Street & Stoke Quay 1.09 96 IP047 Land at Commercial Road 4.59 101 IP049 No 8 Shed, Orwell Quay 0.76 200 IP054 Land between Old Cattle Market & Star Lane 1.71 94 IP080 240 Wherstead Road 0.49 26 IP096 Car Park Handford Road East 0.22 10 IP098 Transco, south of Patteson Road 0.64 63 IP188 Websters Saleyard site, Dock Street 0.11 10 Total 623

IP-One Area Period 2 (Years 6-10)

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP003 Waste tip north of Sir Alf Ramsey Way 1.57 173 IP004 Bus depot, Sir Alf Ramsey Way 1.07 59 IP006 Co-op Warehouse, Paul’s Road 0.63 28 IP007 Ranelagh School 0.50 18 IP011b Smart Street, Foundation Street 0.69 61 IP015 West End Road Surface Car Park 1.22 27 IP028b Land West of Greyfriars Road () 0.97 21 IP031 Burrell Road 0.74 81 IP036b Shed 7 0.79 65 IP037 Island Site 6.02 331 IP041 Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive 0.52 29 IP044 Land South of Mather Way 0.78 17 IP045 Holywells Road West / Toller Road 2.06 113 IP048 Mint Quarter 3.08 68 IP050 Land West of New Cut 0.46 25 IP051 Old Cattle Market, Portman Road – South 1.85 41 IP055 Crown House etc., Crown Street 2.61 57 IP064 Holywells Road East 2.29 52 IP081 Land North of Ranelagh Road 0.36 32 IP083 Banks of river, upriver from Princes Street 0.76 17 IP089 Waterworks Street 0.31 34 IP120 Land West of West End Road 1.03 46 IP136 Silo, College Street 0.16 21 IP154 Russell Road 1.01 56 Total 1472

90 Rest of Borough Period 1 (Years 1-5)

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP005 Former Tooks Bakery, Old Norwich Road 2.80 100 IP010a Co-op Depot, Felixstowe Road 3.88 110 IP016 Funeral Directors, Suffolk Road 1.04 34 IP029 Land opposite 674-734 Bramford Road 2.26 51 IP032 King George V Field, Old Norwich Road 3.54 62 IP033 Land at Bramford Road (Stocks site) 2.03 46 IP065 Former 405 Club, Bader Close 3.22 87 IP073 Thomas Wolsey Special School, Old Norwich Road 1.38 62 IP116 St Clement’s Hospital Grounds 12.57 350 Total 902

Rest of Borough Period 2 (Years 6-10)

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP009 Victoria Nurseries, Westerfield Road 0.39 14 IP010b Felixstowe Road 2.79 75 IP013 Hill House Road 0.10 5 IP018 Deben Road 0.36 16 IP020b Water Tower, Park Road 1.20 42 IP058 Raeburn Road South / Sandy Hill Lane 5.85 102 IP066 JJ Wilson, White Elm Street 0.22 10 IP067 Former British Energy Site 5.25 37 IP072 Cocksedge Engineering, Sandy Hill Lane 0.63 22 IP097 Telephone Exchange, Portman Road 0.53 24 IP101 Rear of Stratford Road & Cedarcroft Road 0.20 9 IP104 301-305 Norwich Road 0.66 15 IP105 Depot, Beaconsfield Road 0.34 15 IP108 Builders Yard, Vermont Crescent 0.20 7 IP112 2 & 4 Derby Road 0.49 22 IP113 The Railway PH, Foxhall Road 0.34 3 IP121 Front of pumping station, Belstead Road 0.60 27 IP129 BT Depot, Woodbridge Road 1.07 48 Total 493

91 Rest of Borough Period 2 (Years 6-10) as part of broad location (Years 11-15)

Site Site Name Site Size Indicative Ref (ha) Capacity (Homes) IP179 Land surrounding Thurleston Lane (part of option 32.10 562 A) IP180 Land to east of Henley Road north of Railway 75.69 2044 Line (part of option B) IP181 Land west of Westerfield Road (part of option C) 41.57 1122 IP182 Land to the east of Westerfield Road (part of 59.16 1242 option D) IP183 Land north of Millennium Cemetery (part of 21.95 384 option E) IP184 Land adjacent to Humber Doucy Lane (part of 12.94 226 option F) IP185 Ipswich School Playing Field (part of option C) 12.55 339 IP186 Land opposite 289-299 Henley Road 1.50 41 Total 5960

Sites for Student Accommodation

Site Ref Site Name Site Indicative Size Capacity (ha) (Homes) IP001 Land between 81-97 Fore Street 0.12 5 IP011a Smart Street, Foundation Street 0.16 0 IP012 Peter’s Ice Cream 0.32 68 IP036a Shed 7 1.13 152 IP052 Land between Lower Orwell Street & Star Lane 0.40 26 IP156 Land between Star Lane & College St east of Slade St 0.24 51 IP172 15-19 St Margaret’s Green 0.08 17 IP178 Island House, Duke Street 0.09 31 Total 350

Sites Not Deliverable

Site Ref Site Name Site Reason Size (ha) IP002 Handford Road East 0.46 Alternative use preferred IP008 All Weather Area, Halifax Road 0.78 Site not available IP017 Land West of Handford Cut 0.49 Site not available IP019 153-159 Valley Road 0.25 Permission implemented IP023 Fire Station, Colchester Road 1.21 Existing use IP024 Mallard Way Garages 0.14 Poor access IP026 163 & 165 Henniker Road 0.16 Existing use IP027 Widgeon Close Garages 0.10 Poor access IP030 Land at Humber Doucy Lane 2.48 Drainage IP035 Key Street / Star Lane / Burtons Site 0.54 Alternative use preferred IP046 Wolsey Street 0.26 Site not available IP053 Orwell Retail Park, Ranelagh Road 3.61 Site not available

92 IP057 Princes Street / New Cardinal Street 0.42 Alternative use preferred IP060 Fison House, Princes Street 0.35 Existing use IP061 School site, Lavenham Road 1.08 Alternative use preferred IP062 London Road Allotments 1.55 Site not available IP063 London Road Allotments 0.73 Site not available IP069 Land between Cobbold St & 0.19 Site not available Woodbridge Rd IP071 St Edmund House, Rope Walk 0.43 Existing use IP075 Playing fields, Victory Road 0.43 Alternative use preferred IP076 Land at Yarmouth Road 0.78 Site not available IP082 83/85 Dales Road 0.57 Existing use IP093 Chantry Close, London Road 0.41 Alternative use preferred IP094 Rear of Grafton House, Russell Road 0.31 Alternative use preferred IP095 Morpeth House, 97-99 Lacey Street 0.31 Site not available IP100 6-24 Defoe Road 0.20 Site not available IP102 Henniker Road (R/O 668-730 0.36 Site not available Bramford Road) IP103 32 Larchcroft Road 0.23 Site not available IP106 R/O Riverside Road / Bramford Road 0.34 Site not available IP107 R/O 601-655 Bramford Road 0.95 Site not available IP110 14 Crofton Road 0.26 Site not available IP111 Club, Newton Road 0.32 Existing use IP114 R/O Cauldwell Hall Rd & Kemball St 0.20 Poor access IP115 547 Foxhall Road & land to rear 0.37 Site not available IP117 R/O Allenby Road & Hadleigh Road 0.46 Poor access IP122 R/O 17-27 Ramsey Close (Wigmore 0.36 Site not available Close) IP123 Car Park, Crown St/Tower Ramparts 0.29 Site not available IP124 100 Clapgate Lane 0.32 Site not available IP125 Corner Hawke Road & Holbrook Road 0.25 Site not available IP126 251 Clapgate Lane 0.58 Site not available IP134 St Matthews Street 0.40 Alternative use preferred IP137 Running Buck PH, St Margaret’s Plain 0.15 Site not available IP138 235/255 Ranelagh Road 0.16 Site not available IP141 Cranes site 16.74 Alternative use preferred IP142 Duke Street 1.20 Alternative use preferred IP143 Former Norsk Hydro Site, Sandy Hill 6.55 Alternative use preferred Lane IP144 Wooded area and large verge, 2.11 Site not available Birkfield Drive IP145 St Clement’s Golf Course 13.15 Existing use IP148 Land south of A14 14.32 Site not available IP152 Airport Farm Kennels, north of A14 8.40 Alternative use preferred IP155 Halifax Road Sports Ground 4.67 Site not available IP157 Land fronting the northern quays of 0.40 Existing use the Waterfront eastern end IP158 Princes Street / Portman Road 0.29 Existing use IP164 Former Kennings, Duke Street 0.26 Alternative use preferred IP170 Currier’s Lane 0.09 Alternative use implemented IP187 Goods Vehicle Testing Station, 1.34 Existing use Landseer Road

93 Sites Not Suitable for Housing Development

Site Ref Site Name Site Reason Size (ha) IP034 578 Wherstead Road 0.64 Flood Risk IP042 Land between Cliff Quay & Landseer 3.78 Sewage Works proximity Road IP056 Russell Rd/ Princes St/ Chancery Rd 0.63 Poor location IP070 Orwell Quay 0.42 Not appropriate IP077a Drunken Docker area (north) 0.25 Existing use IP077b Drunken Docker area (south) 1.33 Existing use IP078 Land north of Whitton Sports Centre 0.85 Existing use IP079 Land south of Sewage Works 4.16 Sewage Works proximity IP086 Area north of Carr Street 0.78 Existing use IP087 Car Park off St Nicholas Street 0.17 Existing use IP092 427 Wherstead Road 0.29 Flood Risk IP099 Part former Volvo site, Raeburn Road 2.29 Sewage Works proximity south IP119 Land East of West End Road 0.93 Shape and location IP127b 15-39a Bucklesham Road 1.06 Sewer IP139 Royal Mail Sorting Office, 1.31 Poor location Commercial Road IP140 Land north of Whitton Lane 6.92 Noise IP146 Ransomes Europark (east) 16.69 Existing use IP147 Land between railway junction and 7.57 Noise Hadleigh Road IP149 Land at Pond Hall Farm, south of the 10.02 Access A14 IP151 Lister’s, Landseer Road 1.46 Hazardous substance proximity IP153 Car Park, Sir Alf Ramsey Way / 0.17 Overshadowed Portman Road IP159 30 Knightsdale Road 3.40 Existing use

94 Annex J

Site Sheets

95 SITE REF NO: IP001 (Preferred Options ref: UC001) ADDRESS: Land between 81-97 Fore Street SITE AREA: 0.12 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

5 (Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 58 student accommodation units. Achievable Yes Likely in the form of student accommodation as above.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that five student dwellings (58 student accommodation units) are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission for student accommodation and this is deliverable within five years from adoption of the plan SITE REF NO: IP002 (Preferred Options ref: UC002) ADDRESS: Handford Road East SITE AREA: 0.46 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Potential Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Planning permission for GP medical practice. Achievable No Alternative use preferred.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing and available but there is a current planning permission for a GP medical practice on the site. SITE REF NO: IP003 (Preferred Options ref: UC003) ADDRESS: Waste tip north of Sir Alf Ramsey Way SITE AREA: 1.57 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 173 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 110dph. Redevelopment would be dependent upon relocation of existing businesses and the waste tip. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP004 (Preferred Options ref: UC004) ADDRESS: Bus depot, Sir Alf Ramsey Way SITE AREA: 1.07 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 59 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 110dph. Redevelopment is dependent upon the relocation of the bus depot. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP005 (Preferred Options ref: UC005) ADDRESS: Former Tooks Bakery, Old Norwich Road SITE AREA: 2.80 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 M 100 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Vacant site as former bakery now demolished. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years of adoption of the plan. It is suggested that 80% of the site is delivered for medium-density housing at 45dph giving an indicative capacity of 100 homes, and that the site should be delivered in conjunction with the adjacent playing fields, site IP032. However delivery of the site is not dependent on IP032. SITE REF NO: IP006 (Preferred Options ref: UC006) ADDRESS: Coop Warehouse, Paul's Road SITE AREA: 0.63 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 28 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 45dph and there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the intentions of the current occupiers. Other constraints identified include noise from the railway line. SITE REF NO: IP007 (Preferred Options ref: UC007) ADDRESS: Ranelagh School SITE AREA: 0.69 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 18 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, including conversion of the school building, which is identified as an ‘other constraint’ above. An appropriate density would be around 35dph on 0.5ha of the site, although redevelopment would be dependent upon the relocation of the school and teachers’ centre. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP008 (Preferred Options ref: UC008) ADDRESS: All Weather Area, Halifax Road SITE AREA: 0.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Site Not Available

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for any housing development. SITE REF NO: IP009 (Preferred Options ref: UC009) ADDRESS: Victoria Nurseries, Westerfield Road SITE AREA: 0.39 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 14 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 35dph and there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP010a (Preferred Options ref: UC010) ADDRESS: Co-op Depot, Felixstowe Road SITE AREA: 3.88 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 110 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Car showrooms on the site are now vacant and landowner intends to develop. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years of adoption of the plan. It is suggested that around 60% of the site is delivered for medium-density housing at 45dph giving an indicative capacity of 110 homes on 2.45ha, while retaining other viable existing uses on the site. Other constraints identified on the site include the need to incorporate viable existing uses into any redevelopment and the noise from the railway line. SITE REF NO: IP010b (Preferred Options ref: UC010) ADDRESS: Felixstowe Road SITE AREA: 2.79 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 75 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 45dph, although redevelopment would be dependant upon the relocation of existing businesses. Other constraints identified include noise from the railway line. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP011a (Preferred Options ref: UC011) ADDRESS: Smart Street, Foundation Street SITE AREA: 0.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

(Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to Part within Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 124 student accommodation units. Achievable Yes Likely in the form of student accommodation as above.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 124 student accommodation units are deliverable within five years from adoption of the plan, although this particular development does not contribute to the total student dwelling delivery in terms of student dwelling numbers. SITE REF NO: IP011b (Preferred Options ref: UC011) ADDRESS: Smart Street, Foundation Street SITE AREA: 0.69 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 61 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to Part within Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 110dph. Redevelopment is dependent upon the relocation of the bus depot. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP012 (Preferred Options ref: UC012) ADDRESS: Peter's Ice Cream SITE AREA: 0.32 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

68 (Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has a resolution to grant planning permission for 397 student accommodation units. Achievable Yes Likely in the form of student accommodation as above.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 68 student dwellings (397 student accommodation units) are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission for student accommodation and this is deliverable within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP013 (Preferred Options ref: UC013) ADDRESS: Hill House Road SITE AREA: 0.10 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 5 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 45dph. Redevelopment is dependent upon the relocation of the existing business. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP014 (Preferred Options ref: UC014) ADDRESS: Orwell Church SITE AREA: 0.21 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 23 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Part within Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Although the site is currently in use, there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available for development within 1-5 years. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY We believe there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and housing could be delivered within five years of adoption of the plan. It is suggested that 100% of the site is delivered for high-density housing at 110dph giving an indicative capacity of 23 homes. SITE REF NO: IP015 (Preferred Options ref: UC015) ADDRESS: West End Road Surface Car Park SITE AREA: 1.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 27 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although should be considered alongside site IP083. Available No Existing economic use as a car park. Achievable No Would ideally be part of a larger redevelopment.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger redevelopment, which is dependent upon the provision of a new car park. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. It is suggested that 20% of the site is delivered for high-density housing at 110dph giving an indicative capacity of 27 homes. Any redevelopment on the site should also be considered alongside site IP083, Banks of the river, upriver from Princes Street. It should also be noted there is a medium pressure Transco pipeline through the site. SITE REF NO: IP016 (Preferred Options ref: UC016) ADDRESS: Funeral Directors, Suffolk Road SITE AREA: 1.04 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 34 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Yes Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Subject to relocation of existing businesses. Achievable Yes At a low density.

SUMMARY The site is available subject to relocation of existing businesses and it is considered that there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years of adoption of the plan. Other constraints identified include the site being within 250-metre buffer zone for the closed landfill site at Cemetery Road and the fact that the site is very undulating in nature. It is suggested that 100% of the site is delivered for low-density housing at 35dph giving an indicative capacity of 34 homes on 0.97ha of the site. SITE REF NO: IP017 (Preferred Options ref: UC017) ADDRESS: Land West of Handford Cut SITE AREA: 0.49 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site is in multiple ownership. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development but is currently in multiple ownership and it is less likely the site will be available within the first ten years of the plan. Should the site be deliverable we would suggest 100% medium-density housing, giving an indicative capacity of 22 homes. SITE REF NO: IP018 (Preferred Options ref: UC018) ADDRESS: Deben Road SITE AREA: 0.36 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 16 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to Nearby Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Yes Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time. Dependent upon relocation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development at around 45dph. Redevelopment is dependent upon the relocation of the existing businesses. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available and developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP019 (Preferred Options ref: UC019) ADDRESS: 153-159 Valley Road SITE AREA: 0.25 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Planning permission implemented

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for residential development on this site has been implemented. SITE REF NO: IP020a (Preferred Options ref: UC020) ADDRESS: Water Tower SITE AREA: 0.41 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

6 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 6 dwellings. Achievable Yes Likely in the form above.

SUMMARY This part of the site is available and it is considered that 6 dwellings are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission and this is deliverable within five years. SITE REF NO: IP020b (Preferred Options ref: UC020) ADDRESS: Water Tower, Park Road SITE AREA: 1.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 42 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development at around 35dph in line with recent development on the nearby site on Westerfield Road, reference IP009. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP021 (Preferred Options ref: UC021) ADDRESS: Randwell Close SITE AREA: 0.24 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 5 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for five dwellings has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP022 (Preferred Options ref: UC023) ADDRESS: 94 Foxhall Road SITE AREA: 0.17 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 6 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for six dwellings has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP023 (Preferred Options ref: UC024) ADDRESS: Fire Station, Colchester Road SITE AREA: 1.21 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Continued existing use as a fire station. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, however given the importance of the existing use as a fire station and that the site is unavailable, housing development is less likely within the first ten years of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP024 (Preferred Options ref: UC025) ADDRESS: Mallard Way Garages SITE AREA: 0.14 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Site is located within a residential area. Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Poor access is a significant constraint.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, however poor access is a significant constraint. SITE REF NO: IP025 (Preferred Options ref: UC026) ADDRESS: Former Garages, Recreation Way SITE AREA: 0.19 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 7 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for seven dwellings has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP026 (Preferred Options ref: UC027) ADDRESS: 163 & 165 Henniker Road SITE AREA: 0.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No In current use for Gypsy and Traveller accommodation. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, however the site is less likely to be available over the first ten years of the plan as it is in current use for Gypsy and Traveller accommodation. SITE REF NO: IP027 (Preferred Options ref: UC028) ADDRESS: Widgeon Close Garages SITE AREA: 0.10 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Site is located within a residential area. Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although garages currently in active use. Achievable No Poor access is a significant constraint.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, however poor access is a significant constraint. SITE REF NO: IP028a (Preferred Options ref: UC029) ADDRESS: Land West of Greyfriars Road SITE AREA: 0.06 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

14 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 14 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has a planning permission for 14 dwellings. The site is adjacent to a scheduled ancient monument however there is a reasonable prospect the site could be developed within 1-5 years of adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP028b (Preferred Options ref: UC029) ADDRESS: Land West of Greyfriars Road (Jewsons) SITE AREA: 0.97 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 21 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, dependent upon relocation of existing business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed use development, however redevelopment would be dependant upon the relocation of the existing business. 20% housing, giving an indicative capacity of 21 homes is suggested due to the close proximity to existing leisure uses and its impact on a scheduled ancient monument. However, there are noise constraints identified. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP029 (Preferred Options ref: UC030) ADDRESS: Land opposite 674-734 Bramford Road SITE AREA: 2.26 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 M 51 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Vacant scrubland. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and is available now. It is suggested that 50% of the site is delivered for medium-density housing at 45dph giving an indicative capacity of 51 homes, as there is the need to take into account the close proximity of the A14 and the main railway line. SITE REF NO: IP030 (Preferred Options ref: UC031) ADDRESS: Land at Humber Doucy Lane SITE AREA: 2.48 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although this is dependent on drainage constraints being overcome. Available Yes Current use is for agricultural purposes. Achievable No Drainage concerns and realistically most likely would come forward as part of a larger scheme.

SUMMARY The site may be suitable for housing development depending on concerns over drainage. If the site were to be suitable for housing development it realistically most likely would come forward as part of a larger scheme. SITE REF NO: IP031 (Preferred Options ref: UC032) ADDRESS: Burrell Road SITE AREA: 0.74 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 81 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Part Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time, although part of site dependent upon relocation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and part of the site is available now with a temporary consent for car parking. However redevelopment of the remainder of the site would be dependent upon the relocation of the existing businesses. There is a reasonable prospect the site either in part or in its entirety could be available and developed at a specific point in time, 6- 10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP032 (Preferred Options ref: UC033) ADDRESS: King George V Field, Old Norwich Road SITE AREA: 3.54 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 L 62 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site is available if alternative playing fields found in local area. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years of adoption of the plan, as long as alternative playing fields can be found in the local area. It is suggested that 50% of the site is delivered for low-density housing at 35dph giving an indicative capacity of 62 homes, and that the site should be delivered in conjunction with the adjacent former bakery site, reference IP005, although site IP005 could be delivered independently of this site. SITE REF NO: IP033 (Preferred Options ref: UC034) ADDRESS: Land at Bramford Road (Stocks site) SITE AREA: 2.03 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 M 46 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site is occasionally used for storage of fairground equipment. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within five years of adoption of the plan. It is suggested that 50% of the site is delivered for medium-density housing at 45dph giving an indicative capacity of 46 homes. The site is on a former landfill site and within a landfill consultation zone. An alternative site for travelling showpeople would also need to be found. SITE REF NO: IP034 (Preferred Options ref: UC035) ADDRESS: 578 Wherstead Road SITE AREA: 0.64 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Site is significantly constrained due to flood risk. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not considered suitable for housing development due to significant flood risk constraints. The site is also within a landfill consultation zone and noise issues are possible due to close proximity to the main railway line. SITE REF NO: IP035 (Preferred Options ref: UC036) ADDRESS: Key Street/Star Lane/Burtons Site SITE AREA: 0.54 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for mixed use development. Achievable No Planning permission does not including housing.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and available, although there is a current planning permission for mixed use development, which does not include housing. SITE REF NO: IP036a (Preferred Options ref: UC037) ADDRESS: Shed 7 SITE AREA: 1.13 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

152 (Student) Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 397 student accommodation units. Achievable Yes Under construction.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 152 student dwellings (397 student accommodation units) are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission for student accommodation, which is currently under construction and is deliverable within five years. SITE REF NO: IP036b (Preferred Options ref: UC037) ADDRESS: Shed 7 SITE AREA: 0.79 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 65 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and available. However, unless this part of the site is developed for student accommodation, we would expect the site to be delivered for housing development 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. We would suggest 50% of the site is suitable for high-density housing in the region of 165 dph, giving an indicative capacity of 65 homes. SITE REF NO: IP037 (Preferred Options ref: UC038) ADDRESS: Island Site SITE AREA: 6.02 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 331 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Nearby SPA Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although part of site dependent upon relocation of existing businesses or inclusion within a larger redevelopment of the site. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed use redevelopment. The site has significant constraints and redevelopment would be dependent on the intentions of existing businesses. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, in the latter part of 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP038 (Preferred Options ref: UC039) ADDRESS: Land between Vernon Street & Stoke Quay SITE AREA: 1.43 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

351 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 351 dwellings. Achievable Yes Development to occur within five years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 351 dwellings are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission within five years. SITE REF NO: IP039 (Preferred Options ref: UC040) ADDRESS: Land between Vernon Street & Stoke Quay SITE AREA: 1.09 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 96 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes There is a reasonable prospect site will be available for redevelopment within 1-5 years, although there are existing uses on the site at present. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY We believe there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and housing could be delivered on 80% of the site within five years of adoption of the plan. It is suggested that high- density housing is delivered on the site at 110dph giving an indicative capacity of 96 homes. SITE REF NO: IP040 (Preferred Options ref: UC041) ADDRESS: Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive SITE AREA: 0.73 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

11 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 11 dwellings. Achievable Yes Planning permission to be implemented.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 11 dwellings are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission for a retail-led development and is deliverable within five years. SITE REF NO: IP041 (Preferred Options ref: UC042) ADDRESS: Civic Centre Area / Civic Drive SITE AREA: 0.52 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 29 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although dependent upon relocation of the police station. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use redevelopment. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, in the latter part of 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon relocation of the police station. There are possible noise constraints for any future redevelopment. SITE REF NO: IP042 (Preferred Options ref: UC043) ADDRESS: Land between Cliff Quay and Landseer Road SITE AREA: 3.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Site is not suitable for housing development as too close to Cliff Quay. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is considered not suitable for housing development due to its close proximity to Cliff Quay. The site is also within a Hazardous Substance and Landfill site consultation zone. SITE REF NO: IP043 (Preferred Options ref: UC044) ADDRESS: Commercial Buildings and Jewish Burial Ground, Star Lane SITE AREA: 0.66 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 106 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 211 dwellings. Achievable Yes Although at a lower number than currently granted.

SUMMARY The site is available and it has an existing planning permission for 211 dwellings. However it is considered that in the current economic climate this figure will need to be reduced and therefore it is suggested that a figure of 106 dwellings at 200dph may be more appropriate. The landowner is seeking redevelopment on this site and therefore we believe housing can be delivered within years 1-5 from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP044 (Preferred Options ref: UC045) ADDRESS: Land South of Mather Way SITE AREA: 0.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 17 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development, although it may be necessary to retain part of the site for the boat park. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available at a specific point in time and it is suggested that 20% of the site could be developed for high-density housing at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 17 homes, which could be delivered 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP045 (Preferred Options ref: UC046) ADDRESS: Holywells Road West / Toller Road SITE AREA: 2.06 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 113 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time, although dependent on relocation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development, although any redevelopment is dependent upon relocation of existing businesses and it may have an impact on air quality if an increase of traffic into the AQMA. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available at a specific point in time and it is suggested that 50% of the site could be developed for high-density housing at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 113 homes, which could be delivered 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP046 (Preferred Options ref: UC047) ADDRESS: Wolsey Street SITE AREA: 0.26 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Only as part of a larger redevelopment. Available No Landowner has no intention to redevelop the site. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is only suitable for housing development if part of a larger redevelopment of the area. The site is constrained with potential drainage services under the ground. The site is presently unavailable. SITE REF NO: IP047 (Preferred Options ref: UC048) ADDRESS: Land at Commercial Road SITE AREA: 4.59 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 101 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Opposite Area of Archaeological Importance Part Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area Opposite TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Part of the site accommodates a vacant retail unit and car park. A planning application for a retail-led scheme with residential is pending consideration. Achievable Yes As part of a mixed use scheme, although dependent upon intentions of existing businesses. SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed use scheme. Part of the site is currently available and accommodates a large vacant retail unit and car park. Part of the site however is currently occupied by existing businesses, although we suggest the site as a whole could be a mix of uses accommodating some housing development at a high-density of 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 101 homes, deliverable within five years of adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP048 (Preferred Options ref: UC051) ADDRESS: Mint Quarter SITE AREA: 2.92 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 64 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The majority of the site is available and is currently used as a car park. Achievable No Housing only deliverable as part of a larger mixed used retail-led scheme.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed used retail-led scheme. The majority of the site is available now and is currently used as a surface car park. It is suggested that 20% of the site could be developed for housing at a high-density of 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 64 homes, and there is a reasonable prospect the site could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP049 (Preferred Options ref: UC052) ADDRESS: No 8 Shed, Orwell Quay SITE AREA: 0.76 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 200 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Planning application pending consideration for 200 dwellings. Achievable Yes Applicant believes should planning permission be granted that development could be built within five years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development. The site is available and a planning application has been submitted for a mixed use scheme including 200 dwellings. If approved, the applicant believes that development could be built within five years and as this application has been made recently in the current market, we believe an indicative capacity of 200 is more realistic than the previous 76. SITE REF NO: IP050 (Preferred Options ref: UC053) ADDRESS: Land West of New Cut SITE AREA: 0.46 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 25 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although suggest retention of boat park. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development and it is suggested to retain the boat park. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available at a specific point in time and it is suggested that 50% of the site could be developed for high-density housing at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 25 homes, which could be delivered 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP051 (Preferred Options ref: UC054) ADDRESS: Old Cattle Market, Portman Road - South SITE AREA: 1.85 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 41 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Although in current use as a car park. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed use scheme. It is suggested 20% of the site could be developed for housing at a high-density at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 41 homes, which could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP052 (Preferred Options ref: UC055) ADDRESS: Land between Lower Orwell Street & Star Lane SITE AREA: 0.40 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 132 (Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Planning application submitted for student accommodation. Achievable Yes If planning permission granted, reasonable prospect site will be developed within 1-5 years of adoption of the plan.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development. A planning application has been submitted for 397 student accommodation units, which would equate to 132 dwellings, and is currently being considered. If approved, there is a reasonable prospect the site will be developed within 1-5 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP053 (Preferred Options ref: UC056) ADDRESS: Orwell Retail Park, Ranelagh Road SITE AREA: 3.61 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Existing use value as a retail park and B class planning permissions Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development although it is in existing use as a retail park and the vacant units adjacent to the retail park have planning permissions for B class uses. Therefore the site is unavailable for housing. SITE REF NO: IP054 (Preferred Options ref: UC057) ADDRESS: Land between Old Cattle Market and Star Lane SITE AREA: 1.71 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 94 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Part of site available now. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be developed on available part of the site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use scheme. It is suggested 50% of the site could be developed for housing at a high-density at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 94 homes, and as the majority of the site is available now, there is a reasonable prospect housing could be developed within 1-5 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP055 (Preferred Options ref: UC058 & 72) ADDRESS: Crown House etc., Crown Street SITE AREA: 2.61 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 57 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Opposite Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although part of site dependent upon relocation or redevelopment of existing uses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger mixed use scheme. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available at a specific point in time, although part of the site is dependent upon relocation or redevelopment of existing uses. There is a reasonable prospect the site either in part or in its entirety will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP056 (Preferred Options ref: UC059) ADDRESS: Russell Road/Princes Street/Chancery Road SITE AREA: 0.63 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Site more appropriate for non-residential uses. Available No Value of existing use as a fire station. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is more suitable for non-residential uses. The site is currently unavailable for redevelopment and is in use as a fire station. SITE REF NO: IP057 (Preferred Options ref: UC060) ADDRESS: Princes Street/New Cardinal Street SITE AREA: 0.42 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site has planning permission for office development. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development although employment uses are more appropriate and the site has an existing planning permission for office development. SITE REF NO: IP058 (Preferred Options ref: UC061) ADDRESS: Raeburn Road South / Sandy Hill Lane SITE AREA: 5.85 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 L 102 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development on the area furthest away from the sewage works. A constraint identified is the odour from the sewage works. There is a possible impact on the AQMA around the gyratory if traffic feeds into this and the site is within Landfill consultation zone. There are also bee orchids on the site, which are designated a County Wildlife site. It is suggested 50% of the site is suitable for housing development at 35dph, giving an indicative capacity of 102 homes, and there is a reasonable prospect it could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP059 (Preferred Options ref: UC062) ADDRESS: Elton Park Industrial Estate SITE AREA: 6.61 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

M 130 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes West part of site has outline planning permission for 130 dwellings subject to section 106 being agreed. Achievable Yes Once section 106 agreed expect planning permission to be implemented within 1-5 years from adoption of the plan.

SUMMARY Part of the site is suitable for housing development and the west part has an outline planning permission for 130 dwellings subject to a section 106 being agreed. There is a reasonable prospect that housing will be delivered on site within five years. SITE REF NO: IP060 (Preferred Options ref: UC063) ADDRESS: Fison House, Princes Street SITE AREA: 0.35 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Existing employment use. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although is in current use as a business centre and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be available for housing development during the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP061 (Preferred Options ref: UC064) ADDRESS: School site, Lavenham Road SITE AREA: 1.08 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Preferred use for a new school. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development although is less likely to be available as the preferred use is for a new school. SITE REF NO: IP062 (Preferred Options ref: UC065) ADDRESS: London Road Allotments SITE AREA: 1.55 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Site Not Available

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Subject to drainage issues being resolved. Available No Site not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for housing development. SITE REF NO: IP063 (Preferred Options ref: UC066) ADDRESS: London Road Allotments SITE AREA: 0.73 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Site Not Available

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for housing development. SITE REF NO: IP064 (Preferred Options ref: UC067) ADDRESS: Holywells Road East SITE AREA: 2.29 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 M 52 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time, although dependent on relocation/rationalisation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development, although any redevelopment is dependent upon relocation or rationalisation of existing businesses and it may have an impact on air quality if an increase of traffic into the AQMA. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available at a specific point in time and it is suggested that 50% of the site could be developed for medium-density housing at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 52 homes, which could be delivered 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP065 (Preferred Options ref: UC068) ADDRESS: Former 405 Club, Bader Close SITE AREA: 3.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 87 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site is currently vacant. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing and is available now. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be developed within 1-5 years and it is suggest that 60% of the site is suitable for medium- density housing development at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 87 homes, and any redevelopment may need to include replacement playing pitches elsewhere in the Borough. Protected species (good slowworm and common lizard) have previously been identified on the site. SITE REF NO: IP066 (Preferred Options ref: UC069) ADDRESS: JJ Wilson, White Elm Street SITE AREA: 0.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 10 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Redevelopment would be dependent upon existing business relocating. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 6-10 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as long as this does not disrupt the current employment area. The site could be available if the existing business decides to relocate and if this occurs then there is a reasonable prospect the site could be developed within 6-10 years. SITE REF NO: IP067 (Preferred Options ref: UC070) ADDRESS: Former British Energy Site SITE AREA: 5.25 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 L 37 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site is currently vacant. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 6-10 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for an element of housing development as part of a larger mixed use scheme. Housing would need to be located to the north of the site furthest away from the sewage works, and odour from the sewage works is identified as a constraint. Part of the site is on a former landfill site and the whole of the site is within a Landfill consultation zone. There could be a possible impact upon an AQMA if traffic generated feeds into this. As long as constraints can be overcome, there is a reasonable prospect the site could be developed within 6-10 years. SITE REF NO: IP068 (Preferred Options ref: UC071) ADDRESS: Truck and Car Co SITE AREA: 0.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 14 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has outline planning permission for up to 14 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has outline planning permission for up to 14 dwellings. There are flood risk constraints and the site is close to port activities. There are also potential impacts on air quality if this development generates an increase in traffic into the nearby AQMA, and the site is on the route of a proposed Wet Dock crossing. The southern end of the site is also within the 250-metre hazard consultation zone. However there is a reasonable prospect that the planning permission will be implemented and housing will be delivered on the site within 1-5 years. SITE REF NO: IP069 (Preferred Options ref: UC073) ADDRESS: Land between Cobbold Street and Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 0.19 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Site Not Available

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for housing development. SITE REF NO: IP070 (Preferred Options ref: UC074) ADDRESS: Orwell Quay SITE AREA: 0.42 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Importance of existing use and more appropriate for non-residential. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is more suitable for non-residential uses. SITE REF NO: IP071 (Preferred Options ref: UC075) ADDRESS: St Edmund House, Rope Walk SITE AREA: 0.43 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Office use likely to be retained. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site currently has an office use and this is likely to be retained throughout the plan period. If residential development was likely to occur it is expected this would be for university uses. SITE REF NO: IP072 (Preferred Options ref: UC076) ADDRESS: Cocksedge Engineering, Sandy Hill Lane SITE AREA: 0.63 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 22 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although dependent upon relocation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for low-density housing development, giving an indicative capacity of 22 homes. The site is currently not available and any housing development would be dependent upon the relocation of existing businesses. There is a potential impact upon a nearby AQMA if traffic flows into it and the site is within a Landfill site consultation zone. Odour from the sewage works is also a constraint. However there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP073 (Preferred Options ref: UC077) ADDRESS: Thomas Wolsey Special School, Old Norwich Road SITE AREA: 1.38 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 62 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes School is currently vacant. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and is available now. There is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan and it is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 62 homes. SITE REF NO: IP074 (Preferred Options ref: UC078) ADDRESS: Church and land at Upper Orwell Street SITE AREA: 0.31 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

18 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space Possible Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Possible Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 18 dwellings. Achievable Yes Likely in the form above.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 18 dwellings including conversion of existing church hall, which could be implemented and completed within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP075 (Preferred Options ref: UC079) ADDRESS: Playing fields, Victory Road SITE AREA: 0.43 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Future of playing fields not certain. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site may be needed for possible school expansion therefore although the site could theoretically accommodate residential development it is less likely to be available over the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP076 (Preferred Options ref: UC080) ADDRESS: Land at Yarmouth Road SITE AREA: 0.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Site Not Available

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Part of the site may be suitable subject to overcoming noise/pollution constraints. Available No Site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for residential development and noise is identified as a significant constraint. SITE REF NO: IP077a (Preferred Options ref: UC082) ADDRESS: Drunken Docker area (north) SITE AREA: 0.25 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) This part of the site may be suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable This part of the site may be suitable. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY Following consultation this site has been divided into two and this part may be suitable but would need to be assessed in an update of the SHLAA. SITE REF NO: IP077b (Preferred Options ref: UC082) ADDRESS: Drunken Docker area (south) SITE AREA: 1.33 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Importance of existing use. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is more suitable for non-residential uses and there are existing use constraints on this site. SITE REF NO: IP078 (Preferred Options ref: UC083) ADDRESS: Land north of Whitton Sports Centre SITE AREA: 0.85 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Unknown Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Importance of existing use and potential for non-residential uses. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is more suitable for non-residential uses. SITE REF NO: IP079 (Preferred Options ref: UC084) ADDRESS: Land south of Sewage Works SITE AREA: 4.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Adjacent Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Due to odour from the sewage works. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for residential development. SITE REF NO: IP080 (Preferred Options ref: UC085) ADDRESS: 240 Wherstead Road SITE AREA: 0.49 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 26 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Adjacent AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site is currently vacant and derelict. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and is available now. There are additional constraints as the site is within a Landfill site consultation zone and there is noise from the adjacent railway line. However there is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan and it is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate at 45-55dph, giving an indicative capacity of 22-26 homes. SITE REF NO: IP081 (Preferred Options ref: UC086) ADDRESS: Land North of Ranelagh Road SITE AREA: 0.36 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 32 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes As part of a mixed use scheme. Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although currently in use as a car park and some poor amenity land. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use development, although any redevelopment is dependent upon the car park either no longer being required, or relocated elsewhere. Any redevelopment may have an impact on air quality if an increase of traffic into the AQMA. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available at a specific point in time and it is suggested that 80% of the site could be developed for high-density housing at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 32 homes, which could be delivered 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP082 (Preferred Options ref: UC087) ADDRESS: 83/85 Dales Road SITE AREA: 0.57 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Existing employment use and landowner’s intentions unknown. Achievable No

SUMMARY There is an existing employment use on this site and the landowner’s intentions are unknown. The site is less likely to become available during the plan period for residential development. SITE REF NO: IP083 (Preferred Options ref: UC089) ADDRESS: Banks of river, upriver from Princes Street SITE AREA: 0.76 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 H 17 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although should be considered alongside site IP015. Available Yes Achievable No Will need to be part of a larger redevelopment.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a larger redevelopment, and should be considered alongside site IP015. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. It is suggested that 20% of the site is delivered for high-density housing at 110dph giving an indicative capacity of 17 homes. Any redevelopment would retain the river path and its setting would help provide surveillance. SITE REF NO: IP084 (Preferred Options ref: UC091) ADDRESS: County Hall, St Helen's Street SITE AREA: 0.84 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

79 Apr 2008- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 79 dwellings. Achievable Yes 28 of the 79 dwellings have already been completed on the site.

SUMMARY Part of the planning permission for 79 dwellings has been implemented with 28 dwellings completed. The completion of the remaining 51 dwellings is expected within five years. SITE REF NO: IP085 (Preferred Options ref: UC092) ADDRESS: 345 Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 0.38 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

M 14 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 14 dwellings. Achievable Yes Likely in the form above.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 14 dwellings (townhouses) and we expect this permission to be implemented and completed within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP086 (Preferred Options ref: UC093) ADDRESS: Area north of Carr Street SITE AREA: 0.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Unknown Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Retail and employment uses more suitable. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is adjacent to a scheduled ancient monument. The building fronting Carr Street has recently been refurbished and provides ground floor retail frontage to Carr Street. Retail and employment uses are more suitable in this location. SITE REF NO: IP087 (Preferred Options ref: UC094) ADDRESS: Car Park off St Nicholas Street SITE AREA: 0.17 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Unknown Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Available No Improvements proposed to car park. Achievable No

SUMMARY The landowner has no intentions to develop and there are proposals for landscape improvements to the car park. SITE REF NO: IP088 (Preferred Options ref: UC095) ADDRESS: 79 Cauldwell Hall Road SITE AREA: 0.30 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

16 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has outline planning permission for 16 dwellings, with the demolition of the existing building. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 16 dwellings.. We expect the permission to be implemented and completed within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP089 (Preferred Options ref: UC096) ADDRESS: Waterworks Street SITE AREA: 0.31 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 34 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Part within TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although existing economic use as a car park and other uses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 110dph. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon existing uses, which include a car park, a lock-up shed and some residential dwellings. SITE REF NO: IP090 (Preferred Options ref: UC100) ADDRESS: Europa Way SITE AREA: 1.43 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

142 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Planning permission for 142 dwellings has expired Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a reasonable prospect in time.

SUMMARY The site had planning permission for 142 dwellings as part of a larger mixed use scheme including a food store. This has now expired and we expect the site to be developed at a reasonable prospect in time. SITE REF NO: IP091 (Preferred Options ref: UC101) ADDRESS: Cambridge Drive SITE AREA: 0.63 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

36 Apr 2008- Mar 2011

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 36 dwellings. Achievable Yes Site is under construction.

SUMMARY Development is under construction implementing the planning permission for 36 dwellings, to replace 31 dwellings demolished. Although this represents a net gain of 5 dwellings, the 31 dwellings have already been removed from the total housing stock. SITE REF NO: IP092 (Preferred Options ref: UC102) ADDRESS: 427 Wherstead Road SITE AREA: 0.29 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Due to flood risk. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for residential development due to flood risk and noise issues are identified as a further constraint. SITE REF NO: IP093 (Preferred Options ref: UC103) ADDRESS: Chantry Close, London Road SITE AREA: 0.41 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site has planning permission for a care home. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although there are possible noise constraints from London Road. However there is a planning permission for a care home. SITE REF NO: IP094 (Preferred Options ref: UC104) ADDRESS: Rear of Grafton House, Russell Road SITE AREA: 0.31 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Adjacent Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes As part of mixed use scheme. Available No Landowner favours a non-residential use. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for residential development as landowner favours a non-residential use. SITE REF NO: IP095 (Preferred Options ref: UC106) ADDRESS: Morpeth House, 97-99 Lacey Street SITE AREA: 0.31 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site is not available for redevelopment. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site has a number of trees with tree preservation orders on, the site is difficult to access and there are physical topography constraints. Furthermore there is the need to retain the house as it is of historic interest. Therefore although residential development may be achievable on the site it is less likely due to the constraints and is not available for redevelopment. SITE REF NO: IP096 (Preferred Options ref: UC109) ADDRESS: Car Park Handford Road East SITE AREA: 0.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 10 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part within AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Opposite TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has a temporary planning consent for a car park. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has a temporary planning consent for a car park. There is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan and it is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 10 homes. SITE REF NO: IP097 (Preferred Options ref: UC110) ADDRESS: Telephone Exchange, Portman Road SITE AREA: 0.53 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 24 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon the future of the telephone exchange. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the future of the telephone exchange. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 24 homes. SITE REF NO: IP098 (Preferred Options ref: UC111) ADDRESS: Transco, south of Patteson Road SITE AREA: 0.64 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 63 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Yes Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Subject to overcoming flood risk constraints. Available Yes Subject to relocation of existing gas governor. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect constraints can be overcome and housing will be delivered on site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and is available subject to the relocation of the existing gas governor, which is identified as an other constraint above along with noise. There are flood risk constraints, but there is a reasonable prospect these can be overcome and housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan. It is suggested 100% high-density housing is appropriate at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 63 homes on 0.57ha of the site. SITE REF NO: IP099 (Preferred Options ref: UC113) ADDRESS: Part former Volvo site, Raeburn Road south SITE AREA: 2.29 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Too close to the sewage works. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing due to the importance of the existing use and close proximity of the sewage works. SITE REF NO: IP100 (Preferred Options ref: UC114) ADDRESS: 6-24 Defoe Road SITE AREA: 0.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No The site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for redevelopment and there is no prospect the site would be developable within the period of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP101 (Preferred Options ref: UC115) ADDRESS: R/O Stratford Road & Cedarcroft Road SITE AREA: 0.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 9 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although access to the site is fairly narrow and is between some vacant garages. It suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 9 homes. SITE REF NO: IP102 (Preferred Options ref: UC120) ADDRESS: Henniker Road (R/O 668-730 Bramford Road) SITE AREA: 0.36 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Rear gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP103 (Preferred Options ref: UC125) ADDRESS: 32 Larchcroft Road SITE AREA: 0.23 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No Site is not available. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP104 (Preferred Options ref: UC128) ADDRESS: 301-305 Norwich Road SITE AREA: 0.66 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 M 15 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon the existing car sales business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use scheme, although the site is within a Landfill site consultation zone and noise is a possible constraint. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available and developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the existing car sales business. It is suggested 50% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 15 homes. SITE REF NO: IP105 (Preferred Options ref: UC129) ADDRESS: Depot, Beaconsfield Road SITE AREA: 0.34 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 15 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site could be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon relocation of the existing business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although the site is within a Landfill site consultation zone. There is a reasonable prospect the site could be available and developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon relocation of the existing business. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 15 homes. SITE REF NO: IP106 (Preferred Options ref: UC130) ADDRESS: R/O Riverside Road / Bramford Road SITE AREA: 0.34 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Garden Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP107 (Preferred Options ref: UC132) ADDRESS: R/O 601-655 Bramford Road SITE AREA: 0.95 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Rear gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The rear gardens are not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect they would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP108 (Preferred Options ref: UC148) ADDRESS: Builders Yard, Vermont Crescent SITE AREA: 0.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 L 7 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon relocation of the existing business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although the site is within a Landfill site consultation zone, on a steep slope and Vermont Crescent is an un-adopted road. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon relocation of the existing business and improvements to the road surface. It is suggested 100% low-density housing is appropriate, at 35dph, giving an indicative capacity of 7 homes. SITE REF NO: IP109 (Preferred Options ref: UC156) ADDRESS: R/O Jupiter Road & Reading Road SITE AREA: 0.42 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

13 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 13 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 13 dwellings granted in March 2009, one less than the 14 granted in January 2008. We believe the planning permission will be implemented and the site completed within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP110 (Preferred Options ref: UC157) ADDRESS: 14 Crofton Road SITE AREA: 0.26 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP111 (Preferred Options ref: UC167) ADDRESS: Club, Newton Road SITE AREA: 0.32 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Importance of existing use would prevent housing development. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP112 (Preferred Options ref: UC170) ADDRESS: 2 & 4 Derby Road SITE AREA: 0.49 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 22 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon relocation of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and there is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon relocation of existing businesses and mitigating measures against noise from the railway line. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 22 homes. SITE REF NO: IP113 (Preferred Options ref: UC171) ADDRESS: The Railway PH, Foxhall Road SITE AREA: 0.34 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

20 M 3 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Alongside existing uses. Available No Reasonable prospect part of the site will be available at a specific point in time, currently used as a car park. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY Part of the site, currently used as a car park, is suitable for housing development and there is a reasonable prospect this will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. It is suggested 20% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 3 homes. SITE REF NO: IP114 (Preferred Options ref: UC172) ADDRESS: R/O Cauldwell Hall Road & Kemball Street SITE AREA: 0.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY Development on the site is dependent upon the relocation of the existing business. The site as shown on this sheet is unlikely to be available in its entirety and due to the uncertain availability of the site it is assumed that any residential development is more likely to come forward as windfall. SITE REF NO: IP115 (Preferred Options ref: UC180) ADDRESS: 547 Foxhall Road & Land to rear SITE AREA: 0.37 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Unknown Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP116 (Preferred Options ref: UC185) ADDRESS: St Clement's Hospital Grounds SITE AREA: 12.57 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 L 350 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The landowner is exploring redevelopment opportunities, subject to relocation of the hospital. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on site within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and the landowner is exploring redevelopment opportunities, subject to relocation of the hospital. The site is on the edge of a Landfill consultation zone and there is a potential impact on air quality if additional traffic is generated. There is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan. It is suggested 80% low-density housing is appropriate around 35-37.5dph, just under the threshold for medium density, giving an indicative capacity of 350 homes. SITE REF NO: IP117 (Preferred Options ref: UC192) ADDRESS: R/O Allenby Road & Hadleigh Road SITE AREA: 0.46 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Adjacent Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable No Access is a significant constraint.

SUMMARY The site is not deliverable due to access constraints and other constraints are identified including noise and the topography of the site. There is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP118 (Urban Capacity Study ref: UC196) ADDRESS: Rear of 76-108 Victoria Street SITE AREA: 0.21 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 3 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Rear Gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Planning permission for three dwellings implemented. Rear gardens are not available (see below). Achievable Yes Three dwellings completed. Development on rear gardens is not achievable (see below).

SUMMARY The planning permission for three dwellings has been implemented and the remainder of the site is rear gardens, which are less likely to be developed. There are multiple ownership constraints and difficulty obtaining access. SITE REF NO: IP119 (Preferred Options ref: UC199) ADDRESS: Land East of West End Road SITE AREA: 0.93 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Available No Achievable No .

SUMMARY Following consultation on the draft report it was decided that the site is not suitable for housing development. SITE REF NO: IP120 (Preferred Options ref: UC201) ADDRESS: Land West of West End Road SITE AREA: 1.03 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 46 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon the existing car sales business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although it is constrained by adjacent electricity substation. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the existing car sales business. Other constraints identified include noise as the site is adjacent to a busy road and its proximity to an electricity sub-station. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 46 homes. SITE REF NO: IP121 (Preferred Options ref: UC209) ADDRESS: Front of pumping station, Belstead Road SITE AREA: 0.60 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 27 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon the requirements of the landowner. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although access for the pumping station will need to be maintained and this may constrain the site. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the requirements of the landowner. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 27 homes. SITE REF NO: IP122 (Preferred Options ref: UC213) ADDRESS: R/O 17-27 Ramsey Close (Wigmore Close) SITE AREA: 0.36 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although access is constrained. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP123 (Preferred Options ref: UC224) ADDRESS: Car Park, Crown Street/Tower Ramparts SITE AREA: 0.29 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Unknown Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes As part of a larger mixed use scheme. Available No In use as a car park and landowner intentions unknown. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP124 (Preferred Options ref: UC229) ADDRESS: 100 Clapgate Lane SITE AREA: 0.32 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for development and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP125 (Preferred Options ref: UC230) ADDRESS: Corner Hawke Road & Holbrook Road SITE AREA: 0.25 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Site in current use and landowner intentions unknown. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is in present use and not available for development, and there is no reasonable prospect the site would be developable within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP126 (Preferred Options ref: UC231) ADDRESS: 251 Clapgate Lane SITE AREA: 0.58 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY Potential for development of part of the site to the rear alongside existing use although access to the rear is an issue. However the site is not available for residential development over the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP127a (Preferred Options ref: UC234) ADDRESS: 15-39a Bucklesham Road SITE AREA: 0.14 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

3 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has planning permission for three dwellings. Achievable Yes There is a reasonable prospect the permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has a planning permission for three dwellings and there is a reasonable prospect the permission will be implemented. SITE REF NO: IP127b (Preferred Options ref: UC234) ADDRESS: 15-39a Bucklesham Road SITE AREA: 1.06 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Site has physical constraints. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for residential development due to physical constraints identified in the form of a sewer running across the front gardens of 27-39a Bucklesham Road. The site is also not available for development. SITE REF NO: IP128 (Preferred Options ref: UC236) ADDRESS: Former Driving Test Centre, Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 0.62 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 48 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 48 dwellings. Achievable Yes Planning permission to be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 48 dwellings and there is a reasonable prospect these dwellings will be delivered on the site within five years. SITE REF NO: IP129 (Preferred Options ref: UC237) ADDRESS: BT Depot, Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 1.07 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 48 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although this is dependent upon the future of the existing business. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although it may impact upon an AQMA if there is an increase in traffic into the town centre at peak times. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan, although this is dependent upon the future of the existing business. It is suggested 100% medium-density housing is appropriate, at 45dph, giving an indicative capacity of 48 homes. SITE REF NO: IP130 (Preferred Options ref: UC241) ADDRESS: South of South Street SITE AREA: 0.22 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

12 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permissions for 11 dwellings and 1 dwelling. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permissions will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permissions for 11 dwellings at 74-78 Norwich Road and 1 dwelling at 37 South Street. We expect the permissions to be implemented and completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP131 (Preferred Options ref: UC245) ADDRESS: 488-496 Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 0.37 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

34 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 34 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 34 dwellings granted in March 2007. We believe the planning permission will be implemented and the site completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP132 (Preferred Options ref: UC247) ADDRESS: Bridge Street, Northern Quays (west) SITE AREA: 0.18 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

64 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 64 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 64 dwellings. We expect the permission to be implemented and completed within five years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP133 (Preferred Options ref: UC248) ADDRESS: South of Felaw Street SITE AREA: 0.41 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

47 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Green space Conservation Area Part TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 47 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 47 dwellings. We expect the permission to be implemented and completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP134 (Preferred Options ref: UC249) ADDRESS: St Matthews Street SITE AREA: 0.40 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Part Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Part TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Landowner prefers other uses to housing development. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for residential development, as the landowner prefers other uses. SITE REF NO: IP135 (Preferred Options ref: UC250) ADDRESS: 112-116 Bramford Road SITE AREA: 0.17 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

24 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Part AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Opposite Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has outline planning permission for 24 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has outline planning permission for 24 dwellings. We expect the permission to be implemented and completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP136 (Preferred Options ref: UC251) ADDRESS: Silo, College Street SITE AREA: 0.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

80 H 21 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development around 165dph as part of a mixed use scheme. There site is available and there is a reasonable prospect it could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP137 (Preferred Options ref: UC252) ADDRESS: Running Buck PH, St Margaret's Plain SITE AREA: 0.15 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Adjacent Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Landowner has no intentions to develop. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for residential development, however the landowner has no intentions to develop. SITE REF NO: IP138 (Preferred Options ref: UC254) ADDRESS: 235/255 Ranelagh Road (was in as London Road) SITE AREA: 0.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for residential development and there is no reasonable prospect it will be available during the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP139 (Preferred Options ref: UC256) ADDRESS: Royal Mail Sorting Office, Commercial Road SITE AREA: 1.31 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Opposite Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Poor site for housing. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development as it is surrounded by a two lane one-way system on three sides and the existing use value. SITE REF NO: IP140 (Preferred Options ref: UC257) ADDRESS: Land north of Whitton Lane SITE AREA: 6.92 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Countryside Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Possible Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Close proximity to the A14 and Park and Ride station. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development due to its close proximity to the A14 and the Park and Ride station, and the associated noise. SITE REF NO: IP141 (Preferred Options ref: UC258) ADDRESS: Cranes Site SITE AREA: 16.74 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Yes Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes As part of a larger mixed use scheme Available Yes Although preferred use is employment Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for residential development, although there are noise issues alongside the railway line. However housing development is not achievable due to the importance of the existing site as an employment use, despite the fact it is currently vacant. SITE REF NO: IP142 (Preferred Options ref: UC259) ADDRESS: Duke Street SITE AREA: 1.20 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Preferred use for a new school on part of site, and part of site in use as a breakers yard. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development although is less likely to be available as the preferred use is for a new school and there is also currently a breakers yard on the site. SITE REF NO: IP143 (Preferred Options ref: UC260) ADDRESS: Former Norsk Hydro Site, Sandy Hill Lane SITE AREA: 6.55 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although only on part of the site. Available Yes Landowner has pursued non-residential uses. The site is vacant. Achievable No

SUMMARY Part of the site is suitable for housing, although the majority of the site is within a hazardous substance consultation zone and the landowner has pursued non-residential uses. SITE REF NO: IP144 (Preferred Options ref: UC261) ADDRESS: Wooded area and large verge, Birkfield Drive SITE AREA: 2.11 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

0 Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes On part of the site. Available No Open space and part of site is an existing local wildlife site. Achievable No

SUMMARY Although part of the site is suitable for housing development, the site is not available and the site has an important existing use as open space and a local wildlife site. SITE REF NO: IP145 (Preferred Options ref: UC262) ADDRESS: St Clement's Golf Course SITE AREA: 13.15 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes For a small element of specialist housing. Available Yes Although dependent upon the relocation of the golf club. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is currently allocated for open space in the development plan and the importance of the existing use means this site is unachievable. SITE REF NO: IP146 (Preferred Options ref: UC263) ADDRESS: Ransomes Europark (east) SITE AREA: 16.69 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Existing employment area. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development due to the importance of the existing use. The site is also located next to a railway line and the A14. SITE REF NO: IP147 (Preferred Options ref: UC264) ADDRESS: Land between railway junction and Hadleigh Road SITE AREA: 7.57 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Adjacent Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Existing employment area. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development due to the importance of the existing use and is surrounded on two sides by railway lines. SITE REF NO: IP148 (Preferred Options ref: UC265) ADDRESS: Land south of the A14 SITE AREA: 14.32 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Possible Recreation and open space Countryside Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Although part of the site is within an AONB. Available No Landowner has no intentions to cease agricultural use. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for some housing development, although part of the site is within an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty defined within the Ipswich Local Plan (1997) and part of the site is adjacent to the A14. However, the site is not available for housing development and the landowner has no intentions to develop. SITE REF NO: IP149 (Preferred Options ref: UC266) ADDRESS: Land at Pond Hall Farm, south of the A14 SITE AREA: 10.02 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Site access constrained and adjacent to River Orwell. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development. SITE REF NO: IP150 (Preferred Options ref: UC267) ADDRESS: Land south of Ravenswood SITE AREA: 34.78 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

155 Apr 2009- Mar 2012

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 155 residential dwellings. Achievable Yes Under construction. Likely to be completed within three years from April 2009.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 155 dwellings are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permissions and this is deliverable within three years from April 2009, as development is under construction. SITE REF NO: IP151 (Preferred Options ref: UC268) ADDRESS: Lister's, Landseer Road SITE AREA: 1.46 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No More suited to employment uses. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is more suited to employment uses because it is in a hazardous substance consultation zone. SITE REF NO: IP152 (Preferred Options ref: UC269) ADDRESS: Airport Farm Kennels, north of A14 SITE AREA: 8.40 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Possible Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Part of site only as some of the site is within the Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty. Available No Landowner proposes an employment use on the site. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for some limited housing development, although part of the site is an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty and road noise from the A14 is a constraint. However the landowner is exploring employment use and we believe there is no reasonable prospect the site will be available for housing development within the plan period. SITE REF NO: IP153 (Preferred Options ref: UC270) ADDRESS: Car Park, Sir Alf Ramsey Way/Portman Road SITE AREA: 0.17 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Overshadowed by football stadium. Available Yes Council-owned car park. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not suitable for housing development and is overshadowed by the football stadium. SITE REF NO: IP154 (Preferred Options ref: UC271) ADDRESS: 2-6 Russell Road SITE AREA: 1.01 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 H 56 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Reasonable prospect site will be available at a specific point in time, although dependent upon intentions of existing businesses. Achievable No Reasonable prospect site could be developed at a specific point in time, as part of a mixed use scheme.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development as part of a mixed use scheme that could incorporate the existing uses. Any redevelopment would be dependent upon intentions of existing businesses and 50% high-density housing at 110dph, giving an indicative capacity of 56 homes, is suggested for this site. There is a reasonable prospect the site will be available and could be developed at a specific point in time, 6-10 years from adoption of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP155 (Preferred Options ref: UC272) ADDRESS: Halifax Road Sports Ground SITE AREA: 4.67 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Allocated and in use as a playing field. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development but is not available as it is allocated and in use as a playing field. SITE REF NO: IP156 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land between Star Lane and College Street east of Slade Street SITE AREA: 0.24 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

51 (Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 373 student accommodation units. Achievable Yes Development to occur within five years from adoption of plan.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 373 student accommodation equating to 51 student dwellings, and we expect the planning permission to be implemented within five years from adoption of plan. SITE REF NO: IP157 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land fronting the northern quays of the Waterfront eastern end SITE AREA: 0.40 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Yes Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Alternative existing uses considered more appropriate. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is not available for housing development and alternative existing uses are considered more appropriate on this site. SITE REF NO: IP158 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Princes Street / Portman Road SITE AREA: 0.29 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No Existing employment use value. Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, however the site is not available and there is an existing employment use value. SITE REF NO: IP159 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 30 Knightsdale Road SITE AREA: 3.40 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not suitable for housing development

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable No Existing employment use value surrounded by employment uses. Available No Achievable No

SUMMARY The site is an existing employment use and is surrounded by other employment uses. SITE REF NO: IP161 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 2 Park Road SITE AREA: 0.35 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

13 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Adjacent Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Yes Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 13 dwellings. Achievable Yes Likely in the form above.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 13 dwellings and we expect this permission to be implemented and completed within five years from adoption of plan. SITE REF NO: IP162 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 52 Belstead Road SITE AREA: 0.23 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 9 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for ten dwellings (a net gain of nine) has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP163 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Rear of 411-417 Bramford Road SITE AREA: 0.75 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

34 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Gardens Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Possible Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 34 dwellings. Achievable Yes We expect the planning permission to be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 34 dwellings and we expect this permission to be implemented and completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP164 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Former Kennings, Duke Street SITE AREA: 0.26 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 76 dwellings. Achievable No We believe alternative uses are preferred.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 76 dwellings, which is not deliverable and we believe alternative uses are preferred by the landowner. SITE REF NO: IP165 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Eastway Business Park, Europa Way SITE AREA: 2.08 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 M 100 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site had planning permission for 218 dwellings, now expired. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years at a lower density.

SUMMARY The site had planning permission until recently for 218 dwellings, which is not deliverable. However we believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years at a lower density of no more than 55 dwellings per hectare, giving an indicative capacity of 135 homes. Discussions with landowners indicate 100 dwellings is more realistic. SITE REF NO: IP166 (Preferred Options ref: UC243) ADDRESS: Former Reservoir, Spring Road SITE AREA: 0.25 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission 24 implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable Yes

SUMMARY The planning permission for 24 dwellings has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP167 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 11 St Georges Street SITE AREA: 0.17 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

39 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Adjacent TPO on site or nearby Opposite Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has planning permission for 39 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of plan.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 39 dwellings and we believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years from adoption of plan. SITE REF NO: IP168 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Stoke Park Drive SITE AREA: 2.45 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

51 Apr 2008- Mar 2013

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 51 dwellings. Achievable Yes Site was under construction, supermarket has been built and residential expected to be completed within five years

SUMMARY Development was under construction implementing the planning permission and a supermarket has been built. We expect the 51 dwellings as part of the mixed use development to be delivered within five years. SITE REF NO: IP169 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 23-25 Burrell Road SITE AREA: 0.08 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

10 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Adjacent AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for 10 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of plan.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 10 dwellings and we believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years from adoption of plan. SITE REF NO: IP170 (Preferred Options ref: UC090) ADDRESS: Currier's Lane SITE AREA: 0.09 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW) Planning permission implemented and site completed

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Flood Zones 2 or 3 AQMA within or close to Listed buildings or adjacent to Area of Archaeological Importance Recreation and open space Conservation Area TPO on site or nearby Contaminated Wildlife site or adjacent to Existing use Other constraints

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Achievable No Alternative use implemented.

SUMMARY The planning permission for B1/A2 uses has been implemented and the site completed. SITE REF NO: IP172 (Preferred Options ref: UC088) ADDRESS: 15-19 St Margaret's Green SITE AREA: 0.08 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

17 (Student) Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for student accommodation. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect the planning permission will be implemented.

SUMMARY The site has planning permission for 72 student rooms equating to 17 dwellings. We expect the permission to be implemented and completed within five years. SITE REF NO: IP173 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 36-48 St Helen's Street SITE AREA: 0.06 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

13 Apr 2009- Mar 2010

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission and is under construction. Achievable Yes Development on the site is under construction.

SUMMARY Development is under construction implementing the planning permission for 13 dwellings. SITE REF NO: IP174 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 12 Tacket Street SITE AREA: 0.04 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

14 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site had planning permission for 14 dwellings, now expired. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of plan.

SUMMARY The site had planning permission until recently for 14 dwellings as part of a mixed use redevelopment of the site. We believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years from adoption of plan at a similar density in more favourable market conditions. SITE REF NO: IP175 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: 47-51 Waveney Road SITE AREA: 0.15 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

12 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has outline planning permission for 12 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years.

SUMMARY The site has outline planning permission for 12 dwellings and we believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years. SITE REF NO: IP176 (Preferred Options ref: UC081) ADDRESS: 7-9 Woodbridge Road SITE AREA: 0.05 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

14 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has outline planning permission for 14 dwellings. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of plan.

SUMMARY The site has outline planning permission for 14 dwellings as part of a mixed use development and we believe there is a reasonable prospect the site could be delivered for housing development within five years from adoption of plan. SITE REF NO: IP177 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Lock-up Garages rear of 16-30 Richmond Road SITE AREA: 0.13 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

6 Apr 2009- Mar 2014

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to No Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site had planning permission for 6 dwellings, now expired. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect housing could be delivered on the site within five years.

SUMMARY The site had planning permission until recently for 6 dwellings. We believe there is a reasonable prospect that housing development could be delivered on the site within five years at a similar density in more favourable market conditions. SITE REF NO: IP178 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Island House, Duke Street SITE AREA: 0.09 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

31 (Student) Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Possible Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Yes Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Site has planning permission for student accommodation. Achievable Yes Reasonable planning permission will be implemented within five years.

SUMMARY The site is available and it is considered that 31 student dwellings are deliverable through the implementation of the existing planning permission for student accommodation, within five years. SITE REF NO: IP179 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land surrounding Thurleston Lane (part of option A) SITE AREA: 32.10 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 L 562 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted by interested parties through the local development framework process. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. SITE REF NO: IP180 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land to east of Henley Road north of railway line (part of option B) SITE AREA: 75.69 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 2044 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted by interested parties through the local development framework process, although there are noise constraints from the railway line. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. Furthermore in order to sustain a sustainable urban extension of this size additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP181 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land west of Westerfield Road (part of option C) SITE AREA: 41.57 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 1122 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby Yes Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted by interested parties through the local development framework process, although there are noise constraints from the railway line. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. Furthermore in order to sustain a sustainable urban extension of this size additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP182 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land to the east of Westerfield Road (part of option D) SITE AREA: 59.16 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 L 1242 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted by interested parties through the local development framework process, although there are noise constraints from the railway line. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. Furthermore in order to sustain a sustainable urban extension of this size additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP183 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land north of Millennium Cemetery (part of option E) SITE AREA: 21.95 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 L 384 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Yes

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted for development by interested parties through the local development framework process, although there are noise constraints from the railway line and the site is adjacent to a cemetery whose future needs must also be considered. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. Furthermore in order to sustain a sustainable urban extension of this size additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP184 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land adjacent to Humber Doucy Lane (part of option F) SITE AREA: 12.94 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

50 L 226 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and has been promoted for development by interested parties through the local development framework process. However in order for the development to be viable, the appropriate infrastructure needs to be in place in particular traffic related. Furthermore this site should be considered as part of a larger urban extension and in order to sustain a sustainable urban extension of the size suggested, additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP185 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Ipswich School Playing Field (part of option C) SITE AREA: 12.55 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 339 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space Yes Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated No Wildlife site or adjacent to Possible Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist and existing use value.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although is in current use as playing fields and these would need to be located elsewhere in the Borough to enable housing development to occur. The site should be considered as part of a larger urban extension, to enable the delivery of appropriate infrastructure in particular traffic related and additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP186 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Land opposite 289-299 Henley Road SITE AREA: 1.50 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

60 M 41 Apr 2015- Mar 2020

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways Yes Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Possible Wildlife site or adjacent to Countryside Existing use Possible Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes The site has been promoted for housing development. Achievable No Infrastructure constraints exist.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development, although it should be considered alongside site IP180 as part of a larger urban extension, to enable the delivery of appropriate infrastructure in particular traffic related and additional facilities such as shops and schools need to be considered alongside housing. SITE REF NO: IP187 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Goods Vehicle Testing Station, Landseer Road SITE AREA: 1.34 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

Not Deliverable

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 No AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to No Area of Archaeological Importance No Recreation and open space No Conservation Area No TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Likely Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use Yes Other constraints Possible

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available No The site is not available for development. Achievable No

SUMMARY The importance of the existing use means the site is less likely to be available within the period of the plan. SITE REF NO: IP188 (Preferred Options ref: -) ADDRESS: Websters Saleyard site, Dock Street SITE AREA: 0.11 ha

SUGGESTED OPTION DENSITY OF SITE INDICATIVE % OF SITE FOR FOR HOUSING LIKELY DELIVERY CAPACITY HOUSING (HIGH, MEDIUM, TIMESCALE (HOMES) LOW)

100 H 10 Apr 2010- Mar 2015

CONSTRAINTS Access and Highways No Flood Zones 2 or 3 Yes AQMA within or close to Possible Listed buildings or adjacent to Adjacent Area of Archaeological Importance Yes Recreation and open space No Conservation Area Yes TPO on site or nearby No Contaminated Yes Wildlife site or adjacent to No Existing use No Other constraints No

DELIVERABILITY Suitable Yes Available Yes Derelict buildings on site. Achievable Yes Reasonable prospect site could be developed within 1-5 years.

SUMMARY The site is suitable for housing development and is available now. There is a reasonable prospect housing will be delivered on the site within five years from adoption of the plan and it is suggested 100% high-density housing is appropriate at 165dph, giving an indicative capacity of 10 homes.