DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Checklist of Birds of Michigan's Upper Peninsula

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Checklist of Birds of Michigan's Upper Peninsula ____Bufflehead ____Wilson’s Snipe Field Checklist of Birds of ____Common Goldeneye ____Bald Eagle ____American Woodcock Michigan’s Upper Peninsula ____Barrow’s Goldeneye (A) ____Northern Harrier ____Wilson’s Phalarope (U) ____Hooded Merganser ____Sharp-shinned Hawk ____Red-necked Phalarope (R) ____Common Merganser ____Cooper’s Hawk ____Red Phalarope (R) This checklist is composed of all 399 species acceptable as ____Red-breasted Merganser ____Northern Goshawk Jaegers having been observed within Michigan’s Upper Peninsula ____Ruddy Duck (U) ____Red-shouldered Hawk ____Pomarine Jaeger (R) as of 8 January 2014 by Michigan Bird Records Fowl ____Broad-winged Hawk ____Parasitic Jaeger (U) Committee standards. The sequence of birds in this list Quail ____Short-tailed Hawk (A) ____Long-tailed Jaeger (R) follows the 54th Supplement to the American ____Northern Bobwhite (A) ____Swainson‘s Hawk (R) Murres & Relatives Ornithologists’ Union’s 7th Edition Checklist. Species that Pheasant, Grouse, and Turkey ____Red-tailed Hawk ____Ancient Murrelet (A) have nested in the U.P. are italicized. Uncommon species ____Ring-necked Pheasant (U) ____Ferruginous Hawk (A) Gulls_& Terns are indicated by U. Species rarely seen in the U.P. are ____Ruffed Grouse ____Rough-legged Hawk ____Black-legged Kittiwake (R) designated with an R. Accidental species have been ____Spruce Grouse ____Golden Eagle (U) ____Ross’s Gull (A) documented just once or only a few times in the U.P. and ____Sharp-tailed Grouse Rails, Cranes, and Relatives ____Ivory Gull (A) are indicated by an A. An E designates extirpated species, ____Greater Prairie-Chicken (E) Rails, Gallinules, & Coots ____Sabine’s Gull (R) while extinct species are indicated by t. ____Wild Turkey ____Yellow Rail (R) ____Bonaparte’s Gull Loons ____Black Rail (A) ____Little Gull (R) Observer __________________________________ ____Red-throated Loon ____King Rail (A) ____Laughing Gull (R) Date______________________________________ ____Pacific Loon (R) ____Virginia Rail ____Franklin’s Gull (U) Location___________________________________ ____Common Loon ____Sora ____Heermann’s Gull (A) ____Yellow-billed Loon (A) ____Purple Gallinule (A) ____Ring-billed Gull Grebes ____Common Gallinule (R) ____California Gull (A) Waterfowl ____Pied-billed Grebe ____American Coot ____Herring Gull Geese, Swans, Ducks, & Relatives ____Horned Grebe Cranes ____Thayer’s Gull (U) Whistling-Ducks ____Red-necked Grebe ____Sandhill Crane ____Iceland Gull (U) ____Fulvous Whistling-Duck (A) ____Eared Grebe (R) Shorebirds and Relatives ____Lesser Black-backed Gull (R) Geese and Swans ____Western Grebe (R) Stilts and Avocets ____Slaty-backed Gull (A) ____Greater White-fronted Goose (R) Frigates, Gannet, Cormorants, & Anhinga ____American Avocet (R) ____Glaucous Gull ____Snow Goose ____Frigate sp. (A) Plovers ____Great Black-backed Gull (U) ____Ross’s Goose (R) ____Northern Gannet ____Black-bellied Plover ____Least Tern (A) ____Brant (R) ____Double-crested Cormorant ____American Golden-Plover ____Caspian Tern ____Cackling Goose ____Anhinga (A) ____Wilson’s Plover (A) ____Black Tern ____Canada Goose Pelicans, Herons, and Ibises ____Semipalmated Plover ____Common Tern ____Mute Swan Pelicans ____Piping Plover (U) ____Arctic Tern (A) ____Trumpeter Swan ____American White Pelican ____Killdeer ____Forster’s Tern (U) ____Tundra Swan ____Brown Pelican (A) Sandpipers and Phalaropes Pigeons and Doves Ducks and Mergansers Bitterns, Herons, and Egrets ____Spotted Sandpiper ____Rock Pigeon ____Wood Duck ____American Bittern ____Solitary Sandpiper ____Eurasian Collared-Dove (A) ____Gadwall ____Least Bittern (R) ____Greater Yellowlegs ____White-winged Dove (A) ____Eurasian Wigeon (A) ____Great Blue Heron ____Willet (U) ____Mourning Dove ____American Wigeon ____Great Egret (U) ____Lesser Yellowlegs ____ Passenger Pigeon (t) ____American Black Duck ____Snowy Egret (R) ____Upland Sandpiper ____Inca Dove (A) ____Mallard ____Little Blue Heron (A) ____Whimbrel (U) ____Common Ground-Dove (A) ____Blue-winged Teal ____Tricolored Heron (A) ____Hudsonian Godwit (U) Cuckoos ____Cinnamon Teal (A) ____Cattle Egret (R) ____Marbled Godwit (U) ____Yellow-billed Cuckoo ____Northern Shoveler ____Green Heron ____Ruddy Turnstone ____Black-billed Cuckoo ____Northern Pintail ____Black-crowned Night-Heron (R) ____Red Knot (U) Owls ____Green-winged Teal ____Yellow-crowned Night-Heron (A) ____Ruff (A) ____Barn Owl (A) ____Canvasback Ibises ____Stilt Sandpiper (U) ____Eastern Screech-Owl (A) ____Redhead ____White Ibis (A) ____Sanderling ____Great Horned Owl ____Ring-necked Duck ____Glossy Ibis (A) ____Dunlin ____Snowy Owl ____Greater Scaup ____White-faced Ibis (A) ____Purple Sandpiper (R) ____Northern Hawk Owl (R) ____Lesser Scaup Vultures, Osprey, Hawks, and Allies ____Baird’s Sandpiper ____Burrowing Owl (A) ____King Eider (R) Vultures ____Least Sandpiper ____Barred Owl ____Common Eider (A) ____Black Vulture (A) ____White-rumped Sandpiper (U) ____Great Gray Owl (U) ____Harlequin Duck (U) ____Turkey Vulture ____Buff-breasted Sandpiper (U) ____Long-eared Owl ____Surf Scoter Ospreys ____Pectoral Sandpiper ____Short-eared Owl ____White-winged Scoter ____Osprey ____Semipalmated Sandpiper ____Boreal Owl (R) ____Black Scoter Kites, Eagles, & Hawks ____Western Sandpiper (R) ____Northern Saw-whet Owl ____Long-tailed Duck ____Swallow-tailed Kite (A) ____Short-billed Dowitcher ____Mississippi Kite (A) ____Long-billed Dowitcher (R) Nighthawks and Nightjars ____Blue Jay Waxwings ____Lark Sparrow (U) ____Common Nighthawk ____Clark’s Nutcracker (A) ____Bohemian Waxwing ____Black-throated Sparrow (A) ____Chuck-will’s Widow (A) ____Black-billed Magpie (A) ____Cedar Waxwing ____Lark Bunting (R) ____Eastern Whip-poor-will ____American Crow Longspurs and Snow Bunting ____Savannah Sparrow Swifts and Hummingbirds ____Common Raven ____Lapland Longspur ____Grasshopper Sparrow (U) ____Chimney Swift Larks ____Chestnut-collared Longspur (A) ____Henslow’s Sparrow (R) ____Green Violetear (A) ____Horned Lark ____Smith’s Longspur (R) ____Le Conte’s Sparrow (U) ____Ruby-throated Hummingbird Swallows ____McCown’s Longspur (A) ____Nelson’s Sparrow (A) ____Anna’s Hummingbird (A) ____Purple Martin ____Snow Bunting ____Fox Sparrow ____Rufous Hummingbird (A) ____Tree Swallow Warblers ____Song Sparrow ____Broad-billed Hummingbird (A) ____Violet-green Swallow (A) ____Ovenbird ____Lincoln’s Sparrow Kingfishers ____Northern Rough-winged Swallow ____Worm-eating Warbler (A) ____Swamp Sparrow ____Belted Kingfisher ____Bank Swallow ____Louisiana Waterthrush (A) ____White-throated Sparrow Woodpeckers ____Cave Swallow (A) ____Northern Waterthrush ____Harris’s Sparrow (U) ____Lewis’s Woodpecker (A) ____Cliff Swallow ____Golden-winged Warbler ____White-crowned Sparrow ____Red-headed Woodpecker (U) ____Barn Swallow ____Blue-winged Warbler (R) ____Golden-crowned Sparrow (A) ____Red-bellied Woodpecker Chickadees and Titmice ____Black-and-white Warbler ____Dark-eyed Junco ____Yellow-bellied Sapsucker ____Black-capped Chickadee ____Prothonotary Warbler (A) Cardinals, Tanagers, Grosbeaks, & Relatives ____Downy Woodpecker ____Boreal Chickadee ____Tennessee Warbler ____Summer Tanager (R) ____Hairy Woodpecker ____Tufted Titmouse (R) ____Orange-crowned Warbler ____Scarlet Tanager ____American Three-toed Woodpecker (R) Nuthatches ____Lucy’s Warbler (A) ____Western Tanager (A) ____Black-backed Woodpecker ____Red-breasted Nuthatch ____Nashville Warbler ____Northern Cardinal ____Northern Flicker ____White-breasted Nuthatch ____Virginia’s Warbler (A) ____Rose-breasted Grosbeak ____Pileated Woodpecker Creepers ____Connecticut Warbler (U) ____Blue Grosbeak (A) Falcons ____Brown Creeper ____Mourning Warbler ____Painted Bunting (R) ____American Kestrel Wrens ____Kentucky Warbler (A) ____Indigo Bunting ____Merlin ____Rock Wren (A) ____Common Yellowthroat ____Dickcissel (R) ____Gyrfalcon (R) ____House Wren ____Hooded Warbler (A) Blackbirds & Relatives ____Peregrine Falcon ____Winter Wren ____American Redstart ____Bobolink ____Prairie Falcon (A) ____Sedge Wren ____Kirtland’s Warbler (R) ____Red-winged Blackbird Songbirds ____Marsh Wren ____Cape May Warbler ____Eastern Meadowlark Flycatchers ____Carolina Wren (U) ____Cerulean Warbler (R) ____Western Meadowlark (U) ____Olive-sided Flycatcher Gnatcatchers ____Northern Parula ____Yellow-headed Blackbird (U) ____Eastern Wood-Pewee ____Blue-gray Gnatcatcher ____Magnolia Warbler ____Rusty Blackbird ____Yellow-bellied Flycatcher Kinglets ____Bay-breasted Warbler ____Brewer’s Blackbird ____Acadian Flycatcher (A) ____Golden-crowned Kinglet ____Blackburnian Warbler ____Common Grackle ____Alder Flycatcher ____Ruby-crowned Kinglet ____Yellow Warbler ____ Boat-tailed/Great-tailed Grackle (A) ____Willow Flycatcher (U) Old World Flycatchers ____Chestnut-sided Warbler ____Brown-headed Cowbird ____Least Flycatcher ____Northern Wheatear (A) ____Blackpoll Warbler ____Orchard Oriole (R) ____Eastern Phoebe Thrushes ____Black-throated Blue Warbler ____Baltimore Oriole ____Say’s Phoebe (A) ____Eastern Bluebird ____Palm Warbler ____Bullock’s Oriole (A) ____Vermilion Flycatcher (A) ____Mountain Bluebird (A) ____Pine Warbler Finches ____Ash-throated Flycatcher (A) ____Townsend’s Solitaire (U) ____Yellow-rumped Warbler ____Gray-crowned Rosy-Finch (A) ____Great Crested Flycatcher ____Veery ____Yellow-throated Warbler (A) ____Pine Grosbeak ____ Tropical Kingbird (A) ____Gray-cheeked Thrush ____Prairie Warbler (R) ____House Finch ____Western Kingbird (R) ____Swainson’s Thrush ____Black-throated Gray Warbler (A) ____Purple Finch ____Eastern
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Birds of Centre Island 105
    BIRDSs-OFCENTRE ISLAND By W. J. COOPER Centre Island lies in Foveaux Strait 7 km south of the South Island, 40 km west-southwest of Invercargill and 16 km southwest of Riverton, at 46O27' 30' ' S, 167O50' 30' ' E (Figure 1). The island is about 89 ha and rises FIGURE 1 - Centre Island Most of the island is covered with exotic pasture grasses, club rush (Scirpus nodosus), water-fern (Histiopteris incisa), Carex appressa, and bush lawyer (Rubus cissoides) in varying quantities with clumps of gorse (Ulex europaeus), especially on the northern slopes, and at the eastern end, flax (Phormium colensoi). Some scattered, stunted, wind-shorn macrocarpa trees (Cupressus macrocarpa) are near the houses. The steeper slopes to the south and west have an interesting mat of saltmarsh vegetation with Selleria radicans, Samolus repens, the shore gentian (Gentiana saxosa), Scirpus cemuus, native celery (Apium prostraturn), and Crassula moschata as predominant species. The cliffs, drier soils and rock outcrops feature the blue shore tussock (Poa astonii), Hebe elliptica, and scattered muttonbird scrub (Senecw reirwldii) as dominant species. Some taupata (Coprosma repens) is on coastal banks. 104 COOPER NOTORNIS 38 The dunes backing the beaches to the north and east are dominated by marram (Ammophila arenaria). Pingao (Desmoschoenus spiralis) dominates a small part of the dunes on the northern shore. The island was reserved as "a site for a lighthouse and Premises connected therewith" in 1875 and was occupied by lighthouse keepers from 1878 until 1989, when the lighthouse was automated. Known scientific visits have been few and brief. Maida and Olga Sansom visited Kuru-kuru, a rocky pinnacle below the lighthouse, on 21 November 1955 (Sansom M.L.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Establishments and Extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus Bassanus Colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008
    Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008 Robert T. Barrett Barrett, R.T. 2008. Recent establishments and extinctions of Northern Gannet Morus bassanus colonies in North Norway, 1995-2008. – Ornis Norvegica 31: 172-182. Since the last published review of the development of the Northern Gannet Morus bassanus population in Norway (Barrett & Folkestad 1996), there has been a general increase in numbers breeding in North Norway from ca. 2200 occupied nests in 1995 to ca. 2700 in 2008. In Lofoten and Vesterålen, however, numbers have decreased from 1500 occupied nests in 1989 to 500 in 2008, and what were the two largest colonies on Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa have been abandoned. Small colonies have, in the meantime, been established in the region, but these are all characteristically unstable. A new colony established in Troms in 2001 increased to 400 occupied sites in 2007, but the population dropped to 326 in 2008. Harassment by White-tailed eagles Haliaeetus albicilla is mooted as the main cause of the decline in Lofoten and Vesterålen. Robert T. Barrett, Dept. of Natural Science, Tromsø University Museum, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway. INTRODUCTION the well-established colonies, Skarvklakken and Hovsflesa in the north of the country, there were Apart from perhaps the Great Skua Catharacta even signs of declines between 1991 and 1995. skua, there is no species whose establishment as a This paper documents the subsequent fate of the breeding bird in Norway and subsequent popula- North Norwegian colonies, including the extinc- tion development has been so well documented tion of some and the establishment of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Vulnerability Assessments
    Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change, to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia: Bird Vulnerability Assessments Attachment (2) to the Final Report June 2011 Citation: Gonzalez, D., Scott, A. & Miles, M. (2011) Bird vulnerability assessments- Attachment (2) to ‘Assessing the vulnerability of native vertebrate fauna under climate change to inform wetland and floodplain management of the River Murray in South Australia’. Report prepared for the South Australian Murray-Darling Basin Natural Resources Management Board. For further information please contact: Department of Environment and Natural Resources Phone Information Line (08) 8204 1910, or see SA White Pages for your local Department of Environment and Natural Resources office. Online information available at: http://www.environment.sa.gov.au Permissive Licence © State of South Australia through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources. You may copy, distribute, display, download and otherwise freely deal with this publication for any purpose subject to the conditions that you (1) attribute the Department as the copyright owner of this publication and that (2) you obtain the prior written consent of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources if you wish to modify the work or offer the publication for sale or otherwise use it or any part of it for a commercial purpose. Written requests for permission should be addressed to: Design and Production Manager Department of Environment and Natural Resources GPO Box 1047 Adelaide SA 5001 Disclaimer While reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the contents of this publication are factually correct, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources makes no representations and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy, completeness or fitness for any particular purpose of the contents, and shall not be liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behaviour of the Gannet by J
    The behaviour of the Gannet By J. B. Nelson (Concluded from page 2 88) EGG LAYING THE ECOLOGY OF the egg laying of the Gannet Sula bassana (effect of density, age and nest position on the onset and synchronisation of laying) is discussed elsewhere (Nelson 1964a and in preparation). The act of deposition was observed on five occasions on all of which the tail was depressed and guided the egg into the nest—important in view of the Gannet's poorly developed retrieving ability. The one accurately timed laying took two minutes. Eggs may be laid at any time of day, and possibly also at night. INCUBATION Gannets (and apparently all Sulidae) lack brood patches and incubate their single egg beneath their webs, which become highly vascularised and hot during incubation. Non-breeding birds caught during the breeding season had cool webs, but no known breeders were caught off the nest, so it was not known whether webs remain hot. Howell and Bartholomew (1962) showed that the mean internal temperature of incubated eggs of the Red-footed Booby S. sula was 36° C. and the foot temperature 3 5.8° C, and suggested that the feet do not provide the main source of heat for incubation. They were vague in their alternative and the difference in the temperatures they recorded would seem too small to disprove the conventional view. The egg tempera­ ture achieved by this method compares favourably with that of brood- spot incubation (e.g. 36.6° C. for the surface temperature of Herring Gulls' eggs: Baerends 1959).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Patterns of Size and Shape of the Nasal Gland Depression in Phalacrocoracidae
    PHYLOGENETIC PATTERNS OF SIZE AND SHAPE OF THE NASAL GLAND DEPRESSION IN PHALACROCORACIDAE DOUGLAS SIEGEL-CAUSEY Museumof NaturalHistory and Department of Systematicsand Ecology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-2454 USA ABSTRACT.--Nasalglands in Pelecaniformesare situatedwithin the orbit in closelyfitting depressions.Generally, the depressionsare bilobedand small,but in Phalacrocoracidaethey are more diversein shapeand size. Cormorants(Phalacrocoracinae) have small depressions typical of the order; shags(Leucocarboninae) have large, single-lobeddepressions that extend almost the entire length of the frontal. In all PhalacrocoracidaeI examined, shape of the nasalgland depressiondid not vary betweenfreshwater and marine populations.A general linear model detectedstrongly significant effectsof speciesidentity and gender on size of the gland depression.The effectof habitat on size was complexand was detectedonly as a higher-ordereffect. Age had no effecton size or shapeof the nasalgland depression.I believe that habitat and diet are proximateeffects. The ultimate factorthat determinessize and shape of the nasalgland within Phalacrocoracidaeis phylogenetichistory. Received 28 February1989, accepted1 August1989. THE FIRSTinvestigations of the nasal glands mon (e.g.Technau 1936, Zaks and Sokolova1961, of water birds indicated that theseglands were Thomson and Morley 1966), and only a few more developed in species living in marine studies have focused on the cranial structure habitats than in species living in freshwater associatedwith the nasal gland (Marpies 1932; habitats (Heinroth and Heinroth 1927, Marpies Bock 1958, 1963; Staaland 1967; Watson and Di- 1932). Schildmacher (1932), Technau (1936), and voky 1971; Lavery 1972). othersshowed that the degree of development Unlike most other birds, Pelecaniformes have among specieswas associatedwith habitat. Lat- nasal glands situated in depressionsfound in er experimental studies (reviewed by Holmes the anteromedialroof of the orbit (Siegel-Cau- and Phillips 1985) established the role of the sey 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Guano-Producing Birds of Peru [“Informe Sobre Aves Guaneras”]
    PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 197 A report on the guano-producing birds of Peru [“Informe sobre Aves Guaneras”] July 2018* *Original manuscript completed1942 William Vogt1 with translation and notes by David Cameron Duffy2 1 Deceased Associate Director of the Division of Science and Education of the Office of the Coordinator in Inter-American Affairs. 2 Director, Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, Department of Botany, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822, USA PCSU is a cooperative program between the University of Hawai`i and U.S. National Park Service, Cooperative Ecological Studies Unit. Organization Contact Information: Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit, Department of Botany, University of Hawai‘i at Manoa 3190 Maile Way, St. John 408, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96822, USA Recommended Citation: Vogt, W. with translation and notes by D.C. Duffy. 2018. A report on the guano-producing birds of Peru. Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit Technical Report 197. University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa, Department of Botany. Honolulu, HI. 198 pages. Key words: El Niño, Peruvian Anchoveta (Engraulis ringens), Guanay Cormorant (Phalacrocorax bougainvillii), Peruvian Booby (Sula variegate), Peruvian Pelican (Pelecanus thagus), upwelling, bird ecology behavior nesting and breeding Place key words: Peru Translated from the surviving Spanish text: Vogt, W. 1942. Informe elevado a la Compañia Administradora del Guano par el ornitólogo americano, Señor William Vogt, a la terminación del contracto de tres años que con autorización del Supremo Gobierno celebrara con la Compañia, con el fin de que llevara a cabo estudios relativos a la mejor forma de protección de las aves guaneras y aumento de la produción de las aves guaneras.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining Fine-Scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry
    OCS Study BOEM 2017-069 Determining Fine-scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry US Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs OCS Study BOEM 2017-069 Determining Fine-scale Use and Movement Patterns of Diving Bird Species in Federal Waters of the Mid-Atlantic United States Using Satellite Telemetry Authors Caleb S. Spiegel, USFWS Division of Migratory Birds (Project Manager, Editor) Alicia M. Berlin, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Andrew T. Gilbert, Biodiversity Research Institute Carrie O. Gray, Biodiversity Research Institute William A. Montevecchi, Memorial University of Newfoundland Iain J. Stenhouse, Biodiversity Research Institute Scott L. Ford, Avian Specialty Veterinary Services Glenn H. Olsen, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Jonathan L. Fiely, USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center Lucas Savoy, Biodiversity Research Institute M. Wing Goodale, Biodiversity Research Institute Chantelle M. Burke, Memorial University of Newfoundland Prepared under BOEM Intra-agency Agreement #M12PG00005 by U.S. Department of Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Migratory Birds 300 Westgate Center Dr. Hadley, MA 01035 Published by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Ocean Energy Management Office of Renewable Energy Programs 2017-069 DISCLAIMER This study was funded by the US Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), Environmental Studies Program, Washington, DC, through Intra-agency Agreement Number M12PG00005 with the US Department of Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Division of Migratory Birds, Hadley, MA. This report has been technically reviewed by BOEM and it has been approved for publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Noss NNR Annual Report 2018.Pdf
    Noss National Nature Reserve Annual Report 2018 An insight into the life and work on the Isle of Noss National Nature Reserve during the 2018 season Arctic skuas Introduction Noss is managed as a National Nature Reserve by Scottish Natural Heritage. From May to September each year two wardens take up residence on the island to run the Zodiac ferry from nearby Bressay, and to monitor the internationally important seabird colonies on Noss. Every summer over 80,000 seabirds breed on the island, including the fifth largest great skua colony in the world and the seventh largest gannetry in the UK. The seabirds on Noss have been carefully monitored for decades, with data going back to 1946. Monitoring seabird populations is important both for seabird conservation and because it can give us a better understanding of how the marine environment (which is notoriously hard to study) is changing. This report gives a summary of the 2018 seabird breeding season and shows how populations on Noss have changed over time. Visitors to Noss travel to the island in our small inflatable ferry and enjoy a warm welcome from one of the resident wardens. The cliffs alone are impressive, but add on thousands of cliff-nesting birds and, of course, the iconic puffin, and you can see why Noss is such a popular destination for tourists and locals alike. The island is also part of a working sheep farm and provides an excellent example of how agriculture and conservation can work together. 2 slight increase on the last full island count Seabirds in 2013, which totalled 465, and suggests that the Noss population is stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern-Gannet-En.Pdf
    Introduction This bird • is a fast and powerful flyer but its short legs and large webbed feet make it awkward at landings and take-offs • can see forward with both eyes—which is unusual in birds • may glide for hours just above the wave tips, seldom moving its wings • occupies the same nest year after year, until it becomes a substantial heap of feathers, fish skeletons, and droppings Description The Northern Gannet is one of three subspecies of Gannet Morus bassanus in the world: the other two occur along the south coast of Africa and in Tasmania and New Zealand. Adult gannets have dazzling white plumage except for narrow grey spectacles and jet black, tapering wingtips. During the breeding season, the head and neck assume a delicate saffron yellow tinge. The eyes are an icy blue, and the bill is blue to grey-blue. Young gannets in autumn plumage are brown, with many white flecks. With the passing of each season, they become progressively whiter, reaching the complete adult plumage in their fourth or fifth year. Habitats and Habits Gannetries are located on steep cliffs and small offshore islands. At almost all these sites, land predators cannot reach the nesting birds. An exception is Bonaventure Island, which is inhabited by red foxes. If disturbed, gannets will often desert their nest, particularly if they are nesting for the first time. The offshore islands and steep cliffs that appeal to gannets have sometimes been selected for lighthouses, and several gannetries were probably abandoned in the 19th and early 20th centuries because lighthouses were built on them.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of the Double-Crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax Auritus) in North America
    STATUS OF THE DOUBLE-CRESTED CORMORANT (PHALACROCORAX AURITUS) IN NORTH AMERICA PREPARED BY: LINDA R. WIRES FRANCESCA J. CUTHBERT DALE R. TREXEL ANUP R. JOSHI UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE 1980 FOLWELL AVE. ST. PAUL, MN 55108 USA MAY 2001 PREPARED UNDER CONTRACT WITH *U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE *CONTENT MATERIAL OF THIS REPORT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE OPINIONS OF USFWS Recommended citation: Wires, L.R., F.J. Cuthbert, D.R. Trexel and A.R. Joshi. 2001. Status of the Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus) in North America. Final Report to USFWS. FINAL DRAFT Executive Summary i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction: Since the late-1970s, numbers of Double-crested Cormorants (Phalacrocorax auritus) (DCCO) have increased significantly in many regions of North America. A variety of problems, both real and perceived, have been associated with these increases, including impacts to aquaculture, sport and commercial fisheries, natural habitats, and other avian species. Concern is especially strong over impacts to sport and commercial fishes and aquaculture. Because of increasing public pressure on U.S. government agencies to reduce DCCO conflicts, the USFWS is preparing an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), and in conjunction with the U.S. Department of Agriculture/Wildlife Services (USDA/WS) and state resource management agencies, will develop a national management plan for the DCCO. This assessment will be used to prepare the EIS and management plan. Populations and trends: The DCCO breeding range in North America is divided into five geographic areas. Since at least 1980, numbers have clearly increased in three of the breeding areas: Canadian and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Plastic Ingestion in Marine and Coastal Bird Species of Southeastern Australia
    Gilbert et al.: Plastic ingestion in Australian seabirds 21 PLASTIC INGESTION IN MARINE AND COASTAL BIRD SPECIES OF SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA JANN M. GILBERT1,2, AMANDA J. REICHELT-BRUSHETT2, ALISON C. BOWLING3 & LES CHRISTIDIS1 1National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales 2450, Australia ([email protected]) 2Marine Ecology Research Centre, School of Environment, Science and Engineering, Southern Cross University, Lismore, New South Wales 2480, Australia 3School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, New South Wales 2450, Australia Received 14 August 2015, accepted 29 October 2015 SUMMARY Gilbert, J.M., Reichelt-Brushett, A.J., Bowling, A.C., Christidis, L. 2016. Plastic ingestion in marine and coastal bird species of southeastern Australia. Marine Ornithology 44: 21–26. Plastic pollution is a significant problem in all oceans of the world and accounts for up to 90% of marine debris. Ingestion of plastic by seabirds and its effects are well documented, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere. However, fewer data exist for levels of plastic in seabird and coastal bird species in Australian waters or the southwestern Pacific. In this study, the stomach contents of a variety of seabirds and coastal birds (migratory and resident) were analysed for plastic. Nine (30%) of the birds sampled contained plastic. The median mass of plastic per bird was 41.7 mg and median number of pieces was 3.0. Shearwaters Puffinus spp. had significantly higher plastic mass and number of pieces than other species, and the most common type of plastic was manufactured. However, industrial pellets also contributed substantially. Plastics were primarily dark in colour.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds (DNA'dna Hybridization/Mtdna Sequences/Phylogeny/Systematics)
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 91, pp. 9861-9865, October 1994 Evolution Molecules vs. morphology in avian evolution: The case of the "pelecaniform" birds (DNA'DNA hybridization/mtDNA sequences/phylogeny/systematics) S. BLAIR HEDGES* AND CHARLES G. SIBLEyt *Department of Biology and Institute of Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; and t433 Woodley Place, Santa Rosa, CA 95409 Contributed by Charles G. Sibley, June 20, 1994 ABSTRACT The traditional avian Order Pelecaniformes the three front toes has evolved in groups with separate is composed of birds with all four toes connected by a web. This origins-e.g., ducks, gulls, flamingos, and albatrosses. Could "totipalmate" condition is found in ca. 66 living species: 8 the totipalmate condition, which occurs in fewer species, also pelicans (Pelecanus), 9 boobies and gannets (Sula, Papasula, have multiple origins? Sibley and Ahlquist (2) reviewed the Morus), ca. 37 cormorants (Phalacrocorax) , 4 anhingas or literature from 1758 to 1990. darters (Anhinga), 5 frigatebirds (Fregata), and 3 tropicbirds There have been many morphological studies of the pele­ (Phaethon). Several additional characters are shared by these caniforms; those of Lanham (3), Saiff(4), and Cracraft (5) are genera, and their monophyly has been assumed since the among the most recent. Lanham (3) recognized their diversity beginning of modern zoological nomenclature. Most ornithol­ but concluded that the totipalmate birds form a natural order. ogists classify these genera as an order, although tropicbirds He assigned Phaethon and Fregata to separate suborders, have been viewed as related to terns, and frigatebirds as the other genera to the suborder Pelecani, and suggested that relatives of the petrels and albatrosses.
    [Show full text]