Richard Morris Hunt Architecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richard Morris Hunt Architecture Hunt was a preeminent figure in the history of American Richard Morris Hunt architecture. According to New York Times critic PAUL GOLD- Architect ( 1827 – 1895 ) BERGER, he was “American architecture’s first, and in many ways its greatest, statesman.” Hunt’s sculpted the face of New York City, including designs for the facade and Great Hall of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty and many Fifth Avenue mansions lost to the wrecking ball. He founded both the American Insti- tute of Architects and the Municipal Art Society. Hunt was born in Vermont and, following the early death of his father, his mother took the family to Europe, where they remained for more than a decade. The aspiring archi- tect Hunt became the first American to attend the École des Beaux-Arts in Paris. He later supervised work on the Louvre Museum, which was being renovated for Napoleon III, and he designed the Pavillon de la Bibliothèque. After his return to America in 1855, Hunt founded the first American architectural school at his 10th Street studio building. One of his first students, ILLIAMW ROBERT WARE, went on to found the first two university programs in ar- chitecture: MIT in 1866, and Columbia in 1881. Hunt’s greatest influence was his insistence that architects be treated, and paid, as legitimate and respected profes- sionals equivalent to doctors and lawyers. He sued one of his early clients for non-payment of his five percent fee, which established an important legal precedent. He brought the first apartment building to Manhattan, and set a new grand style of houses for the social elite and mil- lionaires of the Gilded Age. After Hunt died in 1895, the Municipal Art Society asked sculptor DANIEL CHESTER FRENCH and architect BRUCE PRICE to design a memorial for him, which is installed in the wall of Central Park across from today’s Frick Museum. Follow- ing Hunt’s death, his son RICHARD HOWLAND HUNT took over his practice..
Recommended publications
  • QUES in ARCH HIST I Jump to Today Questions in Architectural History 1
    [email protected] - QUES IN ARCH HIST I Jump to Today Questions in Architectural History 1 Faculty: Zeynep Çelik Alexander, Reinhold Martin, Mabel O. Wilson Teaching Fellows: Oskar Arnorsson, Benedict Clouette, Eva Schreiner Thurs 11am-1pm Fall 2016 This two-semester introductory course is organized around selected questions and problems that have, over the course of the past two centuries, helped to define architecture’s modernity. The course treats the history of architectural modernity as a contested, geographically and culturally uncertain category, for which periodization is both necessary and contingent. The fall semester begins with the apotheosis of the European Enlightenment and the early phases of the industrial revolution in the late eighteenth century. From there, it proceeds in a rough chronology through the “long” nineteenth century. Developments in Europe and North America are situated in relation to worldwide processes including trade, imperialism, nationalism, and industrialization. Sequentially, the course considers specific questions and problems that form around differences that are also connections, antitheses that are also interdependencies, and conflicts that are also alliances. The resulting tensions animated architectural discourse and practice throughout the period, and continue to shape our present. Each week, objects, ideas, and events will move in and out of the European and North American frame, with a strong emphasis on relational thinking and contextualization. This includes a historical, relational understanding of architecture itself. Although the Western tradition had recognized diverse building practices as “architecture” for some time, an understanding of architecture as an academic discipline and as a profession, which still prevails today, was only institutionalized in the European nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island New Jersey and New York July 2018 Foundation Document
    NATIONAL PARK SERVICE • U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Foundation Document Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island New Jersey and New York July 2018 Foundation Document NEW JERSEY HUDSON JERSEY CITY RIVER NEW YORK Ferry tickets MANHATTAN N Railroad Terminal ew J e r Liberty State Park s e Ferry tickets y Battery f Castle Clinton e Park Ellis r National r Island y Monument Statue of Liberty National y EAST RIVER rr Monument e f rk o Y ew Governors Island Liberty N National Monument Island North 0 0.5 Kilometer BROOKLYN 0 0.5 Mile ELLIS ISLAND IMMIGRATION MUSEUM Interior shown at right Ferry Building American Immigrant Museum Wall of Honor Entrance Ellis Island Fort Gibson 0 75 meters 0 250 feet Buildings shown in gray are closed to the public. Statue of Liberty National Monument and Ellis Island Contents Mission of the National Park Service 1 Introduction 2 Part 1: Core Components 3 Brief Description of the Park 3 Statue of Liberty National Monument 3 Ellis Island 5 Park Purpose 6 Park Significance 7 Fundamental Resources and Values 8 Other Important Resources and Values 10 Interpretive Themes 10 Part 2: Dynamic Components 11 Special Mandates and Administrative Commitments 11 Special Mandates 11 Administrative Commitments 11 Assessment of Planning and Data Needs 12 Analysis of Fundamental Resources and Values 13 Analysis of Other Important Resources and Values 28 Identification of Key Issues and Associated Planning and Data Needs 31 Planning and Data Needs 31 Part 3: Contributors 33 Statue of Liberty National Monument and
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    CANON: ENGLISH ANTECEDENTS OF THE QUEEN ANNE IN AMERICA 1 ​ ​ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First I would like to thank my thesis advisor Janet W. Foster, adjunct assistant professor, Columbia University, for her endless positivity and guidance throughout the process. We share an appreciation for late nineteenth century American architecture and I feel very grateful to have worked with an advisor who is an expert on the period of time explored in this work. I would also like to thank my readers Jeffrey Karl Ochsner, professor, University of Washington, ​ and Andrew Saint, author, for their time and assistance. Professor Ochsner thank you for your genuine interest in the topic and for contributing your expertise on nineteenth century American architecture, Henry Hobson Richardson and the Sherman house. Andrew thank you for providing an English perspective and for your true appreciation for the “Old English.” You are the expert on Richard Norman Shaw and your insight was invaluable in understanding Shaw’s works. This work would not have come to fruition without the insight and interest of a number of individuals in the topic. Thank you Sarah Bradford Landau for donating many of the books used in this thesis and whose article “Richard Morris Hunt, the Continental Picturesque and the ‘Stick Style’” was part of the inspiration for writing this thesis, and as this work follows where your article concluded. Furthermore, I would like to thank Andrew Dolkart, professor, Columbia University, for your recommendations on books to read and places to see in England, which guided the initial ideas for the thesis. There were many individuals who offered their time, assistance and expertise, thank you to: Paul Bentel, adjunct professor, Columbia University Chip Bohl, architect, Annapolis, Maryland Françoise Bollack, adjunct professor, Columbia University David W.
    [Show full text]
  • Babylon/Islip Sample
    Table of Contents Acknowledgments . vi Factors Applicable to Usage . viii Introduction . ix Maps of Long Island Estate Areas . xi Surname Entries A – Z . 1 Appendices: Architects . 305 Civic Activists . 311 Estate Names . 314 Golf Courses on Former South Shore Estates . 320 Landscape Architects . 321 Maiden Names . 323 Occupations . 337 Rehabilitative Secondary Uses of Surviving Estate Houses . 348 Statesmen and Diplomats Who Resided on Long Island's South Shore . 350 Village Locations of Estates . 352 America's First Age of Fortune: A Selected Bibliography . 359 Selected Bibliographic References to Individual South Shore Estate Owners . 366 Biographical Sources Consulted . 387 Maps Consulted for Estate Locations . 388 Illustration Credits . 389 I n t r o d u c t i o n Previously studded with estates and grand hotels, the quiet, year-round villages in the Towns of Babylon and Islip today suggest little of the past and the seasonal frenzy of social activity that was the “Hidden Gold Coast” on the South Shore of Long Island. To many who pick up this volume, the concept of an estate area, a “Gold Coast,” in this section of the South Shore of Long Island will be a new concept. In truth it is an old reality; preceding the development of Long Island’s North Shore Gold Coast by some forty years. Spending the Spring and Autumn months in this area of western Suffolk County on the land that slopes down to the Great South Bay with the Atlantic Ocean visible on the horizon beyond Fire Island was such a social phenomenon that the Brooklyn Daily Eagle and local newspapers announced the rental intentions and seasonal arrivals of families.
    [Show full text]
  • The Statue of Liberty: an American Symbol in Its Classical Context Victoria Tietze Larson
    The statue of Liberty: an American symbol in its classical context Victoria Tietze Larson The Statue of Liberty (fig.1) is one of the most instantaneously recognizable tourist images in the world, along with the likes of the Taj Mahal, Colosseum,Parthenon, and Eiffel Tower, and has been satirized, idealized, reproduced, and generally exploited so many times, that now, more than anything, it is the embodiment of 'kitsch'. Indeed, the vast rnajority of the more than one million visitors annually who clamber onto the Miss New Jersey and Miss New York to be ferried, consuming soda and pretzels, from Manhattan and New Jersey, to visit the Statue, have little inkling of the classical tradition to which this monument belongs and which was so important a part of its original meaning when it was unveiled by its sculptor, the Frenchman Frederic- Auguste Bartholdi, in 1886. Allegorical representations of abstract concepts in female form (everything from Immortality to Electricity!) were all the rage in European and American nineteenth-century sculpture, so in a sense we have to look no further than contemporary art to understand the immediate influences which shaped the Statue of Liberty. Yet the nineteenth-century fashion for such allegories was the final flowering of a plant that had its roots in antiquity. The conventional training of the nineteenth-century sculptor included much study of classical casts, and in one photograph of a young Bartholdi, staged to represent his evolution as sculptor, he poses next to a replica of Polyclitus' famous Doryphorus or Spear Bearer (fig. 2). In his publicization of the Statue of Liberty Bartholdi emphasized its classical precedents-especially for its colossal size.
    [Show full text]
  • 9781938360985 Half Book.Indd
    Statue of Liberty Art of the United States of America Rebecca Hinson Statue of Liberty Art of the United States of America Rebecca Hinson Dedicated to my beloved friend, Penelope Day Copyright © 2013 by Rebecca Ann Hinson All rights reserved. Library of Congress Control Number: 2014917055 Edited by Richard Lederer & John Robuck History Consultant: Roy Bartolomei Rebecca Hinson Publishing Lake Worth, Florida Printed in the United States of America ISBN 978-1-938360-98-5 ARTISTS Cover, 2, 12-20, 24, Frédéric Auguste Bartholdi, Alexandre-Gustave Eiffel, Richard Morris Hunt; 4, Allan Ramsay; 5, William Barnes Wollen; 6, John Ward Dunsmore; 7, Antoine Roux; 8, Junius Brutus Stearns. The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World stands on Liberty Island in New York Harbor. The story of the monument begins with the Thirteen Colonies, which were British territories founded on the Atlantic coast of North America. When the British Parliament levied taxes on the colonies and passed laws that the colonists hated, many resisted. In 1775, King George III declared they were traitors. The colonists formed the Continental Congress, which declared the independence of the United States of America. The American Revolutionary War had begun. French allies provided the Americans with money, 6,000 soldiers, and a squadron of warships. The French Marquis de Lafayette served in the Continental Army under George Washington. During the war, Lafayette convinced King Louis XVI to send 6,000 more soldiers and six more warships. With help from the French, the Americans won the war. The country’s freedom from Great Britain’s power had been secured, but some people lacked freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • FIRST PRECINCT POLICE STATION, South Street and Old Slip, Borough of Manhattan
    Landmarks Preservation commission September 20, 1977, Number 2 LP-0968 FIRST PRECINCT POLICE STATION, South Street and Old Slip, Borough of Manhattan. Built 1909-11, Architects Hunt & Hunt. Landmark Site: Borough of Manhattan Tax Map Block 34, Lot 37. On July 12, 1977, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Land­ mark of the First Precinct Police Station, and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No.4}. The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the pro­ visions of law. No witnesses spoke in favor of designation. There were no speakers in opposition to designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS The First Precinct Police Station, designed in the neo-Italian Renaissance style by the notable architectural firm of Hunt & Hunt, was erected in 1909-11. This impres­ sive ,public building still commands its waterfront site, although it is now surrounded by modern office buildings. The station house stands on Old Slip, in an area which has been important to the city since the late 17th century. Old Slip, at the foot of William Street, was the first slip in the city. These slips were openings between two wharves, where boats were unloaded during high tide. originally a shady, natural meeting place, Old Slip became the site of one of the first official market places in New Amsterdam. The Old Slip Market at Pearl Street reached its peak of popularity in the 1720s. This market lingered on until 1778 and, beginning in the late 18th century, the Slip began to be filled in.
    [Show full text]
  • 1885-1915 Urbanism & the Search for Order
    History of New York City Architecture: 1885-1915 Urbanism & the Search for Order 1885-1915 Urbanism & the Search for Order A period of “creative eclecticism” – buildings were carefully designed to accommodate historic styles with modern functions. Historical association brought a sense of continuity and security in a time of great change. Multiple period revival styles: Beaux-Arts, neo-classical, neo-Gothic, neo-Federal Characteristics of Beaux-Arts style Classical based on Greek & Roman structures Symmetrical (generally) Heavy stone bases (rustification) Use of light colored materials Grand stairways Paired columns with plinths Monumental attics Grand opening/ entrances Extensive ornamentation (cartouch, festoon, sculpture, rustification, horror vacui, etc) The Lotos Club, originally Margaret Vanderbilt Shepard residence/ later Mr. & Mrs. William Schiefflin residence, Richard Howland Hunt, 1900. New India House/ originally Marshall Orme Wilson residence, Warren & Wetmore, 1903. Monumental attics (usually used mansard roofs) Grand opening/ entrances Heavy stone base using rustification stone masonry with the joints between the blocks deeply cut back Extensive ornamentation Cartouches- an ornamental panel in the form of a scroll, circle or oval, often bearing an inscription Festoon a decorative garland suspended in a curve between 2 points carved in stone Grand entrance Light colored limestone Extensive ornamentation (cartouch, festoons, foliated carving) Extensive ornamentation Plinths (square or rectangular base for a column, pilaster or a solid monumental base, often ornamented to support a statue Residences and Hotels The Lotos Club, originally Margaret Vanderbilt Shepard residence/ later Mr. & Mrs. William Schiefflin residence, Richard Howland Hunt, 1900. New India House/ originally Marshall Orme Wilson residence, Warren & Wetmore, 1903. St. Regis-Sheraton Hotel, Trowbridge & Livingston, 1904.
    [Show full text]
  • Manhattan Parking Garages 1897 – 1930: Signficance and Preservation
    MANHATTAN PARKING GARAGES 1897 – 1930: SIGNFICANCE AND PRESERVATION Hilary Grossman Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Historic Preservation Graduate School of Architecture Columbia University May, 2013 Table of Contents Introduction: Abstract ................................................................................................................................... 1 Chapter One: History .................................................................................................................................... 2 1897 – 1906: The Beginnings ................................................................................................................... 4 1907 – 1910: Development of the Automobile Industry and Garage ..................................................... 12 1911 – 1916: The Garage becomes Widespread .................................................................................... 15 1917 – 1930: The Age of the Automobile .............................................................................................. 18 Chapter Two: Survey ................................................................................................................................. 27 Survey: .................................................................................................................................................... 28 Analysis of Survey: ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arindam Dutta, Reinhold Martin, Mabel O. Wilson Teaching Fellows
    Questions in Architectural History 1 Faculty: Arindam Dutta, Reinhold Martin, Mabel O. Wilson Teaching Fellows: Óskar Arnórsson, Caitlin Blanchfield, Christopher Cowell, Eva Schreiner, Elliott Sturtevant, Ife Vanable Martin, Wilson: Wed 11am-1pm Dutta: Thurs 11am-1pm Fall 2017 This two-semester introductory course is organized around selected questions and problems that have, over the course of the past two centuries, helped to define architecture’s modernity. The course treats the history of architectural modernity as a contested, geographically and culturally uncertain category, for which periodization is both necessary and contingent. The fall semester begins with the apotheosis of the European Enlightenment and the early phases of the industrial revolution in the late eighteenth century. From there, it proceeds in a rough chronology through the “long” nineteenth century. Developments in Europe and North America are situated in relation to worldwide processes including trade, imperialism, nationalism, and industrialization. Sequentially, the course considers specific questions and problems that form around differences that are also connections, antitheses that are also interdependencies, and conflicts that are also alliances. The resulting tensions animated architectural discourse and practice throughout the period, and continue to shape our present. Each week, objects, ideas, and events will move in and out of the European and North American frame, with a strong emphasis on relational thinking and contextualization. This includes a historical, relational understanding of architecture itself. Although the Western tradition had recognized diverse building practices as “architecture” for some time, an understanding of architecture as an academic discipline and as a profession, which still prevails today, was only institutionalized in the European nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Why France Wanted to Give the Statue of Liberty to America
    Why France wanted to give the Statue of Liberty to America France had helped America become free from England during the War for Independence and had supported the cause of the Union during the Civil War. In fact, America would not have won her independence without the help of France who provided arms, ships, money, and men to the American colonies. Some Frenchmen – most notably the Marquis de Lafayette, a close friend of George Washington – even became high-ranking officers in the American army. It was an alliance of respect and friendship the French would not forget.1 In 1865 France had already endured 13 years of Napoleon III’s dictatorship. France, who had suffered so much from the anarchy of the French Revolution and the tyranny of the Napoleon dynasty, was ready for the liberty America had achieved. There was a genuine flow of sympathy between France and America, and France wanted to cement their affections and inherit the blessings flowing from America. The people of France wanted to give the United States a great monument as a lasting memorial to independence and thereby show that the French government was also dedicated to the idea of human liberty. They also wanted commemorate 100 years of friendship between the two nations. This is the reason France wanted to give the Statue of Liberty to America--France loved what America had done and desperately wanted the same blessings of freedom! 2 Why the Statue of Liberty symbolizes liberty to the world Edouard-Rene Lefebvre de Laboulaye was the original sponsor of the Statue of Liberty.
    [Show full text]
  • Ellis Island & Statue of Liberty
    COMPLIMENTARY $3.95 2019/2020 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS ELLIS ISLAND & STATUE OF LIBERTY THE IMMIGRANT JOURNEY • HISTORICAL HIGHLIGHTS SIGHTSEEING • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS T:5.375” S:4.75” WELCOME S:7.375” WelcomeT:8.375” to the Statue of Liberty Na- SO TASTY EVERYONE WILL WANT A BITE. tional Monument and Ellis Island. FUN FACTS The Statue of Liberty was presented by the people of France to the people of the United States in 1886 to honor the Shutterstock friendship between the two nations. Today, it is recognized as a symbol of liberty throughout the world. It was es- tablished as a national monument in 1924 and placed under the management of the National Park Service (NPS) in 1933. It underwent an extensive $87 mil- lion renovation, funded and overseen by The Statue of Liberty-Ellis Island Foun- More than 40 percent of America’s population can trace their ancestry dation, just in time for the statue’s 100th through Ellis Island. birthday in 1986. Millions visit the statue each year. Established: France gave the Statue Ellis Island was the gateway through of Liberty to the United States as a gift which more than 12 million immigrants in 1886. It was established as a na- passed between 1892 and 1954 in their tional monument in 1924; Ellis Island search for freedom of speech and reli- was added to it in 1965. gion, and for economic opportunity in Immigration: Between 1892 and the United States. Because of its unique 1954, more than 12 million immigrants historical importance, it was declared passed through Ellis Island on their way ©2019 Preferred Brands International.
    [Show full text]