DOCSLIB.ORG

Stephens' Kangaroo Rat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stephens' Kangaroo Rat SPECIES REPORT FOR STEPHENS’ KANGAROO RAT (Dipodomys stephensi) Stephens’ kangaroo rat habitat, Naval Weapons Station Seal Beach Detachment Fallbrook, San Diego County Photo credit: Stephens’ kangaroo rat (Photo credit: Joanna Gilkeson, USFWS). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife Office, Carlsbad California Version 1.1 July 30, 2020 Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Species Report 2020 [This page intentionally left blank] ii Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Species Report 2020 Suggested citation: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species Report for the Stephens’ kangaroo rat (Dipodomys stephensi). Version 1.1, July 30, 2020. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Sacramento, California. xi + 125 pp. iii Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Species Report 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. viii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS USED .......................................................................................... x 1.0 INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SPECIES DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................ 2 2.1 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Physical Appearance ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 RANGE AND HABITAT USE ......................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Historical Biogeography ....................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Geographical Distribution ..................................................................................................... 4 3.2.1 Range Maps ................................................................................................................... 4 3.3.1 Physical Setting .............................................................................................................. 8 3.3.2 Ecological Setting ........................................................................................................ 10 3.3.3 Suitable Habitat ............................................................................................................ 13 4.0 LIFE HISTORY AND ECOLOGY .................................................................................................. 19 4.1 General Habits .................................................................................................................... 19 4.2 Reproduction, Growth, Longevity ...................................................................................... 21 4.3 Diet and Foraging Behavior ................................................................................................ 24 4.4 Movement and Home Range .............................................................................................. 26 4.5 Genetics............................................................................................................................... 28 4.6 Mortality/Predation ............................................................................................................. 31 4.7 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 32 5.0 SPECIES BIOLOGICAL STATUS .................................................................................................. 33 5.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Riverside County ................................................................................................................ 34 5.3 San Diego County ............................................................................................................... 39 5.3.1 Lake Henshaw/Warner Springs ................................................................................... 39 5.3.2 Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Monitoring Program . 41 5.3.3 Fallbrook ...................................................................................................................... 42 5.3.4 Ramona Grasslands County Preserve .......................................................................... 44 5.3.5 Rancho Guejito Ranch ................................................................................................. 45 5.4 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 46 iv Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Species Report 2020 6.0 STRESSORS ............................................................................................................................... 46 6.1 Habitat Loss Due To Urban and Agricultural Development .............................................. 48 6.1.1 Conserved Lands—Riverside County.......................................................................... 50 6.1.2 Conserved Lands—San Diego County ........................................................................ 51 6.1.3 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 51 6.2 Habitat Fragmentation ........................................................................................................ 51 6.2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 51 6.2.2 Habitat Fragmentation Analysis .................................................................................. 53 6.2.3 Current Impact to Stephens’ kangaroo rat from Habitat Fragmentation ..................... 56 6.2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 56 6.3 Habitat Modification—Conversion of Native Vegetation .................................................. 57 6.3.1 Wildfire ........................................................................................................................ 57 6.3.2 Nonnative Grasses ......................................................................................................... 57 6.3.3 Invasive Species ............................................................................................................ 57 6.4 Habitat Destruction or Modification—Other ...................................................................... 59 6.4.1 Nonnative Ungulates .................................................................................................... 59 6.4.2 Unauthorized Off-Highway Vehicles (OHVs) ............................................................ 59 6.4.3 Wildfire Suppression and Prevention Activities .......................................................... 61 6.4.4 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 62 6.5 Overutilization for Commercial, Recreational, Scientific, or Educational Purposes ......... 63 6.5.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 63 6.6 Disease ................................................................................................................................ 63 6.6.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 64 6.7 Predation ............................................................................................................................. 64 6.7.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 65 6.8 Use of Rodenticides ............................................................................................................ 65 6.8.1 Summary ...................................................................................................................... 67 6.9 Wildfire ............................................................................................................................... 67 6.9.1 Evaluation of Wildfire—Direct, Short-term Effects .................................................... 68 6.9.2 Evaluation of Wildfire—Indirect, Long-term Effects ................................................. 68 6.9.3 Conclusion ................................................................................................................... 69 6.10 Climate Change ................................................................................................................. 69 6.10.1 Current Trends–Temperature and Precipitation ......................................................... 71 6.10.2 Future Projections ...................................................................................................... 73 v Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Species Report 2020 6.10.3 Summary ...................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jeremy Langley Chief Operations Officer Wilhite Langley, Inc. 21800 Barton Road, Ste 102 Grand Terrace, Ca 92313
    47 1st Street, Suite 1 Redlands, CA 92373-4601 (909) 915-5900 May 22, 2019 Jeremy Langley Chief Operations Officer Wilhite Langley, Inc. 21800 Barton Road, Ste 102 Grand Terrace, Ca 92313 RE: Biological Resources Assessment, Jurisdictional Waters Delineation Glen Helen/Devore parcel - APN: 0261-161-17, Devore, CA Dear Mr. Langley: Jericho Systems, Inc. (Jericho) is pleased to provide this letter report that details the results of a general Biological Resources Assessment (BRA) that includes habitat suitability assessments for nesting birds, Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) [BUOW] and a Jurisdictional Waters Delineation (JD) for the proposed Glen Helen/Devore parcel (Project) located within Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) #0261-161-17 in the community of Devore, CA (Attachment B: Figures 1 and 2). This report is designed to address potential effects of the proposed Project to designated Critical Habitats and/or any species currently listed or formally proposed for listing as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the California Endangered Species Act (CESA), or species designated as sensitive by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or the California Native Plant Society (CNPS). Attention was focused on sensitive species known to occur locally. This report also addresses resources protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, federal Clean Water Act (CWA) regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) respectively; and Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code (FCG) administered by the CDFW. SITE LOCATION The approximately 1-acre parcel (APN: 0261-161-17) is located north of Kendall Drive just north of the intersection with N.
    [Show full text]
  • Body Size, Not Phylogenetic Relationship Or Residency, Drives Interspecific Dominance in a Little Pocket Mouse Community
    Animal Behaviour 137 (2018) 197e204 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav Body size, not phylogenetic relationship or residency, drives interspecific dominance in a little pocket mouse community * Rachel Y. Chock a, , Debra M. Shier a, b, Gregory F. Grether a a Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A. b Recovery Ecology, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, Escondido, CA, U.S.A. article info The role of interspecific aggression in structuring ecological communities can be important to consider Article history: when reintroducing endangered species to areas of their historic range that are occupied by competitors. Received 6 September 2017 We sought to determine which species is the most serious interference competitor of the endangered Initial acceptance 6 November 2017 Pacific pocket mouse, Perognathus longimembris pacificus, and more generally, whether interspecific Final acceptance 1 December 2017 aggression in rodents is predicted by body size, residency status or phylogenetic relatedness. We carried out simulated territory intrusion experiments between P. longimembris and four sympatric species of MS. number: A17-00719 rodents (Chaetodipus fallax, Dipodomys simulans, Peromyscus maniculatus, Reithrodontomys megalotis)ina field enclosure in southern California sage scrub habitat. We found that body size asymmetries strongly Keywords: predicted dominance, regardless of phylogenetic relatedness or the residency status of the individuals. aggression The largest species, D. simulans, was the most dominant while the smallest species, R. megalotis, was the dominance least dominant to P. longimembris. Furthermore, P. longimembris actively avoided encounters with all interference competition Perognathus longimembris species, except R.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Native to the USA and Canada for Which the MIL Has an Image (296) 31 July 2021
    Mammal species native to the USA and Canada for which the MIL has an image (296) 31 July 2021 ARTIODACTYLA (includes CETACEA) (38) ANTILOCAPRIDAE - pronghorns Antilocapra americana - Pronghorn BALAENIDAE - bowheads and right whales 1. Balaena mysticetus – Bowhead Whale BALAENOPTERIDAE -rorqual whales 1. Balaenoptera acutorostrata – Common Minke Whale 2. Balaenoptera borealis - Sei Whale 3. Balaenoptera brydei - Bryde’s Whale 4. Balaenoptera musculus - Blue Whale 5. Balaenoptera physalus - Fin Whale 6. Eschrichtius robustus - Gray Whale 7. Megaptera novaeangliae - Humpback Whale BOVIDAE - cattle, sheep, goats, and antelopes 1. Bos bison - American Bison 2. Oreamnos americanus - Mountain Goat 3. Ovibos moschatus - Muskox 4. Ovis canadensis - Bighorn Sheep 5. Ovis dalli - Thinhorn Sheep CERVIDAE - deer 1. Alces alces - Moose 2. Cervus canadensis - Wapiti (Elk) 3. Odocoileus hemionus - Mule Deer 4. Odocoileus virginianus - White-tailed Deer 5. Rangifer tarandus -Caribou DELPHINIDAE - ocean dolphins 1. Delphinus delphis - Common Dolphin 2. Globicephala macrorhynchus - Short-finned Pilot Whale 3. Grampus griseus - Risso's Dolphin 4. Lagenorhynchus albirostris - White-beaked Dolphin 5. Lissodelphis borealis - Northern Right-whale Dolphin 6. Orcinus orca - Killer Whale 7. Peponocephala electra - Melon-headed Whale 8. Pseudorca crassidens - False Killer Whale 9. Sagmatias obliquidens - Pacific White-sided Dolphin 10. Stenella coeruleoalba - Striped Dolphin 11. Stenella frontalis – Atlantic Spotted Dolphin 12. Steno bredanensis - Rough-toothed Dolphin 13. Tursiops truncatus - Common Bottlenose Dolphin MONODONTIDAE - narwhals, belugas 1. Delphinapterus leucas - Beluga 2. Monodon monoceros - Narwhal PHOCOENIDAE - porpoises 1. Phocoena phocoena - Harbor Porpoise 2. Phocoenoides dalli - Dall’s Porpoise PHYSETERIDAE - sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus – Sperm Whale TAYASSUIDAE - peccaries Dicotyles tajacu - Collared Peccary CARNIVORA (48) CANIDAE - dogs 1. Canis latrans - Coyote 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Fleas (Siphonaptera) Infesting Giant Kangaroo Rats (Dipodomys Ingens) on the Elkhorn and Carrizo Plains, San Luis Obispo County, California
    SHORT COMMUNICATION Fleas (Siphonaptera) Infesting Giant Kangaroo Rats (Dipodomys ingens) on the Elkhorn and Carrizo Plains, San Luis Obispo County, California STEPHEN P. TABOR/ DANIEL F. WILLIAMS,2 DAVID}. GERMAN0,2 3 AND REX E. THOMAS J. Med. Entomol. 30(1): 291-294 (1993) ABSTRACT The giant kangaroo rat, Dipodomys ingens (Merriam), has a limited distri­ bution in the San Joaquin Valley, CA. Because of reductions in its geographic range, largely resulting from humans, the species was listed as an endangered species in 1980 by the California Fish and Game Commission. As part of a study of the community ecology of southern California endangered species, including D. ingens, we were able to make flea collections from the rats when they were trapped and marked for population studies. All but one of the fleas collected from the D. ingens in this study were Hoplopsyllus anomalus, a flea normally associated with ground squirrels (Sciuridae). It has been suggested that giant kangaroo rats fill the ground squirrel niche within their range. Our data indicate that this role includes a normal association with Hoplopsyllus anomalus. KEY WORDS Dipodomys ingens, Hoplopsyllus anomalus, population studies THE GIANT KANGAROO RAT, Dipodomys ingens the only flea known from D. ingens. We found no (Merriam), is the largest of the kangaroo rats and additional information on collection records from the largest North American heteromyid. The his­ D. ingens. Therefore, we took the opportunity to torical range of the species lies along the western collect and identify fleas from D. ingens as part of side of the San Joaquin Valley, CA from the a larger study on the effects of drought, grazing Tehachapi Mountains on the southern extremity by livestock, and humans on a community of in San Luis Obispo, Kern, and Santa Barbara endangered species that includes populations of counties to the southern tip of Merced County D.
    [Show full text]
  • Translocating Endangered Kangaroo Rats in the San Joaquin Valley of California: Recommendations for Future Efforts
    90 CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME Vol. 99, No. 2 California Fish and Game 99(2):90-103; 2013 Translocating endangered kangaroo rats in the San Joaquin Valley of California: recommendations for future efforts ERIN N. TENNANT*, DAVID J. GERMANO, AND BRIAN L. CYPHER Department of Biology, California State University, Bakersfield, CA 93311 USA (ENT, DJG) Endangered Species Recovery Program, California State University – Stanislaus, P.O. Box 9622, Bakersfield, CA 93389 USA (BLC) Present address of ENT: Central Region Lands Unit, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, 1234 E. Shaw Ave. Fresno, CA 93710 USA *Correspondent: [email protected] Since the early 1990s, translocation has been advocated as a means of mitigating impacts to endangered kangaroo rats from development activities in the San Joaquin Valley. The factors affecting translocation are numerous and complex, and failure rates are high. Based on work we have done primarily with Tipton kangaroo rats and on published information on translocations and reintroductions, we provide recommendations for future translocations or reintroductions of kangaroo rats. If the recommended criteria we offer cannot be satisfied, we advocate that translocations not be attempted. Translocation under less than optimal conditions significantly reduces the probability of success and also raises ethical questions. Key words: Dipodomys heermanni, Dipodomys ingens, Dipodomys nitratoides, reintroduction, San Joaquin Valley, Tipton kangaroo rat, translocation ________________________________________________________________________ Largely due to habitat loss, several species or subspecies of kangaroo rats (Dipodomys spp.) endemic to the San Joaquin Valley of California have been listed by the state and federal governments as endangered. These include the giant kangaroo rat (D. ingens), and two subspecies of the San Joaquin kangaroo rat (D.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipodomys Ingens)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens) Photo by Elizabeth Bainbridge Version 1.0 August 2020 Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service August 2020 GKR SSA Report – August 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service listed the giant kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ingens) as endangered under the Endangered Species Act in 1987 due to the threats of habitat loss and widespread rodenticide use (Service 1987, entire). The giant kangaroo rat is the largest species in the genus that contains all kangaroo rats. The giant kangaroo rat is found only in south-central California, on the western slopes of the San Joaquin Valley, the Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains, and the Cuyama Valley. The preferred habitat of the giant kangaroo rat is native, sloping annual grasslands with sparse vegetation (Grinnell, 1932; Williams, 1980). This report summarizes the results of a species status assessment (SSA) that the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) completed for the giant kangaroo rat. To assess the species’ viability, we used the three conservation biology principles of resiliency, redundancy, and representation (together, the 3Rs). These principles rely on assessing the species at an individual, population, and species level to determine whether the species can persist into the future and avoid extinction by having multiple resilient populations distributed widely across its range. Giant kangaroo rats remain in fragmented habitat patches throughout their historical range. However, some areas where giant kangaroo rats once existed have not had documented occurrences for 30 years or more. The giant kangaroo rat is found in six geographic areas (units), representing the northern, middle, and southern portions of the range.
    [Show full text]
  • Rats, Kangaroo
    Volney W. Howard, Jr. Professor of Wildlife Science Department of Fishery and KANGAROO RATS Wildlife Sciences New Mexico State University Las Cruces, New Mexico 88003 Fig. 1. The Ord’s kangaroo rat, Dipodomys ordi Identification and Range Fumigants Damage Prevention and There are 23 species of kangaroo rats Control Methods Aluminum phosphide and gas car- (genus Dipodomys) in North America. tridges are registered for various Fourteen species occur in the lower 48 Exclusion burrowing rodents. states. The Ord’s kangaroo rat (D. ordi, Fig. 1) occurs in 17 US states, Canada, Rat-proof fences may be practical only Trapping and Mexico. Other widespread species for small areas of high-value crops. Live traps. include the Merriam kangaroo rat Cultural Methods Snap traps. (D. merriami), bannertail kangaroo rat (D. spectabilis), desert kangaroo rat Plant less palatable crops along field Other Methods (D. deserti), and Great Basin kangaroo edges and encourage dense stands rat (D. microps). of rangeland grass. Use water to flush kangaroo rats from burrows. Repellents Kangaroo rats are distinctive rodents with small forelegs; long, powerful None are registered. hind legs; long, tufted tails; and a pair Toxicants of external, fur-lined cheek pouches similar to those of pocket gophers. Zinc phosphide. They vary from pale cinnamon buff to a dark gray on the back with pure white underparts and dark markings PREVENTION AND CONTROL OF WILDLIFE DAMAGE — 1994 Cooperative Extension Division Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources University of Nebraska - Lincoln United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Animal Damage Control B-101 Great Plains Agricultural Council Wildlife Committee their burrows for storage.
    [Show full text]
  • San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Study
    NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, INC. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus) Presence/Absence Trapping Studies Cajon Boulevard Warehouse Project San Bernardino, California Prepared for: L&L Environmental 721 Nevada, Suite 307 Redlands, CA 92373 951 681 4929 Prepared by: ENVIRA P. O. Box 2612 Ramona, CA 92065 Phone 619-885-0236 E-mail [email protected] May 9, 2018 Project Number: LLE18-101 T (951) 686-4483 3415 Valencia Hill Drive F (951) 686-8418 Riverside, California 92507 [email protected] Cajon Boulevard Warehouse Development! NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, INC. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey CERTIFICATION This Phase One Survey and report were conducted and prepared in accordance with professional requirements for small mammal trapping studies by Philippe Vergne (USFWS Permit TE068072-3). Philippe Jean Vergne, Field Biologist and Author. !!!!!!! !! May 9, 2018 Cajon Warehouse Trapping LLE18-101!i Cajon Boulevard Warehouse Development! NATURAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT, INC. San Bernardino Kangaroo Rat Trapping Survey Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction!.........................................................................................................................................................................1 2.0 Site Location and Project Description!..............................................................................................................................1 3.0 Methods................................................................................................................................................................................!
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Rangewide SKR Management & Monitoring Plan
    Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Rangewide Management and Monitoring Plan Photo by Moose Peterson March 2021 Prepared by Conservation Biology Institute for Bureau of Land Management and Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency CBI is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization that works collaboratively to conserve biological diversity in its natural state through applied research, education, planning, and community service. Preferred Citation: Spencer, W.D., D. DiPietro, H. Romsos, D. Shier, and R. Chock. 2021. Stephens’ Kangaroo Rat Rangewide Management and Monitoring Plan. Unpublished report prepared by the Conservation Biology Institute for Bureau of Land Management and Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency. March 2021. SKR Rangewide Management & Monitoring Plan Conservation Biology Institute, 2021 Table of Contents Foreword 5 Acknowledgments 7 Glossary 8 1. Introduction 12 1.1. Background and Context 14 1.2. Approach 16 1.2.1. Use of Habitat Models and Delineating Population Units 17 1.2.2. Biogeographic Mapping and Genetic Considerations 17 1.2.3. Threats Assessment 18 1.2.4. Management Strategy 18 1.2.5. Monitoring Strategy 18 1.2.6. Data Management Strategy 19 1.2.7. Coordination Structure 19 2. SKR Ecology 20 2.1. Distribution and Population Genetics 20 2.2. Habitat 21 2.3. Sociality and Burrow Use 22 2.4. Diet and Foraging 23 2.5. Space-use Patterns 23 2.6. Reproduction 23 2.7. Communication 24 2.8. Activity Patterns 24 2.9. Interspecific Relationships 25 3. SKR Habitat Model 27 3.1. Methods 28 3.2. Results and Discussion 29 4. Delineating SKR Habitat & Population Units 34 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of the Endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat
    Population Genetics of the Endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ingens, in the Southern San Joaquin Valley Nicole C. Blackhawk, B.S. A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Biology California State University, Bakersfield In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of Masters of Science Summer 2013 Copyright By Nicole Cherri Blackhawk 2013 Summer 2013 Population Genetics of the Endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ingens, in the Southern San Joaquin Valley Nicole C. Blackhawk This thesis has been accepted on behalf of the Department of Biology by their supervisory committee: 1 Population Genetics of the Endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys ingens, in the Southern San Joaquin Valley Nicole C. Blackhawk Department of Biology, California State University, Bakersfield Abstract The Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens) is a federally and state-listed endangered species, endemic to the San Joaquin Valley, Carrizo and Elkhorn Plains, and the Cuyama Valley. Populations of the endangered Giant Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ingens) have decreased over the past 100 years because of habitat fragmentation and isolation. Changes in the population structure that can occur due to habitat fragmentation can significantly affect the population size and the dispersal of these animals. Dr. David Germano and I collected small ear clippings from male and female Giant Kangaroo Rats from six sites along the southern San Joaquin Valley to determine the genetic population structure of this species in this part of their range. We predicted that geographic distance and isolation of populations would decrease genetic relatedness compared to populations closer together. Having a better understanding of the genetic structure in this species will help with conservation actions, such as translocating individuals within the range of the species.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Programme
    Final Programme Follow us OFFICIAL CORPORATE SUPPORTER @IBAevents #IBARome Expert and professional advice since 1975 The law firm Studio Legale Tributario Fantozzi & Associati was established in 1975 by Augusto Fantozzi, a lawyer and full professor of tax law at the ‘’La Sapienza’’ and ‘’LUISS’’ Universities in Rome. Professor Fantozzi was the Italian Minister for Finance and the Minister of Foreign Trade between 1995 and 1998, and he is a member of the Board of Directors and the Board of Statutory Auditors of several leading Italian companies and multinational corporations. The Firm has offices in Rome, Milan and Bologna. With 8 Senior Partners, all lawyers or chartered accountants, and more than 30 legal professionals, the Firm is highly specialised in tax law, and as such provides clients with advice on Italian and international fiscal law, and assists them in tax litigation. Thanks to the years of experience of its partners and legal professionals, the Firm can offer clients full support in resolving tax and corporate issues, both nationally and internationally. Over the years the Firm has dealt with the fiscal aspects of numerous important corporate and financial operations carried out by public and private companies, banks, finance companies and insurance undertakings, and has become their go-to adviser on ordinary and extraordinary tax matters. ROMA | MILANO | BOLOGNA www.fantozzieassociati.com Follow us CONTENTS Contents @IBAevents #IBARome Introduction by the President of the IBA 5 IBA Management Board and IBA Staff 6 Opening
    [Show full text]
  • Ord's Kangaroo Rat, Dipodomys Ordii
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Ord’s Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys ordii in Canada ENDANGERED 2017 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2017. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Ord’s Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys ordii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xiii + 58 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2006. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Ord’s kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vii + 34 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Gummer, D.L. 1995. COSEWIC status report on the Ord's kangaroo rat Dipodomys ordii in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. 1-27 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Darren Bender and David Gummer for writing the status report on Ord’s Kangaroo Rat (Dipodomys ordii) in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Justina Ray, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur le Rat kangourou d'Ord (Dipodomys ordii) au Canada.
    [Show full text]