DOCSLIB.ORG

WHAT IS an ATMOSPHERIC RIVER (AR)? HOW DO ALASKA FORECASTERS MONITOR THESE IMPACTFUL EVENTS? Dr

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WHAT IS an ATMOSPHERIC RIVER (AR)? HOW DO ALASKA FORECASTERS MONITOR THESE IMPACTFUL EVENTS? Dr WHAT IS AN ATMOSPHERIC RIVER (AR)? HOW DO ALASKA FORECASTERS MONITOR THESE IMPACTFUL EVENTS? Dr. Marty Ralph Aaron Jacobs Director, Center for Western Senior Service Hydrologist, Weather and Water Extremes National Weather Service, (CW3E) Juneau Alaska Outline CW3E Mission What is an atmospheric river (AR)? What are the conditions that lead to ARs? AR Research using Observations and Globally Situational Awareness Impacts from ARs on Alaska Communities How are ARs, monitored, assessed and forecasted in Alaska? Ongoing AR research in Alaska ATMOSPHERIC RIVERS OVER ALASKA SSMI/SSMIS/AMSR2-derived Integrated Water Vapor (IWV) Valid: 00 UTC 01 August 2019 – 16 UTC 05 August 2019 Provided by: B. Kawzenuk & C. Hecht First Multi-year Catalog of AR Events Created Used RNW 2004 Method & Satellite IWV Data •Long, narrow plume of enhanced 16-Feb-04 atmospheric water vapor in warm North coast sector of winter storms •Identified via integrated water vapor (IWV) in numerical models or observed in SSMI/S Satellite IWV >2cm: estimates >2000 km long •Example from 2014 illustrates AR South coast landfall in California IWV >2cm: <1000 km wide Method from F.M. Ralph, P. Neiman, G. Wick (2004), Mon. Wea. Rev. (“RNW method”) Neiman, P.J., F.M. Ralph, G.A. Wick, J. Lundquist, and M.D. Dettinger (2008), J. Hydrometeor. 4 SSM/I Integrated Water Vapor (cm) Flooding on California’s Russian River: Role of atmospheric rivers Ralph, F.M., P. J. Neiman, G. A. Wick, S. I. Gutman, M. D. Dettinger, D. R. Cayan, A. White (Geophys. Res. Lett., 2006) ARs can CAUSE • SSM/I satellite data shows atmospheric FLOODS and river Atmospheric • Stream gauge data show regional extent of Rivers,PROVIDE Floods and high stream flow covers 500 km of coast WATERthe Water Russian River floods are Resources of associated with atmospheric SUPPLYCalifornia rivers Mike Dettinger, M. Ralph, , T. Das, - all 7 floods over 8 years. P. Neiman, D. Cayan (Water, 2011) 5 Region for which atmospheric river events are a dominant cause of extreme precipitation, flooding and contribute to water supply in the Western U.S. (Ralph et al. 2014) Region of major atmospheric river influence Lake Mendocino - Pilot study ARs as “Drought busters” ARs contribute to breaking >40% of CA droughts Dettinger 2013 6 The frontal wave increased the Phasing of tropical and extratropical duration of AR conditions where conditions leading to entrainment of the extreme precipitation tropical water vapor into the AR occurred Conceptual Model of Synoptic Conditions Associated with an AR “Tapping” the Tropical Water Vapor Reservoir, which leads to a more extreme rainfall event on the US West Coast Marty Ralph, Paul Neiman, George Kiladis Conceptual Model of Synoptic Conditions Associated with an AR “Tapping” the Tropical Water Vapor Reservoir, which leads to a more extreme rainfall event on the US West Coast Derived from Ralph et al. 2011, Mon. Wea. Rev. Where do Atmospheric Rivers Make Relationship Between Coastal Extreme Surface Landfall Globally? Winds and AR Landfall? Locations (dots), and frequencies (dot sizes) of landfalling atmospheric rivers Percentage of coastal extreme surface winds Guan and Waliser, 2015 (JGR) events that are associated with landfalling atmospheric rivers (color fill), and frequency of occurrence (dot size). Waliser and Guan, 2017 (Nat. Geoscience) Emerging Topic: Impacts of ARs on Polar Regions The Role of Atmospheric Rivers in GRL 2014 Extratropical and Polar Hydroclimate, JGR- Atmos 2018 Deanna Nash, D Waliser, B. Guan, H. Ye and F.M. Ralph Dropsonde Observations of Total Integrated Water Vapor Transport within North Pacific Atmospheric Rivers F.M. Ralph, S. Iacobellus, P.J. Neiman, J. Cordeira, J.R. Spackman, D. Waliser, G. Wick, A.B. White, C. Fairal, J. Hydrometeorology (2017) Method/Data: Uses 21 AR cases observed in KEY FINDING 2005 - 2016 with full dropsonde transects. An average AR* transports 4.7 ± 2.0 x 108 kg s-1 of AR edges best defined by using water vapor; equivalent to 2.6 times the average IVT = 250 kg m-1 s-1 discharge of liquid water by the Amazon River NASA GLOBAL HAWK Conclusions*: • Average width: 850 km Synthesis from 21 observed ARs; Used in the Glossary of • 75% of water vapor transport occurs below 3 Meteorology’s Definition of “Atmospheric River.” AIR FORCE C-130 km MSL; < 1% occurs above 8 km MSL • Average max IVT: ~800 kg m-1 s-1 21 aircraft *Represent averages For transects of ARs the Northeast PaciFic used here Ocean in the January- March season Background image denotes weekly AR Uses a total of 304 frequency during cool dropsondes seasons (Nov -Feb). Forecasting Challenges in Alaska & British Columbia Model-averaged Peirce skill score (PSS) Error in IVT for Re-Forecast Hits 1–7 Day Forecast Magnitude Error Forecast models tend to mis-forecast IVT magnitudes by 100 to 250 kg m–1 s–1 AR landfall location by 200–1000 km out to 7-day lead times over British Colombia and Alaska RMSE of Landfall Location Error Forecast Models tend to perform worse over British Colombia and Alaska compared to the rest of the U.S. West Coast when 1–7 Day Forecast forecasting atmospheric rivers out to 8-day lead times Position Error Beyond 8-day lead times, forecast models perform comparably for all Western North American locations Analysis and graphics from Nardi et al. 2018 Provided by: C. Hecht AR Reconnaissance Cw3e.ucsd.edu A Scale to Characterize the Strength and Impacts of Atmospheric Rivers F. Martin Ralph (SIO/CW3E), J. J. Rutz (NWS), J. M. Cordeira (Plymouth State), M. Dettinger (USGS), M. Anderson (CA DWR), D. Reynolds (CIRES), L. Schick (USACE), C. Smallcomb (NWS); Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. (Feb. 2019); DOI/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0023.1 The AR level of an AR Event* is based on * An “AR Event” refers to the eXistence of AR conditions at a specific location for a specific period of time. ** How long IVT>250 at that location. IF duration is <24 h, reduce AR by 1, iF longer than 48 h, add 1. its Duration** and max Intensity (IVT)*** *** This is the maX IVT at the location of interest during the AR. Determining AR Intensity and AR Category AR 5 – Primarily hazardous IMPACTS The Oroville Event Step 1: Pick a location AR AR 4 – Mostly hazardous, also beneficial Step 2: Determine a time period when IVT > 250 AR 3 – Balance of beneficial and hazardous (using 3 hourly data) at that location, either in the AR 2 – Mostly beneficial, also hazardous past or as a forecast. The period when IVT AR 1 – Primarily beneficial continuously exceeds 250 determines the start and end times of the AR, and thus also the AR Duration for the AR event at that location. Step 3: Determine AR Intensity - Determine max IVT during the AR at that location - This sets the AR Intensity and preliminary AR CAT Step 4: Determine final value of AR level to assign - If the AR Duration is > 48 h, then promote by 1 level - If the AR Duration is < 24 h, then demote by 1 level ) 1 AR Duration (hours) - s On the Web: CW3E.UCSD.EDU 1 - AR “Intensity” On Twitter: @CW3E_Scripps (IVT) 250 IVT(kg m Date and Time Atmospheric Rivers Highlighted in the U.S. Fourth National Climate Assessment, released on 3 November 2017 1. Tropical Cyclones (Hurricanes and Typhoons) 2. Severe Convective Storms (Thunderstorms) 3. Winter storms 4. Atmospheric Rivers (NEW in 4th Assessment) CW3E Atmospheric River Outlooks CW3E Website cw3e.ucsd.edu Points of Contact Director: [email protected] Forecast Products/Outlooks: [email protected] & [email protected] Impacts from ARs on Alaska Communities Heavy rain producing: damaging flooding Heavy rain producing: debris flows Heavy snowfall producing: dangerous driving/traveling conditions, increased avalanche potential Heavy rain producing: beneficial effects Impacts from ARs on Alaska Communities: Heavy Rainfall-Debris flows/Record High Streamflows January 14, 2014, Sitka and Prince of Wales Island (POW) Debris flows resulted from: Flooding and impacts: • Very moist antecedent soil conditions – nearly continuous • Highest ever stage and flow ever recorded on Staney rainfall over previous month (17”-37”), with record daily Creek, 17.55 ft rainfall amounts on Jan 14 of 2.5”-3.5” • Numerous roads were flooded and impassable, along with • Strong wind gusts (greater than 45 mph) which helped to debris flows over roadways isolated several communities generate widespread mudslides along steep and deforested disrupting transportation terrain on POW • Debris flows also caused loss of power and damaged structures • Storm water drainage pumps became clogged with debris Staney Creek river gauge showing record Home in the Hollis area caught in landslide, Landslide on the Klawock-Hollis crest of 17.55 feet, moderate flood along with some flooding, courtesy of state Highway, stage is 17.5 feet (source: USGS/NWS) troopers. courtesy of state troopers, Impacts from ARs on Alaska Communities: Heavy Rainfall/Flooding December 10-14 2013, Ketchikan • 5 days of heavy precipitation (wettest 5 day period since 1902) ranging from 13 to 23 inches, with one day totals from 3 to 5 inches • Spillways on many area dams released water uncontrollably into Ketchikan Creek and produced flooding -- Area dams rose 7 to 14 ft with at least 2 ft over spillway Impacts from ARs on Alaska Communities: Heavy Snowfall November 20-25, 2015, Susitna Valley • Antecedent cold airmass kept precipitation as snow in the northern Susitna Valley • 2 day snow totals exceeded 40 inches and 5 day totals exceed 60 inches • The Parks Highway is closed due to dangerous driving conditions and avalanche mitigation work • Alaska Railroad train is caught in an avalanche. Crew is rescued, but railroad remains closed for 2.5 days Left: Alaska Railroad train covered in snow from avalanche.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Southern Hemisphere Mid- and High-Latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, And
    Ahn et al. Progress in Earth and Planetary Science (2019) 6:34 Progress in Earth and https://doi.org/10.1186/s40645-019-0277-y Planetary Science RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Southern Hemisphere mid- and high- latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO: spatiotemporal patterns revealed by satellite observations Dha Hyun Ahn1, Taejin Choi2, Jhoon Kim1, Sang Seo Park3, Yun Gon Lee4, Seong-Joong Kim2 and Ja-Ho Koo1* Abstract To assess air pollution emitted in Southern Hemisphere mid-latitudes and transported to Antarctica, we investigate the climatological mean and temporal trends in aerosol optical depth (AOD), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and formaldehyde (HCHO) columns using satellite observations. Generally, all these measurements exhibit sharp peaks over and near the three nearby inhabited continents: South America, Africa, and Australia. This pattern indicates the large emission effect of anthropogenic activities and biomass burning processes. High AOD is also found over the Southern Atlantic Ocean, probably because of the sea salt production driven by strong winds. Since the pristine Antarctic atmosphere can be polluted by transport of air pollutants from the mid-latitudes, we analyze the 10-day back trajectories that arrive at Antarctic ground stations in consideration of the spatial distribution of mid-latitudinal AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO. We find that the influence of mid-latitudinal emission differs across Antarctic regions: western Antarctic regions show relatively more back trajectories from the mid-latitudes, while the eastern Antarctic regions do not show large intrusions of mid-latitudinal air masses. Finally, we estimate the long-term trends in AOD, CO, NO2, and HCHO during the past decade (2005–2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Extreme Weather Events
    Extreme weather events Introduction The further a particular weather event lies from the typical range of that type of event, the more it is likely to be described as an extreme event, irrespective of whether it concerns a violent storm, unusual temperatures, heavy precipitation, drought or flood. 2012 seems to have been a year of extreme weather events (‘superstorm’ Sandy in the USA, high rainfall and floods in the UK, etc.). Other years in the last decade have also contained droughts and wildfires (in the USA and Australia), hurricane Katrina (USA), floods (Pakistan) and heat waves (Russia and France). At the same time it is becoming increasingly accepted that human activity, principally the burning of fossil fuels, is changing the global climate and causing the atmosphere to warm. The average global temperature of the lowermost atmosphere has increased markedly since about 1980. Are the two observations, which operate on different timescales1, connected? Are extreme weather events really becoming more common and/or more severe, or are they perhaps part of the climate’s natural variability? The aim of this document is to investigate these two questions. Some basic physics of a warmer atmosphere As air warms its humidity is able to rise and so the atmosphere carries more water vapour. For example, the water content of the atmosphere increases by 7% for each degree Centigrade rise in temperature, although globally precipitation is expected to rise by only about 2%/°C because relative humidity is typically not expected to change on the global scale.8 1 climate change is defined as changes occurring at least over a few decades whereas extreme weather typically lasts from days to months.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Rivers: Harbors for Extreme Winter Precipitation by Zack Guido
    3 | Feature Article Atmospheric Rivers: Harbors for Extreme Winter Precipitation By Zack Guido ierce winds loaded with moisture Fblasted into the Southwest on Decem- ber 18, 2010, dumping record-setting rain and snow from Southern California to southern Colorado. Fourteen inches of rain drenched St. George, Utah, over six days, while 6 inches soaked parts of northwest Arizona in a torrent that sin- gle-handedly postponed drought. Behind this wet weather was a phe- nomenon called atmospheric rivers, a Figure 1. A satellite image of an atmospheric river striking the Pacific Northwest on term first coined in 1998. ARs, as they November 7, 2006. This event produced about 25 inches of rain in three days. Warm are known to scientists, often deliver colors in the image represent moist air and cool colors denote dry air. The horizontal extreme precipitation, mostly to the band of red and purple at the bottom of the image is the Intertropical Convergence West Coast, but sometimes inland as Zone (ITCZ), a normally moist area that some of the strongest ARs can tap into, as well, prompting researchers to probe how happened in this case. Photo credit: Marty Ralph. they form and the effects they have in a changing climate. They are products of an unevenly heated through March is the peak season for Earth and form during winter, when the ARs that drench Southern California. ARs have caused nearly all of the largest temperature difference between the trop- floods on record in California, account- ics and the poles is greatest. The most intense ARs can transport an ing for most of the $400 million the state amount of water vapor equal to the flow spends each year to repair flood damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Rivers
    Atmospheric Rivers What is an Atmospheric River? Atmospheric rivers are relatively narrow regions in the atmosphere that are responsible for most of the transport of water vapor from the tropics. Atmospheric rivers come in all shapes and sizes but those that contain the largest amounts of water vapor and strongest winds are responsible for extreme rainfall events and floods. This type of hydrologic event can affect the entire west coast of North America. These extreme events can disrupt travel, induce mudslides, and cause damage to life and property. Not all atmospheric rivers are disruptive. Many are weak and provide beneficial rain or high elevation snow that is crucial to the water supply. The image on the left shows an atmospheric river that affected South- east Alaska on 11-08-2014. The atmospheric river is marked by the narrow plume of subtropical moisture evident in the Total Precipitable Water field extending from the central Pacific northeastward through the Gulf of Alaska. Why do Atmospheric Rivers Occur in SE Alaska? Due to its location on the western side of the North American continent, SE Alaska is often the target for powerful ocean storms that form over the western and central Pacific Ocean and move eastward, steered by the prevailing westerly upper level jet stream. These powerful low pressure systems often have strong fronts associated with them. Fronts act like a conduit to channel warm, moist air northward and eastward ahead of the low pressure system in what is called the “warm conveyor belt”. The strongest fronts are also regions of strong winds in the lower portions of the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Four Atmospheric River Events Over the Pacific West Coast of the United States Isaac Arseneau1, Dr
    A Case Study of Four Atmospheric River Events Over the Pacific West Coast of the United States Isaac Arseneau1, Dr. Wendell Nuss2 1Valparaiso University OCE 1659628 Abstract 2Naval Postgraduate School Atmospheric Rivers (AR) are moisture phenomena related to cyclones which bring moisture and large amounts of precipitation to areas of enhanced elevation along coastal areas. These events bring much of the rain received by the state of California, and the past winter many AR events brought much-needed rain to the region. Four different events from the 2016 fall through 2017 spring seasons are examined to better identify the relative roles of long-range moisture transport versus local moisture fluxes in AR events. Cross-sections of areas and times of interest during each event are generated, along with trajectory analyses of each event which will aid in determining the origin of the moisture being moved over land. Both the cross-sections and the trajectory analysis are taken from the CFSR (Climate Forecast System Reanalysis) model. It is expected that the results of these processes will support the findings of Dacre et al. (2015), which show that the moisture anomaly present during AR events is not actually due to moisture transport directly along the AR itself. Rather, the AR is the result of moisture convergence due to a combination of the warm conveyor belt forcing the ascent of moisture over the warm front and the trailing cold front forcing ascent as it closes the gap between itself and the warm front. The importance of this research is first and foremost evident in the California region, as water conservation in naturally dry areas is extremely important to the ever-expanding cities and communities present there and October 13, 2016 January 17, 2016 February 7, 2016 April 5, 2016 require long-term planning.
    [Show full text]
  • Inland Impacts of Atmospheric River and Tropical Cyclone Extremes on Nitrate Transport and Stable Isotope Measurements
    Environmental Earth Sciences (2019) 78:36 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-8018-x THEMATIC ISSUE Inland impacts of atmospheric river and tropical cyclone extremes on nitrate transport and stable isotope measurements A. Husic1 · J. Fox2 · E. Adams2 · J. Backus3 · E. Pollock4 · W. Ford5 · C. Agouridis5 Received: 30 June 2018 / Accepted: 19 December 2018 © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Atmospheric rivers and tropical cyclones originate in the tropics and can transport high rainfall amounts to inland temper- − ate regions. The purpose of this study was to investigate the response of nitrate (NO3 ) pathways, concentration peaks, and 15 18 2 18 13 stable isotope (δ NNO3, δ ONO3, δ HH2O, δ OH2O, and δ CDIC) measurements to these extreme events. A tropical cyclone and atmospheric river produced the number one and four ranked events in 2017, respectively, at a Kentucky USA watershed characterized by mature karst topography. Hydrologic responses from the two events were different due to rainfall character- istics with the tropical cyclone producing a steeper rising limb of the spring hydrograph and greater runoff generation to the 2 18 surface stream compared to the atmospheric river. Local minima and maxima of specific conductance, δ HH2O, δ OH2O, and 13 − 15 18 δ CDIC coincided with hydrograph peaks for both events. Minima and maxima of NO 3 , δ NNO3, δ ONO3, and temperature lagged behind the hydrograph peak for both events, and the values continued to be impacted by diffuse recharge during − hydrograph recession. Quick-flow pathways accounted for less than 20% of the total NO3 yield, while intermediate (30%) and slow-flow (50%) pathways composed the remaining load.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Rivers in CMIP5 Climate Ensembles Downscaled with a High Resolution Regional Climate Model
    https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2021-49 Preprint. Discussion started: 22 July 2021 c Author(s) 2021. CC BY 4.0 License. Atmospheric Rivers in CMIP5 climate ensembles downscaled with a high resolution regional climate model Matthias Gröger1, Christian Dieterich1, Cyril Dutheil1, H.E. Markus Meier1,2, Dmitry V. Sein3,4, 1Department of Physical Oceanography and Instrumentation, Leibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research 5 Warnemünde, Rostock, 18119, Germany 2Research and Development Department, Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute, Norrköping, 601 76, Sweden 3 Shirshov Institute of Oceanology, Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow, Russia 4 Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research; Bremerhaven, Germany 10 Correspondence to: Matthias Gröger ([email protected]) Abstract Atmospheric rivers (AR) are important drivers of heavy precipitation events in western and central 15 Europe and often associated with intense floods. So far, the ARs response to climate change in Europe has been investigated by global climate models within the CMIP5 framework. However, their spatial resolution between 1 and 3° is too coarse for an adequate assessment of local to regional precipitation patterns. Using a regional climate model with 0.22° resolution we downscale an ensemble of 24 global climate simulations following the greenhouse gas scenarios RCP2.6, RCP4.5, 20 RCP8.5. The performance of the model was tested against ER-I reanalysis data. The downscaled simulation notably better represents small-scale spatial characteristics which is most obvious over the terrain of the Iberian Peninsula where the AR induced precipitation pattern clearly reflect eat-west striking 25 topographical elements resulting in zonal bands of high and low AR impact.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Fronts and Eddies Force Atmospheric Rivers and Heavy
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21504-w OPEN Ocean fronts and eddies force atmospheric rivers and heavy precipitation in western North America ✉ Xue Liu1,2,8, Xiaohui Ma 3,4,8 , Ping Chang 1,2,5, Yinglai Jia3, Dan Fu 1,2, Guangzhi Xu6, Lixin Wu 3,4, R. Saravanan1,5 & Christina M. Patricola 7 Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are responsible for over 90% of poleward water vapor transport in the mid-latitudes and can produce extreme precipitation when making landfall. However, 1234567890():,; weather and climate models still have difficulty simulating and predicting landfalling ARs and associated extreme precipitation, highlighting the need to better understand AR dynamics. Here, using high-resolution climate models and observations, we demonstrate that mesos- cale sea-surface temperature (SST) anomalies along the Kuroshio Extension can exert a remote influence on landfalling ARs and related heavy precipitation along the west coast of North America. Inclusion of mesoscale SST forcing in the simulations results in approximately a 40% increase in landfalling ARs and up to a 30% increase in heavy precipitation in mountainous regions and this remote impact occurs on two-week time scales. The asym- metrical response of the atmosphere to warm vs. cold mesoscale SSTs over the eddy-rich Kuroshio Extension region is proposed as a forcing mechanism that results in a net increase of moisture flux above the planetary boundary layer, prompting AR genesis via enhancing moisture transport into extratropical cyclones in the presence of mesoscale SST forcing. 1 International Laboratory for High-Resolution Earth System Prediction, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers Inferred from Satellite Observations Over the Eastern North Pacific Ocean
    NOVEMBER 2013 M A T R O S O V 3757 Characteristics of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers Inferred from Satellite Observations over the Eastern North Pacific Ocean SERGEY Y. MATROSOV Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, and NOAA/Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado (Manuscript received 8 November 2012, in final form 4 February 2013) ABSTRACT Narrow elongated regions of moisture transport known as atmospheric rivers (ARs), which affect the West Coast of North America, were simultaneously observed over the eastern North Pacific Ocean by the polar- orbiting CloudSat and Aqua satellites. The presence, location, and extent of precipitation regions associated with ARs and their properties were retrieved from measurements taken at 265 satellite crossings of AR formations during the three consecutive cool seasons of the 2006–09 period. Novel independent retrievals of AR mean rain rate, precipitation regime types, and precipitation ice region properties from satellite mea- surements were performed. Relations between widths of precipitation bands and AR thicknesses (as defined by the integrated water vapor threshold of 20 mm) were quantified. Precipitation regime partitioning in- dicated that ‘‘cold’’ precipitation with a significant amount of melting precipitating ice and ‘‘warm’’ rainfall conditions with limited or no ice in the atmospheric column were observed, on average, with similar fre- quencies, though the cold rainfall fraction had an increasing trend as AR temperature decreased. Rain rates were generally higher for the cold precipitation regime. Precipitating ice cloud and rainfall retrievals in- dicated a significant correlation between the total ice amounts and the resultant rain rate. Observationally based statistical relations were derived between the boundaries of AR precipitation regions and integrated water vapor amounts and between the total content of precipitating ice and rain rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Landfalling Impacts of Atmospheric Rivers: from Extreme Events to Long-Term Consequences
    Landfalling Impacts of Atmospheric Rivers: From Extreme Events to Long-term Consequences Paul J. Neiman1, F.M. Ralph1, G.A. Wick1, M. Hughes1, J. D. Lundquist2, M.D. Dettinger3, D.R. Cayan3, L.W. Schick4, Y.-H. Kuo5, R. Rotunno5, G.H. Taylor6 1NOAA/Earth System Research Lab./Physical Sciences Div., Boulder, CO 2University of Washington, Seattle, WA 3U.S. Geological Survey, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, CA 4U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, Seattle, WA 5National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 6Oregon Climate Service, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR Presented at: The 2010 Mountain Climate Research Conference Blue River, Oregon. 8 June 2010 Motivation: Atmospheric rivers (ARs) generate devastating floods, and also replenish snowpacks and reservoirs, across the semi-arid West. Hence, it is crucial to understand this key phenomenon, both as a major weather producer and as one that contributes significantly to climate-scale impacts. Outline 1. Brief Review of ARs 2. ARs as extreme weather events 3. Long-term impacts of ARs 4. Concluding Remarks A few acronym definitions: AR = atmospheric river IWV = integrated water vapor LLJ = low-level jet MSL = above mean sea level SWE = snow water equivalent APDF = annual peak daily flow NARR = North American regional reanalysis Zhu & Newell (1998) concluded in a 3-year ECMWF model diagnostic study: 1) 95% of meridional water vapor flux occurs in narrow plumes in <10% of zonal circumference. 2) There are typically 3-5 of these narrow plumes within a hemisphere at any one moment. 3) They coined the term “atmospheric river” (AR) to reflect the narrow character of plumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief Communication: an Electrifying Atmospheric River – Understanding the Thunderstorm Event in Santa Barbara County During March 2019
    Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 1931–1940, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-1931-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Brief Communication: An electrifying atmospheric river – understanding the thunderstorm event in Santa Barbara County during March 2019 Deanna Nash1 and Leila M. V. Carvalho1,2 1Department of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA 2Earth Research Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA Correspondence: Deanna Nash ([email protected]) Received: 15 October 2019 – Discussion started: 27 November 2019 Revised: 15 May 2020 – Accepted: 3 June 2020 – Published: 6 July 2020 Abstract. On 5 March 2019 12:00 UTC, an atmospheric region is at high risk for post-fire debris flow when 15 min of river (AR) made landfall in Santa Barbara, CA, and lasted ap- rainfall has an intensity greater than or equal to 24 mmh−1 proximately 30 h. While ARs are typical winter storms in the (USGS, 2019). These conditions were observed during the area, the extraordinary number of lightning strikes observed devastating Montecito debris flow on 9 January 2018 that re- near coastal Santa Barbara made this event unique. The sulted in 23 deaths, 246 structures destroyed, and 167 dam- Earth Networks Global Lightning Network (ENGLN) de- aged structures (Oakley et al., 2018). On 1 March 2019, the tected 8811 lightning flashes around southern California (30 National Weather Service (NWS) in Oxnard, CA, forecasted to 37◦ N and 130 to 115◦ W) in 24 h, which is roughly 2500 two storms to hit Santa Barbara County (1–2 March 2019 times the climatological flash rate in this region.
    [Show full text]
  • Precipitation, Aerosols, and Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Experiment
    CalWater 2015 Precipitation, Aerosols, and Pacific Atmospheric Rivers Experiment NOAA HMT Network DOE G-1 (Sierra Nevada & Coastal Ranges) Aerosols, Wind Profilers, Radars, GPS Met Microphysics NOAA R/V Ron Brown DOE ARM Mobile Facility 2, Air-Sea Fluxes, Precipitation Estimates, Radiosondes, Ozonesondes NASA ER-2 Cloud & Aerosol Remote Sensors, Microwave Radiometer NOAA WP-3D Precipitation and Cloud Radar, Dropsondes Remote Aerosols Plume (NOAA), AXBTs (NRL), Cloud Probes Atmospheric River NOAA G-IV Dropsondes (NOAA), Precipitation Radar, Airborne GPS Radio Occultation, Ozone Adapted from Ralph and Dettinger BAMS 2012 From January to March 2015, government and university Aerosol Impacts on Precipitation forecasters, research scientists, and engineers will participate Aerosols (such as dust and pollution) from local sources, as well in the CalWater 2015 western U.S. precipitation. Aerosols interacting with atmospheric field campaign, which will deploy state- as those transported from remote continents, can influence and at ground sites to study two phenomena that play key water vapor can enhance storm development through the of-the-art monitoring equipment on a research ship, airplanes, roles in water supply availability and the incidence of extreme formation of additional cloud droplets and also directly enhance precipitation events along the West Coast of the United States: or suppress precipitation. Atmospheric Rivers and Aerosol Impacts on Precipitation. How will this be accomplished? Atmospheric Rivers Researchers will use a variety of methods and instruments to Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow conveyor belts of water collect a comprehensive data set in environments where ARs vapor that can extend thousands of miles. They are responsible for delivering much of the water vapor associated with major storms along the U.S.
    [Show full text]