DOCSLIB.ORG

Today's Outline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Today's Outline Today's outline Outline Review Dark matter Homework due Friday Morning Galaxy Types Tonight: Public talk on Exoplanets! 7:30pm tonight Elliptical Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence Review: Components of Galaxies Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies Tutorial on dark matter in galaxies Galaxy Types I Main classes I Hubble's system I special types Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence Review: Components of Galaxies Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Tutorial on dark matter in galaxies Elliptical Spiral Irregular Galaxy Types Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals I Main classes Dwarf Galaxies I Hubble's system I special types Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence Tutorial: Orbits around Galaxies and Dark Matter Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies Dark matter halo Outline Review Orbital period of a star is Dark matter: Dark matter determined by the mass Galaxy Types I more like "ghost matter" Elliptical enclosed in its orbit. Spiral I does not interact Irregular Hubble Sequence Orbital motions indicate there electromagnetically Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies is more mass than there are Most of our everyday world stars, gas and dust. (light, solid objects, In a galaxy, there is more dark chemistry) is due to matter than everything else. electromagnetic interactions The dark matter halo is much Makes dark matter very hard larger than the galaxy that to detect { only through other lives in it. forces (weak, gravity) Galaxy Types Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Major galaxy types Irregular Special galaxy types Hubble Sequence I Elliptical Giant Ellipticals I dwarf galaxies Dwarf Galaxies I Spiral I giant elliptical Irregular I galaxies Hubble classification Elliptical Galaxies Outline Elliptical galaxies are a pure Review spheroidal component Dark matter I pure spheroid component Galaxy Types Elliptical I stars and some hot gas Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence I no star formation Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies I old stars I wide variety of sizes I most common type in galaxy clusters Are not necessarily "spherical" generally more oval-shaped often due to rotational flattening, making them somewhat "squashed" Spiral Galaxies Outline Spiral galaxies show Review star-forming arms and Dark matter sometimes bars Galaxy Types Elliptical Also called "disk" galaxies Spiral Irregular because the have a prominent Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals disk component Dwarf Galaxies I strong disk component I also have a spheroid I dust I cold gas and star formation I most common type outside clusters Irregular Galaxies Outline Review Dark matter Irregulars are Galaxy Types Elliptical Galaxies without a clear Spiral Irregular organization Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies I Many small galaxies I Satellite galaxies I Some merger products I usually dusty and star-forming Hubble Sequence Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies Based mostly on "shape" of galaxy: Elliptical sequence based on "roundness" Two spiral sequences: with and without bar "Lenticular" are in-between: disk and spheroid, no spiral Sequence has only modest physical meaning, mostly a conevient way to classify Galaxy Types Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Major galaxy types Irregular Special galaxy types Hubble Sequence I Elliptical Giant Ellipticals I dwarf galaxies Dwarf Galaxies I Spiral I giant elliptical Irregular I galaxies Hubble classification Giant Elliptical Galaxies Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Irregular Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals Dwarf Galaxies At core of a cluster, galaxies merge to form one Giant elliptical Made up of lots of other galaxies put together Dwarf Galaxies Outline Review Many small dwarf Dark matter galaxies orbiting all Galaxy Types large galaxies Elliptical Spiral Irregular I mostly spheriodal Hubble Sequence Giant Ellipticals (not currently Dwarf Galaxies forming stars) I many have been "eaten" by the dominant galaxy in the past, thus giving their stars to the larger galaxy Galaxy Types Outline Review Dark matter Galaxy Types Elliptical Spiral Major galaxy types Irregular Special galaxy types Hubble Sequence I Elliptical Giant Ellipticals I dwarf galaxies Dwarf Galaxies I Spiral I giant elliptical Irregular I galaxies Hubble classification.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Galaxy Classification Questions of the Day
    Galaxy classification Questions of the Day • What are elliptical, spiral, lenticular and dwarf galaxies? • What is the Hubble sequence? • What determines the colors of galaxies? Top View of the Milky Way The MW is a “spiral” galaxy, or a “late type” galaxy. The different components have different colors, motions, and chemical compositions different origins! Other Late Type Spiral Galaxies • More disk than bulge (if any!). • High current star formation. These are also “late-type” galaxies. Apparent shape depends on orientation Other Types: “Early type galaxies” • More bulge than disk. • Low current star formation. “Sombrero Galaxy” And even earlier type galaxies: • Elliptical Galaxies (or just “ellipticals”) – No disk! All bulge! Have evolved to the point – Very little gas where no gas is left for – Probably old! making new stars! “spheroidals” And in between, “lenticulars” • Just a hint of a disk. • Low current star formation. “S0” galaxies: Like ellipticals, but usually a bit flatter. Many galaxies have “bars” – linear arrangements of stars (The Milky Way has a bar!) All of these different types of galaxy fit nicely into a sequence. Ellipticals Unbarred and Barred Spirals Lenticulars Number indicates how flat the elliptical is Lowercase “a”, “b”, “c” indicates how unlike the spiral is to an elliptical Things that vary along the Hubble Sequence: 1. “Bulge-to-Disk Ratio” 2. Lumpiness of the spiral arms 3. How tightly the spiral arms are wound E Sa Sb Sc “early type” “late type” Things that vary along the Hubble Sequence: 1. “Bulge-to-Disk Ratio” 2. Lumpiness of the spiral arms 3. How tightly the spiral arms are wound E Sa Sb Sc Note: These are not exact trends! Galaxies are much more complex than stars! 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review
    Modified Newtonian Dynamics, an Introductory Review Riccardo Scarpa European Southern Observatory, Chile E-mail [email protected] Abstract. By the time, in 1937, the Swiss astronomer Zwicky measured the velocity dispersion of the Coma cluster of galaxies, astronomers somehow got acquainted with the idea that the universe is filled by some kind of dark matter. After almost a century of investigations, we have learned two things about dark matter, (i) it has to be non-baryonic -- that is, made of something new that interact with normal matter only by gravitation-- and, (ii) that its effects are observed in -8 -2 stellar systems when and only when their internal acceleration of gravity falls below a fix value a0=1.2×10 cm s . Being completely decoupled dark and normal matter can mix in any ratio to form the objects we see in the universe, and indeed observations show the relative content of dark matter to vary dramatically from object to object. This is in open contrast with point (ii). In fact, there is no reason why normal and dark matter should conspire to mix in just the right way for the mass discrepancy to appear always below a fixed acceleration. This systematic, more than anything else, tells us we might be facing a failure of the law of gravity in the weak field limit rather then the effects of dark matter. Thus, in an attempt to avoid the need for dark matter many modifications of the law of gravity have been proposed in the past decades. The most successful – and the only one that survived observational tests -- is the Modified Newtonian Dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Galaxy Morphology
    The Morphological Evolution of Galaxies Roberto G. Abraham Sidney van den Bergh Dept. of Astronomy & Dominion Astrophysical Observatory Astrophysics Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics University of Toronto National Research Council of Canada 60 St. George Street Victoria, British Columbia Toronto, Ontario M5S 3H8, V9E 2E7, Canada Canada ABSTRACT Many galaxies appear to have taken on their familiar appearance relatively recently. In the distant Universe, galaxy morphology started to deviate significantly (and systematically) from that of nearby galaxies at redshifts, z, as low as z = 0.3. This corresponds to a time ~3.5 Gyr in the past, which is only ~25% of the present age of the Universe. Beyond z = 0.5 (5 Gyr in the past) spiral arms are less well-developed and more chaotic, and barred spiral galaxies may become rarer. By z = 1, around 30% of the galaxy population is sufficiently peculiar that classification on Hubble’s traditional “tuning fork” system is meaningless. On the other hand, some characteristics of galaxies do not seem to have changed much over time. The co-moving space density of luminous disk galaxies has not changed significantly since z = 1, indicating that while the general appearance of these objects has continuously changed with cosmic epoch, their overall numbers have been conserved. Attempts to explain these results with hierarchical models for the formation of galaxies have met with mixed success. denoted Sa, Sb, and Sc (SBa, SBb, SBc in of Hubble’s classification system are Introduction the case of barred spirals). A final “catch- based on the idea that most matter in the all” category for irregular galaxies is also Universe is not in stellar or gaseous form, Nearby galaxies are usually classified on included.
    [Show full text]
  • Disk Galaxy Rotation Curves and Dark Matter Distribution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Disk galaxy rotation curves and dark matter distribution by Dilip G. Banhatti School of Physics, Madurai-Kamaraj University, Madurai 625021, India [Based on a pedagogic / didactic seminar given by DGB at the Graduate College “High Energy & Particle Astrophysics” at Karlsruhe in Germany on Friday the 20 th January 2006] Abstract . After explaining the motivation for this article, we briefly recapitulate the methods used to determine the rotation curves of our Galaxy and other spiral galaxies in their outer parts, and the results of applying these methods. We then present the essential Newtonian theory of (disk) galaxy rotation curves. The next two sections present two numerical simulation schemes and brief results. Finally, attempts to apply Einsteinian general relativity to the dynamics are described. The article ends with a summary and prospects for further work in this area. Recent observations and models of the very inner central parts of galaxian rotation curves are omitted, as also attempts to apply modified Newtonian dynamics to the outer parts. Motivation . Extensive radio observations determined the detailed rotation curve of our Milky Way Galaxy as well as other (spiral) disk galaxies to be flat much beyond their extent as seen in the optical band. Assuming a balance between the gravitational and centrifugal forces within Newtonian mechanics, the orbital speed V is expected to fall with the galactocentric distance r as V 2 = GM/r beyond the physical extent of the galaxy of mass M, G being the gravitational constant.
    [Show full text]
  • High Velocity Dispersion in a Rare Grand Design Spiral Galaxy at Redshift Z =2.18
    High Velocity Dispersion in a Rare Grand Design Spiral Galaxy at Redshift z =2.18 Nature, in press (July 19 2012) 1 2 3 4 David R. Law , Alice E. Shapley , Charles C. Steidel , Naveen A. Reddy , Charlotte R. 5 6 Christensen , Dawn K. Erb 1 Dunlap Institute for Astronomy & Astrophysics, University of Toronto, 50 St. George Street, Toronto M5S 3H4, Ontario, Canada 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 3 California Institute of Technology, MS 249-17, Pasadena, CA 91125 4 Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 5 Steward Observatory, 933 North Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ 85721 6 Department of Physics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI 53211 Although relatively common in the local Universe, only one grand-design spiral galaxy has been spectroscopically confirmed1 to lie at z>2 (HDFX 28; z=2.011), and may prove to be a major merger that simply resembles a spiral in projection. The rarity of spirals has been explained as a result of disks being dynamically ‘hot’ at z>2 2,3,4,5 which may instead favor the formation of commonly-observed clumpy structures 6,7,8,9,10. Alternatively, current instrumentation may simply not be sensitive enough to detect spiral structures comparable to those in the modern Universe11. At redshifts <2, the velocity dispersion of disks decreases12, and spiral galaxies are more numerous by z~1 7,13,14,15. Here we report observations of the grand design spiral galaxy Q2343-BX442 at z=2.18. Spectroscopy of ionized gas shows that the disk is dynamically hot, implying an uncertain origin for the spiral structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Rotation Curves
    Chapter 5 Rotation Curves 5.1 Circular Velocities and Rotation Curves The circular velocity vcirc is the velocity that a star in a galaxy must have to maintain a circular orbit at a specified distance from the centre, on the assumption that the gravitational potential is symmetric about the centre of the orbit. In the case of the disc of a spiral galaxy (which has an axisymmetric potential), the circular velocity is the orbital velocity of a star moving in a circular path in the plane of the disc. If 2 the absolute value of the acceleration is g, for circular velocity we have g = vcirc=R where R is the radius of the orbit (with R a constant for the circular orbit). Therefore, 2 @Φ=@R = vcirc=R, assuming symmetry. The rotation curve is the function vcirc(R) for a galaxy. If vcirc(R) can be measured over a range of R, it will provide very important information about the gravitational potential. This in turn gives fundamental information about the mass distribution in the galaxy, including dark matter. We can go further in cases of spherical symmetry. Spherical symmetry means that the gravitational acceleration at a distance R from the centre of the galaxy is simply GM(R)=R2, where M(R) is the mass interior to the radius R. In this case, 2 vcirc GM(R) GM(R) = 2 and therefore, vcirc = : (5.1) R R r R If we can assume spherical symmetry, we can estimate the mass inside a radial distance R by inverting Equation 5.1 to give v2 R M(R) = circ ; (5.2) G and can do so as a function of radius.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of the DC14 and Corenfw Dark Matter Halo Models on Galaxy Rotation Curves F
    A&A 605, A55 (2017) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730402 & c ESO 2017 Astrophysics Testing baryon-induced core formation in ΛCDM: A comparison of the DC14 and coreNFW dark matter halo models on galaxy rotation curves F. Allaert1, G. Gentile2, and M. Baes1 1 Sterrenkundig Observatorium, Universiteit Gent, Krijgslaan 281, 9000 Gent, Belgium e-mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Physics and Astrophysics, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium Received 6 January 2017 / Accepted 15 June 2017 ABSTRACT Recent cosmological hydrodynamical simulations suggest that baryonic processes, and in particular supernova feedback following bursts of star formation, can alter the structure of dark matter haloes and transform primordial cusps into shallower cores. To assess whether this mechanism offers a solution to the long-standing cusp-core controversy, simulated haloes must be compared to real dark matter haloes inferred from galaxy rotation curves. For this purpose, two new dark matter density profiles were recently derived 10 11 from simulations of galaxies in complementary mass ranges: the DC14 halo (10 < Mhalo=M < 8 × 10 ) and the coreNFW halo 7 9 (10 < Mhalo=M < 10 ). Both models have individually been found to give good fits to observed rotation curves. For the DC14 model, however, the agreement of the predicted halo properties with cosmological scaling relations was confirmed by one study, but strongly refuted by another. A next important question is whether, despite their different approaches, the two models converge to the same solution in the mass range where both should be appropriate. To investigate this, we tested the DC14 and coreNFW halo 9 10 models on the rotation curves of a selection of galaxies with halo masses in the range 4 × 10 M – 7 × 10 M and compared their 11 predictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Possible Evidence for the Ejection of a Supermassive Black Hole from An
    Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 000–000 (0000) Printed 4 June 2021 (MN LATEX style file v2.2) Possible evidence for the ejection of a supermassive black hole from an ongoing merger of galaxies Martin G. Haehnelt1⋆, Melvyn B. Davies2 and Martin J. Rees1 1Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHA 2Lund Observatory, Box 43, SE–221 00, Lund, Sweden 4 June 2021 ABSTRACT Attempts of Magain et al (2005) to detect the host galaxy of the bright QSO HE0450– 2958 have not been successful. We suggest that the supermassive black hole powering the QSO was ejected from the observed ULIRG at the same redshift and at 1.5 arcsec distance. Ejection could have either be caused by recoil due to gravitational wave emission from a coalescing binary of supermassive black holes or the gravitational slingshot of three or more supermassive black holes in the ongoing merger of galaxies which triggered the starburst activity in the ULIRG. We discuss implications for the possible hierarchical build-up of supermassive black holes from intermediate and/or stellar mass black holes, and for the detection of coalescing supermassive binary black holes by LISA. Key words: Black hole physics; Celestial mechanics, stellar dynamics; Binaries: general; Galaxies:nuclei 1 INTRODUCTION jevic & Merritt 2001). The further evolution is somewhat uncertain. Hardening by gravitational interaction with stars In their recent paper, Magain et al (2005) describe observa- passing close to the binary will be much slower than the typ- tions of the bright quasar HE0450–2958 which suggest that ical duration of the star formation bursts in ULIRGs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Galaxy Classification Grid That Better Recognises Early-Type Galaxy
    MNRAS 000,1– ?? (2019) Preprint 24 July 2019 Compiled using MNRAS LATEX style file v3.0 A galaxy classification grid that better recognises early-type galaxy morphology Alister W. Graham? Centre for Astrophysics and Supercomputing, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia. Accepted 2019 June 7. Received 2019 June 7; in original form 2019 April 26 ABSTRACT A modified galaxy classification scheme for local galaxies is presented. It builds upon the Aitken-Jeans nebula sequence, by expanding the Jeans-Hubble tuning fork diagram, which it- self contained key ingredients from Curtis and Reynolds. The two-dimensional grid of galaxy morphological types presented here, with elements from de Vaucouleurs’ three-dimensional classification volume, has an increased emphasis on the often overlooked bars and continua of disc sizes in early-type galaxies — features not fully captured by past tuning forks, tridents, or combs. The grid encompasses nuclear discs in elliptical (E) galaxies, intermediate-scale discs in ellicular (ES) galaxies, and large-scale discs in lenticular (S0) galaxies, while the E4-E7 class is made redundant given that these galaxies are lenticular galaxies. Today, these struc- tures continue to be neglected, or surprise researchers, perhaps partly due to our indoctrination to galaxy morphology through the tuning fork diagram. To better understand the current and proposed classification schemes — whose origins reside in solar/planetary formation models — a holistic overview is given. This provides due credit to some of the lesser known pioneers, presents some rationale for the grid, and reveals the incremental nature of, and some of the lesser known connections in, the field of galaxy morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics Beyond the Standard Model and Dark Matter.Pdf
    Physics Beyond the Standard Model and Dark Matter Elise Wursten CERN, RIKEN AVA School on Precision Physics 25th of March 2020 1 Contents • Standard Model • Introduction • Open issues & Beyond • Dark Matter • Why do we think it exists? • Dark Matter Candidates • Searches for Dark Matter 2 Standard Model 3 Standard Model Fundamental constants have to be determined by experiment 4 Standard Model – Open Issues & Beyond Fundamental constants have to be determined by experiment • The strong CP problem: CP violating θ- term in Lagrangian is suppressed by 9 orders of magnitude. Why? • Possible solution: There is a particle called the axion, which makes this parameter small because of a spontaneously broken symmetry (Peccei-Quinn) • Candidate for dark matter 5 Standard Model – Open Issues & Beyond Fundamental constants have to be determined by experiment • Hierarchy problem: why is the Higgs mass so low? • Quantum corrections would make the mass huge! • Proposed solution is supersymmetry: fermionic and bosonic loop corrections cancel each other out • Lightest SUSY particle is candidate for dark matter 6 Standard Model – Open Issues & Beyond Fundamental constants have to be determined by experiment • What about the neutrino masses? • Are these fundamental constants really constant? (see next talk) 7 Standard Model – Open Issues & Beyond • Why is there so much more matter than antimatter in the universe? Baryon asymmetry parameter: Observed: Standard Model prediction: 5 Standard Model – Open Issues & Beyond • Why is there so much more matter than antimatter in the universe? Baryon asymmetry parameter: Observed: Standard Model prediction: • Conditions for baryon asymmetry by Sakharov: • Baryon number violation • C and CP violation • Departure from local equilibrium (or CPT violation) [1] JETP Lett 5, 24-27 (1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Turbulent Formation of Protogalaxies at the End of the Plasma Epoch: Theory and Observations
    Turbulent formation of protogalaxies …, Nova Book, Galaxies: Dynamics, Formation and Evolution 1 Turbulent formation of protogalaxies at the end of the plasma epoch: theory and observations Rudolph E. Schild1,2 1 Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2 [email protected] and Carl H. Gibson 3,4 3 University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0411, USA [email protected], http://sdcc3.ucsd.edu/~ir118 ABSTRACT The standard model of gravitational structure formation is based on the Jeans 1902 acoustic theory, neglecting nonlinear instabilities controlled by viscosity, turbulence and diffusion. A linear insta- bility length scale equal to the sound speed times the gravitational freefall time emerges. Because the Jeans scale LJ for the hot primordial plasma is always slightly larger than the scale of causal connection ct, where c is the speed of light and t is the time after the big bang, it has been assumed that no plasma structures could form without guidance from a cold (so LJ CDM is small) collisionless cold-dark-matter CDM fluid to give condensations that gravitationally collect the plasma. Galaxies by this CDM model are therefore produced by gradual hierarchical-clustering of CDM halos to gal- axy mass over billions of years, contrary to observations showing that well formed galaxies existed much earlier. No observations exist of CDM halos. However, Gravitational instability is non- linear and absolute, controlled by viscous and turbulent forces or by diffusivity at Schwarz length scales smaller than ct. Because the universe during the plasma epoch is rapidly expanding, the first structures formed were at density minima by fragmentation when the viscous-gravitional scale LSV first matched ct at 30,000 years to produce protosupercluster voids and protosuperclusters.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosion of the Science Modification of Newtonian Dynamics Via Mach's
    Physics International Original Research Paper Explosion of the Science Modification of Newtonian Dynamics Via Mach’s Inertia Principle and Generalization in Gravitational Quantum Bound Systems and Finite Range of the Gravity-Carriers, Consistent Merely On the Bosons and the Fermions Mohsen Lutephy Faculty of Science, Azad Islamic University (IAU), South Tehran branch, Iran Article history Abstract: Newtonian gravity is modified here via Mach's inertia principle Received: 29-04-2020 (inertia fully governed by universe) and it is generalized to gravitationally Revised: 11-05-2020 quantum bound systems, resulting scale invariant fully relational dynamics Accepted: 24-06-2020 (mere ordering upon actual objects), answering to rotation curves and velocity dispersions of the galaxies and clusters (large scale quantum bound Email: [email protected] systems), successful in all dimensions and scales from particle to the universe. Against the Milgrom’s theory, no fundamental acceleration to separate the physical systems to the low and large accelerations, on the contrary the Newtonian regime of HSB galaxies sourced by natural inertia constancy there. All phenomenological paradigms are argued here via Machian modified gravity generalized to quantum gravity, especially Milgrom empirical paradigms and even we have resolved the mystery of missing dark matter in newly discovered Ultra Diffuse Galaxies (UDGs) for potential hollow in host galaxy generated by sub quantum bound system of the globular clusters. Also we see that the strong nuclear force (Yukawa force) is in reality, the enhanced gravity for limitation of the gravitational potential because finite-range of the Compton wavelength of hadronic gravity-carriers in the nucleuses, reasoning to resolve ultimately, one of the biggest questions in the physics, that is, so called the fine structure constant and answering to mysterious saturation features of the nuclear forces and we have resolved also the mystery of the proton stability, reasonable as a quantum micro black hole and the exact calculation of the universe matter.
    [Show full text]