6.3 Urban Growth Corridor - Locality Naming and Boundaries

Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

6.3 URBAN GROWTH CORRIDOR - LOCALITY NAMING AND BOUNDARIES

(Altone Ward, Swan Valley/Gidgegannup Ward) (Information Services)

KEY ISSUES

• The development of the urban growth corridor requires the naming of localities and the definition of locality boundaries.

It is recommended that the new localities be named and the boundaries defined.

BACKGROUND

Portions of the existing West Swan, Henley Brook, Caversham and Whiteman localities make up the Urban Growth Corridor. The most recently named of these was Whiteman, formally named in 1981 and Henley Brook, formally named in 1972.

The City refers to three of these development cells of the corridor as Albion, West Swan East and West Swan West. The fourth is Caversham which is not subject to renaming.

The Albion development currently sits across the existing locality boundaries of Whiteman, Henley Brook and West Swan. Albion has been the subject of a suburb name proposal by the Vintage Sports Car Club.

West Swan West is west of the proposed Perth–Darwin National Highway from the remainder of West Swan, creating a suburb division similar to the situation in Beechboro where a number of residents are located north of Reid Highway whilst the majority of the suburb is south of the Highway.

There has been interest from the residents of Beechboro (North) to rename that portion to Bennett Springs. As this was the developer’s estate name it is not supported by the Geographic Names Committee. Developers at the time may have informed buyers that the suburb would be called Bennett Springs.

Inclusion of Beechboro north with the West Swan West development is a logical grouping for a new suburb due to the confines of the area. Whiteman Park to the north, Perth–Darwin Highway to the east, Reid Highway to the south and Malaga to the west encircle this residential development.

The Urban Growth Corridor developments have average block sizes in the 400-600m2 range. These urban sized lots will be significantly different to the existing rural blocks of the Swan Valley suburbs that average 2ha in size.

These developments have necessitated the creation of new localities and definition of new locality boundaries, taking into consideration their community focus, points of

Page 1 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

access and constraints. Naming each development would give each area and the new communities their own identity.

REPORT

The City of Swan proposed to name the urban growth corridor after the developers chose not to submit locality names.

The City of Swan wrote to the Department of Indigenous Affairs, Swan Indigenous Reference Group and the Swan Valley Progress Association inviting them to submit potential names for the three proposed localities. These groups were identified as having a direct community of interest with the area or the land.

All three groups recorded no official reply to the City so we proceeded with a public advertising via print media and the City of Swan website. Members of the public were invited to submit potential locality names. Submissions were to include name, source, meaning or definition and which locality they were to apply. Respondents were also to be guided by the Geographic Names Committee Western Australia: Principles, Guidelines and Procedures document.

In total 51 names were received recognising many different pioneering and Aboriginal terms. City staff reviewed these names and discarded those which were not in accordance with the guidelines.

In providing some naming guidance to the process the Geographic Names Branch of Landgate also reviewed the list of names submitted and indicated those names that may be considered by the Geographic Names Committee.

Two of the names were submitted before any call for names was made public, Brabham, proposed for Area C and Bennett Springs, submitted as a renaming of the Beechboro north area now part of proposed Area A.

Brabham, as submitted by the Vintage Sports Car Club of WA, is named after Sir Jack Brabham. Whilst the man could be judged a great Australian icon, his name is not very significant to the area. Born in New South Wales and currently still living, Jack Brabham only raced at the Caversham racetrack on two occasions. The first time for third place and the second time he did not finish. The main straight of the racetrack forms the eastern boundary of Area C, the remainder of the track is outside the area and also outside the urban growth corridor. The Brabham Reserve, an area of bush forever at the south of Area C was named last year.

Bennett Springs, submitted by West Swan MLA Rita Saffioti in support of a community group, is a developer’s estate name. QUBE began development of the Bennett Springs Estate subdivision in 1999. The MLA’s office surveyed the residents of the estate area asking “Do you support changing the suburb name of Beechboro (north of Reid Hwy) to Bennett Springs?” The name has support from the local residents, of 1200 residences 400 returned their survey in favour of the change and 14 were against. An additional 4 residents were in favour of Bennett Springs in reply to our advertising. In total this represents 33% of residents in favour of the change and 1.1% against.

With each of these two names there are points in the guidelines which would leave them unsupported.

Page 2 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

• Localities may not be named in honour of someone still living.

• Renaming proposals are unlikely to succeed if the proposal seeks to adopt a developer’s inappropriate name coined to promote a development.

From the submissions entered we did receive some well thought out and appropriate names for each locality. Some names were submitted by more than one individual or group.

For Area A, Bennett Brook received three separate submissions. All three referenced the geographical feature that is Bennett Brook. The Bennett Brook was named after Matilda Bennett who was the wife of the Surveyor-General John Septimus Roe.

For Area B, Dayton stood out significantly. Walter Day, an English migrant who lived and worked in the area, enlisted with the Australian Imperial Force in World War 1 and was awarded the Military Medal for bravery in the field. He was also awarded the Centenary Medal and a certificate for the best vineyard in WA during Western Australia’s centenary of 1929. A successful vigneron and cattleman, Walter Day owned many properties throughout the Swan Valley and even had land resumed for Whiteman Park.

Within Area C Haddrill and Wanunga were names that were well thought of. William Haddrill was one of the first labourers in the colony to be able to purchase his own land, he built a home and raised a family there. His descendants remained in possession of this property for 140 years. Haddrill’s house is listed as a permanent entry with the Heritage Council of WA.

Wanunga is an aboriginal word meaning “peaceful or quiet”. It also happens to be the name of a bushwalk trail in Whiteman Park and land currently in Whiteman will form some of the new locality of Area C.

These names represent both pioneer and aboriginal influences, both of which are representative of the category, name associated with the area, as stated in the guidelines.

The guidelines for locality size as set out by the Geographic Names Committee of Western Australia;

Urban localities;

• Minimum size of localities to be 100ha.

• Minimum number of available lots to be 1000 and maximum to be 10000

• Ideal size to be approximately 500ha

Urban Growth Corridor projections estimate 12500 dwellings and 33000 residents.

Area A 425ha, 3000 dwellings (includes Beechboro north)

Area B 263ha, 2500 dwellings

Area C 624ha, 5000 dwellings (includes 60ha of bush forever)

Page 3 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

Generally the proposals will shift the existing locality boundary alignments from their current position to the existing and proposed road centrelines and lot boundaries to form the new localities.

The proposed alignment in each location will follow the description below and as depicted on the attached maps (Figures 1 - 3)

Area A: From the intersection of the locality boundaries of Ballajura, Malaga, Whiteman and Beechboro continue east following the Beechboro boundary (Marshall Road) to the intersection of Marshall Road and Roedean Street. Continue north and follow the existing West Swan locality boundary to the centreline of the proposed Perth – Darwin National Highway. Continue south along this centreline until the intersection with Reid Highway. Continue westerly along Reid Highway to the existing locality boundary between Beechboro and Malaga. From here continue north following the existing locality boundary of Beechboro to the point of origin. See Figure 1

Area B: From the intersection of Harrow Street and Malvern Street continue south along Malvern Street to the eastern lot boundary of lot 29 Sam Rosa Place. Continue south along each of the following eastern lot boundaries in this order; Lot 26 Sam Rosa Place, Lot 7 Coast Road, Lot 15 Coast Road, Lot 4 Victoria Road and Lot 56 Victoria Road, all lots are currently within West Swan. Continue to the intersection with Reid Highway, continue west along the centreline of Reid highway to the intersection with the centreline of the proposed Perth – Darwin National Highway (currently Lord Street). Continue along this centreline to the intersection with the existing West Swan boundary. Follow the boundary east then north to the intersection with Harrow Street. From here continue east along Harrow Street to the point of origin. See Figure 2

Area C: From intersection of Park Street and Murray Road continue south along Murray Road to the intersection with Woollcott Avenue. Continue south along the existing West Swan boundary to the intersection of Youle-Dean Road and the centreline of the proposed Henley Brook Avenue. Continue south along this centreline to the intersection with Harrow Street. Continue west along Harrow St to the intersection of Lord Street (West Swan boundary). Follow the West Swan boundary south then west to the intersection with the centreline of the proposed Perth – Darwin National Highway. Continue north along this centreline to the intersection with Park Street, turn east and continue along Park Street to the point of origin. See Figure 3

The Local Government Advisory Board has advised the City of Swan that the Ward and Representation review of Council may be carried out after the 2011 Ordinary Elections. Therefore ward areas remain as they are for now. Existing wards that could be directly impacted by these new localities are the Swan Valley/Gidgegannup Ward and Altone Ward.

A briefing session was held with Council to explain the naming process and preview the names submitted. Councillors were asked to indicate three preferred names in order for each locality with a 3, 2, 1 rating. The results were tallied and showed preferences for the following;

Area A – Bennett Springs (17), Bennett Brook (12) and Bennett (6).

Area B – Dayton (13), Kambarang (6) and Hooper (6).

Area C – Albion (7), Haddrill (7) and Aitken (4).

Page 4 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

In conclusion, there have been some very good submissions made by the public and these should be considered by Council. These names represent geographical features, pioneering names and aboriginal terms. Any of these names would represent their chosen locality.

ATTACHMENTS

• Submitted locality names list by area

• Locality names list reviewed by City of Swan and Geographic Names Branch, Landgate

• Locality Boundary Plans

STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS

Nil

STATUTORY ENVIRONMENT

Nil

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS

Nil

RECOMMENDATION

That the Council resolve to:

1) Endorse three preferred locality names for each of the proposed new localities of the urban growth corridor:

Area A – Bennett Springs, Bennett Brook, Bennett

Area B – Dayton, Hooper, Kambarang

Area C – Albion, Haddrill, Wanunga

2) Endorse the alignment of the locality boundaries for the three proposed new localities of the urban growth corridor as depicted on the attached plans.

3) Submit the locality names and boundaries to Geographic Names Committee of Western Australia for review and approval.

Page 5 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

MOTION that the Council resolve to:

1) Endorse "Bennett Springs" as the preferred locality name for Area A of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

2) Record that the reasons for changing the Recommendation for the locality name of Area A are:

1. Bennett Springs has extremely strong community support and is also endorsed by local members of Parliament.

2. Local businesses including the major shopping precinct and tavern both use the nameSprings ie Springs Shopping Centre, Springs Tavern.

3. The guidelines of the GNC concerning inappropriate developers estate names coined to promote a development is not relevant.

(a) The area of the previous developers QUBE commenced in 1999 in the suburb of Beechboro and their estate area is now developed, therefore no gain or promotion of the estate could now be gained.

(b) The new locality also includes another developed part of Beechboro which had an estate name of Orchid Park as well as undeveloped land in Whiteman and Caversham.

(c) The major thoroughfare of the existing suburb is Bennett Springs Drive (formerly Coast Road). It connects the Orchid Park locality of Beechboro through the existing developed area to the new undeveloped residential area of Area A. It is appropriate that the name of the locality is reflected and supported by the major thoroughfare which connects the western (developed) area to the eastern (undeveloped) area.

(d) There is nothing to suggest that Bennett Springs was an inappropriate developers estate name.

4. The locality of Bennett Springs will avoid confusion as it is already a well established area within the community and the City of Swan. The adjoining suburb of Caversham had an estate name of Bennett Brook in Bennett Street only 4km away.

(Cr Lucas - Cr Färdig)

MOTION that the Council resolve to:

1) Endorse "Dayton" as the preferred locality name for Area B of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

(Cr Holmes - Cr Wainwright)

MOTION that the Council resolve to:

1) Endorse "Brabham" as the preferred locality name for Area C of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

Page 6 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

2) Record that the reason for changing the Recommendation for the locality name of Area C is that the name Brabham will recognise a great Australian, capture a tourism opportunity and support the vision of a dedicated group of motoring enthusiasts.

(Cr T Williams - Cr Färdig)

MOTION that the Council resolve to:

1) Endorse the alignment of the locality boundaries for the three proposed new localities of the urban growth corridor as depicted on the attached plans.

2) Submit the locality names and boundaries to Geographic Names Committee of Western Australia for review and approval.

(Cr Wainwright - Cr Holmes)

AMENDMENT TO THE MOTION

That part 2) of the motion be amended to read:

2) Submit the locality names and boundaries to Geographic Names Committee of Western Australia for approval.

(Cr McNamara - Cr Holmes)

THE AMENDMENT WAS PUT TO THE VOTE AND CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

THE AMENDMENT BECAME PART OF THE SUBSTANTIVE MOTION

RESOLVED UNANIMOUSLY TO:

1) Endorse "Bennett Springs" as the preferred locality name for Area A of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

2) Endorse "Dayton" as the preferred locality name for Area B of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

3) Endorse "Brabham" as the preferred locality name for Area C of the proposed locality of the urban growth corridor.

4) Endorse the alignment of the locality boundaries for the three proposed new localities of the urban growth corridor as depicted on the attached plans.

5) Submit the locality names and boundaries to Geographic Names Committee of Western Australia for approval.

6) Record that the reasons for changing the Recommendation for the locality name of Area A are:

1. Bennett Springs has extremely strong community support and is also endorsed by local members of Parliament.

2. Local businesses including the major shopping precinct and tavern both use the nameSprings ie Springs Shopping Centre, Springs Tavern.

Page 7 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

3. The guidelines of the GNC concerning inappropriate developers estate names coined to promote a development is not relevant.

(a) The area of the previous developers QUBE commenced in 1999 in the suburb of Beechboro and their estate area is now developed, therefore no gain or promotion of the estate could now be gained.

(b) The new locality also includes another developed part of Beechboro which had an estate name of Orchid Park as well as undeveloped land in Whiteman and Caversham.

(d) There is nothing to suggest that Bennett Springs was an inappropriate developers estate name.

7) Record that the reason for changing the Recommendation for the locality name of Area C is that the name Brabham will recognise a great Australian, capture a tourism opportunity and support the vision of a dedicated group of motoring enthusiasts.

Page 8 Ordinary Meeting of Council 24 November 2010

Page 9