2020 Newsletter
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2033 Review of Potential Development Sites
Pyrton NP - Review of potential development sites Final submission Pyrton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033 Review of Potential Development Sites V11.0 7th February 2018 Page 1 of 39 Pyrton NP - Review of potential development sites Final submission Contents 1. Land at Poppett’s Hill Farm 3 2. Land at New Farm 8 3. Land opposite Hall Close 15 4. Land between Old Vicarage Cottage and the Lodge House 21 5. PYR 2 30 6. PYR 1 41 7. Christmas Common mast site 48 V11.0 7th February 2018 Page 2 of 39 Pyrton NP - Review of potential development sites Final submission 1. Land at Poppett’s Hill Farm Assessment criteria Response Site characteristics Site description/current Aerial mapping and the site’s planning history indicate that the use site appears to be used for cattle farming. The site is isolated. The next nearest farm is Stoke Grange Farm, located circa 0.47 miles to the northeast. Site area Circa 1.10 hectares Greenfield/agricultural/pre Agricultural land viously developed/brownfield Site boundaries Agricultural fields surround the site. Surrounding land uses Agricultural Existing access/adjacent Farm tracks to a highway Topography Flat Vegetation Hedgerows Planning history / ● 21/11/1996 – replacement of fire damaged agricultural pre-application barns with new building – Approved 14/01/1997. discussions ● 22/02/1994 – Erect farm building – Approved 19/04/1994. ● 14/06/1977 – Erection of pre-fabricated calf house and loose box building – Approved 13/09/1977. ● 05/01/1973 – Erection of third cubicle house, silo barns, 1-4, milking parlour and amend position of slurry silo – Approved 20/02/1973. -
Pyrton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033
Pyrton NP - Landscape and Green Space Study Final PDF Pyrton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033 Landscape and Green Space Study V11.0 7th February 2018 Page 1 of 46 Pyrton NP - Landscape and Green Space Study Final PDF Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. References and Data Sources 4 3. The Origins of the Parish 5 4. Regional Landscape Character Context 8 4.1. Countryside Agency, Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland, 2002 8 4.2. South Oxfordshire Landscape Character Assessment (adopted July 2003) 9 4.2.1. Downs and Vale Fringe Landscapes 9 4.2.2. Parkland and Estate Farmland 10 4.2.3. Landscape Management Issues 10 4.2.4. Landscape Enhancement priorities 10 4.2.5. Planning and development issues 10 4.3. Chilterns AONB Character Assessment and Management Plan 11 4.4. Oxfordshire Wildlife and Landscape Study (OWLS) 13 4.4.1. Clay Vale 14 4.4.2. Estate Farmlands 15 4.4.3. River Meadowlands 16 4.4.4. Wooded Estate Slopes and Valley Sides 17 4.4.5. Wooded Farmland 18 5. Pyrton Landscape Types 21 5.1. The Pyrton Landscape 21 5.2. The Chiltern Escarpment and AONB 21 5.3. The Main Settlement of Pyrton 23 5.3.1. Views 26 5.3.2. Green Spaces 27 5.4. The Estate Parkland of Shirburn and Pyrton Manor 28 5.5. Hillside farmsteads in the North of the Parish (Clare and Golder) 30 5.6. Lower Lying Farmland 31 6. Maintaining a separate identity 33 6.1. Fields off Pyrton Lane (PYR2 and Pyrton Charity Field) 33 6.2. -
Pyrton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033
Pyrton NP - Landscape and Green Space Study Final submission Pyrton Neighbourhood Plan 2018 - 2033 Landscape and Green Space Study V11.0 7th February 2018 Page 1 of 46 Pyrton NP - Landscape and Green Space Study Final submission Contents 1. Introduction 4 2. References and Data Sources 4 3. The Origins of the Parish 5 4. Regional Landscape Character Context 8 4.1. Countryside Agency, Landscape Character Assessment Guidance for England and Scotland, 2002 8 4.2. South Oxfordshire Landscape Character Assessment (adopted July 2003) 9 4.2.1. Downs and Vale Fringe Landscapes 9 4.2.2. Parkland and Estate Farmland 10 4.2.3. Landscape Management Issues 10 4.2.4. Landscape Enhancement priorities 10 4.2.5. Planning and development issues 10 4.3. Chilterns AONB Character Assessment and Management Plan 11 4.4. Oxfordshire Wildlife and Landscape Study (OWLS) 13 4.4.1. Clay Vale 14 4.4.2. Estate Farmlands 15 4.4.3. River Meadowlands 16 4.4.4. Wooded Estate Slopes and Valley Sides 17 4.4.5. Wooded Farmland 18 5. Pyrton Landscape Types 21 5.1. The Pyrton Landscape 21 5.2. The Chiltern Escarpment and AONB 21 5.3. The Main Settlement of Pyrton 23 5.3.1. Views 26 5.3.2. Green Spaces 27 5.4. The Estate Parkland of Shirburn and Pyrton Manor 28 5.5. Hillside farmsteads in the North of the Parish (Clare and Golder) 30 5.6. Lower Lying Farmland 31 6. Maintaining a separate identity 33 6.1. Fields off Pyrton Lane (PYR2 and Pyrton Charity Field) 33 6.2. -
SEA Screening Statement
Screening Statement on the determination of the need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and European Directive 2001/42/EC for the Lewknor Neighbourhood Development Plan 06 APRIL 2020 SUMMARY Following consultation with statutory bodies, South Oxfordshire District Council (the ‘Council’) determines that Lewknor Neighbourhood Development Plan (Lewknor NDP) does not require a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA). INTRODUCTION 1. An initial screening opinion was used to determine whether or not the contents of the emerging Lewknor Neighbourhood Development Plan (Lewknor NDP) required a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the European Directive 2011/42/EC (the Directive) and associated Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (the Regulations). A Habitats Regulation Screening Assessment is included in Appendix 2. 2. Any land use plan or programme ‘which sets the framework for future development consent of projects’ must be screened according to a set of criteria from Annex II of the Directive and Schedule 1 of the Regulations. These criteria include exceptions for plans ‘which determine the use of a small area at local level’ or which only propose ‘minor modifications to a plan’, if it is determined that the plan is unlikely to have significant environmental effects. 3. The initial screening opinion was subject to consultation with Historic England, the Environment Agency, Natural England and Oxfordshire County Council. The results of the screening process are detailed in this Screening Statement. THE SCREENING PROCESS 1. Using the criteria set out in Annex II of the Directive and Schedule 1 of the Regulations, a Screening Opinion determines whether a plan or programme is likely to have significant environmental effects. -
Oxfordshire Flora Group 2019 Newsletter
Ashmolean Natural History Society of Oxfordshire Oxfordshire Flora Group 2019 Newsletter Fallopia dumetorum Copse Bindweed Photograph by Phil Cutt 1 INTRODUCTION As always, I am so impressed by the commitment of all our Flora Guardians in 2019. It was a year of strange weather, with periods of rain, periods of drought and some hot spells that were very hot indeed. As you will read in the following reports, our targeted plants were affected by this situation in various ways. This work took up a lot of time but OFG members also managed to arrange and attend many surveys that gathered data for the BSBI 2020 Atlas, with the final date for submitting results being December 2019. We had an excellent series for Spring Term Lunchtime talks, the last to be arranged by Susan Erskine, who formally retired from that role in March 2019. Keith Kirby started the series by describing his work at Wytham in a talk entitled A View from the Bramble Patch: Changes in the Flora of Wytham Woods. Lisa Lane, (Upper Thames Living Landscape Manager for BBOWT) gave an illuminating talk on Chimney Meadows – Floodplain Restoration and Laurence Bee fascinated everyone with an introduction to plant galls called Knoppers and Spangles. Unfortunately, Judy Webb was forced by ill-health to cancel her talk on Marsh Lousewort but Brian Laney very nobly stood in to give a talk on New Plant Finds in Northamptonshire. I would like to thank Susan again for her sterling work over the years in organising so many excellent series of Spring Talks and welcome Tanya Smith who has graciously agreed to take on the role, starting in 2020. -
Salford 334 Number Status Description Width Conditions + Limitations Remarks (Non-Conclusive Information)
Salford 334 Number Status Description Width Conditions + Limitations Remarks (non-conclusive information) 1 FP From FP 2, S of the church, leading NW past Greathouse Barn to rejoin FP 2, S of Springhill Farm, then SW to the Chipping Norton to Moreton-in-Marsh road (A44), NW of Fishers Barn. 2 FP From the Chipping Norton to Moreton-in-Marsh road (A44), S of the churchyard, Salford, leading N past FP 1, S of the church, then N through the churchyard to FP 3 and NNW past FP 4 to FP 5 NW of The Leys, continuing NW and WNW over the stream to FP 1, S of Springhill 3 FP From FP 2 N of the churchyard, Salford, leading NE to FP 4 and E and SE to Cooks Lane opposite the School. 4 FP From FP 3, SW of The Leys, leading NW to FP 2. 5 FP From Golden Lane leading NW, N of The Leys, to FP 2. 6 FP From the S end of BR 7 at Golden Lane, Salford, leading N past Rectory Farm to Rollright FP 7 at the Rollright Parish boundary. 7 BR From Golden Lane, Salford, at the S end of FP6 leading FP section now numbered as FP18. NE then SE to FP18, then NE to Rollright BR18 at the Rollright Parish boundary. 8 RUPP From near Betteridge Cottage, Salford, leading SE past Formerly described as CRB. the S end of FP 16 to Over Norton RUPP 11 at the bridge on Salford Brook at the Over Norton Parish boundary. -
2018 Newsletter
Ashmolean Natural History Society of Oxfordshire Oxfordshire Flora Group 2018 Newsletter Oenanthe silaifolia Narrow-leaved Water-dropwort June 2018 Photograph by Judy Webb 1 INTRODUCTION I am amazed and impressed each year by the sheer amount of work which is racked up by our dedicated Flora Guardians. We are grateful to them. As usual the fortunes of the plants we look after have waxed and waned; 2018 was an exceptional summer and the weather seems to have suited some plants but not others. A year’s hard work was also put in by the committee. Sally Rankin keeps an eye on the finances and each year undertakes the hard work of sending our funding application to Natural England. Sally Abbey slaves over this newsletter and takes the minutes. Camilla Lambrick undertakes the massive task of overseeing the work of the FGs. Sue Helm works very hard on the arrangements for our very popular conferences, both the smaller FG conferences and the bigger ones which are open to all. This year Susan Erskine organised her last set of Spring Lectures. Susan has been a very active member of the group for over 25 years, Secretary for many years and then Chairman. She has been a rock and will be greatly missed. The Spring Lectures organisation is being taken over by Tanya Smith. I myself am retiring as Chairman and from the committee in 2019 though I shall continue to manage the website. I wish the OFG every success in the future. Frances Watkins Frances Watkins Frances Watkins has been a stalwart of the Oxfordshire Flora Group since its inception in 2013 (and before that of the Rare Plants Group). -
Risk Maps for Individual Host Species and Lists of Designated Sites at Risk
APPENDIX 2: RISK MAPS FOR INDIVIDUAL HOST SPECIES AND LISTS OF DESIGNATED SITES AT RISK. Figure 1 Risk posed to V. myrtillus under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 2 Figure 2 Risk posed to V. vitis-idaea under the three different risk scenarios. ....................... 3 Figure 3. Risk posed to C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. .......................... 4 Figure 4 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 5 Figure 5 Risk posed to SSSIs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ..................................................................................... 6 Figure 6 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 7 Figure 7 Risk posed to SPAs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ........................................................................................... 8 Figure 8 Risk posed to SACs for species V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea, A. uva-ursi and C. vulgaris under the three different risk scenarios. ............................................................. 9 Figure 9 Risk posed to SACs for species, V. myrtillus, V. vitis-idaea and A. uva-ursi under the three different risk scenarios. ................................................................................... 10 Table 1 Lists of all SPAs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. ................................................... 11 Table 2 Lists of all SACs selected out as potentially suitable, with details of the total suitable area and their inclusion in each of the risk scenarios. -
Figure 4B M4 - M40 Link: ‘M35’ Part 2
Copyright © 2013, 2016 Pleiade Associates Ltd [23.5] Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2013 Statutory Ancient Monuments A Settlement site SE of church, Appleford SAM 1004849 Iffley Meadows Potential SSSI B Settlement site at Northfield Farm SAM 1002925 Chinnor Reservoir 7 (Thames Water) C Sinodun Hill Camp SAM 1006302 Thame Park D Dyke Hills SAM 238029 (Grade II*) E • Ascott Earl Motte and Bailey castle SAM 21806 • Ascott d’Oyley 12th Century Motte & Bailey castle & associated earthworks SAM 21790 F Carfax conduit SAM 2380291193569 G Site of Roman Kilns SAM 2380291006337 Littlemoor Railway Cutting Listed Buildings SSSI Grade I Sydenham C.A. 1 Church of St Mary, Long Wittenham 2 Abbey Church of St Peter & St Paul, Dorchester 3 Church of St Giles, Newington 4 The Manor, Chalgrove Spartum Fen 5 Church of St Mary, Chalgrove Great Haseley C.A. SSSI 6 Church of St Andrew, Wheatfield 7 Thame Park Continued on Fig. 6A Grade II* 8 Barn (15th c), Drayton St. Leonard 9 Newington House, Newington Sugworth Toot Baldon CA Little Milton C.A. 10 Adwell House, Adwell SSSI 11 Nuneham House, Nuneham Courteney 12 Old All Saints Church, Nuneham Courteney Oakley C.A. 13 Baldon House, Marsh Baldon Little Haseley C.A. Conservation Area SSSI / SAC Projected SSSI Impact Risk Zone junction Marsh Baldon CA National Nature Reserve (NNR) 10 6 Historic Garden Nuneham Courtney CA 13 Kingston Blount C.A. Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty Aston Rowant C.A. Oxford Green Belt Proposed extension to Oxford Green Belt Chilterns Beechwoods SAC Registered Historic Battlefield 12 Ascott Park (Grade II) 11 E Archeological sites: Northfield Farm Chalgrove Airfield (Grey, M. -
Draft Neighbourhood Plan
Initial Screening Opinion on the determination of the need for a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 and European Directive 2001/42/EC for the Aston Rowant Neighbourhood Development Plan [6TH JUNE 2018] SUMMARY In this initial screening opinion, South Oxfordshire District Council (the ‘Council’) determines that the Aston Rowant Neighbourhood Development Plan (Aston Rowant NDP) does not require a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) At the time this screening exercise has been undertaken there is no certainty in regards to the location of the proposed site allocations. Given the scale of the proposed residential development, provided that the site selection process carefully avoids on or near to sensitive areas, the proposals in the plan are not considered to create significant effects. This screening opinion may need to be reviewed once the location of the proposed site allocations are known. This screening opinion is for consideration by the statutory consultees whose input will inform the final screening statement. INTRODUCTION 1. This initial screening opinion has been used to determine whether or not the contents of the emerging Aston Rowant Neighbourhood Development Plan (Aston Rowant NDP) requires a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) in accordance with the European Directive 2011/42/EC (the Directive) and associated Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 (the Regulations). 2. Any land use plan or programme ‘which sets the framework for future development consent of projects’ must be screened according to a set of criteria from Annex II of the Directive and Schedule 1 of the Regulations.