April 2007 THE Volume 32, No. 7

awyTHEeSTATErBAR OF MONTANA

The Discipline Counsel’s Pets annual report AT THE in Memoriam in honor of Paul Raftery

The ‘legal thuggery’ ruling – aimed at a California law firm

estate Two high-profile disbarments

Legal-system bills plans in the last days of the Legislature Update on Page 5

THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL INDEX

Published every month except January and July by the State Bar of Montana, 7 W. Sixth Ave., Suite 2B, P.O. Box 577, Helena MT 59624. Phone (406) 442-7660; Fax (406) 442-7763. COVER STORY E-mail: [email protected] l Providing for pets in estate plans 9 STATE BAR OFFICERS President Peggy Probasco, Butte President-Elect FEATURES John C. “Jock “ Schulte, Missoula Secretary-Treasurer l Memoriam to Paul Raftery 6 Chris Tweeten, Helena Immediate Past President Bernard McCarthy, Whitehall l ABA eases practice rules in disasters 12 Chair of the Board Cynthia K. Smith, Missoula l Two pro bono programs in Billings 13

Board of Trustees l IOLTA: A little interest goes a long way 15 Pam Bailey, Billings Carl Borgquist, Bozeman l Justice Foundation hires development director 24 Vicki W. Dunaway, Billings Gale Gustafson, Conrad l Discipline Counsel annual report 24 Peter L. Helland, Glasgow Thomas Keegan, Helena Daniel N. McLean, Helena l The Legal Writer: redundancies & euphemisms 32 Jane Mersen, Bozeman Mark D. Parker, Billings Ann Shea, Butte Cynthia Smith, Missoula COMMENTARY Randall Snyder, Bigfork K. Paul Stahl, Helena l President’s Message: Defining the rule of law 4 Joseph M. Sullivan, Great Falls Shane Vannatta, Missoula Tammy Wyatt-Shaw, Missoula STATE BAR NEWS ABA Delegates Damon L. Gannett, Billings Max Hansen, Dillon l Legislative update: judiciary budget 5 l Laptops make debut at Bar Exam 16 THE MONTANA LAWYER Publisher l Road Show set for 3 cities 16 Christopher L. Manos, Executive Director l Professionalism Award nomination form 17 Editor Charles Wood (406) 447-2200; fax: 442-7763 l State Bar calendar 18 e-mail: [email protected] l Law Day forums & classes 19 SUBSCRIPTIONS are a benefit of State Bar member- ship; others purchase a year’s subscription for $25, pre- paid. Third Class postage paid at Helena MT 59601. COURTS ADVERTISING RATES are available upon request. l Court disbars Dan Shea, Pete Bacheller 8 Statements and expressions of opinion appearing herein are those of the advertisers or authors and do not nec- essarily reflect the views of the State Bar of Montana. l The ‘legal thuggery’ ruling 22 l Order: objection limits are self-enforcing 27 POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Montana Lawyer, P.O.Box 577, Helena MT 59624.

Copyright 2006-2007 State Bar of Montana REGULAR FEATURES Printed in Billings at Artcraft Printers l Upcoming CLE seminars 19 l State Bar Book & Video Store 20 l News About Members 33 l Deaths 33 l Classifieds 37 PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Defining the rule of law ... and your place in carrying it out near and far Peggy Probasco

t seems to me that simply doing what is right is consid- and equity for all. They can be found in principles that ered generous, while that which is done at any cost in guide our teachers, our labor force, physicians, journalists I the name of profit is considered good business. In light and clergy. They are at work in the engineering, architec- of this, but without trying to assign the legal profession the tural and corporate markets. They are the engine that drives additional duty of society’s moral compass, I offer the fol- the success of our community, our state and our nation. lowing thoughts. This may seem a lofty endeavor for any individual attor- Recently, I had the opportunity to hear William Neukom, ney to address. But you represent these principles by the president-elect of the American Bar Association speak very nature of the work you do every day. Given Mr. regarding his mission when he becomes the ABA president Neukom’s remarks, each of us is provided with an opportu- in August. His ideas are ambitious and relevant to our state nity to demonstrate the relevance of these principles to on several fronts. He began with bringing a clearer under- everyone with whom we interact. standing of the rule of law into mainstream America. With I heard a clear demonstration of this in a story on a working definition of the rule of law, he hopes to join the National Public Radio on April 5. This story covered the World Justice Project, a new organi- increasing reliance of commanding zation formed at a symposium in officers in the field on their resident November 2005. Army lawyers can provide judge advocate generals (JAGs) to The working definition of the rule sound advice indeed to their advise commanders in combat strate- of law will sound immediately famil- gy, prisoner interrogation and interac- iar to many of you, but please consid- commanders if it is driven by tion with the local population. In er the ways we might promote this the rule of law. turn, the JAG corps is required to concept in our state. The rule of law engage in additional training, includ- is based on four principles: ing combat training, in order to pro- vide better advice. This important n A system of self-government in which all persons, position, if driven by the rule of law, can provide sound including the government, are accountable under the law. information indeed. The JAG corps gets constant updates on the rules of combat, interrogation and local interaction to n A system based on fair, publicized, broadly under- help them promote the purpose of our presence in foreign stood and stable laws. countries. Whether or not you agree with our presence out of country, promoting the rule of law once there is critically n A fair, robust, and accessible legal process in which important. rights and responsibilities based in law are enforced. I am certain we can each point to other examples closer to home that reveal that the rule of law is a cornerstone of n Diverse, competent and independent lawyers and our society that can address problems on a global scale. judges. Consider this as you go about your business. Finally, April is humor month. Notwithstanding the If you have read the mission of the State Bar of Montana, lawyer jokes – that are almost universally not funny – con- you will find these principles, albeit much more broadly sider humor in general. My father had a wonderful sense of stated. So what? What about this endeavor is new or excit- humor. My mother has a wonderful sense of humor. At its ing or inspiring for practicing attorneys? The difference lies core, it is the ability to laugh at one’s self, rather than to in the relevance of these principles in local, state, national laugh at someone else’s pain or misery. and world communities. Certainly these principles guide Within those parameters, may you find something to the legal community, but they also represent a good founda- laugh at every day. m tion for any community that wants to promote opportunity

PAGE 4 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 2007 LEGISLATURE Judiciary budget is With about two weeks the State Bar if the person left in the 2007 session of has graduated from any law the , biggest legal item school, whether or not the the focus was on appropria- school is accredited. tions bills, including the budget for the Judiciary. OTHER BILLS on the On April 11, the day The left in session State Bar’s Bill Watch List Montana Lawyer went to (see www.montanabar.org), press, House Bill 819, but on which the Bar’s which contains the $70.1 million was HB 402, revising fees collected by Executive Commitee has not taken a the Supreme Court. The new law Judicial Branch budget for the biennium, stand are: was tentatively approved by the Senate. requires cross-appellants to pay a filing fee, adds other fees and increases certain Since our March-edition update, the n HB 251, authorizing a city or town current fees. biggest development was the death of to establish a city court of record, was Of the three bills actively supported House Bill 60, the Access to Civil passed by the House, died in committee. Justice Act which would have provided by the State Bar through testimony at hearing, Here’s how they fared: $1.1 million to allow the courts to set up n HB 722, requiring justice courts a self-help law program for Montana cit- to be courts of record, died in commit- n HB 60, titled The Montana Access izens. HB 60 failed to meet the appro- tee. priations-bill transmittal deadline of to Civil Justice Act, died (see paragraphs March 29. But on the motion of Sen. above) but some of the money it con- n HJ 43, a resolution calling for the Carol Williams, D-Missoula, the Senate tained was shifted to the Judiciary budg- study of major aspects of the Judicial Finance & Claims Committee added a et. Branch, was passed by the House, but n one-time only $505,000 appropriation to HB 361, introduced by Deborah was tabled in the Senate Judiciary the Judiciary’s budget (HB 819), so the Kottel, D-Great Falls, revises the law on Committe on April 4. Among other program was still alive, though with half proxy marriage, requiring one party to things, the study would determine if the requested funding.. The self-help be a citizen member of the U.S. Armed there is adequate legislative oversight of law program would be administered by Forces, was was passed by both the the Judicial Branch; identify any public the . The act is House and the Senate and awaited the concerns with the Judicial Branch that designed to make Montana's court sys- governor’s signature. need to be addressed through legislation; tem more accessible by providing all determine if the Montana Canons of n Montanans with user-friendly informa- SB 202, which provides candidates Judicial Ethics, Judicial Standards tion through technology and volunteer for election to the Montana Supreme Commission and employee Code of services, and improve court proceeding Court with the option of a publicly Conduct are approporiate; assess for self-represented litigants. financed election campaign, was passed whether the current processes for judi- by the Senate, heard in a House cial recusal, disqualification, or THE NEW OFFICE of Public Appropriations hearing on April 10, and impeachment are correctly written and Defender, established last year, also was still alive. functioning as they should; and examine received a funding scare as legislators the appropriateness of judicial opinions. drastically pared back its funding As we reported last month, all four The resolution could still be revived request. But on March 29, the Senate bills actively opposed by the State Bar before the end of the session. Finance & Claims Committee threw $4 have died. They would have required a million back into the Public Defender candidate for district judge to meet cer- KEEP WATCHING the State Bar’s pot, bringing the total funding for 2008 tain minimum civil or criminal trial- Bill Watch List at www.montanabar.org and 2009 to nearly $34.6 million, still experience qualifications; required dis- to see whether these and other bills are less than the amount the Public Defender qualification of a judge from a case introduced and become law. We’ll have Office sought. when an attorney in the case has made a an update on the final passage of Bar- reportable campaign contribution to the watched bills in the May Montana OF THE BILLS LISTED on the judge; made the unauthorized practice of Lawyer. State Bar’s Bill Watch List, only one had law a crime; and urged the Montana Meanwhile, the complete text of the been passed by the Legislature and Supreme Court to allow any person to bills can be found at the Legislature’s signed into law by the governor. That take the examination for admission to web site at http:leg.mt.gov. m

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 5 MONTANA ATTORNEYS Court establishes memoriam to slain clerk ‘Paul was foremost a citizen and a gentleman’

The Montana Supreme Court on March 6 established the duties. He became a detective and eventually, as a result of report by its Memoriam Committee as the Court’s memoriam his skill in solving crimes, was promoted to Chief Detective, to Paul A. Raftery, the Supreme Court clerk who was killed in where he supervised other officers and oversaw all criminal December by two teen-aged muggers in Helena. The memori- investigations in Sublette County. am follows: As Chief Detective, Paul became heavily involved with the court system. He served as WE, THE COMMITTEE having been chief liaison officer between the County appointed by the Chief Justice of this Attorney’s Office and the courts. He Court to prepare a memoriam on the life often testified in criminal trials. He was and service of Paul Anthony Raftery, do not only respected by prosecutors, but hereby submit the following report and his judgment and fairness also won the motion: respect of the criminal-defense bar. Paul Anthony Raftery was born Paul was also a respected member of March 10, 1965, in Berkeley, California. the Pinedale community. His fellow He graduated from high school in San sheriff’s deputies, in particular, consid- Jose in 1983. As a young man, he was ered him a person they could count on interested in music and ran cross-country and who took an interest in them person- and track and field. He also loved the ally, as well as professionally. In his outdoors and distinguished himself by free time, he enjoyed riding his Harley- attaining the rank of Eagle Scout. Davidson motorcycle and camping in the Paul graduated from the University of Wind River Mountains, outside of California-Davis in 1988 with a bache- Pinedale. lor’s degree in Wildlife and Fisheries Although Paul was raised in Biology. While at Davis, he ran for the California, his family had deep ties to university’s track and field team. Montana. His father was raised in In 1989, Paul accepted a position as a Helena. His grandfather served as the law enforcement ranger for the National secretary to the State Livestock Park Service at Canyon de Chelly Commission and as stenographer to National Monument on the Navajo Governor Sam Stewart. Indian Reservation in Arizona. It was there that Paul began his law enforcement career. He assisted IN 2003, PAUL RETURNED to his family’s Montana park visitors, enforced park regulations, became a medical roots when he enrolled in the School of technician, and assisted in search and rescue efforts. Law in Missoula. Although he had been absent from the aca- demic world for some years, Paul distinguished himself from IN 1990, PAUL GRADUATED with honors from the the start with his strong work ethic and discipline. Paul soon Federal Law Enforcement Academy in Glynco, Georgia. He became a fixture in the law school’s Castles Center, where he immediately secured a job with the U.S. Park Police in spent hours each day studying. He also completed almost Washington, D.C., where he served as a crime investigator. twice the required hours while working at the Indian Law During that time he also was introduced to the court system as Clinic. His diligence paid off in the form of excellent grades he prepared cases for trial and testified in court. and considerable respect among the law school faculty and his In 1994, Paul left the District of Columbia and moved back peers. west to Pinedale, Wyoming, where he became a deputy sheriff After graduating with honors from law school in May, 2006, in Sublette County. In Pinedale, as a uniformed police officer, Paul passed the bar examination and was admitted to the prac- Paul engaged in the nuts and bolts of day-to-day law enforce- tice of law in the courts of Montana the following September. ment. He distinguished himself by proving he had the courage He accepted a position as a law clerk in the chambers of required of a street policeman and also became known for pos- Justice John Warner at the Montana Supreme Court. Paul sessing extraordinary judgment in the performance of his immediately demonstrated exceptional skill in legal research,

PAGE 6 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 legal analysis and in the drafting of Supreme Court opinions. liant legal career and robbed the State Bar of Montana of one He was often the first to arrive in the office each morning and its most promising young members. His service to the United the last to leave at night. It quickly became evident that he States, the State of Wyoming, this Court, and the community could look forward to a successful career as a lawyer. of Helena distinguished Paul both as a lawyer and a citizen. He will be missed. PAUL WAS ACTIVE in the Helena Community, becoming a member of the Saint Helena Cathedral Parish, and volunteer- NOW, THEREFORE, your committee moves this ing his services at community events. He was also dedicated Honorable Court to accept and approve this memoriam in to his dog, Thelma, and, at lunch each day, Paul ran or biked honor of the late Paul A. Raftery, that the Court order that the home across town to care for her. same be spread upon the minutes of this Court, that copies Paul was a humble and unassuming man who always made hereof be provided to the members of his family, and that this time for others. He was a careful listener and, while he was memoriam be published in the next volume of Montana willing to take a position and defend it, he respected the Reports with corresponding notation on the spine of the vol- beliefs of others. Although he took his work very seriously, ume. Paul also had a splendid sense of humor that was a blessing to all who knew him. Former Sublette County Attorney Dale DONE and DATED this 6th day of March, 2007. Aronson, who knew Paul for several years, perhaps described Justice John Warner him most appropriately: Paul was foremost a citizen and a Justice Jim Rice gentleman. Zach Zipfel, Esq. Paul A. Raftery, attorney at law and law clerk to the Margaret Weamer, Esq. Montana Supreme Court, was slain on Friday, December 8, Lisa Kallestad, Esq. 2006, while walking home after spending an evening with Stuart Segrest, Esq. friends. His tragic death cut short what promised to be a bril-

Springs on March 15-16. At the meet- Two earn awards from MTACDL ing, Great Falls attorney Daniel Donovan assumed the presidency of the group for 2007 and 2008. The Montana Association of Criminal Justice Nelson, who has been on the About 60 criminal defense lawyers Defense Lawyers (MTACDL) presented Court since 1993, was acknowledged attended the seminar. The featured its top awards to a Helena attorney and a and honored by MTACDL as a judge speakers were James McKay of Supreme Court Justice. who “has demonstrated a continuing Connecticut and James Klein of The Lawyer of the Year Award was dedication to protecting democratic prin- Washington, D.C. Mr. McKay, the presented to Bill Hooks of Helena. ciples, has staunchly preserved and supervisory public defender for The Judicial Recognition Award was defended the constitutional rights of Middlesex County, Conn., gave presen- presented to the Hon. James C. Nelson, Montanans, and has endeavored to tations on “A Five-Step Analytic Justice of the Montana Supreme Court. ensure justice and due process for per- Approach to Dealing with Expert sons accused of crime in Montana.” Testimony” and “How to Cross-Examine Mr. Hooks, the first appellate defend- In accepting the Judicial Recognition the Expert.” Mr. Klein, chief of the er for the State of Montana, has been in Award, Justice Nelson acknowledged the Appellate Division of Public Defender private practice since 2000 and is recog- dedication and support of his law clerks, Services in Washington, D.C., spoke on nized as an authority on criminal appeals Maria Roberts, Brent Larson, Seth “Rethinking that ‘Fixed’ Record: and post-conviction litigation. With co- Palmer, and Ben Sather, and his assis- Capitalizing on Trial Skills in Appellate counsel Greg Jackson, Mr. Hooks tant, Lorrie Cole. and Habeas Brief Writing.” recently negotiated a life sentence in the The awards were presented during Daniel Johnson death penalty case. MTACDL’s annual meeting at Chico Hot

Montana’s Lawyers Helping Lawyers Hotline 1-888-385-9119 Call if you or a judge or attorney you know needs help with stress and depression issues or drug or alcohol addiction

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 7 DISCIPLINE Supreme Court disbars two Montanans Former justice Shea’s Billings lawyer admitted ‘one-man war’ fails tapping into trust fund The Montana Lawyer By Greg Tuttle of the Billings Gazette aniel Shea, a Montana Supreme Court justice from 1977 to 1984, was disbarred by the Court on March recently disbarred Billings attorney admitted to a D 21 for the unauthorized practice of law. District Court judge in Harlowton on March 20 that The Commission on Practice had A he drained a $200,000 trust recommended the punishment for fund account that he was appointed Mr. Shea, of Helena, whose license to manage. to practice law has been suspended Pierre “Pete” Bacheller told since 1989 for mishandling cases. Judge Randall Spaulding that he The Commission said that Mr. Shea “converted to (his) own use” the “lacks the fundamental prerequisites” money placed in trust from an to be a lawyer. insurance settlement for a The Office of Disciplinary Harlowton woman injured in a Counsel (ODC) filed a complaint ranch accident as a child. against Mr. Shea on Oct. 17, 2005, After the admission, Spaulding alleging that Shea had engaged in the found Bacheller in contempt on one unauthorized practice of law in con- Shea during term of two allegations that he failed to Pete Bacheller nection with the case of Old Elk v. as justice respond to court orders issued in Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies, recent months. Spaulding released Bacheller from the Inc., Cause No. BDV-1995-18 (First Judicial District Court, Wheatland County jail and ordered him to gather financial Lewis and Clark County). records that might help account for the missing trust fund Mr. Shea, 68, admitted that he helped several people – money. laid off by Healthy Mothers, Healthy Babies – sue the non- Bacheller was disbarred by the Montana Supreme Court profit organization in 1995, more than five years after his on Feb. 22 after the justices found that he diverted money license to practice law in Montana was suspended. He also in another case and failed to properly represent clients in a did research on the lawsuit while it was being handled by civil lawsuit. several lawyers over nine years in various courts. Bacheller’s legal troubles may be mounting. Attorneys Disciplinary proceedings began after Helena District Judge involved in the Harlowton trust fund case said that state and Jeffrey Sherlock, who was the presiding judge in the Healthy federal agents have begun a criminal investigation into Mothers case, filed a complaint against Mr. Shea. Bacheller’s activities. In what one newspaper called “a one-man war” against “We are aware and cooperating with state and federal the Commission on Practice, Mr. Shea filed lengthy briefs criminal investigators,” said Billings attorney Cliff saying the Commission’s procedures were improper. But he Edwards, who represents Beth Spizziri, the Harlowton never filed a formal answer to the Commission’s charges of woman whose trust fund Bacheller controlled. unauthorized practice. “Shea instead elected to attack the What remains unclear is where the $200,000 went. integrity of ODC, the review panel of the Commission, the Questioned by Spaulding during the hour-long hearing, Commission, the district court judge who referred the com- Bacheller said he does not know how much of the money plaint to ODC, and this Court,” the Supreme Court disbar- may be left, or if he can trace the funds through his finan- ment order said. cial records. Bacheller said he is willing to cooperate with Even after the Commission recommended disbarment, efforts to make a full accounting. “Shea once again chose largely to forego any attempt to Bacheller, who appeared subdued throughout the hear- address the merit of the Commission’s Findings of Fact and ing, was represented by Billings attorney Michael Moses. Conclusions of Law,” the Court said. “Shea once again opted to launch ad hominem attacks” on the courts and the disciplinary agencies. m More on BACHELLER DISBARRED, Page 31

PAGE 8 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 COVER STORY

Providing for ments. By the Humane Society The value of pets to older of the United States people or those experiencing health issues is well established. our clients want the very pets It may often be in a pet pets owner’s best interest to keep best for their pets. They Ywant to know that you as companion animals in their com- an estate planner can help them pany if they are elderly, incapac- provide for the dog, cat, horse, or in estate plans itated, ill or dying – and likely bird who is much more than sim- suffering the accompanying emo- ply property to them. tional consequences. These Thought lately about provid- problems, of course, can be com- ing for pets in your clients’ estate pounded for seniors who have plans? Not likely. The subject outlived loved ones, may live seldom receives in-depth news alone or far away from family coverage or even cocktail party members, or have too much time discussion. But it deserves your on their hands, causing substan- attention. Because the bonds tial anxiety. between people and their pets are Interacting with animal usually so great – remember all friends, who provide uncondi- the pet owners during Hurricane tional love, helps lower blood Katrina who risked their lives pressure, increases exercise and because they would not leave circulation, boosts mental acuity their pets behind? – giving some and enhances opportunities for attention to this issue can provide social interaction. Pets also pro- peace of mind for you and your vide something else on which to clients. focus, alleviating people’s wor- The Humane Society of the ries about their own conditions United States (HSUS) encour- and reducing stress, depression, ages estate planning professionals and laypeople to carefully and loneliness. A number of studies cited by the Delta consider the ramifications of failing to adequately provide for Society, whose mission is to improve human health through companion animals in the event that the owners die before service and therapy animals, show the beneficial physiological their pets. Equally important is moving forward with necessary and psychological effects that companion animals can have on actions ensuring their companions’ safety, care, and smooth people facing health issues. transition to new homes. Some older people who do not have pets because they All too often, people assume that they will survive their worry they will not survive these friends, but would like to beloved pets or that friends, relatives, or neighbors – who once have a companion animal, may actually benefit from acquiring verbally promised to care for these pets in the event of death a pet. If these potential pet owners know there are specific or disability – are still able or interested in adding new animals legal and financial vehicles to provide securely for pets in to their households. This is not always the case; sometimes estate plans, they might feel more comfortable acquiring the their current circumstances prevent them from fulfilling that pets who could improve their lives. Then they could adopt promise. Meanwhile, employees of local animal shelters fre- from an animal shelter, helping reduce the pet overpopulation quently see the unintended consequences of people’s failure to crisis in America. Many times, older animals with shorter appropriately provide for their pets in their wills or ascertain expected lifespans arrive in shelters with less chance of adop- that friends, relatives, or neighbors truly want new companion tion than puppies and kittens, despite the fact they may be animals in their households. socialized and housetrained as a result of living in another Even people who have conscientiously provided for their home. These mature animals might be ideal candidates for pets in their wills may have neglected to consider a trust some people whose lives could be greatly enhanced with the and/or powers of attorney affecting their companion animals help of a new animal companion. that would commence in cases of severe disability, when a will would not be read. Similarly, people who want to ensure that Free Humane Society kit they take their role as caregiver seriously may not know where To help with this issue, The Humane Society’s Office of to turn for advice on planning for their pets in estate docu- Major and Planned Gifts now offers a free kit, “Providing for Your Pet’s Future Without You,” complete with a six-page fact

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 9 sheet, wallet alert cards, emergency decals for windows and not be overemphasized. doors, and caregiver information forms. The fact sheet is avail- How can clients ensure long-term or permanent pet care able online at www.hsus.org/petsinwills. The material is suit- upon becoming seriously ill or dying? able for estate planning professionals and their clients. The best way is to ensure that clients make formal arrange- Taking both practical and estate planning steps for a win- ments that specifically cover the care of their pets. It’s not win-win situation benefits pet owners, who may receive enough that friends once verbally promised to take in the ani- greater peace of mind knowing their pets will be cared for as mals or even that the clients decided to leave money to friends they intended; the animals themselves, who will be much more for that purpose. An attorney will need to draw up a special likely to experience a smooth transition to a new home; and will, trust or other document to provide for the care and own- family, friends and other survivors who may or may not want ership of clients’ pets, as well as the money necessary to care the responsibility of caring for the pets, but will appreciate for them. knowing that provisions have been made. Choosing a permanent caregiver The issue facing pet-owning clients Your clients should first decide whether they want all their Because pets usually have shorter life spans than humans, pets to go to one person, or whether different pets should go to your clients may have planned for their animal friends’ pass- different people. If possible, keep pets who have already bond- ing. But what if your clients become ill or incapacitated or die ed with each other together. When selecting caregivers, con- first? sider partners, adult children, parents, brothers, sisters and As responsible pet owners, your clients provide their pets friends who have met the pets and have successfully cared for with food and water, shelter, veterinary care, and love. To pets themselves. Also, name alternate caregivers in case the ensure this quality of care continues should something unex- first choice becomes unable or unwilling to take the pets. pected happen to them, it’s critical that they plan ahead. Make sure your clients discuss their expectations with What can clients do now to prepare for the unexpected? potential caregivers so they understand the large responsibility In the confusion that accompanies a person’s unexpected ill- of caring for pets. Remember, new owners will have full dis- ness, accident, or death, pets may be overlooked. In some cretion over the animals’ care – including veterinary treatment cases, pets are discovered in the person’s home days after the and euthanasia – so clients should make sure they choose peo- tragedy. To prevent this from happening, pet owners should ple they trust to do what is in the best interests of the pets. take these simple precautions: If all else fails, it is possible for clients to direct their execu- tors or personal representatives, in a will or some other estate n Find at least two responsible friends or relatives who planning document, to place their animals with other individu- agree to serve as temporary emergency pet caregivers. Provide als or families (not an institutionalized setting). Finding a sat- them with keys to the home, feeding and care instructions, the isfactory new home can take several weeks of searching, so it name and phone number for the pets’ veterinarian, and infor- is important to line up temporary care. mation about the permanent care provisions made for the pet. Clients should know and trust their executors and provide useful – but not unrealistically confining – instructions in their n Make sure neighbors, friends, and relatives know how wills. They should authorize their executors to expend funds many pets are owned and the names and contact numbers of from their estates for the temporary care of their pets, as well the individuals who have agreed to serve as emergency care- as for the costs of looking for new homes and transporting the givers. animals to them. The will should grant broad discretion to the executors in making decisions about the animals and in n Carry a wallet alert card that lists the names and phone expending estate funds on the animals’ behalf. numbers of emergency pet caregivers. Sample language for this approach is:

n Post removable “in case of emergency” notices on their [Article Number] doors or windows specifying how many and what types of pets A. As a matter of high priority and importance, I direct my are in the home. These notices will alert emergency response Personal Representative to place any and all animals I may personnel during a fire or other home emergency. Avoid using own at the time of my death with another individual or stickers. Because these are often left behind by former resi- family (that is, in a private, non-institutionalized setting) dents, firefighters may assume the stickers are outdated, or where such animals will be cared for in a manner that any worse, risk their lives trying to find a pet no longer in the responsible, devoted pet owner would afford to his or her house. pets. Prior to initiating such efforts to place my animals, I direct my Personal Representative to consult n On the inside of front and back doors, affix removable ______, D.V.M. (currently at the notices listing emergency contact names and phone numbers. ______Hospital) or, in the event of Dr. ______unavailability, a veterinarian chosen The HSUS’s kit provides all of these materials, making the by my Personal Representative, to ensure that each animal above steps quite simple. Because pets need care daily and is in generally good health and is not suffering physically. will need immediate attention, the importance of the steps can- In addition, I direct my Personal Representative to provide

PAGE 10 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 Is a will the best way to provide for a pet? Although a lawyer will help decide what type of document best suits clients’ needs, clients should be aware of some draw- backs to a will. For example, a will takes effect only upon death, and it will not be probated and formally recognized by a court until days or even weeks later. What’s more, if legal dis- putes arise, the final settlement of property may be prolonged. Even determining the rightful new owner of pets can be delayed. This means is that it may take a long time for instruc- tions regarding the pets’ long-term care to be carried out. This doesn’t necessarily mean that people should not include provisions in their wills that provide for pets. It simply means that clients should explore creating additional docu- ments that compensate for their wills’ limitations. How can setting up a trust help? Unlike a will, a trust can provide for pets immediately – not only if clients die, but also if they become ill or incapacitated. That’s because clients determine when their trusts become effective. When a trust is created for pets, money is set aside to be used for the pets’ care and trustees are specified to con- trol the funds. A trust created separately from the will does, however, carry certain benefits:

n It can be written to exclude certain assets from the pro- bate process so that funds are more readily available to care for a pet.

n It can be structured to provide for a pet during a lengthy To order free copies of the Humane Society’s pets- disability. in-estate-planning kit, above, send an e-mail to [email protected]. There are many types of wills and trusts. Determining which is best for your clients and their pets depends on their situations and needs. An attorney will need to make sure that a trust for the bene- any needed, reasonable veterinary care that my animal(s) fit of one or more specific animals is valid and enforceable in may need at that time to restore the animal(s) to generally the state in question. Even if state law recognizes the validity good health and alleviate suffering, if possible. Any ani- of such trusts, keep in mind that tying up a substantial amount mal(s) not in generally good health or that is so suffering of money or property in a trust for the animals’ benefit may — and that is beyond the capabilities of veterinary medi- prove to be controversial from a relative’s or other heir’s point cine, reasonably employed, to restore to generally good of view. Moreover, trusts are legal entities that are relatively health, or to alleviate its suffering – shall be euthanized, expensive to administer and maintain – all of which under- cremated, and the ashes disposed of in the discretion of my score the need for careful planning. Personal Representative. Any expenses incurred for the After you’ve overseen the creation of wills, trusts, or both, care (including the costs of veterinary services), placement, your clients should leave copies with the people they’ve cho- or transportation of my animals, or to otherwise effect the sen to be executors of their estates, as well as the pets’ desig- purposes of this Article ______up to the time of nated caregivers, so the caregivers can look after the pets placement, shall be charged against the principal of my immediately. (The executor and caregiver may or may not be residuary estate. Decisions my Personal Representative the same person.) Make sure the caregivers also have copies makes under this Article ______– for of the pets’ veterinary records and information about their example, with respect to the veterinary care to be afforded behavior traits and dietary preferences. to my animal(s) and the costs of such care – shall be final. My intention is that my Personal Representative have the Pet trust legislation broadest possible discretion to carry out the purposes of In recent years, specific pet trust legislation has been enact- this paragraph. ed in 35 states (including Montana) and the District of Columbia. The laws permit a person to create a trust for the care of designated domestic or pet animals and specifies that a

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 11 pet owner’s intent to provide for his or her animal can now be additional expenses. protected by the courts. Whereas leaving too much money in the trust can cause problems with heirs or potential heirs, leaving too little could What is a reasonable sum to leave? compromise the care of the animal. The trust also should stip- The answer depends on the age, health, estimated lifespan ulate the frequency and amounts of payments, as well as and number of pets involved. The funds needed to care for a whether amounts should be adjusted for inflation. Finally, pet young horse will certainly be much greater than those needed owners may want to consider paying a fee to caretakers and/or for an aged parakeet. trustees for their time and effort. It also depends on how much care the owner wishes the ani- mals to receive. If the animals get cancer, diabetes, hip dys- plasia, or some other ailment, what kind of treatment do pet TO ORDER A FREE COPY of the kit, call the Humane Society owners want to provide and do they want to provide it indefi- of the U.S. at (202) 452-1100 or send an e-mail to petsinwill- nitely or for a limited period of time? Also, the pet owner [email protected]. A fact sheet is also available at may want to look into cremation and burial prices. www.hsus.org/petsinwills. Pets can be expensive even when there are no emergencies. m Pet food, grooming, routine veterinary care, vaccines, basic medications (like heartworm and flea preventatives), boarding and kennel fees, sitters, and teeth cleaning can add up to hun- dreds of dollars per animal per year. Horses, of course, mean

judiciary to maintain control over the ABA delegates approve model court rule process. Once the jurisdiction’s highest court easing practice restrictions during disasters determines that an emergency affects a state’s justice system, key provisions of the rule authorize the court to: The ABA House of Delegates, meet- Katrina, began waiving their unautho- ing Feb. 12 in Miami, voted unanimous- rized practice rules on an ad hoc basis to l Allow out-of-state lawyers to pro- ly to adopt a model court rule loosening help displaced lawyers to resume their vide pro bono legal services to the citi- restrictions on lawyers’ ability to prac- practices elsewhere on a temporary zens of the affected state, regardless of tice across state lines after a major disas- basis, and to help other lawyers provide where those citizens temporarily reside. ter has occurred, the ABA announced. legal services to those affected by the The proposal was presented to the storm. l Allow lawyers from an affected delegates by the ABA Standing The task force then asked the ABA jurisdiction to provide legal services in Committee on Client Protection. Center for Professional Responsibility to another state, on a temporary basis, that According to the committee’s report, the help draft a model rule to address this are reasonably related to the lawyers’ need for such a rule became clear in the situation. practices in the affected jurisdiction. aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Frank X. Neuner Jr., former president Rita, which wrought havoc on the court of the Louisiana State Bar, and H. The rule also provides for the regula- systems in parts of Louisiana, Thomas Wells Jr. of Alabama, co-chair tion of these lawyers by subjecting them Mississippi, and Alabama. The devasta- of the ABA Special Committee on to local discipline, requiring them to file tion simultaneously increased the need Disaster Preparedness and Response, a registration statement with the court, for legal services and decreased their spoke in support of the rule, as did and requiring them to inform clients of availability in the affected communities. Stephen Gillers, chair of the ABA Joint the practice restrictions imposed by the Compounding the problem were Committee on Lawyer Regulation and a rule. Pro bono services provided under states’ unauthorized practice rules, former member of the ABA Commission the rules shall be “assigned and super- which impeded efforts by lawyers from on Multijurisdictional Practice. vised” through an established nonprofit affected jurisdictions to continue serving The “Model Court Rule on Provision bar association, pro bono program, or clients after they or their clients (or of Legal Services Following legal services program, or an organiza- both) had sought refuge in other states, Determination of Major Disaster” pro- tion specifically designated by the court, and hampered attempts by out-of-state vides a template that state courts can use (deleting a provision that would have lawyers to offer free services to victims to respond quickly to emergencies that required supervision by a local lawyer). of the storms. affect a jurisdiction’s legal system, the Full text of the rule presented to the As an immediate response, many ABA said. It does this by temporarily delegates is available at jurisdictions, with the encouragement of relaxing restrictions on lawyers’ cross- http://www.abanet.org/cpr/clientpro/Rec the ABA Task Force on Hurricane border practice while enabling the state’s om_Report_Katrina.pdf. m

PAGE 12 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 ACCESS TO JUSTICE 2 who nurture pro bono programs in Billings

tacts in the community as A project volunteer well.” For an attorney who is not generating rev- and a law-firm enue from the majority of his clients, this sort of position is impossible to attorney show why achieve. It takes years of fee-generating cases to individual efforts build the type of network – of attorneys and parale- are so important gals – that Crowley puts at the disposal of every pro bono client Mr. By Ryan Hazen, coordinator Connelley and his col- Modest Means Program leagues represent. State Bar of Montana “It’s not just me doing the work,” Mr. Connelley ith more than 100,000 resi- said, “it’s co-counseling dents, Billings is home to with other lawyers and about 10 percent of the people W Gary Connelley, who has a Legal Services placing cases within the living in Montana. Even with such a background, was hired by the Crowley firm to firm, too. Lawyers will large population to cover, the 400 attor- coordinate its pro bono program. come to me and tell me neys in Billings performed well above what kind of [pro bono] the state average number of hours of pro cases they’re interested in bono work, according to the 2006 firms with a program like this. One of and I will look for those cases.” The Montana State Bar pro bono survey. the decisions made early on was that the Crowley program is not limited to This article focuses on a few of the program was going to be litigation- Billings, but reaches just as far as the legal professionals and organizations based.” As the largest firm in four firm’s ability to provide fee-generating that have made tremendous efforts to states, Crowley was better equipped to legal representation does – from bring justice to such a large segment of support this type of program than any Kalispell, MT to Williston, N.D. Montana’s populace. other firm in Montana. “Over the past couple of years, we’ve “When I was at Legal Services we had The Crowley program been focusing more on children’s law only one or two sets of the Montana The first on the list is Gary Connelley issues and young mothers’ issues. We codes,” he recalled, “When I came over and the law firm of Crowley, Haughey, have initiated a partnership with a Head [to Crowley] one of the first things they Hanson, Toole, & Dietrich. Mr. Start program called Young Families, for said was, ‘well, here’s your full set of Connelley, now the pro bono coordinator young parents who are still in school. MCAs.’ I’ve been able to do things [at for Crowley, has a Montana Legal Through that program they get day care, Crowley] that I would never have been Services Association background. He heath support, and we have partnered able to do on my own or at Legal spent his first few years out of law with that program to help them with Services.” school working for MLSA in Billings. their legal needs.” The program has provided Mr. There he specialized in domestic vio- Connelley with not only the material lence and migrant workers’ issues. After benefits that Legal Services’ funding is The Family Law Project 10 years with MLSA, he was asked by simply not able to provide, but also the Even with all of the resources the the Crowley firm to coordinate a pro wealth of experience and extensive com- Crowley firm can provide, Mr. bono program at its main office in munity network that comes with a legal Connelley and his colleagues are still Billings. The program would take pro powerhouse like Crowley. unable to aid everyone in the area who bono referrals from MLSA as well as needs representation. For this reason, he from inside the firm itself. Speaking of his associates at the firm, provides referrals to and from other pro- “At the time,” Mr. Connelley Mr. Connelley said, “I get to tap into not grams in the area, such as the Family explained, “there were only a handful of only their knowledge base, but their con- Law Project, a pro se clinic that has an

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 13 the pro se process,” Ms. Fain explained. court, the Family Law Project encour- “As long as the documentation is done ages clients to settle their family law correctly, it basically gets the attorney matters using alternative methods of dis- partway through the process.” pute resolution, allowing attorneys to Ms. Fain said that about 80 percent volunteer time without the added com- of cases in the Family Law Project are mitment of taking that same case to successfully completed through the pro court. “I’ve made about a dozen settle- se clinics. By encouraging all clients to ment master referrals,” Ms. Fain said, open cases without an attorney, the most of which are requested by attorneys Family Law Project is conserving valu- or judges. able volunteer attorney time and distrib- On the horizon for the Family Law uting it to those cases that are actually Project is an interactive video, which too complicated for a non-attorney to can guide clients through the process of handle. filling out the appropriate pro se forms The Family Law Project also sponsors for their legal needs. Using the funds a free CLE for all attorneys in the pro- generated from FLP-sponsored CLEs, gram, to teach them in the basics of fam- the program recently purchased a laptop When the Family Law Project ran ily law. Other attorneys are welcome to and projection screen, which will further out of money, Patty Fain volun- attend, but anyone who chooses not to reduce the need for experienced volun- teered to continue managing it for teer time and allow clients with time- no pay. sensitive issues to get help in a more immediate fashion. accompanying volunteer pro bono pro- Support from a judge gram. Loosely housed in the Billings Billings District Judge Russ Fagg said MLSA office, the Family Law Project is Patty Fain “really is a godsend.” Judge headed by Patty Fain, a volunteer free- Fagg takes the time to make phone calls lance paralegal in Billings. Without a to attorneys on behalf of the Family Law sponsoring firm for the program, Ms. Project. He believes that judicial support Fain works without expectation of com- is absolutely indispensable. pensation, coordinating the Family Law “We’ve learned that it does help to Project’s pro se clinics and making pro have a judge call,” Judge Fagg says, bono referrals. “they [lawyers who might participate] “The core of the Family Law Project will take the call a little quicker. I think existed before my involvement in it it’s harder to say no when a judge is ask- ing.” did,” Ms. Fain told The Montana District Judge Russ Fagg takes an Lawyer. “The more formalized process Of course, Judge Fagg uses his status active role in supporting the Family judiciously, recognizing that the attor- started in 1998, when Legal Services Law Project. decided to hire someone to help admin- neys participating in this program are ister the program.” doing so out of their own personal and The someone they hired was Ms. professional time. Fain. She stayed in that capacity for sign up for the pro bono project must “I have to be honest,” he admitted, “I about a year. When the funding for the pay the full CLE fee. This money goes feel a little bit uncomfortable asking program expired she then decided to stay into the Family Law Project coffers, and because I know I’m imposing on them, I on as a volunteer. is used to purchase equipment for the know they’re busy. But I also know the After building a sturdy base of attor- pro se clinics. need for the people out there.” neys willing to accept contested family The project recently established a Striking that balance between client law cases, it became clear that there was settlement master option to keep the need and lawyer availability is a crucial too great a need to address with pro numbers of litigated cases to a mini- element of the most successful pro bono bono attorneys alone. Ms. Fain and her mum. “The number of attorneys willing programs in Montana. MLSA colleagues redesigned the project to take contested cases has a tendency to It is clear that the Family Law Project to focus most heavily on pro se repre- shrink over time,” Ms. Fain said, “so we and the Crowley Pro Bono Program suc- sentation, reserving volunteer attorneys’ wanted other areas where someone could ceed because of the the strong personal time for the more complicated contested assist without having to take a contested commitment of Patty Fain and Gary cases that could not be solved through case. That’s where we started with the Connelley. And credit is due to the self-representation alone. settlement masters.” Crowley partners and MLSA for funding “We would prefer they start through Instead of taking cases directly to these programs. m

PAGE 14 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 ACCESS TO JUSTICE A little bit of interest goes a long way

status (see listings below) call, visit or write your bank man- Lawyers, firms can urge higher IOLTA rates, agement and request a more favorable interest rate. to help increase funds for civil legal aid n If your bank denies your request for a more favorable By Amy Sings In The Timber rate, consider switching your IOLTA account to a bank that Director of IOLTA Operations more fully supports the IOLTA program. Montana Justice Foundation Some banks in Montana are doing their part. The Montana ou can help increase the amount of funds available to Justice Foundation promotes IOLTA “Leadership Banks” Montana’s legal service providers by negotiating with among the legal community and encourages law firms and Yyour bank to increase interest rates and eliminate fees attorneys to place their IOLTA accounts with these MJF Honor on your lawyer trust accounts.. Roll banks (listed rates were gathered from February IOLTA Despite the gains the Interest on Lawyer Trust Accounts reporting data): (IOLTA) program has experienced over the last several years, many banks continue to pay interest rates well below that of Gold Level Leadership Banks other local banks. Of the more than 40 banks offering IOLTA These banks offer an annual net yield of 2.0 percent or accounts in Montana, nearly 70 percent are paying below 1.25 higher and tie their deposit rate to a recognized market indica- percent on existing IOLTA accounts and many as low as .25 tor: percent. When you consider that the prime rate is currently 8.25 percent and the federal funds rate is at 5.25 percent, this Mountain West Bank 4.76% on all accounts fact is alarming. The interest generated by the IOLTA program is collected Valley Bank of Helena 4.76% on all accounts by the Montana Justice Foundation (MJF) and distributed in a competitive grant process among qualified non-profit organi- Yellowstone Bank, Billings 4.76% on all accounts zations committed to achieving access to justice for all Montanans. Nearly 90 percent of all interest generated by the Big Sky Western Bank 4.76% - 3.01% IOLTA program has gone directly to the Montana Legal Services Association (MLSA), Montana’s largest provider of Western Security Bank 4.76% - 3.01% legal aid to low-income Montanans. Legal aid programs that receive IOLTA funds address a Wells Fargo 3.1% - .55% number of critical needs for Montana’s poor, such as preserv- ing housing, protecting subsistence income, obtaining access Silver Level Leadership Banks to health care, addressing issues of domestic violence, provid- These banks offer an annual net yield of 2.0% or higher: ing food and clothing for families, and maintaining their safe- ty, independence and dignity. U.S. Bank 4.47% - .10% You can make a difference. A unified, committed legal community dedicated to maximizing the potential of the Bank of Bozeman 5.12% - 2.02% IOLTA program is the single, most effective way for the Montana Justice Foundation to accomplish its mission of mak- Heritage Bank 2.0% on all accounts ing justice accessible to all Montanans. In the past, Montana banks have responded to lawyer Glacier Bank 2.0% on all accounts requests to provide more favorable interest rates on IOLTA accounts. Most banks have the power to set their own interest rates on IOLTA accounts. Account holders are the key to the FOR MORE INFORMATION on how to contact your bank, tips success of the IOLTA program. on how to ask your bank for a more favorable rate, or to learn To advocate for higher IOLTA interest rates: your current IOLTA interest rate, please contact Amy Sings In The Timber with the Montana Justice Foundation at n Be aware of the interest rate being paid on your IOLTA [email protected] or call (406) 523-3920. accounts.

n If the rate your bank is paying is below Leadership Bank

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 15 STATE BAR NEWS Laptops make good debut in Bar Exam “Because we encouraged everyone to upload immediately Most examinees opt to use computers; following each testing session, we had confirmation that all our examinees’ answers – including the one with the glitch – one test-day glitch is quickly fixed had been uploaded within half an hour following each ses- sion,” she said. More than half the examinees at the Montana Bar Exam on ExamSoft allows examinees to use their laptops during the Feb. 26-27 used laptop computers to take the test, instead of bar exam by creating a secure test environment. During test- using the traditional handwriting method. ing, examinees cannot access their hard drives, Internet, or any The February exam was the first Montana Bar Exam in other memory functions. Once a testing session is completed, which laptops have been allowed. Of 51 examinees, 29 opted the answers are stored as deeply encrypted files on the exami- to use their laptops. nees’ hard drives. The examinees then use a wireless connec- On July 28, the Montana Supreme Court wrote to the Board tion to upload their exams to ExamSoft’s server in Florida. of Bar Examiners supporting the Board’s recommendation to In a letter to the Connecticut Bar Examining Committee, allow use of laptops during the exam Twenty-nine other states Ms. Weber had high praise for the ExamSoft company. Ms. have adopted ExamSoft’s SoftTest software for bar exams. Weber said other admission authorities that use ExamSoft had “There was only one minor glitch in uploading one exami- few complaints. nee’s answers,” said Jan Weber, the State Bar’s Admissions “One concern was whether laptop users would have an Administrator. James Cramer, the Information Technology advantage over those handwriting,” Ms. Weber wrote. She director for the University of Montana School of Law, was said that California bar examiners commissioned a study on able to fix the problem within minutes. that question. The study concluded that, “there does not now Mr. Cramer was ExamSoft’s designated “on-site engineer” appear to be any advantage or disadvantage to using a laptop for the exam. He has been providing the tech support for relative to writing.” exams at the University of Montana for several years and has Before hiring ExamSoft, Ms. Weber observed a day of final served as a bar exam site engineer in Texas. ExamSoft, a exams at the UM Law Shool. “What I observed assured me Florida company, provides and pays for at least one technical that ExamSoft is secure, user friendly, and of substantial value engineer to be present during every bar exam. in my role as administrator.” Mr. Cramer’s presence at the exam “significantly decreased ExamSoft is used in roughly 110 law schools throughout my stress level, because I did not have to be concerned with the country, including UM. “The students at our law school any technology issues,” said Ms. Weber. “James was able to have been using this software for several years and are very monitor all of our examinees and was in communication with comfortable with it,” Ms. Weber wrote to the Connecticut Bar. a technician at ExamSoft. “In recent years, the students have been clamoring for the “ExamSoft was very quick to deal with this anomaly and Board to adopt use of computer-based testing. What’s more, nearly instantly wrote code into the software to avoid this par- the staff of the UM law school believes ExamSoft is absolute- ticular problem (for every jurisdiction) in the future,” Ms. ly reliable and secure.” m Weber said.

The Committee has a list of eight Road Show set for Helena, Great Falls, Dillon topics that it must narrow down in its next conference call. The agenda may The State Bar of Montana Road be in Helena with the 1st Judicial include presentations by Supreme Court Show, featuring three hours of discus- District Bar Association on June 7; in justices, legislators, state officials and sions on Bar issues and attorney ethics, Great Falls with the Cascade County Bar Bar leaders. has been tentatively scheduled to appear on June 22nd; and in Dillon with the 5th The Road Show, which is really a in three cities in June. Judicial District Bar on July 25. three-hour CLE, is a popular event with In the past, the Road Show has been The Road Show also may appear in Montana lawyers because it is one of the concentrated on three or four cities in one or two other cities this year, few events where free Ethics credits can one particular area of the state. Starting although they have not yet been sched- be earned. More details will be pub- this year in an experiment, the Road uled, said State Bar Legal Counsel Betsy lished in the May edition of The Show will visit one city in each of three Brandborg, who is working on the Road Montana Lawyer and on the Bar web or four different areas of the state. Show planning with the Bar’s site at www.montanabar.org. The events for 2007 are scheduled to Professionalism Committee.

PAGE 16 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 17 STATE BAR CALENDAR

April 23 May 1 State Bar Law Day Forum, featuring Chief Justice Karla Gray, Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection board meeting, 10 a.m., 7 p.m., Carroll College Student Center, Helena State Bar offices, Helena

April 25 May 4 Deadline for advertising and content for the May edition of CLE Institute spring meeting, Billings The Montana Lawyer magazine May 4 April 27 State Bar Executive Committee meeting, 10 am, State Bar Peoples Law Center meeting, 1 p.m., State Bar offices, offices, Helena Helena May 8 April 30 State Bar Law Day Forum on identity theft and fraud, 1 p.m., Montana Justice Foundation meeting, 10 a.m., State Bar Room 14, Tech Hall, Rocky Mountain College, Billings offices, Helena May 8 May 1 Swearing-in ceremony for new Montana lawyers, 10 a.m, Law Day Montana Supreme Court chambers, Helena

May 1 May 8 State Bar Law Day Forum on environmental issues, 6 p.m., Swearing-in ceremony for new federal-court lawyers, 1:30 Copper Lounge of Montana Tech Student Union, Butte p.m., Max Baucus Federal Building, Helena

Attention Lawyers! Law Day is rapidly approaching and volunteers are still needed

Plans are under way to make this year’s Law Day a tremendous success. Because of the theme, “Ensuring democracy, empowering youth,” a large effort is being made to guarantee that Montana students are given an opportunity to interact with informed and captivating members of the legal community.

To accommodate the schedules of schools and guest speakers, this year’s activities will take place throughout the entire week of May 1st.

There are several ways for you to be involved in this year’s activities – as a guest speaker or as a project planner. First, contact your local bar and see what activities are being planned in your area. If you live in one of Montana’s major urban centers, check and see if you have a Law Day coordinator that might help you with placement. Or just initiate things on your own. Check with your local schools and see if they’d be interested in having you as a speaker.

The Law Related Education Center is always more than happy to provide lesson plans, lecture materials, or advice on project ideas. For any assistance you might need or just to check in on some of the statewide activities, contact:

Andrew Fox 406/442-7600 x 1205 [email protected] LRECenter web site at www.montanabar.org/groups/lrecenter/index.html

PAGE 18 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 Upcoming CLE seminars for Montana lawyers

April 24 Teleconference Important Lessons for Trustees: How & Why to Say Yes or No Other web & phone CLEs for Montana credit are: to a Beneficiary 1.50 CLE credits. Presented by Cannon, (800) 775-7654. n MTLA's SeminarWeb Live! Seminars at www.sem- inarweblive.com/mt/index.cfm?showfullpage=1&even April 26 Missoula – Marriot Hotel t=show AppPage&pg=semwebCatalog&panel Landlord-Tenant Law 6.50 CLE credits, including 1.00 Ethics =browseLive credit. Presented by Sterling Education Services, (715) 855- 0495 n Lorman Education Services' teleconferences at www.lorman.com/teleconferences/ April 27 Polson – KwaTakNuk Resort Control Your Workers’ Compensation Costs: Improve Safety June 12 Teleconference 6.0 CLE credits. Presented by Putman & Associates, (406) Retirement Benefit Planning 1.50 CLE credits. Presented by 257-0269 Cannon, (800) 775-7654.

May 22 Teleconference July 17 Teleconference, Estate Planning for Business Owners: A Guide for Basics & Compliance Issues for Trustees 1.50 CLE credits. Presented Advanced 1.50 CLE credits. Presented by Cannon, (800) by Cannon, (800) 775-7654. 775-7654. Forums, classes revolve around Law Day

With the national Law Day about to arrive on May 1, the n Rocky Mountain College, May 8. The State Bar of State Bar’s Law-Related Education Center is working with Montana will present a Law Day lecture in Room 14 of Tech local bar associations to make presentations on legal topics to Hall at Rocky Mountain College in Billings at 1 p.m. Cort schools. Help from Montana lawyers and judges is still need- Jensen of the state Attorney General’s office will discuss the ed (see box on preceding page). risks of identity theft and internet fraud. He will be available The LRE Center also has set up three public forums, at col- for issue-specific questions at the conclusion of his lecture. lege settings, for discussion of legal issues. They are: In addition to the statewide lecture series being hosted by the State Bar of Montana, there are several other Law Day n Carroll College, April 23. Montana Supreme Court Chief Justice Karla Gray will speak at the student center of Carroll College in Helena at 7 p.m. She will address the history and future of the Montana Constitution and the obstacles and chal- lenges it presents to the next generation. After the lecture, the Chief Justice will be available for a question and answer ses- sion. Refreshments will be provided.

n Montana Tech, May 2. At 6 p.m. the State Bar of Montana will host a panel discussion on environmental law in Montana. The lecture will take place at the Copper Lounge of the Student Union on the campus of Montana Tech in Butte. The panel members will discuss their reactions to House Bill 610, which limits who can file lawsuits under the Montana Environmental Policy Act. The forum is designed to give the audience the opportunity to hear the unique and contrasting views of both business and industry and environmental non- profit organizations. Representatives voicing the opinions of industry will be Tim McHugh of Montana Resources and Becky Summerville. Representing environmental nonprofits will be Kim Wilson and Matt Clifford of the Clark Fork Coalition.

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 19 State Bar of Montana Bookstore These Montana legal manuals and videos are for sale or rent via this mail-order catalog. Other Montana Bar-produced video seminars, are available for download to your computer on the Online CLE catalog at www.montanabar.org.

LEGAL MANUALS MONTANA VIDEO/CD SEMINAR RENTALS Montana Probate Forms Public Information Flyers 2006, 288 pages tri-fold brochures, $10/bundle of 100 For rentals, send 2 checks – one for Book plus CD $150 Bankruptcy $50 rental fee, one for $25 security Client Bill of Rights deposit Civil Jury Instructions Dispute Resolution (MPI – MT Pattern Instructions) Divorce in Montana NEW! 2007 Landlord-Tenant CLE 1999 w/2003 Update, 400 pages How Lawyers Set Their Fees 3.0 CLE credits Book plus CD $200 Purchasing Your Home 3-CD set, audio only, rental Renting a House or Apartment Criminal Jury Instructions Small Claims Court 2007 Montana Ethics CLE, Butte 1999 w/2003 Update, 400 pages After an Auto Accident 5.0 CLE credits, including 5.0 Ethics Book plus CD $105 When You Need a Lawyer credits Wills & Probate VHS tape, set of 4, rental Handbook for Guardians & Set of 4 DVDs, rental Conservators Statute of Limitations Manual Printed accompanying CLE materials 2005, 60 pages incl. 5 forms 1998, 95 pages w/2001 Update available, see “CLE Materials” list Book plus CD $150 Book $25 on next page

2007 Lawyers’ Deskbook & Step-parent Adoption Forms 2006 State & Federal Court Directory 2003, 5 forms Decisions Affecting Criminal Law Sold out! Order the 2007 mid-year Book $20 2.0 CLE credits update CD (available in July) $20 DVD Rental U.S. & Montana Constitutions MT Family Law Form Book Pocket-sized booklet 2005 Chapter 13 Bankruptcy CLE 2005, 93 pages incl. 26 forms Reprint coming May 2007 5.0 CLE credits Book and CD $150 $4 each Set of 4 CDs, rental Set of 4 VHS tapes, rental Public Discipline Under MT Rules Printed accompanying CLE materials of Professional Conduct available, see “CLE Materials” list 2007, 104 pages annotated on next page Book $35

Please send the item(s) circled above in Book & CD ___ Videotape___ DVD ___ format to: (send printed CLE materials via _____ postal mail, ____ e-mail)

Name ______Mailing Address ______Street Address ______City, State, Zip______Amount Enclosed $______(Payment must accompany all orders) Credit Card: Visa ___ Mastercard ___ Account No: ______Exp. Date ______3-digit PIN on the back of your card _____ Mail order & payment to: State Bar of Montana, PO Box 577, Helena MT 59624

Updated 4/12/07 activities being planned. The New Lawyers Section of the State Bar has been invaluable in their contribution to Law Day efforts. With the help of coordinator Heather McDowell, plans have come together in Billings. A successful effort has been made to ensure that attorneys will have a pres- 2005 Information Technology CLE ence in local public schools. Speakers will travel to Central High School in Billings 1.50 CLE credits to address the school’s social studies students. DVD, rental For several years, Jason Holden has coordinated Law Day efforts in Great Falls. This year, Mr. Holden estimates that between 15 and 30 lawyers will participat Great 2005 MT Constitution & School Fall’s activities. They will volunteer in regional middle schools as speakers to an Funding audience of young civics students. 5.0 CLE credits Through the hard work of coordinators Brenda Wahler, Chris Tweeten, and Julie Set of 3 VHS tapes, rental Johnson, events are taking shape in Helena. Volunteers are being recruited to do work in Capitol High School, Helena High School, Helena Middle School and C.R. 2004 Family Law CLE Anderson Middle School. 5.0 CLE credits, inc. 1.0 Ethics credit Although Law Day is approaching rapidly, attorneys across the state are still put- Set of 4 VHS tapes, rental ting forth an effort to plan events in their regions. This year’s goal of expanding DVD, rental activities to the general public is proving to give Law Day 2007 a very unique and new flavor. The combination of public school volunteers and a public lecture series 2004 Law & Psychology CLE has guaranteed that Law Day will be an all inclusive community event. 5.0 CLE credits, including 3.5 Ethics VHS tapes, set of 10, rental Set of 10 DVDs, rental New issue of The Complete Lawyer on web

The State Bar of Montana’s new e-zine (a magazine found only on the web) for MONTANA VIDEO/CD its members has just published its second issue, with the main topic “The Fast- SEMINARS – FREE Changing Face of Diversity.” The Complete Lawer is a resource (bookmark it on your computer) to help guide Guardian Ad Litem’s Role in Abuse attorneys in their careers, their businesses, and their personal lives, tackling impor- & Neglect Proceedings tant topics facing lawyers. The magazine can be found at http://montana.thecom- 2.50 CLE credits pletelawyer.com. VHS tape, free, please return “Change is one of the most onerous challenges human beings grapple with,” said the e-zine’s editors. “Diversity, for example, is hard to achieve because change is at 2005 State Bar Annual Meeting its heart. This edition of TCL examines diversity from the perspectives of psycholo- w/Tom Brokaw speech, Jameson gy, biology and brain science. While research tells us we have a long way to go Award Presentation & “On the Air” with our efforts to institute lasting diversity initiatives, the heartening news is that with Bar members as humans we have a built-in bias towards empathy, cooperation and altruism – pro- CDs, free, please return vided we develop the social intelligence to nurture these capacities in ourselves and others. [View the issue] Steven Keeva, 2004 UM The Atlanta Bar Association brings you this issue of The Complete Lawyer. The Blakenbaker Lecture on cover story asks the question, “How can groups divided by prejudice learn to live Professional Responsibility and work together effectively?” CD, free, please return See the e-zine at http://montana.thecompletelawyer.com.

CLE MATERIALS

CLE outlines for all January What do you do in your spare time? through June 2006 CLEs When not practicing law, many Montana attorneys practice fascinating hobbies, CD only, $35 have scholarly interests or participate in sports. We know one lawyer who writes music and plays it on his mandolin, others who write books, paint, carve or sculpt 2007 Montana Ethics CLE works of art, and one judge who climbs mountains. 300 pages, $35 The Montana Lawyer would like to hear about State Bar members with interesting hobbies and interests, both to present in the magazine and to display the members’ 2005 Chapter 13 Bankruptcy CLE works at the Bar’s Annual Meeting in Missoula in September. 150 pages, $35 If you or any judge, lawyer, or legal assistant that you know has a pasttime that we should display, please contact Montana Lawyer Editor Charles Wood at (406) 447-2200 or [email protected].

THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 21 COURTS

By Eric Newhouse Justices accuse expended in trying to recover from of the Great Falls Tribune your actions. The price: an additional Calif. law firm $50,000 beyond the loss in value of he Montana Supreme Court the painting.” upheld an $11 million judg- of ‘legal thuggery’ Seltzer refused to be pressured into Tment for artist Steve Seltzer, changing his opinion, but the decision calling threats to force him to change cost him. his appraisal “legal thuggery.” in Montana case “Seltzer testified, he experienced “Baseless lawsuits prosecuted in ‘a state of panic’ as a result of the furtherance of ulterior motives have financial implications posed by the no place in our courts,” stated the unanimous opinion, lawsuit, as well as the potential impact on his reputation in the authored by Justice James Nelson. art community,” the Supreme Court opinion stated. The March 12 opinion came as a huge relief for the Great “He testified: ‘I was fearful of losing everything that I had. Falls appraiser and artist. Everything that my wife and I had worked for 37 years to He was sued by a collector who disputed Seltzer’s conclu- accumulate. I mean, my home, my art studios, my cars. All my sion that a painting was the work of his grandfather, O.C. personal belongings.’ Seltzer. Carol Seltzer testified that her husband was a nervous “This is a judgment on moral virtue of major proportions,” wreck, unable to eat or sleep well. “He was confident he Seltzer said after the Supreme Court ruling. could prove that this was his grandfather’s work. He never The multi-million-dollar dispute revolved around a painting, wavered on that,” she said. “But there was a huge amount of “Lassoing a Longhorn,” which Steve and Frank Morton pressure on him. And he became physically ill as a result of bought from the Kennedy Galleries in New York City for that.” $38,000 in 1972. It had a signature of C.M. Russell, a buffalo GDC filed a multi-count lawsuit against Seltzer, which it skull – Russell’s trademark – and a 1913 date. lost. Seltzer counter-sued, charging his reputation, professional But, as the Supreme Court noted, the painting style was standing and health had been harmed by a frivolous lawsuit. unlike Russell and more like one of his contemporaries, O.C. “He was clearly wronged, and he’s just such a good guy,” said Seltzer. his Great Falls attorney, Zander Blewett III. When Steve Morton decided to sell it five years ago, he sent A District Court jury agreed and awarded Seltzer $1.1 mil- the painting to Steve Seltzer for authentication. Seltzer con- lion in actual damages, plus $20 million in punitive damages cluded that, based on the painting techniques, it had been from the law firm that had sued him. painted by his grandfather. On GDC’s appeal, District Judge Dirk Sandefur left actual Russell expert Ginger Renner backed up that appraisal, damages standing, but reduced the punitive award to $9.9 mil- adding that she believed the signature had been altered. Since lion. Russell is the more famous of the pair, the painting’s estimated The affirmed that ruling. value dropped from $650,000 to $65,000. “Abusive conduct toward an individual, which causes the Morton quickly hired Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher (GDC), a type of harm at issue here, merits considerable punishment California law firm, which sent a demand letter to Renner and regardless of the setting in which it takes place. However, the Seltzer. It said: fact that GDC utilized the judicial system as a tool to accom- “1. Each of you will draft a letter to our specifications plish intimidation and oppression makes this behavior unique- completely recanting and withdrawing any statement you have ly egregious,” the opinion states. “In short, GDC’s use of the previously made regarding the authenticity of the painting cur- judicial system amounts to legal thuggery.” rently owned by Mr. Morton. Calls seeking comment from GDC’s attorneys were not “2. In the letter, among other admissions you will make, returned. you will admit that you did not perform a detailed examination Adding in interest while the case was under appeal, Seltzer of the painting and that your “opinion” was merely conjecture should get about $13.5 million, Blewett said. The dispute may on your part. also have destroyed the value of the painting at issue, Seltzer “3. You will agree to compensate Mr. Morton for the dif- noted. “It’s a wonderful painting, but it can’t be sold as a ference between what the painting sells for today, after we Russell and it no longer has Seltzer’s name on it,” he said. “I have tried to remove the cloud from its provenance, and what can’t imagine that anyone would buy it except for curiosity it could have sold for two years ago prior to your defamatory value,” he added. “It’s a very curious piece of work now.” remarks about its authenticity. “4. Independently, you will reimburse Mr. Morton for the This article was published in the Great Falls Tribune on time, expense, embarrassment, grief and anxiety he has March 14.

PAGE 22 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 Court corrects its February Oral arguments electronic-discovery order April 2007

The following order was issued by the Montana Supreme Court on April n Cause OP 06-0232 – LORI OBERSON, 4: Legal Guardian for BRIAN MUSSELMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, Respondents and Cross- IN THE MATTER OF PROPOSED REVISIONS Appellants, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO THE MONTANA RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE WITH et al., Defendant, Appellants and Cross- RESPECT TO DISCOVERY OF ELECTRONIC INFORMATION Respondents. Oral argument before the Montana Supreme On February 28, 2007, we entered an order in the above matter adopt- Court is set for Friday, April 20, at 10 a.m. in ing the Majority Proposal to Amend Rule 26 of the Montana Rules of the University Theater, University of Montana, Civil Procedure and Related Rules to Facilitate Electronic Discovery. We Missoula. An introduction to the oral argument erroneously included “26(b)(2)” in the final paragraph of the revised will begin at 9:30 a.m. Rule 26(b)(1). The third sentence of the second paragraph erroneously constituted a sentence fragment. May 2007 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that our February 28, 2007, Order is amended, nunc pro tunc, to delete the extraneous reference to “Rule n Cause DA 06-0052 – STATE OF MON- 26(b)(2)” in the first paragraph of revised Rule 26(b)(1), and to split the TANA, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RAUL C. third sentence of the second paragraph of revised Rule 34(b) into two SANCHEZ, Defendant and Appellant. separate sentences, as follows: Oral argument before the Montana Supreme The response shall state, with respect to each item or category, that Court is set for Monday, May 7, at 10:00 a.m. inspection and related activities will be permitted, as requested, in the Strand Union Building, Ballroom A, on unless the request is objected to. An objection to the requested form the campus of Montana State University, or forms for producing electronically stored information shall state Bozeman. An introduction to the oral argument the reasons for the objection. m will begin at 9:30 a.m.

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 23 DISCIPLINE Complaints drop, but ODC had busy 2006 Montana’s Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) received lawyers and one out-of-state lawyer who applied for admission 371 new complaints against attorneys last year, a drop in the to the Montana State Bar.2 The public sanctions and disability number of complaints made in 2005 and 2004, said the 2006 inactive rulings included three disbarments, nine suspensions, Annual Report of the ODC, which was released in February one prohibited admission, five public censures, three proba- 2007. tions and two attorneys were placed on disability/inactive sta- The ODC, headed by Disciplinary Counsel Shaun R. tus. They are: Thompson, is part of a lawyer-regulation system established by the Montana Supreme Court in 2002. The system consists l Atcheson, Brian T. – Suspension, extended 1 year. of ODC and the Commission on Practice (COP). ODC per- l Baldassin, William– Disability inactive status. forms central intake functions and processes, investigates and l D’Alton, Moira – Suspension, 30 days; public censure; prosecutes complaints against lawyers within the jurisdiction probation. of the Court. COP hears and decides the complaints and, in l Drozdz, Marla Jean – Suspension, 60 days. appropriate cases, makes recommendations to the Court for l Dupuis, Rebecca – Indefinite suspension. discipline. COP and ODC are under the direct supervision of l Dupuis, Rebecca – Disbarred. the Montana Supreme Court. l Harrington, J. Cort Jr. – Suspension, 6 months; public The following statistics are provided in the 11-page report. censure; probation. More details and comparisons to the ODC’s previous three l Hawkins, Kristine – Disability inactive status. years can be found in the complete report at www.montana- l Hussey, Bruce – Disbarred. courts.org/supreme/odc/reports/06_annual%20report.pdf. l Lynch, Jeff R. – Disbarred. l Moses, Stephen – Indefinite suspension, one year Number of complaints minimum. From Jan. 1 through Dec. 31, 2006, there were 371 new l Musick, Richard L. – Indefinite suspension, one year complaints. Of those complaints, ODC opened and docketed minimum. 269 new files on matters involving allegations of attorney mis- l Neidhardt, Donald J. – Prohibited admission, one year; conduct, or where the complainant appealed a dismissal by censure. ODC. l Strickland, Graeme – Suspension, one year minimum. Based upon the fact that there are about 2,800 active in- l Truman, Catherine – Public censure. state lawyers, and while some lawyers were subject to multiple l Turrin, Fausto G. – Public censure. inquiries, informal disciplinary complaints averaged about one l Wesson, Kenneth – Indefinite suspension, one year for every eight lawyers over the 12-month period. minimum. As noted in ODC’s Annual Report for 2005, in prior years, l Wing, David – Probation. when calculating the total number of complaints, matters that were opened as pencil files and then later opened and docketed By comparison, in 2005, 18 formal disciplinary sanctions as new, informal complaint files were counted twice in the and disability inactive rulings were imposed on Montana complaint total. Without the duplication, the total number of lawyers; in 2004, 21 formal disciplinary sanctions and disabili- complaints for 2005 would be 429, and for 2004, the total ty inactive rulings were imposed; and, in 2003, 16 formal dis- would be 415. In this report, ODC, in calculating the total ciplinary sanctions were imposed. There were about 58 public number of complaints, does not duplicate files that were disciplinary orders in the ten-year period between 1992 and opened as pencil files and later opened as informal complaint 2002 compared with 77 public disciplinary orders or disability files. inactive rulings in the last four years, 2003-2006.3 By comparison, the number of complaints received in 2006 represents a decrease of about 14 percent from the number of Private discipline complaints received in 2005, about an 11 percent decrease In 2006, COP imposed an additional 14 private and infor- from 2004, 14 percent increase from 2003, and 28 percent mal disciplinary sanctions on 14 attorneys based on 14 disci- increase from 2002.1 plinary orders, including 13 private admonishments and one probation. By comparison, in 2005, COP imposed 31 private Lawyers disciplined or placed on and informal disciplinary sanctions on 31 attorneys based on 31 disciplinary orders, including two probations, 27 private disability inactive status admonishments and two resignations; in 2004, 22 private and In 2006, the Montana Supreme Court imposed 24 formal informal disciplinary orders, including nine probations and 13 disciplinary sanctions and disability inactive rulings (perma- private admonishments; and in 2003, 28 private and informal nent public records) based on 17 Court orders for 16 Montana disciplinary orders and disability inactive rulings, including

PAGE 24 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 five probations, 21 private admonishments and two attorneys l 155 carried over from 2005. were transferred disability inactive status. l 269 new cases docketed in 2006. In 2006, about one for every 165 lawyers was formally sanctioned or transferred to disability inactive status and about Of those 455 open cases, ODC completed intake and inves- one in every 200 was privately sanctioned. Or, collectively, tigations and made 289 reports and recommendations (includ- about one in every 90 Montana lawyers (one percent) was ing supplemental reviews or appeals) to the COP over the either publicly or privately sanctioned or transferred to disabil- course of the five COP meetings held during the year. In com- ity inactive status. In 2005, this statistic was one in every 57 parison, ODC completed 353 case reports in six COP meetings lawyers; in 2004, one in every 56 lawyers; and in 2003, one in in 2005, 280 reports in five COP meetings in 2004, and 296 every 70 lawyers. reports in six COP meetings in 2003. This represents a slight Alternatively, 89 of 90 Montana lawyers (99 percent) were decrease in the average case reports reviewed per meeting. The not subject to any disciplinary sanction or disability inactive averages are as follows: rulings last year. Montana lawyers continue to overwhelmingly l 2006 – 58 reports per meeting. represent their clients ethically. l 2005 – 59 reports per meeting. Since 2003, there has been a sharp increase in public disci- l 2004 – 56 reports per meeting. plinary orders and disability inactive rulings (from six per year l 2003 – 49 reports per meeting. to over 18 per year on average). Screened and docketed cases Including both screened files and docketed matters, ODC Cases in Inventory prepared the following number of reports or dismissal letters per year: Effective July 7, 2003, the Montana Supreme Court amend- l 2006 – 348 reports/dismissals. ed the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement to allow l 2005 – 393 reports/dismissals. ODC to dismiss cases under limited circumstances. l 2004 – 342 reports/dismissals. l 2003 – 325 reports/dismissals. Screened cases Of the 371 new informal disciplinary inquiries in 2006, One hundred ninety-four cases were in inventory and car- ODC was able to screen (i.e., not immediately docketed) 145 ried over to 2007, nearly all of them less than 120 days old, of those cases (about 39 percent) because they did not appear compared with 186 cases carried over from 2005 to 2006, 110 to state a disciplinary complaint. The results of those are cases from 2004 to 2005, and 72 cases from 2003 to 2004.5 described below: At the end of 2006, there were 25 open formal cases. There were 22 pending formal actions before the Montana Supreme l 145 inquiries screened prior to COP involvement. Court. ODC had three additional formal complaints to file pur- - 57 dismissed by ODC suant to COP’s recommendation. - 17 ODC dismissals appealed to COP - 40 inquiries closed as dismissals Public inquiries - 50 closed with no further action In addition to the ODC’s handling of complaint investiga- l 90 closed without COP involvement. tions and prosecutions, the office received the following l 45 docketed cases, including 17 appeals. inquiries from the public per year. l 15 screened cases carried over to 2007. l 2006 – 405 telephone, 59 written, 4 walk-ins. l 2005 – 460 telephone, 117 written, 9 walk-ins. In the 50 screened complaints resulting in closure with no l 2004 – 654 telephone, 87 written, 17 walk-ins. further action, the complainant did not respond to ODC’s l 2003 – 562 telephone, 139 written, 7 walk-ins. request for more information or the matter was withdrawn. In some of the 45 screened complaints resulting in docketed ODC mailed 468 complaint packets and information forms cases, informal disciplinary matters, more than one docketed in 2006, compared with 585 packets in 2005. 758 packets in file was opened. 2004, and 655 in 2003.6 Docketed cases Of the 371 new informal disciplinary inquiries in 2006, 269 Case Prosecutions files were docketed. Of those 269 new docketed cases, ODC issued dismissal letters in two of those cases prior to COP Disciplinary counsel appeared at 23 hearings over the review. Neither of ODC’s dismissals of docketed matters were course of the five COP meetings held during the year further appealed to COP. described below. ODC had 455 open (docketed) cases in 2006 based on the l 15 - Formal hearings. following: l 6 - Rule 26 consent hearings (involving both formal and l 6 cases carried over from 2003. informal cases). l 23 carried over from 2004. l 1 - Rule 28 hearing (one additional Rule 28 matter was

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 25 reviewed by COP where the hearing was waived by the cases without authority) – 13 percent. respondent). l 0 - Show Cause hearings l Personal Misconduct (such as dishonesty and misrep- l 0 - Reinstatement hearings resentations to non-clients, clients, opposing parties and counsel, or a court) – 11 percent. In previous years, ODC appeared at 53 hearings over 6 meetings in 2005, 38 hearings over five meetings in 2004, and l Other categories, including excessive fees, prosecutori- 37 hearings over six meetings in 2003. In the past, OTSC al misconduct, trust-account violations each made up two hearings set when a lawyer has failed to response have often percent or less of the 2006 breakdown. unduly delayed the proceedings. Now, ODC usually includes failure to respond as a ground for discipline in the formal com- Disposition of Cases by Review Panels plaint. Of the 289 cases reviewed, the COP dismissed 77 percent after a review panel determined that either the complaint was Nature of grievants outside the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Court or there was Complaints from clients or former clients far exceeded no evidence or insufficient evidence that a violation had complaints filed by others. No attorneys self-reported. In occurred (up from 73 percent in 2005, 72 percent in 2004 and 2006, the types of complainants whose complaints resulted in 65 percent in 2003 and 2002). docketed cases were: The review panel recommended further ODC investigation l Clients or former clients 65 percent. in only about one percent of the cases reviewed (same in 2005 l Attorneys 5 (a four-year low) and 2004, and down from two percent in 2003). l Opposing parties 15 It recommended discipline in about 18 percent of the cases l Third parties/other 14 reviewed (compared with 16 in 2005, 26 percent in 2004 and l Courts 1 17 percent in 2003). Eleven percent (33 cases) of the cases reviewed resulted in Practice areas a recommendation for formal discipline (compared with eight The following is a 2006 breakdown of the various areas of percent in 2005, 18 percent in 2004 and 11 percent in 2003). practice in which docketed cases were involved: Seven percent (20 cases) of the cases reviewed resulted in a l Criminal law 36 percent recommendation for informal discipline (compared with eight l Family law 23 percent in 2005, nine percent in 2004 and six percent in 2003). l Civil litigation 14 Nine cases were deferred due to the lawyer’s transfer to dis- l Personal injury 5 ability inactive status or disbarment (two in 2005 and none in l Probate 5 2004). l Bankruptcy 3 One show-cause recommendation was made due to a l Real estate 3 lawyer’s failure to respond to an ODC inquiry, which was l Business 1 resolved prior to hearing (1l show-cause orders were issued in l Other 10 2005, nine in 2004 and 16 in 2003). One case was resolved by consent discipline by an adjudi- Types of allegations catory panel under Rule 26 prior to review by a review panel The following is a comparison of the types of allegations (none in 2005, one in 2004 and none in 2003). made in complaints received by ODC that resulted in docketed Eleven cases were continued to the January 2007 meeting. cases in 2006:

l Performance and Communication (the lawyer acted Other Matters incompetently or did not perform promised legal services at all, delayed performance beyond what was expected, or Suggested rule revisions and other matters failed to adequately communicate with the client) – 52 per- Rule 5, Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement (2002) cent. was amended, effective Nov. 8, 2006, to have the Board of Trustees of the State Bar of Montana review ODC’s budget. l Interference with Justice (the lawyer failed to expedite litigation, communicated with represented adversaries, Much of the language of the current Rules for Lawyer made misrepresentations to a court, disobeyed court orders, Disciplinary Enforcement is derived from the rules that existed or filed non-meritorious claims) – 14 percent. prior to the restructuring of the lawyers disciplinary system in 2002. Some parts, but not all, are based on the ABA Model l Conflicts of Interest or Improper Withdrawals (the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement. lawyer failed to satisfy duties to the client by disregarding conflicts of interest, improperly withdrawing from repre- There are certain internal inconsistencies within the rules. sentation, failing to turn over files to the client, or settling Also, there are a number of areas in which the rules could be improved or clarified. ODC intends to propose, after consulta-

PAGE 26 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 tion with members of the Commission, a comprehensive revi- ures for 2004 and 2005 rather than the duplicated figures as in previous reports. sion of the rules. 2. Some lawyers received multiple sanctions for their misconduct in a discipli- nary matter. In addition, some sanctions were imposed for an attorney’s conduct in multiple matters. Annotation project 3. In years prior to 2006, these figures included only one sanction per attor- In 2005, former Disciplinary Counsel Tim Strauch, in con- ney. 4. The total private sanctions for 2005 differs in this report from the 2005 junction with the University of Montana School of Law, com- annual report because ODC used a more accurate way of calculating the totals. pleted the annotation project for the years 1992-2004. The In the past, a private admonition was counted in the year the case was closed in final work product is a comprehensive set of annotations of all ODC’s database. Now, it is counted when an adjudicatory panel approves the giv- Supreme Court decisions and COP recommendations in formal ing of a private admonition. The figures for 2003 and 2004 remain unchanged. 5. Thirteen cases were continued from the November 2006 COP meeting to disciplinary matters since 1992. ODC has updated the annota- the January 2007 meeting due to the absence of some COP members. tions with the 2005 cases and will continue to do so annually. 6. Since the time that ODC’s webpage was up and running, ODC began refer- ring people directly to the website where they could review and download ODC’s NOTES information and forms. ODC did not keep a log of these inquiries. The result of these referrals is a decrease in telephone inquiries and packets mailed. 1. When calculating the year-to-year comparisons, ODC used the actual fig-

it deems appropriate. 30-day limit to file objections Rule 16 is clearly meant to be self- executing. In the past, however, this Court often has issued orders specifying now ‘self-enforcing,’ not in orders that a lawyer has thirty days to file objections. Because the rule does not The following Montana Supreme Court from date of service within which to require such an order and a lawyer sub- order, approved by all seven justices, file with the Court objections to the ject to disciplinary proceedings is on was filed by the Court on March 21: findings of fact and conclusions of notice about the applicability of the law and recommendation of disci- Montana Rules of Lawyer Disciplinary AF 06-0628 pline, and a written brief in support Enforcement, we will do so no longer. IN THE MATTER OF THE RULES thereof. THEREFORE, OF LAWYER DISCIPLINARY IT IS ORDERED that, effective May ENFORCEMENT The rule further provides that, after 1, 2007, this Court will no longer issue the lawyer serves a copy of the objec- orders expressly providing 30 days for Rule 16 of the Montana Rules of tions and brief on Disciplinary Counsel, the filing of objections to findings, con- Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement states, Disciplinary Counsel shall have thirty clusions and recommendations of the in part, that days to file an opposing brief and serve Commission on Practice; and it on the lawyer or lawyer’s counsel. In IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on [a]fter service of a copy of the find- addition, the rule states that after such and after May 1, 2007, the time limits in ings of fact and conclusions of law filings, or at the expiration of the time Rule 16 of the Montana Rules of Lawyer and recommendation of discipline to allowed for such filings, the Court shall Disciplinary Enforcement shall be self- the lawyer and to lawyer’s counsel, if consider the matter, issue its written executing. m any, the lawyer shall have thirty days decision, and impose such discipline as

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 27 BAR-BENCH BRIEFS

U.S. Supreme Court rejects O’Neill appeal bar foundations. The seminar provides the opportunity to con- Montana state senator Jerry O’Neil has lost his effort to fer with ABA officials, bar leader colleagues, executive staff, have the U.S. Supreme Court hear his claim that he should be and other experts on the operation of such associations. allowed to practice law, despite not being a licensed lawyer. Ms. Smith, who runs a private law practice in Missoula, The court denied Mr. O’Neil’s appeal on March 19, without attended BLI sessions on bar governance, finance, communi- comment. The denial means that a Montana Supreme Court cations, and planning. State Bar Executive Director Chris ruling issued in November will stand. Manos also attended the March BLI. The state high court upheld a District Court ruling from 2004 that found Mr. O’Neil in contempt and prohibited him from practicing law. UM student wins top bankruptcy-law award A self-described “independent paralegal” from Columbia University of Montana law student Valerie Grubich has Falls, Mr. O’Neil has long sought permission for nonlawyers been selected to receive the 2007 Distinguished Bankruptcy to give legal advice and prepare legal documents. O’Neil has Student Award for the 9th Circuit from the American College tried unsuccessfully to change state law so that the Legislature, of Bankruptcy. rather than the Supreme Court, would have authority to deter- The awards are presented annually to the top law students mine eligibility to practice law. in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 9th and 11th Circuit Courts of Appeal. Disputes over O’Neil’s desire to practice law began in the Ms. Grubich is the first Montana student to receive the award 1980s. In 1986, he was rejected as a candidate for the Montana for the 9th Circuit, which includes Alaska, Arizona, California, Supreme Court, for lack of credentials. The constitution Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. requires that Supreme Court justices be lawyers. She was nominated for the award by the Hon. Ralph Kirscher, chief judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Montana. She traveled to Washington, D.C., in Bozeman attorney to run for state AG slot March to represent the 9th Circuit at an awards reception dur- Bozeman attorney announced that he is a ing the annual meeting of the American College of Democratic candidate for Montana attorney general in the Bankruptcy. 2008 election. Ms. Grubich, will receive her juris doctorate degree from Mr. Wheat, who served in the state Senate, in 2003 and UM School of Law this year. 2005, entered the race at a press conference in the old Supreme Court Chambers in the Capitol in Helena on March 29. Study shows length of time for capital appeals Mr. Wheat, a 1978 graduate of the University of Montana How long do appeals in capital cases take? School of Law, worked for three years as a deputy county A report by a visiting fellow of the National Institute of attorney in Butte-Silver Bow counties, then moved to Justice details how long it takes court systems to process a Bozeman to enter private practice, specializine in representing direct appeal in capital cases. plaintiffs in personal-injury cases. “I think it is important that Dr. Barry Latzer, professor at John Jay College of Criminal the next attorney general have courtroom experience,” he was Justice, examined data for 1,676 cases resolved between 1992- quoted by the Billings Gazette as saying. 2002 in 14 states. The Gazette said that House Minority Leader John Parker of He found that, measuring from date of death sentence, it Great Falls and Helena attorney Steve Bullock also have said took a median 966 days to complete direct appeal. The number they will be in the Democratic race for the attorney general of days for an appeal to reach the court of last resort varied office. Democrat Mike McGrath, the present attorney general, greatly between states. Petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court cannot run for re-election as AG in 2008 because of term lim- added a median of 188 to 250 days. its. Factors that affected the number of days required to process an appeal included case complexity, number of dissenting opinions, if there was a reversal of the lower court decision, Smith attends ABA Bar Leadership Institute prior review by an intermediate appellate court, and if there Joining some 300 other emerging leaders of lawyer organi- were state laws or rules on expediting capital appeals. zations from across the country at the American Bar Read the full report at www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ Association’s Bar Leadership Institute (BLI), March 15-17 in nij/grants/217555.pdf Chicago was Cynthia K. Smith of Missoula, chair of the State Bar of Montana’s Board of Trustees. The BLI is held annually in Chicago for incoming officials of local and state bars, special-focus lawyer organizations and

PAGE 28 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007

BACHELLER DISBARRED, from Page 8 those rights, Bacheller court order, Spaulding said. agreed to testify. But the judge warned Bacheller that Moses then asked an arrest warrant would be issued if The Spizziris, a ranch family in Bacheller why he didn’t respond to Bacheller failed to meet the May 1 dead- Shawmut, did not attend the hearing but Spaulding’s court orders. “Depression. line for providing financial records relat- were represented by attorney Linda Despair. Fear.” Bacheller responded. ed to the trust fund. Hickman. Bacheller said he had “nothing left to Hickman said after the hearing that After the hearing, Diane Spizziri said turn over” because he had “converted she didn’t feel it was appropriate at this she was disappointed but not surprised (the trust fund) to my own use.” He said stage of the case to press Bacheller on to learn that Bacheller had pirated her no one knew what he did until early how and where he spent the money. daughter’s trust fund. Spizziri said that March, when he talked with Moses “Ultimately I hope we’ll get that while she appreciated Bacheller’s admis- about the case. answer,” she said. sion, she believes the former lawyer “Is there anything left of Beth’s (trust Hickman, who is also the Wheatland entrusted to oversee her daughter’s trust fund) to transfer?” Moses asked. “No,” County attorney, said she is aware that fund owes the family more than an Bacheller responded. Bacheller is being investigated for possi- accounting of how he spent the money. Bacheller said he has financial ble criminal charges. Any criminal “Not that this will heal the wounds, records that may help track where the charge in the case would be filed in but I expect an apology from him,” money was spent. A trustee has been Yellowstone County District Court or in Spizziri said. appointed to oversee Bacheller’s busi- federal court, she said. Beth Spizziri, 23, was 12 years old ness records since his law firm was shut- Edwards said his next step is to when she was injured in an accident at tered after his disbarment. request reimbursement for Beth the family ranch. Two insurance settle- Bacheller told Spaulding he did not Spizziri’s financial loss through a ments eventually awarded her just more know how much of the trust fund might Montana Bar Association program called than $200,000. Edwards represented remain. Bacheller was not asked how he the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection. Beth Spizziri in the case, and Bacheller spent the money. The program uses an assessment paid was appointed afterward to act as her Spaulding dismissed the contempt annually by Montana attorneys to pay guardian and the conservator of the set- charge related to Bacheller’s failure to for losses to clients of attorneys found to tlement, which had been placed in trust. appear for the first hearing. He found have committed a fraud. Last year, the Spizziris hired Hickman Bacheller in contempt for failing to “I think that’s one of the great func- after becoming concerned that bills were respond to the second order requiring tions the bar provides,” Edwards said. not being paid from the trust. When him to turn over the trust money. queries to Bacheller went unanswered, Because the contempt charge is a civil This story appeared in the Billings Hickman filed a motion in District Court complaint, the only punishment avail- Gazette on March 21. to force Bacheller to give an accounting able is to require Bacheller to fulfill the of the trust fund. In September, Spaulding ordered Bacheller to appear in court on Jan. 2 with the financial records. When Bacheller failed to appear on that date, Spaulding issued a second order terminat- ing him as conservator and guardian and ordering him to transfer the trust money to Beth Spizziri by Feb. 15. When Spaulding still got no response from Bacheller, the judge issued an arrest order for the attorney on two civil con- tempt charges for violating court orders. He was held until in the Wheatland County jail on bond set by Spaulding at $200,131.48, the amount of the trust fund award. At the hearing, Moses told Spaulding that he was concerned that Bacheller had the right to remain silent. After discussing

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 31 Bad: For free The Legal Writer Better: Free (Does the “for” add any meaning?) Bad: In order to Better: To (Same here – unless the in order adds some- Judge Mark Painter thing, strike it.)

Bad: By means of Redundancies Better: By (Same) & euphemisms There are countless others. If you strike them you not only cut bad grammar but also save words. And your Redundancies writing becomes much crisper. Redundancies add words without adding meaning, clutter- Euphemisms ing up our writing. Remember that the goal is to use as few Shun euphemisms. If people die, they died. They didn’t words as possible without losing meaning. Use the words you pass away, or pass on, or even worse, expire. (Do we all have need to make the meaning clear, but no more. an expiration date?). A tax increase is just that – not a revenue The legal redundancies that resulted from the Norman enhancement. Conquest – will and testament, null and void, free and clear, A euphemism is a less harsh term for something we don’t give and devise, and others of that ilk – were the subject of a really want to talk about: collateral damage, instead of civilian previous column [at http://www.judgepainter.org/legal- deaths, correctional facility for prison. And toilet paper has writer34.htmt]. Never use them. morphed into bathroom tissue. The simple concept of a lie is But we use many others – the garden-variety redundancies now a fabrication, or erroneous information, or disinformation. that creep into our writing – such as the usual example of very One of my favorites is how lawyers describe their clients’ unique. Since unique means one of a kind, there can’t be any thefts: they just misappropriated the money. Sounds like a degrees. We use more of these than we might think. I have simple bookkeeping error. seen the ones in the chart below more than a few times. Not all euphemisms are bad – sometimes a new word for something is better. Mentally challenged sounds kinder or Bad: During the month of May more accurate than mentally retarded. But eschew extending Better: In May (May is a month, making month redundant.) challenged to the mundane: our vertically challenged candi- date, the follically challenged newsreader. Bad: John Smythe, fifty years of age If a new word helps, use it. But most are just silly, such as Better: John Smythe, 50 (What else would it be but age?) in the new government term for hunger. Hunger has been euphemized. Bad: Going at a speed of 70 miles per hour The U.S. Department of Agriculture has started to purge Better: Going 70 (Again, everyone knows.) hunger from America. A noble goal, but there will still be as many hungry Americans. But they have been redefined as Bad: A period of a week “lacking in food security.” Maybe terrorists are blowing up Better: A week the broccoli? Should we lock up the lima beans? Food insecurity is a euphemism; it’s also jargon of the worst Bad: Hit him with a closed fist kind – bureaucratic doublespeak. Better: Fist (If it’s not closed it’s not a fist.) I’m not making this up. A panel of “experts” in hunger (food insecurity) has studied the issue for the USDA. Bad: Convicted felon I download the quotation below directly from the USDA Better: Felon (To be a felon one must necessarily be convict- web site. (It was not easy to find – the headline on the web ed.) site was that four people had been appointed to the Peanut Board.) The experts, after no telling how long and at what Bad: Pair (or set) of twins cost, have come up with, among others, these recommenda- Better: Twins tions: n Recommendation 3-1: USDA should continue to Bad: In the near vicinity measure and monitor food insecurity regularly in a house- Better: In the vicinity, or better, near. hold survey. Given that hunger is a separate concept from food insecurity, USDA should undertake a program to Bad: It was raining outside measure hunger, which is an important potential conse- Better: It was raining (Does it rain inside?) quence of food insecurity. n Recommendation 3-2: To measure hunger, which is Bad: Past history an individual and not a household construct, USDA should Better: History (History is necessarily past.)

PAGE 32 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 develop measures for individuals on the basis of a struc- gry? It also says something similar in the second paragraph. tured research program, and develop and implement a Paragraph three talks about measuring problems of food inse- modified or new data gathering mechanism. The first step curity. I guess we would expect adverse family and social should be to develop an operationally feasible concept and interaction if people do not have enough to eat. definition of hunger. Most Americans are food secure – we have plenty to eat. n Recommendation 3-3: USDA should examine in its We are so secure that obesity is a major problem. research program ways to measure other potential, closely But according to the same USDA, there are still 35 million linked, consequences of food insecurity, in addition to Americans who are sometimes hungry – that is they do not hunger, such as feelings of deprivation and alienation, dis- have enough to eat – they should not be euphemized away. tress, and adverse family and social interaction. n Recommendation 3-4: USDA should examine alter- Readability nate labels to convey the severity of food insecurity with- I always show the readability scores for this column. out the problems inherent in the current labels. Statistics for this column (excepting the quotes, of course, Furthermore, USDA should explicitly state in its annual which are unintelligible): 13 words per sentence, 7 passive reports that the data presented in the report are estimates of voice, and grade level 9.3. prevalence of household food insecurity and not prevalence of hunger among individuals. MARK PAINTER has served as a judge on the Ohio 1st District Court of Appeals for 12 years, after 13 years on the Running a test of readability on the above gem, it comes in Hamilton County Municipal Court. He has taught as an adjunct at a grade level of 18.7 – people who have had 18.7 years of professor at the University of Cincinnati College of Law since formal education should be able to understand it. That means 1990. Judge Painter is the author of 340 nationally published a doctorate. decisions, 102 legal articles, and 5 books, including “The Legal Being the proud owner of a doctorate, I should understand Writer: 40 Rules for the Art of Legal Writing.” It is available it, but I don’t. Are they trying to say that hunger affects peo- from http://books.lawyersweekly.com. Judge Painter has given ple, not households? So, in the last paragraph, household food dozens of seminars on legal writing. Contact him through his insecurity doesn’t mean the people in the household are hun- web site, www.judgepainter.org.

NEWS ABOUT MEMBERS

Karan L. Dunnigan, a 1983 graduate, with honors, from the criminal defense and personal injury law. Mailing address is: University of Montana School of Law, was recently named 309 1st Ave. E, Kalispell, MT 59901; phone (406) 752-9369; field solicitor (Billings Field Office), Office of the Solicitor, fax (406)-257-7469. U.S. Department of the Interior. The Office of the Solicitor provides legal services to the Secretary of the Interior and var- ious Interior bureaus and agencies. Ms. Dunnigan has been an DEATHS attorney-advisor in the Solicitor's Office since 1988. Prior to that, Ms. Dunnigan clerked for former U.S. District Judge James F. Battin. Fred Root, Missoula attorney Retired Missoula attorney Fred C. Root, 93, died on March Paul T. Ryan has opened the office of Paul Ryan & Associates 4 at his home. PLLC in Missoula. Mr. Ryan has been practicing law in Mr. Root was born and raised in Butte. He was an accom- Missoula since 1993, and was formerly a shareholder at plished middleweight boxer. He attended Butte public schools, Datsopoulos, MacDonald & Lind. His new office will have an Montana State University and the University of Montana, emphasis on personal injury law, criminal defense and civil lit- where he received his law degree in 1942. igation. He is a native of Missoula. Contact him at 218 E. After graduation, Mr. Root entered the U.S. Army and Front St., Suite 210, Missoula MT 59802; (406) 542-2233; or served through the remainder of World War II, serving in the [email protected]. Philippines and New Guinea. He was decorated on several occasions and received a Purple Heart for wounds received in Timothy K. Wenz has opened the Wenz Law Office in combat in New Guinea. He ended his military career as a cap- Kalispell. Mr. Wenz is a 2002 graduate of the University of tain in 1946. Montana School of Law. From October 2002 to February In 1943, he married Ida Radcliff Birke of Manchester, 2007, he served as a deputy county attorney for Flathead England. She died in 1967 in Missoula. County where he prosecuted felony and misdemeanor criminal In 1946, Mr. Root started his general law practice in cases. He will have a general practice with an emphasis on Missoula, practicing in state and federal courts. He was a pres-

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 33 DEATHS

ident of the Western Montana Bar Association. In 1961, he Judge McCarvel didn’t hesitate to cite people for contempt became the Missoula city attorney, and he held that position during his time on the bench, the Tribune said. until 1978, when he retired. “You didn’t try to pull any fast stunts in his courtroom,” Mr. Root was an active, charter member of the Western McKittrick recalled. “He maintained control.” Montana Shrine, as well as the Odd Fellows, Elks, Masons, McKittrick said he and Judge McCarvel both grew up in and the American Disabled Veterans. Anaconda, and their fathers both came from the same town in Mr. Root is survived by a daughter and a son. Ireland, Carrickmacross. A World War II Navy veteran, Judge McCarvel gained a law degree from the University of Michigan. John McCarvel, retired district judge Judge McKittrick’s father, Dan, who was mayor of Former Great Falls District Judge John M. McCarvel, died Anaconda at the time, hired McCarvel as the city attorney March 10 at age 85 in a hospital near his Palm Desert, Calif., right out of college, the Tribune said. home. He was a past president of the Montana Bar As an attorney, McCarvel handled private criminal defense Association. cases – sometimes for indigent defendants – as well as person- In a tribute on March 14, the Great Falls Tribune called him al injury cases and divorce matters, Judge McKittrick recalled. “a colorful state judge who produced many opinions and ran a no-nonsense courtroom.” Judge McCarvel was in private law practice when he was Leonard Jungers, attorney and farmer first elected to the bench in 1978. He served as district judge Leonard D. Jungers, 77, a longtime attorney in Big Sandy through 1994, when he lost a bid for re-election. and Fort Benton, died at his home in Billings on March 19 “He cut to the core of matters,” recalled District Judge Tom after a lengthy illness. McKittrick of Great Falls for the Tribune article. “He didn’t He was born in Regent, N.D. He graduated from high beat around the bush.” McKittrick prosecuted cases before school in Forsyth, Mont., and received a bachelor of arts McCarvel, and also served with him as a judge. degree from Carroll College in Helena. After serving two years in the Army, he attended law school at Gonzaga University in Spokane. He passed the Montana bar exam in 1956 and gradu- ated from law school the following year. Mr. Jungers practiced law in Fort Benton and Big Sandy for 50 years, but his first love was his farm, his obituary said. Mr. Jungers is survived by his wife, Audrey, a daughter and a son. He has preceded in death by two sons and a grandson.

Robert Gabriel, Great Falls attorney Retired Great Falls attorney Robert "Bob" W. Gabriel, 78, died of natural causes March 20 at a Great Falls hospital. Mr. Gabriel was born in Ortonville, Minn., and grew up and attended schools in Minnesota, North Dakota and Montana, graduating from Great Falls High in 1945. He received a law degree from University of Montana School of Law. Mr. Gabriel was one of the founding members of the Montana Trial Lawyers Association. He worked as a city attor- ney for Great Falls and was an assistant district attorney for Cascade County. He operated a private law practice in Great Falls for more than 50 years. Mr. Gabriel was a strong advo- cate for Native American rights and performed such advocacy pro bono, his obituary said. Mr. Gabriel was president of the Young Democrats State Association, delegate to the Democratic National Convention in 1960, and he met John F. Kennedy. He ran for the Montana Supreme Court in 1972. He also was passionate about farming, beginning with the original breaking of the land on the family farm west of Box

PAGE 34 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 Elder which is still operated by his nephew. He was an avid In the early 1950s, Mr. Kohn joined American National fly fisherman, private pilot, bird hunter, skiier, motorcyclist, Insurance Company, became a chartered life underwriter, and sculptor and short-story writer. became active in the National Association of Life Survivors include his wife, Catherine, and a daughter. Underwriters. In 1968, he was elected trustee of the national association. He was also active in the Montana Life Underwriter's Association. Jerry Kohn, attorney and insurance man Mr. Kohn was president of the Billings Optimist Club, dis- Jerome M. "Jerry" Kohn died on March 28 at the age of 91. trict governor of Optimist International, and an active member Mr. Kohn was born in in Far Rockaway, N.Y. He soon of the Elks Club. He belonged to Congregation Beth Aaron, moved with his mother to Billings and remained a resident of helping to establish the congregation's first synagogue in 1940 Billings for the next 90 years, until his death. and later serving as president of the congregation. As a young- For his junior and senior years of high school, his parents ster, Jerry missed the opportunity to have a Bar Mitzvah, the enrolled him in the Randolph Macon military academy in traditional Jewish coming-of-age ceremony for 13-year-olds. Front Royal, Va., where he graduated as valedictorian in 1932. He remedied that in 1998, when he and several other adult He then went on to attend the University of Virginia, where he members of the congregation, after months of Hebrew lessons graduated with honors in 1936, and the University of Montana and other studies, were Bar Mitzvahed together in a ceremony School of Law, where he graduated in 1938. both solemn and joyous. He was 83 years old at the time. After law school, Mr. Kohn practiced law in Billings and Mr. Kohn was appointed by Gov. Ted Schwinden to the State also helped his mother operate the family's wholesale candy Board of Medical Examiners and spent many years represent- and tobacco business. In 1942, he joined the Navy and attend- ing the insurance industry on the hospital rate review board. ed midshipman's school at Columbia University in New York Mr. Kohn traveled extensively, and in 2001 he fulfilled a City, where he earned an ensign's commission. During World lifelong dream of traveling all the way around the United War II, he served on the staff of Admiral M.L. Deyo, seeing States by train. He was a member of MENSA, an enthusiastic action in both the Atlantic and Pacific theaters. "big brother" for the Big Brothers and Big Sisters program in In 1941, Jerry married Elizabeth "Betty" Sanders of Wilsall. Billings, and a dedicated H.O.S.T.S. volunteer, helping Billings After the war, they settled back in Billings to raise a family. elementary students with reading and math for over 10 years. She died in 2000. Mr. Kohn is survived by two daughters and a son.

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 35 PAGE 36 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 CLASSIFIEDS

CLASSIFIEDS POLICY: There is a ASSOCIATE: Small downtown Billings Indian law and criminal law, and trial minimum charge of $35 for all ads, firm seeks full-time associate attorney. experience preferred. Knowledge of even for State Bar of Montana mem- Firm specializes in business, commer- criminal law and procedures, rules of bers. All ads over 50 words are cial and agricultural law, real estate, evidence and civil procedures, familiari- charged at 70 cents per word. estate planning/ probate, tax, litigation, ty with computerized legal research and Send classified ads to The Montana and water law. Applicants must demon- word processing are required. Indian Lawyer magazine, P.O. Box 577, strate superior research, analytical, preference applies. Salary range nego- Helena MT 59624; or fax to (406) 442- interpersonal and writing skills. tiable, from $50,000 depending on qual- 7763; or e-mail to cwood@montan- Preferred candidate will have 1-2 years ifications. Submit a letter of interest, abar.org. Please include billing relevant experience; however, firm will resume and references to: Crow Human address. The deadline for the May consider less-experienced applicant with Resources Department, PO Box 159, issue is April 25. Call (406) 447-2200 excellent credentials. Please send cover Crow Agency MT 59022, with a copy for more information. letter and resume to The Montana to Office of Legal Counsel, PO Box ______Lawyer #3-23, PO Box 577, Helena MT 340, Crow Agency MT 59022. Position 59624. open until filled. ATTORNEY POSITIONS ATTORNEY: Law firm in Missoula is ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY: Busy Great CIVIL LITIGATION ATTORNEY: seeking an attorney to work in a litiga- Falls firm seeks an attorney with experi- Butte law firm seeks attorney to prac- tion practice. Excellent research, writing ence in civil litigation. Strong research tice civil litigation. The firm's practice and people skills required. Please send and writing skills required. Competitive emphasizes trials of personal injury, or e-mail letter of application, resume salary and benefits. All inquiries will be medical malpractice and insurance dis- and references to: Datsopoulos, kept confidential. Send letter of applica- putes. Strong research and writing skills MacDonald & Lind PC, Attn: Office tion, resume, references and a writing required. Competitive salary and bene- Admin, 201 W. Main, Suite 201, sample to The Montana Lawyer #3-22, fits. Applicants must be admitted to Missoula MT 59802; PO Box 577, Helena MT 59624. practice in Montana. Send letter of [email protected]. All inquiries application, resume, three references strictly confidential. ASSOCIATE: Sullivan Tabaracci & and a writing sample to The Montana Rhoades PC seeks an associate attorney Lawyer #1-24, PO Box 577, Helena MT ATTORNEY: Dawson County Domestic with at least 3 to 7 years experience to 59624. Violence Program is seeking a full-time complement its growing transactional civil legal attorney to work in Eastern and litigation practice specializing in ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY: Small Montana. This individual will provide commercial, real estate and business Billings firm seeks full-time associate civil legal assistance to victims of law. Our 11-member firm enjoys over attorney in general practice, emphasiz- domestic violence, sexual assault and seven decades of combined experience, ing transactional law, including real stalking. Salary depends on experience. and provides associates with excellent estate, banking and health care. Private Send a resume and a sample of your opportunities to expand their legal prac- practice or clerkship experience pre- legal writing. Applicants must be admit- tice. In our continuing effort to exceed ferred. Send letter of interest, resume ted to practice in Montana. Send to: our client’s expectations, we hire only and writing sample to Felt, Martin, Dawson County Domestic Violence exceptional attorneys and staff. Situated Frazier, Jacobs & Rapkoch PC, PO Box Program, PO Box 505, Glendive MT in centrally-located Missoula, the firm’s 2558, Billings MT 59103-2558. 59330. upscale office suite offers a spacious, technologically advanced and pleasant ATTORNEY: The Montana School TRIBAL PROSECUTOR: The Crow work environment. Successful appli- Boards Association is seeking to hire an Tribe, located in Big Horn County, cants must be licensed to practice law in attorney with experience in litigation, Montana, is seeking an attorney to fill a Montana and demonstrate an exception- public agency law and/or labor/employ- full-time position as tribal prosecutor. al academic background as well as ment law. Competitive salary range: Applicant must have a minimum of superior research, analytical, verbal and $60,000 - $80,000 depending on educa- three years legal experience and must writing capabilities. All applications tion, background and training. Excellent be currently licensed in any state and will be held in confidence. Please sub- benefits package. For further informa- must pass the Crow Tribal Bar mit your cover letter and resume to: tion contact Debra Silk at 442-2180 or Examination within six months of Sullivan, Tabaracci & Rhoades PC, visit our web site at www.mtsba.org. employment. Experience working with Attn: Office Administrator, 1821 South Indian communities, experience in Avenue West, Third Floor, Missoula

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 37 MT 59801; www.montanalawyer.com; (approx. $5000/yr); profit sharing after CONSULTANTS & EXPERTS [email protected] one year. Pay is $12 to $17.50/hour to start, depending on experience. CERTIFIED LEGAL NURSE CON- Monday-Friday day shift for 37.5 SULTANT: Professional, affordable LEGAL ASSISTANTS hours/week. Hiring as soon as possible. assistance with medical lawsuits. To Apply: Submit cover letter, resume, Certified Legal Nurse Consultant, & OTHER PROFESSIONALS 2 professional references, to Phillips Registered Nurse, 20+ years' experi- Bohyer & Hedger PC, Attention ence. Specialties: screen cases for PARALEGAL needed to add to busy firm Priscilla Phillips, PO Box 8569, merit, assess causation/damages, inter- of six attorneys and two existing parale- Missoula MT 59807 pret medical records, facilitate commu- gals. Must have at least one year experi- nication. Accept cases involving health, ence, more preferred. Applicant must LEGAL ASSISTANT: Small downtown illness, injury, workers’ compensation, have strong communication and writing Billings firm seeks personable and general negligence, defendant or plain- abilities. Work includes direct client and motivated legal assistant for part-time tiff. Marni Allen, RN, CLNC. (406) witness contact, drafting of pleadings, employment. Ideal candidate must be 690-4314. discovery, affidavits, motions, some ele- well organized, with strong computer mentary research and briefing, exhibit skills and ability to thrive in a busy MEDICAL MALPRACTICE: We have and trial preparation. Emphasis on fami- environment. Salary appropriate to thousands of physician expert witness- ly law, although general civil and tort experience. Please send cover letter and es. Fast, affordable, flat-rate referrals to litigation (mostly plaintiffs' personal resume to The Montana Lawyer #3-23, board certified, practicing doctors in all injury) is also included. Health insur- PO Box 577, Helena MT 59624. specialties. Your satisfaction guaran- ance, retirement, paid holidays and teed. Just need an analysis? Our veteran MD specialists can do that for you, vacation. Good working environment. LEGAL ADMINISTRATOR: Missoula quickly and easily, for a low flat fee. Salary depends on experience and quali- law firm of Boone Karlberg PC seeks Med-Mal EXPERTS, Inc. fications. Send letter and resume to legal administrator for office of 14 www.medmalEXPERTS.com; (888) 521- Steve Mackey, Towe, Ball, Enright, attorneys. Duties include human 3601. Mackey & Sommerfeld PLLP, PO Box resource management, financial over- sight, A/P, A/R, payroll and taxes, facili- 30457, Billings MT 59107-0457; (406) INTERPRETING & TRANSLA- ty management, network administration. 248-7337; [email protected]. TIONS SERVICE: English into Boone Karlberg offers excellent benefit Spanish or Spanish into English. Over package and salary depends on experi- LEGAL SECRETARY / LEGAL SUP- 15 years of experience. Simultaneous, PORT: The Missoula law firm of ence. Please send cover letter and consecutive, interpreting and transla- Phillips Bohyer & Hedger is seeking a resume to Dean A. Stensland, Boone tions of documents, in the legal and highly professional full-time legal sec- Karlberg PC, PO Box 9199, Missoula medical fields, workers’ comp or any retary for two positions. Requires two MT 59807-9199. miscellaneous documents. References years experience in a law firm - educa- upon request. Call: (406) 370-6049 or tion, licensing, certificate or training (406) 777-2802. See web site: will be considered. Will provide support LEGAL RESEARCH www.spanishinterpretingservice.com. to attorneys and paralegals. Requires a high degree of accuracy. Involves word BRIEF WRITING SERVICE: Most FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMIN- processing; transcribing; opening new issues, but focus on criminal law. Eight ER: Trained by the U.S. Secret Service files; mail duties; calendar oversight for years experience prosecuting and eight and U.S. Postal Crime Lab. Retired meetings, travel, appointments, semi- years defending. References available. from the Eugene, Ore., P.D. as their nars; legal assistant tasks; possible Day: (406) 323-3801, evening: (406) examiner. Qualified in state and federal backup phone reception and other duties 323-2377. courts. The only examiner in the as needed. Must have strong comput- Northwest certified by the American er/word processing skills, excellent DON'T FORGET YOUR BRIEFS! I'll Board of Forensic Document written and oral language skills, reason- write them for you. Quality results at Examiners. Full-service laboratory for ing and problem-solving ability. Must reasonable rates. Local references avail- handwriting comparisons and other doc- maintain confidentiality, be able to able. Credentials: 22 years of practice ument-related examinations. Contact Jim Green at (888) 485-0832 in focus on work while multi-tasking, be in Boston, most recently at Bingham Eugene, Ore. supportive and friendly while maintain- McCutchen (financial restructuring, ing calm and professional demeanor. bankruptcy); admitted in Montana May 2005; CLE veteran; former federal law FORENSIC DOCUMENT EXAMIN- Experience in insurance defense litiga- clerk; Boston College Law Review ER: Specialization: Identification / tion or railroad practice a plus. (1981). Mary DeNevi, 2309 Cloverdale elimination through examination and Minimum typing test of 60 WPM, Drive, Missoula MT 59803; comparison of handwriting, typewriters, WordPerfect and Word tests. [email protected]; (406) 541-0416. photocopiers, printing processes, paper Competitive pay package includes and inks. Forensic document appren- 401K; health insurance/flex benefit ticeship through the Colorado Bureau of

PAGE 38 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007 Investigation. Plum Creek Forensic Laboratory LLC, Darla McCarley- INVESTIGATORS Celentano, PO Box 21, Castle Rock CO 80104-0021; phone / fax (303) 663- INVESTIGATIONS & IMMIGRATION 2450; e-mail [email protected]. CONSULTING: 34 years investigative experience with the U.S. Immigration Service, INTERPOL, and as a private INSURANCE CONSULTANT / investigator. President of the Montana EXPERT WITNESS - BAD FAITH: P.I. Association. Criminal, fraud, back- 20 years multi-line claims experience, ground, loss prevention, domestic, including Montana claims. JD & CPCU workers’ compensation, discrimination credentials. (425) 776-7386, and sexual harassment, asset location, www.expertwitness.com/huss. real estate, surveillance, record search- es, and immigration consulting. Donald M. Whitney, Orion International Corp., COMPUTER FORENSICS & DATA PO Box 9658, Helena MT 59604. (406) RECOVERY: Retrieval and examina- 458-8796 / 7. tion of computer and electronically stored evidence by certified computer examiner. Expert testimony on findings. EVICTIONS Practice limited to civil and administra- tive matters. No charge for preliminary EVICTIONS LAWYER: We do hundreds review. Contact Jimmy Weg, CFCE, of evictions statewide. Send your land- Weg Computer Forensics LLC, 512 S. lord clients to us. We’ll respect your Roberts, Helena MT 59601. (406) 449- “ownership” of their other business. 0565 (evenings); jimmyweg@ya- Most evictions cost about $216 includ- hoo.com. ing all fees and costs. Call for a price list. Hess-Homeier Law Firm, (406) 549-9611, [email protected]. MEDIATION

ALLEN CHRONISTER: Attorney with over 25 years of experience in civil liti- WEB gation and in mediating a wide variety of disputes, available for mediations. MONTANA LAW WEEK Reasonable rates, will travel. Allen The Weekly Digest of Montana Law Chronister, PO Box 1152, Helena MT www.MontanaLawWeek.net 59624; (406) 449-3691; [email protected]

MICHAEL H. KEEDY: As a former dis- BEST WEB PORTAL trict court judge, I bring 12 years valu- FOR MONTANA LAWYERS able experience to bear in settling your www.montanabar.org case. In addition, I have over 30 years’ All the legal resources & news you need experience in a variety of other legal from the State Bar of Montana pursuits. Conference rooms are avail- able at our Kalispell offices. Please call THE COMPLETE LAWYER me at (406) 752-7122 or (888) 865- State Bar’s “e-zine” with great career, 8144. life and law-practice advice. www.montana.thecompletelawyer.com SARAH H. SEILER, LCSW, LAC: Specializing in family dispute resolu- tion, child-centered divorce mediation, guardian ad litem representation and custody investigations. Contact Resolution Consultants Inc., PO Box 604, Townsend MT 59644; (406) 980- 1615 or 266-5475; [email protected]

APRIL 2007 THE MONTANA LAWYER PAGE 39 THE MONTANA

PRESORTED STANDARD US POSTAGE PAID PERMIT 1 awyer BILLINGS MT State Bar of Montana P.O.L Box 577 Helena MT 59624

PAGE 40 THE MONTANA LAWYER APRIL 2007