European Parliament 2019-2024

Committee on Fisheries

2019/2162(INI)

11.9.2020

AMENDMENTS 1 - 218

Draft report Caroline Roose (PE650.373v01-00)

More fish in the seas? Measures to promote stock recovery above the maximum sustainable yield (MSY), including fish recovery areas and marine protected areas (2019/2162(INI))

AM\1212819EN.docx PE657.286v01-00

EN United in diversityEN AM_Com_NonLegReport

PE657.286v01-00 2/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 1 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Citation 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

— having regard to Article 3(3) of the — having regard to Article 3(3) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), and to Treaty on European Union (TEU), and to Articles 11 and 191 of the Treaty on the Articles 11, 39 and 191 of the Treaty on Functioning of the European Union the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), (TFEU),

Or. en

Amendment 2 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Article 13 of the Lisbon Treaty which requires that in formulating the Union’s fisheries (and other) policies, the Union and the Member States shall, since animals are sentient beings, pay full regard to the welfare requirements of animals

Or. en

Amendment 3 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Regulation (EU) No 1241/2019 on the conservation of fisheries resources and the protection of marine ecosystems through technical

AM\1212819EN.docx 3/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN measures,

Or. en

Amendment 4 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Council regulation 1099/2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing, of which the key principle that animals “shall be spared any avoidable pain, distress or suffering during their killing and related operations”, applies to fish.

Or. en

Amendment 5 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to Directive 2014/89/EU of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning (Maritime Spatial Planning Directive),

Or. en

Amendment 6 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 b (new)

PE657.286v01-00 4/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Council Directive of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources (91/676/EEC), with regard to fertilizer run-off,

Or. en

Amendment 7 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 4 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents and Regulation (EC) 1367/2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies,

Or. en

Amendment 8 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its resolution of 16 January 2018 on international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals

AM\1212819EN.docx 5/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 9 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2020 edition of the FAO report on the State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA),

Or. en

Amendment 10 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Farm to Fork Strategy (COM(2020) 381 final),

Or. en

Amendment 11 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Towards more sustainable fishing in the EU: state of play and orientations for 2021 (COM/2020/248 final),

PE657.286v01-00 6/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 12 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to its Resolution (2017/2055(INI)) on international ocean governance: an agenda for the future of our oceans in the context of the 2030 SDGs,

Or. en

Amendment 13 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2002 Johannesburg Declaration on Sustainable Development, the Johannesburg Plan of Implementation and to the report “The Future we Want” of the 2012 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development (Rio+20),

Or. en

Amendment 14 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1212819EN.docx 7/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN - having regard to the Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) report on Monitoring the performance of the Common Fisheries Policy (STECF-Adhoc-20-01),

Or. en

Amendment 15 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 5 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to target 11 of the Aichi Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011-2020,

Or. en

Amendment 16 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate,

Or. fr

Amendment 17 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 6 a (new)

PE657.286v01-00 8/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2019 IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate,

Or. en

Amendment 18 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Sustainable Development Goal 14 of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, on the conservation and sustainable use of the oceans, seas and marine resources,

Or. en

Amendment 19 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Citation 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive,

Or. fr

Amendment 20 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

AM\1212819EN.docx 9/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Citation 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2020 STECF report on monitoring the performance of the CFP,

Or. en

Amendment 21 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the 2017 Special report of the European Court of Auditors “More efforts needed to implement the Natura 2000 network to its full potential” (No 1/2017),

Or. en

Amendment 22 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Citation 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Environment Agency report 'Marine messages II',

Or. fr

Amendment 23 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

PE657.286v01-00 10/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Citation 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Ombudsman’s case 640/2019/FP,

Or. en

Amendment 24 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Citation 9 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the EEA report No 3/2015 “Marine protected areas in Europe’s seas: An overview and perspective for the future”,

Or. en

Amendment 25 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the Commission report of 31 July 2018 assessing Member States'programmes of measures under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive 2008/56/EC (MSFD) (COM(2018)562)

Or. en

Amendment 26 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

AM\1212819EN.docx 11/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Citation 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- having regard to the European Commission Report assessing Member States’ programmes of measures under the MSFD (COM/2018/562),

Or. en

Amendment 27 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Citation 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

- Having regard to the Commission communication COM(2020) 248, entitled ´Towards more sustainable fishing in the EU: state of play and orientations for 2021´of June 2020

Or. en

Amendment 28 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the common fisheries A. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) is aimed at ensuring that policy (CFP) is aimed at ensuring that fishing and aquaculture activities are fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long environmentally sustainable in the long term and at progressively restoring and term and are managed in a way that is maintaining populations of fish stocks consistent with the objectives of achieving above biomass levels capable of producing economic, social and employment the maximum sustainable yield (MSY); benefits, and of contributing to the

PE657.286v01-00 12/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN availability of food supplies;

Or. en

Amendment 29 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the common fisheries A. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) is aimed at ensuring that policy (CFP) is aimed at ensuring that fishing and aquaculture activities are fishing and aquaculture activities are environmentally sustainable in the long environmentally, socially and term and at progressively restoring and economically sustainable in the long term maintaining populations of fish stocks and at progressively restoring and above biomass levels capable of producing maintaining populations of fish stocks the maximum sustainable yield (MSY); above biomass levels capable of producing the maximum sustainable yield (MSY);

Or. it

Amendment 30 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital A

Motion for a resolution Amendment

A. whereas the common fisheries A. whereas the common fisheries policy (CFP) is aimed at ensuring that policy (CFP) is aimed, inter alia, at fishing and aquaculture activities are ensuring that fishing and aquaculture environmentally sustainable in the long activities are environmentally sustainable term and at progressively restoring and in the long term and at progressively maintaining populations of fish stocks restoring and maintaining populations of above biomass levels capable of producing fish stocks capable of producing the the maximum sustainable yield (MSY); maximum sustainable yield (MSY);

Or. fr

Amendment 31

AM\1212819EN.docx 13/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas over-centralised fisheries management that is far removed from local reality has, in the past, frequently proved counterproductive; whereas local management is the best means of ensuring a three-dimensional approach to achieving fisheries policy objectives, that is to say one that encompasses the economic, social and environmental aspects;

Or. pt

Amendment 32 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital A a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Aa. whereas Goal 14 of the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development calls for the oceans, seas and marine resources to be conserved and used sustainably,

Or. fr

Amendment 33 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital B

Motion for a resolution Amendment

B. whereas the aim of the Marine B. whereas the aim of the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) is

PE657.286v01-00 14/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN to protect and preserve the marine to protect and preserve the marine environment, prevent its deterioration and environment, prevent its deterioration and restore marine ecosystems, and to achieve restore marine ecosystems, and to achieve Good Environmental Status (GES) for EU Good Environmental Status (GES) for EU marine waters by 2020; marine waters;

Or. fr

Amendment 34 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital B a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ba. whereas under the Marine Strategy Framework Directive, 'good environmental status' is based on 11 descriptors, and whereas descriptor 3 assesses populations of all commercially exploited fish and shellfish which are within safe biological limits, exhibiting a population age and size distribution that is indicative of a healthy stock;

Or. fr

Amendment 35 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital B b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Bb. whereas there are three primary assessment criteria under descriptor 3 of the MSFD – fishing mortality (D3C1), spawning-stock biomass (D3C2) and demographic characteristics (D3C3), but only 10.5% of stocks can be assessed in the light of the two main indicators and there is no satisfactory common assessment methodology at European level for criterion D3C3;

AM\1212819EN.docx 15/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. fr

Amendment 36 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Recital B c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Bc. whereas the collection of data on some fish stocks needs urgent improvement, particularly stocks in the Black Sea, the Mediterranean and Macaronesia, with a view to carrying out a scientific assessment that is essential to the sustainable management of stocks;

Or. fr

Amendment 37 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital C

Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas fisheries management C. whereas fisheries management measures adopted under the CFP are measures adopted under the CFP are beginning to bear fruit, as the number of beginning to bear fruit in European fish stocks exploited at sustainable levels is waters, as the number of fish stocks increasing, making higher yields possible exploited at sustainable levels is for stocks which were until recently increasing, making higher yields possible overexploited; for stocks which were until recently overexploited;

Or. fr

Amendment 38 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital C

PE657.286v01-00 16/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

C. whereas fisheries management C. whereas fisheries management measures adopted under the CFP are measures adopted under the CFP are beginning to bear fruit, as the number of bearing fruit, as the number of fish stocks fish stocks exploited at sustainable levels is exploited at sustainable levels is increasing, making higher yields possible increasing, making higher yields possible for stocks which were until recently for stocks which were overexploited; overexploited;

Or. en

Amendment 39 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ca. whereas these encouraging results must be lessened by the signing of international fisheries agreements between the EU and third countries that transport the fishing effort European states' vessels elsewhere;

Or. fr

Amendment 40 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Recital D

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D. whereas still around 38 % of stocks D. whereas despite the huge drop in in the North-East Atlantic and around 92 fishing pressure which according to the % in the Mediterranean are overexploited, Scientific, Technical and Economic according to the Scientific, Technical and Committee for Fisheries (STECF) has Economic Committee for Fisheries been reduced almost by half in the last 20 (STECF), despite the legal requirement to years on average for all the stocks stop overfishing by 2020; evaluated in the North-East Atlantic, still around 38 % of stocks in this area are overexploited. However, these stocks

AM\1212819EN.docx 17/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN represent a small portion of the total landings. In the Mediterranean, according to the Commission for the Mediterranean(GFCM) 2018 report on The State of Mediterranean and Black Sea Fisheries, the percentage of overexploited fish stocks decreased from 88 percent in 2014 to 78percent in 2016, and to 62.5 percent in 2017 according to the SOFIA report 2020 (http://www.fao.org/gfcm/news/detail/en/c /1174318/);

Or. en

Amendment 41 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Recital D

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D. whereas still around 38 % of stocks D. whereas still around 38 % of stocks in the North-East Atlantic and around 92 % in the North-East Atlantic and around 92 % in the Mediterranean are overexploited, in the Mediterranean are overexploited or according to the Scientific, Technical and exploited exceeding MSY levels, according Economic Committee for Fisheries to the Scientific, Technical and Economic (STECF), despite the legal requirement to Committee for Fisheries (STECF), despite stop overfishing by 2020; the legal requirement to stop overfishing by 2020;

Or. en

Amendment 42 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. whereas in 2019 the Council set 62 out of 78 TACs in line with Fmsy. It is therefore expected that in 2020 more than

PE657.286v01-00 18/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN 99% of landings in the Baltic, North Sea and the Atlantic managed exclusively by the EU will come from sustainably managed fisheries;

Or. en

Amendment 43 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. whereas overcapacity is one of the key drivers of overfishing in Europe and worldwide, and efforts to reduce capacity have been broadly offset by technological progress in fishing efficiency;

Or. en

Amendment 44 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Recital D a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D a. Whereas fish are sentient beings and should be spared unnecessary suffering during capture, landing and slaughter.

Or. en

Amendment 45 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new)

AM\1212819EN.docx 19/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

D b. whereas in the northeast Atlantic the biomass has continued to increase since 2007, and in 2018 was 48% higher than in 2003 for fully assessed stocks. In the Mediterranean and Black Seas, the situation has remained essentially unchanged since the start of the data series in 2003, although since 2012 there has may been a slight increase in biomass;

Or. en

Amendment 46 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Recital D b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

D b. Whereas EU animal welfare legislation is currently not applicable to marine invertebrates, like crabs and lobsters; whereas several third countries have included decapod crustaceans in their animal welfare legislation; whereas Switzerland recently banned the practice of boiling lobsters alive;

Or. en

Amendment 47 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Francisco José Millán Mon, Gabriel Mato, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Recital E

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E. whereas fishing at maximum deleted economic yield (MEY) refers to the level of capture at which social, environmental

PE657.286v01-00 20/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN and economic benefits for society are maximised, which improves the resilience of the sector;

Or. en

Amendment 48 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital E

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E. whereas fishing at maximum deleted economic yield (MEY) refers to the level of capture at which social, environmental and economic benefits for society are maximised, which improves the resilience of the sector;

Or. en

Amendment 49 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital E

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E. whereas fishing at maximum E. whereas fishing at maximum economic yield (MEY) refers to the level economic yield (MEY) refers to the level of capture at which social, environmental of capture at which social, environmental and economic benefits for society are and economic benefits for society are maximised, which improves the resilience maximised, which improves the resilience of the sector; of the sector; stresses, however, the complexity of its calculation method;

Or. fr

Amendment 50 Pierre Karleskind

AM\1212819EN.docx 21/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Recital E

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E. whereas fishing at maximum E. whereas fishing at maximum economic yield (MEY) refers to the level economic yield (MEY) refers to the level of capture at which social, environmental of capture at which economic benefits for and economic benefits for society are fleets are maximised, which improves the maximised, which improves the resilience resilience of the sector, and at which of the sector; stocks are maintained above MSY;

Or. fr

Amendment 51 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Ea. whereas earnings are very unequally distributed between industrial fisheries on the one hand, which tend to plunder a larger share of resources, and small-scale fisheries on the other; whereas more stable and increased earnings from fisheries can provide a major incentive for reducing catches, thereby contributing to more sustainable resource management;

Or. pt

Amendment 52 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E a. whereas for multi-specific fisheries the species management based in MSY

PE657.286v01-00 22/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN model is impossible to apply, even in scientifically well-known and documented fisheries

Or. en

Amendment 53 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital E a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E a. whereas the CFP is not fully implemented yet and some of its measures such as the establishment of Fish Stock Recovery Areas haven’t been used;

Or. en

Amendment 54 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital E b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

E b. whereas globally 66% of the marine environment has been altered by human pressure according to IPBES and 34,2% of fish stocks are fished at biologically unsustainable levels according to FAO;

Or. en

Amendment 55 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Recital F

AM\1212819EN.docx 23/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

F. whereas the International Union deleted for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) calls for at least 30 % of all marine habitats to be transformed by 2020 into a network of highly protected marine protected areas (MPAs), among other efficient area-based conservation measures, the aim being to have no extractive activities carried out in at least 30% of the ocean;

Or. fr

Amendment 56 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital F

Motion for a resolution Amendment

F. whereas the International Union for F. whereas the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) calls for at Conservation of Nature (IUCN) calls for at least 30 % of all marine habitats to be least 30 % of all marine habitats to be transformed by 2020 into a network of transformed by 2020 into a network of highly protected marine protected areas highly protected marine protected areas (MPAs), among other efficient area-based (MPAs), among other efficient area-based conservation measures, the aim being to conservation measures, the aim being to have no extractive activities carried out in have no extractive activities carried out in at least 30% of the ocean; at least 30% of the ocean, without considering the socio-economic consequences;

Or. en

Amendment 57 François-Xavier Bellamy

Motion for a resolution Recital F

Motion for a resolution Amendment

F. whereas the International Union for F. whereas the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) calls for at Conservation of Nature (IUCN) advocates

PE657.286v01-00 24/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN least 30 % of all marine habitats to be the transformation of at least 30 % of all transformed by 2020 into a network of marine habitats by 2020 into a network of highly protected marine protected areas highly protected marine protected areas (MPAs), among other efficient area-based (MPAs), among other efficient area-based conservation measures, the aim being to conservation measures, the aim being to have no extractive activities carried out in have no extractive activities carried out in at least 30% of the ocean; at least 30% of the ocean;

Or. fr

Amendment 58 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Recital F a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

F a. Whereas the FAO State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA) report reiterates that management is the best tool for conservation and the only path to sustainability and that stocks under effective management are increasingly sustainable, with 78.7 percent of current global marine fish landings coming from biologically sustainable stocks;

Or. en

Amendment 59 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Recital G

Motion for a resolution Amendment

G. whereas the 2030 EU Biodiversity deleted Strategy calls for a legally binding objective to protect at least 30 % of the EU’s sea area, and for 10 % of the EU’s sea area to be strictly protected;

AM\1212819EN.docx 25/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 60 Maxette Pirbakas, France Jamet

Motion for a resolution Recital H

Motion for a resolution Amendment

H. whereas the loss of marine H. whereas the loss of marine biodiversity has socio-economic impacts biodiversity has socio-economic impacts on the fishing sector, coastal communities on the fishing sector, coastal and overseas and society as a whole, and should communities and society as a whole, and therefore be prevented; whereas rebuilding should therefore be prevented; whereas fish populations would bring larger rebuilding fish populations would bring economic benefits than the current state of larger economic benefits than the current marine fish populations, according to the state of marine fish populations, according World Bank; to the World Bank;

Or. fr

Amendment 61 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital H a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

H a. whereas healthy habitats, including sandbanks, seagrass meadows and coral reefs, are essential to the restoration of marine ecosystem functioning and to the replenishment of fish stocks and to providing carbon sinks to mitigate climate change;

Or. en

Amendment 62 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution

PE657.286v01-00 26/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Recital H b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

H b. whereas well-managed Marine Protected Areas are essential to enhance biodiversity and to preserve natural habitats of other species such as birds.

Or. en

Amendment 63 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Recital I

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I. whereas there is a strong scientific deleted consensus that MPAs are beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment;

Or. en

Amendment 64 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital I

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I. whereas there is a strong scientific I. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that MPAs are beneficial to consensus that MPAs are beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment; and their positive effects on recruitment, for example through the protection of reproduction sites, protection of juveniles and big mother fishes with high reproductive capacities;

Or. en

AM\1212819EN.docx 27/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Amendment 65 Caroline Roose

Motion for a resolution Recital I

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I. whereas there is a strong scientific (Does not affect the English version.) consensus that MPAs are beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment; (Does not affect the English version.)

Or. fr

Amendment 66 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Recital I

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I. whereas there is a strong scientific I. whereas there is a strong scientific consensus that MPAs are beneficial to consensus that MPAs can be beneficial to fisheries because of their spillover effect fisheries because of their spillover effect and their positive effects on recruitment; and their positive effects on recruitment;

Or. en

Amendment 67 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I a. whereas pollution originating from the land, especially in partially enclosed sea basins, and from other marine activities also have an impact on fish stock recovery;

Or. en

PE657.286v01-00 28/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 68 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I a. whereas both biodiversity and food security are better served by effective fisheries management and not by establishing no-take zones;

Or. en

Amendment 69 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Recital I a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I a. Whereas the overall biomass of quota species within EU managed stocks was 48% higher in 2018 than in 2003;

Or. en

Amendment 70 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I b. Whereas wild-caught fish is by far the healthiest and most environmentally friendly source of protein on earth thanks to the low carbon footprint of the fishing industry, hence seafood is the best choice to fight climate change;

AM\1212819EN.docx 29/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 71 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I b. whereas the Ombudsman’s recommendation to proactively make public documents related to the adoption of the TAC regulations was so far not followed by the Council of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 72 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Recital I b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I b. Whereas fishing at MSY continues to be positive in the North East Atlantic;

Or. en

Amendment 73 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Recital I c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I c. Whereas 99% of landings from the Baltic and the North Sea, where stocks are managed by the EU, are 'sustainable

PE657.286v01-00 30/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN managed stocks' in 2020;

Or. en

Amendment 74 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Recital I d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

I d. Whereas TACs in the North East Atlantic were proposed in line with MSY for all 78 stocks for which scientific advice was available;

Or. en

Amendment 75 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Reiterates its call for full 1. Reiterates its call for CFP reform implementation of the CFP with the aim guaranteeing the sovereignty of the of restoring and maintaining populations of Member States over their exclusive fish stocks above biomass levels capable of economic zones, promoting decentralised producing MSY; and local fisheries management and modernisation of the fisheries sector, with the aim of ensuring its socio-economic viability and restoring and maintaining populations of fish stocks above biomass levels capable of producing MSY;

Or. pt

Amendment 76 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard

AM\1212819EN.docx 31/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1. Reiterates its call for full 1. Reiterates its call for full implementation of the CFP with the aim of implementation of the CFP with the aim of restoring and maintaining populations of restoring and maintaining populations of fish stocks above biomass levels capable of fish stocks above biomass levels capable of producing MSY; producing Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY), by achieving the MSY exploitation rate by 2015 where possible and, on a progressive, incremental basis at the latest by 2020 for all stocks.

Or. en

Amendment 77 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. reiterates the need to maintain or reduce fishing mortality under MSY levels to achieve a healthy population age and size distribution for all populations currently fished pursuant to the Marine Strategy Framework Directive objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 78 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

1 a. emphasizes that nature, fish and other living organisms have an intrinsic value, even if they remain unexploited by human activities;

PE657.286v01-00 32/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Or. en

Amendment 79 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Calls on the Commission and the 2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen scientific Member States to strengthen scientific coverage with the objective that 100 % of coverage with the objective that 100 % of the fish stocks exploited in European the target fish stocks exploited in European waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and that the MSY can be calculated for all determine the TAC levels to achieve MSY, these stocks; where possible, for all these stocks;

Or. en

Amendment 80 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Calls on the Commission and the 2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen scientific Member States to strengthen scientific coverage with the objective that 100 % of coverage of the fish stocks exploited in the fish stocks exploited in European European waters, so that the MSY can be waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 calculated for all these stocks; and that the MSY can be calculated for all these stocks;

Or. en

Amendment 81 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution

AM\1212819EN.docx 33/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Calls on the Commission and the 2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen scientific Member States to strengthen scientific coverage with the objective that 100 % of coverage with the objective that 100 % of the fish stocks exploited in European the fish stocks exploited in European waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and that the MSY can be calculated for all that the MSY be calculated for all stocks these stocks; that it is scientifically possible;

Or. en

Amendment 82 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Calls on the Commission and the 2. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to strengthen scientific Member States to strengthen scientific coverage with the objective that 100 % of coverage with the objective that 100 % of the fish stocks exploited in European the fish stocks exploited in their waters be waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and assessed at the latest by 2025 and that the that the MSY can be calculated for all MSY can be calculated for all these stocks; these stocks;

Or. pt

Amendment 83 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2. Calls on the Commission and the 2. Calls on the Member States to Member States to strengthen scientific strengthen scientific coverage with the coverage with the objective that 100 % of objective that 100 % of the fish stocks the fish stocks exploited in European exploited in European waters be assessed waters be assessed at the latest by 2025 and at the latest by 2025 and that the MSY can that the MSY can be calculated for all be calculated for all these stocks;

PE657.286v01-00 34/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN these stocks;

Or. fr

Amendment 84 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2a. Points out that the Member States are responsible for collecting data and that these data are essential to assessing the health of fish stocks; points out that under Article 23 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1004 on the establishment of a Union framework for the collection, management and use of data in the fisheries sector, the Commission must submit to Parliament and the Council a report on the regulation's implementation and functioning;

Or. fr

Amendment 85 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

2 a. Instigates the Commission, the Member States nad the Scientific community to develop a scientific based model for multi-specific fisheries that allow the management and optimisation level of exploitation that can be used for the stocks explored in this way. This model should make possible apply similar management objectives to the use of MSY in CFP, making possible to follow the

AM\1212819EN.docx 35/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN evolution of the implemented management rules

Or. en

Amendment 86 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Urges the Commission to 3. Urges the Commission to strengthen the implementation of the strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries ecosystem approach to fisheries management in order to minimise negative management in order to minimise the impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks negative impacts of fishing activities and and society; other factors such as climate change on marine ecosystems, fish stocks and society, including by increasingly applying multi- species approaches;

Or. en

Amendment 87 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Urges the Commission to 3. Urges the Commission to strengthen the implementation of the strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries ecosystem approach to fisheries management in order to minimise negative management in order to minimise the impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks negative impacts of human activities on and society; marine ecosystems, fish populations and society; and in order to ensure ocean resilience to climate change;

Or. en

PE657.286v01-00 36/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 88 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Urges the Commission to 3. Urges the Commission to strengthen the implementation of the strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries ecosystem approach according to the management in order to minimise negative objectives set in the new Technical impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks Measures Regulation Regulation (EU) and society; 2019/1241 in order to minimise negative impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks and society;

Or. en

Amendment 89 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

3. Urges the Commission to 3. Suggests that studies on the strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries ecosystem approach to fisheries management be stepped up in order to management in order to minimise negative establish the extent to which that impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks approach makes it possible to minimise and society; negative impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks and society;

Or. fr

Amendment 90 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 3

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1212819EN.docx 37/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN 3. Urges the Commission to 3. Urges the Commission to strengthen the implementation of the strengthen the implementation of the ecosystem approach to fisheries ecosystem approach to fisheries management in order to minimise negative management in order to minimise negative impacts on marine ecosystems, fish stocks impacts on marine ecosystems, fisheries and society; stocks and society;

Or. en

Amendment 91 Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Subheading 1 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Reiterates that fully documented fisheries and quality data is key to improve fisheries management ; calls for the European Commission and Member States to take the necessary steps in order to improve data collection on recreational fisheries, considering their environmental impact and socio-economic value;

Or. en

Amendment 92 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental results of studies showing the detrimental impacts of fishing techniques such as impacts of some fishing techniques; bottom-contacting gear or fish aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their use;

Or. fr

PE657.286v01-00 38/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 93 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and, with a view to results of studies showing the detrimental implementing an ecosystem approach to impacts of fishing techniques such as fisheries management, to establish which bottom-contacting gear or fish practices are harmful to stocks, ocean aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly biodiversity and marine environments and limiting their use; to introduce measures to limit and change them;

Or. fr

Amendment 94 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and encourage exchanges of results of studies showing the detrimental good practices regarding the use of impacts of fishing techniques such as alternative and more sustainable fishing bottom-contacting gear or fish techniques and devices; aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their use;

Or. it

Amendment 95 Fredrick Federley

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

AM\1212819EN.docx 39/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and survival of non-target results of studies showing the detrimental species, and to take into account the results impacts of fishing techniques such as of studies showing the detrimental impacts bottom-contacting gear or fish aggregating of fishing techniques such as bottom- devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their contacting gear or fish aggregating devices use; (FADs) by strongly limiting their use;

Or. en

Amendment 96 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental results of studies demonstrating the impacts of fishing techniques such as advantages of gear that has a positive bottom-contacting gear or fish effect on ecosystems and selectivity; aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their use;

Or. en

Amendment 97 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and to take into account the results of studies showing the detrimental results of studies showing the impacts of

PE657.286v01-00 40/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN impacts of fishing techniques such as fishing techniques such as bottom- bottom-contacting gear or fish aggregating contacting gear or fish aggregating devices devices (FADs) by strongly limiting their (FADs); use;

Or. en

Amendment 98 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution Amendment

4. Calls on the Commission to 4. Calls on the Commission to continue to support plans to improve continue to support plans to improve selectivity and to take into account the selectivity and measures to minimise the results of studies showing the detrimental impacts of fishing gear on marine impacts of fishing techniques such as ecosystems and in particular on sensitive bottom-contacting gear or fish species and habitats, including where aggregating devices (FADs) by strongly appropriate by using incentives; limiting their use;

Or. en

Amendment 99 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Considers that the EU should go deleted beyond current fisheries management practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems;

Or. en

AM\1212819EN.docx 41/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Amendment 100 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Considers that the EU should go 5. Considers that the EU, following beyond current fisheries management the assessment of the CFP by 2022, practices and promote a transition towards should go beyond current fisheries low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish management practices and promote a stocks and restore marine ecosystems; transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems in consultation with stakeholders, particularly the fisheries sector;

Or. fr

Amendment 101 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Considers that the EU should go 5. Considers that the EU should go beyond current fisheries management beyond current fisheries management practices and promote a transition towards practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish low-impact fisheries in order, not only to stocks and restore marine ecosystems; preserve fish stocks at current levels but, more importantly, to rebuild fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 102 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE657.286v01-00 42/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN 5. Considers that the EU should go 5. Considers that the EU should beyond current fisheries management promote a transition towards low-impact practices and promote a transition towards fisheries in order to rebuild fish stocks and low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fish restore marine ecosystems; stocks and restore marine ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 103 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Considers that the EU should go 5. Considers that the EU should beyond current fisheries management increase human and financial efforts for practices and promote a transition effective fisheries management, towards low-impact fisheries in order to particularly through the EMFF, in order rebuild fish stocks and restore marine to continue rebuilding fish stocks and ecosystems; restoring marine ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 104 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5. Considers that the EU should go 5. Considers that the EU should beyond current fisheries management continue to promote a transition towards practices and promote a transition towards low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild low-impact fisheries in order to rebuild fisheries stocks and restore marine fish stocks and restore marine ecosystems; ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 105 João Ferreira

AM\1212819EN.docx 43/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Considers that attention and support should be particularly focused on small-scale fisheries, which are potentially less predatory and more sustainable, not only in terms of biological resource management but also from a socio-economic point of view;

Or. pt

Amendment 106 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

5a. Calls on the Commission to support the harmonisation of the indicators under criterion D3C3 of the MSFD, with the aim of setting benchmarks and an assessment methodology that are common to the Member States;

Or. fr

Amendment 107 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Considers that MSY should not be deleted the only indicator relating to EU fisheries management and that maximum economic yield (MEY) should also be

PE657.286v01-00 44/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN used;

Or. fr

Amendment 108 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Considers that MSY should not be deleted the only indicator relating to EU fisheries management and that maximum economic yield (MEY) should also be used;

Or. en

Amendment 109 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Considers that MSY should not be 6. Considers that fisheries the only indicator relating to EU fisheries management should better take into management and that maximum economic account species interactions, socio- yield (MEY) should also be used; economic factors and effects of climate change and pollution; however existing exploitation targets based on fishing mortality (Fmsy) should not be changed;

Or. en

Amendment 110 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

AM\1212819EN.docx 45/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Considers that MSY should not be 6. Considers that MSY should be the the only indicator relating to EU fisheries only indicator relating to EU fisheries management and that maximum economic management; yield (MEY) should also be used;

Or. en

Amendment 111 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6. Considers that MSY should not be 6. Considers that MSY should not be the only indicator relating to EU fisheries the only indicator relating to EU fisheries management and that maximum economic management and that use of maximum yield (MEY) should also be used; economic yield (MEY) should also be considered;

Or. pt

Amendment 112 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Considers it necessary to increase earnings from fisheries as part of the strategy for more sustainable resource management and that this can be achieved by increasing the commercial value of fish and through fleet renewal and rationalisation; considers, therefore, that EU funding, in particular the EMFF, should be substantially increased and channelled into: the establishment and operation of a system of minimum prices at first sale to protect

PE657.286v01-00 46/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN fishermen's earnings and ensure a sustained supply of fish to the public; support for the provision of storage facilities; support for fleet renovation and upgrading or the purchase of new vessels; adequate financial and social benefits for this sector and those working in it to offset the resource conservation measures being imposed; temporary cessation assistance for the purposes of resource management; considers that these support measures should target small- scale fishing fleets in particular;

Or. pt

Amendment 113 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

6a. Points out that limiting the pressure of human activities requires more research and innovation in the fisheries sector with a view to developing good practices linked to the development of the circular economy, sustainability and the selectivity of fishing gear;

Or. fr

Amendment 114 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively seek scientific advice on MEY, starting with the most important stocks;

AM\1212819EN.docx 47/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 115 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively seek scientific advice on MEY, starting with the most important stocks;

Or. en

Amendment 116 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Calls on the Commission to 7. Calls on the Commission to look progressively seek scientific advice on into whether indicators other than MSY MEY, starting with the most important could be used in fisheries management by stocks; carrying out, for example, test phases on some stocks in consultation with the fisheries sector; calls, in this regard, on the Commission to look at MEY and mixed fisheries indicators;

Or. fr

Amendment 117 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

PE657.286v01-00 48/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN 7. Calls on the Commission to 7. Calls on the Commission to progressively seek scientific advice on progressively seek scientific advice on MEY, starting with the most important MEY, starting with the most important stocks; stocks and providing adequate and updated social and economic impact studies;

Or. it

Amendment 118 Nicolás González Casares, Clara Aguilera

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7. Calls on the Commission to 7. Calls on the Commission to progressively seek scientific advice on progressively seek scientific advice on MEY, starting with the most important MEY, starting by studying the feasibility stocks; of its application to specific stocks;

Or. en

Amendment 119 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

7a. Calls on the Member States to consider the desirability of introducing exclusive access privileges for small-scale fishing activity in defined areas;

Or. pt

Amendment 120 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

AM\1212819EN.docx 49/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. fr

Amendment 121 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. pt

Amendment 122 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. it

Amendment 123 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution

PE657.286v01-00 50/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 124 Nicolás González Casares, Clara Aguilera

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 125 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 126 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

AM\1212819EN.docx 51/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to deleted progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. en

Amendment 127 Caroline Roose

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8. Calls on the Commission to (Does not affect the English version.) progressively propose TACs that are set at the level of MEY for all stocks in the long term and for 30 % of TACs by 2030;

Or. fr

Amendment 128 Rosa D'Amato

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8a. Underlines the importance of small-scale coastal fishing and believes that this sector can significantly facilitate transition to sustainable fish stock management; calls on each of the Member States accordingly to increase the percentage of national quotas allocated to this sector;

Or. it

PE657.286v01-00 52/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 129 Isabel Carvalhais

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8 a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Member States adopt data collection programmes that collect data covering the impact of fishing activities on the wider environment, including on the bycatch of sensitive species and impact on seabed;

Or. en

Amendment 130 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8 a. Considers that this approach should also be applied to the external dimension of the CFP.;

Or. en

Amendment 131 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8 b. Urges the Commission to tackle the problem of overcapacity, including by requesting the STECF to implement a methodology that takes into account the ‘technological creep’ (i.e. gradual increase in fishing power) when assessing

AM\1212819EN.docx 53/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN trends in fishing fleet capacity;

Or. en

Amendment 132 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 8 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

8 c. Demands that the Council proactively makes public all documents related to the adoption of TAC Regulations in line with the Ombudsman’s recommendation and comply with Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 and Regulation (EC) 1367/2006;

Or. en

Amendment 133 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Subheading 2

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Expanding the network of protected areas Improving the management of marine and improving its management protected areas

Or. en

Amendment 134 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Emphasises that, while the deleted

PE657.286v01-00 54/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN European Union has made progress and met the target of designating 10 % of Europe’s waters as protected areas, the network of MPAs is far from being fully effective, and that only a very small share of the existing MPAs have management plans and protection measures;

Or. en

Amendment 135 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9. Emphasises that, while the 9. Emphasises that, while the European Union has made progress and European Union has made progress and met the target of designating 10 % of met the target of designating 10 % of Europe’s waters as protected areas, the Europe’s waters as protected areas, the network of MPAs is far from being fully network of MPAs is far from being fully effective, and that only a very small share effective, and that only a very small share of the existing MPAs have management of the existing MPAs have management plans and protection measures; plans and protection measures; Insists that all MPA's should constitute the primary basis of a balanced ecosystem approach to Marine Spatial Planning; Stresses that for effective protection of our ocean to be achieved, from the seabed to the surface, MPA's must have comprehensive management plans that address all cumulative human stressors which impact biodiversity.

Or. en

Amendment 136 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1212819EN.docx 55/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN 9a. points out that MPAs provide key ecological functions in the reproduction of fish stocks (spawning grounds and nurseries);

Or. fr

Amendment 137 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

9 a. Highlights that successful MPAs offer large socio-economic benefits, especially for coastal communities, the fisheries and tourism sector;

Or. en

Amendment 138 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s deleted proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected;

Or. en

Amendment 139 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

PE657.286v01-00 56/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected; considers that these objectives should be part of Member State development strategies and should be proposed and agreed by them, always in close coordination and cooperation with local communities, entities and authorities and the municipal councils, thereby encouraging local management;

Or. pt

Amendment 140 François-Xavier Bellamy

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. calls on the Commission, in its proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to accompany to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU its decision to protect 30% of the sea area protected; in the EU with an impact assessment based on scientifically proven facts with a view to evaluating the consequences of a goal of this kind on fisheries and to prevent any adverse effects.

Or. fr

Amendment 141 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy,

AM\1212819EN.docx 57/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected, which includes areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques are banned, and fisheries stock recovery areas are set, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 142 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected and stresses that no industrial nor extractive activities should be located in these;

Or. en

Amendment 143 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected and 10 % strictly protected;

Or. fr

Amendment 144 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

PE657.286v01-00 58/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Takes note of the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected;

Or. en

Amendment 145 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Takes note of the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected;

Or. en

Amendment 146 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU to protect the EU sea area more protected; effectively;

Or. it

Amendment 147 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

AM\1212819EN.docx 59/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10. Welcomes the Commission’s 10. Notes the Commission’s proposal, proposal, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, in its 2030 Biodiversity Strategy, to have at to have at least 30 % of sea area in the EU least 30 % of sea area in the EU protected; protected;

Or. fr

Amendment 148 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

10 a. Calls on the Commission to conduct an impact assessment of this proposal;

Or. en

Amendment 149 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, deleted meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

PE657.286v01-00 60/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Or. fr

Amendment 150 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, deleted meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 151 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, deleted meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. en

AM\1212819EN.docx 61/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Amendment 152 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 11. Calls that 1/3 of that area, meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a 10 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), activities are prohibited (no-take zones); areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom- contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 153 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 11. Calls on the Member States to 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a consider the possibility and value of high level of protection, which includes designating up to half of that area, areas where all catches and any economic meaning 15 % of European waters, to activities are prohibited (no-take zones), benefit from a high level of protection, areas where only the most destructive which includes areas where all catches and fishing techniques, such as bottom- any economic activities are prohibited (no- contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock take zones), areas where only the most recovery areas, as provided for under the destructive fishing techniques, such as CFP; bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. pt

Amendment 154 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard

PE657.286v01-00 62/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, 11. Stresses that all MPA's should meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, by benefit from a high level of protection, prohibiting fishing activities, in particular which includes areas where all catches the most destructive fishing techniques, and any economic activities are prohibited such as bottom-contacting gear, and other (no-take zones), areas where only the most harmful economic activities inside these destructive fishing techniques, such as area's. bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 155 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, 11. Calls for a high level of protection, meaning 15 % of European waters, to based on suitable scientific assessment, benefit from a high level of protection, for areas recognised as being at risk, which includes areas where all catches including those where all catches and any and any economic activities are prohibited economic activities are prohibited (no-take (no-take zones), areas where only the most zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and bottom-contacting gear shown to have an fish stock recovery areas, as provided for adverse impact, are banned, and fish stock under the CFP; recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. it

Amendment 156 Bert-Jan Ruissen, Ruža Tomašić

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

AM\1212819EN.docx 63/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, 11. Takes note of the Commission's meaning 15 % of European waters, to proposal to have 10 % of European waters, benefit from a high level of protection, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no- any economic activities are prohibited (no- take zones), areas where only the most take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and bottom-contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP; under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 157 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a 10 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), activities are prohibited (no-take zones), areas where only the most destructive areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom- fishing techniques, such as bottom- contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP; CFP;

Or. fr

Amendment 158 Caroline Roose

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, meaning (Does not affect the English version.)

PE657.286v01-00 64/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), areas where only the most destructive fishing techniques, such as bottom- contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as provided for under the CFP;

Or. fr

Amendment 159 Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 11. Calls for half of that area, meaning 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a 15 % of European waters, to benefit from a high level of protection, which includes high level of protection, which includes areas where all catches and any economic areas where all catches and any economic activities are prohibited (no-take zones), activities are prohibited, areas where only areas where only the most destructive the most destructive fishing techniques, fishing techniques, such as bottom- such as bottom-contacting gear, are contacting gear, are banned, and fish stock banned, and fish stock recovery areas, as recovery areas, as provided for under the provided for under the CFP; CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 160 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. urge the Commission to adopt guidelines for the MPA targets to be implemented at each EU Marine regions level to ensure balanced geographic distribution and ecological

AM\1212819EN.docx 65/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN representativity;

Or. en

Amendment 161 Isabel Carvalhais

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

11 a. Urge the Commission to adopt guidelines for the MPA targets to be implemented at each EU maritime region to ensure balanced geographic distribution and ecological representativity;

Or. en

Amendment 162 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Calls for MPAs to be established deleted as part of a coherent network of connected areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas; recalls the requirement to cease fishing with bottom-contacting gear below 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or are likely to occur;

Or. en

Amendment 163 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

PE657.286v01-00 66/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Calls for MPAs to be established as 13. Calls for MPAs to be established as part of a coherent network of connected part of a coherent network of connected areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas; recalls the requirement to cease areas; fishing with bottom-contacting gear below 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or are likely to occur;

Or. en

Amendment 164 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

13. Calls for MPAs to be established as 13. Calls for MPAs to be established as part of a coherent network of connected part of a coherent network of connected areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas, including offshore and deep-sea areas; recalls the requirement to cease areas, and with a view to ensure balanced fishing with bottom-contacting gear below geographic distribution and ecological 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine representativity; recalls the requirement to ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or cease fishing with bottom-contacting gear are likely to occur; below 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or are likely to occur;

Or. en

Amendment 165 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1212819EN.docx 67/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN 13. Calls for MPAs to be established as 13. Calls for MPAs to be established as part of a coherent network of connected part of a coherent European network of areas, including offshore and deep-sea connected areas, including offshore, high- areas; recalls the requirement to cease seas and deep-sea areas; recalls the fishing with bottom-contacting gear below requirement to cease fishing with bottom- 400 m in areas where vulnerable marine contacting gear below 400 m in areas ecosystems (VMEs) are known to exist or where vulnerable marine ecosystems are likely to occur; (VMEs) are known to exist or are likely to occur;

Or. en

Amendment 166 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Urges the Commission to set strong 14. Urges the Commission to set strong MPA management guidelines for Member MPA management guidelines for Member States and to establish a classification of States and to establish a classification of MPAs taking into account their stage of MPAs taking into account their stage of establishment, management plans and establishment, management plans and ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing guidelines such as the global standards of guidelines such as the global standards of the IUCN; the IUCN; and to implement a formal and effective European Marine Protected Areas Network;

Or. en

Amendment 167 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Urges the Commission to set strong 14. Urges the Commission to set strong MPA management guidelines for Member science-based MPA management States and to establish a classification of guidelines for Member States and to MPAs taking into account their stage of establish a classification of MPAs taking

PE657.286v01-00 68/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN establishment, management plans and into account their stage of establishment, ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing management plans and ecosystemic guidelines such as the global standards of benefits, drawing on existing guidelines the IUCN; such as the global standards of the IUCN;

Or. fr

Amendment 168 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Urges the Commission to set strong 14. Urges the Commission to set clear MPA management guidelines for Member MPA management guidelines for Member States and to establish a classification of States and to establish a classification of MPAs taking into account their stage of MPAs taking into account their stage of establishment, management plans and establishment, management plans and ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing guidelines such as the global standards of guidelines; the IUCN;

Or. fr

Amendment 169 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14. Urges the Commission to set strong 14. Urges the Commission to propose MPA management guidelines for Member strong MPA management guidelines for States and to establish a classification of Member States and to establish a MPAs taking into account their stage of classification of MPAs taking into account establishment, management plans and their stage of establishment, management ecosystemic benefits, drawing on existing plans and ecosystemic benefits, drawing on guidelines such as the global standards of existing guidelines such as the global the IUCN; standards of the IUCN;

Or. pt

AM\1212819EN.docx 69/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Amendment 170 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

14a. Insists that the Commission must accompany fisheries agreements with third countries with management and governance measures such as protected marine areas, thus making it possible to improve fish stock management and tackle these agreements' many cumulative effects, such as pollution, IUU fishing and the development of some practices such as industrial fisheries that put the sustainability of some stocks at risk;

Or. fr

Amendment 171 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management stronger and more effective management plans for the existing MPAs and to put in plans for the existing MPAs and to put in place stronger control measures to ensure place stronger control measures to ensure that MPAs are respected, including by that MPAs are respected, including by involving the fisheries sector; involving the fisheries sector and the relevant organisations with regard to the management of human and economic activities at sea (regional fisheries management organisations, regional sea conventions, the International Maritime Organisation, and so on);

Or. fr

Amendment 172

PE657.286v01-00 70/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management stronger and more effective management plans for the existing MPAs and to put in plans for the existing MPAs and to put in place stronger control measures to ensure place stronger control measures to ensure that MPAs are respected, including by that MPAs are respected, including by involving the fisheries sector; involving the fisheries sector, expanding the scope of the Vessel Monitoring System (VMS) such as by transmitting vessel position data close to real-time and strengthening of on-the-spot controls;

Or. en

Amendment 173 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management stronger and more effective management plans for the existing MPAs and to put in plans for the existing MPAs and to put in place stronger control measures to ensure place stronger monitoring, surveillance that MPAs are respected, including by and control measures to ensure that MPAs involving the fisheries sector; are respected, including by involving all stake holders in particular the commercial and recreational fisheries sector;

Or. en

Amendment 174 Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

AM\1212819EN.docx 71/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management stronger and more effective management plans for the existing MPAs and to put in plans for the existing MPAs and to put in place stronger control measures to ensure place stronger control measures to ensure that MPAs are respected, including by that MPAs are respected, including by involving the fisheries sector; involving the commercial fisheries sector; as well as recreational fisheries;

Or. en

Amendment 175 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set strong stronger and more effective management and more effective management plans for plans for the existing MPAs and to put in the existing MPAs and to put in place place stronger control measures to ensure suitable control measures to ensure that that MPAs are respected, including by MPAs are respected, including by involving the fisheries sector; involving the fisheries sector;

Or. it

Amendment 176 François-Xavier Bellamy

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set strong stronger and more effective management and effective management plans for the plans for the existing MPAs and to put in existing MPAs and to put in place strong place stronger control measures to ensure control measures to ensure that MPAs are that MPAs are respected, including by respected, including by involving the involving the fisheries sector; fisheries sector;

Or. fr

PE657.286v01-00 72/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 177 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15. Urges Member States to set 15. Urges Member States to set stronger and more effective management effective management plans for the plans for the existing MPAs and to put in existing MPAs and to put in place effective place stronger control measures to ensure control measures to ensure that MPAs are that MPAs are respected, including by respected, including by involving the involving the fisheries sector; fisheries sector;

Or. en

Amendment 178 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15 a. Calls on the Commission to start infringement procedures against Member States that are not respecting their obligations regarding the effectiveness of the protection of MPAs;

Or. en

Amendment 179 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15 b. Calls on the Commission to take action when Member States fail to agree, within one year of ongoing negotiations (informal and formal), on the adoption of

AM\1212819EN.docx 73/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN joint recommendations for fisheries management measures in offshore MPAs in line with Article 11 of the CFP, including by proposing its own measures or by taking emergency measures to protect the site as long as an agreement has not been reached;

Or. en

Amendment 180 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 c (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15 c. Stresses that greater scrutiny over fisheries management measures within Natura 2000 sites, submitted by EU Member States, is necessary in order to ensure that conservation objectives are achieved in line with Article 11 of the Common Fisheries Policy,

Or. en

Amendment 181 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 15 d (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

15 d. Emphasises that the designation of areas and development of management measures should be based on the best available scientific advice;

Or. en

Amendment 182

PE657.286v01-00 74/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by them being rational, justified by science fishers, coastal communities and other and not simply established to reach a stakeholders; calls therefore for the quota, thereby the need for cost-benefit inclusion of the fisheries sector, including analyses, monitoring and enforcement. In its artisanal component, as well as other order for MPAs to be accepted by fishers, relevant stakeholders, in the design, coastal communities and other stakeholders management and monitoring of MPAs; they need to understand why, how and what must be protected; calls therefore for the inclusion of the fisheries sector, including its artisanal component, as well as other relevant stakeholders, such as fisheries management bodies, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs;

Or. en

Amendment 183 Niclas Herbst

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that there should not MPAs and other protected areas lies in be a systematic ban of all human activities them being accepted and embraced by in MPAs and that some activities are fishers, coastal communities and other compatible and can serve the objectives of stakeholders; calls therefore for the MPAs ; recognises that the success of inclusion of the fisheries sector, including MPAs and other protected areas lies in its artisanal component, as well as other them being accepted and embraced by relevant stakeholders, in the design, fishers, coastal communities and other management and monitoring of MPAs; stakeholders; calls therefore for the inclusion of the commercial fisheries sector, including its artisanal component, as well as other relevant stakeholders, such as anglers organisations, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs;

AM\1212819EN.docx 75/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Or. en

Amendment 184 François-Xavier Bellamy

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by their scientific justification founded on fishers, coastal communities and other impact analyses that encourage fishers, stakeholders; calls therefore for the coastal communities and other stakeholders inclusion of the fisheries sector, including to accept and adopt them; calls therefore its artisanal component, as well as other for the inclusion of the fisheries sector, relevant stakeholders, in the design, including its artisanal component and management and monitoring of MPAs; scientific fisheries-management bodies, as well as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs;

Or. fr

Amendment 185 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by them being accepted and embraced by fishers, coastal communities and other fishers, coastal communities and other stakeholders; calls therefore for the stakeholders; calls therefore for the inclusion of the fisheries sector, including inclusion of the fisheries sector, including its artisanal component, as well as other its artisanal component, as well as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, relevant stakeholders, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs; management and monitoring of MPAs, providing them with adequate funding to meet the cost of prohibitions;

Or. it

PE657.286v01-00 76/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 186 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by them being accepted and embraced by fishers, coastal communities and other fishers, coastal communities and other stakeholders; calls therefore for the stakeholders; calls therefore for the inclusion of the fisheries sector, including inclusion of the fisheries sector, including its artisanal component, as well as other its artisanal component, as well as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, relevant stakeholders, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs; management and monitoring of MPAs and for civil society to be encouraged to participate by introducing educational marine areas;

Or. fr

Amendment 187 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by them being accepted and embraced by fishers, coastal communities and other fishers, coastal communities and other stakeholders; calls therefore for the professional and recreational inclusion of the fisheries sector, including stakeholders; calls therefore for the its artisanal component, as well as other inclusion of the fisheries sector, including relevant stakeholders, in the design, its artisanal and recreational component, management and monitoring of MPAs; as well as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, management, monitoring and even control of MPAs;

Or. en

AM\1212819EN.docx 77/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Amendment 188 João Ferreira

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the successful MPAs and other protected areas lies in implementation and ecological them being accepted and embraced by development of MPAs and other protected fishers, coastal communities and other areas depends on them being accepted and stakeholders; calls therefore for the embraced by fishers, coastal communities inclusion of the fisheries sector, including and other stakeholders; calls therefore for its artisanal component, as well as other the inclusion of the fisheries sector, relevant stakeholders, in the design, including its artisanal component, as well management and monitoring of MPAs; as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs;

Or. pt

Amendment 189 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution Amendment

16. Recognises that the success of 16. Recognises that the success of MPAs and other protected areas lies in MPAs and other protected areas lies in them being accepted and embraced by them being accepted and embraced by fishers, coastal communities and other fishers, coastal communities and other stakeholders; calls therefore for the stakeholders; calls therefore for the inclusion of the fisheries sector, including inclusion of the fisheries sector, including its artisanal component, as well as other its artisanal component, as well as other relevant stakeholders, in the design, relevant stakeholders, in the design, management and monitoring of MPAs; governance and monitoring of MPAs;

Or. fr

Amendment 190 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

PE657.286v01-00 78/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Stresses the importance of having a 17. Stresses the importance of having a comprehensive and coherent approach comprehensive and coherent approach when establishing MPAs, by not only when establishing MPAs, by not only limiting commercial fishing activities but limiting commercial fishing activities but also tackling other activities such as fossil also tackling other activities such as fossil fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, large-scale aquaculture, dredging, transport large-scale aquaculture, dredging, and recreational fisheries; transport, recreational fisheries and other leisure activities;

Or. en

Amendment 191 Peter van Dalen, Annie Schreijer-Pierik, François-Xavier Bellamy, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Niclas Herbst, Cláudia Monteiro de Aguiar

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17. Stresses the importance of having a 17. Stresses the importance of having a comprehensive and coherent approach comprehensive and coherent approach when establishing MPAs, by not only when establishing MPAs, by not only limiting commercial fishing activities but limiting commercial fishing activities but also tackling other activities such as fossil also tackling other activities such as fossil fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, large-scale aquaculture, dredging, transport large-scale aquaculture, dredging, offshore and recreational fisheries; wind farms, transport and recreational fisheries;

Or. en

Amendment 192 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution Amendment

AM\1212819EN.docx 79/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN 17. Stresses the importance of having a 17. Stresses the importance of having a comprehensive and coherent approach comprehensive and coherent approach when establishing MPAs, by not only when establishing MPAs, by not only limiting commercial fishing activities but limiting commercial fishing activities but also tackling other activities such as fossil also tackling other activities such as fossil fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, fuel exploration and exploitation, mining, large-scale aquaculture, dredging, transport offshore windfarms, large-scale and recreational fisheries; aquaculture, dredging, transport and recreational fisheries;

Or. en

Amendment 193 François-Xavier Bellamy

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17a. Calls for an end to be brought to the installation of any offshore wind farms, given the known effects of this technique, which reduces biodiversity and destabilises marine ecosystems, and to prevent as yet poorly understood or unforeseeable negative effects; calls for the installation of any floating wind farms to be preceded by a thorough impact assessment to ensure that these farms do not damage the marine environment;

Or. fr

Amendment 194 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 17 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

17 a. Expresses serious concern that 59% of northern Europe's Marine Protected Areas are commercially trawled1a, with average trawling intensity

PE657.286v01-00 80/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN 38% higher than in non-protected areas, suggesting that MPAs do not reduce fishing pressure under current management ______1a "Elevated trawling inside protected areas undermines conservation outcomes in a global fishing hot spot" By Manuel Dureuil, Kristina Boerder, Kirsti A. Burnett, Rainer Froese, Boris Worm, Published in Science 21 Dec 2018 : 1403- 1407

Or. en

Amendment 195 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Invites the Member States to 18. Invites the Member States to make expand the network of fish stock recovery further efforts on fish stock recovery areas areas under the CFP; under the CFP in accordance with the best available scientific advice where there is clear evidence of heavy concentrations of fish below minimum conservation reference size or of spawning grounds;

Or. en

Amendment 196 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Invites the Member States to 18. Invites the Member States to expand the network of fish stock recovery expand the network of fish stock recovery areas under the CFP; areas under the CFP, emphasises the need to include the evaluation of designation

AM\1212819EN.docx 81/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN and success of such areas in the upcoming report on the functioning of the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 197 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Invites the Member States to 18. Invites the Member States to expand the network of fish stock recovery expand, if possible, the network of fish areas under the CFP; stock recovery areas under the CFP;

Or. fr

Amendment 198 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18. Invites the Member States to 18. Invites the Member States to expand the network of fish stock recovery expand the network of fisheries stock areas under the CFP; recovery areas under the CFP;

Or. en

Amendment 199 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18a. Calls on the Commission, in

PE657.286v01-00 82/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN international UN negotiations on marine biodiversity beyond national jurisdictions, to champion an ambitious governance model with a view to supporting the development of a new binding international legal instrument, in the definition of impact assessments on the environment and protected marine areas at high sea;

Or. fr

Amendment 200 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 a. Calls on the European Commission and Member States to take a proactive role in the creation of new effectively-managed MPAs in the high seas, both in the framework of RFMOs and the upcoming international legally binding instrument under UNCLOS on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity of areas beyond national jurisdiction;

Or. en

Amendment 201 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 a. calls on the Commission to systematically start infringement procedures against Member States who are not respecting their obligations regarding the effectiveness of the

AM\1212819EN.docx 83/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN protection of MPAs;

Or. en

Amendment 202 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 18 b (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

18 b. calls on the Commission to take action, including through submitting management proposal, when Member States fail to agree on joint recommandation for fisheries management in MPAs under Article 11 of the CFP and Article 13(4) of the MSFD;

Or. en

Amendment 203 Catherine Chabaud

Motion for a resolution Subheading 3 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

Calls on the Commission to promote the idea that the ocean in its entirety provides humanity with ecosystem services, and must, therefore, be recognised as a common good in international UN negotiations with a view to prioritising the responsibility principle over the principles laid down in the Convention on the Law of the Sea of sovereign rights in exclusive economic zones and of freedom of navigation on the high seas;

Or. fr

PE657.286v01-00 84/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN Amendment 204 Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Peter van Dalen

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Stresses that rapid and strong action 19. Stresses that rapid and strong action to fight climate change is essential for the to fight climate change is essential for the preservation of healthy fish populations, preservation of healthy fish populations, and therefore for the continuity of fishing and therefore for the continuity of fishing activity and for food security in the long activity and for food security in the long term; term; Recalls that according to Article 2 of the Paris Agreement, parties shall aim at increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development, in a manner that does not threaten food production;

Or. en

Amendment 205 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Stresses that rapid and strong action 19. Stresses that rapid and strong action to fight climate change is essential for the to fight climate change and mitigate its preservation of healthy fish populations, effects on water temperature, for example, and therefore for the continuity of fishing is essential for the preservation of healthy activity and for food security in the long fish populations, and therefore for the term; continuity of fishing activity and for food security in the long term;

Or. it

Amendment 206 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares, Ivo Hristov

AM\1212819EN.docx 85/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Stresses that rapid and strong action 19. Stresses that rapid and strong action to fight climate change is essential for the to fight climate change is essential for the preservation of healthy fish populations, preservation of healthy marine organisms and therefore for the continuity of fishing populations and habitats, and therefore for activity and for food security in the long the continuity of sustainable fishing term; activity and for food security in the long term;

Or. en

Amendment 207 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19. Stresses that rapid and strong action 19. Stresses that rapid and strong action to fight climate change is essential for the to fight pollution and the influence of preservation of healthy fish populations, climate change is essential for the and therefore for the continuity of fishing preservation of healthy fish populations, activity and for food security in the long and therefore for the continuity of fishing term; activity and for food security in the long term;

Or. fr

Amendment 208 Manuel Bompard, Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

19 a. underlines the positive contribution from MPAs to climate adaptation through strengthening ecosystems resilience; urges Member States to reinforce the role of MPA

PE657.286v01-00 86/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN networks in their national climate adaptation strategies (NAS);

Or. en

Amendment 209 Isabel Carvalhais, Manuel Pizarro, Carmen Avram, Nicolás González Casares

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Stresses that the rebuilding of fish 20. Stresses that the rebuilding of stocks also requires tackling other fisheries stocks also requires tackling anthropogenic effects such as oxygen anthropogenic pollution, mainly inland but depletion and acidification, as well as also marine, that have negative impact on various sources of pollution impacting the stocks rebuilding or contributing to it rebuilding of fish stocks, such as nitrates, scarcity; waste water, fertilisers, pesticides, toxic chemicals, pollution from industrial activity and mass tourism, residues from aquaculture, plastic and microplastic pollution, sun creams, hormones, noise pollution, oil leaks and lost or discarded fishing gear;

Or. en

Amendment 210 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Stresses that the rebuilding of fish 20. Stresses that the rebuilding of fish stocks also requires tackling other stocks and maintaining them at a anthropogenic effects such as oxygen sustainable level also requires tackling depletion and acidification, as well as some anthropogenic effects linked to various sources of pollution impacting the climate change, such as oxygen depletion rebuilding of fish stocks, such as nitrates, and acidification, as well as various waste water, fertilisers, pesticides, toxic sources of pollution impacting the chemicals, pollution from industrial rebuilding of fish stocks, such as nitrates, activity and mass tourism, residues from waste water, fertilisers, pesticides, toxic

AM\1212819EN.docx 87/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN aquaculture, plastic and microplastic chemicals, pollution from industrial pollution, sun creams, hormones, noise activity and mass tourism, residues from pollution, oil leaks and lost or discarded aquaculture, plastic and microplastic fishing gear; pollution, sun creams, hormones, noise pollution, oil leaks and lost or discarded fishing gear;

Or. fr

Amendment 211 France Jamet, Maxette Pirbakas

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20. Stresses that the rebuilding of fish 20. Stresses that the rebuilding of fish stocks also requires tackling other stocks also requires tackling other anthropogenic effects such as oxygen anthropogenic effects such as oxygen depletion and acidification, as well as depletion and acidification, as well as various sources of pollution impacting the various sources of pollution impacting the rebuilding of fish stocks, such as nitrates, rebuilding of fish stocks, such as nitrates, waste water, fertilisers, pesticides, toxic plastic and microplastic pollution, waste chemicals, pollution from industrial water, fertilisers, plant protection activity and mass tourism, residues from products, toxic chemicals, pollution from aquaculture, plastic and microplastic industrial activity and mass tourism, pollution, sun creams, hormones, noise residues from aquaculture, plastic and pollution, oil leaks and lost or discarded microplastic pollution, sun creams, fishing gear; hormones, noise pollution, oil leaks and lost or discarded fishing gear;

Or. fr

Amendment 212 Rosa D'Amato

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20a. Underlines the need to involve fishermen in the fight against pollution of the seas and oceans; calls on the Commission accordingly to urge Member

PE657.286v01-00 88/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN States to adopt legislation authorising fishermen to bring to land any waste caught at sea; considers that these provisions should introduce a system of incentives for fishermen and for the use of appropriate collection systems;

Or. it

Amendment 213 Caroline Roose, Grace O'Sullivan, Francisco Guerreiro, Benoît Biteau

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20 a. Calls on the European Commission to publish a study on the impact of those diverse sources of pollution on the rebuilding fish stocks and on marine ecosystems;

Or. en

Amendment 214 Fredrick Federley

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

20 a. Stresses the importance of increasing the survival rate of non-target species by reducing injuries and stress caused during capture and release.

Or. en

Amendment 215 Rosanna Conte, Valentino Grant, Massimo Casanova

Motion for a resolution

AM\1212819EN.docx 89/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Calls on the Commission to 21. Calls on the Commission to consider these requests and to respond to consider these requests and to respond to them in its new action plan to preserve them in its new action plan to preserve fisheries resources and protect marine fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems, which it plans to present by ecosystems and coastal communities 2021, as well as in all forthcoming dependent on small-scale fishing legislative proposals; activities, which it plans to present by 2021, as well as in all forthcoming legislative proposals;

Or. it

Amendment 216 Pierre Karleskind

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21. Calls on the Commission to 21. Calls on the Commission to consider these requests and to respond to consider these requests and to respond to them in its new action plan to preserve them in its new action plan to preserve fisheries resources and protect marine fisheries resources and protect marine ecosystems, which it plans to present by ecosystems, which it plans to present by 2021, as well as in all forthcoming 2021, in its revision of the CFP, as well as legislative proposals; in all forthcoming legislative proposals;

Or. fr

Amendment 217 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

21 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to develop and implement gentler methods of capture, landing and slaughter of fish in

PE657.286v01-00 90/91 AM\1212819EN.docx EN order to reduce stress and improve fish quality.

Or. en

Amendment 218 Anja Hazekamp, Manuel Bompard, Francisco Guerreiro

Motion for a resolution Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution Amendment

22 a. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to take steps to improve the welfare of marine invertebrates, like crabs and lobsters, by including these animals in their animal welfare legislation and by banning the practice of boiling these animals alive.

Or. en

AM\1212819EN.docx 91/91 PE657.286v01-00 EN