ESSENTIAL REFERENCE PAPER C

Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered ouside of the settlement boundary. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. wholly within Flood Zone 2 with the eastern part in landowner and is considered to be Flood Zone 3 wherein development would not be available. suitable. Recognising the amenity, wildlife and Bishop's Stortford 01/001 2.89 leisure value of the 'green finger', the Council has No No No No Town designated this area as a Local Green Space in the emerging District Plan. The site is therefore unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Bishop's Stortford 01/002 0.0587 threshold as identified by national policy. Town N - This site is currently located in the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered The site is outside of the settlement boundary. Located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered adjacent to an exisiting employment area, the site landowner and is considered to be deliverable Bishop's Stortford 01/003 0.42 is considered suitable for employment use, available. subject to a Town subject to a change in policy. review of the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/004 8.07 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 21 dwellings settlement boundary. It is currently in employment through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. use although not designated as an Employment is currently in employment use and is The site is Area within the Local Plan. The site is considered not considered available. considered to be suitable for residential development subject developable Bishop's Stortford 01/005 0.7 to marketing of the site. subject to Town consideration of existing employment use.

Bishop's Stortford Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 01/006 0.057 Town threshold as identified by national policy. N - This site is currently garden land associated Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered with the existing dwelling. The majority of the site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. is within Flood Zone 3. In addition, the site forms landowner and is considered to be Bishop's Stortford part of one of Bishop's Stortford's 'green wedges' available. 01/007 1.25 No No No No Town which help to protect the historic character of the town. As such, it is considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/008 1.19 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y - This largely greenfield site (garden land) is Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 14 dwellings located within the settlement boundary of Bishop's through the Call for Sites, and while achievable. Stortford. An application for 13 dwellings was there are multiple land ownerships it is The site is previously refused and subsequently dismissed on considered to be available. considered to be Bishop's Stortford appeal although the Inspector suggested the the deliverable 01/009 0.46 Town principle of development in this location was accepted. The site is therefore considered to be suitable for development.

N - The site is already predominantly within leisure Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered The site is use as it is the site of Bishop's Stortford Football through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered Club. There is space around the stadium which landowner and is considered to be deliverable Bishop's Stortford potentially could be used for other uses, available. subject to a 01/010 2.99 Town particularly if the stadium is relocated on site. review of the However, at present the site is unsuitable as it is Green Belt. located within the Green Belt.

N - This relatively small site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 17 Green Belt, adjacent to the settlement boundary. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings As such it is currently unsuitable for development. landowner and is considered to be However, the site is well related to the existing available. The site is Bishop's Stortford 01/011 0.56 settement and the Green Belt Review concluded considered Town that it has 'high' suitability for development. The deliverable site could therefore be suitable subject to a review subject to a of the Green Belt boundary. review of the Green Belt

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Bishop's Stortford 01/012 0.22 threshold as identified by national policy. Town N - The site is currently located in the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 53 outside of the settlement boundary and as such is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings currently unsuitable for development. However, landowner and is considered to be there are no further policy constraints on the site available. The site is Bishop's Stortford and the Green Belt Review concludes that the considered 01/014 2.12 Town wider area has potential for development. deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt

Bishop's Stortford Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 01/015 0.1 Town threshold as identified by national policy. Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Bishop's Stortford 01/016 0.1 threshold as identified by national policy. Town Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This green field site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt outside of the settlement boundary. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. is designated as 'open space' in the District Plan. landowner and is considered to be Recognising the amenity, wildlife and leisure value available. Bishop's Stortford of the 'green finger', the Council has also 01/017 3.07 No No No No Town designated this area as a Local Green Space in the emerging District Plan. The site is therefore unsuitable for development.

Bishop's Stortford Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 01/018 0.14 Town threshold as identified by national policy. Y - The majority of this site is within the existing Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered The site is settlement boundary of Bishop's Stortford. A small through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered section is within the Green Belt. However, as the landowner and is considered to be deliverable for Bishop's Stortford proposed use is for education, it is considered that available. education 01/019 1 Town Very Special Circumstances apply which would purposes not require a review of the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/020 17.96 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/021 0.98 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Y - This greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 45 dwellings Bishop's Stortford. The site is reasonably well through the Call for Sites by the achievable. related to existing development and this landowner and is considered to be The site is Bishop's Stortford 01/022 1.5 relationship will be increased following available. considered Town implementation of the Bishop's Stortford North deliverable scheme. In principle, the site is considered suitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/023 18.78 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/024 154.05 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted.

Y - This brownfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 11 dwellings settlement boundary and as such there is no in through the Call for Sites by the achievable. principle objection to development in this location. landowner and is considered to be The site is Bishop's Stortford In order for residential development to come available. considered 01/025 0.42 Town forward an alternative location for the existing Air deliverable. Cadet HQ would need to be found.

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/027 0.47 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y - This brownfield site is located in a central Y - The site is owned by East Herts Y – Site is considered Up to 42 dwellings location. Planning permission had previously been Council which has intentions to achievable. secured but has since lapsed. Part of the site is develop the site. The site is Bishop's Stortford 01/028 1.4 located within Flood Zone 3 and would not be considered Town suitable for development. The rest of the site is deliverable considered suitable.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt, outside of the settlement boundary. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Inspector to the Examination of the adopted Local landowner and is considered to be Plan 2007 stated that development of this site available. would amount to a protruding developed wedge, Bishop's Stortford poorly related to the form and pattern of the 01/030 0.93 No No No No Town settlement. The Green Belt Review also suggested that the broad parcel plays a signifcant role in preventing sprawl. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Bishop's Stortford 01/031 0.2 threshold as identified by national policy. Town

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary. It is currently in employment through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. Up to 8 dwellings use although not designated as an Employment is currently in employment use and is Area within the Local Plan. The site is considered not considered available. The site is Bishop's Stortford to be suitable for residential development subject considered 01/032 0.27 Town to marketing of the site. developable subject to consideraton of employment uses.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt, outside of the settlement boundary. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. majority of the site is located within Flood Zone 2 landowner and is considered to be wherein the Sequential Test would need to be available. applied. The Green Belt Review states that this Bishop's Stortford 01/033 4.68 broad area plays a signifcant role in preventing No No No No Town sprawl and the site is also poorly related to the existing urban area. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as this is a proposal is for open Bishop's Stortford 01/042 space and is not a proposal for development. Town

Site not assessed as permission has been Bishop's Stortford 01/043 1.39 granted and the principle of development is Town therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary and was previously allocated through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. Up to 43 dwellings for development within the adopted Local Plan. It is currently in employment use and is is currently in employment use although not not considered available. The site is designated as an Employment Area within the considered Bishop's Stortford 01/119 1.42 Local Plan. The site is considered to be suitable developable Town for residential development subject to marketing subject to of the site. consideration of existing employment use

Y - This vacant brownfield site is located is located Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 400 within the settlement boundary and was previously through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings allocated for development within the adopted landowner and is considered to be Local Plan. The site is considered suitable for available. The site is Bishop's Stortford development. An application has been submitted considered 01/120 5.25 Town for 682 dwellings. In addition the site has been deliverable. identified within the District Plan for 400 dwellings.

N - The site is currently located in the Green Belt, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 104 outside of the settlement boundary and as such is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings currently unsuitable for development. However, landowner and is considered to be there are no further policy constraints on the site available. The site is Bishop's Stortford and the Green Belt Review concludes that the considered 01/136 4.16 Town wider area has potential for development. deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 44 dwellings settlement boundary and as such there is no in through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. principle objection to development in this location. is currently in use as a fire station and The site is In order for residential development to come is not considered available. considered Bishop's Stortford forward an alternative location for the existing Fire developable 01/139 1.45 Town Station would need to be found. subject to relocation of the Fire Station.

Y - This greenfield site is in use as a sports field N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 103 associated with the High School and is designated through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. dwellings under Policy LRC1 in the Local Plan. The site is is currently in use as a sports field and considered suitable for development subject to the is not considered available. The site is Bishop's Stortford relocation of the sports facilities to a suitable considered 01/157 3.44 Town alternative site. developable subject to relocation of the sports facilities Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N -This green field site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 102 Bishop's Stortford between London Road and the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings railway line. At present, London Road forms a landowner and is considered to be clear Green Belt boundary. While the railway line available. The site is would contain development to the east there is no considered Bishop's Stortford 01/158 3.4 obvious boundary to the south of the site. deliverable Town However, consideration could be given to subject to a development in this location. Nevertheless, it is review of the considered unsuitable due to its location in the Green Belt Green Belt.

N - this partly greenfield site is located adjacent to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 22 the settlement boundary and north of Southern through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Country Park. The site is well related to the landowner and is considered to be existing settlement and the Green Belt Review available. The site is Bishop's Stortford suggested that the broad parcel of land had 'high' considered 01/159 0.73 Town suitability for development. However, at present, it deliverable is considered unsuitable due to its Green Belt subject to a location. review of the Green Belt

N - Whilst the site is within the settlement Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered boundary the majority of the site is within Flood through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Zone 3. In addition it forms a functional link with landowner and is considered to be Bishop's Stortford 01/160 1.32 the large open swathes of land to the west and is available. No No No No Town an integral part of the riverscape. As such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary. The majority of the site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. located within Flood Zone 2 wherein the landowner and is considered to be Sequential Test would need to be applied. The available. Bishop's Stortford 01/161 1.43 site forms a visual and functional link with the No No No No Town large swathes of open land to the west and is an integral part of the river landscape. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered the A1184 within the Green Belt. The A1184 forms through the Call for Sites by the achievable. a strong Green Belt boundary at present which landowner and is considered to be Bishop's Stortford should not be breached. In addition, the site would available. 01/162 1.58 No No No No Town be relatively poorly related to the existing urban area and is considered unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 96 Owles Lane. While the site is well related to the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings former Sainsburys depot which is currently being landowner and is considered to be re-developed, development of the majority of the available. The site is site would represent a serious incursion into the considered countryside and would significantly harm the rural deliverable setting of Buntingford and the surrounding area. subject to a 02/001 Buntingford Town 12.24 The north western section of the site, which does review of the not extend beyond the urban form of the settlement Sainsbury's site could be suitable. However, it lies boundary. within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and, as such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as permission has been 02/002 Buntingford Town 18.22 granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 02/003 Buntingford Town 1.2 therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. 02/004 Buntingford Town 11.73

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 400 Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, between the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings existing urban area and the A10. The site is well landowner and is considered to be related to the existing settlement and any available. The site is incursion into the countryside would be limited by considered the presence of the A10 which would form the deliverable western boundary of the site. While the site could subject to a be considered developable subject to a review of review of the 02/005 Buntingford Town 21.25 the settlement boundary, the impact of a settlement development of this size on existing infrastructure, boundary. and the ability to provide new services and facilities as part of the development, would need to be carefully considered. A planning application for 400 homes has been submitted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 02/006 Buntingford Town 2.78 therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been 02/007 Buntingford Town 10.93 granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 64 Buntingford, outside of the settlement boundary. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings While it is well related to the existing settlement, it landowner and is considered to be is currently unsuitable due to its location within the available. The site is Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. considered 02/008 Buntingford Town 2.14 deliverable subject to a review of the settlement boundary.

Site not assessed as permission has been 02/009 Buntingford Town 17.39 granted and the principle of development is therefore accepted. N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 22 Buntingford, east of Aspenden Road. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings well related to the existing settlement, particularly landowner and is considered to be as land immediately to the south has recently available. The site is been given permission at appeal. The site is considered 02/011 Buntingford Town 0.73 considered to be unsuitable due to its location deliverable within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. subject to a review of the settlement boundary.

N- This site is located to the north of Hertford Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 50 outside of the settlement boundary. While the site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings is well related to existing urban area it is currently landowner and is considered to be unsuitable for development due to its location available. The site is within the Green Belt. However, the site is part of considered 03/001 Hertford Town 1.68 an area proposed for development within the deliverable emerging District Plan. subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y - This brownfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 193 settlement boundary of Hertford. The site is through the Call for Sites by the acheivable. dwellings allocated for employment use within the adopted landowner and is considered to be Local Plan. However, the Plan establishes the available. The site is potential for residential development on land east considered 03/002 Hertford Town 4.2 of Marshgate Drive. As such the site is considered deliverable. to be suitable for development as part of a mixed use scheme.

N - This greenfield site is located immediately to Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered the east of the trainline, and is poorly related to the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. main built up area. The site forms part of a green landowner and is considered to be 03/003 Hertford Town 0.47 finger and is located within the Green Belt. As available. No No No No such the site is considered unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenefield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered the trainline and adjacent to Goldings Estate through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Historic Park and Garden. The site is wholly landowner and is considered to be located with Flood Zone 3. The majority of the site available. 03/004 Hertford Town 3.04 No No No No is also located within the Green Belt. As such development in this location is considered unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 50 Hertford, adjacent to Balls Park. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings currently part of a Green Finger. However, the landowner and is considered to be eastern section of the site lies between two areas available. The eastern of residential development and development of section of the site this section is unlikely to cause significant harm to is considered 03/005 Hertford Town 4.87 the Green Finger. The western section of the site deliverable should be maintained as green space. Overall, the subject to a site is currently unsuitable due to its location in the review of the Green Belt. Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Hertford, immediately to the north of the A414. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. While the site is well related to the existing urban landowner and is considered to be area, it forms part of a green finger and is located available. within the Green Belt. In addition, the site is 03/006 Hertford Town 2.34 covered by mature trees and adds to the No No No No character of the town in this location. As such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site, whilst located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered built up area of Hertford, is covered by a blanket through the Call for Sites by the achievable. 03/007 Hertford Town 0.29 TPO (TPO No 403) and as such is considered landowner and is considered to be No No No No unsuitable for development. available.

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 18 dwellings settlement boundary, east of the A414. The site through the Call for Sites. However, achievable could be suitable for development subject to the due to the existing uses on site, and The site is relocation of the Fire Station. the need for these to be relocated, the considered site is not currently considered to be developable 03/008 Hertford Town 0.59 available. Nevertheless the site could subject to become available later in the plan relocation of the period. Fire Station. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y - This site is located within the settlement N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is conisidered Up to 14 dwellings boundary and is currently in use as allotments. It through the Call for Sites. However, achievable is well related to existing development and is due to the existing uses on site, and The site is considered to be suitable for development subject the need for these to be relocated, the considered to the relocation of the current use. site is not currently considered to be developable 03/009 Hertford Town 0.45 available. subject to relocation of the existing use.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 300 Hertford, adjacent to Panshanger Park and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Garden. The site is currently located within the landowner and is considered to be Green Belt and as such is considered unsuitable available. The site is for development. However, the site is well related considered 03/010 Hertford Town 11.37 to the built up area and has been proposed for deliverable release from the Green Belt through the emerging subject to a District Plan. review of the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 03/012 Hertford Town 0.21 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 03/013 Hertford Town 0.07 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 03/014 Hertford Town 0.22 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 03/015 Hertford Town 0.07 threshold as identified by national policy.

N - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary, adjacent to the River Lea. It through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. is currently considered to be unsuitable as the site is currently in employment use and is 03/016 Hertford Town 0.45 is designated as an Employment Area. not considered available. No No No No

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 8 dwellings settlement boundary. While not allocated as an through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. Employment Area, it is in current employment use. is currently in employment use and is The site is The site could be suitable for residential not considered available. considered development subject to marketing of the site. developable 03/017 Hertford Town 0.25 subject to consideraton of employment uses.

Site not assessed as permission has been 03/018 Hertford Town 2.36 granted and development is complete. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This large greenfield site forms part the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Goldings Estate Historic Park and Garden. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. site is poorly related to the village of Waterford. landowner and is considered to be the majority of the site is identified as an area of available. 03/019 Hertford Town 40.47 protected open space. The site is also located No No No No within the Green Belt and as such is considered unsuitable for development.

Y - This greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 18 dwellings settlement boundary. While the topography of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. site could be challenging, it is considered to be landowner and is considered to be The site is suitable. available. considered 03/020 Hertford Town 0.59 deliverable.

N - This site is part of the Goldings Estate Historic Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Park and Garden. The site is located within the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Green Belt, isolated from the built up area of landowner and is considered to be 03/021 Hertford Town 1.37 No No No No Hertford, and as such is considered unsuitable for available. development.

N - This site is located in the Green Belt outside of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered the settlement boundary. The whole site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. covered by a blanket TPO (TPO No 4). As such landowner and is considered to be 03/022 Hertford Town 1.54 while the site is well related to existing urban area available. No No No No it is considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 03/023 Hertford Town 0.052 threshold as identified by national policy.

Y - This brownfield site is located within the N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 13 dwellings settlement boundary, and as such is considered through the Call for Sites. However, achievable suitable for development subject to the relocation due to the existing uses on site, and The site is of the existing use. the need for this to be relocated, the considered to be site is not currently considered to be developable 03/024 Hertford Town 0.42 available. subject to relocation of the existing use. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt to the south of Hertford and to the west of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Mangrove Road. While the site is reasonably well landowner and is considered to be related to the existing settlement, development available. would extend the ribbon of development along Mangrove Road. In addition, development of the 03/025 Hertford Town 2.76 western half of the site would extend beyond the No No No No current urban form and would harm the character of the Green Finger. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable.

This site has not been assessed as it is already in current employment use. 03/111 Hertford Town 7.47

N - This largely greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 150 north of Hertford. The majority of the site extends through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings well beyond the existing urban form and landowner and is considered to be development of the site in its entireity would lead available. The site is to an unacceptable incursion into the Green Belt, considered and the countryside in general. The southern part deliverable of the site, including the nursery, is well related to subject to a 03/120 Hertford Town 76.4 the existing settlement and as such could be review of the considered developable subject to a review of the Green Belt. Green Belt. This part of the site has been identified as a proposed allocation within the emerging District Plan.

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt to the south of Hertford. The railway through the Call for Sites by the achievable. line forms a strong Green Belt boundary in this landowner and is considered to be location and should not be breached. In addition, available. development would be poorly related to the 03/134 Hertford Town 15.6 No No No No existing urban area and would result in an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. As such this site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 300 Hertford. Part of the site is a county wildlife site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings and would therefore be unsuitable for landowner and is considered to be development. While the remainder of the site is available. The site is well related to the existing urban area, it is within considered 03/152 Hertford Town 11.62 the Green Belt and therefore currently unsuitable. deliverable The site has been identified for development subject to a within the emerging District Plan. review of the Green Belt. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt to the south of Hertford. The site forms an through the Call for Sites by the achievable. integral part of the Green Finger and any landowner and is considered to be development would harm its openness and available. 03/153 Hertford Town 1.95 character by breaching the existing line of the No No No No urban form. As such the site is not considered to be suitable for development.

N - This is a greenfield site located on the edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Hertingfordbury. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt, on landowner and is considered to be the edge of a Group 2 village. However the site available. 03/154 Hertford Town 1.92 could not be considered to be infill development No No No No and so would remain unsuitable under the draft Plan.

N - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary, adjacent to the River Lea. It through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. is currently considered to be unsuitable as the site is currently in employment use and is 03/156 Hertford Town 0.69 is designated as an Employment Area not considered available. No No No No

N - This brownfield site is located within the N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered settlement boundary. The site is a designated through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. Employment Area and forms a key part of the is currently in employment use and is 03/157 Hertford Town 2.9 local employment offer. As such the site is not considered available. No No No No considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth. It is surrounded on three sides through the Call for Sites by the achievable. by existing development and would therefore landowner and is considered to be relates well to the built up structure of the town. available. However, the site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of Sawbridgeworth the town with Harlow. Although in itself 04/001 2.51 No No No No Town development of the site would not reduce the gap between the two settlements, further urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Sawbridgeworth 04/002 0.2 threshold as identified by national policy. Town Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha Sawbridgeworth 04/003 0.21 threshold as identified by national policy. Town Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth, part of which is within a county through the Call for Sites by the achievable. wildlife site. The site forms part of a wider landowner and is considered to be Sawbridgeworth strategic section of Green Belt that prevents available. 04/004 4.08 No No No No Town coalescence of the town with High Wych. Development would directly reduce the gap between the two settlements.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 120 Sawbridgeworth. A large county wildlife site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings located on the site and would not be suitable for landowner and is considered to be development. The site forms part of a wider available. The site is strategic section of Green Belt that prevents considered coalescence of the town with High Wych. deliverable Sawbridgeworth 04/005 27.9 Development of the site as a whole would have a subject to a Town significant impact on the countryside in this review of the location. However, development of the eastern Green Belt. part of the site would not reduce the gap between the two settlements and could be considered suitable.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 175 Sawbridgeworth and to the south of West Road. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Development would relate well to the existing landowner and is considered to be urban area. However, the site is currently within available. The site is Green Belt and is therefore considered to be considered Sawbridgeworth 04/006 14.19 unsuitable at present. The western part of the site deliverable Town is considered to be more sensitive in Green Belt subject to a terms than the eastern part and should remain review of the undeveloped. Green Belt.

N - This very large greenfield site is located on the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered western side of Sawbridgeworth. Development of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. the site would represent a wholly inappropriate landowner and is considered to be incursion into the countryside. Furthermore the available. southern part of the site lies within an area of Sawbridgeworth Green Belt that is of strategic importance given 04/007 108.84 No No No No Town that it prevents the coalescence of Sawbridgeworth with High Wych. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This part greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 31 Green Belt on the northern edge of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Sawbridgeworth. When viewed in isloation, the landowner and is considered to be site is separated from the existing main built up available. The site is area of the town and as such is considered to be considered unsuitable. However, it could be brought forward deliverable Sawbridgeworth in conjunction with site 04/056. subject to a 04/008 1.04 No No No Town review of the Green Belt and if brought forward with 04/056

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth. The site forms part of a wider through the Call for Sites by the achievable. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents landowner and is considered to be coalescence of the town with High Wych. Although available. in itself development of the site would not reduce Sawbridgeworth 04/009 8.79 the gap between the two settlements, further No No No No Town urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth. The site forms part of a wider through the Call for Sites by the achievable. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents landowner and is considered to be coalescence of the town with High Wych. Although available. in itself development of the site would not reduce Sawbridgeworth 04/010 1 the gap between the two settlements, further No No No No Town urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt to the south of Sawbridgeworth. Development through the Call for Sites by the achievable. of the site would lead to the coalescence of landowner and is considered to be Sawbridgeworth 04/011 4.05 Sawbridgeworth and Harlow. As such it is not available. No No No No Town considered suitable for development.

N - This part greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt on the northern edge of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Sawbridgeworth. It has the potential to form part of landowner and is considered to be the larger site alongside neighbouring land. available. Sawbridgeworth 04/012 5.29 However, when viewed in isloation, the site is No No No No Town separated from the existing main built up area of the town and as such is considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 125 Sawbridgeworth and to the north of West Road. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Development would relate well to the existing landowner and is considered to be urban area. However, the site is currently within available. The site is Green Belt and is therefore considered to be considered to be Sawbridgeworth 04/013 5.93 unsuitable at present. The site was identified deliverable Town within the emerging District Plan as a proposed subject to a allocation for 100 dwellings. review of the Green Belt.

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. river landscape in this area. In addition, the site is landowner and is considered to be located within a strategically important parcel of available. Sawbridgeworth 04/014 0.73 Green Belt that helps prevent the coalescence of No No No No Town Sawbridgeworth with Lower Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. river landscape in this area. In addition, the site is landowner and is considered to be located within a strategically important parcel of available. Sawbridgeworth 04/015 2.99 Green Belt that helps prevent the coalescence of No No No No Town Sawbridgeworth with Lower Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This is a brownfield site located on the edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Spellbrook. The site is considered to be unsuitable through the Call for Sites by the achievable. as it is located within the Green Belt, on the edge landowner and is considered to be of a Group 2 villlage. However the site could not available. Sawbridgeworth 04/017 11.21 be considered to be infill development and so No No No No Town would remain unsuitable under the draft Plan.

Y - The site consists of a nursery and orchard, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Deliverable for much of which is designated as a county wildlife through the Call for Sites by the achievable. community use site. The site is suitable for community uses which landowner and is considered to be Sawbridgeworth 04/018 27.9 would preserve and enhance this asset. available. Town Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth. It forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the achievable. section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of landowner and is considered to be the town with Harlow and High Wych. Although in available. itself development of the site would not reduce Sawbridgeworth 04/055 3.86 the gap between the two settlements, further No No No No Town urbanisation and reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 76 Sawbridgeworth. As it is adjacent to the settlement through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings boundary, it is well related to the existing urban landowner and is considered to be area. However the site is within the Green Belt available. The site is and is therefore currently considered to be considered Sawbridgeworth 04/056 2.53 unsuitable. deliverable Town subject to a review of the Green Belt

N - This site is located on the edge of Spellbrook. Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered It is considered to be unsuitable as it is located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. within the Green Belt, on the edge of a Group 2 landowner and is considered to be Sawbridgeworth 04/060 0.27 village and could not be considered to be infill available. No No No No Town development.

N - This greenfield site is located within Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 5 dwellings Spellbrook. Development in this location is likely to through the Call for Sites by the achievable. be considered infill and is therefore appropriate for landowner and is considered to be The site is Sawbridgeworth limited development available. considered 04/061 0.42 Town deliverable

N - This site is located on the eastern side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Sawbridgeworth and forms an integral part of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. river landscape in this area. In addition, the site is landowner and is considered to be located within a strategically important parcel of available. Sawbridgeworth Green Belt that helps prevent the coalescence of 04/062 5.75 No No No No Town Sawbridgeworth with Lower Sheering. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the achievable. section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of landowner and is considered to be the town with Hertford and Great Amwell. Further available. urbanisation and reduction in openness of this 05/001 Ware Town 11.23 strategically important area of Green Belt land No No No No should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been 05/002 Ware Town 1.8 granted and development is complete.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north west Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered of Ware. While the site is within the route of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. A10, and is well related to the existing settlement, landowner and is considered to be it forms part of Poles Park which is designated as available. 05/003 Ware Town 10.65 a historic park or garden. The site is also currently No No No No located within the Green Belt. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is considered to The site could Ware. The site is well related to the existing urban through the Call for Sites by the be achievable at present. form part of a area and could be appropriate for development, landowner and is considered to be However, in order to deliver a larger strategic either in isolation or as part of a larger strategic available. strategic scale of scale site. However, at present the site is considered to development, major development in 05/004 Ware Town 5.2 be unsuitable due to its location within the Green infrastructure would be this location Belt. required. Further work would subject to a therefore be required to review of the assess achievability. Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is currently in use as Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered allotments associated with Presdales School. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Up to 34 site is relatively well related to the existing urban landowner and is considered to be dwellings area, however it is considered to be unsuitable for available. development due to its location in the Green Belt. The site is 05/005 Ware Town 1.12 considered to be deliverable subject to a review of the Green Belt

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 05/007 Ware Town 0.23 threshold as identified by national policy. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the achievable. section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of landowner and is considered to be the town with Hertford. Further urbanisation and available. reduction in openness of this strategically 05/008 Ware Town 2.27 important area of Green Belt land should be No No No No resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been 05/009 Ware Town 1.8 granted and development is complete.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 05/010 Ware Town 0.1 threshold as identified by national policy. Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 05/011 Ware Town 0.1 threshold as identified by national policy. N - This greenfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Ware. The site forms part of a wider strategic through the Call for Sites by the achievable. section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of landowner and is considered to be the town with Hertford. Further urbanisation and available. reduction in openness of this strategically 05/013 Ware Town 14.61 No No No No important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Crane Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Mead area of Ware. While the site is well related through the Call for Sites by the achievable. to existing development, a number of concerns landowner and is considered to be lead to the site being considered unsuitable. The available. site forms part of a wider strategic section of Green Belt that prevents coalescence of the town with Great Amwell. Although in itself development of the site would not reduce the gap between the two settlements, further urbanisation and 05/014 Ware Town 1.66 No No No No reduction in openness of this strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. Furthermore, a large part of the site lies within Flood Zone 3. In addition, development may impact negatively on the adjacent Lee Valley Regional Park.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 05/015 Ware Town 0.4 therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered south of Ware. The site forms part of a wider through the Call for Sites by the achievable. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents landowner and is considered to be coalescence of the town with Hertford. Further available. urbanisation and reduction in openness of this 05/016 Ware Town 4.27 strategically important area of Green Belt land No No No No should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered south of Ware. The site forms part of a wider through the Call for Sites by the achievable. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents landowner and is considered to be coalescence of the town with Hertford. Further available. urbanisation and reduction in openness of this 05/017 Ware Town 2.16 strategically important area of Green Belt land No No No No should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as permission has been 05/018 Ware Town 2.1 granted and development is complete.

N - This partly greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered south of Ware. The site forms part of a wider through the Call for Sites by the achievable. strategic section of Green Belt that prevents landowner and is considered to be coalescence of the town with Hertford. Further available. 05/019 Ware Town 3.85 urbanisation and reduction in openness of this No No No No strategically important area of Green Belt land should be resisted. As such, the site is considered to be unsuitable for development.

This site has been assessed as part of site 44/005. 05/020 Ware Town 11.75

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 05/021 Ware Town 0.1 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 05/022 Ware Town 0.82 therefore accepted.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Ware. While the site is within the route of the A10, through the Call for Sites by the achievable. and is well related to existing development, it is landowner and is considered to be within the Green Belt and much of the site is available. 05/090 Ware Town 0.72 subject to a Tree Preservation Order. As such the No No No No site is considered to be unsuitable for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located off Viaduct Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Road. While it is well related to existing through the Call for Sites by the achievable. development, the site lies within the Green Belt. In landowner and is considered to be addition, the green space plays an important role available. 05/096 Ware Town 1.2 in maintaining the semi-rural character of this part No No No No of Ware. As such it is considered to be unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. The site is open through the Call for Sites by the achievable. land, unrelated to a settlement. Development in landowner and is considered to be 06/001 Albury 6.25 this location would be an unacceptable intrusion available. No No No No into open countryside, and as such is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. It is unrelated to a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. settlement and development in this location would landowner and is considered to be be an unacceptable intrusion into open available. 06/002 Albury 0.96 countryside. As such it is considered to be No No No No unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt on the edge of a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Group 3 village. Any development in this location landowner and is considered to be would represent an unacceptable encroachment available. 07/001 Anstey 0.52 No No No No into the countryside, and as such is considered to be unsuitable.

N – This brownfield site is identified as an N - While the site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Employment Area which is located in the Rural through the Call for Sites on behalf of achievable. Area Beyond the Green Belt. The site promoters the landowner, it is currently consider that the site is no longer suitable or designated as an Employment Area viable for ongoing employment use. The site is and is therefore not considered to be 07/002 Anstey 2.7 however entirely separate from any existing currently available. No No No No settlement and as such is considered to be an unsustainable location for residential development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 08/001 Ardeley 0.19 Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered The site is Buntingford, immediately north of an allocated through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered employment area. It is considered that the site landowner and is considered available. deliverable for would be deliverable for employment use subject employment uses 09/001 Aspenden 2.8 to an extension of the existing employment area. subject to a This is proposed as part of the emerging District review of the Plan. Green Belt.

Y – This former orchard is located in the Green Y - The Call for Sites form has been Y – Site is considered Up to 10 dwellings Belt on the edge of Aston, a Group 2 village. The submitted on behalf of six landowners. achievable. site is surrounded by development on three sides It is therefore considered that the site The site is and is therefore likely to be considered is available. considered 10/001 Aston 0.44 appropriate for limited infill development. deliverable

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt to the north of Aston. Development through the Call for Sites by the achievable. would not represent infill development in a Group landowner and is considered available. 2 village and could not come forward through a 10/002 Aston 3.04 No No No No Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt to the west of Aston. Development would not through the Call for Sites by the achievable. represent infill development in a Group 2 village landowner and is considered available. and could not come forward through a 10/003 Aston 0.48 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the No No No No Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Belt to the west of Aston. Development would not through the Call for Sites by the achievable. represent infill development in a Group 2 village landowner and is considered available. and could not come forward through a 10/004 Aston 0.29 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the No No No No Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is poorly related to either Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is considered to The site could Stevenage or Aston End and lies within the Green through the Call for Sites by the be achievable at present. form part of a Belt. It is therefore unsuitable at present when landowner and is considered available. However, in order to deliver a larger strategic considered in isolation. However, the site does strategic scale of scale relate well to other SLAA sites further north, and development, major development in 10/006 Aston 9.7 there may be potential for strategic scale infrastructure would be this location development, including necessary services and required. Further work would subject to a facilities, which would relate well to Stevenage. therefore be required to review of the assess achievability. Green Belt. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located in the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered adjacent to Gresley Way and the built up area of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Stevenage. The site would have to be accessed landowner and is considered available. from Gresley Way. However, at present there is landscaped banking and mature tree growth which 10/007 Aston 1.3 No No No No screens views of the urban area of Stevenage from open countryside. On this basis the site is considered to be unsuitable.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 11/001 Bayford 0.18 threshold as identified by national policy.

Y– This site is located within the Green Belt and is Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered The site is currently in authorised Gypsy and Traveller use. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered The site is in a rural location which is remote from landowner and is considered to be deliverable for local services and is therefore considered to be an available. Gypsy and 11/003 Bayford 0.28 unsustainable location for future general needs Traveller use No No No housing. However it is suitable for an expansion for Gypsy and Travellers.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt. Any development would be an through the Call for Sites by the achievable. 12/001 Bengeo Rural 22.12 incursion into open countryside and, as such, is landowner and is considered to be No No No No considered to be unsuitable. available.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Area Beyond the Green Belt to the south west of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Tonwell, a Group 2 village. While the site would landowner and is considered to be not constitute infill development, it could come available. The site is forward if identified through a Neighbourhood considered Plan. deliverable subject to a 12/002 Bengeo Rural 0.41 review of the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt. Any development would be an through the Call for Sites by the achievable. 12/003 Bengeo Rural 0.32 incursion into open countryside and, as such, is landowner and is considered to be No No No No considered to be unsuitable. available. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Beyond the Green Belt, in a Group 2 village. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Whilst reasonably well related to the existing built landowner and is considered to be up area of Benington, this is a relatively large site available. The site is and its development would be out of scale with the considered form and character of the village. However, deliverable development of part of the site could be suitable if subject to a 13/001 Benington 1.74 identified through a Neighbourhof Plan for review of the Benington. settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - Site has been promoted through Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. the Call for Sites process. Site is in achievable. Development on the edge of this Group 3 multiple land ownership within same settlement would result in an unacceptable family with intentions known. Site is 13/002 Benington 0.31 incursion into the countryside. As such, the site is considered available for development. No No No No considered unsuitable.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 9 dwellings Area Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of Town through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Lane, Benington. Although the site would not landowner and is considered to be The site is represent infill development in a Group 2 village, available. considered the site could be brought forward if identified deliverable within a Neighbourhood Plan. subject to a review of the 13/003 Benington 0.34 No No settlement No boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Development on the edge of this Group 3 landowner and is considered to be settlement would result in an unacceptable available. 13/004 Benington 0.36 No No No No incursion into the countryside. As such, the site is considered unsuitable.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/005 Benington 0.14 Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt, to the west of Hebing End. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Development on the edge of this Group 3 landowner and is considered to be settlement would result in an unacceptable available. 13/006 Benington 0.84 No No No No incursion into the countryside. As such, the site is considered unsuitable.

N – This brownfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - Site is in multiple ownership. Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt. Previously in use as a However it has been promoted for achievable. chalk pit and pumping station, the site is located development by the landowner within the Benington Conservation Area. This site through the Call for Sites and is is heavily covered by mature tree coverage and therefore considered available for topographically constrained due to the height development. 13/008 Benington 0.34 difference of the site and the road. Development No No No No on this site is not considered to relate well to the built up area and is therefore considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/009 Benington 0.17

N - Site is predominantly a greenfield site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered containing disused sheds along the north-west through the Call for Sites by the achievable. boundary of the site. Site is located within the landowner and is considered to be Green Belt in a rural setting with limited access to available. 13/010 Benington 0.74 local services. Site is not considered to be located No No No No in a sustainable location and is therefore considered unsuitable for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/011 Benington 0.17

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 13/012 Benington 0.22 Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Area Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of Town through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Lane, Benington. Although the site would not landowner and is considered to be represent infill development in a Group 2 village, available. The site is the site could be brought forward if identified considered within a Neighbourhood Plan. deliverable subject to a 13/013 Benington 0.77 review of the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Area Beyond the Green Belt, to the west of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Walkern Road, Benington. Although the site would landowner and is considered to be not represent infill development in a Group 2 available. The site is village, the site could be brought forward if considered identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. deliverable subject to a review of the 13/018 Benington 1.25 settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Benington.

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 30 Beyond the Green Belt, adjacent to existing through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings development on Pelham Road and opposite the landowner and is considered to be existing housing on Friars Road. The site is available. The site is relatively large although it does have a reasonable considered relationship with the existing built up area of deliverable Braughing. Potential access can be achieved subject to an from Pelham Road. The site has surface water amendment to 15/001 Braughing 1.71 flooding issues towards its northern boundary. the village Development of part of the site may be considered boundary through appropriate with careful layout in keeping with the a Neighbourhood surrounding area without having an adverse Plan for impact visually. However the site is currently Braughing. outside of the village boundary and is therefore currently unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt, between Braughing and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Hay Street. Development in this location would landowner and is considered to be represent an unacceptable extension of ribbon available. 15/002 Braughing 0.83 development in a rural setting. Remote from No No No No Braughing and its local services the site is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

N - This greenfield site lies within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. would be out of scale with the character of the landowner and is considered to be existing village. Although the site lies adjacent to available. the village boundary, it cannot be described as being within the built up area of the village. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public footpaths, and separates the village from the isolated ribbon development to the north. To 15/003 Braughing 1.61 No No No No connect the two would involve an unacceptable incursion into countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. An outline application for 60 houses (3/14/1448/OP) was refused, a public inquiry has taken place and the appeal has been dismissed.

N - This large greenfield site lies within the Rural Y - Site has been promoted through Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the the call for sites process. Planning achievable. site would be out of scale with the charcter of the application indicates the site owners existing village. Although the site lies adjacent to intentions. Site is therefore considered the village boundary, it cannot be described as available. being within the built up area of the village. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public footpaths, and separates the village from the isolated ribbon development to the north. To 15/004 Braughing 6.7 connect the two would involve an unacceptable No No No No incursion into countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. An outline application for 60 houses (3/14/1448/OP) was refused, a public inquiry has taken place and the appeal has been dismissed. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – The site is contained and is relatively well Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 18 related to the existing settlement. It could be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings suitable for development but at present is located landowner and is considered to be within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. available. The site is considered deliverable subject to an amendment to 15/005 Braughing 0.73 the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Braughing.

N – This site is located on the western side of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 8 dwellings Braughing, adjacent to the settlement boundary. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. The site is well related to the existing settlement. landowner and is considered to be The site is However, at present is located within the Rural available. considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. deliverable subject to an amendment to 15/007 Braughing 0.33 the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Braughing.

N – This very large greenfield site is located within Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt to the north through the Call for Sites by the achievable. of Braughing. Development of the site would be landowner and is considered to be totally out of scale with the existing village and available. contrary to the Council’s policy to allow some limited development in sustainable villages. The site is part of the open countryside, traversed by public footpaths, and separates Braughing from 15/016 Braughing 36 the hamlet of Hay Street to north. To connect the No No No No two would involve an unacceptable incursion into open countryside, which forms an important setting for the village. The site is not considered suitable for future housing development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt to the north of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Braughing. The site falls within SLAA site ref landowner and is considered to be 15/016. The site is part of the open countryside available. and is isolated from both Braughing to the south 15/019 Braughing 2.49 and Hay Street to the north. The site is in a rural No No No No location which is remote from local services and is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N- This large green field site is located to the north Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered of Puckeridge in the Rural Area Beyond the Green through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Belt, an Area of Archaeological Significance and landowner and is considered to be within a Scheduled Monument. The site is located available. away from the built up area of the village, in open countryside. The site does not have direct access. 15/020 Braughing 6.1 Constrained by both its unsustainable location and No No No No topography the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - Located on Pump Hill, the site is surrounded Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 5 dwellings by low density residential development. There is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. currently no direct access to the site. Access may landowner and is considered to be The site is be constrained by TPO's along the eastern available. cosnidered boundary. The site is well related to existing deliverable development and is likely to be considered infill. subject to being 16/001 Brent Pelham 0.31 However at present the site is unsuitable as it is identified within a located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Neighbouhood Belt. Plan for Brent Pelham.

Site not assessed as permission has been 17/001 Brickendon Liberty 1.09 granted and development is complete.

N - This is a large greenfield site located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt, to the south of Hertford. It is located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. between the railway line and Brickendon Lane. landowner and is considered to be There is potential for development to have a available. negative impact on Brickendonbury. Development would represent an unacceptable incursion into 17/002 Brickendon Liberty 24.89 open countryside, impacting on the openness of No No No No the Green Belt in this location. As such the site is considered unsuitable for future housing development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 17/003 Brickendon Liberty 0.17 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 18/001 Buckland 0.155

N – This is an isolated site located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Surrounded by open through the Call for Sites by the achievable. fields and a handful of farm house residences, the landowner and is considered to be site is accessed via a narrow road. There is a available. history of refused and withdrawn planning applications on the site including for an agricultural barn to house a herd of Alpacas. The southern 19/001 Cottered 2.18 edge of the site lies in Flood Zone 3. Given that No No No No the site is in a rural location which is remote from local services it is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development through the Call for Sites by two achievable. dwellings of the whole site would be inapproriate. However, landowners and is considered to be the northern part of the site is well related to available. The site is existing development. Although it would not considered represent infill development in a Group 2 village, deliverable the site could be brought forward if identified subject to a 19/002 Cottered 12.94 within a Neighbourhood Plan. No No review of the No settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Cottered.

N – This site lies within the Rural Area Beyond the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 5 dwellings Green Belt, partly within an Area of Archaeological through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Significance and within the Cottered Conservation landowner and is considered to be The site is Area. Warren Lane is a narrow road with farm available. considered houses on both sides. The site could be considerd deliverable 19/003 Cottered 0.45 as infill in a Group 2 village, and as such, is considered to be suitable.

Site not assessed as permission has been 19/004 Cottered 0.34 granted and development is complete. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings whole site would be inapproriate. However, part of landowner and is considered to be the site is well related to existing development. available. The site is Although it would not represent infill development considered in a Group 2 village, the site could be brought deliverable forward if identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. subject to a 19/005 Cottered 2.092 review of the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Cottered.

N - While it is well related to existing development, Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Bulls Green is a Group 3 village in the Green Belt through the Call for Sites by the achievable. 20/001 Datchworth 0.48 which is an unsustainable location for future landowner and is considered to be No No No No housing development. available.

N - Site is a previously developed site but is N - Site is currently in employment use Y – Site is considered currently in commerical use. The site is also within and is not considered to be available achievable. the Green Belt and is detached from the main built at present. However the site has been 20/002 Datchworth 0.78 up area of Datchworth. It is therefore in an promoted by the landowners through No No No No unsustainable location for future housing the Call for Sites process. development.

N - Site is within the Green Belt. While it is well N - The southern part of the site is Y - Site is considered related to existing development, Burnham Green currently in use as a site for mobile achievable. is a Group 3 village which is an unsustainable homes and so is not considered to be 20/003 Datchworth 1.32 location for future housing development. currently available. No No No No

N – This large greenfield site is located in the N - The site was not submitted through Y – Site is considered Green Belt adjacent to the main built up area of the Call for Sites and it is therefore not achievable. Datchworth. Development would not represent known whether the site is available. infill development in a Group 2 village and could 20/009 Datchworth 20 not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan No No No No due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt adjacent to the main built up area of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Datchworth, a Group 2 village. Although the site is landowner and is considered to be adjacent to the main built up area of the village the available. scale of development proposed would be inappropriate, representing an unacceptable intrusion into the openness of the Green Belt. This site is therefore considered unsuitable for 20/010 Datchworth 4.12 development. A smaller scale of development No No No No maybe more acceptable in Green Belt terms, however it would not consitute infill development in a Group 2 village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt.

N - Site is within the Green Belt. Development Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered would involve the consolidation of existing ribbon through the Call for Sites by the achievable. development away from the main part of the landowner and is considered to be village. Previous applications for residential available. development in this location have been refused. 20/011 Datchworth 2.5 Burnham Green is a Group 3 village in the Green No No No No Belt which is an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt. It is poorly related to the main built up through the Call for Sites by the achievable. area of the village and the scale of development landowner and is considered to be proposed would be inappropriate, representing an available. unacceptable intrusion into the openness of the Green Belt. Development would not represent infill 20/012 Datchworth 4.75 development in a Group 2 village and could not No No No No come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – The site is located within the Green Belt and is Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site is currently used as stables. There are existing through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. However, it unsuitable when residential dwellings to the south-eastern part of landowner and is considered to be is likely that significant considered in the site, while there is an upward slope on its available. infrastructure would be isolation. northern part. Although the site has direct access required which would impact However, it could and lies close to existing development, Gilston is a on viability. form part of a Group 3 village and is therefore considered to be much larger 21/001 Eastwick & Gilston 2.29 an unsustainable location for further non-strategic strategic scale development. There is however potential for the development to site to form part of a much larger strategic site to the north of the north of Harlow. Harlow subject to a review of the Green Belt

N - There are a number of constraints on site Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could including Areas of Archealogical Significance and through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. However, it provide strategic Wildlife Sites. It is likely however that, given the landowner and is considered to be is likely that significant scale size of the site, impacts on these areas could be available. infrastructure would be development, mitigated through careful design. The south required which would impact either in isloation western part of the site lies within Flood Zones 2 on viability. or as part of a and 3 which would constrain the developable area. wider scheme, to 21/002 Eastwick & Gilston 136.29 The site could provide strategic scale the north of development, either in isolation or as part of a Harlow subject to wider scheme involving neighbouring sites. a review of the However, the site is within the Green Belt and is Green Belt therefore currently unsuitable.

N - There are a number of constraints on site Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could including Areas of Archealogical Significance and through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic Wildlife sites. It is likely however that, given the landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale size of the site, impacts on these areas could be available. has been assessed through development, mitigated through careful design. The southern the Delivery Study and is either in isloation part of the site lies within Flood Zones 2 and 3 considered to be viable. or as part of a which would constrain the developable area. The wider scheme, to 21/004 Eastwick & Gilston 1015.41 site could provide strategic scale development, the north of either in isolation or as part of a wider scheme Harlow, subject to involving neighbouring sites. However, the site is a review of the within the Green Belt and is therefore currently Green Belt unsuitable.

N - This Green Belt site is designated as an Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered of Archaeological Significance. Whilst located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. adjacent to Terlings Park, the site is separated landowner and is considered to be from SLAA sites to the north by the A414 and available. appears isolated and unrelated to existing 21/005 Eastwick & Gilston 0.81 No No No No development and facilities. The site is therefore considered to be an unsuitable location for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This Green Belt site is designated as an Area Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered of Archaeological Significance. Gilston Park through the Call for Sites by the achievable. House is also a Grade 2* listed building and any landowner and is considered to be Eastwick and development in this location would have a available. 21/006 8.02 No No No No Gilston significant impact on its setting. The site is therefore considered to be an unsuitable location for development.

The site is largely within Flood Zones 2 and 3 Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site is which would constrain the developable area and through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. However, it unsuitable when result in isolated development. The site could landowner and is considered to be is likely that significant considered in provide strategic scale development, either in available. infrastructure would be isolation. isolation or as part of a wider scheme involving required which would impact However, it could neighbouring sites. However, the site is within the on viability. form part of a Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable much larger 21/009 Eastwick & Gilston 113.35 strategic scale development to the north of Harlow subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y – This greenfield site is located in the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Area Beyond the Green Belt, within Furneux through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. Pelham, a Group 2 village. Although well related to landowner and is considered to be the existing built up area, there is no direct access available. 22/001 Furneux Pelham 0.31 to the site. The site is covered by mature trees No No No No and development would impact negatively on the character of the village.

N - Site is a greenfield site, located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, to the east of through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. Furneux Pelham. Located adjacent to a Grade II landowner and is considered to be listed building, the site is bounded by heavy foliage available. without direct access into it. The site is divorced 22/002 Furneux Pelham 0.26 from the main settlement and local services and No No No No facilities and is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Up to 9 dwellings Area Beyond the Green Belt, to the south of through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. Barleycroft End, Furneux Pelham. The site is landowner and is considered to be The site is located adjacent to the settlement boundary. As available. deliverable such limited development in this location could subject to a come forward if the site is identified in a review of the Neighbourhood Plan settlement 22/003 Furneux Pelham 0.37 boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Furneux Pelham.

N – This brownfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Area Beyond the Green Belt, an Area of through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. Archaeological Significance and the Furneux landowner and is considered to be Pelham Conservation Area. The site partially available. serves as an access to adjacent buildings and to a storage and employment site on the southern part of the site. The site is located outside of the main built up area. Whilst there is scope for infill 22/004 Furneux Pelham 0.25 development in Group 2 villages, the site forms No No No No part of a wider gap which is important to the setting of the village. Planning permission for the demolition of a Dutch barn and erection of 3 dwellings has previously been refused (ref. 3/10/1838/FP). As such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

This site has not been assessed as it has been 23/001 Great Amwell 0.65 confirmed as no longer being available.

N – This brownfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Green Belt in Great Amwell, a Group 2 Village. through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. The site is currently in use as a nursery with landowner and is considered to be storage units. The site is fairly well screened by available. mature hedgerows to the south and east of the site. Development of a site of this size would be 23/002 Great Amwell 2.05 out of scale and character with the area and would No No No No impact on the openness of the Green Belt in this strategic gap. As such the site is considered unsuitable for housing development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y – This partially greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the Up to 5 dwellings Green Belt, within the built up area of Stanstead through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. Abbotts. The northern part of the site is within a landowner and is considered to be The site is Local Wildlife Site. There is an existing depot available. considered located on the site; the SLAA site boundary deliverable 23/003 Great Amwell 0.23 excludes the pumping station. The site is also located adjacent to a railway line where a buffer may be required. The site is potentially considered suitable for infill development.

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Green Belt, to the west of Great Amwell and east through the Call for Sites by the achievable. of the A10. The site lies in the strategic gap landowner and is considered to be between the southern edge of Ware and the north available. side of Hoddesdon (2.4 km apart). Large scale development in this location would represent a 23/004 Great Amwell 39.49 clear incursion into open countryside, impacting No No No No on the openness of the Green Belt in this sensitive location and as such the site is considered unsuitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered A1170 with access from Hilllside Lane. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. located within the Green Belt and forms part of the landowner and is considered to be strategic gap between Great Amwell and available. 23/021 Great Amwell 22.2 Stanstead Abbotts. As such the site is considered No No No No unsuitable for residential development.

N – This part brownfield/greenfield site is located Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered within the Green Belt in Great Amwell, a Group 2 through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Village. Development of a site of this size would landowner and is considered to be be out of scale and character with the area and available. would impact on the openness of the Green Belt in 23/022 Great Amwell 3.69 No No No No this strategic gap. As such the site is considered unsuitable for housing development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Belt and its development would be totally through the Call for Sites by the achievable. out scale with the village. It would also involve an landowner and is considered to be unacceptable intrusion into open countryside on available. the opposite side of the main road to the village. It would be an isolated development and an 25/001 Hertford Heath 5.46 No No No No intrusion into land, which forms part of a swathe of agricultural land and is part of the open setting of the village. There are TPOs on northern and eastern boundaries of site.

N – This strategic greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Belt to the north of the main built up area of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Up to 40 Hertford Heath, a Group 1 village. Developing a landowner and is considered to be dwellings large neighbourhood/settlement in this location available. would be totally out of scale with the village and an The site is unacceptable intrusion into the openness of the considered Green Belt. However, the southern part of the site deliverable 25/002 Hertford Heath 70.38 could be considered suitable subject to a review of subject to a the Green Belt. review of the Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hertford Heath.

N – This part greenfield/brownfield site is located Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered in the Green Belt outside of the village boundary. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Whilst the site has some existing dwellings on it, landowner and is considered to be further intensification would impact on the available. 25/003 Hertford Heath 1.7 openness of the Green Belt in this location. As No No No No such the site is considered unsuitable for further residential development.

N - This is a very large site in the Green Belt. The Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered site promoter has suggested that it could be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. appropriate for a number of uses. However, there landowner and is considered to be are a large number of constraints on the site. Part available. of it remains in use as a quarry, and the workings and curtilage take up a considerable amount of land. Part of the site is also constrained by Flood Zones 2 and 3 and the promoter advises that there are lagoons on site. Further constraints 26/001 Hertingfordbury 128.5 include a Scheduled Ancient Monument, Tree No No No No Preservation Orders and Local Wildlife Sites. Given it's isolated location, it is considered that any development would represent an unacceptable incursion into open countryside. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could Green Belt to the east of Welwyn Garden City, through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic north of the A414. The majority of the site is landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale identified as an Area of Archaeological available. has been assessed through development, Significance and there are a number of features of the Delivery Study and is either in isloation historic importance in the locality. The area considered to be viable. or as part of a contains known reserves of sand and gravel wider scheme, to minerals which would need to be extracted prior to the east of 26/003 Hertingfordbury 71.11 any development. The site is currently unsuitable; Welwyn Garden however, it offers the opportunity to provide a City, subject to a sustainable urban extension to Welwyn Garden review of the City in conjunction with adjacent land in Welwyn Green Belt Hatfield Borough, subject to a review of the Green Belt.

N – This submission is made up of a number of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered large greenfield sites within the Green Belt linking through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Hertingfordbury, Birch Green and Letty Green landowner and is considered to be below the Old Coach Road and another two sites available. north of the A414. The developer notes that the area could provide small-scale development in keeping with the character of the existing 26/004 Hertingfordbury 127.21 settlements. Development would not represent No No No No infill development in a Group 2 village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This brownfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Belt to the east of Birch Green. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. currently used for horticulture and storage. landowner and is considered to be Development would not represent infill available. development in a Group 2 village and could not 26/005 Hertingfordbury 0.69 come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due No No No No to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt to the west of Hertingfordbury, in close through the Call for Sites by the achievable. proximity to two Grade II Listed Buildings. Poorly landowner and is considered to be related to the existing settlement, development in available. this location would represent an unacceptable incursion into the countryside impacting on the openness of the Green Belt. Development would 26/006 Hertingfordbury 3.8 not represent infill development in a Group 2 No No No No village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This part brownfield/greenfield site is located Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered in the Green Belt to the west of Hertingfordbury, in through the Call for Sites by the achievable. close proximity to two Grade II Listed Buildings. landowner and is considered to be Poorly related to the existing settlement, available. development in this location would represent an unacceptable incursion into the countryside impacting on the openness of the Green Belt. 26/007 Hertingfordbury 1.8 Development would not represent infill No No No No development in a Group 2 village and could not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt to the north of Birch Green. To the east of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. site lie two Grade II Listed Buildings. Development landowner and is considered to be would not represent infill development in a Group available. 2 village and could not come forward through a 26/008 Hertingfordbury 0.6 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the No No No No Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt to the north of Birch Green. Development through the Call for Sites by the achievable. would not represent infill development in a Group landowner and is considered to be 2 village and could not come forward through a available. 26/009 Hertingfordbury 0.57 Neighbourhood Plan due to its location in the No No No No Green Belt, and as such is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site is located to the east of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Staines Green. Staines Green is a Group 3 Village through the Call for Sites by the achievable. in the Green Belt and as such the site is landowner and is considered to be 26/010 Hertingfordbury 7 considered unsuitable for development. available. No No No No Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Belt around High Wych. There are a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. number of constraints on site including Areas of landowner and is considered to be Archaeological Significance and Wildlife Sites. It is available. likely that, given the size of the site, impacts on these areas could be mitigated through careful 27/002 High Wych 169.98 design. However, this area will form a senstive No No No No strategic gap between High Wych and the Gilston Area development. As such, it is considered unsuitable.

N – This greenfield site lies to the south of High Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Wych. It forms part of the strategic gap between through the Call for Sites by the achievable. the village and Sawbridgeworth and as such is landowner and is considered to be 27/003 High Wych 6.81 considered unsuitable for development. available. No No No No

N – This greenfield site lies within the Green Belt. N - The ownership of the site is not Y - Site is considered The northern part of the site is located in the High known. Site not considered to be achievable. Wych Conservation Area and there are Listed available now. Buildings nearby. The site is surrounded by open land apart from a few buildings/structures to the north. Direct access to the site is currently provided from High Wych Lane, through a playground. This is a relatively large site, 27/004 High Wych 1.72 No No No No unrelated to the form and character of the village. Its development would be an incursion into land which forms part of the countryside and the visual setting for the village. As such is not considered suitable for development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Although relatively through the Call for Sites by the achievable. well related to existing development, Allen’s Green landowner and is considered to be is a Group 3 village and is therefore considered to available. 27/008 High Wych 0.7 be an unsustainable location for future housing No No No No development.

Y - Site is located within the Rural Area Beyond Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Site is considered the Green Belt and in Flood Zone 3. Site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable for deliverable for proposed for leisure/recreational use. Planning landowner and is considered to be leisure/recreation use. Leisure/Recreatio permission (3/09/0352/FP) previously granted for available. Planning permission n use 28/001 Hormead 0.9 a football pitch and car parking. Site is therefore (3/09/0352/FP) previously granted for considered suitable for leisure/recreational use. a football pitch and car parking. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This predominantly greenfield site is located Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered within Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. This is a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. relatively large site and its development would be landowner and is considered to be out of scale with the existing village. Whilst available. development would link the school and the main built up area of the village this would be an 28/002 Hormead 3.63 unacceptable intrusion into the countryside setting No No No No of the village. Great Hormead is also a Group 3 village which is an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N - This partially brownfield site is located within Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, adjacent to through the Call for Sites by the achievable. the Great Hormead Conservation Area. The landowner and is considered to be northern part of the site is open land and a brick available. grain store, which is currently unused, is located on the southern boundary of the site. Site slopes 28/003 Hormead 0.89 gradually to the north. Whilst the site is well No No No No located adjacent to the built up area, Great Hormead is a Group 3 village which is an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Located to the rear through the Call for Sites by the achievable. of existing residential development, there is no landowner and is considered to be direct access. There is pedestrian access to the available. south-east boundary of the site; however, further highways work would be necessary. Whilst the 28/004 Hormead 1.28 site is located adjacent to the built up area, Great No No No No Hormead is a Group 3 village which is an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N – This isolated brownfield site is located within N - Whilst the site has been promoted Y - Site is considered the Rural Area Beyond Green Belt. The site is through the Call for Sites process, site achievable. currently in B2 and B8 use, although not is currently in employment use and is designated as an Employment Area in the Local not considered available. Plan. Given that the site is in a rural location which is remote from local services it is considered to be 28/005 Hormead 1.03 an unsustainable location for future housing No No No No development. It is also important to ensure that local employment sites are not lost to housing to ensure a balanced community. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located to the west Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 of Hunsdon, a Group 1 village. The south western through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings section of the site lies within a County Wildlife landowner and is considered to be Site. While development of the entire site would available. The site is be completely out of scale with the character of considered the village, the south eastern section of the site deliverable could be suitable for small scale development. subject to an However, at present the site is unsuitable due to amendment to 29/001 Hunsdon 28.95 its location within the Rural Area Beyond the the village Green Belt. boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt to the north of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Hunsdon, a Group 1 village. The site is not well landowner and is considered to be related to the existing settlement and development available. would result in an extension of ribbon 29/002 Hunsdon 1.07 development into open countryside. The site is not No No No No considered to offer a suitable location for future development.

N - This brownfield site is located in the Rural N - While the site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt and is currently in through the Call for Sites on behalf of achievable. various uses including employment, although not the landowner, it is currently in designated as an Employment Area in the Local employment use and is therefore not Up to 29 dwellings Plan. While the site lies outside of the identified considered to be currently available. village boundary, it is well related to the existing The site is settlement and could offer the opportunity to considered provide small scale development which may developable enhance the character of the village in this subject to an amendment to the 29/003 Hunsdon 1.14 location. village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon and consideration of employment use. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - There are a number of constraints on site Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could including Areas of Archealogical Significance and through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic Wildlife sites. It is likely however that, given the landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale size of the site, impacts on these areas could be available. has been assessed through development, mitigated through careful design. The site could the Delivery Study and is either in isloation provide strategic scale development, either in considered to be viable. or as part of a isolation or as part of a wider scheme involving wider scheme, to 29/004 Hunsdon 114.43 neighbouring sites. However, the site is within the the north of Green Belt and is therefore currently unsuitable. Harlow, subject to a review of the Green Belt

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 29/005 Hunsdon 0.41 therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 29/006 Hunsdon 0.33 therefore accepted.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 29/015 Hunsdon 0.36 therefore accepted.

N - This brownfield site lies within Rural Area N - While the site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt in the hamlet of through the Call for Sites on behalf of achievable. Hunsdonbury, a Group 3 settlement. It is therefore the landowner, development would considered to be unsuitable for future housing result in the loss of a site that was development. There is a planning application on peviosuly in employment use and 29/017 Hunsdon the site awaiting decision on for the demolition of therefore is not considered to be No No No No existing dwellings and erection of 14 number of currently available. dwellings with garaging and landscaping (3/15/0260/FUL).

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 29/018 Hunsdon 0.42 therefore accepted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – The site lies in the Green Belt, in an isolated Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered location on the edge of Hunsdonbury. The site is a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. clearing within a woodland. To the east is Bury landowner and is considered to be Plantation which is designated as a Wildlife Site. available. The site is predominantly open. The site is submitted as part of a ‘linked hamlet’ concept. However this is not considered a sustainable 29/019 Hunsdon 2.81 approach for future housing development and No No No No would result in isolated groupings of development with no supporting infrastructure/services. The site is considered unsuitable for future housing development.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 29/020 Hunsdon 0.25 therefore accepted.

N - This greenfield site is located on the southern Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 edge of Hunsdon. The northern part of the site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings in use as open space. While the remainder of the landowner and is considered to be site is well related to the existing urban area, it is available. The site is currently considered to be unsuitable as it is considered located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green deliverable Belt. subject to an 29/021 Hunsdon 2.02 amendment to the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Hunsdon.

N - This greenfield site is located within Hunsdon Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Parish, immediately to the west of Briggens Park. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. While the site is located very close to the A414 it landowner and is considered to be is not well connected to any existing settlement, available. the closest being Roydon within Epping Forest 29/022 Hunsdon 4.25 District. Given its relative isolation and the fact that No No No No the site lies within the Green Belt, it is not considered suitable for development.

N - The site is located within the Green Belt and is Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered not related to any existing settlement and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. development would result in an unacceptable landowner and is considered to be incursion into the countryside. The site is therefore available. 30/001 Little Berkhamsted 5.7 No No No No in an unsustainable location and is unsuitable for future development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt in Little Berkhamsted, a Group 3 village. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. While the site is reasonably well related to the landowner and is considered to be existing settlement Little Berkhamsted has limited available. 30/002 Little Berkhamsted 2.9 services and facilities and as such is considered No No No No to be an unsuitable location for future development.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt in Little Berkhamsted, a Group 3 village. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. While the site is reasonably well related to the landowner and is considered to be existing settlement Little Berkhamsted has limited available. 30/003 Little Berkhamsted 4.29 services and facilities and as such is considered No No No No to be an unsuitable location for future development.

N - This is a greenfield site located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Stortford Road. The site is covered by an Area of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Archaelogical Significance designation although it landowner and is considered to be is likely that this could be mitigated. The site is not available. well related to the existing settlement and 31/001 Little Hadham 0.66 development would represent an unacceptable No No No No extension to existing ribbon development. This site is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable.

N - This is a very large greenfield site, consisting Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is considered to The site could of a number of open fields around the village of through the Call for Sites by the be achievable at present. form part of a Little Hadham, a Group 2 village. Topographically landowner and is considered to be However, in order to deliver a larger strategic the site varies, the northern half of the site available. strategic scale of scale overlooks Little Hadham and is highly visible from development, major development in surrounding areas. The River Ash runs through infrastructure would be this location. The the site, along the eastern half on a north-south required. Further work would site could be axis. Along the line of the river, the site lies within therefore be required to considered to be Flood Zone 3 with a risk of Surface Water assess achievability. either deliverable 31/002 Little Hadham 269.05 Flooding although the construction of the Little or developable Hadham bypass ad associated flood alleviation depending on the measures should largely address this issue. While nature and scale the site could form part of a larger strategic scale of development. of development in this location in the future, it is currently considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a brownfield site located in Bury Green. N - While the site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site currently contains vacant offices and is through the Call for Sites on behalf of achievable. identified in the Local Plan as a Major Developed the landowner, development would Site. Planning permission (3/07/1540/PD) for the result in the loss of an employment demolition of these units was granted in 2007 site and therefore is not considered to although this has not been implemented. The site be currently available. 31/003 Little Hadham 3.35 is relatively well related to the existing settlement No No No No of Bury Green but, as this is a Group 3 village, the site is considered to be unsuitable for the scale of development envisaged.

N - This greenfield site is currently used as private Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered garden land for the occupiers to the east of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. site. Access is an issue which would need to be landowner and is considered to be overcome. In addition, the site is covered in available. mature trees which conribute to the character of 31/004 Little Hadham 0.25 this part of the village. As such, it is not No No No No considered that the site is suitable.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Belt to the north east of Bury Green. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. site consists of an enclosed field bounded by landowner and is considered to be mature hedgerow with direct access on the available. northern boundary of the site. A wildlife site covers much of the site. Development in this isloated 31/005 Little Hadham 0.41 location would result in an unacceptable incursion No No No No into the countryside, impacting on the openness of the Green Belt. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable.

Y - This is a greenfield site located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 5 dwellings Up to an Stortford Road. The site consists of a flat, open through the Call for Sites by the achievable, additional 12 field. The site is constrained as it is located within landowner and is considered to be Infill development dwellings Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. However, the available. in accordance with site is located in close proximity to local services Group 2 village The site is and facilities. The site is regarded as infill policy considered development and so is considered to be suitable deliverable for limited development in accordance with Group subject to an 31/006 Little Hadham 0.66 2 village policy. Further development could be amendment to identified within a Neighbourhood Plan the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Hadham. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 31/007 Little Hadham 0.18

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural N - Land ownership and intentions for Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt to the south of the site are unknown. achievable. Stortford Road. The site is not well related to the existing settlement and would represent an 31/024 Little Hadham 5.1 unacceptable incursion into the countryside. The No No No No site is therefore unsuitable for future development.

N - This part greenfield, part brownfield site is N - Site has been identified through Y - The site is considered to The site could located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green the Call for Sites process with land be achievable at present. form part of a Belt. The northern half of the site is in industrial ownership and intentions known. However, in order to deliver a larger strategic use while the southern half is greenfield, adjacent However, upper half of site is currently strategic scale of scale to the A120. There is direct access to the in employment use and is therefore development, major development in industrial units via Church End, with no direct not considered available at the present infrastructure would be this location. The access to the southern half of the site. While time required. Further work would site could be development of the site in isolation would be therefore be required to considered to be 31/025 Little Hadham 12.18 unacceptable, it could form part of a larger assess achievability. either deliverable strategic scale of development in this location in or developable the future. depending on the nature and scale of development.

N - This is a brownfield site, located to the south Y - The site has been promoted Y - In order to bring this site of Hadham Ford within the Rural Area Beyond the through the Call for Sites by the forward remediation of the site Green Belt and within an Area of Archaelogical landowner and is considered to be would be required. However Significance. The site which is a disused pit is available. without further information it is 31/026 Little Hadham 1.08 poorly related to Hadham Ford. Development considered that the site is No No No No would represent an unacceptable incursion into acheiveable. the countryside in this location.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development through the Call for Sites by the achievable. in this location would lead to a significant landowner and is considered to be reduction in the gap between Little Hadham and available. Hadham Ford. The southern part of the site, which is closest to existing development, lies within Flood Zone 3b. Development of the remaining part 31/027 Little Hadham 2.62 of the site, outside of Flood Zone 3b, would be No No No No unsuitable as it would be poorly related to the existing village. It is therefore considered to be unsuitable for future development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a greenfield site located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 19 Little Hadham, within the Rural Area Beyond the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Green Belt. There are a number of TPO landowner and is considered to be designations along the western boundary of the available. The site is site. It is relatively well related to the existing built considered up area of Little Hadham but does not constitute deliverable infill development in a Group 2 village and is subject to an therefore currently considered to be unsuitable. amendment to 31/028 Little Hadham 0.74 Development could be brought foward through a the village Neighbourhood Plan. boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Little Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development through the Call for Sites by the achievable. in this location would lead to a significant landowner and is considered to be reduction in the gap between Little Hadham and available. 31/029 Little Hadham 1.83 Hadham Ford. The site is therefore considered to No No No No be unsuitable for future development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 31/030 Little Hadham 0.2 threshold as identified by national policy.

N - This is a greenfield site currently in use as N - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 20 allotment gardens within the Rural Area Beyond through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings the Green Belt. It is located to the west of Much landowner, however it is currently in Hadham adjacent to the Group 1 village use as allotments and details of the The site is development boundary and within an Area of proposed relocation are not clear. It is considered Archaelogical Significance. There is a proposal to therefore considered that the site is deliverable re-locate the allotments to the north of the site not available at present. subject to an although no details are provided. Development of amendment to the site may be considered appropriate; however, the village 33/001 Much Hadham 0.79 the site is currently outside of the village boundary. boundary through The site is therefore currently unsuitable. a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham and relocation of the allotments.

This site has not been assessed as planning 33/002 Much Hadham 0.23 permission has been granted. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N -This greenfield site lies to the south of Much Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 15 Hadham, within the Conservation Area. While the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings site is seperated from the main built up area, and landowner and is considered to be consequently the village boundary, the site could available. The site is be brought forward through a review of the considered boundary. However, at present the site is deliverable unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area subject to an Beyond the Green Belt. amendment to 33/004 Much Hadham 0.58 No No No the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a large greenfield site adjacent to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Conservation Area. Access onto the site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. through a narrow road. The site is unsuitable as it landowner and is considered to be is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, is available. poorly related to the existing settlement and would 33/005 Much Hadham 4.49 No No No No lead to an unacceptable incursion of development into an open countryside location.

N - This site lies to the south of Much Hadham Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 and is adjacent to the Conservation Area. While through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings the site is seperated from the main built up area of landowner and is considered to be the village, and consequently the village boundary, available. The site is it could be brought forward in conjunction with site considered 33/004 through a review of the village boundary. deliverable However, at present the site is unsuitable due to subject to an 33/012 Much Hadham 1.21 its location within the Rural Area Beyond the No No amendment to No Green Belt. the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a greenfield site located to the north- Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 west of Much Hadham within the Rural Area through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Beyond the Green Belt. Development of the site landowner and is considered to be may be considered appropriate subject to access available. The site is issues; however, the site is currently outside of the considered village boundary. The site is therefore currently deliverable unsuitable. subject to an 33/013 Much Hadham 1.36 amendment to the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered to be Up to 30 Beyond Green Belt which lies immediately to the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings west of site 33/013.While the site is seperated landowner and is considered to be from the main built up area of the village, and available. The site is consequently the village boundary, it could be considered brought forward in conjunction with site 33/013, deliverable subject to access issues, through a review of the subject to an 33/014 Much Hadham 1.47 village boundary. However, at present the site is No No amendment to No unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area the village Beyond the Green Belt. boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This large greenfield site is located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered to be Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt to the west of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Much Hadham. Although the site is adjacent to the landowner and is considered to be main built up area of the village, achieving a available. suitable access may be an issue. The scale of 33/015 Much Hadham 11.17 development proposed would be inappropriate, No No No No representing an unacceptable incursion into the countryside setting of the village. The site is therefore considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site forms a small part of site Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered to be Up to 14 33/015. The site is well related to the existing built through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings up area of the village, although achieving a landowner and is considered to be suitable access may be an issue. At present the available. Site considered site is considered to be unsuitable due to its deliverable location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green subject to an Belt. amendment to 33/015a Much Hadham 0.57 the village boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a greenfield site to the south-west of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 9 dwellings Much Hadham. It is largely covered with woodland through the Call for Sites by the achievable although there are no TPO's on the site itself. The landowner and is considered to be Site considered site is adjacent to the existing village boundary available. deliverable and access could be achieved from Millers View. subject to an Development of the site may be considered amendment to appropriate; however, the site is currently outside the village 33/016 Much Hadham 0.37 of the village boundary, within the Rural Area boundary through Beyond the Green Belt. The site is therefore a Neighbourhood currently unsuitable. Plan for Much Hadham.

N - This is a brownfield site currently in N - While the site has been promoted Y - Site is considered employment use. It is located within the Rural through the Call for Sites on behalf of achievable Area Beyond the Green Belt, within a Group 3 the landowner, development would settlement that has very limited access to local result in the loss of an employment services and facilities. Therefore, while continued site and therefore is not considered to 35/001 Standon 1.74 No No No No employment use on site is considered appropriate, be currently available. residential redevelopment would be unsuitable.

N - This is a greenfield site, adjacent to the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered boundary. While it is well related to the existing through the Call for Sites by the achievable. settlement, it is considered to be unsuitable as it landowner and is considered to be lies within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt available. 35/002 Standon 0.48 No No No No and is currently designated as protected open space. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - The majority of the site lies outside of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 2 dwellings Up to 12 settlement boundary, within the Rural Area through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Beyond the Green Belt and, as a whole, is landowner and is considered to be On part of site therefore considered to be unsuitable. It is, available. within settlement On site as a however, well related to the existing settlement. boundary whole, subject to The western part of the site is located within the a review of the settlement boundary and is therefore considered village boundary 35/003 Standon 0.47 to be deliverable. Any proposals would need to through a give consideration to the proximity of the site to Neighbourhood the Conservation Area. Plan for Standon.

N - This is a large greenfield site, located Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 146 immediately north of the A120, and reasonably through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings well related to the existing settlement. While landowner and is considered to be development of the entire site would be contrary to available. Subject to a Group 1 village policy, it could enable the delivery review of the of 10% growth within the village as envisaged by village boundary the draft District Plan. However, at present the site through a 35/004 Standon 11.24 is considered to be unsuitable as it is located Neighbourhood within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. The Plan for Standon. site is currently subject to Planning Application 3/15/2081/OUT for up to 205 dwellings.

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site is considered to be unsuitable as it is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. located within the Rural Area Beyond the Green landowner and is considered to be Belt. While development on the edge of Group 2 available. 35/005 Standon 2.93 villages can be delivered through Neighbourhood No No No No Plans, development of this site would lead to an unaccepable incursion into the countryside.

N - This site is located to the north of Colliers End. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site is detached from the settlement and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. The demolition of development would result in an unacceptable landowner and is considered to be existing units and remediation 35/007 Standon 5.79 incursion into the countryside. As such it is available. of the site would be required. No No No No considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 a Group 2 village. While located within the Rural through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Area Beyond the Green Belt, the site is located landowner and is considered to be adjacent to existing development. Although it available. The site is would not represent infill development in a Group considered 2 village, the site could be brought forward if deliverable identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. subject to an 35/008 Standon 0.5 amendment to the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

Please note that these sites have not been 35/010 Standon 1.19 assessed as they are allocated employment sites.

Please note that these sites have not been assessed as they are allocated employment sites. 35/011 Standon 0.93

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 35/012 Standon 0.06

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 It is a large site, the majority of which would be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings inapproriate due to an unacceptable incursion into landowner and is considered to be the countryside. However the south western available. The site is parcel of the site is well related to existing considered development and could be brought forward for deliverable small scale development through a subject to an Neighbourhood Plan. amendment to 35/013 Standon 5.63 the settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a greenfield site located in Colliers End, Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 6 dwellings a Group 2 village. While located within the Rural through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Area Beyond the Green Belt, the site is located landowner and is considered to be The site is adjacent to existing development. Although it available. considered would not represent infill development in a Group deliverable 2 village, the site could be brought forward if subject to an identified within a Neighbourhood Plan. amendment to the settlement 35/014 Standon 0.25 No No No boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

N - This site is located to the north of Colliers End. Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site is detached from the settlement and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. development would result in an unacceptable landowner and is considered to be incursion into the countryside. As such it is available. 35/015 Standon 1.84 No No No No considered to be unsuitable.

N - The site consists of two distinct fields divided Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 by a mature tree row which runs along the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings northern axis, both in agricultural use. The landowner and is considered to be western field is partially located within Flood Zone available. Subject to a 2 and is also at risk of surface water flooding. This review of the part of the site also contains a Scheduled Ancient village boundary Monument and is covered by an Area of through a Archaeological Significance. Development of the Neighbourhood 35/016 Standon 8.72 entire site would lead to a scale of development Plan for Standon that would be contrary to Group 1 village policy, although a smaller scale of development adjacent to existing development could be appropriate. The site is within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is therefore unsuitable.

N - This site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 23 Beyond the Green Belt and partly within Flood through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Zone 2 and 3 with a risk of surface water flooding. landowner and is considered to be In light of the recent appeal decision on land to the available. Subject to a east of Cambridge Road, development of the site review of the may be considered appropriate; however, the site village boundary 35/017 Standon 0.9 is currently outside of the village boundary. The through a site is therefore currently unsuitable. Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This site is located within the Rural Area Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Beyond the Green Belt. Any development in this through the Call for Sites by the achievable. location would represent an encroachment into the landowner and is considered to be countryside. Bromley is a Group 3 village with little available. or no access to services and facilities and is 35/018 Standon 0.33 No No No No considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

N - This is a greenfield site, located within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Latchford is a through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Group 3 village with very limited access to landowner and is considered to be 35/019 Standon 1.09 services and facilities and is therefore considered available. No No No No to be an unsuitable location for development.

N - This site is located within the Rural Area N - The site was promoted through the Y - Site is considered Up to 30 Beyond the Green Belt and partly within Flood previous Local Plan process. It is achievable. dwellings Zone 2 and 3 with a risk of surface water flooding. unknown whether the site is still In light of the recent appeal decision on land to the available. Subject to a east of Cambridge Road, development of the site review of the may be considered appropriate; however, the site village boundary 35/033 Standon 1.77 is currently outside of the village boundary. The through a site is therefore currently unsuitable. Neighbourhood Plan for Standon.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 35/034 Standon 1.98 therefore accepted.

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Buntingford Road. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. unsuitable as it is located within the Rural Area landowner and is considered to be 35/036 Standon 0.53 Beyond the Green Belt and is identified as a available. No No No No Scheduled Monument.

N - This is a greenfield site located off Stortford Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 30 Road within the Rural Area Beyond the Green through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Belt, adjacent to the existing settlement boundary. landowner and is considered to be Development of the site may be considered available. Subject to a appropriate; however, the site is currently outside review of the of the village boundary. The site is therefore village boundary 35/037 Standon 2.47 currently unsuitable. through a Neighbourhood Plan for Standon. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt to the west of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. A10. The site is considered to be unsuitable for landowner and is considered to be development as it is isolated from the existing built available. 35/038 Standon 1.8 up area of Puckeridge due to the presence of the No No No No A10. In addition, part of the site is located within Flood Zone 3.

N - This is a greenfield site located outside of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered village boundary. The site is unsuitable as it is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. within the Green Belt, is not well related to the landowner and is considered to be 36/001 Stanstead Abbotts 3.38 existing settlement and development would result available. No No No No in an unacceptable incursion into open countryside.

N - The site is relatively well related to the existing Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered settlement. However it is unsuitable as it is located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. within the Green Belt and the Lee Valley Regional landowner and is considered to be 36/002 Stanstead Abbotts 1.32 Park. It is also partly designated as Open Space available. No No No No and lies within Flood Zones 2 and 3.

Y - This is a greenfield site within the Green Belt Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Site is considered and the Lee Valley Regional Park and has been through the Call for Sites by the achievable. deliverable for proposed for use as a private marina. The site is landowner and is considered to be proposed use. considered suitable for the proposed use subject available. 36/003 Stanstead Abbotts 0.22 to an assessment of the potential impact on the wildlife site.

Please note that this site has not been assessed as it is in current employment use. 36/006 Stanstead Abbotts 1.34

N - This is a greenfield site located immediately to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered the south of Stanstead Abbotts outside of the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. village boundary. While the site is well related to landowner and is considered to be 36/007 Stanstead Abbotts 1.35 the existing settlement it is unsuitable as it is available. No No No No within the Green Belt and the Lee Valley Regional Park.

N - This is a greenfield site currently in use as a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered private garden with a tennis court and storage through the Call for Sites by the achievable. facilities on site. It is unsuitable as it is within the landowner and is considered to be Green Belt, would result in an unacceptable available. 36/008 Stanstead Abbotts 0.91 No No No No incursion into the countryside and is poorly related to the existing settlement Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a part greenfield, part brownfield site N - Site has been identified through Y - Site is considered with a residential care home, located to the north the 2007 Local Plan process. It is not achievable. of the High Street, immediately adjacent to known whether the land is still residential development. While the site is relatively available. 36/016 Stanstead Abbotts 0.94 well related to the existing settlement, it is No No No No unsuitable as it is located in the Green Belt and Lee Valley Regional Park and is also partly within Flood Zones 2 and 3.

N - This is a brownfield site located to the south of N - Site has been identified through Y - Site is considered Marsh Lane which is currently in use as a nursery. the 2007 Local Plan process. It is not achievable. The demolition of While the site is relatively well related to the known whether the land is still existing units would be existing settlement, it is unsuitable as it is located available. required to redevelop this site. 36/017 Stanstead Abbotts 1.2 in the Green Belt and Lee Valley Regional Park No No No No and is also partly within Flood Zones 2 and 3.

N - This greenfield site is located on the edge of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Stanstead Abbotts. The site is considered to be through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Up to 9 dwellings unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt. landowner and is considered to be However, as a Group 1 village the site could be available. The site is delivered through a Neighbourhood Plan. considered deliverable subject to a 36/018 Stanstead Abbotts 0.34 No No review of the No Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Stanstead Abbotts.

N - This is a greenfield site consisting of two large Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered parcels of land separated by the A414 located through the Call for Sites by the achievable. within the Green Belt. The site forms part of the landowner and is considered to be Stanstead St strategic gap between the settlements of available. 37/001 45.8 No No No No Margarets Hoddesdon, Stanstead St Margarets and Great Amwell. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This is a greenfield site which lies between the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered A10 and the A1170 within the Green Belt. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. forms part of the strategic gap between the landowner and is considered to be Stanstead St settlements of Hoddesdon, Stanstead St available. 37/002 18.03 No No No No Margarets Margarets and Great Amwell. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

Y - This is a greenfield site, the majority of which Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 dwellings is within the settlement boundary and is therefore through the Call for Sites by the achievable. suitable. A small section of the site is located landowner and is considered to be On part of site Stanstead St within Flood Zone 2. The southern section of the available. within the 37/003 0.48 Margarets site lies on the other side of the A414, within the settlement Green Belt, and is therefore unsuitable. boundary.

N - This is a brownfield site which lies between the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered A10 and the A1170 within the Green Belt. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Demolition and contains derelict buildings relating to its former landowner and is considered to be clearing of the existing units use as a nursery. The site forms part of the available. would be required and there is Stanstead St strategic gap between the settlements of a potential need for 37/004 1.88 No No No No Margarets Hoddesdon, Stanstead St Margarets and Great remediation work. Amwell. As such the site is considered to be unsuitable.

N - This isolated site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt, adjacent to Hubbard's Wood Wildlife Site and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. within an Area of Archaelogical Significance. The landowner and is considered to be site is unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt and available. in a rural location which is remote from local 38/001 Stapleford 0.31 No No No No services. It is therefore considered to be an unsustainable location for future housing development.

N - This isolated site is located within the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Belt, adjacent to Hubbard's Wood Wildlife Site. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. The site is unsuitable as it is within the Green Belt landowner and is considered to be and in a rural location which is remote from local available. 38/002 Stapleford 0.43 services. It is therefore considered to be an No No No No unsustainable location for future housing development.

N - This greenfield site is located adjacent to Y - The site is in the ownership of a Y - Site is considered Tewin Cowper Primary School. Part of the site is single landowner and has been achievable. designated as open space and is currently in use promoted through the Call for Sites. as allotments. The site promoter has suggested Part of the site is currently in use as that the southern part of the site could be used to allotments. However the rental re-locate the allotments. However, while the site is agreement with the Parish Council can reasonably well related to the existing settlement, be terminated with 12 months notice 40/001 Tewin 1.49 it is considered to be unsuitable due to its location and there is potential to relocate the No No No No within the Green Belt. Development in this location allotments to the southern part of the would result in an unacceptable intrusion into the site. It is therefore considered that the rural setting of the village. site is available. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This part greenfield, part brownfield site is Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered poorly related to the existing built up area of through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Tewin. There are a number of existing structures landowner and is considered to be on the site which are not proposed for demolition available. which would constrain the developable area of the site. Much of the site, including the entire 40/002 Tewin 1.97 No No No No boundary, is covered by a blanket Tree Preservation Order. The site is unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt

N - This greenfield site is located east of Upper Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green Road. While it is well related to the existing through the Call for Sites and is achievable. settlement the site is considered to be unsuitable assumed to be available although the due to its location within the Green Belt. In order site is owned by more than one for the site to come forward, the Green Belt would landowner. need to be reviewed through the District Plan. The emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 40/003 Tewin 1 No No No No village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This large greenfield site is located to the north Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered of Tewin. The site is approximately 2 hectares in through the Call for Sites by the achievable. total although the site promoter has suggested landowner and is considered to be that approximately 0.65 hectares could be suitable available. for development. While the site is relatively well related to the existing settlement, it is considered to be unsuitable due to its location within the Green Belt. In order for the site to come forward, 40/004 Tewin 2.23 the Green Belt would need to be reviewed through No No No No the District Plan. The emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This mainly greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered west of Tewin. While adjacent to the existing through the Call for Sites by the achievable. village boundary, the site is considered to be landowner and is considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related to the existing available. 40/007 Tewin 0.91 settlement, lies within the Green Belt and any No No No No development would represent an unacceptable incursion into the countryside. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located east of Upper Y - The site has been promoted by the Y - Site is considered Green Road. While it is well related to the existing landowner through the Call Sites and achievable. settlement the site is considered to be unsuitable is therefore considered to be available. due to its location within the Green Belt. In order for the site to come forward, the Green Belt would need to be reviewed through the District Plan. The 40/008 Tewin 0.31 emerging Plan identifies Tewin as a Group 2 No No No No village, wherein only limited infill development would be appropriate. This site would not constitute limited infill development.

N - This is a very large site to the south east of Y - The site has been promoted by a Y - Site is considered Tewin which is owned by a number of different group of over 70 landowners through achievable. plot owners. The site is considered to be the Call for Sites and is considered to unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt be available 40/022 Tewin 69.76 and is very poorly related to the existing No No No No settlement. Development in this location would result in an unacceptable intrusion into open countryside.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered railway line within Thorley Parish. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related landowner and is considered to be 41/001 Thorley 0.44 to the existing settlement of Bishop's Stortford and available. No No No No is located within the Green Belt.

N - This large greenfield site is located to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered 750-1,000 south of Bishop's Stortford within the bypass. The through the Call for Sites by the achievable. The site is of a dwellings site is within an Area of Archaelogical Significance landowner and is considered to be strategic scale and would and is traversed by the Hertfordshire Way available. require the provision of The site is footpath. While the site is well related to the supporting infrastructure. considered to be existing settlement, it is currently considered to be deliverable unsuitable due to its location within the Green Belt. subject to a However it should be noted that the site has been review of the 41/002 Thorley 53.14 identified within the emerging District Plan as a Green Belt. The potential housing allocation. final yield would depend on the level of infrastructure to be provided.

N- This site is located to the south of Bishop's Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Stortford to the west of the A1184 at Thorley through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Wash Farm. The site is considered to be landowner and is considered to be 41/003 Thorley 0.48 unsuitable as it is poorly related to the existing available. No No No No settlement of Bishop's Stortford and is located within the Green Belt. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered railway line withinThorley Parish. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related landowner and is considered to be 41/005 Thorley 10.91 to the existing settlement of Bishop's Stortford and available. No No No No is located within the Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Thorley Street. While the site is reasonably well through the Call for Sites by the achievable. 41/007 Thorley 0.74 related to existing development, the site is landowner and is considered to be No No No No considered to be unsuitable as it is located in the available. Green Belt.

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Thorley Street. While the site is reasonably well through the Call for Sites by the achievable. related to existing development, the site is landowner and is considered to be 41/008 Thorley 0.45 considered to be unsuitable as it is located in the available. No No No No Green Belt.

N- This greenfield site is located to the north west Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered of High Cross, a Group 2 village. The northern through the Call for Sites by the achievable. part of the site is designated as open space and is landowner and is considered to be used as playing pitches. The considered to be available. unsuitable as it is located within the Rural Area 42/001 Thundridge 8.5 Beyond the Green Belt, is poorly related to the No No No No existing settlement and would represent an unacceptable incursion of built development into open countryside.

N - The site is reasonably well related to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered existing village. Development would not represent through the Call for Sites by the achievable. infill development in a Group 2 village and could landowner and is considered to be not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan available. 42/002 Thundridge 0.97 due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such No No No No is considered unsuitable.

N - The site is reasonably well related to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered existing village. Development would not represent through the Call for Sites by the achievable. infill development in a Group 2 village and could landowner and is considered to be not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan available. 42/003 Thundridge 1.25 due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such No No No No is considered unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the east of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered school. The site is reasonably well related to the through the Call for Sites by the achievable. existing urban area. Access is considered to be a landowner and is considered to be significant constraint and although this could be available. achieved if the site is brought forward alongside 42/004 Thundridge 1.09 site 42/008, this would result in a cumulative total No No No No of development that would be inappropriate in a Group 2 village.

N - The site is reasonably well related to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered existing village. Development would not represent through the Call for Sites by the achievable. infill development in a Group 2 village and could landowner and is considered to be not come forward through a Neighbourhood Plan available. 42/005 Thundridge 1.13 due to its location in the Green Belt, and as such No No No No is considered unsuitable.

Please note that this site has not been assessed 42/006 Thundridge 1.47 as it is in current employment use.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 42/007 Thundridge 0.19

N -This is a greenfield site that is reasonably well Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 related to the existing settlement of High Cross. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings Access could be achieved from the north of the landowner and is considered to be site. Although it would not represent infill available. Subject to a development in a Group 2 village, the site could review of the be brought forward if identified within a village boundary 42/008 Thundridge 1.15 Neighbourhood Plan. However, the site is through a currently unsuitable due to its location within the Neighbourhood Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt Plan for Thundridge

Y - This is a greenfield site which now lies outside Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered the settlement boundary. Access to this site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered to be a major constraint, and as such it landowner and is considered to be 42/009 Thundridge 0.71 is considered that the site is unsuitable. available. No No No No Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - The site is currently in use as open storage. It Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site could be is adjacent to the High Cross village boundary and through the Call for Sites by the achievable. appropriate for existing employment use. The site is currently landowner and is considered to be employment use unsuitable due to its location within the Rural Area available. subject to a Beyond the Green Belt. review of the village boundary 42/010 Thundridge 0.57 through a Neighbourhood Plan for Thundrdge

N - The site is adjacent to the High Cross village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered The site could be boundary and existing employment use. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. appropriate for is currently unsuitable due to its location within the landowner and is considered to be employment use Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. available. subject to a review of the village boundary 42/011 Thundridge 1.5 through a Neighbourhood Plan for Thundridge.

N - The site is unsuitable as it lies within Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond Green Belt and is isolated from any through the Call for Sites by the achievable. existing settlement. landowner and is considered to be 42/012 Thundridge 0.26 No No No No available.

N - The site is unsuitable as it lies within Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond Green Belt and is isolated from any through the Call for Sites by the achievable. existing settlement, and would represent an landowner and is considered to be 42/013 Thundridge 18.44 unacceptable incursion of built development within available. No No No No an open countryside setting.

N - This is a greenfield site located immediately Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered adjacent to the existing village boundary. through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Following planning permission for the site landowner and is considered to be 42/014 Thundridge 0.86 immediately to the west, it is unlikely that this site available. No No No No could be accessed. It is therefore considered to be unsuitable.

Y - This is a greenfield site which lies within the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered village boundary. While very well related to through the Call for Sites by the achievable. existing development, it is considered that this site landowner and is considered to be 42/017 Thundridge 0.78 performs an important role in maintaining the available. No No No No character of the village. As such it is considered to be unsuitable. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a large greenfield site to the south of N - Land ownership is unknown Y - Site is considered Thundridge. The site is considered to be achievable. unsuitable as it is located in the Green Belt, is poorly related to the existing settlement and would 42/030 Thundridge 13.2 represent an unacceptable incursion of built No No No No development into an open countryside setting.

N - This greenfield site lies adjacent to the village Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered boundary to the north west of High Cross. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. is considered to be unsuitable as it lies within the landowner and is considered to be Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt, is poorly available. related to the existing settlement and would 42/032 Thundridge 1.33 No No No No represent an unacceptable incursion of built development into an open countryside setting.

N - This large greenfield site is located to the west Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered of Thundridge, a Group 2 village. While it is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. relatively well related to the existing settlement, landowner and is considered to be the site is considered to be unsuitable due to its available. 42/033 Thundridge 3.8 location within the Green Belt and development No No No No would result in an unacceptable incursion into an open countryside setting.

N - This greenfield site lies to the east of High Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Cross and immediately adjacent to the existing through the Call for Sites by the achievable. village boundary, with the A10 to the east. Access landowner and is considered to be to this site is considered to be a major constraint, available. 42/034 Thundridge 1.61 No No No No and as such it is considered that the site is unsuitable.

N - This is a greenfield site located off Poles Lane Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered within a designated Wildlife Site. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered to be unsuitable as it is within the landowner and is considered to be 42/035 Thundridge 1.02 Green Belt and is poorly related to the existing available. No No No No settlement. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This is a large greenfield site predominantly in Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is considered to The site could agricultural use. The southern part of the site lies through the Call for Sites by the be achievable at present. form part of a immediately to the east of Stevenage and the landowner and is considered to be However, in order to deliver a larger strategic northern half of the site is located to the east of available. strategic scale of scale Box Wood, an Ancient Woodland and development, major development in Conservation Wildflife site.The southern half could infrastructure would be this location. The be appropriate as part of an urban extension to required. Further work would site could be Stevenage, although consideration would have to therefore be required to considered to be 43/002 Walkern 248 be given to the impact on the Beane valley. The assess achievability. either deliverable site is currently unsuitable due to its location within or developable the Green Belt. depending on the nature and scale of development.

N - This is a greenfield site located to the east of Y - The site has been promoted Y - The site is considered to The site could Gresley Way in Stevenage. The site could be through the Call for Sites by the be achievable at present. form part of a appropriate as part of an urban extension to landowner and is considered to be However, in order to deliver a larger strategic Stevenage, although consideration would have to available. strategic scale of scale be given to the impact on the Beane valley. The development, major development in site is currently unsuitable due to its location within infrastructure would be this location. The the Green Belt. required. Further work would site could be therefore be required to considered to be 43/003 Walkern 9.82 assess achievability. either deliverable or developable depending on the nature and scale of development.

N - The site is located on the eastern side of the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered village, adjacent to the village boundary, and is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. reasonably well related to existing development. landowner and is considered to be The site is considered to be unsuitable due to its available. 43/004 Walkern 0.54 location within the Rural Area Beyond the Green No No No No Belt. Winters Lane is also extremely narrow which is likely to cause severe access difficulties.

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Any development in through the Call for Sites by the achievable. this location would represent an encroachment landowner and is considered to be into the countryside. Clay End is a very small available. 43/005 Walkern 0.13 Group 3 village with little or no access to services No No No No and facilities and is considered to be an unsustainable location for development. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located within the Rural Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Area Beyond the Green Belt. Any development in through the Call for Sites by the achievable. this location would represent an encroachment landowner and is considered to be into the countryside. Clay End is a very small available. 43/006 Walkern 0.16 Group 3 village with little or no access to services No No No No and facilities and is considered to be an unsustainable location for development.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 43/007 Walkern 0.2 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 43/008 Walkern 0.18 threshold as identified by national policy.

Site not assessed as permission has been granted and the principle of development is 43/009 Walkern 1.89 therefore accepted.

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 9 dwellings village boundary, within the Walkern Conservation through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Area and opposite Grade II listed buildings to the landowner and is considered to be Subject to a north. The site is relatively well related to the available. review of the existing built up area, however, the site is currently village boundary considered to be unsuitable due to its location through a 43/010 Walkern 0.34 within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Neighbourhood Plan for Walkern.

N - This is a greenfield site located adjacent to the Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 3 dwellings village boundary, within the Walkern Conservation through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Area. The site is relatively well related to the landowner and is considered to be Subject to a existing built up area, however, the site is currently available. review of the considered to be unsuitable due to its location village boundary within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. through a 43/011 Walkern 0.12 Neighbourhood Plan for Walkern. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could Green Belt to the north of Ware, adjacent to through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic Fanhams Hall, a registered Park and Garden. landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale The site is currently unsuitable; however, it offers available. has been assessed through development, the opportunity to provide a sustainable urban the Delivery Study and is either in isloation extension to Ware subject to a review of the considered to be viable. or as part of a 44/001 Wareside 39.43 Green Belt. wider scheme, to the north and east of Ware, subject to a review of the Green Belt

N - This is a brownfield site to the north of Babbs Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green, a very small Group 3 settlement, which through the Call for Sites by the achievable. contains a number of existing farm buildings. The landowner and is considered to be site is considered to be unsuitable as it is located available. 44/002 Wareside 0.28 No No No No within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and is isolated from local services and facilities.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha threshold as identified by national policy. 44/003 Wareside 0.18

N - This is a greenfield site to the north of Babbs Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Green, a very small Group 3 settlement. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. is considered to be unsuitable as it is located landowner and is considered to be within the Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt and available. 44/004 Wareside 0.69 is isolated from local services and facilities. No No No No

N – This large greenfield site is located in the Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could Green Belt to the north and east of Ware. The site through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic is currently unsuitable; however, it offers the landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale opportunity to provide a sustainable urban available. has been assessed through development, extension to Ware subject to a review of the the Delivery Study and is either in isloation Green Belt. considered to be viable. or as part of a 44/005 Wareside 99.18 wider scheme, to the north and east of Ware, subject to a review of the Green Belt Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N – This greenfield site is located in the Green Y - The site has been promoted Y - It is considered that the The site could Belt to the north east of Ware, partly within an through the Call for Sites by the site is achievable. provide strategic Area of Archaelogical Significance. The site is landowner and is considered to be Development in this location scale currently unsuitable; however, the site does relate available. has been assessed through development, as well to other SLAA sites in the area, and there the Delivery Study and is part of a wider may be potential for strategic scale development, considered to be viable. scheme, to the 44/006 Wareside 1.5 including necessary services and facilities, which north and east of would relate well to Ware. Ware, subject to a review of the Green Belt

Y – This brownfield site is located within the built Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 dwellings up area of Watton-at-Stone where the principle of through the Call for Sites by the achievable, although means of development is acceptable. The portakabins landowner and is considered to be access will need to be The site is which were stored there by the previous tenant available. formalised with a third party considered have all been removed and just two small, owner. deliverable obsolete workshop buildings remain. It has not 45/001 Watton-at-Stone 0.39 been in employment use and therefore Policy EDE2 does not apply. The premises have been vacant for over four years.

N – This brownfield site is located to the south of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Watton-at-Stone, adjacent to a designated Wildlife through the Call for Sites by two achievable. Site. The site is also located within an Area of landowners and is considered to be Archaeological Significance. Planning permission available. for residential development has previously been 45/002 Watton-at-Stone 0.71 refused. The site is considered to be unsuitable No No No No due its rural location within the Green Belt.

Site not assessed as it falls below the 0.25ha 45/003 Watton-at-Stone 0.11 threshold as identified by national policy.

N - This greenfield site is located to the north of Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 52 Watton at Stone, a Group 1 settlement. The site through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings lies within an Area of Archaelogical Significance. landowner and is considered to be While the site is well related to the exisitng available. The site is settlement, it is currently considered to be considered unsuitable due its location within the Green Belt. deliverable However, the site could help enable the delivery of subject to a 45/004 Watton-at-Stone 2.08 10% growth within the village if identified through a review of the Neighbourhood Plan. Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Watton at Stone. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This greenfield site is located to the north Y - Although not promoted through the Y - Site is considered Up to 55 west of Watton at Stone, a Group 1 settlement. Call for Sites, landowner and achievable. dwellings While the site is well related to the exisitng intentions are known. Site is therefore settlement, it is currently considered to be considered to be available. The site is unsuitable due its location within the Green Belt. considered However, the site could help enable the delivery of deliverable 10% growth within the village if identified through a subject to a 45/007 Watton-at-Stone 2.2 Neighbourhood Plan. review of the Green Belt through a Neighbourhood Plan for Watton at Stone.

N - This greenfield site is located to the south of N - The site was not submitted through Y - Site is considered Watton at Stone within an Area of Archaeological the Call for Sites and it is therefore not achievable. Significance. Whilst the site has a reasonable known whether the site is available. relationship to the form of the village, it is not clear how a satisfactory access could be provided to the 45/009 Watton-at-Stone 1.3 site. The site is currently considered to be No No No No unsuitable as it is located within the Green Belt and is currently in allotment use and safeguarded as such in the Local Plan.

N - This greenfield site is located to the west of Y - The site has been promoted Y – Site is considered Up to 10 Westmill, a Group 2 village. Although it would not through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings represent infill development in a Group 2 village, landowner and is considered to be the site could be brought forward if identified available. The site is within a Neighbourhood Plan. However, the site is considered to be currently unsuitable due to its location within the deliverable Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. subject to a review of the 46/001 Westmill 0.6 No No settlement No boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Westmill

Y - This site is located to the east of Widford, a Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 5 dwellings Group 2 village. Part of the sites lies within an through the Call for Sites by the achievable. Area of Archaelogical Significance. Development landowner and is considered to be The site is of the part of the site that is located within the built available. considered up area is considered to be suitable as it deliverable 47/001 Widford 0.53 constitutes infill development in a Group 2 village. The area outside of the built up area is unsuitable as it is subject to Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt policy. Deliverable with Developable with SLAA Site Area Policy Change Policy Change PARISH Suitable Available Achievable Deliverable Developable REF (Ha)

N - This relatively large greenfield site is located to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered the east of Widford, a Group 2 village. The site is through the Call for Sites by the achievable. considered to be unsuitable as it is poorly related landowner and is considered to be to the existing settlement and is located within the available. Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. Development 47/002 Widford 1.66 No No No No would also constitute an unacceptable incursion into open countryside.

N - This relatively large greenfield site is located to Y - The site has been promoted Y - Site is considered Up to 10 the south of Widford. Although it would not through the Call for Sites by the achievable. dwellings represent infill development in a Group 2 village, landowner and is considered to be the site could be brought forward if identified available. The site is within a Neighbourhood Plan. However, the site is considered to be currently unsuitable due to its location within the deliverable Rural Area Beyond the Green Belt. subject to a 47/011 Widford 1.12 No No review of the No settlement boundary through a Neighbourhood Plan for Widford.