Dispatch Activity Report 11/29/19 - 12/5/19
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Seattle SDCI
2019 The objectives for hosting the 2019 People’s Choice Urban Before voting, the public was asked to reflect on design and Design Awards were threefold: to dialogue with the public development in Seattle and consider key principles of urban about urban design issues and considerations; to promote design as criteria to evaluate projects. The public was invited to public understanding of the Design Review Program in vote for the project in each category which they felt Seattle; and to engage the public by voting on the finalist demonstrated design excellence. Voting occurred in person at projects which they feel best exhibit great urban design. We the 2019 Seattle Design Festival and via an online survey. We believe it is important to recognize and praise the many were very excited to receive over 500 votes in the People’s architects and developers that are going through the design Choice competition and are pleased to announce the winning review process and doing great work in our communities. buildings. Design Review Program staff started with a list of over 200 Design Review projects that were completed in the previous two years. Projects were sorted into three categories: Highrise, Midrise and Lowrise. Staff then went through several selection rounds to identify exemplary projects, based Thank you for participating! on the Council adopted Design Guidelines, resulting in a list of 9 projects per category. WHAT IS DESIGN REVIEW? Design Review is one of the tools the City uses to create a better city by giving citizens, the Design Review Boards and the Department of Construction and Inspections (SDCI) a voice in the design of most new multifamily and commercial buildings. -
Dispatch Activity Report 11/1/19 - 11/7/19
Dispatch Activity Report 11/1/19 - 11/7/19 Start Date Job ID NR JM App Site Site Address City State Work Type County Contractor Report To Alaska Native Medical 11/1/2019 143064 * 0 1 Center 4320 Diplomacy Dr. Anchorage AK Carpenters Anchorage Elite Acoustics & Interiors Jason Jensen FNA Head Start Phase 3 11/1/2019 143063 * 0 1 Expansion 3830 Cushman Street Fairbanks AK Carpenters Fairbanks North Star GHEMM Company INC Office- Heather Haskell Corporation Davis 11/4/2019 143158 * 2 0 Clear LRDR Radar Bldg Clear Air Force Base AK Carpenters Fairbanks North Star Constructors JV Ryan Kramer 11/4/2019 143079 * 2 0 Moose Pass Hangar Mile 36 Seward Hwy Moose Pass AK Carpenters Kenai Peninsula Jaffa Construction Bruce Jaffa 11/6/2019 143307 * 0 1 Soldotna Hospital 250 Hospital Place Soldotna AK Carpenters Kenai Peninsula Elite Acoustics & Interiors Jason Jensen Norton Sound Health 11/4/2019 143160 * 1 0 Corporation Nome Bypass Nome AK Carpenters Nome BEK of Alaska Dan Inman 11/7/2019 143274 * 0 3 Missile Field 4 Ft. Greely AK Carpenters Southeast Fairbanks Neeser Construction Chuck Holbrook Glenn Hwy Capacity 10204 Eagle View Kiewit Infrastructure 11/7/2019 143317 * 1 0 Improv DB Phase 2 Drive Eagle River AK Piledrivers Anchorage West Co AK Kenneth Walker Glenn Hwy Capacity 10204 Eagle View Kiewit Infrastructure 11/7/2019 143319 * 1 0 Improv DB Phase 2 Drive Eagle River AK Piledrivers Anchorage West Co AK Kenneth Walker AK 7 6 Total NAES Power Contractors/PMRI in 11/5/2019 143171 1 0 Colstrip Power Plant 1 Warehouse Rd Colstrip MT Carpenters Rosebud Colstrip Monty Erickson 2827 Lexington 11/4/2019 143083 * 0 1 Markovich Shop Avenue Butte MT Carpenters Silver Bow Markovich Construction Kevin Houchin Billings Airport Terminal 11/5/2019 143293 * 4 0 Expansion(*seenotes) 1901 Terminal Circle Billings MT Carpenters Yellowstone Sletten Construction Dave Heston MT 5 1 Total Balfour Beatty dba 11/4/2019 143262 * 1 0 Lake Oswego City Hall 320 A Ave Lake Oswego OR Carpenters Clackamas Howard S. -
The Sustainability of Tall Building Developments: a Conceptual Framework
buildings Review The Sustainability of Tall Building Developments: A Conceptual Framework Kheir Al-Kodmany Department of Urban Planning and Policy, College of Urban Planning and Public Affairs, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; [email protected] Received: 26 November 2017; Accepted: 3 January 2018; Published: 5 January 2018 Abstract: As cities cope with rapid population growth—adding 2.5 billion dwellers by 2050—and grapple with expansive sprawl, politicians, planners, and architects have become increasingly interested in the vertical city paradigm. This paper reviews and examines shortfalls of tall buildings found in the literature to inform future developments. The paper gathers a vast amount of fragmented criticism and concerns, and organizes them around the three pillars of sustainability: social, economic, and environmental. Mapping out the “unsustainable” aspects forms the foundation for addressing them in future research and tall building developments. Keywords: sustainability; high-rise developments; economic shortfalls; social failure; environmental problems 1. Introduction 1.1. What Is a Tall Building? There is no universally accepted definition of a “tall building”. Governments around the world differ in how they define “tall buildings”. For example, German regulations define “tall buildings” as buildings higher than 22 m (72 ft) with room for the permanent accommodation of people [1]. City officials derived this limit from the length of ladders used by the firefighters. Leicester City Council in the UK defines a tall building as any structure over 20 m/66 ft in height, and/or a building of any height that is substantially higher than the predominant height of the buildings in the surrounding area, and/or a building that would make a significant impact on the city’s skyline [2]. -
DISTRICT of COLUMBIA INVENTORY of HISTORIC SITES ALPHABETICAL VERSION September 30, 2009
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INVENTORY OF HISTORIC SITES ALPHABETICAL VERSION September 30, 2009 The District of Columbia Inventory of Historic Sites is the District government’s list of officially designated historic properties. Properties in the Inventory are deemed worthy of recognition and protection for their contribution to the cultural heritage of one of the nation’s most beautiful and historic cities. 2009 Inventory The D.C. Inventory originated in 1964, with 289 listings. The 2009 version of the Inventory contains more than 700 designations encompassing nearly 25,000 properties. Included in the Inventory are: 500 historic landmark designations covering more than 800 buildings 150 historic landmark designations of other structures, including parks, engineering structures, monuments, building interiors, artifacts, and archaeological sites 50 historic districts, including 28 neighborhood historic districts. Properties in the Inventory properties are protected by both local and federal historic preservation laws. The D.C. Historic Preservation Review Board (HPRB) designates properties for inclusion in the Inventory, and the D.C. Historic Preservation Office (HPO) maintains the Inventory and supporting documentation. A component of the D.C. Office of Planning, HPO is both the staff to the Review Board and the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) for the District of Columbia. Searching the Inventory The 2009 version of the D.C. Inventory is presented in multiple formats for convenience. Each of these formats is available on the HPO website and may be obtained in an electronic copy. The main or thematic version of the Inventory is arranged to promote understanding of significant properties within their historic context. Designations are grouped by historical period and theme (see the Table of Contents).