Demographic Processes in the Municipalities of the Toplica District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Demographic Processes in the Municipalities of the Toplica District DEMOGRAPHIC PROCESSES IN THE MUNICIPALITIES OF THE TOPLICA DISTRICT Ninoslav Golubović1, Aleksandar Radivojević1, Ljiljana Stričević1 1 University of Niš, Faculti of Sciences and Mathematics, Department of Geography Abstract: This paper analyses the long-term demographic processes on the territory of the Toplica District, which marked the last sixty-year period. The results of the 1948 to 2011 Censuses were used in the analysis. The processes which marked this period were depopulation (total and natural) and the aging of the population (both total population and specific age groups). The intensity of depopulation in some periods is investigated on the basis of intercensus changes in population. The age structure is presented by means of the aging index, the aging coefficient, the median age and the percentage share of age groups in the total population. In order to create a more complete demographic picture, the analysis of demographic data was done by the type of settlement, at the level of municipalities as well as the district as a whole. Keywords: Toplica district, depopulation, age structure, aging of the population 1. Introduction Demographic processes on the territory of the Toplica District in the second half of the twentieth and early twenty-first century are characterized by extremely unfavorable trends, affecting both present and future demographic and economic development. The processes of total and natural depopulation and the aging of the population are seen as fundamental demographic processes on the territory of both Serbia and the Toplica District (Djokic, 2015). The intensive process of depopulation, caused by extensive emigration of the population and a negative population growth, has led to significant changes in the age structure of the population of the analysed area. Negative demographic processes which have marked the entire period exhibit different intensity if they are analysed at lower administrative-territorial units (municipalities and the type of settlement). Demographic dynamics demonstrates an ever stronger spatial polarization, which is particularly 37 evident when it comes to urban and non-urban settlements (Jukic, Turk, 2010). It is notable that in certain territorial units of districts, these processes take place more slowly, while in others, they have led to a complete degradation of demographic resources. The basic demographic processes that are discussed in this paper are depopulation and the aging of the population. 2. Materials and methods The timeframe of the research covers the period from 1948 to 2011. The results of eight post-war Censuses were used for the analysis of demographic processes. When analyzing the numerical population trends, it should be taken into account that starting from the 2002 Census, there are differences in the census methodology, which makes it difficult to comparethe data. The 2002 Census in Serbia applied international recommendations which suggest that the permanent resident population includes the population living in the country and persons with temporary work and residence abroad for less than a year. Foreign nationals with work and residence in Serbia for longer than a year are also included in the permanent resident population. The analysis of demographic processes on the territory of the Toplica District and its lower administrative-territorial units is based on the use of relevant demographic variables, which serve to calculate the demographic indicators of negative demographic processes. Several variables were used to shape the indicators: the percentage share of the population by five-year age groups, the percentage share of the population younger than 20 years of age, the percentage share of the population over 60, intercensal population change and median age. Based on these, the aging index and the aging coefficient were calculated. The obtained results determined the direction and intensity of changes in the analysed period, and pointed to the consequences of such developments. 3. Population changes Change in the total population is a synthetic indicator of demographic trends and processes in a particular area (Turk, Jukic, 2009). It is a result of natural and spatial mobility of the population. The territory of the Toplica 38 District and its component parts are characterized by the processes of total depopulation and extreme aging of the population. In the period from 1948 to 2011, population growth was only recordedin the observed area in the first intercensus period (1948-1953), whereas stagnation was recorded in all other periods. Total population decline from 1948 to 2011 amounted to 49,748 or 35.16%. The long-term process of depopulation threatened the vital characteristics of the population, and it is certain that the population decline will continue in the future as well. The decrease of population in the observed period was recorded in all municipalities. It ranged from 22.97% in the Municipality of Zitoradja to 50.35% in the Municipality of Blace. The municipalities of Prokuplje and Kursumlija recorded a decrease of 25.08% and 48.47% respectively. Table 1 shows that the Municipalities of Blace and Kursumlija have extremely negative demographic characteristics. The population of these municipalities belongs to the strong depopulation type (Kursumlija) and the first phase of extinction type (Blace). The extent of depopulation can best be seen if analysed by the type of settlement. Only 16 settlements, four of which are municipal centers, had an increase in population, while the trend of population decline was recorded in 251 settlements. Three rural settlements were affected by total depopulation: Vukojevac and Tacevac in the Municipality of Kursumlija and Obrtnica in the Municipality of Prokuplje. An interesting example is the village of Rastelica (Municipality of Kursumlija) where the 2002 Census did not record a single resident, while the following Census recorded three inhabitants. All these settlements are located in the altitude zone of 750 to 850 meters above sea level. The most intensive depopulation process, where the population decreased by more than 90%, was recorded in 59 settlements. 167 settlements belong to the second group of settlements with extremely unfavorable demographic characteristics, where the decrease ranged between 40 to 90%. 17 settlements belong to the group of settlements with slightly more favorable characteristics, although still negative (decrease from 10 to 40%). Only 5 settlements experienced a decrease of 10%. In order to gain a better understanding of demographic processes and potential, hypsometric distribution of the population and settlements was analysed as well. For this purpose, settlements are classified into three groups: settlements located in the altitude zone of 200 to 499 meters above sea level, settlements located in the altitude zone of 500 to 999 meters above sea level and settlements located in the altitude zone above 1000 meters 39 above sea level. Demographic problems are particularly pronounced in the parts of the district with high altitude, which have been characterized by extreme depopulation for several decades, caused by emigration of the working-age and fertile-age population (Ivkovic, Todoric, 2013). Most of the settlements, 147, are located in the altitude zone of 200 to 499 meters, which represents 55.06% of the total number of settlements. 116 settlements are located in the next altitude zone (500 to 999 metres) which represents 43.45%, while only 4 settlements are located in the altitude zone above 1000 meters (1.5%). Analyzing the settlements and population by hypsometric zones, it can be clearly observed that the depopulation is more pronounced with higher altitudes (Ivkovic, Todoric, 2013). The most intensive population decline occurred in the highest altitude zone. The percentage share of the population of this zone in the total population during the period under review decreased from 0.97% to 0.13%. The population of the four settlements in this zone, according to the last Census, makes up only 8.78% of the population in 1948. Table 1. Population change by type of settlement from 1948 to 2011 Type of change Type of change 1953/48 1961/53 1971/61 1981/71 1991/81 2002/91 2011/2002 2011/1948 1948-2011 2002-2011 Toplica District 105.60 94.46 91.78 94.13 91.70 91.29 89.89 64.84 R4 R3 Urban 115.01 130.76 154.27 131.50 113.45 101.49 97.79 343.50 P1 R1 Other 104.62 90.30 81.41 82.37 80.78 84.10 83.16 35.79 R4 R4 Blace 103.94 89.80 87.47 89.69 90.60 87.59 85.43 49.65 R4 R4 Urban 119.57 117.56 131.55 130.71 118.58 104.53 96.12 287.99 P1 R2 Other 102.63 87.10 81.69 81.02 81.07 79.13 78.38 29.75 R4 R3 Zitoradja 105.54 98.41 96.16 97.58 94.37 93.15 89.90 77.03 R4 R3 Other 105.54 98.41 96.16 97.58 94.37 93.15 89.90 77.03 R4 R3 Kursumlija 106.67 92.77 85.84 87.23 85.38 91.60 88.92 51.53 R4 R3 Urban 112.05 122.78 195.37 142.96 118.25 108.50 96.49 475.72 P1 R2 Other 106.24 90.20 73.09 69.89 64.45 71.86 75.56 17.13 R4 R4 Prokuplje 105.60 95.94 95.41 98.15 94.16 91.56 91.58 74.92 R4 R3 Urban 115.00 136.11 146.97 127.35 110.55 97.77 98.77 312.77 P1 R1 Other 103.98 88.27 80.20 82.38 80.47 84.44 82.03 33.80 R4 R4 Source: Census of population, households and apartments in 2011 in the Republic of Serbia, Comparative overview of population 1948/2011, Data by settlements, Book 20, RSO Belgrade, 2014. The settlements in the altitude zone from 500 to 999 meters recorded a slightly lower decrease in the total population.
Recommended publications
  • ODLUKU O Izboru Pravnih Lica Za Poslove Iz Programa Mera Zdravstvene Zaštite Životinja Za Period 2014–2016
    Na osnovu člana 53. stav 5. Zakona o veterinarstvu („Službeni glasnik RS”, br. 91/05, 30/10, 93/12), Ministar poljoprivrede, šumarstva i vodoprivrede donosi ODLUKU o izboru pravnih lica za poslove iz Programa mera zdravstvene zaštite životinja za period 2014–2016. godine Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014–2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS „Tika Vet” Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, 2. VS „Mladenovac” Mladenovac Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, VS „Aćimović– 3. Obrenovac Zabrežje, Jasenak, Konatica, LJubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Obrenovac” Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, 4. VS „Dr Kostić” Obrenovac Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS „Simbiosis Vet” Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS „Nutrivet” Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, 7. VS „Grocka” Grocka Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudraci, Ritopek Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, 8. VS „Arnika Veterina” Lazarevac Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, 9. VS „Artmedika Vet” Lazarevac Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, VS „Alfa Vet CO 10. Lazarevac Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, 2007” Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS „Ardis Vet” Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS „Uniprim Vet” Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS „Vidra-Vet” Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Uredba O Kategorizaciji Državnih Puteva
    UREDBA O KATEGORIZACIJI DRŽAVNIH PUTEVA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 105/2013 i 119/2013) Predmet Član 1 Ovom uredbom kategorizuju se državni putevi I reda i državni putevi II reda na teritoriji Republike Srbije. Kategorizacija državnih puteva I reda Član 2 Državni putevi I reda kategorizuju se kao državni putevi IA reda i državni putevi IB reda. Državni putevi IA reda Član 3 Državni putevi IA reda su: Redni broj Oznaka puta OPIS 1. A1 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Horgoš) - Novi Sad - Beograd - Niš - Vranje - državna granica sa Makedonijom (granični prelaz Preševo) 2. A2 Beograd - Obrenovac - Lajkovac - Ljig - Gornji Milanovac - Preljina - Čačak - Požega 3. A3 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Batrovci) - Beograd 4. A4 Niš - Pirot - Dimitrovgrad - državna granica sa Bugarskom (granični prelaz Gradina) 5. A5 Pojate - Kruševac - Kraljevo - Preljina Državni putevi IB reda Član 4 Državni putevi IB reda su: Redni Oznaka OPIS broj puta 1. 10 Beograd-Pančevo-Vršac - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Vatin) 2. 11 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Kelebija)-Subotica - veza sa državnim putem A1 3. 12 Subotica-Sombor-Odžaci-Bačka Palanka-Novi Sad-Zrenjanin-Žitište-Nova Crnja - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Srpska Crnja) 4. 13 Horgoš-Kanjiža-Novi Kneževac-Čoka-Kikinda-Zrenjanin-Čenta-Beograd 5. 14 Pančevo-Kovin-Ralja - veza sa državnim putem 33 6. 15 državna granica sa Mađarskom (granični prelaz Bački Breg)-Bezdan-Sombor- Kula-Vrbas-Srbobran-Bečej-Novi Bečej-Kikinda - državna granica sa Rumunijom (granični prelaz Nakovo) 7. 16 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bezdan)-Bezdan 8. 17 državna granica sa Hrvatskom (granični prelaz Bogojevo)-Srpski Miletić 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Toplicke Novine Br-59 Za Web.Pdf
    TOPLI^KE NOVINE MAJ 2014. Odr`ana 17. sednica Skup{tine Op{tine Prokupqe Novi predsednik Op{tineOp{tine Odbornici prokupa~ke Skup - Na{a op{tina raspola`e poqo- {tine razre{ili su dr Qubi{u privrednim resursima, imamo \urkovi}a funkcije predsedni - pre hrambenu industriju, mogu} - ka Op{tine i za novog predsed- nost eksploatacije {umskog i ni ka izabrali Miroquba Pau no- lekovitog biqa, tu su na{i po- vi}a, zajedni~kog kandidata SPS qoprivredni proizvo|a~i, kao i i SNS. {ansu u razvoju turizma i ugos- Paunovi} je do sada radio kao titeqstva. Ciq nam je da osavre- savetnik pri Ministarstvu po- menimo poqoprivrednu pro iz vo- qoprivrede i za{tite `ivotne dwu i tehnologiju i time stvo- sredine. Novoizabrani predsed- rimo uslove za boqi plasman na - nik je u obra}awu odbornicima {ih proizvoda, a sve to uz ade k- istakao da }e prvi korak u wego - vatne mere poreske politike, ob- vom radu biti evidentirawe svih jasnio je Paunovi} i naglasio da praksa. Radi se o ~oveku koji ne - ~lanovi Organizacionog odbora problema koje ima Op{tina nam je u svemu tome potrebna po - ma mrqe u karijeri, dobrom do - za proslavu slave i Komisije za Pro kupqe. mo}, kako op{tinskog, tako i re- ma}inu i po{tenom ~oveku, re - sprovo|ewe javnog nadmetawa za - Pred nama je puno izazova, publi~kog buxeta. kao je Laketi} i naglasio da je za davawe u zakup poqoprivrednog puno te{ko}a i problema. Po k - Na sednici Skup{tine Op{ - dobrobit Op{tine potrebna sa - zemqi{ta.
    [Show full text]
  • Rešenje O Ustanovljavanju Ribarskih Područja
    REŠENJE O USTANOVLJAVANJU RIBARSKIH PODRUČJA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 90/2015) 1. Na teritoriji Republike Srbije ustanovljavaju se sledeća ribarska područja: 1) Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" ustanovljava se na ribolovnim vodama vodotoka reka: Binačka Morava, Preševska Moravica, Južna Morava od nastanka do ušća Barbeške reke (kod mesta Zaplanjska Toponica), Pčinja, Dragovištica, Jerma, Veternica, Vlasina, reka Jablanica od administrativne granice između opštine Lebane i grada Leskovca do ušća, reka Nišava od državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom do granice Parka prirode "Sićevačka klisura" i svih ostalih pritoka navedenih reka i drugih prirodnih ili veštačkih ribolovnih voda koje su u granicama ribarskog područja, osim ribolovnih voda u okviru granica zaštićenih područja. Granica ribarskog područja polazi od tromeđe grada Niša, opštine Svrljig i opštine Bela Palanka i ide administrativnom granicom između ove dve opštine do Svrljiškog Timoka i dalje njegovom levom obalom do izvorišta, zatim severnom administrativnom granicom opštine Pirot do državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom. Granica dalje ide na jug državnim granicama Republike Bugarske i BJR Makedonije, zatim ka severu zapadnim administrativnim granicama opština Preševo, Bujanovac, grada Vranja i grada Leskovca, nastavlja desnom obalom Puste reke do administrativne granice grada Leskovca, dalje prati severnu administrativnu granicu grada Leskovca i opštine Vlasotince, zapadnu administrativnu granicu opština Babušnica i Bele Palanke, do polazne tačke. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava" prostire se na teritorijama sledećih jedinica lokalnih samouprava: grad Vranje, grad Leskovac, opština Preševo, opština Bujanovac, opština Trgovište, opština Bosilegrad, opština Surdulica, opština Vladičin Han, opština Crna Trava, opština Vlasotince, opština Babušnica, opština Dimitrovgrad, opština Pirot i opština Bela Palanka. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" koristi se za rekreativni ribolov.
    [Show full text]
  • Rešenje O Ustanovljavanju Ribarskih Područja
    REŠENJE O USTANOVLJAVANJU RIBARSKIH PODRUČJA ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 90/2015) 1. Na teritoriji Republike Srbije ustanovljavaju se sledeća ribarska područja: 1) Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" ustanovljava se na ribolovnim vodama vodotoka reka: Binačka Morava, Preševska Moravica, Južna Morava od nastanka do ušća Barbeške reke (kod mesta Zaplanjska Toponica), Pčinja, Dragovištica, Jerma, Veternica, Vlasina, reka Jablanica od administrativne granice između opštine Lebane i grada Leskovca do ušća, reka Nišava od državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom do granice Parka prirode "Sićevačka klisura" i svih ostalih pritoka navedenih reka i drugih prirodnih ili veštačkih ribolovnih voda koje su u granicama ribarskog područja, osim ribolovnih voda u okviru granica zaštićenih područja. Granica ribarskog područja polazi od tromeđe grada Niša, opštine Svrljig i opštine Bela Palanka i ide administrativnom granicom između ove dve opštine do Svrljiškog Timoka i dalje njegovom levom obalom do izvorišta, zatim severnom administrativnom granicom opštine Pirot do državne granice sa Republikom Bugarskom. Granica dalje ide na jug državnim granicama Republike Bugarske i BJR Makedonije, zatim ka severu zapadnim administrativnim granicama opština Preševo, Bujanovac, grada Vranja i grada Leskovca, nastavlja desnom obalom Puste reke do administrativne granice grada Leskovca, dalje prati severnu administrativnu granicu grada Leskovca i opštine Vlasotince, zapadnu administrativnu granicu opština Babušnica i Bele Palanke, do polazne tačke. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava" prostire se na teritorijama sledećih jedinica lokalnih samouprava: grad Vranje, grad Leskovac, opština Preševo, opština Bujanovac, opština Trgovište, opština Bosilegrad, opština Surdulica, opština Vladičin Han, opština Crna Trava, opština Vlasotince, opština Babušnica, opština Dimitrovgrad, opština Pirot i opština Bela Palanka. Ribarsko područje "Južna Morava 1" koristi se za rekreativni ribolov.
    [Show full text]
  • Nadležne Veterinarske Stanice 2014 Do 2016
    ODLUKA O IZBORU PRAVNIH LICA ZA POSLOVE IZ PROGRAMA MERA ZDRAVSTVENE ZAŠTITE ŽIVOTINJA ZA PERIOD 2014-2016. GODINE ("Sl. glasnik RS", br. 23/2014) Poslovi iz Programa mera za period 2014-2016. godine, koji su utvrđeni kao poslovi od javnog interesa, ustupaju se sledećim pravnim licima: Grad Beograd 1. VS "Tika Vet" Mladenovac Rabrovac, Jagnjilo, Markovac 2. VS "Mladenovac" Mladenovac Amerić, Beljevac, Velika Ivanča, Velika Krsna, Vlaška, Granice, Dubona, Kovačevac, Koraćica, Mala Vrbica, Međulužje, Mladenovac, selo Mladenovac, Pružatovac, Rajkovac, Senaja, Crkvine, Šepšin 3. VS "Aćimović- Obrenovac Baljevac, Brović, Vukićevica, Grabovac, Draževac, Zabrežje, Jasenak, Obrenovac" Konatica, Ljubinić, Mislođin, Piroman, Poljane, Stubline, Trstenica 4. VS "Dr Kostić" Obrenovac Belo Polje, Brgulice, Veliko Polje, Dren, Zvečka, Krtinska, Orašac, Ratari, Rvati, Skela, Ušće, Urovci 5. VS "Simbiosis Vet" Obrenovac Obrenovac, Barič, Mala Moštanica 6. VS "Nutrivet" Grocka Begaljica, Pudarci, Dražanj 7. VS "Grocka" Grocka Umčari, Boleč, Brestovik, Vinča, Grocka, Živkovac, Zaklopača, Kaluđerica, Kamendo, Leštane, Pudarci, Ritopek 8. VS "Arnika Veterina" Lazarevac Baroševac, Prkosava, Rudovci, Strmovo, Mali Crljeni, Kruševica, Trbušnica, Bistrica, Dren 9. VS "Artmedika Vet" Lazarevac Vrbovno, Stepojevac, Leskovac, Sokolovo, Cvetovac, Vreoci, Veliki Crljeni, Junkovac, Arapovac, Sakulja 10. VS "Alfa Vet CO 2007" Lazarevac Lazarevac, Šopić, Barzilovica, Brajkovac, Čibutkovica, Dudovica, Lukovica, Medoševac, Mirosaljci, Zeoke, Petka, Stubica, Šušnjar, Županjac, Burovo 11. VS "Ardis Vet" Sopot Slatina, Dučina, Rogača, Sibnica, Drlupa 12. VS "Uniprim Vet" Barajevo Arnajevo, Rožanci, Beljina, Boždarevac, Manić 13. VS "Vidra-Vet" Surčin Bečmen, Petrovčić, Novi Beograd, Bežanija 14. VS "Srem-Vet" Surčin Surčin, Dobanovci, Boljevci, Jakovo, Progar Zemun Zemun 15. VS "Makrovet" Zemun Ugrinovci, Batajnica 16. VS "SV. Modest" Voždovac Ripanj, Zuce, Beli Potok, Kumodraž, selo Rakovica, Jajinci Grocka Vrčin 17.
    [Show full text]
  • Indeks Rasta Broja Stanovnika Po Naseljenim Mestima 2002-2011
    Indeks rasta broja stanovnika po naseljenim mestima 2002-2011. godine KELEBIJA ĐALA HORGOŠ BAČKI VINOGRADI SUBOTICA PALIĆ MARTONOŠ RABE SRPSKI KRSTUR HAJDUKOVO LJUTOVO LEGENDA MAJDAN MALI PESAK ŠUPLJAK SIGET MALE KANJIŽA PIJACE FILIĆ DONJI TAVANKUT MALA GORNJI BANATSKO ARANĐELOVO BOSNA TAVANKUT ZIMONIĆ NOVI KNEŽEVAC NOVO PODLOKANJ SELO BIKOVO VELEBIT VRBICA MIŠIĆEVO ADORJAN pad broja stanovnika RIĐICA OROM BAJMOK SANAD CRNA TREŠNJEVAC BARA RASTINA ĐURĐIN TOTOVO ALEKSA VIŠNJEVAC SELO BANATSKI ŠANTIĆ MONOŠTOR STANIŠIĆ STARI NOVI DOLINE ŽEDNIK ŽEDNIK ČOKA BAČKI BREG GAKOVO ČANTAVIR SENTA PAČIR MOKRIN BOGARAŠ BAČKO DUŠANOVO porast broja stranovnika KOLUT JAZOVO MALI BEOGRAD TORNJOŠ SVETOZAR MILETIĆ OSTOJIĆEVO GORNJI BREG NAKOVO STARA MORAVICA BAČKI SOKOLAC KARAĐORĐEVO ZOBNATICA BEZDAN ČONOPLJA SAJAN KEVI NOVO TOMISLAVCI MIĆUNOVO ORAHOVO PADEJ BANATSKO KRIVAJA GORNJA VELIKO SELO ROGATICA SVETIĆEVO STERIJINO KIKINDA IĐOŠ UTRINE BAČKI ADA BAČKA TOPOLA KAVILO stagnacija broja stanovnika MONOŠTOR SOMBOR KLJAJIĆEVO POBEDA TELEČKA OBORNJAČA BAJŠA NJEGOŠEVO BOGARAŠ OBORNJAČA SREDNJI SALAŠ NOVI GUNAROŠ BOČAR KOZARCI MOL PANONIJA BAGREMOVO KUPUSINA BAČKO PETROVO SELO RUSKO SRPSKA SELO CRNJA LIPAR MALI IĐOŠ RADOJEVO SIVAC MILEŠEVO NOVO MILOŠEVO bez stanovnika NOVA CRVENKA BANATSKA TOPOLA LOVĆENAC PRIGREVICA TOBA STAPAR VOJVODA STEPA CRVENKA HETIN SVILOJEVO FEKETIĆ APATIN NOVA BEČEJ CRNJA BAŠAID NOVI BEČEJ ALEKSANDROVO KRUŠČIĆ KULA BAČKI BRESTOVAC nepopisano područje Kosova i Metohije DOROSLOVO SRBOBRAN SONTA TORDA RADIČEVIĆ VRBAS SRPSKI ITEBEJ BAČKI
    [Show full text]
  • Region Opština Mesto Broj Goveda (Živih) BEOGRAD BARAJEVO
    Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD BARAJEVO ARNAJEVO 307 BACEVAC 101 BARAJEVO 281 BELJINA 268 BOŽDAREVAC 226 GUNCATI 133 LISOVIĆ 111 MANIC 71 MELJAK 48 ROŽANCI 301 VELIKI BORAK 282 VRANIĆ 267 ŠILJAKOVAC 36 BEOGRAD-SURČIN BEČMEN 36 BOLJEVCI 111 DOBANOVCI 507 JAKOVO 193 PETROVČIĆ 257 PROGAR 79 SURČIN 51 GROCKA BEGALJICA 40 BOLEČ 5 BRESTOVIK 4 DRAŽANJ 128 GROCKA 4 KALUĐERICA 11 KAMENDOL 28 LEŠTANE 1 PUDARCI 87 UMČARI 488 VRCIN 88 ZAKLOPACA 5 ŽIVKOVAC 7 LAZAREVAC ARAPOVAC 89 BAROŠEVAC 34 BARZILOVICA 102 BISTRICA 150 BRAJKOVAC 184 BUROVO 12 CVETOVAC 64 DREN 128 DUDOVICA 247 JUNKOVAC 46 KRUŠEVICA 34 LAZAREVAC 20 LESKOVAC 146 LUKAVICA 54 MALI CRLJENI 35 MEDOŠEVAC 9 MIROSALJCI 236 PETKA 46 PRKOSAVA 7 Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD LAZAREVAC RUDOVCI 26 SOKOLOVO 94 STEPOJEVAC 107 STRMOVO 52 STUBICA 33 TRBUŠNICA 286 VELIKI CRLJENI 165 VRBOVNO 114 VREOCI 26 ZEOKE 11 ČIBUTKOVICA 100 ŠOPIĆ 91 ŠUŠNJAR 39 ŽUPANJAC 35 MLADENOVAC AMERIC 183 BELJEVAC 91 CRKVINE 108 DUBONA 62 GRANICE 26 JAGNJILO 914 KORAĆICA 555 KOVAČEVAC 595 MALA VRBICA 46 MARKOVAC 161 MEĐULUŽJE 336 MLADENOVAC (SELO) 109 MLADENOVAC (VAROŠ) 128 PRUŽATOVAC 482 RABROVAC 1,109 RAJKOVAC 93 SENAJA 8 VELIKA IVANČA 960 VELIKA KRSNA 918 VLAŠKA 350 ŠEPŠIN 77 NOVI BEOGRAD NOVI BEOGRAD 22 OBRENOVAC BALJEVAC 117 BARIČ 28 BELO POLJE 64 BROVIĆ 354 DRAŽEVAC 434 DREN 389 GRABOVAC 1,109 JASENAK 316 KONATICE 93 KRTINSKA 915 LJUBINIC 436 MALA MOŠTANICA 38 MISLODIN 135 OBRENOVAC 19 ORAŠAC 573 PIROMAN 292 Region Opština Mesto Broj goveda (živih) BEOGRAD OBRENOVAC POLJANE 220 RATARI
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure of Serbian Railways Jsc Network
    INFRASTRUCTURE OF SERBIAN RAILWAYS JSC NETWORK STATEMENT 2021 Adopted by the Shareholders of „Infrastructure of Serbian Railways “ JSC No: 5/2020-270-111 dated January 8, 2020 Effective as of Decembre 13, 2020 Applicable to 2020/2021 Timetable 2 Network Statement 2021 Amendments, corrections and interpretations No Subject Determined by the act no. Valid as of The Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian 1. First amendments March 23rd, 2020. Railways“ JSC No: 5/2020-275-114 as of March 23rd 2020. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian 2. Second amendments June 18th, 2020. Railways“ JSC No: 5/2020-282-117 as of June 18th 2020.. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian September 21th, 3. Third amendments Railways“ JSC 2020. No: 5/2020-297-122 as of September 21th 2020. Decision of the Shareholders of „Infrastrusture of Serbian October 5th, 4. Fourth amendments Railways“ JSC 2020. No: 5/2020-301-123 as of October 5th 2020. 3 Network Statement 2021 CONTENTS GLOSSARY ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. GENERAL INFORMATION ......................................................................................................................11 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................11 1.1.1. Background Information on Infrastructure Manager ......................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Danube Pollution Reduction Programme
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL PLANNING WORKSHOP FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Novi Sad, November 24-27, 1998 FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL PLANNING WORKSHOP FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA Novi Sad, November 24-27, 1998 FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The present report is based on the results of the National Planning Workshop, held in Novi Sad, FR of Yugoslavia from 24. to 27. November 1998. The main goal of the workshop and its report is to provide a comprehensive presentation of analysis concerning problems and solutions for reduction, as well as control of water pollution and its effects. The result is a national contribution to the development of the Danube Pollution Reduction Programme and a revision of the Strategic Action Plan (SAP) of the ICPDR. The workshop was prepared by Federal Ministry for Development, Science and Development, Country Program Coordinator, Dr Zoran and Aleksandar Djuki assisted by the secretariat. The National Planning Workshop was attended by participants from various sectors: Federal and Republican Ministries for Environment, Agriculture and Water Management; Federal and Republican Hydrometheorogical Institutes; Universities; Research Institutes, NGO’s, and Private Sector. A list of participants is attached to this report in Annex. The present report was prepared by Miroslav Radoje Identification and Description of River Basin Areas and Sector Strategies, Dr Miodrag Agriculture, Branislav Industry and prof. Luka ! " Valuable technical assistance was given by Aleksandar Djuki" A team of international experts from UNDP/GEF, Maxime Belot and Marcela Fabianova gave assistance, support and guidance in the methodological approach and report writing.
    [Show full text]
  • National Reviews 1998 Federal Republic of Yugoslavia
    DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance DANUBE POLLUTION REDUCTION PROGRAMME NATIONAL REVIEWS 1998 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA TECHNICAL REPORTS Part A: Social and Economic Analysis Part B: Financing Mechanisms FEDERAL MINISTRY FOR DEVELOPMENT, SCIENCE AND ENVIRONMENT in cooperation with the Programme Coordination Unit UNDP/GEF Assistance Preface The National Reviews were designed to produce basic data and information for the elaboration of the Pollution Reduction Programme (PRP), the Transboundary Analysis and the revision of the Strategic Action Plan of the International Commission for the Protection of the Danube River (ICPDR). Particular attention was also given to collect data and information for specific purposes concerning the development of the Danube Water Quality Model, the identification and evaluation of hot spots, the analysis of social and economic factors, the preparation of an investment portfolio and the development of financing mechanisms for the implementation of the ICPDR Action Plan. For the elaboration of the National Reviews, a team of national experts was recruited in each of the participating countries for a period of one to four months covering the following positions: Socio-economist with knowledge in population studies, Financial expert (preferably from the Ministry of Finance), Water Quality Data expert/information specialist, Water Engineering expert with knowledge in project development. Each of the experts had to organize his or her work under the supervision of the respective Country Programme Coordinator and with the guidance of a team of International Consultants.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandrovac AS
    A Aleksandrovac AS - Brus AS 1 Aleksandrovac AS - Ploča - Jošanička Banja 2 Aleksandrovac AS - Stalać - kod stadiona 3 Aleksandrovac AS - Trstenik AS (preko Stopanje) 4 Aleksandrovac AS - Velika Vrbnica - Kruševac AS 5 Aleksandrovo II (Kafana "Mali odmor") - Balajnac (okretnica) 7 Aleksinac AS - Aleksinački Rudnik R 8 Aleksinac AS - Beograd AS (autoput) 9 Aleksinac AS - Ćićevac AS 10 Aleksinac AS - Ćuprija AS (autoput) 11 Aleksinac AS - Gornja Toponica (raskrsnica) 12 Aleksinac AS - Jagodina AS (autoput) 13 Aleksinac AS - Mozgovo - Okretnica 14 Aleksinac AS - Niš AS (autoput) 15 Aleksinac AS - Paraćin AS (autoput) 16 Aleksinac AS - Praskovče - Ražanj AS 17 Aleksinac AS - Ražanj AS (autoput) 18 Aleksinac AS - Smederevo AS (autoput) 19 Aleksinac AS - Sokobanja AS 20 Aleksinac AS - Tešica - Gornja Toponica - Niš AS 21 Aleksinac AS - Varvarin AS (autoput) 23 Aleksinac AS - Vitkovac - Kaonik R 24 Aleksinac AS - Zgrada Skupštine opštine - Aleksinački Rudnik 25 Aleksinački Rudnik - Aleksinac - zelena pijaca - Aleksinac AS 26 Aleksinački Rudnik - Niš AS (autoput) 27 Aleksinački Rudnik R - Aleksinac AS 28 Alibunar AS - Dobrica 29 Alibunar AS - Pančevo AS 30 Alibunar AS - Plandište AS 31 Alibunar AS - Uljma - Vršac AS 32 Alk pumpa - Đerekare - Tutin AS 33 Apatin AS - Kupusina - Sombor AS 34 Apatin AS - Prigrevica 35 Apatin AS - Sombor AS 36 Apatin AS - Sonta - ulica Vuka Karadžića, ispred škole "I.G.Kovačić" 37 Aranđelovac AS - Darosava - Belanovica AS 38 Aranđelovac AS - Jelovik I - Dragolj - Vrba 39 Aranđelovac AS - Krćevac - Mladenovac AS 40
    [Show full text]