DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi 2020 Statewide 305(B) Water Quality Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi 2020 Statewide 305(B) Water Quality Report State of Mississippi Water Quality Assessment 2020 Section 305 (b) Report MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY State of Mississippi Water Quality Assessment 2020 Section 305(b) Report Department of Environmental Quality December 1, 2020 Prepared by: Office of Pollution Control Field Services Division Post Office Box 2261 Jackson, MS 39225 (601) 961-5171 www.mdeq.ms.gov i ABSTRACT Section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act (CWA) requires each state to describe the quality of their water resources in a report for the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Congress, and the public on a biennial basis. The Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), as the lead agency for environmental protection in Mississippi, is the state agency responsible for generating this report. The purpose of Mississippi's 2020 Water Quality Assessment §305(b) Report is to comprehensively describe for USEPA, Congress, and the public the status of the quality of the state's surface waters. This 2020 §305(b) report fulfills all reporting requirements under §305(b) of the CWA. Along with the water quality assessment information, the report also describes the state’s assessment methodology and gives the causes, where known, for those waters identified as impaired. Additionally, Mississippi’s surface water quality monitoring program is described in this report. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to express their appreciation to the staff of the Surface Water Division’s Basin Management Section and the Modeling and TMDL Branch who contributed to this report. It should also be noted that without the help and support from the staff in the Data Integration Division who helped with all database needs and GIS support, development of this report would not have been possible. Special thanks is extended to the staff of the Field Services Division for their data collection and laboratory efforts in providing most of the data used in this assessment cycle, as well as their contributions to this narrative report. The Water Quality Assessment Section would also like to thank Jeff Thomas and Kosalram Gopalsamy without whom this effort would have been impossible. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ....................................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ v TABLE OF TABLES.............................................................................................................................. v List of Acronyms ................................................................................................................................... vi PART I .................................................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 2 Background and Purpose....................................................................................................................... 2 Mississippi’s Surface Waters ................................................................................................................ 3 PART II .................................................................................................................................................. 5 SURFACE WATER ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND STATEWIDE ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................ 5 Assessment Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 Water Quality Standards ....................................................................................................................... 7 Mississippi 2020 §305(b) Assessment Methodology .............................................................................. 7 Data Representativeness........................................................................................................................ 8 Data Quality ....................................................................................................................................... 10 Waterbody Use Support Determination ............................................................................................... 10 Assessment Database (ADB) .............................................................................................................. 10 Statewide Assessment Summary .......................................................................................................... 13 Designated Use Support-Rivers and Streams ....................................................................................... 13 Causes and Sources of Impairment of Designated Uses-Rivers and Streams ......................................... 16 Assessment Summary for ALUS and Recreation ................................................................................. 19 Designated Use Support – Estuaries and Coastal Waters ...................................................................... 21 Aquatic Life Use Support (ALUS) Assessment ................................................................................... 21 Recreation Use Support Assessment .................................................................................................... 23 Lakes: Statewide Assessment Summary .............................................................................................. 24 Lake Water Quality............................................................................................................................. 24 Use Support Determinations................................................................................................................ 24 Assessment Summary for ALUS Determinations ................................................................................ 25 Section 314 Reporting-Trophic Status ................................................................................................. 26 Lake Pollution Control Methods.......................................................................................................... 31 PART III ............................................................................................................................................... 32 PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERNS AND ADVISORIES ....................................................................... 32 Public Health Concerns and Advisories ............................................................................................... 33 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Fish Tissue Contamination .................................................................................................................. 34 Mercury Contamination in Fish Tissue ................................................................................................ 37 DDT Contamination in the Delta ......................................................................................................... 37 Fish Kills ............................................................................................................................................ 40 Shellfish Restrictions .......................................................................................................................... 42 Beach Advisories ................................................................................................................................ 43 PART IV ............................................................................................................................................... 44 SURFACE WATER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY ..................... 44 Basin Management Approach .............................................................................................................. 45 MDEQ Surface Water Monitoring Program ....................................................................................... 48 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 48 Surface Water Monitoring Strategy ..................................................................................................... 48 Description of MDEQ Sampling Networks .......................................................................................... 50 Status & Trends Ambient Monitoring Networks .................................................................................. 50 Ambient Bridge Network .................................................................................................................... 51 iv Ambient Biological Network .............................................................................................................. 53 Ambient
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paddling the Mississippi River Tributaries Experience the Rivers, Bayous and Lakes of the Mississippi-Louisiana Delta
    Paddling the Mississippi River Tributaries Experience the rivers, bayous and lakes of the Mississippi-Louisiana Delta Although you won’t find much white water in Mississippi or Louisiana, you will encounter some beautiful scenery and plentiful wildlife while paddling our waterways. Many creeks, streams, bayous and rivers in both the Mississippi and Louisiana deltas are lined by deep woods that are home to a variety of plant and animal life. Birding from a kayak or canoe can take on an entire- ly new dimension. Paddle the Miss-Lou and discover a new perspective on our region. The best time to paddle is during the spring or fall. Water levels are generally high enough in the summer to paddle lakes and rivers, too. If you are looking for real adventure you may want to consider a trip on the Mississippi River with John Ruskey of Quapaw Canoe Co. John conducts daylong and overnight trips on the river where you can paddle with others in one of his large hand- made wooden canoes or rent your own. Paddling Trails 1. Sunflower River, Clarksdale - Take a 10-mile paddle out of the fertile fields of Coahoma County into the busy little city of Clarksdale. The Sunflower follows an old channel of the Mississippi River as it winds between farms, neighborhoods, wetlands and abandoned sharecropper shacks. 2. Yalobusha River, Downtown Grenada to Holcomb - Explore the diverse topography of this region as you paddle from downtown Grenada, Miss. and the scenic loess bluffs into the flatlands of the Mississippi delta. 3. Yalobusha River, Holcomb to Malmaison Wildlife Management Area - There are opportunities to view ample wildlife as you paddle through Malmaison Wildlife Management Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load Yazoo River Basin Hills Region
    FINAL REPORT April 2008 ID: 908041701 Total Maximum Daily Load Yazoo River Basin Hills Region for Impairment Due to Sediment Prepared By Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality Office of Pollution Control TMDL/WLA Branch MDEQ P.O. Box 10385 Jackson, MS 39289-0385 (601) 961-5171 www.deq.state.ms.us ____________________________________Sediment TMDL for the Yazoo River Basin Hills Region FOREWORD This report contains one or more Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) for water body segments found on Mississippi’s 1996 Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies. Because of the accelerated schedule required by the consent decree, many of these TMDLs have been prepared out of sequence with the State’s rotating basin approach. The implementation of the TMDLs contained herein will be prioritized within Mississippi’s rotating basin approach. The amount and quality of the data on which this report is based are limited. As additional information becomes available, the TMDLs may be updated. Such additional information may include water quality and quantity data, changes in pollutant loadings, or changes in landuse within the watershed. In some cases, additional water quality data may indicate that no impairment exists. Conversion Factors To convert from To Multiply by To convert from To Multiply by mile 2 acre 640 acre ft 2 43560 km 2 acre 247.1 days seconds 86400 m3 ft 3 35.3 meters feet 3.28 ft 3 gallons 7.48 ft 3 gallons 7.48 ft 3 liters 28.3 hectares acres 2.47 cfs gal/min 448.8 miles meters 1609.3 cfs MGD 0.646 tonnes tons 1.1 m3 gallons
    [Show full text]
  • An Early History of Simpson County, Mississippi by Bee King
    An Early History of Simpson County, Mississippi by Bee King Compiled by Frances B. Krechel AFFECTIONATELY DEDICATED TO: Mrs. L. H. Holyfield (Beulah Boggan) (Electronic version prepared by NP Computers for Mendenhall Public Library, Lu Ann Bailey Librarian) Due to her life-long (b. 1893) interest, and being a native Mississippian, Miss Beulah has gathered together many historical articles and books, and it is basically from this remarkable and vast collection that the enclosed material has been taken, her love of Mississippi history proved to be contagious. So it is with deep appreciation and a sincere “Thank You” for the special help and encouragement, that another chapter has been added to the extensive recording of the state’s heritage. Miss Beulah has also meticulously and lovingly chronicled the names and dates of her Boggan and related families and it is through this mutual family connection that the compiler became interested in the events concerning the early days. All of the stories have been selected from a series of articles written by the late Bee King, who was a well- known lawyer, historian and writer. The Simpson County News began running the series in their weekly newspaper in 1937 and continued until 1948. Mr. King’s writings are a graphic presentation of the life and times of early Simpson County. He interviewed the elderly citizens through out the area and uniquely recorded for posterity the experiences of the people in day to day living. The picture shows Mr. King in his office when he was Mayor of Mendenhall, the county seat of Simpson County.
    [Show full text]
  • Yazoo River Basin
    YAZOO RIVER BASIN Name of Waterway From To Date Black Bayou MS State Highway 12; in Leroy Steele Bayou; origin and 1990 Percy Wildlife Management Area; confluence of Swan Lake; west of Hollandale, MS east of MS south of MS State Highway State Highway 1; in south central 12; southeast of Hollandale, Washington County MS; in south central 33° 09′ 33″ / 90° 55′ 26″ Washington County 33° 07′ 16″ / 90° 57′ 31″ Steele Bayou Origin, confluence of Swan Lake Big Sunflower River; just 1990 and Black Bayou; southwest of upstream of the Corps of Hollandale, MS; south of MS State Engineers' Steele Bayou Highway 12; betweeb MS State Control Structure; just north Highway 1 and U.S. Highway 61; of MS State Highway 465; north of MS State Highway 436; in southwest of Redwood, MS; southwest Washington County in south Issaquena County 33° 07′ 16″ / 90° 57′ 31″ 32° 27′ 42″ / 90° 53′ 30″ Quiver River Confluence of Parks Bayou; east Big Sunflower River; north- 1990 of Drew, MS; west of Glendora, east of Indianola, MS; north- MS; just north of Leflore - west of Moorhead, MS; just Tallahatchie County line; in south- north of U.S. Highway 82; west Tallahatchie County just downstream of county 33° 48′ 59″ / 90° 25′ 23″ road bridge; in south central Sunflower County 33° 28′ 05″ / 90° 33′ 53″ Big Sunflower River U.S. Highway 61; in Clarksdale, Yazoo River; north of 1990 MS; in Coahoma County Vicksburg, MS; southwest of 34° 11′ 32″ / 90° 34′ 15″ Redwood, MS; just south of MS State Highway 465; Issaquena County /Warren County line 32° 26′ 54″ / 90° 53′ 30″ Hushpuckena River U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 86, No. 131/Tuesday, July 13, 2021
    36678 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 131 / Tuesday, July 13, 2021 / Proposed Rules 93.101, 93.118, and 93.124). An MVEB they meet the criteria of the CAA. Dated: July 7, 2021. is defined as ‘‘that portion of the total Accordingly, this action merely Diana Esher, allowable emissions defined in the approves state law as meeting Federal Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. submitted or approved control strategy requirements and does not impose [FR Doc. 2021–14853 Filed 7–12–21; 8:45 am] implementation plan revision or additional requirements beyond those BILLING CODE 6560–50–P maintenance plan for a certain date for imposed by state law. For that reason, the purpose of meeting reasonable this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory further progress milestones or DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR demonstrating attainment or action’’ subject to review by the Office maintenance of the NAAQS, for any of Management and Budget under Fish and Wildlife Service criteria pollutant or its precursors, Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, allocated to highway and transit vehicle October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 50 CFR Part 17 use and emissions (40 CFR 93.101).’’ January 21, 2011); Under the conformity rule, LMP areas • Does not impose an information [Docket No. FWS–R4–ES–2020–0062; may demonstrate conformity without a collection burden under the provisions FF09E21000 FXES11110900000 212] regional emission analysis (40 CFR of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 RIN 1018–BE55 93.109(e)). However, because LMP areas U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); are still maintenance areas, certain • Is certified as not having a Endangered and Threatened Wildlife aspects of transportation conformity significant economic impact on a and Plants; Designation of Critical determinations still will be required for substantial number of small entities Habitat for Pearl Darter transportation plans, programs, and under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi
    Prepared in cooperation with the City of Hattiesburg, City of Petal, Forrest County, Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, Mississippi Department of Homeland Security, and the Emergency Management District Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Left, photograph looking downstream at the Leaf River at State Highway 42 above Hattiesburg, Mississippi, April 25, 2012. Right, inundation map of Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi (02473000), at 34.0 feet gage datum (see Sheet 13 for details). Flood-Inundation Maps for the Leaf River at Hattiesburg, Mississippi By John B. Storm Prepared in cooperation with the City of Hattiesburg, City of Petal, Forrest County, Mississippi Emergency Management Agency, Mississippi Department of Homeland Security, and the Emergency Management District Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 3228 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened Species Status for the Pearl Darter
    Federal Register / Vol. 82, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 20, 2017 / Rules and Regulations 43885 Required Determinations Internet at http://www.regulations.gov at Code of Federal Regulations, as set forth Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2016–0057 and below: National Environmental Policy Act (42 upon request from the Pacific Islands U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) Fish and Wildlife Office (see FOR PART 17—ENDANGERED AND We have determined that FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). THREATENED WILDLIFE AND PLANTS environmental assessments and environmental impact statements, as Authors ■ 1. The authority citation for part 17 defined under the authority of the The primary authors of this final rule continues to read as follows: National Environmental Policy Act are the staff members of the Pacific Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1361–1407; 1531– (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), need not Islands Fish and Wildlife Office. 1544; 4201–4245; unless otherwise noted. be prepared in connection with listing a species as an endangered or List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 17 ■ 2. In § 17.11(h), add an entry for ‘‘Iiwi threatened species under the (honeycreeper)’’ to the List of Endangered Species Act. We published Endangered and threatened species, Endangered and Threatened Wildlife in a notice outlining our reasons for this Exports, Imports, Reporting and alphabetical order under BIRDS to read determination in the Federal Register recordkeeping requirements, as set forth below: on October 25, 1983 (48 FR 49244). Transportation. § 17.11 Endangered and threatened References Cited Regulation Promulgation wildlife. A complete list of references cited in Accordingly, we amend part 17, * * * * * this rulemaking is available on the subchapter B of chapter I, title 50 of the (h) * * * Listing citations and Common name Scientific name Where listed Status applicable rules ******* BIRDS ******* Iiwi (honeycreeper) ........
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in the Mississippi Embayment in Mississippi and Alabama by PAUL R
    Low-Flow Characteristics of Streams in the Mississippi Embayment in Mississippi and Alabama By PAUL R. SPEER, HAROLD G. GOLDEN, JAMES F. PATTERSON, and others fPith a section on QUALITY OF THE WATER By W. J. WELBORNE WATER RESOURCES OF THE MISSISSIPPI EMBAYMENT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 448-1 The magnitude, duration, frequency of recurrence, and chemical composition of low flows UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1964 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library catalog cards for this publication appear after page 147. For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Page Abstract ________________________________ II Factors affecting low flow Continued Introduction ____________________________ 2 Eastern Gulf of Mexico basins Continued Purpose and scope_--_--__---------- 2 Pascagoula River basin______________________ I 26 Definition of terms------------------ 3 Pearl River basin_____-_------ 27 Description of the area___ _______________ 4 Tennessee River basin_____________ 27 Climate ___________________________ 4 Lower Mississippi River basin______ 27 Physiography _______________________ 4 Hatchie River basin_________ 27 Geology. _ __-_--___-_-_________ Wolf River basin.____________ 28 Manmade changes Yazoo River basin____________ 28 Tombigbee-Black Warrior River basin. Big Black River basin_____-___ 30 Pearl River basin___________________ Bayou Pierre basin__________ 30 Yazoo River basin__________._______ Low flows and ground-water fluctuations. 30 Big Black River basin________________ 9 Method of study.___________________ 31 Farm ponds ar>d lakes.-______________ 9 Basic data for the analysis-_____________ 31 Low-flow characteristics__--___-_________. 9 Low-flow frequency analysis ----- 32 Low-flow frequency._____________ _.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT of MISSISSIPPI Eastern Division
    Case 2:20-cv-00158-KS-MTP Document 1 Filed 08/26/20 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI Eastern Division THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) and THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Case No. 2:20-cv-158-KS-MTP v. ) ) THE CITY OF HATTIESBURG, MISSISSIPPI, ) ) Defendant. ) COMPLAINT The United States of America, by authority of the Attorney General of the United States and through the undersigned attorneys, acting at the request of the Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the State of Mississippi, by and through the Mississippi Commission on Environmental Quality, acting through the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), hereby allege as follows: NATURE OF ACTION 1. This is a civil action for injunctive relief and penalties brought under Sections 309(b) and 309(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA or “the Act”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(b) and 1319(d), and under the Mississippi Air and Water Pollution Control Law (MAWPCL) (Miss. Code Ann. §§ 49-17-1 through 49-17- 43), against the Defendant, the City of Hattiesburg, Mississippi for unauthorized discharges of pollutants from its wastewater collection and transmission system 1 Case 2:20-cv-00158-KS-MTP Document 1 Filed 08/26/20 Page 2 of 18 (WCTS) in violation of Section 301 of the Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1311, and for violations of conditions established in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits issued to Hattiesburg by MDEQ pursuant to its EPA-approved permit program under Section 402 of the Act, 33 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar No. 130
    Calendar No. 130 109TH CONGRESS REPORT " ! 1st Session SENATE 109–84 ENERGY AND WATER APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2006 JUNE 16, 2005.—Ordered to be printed Mr. DOMENICI, from the Committee on Appropriations, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 2419] The Committee on Appropriations, to which was referred the bill (H.R. 2419) making appropriations for energy and water develop- ment for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2006, and for other purposes, reports the same to the Senate with an amendment and recommends that the bill as amended do pass. Amount in new budget (obligational) authority, fiscal year 2006 Total of bill as reported to the Senate .................... $31,245,000,000 Amount of 2005 appropriations ............................... 29,832,280,000 Amount of 2006 budget estimate ............................ 29,746,728,000 Amount of House allowance .................................... 29,746,000,000 Bill as recommended to Senate compared to— 2005 appropriations .......................................... ∂1,412,720,000 2006 budget estimate ........................................ ∂1,498,272,000 House allowance ................................................ ∂1,499,000,000 21–815 PDF CONTENTS Page Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 4 Summary of Estimates and Recommendations ..................................................... 4 Title I—Department of Defense—Civil: Department of the Army: Corps of Engineers—Civil: General Investigations
    [Show full text]
  • Incremental Effects Memorandum for the Economic Analysis for the Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Pearl Darter
    May 20, 2020 MEMORANDUM To: Industrial Economics, Incorporated (IEc) From: Stephen Ricks, Field Supervisor, Ecological Services, Mississippi Field Office Subject: Incremental Effects Memorandum for the Economic Analysis for the Proposed Rule to Designate Critical Habitat for the Pearl Darter The purpose of this memorandum is to provide information to serve as a basis for conducting an economic analysis for the proposed designation of critical habitat for the pearl darter. Section 4(b)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) requires the Secretary of Interior (Secretary), and therefore by delegation the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), to consider the economic, national security, and other impacts of designating a particular area as critical habitat. The Secretary may exclude an area from critical habitat if the Secretary determines that the benefits of exclusion outweigh the benefits of including the area as critical habitat, unless the exclusion will result in the extinction of the species. In part to comply with section 4(b)(2) of the Act and consider the economic impacts of a proposed critical habitat designation, the Service prepares an economic analysis that describes and monetizes, where possible, the probable economic impacts of the proposed regulation. The data in the economic analysis may be used in the discretionary balancing evaluation under section 4(b)(2) of the Act to consider any particular area for exclusion from the final designation. Determining the economic impacts of a critical habitat designation involves evaluating the “without critical habitat” baseline versus the “with critical habitat” scenario, to identify those effects expected to occur solely due to the designation of critical habitat and not from the protections that are in place due to the species being listed under the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Firm Map Index
    NOTE TO USERS FEMA maintains information about map features, such as street locations and names, in or near designated flood hazard areas. Requests to revise information in or near designated flood hazard areas may be provided to FEMA during the community review period, at the final Consultation Coordination Officer's meeting, or during the statutory 90-day appeal period. Approved requests for changes will be shown on the final printed FIRM. LISTING OF COMMUNITIES COMMUNITY MOST RECENT FIRM MAP NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME LOCATED ON PANELS INITIAL NFIP DATE INITIAL FIRM DATE NUMBER PANEL DATE 1 1 0020, 0040, 0041 0042 , 0043, 0044, 0075, 0100, COVINGTON COUNTY, 280291 0125, 0131, 0132, 0135, 0145, 0150, 0165, 0170, 0175, January 27, 1978 December 15, 1990 UNINCORPORATED AREAS 0200, 0210, 0250, 0260, 0270, 0275, 0280, 0290, 0300, 0325, 0350 28031C0075C 28031C0100C COLLINS, CITY OF 2 80047 0165, 0170, 0260 October 29, 1976 August 5, 1985 MOUNT OLIVE, TOWN OF 2 8 0 0 4 8 0043, 0044, 0131, 0132 August 1, 1975 September 15, 1989 MITH COUNTY * 28031C0042C S SEMINARY, VILLAGE OF 2 8 0 0 4 9 0260, 0270, 0280, 0290 August 1, 1975 28031C0040C *28031C0041C H COUNTY 1 SMIT PANEL NOT PRINTED McNair Millpond Okatoma Creek UNTY COVINGTON CO reek ill C 28031C0020C SIMPSON COUNTY ll M r Hi Town of k nke MAP DATES MAP REPOSITORIES OUNTY e Bu COVINGTON C e Mount Olive r C 49 35 This FIRM index displays the map date for each FIRM panel at the time (Maps available for reference only, not for distribution.) n Town Creek Tributary o t l 532 that this Index was printed.
    [Show full text]