Public, Education, and Government Cable Television Access in Hawai'i: Unscrambling the Signals

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Public, Education, and Government Cable Television Access in Hawai'i: Unscrambling the Signals Public, Education, and Government Cable Television Access in Hawai'i: Unscrambling the Signals SUSAN EKIMOTO JAWOROWSKI Researcher Report No.4, 1995 Legislative Reference Bureau State Capitol Honolulu, Hawaii FOREWORD This study was prepared in response to Senate Resolution No. 65, Senate Draft 1 (1995). The Resolution directed the Legislative Reference Bureau to study the nonprofit public, education, and government cable access organizations in Hawai'i to determine whether their operations provide the type of access and programming intended by federal and state law. The Bureau was also directed to answer specific issues related to their management, funding, and operation. The Bureau wishes to extend its appreciation to all those who assisted in the study, including the respondents from other access organizations across the United States and in Canada. The Bureau extends special thanks to Sue Buske, Kathleen Schuler, Sanford Inouye, Ras Skelton, Darla Palmer, Richard Turner, Juergen Denecke, Brian Lee, Wendy Arbeit, Bruce Fisher, Prema Qadir, Carol Bain, Ed Coil, Andy Park, and Robbie Aim for their cooperation and assistance. Wendell K. Kimura Acting Director November 1995 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page FOREWORD ..................................................................................................., ii 1. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. Nature of the Study ................................................................................. Objective of the Study ............................................................................. Organization of the Study ........................................................................ 2. BACKGROUND ................................................................................................ 2 The Players The Federal Government .......................................................................... 2 The State................................................................................................. 2 The Cable Companies ..... ......................... .......... ... ... ...... ...... ................. ... 3 The Access Organizations........................................................................ 3 Interconnections between the State, the Cable Companies, and the Access Organizations Other Issues............................................................................................ 6 Endnotes ................................................................................................. 6 3. 'OLELO: THE CORPORATION FOR COMMUNITY TELEVISION ...................... 9 Background ....... ......................................... ................... .......................... 9 Training ................................................................................................... 9 Equipment and Facility Availability................... ............ ........ ..................... 12 Cablecast Access..................................................................................... 15 Editorial Guidelines........... ........... ........................ .................................... 16 Promotion................................................................................................ 17 Viewership............................................................................................... 17 Budget .................................................................................................... 18 Board Membership............................................... .......... ...... .................... 18 What the State Can Do to Help Meet PEG Access Goals........ ...... .............. 18 Public Comments on 'Olelo....................................................................... 19 Endnotes................................................................................................. 20 4. HO'IKE: KAUA'I COMMUNITY TELEVISION ................................................... .. 22 Background ......................................................... ...................... .............. 22 Training. .............................................................. ............... ..................... 23 Equipment Availability .............................................................................. 24 Cablecast Access..................................................................................... 24 Editorial Guidelines......... ......... ............................................ ........ ............ 25 iii Promotion................................................................................................ 26 Viewership ............. , ...... ,.......................................................................... 26 Budget .................................................................................................... 26 Board Membership.................................................... ............................... 27 What State Could Do to Assist Public Access... .......... ...... ......................... 27 Guidelines to Restrict Potential Abuse of G Channel.................................. 27 Public Comments........................................................................ ............. 28 Endnotes................................................................................................. 29 5. AKAKU: MAUl COMMUNITY TELEViSiON ....................................................... 30 Background.............................................................. ............................... 30 Training.................................................................. ...... ........................... 31 Equipment Availability .............................................................................. 31 Cablecast Access..................................................................................... 32 Editorial Guidelines................... ............................................................... 33 Promotion................................................................................................ 33 Viewership............................................................................................... 33 Cablecast Scheduling............................................... ................................ 33 Budget .................................................................................................... 34 Board Membership ................................................................................... 35 Community Access to Channels................................................................ 36 Endnotes... ............ .................................................................................. 36 6. NA LEO '0 HAWAI'I, INC ................................................................................. 37 Background........... ................................................... ..... .......................... 37 Training ..... '" ........................ ....... .............. .............................................. 37 Equipment Availability .............................................................................. 37 Broadcast Access .................................................................................... 38 Editorial Guidelines ......................... ......................................................... 38 Promotion.. ............ ......... ................................................................... ... .. 38 Viewership......... ........ ............................................. ...... ........................... 39 E & G Programming................................................ ................................. 39 Budget .................................................................................................... 39 Proposed Insurance Deposit and Fees ...................................................... 39 Board Membership. .................................................... ............. ................. 39 What Could the State Do to Try to Help Na Leo Meet PEG Goals................ 40 What the State Can Do to Help Na Leo Promote the G Function ................. 40 Public Comments... ......... ............................ ............................................. 41 Endnotes... .............................................................................................. 41 7. WHAT TYPE OF ACCESS SHOULD BE PROVIDED? ....................................... .. 42 1. Speakers' Access to Technology............................................. 43 2. Access to the Medium. ............... ........... .................................. 45 3. The Community's Access ........................................................ 46 Endnotes........................ ......................................... ................................ 46 iv Page 8. BOARD SELECTION ....................................................................................... 48 Proponents of Board Selection.................................................................. 50 Criticism of Current Selection Process....................................................... 51 1. No Subscriber Representation ........................... ...................... 51 2. No Producer Representation.............................. ............ .......... 52 3. No Election of Board Members................................................ 52 4. Removal from Local Community .............................................. 53 5. State Appointments................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Public Service, Private Media: the Political Economy of The
    PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) by GLENN MICHAEL MORRIS A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2010 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation ofApproval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Glenn Morris Title: "Public Service, Private Media: The Political Economy ofthe Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN)." This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department of Journalism and Communication by: Janet Wasko, Chairperson, Journalism and Communication Carl Bybee, Member, Journalism and Communication Gabriela Martinez, Member, Journalism and Communication John Foster, Outside Member, Sociology and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. June 14,2010 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 © 2010 Glenn Michael Morris IV An Abstract of the Dissertation of Glenn Michael Morris for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism and Communication to be taken June 2010 Title: PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) Approved: _ Dr. Janet Wasko The Satellite-Cable Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN) is the only television outlet in the U.S. providing Congressional coverage. Scholars have studied the network's public affairs content and unedited "gavel-to-gavel" style of production that distinguish it from other television channels.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Historie a Vývoj Mtv
    Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce 2011 Eliška Junková Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Bakalářská práce Globalizační fenomén MTV Eliška Junková Plzeň 2011 Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Katedra sociologie Studijní program Sociologie Studijní obor Sociologie Bakalářská práce Globalizační fenomén MTV Eliška Junková Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Stanislav Holubec, Ph.D. Katedra sociologie Fakulta filozofická Západočeské univerzity v Plzni Plzeň 2011 Prohlašuji, ţe jsem práci zpracovala samostatně a pouţila jen uvedených pramenů a literatury. Plzeň, duben 2011 ……………………… Ráda bych poděkovala PhDr. Stanislavu Holubcovi, Ph.D. za odborné vedení při psaní této práce, za cenné rady a připomínky. Obsah 0 ÚVOD.............................................................................................. 1 1 GLOBALIZACE MÉDIÍ .................................................................. 4 1.1 KATEGORIE WORLD MUSIC ........................................................ 5 2 HISTORIE A VÝVOJ MTV ............................................................ 7 2.1 BREAKING THE COLOR BARRIER .................................................. 9 2.2 PRONIKÁNÍ HUDEBNÍCH ŽÁNRŮ NA MTV ..................................... 10 2.3 MUSIC AWARDS A FENOMÉN MADONNA ..................................... 12 2.4 KAMPANĚ MTV........................................................................... 14 3 GLOBALIZACE MTV ................................................................... 14 3.1 EXPANZE
    [Show full text]
  • Retrocom Mid-Market Real Estate Investment Trust
    RETROCOM MID-MARKET REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 March 30, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Forward-Looking Statements......................................................................................................... 4 Structure of the REIT..................................................................................................................... 4 General Development of the Business........................................................................................... 6 Internal Growth Through Active Asset Management........................................................ 8 External Growth Through Acquisitions............................................................................. 9 Description of the Business ........................................................................................................... 9 Overview of Properties .................................................................................................... 13 Top 20 Tenants ................................................................................................................ 14 Schedule of Lease Maturities........................................................................................... 15 Description of Properties ................................................................................................. 15 Debt Strategy ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • City Wide Drainage Assessment Report
    City of Summit City Wide Drainage Assessment Report Dept. of Community Services Division of Engineering Revised - July 2020 Aaron Schrager, City Engineer Rick Matias, Assistant City Engineer Lori Toth, Assistant Engineer Page 1 of 37 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 3 SUMMARY 5 CATEGORY I – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 1. Golf Course Pond (Permitting Phase) 7 2. Salt Brook 8 3. West End Avenue Erosion 9 4. Railroad Culverts 10 5. Middle Avenue Culvert 11 6. Beekman Road Culvert 12 CATEGORY II – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 7. Briant Parkway, Easements near Springfield Avenue intersection 14 8. Portland Road – At Dorchester Road 15 9. Tulip Street – Oakland Place to Linden Place 16 10. Kenneth Court and Crest Acre Court 17 11. Morris Avenue at Elm Street Condo Driveway 18 12. Martins Brook 19 CATEGORY III – DRAINAGE LOCATIONS 13. Huntley Road (Under Construction) 21 14. Gloucester Road (Design Complete – Awaiting Construction) 22 15. Wade Drive 23 16. Sweet Briar Road / Plymouth Road (Under Construction - Phased) 24 17. Dorset Lane Icing 25 18. Club Drive 26 19. Ox Bow Lane 27 20. Princeton Street 28 21. Division Avenue Bridge (Part of #2) 29 22. Beverly Road & Sheridan Road 30 Page 2 of 37 COMPLETED PROJECTS (Pages 31-37) 1. 236 Springfield Avenue “The Dell” (Designed Completed-work not to be completed) 2. Whittredge Road/Dogwood Drive (Completed Fall 2007) 3. New Providence Avenue (Completed 2007) 4. Sheffield Road (Completed Fall 2008) 5. Memorial Field Basketball Courts (Completed 2008) 6. 8 & 12 Sweet Briar Road (Completed – Fall 2009) 7. Springfield Avenue and Summit Avenue (Completed – Fall 2009) 8. Laurel Avenue (Completed – Fall 2009) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • MODEL BUILDER MAY 1980 FULL SIZE PLANS AVAILABLE - SEE PAGE 108 15 Least 20 Grains Per Inch
    MO BUI volume 10, number 100 ISSN 0194 7079 • CURTISS F6C-1 Eugene Martin's 2 " R/C Scale Classic • GOLDEN EAGLE New Std. Class Sailplane by Tom Williams • SKYROCKET - 1940 O.T. By Larry Eisinger • F.A.C. TRAINER F/F Sport Rubber by Frank Scott The i h Radio co of Whttt makes the Ι -series so unique' Full programming. Modular AM and FM queue) boards. ATV. Direct Servo Con­ trol. Dual rates dnd mixing circuitry. Human engineered controls of uncommon quality and precision. And the meticulous hand­ rails mans hip that has made us famous. Tl»c acutpenbe U N 2ft p ^risciti^ l»uwt*tii 4. 5. 6 and S channel models, plus the 5JH/h Inside and out the Futaba "Supcmtlios helicopter and the are built for !he most critical radio control 6JB/be.<; version* enthusiasts sc»s«>».· And now the . the reliability, and technical wizardry/ "“« j new S124 servo, with to match the most demanding and skillful pat­ dual ball bearings and tern flyers!' noted Mode! AirpUmt .Virus. coreless high torque/high speed motor, is Fixing Models found the component available as a J-series option. assembly and circuit board layout "truly Closely examine the J-senes at your RC excellent" specialist. Isn't your model worthy of a Futaba? Futaba / ulaba t orporatioa of A mtrica 555 Hr« tVi m naStrrtt/C<>mpcim/CA <*>220 L B A T T (% CHECK ö -® THINK TWICE m I B The best Glow Plug and the best Fuel go together like a horse and carriage. You can’t get the best out of either without the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Justifiable Expectations Standard: the Basis for the Exercise of the Public Interest Power of the Ontario Securities Commission
    Justifiable Expectations Standard: The Basis for the Exercise of the Public Interest Power of the Ontario Securities Commission Paul Davis August 22, 2014 Paul Davis is a partner of McMillan LLP. This paper was prepared with the assistance of Sandy Andreou (an associate at McMillan LLP); and Allison Vale, David Zhou, Jennifer Allman and Matthew Burns, each of whom is a summer student. McMillan LLP Brookfield Place, 181 Bay Street, Suite 4400, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J 2T3 Vancouver Calgary Toronto Ottawa Montréal Hong Kong mcmillan.ca TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3. JURISPRUDENCE ................................................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Cablecasting ....................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1.1 Summary .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.1.2 Observations ........................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Re Lindzon .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eddie: the Sleepwalking Cannibal
    Presents EDDIE: THE SLEEPWALKING CANNIBAL A FILM BY BORIS RODRIGUEZ Starring Thure Lindhardt In English 83 min., Canada/Denmark To download hi-res images and video clips: http://www.musicboxfilms.com/eddie--the-sleepwalking-cannibal-movies-57.php NY Press Contact: LA/Online Press Contact: Emma Griffiths Clay Dollarhide Emma Griffiths PR Ginsberg/ Libby 917-806-0599 323-645-6819 [email protected] [email protected] SYNPOSIS Thure Lindhardt (Keep the Lights On) stars in this quirky horror-comedy as Lars, a former darling of the art scene slipping away into the land of has-beens and struggling with lack of inspiration. When Lars’ art dealer Ronny arranges a teaching job in a small town as a “therapeutic measure” to stir up his creative juices, things don’t quite turn out as planned. At first, life in the peaceful small town seems rosy, as he settles in and impresses beautiful fellow colleague Leslie by taking in the brawny, mute Eddie after the latter’s caregiver passes away. But Lars soon discovers that the façade of serenity hides something unimaginable: Eddie suffers from a rare form of sleepwalking that transforms him from a docile, cereal-obsessed art student into a ravenous sleepwalking cannibal. Initially horrified by Eddie’s dark secret, Lars becomes enthralled by the not-so-gentle giant: at long last, here’s the muse he’d been searching for! Exceptional art comes at a very high price...and how far is Lars willing to go for his next masterpiece? Eddie: The Sleepwalking Cannibal is a fresh, clever satire about artistic inspiration that pushes boundaries with its unique blend of offbeat humor, twisted friendships, sweet-hearted romance, and the gory realities of sleepwalking cannibalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-105 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 06-105 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications for Consent to the Assignment ) MB Docket No. 05-192 and/or Transfer of Control of Licenses ) ) Adelphia Communications Corporation, ) (and subsidiaries, debtors-in-possession), ) Assignors, ) to ) Time Warner Cable Inc. (subsidiaries), ) Assignees; ) ) Adelphia Communications Corporation, ) (and subsidiaries, debtors-in-possession), ) Assignors and Transferors, ) to ) Comcast Corporation (subsidiaries), ) Assignees and Transferees; ) ) Comcast Corporation, Transferor, ) to ) Time Warner Inc., Transferee; ) ) Time Warner Inc., Transferor, ) to ) Comcast Corporation, Transferee ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: July 13, 2006 Released: July 21, 2006 By the Commission: Chairman Martin, and Commissioners Tate and McDowell issuing separate statements; Commissioner Copps dissenting and issuing a statement; and Commissioner Adelstein approving in part, dissenting in part and issuing a statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES......................................................................................................6 A. Adelphia Communications Corporation .......................................................................................... 6 B. Comcast Corporation ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • C I N E Mati
    C I N E MAti • TRADE NEWS • Dis~ption feared as Telefilm changes bosses Fundamental change OTTAWA - One week after II film and teleVIsio n, the indus­ the Canadian Film Develop­ was announced that Andre try will have toO u nderga another ment Carporatian, assumed a needed: broadcast review Lamy, Telefilm Canada's execu­ waiting periad while the new major role in the productian tive director, would be stepping executive masters the intrica­ industry when it toak on the TORONTO - Cammunications veloped piece-by-piece. The down on Aug. 1 as head of the cies af the industry. administration af the Braad­ minister Marcel Masse Apr. 9 system is fragile - all its parts carporatian, Peter Pearson re­ These fears were echoed in cast Program Develapment announced a long-awaited re­ are interrelated. All parts afthe signed his post as director of the Taronto, although attenuated Fund in 1983. Funded by a 6% view of broadcasting policy. In system depend on each other Canadian Broadcast Program by the belief that the new boss tax on the cable industry's re­ a luncheon address jointly for success. The activities and Development Fund, effective would come from the ranks af venues the Broadcast Fund has hosted by the Canadian Cable pragrams and investment plans June 1. The Pearson announce­ Taronta praducers. The tradi­ been a majar boaster af inde­ Television Assaciation and the af cable operators and conven­ ment, made on May 2, took the tion at Telefilm is to have the pendent film productian in Broadcast Executives Society, tional broadcasters and pay industry by surprise and the tap post alternate between Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works and Government Services Canada
    Public Works and Government Services Canada Requisition No. _______________________________ DRAWINGS & SPECIFICATIONS For RCMP Valemount Detachment Generator Replacement 1435 5th Avenue Valemount, BC Project No. R.109058.001 November 2020 APPROVED BY: Cheng, Huangchung Digitally signed by Cheng, Huangchung ____________________________________Date: 2021.01.18 16:25:32 -08'00' Regional Manager, A&E Services Date Digitally signed by Chris Patterson _____________________________Chris Patterson Date: 2020.12.09 06:43:01 ________ -08'00' Construction Safety Coordinator Date TENDER: Digitally signed by: Dezfooli, Masood Dezfooli, DN: CN = Dezfooli, Masood C = CA O = GC OU = PWGSC-TPSGC ____________________________________Masood Date: 2021.01.15 09:49:50 -08'00' Project Manager Date Real Property Services Branch, Professional and Technical Services, Pacific Region Room 219 - 800 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6Z 0B9 PROJECT # R.109058.001 PUBLIC WORKS AND GOVERNMENT SERVICES CANADA Section 00 00 10 VALEMOUNT DETACHMENT GENERATOR REPLACEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1435 5TH AVENUE, VALEMOUNT, BC Page 1 SPECIFICATION SECTION PAGES DIVISION INDEX 00 01 07 Seal Page 1 00 00 10 Table of Contents 2 DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 11 55 General Instructions 10 01 14 00 Work Restrictions 4 01 31 00 Management and Coordination 3 01 31 19 Project Meetings 2 01 32 17 Construction Progress Schedule 2 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures 3 01 35 33 Health and Safety Requirements 10 01 45 00 Quality Control 1 01 51 00 Temporary Facilities 2 01 56 00 Temporary Barriers
    [Show full text]
  • Of Rio Algom, Represents in My View a Private Arrangement Between Rio
    Page 22 of Rio Algom, represents in my view a private arrangement between Rio Algom and participants that would not give any rights to third parties except perhaps shareholders of Rio Algom derivately. When Albino encashed his rights under the Incentive Plan, he sold no shares into the market. There was no person in the market who purchased shares from or sold shares to him. No report of any trade was made over the Toronto Stock Exchange tape or the tape of any other stock exchange on which the shares of Rio Algom were listed. His encashment of award units was market neutral. If his actions brought harm, it was harm to Rio Algom itself who, as a result of his actions, may have paid more on encashment than it might otherwise have done. This would probably give Rio Algom a right of action against Albino. We were advised when this matter first came before us on January 25 that litigation was pending between Rio Algom and Albino and that Rio Algom had pleaded the actions of Albino in encashing his units in its statement of defence. The matters now before us were accordingly in issue in the action. It was on the basis of this information that we granted Albino's counsel the adjournment which he sought. We were also advised that the litigation had been settled. While details of the settlement were not before us, nor indeed should they have been, we can only assume that all matters at issue between the parties, including the encashment by Albino of his award units, were considered in reaching the settlement.
    [Show full text]
  • C Anadian Tire a Nnual R Eport 2 0
    ey Canadian Tire Annual Report 2006 the meets than More Table of Contents 2 Business platform 14 Leadership team 4 Core strengths 15 Chairman’s letter to 6 Value of the business model shareholders 8 Strategies driving growth 16 Board of Directors 10 Chief Executive Officer’s 18 Corporate responsibility letter to shareholders 21 Shareholder and corporate 12 Performance scorecard information 22 Store locations 2006 ($ in millions except for per share amounts) 2006 2005 % Change Consolidated Highlights Gross operating revenue1 $ 8,269.1 $ 7,721.6 7.1% Earnings before income taxes and minority interest 557.8 527.7 5.7% Income taxes 200.8 190.0 5.7% Net earnings 354.6 330.1 7.4% Cash generated from operating activities before changes in other working capital components 697.3 700.7 (0.5)% Cash generated from operating activities 682.5 413.5 65.0% Dividends paid 52.2 45.7 14.0% Per share Net earnings $ 4.35 $ 4.04 7.7% Diluted earnings 4.31 3.98 8.3% Cash generated from operating activities before changes in other working capital components 8.55 8.57 (0.3)% Cash generated from operating activities 8.37 5.06 65.4% Dividends declared 0.66 0.58 13.8% Shareholders’ equity 34.19 30.83 10.9% Number of shares outstanding – weighted average (thousands) 81,576 81,764 Ratios2 Current ratio 1.5 1.6 Canadian Tire Retail inventory turnover 9.8 10.7 Long-term debt to total capitalization (%) 28.3 31.7 Interest coverage 8.4 7.3 Return on equity (%) 13.4 13.9 1 Gross operating revenue for 2005 has been restated for the impact of EIC-156 as required by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
    [Show full text]