Annual Report, 2018. NAC Kazatomprom JSC

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report, 2018. NAC Kazatomprom JSC DELIVERING ON PROMISES. CREATING VALUE. ANNUAL REPORT / 2018 NAC Kazatomprom JSC ABOUT THIS REPORT The purpose of this Integrated Annual Report is to inform readers about the material aspects of the business of joint stock company (JSC) Kazatomprom (the Company), Kazakhstan’s national atomic company. With this report, the Company aims to help investors and other stakeholders understand how it formulates its development strategy, manages its operations, achieves its financial performance, ensures the long-term sustainability of its business and develops value for stakeholders and interested parties. It addresses the following questions. WHAT DO THE COMPANY, ITS SUBSIDIARIES, ASSOCIATES AND JOINT VENTURES DO? IN WHAT ENVIRONMENT DOES THE COMPANY OPERATE? HOW WILL THE COMPANY’S CORPORATE-GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE PROVIDE FOR VALUE CREATION FOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG TERM? WHAT IS THE COMPANY’S BUSINESS MODEL? WHAT ARE THE MAIN RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES INFLUENCING THE COMPANY’S ABILITY TO CREATE VALUE FOR STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SHORT, MEDIUM AND LONG TERM, AND HOW ARE THESE BEING MANAGED? WHAT ARE THE COMPANY’S GOALS, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES, AND HOW DOES IT INTEND TO ACHIEVE THEM? TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE COMPANY MET ITS GOALS, AIMS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD, AND WHAT HAS BEEN THE EFFECT ON ITS VALUATION FOR STAKEHOLDERS? WHAT ARE THE KEY CHALLENGES AND UNCERTAINTIES THE COMPANY IS LIKELY TO FACE IN PURSUING ITS DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY AND WHAT ARE THE POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR ITS BUSINESS MODEL AND FUTURE PERFORMANCE? NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 1 Contents CONTENTS KEY FIGURES. KEY INDICATORS — 2018 4 1. ABOUT THE COMPANY 26 2018 KEY EVENTS 6 STATEMENT OF THE CHAIR OF THE BOARD 1.1 Activity Profile 27 OF DIRECTORS 8 1.2 Main Products 28 STATEMENT OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 10 1.3 Company History 28 BUSINESS MODEL 12 1.4 Company Asset Structure 30 COMPANY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 15 1.5 Geography and Target Markets 32 BUSINESS TRANSFORMATION 19 1.6 Association Membership and International LISTING INFORMATION 21 Compliance 38 ABOUT KAZAKHSTAN 22 2. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW 40 2.1 Significant Factors Affecting Group Operating Results 42 2.2 Key Performance Indicators 47 2.3 Capital Expenditures Review 50 2.4 Reserves and Geological Surveys 53 2.5 Financial Analysis 54 2.6 Liquidity and Capital Resources 58 2.7 Indebtedness 62 2.8 Guidance for 2019 63 Sensitivity Analysis for 2019 64 2.9 Forward-looking Statements 65 3. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT 66 Programme of Sustainable Development 67 Sustainable Development Initiatives 69 Governance Diagnostics 69 3.1 Sustainable Economic Development 70 Created and Distributed Direct Economic Value 70 Science and Innovation 70 Economic Effect in Regions of Operation 71 Charity and Sponsorship 72 Procurement 72 3.2 Social Responsibility 74 Company Staff 74 Social Policy 79 Social Stability 81 Occupational Health and Safety 82 2 | Annual Report 2018 3.3 Environmental Responsibility 84 4.15 External Audit 132 Waste Management 85 Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions 87 5. ABOUT THIS REPORT 133 Energy Efficiency 87 Water Resources 88 5.1 Principles for Defining Report Content Nuclear Safety 89 and Subject Limitations 134 3.4 Development Plans 91 5.2 Essential Subjects 135 3.5 Interaction with the Stakeholders 93 5.3 Standards and Guidelines 137 5.4 External Verification 137 4. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS 98 6. INFORMATION FOR SHAREHOLDERS 141 4.1 Corporate Governance Structure 99 7. CONTACT INFORMATION 142 4.2 Corporate Governance Code 101 4.3 General Meeting of Shareholders 103 ANNEXES 143 4.4 Board of Directors 103 Composition of the Board of Directors 104 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 143 Changes in the Composition of the Board of Directors in 2018 108 INDEX OF GRI-COMPLIANT STANDARDS Activity of the Board of Directors 108 IN THIS REPORT 254 Assessment of the Activity of the Board of Directors 110 General Disclosures 254 Engagement of Independent Directors 110 Specific Disclosures 256 Committees of the Board of Directors 110 4.5 Management Board 115 GLOSSARY 259 Composition of the Management Board 115 Activity of the Management Board in 2018 120 Management Board Committees 121 4.6 Remuneration of Directors and Executives 123 4.7 Statement of Responsibility of Members of the Board of Directors and the Management Board 123 4.8 Employment Agreements of Senior Management 123 4.9 Conflicts of Interest 124 4.10 Internal Audit System 124 4.11 Organisational Structure of the Company’s Corporate Centre 124 4.12 Corporate Ethics 125 4.13 Risk Management and Internal Control 126 4.14 Information on Taxation in the United Kingdom 130 NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 3 Key Figures KEY FIGURES Key indicators — 2018 102-7 Uranium production output in volume Output of niobium terms (including all participations, products (tonnes of Nb) subsidiaries and affiliates) (tonnes) 11,476 25.6 PRODUCTION –5% 12,093 –5.2% 27 KAP2 2018 2017 2018 2017 Output of beryllium Output of tantalum products (tonnes of Be) products (tonnes of Ta) 1,711.7 131.7 1st 8% 1,585.2 –6% 140 Kazatomprom 2018 2017 2018 2017 uranium mining world ranking in 2017-2018 (in Electrical power Kazatomprom share of the global natural volume terms) output (million kWh)1 uranium mining market, (including all participations, subsidiaries and affiliates (%) 117.8 2.6% 114.8 9% 23% 2018 2018 2017 21% 2017 Revenue (KZT million) Operating profit (KZT million) 436,632 77,480 58% 277,046 138% 32,602 FINANCE 2018 2017 2018 2017 1 In 2018 operations of MAEK-Kazatomprom LLP were classified as discontinued. 4 | Annual Report 2018 Net profit Net debt/Adjusted (KZT million) EBITDA 380,266 0.54 173% 139,154 142% –1.3 2018 2017 2018 2017 Profitable mining investments Free float of shares (%) (100% base) (KZT billion) 81.5 8% 75.4 14.92% 2018 2018 2017 0% 2017 Net income per share (KZT/share) 1,435.0 169% 534.1 2018 2017 Number of employees Social security tax and social contributions (KZT million) 20,507 6,034 % 25,020 % 6,163 STAFF –18 –2 AND SOCIAL 2018 2017 2018 2017 RESPONSIBILITY Injury frequency rate (number of injuries per 1,000 employees) 0.15 52% 0.31 HEALTH AND SAFETY 2018 2017 NAC Kazatomprom JSC | 5 2018 Key Events 2018 KEY EVENTS 01 JANUARY 03 MARCH 07 JULY • 10 January 2018: The termination • 7 March 2018: A Memorandum of • 3 July 2018: NAC Kazatomprom JSC of the activities of Ulba FtorComplex Understanding is signed by NAC completes the sale of 100% of its LLC is registered by order of the Kazatomprom JSC and a consortium shares in MAEK-Kazatomprom LLP to Department of Justice of Ust- of Japanese companies (EAHL) in Nur- Samruk-Kazyna JSC. Kamenogorsk, Department of Justice Sultan (Astana), setting out the basic • 1 July 2018: In the corporate centre of East Kazakhstan region No. 41. conditions for the parties’ interaction of NAC Kazatomprom JSC and with respect to Baiken-U LLP, Kazatomprom-SaUran LLP a single Kyzylkum LLP and JV Kharasan-U LLP. integrated SAP system was put into operation. • 31 July 2018: Transition to new 02 FEBRUARY strategic planning and performance management processes completed. • 8 February 2018: The Board of 04 APRIL Directors of NAC Kazatomprom JSC approves a new development strategy • 4 April 2018: The termination of for 2018-2028. the activities of Geotechnoservice LLP is registered by Order of the 08 AUGUST Department of Justice of South Kazakhstan region No. 22. • 29 August 2018: Extraordinary General Meeting of the shareholders 03 MARCH in Ulba-Konversia LLP approves the voluntary liquidation of • 2 March 2018: The “Kazatomprom the legal entity. The liquidation Town Hall: In Lockstep with Time” 06 JUNE committee also approves decisions is held in the city of Shymkent, on the procedure for and terms of during which Galymzhan Pirmatov, • 29 June 2018: NAC Kazatomprom liquidation. Chairman of the Board of NAC JSC sells 100% of its shares in the Kazatomprom JSC, presents NAC authorised capital of KAES JSC to Kazatomprom JSC’s strategic Samruk-Kazyna JSC. priorities for 2018-2028, in line with • Transition to the target model the new development strategy. of personnel management was completed within the transformation programme. The project covers the corporate centre and 6 subsidiaries and affiliates. 6 | Annual Report 2018 09 SEPTEMBER 10 OCTOBER 12 DECEMBER • 3 September 2018: • 12 October 2018: NAC Kazatomprom • 13 December 2018: NAC Kazatomprom JSC signs an JSC signs an agreement to sell its NAC Kazatomprom JSC completes a agreement with EAHL, under which, 100% stake in the share capital of transaction to acquire 40.05% of the and under a number of specific Sareco LLP. The buyer is NMC Tau- shares of Energy Asia (BVI) Limited conditions, to buy 40.05% of Energy Ken Samruk JSC. (EAL) and 16.02% of shares in the Asia (BVI) Limited (owner of 95% of • Transition to the target model of authorised capital of JV Kharasan-U shares in the authorised capital of integrated security was completed LLP. Consequently, the Company’s Baiken-U LLP and 40% of shares in the within the transformation stake in Baiken-U LLP increases from authorised capital of Kyzylkum LLP) programme. The project covers the 5% to 52.5% (5% direct participation and 16.02% of shares in the authorised corporate centre and 6 subsidiaries and 47.5% indirectly through EAL), its capital of JV Kharasan-U LLP. and affiliates. stake in Kyzylkum LLP increases from • 28 September 2018: NAC • 15 October 2018: The integrated 30% to 50% (30% direct participation Kazatomprom JSC enters into an planning system has been put into and 20% indirectly through EAL) agreement to sell its 76% stake in commercial operation at the first-tier and its stake in JV Kharasan-U LLP the authorised capital of Kyzyltu LLP enterprises.
Recommended publications
  • 2020 Conflict Minerals Report
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM SD Specialized Disclosure Report O-I GLASS, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-9576 22-2781933 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) file number) Identification No.) One Michael Owens Way, Perrysburg, Ohio 43551 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (567) 336-5000 Mary Beth Wilkinson (567) 336-5000 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: ☒ Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2019. Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report A copy of the Conflict Minerals Report for O-I Glass, Inc. (the “Company”) is provided as Exhibit 1.01 hereto and is publicly available at www.o-i.com. The term “Company,” as used herein and unless otherwise stated or indicated by context, refers to Owens-Illinois, Inc. and its affiliates (“O-I”) prior to the Corporate Modernization (as defined below) and to O-I Glass, Inc. and its affiliates (“O-I Glass”) after the Corporate Modernization. On December 26 and 27, 2019, the Company implemented the Corporate Modernization (“Corporate Modernization”), whereby O-I Glass became the new parent entity with Owens-Illinois Group, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin No.146
    BULLETIN N° 146 ISSN 1019-2026 TANTALUM-NIOBIUM INTERNATIONAL STUDY CENTER PRESIDENT’S LETTER Quarterly Bulletin in electronic format Friends, After 146 issues in paper format, stretching back to the June, and the northern summer has fi nally arrived! The last few foundation of the association in 1974, the Executive months have seen several natural disasters in many parts of the world, Committee of the T.I.C. has decided that it is time for the from earthquakes, tornados, fl oods and fi res. Our sympathies to any quarterly Bulletin to enter the electronic era. of our members - be it their employees, families, or friends - who may have been impacted. With 1250 paper copies currently being sent around the world each quarter, not only to our member companies but also to In April, members of the Executive Committee met, along with our over 850 non-members, this change will bring a substantial Technical Promotion Offi cer and Secretary General, to review benefi t for the environment and reduce costs. plans for the Fifty-second General Assembly to be held in Almaty, Kazakhstan, on Monday October 17th. The T.I.C. meeting, technical programme and visits will extend from Sunday October 16th to This issue will therefore be the last on paper. Wednesday October 19th. The technical programme is taking shape, and as you will see from the list of papers elsewhere in this Bulletin, From September onwards, the nominated delegate of each it promises to be engaging and informative for both the niobium and member company will receive the document by e-mail, in pdf tantalum industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Risk Assessment : Central Asia After Independence
    FOI-R--1292--SE July 2004 ISSN 1650-1942 User report Björn Sandström Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence NBC Defence SE-901 82 Umeå SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY FOI-R--1292--SE NBC Defence July 2004 SE-901 82 Umeå ISSN 1650-1942 User report Björn Sandström Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence 2 Issuing organization Report number, ISRN Report type FOI – Swedish Defence Research Agency FOI-R--1292--SE User report NBC Defence Research area code SE-901 82 Umeå 3. NBC Defence and other hazardous substances Month year Project No. July 2004 A6131 Customers code 2. NBC Defence Research Sub area code 31 N research Author/s (editor/s) Project manager Björn Sandström Nils Olsson Approved by Åke Sellström Sponsoring agency Scientifically and technically responsible Nils Olsson Report title Nuclear Risk Assessment: Central Asia after Independence Abstract (not more than 200 words) From a nuclear weapons policy point-of-view, the Central Asian states, which formerly were part of the USSR, has created a lot positive, such as declaring the region as a nuclear-weapons-free zone, in their first decade of independence. The nuclear risks are still considerable, but in general the situation has greatly improved compared to 1991. Concerns regarding nuclear weapons have been eliminated. In addition, only a limited amount of weapons-grade nuclear material remains. Today, highly-enriched uranium and spent nuclear fuel elements are probably of most concern. With efforts by international assistance programs, that material now seems reasonably well-guarded. Industrial and medical radiation sources are also on the list of nuclear, or rather radiological, concerns in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM SD SPECIALIZED DISCLOSURE REPORT SONUS NETWORKS, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter) DELAWARE 001-34115 04-3387074 (State or Other Jurisdiction (Commission File Number) (IRS Employer of Incorporation) Identification No.) 4 TECHNOLOGY PARK DRIVE, WESTFORD, MASSACHUSETTS 01886 (Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code) Jeffrey M. Snider Senior Vice President, Chief Administrative Officer, General Counsel and Secretary (978) 614-8100 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: x Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Section 1 — Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01. Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report Sonus Networks, Inc. (the “Company,” “Sonus,” “we,” or “our”) has determined that some of the products that Sonus manufactures or contracts to manufacture include gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite and wolframite, including their derivatives, tantalum, tin and tungsten (“Conflict Minerals” or “3TG”), and that these Conflict Minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of these products. The Company conducted a Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”) to determine whether any of the Conflict Minerals in its products originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (“Covered Country”) and whether the Conflict Minerals are from recycled or scrap sources.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM SD Specialized Disclosure Report MTS SYSTEMS CORPORATION (Exact Name of registrant as specified in its charter) Minnesota 0-02382 41-0908057 (State or other jurisdiction of (Commission (IRS Employer incorporation or organization) File Number) Identification No.) 14000 Technology Drive, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Phyllis Nordstrom (952) 937-4005 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: ☒ Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01. Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report. A copy of the Conflict Minerals Report of MTS Systems Corporation (the ”Company”) for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 is provided as Exhibit 1.01 to this Form SD and is publicly available at http://www.mts.com/en/about/Ethics/index.htm. Item 1.02. Exhibits. As specified in Section 2, Item 2.01 of this Form SD, the Company is hereby filing its Conflict Minerals Report as Exhibit 1.01 to this report. Section 2 – Exhibits Item 2.01. Exhibits. The following exhibit is filed as part of this report: Exhibit 1.01 – Conflict Minerals Report of MTS Systems Corporation SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized undersigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Kazakhstan Nuclear Chronology
    Kazakhstan Nuclear Chronology 2010 | 2009-2000 | 1999-1990 Last update: August 2010 This annotated chronology is based on the data sources that follow each entry. Public sources often provide conflicting information on classified military programs. In some cases we are unable to resolve these discrepancies, in others we have deliberately refrained from doing so to highlight the potential influence of false or misleading information as it appeared over time. In many cases, we are unable to independently verify claims. Hence in reviewing this chronology, readers should take into account the credibility of the sources employed here. Inclusion in this chronology does not necessarily indicate that a particular development is of direct or indirect proliferation significance. Some entries provide international or domestic context for technological development and national policymaking. Moreover, some entries may refer to developments with positive consequences for nonproliferation. 2010 16 June 2010 It was announced that plans for a joint uranium enrichment center (UEC) between Kazakhstan and Russia located at the Angarsk Electro-Chemical Combine were dropped due to lack of economic feasibility. Reportedly, Kazakhstan may instead buy shares in one of Russia's four already operating enrichment centers. The UEC is separate from the international uranium enrichment center (IUEC) already operating in Angarsk. IUEC, created with the IAEA's approval, is meant to provide uranium enrichment for civilian purposes to states party to the NPT. Kazakhstan and Russia are already partners at the IUEC, with Rosatom owning 90%. Ukraine and Armenia are expected to join the project. — Judith Perera, "Change of plan on Kazakh uranium enrichment," McCloskey Nuclear Business, 16 June 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Minerals Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2020
    AtriCure, Inc. Conflict Minerals Report For the Year Ended December 31, 2020 This report for the year ended December 31, 2020 (the Reporting Period) is presented to comply with Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Rule). The Rule was adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to implement reporting and disclosure requirements related to conflict minerals as directed by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act). The Rule imposes certain reporting obligations on SEC registrants whose manufactured products contain conflict minerals which are necessary to the functionality or production of their products. Conflict minerals are defined as cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, gold, wolframite, and their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold (collectively, 3TG) for the purposes of this assessment. Additionally, this report is presented to comply with the Public Statement on the Effect of the Recent Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule issued by the Director of the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2014 and the Updated Statement on the Effect of the Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule issued on April 7, 2017, which states that companies must continue to comply with the requirements of Items 1.01(a) and (b) of Form SD, which require a description of the company’s reasonable country of origin inquiry, however, companies will not face enforcement actions if they fail to conduct due diligence on the source and chain of custody of conflict minerals required by Item 1.01(c) of Form SD (collectively, the SEC Statements).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Form
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM SD Specialized Disclosure Report SPX Corporation (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 1-6948 38-1016240 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File Number) Identification No.) 13320-A Ballantyne Corporate Place, Charlotte, North Carolina 28277 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) John W. Nurkin (980) 474-3804 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: x Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Section 1 — Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report Conflict Minerals Disclosure SPX Corporation (“SPX” or the “Company”) is filing this Form SD pursuant to Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the reporting period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”). Under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations, if any “conflict minerals” (as defined below) are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by the Company or contracted by the Company to be manufactured, the Company must conduct in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry (“RCOI”) regarding those “conflict minerals” that is reasonably designed to determine whether any of the “conflict minerals” originated in the Covered Countries (as defined below) or are from recycled or scrap sources.
    [Show full text]
  • EX-1.01 2 A19-8840 1Ex1d01.Htm EX-1.01 Exhibit 1.01
    EX-1.01 2 a19-8840_1ex1d01.htm EX-1.01 Exhibit 1.01 Conflict Minerals Report of Celestica Inc. For the reporting period from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 This Conflict Minerals Report (“CMR”) of Celestica Inc. (“Celestica” or the “Company”) has been prepared pursuant to Rule 13p-1 (“Rule 13p- 1”) and Form SD promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, for the reporting period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. Introduction Rule 13p-1 requires disclosure of certain information when a company manufactures or contracts to manufacture products for which the minerals specified in such Rule are necessary to the functionality or production of those products. The specified minerals are gold, columbite-tantalite (coltan), cassiterite and wolframite, including their derivatives, which are limited to tantalum, tin and tungsten (the “Conflict Minerals”). The “Covered Countries” for the purposes of Rule 13p-1 are the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the Republic of the Congo, the Central African Republic, South Sudan, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania, Zambia and Angola. Celestica is a multinational electronics manufacturing services (“EMS”) and supply chain solutions company headquartered in Toronto, Canada. The Company’s global network is comprised of approximately 30 sites in 15 countries in North America, Europe and Asia. The Company manufactures, or contracts to manufacture, certain products for which Conflict Minerals are necessary to their functionality or production. Celestica builds products for a wide variety of leading OEM (original equipment manufacturer) customers and other customers, to be marketed under the customers’ brands. Typically, the customer specifies all parts to be included in the product through an Approved Vendor List (“AVL”).
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities And
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 Form SD Specialized Disclosure Report Cummins Inc. Indiana 1-4949 35-0257090 (State or other Jurisdiction of (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Incorporation) Identification No.) 500 Jackson Street P. O. Box 3005 Columbus, IN 47202-3005 (Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code) Mark Sifferlen, Vice President of Ethics and Compliance & Corporate Secretary, (812) 377-5000 (Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this report.) Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies: ☒ Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2016. Section 1 – Conflict Minerals Disclosure Item 1.01 Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report Conflict Minerals Disclosure The Company performed a reasonable country of origin inquiry, in which it surveyed over 900 direct suppliers regarding whether its necessary cassiterite, columbite-tantalite, wolframite, gold, and their derivatives, which are limited to tin, tantalum, tungsten, and gold (3TG or Conflict Minerals), have been sourced from the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country (Covered Countries). Most of the responses the Company received indicated that the 3TG in the suppliers’ components and materials either 1) did not originate from a Covered Country, 2) were not necessary to the functionality of the components and materials or 3) the source country was undeterminable. In addition, 28 direct suppliers informed the Company that their 3TG originated from scrap or recycled sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Complexes in Russia and Kazakhstan: Prospects for Development and Cooperation
    Nuclear Energy Complexes in Russia and Kazakhstan: Prospects for Development and Cooperation Industry Report April 4, 2008 Eurasian Development Bank (EDB) is an international financial institution established with a view to facilitate economic growth and integration processes in Eurasia. The Bank was founded by intergovernmental agreement signed in January 2006 by Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Negotiations are currently underway with a number of neighboring countries. Electric power, water and energy, transportation infrastructure and high-tech and innovative industries are the key areas for Bank’s financing activity. The Bank, as part of its mission, provides quality research and analysis of contemporary development issues and trends in the region with particular focus on Eurasian integration. The Bank conducts regular conferences and round tables addressing various aspects of integration. During 2007, the Bank in partnership with ITAR-TASS and EurAsEC published monthly analytical journal The Continent of Partnership. Archives of this publication for 2007 are available at www.eabr.org. In 2008, the Bank launched quarterly academic and analytical Journal of Eurasian Integration and an annual almanac EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook. In addition, every fortnight new issues of information digest are released covering regional integration, development banks’ activities and investment projects in the post-Soviet space. The Bank’s Strategy and Research Department also publishes detailed Industry and Country Analytical Reports. It also plans to realize a number of research and technical assistance projects. “Development of the Eurasian Integration Index” will be the first in the project pipeline. Address: Republic of Kazakhstan, 050000, Almaty, Panfilov St, 98 Eurasian Development Bank Tel.: +7 (727) 244 40 44 ext.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Minerals Yearbook
    2007 Minerals Yearbook BERYLLIUM U.S. Department of the Interior May 2010 U.S. Geological Survey BERYLLIUM By Brian W. Jaskula Domestic survey data and tables were prepared by Alan Ray, statistical assistant, and the world production table was prepared by Lisa D. Miller, international data coordinator. U.S. mine shipments of beryllium ore in 2007 decreased to 3 years and would require additional title III approval (Brush slightly from those of the previous year, while ore consumption Engineered Materials Inc., 2008a, p. 37). for the production of beryllium hydroxide increased (table 1). National Defense Stockpile.—The United States maintained The Defense National Stockpile Center (DNSC) of the U.S. a stockpile of strategic materials for use during a national Department of Defense offered and sold selected beryllium emergency. As of December 31, 2007, the NDS goal for hot- materials from the National Defense Stockpile (NDS). On the pressed beryllium metal powder was 45 metric tons (t) (table 2). basis of estimated contained beryllium, total U.S. imports of A goal of 155 t of hot-pressed beryllium metal powder, however, beryllium materials were higher and total U.S. exports were had been proposed in the 2003 National Defense Stockpile lower than those of 2006. Requirements Report to the Congress. The Annual Materials Beryllium is gray in color and one of the lightest metals. Plan for fi scal year 2007, which represented the maximum Its other physical and mechanical properties—outstanding quantities of beryllium materials that could be sold from stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, one of the October 1, 2006, through September 30, 2007, was unchanged highest melting points of all light metals, high specifi c heat, from that of fi scal year 2006 (table 2).
    [Show full text]