On-Line Table:Summary of Imaging Findings and Impact On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

On-Line Table:Summary of Imaging Findings and Impact On On-line Table: Summary of imaging findings and impact on management in 23 patients Change in Patient Age Clinical History and Prior MRI (Yes/No)? Diagnostic Change in No. (yr) Sex Duration of Symptoms Findings Preimaging Clinical Differential Pertinent Findings? Pertinent MRN Findings Thinking Management 1 28 F 1 yr Urinary symptoms, lower 1) Tethered cord None 1) No, CES Yes No, continue PFPT extremity numbness, 2) PFD 2) Mild LϾR trochanteric PFD 3) Coccydynia bursitis 2 73 M 2.5 yr Defecatory and urinary 1) Cauda equina nerve root injury Yes, and sacral Tarlov cysts 1) S1 and S2 ganglionopathies Yes Yes, referral to pain symptoms after Tarlov 2) Recurrent Tarlov cysts with residual Tarlov cysts management cyst operation, PFD 3) PFD 332Mϳ3 yr Urinary retention with left 1) Demyelinating disease None 1) Large sacral lipomyelocele Yes Yes, referred to sacral neurologic 2) Cauda equina syndrome with tethered cord neurosurgery deficits 2) Sacral dysraphism 480Fϳ1 yr Sensory and defecatory 1) S2–3 neuropathy/radiculopathy Yes, anterolisthesis L3–L4 and 1) Mild L femoral neuropathy Yes Yes, sent to pelvic PT symptoms, Tarlov 2) Left lower lumbar radiculopathy impingement on left 2) Mild L sciatic neuropathy for her sacral/ cysts S2–3, left leg 3) PFD L3 nerve root 3) Left L5–S1 radiculopathy pelvic floor pain radiculopathy and 4) Tarlov cysts present but PFD without cauda equina compromise 5 61 F 2 yr Gluteal/ischial/pelvic pain, 1) Lumbosacral radiculopathy No (MRI after MRN failed to 1) Arachnoiditis at L4–L5 level Yes Yes, chronic CES and constipation, prior L 2) Concern for lumbar stenosis reveal arachnoiditis) 2) Enhancing soft-tissue neurosurgical spine operation or CES thickening, right epidural decompression space at L4–L5 level and resection of markedly compressing epidural lesion thecal sac to left, likely granulation tissue and scarring 659Fϳ1.5 yr Vaginal pain/numbness 1) Bilateral sacral polyradiculopathies Yes, outside MRI not in 1) Right piriformis syndrome Yes Yes, medication after Tarlov cyst 2) PFD imaging system with mild right sciatic management and operation, right gluteal 3) Piriformis syndrome neuropathy PFPT for PFD and pain/spasm 2) No, Tarlov cyst remnants neuropathic pain and piriformis syndrome 7 39 F 25 yr, worsening for Pregnant with bilateral 1) Bilateral L2–3 radiculopathy Yes, a remote postop MRI not 1) Small disc protrusion at No None 4mo radiculopathies, history 2) CES available in imaging system L5–S1 of unstable 3) Meralgia paresthetica 2) Right meralgia AJNR Am J Neuroradiol retrolisthesis L2–3 4) SI pain and dysfunction paresthetica 8 44 M 8 mo Pelvic pain, urinary 1) CES No 1) Extensive upper abdominal Yes Yes, final diagnosis symptoms, history of 2) Infectious (discitis or epidural lymphadenopathy was Hodgkin HIV with decreased abscess) given HIV history 2) Mild left ilioinguinal lymphoma; nerve sphincter tone and 3) PFD and left pudendal abnormalities were sacral nerve root neuropathies never treated deficits and PFD given malignant diagnosis 9 53 M 7 mo Defecatory and urinary 1) Incomplete CES No 1) Moderate arachnoiditis Yes Yes, CT-guided symptoms with pelvic 2) Pelvic floor dysfunction 2) Moderate right genitofemoral ● pain and numbness genitofemoral nerve block, : ●● after spinal operation, neuropathy at the prior referral to PFD hernia site repair due to operation for GF perineural fibrosis neurectomy/ re-implantation, 2017 www.ajnr.org spinal cord stimulator trial 10 61 F Chronic, but worsened Buttock/perineal 1) Incomplete CES Yes, L5–S1 moderate central 1) Moderate arachnoiditis Yes Yes, pelvic PT to work 2yrago numbness, pelvic pain, 2) PFD and bilateral 2) Bilateral pudendal on pudendal constipation after neuroforaminal stenosis neuropathy with bilateral neuropathy and spinal operation, sacral with nerve root perineural scarring ischiofemoral nerve root deficits and impingements 3) Bilateral ischiofemoral impingement, PFD impingements referral to neurosurgery (continued) E1 E2 Petrasic On-line Table: Continued Change in Patient Age Clinical History and Prior MRI (Yes/No)? Diagnostic Change in ● No. (yr) Sex Duration of Symptoms Findings Preimaging Clinical Differential Pertinent Findings? Pertinent MRN Findings Thinking Management 2017 www.ajnr.org 11 43 F Severe worsening ϫ1 yr Frequent urinary 1) PFD Yes, heavily 1) Intradural mass likely No Yes, neurosurgery symptoms, history of 2) Cauda equina compromise calcified intrathecal lesions at representing benign referral known L3–4 calcified L3–4 level partially cystic lesions of unclear ependymoma, displacing etiology, PFD CE nerve roots but with no abnormal signal changes in nerve roots 12 72 F 15 mo Vaginal pain, urinary 1) Incomplete CES Yes, outside MRI 1 yr prior, not 1) Moderate arachnoiditis at Yes Yes, referred to retention, right more 2) PFD in imaging system L4–L5, at the site of prior neurosurgery, than left radiculopathy operation ganglion impar after spinal operation, 2) Mild pudendal neuropathies, block, and offered PFD on exam rightϾleft spinal cord stimulator 13 58 M 2 yr Urinary symptoms, 1) CES None since prior spine 1) Moderate arachnoiditis, Yes Yes, referral to constipation, leg operation worse at L4–L5 level neurology and weakness after 2) Downstream lumbosacral neurosurgery, spinal operation plexopathies and bilateral offered spinal cord sciatic and femoral stimulator; referral neuropathies, worse to neurourology, on right learned to catheterize 14 29 F 6–12 mo RLQ pain, constipation, 1) MS-related symptoms No, multiple cervical and 1) Mild degenerative disease No No, continued pelvic history of MS, sacral 2) PFD thoracic MRIs to follow of the lower lumbar spine PT and did well nerve root deficits on 3) MS plaque in the conus patient’s known MS right and PFD 15 56 F 6 mo Defecatory and urinary 1) Incomplete CES Yes, no pertinent findings 1) Mild-to-moderate Yes Yes, referral to symptoms, LLQ pain, 2) Radiation arachnoiditis at the neurosurgery, less left buttock/vaginal cystitis/proctitis surgical level (L3–4) emphasis on numbness after spinal 2) Mild left sciatic radiation effects operation and radiation neuropathy causing her for colorectal cancer, symptoms LϾR sacral nerve root (stopped urethral deficits dilations and proctitis treatments) 16 44 F Chronic, worsened Pelvic pain, known small 1) PFD Yes, several small perineural 1) Multiple lumbosacral Yes Yes, referral to 1–2 yr ago sacral perineural cysts, 2) Sacral radiculopathy cysts in sacral foramina neuropathies (left L5, neurosurgical history of multiple 3) Pudendal neuropathy bilaterally bilateral S1, left S2, specialist regarding cancers and pelvic 4) Radiation plexopathy and right S3) Tarlov cysts; radiation, PFD 2) Multiple Tarlov cysts treatment focused 3) Right pudendal on LMN neuropathy dysfunction 17 56 M 5 yr Urinary symptoms that 1) Pelvic floor dysfunction No 1) Findings compatible No No, pain improved started in childhood, 2) Ilioinguinal or genitofemoral with R ilioinguinal and with pelvic PT right groin/testicular neuropathy genitofemoral alone, no pain after hernia repair, 3) SBO/tethered cord or other neuropathies explanation for PFD cauda equina compromise urinary retention found 18 57 F 6 yr Defecatory and urinary 1) PFD No 1) Left S1 and S3 neuropathies Yes Lost to follow-up symptoms requiring 2) CES 2) Bilateral pudendal catheterizations, severe neuropathies PFD and sacral nerve root deficits (continued) On-line Table: Continued Change in Patient Age Clinical History and Prior MRI (Yes/No)? Diagnostic Change in No. (yr) Sex Duration of Symptoms Findings Preimaging Clinical Differential Pertinent Findings? Pertinent MRN Findings Thinking Management 19 57 F 12 yr, worsened Rectal pain after spinal 1) Incomplete CES No 1) Moderate canal stenosis No Yes, stopped pelvic ϳ3moago operation, bilateral 2) Left piriformis syndrome and right neuroforaminal PT radiculopathies and left 3) Left SIJ pain/dysfunction narrowing at L3–L4 piriformis tenderness 2) Findings of tethered cord on exam 3) Left piriformis muscle atrophy 20 50 F 4 yr Urinary and fecal 1) PFD Yes, L5–S1, 3- to 4-mm 1) Mild left sciatic Yes Yes, CT-guided incontinence, low back 2) Myofascial back pain posterior central disc neuropathy diagnostic sciatic and left leg pain after 3) CES or sacral radiculopathy herniation mildly indents nerve block MVC, PFD and reduced after MVC the thecal sac recommended anal sphincter tone 21 33 F 8 yr Urinary retention after pelvic 1) PFD No 1) Mild right S1 traction injury Yes lost to follow-up trauma, PFD 2) CES and right S2 neuroma in continuity 2) Downstream pudendal and sciatic neuropathies 22 79 F 10 yr Left gluteal/rectal pain 1) CES Yes, no pertinent findings 1) CES with arachnoiditis and Yes Yes, referred to after spinal operation, 2) Lumbar radiculopathy neuropathies of left- interventional constipation, urinary sided L4, S1, and S2 nerves spine for injections incontinence, and left sacral nerve root AJNR Am J Neuroradiol deficits 23 53 M 12 yr, worsened in Rectal pain, history of 1) Lumbar arachnoiditis Yes, clumping of intrathecal 1) Moderate arachnoiditis Yes Yes, CT-guided recent mo paraplegia (complete T5 2) Vertebral discitis/osteomyelitis nerve roots at L5–S1 level, 2) Bilateral pudendal pudendal nerve spinal cord injury), no likely arachnoiditis and right inferior blocks ϫ3 movement or sensation hemorrhoidal below the level of neuropathies injury, known lumbar arachnoiditis and possible discitis/ osteomyelitis of the ● lumbar spine : ●● Note:—PFPT indicates pelvic floor physiotherapy; PFD, pelvic floor dysfunction; PT, physical therapy; RLQ ϭ right lower quadrant; SIJ, sacroiliac joint; SBO, small bowel obstruction; MVC, motor vehicle crash; postop, postoperative; SI, sacroiliac; CE, cauda equina; LLQ, left lower quadrant; R, right; L, left; LMN, lower motor neuron; GF, genitofemoral. 2017 www.ajnr.org E3.
Recommended publications
  • Universitätsspital Balgrist, Zürich Chiropraktische Medizin Kommissarischer Leiter: Prof
    Universitätsspital Balgrist, Zürich Chiropraktische Medizin Kommissarischer Leiter: Prof. Dr. Armin Curt, MD, FRCPC Betreuung der Masterarbeit: Dr. Brigitte Wirth, PT, PhD Leitung der Masterarbeit: Prof. em. Dr. Barry Kim Humphreys, BSc, DC, PhD A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ON QUANTIFIABLE PHYSICAL RISK FACTORS FOR NON-SPECIFIC ADOLESCENT LOW BACK PAIN MASTERARBEIT zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Master in Chiropraktischer Medizin (M Chiro Med) der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Zürich vorgelegt von Tobias Potthoff (09-712-712) 2017 Table of Content 1. Scientific Accompanying Text .......................................................................................................... 3 2. Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 13 3. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 14 4. Methods ........................................................................................................................................ 15 a. Search strategy .......................................................................................................................... 15 b. Inclusion criteria ........................................................................................................................ 15 c. Study selection .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Injuries and Affections of the Spine ศ.นพ.พิบูลย์ อิทธิระวิวงศ์ ภาควิชาออร์โธปิดิกส์ I
    Injuries and Affections of the Spine ศ.นพ.พิบูลย์ อิทธิระวิวงศ์ ภาควิชาออร์โธปิดิกส์ I. Injuries of the spine and thorax :- Classification 1. Major fractures and displacements of the cervical spine - Wedge compression fracture of vertebral body - Burst fracture of vertebral body - Extension subluxation - Flexion subluxation - Dislocation and fracture-dislocation - Fracture of the aieas - Fracture-dislocation of atlanto-axial joint - Intra-spinal displacements of soft tissue 2. Major fractures and displacements of the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae - Wedge compression fracture of vertebral body - Burst fracture of vertebral body - Dislocation and fracture-dislocation 3. Paraplegia from spinal injuries 4. Minor fractures of the spinal column - Fracture of transverse processes - Fracture of spinous processes - Fracture of the sacrum - Fracture of the coccyx 5. Fractures of the thoracic case - Fracture of the ribs - Fracture of the sternum II. Orthopaedic disorders of the spine Disorders Neck and cervical spine Trunk and spine (T,L,S) Congenital - Lumbar and sacral variations, abnormalities Hemivertebra. Spina bifida. Deformities Infantile torticollis Scoliosis. Congenital short neck Kyphosis. Congenital high spcapula Lordosis. Infections of bone Tuberculosis of C-spine Tuberculosis of T or L-spine Pyogenic infection of C- Pyogenic infection of T of L-spine. spine Arthritis of the spinal Ankylosing spondylitis Rheumatoid arthritis Osteoarthritis joints Cervical spondylosis Ankylosing spondylitis Osteochondritis - Scheuermann’s disease Calve’s
    [Show full text]
  • Evicore Spine Imaging Guidelines
    CLINICAL GUIDELINES Spine Imaging Policy Version 1.0 Effective February 14, 2020 eviCore healthcare Clinical Decision Support Tool Diagnostic Strategies: This tool addresses common symptoms and symptom complexes. Imaging requests for individuals with atypical symptoms or clinical presentations that are not specifically addressed will require physician review. Consultation with the referring physician, specialist and/or individual’s Primary Care Physician (PCP) may provide additional insight. CPT® (Current Procedural Terminology) is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association (AMA). CPT® five digit codes, nomenclature and other data are copyright 2017 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. No fee schedules, basic units, relative values or related listings are included in the CPT® book. AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. AMA assumes no liability for the data contained herein or not contained herein. © 2019 eviCore healthcare. All rights reserved. Spine Imaging Guidelines V1.0 Spine Imaging Guidelines Procedure Codes Associated with Spine Imaging 3 SP-1: General Guidelines 5 SP-2: Imaging Techniques 14 SP-3: Neck (Cervical Spine) Pain Without/With Neurological Features (Including Stenosis) and Trauma 22 SP-4: Upper Back (Thoracic Spine) Pain Without/With Neurological Features (Including Stenosis) and Trauma 26 SP-5: Low Back (Lumbar Spine) Pain/Coccydynia without Neurological Features 28 SP-6: Lower Extremity Pain with Neurological Features (Radiculopathy, Radiculitis, or Plexopathy and Neuropathy) With or Without Low Back (Lumbar Spine) Pain 32 SP-7: Myelopathy 36 SP-8: Lumbar Spine Spondylolysis/Spondylolisthesis 39 SP-9: Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 42 SP-10: Sacro-Iliac (SI) Joint Pain, Inflammatory Spondylitis/Sacroiliitis and Fibromyalgia 44 SP-11: Pathological Spinal Compression Fractures 47 SP-12: Spinal Pain in Cancer Patients 49 SP-13: Spinal Canal/Cord Disorders (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effectiveness and Harms of Spinal Manipulative
    Effectiveness and Harms of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Evidence-based Synthesis Program for the Treatment of Acute Neck and Lower Back Pain APPENDIX A. SEARCH STRATEGIES 1. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW SEARCH STRATEGIES SEARCH STRATEGY FOR “CHIROPRACTIC” SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS DATABASE SEARCHED: Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Other Reviews NO DATE OR LANGUAGE LIMITATIONS SEARCH STRATEGY: 'chiroprac* in Title, Abstract, Keywords Cochrane Reviews (17) Other Reviews (44) SEARCH STRATEGY: "Manipulation, Spinal" Cochrane Database Search Strategy #2: spine or spinal or neck or back or cervi* and (smt or manipulat* or chiropract*):ti,ab,kw Dates: 2011-present, Limit to the Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Other Reviews (DARE), Technology Assessments, and Economic Evaluations databases. Forward search on: Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). Aug 1 1996;21(15):1746-1759; discussion 1759-1760. 2. UPDATE SEARCH STRATEGIES SPINAL MANIPULATION THERAPY – 2015 UPDATE SEARCH METHODOLOGY DATABASE SEARCHED & TIME PERIOD COVERED: COCHRANE CENTRAL – 1/1/2011-2/06/2017 SEARCH STRATEGY: #1 MeSH descriptor: [Back] explode all trees #2 MeSH descriptor: [Buttocks] this term only #3 MeSH descriptor: [Leg] this term only 54 Effectiveness and Harms of Spinal Manipulative Therapy Evidence-based Synthesis Program for the Treatment of Acute Neck and Lower Back Pain #4 MeSH descriptor: [Back Pain] explode all trees #5 MeSH descriptor: [Back Pain]
    [Show full text]
  • Coccydynia: a Story Retold
    Open Access Austin Journal of Surgery Special Article - Brain Tumor Surgery Coccydynia: A Story Retold Sarmast AH*, Kirmani AR and Bhat AR Department of Neurosurgery, Sher I Kashmir Institute of Abstract Medical Sciences, India Coccydynia refers to a pathological condition in which pain occurs in the *Corresponding author: Arif Hussain Sarmast, coccyx or its immediate vicinity. The pain is usually provoked by sitting or rising Department of Neurosurgery, Sher I Kashmir Institute of from sitting. Most cases are associated with abnormal mobility of the coccyx, Medical Sciences, Dalipora Kawadara Srinagar Kashmir, which may trigger a chronic inflammatory process leading to degeneration of this India structure. The exact incidence of coccydynia has not been reported; however, factors associated with increased risk of developing coccydynia include obesity Received: May 06, 2016; Accepted: October 20, 2016; and female gender. Several non operative interventions are currently used Published: October 26, 2016 for the management of coccydynia including Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs), hot baths, ring-shaped cushions, intrarectal massage and manipulation (manual therapy), steroid injection, dextrose prolotherapy, ganglion impar blocks, pulsed Radio Frequency Thermocoagulation (RFT) and psychotherapy. Several studies have reported good or excellent results after coccygectomy especially in patients who are refractory to conservative treatment. Keywords: Coccydynia; Coccygectomy; Sacrococcygeal joint Introduction those with type I [10]. Anterior subluxation is a rare lesion and tends to occur in type III and type IV patterns. Posterior subluxation is The word ‘coccyx’ has its ancestry from the Greek word used the more common in the straighter type I configuration [11]. beak of the cuckoo bird due to remarkable resemblance in appearance when viewed from the side [1-3].
    [Show full text]
  • Spine Imaging Guidelines Version 10.1.2018
    Medical Guidelines Institute Spine Imaging Guidelines Version 10.1.2018 Medical Guidelines Institute Clinical Decision Support Tool Diagnostic Strategies: This tool addresses common symptoms and symptom complexes. Imaging requests for individuals with atypical symptoms or clinical presentations that are not specifically addressed will require consultation with the referring physician, specialist and/or individual’s Primary Care Physician (PCP) may provide additional insight. CPT® (Current Procedural Terminology) is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association (AMA). CPT ® five digit codes, nomenclature and other data are copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. No fee schedules, basic units, relative values or related listings are included in the CPT® book. AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. AMA assumes no liability for the data contained herein or not contained herein. © 2018-2019 Medical Guidelines Institute. All rights reserved. © 2018 Medical Guidelines Institute. All rights reserved. Spine Imaging Guidelines Procedure Codes Associated with Spine Imaging 3 SP-1: General Guidelines 4 SP-2: Imaging Techniques 13 SP-3: Neck (Cervical Spine) Pain Without/With Neurological Features and Trauma 20 SP-4: Upper Back (Thoracic Spine) Pain Without/With Neurological Features and Trauma 24 SP-5: Low Back (Lumbar Spine) Pain/Coccydynia without Neurological Features 27 SP-6: Lower Extremity Pain with Neurological Features (Radiculopathy, Radiculitis, or Plexopathy and Neuropathy) With or Without Low Back (Lumbar Spine) Pain 31 SP-7: Myelopathy 35 SP-8: Lumbar Spine Spondylolysis/Spondylolisthesis 38 SP-9: Lumbar Spinal Stenosis 41 SP-10: Sacro-Iliac (SI) Joint Pain, Inflammatory Spondylitis/Sacroiliitis and Fibromyalgia 44 SP-11: Pathological Spinal Compression Fractures 47 SP-12: Spinal Pain in Cancer Patients 49 SP-13: Spinal Canal/Cord Disorders (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Back Pain: Sacroiliac and Coccydynia Treatment Medical Policy
    Back Pain: Sacroiliac and Coccydynia Treatment Medical Policy Service: Back Pain: Sacroiliac and Coccydynia Treatment PUM 250-0024-1706 Medical Policy Committee Approval 05/27/2021 Effective Date 06/01/2021 Prior Authorization Needed Yes Related Medical Policies: • Back Pain: Epidural Injections • Back and Nerve Pain: Radiofrequency Ablation, Facet Joint, and other Injections • Non-covered Services and Procedures Description: Sacroiliac (SI) joint injection is an injection of local anesthetic and/or a steroid into the articular space between the spinal column and pelvis. Coccydynia/coccodynia, pain in the coccyx (tailbone), is most commonly the result of falling backwards and landing in a sitting position. While most cases resolve without medical care or with conservative management, a minority of individuals may develop chronic coccyx pain. Indications of Coverage: A. Sacroiliac joint injection is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following conditions (1 through 5) are met: 1. Chronic back and buttock pain symptoms for at least three (3) months. 2. Physical exam findings consistent with sacroiliac joint (SIJ) symptoms (e.g., thigh thrust test, distraction test, compression test, Flexion Abduction, and External Rotation test [FABER] also known as “Patrick’s test” and/or Gaenslen’s Maneuver indicate sacroiliac joint cause). The nerve root tension test (straight leg raise), if performed, must be negative unless the provider documents coexistence of both radicular and non-radicular pain. If bilateral injections are requested, the symptoms and physical exam findings, must be bilateral. 3. Within the last six months, the individual has completed a 6-week trial of medications such as anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, analgesics, opioids, gabapentin, and pregabalin.
    [Show full text]
  • Prolo Your Pain Away: Curing Chronic Pain with Prolotherapy
    PROLO YOUR PAIN AWAY®, 4TH EDITION CUR NG CHRONICWITH PAIN PROLOTHERAPY Ross A. Hauser, MD & Marion A. Boomer Hauser, MS, RD PROLO YOUR PAIN AWAY! Curing Chronic Pain with Prolotherapy 4TH EDITION Ross A. Hauser, MD & Marion A. Boomer Hauser, MS, RD Sorridi Business Consulting Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hauser, Ross A., author. Prolo your pain away! : curing chronic pain with prolotherapy / Ross A. Hauser & Marion Boomer Hauser. — Updated, fourth edition. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-9903012-0-2 1. Intractable pain—Treatment. 2. Chronic pain— Treatment. 3. Sclerotherapy. 4. Musculoskeletal system —Diseases—Chemotherapy. 5. Regenerative medicine. I. Hauser, Marion A., author. II. Title. RB127.H388 2016 616’.0472 QBI16-900065 Text, illustrations, cover and page design copyright © 2017, Sorridi Business Consulting Published by Sorridi Business Consulting 9738 Commerce Center Ct., Fort Myers, FL 33908 Printed in the United States of America All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means— electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise—without the prior written permission of the publisher. The only exception is in brief quotations in printed reviews. Scripture quotations are from: Holy Bible, New International Version®, NIV® Copyrights © 1973, 1978, 1984, International Bible Society. Used by permission of Zondervan Publishing House. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Coccyx As a Cause of Coccydynia (Tailbone Pain)
    Article ID: WMC005505 ISSN 2046-1690 Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Coccyx as a Cause of Coccydynia (Tailbone Pain) Peer review status: No Corresponding Author: Dr. Patrick M Foye, M.D., Director, Coccyx Pain Center, Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers: New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, DOC-3100, Newark, New Jersey, 07103 - United States of America Submitting Author: Dr. Patrick M Foye, M.D., Director, Coccyx Pain Center, Professor of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rutgers: New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, DOC-3100, 07103 - United States of America Other Authors: Dr. Jaya S Sanapati, M.D., Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, DOC-3100, Newark, New Jersey, 07103 - United States of America Dr. Alex John, M.D., Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, DOC-3100, Newark, New Jersey, 07103 - United States of America Dr. Steven L Jow, M.D., Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, 90 Bergen St, DOC-3100, Newark, New Jersey, 07103 - United States of America Article ID: WMC005505 Article Type: Case Report Submitted on:06-Aug-2018, 01:01:29 PM GMT Published on: 14-Aug-2018, 06:29:54 AM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/5505 Subject Categories:PAIN Keywords:coccydynia, coccyx, pain, tailbone, avascular necrosis, AVN, osteonecrosis How to cite the article:Foye PM, Sanapati JS, John A, Jow SL. Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the Coccyx as a Cause of Coccydynia (Tailbone Pain). WebmedCentral PAIN 2018;9(8):WMC005505 Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • Coccydynia: an Overview of the Anatomy, Etiology, and Treatment of Coccyx Pain
    2/7/2017 Coccydynia: An Overview of the Anatomy, Etiology, and Treatment of Coccyx Pain Ochsner J. 2014 Spring; 14(1): 84–87. PMCID: PMC3963058 Coccydynia: An Overview of the Anatomy, Etiology, and Treatment of Coccyx Pain Lesley Smallwood Lirette, MD, Gassan Chaiban, MD, Reda Tolba, MD, and Hazem Eissa, MD Department of Pain Management, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA Address correspondence to Lesley Smallwood Lirette, MD, Department of Pain Management, Ochsner Baptist Medical Center, Napoleon Medical Plaza Building, 2820 Napoleon Avenue, Suite 950, New Orleans, LA 70115, Tel: (504) 842­5300, Email: [email protected] Copyright © Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract Go to: Background Despite its small size, the coccyx has several important functions. Along with being the insertion site for multiple muscles, ligaments, and tendons, it also serves as one leg of the tripod—along with the ischial tuberosities—that provides weight­bearing support to a person in the seated position. The incidence of coccydynia (pain in the region of the coccyx) has not been reported, but factors associated with increased risk of developing coccydynia include obesity and female gender. Methods This article provides an overview of the anatomy, physiology, and treatment of coccydynia. Results Conservative treatment is successful in 90% of cases, and many cases resolve without medical treatment. Treatments for refractory cases include pelvic floor rehabilitation, manual manipulation and massage, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, psychotherapy, steroid injections, nerve block, spinal cord stimulation, and surgical procedures. Conclusion A multidisciplinary approach employing physical therapy, ergonomic adaptations, medications, injections, and, possibly, psychotherapy leads to the greatest chance of success in patients with refractory coccyx pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Medical Imaging Procedures
    Recommendations for medical imaging procedures Recommendation by the German Commission on Radiological Protection Adopted at the 300th SSK meeting on 27 June 2019 For many decades, diagnostic imaging has been an indispensable tool of ensure referral guidelines modern medicine to clarify diagnostic questions, thus allowing for the for medical imaging, taking planning of appropriate individual treatments. Some examination methods into account the radiation such as X-ray or nuclear medical diagnostics involve ionising radiation or doses, are available to the radioactive substances. In view of the radiological exposure involved in referrers. such procedures, physicians must consider carefully whether a different The Federal Environment diagnostic method with less or no radiation exposure, such as ultrasound Ministry, being responsible for radiological protection, has for many years or magnetic resonance procedures, might not be at least equally well advocated keeping the number of applications involving radiation suited for a specific patient. Therefore the Recommendations for medical exposure as low as possible. There is constant enhancement of imaging procedures address first of all physicians referring patients for diagnostic procedures and therefore these recommendations are further diagnostics. The goal is to avoid unnecessary radiation exposure reviewed and updated on a regular basis. while achieving the same level of diagnostic accuracy. I would like to thank the German Commission on Radiological Protection, the The recommendations list the most suitable imaging procedures for various medical associations involved and in particular the working group under various diagnostic questions. However, physicians must still provide in the chair of Professor Reinhard Loose for their work. each individual case the justifying indication for the selected examination method and document it.
    [Show full text]
  • Asernip-S Report on Fast-Track Surgery
    ASERNIP S Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures - Surgical Rapid Review Spinal Surgery for Chronic Low Back Pain: Review of Clinical Evidence and Guidelines June 2014 Australian Safety & Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures – Surgical The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons This report has been produced for the Victorian Government Department of Health June 30, 2014 Please note that this brief report, while broad in some aspects of systematic review methodology, should not be considered a comprehensive systematic review. Rather, this is a rapid review in which the methodology has been limited in one or more of the following areas to shorten the timeline for its completion: search strategy, inclusion criteria, assessment of study quality and data analysis. This report also contains non- systematic elements, such as qualitative information gathered from local surgeons. However, it is considered that these amendments would not significantly alter the overall findings of the rapid review when compared to a full systematic review. The methodology used for the rapid review is described in detail, including the limits for this particular topic. These limits were applied following the requirements of the specific review topic, in consultation with the requester. For a more comprehensive understanding of this topic, a broader analysis of the literature may be required. As such, all readers of this document should be aware of the limitations of this review. This brief was prepared by Ms Lynda McGahan and Dr Ann Scott from the Australian Safety and Efficacy Register of New Interventional Procedures – Surgical (ASERNIP-S). Declaration of competing interest: The authors of this publication claim no competing interests.
    [Show full text]