3 Driftpile Cree Nation
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Community Report Driftpile Cree Nation ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PROJECT THIS REPORT HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PROJECT APPLICATION. GIVEN THE RAPID PACE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE AREA, THIS REPORT INFORMATION IS ONLY RELEVANT FOR TWO YEARS FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 2011. AFTER SEPTEMBER 1, 2013 THE PROPONENT MUST CONTACT DRIFTPILE CREE NATION ABOUT USING THE STUDY. ANY OTHER USE IN WHOLE OR IN PART REQUIRES THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF DRIFTPILE CREE NATION. FMA Heritage Inc. Calgary, Alberta December 2011 [Type text] Calgary, Alberta Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Community Report Report Preparation and Acknowledgements Report Preparation and Acknowledgements ATK Study Lead Facilitator: Ave Dersch / Kate McAnally ATK Study Assistant: Rosalind Goldsmith Mike O’Rourke Kathy Slepokura Aurora Van Buren GIS Mapping: Melanie Meeking Iain Smith Report Authors: Ave Dersch Rosalind Goldsmith Kate McAnally Shannon Finnegan Editors: Tania Therien Marie Maccagno Senior Reviewer: Colin Buchanan This report belongs to Driftpile Cree Nation and its members. The completion of this study and report would not have been possible without commitments of time and energy of the following members of Driftpile Cree Nation: George Addais; Mike Auger; Charles Beaver; Alicia Bellerose; Angeline Bellerose; Bill Bellerose; Danny Bellerose; Devin Bellerose; Farrell Bellerose; Julie Bellerose; Kevin Bellerose; Laurie Bellerose; Lillian Bellerose; Phillip Bellerose; Thomas (Tommy) Bellerose; Paul Campiou; Dinah Chalifoux; Eugene Chalifoux; Fred Chalifoux; Kevin Chalifoux; Rodney Chalifoux; Sheldon Chalifoux; Gordon Collins; Henry Collins; Clifford Freeman; Peter Freeman; Bernard Giroux; Charles Giroux; Craig Giroux; David Giroux; Ernie Giroux; Florence Giroux; Fred Giroux; George Giroux; Glen Giroux; Jimmy Bug Giroux; John Henry Giroux; Lawrence Giroux; Leo Giroux; Louise Giroux; Madeline Giroux; Peter Giroux; Ramona Giroux; Rhonda Giroux; Robert Giroux; Ross Giroux; Terry Giroux; Valerie Giroux; Vitale Giroux; Jean Gladue; Gabe Isadore; Gabe Isadore Jr.; George Isadore Jr.; Jay Jay Isadore; Stan Isadore; Vitale Isadore; Dwayne Laboucan; Eugene Laboucan; Everett Laboucan; Jerry Laboucan; Joe Laboucan Sr.; June Laboucan; Lilian Laboucan; Marcel Laboucan; Nellie Laboucan; Rose Laboucan; Sophie Laboucan; Fred Okimaw; Calvin Okimaw; Corine Okimaw; Duran Okimaw; Peter Okimaw; Roger Okimaw; Roger Okimaw; Eva Oppistem; Torraine Rudyk; Charles Thunder; Dolphus Thunder; Bernard Ward; George Ward; Glenna Ward; James Ward; John Ward; Joseph Ward; Rosalie Ward; Linda Willier; Mary Willier December 15, 2011 Page i Calgary, Alberta Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Community Report Executive Summary Executive Summary A summary of potential project effects related to the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, as identified by Driftpile Cree Nation (DCN), appears in Table ES-1. Please note that this table is organized according to the Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment (ESA) disciplines, project and engineering processes, and regulatory and ESA processes. December 15, 2011 Page iii Table ES-1 Summary of Potential Project Effects Summary Effects Anticipated by DCN Mitigation Recommendations Proposed by DCN Category Assessment Disciplines Atmospheric The Project may have adverse effects on air quality as a result Environment: of accidental spills. Air Quality Climate The Project may adversely affect the climate as a result of tree removal for RoW and ancillary facilities. See also Cumulative Effects. Fresh Water Accidental releases will have an adverse effect upon water Complete further assessments regarding potential accidental quality. releases. See also Accidental Releases. Possibility of the Project altering or destroying any freshwater Conduct water quality testing before, during and after springs identified during the study. Two freshwater springs are construction. intersected by the RoW: one located near Crooked Lake (see Figure 7-1b) one north of Whitecourt (see Figure 7-1d). Four freshwater springs located within 60 km of RoW may also be adversely affected: one 40 km south of the Berland River, two 13 km north of Athabasca River and one 24 km south of RoW in the Windfall area (see Figure 7-1a). Freshwater Project will adversely affect fish and aquatic habitat within DCN Create minimum disturbance along banks of watercourses and Fish & Traditional Territory between KP 180 and KP 400 as a result of water bodies. Aquatic waterway and watercourse crossings, including but not limited Northern Gateway to provide a watercourse crossing Habitat to: presentation to the community. McLeod River Complete further assessments regarding potential accidental Athabasca River releases. Smoke Lake Chickadee Creek See also Accidents and Malfunctions. Little Smoky River Windfall Creek Two Creek Error! No text of specified style Page iv December 15, 2011 in document. Calgary, Alberta Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Community Report Executive Summary Summary Effects Anticipated by DCN Mitigation Recommendations Proposed by DCN Category Assessment Disciplines Crooked Lake Shakwatamu River Smoky River Latornell River Karr Creek Deep Valley Creek Simonette River Deep Valley Creek Waskahigan River Iosegun River Berland River Accidental releases will have an adverse effect upon fish and aquatic habitat. Vegetation Project access roads will add to the contaminants affecting Avoid identified vegetation areas. vegetation. See also Wildlife and Construction. Accidental releases will have an adverse effect upon Complete further assessments regarding potential accidental vegetation. releases. See also Accidents and Malfunctions. Herbicide and pesticide use for RoW maintenance will Avoid using herbicides and pesticides for maintaining the adversely affect vegetation. RoW. Use manual brushing instead to control vegetation See also Plant Gathering. growth. Hire DCN members to maintain the RoW. See also Livelihood. Wildlife: The Project will adversely affect thirteen wildlife habitat areas Avoid low lying, wet areas with willows. General intersected by the RoW (see Figures 7 - 1a, 7-1b, 7-1c and 7- 1d). In addition, eight wildlife areas located within 60 km of the Avoid the Windfall area. RoW (see Figures 7 - 1a, 7-1b, 7-1c and 7-1d) may also be adversely affected. Field visits must be conducted by DCN in the spring to identify December 15, 2011 Page v Summary Effects Anticipated by DCN Mitigation Recommendations Proposed by DCN Category Assessment Disciplines the location of beaver, beaver dams, bear dens, game trails, and mineral licks so that they can be avoided When the Project crosses muskegs, which are sensitive areas, Avoid muskegs. there will be adverse effects. Hire DCN community members to identify sensitive areas such as muskegs that need to be avoided. Provide more detailed information to DCN regarding how muskegs will be crossed. Construction will chase animals away from mineral licks and Mineral licks must be avoided and buffered in such a way that they will not return even after construction is complete. there is connectivity to larger habitat areas (i.e. not islands of forest within areas of deforestation). Three mineral licks identified during the study will be interested by the RoW (see Figures 7-1a and 7-1c). Two mineral licks Hire DCN community members to identify mineral licks that located within 60 km of the RoW (see Figure 7-1a) may also need to be avoided. be adversely affected. See also Livelihood. Wildlife: Accidental releases will have an adverse effect upon wildlife. Complete further assessments regarding potential accidental Ungulates releases. See also Accidents and Malfunctions. The width of the RoW will disrupt natural migration patterns. Protect animal movement patterns by boring under sensitive Two migration routes/ areas identified during the study will be areas such as ungulate migration routes. adversely affected (see Figure 7-1a). Twenty-one game trails may also be affected by Project development including nine intersected by the RoW (see Figures 7-1a, 7-1b, 7-1c, and 7-1d). Wildlife: Birds Project could contribute to the continuing decline in waterfowl Hire DCN community members to identify sensitive areas that populations in the area. need to be avoided. See also Livelihood. Error! No text of specified style Page vi December 15, 2011 in document. Calgary, Alberta Aboriginal Traditional Knowledge Community Report Executive Summary Summary Effects Anticipated by DCN Mitigation Recommendations Proposed by DCN Category Assessment Disciplines Project construction will destroy eagle nests. One eagle nest Hire DCN community members to identify eagle nests that located on the RoW will be affected by Project construction need to be avoided. (see Figure 7-1c). See also Livelihood. See also Construction. Wildlife: The Project will adversely affect beaver habitat resulting in a If beavers need to be trapped and relocated, then they should Other decline in beaver populations. Two beaver dams located within be moved as a family unit. Mammals 500 m of the RoW were identified during the study (see Figures 7-1b and 7-1d). Hire a DCN trapper to trap the beavers prior to construction if they are to be relocated. Aboriginal Two multi-use areas intersected by the RoW will be adversely Traditional affected by the Project (see Figure 7-4). In addition, six multi- Knowledge: use areas identified during the study are located within 60 km Multi-use and of the RoW (see Figure 7 – 4). Cultural Areas Ancestral The Project may