(Camp) Ritchie Historic District

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Camp) Ritchie Historic District WA-IV-262 Fort (Camp) Ritchie Historic District Architectural Survey File This is the architectural survey file for this MIHP record. The survey file is organized reverse- chronological (that is, with the latest material on top). It contains all MIHP inventory forms, National Register nomination forms, determinations of eligibility (DOE) forms, and accompanying documentation such as photographs and maps. Users should be aware that additional undigitized material about this property may be found in on-site architectural reports, copies of HABS/HAER or other documentation, drawings, and the “vertical files” at the MHT Library in Crownsville. The vertical files may include newspaper clippings, field notes, draft versions of forms and architectural reports, photographs, maps, and drawings. Researchers who need a thorough understanding of this property should plan to visit the MHT Library as part of their research project; look at the MHT web site (mht.maryland.gov) for details about how to make an appointment. All material is property of the Maryland Historical Trust. Last Updated: 03-12-2004 MARYLAND HISTORICAL TRUST DETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY FORM ~roperty Name: ..... (:~~ Ritc~.e. ..I:Iistoric District Inventory Number: WA-IV-262 Address: MD 550 and Ritchie Road Historic district: X yes no City: Fort Ritchie Zip Code: 21719 County: Washington USGS Quadrangle{s): Blue Ridge Summit, Smithsburg Property Owner: U.S. Army Tax Account ID Number: Tax Map Parcel Number(s): Tax Map Number: Project: Agency: Agency Prepared By: C. Fisher/US_ Arm]'_ Environmental Center Preparer's Name: Date Prepared: 3/3/1997 Documentation is presented in: MHT Files WA-IV-262 Preparer's Eligibility Recommendation: x Eligibility recommended Eligibility not recommended Criteria: X A B xc D Considerations: A B c D E F G Complete if the property is a contributing or non-contributing resource to a NR district/property: Name of the District/Property: Inventory Number: Eligible: yes Listed: yes - ;te visit by MHT Staff yes X no Name: Date: Description of Property and Justification: (Please attach map and photo) The Camp Ritchie Historic District embodies the rich heritage of commitment that individual states have made toward the nation. In addition to the historic theme of military preparedness and training, the stone buildings are architecturally significant for the use oflocally available labor, stone and timber and for the organization of the Post. Thus, the District is considerd eligible under Criteria A and C. [For more information, see the Maryland Inventory of Historic Properties form for WA-IV-262] MARYLAND IDSTORICAL TRUST REVIEW Eligibility recommended X Eligibility not recommended Criteria: XA B XC D Considerations: A B c D E F G MHT Comments: Camp Ritchie Historic District was Federally nominated for the National Register of Historic Places. Reviewer, Office of Preservation Services Date R. Little Wednesday, March 26, 1997 > ~ ~" - " Reviewer, National Register Program Date .. MARY~ HISTORICAL TRUST DI~_..._!ON OF HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL PROGRAMS MARYLAND INVENTORY OF HISTORIC PROPERTIES FORM Complete each itea by marking •x• in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for •not applicable.• For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets. Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. ============================================================================= 1. Name of Property ============================================================================= historic name Camp Ritchie Historic District other names/site number WA-IV-262 ============================================================================= 2. Location ============================================================================= street & number ""M"'D'--'R~o:.i.uiu.t~e-""'s.... s:..i.o~&-,..R._.io.Jt,..c..,h ...... i..:.e ....... Ri..i.o~a..i.d,.__ __________________ not for publication_NlL_ city or town Fort Ritchie vicinity_NA state Maryland code_Mll_ county Washington code~ zi '.Jde 21719 ============================================================================= 3. State/Federal Agency Certification ============================================================================= As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this ___survey __nomination __request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property~~ meets ~~ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant ~~ nationally~~ statewide -~ locally. ( __ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Not Applicable Signature of certifying official Date State or Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property ;K meets __ does not meet the National Register criteria. ( _ _ See continuation sheet for additional comments.) ~ ~commenting or other official Date State or Federal agency and bureau WA-IV-262 ========================================================================= =-~ertification 4. ============================================================================= I, hereby certify that this property is: entered in the Maryland Register ~~ entered in the National Register See continuation sheet. _xx_ determined eligible for the National Register See continuation sheet. determined not eligible for the National Register removed from the National Register other (explain) : Not N;lplicable Signature Date ============================================================================= 5. Classification ============================================================================= Ownership of Property (Check as many boxes as apply) - private public-local public-State ___x public-Federal Category of Property (Check only one box) building(s) ___x district site structure object Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 96 --11. buildings 3 sites 4 --2. structures objects 103 ------1.2. Total N}JJll_ber of contributing resources previously listed in the National F _ster_Q__ Name of related multiple property listing (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) WA-IV-262 =:,-...========================================================================= 6 . .cunction or Use ============================================================================= Historic Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: Defense Sub: military facility Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) Cat: Defense Sub: military facility ============================================================================= 7. Description ============================================================================= Architectural Classification (Enter categories from instructions) Tudor Revival Craftsman Other· castellated Materials (Enter categories from instructions) foundation Concrete & Stone roof Asphalt. Rubber Membrane walls Stone Wood other Wood Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) S attached sheets. WA-IV-262 =-~·========================================================================= 8. dtatement of Significance ============================================================================= ApI?licable National Register Criteria (Mark 11 x 11 in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property for National Register listing) __X_ A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. Prol?erty embodies the distinct~ye characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack individual distinction. D Property has yielded, or is likely to yield information impor­ tant in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations (Mark 11 X11 in all the boxes that apply.) A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. B removed from its original location. C a birthplace or a grave. D a cemetery. E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. F a commemorative property. G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance within the past 50 years. Areas of Significance (Enter categories from instructions) Military Architecture Period of Significance 1926-1945 Significant Dates n/a Significant Person (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Cultural Affiliation Architect/Builder Captain Robert F Barrick Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property oµ_one or more continuation sheets.) WA-IV-262 =·,--~========================================================================= 9. Aajor Bibliographical References ============================================================================= (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file _.NA previously surveyed __NA preliminary determination
Recommended publications
  • Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010
    Description of document: US Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) Impersonal Names Index Listing for the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository, 2010 Requested date: 07-August-2010 Released date: 15-August-2010 Posted date: 23-August-2010 Title of document Impersonal Names Index Listing Source of document: Commander U.S. Army Intelligence & Security Command Freedom of Information/Privacy Office ATTN: IAMG-C-FOI 4552 Pike Road Fort George G. Meade, MD 20755-5995 Fax: (301) 677-2956 Note: The IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents INSCOM investigative files that are not titled with the name of a person. Each item in the IMPERSONAL NAMES index represents a file in the INSCOM Investigative Records Repository. You can ask for a copy of the file by contacting INSCOM. The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source.
    [Show full text]
  • 14310 Castle Drive Brochure
    FOR LEASE $12/SF Modified Gross 14310 Castle Drive, Cascade, MD 21719 Brick Medical/Professional Office Building for Lease This 3,014 SF office building is located on the former U.S. Army base known as Fort Ritchie in Cascade, Maryland and is perfect for professional, medical or research office space. Fort Ritchie is a 516-acre mixed-use development property is a Planned Mixed Use Community Growth HUB with untapped potential and located in the serene mountains that border Frederick and Washington Counties. Located just 15—20 minutes from Interstate Highway Rt 81. PRESENTING Location: 14310 Castle Drive, Cascade, Maryland 21719 Legal: Tax Map 0028, Parcel 0162 and 0152 Zoning: Washington County: SED—The principal function of the Special Economic Development District is to provide a mixed-use zoning classification which will address land use compatibility associated with the redevelopment and reuse of the Fort Ritchie Military Base. Because of the nature of the facility and past developmental patterns, a mixed-use designation is encouraged to optimize land use potential. In addition, the classification needs to be extremely flexible with regard to bulk and area development requirements since existing development patterns and reuse potential will reflect more of a town or campus character than a rural or suburban perspective. Price: $12/SF Modified Gross Contact: Ashleigh Kiggans, Vice President Office: 301-698-9696 ext. 205 Mobile: 703-507-1069 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: Information obtained from sources deemed to be reliable. However, we make no guarantee, warranty or representation. Information, prices, and other data may change without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Fort Ritchie Army Garrison and Cascade, Maryland
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: MILITARY BASE CLOSURE EFFECTS ON A COMMUNITY: THE CASE OF FORT RITCHIE ARMY GARRISON AND CASCADE, MARYLAND Meridith Hill Thanner, Doctor of Philosophy, 2006 Dissertation direction by: Professor Mady W. Segal Department of Sociology Fort Ritchie Army Garrison in Cascade, Maryland, slated for closure as part of the 1995 Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) round, officially ceased military operations three years later on September 30, 1998. Despite the fact that Ritchie shut its gates more than seven years ago, a confluence of circumstances has prevented its reuse; the property remains the possession of the U.S. Army and the community has yet to benefit from reuse efforts. To understand how such base closings affect the local community (the place), as well as the character of the place, an ethnographic case study was undertaken. Interwoven with this understanding of place are individual stories of those affected by the closing and how they, based on their relationship to the place and the meanings they attach to it, responded to the closing and the ensuing reuse process. I conducted in-depth interviews, spent time in the community, reviewed archival records, and collected and analyzed demographic and economic data to quantify some of the social and economic impacts on the area over time, and conducted a post hoc Social Impact Assessment. By employing concepts of place to understand how the community came to see itself in relation to the fort (Ritchie), and how residents came to value and use the fort, several predominant themes emerged. Specifically, I found that residents have a strong sense of place and place attachment, in spite of obvious imbalances of power between different segments of the community, which result in feelings of disenfranchisement by residents from the local political structure.
    [Show full text]