DOCSLIB.ORG

Free Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Free Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Pdf FREE PHILOSOPHY OF PROBABILITY: CONTEMPORARY READINGS PDF Antony Eagle | 560 pages | 31 Dec 2010 | Taylor & Francis Ltd | 9780415483872 | English | London, United Kingdom Antony Eagle (ed.), Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings - PhilPapers Readings in Philosophy of Religion : Ancient to Contemporary. Linda ZagzebskiTimothy D. Comprised of readings from ancient to modern times, this volume offers a comprehensive introduction to the central questions of the philosophy of religion. Provides a history of the philosophy of religion, from antiquity Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings to the twentieth century Each section is preceded by extensive commentary written by the editors, followed by readings that are arranged chronologically Designed to be accessible to both undergraduate and graduate students. Faith Reason and Enthusiasm. The Will to Believe. David Hume and the Probability of Miracles. Letter to Castelli. The Final Cause. Atemporal Personhood. On Fate and On Divination. Middle Knowledge. The Euthyphro Dilemma. The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics. Selections from Treatise on Law. Atheism and Evolution. How Naturalism Implies Skepticism. Critique of the Design Argument The Argument from the Appearance of Design. The Eternality of Motion and the Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Mover. Critique of the Cosmological Argument. Kants Critique of the Three Traditional Proofs. Truth is Subjectivity. Lectures on Religious Belief. The Essence of Religion in General. That Which Is Is Good. Evil and Omnipotence. Soulmaking Theodicy. Horrendous Evils and the Goodness of God. Death is Nothing to Us. The Possibility of Immortality. Christianity and the NonChristian Religions. Timothy Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings. The Nature of the Gods Book 1. The Wager. Readings in Philosophy of Religion: Ancient to Contemporary. Full E-book Contemporary Readings in Curriculum Complete - video dailymotion Ideal for undergraduate courses in philosophy of law, this comprehensive anthology examines such topics as the concept of law, the dispute between natural law theorists and legal positivists, the relations between law and morality, criminal responsibility and Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings punishment, the rights of the individual against the state, justice and equality, and legal evidence as compared with scientific evidence. The readings have been selected from both philosophy and law journals and include classic texts, contemporary theoretical developments, and well-known recent court cases. The text features extensive introductions that make even the most profound writings accessible to undergraduates. Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. US Higher Education Not for profit. All for education. Skip to main content. Search Start Search. Go directly to our online catalogue. Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Send feedback. Description Table of Contents Description Ideal for undergraduate courses in philosophy of law, this comprehensive anthology examines such topics as the concept of law, the dispute between natural law theorists and Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings positivists, the relations between law and morality, criminal responsibility and legal punishment, the rights of the individual against the state, justice and equality, and legal evidence as compared with scientific evidence. Table of Contents Each sub-chapter opens with an Introduction and most close with Suggestions for Further Reading Questions for Discussion are integrated throughout 1. Hart, from The Concept of Law 1. Cover, from Justice Accused 2. Locke Richard A. Scheidler 2. Stevenson Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey 2. Birmingham 4. Boren 4. Hart, from Law, Liberty, and Morality Bowers v. Hardwick 4. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin 4. Casey 4. Smith 4. City of New York 5. Board of Education 5. Bakke Metro Broadcasting, Inc. Federal Communications Commission et al. Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson 5. United States Army 5. Cases Furman v. Georgia Gregg v. Georgia McCleskey v. Kemp Herrera v. Texas 7. Long Island Railroad 7. Keaton 7. Sherry 7. Saks and Robert F. Rapid Transit, Inc. People v. Collins 8. Related Titles. What Is Justice? Solomon Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings Mark C. Feminist Jurisprudence Patricia Smith. The Philosophy of Law Ronald M. Monday - Friday, am - pm EST. Probability interpretations - Wikipedia The word probability has been used in a variety of ways since it was first applied to the mathematical study of games of chance. Does probability measure the real, physical tendency of something to occur or is it a measure of how strongly one believes it will occur, or does it draw on both these elements? In answering such questions, mathematicians interpret the probability values of probability theory. There are two broad categories [1] [2] of probability interpretations which can be called "physical" and "evidential" probabilities. Physical probabilities, which are also called objective or frequency probabilitiesare associated with random physical systems such as roulette wheels, rolling dice and radioactive atoms. In Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings systems, Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings given type of event such as a die yielding a six tends to occur at a persistent rate, or "relative frequency", in a long run of trials. Physical probabilities either explain, or are invoked to explain, these stable frequencies. The two main kinds Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings theory of physical probability are frequentist accounts such as those of Venn, [3] Reichenbach [4] and von Mises Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings and propensity accounts such as those of Popper, Miller, Giere and Fetzer. Evidential probability, also called Bayesian probabilitycan be assigned to any statement whatsoever, even when no random process is involved, as a way to represent its subjective plausibility, or the degree to which the statement is supported by the available evidence. On most accounts, evidential probabilities are considered to be degrees of belief, defined in terms of dispositions to gamble at certain odds. The Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings main evidential interpretations are the classical e. Laplace's [7] interpretation, the subjective interpretation de Finetti [8] and Savage [9]the epistemic or inductive interpretation Ramsey[10] Cox [11] and the Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings interpretation Keynes [12] and Carnap [13]. There are also evidential interpretations of probability covering groups, which are often labelled as 'intersubjective' proposed by Gillies [14] and Rowbottom [6]. Some interpretations of probability are associated with approaches to statistical inferenceincluding theories of estimation and hypothesis testing. The physical interpretation, for example, is taken by followers of "frequentist" statistical methods, such as Ronald Fisher [ dubious — discuss ]Jerzy Neyman and Egon Pearson. Statisticians of the opposing Bayesian school typically accept the existence and importance of physical probabilities, but also consider the calculation of evidential probabilities to be both valid and necessary in statistics. This article, however, focuses on the interpretations of probability rather than theories of statistical inference. The terminology of this topic is rather confusing, in part because probabilities are studied within a variety of academic fields. The word "frequentist" is Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings tricky. To philosophers it refers to a particular theory of physical probability, one that has more or less been abandoned. To scientists, on the other hand, " frequentist probability " is just another name Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings physical or objective probability. Those who promote Bayesian inference view " frequentist statistics " as an approach to statistical inference that recognises only physical probabilities. Also the word "objective", as applied to Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings, sometimes means exactly what "physical" means here, but is also used of evidential probabilities that are fixed by rational constraints, such as logical and epistemic probabilities. It is unanimously agreed that statistics depends somehow on probability. But, as to what probability is and how it is connected with statistics, there has seldom been such complete disagreement and breakdown of communication since the Tower of Babel. Doubtless, much of the disagreement is merely terminological and would disappear under sufficiently sharp analysis. The philosophy of probability presents problems chiefly in matters of epistemology and the uneasy Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings between mathematical concepts and ordinary language as it is used by non-mathematicians. Probability theory is an established field of study in mathematics. It has its origins in Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings discussing the mathematics of games of chance between Blaise Pascal and Pierre de Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings in the seventeenth century, [15] and was formalized and rendered axiomatic as a distinct branch of mathematics by Andrey
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Final Copy 2020 11 26 Stylia
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from Explore Bristol Research, http://research-information.bristol.ac.uk Author: Stylianou, Nicos Title: On 'Probability' A Case of Down to Earth Humean Propensities General rights Access to the thesis is subject to the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International Public License. A copy of this may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This license sets out your rights and the restrictions that apply to your access to the thesis so it is important you read this before proceeding. Take down policy Some pages of this thesis may have been removed for copyright restrictions prior to having it been deposited in Explore Bristol Research. However, if you have discovered material within the thesis that you consider to be unlawful e.g. breaches of copyright (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please contact [email protected] and include the following information in your message: •Your contact details •Bibliographic details for the item, including a URL •An outline nature of the complaint Your claim will be investigated and, where appropriate, the item in question will be removed from public view as soon as possible. On ‘Probability’ A Case of Down to Earth Humean Propensities By NICOS STYLIANOU Department of Philosophy UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL A dissertation submitted to the University of Bristol in ac- cordance with the requirements of the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Faculty of Arts.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Popper and the Philosophy of Mathematics Proceedings of the Conference Held in Klagenfurt, 5 – 7 April, 2018
    Symposium Karl Popper and the Philosophy of Mathematics Proceedings of the Conference held in Klagenfurt, 5 – 7 April, 2018 Edited by Reinhard Neck Alpen-Adria-Universität Klagenfurt 2018 Contents Preface ................................................................................................................ v Programme ...................................................................................................... vii Abstracts and Preliminary Papers .................................................................. 1 Schroeder-Heister, Peter Popper on deductive logic and logical education ...................................................... 2 Binder, David A Critical Edition of Popper's Work on Logic .......................................................... 3 Brîncuş, Constantin and Toader, Iulian Non-normal Interpretations of Positive Logic .......................................................... 8 Pimbé, Daniel Popper and “absolute proofs” ................................................................................. 12 Albert, Max Critical Rationalism and Decision Theory .............................................................. 25 Del Santo, Flavio The physical motivations for a propensity interpretation of probability ................. 26 Afisi, Oseni Taiwo Prospensity Probability and Its Applications of Knowledge in Ifa ......................... 32 Miller, David Independence (Probabilistic) and Independence (Logical) ..................................... 36 Burgoyne, Bernard From cosmic paths to psychic
    [Show full text]
  • Distinguishing ‘‘Or’’ from ‘‘And’’ and the Case for Historical Identification
    Cladistics Cladistics 18 (2002) 585–593 www.academicpress.com Distinguishing ‘‘or’’ from ‘‘and’’ and the case for historical identification Arnold G. Kluge* Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA Accepted 23 August 2002 Abstract The adequacy of a probabilistic interpretation must be judged according to the nature of the event, or thing, being inferred. For example, conditional (frequency) probability is not admissible in the inference of phylogeny, because basic statements of common ancestry do not fulfill the requirements of the relations specified by the probability calculus. The probabilities of the situation peculiar to the time and place of origin of species are unique. Moreover, according to evolutionary theory, an event of species diversification is necessarily unique, because species are parts of a replicator continuum—species arise from ancestral species. Also, these probabilities cannot be ascertained, because the relevant situation cannot be repeated—it is unique. Finally, the applicability of conditional (frequency) probability is denied, because events of common ancestry have already occurred—there is nothing to predict. However, hypotheses of species relationships can be identified objectively according to the degree to which they have survived si- multaneous testing with critical evidence, not with generally confirming evidence. The most parsimonious hypothesis of species relationships represents the least disconfirmed, best supported, proposition among the alternatives being compared. That hypothesis
    [Show full text]
  • Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress
    Page iii Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science Papers from the Harvard Sesquicentennial Congress Edited by Edward C. Moore Page iv Copyright © 1993 by The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487–0380 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America The paper on which this book is printed meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Science­Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48­1984. Library of Congress Cataloging­in ­Publication Data Charles S. Peirce and the philosophy of science : papers from the Harvard Sesquicenten­ nial Congress / edited by Edward C. Moore. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0­8173­0665­X 1. Science—Philosophy—Congresses. 2. Peirce, Charles S. (Charles Sanders), 1839–1914—Congresses. I. Moore, Edward C. (Edward Carter), 1917­ . Q174.C46 1993 501—dc20 92­28877 British Library Cataloguing­in ­Publication Data available Page v To Arthur W. Burks with many thanks Page vi I no longer think, as I once did, that there is a difference between science and metaphysics . as long as a metaphysical theory can be rationally criticized. —Karl R. Popper Page vii CONTENTS Preface xi Acknowledgments xiii Abbreviations xv Introduction: Charles S. Peirce and the Philosophy of Science 1 Edward C. Moore Part 1. Logic and Mathematics 1. Peirce on the Conditions of the Possibility of Science 17 C. F. Delaney 2. Peirce's Realistic Approach to Mathematics: Or, Can One Be a Realist 30 without Being a Platonist? Claudine Engel­Tiercelin 3. Peirce as Philosophical Topologist 49 R. Valentine Dusek 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Probability Probability Is a Measure of the Likeliness That an Event Will Occur
    Page 1 of 8 1. Probability Probability is a measure of the likeliness that an event will occur. Probability is used to quantify an attitude of mind towards some proposition of whose truth we are not certain. The proposition of interest is usually of the form "Will a specific event occur?" The attitude of mind is of the form "How certain are we that the event will occur?" The certainty we adopt can be described in terms of a numerical measure and this number, between 0 and 1 (where 0 indicates impossibility and 1 indicates certainty), we call probability. Thus the higher the probability of an event, the more certain we are that the event will occur. A simple example would be the toss of a fair coin. Since the 2 outcomes are deemed equiprobable, the probability of "heads" equals the probability of "tails" and each probability is 1/2 or equivalently a 50% chance of either "heads" or "tails". These concepts have been given an axiomatic mathematical formalization in probability theory (see probability axioms), which is used widely in such areas of study as mathematics, statistics, finance, gambling, science (in particular physics), artificial intelligence/machine learning, computer science, and philosophy to, for example, draw inferences about the expected frequency of events. Probability theory is also used to describe the underlying mechanics and regularities of complex systems. 1.1 Interpretations When dealing with experiments that are random and well-defined in a purely theoretical setting (like tossing a fair coin), probabilities can be numerically described by the statistical number of outcomes considered favorable divided by the total number of all outcomes (tossing a fair coin twice will yield head-head with probability 1/4, because the four outcomes head-head, head-tails, tails-head and tails-tails are equally likely to occur).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Quantum Mechanics: a Review and Synthesis in Precise
    Open Phys. 2019; 17:390–437 Review Article Brian Drummond* Understanding quantum mechanics: a review and synthesis in precise language https://doi.org/10.1515/phys-2019-0045 1.2 Review scope: understanding the theory Received Feb 19, 2019; accepted Jul 08, 2019 rather than the phenomena . 392 1.3 Review aims: comprehensive coverage, Abstract: This review, of the understanding of quantum precise non-mathematical language . 392 mechanics, is broad in scope, and aims to reflect enough 1.4 Review outline: a synthesised map: the un- of the literature to be representative of the current state derstanding of quantum mechanics . 393 of the subject. To enhance clarity, the main findings are 1.5 Moderate realism: physics might be able to presented in the form of a coherent synthesis of the re- describe independent reality . 393 viewed sources. The review highlights core characteris- 1.6 Nonrelativistic quantum mechanics: time tics of quantum mechanics. One is statistical balance in as independent from space . 394 the collective response of an ensemble of identically pre- 1.7 Understanding probability: differing ap- pared systems, to differing measurement types. Another proaches, no consensus . 395 is that states are mathematical terms prescribing prob- 1.8 Using probability: a classical approach to ability aspects of future events, relating to an ensem- quantum mechanical data . 395 ble of systems, in various situations. These characteris- 1.9 Limits to determinism: not necessarily lim- tics then yield helpful insights on entanglement, mea- its to understanding . 396 surement, and widely-discussed experiments and analy- ses. The review concludes by considering how these in- 2 A core quantum characteristic: prescribed sta- sights are supported, illustrated and developed by some tistical balance 397 specific approaches to understanding quantum mechan- 2.1 Quantum mechanics: prescribing regulari- ics.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizations, Idealizations, and Induction an Investigation of Probability Theory Through Historical Paradigms
    1 Generalizations, Idealizations, and Induction An Investigation of Probability Theory Through Historical Paradigms Chelsea DeMark Advisor: John Nolan, Department of Mathematics & Statistics General University Honors Spring 2012 2 ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study is to investigate the historical foundations of probability theory in order to develop a comprehensive understanding of modern techniques employed in the field. To accomplish this objective, examinations were conducted concerning David Hume’s philosophical problem of Induction and potential solutions via Verificationism or Falsificationism. Next, the study evolved into an exploration of early interpretations of probability theory. The interpretations; Classical, Frequency, Subjective, and Propensity, were subsequently evaluated for their validity under the criterions of meaning discussed. Upon establishing the history of probability theory, the study moved to an investigation of modern probability as developed from the frequency interpretation. It was found that the mathematical institution as a whole largely disregards the problem of induction, locally insofar as it is not applicable to the idealized theoretical nature of probability. The problem of induction is meant to be an exegesis of the scientific process; as modern notions of probability and statistical inference stand, they are tools for quantifying science rather than scientific methods themselves. Having overcome the limitations imposed by the problem of induction, the study then investigated modern methods and concepts utilized in probability, and the cohesiveness of these approaches. The frequency interpretation of probability as discussed in earlier sections of the paper serves ultimately as a unifying force. However, the study finds that an explicit definition of probability is not necessary for or helpful to the success of the discipline, and as such objectivity is able to prevail via a subjective choice in definition, as is demonstrated in the paper’s conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel
    Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel JAMES H. FETZER, Editor OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS Science, Explanation, and Rationality Carl G. Hempel (1905–1997) Photograph by Jan Hempel (1985) Science, Explanation, and Rationality Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel Edited by JAMES H. FETZER 1 2000 3 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 2000 by Oxford University Press Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madsion Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Science, explanation, and rationality : aspects of the philosophy of Carl G. Hempel/edited by James H. Fetzer. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 0-19-512137-6 1. Hempel, Carl Gustav, 1905– I. Fetzer, James H., 1940– B945.H454 S35 2000 191—dc21 99–087642 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper TO PETER in memoriam This page intentionally left blank Editor’s Preface Although Carl G. Hempel was not unusually prolific by some standards (his bibliography reports 112 publications, including a few short monographs and an anthology of twelve articles), his influence was immense.
    [Show full text]