.rri\ o ilRt< t{-+crs] f/s sftq,rt RICHT TO 4q H INFORMATION INFORMATION COMMISSION

BEFORE THE COURT OF DR.JORAM BEGI, STATE CHIEF INFORMATION COMMISSIONER No.APlC-123/2020 Dated, ltanagar the 5th January' 2O2I

Under Section 19(3) RTI Act, 2005

Appellant Respondent

Shri Amin Danggen, Shri Nakyam Tasing, Village-Simong, The PIO-cum-DDSE, Po/Ps Yingkiong, O/o DDSE, Near DC Office Upper , Vs Yingkiong, Arunachal Pradesh. , (m) 7528062354 Arunachal Pradesh.

Dated of hearing held on: 5th January' 2021'

ORDER

whereas, an appeal under section 19(3) of RTI Act, 2005 has been received from shri Amin Danggen, Village-simong, PolPs Yingkiong, Upper siang District, Arunachal pradesh, for non-furnishing of information, by The Plo-cum-DDSE, O/o DDSE, Near DC office Yingkiong, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, as sought, by the Appellant under section 6(1) of RTI Act, 2005 on O5/O8/20I9.

Whereas, the 1't hearing was held through online video / audio conference on 10*h November'202O. Shri Nakyam Tasing, the PIO-cum-DDSE, O/o DDSE, Near DC Office yingkiong, Upper siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, appeared in the hearing through online video conferencing and the Appellant Shri Amin Danggen attended the hearing through online audio conferencing. The PIO informed the Commission that he has taken over the Charge of The PIO-cum-DDSE Yingkiong in the month of December'2O19. The information was sought on 5tn August'2O2l and also the APIO did not bring the matter before the notice of the PlO. However, after receiving the summon from the Commission the PIO has kept all the information ready to be given to the Appellant' The PIO also asked the Appellant to be specific in seeking information as the information sought at Sl.no. 4 of the Form A is clumsY.

Whereas, the Commission directed the PIO to furnish all the correct, complete and Appellant authenticated information as sought by the Appellant in the Form A to the within ten days from the date of issue of this order free of cost. The Commission also directed the plO to give in writing for the information which are not available in the the office record. The Commission asked the Appellant to collect the information from office of the PIO-cum-DDSE, Yingkiong latest by 17th November'2020' The Commission also asked the Appellant to go through the information and convey his satisfaction or dissatisfaction in the next date of hearing. Contd..o..2 -2-

Whereas, the 2nd hearing was held through online video / audio conference on 24th November'2o2o. Shri Nakyam Tasing, the PIO-cum-DDSE, O/o DDSE, Near DC Office Danggen Yingkiong, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, and the Appellant Shri Amin informed the appeared in the hearing through online video conferencing. The Appellant the Commission that the PIO has not furnished complete information for Sl'no' f i'e' with details of infrastructure i.e. school Building, staff, qtrs., playground, furniture etc photograph; sl.no. 3. i.e. School wise detail of govt. schemes, projects, maintenance works and infrastructure development executed / provided by Govt. (state or central) to any and sl.no. 5. i.e. whether any govt defunct schools have been handed over satisfied with organisation, department, NGOs etc. The Appellant also informed that he is to rest of the information furnished by the Plo. The Plo appealed the commission spread exempt photographs of schools as there are total no. of one hundred four schools also appealed over the district, and no such photographs are being maintained. The Plo in the commission to give one month time to collect information from various schools the district and furnish the information to the Appellant' to whereas, the commission after hearing both the parties asked the Appellant for the Sl'no' exempt photographs of schools and directed the PIO to furnish information furniture; 1i.e. the details of infrastructure i.e. School Building, staff, qtrs., playground, 5. give in writing sl.no. 3. Govt. schemes, project against each school if any and for 5l.no. to the Appellant in details on or before 20th December'202O' The Commission also asked the Appellant to receive the information go through and convey his satisfaction or dissatisfaction before next date of hearing.

Whereas, the 3'd hearing was held on 5th January'2021. Shri Nakyam Tasing, the plo-cum-DDSE, O/o DDSE, Near DC Office Yingkiong, Upper siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, and the Appellant shri Amin Danggen attended the hearing in persons. The Appellant informed the Commission that the PIO has furnished all the information and the Appellant is satisfied with the information furnished by the PIO'

Therefore, the case is hereby disposed of' sd/_ (Dr.Joram Begi) State Chief Information Commissioner Arunachal Pradesh lnformation Commission Itanagar M emo N o.AP tc-723 I 2o2o/'db Dated, ltanagar the 4 January'2O21 Copy to: L. Shri Nakyam Tasing, The PIO-cum-DDSE, O/o DDSE, Near DC Office Yingkiong, Upper Siang District, Arunachal Pradesh, 2. Shri Amin Danggen, Village-Simong, Po/Ps Yingkiong, Upper Siang District, Aru-pach-al Pradesh, -omputer Programmer, APIC, ltanagar, to upload in APIC Website, Case file.

Go({\ntPto Registrar / Arunachal Pradesh m ission