Archifacts October 1994

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archifacts October 1994 OBJECTS OF THE ASSOCIATION The objects of the Association shall be: i. To foster the care, preservation, and proper use of archives and records, both public and private, and their effective administration. ii. To arouse public awareness of the importance of records and archives and in all matters affecting their preservation and use, and to co-operate or affiliate with any other bodies in New Zealand or elsewhere with like objects. iii . To promote the training of archivists, records keepers, curators, librarians and others by the dissemination of specialised knowledge and by encouraging the provision of adequate training in the administration and conservation of archives and records. iv. To encourage research into problems connected with the use, administration and conservation of archives and records and to promote the publication of the results of this research. v. To promote the standing of archives institutions. vi. To advise and support the establishment of archives services throughout New Zealand. vii. To publish a journal at least once a year and other publications in furtherance of these objects. ARCHIFACT S Published by the Archives and Records Association of New Zealand 94 ARCHIFACT S Editor: Susan Skudder Editorial Committee: David Green Michael Hoare Gavin McLean Bruce Ralston Reviews Editor: David Green Archifacts is published twice-yearly, in April and October. Articles and correspondence should be addressed to the Editor at: P.O. Box 31553 Wellington intending contributors should obtain a style sheet from the Editor. Printed by Wright and Carman Ltd, Upper Hütt, New Zealand Copyright ARANZ 1994 ISSN 0303-7940 Contents Editoria l í Mor e Perspectives on the Ham Report Ken Scadden Smalkr Institutions 1 Trish Oliff , Bruce Symondson Records Managers 5 Rachel Lilburn The Ham Report: Miniskirt or Maxi? 21 Business and Archives David Retter Doubtful Guests: Business Archives in Research Libraries 35 S. R. Strachan Worlds in Collision 47 Letter to the Editor Robin M. Startup Burn? Bury? or Donate? 52 Book Reviews 54 Accessions 70 Archives and Records Association of New Zealand Inc. P.O. Box 11-553, Manners Street, Wellington, New Zealand Patron Her Excellency Dame Catherine Tizard, GCMG, DBE Governor General of New Zealand Council President Sheryl Morgan Massey University Library, Palmerston North Vice Peter Miller 114 Evans Street, Presidents Opoho, Dunedin, Thérèse Angelo c/- Royal NZ Airforce Museum, RNZAF Base Wigram, Private Bag, Christchurch Secretary Philippa Fogarty c/- National Archives, P.O. Box 12050, Wellington Treasur Michael Hoare Police Centennial Museum, Royal NZ Police College Private Bag, Porirua Membership Thérèse Angelo c/- Royal NZ Airforce Museum, Secretary RNZAF Base Wigram, Private Bag, Christchurch Council Alison Fraser P.O. Box 2907, Wellington Jan Gow P.O. Box 25025, Auckland 5 Tiena Jordan Whakatane District Museum, P.O. Box 203, Whakatane Margaret Morgan Registry, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin Brad Patterson 20 Khyber Road, Seatoun, Wellington 3 Mark Stoddart Regional Archivist, P.O. Box 91220, Auckland Jane Tucker 53 Moana Road, Highbury, Wellington EDITORIA L This issue of Archifacts is something of a miscellany. First, we have the remaining papers from the seminar on the Ham Report, for which there was not room in the April issue. We also publish a paper by David Retter from the Stout Centre seminar on Business Archives, which was somehow omitted from the October 1993 issue. The paper, on the Alexander Turnbull Library's holdings of business archives, complements Peter Miller's on the Hocken's holdings, and includes a very useful list of the business archives in the Turnbull Library. The editorial team apologises to David for the omission of his paper. Rachel Lilbum's article on the Ham Report was not a paper presented at the seminar in March. Rachel provides the unique viewpoint of one who is now a provider of archival education, and has been a working archivist and a recipient of archival education. Her views make a valuable addition to the discussion on archival education. Finally, we have a paper on collection valuation presented by Stuart Strachan to the ARANZ conference in Wellington in August 1993. The requirement to place a monetary value on archival holdings now affects National Archives, the Alexander Turnbull Library and the Hocken Library. As one who has had some involvement in collection valuation, I fee that we do need to talk about the process, what it means for us and how it relates to our core archival work. I hope that Stuart's paper will be a starting point for that discussion. In this issue we also provide an example of that rarest of beasts— a letter to the editor of Archifactsl We hope that this is the beginning of a trend. This is the last issue from this particular version of the editorial committee. Neither Bruce Ralston nor I will be continuing our involvement, mainly because we feel that our other commitments mean that we cannot give the energy and time that Archifacts deserves. David Green will revert to being Reviews Editor only. The other members of the team will be continuing, and the search has begun for others to join them. I look forward to the next issue and wish the team well. Mor e Perspectives on the Ham Report Smaller Institution s Ken Scadden Wellington Maritime Museum Like many of you I was directly involved in the abortive Training Review back in 1987. I strongly support the concept of a Training Report and was involved as a member of the Sole Charge/Small Institution Working Party. I hope that this report will not become a point of contention between groups or individuals for political purposes. It was largely to avoid such problems, I suspect, that ARANZ brought in an independent consultant. My first reaction was that there are no real surprises. Nevertheless, it is a good solid effort which covers all the bases. In some respects, however, it may not go far enough towards taking archival training into the twenty- first century. It could have been written by many archivists practising in New Zealand today, but for reasons alluded to earlier this was done by an overseas expert. Let us ignore the 'colonial cringe/overseas expert telling us what to do syndrome' we may be suffering from. We must make the best of this opportunity—we may not get another! Whether we care to admit it or not, overseas influences have had a major influence on archives development in New Zealand e.g. the Smith Report, the founding of ARANZ and postgraduate training. Section V is where the substance begins. My initial reaction was that pegging our training on a postgraduate qualification was being overambitious, but careful reconsideration shows that this is the best strategy. We need a strong intellectual spearhead for the profession, and this graduate-level qualification will provide it. The 'Past Training' paragraph notes that in the USA, Canada and Australia, pre-employment training has only comparatively recently been seen as a prerequisite to beginning archives work. I agree that we must follow suit. We also need to have parity with overseas colleagues. We must establish the qualification mark at a level sufficiently high to 1 Archifacts enable us to play a full role on the international archives stage; in meetings with international colleagues, contributions of articles to archives journals, etc. The impact on the profession in New Zealand made by the graduates from the University of New South Wales and elsewhere shows that a postgraduate qualification is the absolute minimum desirable standard. Furthermore, if the profession is to attain and then maintain parity with other professions, notably librarians and museum workers, a postgraduate course is essential. In the area of programme delivery I was intrigued by the range of options. In spite of the need for a graduate-level training course, my gut feeling is that the greatest training need for the greatest number of archivists is for a polytech-level course which could be made available for people who are working full- or part-time as archivists. The report does not go far enough for these people. Wellington is the logical place for the postgraduate course but I am not convinced that the School of Librarianship at Victoria University is the ideal venue, at least without major reform. In a School of Librarianship, the archives course is bound to be the poor relation. Major structural change would be needed to give archival training an equal status. In the case of the Wellington Maritime Museum I do not see the possibility in the foreseeable future of recruiting.an archivist with a postgraduate qualification who would be solely employed in archives work. When I was last looking at recruiting staff, I was asked whether I would employ an archivist, a librarian or a museum professional—my answer was preferably all three rolled into one. Versatility is the key in a small institution. At this stage none of my staff would be able to undertake a postgraduate archives diploma. Several non-graduates may be interested in a polytech-level certificate : or short block course or part-time training. I am not totally convinced by arguments that a polytech-level course and a postgraduate diploma could not coexist, although resources would obviously be a problem. The report pays littl e attention to the training undertaken by other arts and cultural heritage professionals. Investigations should be undertaken to see if common-core subjects (e.g. conservation, computerisation, biculturalism, etc) for archives, museum and library para-professionals could be taught jointly. The Whitireia Polytechnic in Porirua has a course which, if modified, could become a model. The option of a national archival institute is attractive. It could accommodate a range of training options, and would take training away from the avarice of polytechs and universities.
Recommended publications
  • Out of This World
    TURANGALÎLA OPERA’S MESSIAEN’S ANTIHERO THE AGE OF ADÈS MASTERPIECE DON GIOVANNI’S DISCOVERING COMES TO NEW RELEVANCE BOLD NEW MUSICAL AUCKLAND I N 2019 HORIZONS SUMMER 2019 VOL.42 NO.1 your free copy OUT OF THIS WORLD APO CONCERTMASTER ANDREW BEER PREPARES TO PUSH THE LIMITS OF VIRTUOSITY We’re taking you behind the headlines Get the inside story from our journalists bringing you all the news that matters. Watch now at nzherald.co.nz/journalists apo.co.nz 3 UPFRONT WITH BARBARA GLASER 15 Bach and Beyond 4 APO NEWS Swedish conductor Sofi Jeannin talks about the demands of a unique Easter concert 7 Auckland Philharmonia Redefining Nature Orchestra 16 PO Box 7083 The orchestra takes you up close Wellesley St to the Animal Kingdom Antihero for the Ages Auckland 1141 ‘The opera of all operas’ in 2019 Phone (09) 638 6266 APO Ticketing (09) 623 1052 [email protected] 18 apo.co.nz aporchestra Chauffeur to the Stars @aporchestra Tony Waring drives APO guests aporchestra in style Patrons Dame Kiri Te Kanawa, DBE, ONZ Dame Catherine Tizard, GCMG, GCVO, DBE, ONZ, QSO 8 19 Sir James Wallace, KNZM, ONZM Dame Rosanne Meo, DNZM The Nature of Love Vice Patron Sonic Riches Composer Ken Young discusses Dame Jenny Gibbs, DNZM, OBE A deep dive into Messiaen’s his new collaboration with Witi Auckland Philharmonia masterpiece Turangalîla Ihimaera Orchestra Board Geraint A. Martin (Chair) Symphony Leigh Auton DEVELOPMENT NEWS Richard Ebbett 20 Lope Ginnen CONTENTS Pare Keiha 11 21 CONNECTING NEWS Kieran Raftery QC Eric Renick Soloist on a High-Wire Julian Smith
    [Show full text]
  • 2.2 the MONARCHY Republican Sentiment Among New Zealand Voters, Highlighting the Social Variables of Age, Gender, Education
    2.2 THE MONARCHY Noel Cox and Raymond Miller A maturing sense of nationhood has caused some to question the continuing relevance of the monarchy in New Zealand. However, it was not until the then prime minister personally endorsed the idea of a republic in 1994 that the issue aroused any significant public interest or debate. Drawing on the campaign for a republic in Australia, Jim Bolger proposed a referendum in New Zealand and suggested that the turn of the century was an appropriate time symbolically for this country to break its remaining constitutional ties with Britain. Far from underestimating the difficulty of his task, he readily conceded that 'I have picked no sentiment in New Zealand that New Zealanders would want to declare themselves a republic'. 1 This view was reinforced by national survey and public opinion poll data, all of which showed strong public support for the monarchy. Nor has the restrained advocacy for a republic from Helen Clark, prime minister from 1999, done much to change this. Public sentiment notwithstanding, a number of commentators have speculated that a New Zealand republic is inevitable and that any move in that direction by Australia would have a dramatic influence on public opinion in New Zealand. Australia's decision in a national referendum in 1999 to retain the monarchy raises the question of what effect, if any, that decision had on opinion on this side of the Tasman. In this chapter we will discuss the nature of the monarchy in New Zealand, focusing on the changing role and influence of the Queen's representative, the governor-general, together with an examination of some of the factors that might have an influence on New Zealand becoming a republic.
    [Show full text]
  • DOWNLOAD NZSO ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Annual Report
    Annual Report 2013 FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 Presented to Hon. Christopher Finlayson Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage 1 To our NZSO Supporters: Thank You. Maestro Circle ($10,000+) Fehl Charitable Trust Mark Barrow Museum Art Hotel Denis & Verna Adam Ian Fraser & Suzanne Snively Michael & Judith Bassett Lorriane Nicholls & Donald & Susan Best Dr John Grigor Philippa Bates Geoff Taylor Sir Roderick & Robin Henderson Patricia Bollard Philip & Viola Palmer Gillian, Lady Deane James & Karen Henry Hugh & Jill Brewerton Barbara Peddie Peter & Carolyn Diessl Les & the late Patricia Jenny Brown Alan & Luba Perry Emma & Jack Griffin Holborow Mary Brown Lady Glennis Pettigrew Charitable Trust Tomas & Jan Huppert Kate M Burtt Tony Reeve The FAME Trust Morgan Patricia Jones Adrienne Bushell John & Helen Rimmer JBWere Annette & Ralph Lendrum Malcolm & Margaret Carr Nigel & Heather Roberts Mary Fitzwilliam Award David Lord & Tracy Grant Lord Noel Carroll Miles Rogers Michael Mongahan Young Ian Macalister Angela Caughey Judith Ross Musicians Foundation Athol & Ngaire Mann Joan Caulfield & Graham Hill Marcus & Eve Rudkin Reeves Harris Orchestra Fund Christopher & Jilly Marshall Dion Church Warwick Slinn Take Note Trust Piera McArthur Lady Patricia Clark Robyn Smith Anonymous (1) Michael McCarthy Jeremy Commons Trevor Smith Campbell McLachlan & Rhona Prue Cotter Martin & Catherine Spencer Virtuoso Circle ($5,000+) Fraser Michael & Marie Crooke Peter & Kay Squires Julian & Selma Arnhold Patricia Morrison QSM Richard & Valerie Crooks Vanessa
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue 2015 with Handbook
    Catalogue 2015 with Handbook The Book Discussion Scheme is a member of the Federation of Workers Educational Associations in Aotearoa New Zealand / Te Whetereihana o nga Kaimahi Akoranga o Aotearoa Contents About Us Welcome ............................................................................................................................................... (i) Handbook Highlights ............................................................................................................................ (ii)-(iv) Book Catalogue Fiction (A-Z) ..................................................................................................................................... 5-71 Non-fiction (A-Z) ............................................................................................................................. 72-104 Index by title .................................................................................................................................... 106-114 Index by author ................................................................................................................................ 115-122 Membership Costs ........................................................................................................................... 123 About Us We’re unique! The Book Discussion Scheme (BDS) is unique in New Zealand. We are the only nationwide organisation that specialises in book groups. We are a not-for-profit organisation with a 40-year track record. What we offer We lend books and discussion
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017 for the Year Ended 31 December 2017
    G.69 ANNUAL REPORT 2017 FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017 NEW ZEALAND SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA TE TIRA PŪORO O AOTEAROA TO OUR NZSO SUPPORTERS: Thank you. MAESTRO CIRCLE Drs JD & SJ Cullington Michael & Judith Bassett Carla & John Wild Denis & Verna Adam Mark De Jong Danielle Bates Anna Wilson Julian & Selma Arnhold Alfie & Susie des Tombe Philippa Bates Anita Woods Lisa Bates MNZM & Douglas Hawkins Christopher Downs & Matthew Nolan Patricia Bollard Barbara Wreford Rex Benson Michiel During & Cathy Ferguson Hugh & Jill Brewerton Dr Alan Wright Donald & Susan Best Tania Dyett Corinne Bridge-Opie Mr Christopher Young Peter Biggs CNZM & Mary Biggs Stephen & Virginia Fisher JE Brown Anonymous (18) Sir Roderick & Gillian, Lady Deane J. S. Fleming Mary E Brown Peter Diessl ONZM & Carolyn Diessl Ian Fraser & Suzanne Snively Robert Carew Dame Bronwen Holdsworth DNZM Belinda Galbraith Noel Carroll VINCENT ASPEY SOCIETY Dr Hylton Le Grice CNZM, OBE Russell & Judy Gibbard Stuart & Lizzie Charters (NOTIFIED LEGACIES) & Ms Angela Lindsay Michael & Creena Gibbons Lorraine & Rick Christie Leslie Austin Peter & Joanna Masfen Mrs Patricia Gillion Lady Patricia Clark Vivian Chisholm Paul McArthur & Danika Charlton Dagmar Girardet Jeremy Commons & the late Gillian Clark-Kirkcaldie Julie Nevett Garry & Susan Gould David Carson-Parker Bryan Crawford Les Taylor QC Laurence Greig Prue Cotter Murray Eggers Anonymous (2) Dr Elizabeth Greigo Colin & Ruth Davey D J Foley Dr John Grigor Rene de Monchy Maggie Harris Cliff Hart David & Gulie Dowrick Eric Johnston & Alison
    [Show full text]
  • Fraser and Churchill: a Working Partnership Between Two Prime Ministers
    Fraser and Churchill: A Working Partnership Between Two Prime Ministers GERALD HENSLEY Mr. Hensley was a New Zealand diplomat (1958-80), who subsequently served two premiers as head of the Prime Minister's Department and was Secretary of Defence. Retiring in 1999, he was honoured by being appointed a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit. A prolific writer on Pacific and Asian affairs, he is the author of a memoir, Final Approaches (2006); Beyond the Battlefield (2009), a history of New Zealand's relations with its World War II allies; and Friendly Fire (2013), on nuclear politics and the collapse of ANZUS, 1984-87. hey couldn’t have been more different in outlook and in background—yet TWinston Churchill and Peter Fraser had greatness, a quality more easily Churchill with Fraser and General Eisenhower on a visit to Allied troops recognised than pinned down, but on the eve of D-Day, May 1944. which might be summed up as the ALEXANDER TURNBULL LIBRARY ability to rise to any large occasion. FINEST HOUR 161 / 18 -oth Britain and New Zealand acquired their true dreamy and leisurely rumination on the obvious,” with B-war leaders after war had broken out—and both decisions bundled hastily together at the close. almost by accident. Neither Winston Churchill nor Peter Fraser had been heads of government, and both were dis- trusted by large elements of their own parties. But for both countries, half the globe away from each other, World War II was the direst emergency of their existence. Michael Joseph Savage, Both sensed the need for someone who could rise to the New Zealand Prime challenge, and both were lucky that the lottery of politics Minister 1935-1940.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dictatorship of Taste
    A Dictatorship of Taste Cultural Nationalism and the Function of the Critic 1947-1961 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of The Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in English in the University of Canterbury By Anne-Maree Mills University of Canterbury 2009 In terms of some green myth, sailing or drowning, Each day makes clear a statement to the next; But to make out our tomorrow from its motives Is pure guessing, yesterday’s were so mixed. Sailing or drowning, the living and the dead, Less than the gist of what has just been said. (‘Sailing or Drowning’, Allen Curnow, 1940). Criticism is much criticised. But this logically establishes its title to exist. Criticism never decides anything. It is an argument. The argument goes on. (W. W. Robson, 1982:56) For New Zealand, then, these islands in the south-west Pacific, the growth of national feeling has meant a double exploration of the independence, in the region of politics – in the widest sense – and in the region of the mind. In either case, within the broad stream of the British tradition, the history of the country has been the history of its discovery – a discovery continuing still – of a tradition of its own. (‘The Development of New Zealand Nationality’, J. C. Beaglehole, 1954:122) i Contents Acknowledgements ii. Abstract iii. Introduction 1 Chapter One: An Absurd Ambition 12 1. Bread and butter criticism: ‘Bookmen’ and culture critics 2. Cultural Antennae: Phoenix and Tomorrow 3. The Centennial 4. Cultural authority and the professionalization of Librarianship 5. Heenan 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Cook Island Migration to New Zealand, 1920-1950
    The Origins of Cook Island Migration to New Zealand, 1920-1950 Rosemary Anderson A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Master of Arts in History at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand September 2014 Abstract It is a little known fact that New Zealand was both a British colony and imperial power in the Pacific during the twentieth century. From 1901 to 1965, under the pretext of a civilising mission, New Zealand exercised moral responsibility for the Cook Islands. Beneficent overtones concealed the colony’s quest for territory and power, and political rhetoric continues to ignore the deficiencies and injustices of their former rule. As patriotic British subjects, and nominal citizens of New Zealand, the Cook Islanders looked to their colonial rulers for a pathway into the modern world. Contact with administrators, teachers, traders and missionaries instilled a sense of kinship, and mass movement to New Zealand in the post-war era is a recognised consequence of these historic ties. This migration is generally regarded as an immediate response to employment opportunities at that time. This thesis explores the social realities of New Zealand’s colonial relationship with the Cook Islands. It draws primarily on the records of the Island Territories Department to address issues of citizenship and status in relation to the Cook Islands’ people. Efforts to control population movement and monitor Cook Islanders in New Zealand bring the powers of New Zealand officials under scrutiny. This approach uncovers the nature of New Zealand rule, and exposes the political and socioeconomic forces that fostered Island discontent. Focusing on the dissemination of knowledge, this history traces the Islanders evolving awareness of the wider world from the time of European contact.
    [Show full text]
  • Government in New Zealand, 1940–511
    4 An Age of the Mandarins? Government in New Zealand, 1940–511 John R . Martin The passage of more than half a century allows us to view the period following the end of the Second World War until the 1950s genuinely as history. Research materials, principally in archives, are supplemented by official histories, and biographies, with a few interviews enriching the story. I have been struck by the number of leading public servants of the period who were still in office during the 1950s and 1960s and who influenced the public service in which I spent 35 years. I was privileged to have known a number of them. In this chapter, after sketching the political and economic situation in New Zealand in 1945, I identify two principal challenges – managing the economy and national development – facing the Labour Government led by Peter Fraser. I also examine changes in organising government business made after the National Government came to office late in 1949. I then describe briefly the state of the public service as New Zealand emerged from the war. I consider the role played by several prominent public servants – a team to set against the Seven Dwarfs – and reflect on what we know about their working relationships with ministers. In essence, the picture is, first, of a group of outstanding and long-serving public servants who worked very closely with Prime Minister Fraser and his deputy, Walter Nash, the minister of finance, through the war and afterwards. With the change of government in 1949, the close, personal and somewhat haphazard methods of working under Labour were succeeded by a more conventional (in the Westminster model) relationship between ministers and officials, conducted within a more formal machinery for the handling of Cabinet business – a change sought unsuccessfully by officials when the Labour Government was in office.2 1 In writing this chapter I have benefited greatly from discussions with Dr Brian Easton, Professor Gary Hawke, Sir Frank Holmes and Mr Noel Lough.
    [Show full text]
  • Bernard Ashwin Secretary to the Nation Building State
    Bernard Ashwin Secretary to the nation building State BRIAN EASTON which he signed. But while he told the Royal Commission he never signed a paper unless he agreed with its con­ ERNARD CARL ASHWIN (1896-1975), founder of the tents, it is what is left unsaid that is often the more impor­ Bmodern Treasury, was one of New Zealand's great tant. In addition there are also various contemporary re­ civil servants, and perhaps the most influential from the marks and memoirs which fill out the picture. Some 1930s to June 1955, when younger colleagues are he retired as Secretary.' alive today, and have Keith Sinclair's biography kindly added to the record. of Nash has only a hand­ Enough to write a full ful of brief references, but biography? Possibly, al­ one says revealingly, though perhaps not 'Fraser ruled in very close enough to capture the consultation with the Fed­ whole of Ashwin. Al­ eration of Labour. The though there is little mate­ other powers in the land rial about his personal life were Waiter Nash and - perhaps as should be for Bernard Ash win.'' The as­ he was a public servant - sessment is echoed by some elements are appar­ John Martin: '[h]e was ent: a simple diction often clearly one of a small using the common ver­ group- Nash, Fraser, and nacular, even to the Royal Walsh being the others - Commission on Banking who were at the centre of (which contrasts with the the decision making proc­ ornate language of his 1926 ess'-' In Ashwin's case that memoir}, and a dry, some­ 'central role' continued times irreverent, sense of into the early years of the humour.
    [Show full text]
  • A Year in Review 2014
    FACULTY OF LAW A YEAR IN REVIEW 2014 WELCOME TO ANOTHER EDITION OF V.ALUM IT HAS BEEN A GREAT PLEASURE and privilege to be Pro-Vice Chancellor and Dean of Victoria’s Faculty of Law for more than eight years. It is astonishing to look back and see what has been achieved, with the highlight being the 2013 PBRF result as the best law faculty in New Zealand for research. This year, that achievement continues with the awarding of two substantial Marsden Grants and recognition in the Legal Research Foundation’s writing awards. It is not always an easy course, steering any faculty of a university. This was particularly the case when we take into account that my appointment more or less coincided with the start of the Global Financial Crisis, which made the business dimensions of running the University that much more difficult. The university was also undergoing significant changes, having recently absorbed a College of Education and started a Faculty of Engineering. Both of these required a significant amount of university resource for which we were in some sort of competition. On top of that, the Government kept sending signals that Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics were its top funding priorities. I have tried to keep putting the case for the importance of Law as a University subject of study that is valuable not only for those who intend to practise Law but also as an intellectual discipline that From the Dean From provides and sharpens all sorts of habits of thought that will contribute to the development of our students as valuable citizens, of New Zealand and, it may be, elsewhere in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Head, Heart and Hand: Studio Pottery in Nelson 1956-1976
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Head, Heart and Hand: Studio Pottery in Nelson 1956 – 1976 Vic Evans 2007 Head, Heart and Hand: Studio Pottery in Nelson 1956 – 1976 A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History at Massey University Vic Evans 2007 Abstract This thesis considers the growth of the studio pottery movement in New Zealand between 1956 and 1976. It uses Nelson as a case study to represent trends that took place across New Zealand. It seeks to explain the spectacular growth of interest in hand-made pottery and the surge in participation at both the amateur and professional level and the effects that this had on the movement. The people who were involved in the revival of studio pottery were, in general, relatively well-educated and prosperous individuals who had experienced changes that had taken place within the New Zealand education system from the late 1930s. Others had similar experiences overseas. In New Zealand they were also the beneficiaries of a relatively stable, highly protected and prosperous economy. Furthermore, New Zealand was subject to the same influences that impacted on individuals overseas – issues relating to work and play and the place of women in society. Overseas experts introduced the pioneers of the New Zealand movement to pottery traditions based on a confused blend of Anglo-Oriental craft philosophies.
    [Show full text]