DOCSLIB.ORG

Alan Gordon Thorne

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alan Gordon Thorne 2012 ANNUAL REPORT THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES 43 Alan Gordon Thorne 19 3 9 - 2 012 It was common in those days for the Sydney Morning Herald to send its young cadets to get Arts degrees at Sydney University, and this they did in Alan’s case (in 1960). He majored in Zoology and Anthropology, and became especially interested in reptiles, in which he thought he would probably specialise, but then he discovered the Department of Anatomy and its indomitable Professor N.W.G. Macintosh, known as Black Mac, who was passionately interested in human origins and evolution and transmitted this passion to Alan. Alan went on to take a Master’s degree and then went on to study for a PhD; at the same time Alan took up a lectureship in the Anatomy Department, which he held until 1969 when he obtained a Research Fellowship (free of teaching responsibilities) in what was then called the Archaeology Department in the Institute of Advanced Studies (now the Department of Archaeology and Natural History, in the College of Asia and the Pacific) at the Australian National University (ANU), where he remained, as a Senior Fellow, until his retirement. His Sydney University PhD was awarded in 1975, early in his tenure at the ANU. It was in 1967, while still at Sydney University, that Alan scored his first academic coup, a result of the same Photo: Courtesy of Maggie Brady Sherlock Holmes qualities that he had displayed at the Herald. He was invited by the Director and Trustees of the National Museum of Victoria to go through their human skeletal material collection and produce an ALA N Thorne was born in Neutral Bay, Sydney, on annotated card index. While doing this, he discovered a 1 March 1939, and was educated at North Sydney Boys box of unregistered bones, including some apparently High. He started his working life as a cadet journalist for mineralised skull fragments of unusual form and the Sydney Morning Herald in 1957, and here he gained a thickness; in the box was a small black-edged card bearing reputation for an enquiring mind. He was assigned to the words ‘Bendigo Police’ in black felt-pen. His enquiries write an article about the 1942 Japanese bombing; not found that such black-edged cards had been issued to the being inclined to rely purely on official government Bendigo police after the death of King George VI in 1952, sources, he did a little investigation of his own and found and had run out in 1962, while felt-tipped pens had first that the official sources were inaccurate. The Australian been issued to police officers in 1957. Alan accordingly government, presumably wishing to avoid spreading carefully studied all the records of skeletal finds between panic, had claimed at the time that seventeen people had 1957 and 1962 in the Bendigo police district, and died in the bombings; what Alan discovered, and discovered that the skull fragments in the box had been published, was that the true number killed was well over found by a bulldozer digging an irrigation channel on a two hundred. An indiscretion, but his career certainly did property at Kow Swamp, in northern Victoria, on 1 May not suffer from it. 1962. In early February 1968, Alan visited Kow Swamp Humanities_AnnRep2012.indd 43 22/10/12 9:19 AM 44 THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES 2012 ANNUAL REPORT together with the Director of the National Museum of and finally merged to form the present-day Aboriginal Victoria, and here they were shown by the former owner population. This model seemed triumphantly vindicated of the property the place where the bones had been found. by the discovery in 1974 of a man’s skeleton, buried with Digging a little at the same place they found a few more scattered ochre at a similar level in the same Mungo fragments, and there were indications that this had been lunette, as gracile as Mungo Lady. quite a large burial ground. In May of that year Alan From then on, Alan worked on his two-populations model carried out a further excavation, and excavations and refined it. He discussed his findings with the American continued, with teams working under his direction, palaeoanthropologist Milford Wolpoff, who became a sporadically up until 1972, during which they retrieved close colleague, and together they proposed the not only the remainder of the original skeleton, but found Multiregional Hypothesis of human evolution, whereby the skeletons of many more individuals. modern humans in each part of the world had largely In the context of a general treatment of Australian descended from local premodern populations (Homo Aboriginal origins, Alan included a brief description of erectus or whatever), while being subject to sufficient gene the first skeleton (Kow Swamp 1) in a chapter in the flow from their contemporaries elsewhere to keep them all important, in some respects groundbreaking, book evolving towards Homo sapiens. As far as Australia was Aboriginal Man and Environment in Australia, edited by concerned, the closest of these premodern populations John Mulvaney and Jack Golson in 1971. He noted the lived in Java, and of course Alan had long maintained that large brow ridges, extremely receding forehead, and very Kow Swamp showed similarities to Javanese Homo large palate and mandible of Kow Swamp 1, contrasting erectus. Yet the evidence from Mungo seemed to indicate with much more modern-looking (but older) skulls found that not one but two separate populations had lived in elsewhere in southern Australia, and mentioned the recent Australia in the Late Pleistocene, giving rise to a new discovery of further skeletons. A description and dilemma: the ‘robust’ people may have carried the mark assessment of the remains to date was published by Alan of ancient Java (as Black Mac himself had put it), but in the prestigious journal Nature in August 1972, co- whose mark did the ‘gracile’ people bear? Alan’s proposal authored with his geological colleague Philip Macumber. was that they bore the mark of eastern Asia, perhaps The Kow Swamp remains proved to be between 8,000 China. And, in one of those coincidences that impinge on and 10,000 years old (in uncalibrated radiocarbon years), so many careers, it was more or less at that time that Alan yet their apparently archaic features (seen in all of the well was picked as part of the first team of Australian scientists enough preserved individuals) in some respects recalled to visit the People’s Republic, still slowly and painfully Homo erectus, the early human species that had existed in emerging from the Cultural Revolution. His contacts with Java from at least one million until perhaps 100,000 years Chinese colleagues continued for the rest of his working ago. As some commentators have carelessly read him as life, and it was in 1986 that, with Wolpoff and a like- saying that the Kow Swamp remains were actually those minded Chinese colleague, Wu Xinzhi, he published a of Homo erectus, it is worthwhile quoting the paper classic paper setting out in detail the requirements of the directly: ‘Although much more recent than equivalent multiregional model and the evidence for it. Because of his material from other parts of the world, the morphological Chinese contributions, he was asked to give the Morrison complex indicates long-term preservation of early sapiens Memorial Lecture at the ANU in 1982. characteristics in southern Australia […] The frontal But archaeology in China was taking another, more public bones are particularly archaic, preserving an almost turn. A vast terracotta army, guarding the tomb of China’s unmodified eastern erectus form’—that is to say, the Kow first Emperor, had been discovered at Xian and was Swamp people had archaic characteristics but certainly gradually being fully excavated. A few pieces were sent for they were Homo sapiens. exhibition in Sydney in 1982 and Film Australia set out to A couple of years before, in 1970, Jim Bowler had make a short feature on them, travelling to China to visit discovered a woman’s cremation in Late Pleistocene the excavation. They needed to find an Australian who deposits at (dry) Lake Mungo, in south-western New was both knowledgeable and at the same time sufficiently South Wales, and alerted Alan. The cremated bones had personable to act as the film’s presenter. Who should been smashed and re-burned and Alan, in a triumph of happen to be in China at the time but Alan Thorne. This the jigsaw-solver’s art, reconstructed the skull. Though, at film, The Entombed Warriors, was followed a year later an estimated 26,000 BP, clearly older than the Kow by Out of Time, Out of Place (also Film Australia), on Swamp remains, Mungo Lady seemed more modern, human evolution research in Australia, Indonesia and almost ultra-modern, with only small brow ridges, a China; both films, and especially Alan’s charismatic rounded forehead, and a generally ‘gracile’ appearance. In presenter role in them, caught the eye of TV filmmaker papers in 1971 and 1972, Alan considered this conundrum, Robert Raymond, and together they made an eleven-part proposing that the best explanation might be that two series Man on the Rim: The Peopling of the Pacific which separate populations, one ‘gracile’ and the other ‘robust’ was screened nationally in 1988. For this series, which and more archaic, had entered Australia at different times dealt with the people and cultures of the whole of the Humanities_AnnRep2012.indd 44 22/10/12 9:19 AM 2012 ANNUAL REPORT THE AUSTRALIAN ACADEMY OF THE HUMANITIES 45 Pacific region, Alan travelled through eastern Asia, Alan’s first excavation in effect rescued the Kow Swamp 1 Polynesia and the western coast of the Americas, as well skeleton from destruction by the 1968 irrigation channel, as Australia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multiregional Origin of Modern Humans
    Multiregional origin of modern humans The multiregional hypothesis, multiregional evolution (MRE), or polycentric hypothesis is a scientific model that provides an alternative explanation to the more widely accepted "Out of Africa" model of monogenesis for the pattern of human evolution. Multiregional evolution holds that the human species first arose around two million years ago and subsequent human evolution has been within a single, continuous human species. This species encompasses all archaic human forms such as H. erectus and Neanderthals as well as modern forms, and evolved worldwide to the diverse populations of anatomically modern humans (Homo sapiens). The hypothesis contends that the mechanism of clinal variation through a model of "Centre and Edge" allowed for the necessary balance between genetic drift, gene flow and selection throughout the Pleistocene, as well as overall evolution as a global species, but while retaining regional differences in certain morphological A graph detailing the evolution to modern humans features.[1] Proponents of multiregionalism point to fossil and using the multiregional hypothesis ofhuman genomic data and continuity of archaeological cultures as support for evolution. The horizontal lines represent their hypothesis. 'multiregional evolution' gene flow between regional lineages. In Weidenreich's original graphic The multiregional hypothesis was first proposed in 1984, and then (which is more accurate than this one), there were also diagonal lines between the populations, e.g. revised in 2003. In its revised form, it is similar to the Assimilation between African H. erectus and Archaic Asians Model.[2] and between Asian H. erectus and Archaic Africans. This created a "trellis" (as Wolpoff called it) or a "network" that emphasized gene flow between geographic regions and within time.
    [Show full text]
  • An Australasian Test of the Recent African Origin Theory Using the WLH
    John Hawks An Australasian test of the recent African Department of Anthropology, origin theory using the WLH-50 calvarium University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, This analysis investigates the ancestry of a single modern human U.S.A. E-mail: specimen from Australia, WLH-50 (Thorne et al., in preparation; [email protected] Webb, 1989). Evaluating its ancestry is important to our understand- ing of modern human origins in Australasia because the prevailing Stephen Oh models of human origins make different predictions for the ancestry Paleoanthropology Laboratory, of this specimen, and others like it. Some authors believe in the Department of Anthropology, validity of a complete replacement theory and propose that modern University of Michigan, humans in Australasia descended solely from earlier modern human Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382, populations found in Late Pleistocene Africa and the Levant. These U.S.A. ancestral modern populations are believed to have completely replaced other archaic human populations, including the Ngandong hominids of Indonesia. According to this recent African origin theory, Keith Hunley the archaic humans from Indonesia are classified as Homo erectus,a Paleoanthropology Laboratory, different evolutionary species that could not have contributed to the Department of Anthropology, ancestry of modern Australasians. Therefore this theory of complete University of Michigan, replacement makes clear predictions concerning the ancestry of the Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1382, specimen WLH-50. We tested these predictions using two methods: U.S.A. E-mail: a discriminant analysis of metric data for three samples that are [email protected] potential ancestors of WLH-50 (Ngandong, Late Pleistocene Africans, Levant hominids from Skhul and Qafzeh) and a pairwise difference analysis of nonmetric data for individuals within these Seth Dobson samples.
    [Show full text]
  • A 150-Year Conundrum: Cranial Robusticity and Its Bearing on The
    SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research International Journal of Evolutionary Biology Volume 2011, Article ID 632484, 18 pages doi:10.4061/2011/632484 Research Article A 150- Year Conundrum: Cranial Robusticity and Its Bearing on the Origin of Aboriginal Australians Darren Curnoe School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to Darren Curnoe, [email protected] Received 15 October 2010; Accepted 16 December 2010 Academic Editor: Bing Su Copyright © 2011 Darren Curnoe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The origin of Aboriginal Australians has been a central question of palaeoanthropology since its inception during the 19th Century. Moreover, the idea that Australians could trace their ancestry to a non-modern Pleistocene population such as Homo erectus in Southeast Asia have existed for more than 100 years, being explicitly linked to cranial robusticity. It is argued here that in order to resolve this issue a new program of research should be embraced, one aiming to test the full range of alternative explanations for robust morphology. Recent developments in the morphological sciences, especially relating to the ontogeny of the cranium indicate that character atomisation, an approach underpinning phylogenetic reconstruction, is fraught with difficulties. This leads to the conclusion that phylogenetic-based explanations for robusticity should be reconsidered and a more parsimonious approach to explaining Aboriginal Australian origins taken. One that takes proper account of the complex processes involved in the growth of the human cranium rather than just assuming natural selection to explain every subtle variation seen in past populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Stegodonts and the Dating of Stone Tool Assemblages in Island Southeast Asia
    Stegodonts and the Dating of Stone Tool Assemblages in Island Southeast Asia HARRY ALLEN KNOWLEDGE OF Southeast Asian prehistory until recently was organized into a sys­ tem of stages rigidly defined in terms of artifact technology, human type, and geol­ ogical epoch. The fit between human types, artifacts, and geological ages was thought to be so close that a find of any diagnostic artifact type or fossil was suf­ ficient to automatically decide the chronological age and technological period as well (see Table 1). The results of archaeological surveys by Bartstra (1978a, 1978b, 1982) and Bart­ stra et al. (1976, 1988) have shaken belief in the association of Homo erectus with Pacitanian-like large-core tool industries. Similarly the appropriateness of the terms Mesolithic and Palaeolithic for Southeast Asia has been questioned (cf. Hutterer 1977). Despite these new results, however, the older interpretive framework of a close connection between geological age, human type, and technological stage has simply been replaced by a revised version (Table 2). Foley (1987) has argued that co variation between hominid fossil morphology and artifact variability is an essential starting point for understanding the evolution of human behavior. Without denying the eventual demonstration of such a covaria­ tion, it must be stated that premature conclusions along these lines have proved damaging for Southeast Asian archaeology. In any case, in Southeast Asia conclu­ sions about relationships between technology and hominid type are bedeviled by a lack of consensus about the taxonomic status of certain of the fossils, in particular the N gandong crania. The taxonomic relationships of the Asian and Australian hominid fossils are cur­ rently under debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Alan Gordon Thorne 1939–2012
    Alan Gordon Thorne 1939–2012 COLIN GROVES School of Archaeology and Anthropology, AD Hope Building #14, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, AUSTRALIA; [email protected] OBITUARY Alan Thorne, Australia’s leading paleoanthropologist, died of Alzheimer’s in June, 2012. AL Alan Thorne in 1999 (photograph by Maggie Brady). hen he was 18, Alan became a reporter for one of Sydney University that he was asked to go to Melbourne WAustralia’s most widely read newspapers, the Syd- to make a catalogue of the human skeletal collection of the ney Morning Herald, which in those days had a policy of National Museum of Victoria. In the course of examining sending many of its young reporters to get an arts degree at and cataloguing the collection there, he discovered a box of Sydney University. Here, Alan graduated in Zoology and unregistered bones, including some evidently mineralised Anthropology, and came under the influence of the char- skull fragments of very unusual form and exceptional ismatic Professor of Anatomy, “Black Mac” Macintosh, thickness. In the box was a small black-edged card bear- who inculcated in him a passion for paleoanthropology, in ing the words “Bendigo Police” in black felt pen. He made which he took a Master’s degree and in which he then en- enquiries, and found that such black-edged cards had been rolled for a Ph.D. During his period in Sydney, he rapidly issued to the Bendigo police after the death of King George acquired great expertise in osteology and general anatomy, VI in 1952, and that the supply had run out in 1962; while and Macintosh held him in high regard and got him to do felt-tipped pens had first been issued to police officers in some teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • WLH 50: How Australia Informs the Worldwide Pattern of Pleistocene Human Evolution
    WLH 50: How Australia Informs the Worldwide Pattern of Pleistocene Human Evolution MILFORD H WOLPOFF Department of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1092, USA; [email protected] SANG-HEE LEE Department of Anthropology, University of California at Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521-0418, USA; [email protected] submitted: 15 July 2013; accepted 9 September 2014 MONOGRAPH CONTENTS Abstract 506 Introduction 506 Background 508 Weidenreich 509 New Fossils, New Details 510 Migration versus Sources 511 Was There a Single Source Population? 513 The Simplest Origins Hypothesis 514 WLH 50 514 Goal of the Description and Analysis 514 Pathology or Artificial Deformation as Explanations for the Anatomy of WLH 50 517 Adaptive Explanations 517 Age or Size Related Ruggedness 517 Artificial Deformation of WLH 50—A Red Herring 517 Pathological Explanation for Cranial Thickness 519 Allometry 520 No Compelling Explanations Replace Ancestry 520 Description of WLH 50 and Comparison with Ngandong Sample 520 Condition and Preservation 520 Vault as a Whole 521 Cranial Bone Thickness 528 Frontal Bone 530 Supraorbital Region 530 Internal Surface 534 Parietal Bones 536 Temporal Bones 538 Occipital 540 Zygomatic Bone 541 Statistical Approaches 542 Discriminant Analysis of Metric Data 543 Pairwise Difference Analysis Using Non-Metric Data 545 STET (STandard Error Test) 545 Standard Error of the Regression Slope 547 Does STET “Work”? 547 STET Analysis 548 How Similar is WLH 50 to Ngandong and to the African Sample? 550 Summary of Results From the Statistical Approaches 551 In Some Tests Reported Above, WLH 50 is Most like the Ngandong Sample 551 In Other Tests, the Hypothesis of Multiple Ancestry (Africans and Ngandong) for WLH 50 Cannot be Rejected 551 PaleoAnthropology 2014: 505−564.
    [Show full text]
  • A 150-Year Conundrum: Cranial Robusticity and Its Bearing on The
    SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research International Journal of Evolutionary Biology Volume 2011, Article ID 632484, 18 pages doi:10.4061/2011/632484 Research Article A 150- Year Conundrum: Cranial Robusticity and Its Bearing on the Origin of Aboriginal Australians Darren Curnoe School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia Correspondence should be addressed to Darren Curnoe, [email protected] Received 15 October 2010; Accepted 16 December 2010 Academic Editor: Bing Su Copyright © 2011 Darren Curnoe. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The origin of Aboriginal Australians has been a central question of palaeoanthropology since its inception during the 19th Century. Moreover, the idea that Australians could trace their ancestry to a non-modern Pleistocene population such as Homo erectus in Southeast Asia have existed for more than 100 years, being explicitly linked to cranial robusticity. It is argued here that in order to resolve this issue a new program of research should be embraced, one aiming to test the full range of alternative explanations for robust morphology. Recent developments in the morphological sciences, especially relating to the ontogeny of the cranium indicate that character atomisation, an approach underpinning phylogenetic reconstruction, is fraught with difficulties. This leads to the conclusion that phylogenetic-based explanations for robusticity should be reconsidered and a more parsimonious approach to explaining Aboriginal Australian origins taken. One that takes proper account of the complex processes involved in the growth of the human cranium rather than just assuming natural selection to explain every subtle variation seen in past populations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Modern Humans the Origins of Modern Humans Biology Reconsidered
    The Origins of Modern Humans The Origins of Modern Humans Biology Reconsidered Edited by Fred H. Smith and James C. M. Ahern Copyright © 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved First Edition © 1984 Alan R. Liss Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at http://www.wiley.com/go/permission. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.
    [Show full text]